#Phone Astrophotography
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
That is incredible
Espensive
Or a dslr?
I have already a dslr
Use it
that's actually insane omg
How long was your exposure time and ISO?
Whats an affordable telescope for nebula
Visual?
I use it but i also use my phone
Don't remember but i think it was 1600 iso and 6 seconds
Hi I’m 16 and I bought an eqm35
1000€ isn't expensive for you?
I also bought a 1000€ lens, but it was literally every € i had
Expensive
Most kids don't get that much allowance and depending on the age and country they may not be able to work a job (which would only be done at summer anyways)
For example you have to be 16 here to get a job at a warehouse
Only at summer
Think about the time you have to save up to get an eqm35 if you don't have a job😭
It's easy bro
Just go with crypto
Learn it and use it you would make some good money out of it but if you have enough knowledge about it otherwise it would be a horrifying experience
I'm 16 myself and I'm near the last semester exams in one of the hardest private schools in Iran called Salam Schools
Only in my free weekends I go for that
I started trading around two months ago but started learning it from way long ago
Do you actually know how long it takes to trade sucsessfully
Years
Not weeks or months
It's not easy at all💀
Hi im 15 and i also bought an eqm-35i mount after realizing how DOGSHIT my mount was after buying it
and now im getting a whole new OTA
nah its not
i thought it was, but it really isnt that hard
It is
if you get a 10$ per hour job it isnt
?
oh
let me make that more smarter
if you get a 9€ per hour job its easy
(thats around 4.5 bottles of prime an hour 😱)

Ok to be fair you’re assuming that you don’t have to pay bills or insurance or anything
Not everybody can keep all the money they earn
yeah\
What are you saying?
yeah
you can get to 1000€ if you put your mind to it
either by stealing a ota from a dome or working
Day moon shot with iPhone 12 through 8inch Dobsonian using 13mm lens
Your dslr will be better than your phone
Like much better.
dude use your dslr
get out of this subreddit and use it
did i jus call it a subreddit
get out of this thread
I use it
No, i also and mostly use my phone for telescope astrophotography, and i like to see what people can do with their phones that I can't do because I'm lazy
Guys, will 2 1kg counter weights balance a 3 kg telescope on a iexos 100 mount
There is a channel called #🤓-ask-a-nerd so you can ask there
why? you have a dslr which is superior
Dslr is much better for astrophotography
North America Nebula Crop from this photo
What?
Yes, i know, but i also like to use my phone, even if dslr is superior, i will keep using my phone, ofc I'm using my dslr, but i also use my phone
Yes. But in the telescope i use my phone, i tried using my camera with the adapter and well, not tracked, and a tracking mount it's too much money for a 15 year boy that lives in Argentina..
yes... king...
Mk
fr?
i gotchu
Bro
1 second with the telescope and dslr with the adapter it's a lot. 900 focal length it's too much
I use it and i also use my phone.
#1102721823206014986
Tbh i wouldn't bother too
+he might not want to kill his shutter
Using a lens is a better idea
dither
Yeah lol this is untracked so I couldn’t dither easily.
What's the difference??
Like what is this then ?
Photography
Because you photographed it
Lol
Visual means looking with the eye, no photos
You'd want a dslr camera for that, not a telescope.(in your situation)
And how much is affordable for you?
What do you think these are from??
From a phone or a real camera with a small lens, no telescope.
Most likely untracked
dslrs go along with scopes quite well
Magellanic Clouds
The trail below is just a satellite flare.
📋Exif:
📷 Phone, Xiaomi Mi9T
⚙ 30x35s iso 800
📌 Contryside of São Paulo, Brazil.
What do you use for stacking?
How can I track objects
Do i need to build a tracker??
Programs like dss, siril etc there are more
You either need to build a tracker or buy one
In his situation. He hasn't mentioned his budget, but he seems very new to the hobby and you def shouldn't buy a telescope for imaging as a total beginner
So a tripod will do the trick??
Realme 9 pro plus
yeah i used a sv105 for my first time
a kit lens would work well, but if you could afford a scope i would get it
Sombrero galaxy starless attempt iphone 11
Phone astrophotography can be very good if you know what ur doing and it's very fine to start with one.
A phone alone is not really enough for deepsky. I used binoculars
And yes you need a tripod
But with tripod along is it enough to i do need to track them right?
damn untracked?
yes
yes
sheesh
i stacked a bunch of short exposures
i used a grid in a third party camera app to keep the stars in roughly the same position
I sort of cut the middle rectangle in half and kept slewing to keep a star in that area
If anyone is willing I’m still looking for beta testers for AstroShader (iOS only atm).
It works by stacking during the capture process. e.g. set 50 exposures and it will align and stack them for you producing a single final image
You don't need to be tracked, but you need to recenter it
Oh hi! I once mentioned in the CloudyNights thread how there seems to be noise reduction going on, as my images ended up not having lots of color noise which prevented me from stacking those again on my pc for a very deep image.
You answered with "I can definitely add functionality to a future release to control this."
Is anything like this already done or on the way?
Hey!
So there’s no noise reduction at all in the processing now.
Although obviously if you align and stack say 50 images in the capture this will reduce the noise a lot, in the same way a longer exposure would.
I haven’t added controls over noise suppression yet, but can do this for sure
This is really werid 🤔 Here is my image of andromeda and the background is very smooth. There no noise left which also kills my weak signal if I plan to stack those stacked images futher
this was taken with the iphone 14 pro max and the zoom lens
Mmm yes this is weird.
What were the settings for exposures and exposure time?
My first thoughts are that the old alignment processing was not super precise (fixed in v1.0.6) and the other thing could be focus.
focus should be fine. This image was taken in january, I'll try again with the updated version to rule out the alignment. Although the stars are pretty well aligned here (the image above is just a zoomed in screenshot)
Yes please - if you were stacking earlier this year the alignment was slightly off which acted like a low-pass filter; removing noise / high frequency spatial signal
Okay thank you! Will do!
One other thing to note is that the zoom camera sensor has worse light sensitivity than the main camera sensor.
Appreciate for Andromeda you might want it to fill the FOV a bit more so it’s a trade off.
…With some help from others working on a slightly crazy solution for imaging dim targets untracked, hopefully out in a week or so 😅
slightly crazy? now that sounds interesting 
Haha so it’s live pixel binning and low light enhancement from the RAW data. So you get a decent preview and then aligning and stacking all this live too 🤪
Pixinsight and Photoshop
I told you, i know, but i also use my phone, mostly for fun, and even if dslr is a million times better, i will keep using my phone
PLEASE
what camera do you even have
Canon 650D
scope focal length?
Like, camera lens
your camera would oversample with your scope a little
That's why I don't use it with my scope
Yee
Yeah, but i have no money, and my parents doesn't leave me sell my camera
One day i will get a better camera, or a tracking mount
Refractor? I have a reflactor, Newtonian
@feral sedge i'd upgrade to a tracker next then scope
You probably won't need the heq 5 depending on the scope so you can skip that
Na, i need it
My telescope is too big for manual mount
And it's hard to take a good picture with the phone, and more hard with the camera..
Which scope
Hokenn
Aperture: 130mm
Focal length 900mm
im used to long fl's being refractors
I'd get 130pds+ eq5 pro/eqm 35 and get coma corrector and guiding later
Sell ur current scope
I wouldn't use it and go untracked with that 135mm lens
I'm actually doing this
And i will do it until i can buy the other accessories 😅
I can take pretty good pictures with just a 135mm
Ye do that
Wo
You wont need heq5 if you get a smaller scope in the future
Yeah, the telescope i have now can be used for pretty deep things, like some Galaxies, or getting a really big detail in nebulosity (?
From December in Sedona, I just found this thread!
Looks sick! What equipment?
I can faintly see the flame nebula
which scope?
Orion nebula without tracker (5 second exposure)
do you have a pc or laptop?
I have laptop, but this was taken by phone-realme 9
ok i'll give you 3 simple tricks to get a slightly better view of orion
-
lower the exposure to about 1s and take as many images as you want, if the nebula gets to about 1/3 from the borders of your lens then stop imaging and re center.
if you don't want to tap each time (which you don't, trust me) use an app called DeepSky camera, really intuitive and you can select the exposure, isso and the file directory (very important to do the file transfer because cammera images are stored in google photos and you have to move them to internal storage) -
load the images onto your laptop and stack them using sequator, this will create as single image with the exposure time combined of all your images plus you get no star trails
-
download siriL and load the image, from there the simplest thing you can do is to do a "histogram" strech, just select it from the dropp down selection of "image procesing" and once you open it select the gear icon and it should brighten up your image a lot and give you a better view
both siriL and sequator are free and are for your laptop
i personally use sequator for the stacking because it's much more forgiving with my lack of skill and tracker
Yo thanks, will definitely try it
if you need any help @ me or dm me
Will, thanks
one last thing, if the stars still seem streched, lower exposure even further
and there are many other tools that will help a lot to erase phone defects but i didn't want to get into the detail
Cool, btw does this work with other nebula's and galaxy's?
any
Cool
yeah you can def do better if its still somehow up
take subs, stack, post-process with siril
this is a sub for me
but thats from awhile ago
this was the finished result
all with phone as a camera
EQM-35 PRO, Andriod A42, 650/134mm Orion observer OTA
Shot on my phone. 72 total frames at 24 frames per second. Each shot with 10 seconds of exposure and 500 iso. All of the frames were edited in lightroom. Took a while to get everything ordered right to process into a video. The shot is of venus and taurus. Hope you guys enjoy
Very first photo of bode's galaxy, i hope i can improve
exosyres down to like 0.05 for no trailing
depends on the zoom
that zoom seems like 1000mm
phone sensors are tiny and so pixels are tinier
bbut the stars are many man pixels each
still like 0.1 sec exopsres
I would never bother with 0.1 sec exposures, just go with 1 sec with small amount of trailing. Phone images won't be perfect anyways
How do I stack in DSS if my raw files only have 30 stars?
My first moon pick
just realized that's gemini, not taurus
Looks realy sharp, what telescope did you use?
Sw 200p
what mount with the 200p
Taurus gone
whats your settup
Wow lucas with more mind boggling projects
6se and uranus c
Eq5
Hit it up then
WHAY
What do you guys use for an intervalometer for astrophotography?
I use my phone
No like to take a picture every XX seconds
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Without having to tap the shutter button
Cause I normally just use an auto clicker and set it to go off every XX seconds but I was curious of there were dedicated apps for that
Then I sit and look at the sky while I wait
Yeah but I like it sometimes, the sky is pretty and sometimes you can see a shooting star
If it's cold then I'm not a fan
no chance in b7
wait
my bad
i've actually seen them
not by my eyes
i was doinn a time lapse
so i caught like 3 or 4
this
Oh that's cool
And yes also recorded from my phone
Did you just take the time lapse in the regular camera app?
And leave your phone out for like an hour or so?
regular camera app
Are you in Europe or the Americas?
Nice
yh
When I look at light pollution maps there's not many bortle 1 places
LUCKY
Yeah it's really cool to see but it may have gone up in recent years cause I can't really see the milky way anymore from my backyard
Or I'm looking across the valley toward bortle 7
Yeah same here
I'm also only 16 and don't happen to have a spare 300k to buy a house with
But once I get my license I can drive out to bortle 1
bro im 14 so yh
it was a clear night yesterday
no idea y i didnt go out
SCHOOOL NIGHTS AHHHHHHHHHHHH
Yeah same here
Astronomy should be a subject
It's nice in the summer here cause it doesn't rain much
That'd be cool
its raining rn
flippin uk weather
But it's also not nice cause it's almost always a drought
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Except this record winter has changed that
Lots of the state is still in a drought but it's mild
idk
And water levels are rising again finally
bro its not my fault
i've been on this planet for only 14 years
i havent even made a dent yet
?
See ya
Why do i feel like it's a satellite
Pretty sure it is as well
Venus but can't understand why it's soo blurred out after removing phone it's ok but after putting phone it's blurred
1 refocus. 2 lower the shutter speed/iso
guys, what is better for planetary, using a 6.5mm eyepiece with a 2X barlow or a 2.4mm eyepiece
this is the one that I want to buy
150/1400
Yeah thats wayyyyyy too much lmao
same here
made another timelapse, no idea what stars those are. it was taken at 1:30 am est last night facing west. I live in Ontario
would be appreciated if someone could tell me what key objects are in it
and what are some other objects I could photograph for a bortle 5 area without a telescope
Just wondering why you need to see it?
A quick search would have told you too
Thats the one
Is this eyepiece good for galaxy astrophotography?
It is a 17mm orion eyepiece
And it looks realy good
No
Buy a dslr
With an eyepiece you can only use a phone
So don't buy it
Save the money
Use ur current eyepiece
that costs more than your scope

no
get a tracking mount and whole new ota
that scope is soley for visual, its even a bird jones style
eyepieces are for the drawer once you get a camera
Oh god right he has that scope
You have no idea how astrophotography is with 1400mm of focal lenght
If ur into astrophotography i'd sell that entire thing because it's useless imo
My telescope costs 1700 lei and the eyepiece is 500
Point stays the same
Yea I get it, I have a shit scope but at the time my parents wouldnt let me get anything more expensive even if I would have saved up some more
You can buy a dslr and a lens but i understand ur parents don't want to
What about this telescope
I have a nikon d3000 and a 75-300 sigma lens
Not sure how good that is but check it out on youtube. I suggest you start with that and not worry about other things. Ur next upgrade would be an electric mount which you shouldn't cheap out on.
People say to avoid it at all cost
Why tho, I get that you can have connection problems but I think that you can conect it to your pc via cable and the conection problem is resolved
I don't think it's that but i'm not sure
It probably isn't as simple as this too but idk
needs a new mount like a HEQ-5
would rather get a quattro ota
only clockdriven too
just get a mount with a synscan computer and use eq-mod
Just focus on 1 thing atm...
I will just wait until I could find a good eq3 goto mount second hand
eqm-35
is it even possible get a glimpse of the milky way through stacking when my frames look like this
bortle 5 area btw
and using sequator
also the section of sky where the milky way rises for me is in the direction of Toronto, thats why the image looks pretty bright
idk if im using the wrong camera settings or not
i took 3 sets of 16 pictures with different settings
the first set of phots was 20 second exposure, 1600 iso
second set was 15 sec exposure, 1600 iso
and the third set was 30 sec exposure, 3200 iso
idk what im doing wrong or if its even possible to shoot a pic of the milky way in my area
The antennae galaxies - iphone 11 - skywatcher 150p - bortle 7
so is it possible or nah?
and any suggestions that may improve the pictures
yes very possible I’m b5 my single subs make out the mw
what settings do you usually use then? I feel like my settings need a lot of tweaking
Try and point at the milkyway core
im p sure i was, i used stellarium prior to taking pictures
what settings though
Settings you gots is fine maybe drop the iso a lil
Make sure when you take subs each sub isn’t trailing tho
ok, would 15 second exposure and 800 iso work well?
Probably
I'd use 25 sec and lower iso
Also ur blown out a bit
Ur probably looking at bortle 9 thats why
Just lower iso
My first images of mars and m44
Wdym? The light pollution map says bortle 5? Whats a good iso to use with 25 sec shutterspeed
also what do you mean by blown out a bit
Yes but you might be LOOKING at a high bortle level
I think
That explains why it's so bright there
Test it, take a few test exposures.
13 pro 30s. Bortle 3 site looking into LP dome from Detroit , Mi.
heres my first ever completed astro photo. taken on iphone 12 mini. photographed last year
took this on my galaxy s8. this was pretty cool
lol
Nah just .5 second exp lock
ive moved on from phone astrophotography to deep sky and dslr
Yea it is fun to experiment every once in a while 🙂
milkyway is getting higher for me so gonna try it
gonna shoot it raw and stack then process to have a look what i get
im genuanlyy curious what ill get
na galaxy s20
shooting the milkyway with a galaxy phone
cant get better than that
commercial worthy
same here
very nice
thanks 🙂 loved the meteor lol
Phone: Samsung S22U
20x30sec at ISO 1600
Stacked on Sequator. Edited in PixInsight.
I left my phone sitting on top of my tracked and guided mount gear.
It wasn't properly mounted but it still came out pretty clean. (It's not looking any better than multiple short subs but it sure was easier
)
where?
Guys, do you have any tips for planetary astrophotography with my phone and 6" telescope. What app should I use? Digital zoom or no?
Any app that lets you record in high resolution and fps
Any recomandations?
Default camera
took this one today
I used nightcap when I did phone planetary but that was back in 2019
It looks good
first time trying widefield, 15s subs at iso 4000, total 3mins
8 minute exposure with S22 Ultra astrophotography mode
@unborn loom sorry for the ping but is this a good amount of exposure? I feel like it wont get detail once I run the frames I took in sequater.
i can't tell if those streaks are clouds or part of the light pollution
50 iso 10 second shutter btw
also taken before the milky way has risen
@dreamy stone those are clouds and raise ur exposure time and iso a bit
ok
how much should i raise them? Idk what the right amount of exposure should look like
I tried a bunch of different settings and they all looked overexposed to me
What bortle are you from?
If it's over exposued ur probably not from bortle 5 or ur looking at a bortle 8-9
I''d use 25secs and iso like 400 maybe
This is 30 secs iso 125 bortle 6
I'd get it brighter
yea me neither
it was with the astromode so everything was p much automatic when i took that
Anyways test different exposures untill they look right to you. Not too dark not too bright. You can even figure out if hr facing a city by pointing it at the opposite direction or just by looking on google maps
well ik in the south i'm facing toronto and missisuaga
thats where i see the skyglow the most
everywhere else the skyglow is closer to the horizon and is blocked by trees and stuff

Better
Yea
is the other one edited too
Nope
oh
i remember the first image being pretty overexposed before I post processed it
I think I used close to max settings, it was 30 sec exposure and 1600 or 3200 iso
yeah i have been
yeah I don't really have the best access to a dark sky location tbf
This is stacked and edited
the closest location to me is like 2 hours away and its bortle 3
oh wait i forgot i took this last night when i was testing exposures, the phone moved a little so some star trailing is seen
and its 25 sec exposure and 400 iso
Bortle 1 and it's 4 hours away 
@unborn loom is this ok?
yeah ig i just need to use that same exposure and iso and stack a bunch of pictures
is 16 pics enough or should i go with more
Take more just incase
like 30?
Milkyway and galaxies
Redmi note 7, powerseeker 114eq1, bortle 3
Tweezers Galaxy
iPhone 11 + Skywatcher 150p
Yooo what, that’s sick for a phone
And you too, damn, y’all are taking really good images
@solemn spindle the classic 150p?
Yes
Stacked
what app did u use
Siril
thinking of getting the classic 150p
so just looking around to see what it's capable of doing
yeah but tracking
you gotta consider that the 150p and all other dobs are actual ass with dso ap
I know
it's my first scope and I want to do visual
alright bet
i got a hybrid imaging rig coming along rn
when i get a uranus-c, it will be good for everyuthing
@edgy talon Later, I'd probably get an imaging rig
Not expecting a dob to do astrophtography
I was just curious as to what it's capable of
refractor, lens or reflector
or catatropic
Also don't be dissapointed if you get bad images as ur first try. You can get AMAZING results with a dob
Check out the thread dobsonian astrophotogtaphy
For example these were made by a heritage 130p untracked
to be fair those are poivre's images 
late response but i would have a idea lol sorry all i know its a generic scope that ebay sellers have rebranded and sold lol
mobile astro is fun if done correctly
poivre never fails to make me disappointed in myself
M83 with an iPhone 11 and Skywatcher 150p
Did some work on the background and colours but kind of messed up the stars
Good job looks good
that meteor is nice
that coma is insane
I think they’re just star trails that were made worse from the stacking
are you untracked?
its a combination of both
if it were just star trails, they would all be going in the same direction
what quattro do you have?
the telescope wouldnt necessarily be the issue, an eyepiece would add a ton of coma
Yeah
do you have the untracked chart
I think his exposures are just too long
And eyepiece yah
You can't expect a perfect image from a phone and untracked scope bruh
short leo triplet test
👀
Heres the final image
first clear night in a month and oh man just had the worst dew i've ever seen, completely soaked the mirror an lens. couldn't even image anything because i couldn't aling the camera to the lens, on that note, how do you guys go by doing that? i try to use my bathinov mask and adjust untill i see the 3 spikes so i can then focus but it's really tedious.
this is the phone astrophotography forum, not the normal ap chat
Capture and share your observations through just about any optic with this handy, simple-to-use smartphone adapter. Whether you’re snapping an Instagram-worthy image of the Moon, sharing your latest wildlife sightings with a binocular or spotting scope, or preserving lab specimens with your micro...
this one?
yes i'm having trouble centering it
exactly
because the diffraction spikes won't show unless i perfectly ailing it
ahhh.
how do you feel shelling out on the nexyz
I'll look online if thare are ways to improve the nxgo
problem is i'd have to import it

ohhh
@magic abyss so is the phone too far away from the eyepiece?
no it's just too hard to guess where the center of the eyepiece is
i was wondering if anyone used some special method
I'm not sure if this is going to work for you with your gear but when I am taking test shots on the eyepiece, I look for a dark gradient like this.
And I make corrections by moving my lens towards the darkness.
When you don't see the gradient, then you are centered.
My gear is a refractor with 25mm plossl and using Samsung S22U. I have the NeXYZ. Having the z axis is nice.
Milky Way - iPhone 14 pro max 1 image with 30 seconds with night mode. Some edits through apples default photos app just to see what details would show.
Thats what i did too
Which refractor do you have?
Orion Short Tube 80
As a phone mount i just use a piece of wood with a hole in it for the eyepiece and hold and center my phone with clamps. Nothing special just a trashy phone adapter but it works
With the phone adapter i got this
@patent zodiac what scope?
what telescope
Skywatcher 130/900 reflector (not an astromaster or a powerseeker...)
Daytime moon with a samsung a22
i needa try that
S23 Ultra 15 sec exposure
Bortle 4 lowest i've been so far
i did
M101 should be right there lol
Is that using the 10x zoom F4.9 lens?
Sure it’s the comet? Not some flaring with the lens?
Unless you stacked a lot of shots, idk because with 40 minutes of data on it, I was no where near getting close to getting that much of a tail? Or actually, what bortle are you in?
gonna get my last phone image
cygnus wall
thats what test exposures are for
i usually just look for stars around the object
then compare with stellarium
human platesolving
ZTF?
E3 ZTF?
is that the comet
when did you take the pictures
oh i saw it visually
fuzzy little thing near kochab
when that bright comet comes around ill nail it
This might be it
My first planetary image taken with a dob!
8 inch Dob f/6
Redmi K20 Pro
Kellner 9mm eyepiece
UnTrAcKeD ;-;
PIPP/AS!3
A bit overexposed
I still looks pretty good
Looks good
No jus 0.6 zoom both of them
Mars in front of M44
Nice
despite having left ap (for now) I still like to revisit old photos and use new photoshop tricks I randomly learn, this is my orion that used to be very red but a new trick has allowed me to bring out the blues without getting rid of the red, the difference between the images can clearly be seen, opinions?
Gj
or maybe this, wo the red I was able to stretch it a bit further but it feels a bit cooked now
I never could get into editing images well because minor adjustments just aren't visible to me, I see the difference but cannot decide which one is better
I like this one a bit more
The Beehive cluster
Stacked about 1000 seconds of integration
my last mobile images
image
ring nebula
my uranus-c should come in a week or so
Thats a great shot! Can't wait to see what you do with uranus!
I think i got two of the Leo triplets Last night
I'll still be here to give advice
noo the joke missed 
it go fart fart
heyyo
processed one
i somehow managed to get moon on my oneplus nord ce 2
without any telescope for matter
Noice
My mobile doesn't support pro mode 😑

bruh
which one though?
Redmi note 5
2018
This actually was my first try of photographing the orion nebula (with an iPhone 8)
Comet neowise a few years ago...
@fair trellis be friends?
Sure
Sended req
Acceptd
Lest go to genral chat
Ok
How did you do that ?
Converting it to black and white
😮
And increasing the contrast
So.....that's how....
Yeah
Cya
So I have an image it took a while ago, but if forget where my camera was facing when I took it.
It was took on January 21st, 12:00, in southern Idaho.
If someone could possibly reverse engineer this image, that would be fantastic
used a threshold filter to make constellations more recognizable, then it was easy peasy. youre looking at the constellation cassiopeia.
Thank you!
no problem
good luck
Only chads use a phone for astrophotography
Australia's was really bad in 2020
For like 2-3 months it was just burning
Really hard
And we didn't get rains. We have shit weather cycles
pointing to andromeda, persues, and cassopiea, maybe aries
this is nearly idetnical to what you saw
i assumed you were near boise
looked at one of my older phone photos from when I was stilla beginner, turns out I got more detail than I thought I did.
The ring nebula, not my best photo but im happy with it
SkyWatcher 130/900
Xiaomi note 12 pro
I reprocessed my ring nebula photo and i got some more color from it
Cool
This is the best I got how u do this
You can still stack photos even using an iPhone
Like others told you
Tell us the equipment you took this with
And tell us how you took it
Then we can help
your stars are trailing
too noisey, zoom out
unfocused
WHAT APP THAT U USED TO SHOOT
lightroom mobile
iPhone 11 default camera app, 5s exposure bortle 7
Astrobot
Take more images and stack them
Try not to get star trails
And don't zoom in with ur phone
And after stacking edit it
Oh uhh btw this is what the original frames looked like (with edits ofc)
👍
Orion spaceprobe 130st with its regular mount
Alr
Bruh this is the best I got when I started off 😭
I just noticed that the moon looks like it’s eclipsing, this was the strawberry moon btw
You can kinda see it here
Nah
its not lemme guess
How? Thru a scope?
rate it, please.. i believe this was thru my telescope and I've edited it
It looks fine
Too edited ?
Yes
Just too low power
It looks a bit yellow
But what scope did you take this with
Mine, the one in my bio (celestron omni az 102) tbh this also could have been just with my phone not my scope
Finally got some red :)
guys is webcam allowed here?
Phone Astrophotography
There's a separate forum for webcam astrophotography
What
?
Ok thx
What scope you got, also try using a big eyepiece so the magnification is better, it will let more light go in. And also try getting a better focus and later on you can crop the image to make it a close up image of the nebula
Lawn sprinkler nebula
10 mm eyepiece with a 130mm reflector
650mm focal length
skywatcher explorer?
Orion spaceprobe 130st
Hm, try using a bigger eyepiece something like 25mm it will be less magnification but it eill let more light in
Trust me I tried that and it didn’t magnify enough to get anything
How much are you cropping?
This is the original image
I cropped it after I took the image
Mizar and Alcor
Hi guys. I want some suggestions that this looks too cooked or is it ok? Last night's image of beehive cluster. Thank you
The purple line is not in the real image i don't know what discord did to the image 😅😂
too much noise, did you try stacking
No😅 it's 2 sec exposure and zoomed in around 65x
Single image
I don't use tracking mount for mobile astrophotography soo find it difficult to center the object
Yeah i understand the pain, but try taking short exposures then stacking them
How many shots should i take? Or it depends on viewing condition?
Im not sure, atleast you need to have 50 short exposure but the images need to be clear without star trailing
As much as you can reasonably
Ok thank you
Ok suree
Would this be any good for processing? (I can separate the frames btw so don’t worry abt that)
Im not sure, i have never taken a video before of a deep sky object
if you stabilize it(track it) and then record it and in pipp you put that video for processing and change the output type to tiff instead of avl then you'll get multiple frames and then stack the results will be much better and you'll get more frames with this methods
I tried this method on moon only cuz in 45 sec time i get 955 frames more or less. For DSO i use a monocular and my phone or camera(point and shoot ) soo that's why in DSO i can't get better framing. But moon is good
I do have this method that’s less conventional, but it works just as well
Time lapse, it was always a video
Is it good for stacking?
This
Because I don’t want 300 photos in my iCloud
And why does it look so weird, it looks like a video made out of images
Oh wait it's sped up
It’s a Timelapse made of 0.5s exposures
0.5sec exposures, wdym? Thought you said it was a video
I said it was a time lapse, video because I didn’t merge the images
I'm confused but ok
Anyways i have no idea how good a video is for deepsky
Ur better off taking many short images than a video
And delete them later
It’s doing both
Ok so you have the 0.5 sec images? How many?
As many in that video
Lemme do the math
Idk how much that is
400
Ok
200s exposure
Stack the images not the video
Not horrible
I know
Ok
I’m not at home rn so can I send you a short 5s clip and some calibration frames I took shortly after so I can get a demo and see if retaking it is a good option
Flat
Dark
Bias
good on you for taking calibration frames even with a phone
5s clip
i just started when i got my uranus-c
I really only took one this time for some… reason
okay me personally
go for something more brighter than ring, like a galaxy
bodes is very easy, heres a 10s exposure at 4.85
i got like 1000 of those
got this afterwards
Also they might not be perfect because I took them a bit late (besides bias frames they usually are taken later?)
i take my calibration frames afterwards
*THIS IS NOT BY A PHONE
only took darks and bias, just started taking flats and darkflats
Dark flats?
Wait so what are darks then?
taking the same exposure as you did with your lights, dark flats are taking the same exposure that you did with your flats
Ok
low do you have any other images
Of other targets?
yes
m13?
Yea
These are of bodes and cigar
10mm eyepiece for both
But I do have 25mm eyepiece ones too
Wide field (with silly visitor)
I don't think calibration frames work like that
If you think about it
Ur frame is not flat, it's a ring. It's not connected directly with the telescope etc
These are real calibration frames instead (bias frames are still all good)
So yeah for the ring nebula I gotta try that one again
Mars unstacked (Stellarium for comparison) not at home so no stack :(
What was the bortle you saw this?😃
mars w 6se and s21 ultra
7
What's calibration frames?
Darks capture the thermal noise of the camera, you capture these by leaving your scope in the same conditions, just with the cap on and the same exposure time. Bias frames are your cameras shortest exposures with the cap on. Flats are where you take exposures with a t-shirt and a white light, you expose them with 1/3 - 1/2 of the histogram, dark flats are where you take the t-shirt off and put the cap back on, using the same exposures as you did with your flats.
Bias frames capture the noise from your iso or gain
Flats get rid of vignetting and dust on your camera
Or telescope optics
And I'm not sure what dark Flats do
dark flats remove noise from your flats
like darks for light frames but for flat frames
thank you, that's what I thought they did
Thank you @edgy talon I'm now very confused hehe.... I'm a very big amateur stargazer haha
its just images to make your image better
K, my photos are trash anyway 
What's this? I took it a while ago
Oh! It's the Subaru logo galaxy isn't it?
Subaru logo galaxy 💀💀💀

I have a horrid idea
It involves making the B.A.T. But with phones instead of fancy cameras
The only issues are that I don’t have a name, and it’s gonna be hard to convince people to join it lol
this has actually happened before
some guy was gonna do an untracked BAT
Not the same as phone
I first have to make sure that this is any good
All I know, I’m not gonna be the best host for this lol
i could be the host actually
use my old data and do bodes or whatever i got
okay
If anyone would like to do a BAT (Big Amature Telescope) of Bode's galaxy and Cigar galaxy, please react here and shoot me a DM, we will do this all in here or a group chat, idk.
There is one
where?
i got tracked data with a phone but i would still love to mess with it
We have an untracked BAT dm
add me
Do you do untracked
nah but i wanna see yalls data
I can show you mine
dm me it
here
oh shit thats nice
atleast you got it man
130mm
1 sec expo
500xstacked
that was the hardest thing i did shooting ztf mainly bc i was rushing
hmmm interesting
M4


