#Planetary Imaging
1 messages Ā· Page 51 of 1
If you expose for Jupiter and the ISS flies past it will look like a bright smudge of white
Like 1 ms if Iām not mistaken
i see
Thanks! I took a look at your photos to get an idea of your equipment, you've got a good scope for it if you can use it without the Hyperstar. (Your DSO quality is really great for a light polluted area by the way.) The AVX mount might cause some problems though, depending on if it can slew fast enough to track the ISS. Here are some general tip...
this guy also used 1ms, his settings are in the comments
Yea itās gotta be mad low
tomorrow i have an 83° pass but clouds clouds more clouds
š³
Illuminated Passover?
yeah from the horizon to 83° to horizon at mag -4
next passes for me on heavens above
So I screwed my iss Passover since I forgot my password to my laptop and it got locked š
Iāll have to try again whenever there is another
Itās ok though since I legit had no clue what I was gonna do since I need to figure out settings all I know is get low exposure
Sv 305 pro, sctw 102 eq3
how are yall doing mars rn?
daylight
Different places in the world
just mid day?
yes
tried to shoot it for 3 days straight but seeing was ass, but it's not really hard to find
equator
dang
it changed to partly cloudy/clear outside ill be attempting
Good luck
i was thinking of having my other camera on the side to get a trail shot but was running out of time
Valid
You got good results though
yarh
and that was a half of the stack, so the other half might have frames of it too
first process with 9 frames im gonna do a few iterations later
1.50ms 250 gain
C8
Nice
for sure! let me go grab it from the other laptop
i would send the avi but for a 0.5 second video its 337mb š
Thanks Iāll get to it tomorrow
Bro That looks really good
š¤¦
I hope I get another pass soon
Should I go through my 17k images instead hopes of getting 1 frame
Buddy are you okay
Turn it into an SER video in PIPP
Then run the video through autostakkert
I have to get them into one drive since I took them on a mac
Lord
Alright Iāll start doing that for now on
some tips?
bc i wanna buy a sv705c and slap a pc cooler fan thingy on there to cool it
for a bit of deep sky and playnetary
That wonāt work.
You need a heat sink directly on the sensor
You wouldn't be able to stabilize its temperature though, which is essentially what cooling is for
so its not very helpfull?
Youāre cooling the camera housing, not the sensor
The heatsink puts a direct thermal connection between the back of the camera and the sensor
so for deepsky and planetary a eos 550d modified would be better?
No itād be worse
bc of the older sensor?
Since those run hotter and also canāt be cooled without drilling holes and putting a heat sink
Partially
Mainly because dslr sensors arenāt very sensitive, run very hot in constant imaging and are very noisy
so i acn put a heat sink on the sv705 but not the eos550da
You canāt put one on either, itās just a lot more dramatic with the eos because itās hotter
Youāll need a player-one astronomy planetary camera at or above the Neptune-664C for one with a heatsink
Those actually get heat away from the sensor quite well and you can at least attach a cooler to it for results.
You'd have better results with a Uranus-C and ACS, because the camera's body is designed for it.
but it costs 400 bucks where i live without the acs
The Neptune-664C also bears the capability of ACS
Itās my camera of choice
Check it out
I am very happy with its results even without an ACS
If you want somewhat effective cooling in a planetary cam, they are the choice.
Yeah. I donāt know of any other camera company that puts heatsinks in their planetary cams
Only for these cameras + all their solar cams.
God that Jupiter is compressed to hell
all those images are
My Neptune-664C runs near ambient in the winter just because of the heatsink (no fan attached)
Like a few degrees off
Itās surprisingly effective
crazy
Ambient for us is relatively warm for the most part in winter.
but i just checked because where i live the uranus c (which i would choose) costs as much as the svbony sv605cc
The measurement I remember is -2C Ambient at 1C Camera
Where do you live?
germany
You donāt need to use a dealer lol, you can buy it from P1 directly
Should be like 311 eur before tax
And Germany has a great used market, Iām sure you can find a TEC cooled 585 from say ToupTek for 300-200
yeah maybe
How does it compare to imx585 cameras?
For deep sky
Itās the exact same as the 585 in every regard besides surface area
Itās just 50% sized
Itās basically the poor manās 585
Oh wow and I thought the 585 was tiny
Thereās now also the new imx908
Starvis 3 sensor at the same size of the imx662
But at 4k with 1.45um pixels
And thatās a really really tiny sensor
Damn
my 585 from zwo runs like 4 above ambient usualy
I should've gotten this instead of a coma corrector that I can't use
why cant you use it?
Focusing issues

i hope you can focus better in the future
i find listening to music helps
My telescope never listens to me so I don't think it'll listen to music
:(
What exposure and gain are recommended for iss
I found 1 frame when i tried getting it I was using 300 gain and 1ms exposure would around 100 gain be better?
thanks bro xD
My best solar white light shots from last year.
Honestly these are amazing
poor connection
they look really good bro
Nice work
someone help! this is all im getting with a 1500mm focal lenght and 2.5x barlow, is it because im using dslr
You're shooting with a 600 mm. I assume yes.
fym 600? 1500x2.5 is 3750
Oh I thought you were shooting with 600. 600x2.5 is 1500.
Set a lower ROI.
whats roi?
Region of interest.
my roi is galaxies
Cropping
oh
When taking video
embarrasing
pipp autostakkerte and registax 6
No... To capture the video?
my dslr... idk i just pressed record and let it do its thing for 5 minutes
If you could set that ROI or crop it in the DSLR that would work.
Or if you can connect it to sharpcap where you easily can set the ROI etc.
I don't have a DSLR so I have no idea tbh
giving up on planetaryāļø
Nooo š
taking a photo of the same planet over and over again doesent seem fun tbh...
What camera do you have?
nikon d5100
I'm reading about that camera. Seems like it's not possible to crop it via the camera itself or sharpcap or anything. In that case ur better off with an astrocamera.
Looks like you shot Jupiter not that high in the sky. That can cause the more blurry looking.
i was rreally excited to test the barlow
i didint even align it properly on the sky
i just kinda
speed allignment
I see
i also shot it through clouds
The sensor is so big it's a bit hard yeah
Is that very undersampled
I always get blurry results
Focal length and pixel size?
And did you drizzle or something?
Damn
Does that look like bad focus or just not sampled enough?
The barlow is very cheap too
You can check https://astronomy.tools/calculators/ccd_suitability
I'm at 0.43" / pixel
I'd need a 5x barlow apparently
Drizzle?
No you don't wanna drizzle in this case I think
I've finally decided to solve my most annoying issue with dealing with a lot of filter combinations. Two filter wheels stacked, that allows me to create all my most important different niche filter combinations while not having to dismantle the imaging train. That way i can do batch imaging with different combinations of niche filters like NUV and R, G and B for instance. Best thing is it's very easy to use, and i can technically use all of the filters of the largest filter wheel (which contain the most basic) without chaging a filter in the second one. In order, there's all the filters included : FW1 - Luminance, Red, Green, Blue, Red+IR, IR720, IR850, CH4 | FW2 - Clear filter, IR Cut, 7nm Ha, #W47 Violet filter and soon to arrive IR685.
Tilting in the imaging train isn't really an issue, as the whole thing is actually very sturdy and the C8's adapter is very strong too. The whole weight of the train is pretty light. And the best for last, all the fitlers are parafocal.
Biblically accurate filter wheel
That wheel is wheeling
double stacking is so smart
afaik dslr like canon only have true crop and doesnt compress the video quality, nikon yeah you can shoot with true crop mode, but it compressed it and when it stacks it gives like weird artefact
https://kuvacode.com/blog/canon-and-nikon-live-view-quality/ you can search it in here
Software for camera remote control and tethered shooting
saturn and titan
Nice words
What should I do?
Haha good one dude
why the hate
ballright
Iām gonna do my first Jupiter timelapse tonight
cant even like imaging galaxies anymore smh
Any tips
could i cover half of my telescopeās aperture with a black piece of cardboard to double my f so planets arent overexposed?
oh yeah and how do i focus on planets? does a bahtinov work?
Focus on the planet directly and don't nerf the telescope by covering half the mirror.
but my jupiter is just a white dot and i cant see the surface when i focus, my current strategy for focusing is turning the focuser until its the smallest
Reduce the camera's exposure or Gain/ISO instead to get it properly exposed.
iso is at 100 and exposure is at its lowest, 1/25 seconds for video
What camera is this?
they said nikon d5100 i believe
i used a dslr for around year and the best result was using backyardeos with a smaller roi. i dont know if it supports nikon but i might have found something that you could crop and record on a laptop to get close to 1:1 pixel resolution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flLc5i_aH-w
Hereās a super quick, informal video on how to use your PC as an external monitor for your DSLR camera using Digicam Control, which works with Sony, Canon, and Nikon cameras.
NOTE: Digicam is for PC only at this time. It is free to download and use.
FOR SUPPORT: http://digicamcontrol.com
I will be doing more in-depth screen capture videos...
he doesnt demonstrate it but its probably be in the software
this ones with backyardeos
What is that camera's best frame rate? I could get 60fps on my DSLR, set ISO to 100 and exposure to 1/250. Sample image here.
Watched a video and I see an option to adjust the minimum shutter speed on the D5100. Perhaps applicable here? https://youtu.be/o9lx7Hj6dzY
I've found this is the best way to set the exposure for video recording on the D5100; especially in low light situations. Obviously this is no substitute for having full control of manual exposure settings, such as on the Canon T2i/T3i, but it's sufficient enough for most amateurs.
The noise in the video would be even less with a suitable vi...
How do I get image perms in here?
for jupiter try your best in getting the moons as small as possible when focusing
ah
magic
sct 
750mm with 3x barlow and planetary camera vs 1500 witj 2.5 barlow and dslr camera
Nice
iss 50° pass 1.1ms gain 260. i noticed the t mount being loose after shooting so focus was affected a little
reprocessed 83° pass from the 7th
last quarter moon
Awesome job
I watched this one too if this was like 2 hours ago
compositing 2 quarter moon, had so much fun processing this pic xD
Thatās fire
Thanks!
nice i have like 3 more high passes at dusk starting the 24th
incredible ive never seen a composite presented like this
Thanks!
How do I get image perms
You need @peak lance
thats cool
good idea
How much Integrstion
Just single two minute stacks.
Iām making a timelapse of jupiters rotation any tips on settings I should turn on
ive would make each stack be like 2 minutes
also dslr or a astrocam?
Thanks
1 minute videos
I did 4000 frame videos last night at 1 minute intervals
Do I just use pipp to create the gif
stack and sharpen
It the seeing is constant yes
Alright my seeing wasnāt great yesterday
I had pretty bad seeing last night but am happy with the result
Seeing was so bad the moon disappeared
Pump up the brightness haha
i will when i have a chance to reprocess
I got school work
Iāll most likely be able to do it tomorrow
why are there no stars?! fake ai nasa fraud
Don't stars orbit Jupiter?
You're going to get put to death
They only orbit the earth
They are just dots in the dome above the flat earth, what are y'all talking about ?
Stars orbit the earth, we are the center of the universe obviously
We knew that 750 years ago, the governments censored the truth
Seeing was good enough to do some NUV. Here's a comparison between the view in green filter and NUV.
great stuff
Another NUV vs G.
does the higher theoretical resolution limit actually effect the images btw
It does. NUV has more effective resolution than green.
But here my NUV is just a little bit under diffraction limited, so it does not really do a fair comparison. Also, NUV has less texture on the sunspots and granules, so again not a fair comp.
ahh
i see
Even at the resolution limit of both, the resolution difference is not really obvious due to the big difference in texture.
i didnt know if daytime is just too seeing limited for uv to actually have an actual higher res xD
It generally is, i just have a very good location.
Still not enough to do proper NUV though.
i think the actual spot has slightly different structure
or it could be discord scaling the image weirdly
Or the Sun just changed between the two captures. 
how far apart in time?!
24 mins
sun changes that much?!
The sun changes actually a damn lot in WL.
damn maybe i really do need to get a solar filter
The granules are very active.
gravy granules š¤¤
are they timelapsable?
They are, i'm waiting for mine to load lol.
over the course of a day it seems like it could be fun
that's 3 hours
does swir have much of an effect on the sun?
so ocean vibes
Contrast becomes very low in NIR, don't know about SWIR.
i think i gotta test lwir and swir on the sun 
I have better, i'm just searching for that dawn file.
Should just be extremly low contrast.
whys that?
In NIR you can barely see the penumbra in live view without screen adjustements.
Not sure.
i see
That's something you should look at. Perfectly illustrates what i was saying. https://www.astrobin.com/iqjmv9/
The texture is really different, and the diffraction is less visible.
I have posted two timelapse there.
would at the very edge of the transmittable uv spectrum have the highest level of contrast?
Ca K you mean ?
i mean like juuust before the atmosphere blocks it
i cant remember like 250nm or something
There's a band with crazy contrast near 393.4nm.
Never seen images from beyond Ca K.
regular scopes cant really do lower than 300
That too.
i think you can get like 40% transmission but thats sorta it
Seeing will never let you imo, and the image will be hazy asf
don't mind me typing the wrong words
wrong words arent real anyways
the atmosphere should stop wobbling some time
it would be really nice imo
No, not really. 300-400nm UV is really the limit of imaging currently, no standard astro CMOS sensor goes above that.
That's not even accounting seeing, ~350nm is really the limit of usable, even under great conditions.
i mean just for in general tbh š
Though if you do SWIR and LWIR images of the Sun, i'll be interested in seeing them.
Worth a ping
probably be really really low snr
luckily long wavelength means i can do somewhat of a longer sub
oh damn so it just gains back contrast juuust after im unable to image in that wavelength 
1200nm is what i would be shooting
Not sure it gains contrast, that's contrast boosted i believe
the one on the right does look interesting imo
oh yeah true
You might get a good view of the umbra.
yup, i have like 20 arcsecond res at lwir
what's the aperture ?
which part is the umbra?
1 week away
for the lwir+mwir scope it will be 76.5mm
its meant for widefield dso
ohhh
the little black dot!!
i like that part
i feel like its hiding something
hole to hollow sun
There's better contrast on this region in the reds, so i guess it goes on similarily in infrared.
-# hollow sun theory
must do 
im planning on buying 2 very very high quality gold mirrors in a few months
ooh
with my 6" lwir has about 10 arcsec res
im forgetting something
oh my god
i wont be able to do lwir solar without a germanium solar filter š
lwir sun is out the question
foil has great transparency in NIR
too much actually
i guess next time i go out for solar and there's good seeing, i'll try NIR imaging
I have done some by the past but it was with the 5" at 19°
I was lucky enough to have three days straight of good seeing in August 2024. 3 days timelapse.
i forgot the sun does that
i love how circle the sun is
then like a bunch of the planets are squished slightly
I reprocessed it Iām not sure why cuts out for a second
Awesome
Any recommendations on a decent 1.5x Barlow
Iām kinda broke though
Or is a 2x fine
I think 2x may be slightly over sampling
It goes like this right?
Correct
Ok
How do I calculate ideal sampling?
6-7 x pixel size = idea focal ratio
So if my pixel size is 2.9 then I do 6.5, so 6.5 x 2.9 =18.85, so since my native focal ratio is 5, I do 19/5 =3.8, so I use a 3x Barlow and an ADC, close enough
Use 6 in average conditions and 7 in perfect conditions
im brainrotted
saturn
5 is average, 6 is good and 7 is excellent
iss looks like that in stellarium?
ISS will transit Jupiter on the 16th of May from here...
With premium yea
good luck & clear skies
im sending you clear skies
I will feel bad for you if u miss it XD
š¤·š¤·āāļøš¤·āāļø
With OSC*
Mono there's not much point going above Wavelength/540nm * 5x pixel size, ish.
sorry, other way around. 540nm/wavelength * 5x pixel size.
Thanks for the info
thats cool
Is there any good 1.5x barlows out there
ive seen the name siebert optics come up a lot for 1.5x barlow, its a bit expensive
How much do they cost,
or i believe you can unscrew the barlow element from a 2x and screw it on the t mount making it around 1.5x
I see that Iām a bit stumped on which one I need since there are so many variants
Why not 2x?
I think over sampling but not sure so Iām outside using my cheap 2x rn
Iām doing another timelapse
Is the celestron sky align thing worth getting?
nope. plate solving is a thing
I think the formula is px_size x 6.5 / f_ratio by jupiter addict
For good seeing
Ok
Well crap the laptop just shut down on me
I came about -><- close to getting that setup. Was ready to put the money down, was at the pawn shop for $1200.
Decent setup, too!
Shut down or went to hibernate?
Not sure tbh itās my dads work laptop so maybe one of the managers donāt like me using it
I think it is restarting
I donāt have the money for a laptop since I bought this scope
Windows update maybe
Mac update maybe.
Dang.
Ethan, tom, do yall recommend just NIR for Saturn early Friday morning? Or maybe mostly nir and a 1 or 2 OSC to combine? I donāt know, also Ethan, what time were you imaging Saturn with that recent post, youāre Texas so 1 hour behind me
Iām North Carolina idk how that even works but apparently Austin is 1 hour behind me
I was thinking shoot for 6am?
I've been recording both OSC and IR shots and combining them with wavelet composition. https://www.cloudynights.com/forums/topic/988913-nir-on-colour-wavelet-compositing-for-better-detail-with-proper-colour-in-poorer-seeing/
I put UTC on all my new image posts.
Thanks Ethan
are jupiters rings visible anyhwere in the 0.0012-1mm infrared range?
mm not um btw
i figurred it out
yes you can
@flint siren can I see your best Saturn?
Is this over sampling I tried my best to edit it to look nice
Jupiter reprocess - April 20th 2026
Cleannnnn
Nice bro
I hope my skies clear
I saw that too, sucks I canāt do it rn
Saturn will be attempted tmr morning at 5-6am
peak
It was cloudy for me unfortunately
how rare are 4 shadows?
use raw because mono8 sacrifices sharpness
Decades rare
Impossible actually.
You can only have 3 shadows.
Due to orbital resonance between the inner three. Io, Europa and Ganymede are never on the same side of their orbits simultaneously (which would be required for 4 shadows). Callisto is independent, so you can get 3 shadows, those being Callisto + 2/3 of the others.
yeah i saw this to on stelarium
For the same reason, you can only get a triple transit.
Doesnt neptune and pluto have a orbital resonance to?
next three shadows is in 2032 i think
2 shadows?
what
Every week for a few weeks in a row, followed by a gap of several months.
You can get all four shadows when these three and Callisto line up on the right side.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Galilean_moon_Laplace_resonance_animation_2.gif
(It never happens)
I need 2 hours of clear skies.
Wanna trade skies? I'm not home and it's clear
Thanks for the correction š I was thinking of when Hubble got 3, but not 4, got mixed up. Was very tired this morning imaging Saturn
Sure.
But I think you've senses the wrong skies š
Seeing was so bad but it was low so thats fair
Nice
Honestly saturn looks good without details
without details?
would you use this scope
Blurry
Peak bro
What design is this???
im hungry
hi hungry
my own 
Looks very long
I meant focal ratio
oh its f30
good for moon visual 
no need for barlows 
oi can you make one for 4 moons?
Right so itās long asf
Talking about planetary settings
Okay well I guess it just won't play in Discord.
never done a transit before but do you think the gain would be something extra low like 0.1-0.5
no no not gain ms
Yea
ive been waiting for a transit for months duurrr
I have 4 decent opportunities this month but this is the best one as the ISS will be 57 angular size
How do I see when I have an lunar iss transit
ah i still dont get why 4 shadows are impossible..
The inner 3 never line up on one side.
dont they have to at some point?
like once every way too long
No, all three never meet at the same point because of their orbital resonance.
awh :(
How often does a 2 or 3 transit happen
3 shadows are once in a decade and 2 are like 25 times a year
Oh gosh
I missed a double transit on Friday due to clouds š
And thereās another one next week but itās under the horizon
T minus 10 minutes hopefully I can capture something good
Guys look whatās happening RIGHT NOW
IS THIS RARE???
I just watched it on my 10ā
My seeing was horrible for it
I had zero clue this was happening 
Rarely
I feel like that would be difficult to capture as well
Yea Iām fully clouded over
And itās still light out
I take it that it already ended
Well itās only like a 20 minute event
Maybe I can get it next time
We'll be seeing many more of these for the next year as equinox approaches.
4deg altitude š„
you red nerd ā¤ļø
I think I first got in in 2023 and then they changed the role system around at some point and then I got it back somewhat recently
It looks like Iāll have clear skies for the one on the 24th what are some good setting for that and is it worth trying to do a timelapse of them approaching each other?
whats your gear?
Christopher go has caught a bunch of them
just get as much data as you can
Christopher go caught Ganymede shadow on top of IO I think infront of Jupiter
Short videos, 30-45 seconds Iād say
Because you want the stacks to not blur the moons much but it depends on which moons
got a ss, im in bed and dont wanna research
Europa and Io
Should my gain be set to where I can barely see them or see them as white dots
yea cuz dont forget when you sharpen them it will brighten them
Ok
Iām excited for these passes I hope I wonāt over expose it again
I hope the cloud cover changes
Pretty sure histogram should be 85-90%
Uhm omg?!?!
@thick heron I did the calculation with your relative location you could get this! Sadly tom couldnāt
I mean even in an animation would look sick in moderate seeing
I presume that Rio wouldn't be able to get that level of detail on Io's surface? Or in better conditions than what I have now could I get something more than a correctly colored spot?
Whoās Rio?
I donāt think I could get that level of detail because of my aperture but the shadow movement Iām confident I could
I mean we are talking about 30 second videos
Io, Europa, and Ganymede In good seeing 10ā
Second photo, moon on lower L looks like Ganymede
Yeah it is
I did this last year, was happy with what I got of Ganymede's surface. Not orbiter level detail, not the 14" level of detail, but just enough to say "oh, it's not a smudge, there's a little contrast there."
Last one is with some weird derotation but the details there none the less
Is the one on the right being eclipsed?
I don't know tbh. I put the time in UTC, I didn't think to check it against Stellarium.
Would be cool if that was the case instead of the process somehow losing data
Itās probably an artifact
š«
I kinda thought so. At least it's the right color.
Which when I processed the first photo that had Io in it, and noticed that it was the right color, I was really happy, I had been so used to seeing white dots when imaging with my DSLR.
I know the feeling
what the hecky
i dont know if i could resolve that
What seeing would you rate this out of its the only timelapse Iāve done so far. I was able to get a moon for a bit
If you think about it resolving, the moons is already requiring a huge aperture, itās more of resolving the fact that itās cut off in half
Detecting the shadow moreover
Dude you have the moon disappearing thatās sick
There are countless of these events in 2026-7 season.
Its gonna happen hopefully this night.
1 moon iss ?
Thats insane
WIsh you clear night
Its gonna be clear. GRS is on the edge... but its worth it. Only 10 min drive again
Can any pro planet imager explain to me what this guy is saying because Iām way lost with big words
Good luck
This is interesting because the ISS takes up almost all of Jupiters surface area
I donāt think your simulation is taking into account the size of the ISS, either way super cool
His image I questioned
Well it only adds the shape of the ISS with stelarium premium
Gotcha, I have that @polar forge where you live
Drop the cords š
Haha
I gotta haul the c11 30 minutes away for this today
Gonna happen in 6 hours but I need no clouds š
I donāt have any transits by the look of it
I would be happy to even get a good photo of the iss
Brian Martin is back apparently
Yeah fourier analysis shows when the image has abused artificial details
But that's literally BM's style
It does not but it gives an idea where its gonna be š
its bm's image?
Netherlands
He's back in the Facebook group he created after being banned from another one? 
Not sure. He could be back under a new name or someone has replicated perfectly his style.
i mean whoever this guy is he isnt even really trying?š
omg
Pretty sure it's him, and now telling he has a C11. Probably still using his 16" but changing setup in the dets to not be recognized.
What is this?
https://www.gpu-vision.fr/zbf_challenge.html
The website looks really vibe coded
And what even is this 
What do you notice about this document about ZBF? https://www.gpu-vision.fr/ZBF_in_5_minutes.pdf
How many hyphens are there
There's absolutely no substance provided about the process. Here's the problem, this is the solution, just trust me bro.
Which one is it?
WTF is this Shit š
What are they trying to do though
they are saying the intensities of noise say your image has fake detail, i think its just from jpeg compression 
nou thanks
wtf is this bs
Absolutely not lol that image got destroyed by artificial sharpening
jupiter addict used f tons of artificial sharpening?
it's not his image
oh
i thought it was from this
but yeah, the other image looks so cooked
this one
All he's talking about it the abundance of certain spatial frequencies in the data. If you apply wavelets of a certain "size", it'll produce a spike at that frequency. Of course if you completely overprocess with wavelets (to the point of destruction) the result becomes artificial. So even a small amount will have an artificial component. This is inherient with the fact blind deconvolution doesn't perfectly replicate the atmospheric blurring. Only stellar decon can reasonably achieve 'accurate' results in the scientific sense.
Either way, his image looks far more artificial and replicates AI, even if AI isn't necessarily involved.
Pending, and Brian Martin is an admin of this group. Probably won't get through lol.
THE admin.
It's his own sandbox he made after getting kicked out of that one FB group.
It does look like a BM image. I wonder if this is what he has also used.
BM i mean.
the process is obviously flawed and produces unnatural results in any case.
I feel like it's just a typical AI processed image with unnaturally sharp edges.
Don't think either do anything particularly special.
Well... One of them stole images, which is special in a bad way.
yup
Brain Martin
ahhhh
Nah Brian not Brain
The Futuristic Hub guy that came in here a while back.
Yee
yea
oh god he's not even trying to hide it anymore š
I want to start planetary imaging with my 10ā dob. Can anyone advise me on what camera/barlow to get for under Ā£400
I know a lot of people use the player one Uranus c
But I use a more budget camera which is the asi662
And before buying a Barlow figure out good sampling using this formula: px_size x 6.5 / f_ratio
Yep 662 is like the 585 but cropped
Actually 664 I think
They're all very similar
Futuristi chub
Should I buy this in the future
If you plan on doing dso too then it's great
I didnāt realize it was good for both
Neither
What Barlow would that suit?
I sent this photo with my skepticism to show Iām not a random Joe, when he says my image thatās what he is referring to.
grs has more detals than his grs 
his is just like a solid puck
I wasnāt going to bother debating about things I donāt understand but I was confused what he meant by no storm detail because mine has center coloration changes
yours has so much storm detail 
Yeah I feel his data may of been better but whatever he did to itā¦
maybe if he did lucky imaging and used wavelets he coulda got some info 
I did this for the 585 camera and got 3.84? Is that the optimal Barlow
I love my Uranus C and M
Def the C
Cuz you donāt want a mono lol cus you would have to get a filter wheel and crap
6.5 is a little optimistic? What about 5?
Right now I only use the Uranus m for lunar detail
Iāll try
I think Iāll get a Uranus c in the future
I believe I need a 1.5x Barlow but the sierbert optics guy never responded to my email
what F ratio is ur scope?
4.9
Just invest in it early and save up for instead of buying a cheap one and then end up buying the Uranus c anyway
That should put you at a 3x barlow.
Thatās just more money down the drain if you plan on not using the old camera
Just save a little more and buy the Uranus c
Thatās what I would do
If I ever buy a Uranus C is there a way to cool it so I can do dso with it as well
It doesnāt need to be cooled for dso tbh
But there is a cooled version thatās like a small % more expensive
It's like 2x more expensive
It's 1.5x more, but worth it for dso
Yeah 1.5x
Little less but yeah
Uncooled is 369
Before tax
Alr lol
Anyways, if you want to do a lot of deep space, you should go for the cooled version
Iām debating if I should save up for a newt and if I should try Nina over asi air
NINA is definitely better than asiair
this is probably a dumb question but is there any way to get venus' cloud structure during broad daylight?
ir maybe idk
venus is 20 degrees alt for me during twilight and that direction is trees
ive looked for photos on astrobin if there were any daytime photos taken featuring cloud structures and couldnt find any
alsooo during the search i found your photo with giant watermark
hell yeah
its my best photo yet
may even beat my tombaugh 4 image
frrrr wonder why its not iotd
How much more complicated is it?
Yeah rdp
Move your setup
What mini pc would you recommend
Sun
Dope
Nice!
How come when I look at these on Stellarium they do not show up on the day? I set it to the exact time of the transit and the station is under the horizon
Did you put in the correct cords?
Also some of those are like a long way away
They donāt get accurate until like a week or less
I like how the planet isnāt even horizontal with the thing on the top right. No effort whatsoever
Single stack
Awesome
Dads work laptop not allowed to have discord on it
Buh
Working with what I have
any filters? im thinking of getting the inexpensive w47+uv/ir cut combo
Only used uv ir cut for this one
nice cause it looks like you got a little cloud structure
The Uranus C with no cooler is a lovely DSO camera on its own. It has a heatsink so you can theoretically add a peltier. How effective it will be is⦠questionable, but itāll make a difference
Iād just recommend you to get the Uranus-C Pro or the ATR585C. The latter has customs and VAT included
There is a pro version with a cooler.
there is a cooler they sell for the uncooled it but to my knowledge is only good for introducing vibrations
@quiet glen never mind then, just enjoy the uncooled product.
the uramus c pro is different to the fan cooled uranus c
Itās a fan
Made for Solar actually
single
Nice pic
Single stack
Really nice! Had to get up early?
IR shot with OSC camera?
Yeah 4:30 to setup
I have a bad feeling my collimation was slightly off but I canāt totally tell
Seeing was very good transparency was average at best, either way well worth getting my lazy ass up
Looks good.
its a bit squished? how low was is?
wait WHATT
Bros locked
Ngl bro I hope you take this as positive feedback but the single stack looked better in my opinion, hope this helped š
I wanna achieve this kind of detail
Mine sorta blurry because of 4 inch
I haven't tested my 4.5 inch, but I assume it has little improvement
Iām sure you can still get the rings though
fov of the scope i will be building
This is also a single stack
Just different wavelengths
do i do planetary when i build the greg
10 inch
Ahh ahh
Thats a higher wavelength so way less signal
the frames were 30ms
just testing around
I got data for a timelapse last night but now that Iāve stacked it I realize seeing was horrible
I got to the point where I stacked 5% and it was still a blob
Anyone know why in registax when you import something a little dim it auto cranks the exposure and contrast up to where you canāt change it
Best I can do atm
Using wavelength decomp with NIR 642 and UV/IR cut
5:32 AM ECT
What aperture
10"
Woah
f13.8
Why so long instead of using a barlow
because i want to use it for dso too
Planetary nebulae :0
that same galaxy with my 6"
i may have to put my 6" attached to it to platesolve yk
Wow
But wouldnt seeing ruin it?
lucky imaging
also yeah the seeing will ruin it
i have some amazing periods tho
like sub arcsecond
Thats what i gotta do with antenna galaxy š
Where u even live?
uk 
Thanks
Ohhh damn... and you get nice seeing? Im jealous
Idk why but is normal, just normalize in autostakkert
I have a chance to get an image of the Chinese space station tonight
Whatās the angular size?
WOAH what galaxy is THAT
NGC2857
no offense but i think youāll just hinder yourself with such a big scope.. like bro i thought my fov was too small
its for ir only
ir ony scope
no visible light
i want that insane reflectivity
full ir spectrum

i want to eventually get a swir cam and a mwir can
can you run that for uranus? i wonderā¦
or Neptune
whats swir and mwir
short wave it and mid wave irš?
yea!
i hate the weird star overlay
OH SHI YOU CAN TOTALLY GO FOR URANUS
you gonna do it sometime right? š„¹
it will be like 3 pixels big š
it will be 2
its 0.17 arcsec per pixel
uranus is 3.42 arcsecs across
yeah
alr 1 sec
Smol scope
i think its 20 px big
what matters is the arcsec per pixel
i think its diamater(in arcsecs)/arcsec ppx
allright so you fit 160 uranusees in your fov
10x16
(3840x2160)/160
your uranus will be 50k pixels
THATS NOT ITS ACTUAL SIZE
HOLY SCAM
thats why i mentioned this
and why i told you the arcsec per pixel
because
do this and you get it
alr fill this out for me please
its 20px big ;-;
trust mee
I fit 25,623 in my fov
i fit over 3
oiš„¹
no

sorry its just more effort than its worth
Do Tom's 24" f/4 with a 585
too lazy to calculate, lenght and apperture?
96" focal length 
MILIMETERS
2400000000nm
Better one from October.
Out of curiosity, did Damian manage to get uranus' rings with his C14 at some point?
ive only seen you do it
Martin Lewis has got them with his 18". Damian once got asymmetric brightening with the C14, but this was decades ago when the rings were edge-on and hence slightly easier to detect / omit circular artifacts.
DP
Pic Du Midi 1-meter.
But both use suboptimal filters, so the planetary glare is stronger than in my raws.
i see
how long should my video of the moon be to have a print worthy image? š„¹
holy sharp
what is this stack bruh..
woaa
what can you see visually through it?
Not the rings. Only the very brightest of the moons and a distinctly circular blue disk. Under good seeing you can spot the northern polar hood, which appears slightly brighter than the rest of the planet.
Tbh Saturn is the best in the 24 visually
bet its majestic... you got any pics of jupiter maybe? bet those are insane
probably the better few
oh my goddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
you can tell apart different cracks on ganymede
wait which one is ganymede
i meant europa sry
Ganymede is in both the 2nd and 3rd images. Europa in the first image.
^simulated views
š„¹
yeah i know