#Planetary Imaging
1 messages · Page 33 of 1
In the summer this is
No way
I’m sure
Damn, I remember like September 2024 for me it felt like over 60 degrees but idk
Ohh
36?
Not nearly as high as I thought haha
Technically it’s several minutes as the horizon can be several degrees below horizontal.
(For mountain top locations)
Lucky.
I’ve also been suffering alongside Duif with low altitude imaging of Saturn. A good challenge but not so fun.
Becomes usable this year at ~37 degrees at peak. Still far from optimal though.
Unfortunately I got my first ever telescope 3 months after this 😭
I got to see Saturn visually a bunch but didn’t get an Astro camera until late January
Phone photographing lmao
The mercury and mars are so good
Im going to send this message so I cna be part of the thread I wanna read this lol
lol
Ye
Cool
Could you make something similar if I sent you my photos? I don’t have photoshop
Old data I assume
Yeppers
sure it will take like 5 min
you prob can use something like canva or photopea though for free
Ohhh
1st one is best imo. Others look unnatural
Agreed, first one has the best processing
looks more natural and the details are soft looking, whilst remaining sharp and noticeable
Agreed. Spacecraft-esque is what I aim for in terms of natural looks, and the 1st image could plausibly fit the bill.
You succeed. To the point that we would be fair to wonder if you actually have some equip that's spacebound beyond earth's atmospheric effects.
He's actually just playing Elite Dangerous irl, flying his starship near the planets to image them with a nice zoom lens.
i dont know, people saying today is smiley face but mine turns sad face, i got venus, moon w/eartshine and saturn here
i got venus also, i use 300mm focal length to shoot this
Might be a reason that it's empty. Kind of hard to build on mountains and not many people want to live in a desert.
ik
What 4 months of progress looks like
Kinda just reposting till I get a clear night
#🔭-astrophotography-chat message
jupiter under a bit below average seeing
I'll have to see what comes out of the mess that I imaged the other night.
is this better?
This was my previous best, shot in above average seeing
Do you think this is better than it
But i like this colors more
your previous best has slightly better details I think, but worse processing than your most recent
Yeah skill>seeing
I've improved since then
if you processed the old data in the same way as the more recent one then it could look even better
Yes but sadly i lost the data
Aww man
real, i spent so long looking through my files on multiple devices trying to get it back
ive never gotten better seeing since
which image of mars looks better?
Somewhere between the two. Leaning towards left.
Imo right
Left, but agree with this
Ahhh I see, perhaps an image like this?
Can you scale up a little?
might end up a bit too pixelated
Maybe not that much but I think it looks better a little more than the first image
Ahh… I really really need to analyze text more efficiently
I see your "not the best" and raise you by "what the 🦆 "
Thats not that bad mine is whorse
Worse*
Nice
Beautiful
whorse
Jupiter?
That’s some crazy clear seeing
good one
😭 I had clouds and bad seeing
Where are you located, what scope and cam?
A uv/ir cut filter
colors are a bit iffy cause i wanted to bring out the moon's color, but other than that, i feel this image is greatly improved from my previous take on the same data
@low oar do you think I could find mercury during daytime at an fov of 0.05x0.04° without goto?
Saturn a couple hours ago.
Gear?
Uhhh without go to idk prob not I did it but 🤷♂️
Also location?
Ye
Looks like a voyiger 1 image fr
I did shoot an airplane 70km away and some cool ducks
Very interesting looking planet
And I see you got the great bird nebula next to it
What’s your focal length bro
FlexTube 400P & Uranus-M just outside San Antonio, Texas, USA.
~8200mm
Image of Finnish airplane i took 2 days ago. (Yes. I took an image of a plane in a whoal diffrent contory.. (250km distance)
@thick heron my friend
They're gonna look almost normal by the time Tom can shoot it.
Heck yeah
They'll still be notably dim, but nothing like this.
I'll get a reasonable view by early July.
Sun rising time is as much of a problem as Saturn's altitude... 3:55am Sunrise during mid-June here.
you can see the chemtrails in such detail
I think it turned out quite good! Is it possible to lucky image?
I have a video of the plabe
Plane*
ppl lucky image the iss so probably
Would u be able to help me?
try the default stuff for lucky imaging and see if it works i guess
It doesnt really.
Can we vc so I can show u?
idk then
never shot planes b4
anyways i wanted to ask, on the topic of things that arent normal
how screwed will i be with a t stop of about, a hundred thousand to a million
heard of a diatom before? yeah thats the effective aperture im dealing with
one of those boys
@sour cradle ?
if normal alignment and quality estimation doesnt work, i dont have any idea what would
Can I just show u the issue?
you can
Yh
@sour cradle ?
ye?
U wanted the data to process
yeah
i wasnt able to get any better really
Also plen.
plane-tary imaging
Took this picture 3 years ago with my 6” Dob and Nikon D5300
Rare occurance where ive seen images of a beluga flying normally and not at an airshow
Yeah I've been told that those Beluga planes are pretty rare. This was a Beluga XL, not sure how rare those are. But yeah this one happened to just fly over my house
That's an incredible shot, holy wow
Over toulouse I see belugas pretty often
@somber stratus These people didn’t mention you in there post…. Did you give them permission?
If it is the same footage. I'd assume it's stolen
What account is this?
Yeah fr
No
Stolen, but what’s new.
Damn I’m sorry man, I reported them
It is what it is.
Oh shoot yeah he should have
There you go
Still says "we captured the space station live"
Yeah I don’t think the guy speaks English very well tbh
Still in the wrong though
I spoke to him in DMs briefly and it was kinda broken English
@fading plume look at his phone jupiter, that is mad and defo deserves mininerd
planetary usually won't get you mininerd. If so it has to be like Tom level stuff. That's what one of the mods said before anyway
tom level should be meganerd with extra glaze
well he is meganerd XD
but I think the reason is that DSO is harder than planetary and takes more knowledge
in some ways
my dso that got me mininerd was gobshite and didnt take much knowledghe ir skill
recently they've raised the bar a lot
tuff
i'd like to say i meet the standards now though
I had to get a 2h tracked image of Andromeda to get mininerd. Back in the day I had gotten it from a dookie untracked Orion.
did you get denerded?
yeah a few times actually lol
people thought he was underage
oof
that was not the reason
got my acc banned from that lol
i was 11 on a very old acc (this was in 2019-2020)
same
more on the knowledge side tho
CH4 at 15°
yooo u joined again!
welcome back
Yeah i need human Contact
u doin better that before u left?
Nah i'm at the lowest and still digging
fck, wanna chat in dms?
Imma go to sleep so tmrw
ok bro gn
Good night!
any cool targets on the moon other than ina?
Pythagoras thing
i might have done it
lemme check
i havent
ill do that then
is it on the middle right ?
nono its the same region just not the correct phase
Attention thread lurkers, your thread has been selected in the champion of thread comps. Go vote! #1369694419963613295 message
Sending the question here for more exposure.
On a level of 0-10, how crazy is tossing about 50K tif images into MS ICE to get a moon stitch?
Eh, actually 38,400
May heaven have mercy on my CPU/RAM
I hope ur house aint made of wood cuz otherwise its gonna burn down
Won't work.
What would you stitch 50k images for
I think ICE loads images in RAM, so you’ll need a few TB of RAM/RAM disc and a few decades of time.
Why not?
A big lunar mosaic.
^
Yea but why haven’t they been stacked first?
What happened is that I imaged it like Ben asked for a project he was working on for lunar mosaic. His instructions were to not track, just film as the moon passed through.
So I thought, Rio's up for the task, set her up like I normally do for planetary, and followed directions.
Nine times. Set up to film a strip of the moon, let it pass, rinse and repeat. I wanted there to be good overlap to have plenty of data per video.
So there wasn't anything to stack per se, because each individual frame was offset from the one before/after it. The stack was itself was supposed to be compiled with this individual's program. Problem is, he couldn't open the ser or smaller avi files that I made from it. Stuck there, I thought I'd see what I could do.
@fading plume @somber stratus in my defense when I ran the frames from one video (little under 5,000) it seemed to be playing nice. I was watching my CPU/RAM stats and the RAM didn't seem to be getting overloaded. I'm processing off of a Samsung T7 external SSD. Maybe if I make more room on the SSD being used?
Not only is it wood, it's possibly built in the 1850s and my computer is in the upstairs area that didn't go through the same extensive remodeling as the downstairs. Still has the original horsehair plaster under the original wallpaper that got painted over.
Uuuuhhhhhh. Good luck is all that i will say
@somber stratus do you think it would somehow be possible for you to image the cave?
I mean I would deff asume not.
8.3355°N 33.222°E
Thats the cords
Reminder to vote in round 2 of the thread competitions #1369694419963613295 message
Ahh
depends on diameter
would need to be at least several hundred meters across
Yeah uhm..
If im not mistaken its either 100 or 40~
@somber stratus but like. Is it possible to reach sharper details than this with an 8"? Seeing was quite good and I was shooting in IR. But like i feel that there should be more to get.
Ina btw (Blue Lake)
IR inherently has less resolving power, so yes.
could get better in VIS
yes, if the seeing cooperates
It never does 😭
Avarage seeing for me is like 2.8arc/s
😭😭😭😭😭
Dang
Do you have a turorial on how to remove the atmosphere above your house? 😭
Crazy
get ping spamed loser
aaaand we got another general chat protostar
?
cool
what telescope do you have? an 8"?
my Ina with 8" newt (cooked saturation to try to get it to show up)
8" skywatcher classic 200p dob
Thats really sharp
Mine (IR)
@ruby compass I used a small ROI at 3600mm fl and this was my actual FOV lol
I had this with a 6” at 3600mm, just need the right seeing and sampling
What.
I also use 3600mm lol
how
my seeing is literal soup and I hate it
FL alone is irrelevant tbh. It's the FL*+camera* that determines sampling.
The issue is my 3.76pix size
😭
I have 3.75um pixels as well. Is that a problem?
I normally have a few nights like this typically in the early autumn
But overall seeing is rough here
Late summer/early autumn is the good stuff
need a video to determine seeing tbh
That looks good, tho tbf I haven’t looked at many Astro images lately so
No, if you match it with the focal length required to hit critical sampling
or thereabouts
Been working and in HS for the last several months but I graduate very soon so im getting back into it 
Luckily there isn't much about. I've been busy with exams also but haven't felt like I've missed much
I have a few problems. 1. My avarage seeing is nearly 3arc/s. 2. I cant image during summer due to living 63° North. 3. During winter (when I can image) it can get down to -25C°.. 4. 3.76 pixel scale. 5. Im not Tom
lemme see if I can find a short clip of some planetary video I have
My ahh seeing (IR)
scrumptious
lol
50° above horizion..
I had a night like that recently. Happens
Tom getting horrid seeing?!
you can have a good telescope but you cant fight the weather
Happens fairly regularly. I just don't bother imaging/posting if it's poor.
Real
Thats like the best i have ever gotten..
How often do you go out and image
You prob remember this image Tom.
Nooo there’s no way
Seeing has to be pretty good for that image
With an 8”
At the very least 5-6/10
Whenever it's clear. I usually do visual first whilst aligning the scope. Can tell if it's a good night from that alone. Most of the time I just don't bother putting the cam in if it's shite.
Yeah. Its like one of my best seeings ever
(if you're talking to me)
nice
this is my best attempt (so far) on copernicus
Actually crazy
vs 2 weeks earlier. Same scope, same sampling.
luck of the draw
I don't have any Jupiter raw video but here's a short clip of some of the best seeing I ever got on mars with 8" newt.
the diffrence is crazy
this was the result I got
Better than Voiadgers final images😭
i deleted all of my previous jupiter raw videos
yeah that's fairly nice
I love the sort of soft look of these raw videos, vibes are unmatched
was this during the opposition?
Idk, the stack is juicy too but I see what you mean. Seems more "real" in a sense.
not sure but it was many months ago when mars was a lot closer
@hasty hull this is really good if you knew the barlow i used. (Tom knows)
Yeah just aesthetics wise
I use the good ol X-Cel LX 3x barlow from celestron
Same. But at time it was very different..
Same night Mars IR. Some really nice moments.
the only mars opposition image i got was this and that was like in late february
Holy.
I need to image Saturn in the morning but it's just so much work to set all this up
I want to, but I can't. Still so poorly placed here.
ecliptic is near horizontal at sunrise
dont let the sun stop you
I doubt it would be visible currently since I have trees on the east though
i got my telescope wayy too late and now the only saturn image i have is saturn without rings
I did image a really cool thing. Mars was extremly close to a mag 6 star. Ill try to find the images both with and without barlow
actually it might ngl just checked on stellarium
show
Here
this is the oldest saturn pic I have lol
thats awesome
How.
a few years ago I had some very lucky seeing somehow
What scope?
now all I get is this
8" f/6 newt (was a dob but I put it on an eq mount for easier tracking)
@fathom oak
Do you acclimatise the scope for a few hours before?
Yes
uh I forget sometimes lol
obviously could be seeing too, granted
it's that important?
oh yeah, big time
oh wow ok I guess I'll make sure to do that next time
I don't have a direct comparison on hand, but it makes a big difference. I use a desk fan on low power all night with the 24". Aim it at the back of the primary
Do you think it is an stupid idea for me to use 7200mm of focal? (it includes the shit barlow)
Also might be worth covering the scope with reflective foil (even thick cooking foil will do). Stops the "top" of the scope that's pointed at the sky from cooling off more rapidly than the bottom of the OTA. Causes asymmetric temperatures and induces tube currents otherwise. It's a careful balance.
e.g Martin Lewis' here.
though this is an actual insulating material
forgot the name
This shit looks like a probe
i love it
it's a 18" home built dob. Bit of a weapon
again depends on camera and scope
its a chonker, thats for sure
but probably not worth doing
oh right i have been meaning to ask, what kind of cam do you use?
a lil birdie said the Uranus C
P1 Uranus-C mostly.
Just picked up the Uranus-M last week though. That'll be replacing my ZWO ASI462MM for mono work.
uncooled right?
here is the mars resoults i get 😭 (not croped)
ye exactly
beats this
awesome saturn
Thought it was jupiter 😭😭
Syrtis Major spotted
Yup
@sour cradle could u vc now?
how do i make moon mosaics?
just like say what you need cause i have to move out of my dorm today, and then tmr i have to unpack stuff, im gonna be busy for a few days
alr.
need help merging 2 images in gimp
(color and ir)
color > decompose to layers, then channel mixer on the colors you want to keep, then change to addition layer mixing, and delete unwanted layers
@sour cradle okay so. i have made the images look good but i now need to take just the colors from the color data
how do i combine?
change the layer mixing
where?
what is it in swedish? 😭
i know its directly translated to färg mixning or färg blandning
ur the swede lol
hsl color should work
right click merge down
up to u
nah
i do not fw mosaics
aint nothing good happen with me an mosaics
i think i just need to increse birghtness of bottom image
how do i change brightness?
k
nothing happends when i change it
you have send a picture of nothing changed
YOO
I GOT IT TO WORK
I JUST NEEDED TO CHANGE THE MODE OF THE BOTTOM PIC TO ADDITION
@sour cradle Can u vc for like literally 1min so i can show u what i mean with nothing happening?
@sour cradle HOLY
Ik
The lesson : aperture 
aperture and seeing
and luck, and money, and...
If I remember correctly, he didn’t even spend that much lol
He got majority used and just built his setup for way cheap than you think
24" was 3.5k, with tracking and the lot.
Still a lot of money, but for a 24" it's a steal.
all relative
It is a steal for a 24 inch. 16 inch scopes in my country sometimes cost more
A once in a lifetime one night tour of our solar system' with a huge 16 inch Newtonian telescope that I've installed on my London roof😁
🔭Telescope Gear used: https://astrobiscuit.com/the_beast/
🎅BEST TELESCOPE : https://astrobiscuit.com/best-telescope-for-christmas-2024/
💛HELP A BISCUIT OUT
Be my patron : https://www.patreon.com/as...
Mars is insane
Especially the clouds
anyone else notice how cooked his planetary processing is? Looks like he maxes the contrast slider lol
I still think Mars is oversaturated but ig that's personal preference.
i can get a 24 inch aragoscope so much cheaper, and it will only have the slight issue of a collecting area the size of a cell of rice plant
Well ... wish me luck.
38K tif images to mosaic.
I'm just going to let it sit and bake for a while.
and why the hell would you do that ?
Can someone help me I tried taking a picture of mars using my celestron 8 se and a camera and a 2x Barlow but mars had no detail, it was soft and zero detail
Could be a multitude of reasons. Out of focus, bad conditions, bad processing, overexposed...
Can you show the image?
good luck
make sure you cool down microsoft ice with ice
do you have the original raw video?
I think so wait let me check
not sure what file that is but no astro software will open it
some sort of weird tif
only windows photo viewer opens it lol
straight off the bat though it looks like a mixture of bad collimation, possibly bad focus, and bad seeing
I'd need the raw video to tell for sure though
might not be a collimation issue because hes using an 8se
wdym lol SCTs need collimation too
might
in the picture he sent I can see a flair on one side of mars so it very well could be part of the problem
can you send it through something like wetransfer
i am compressing it right now
it might take a minuute tho
Is the 8se actually cable of taking decent pictures of mars?
with a decent planetary camera yes. Which camera were you using?
wait why do I hear rain in the video
It’s a fountain
oh lol
In my house 😂
I was like how are you shooting through rain
🤣
hmm that may be limiting you a bit
ya I know
Realistically I knew it would limit me but I did not expect it to not show any detail
Mars is pretty small right now and will be very hard to get detail
a few months ago when it was in opposition it was a lot bigger
The thing is it’s the only planet that’s going to be out for like a month or two
but yeah in the video it looks like a mixture of bad collimation, bad atmospheric conditions, and the mirrorless camera probably isn't helping things
saturn is rising in the early morning right now but yeah currently the positions of the planets aren't good
So you think I should collimate my telescope and try again? Or should I wait for other planets to come up
tbh I doubt you'll get detail on mars since it's so small right now.
You can try but it will be difficult
and honestly the mount is kind of inaccurate so no deep sky objects is possible unfortunetly
I tried a few months ago with a 8" newtonian and planetary camera and only managed this but now it's even smaller and you're using a mirrorless cam so I kinda doubt you'll resolve anything
damn so you think the camera is limiting me that much
DSLRs and mirrorless cameras have big sensors and low framerate so yeah it's not optimal
oh and another question do you think the camera and 2x barlow is enough magnifcation
This was my first time stacking so it did take me hours to try to figure it out especially on a mac
yeah
what software did you use?
Orbital positioning is limiting you the most.
It's very poorly placed now.
whats that?
AutoStakkert by running a windows on my mac
Mars & Earth are far from each other currently.
oh ya
but it is the only planet out so i have no other choice
Granted. Saturn is on it's way back though. Depends where you live as to it's visibility. Southerners have a good view already.
I'm at 34 degrees north and saturn is already fairly high in the morning
where is that
that's my latitude
Ah ok
Huh.
Fixed the layout and back to not responding.... and I remembered that I need to make an adjustment to the layout for the start corner. sigh.
Saturn already gets to 40 degrees before sunrise here.
his processing was kinda questioneble. Atleast jupiter. tho mars is great imo
Not that I've seen. They're impacted more by seeing/transparency/out of control BBQs.
nah
could somone fix colors?
its my moon mosaic
nah they're so bright it doesn't matter
how do i make mosaics?
I'm using Microsoft ICE, it's a legacy software. I'd have to google search it, they discontinued it.
Mars is really far away currently, I was having trouble with my C11 the other night haha
Take panels and stitch them together very easy
Not the best but this is 7 panels from last night
yes but arent there any programs for that?
I do it manually
Which is better in my opinion
I can keep what I want and such
kk
Nah its just i dont know how on earth im gonna pull of a moon mosaic.
this is the kind of levels of zoom we are talking... (colored one)
@low oar
skywatcher classic 200p with homemade eq platform zwo assi224mc and celestron lx xcel 3x barlow
total: 1100$
Take off the Barlow
i want the entirety to be high res
Yea
but ur Kenny
ofc. thats with bralow
Yea
with a much much mu7ch worse one btw
That’s one planet which is very small
To even make a good mosaic you have to find the right balance
3x oversampeling is great
not really. jusy need alot of pannels
that pannel alone took 4hours to edit
Yea for a full moon like 100-125
Yea see what I’m saying
My mosaics take like 2 hours
My quick ones
i like torturing myself
Then keep doing what ur doing haha
btw wanna see the pannel?
Didn’t you show me?
its here
yes but thats cropped
here
I thought it was cropped
You got me so lost man haha
mb
i meant that in this image my part look pixalated
Oh ye I saw
Ur gonna need so much data if you wanna mosaic like that
I’m just saying how I do it
Find a workflow
This was 30 panels all full frame no Barlow
yeah.. the hard part is if i want a color one. Since im using IR data for details and color data for color..
You shoot detail and color sperate
my field of view with balow is 0.04x0.03 degrees.....
yes
Ye like 2 different cameras
same camera
Planetary cams can be a tad sensitive but you do you
I would stack dslr photos for color
i combine these
to get this
Here is the full moon pic panels from above
ik
685
yeah
I just see it as 4 hours for that is kinda wild in my opinion when it could take 5 min
but 1 question Kenny
How many frames was that?
im not used to giump
color data like 1.3k and ir like 2k
Hm?
How did it take 4 hours?
gimp*
I don’t use that
finding where to do shit and blending stuf for the mosaic
Wdym
hard to explain but there are actually 2 pannels of Ir in that data
Ye but you just make it a color overlay
What’s ur appature?
guess
Idk 5 inch?
6?
Are you collimated?
yea
So this is what I call a quick mosaic
Like super easy to do
Probably 10 panels or so
100 frames per panel
And this is with a 6 inch
100 frames aint getting me shit
Wdym
how long do you think my subs are?
color data with 100 frames are not happening
224mc
To zoomed in
That pic above is all off one shoot
Like color and detail from each pannel
Panel
that makes sense
to big pix size
Wym
if i get more zoomed out ill loose detial
You won’t
Even if you do it will be so minor it compensates for the days of processing lol
Ye ur chill
Just test a mosaic at full frame
well if u send me a full frame than sure
i dont have a job unlike you 🤣
I may be wrong but I know if you just practice and trial and error every clear night your find your workflow with your equipment
Wdym
i would never have the money for it
You have a good camera lol
And a 8 inch scope
You can get really insane pics
Mine are pretty basic tbh
You can do insane stuff with your setup
my cameraq is shit
it was great in 2016.
that was 9 years ago..
Fair
My cam is only like $350
I just sold my dslr for it
I was tired of single shot mosaics with a 5 inch lol
tho. somehow it was 300$..
Huh
swedish prices.,.
Idk much about that
ik. your American..
Ye
okay lemme explain it in american. Place called europe. state in europe called sweden. thats where me lives. Sweden prices big. because america (where the camera is from) far away from sweden.
yeah. kinda hard without tracking that actually works nor goto
Zoom out lol
how?
Take that Barlow off lol
nah
lol
Mine is one of these (been 2 months forgot)
def posssible i got this with a 6" (you prob have seen it already)
Yeah
nicely processed
thanks man, do you think its possible to get a sharper shot with a 6" or will i need a fatter scope?
This looks pretty close to the limit for a 6" unfortunately.
so yes, a fatter scope
damn, the seeing was like 0.8 arc sec with 2m/s jetstream so its logical smth sharper isnt possible with a 6", ill get an 8" quattro for dso (my main focus is dsos) with a better barlow with more magnification so i can also shoot planetary
Thing is you'll max out a 6" in barely above average seeing. Diffraction limit is your limiting factor on most non-shit seeing nights (assuming no collimation or optical issues).
8" you'll see some improvement, but not much. It's only a 33% increase in resolve.
still an improvement
my collimation has remained perfect for 2 years, ive cheaked multyple times, im not joking
Yup. I would usually recommend saving up for a bigger scope as to have a larger jump in aperture, but it's fine since you're doing DSO with it.
idk if an eq6r pro can handle a 10"
and 10" DSO is pain. Need a whole new mount probably, gets expensive quick
ye
that's the issue
i want to be safe from wind so 10"+ would be bad cuz its a wind sail and heavvy
Whereas if you're solely planetary oriented it's just big Dob go brrr. It's fine though, if DSO is your thing the 8" will do nicely.
here in greece in the summer there are strong winds
yeah
Guys if I want to record Saturn to then stack it how long should the videos be because I have the celestron 8 se on the mount that it comes
Hell yeah 🔥
Most planetary is about 90s recordings.
Definitely true for Jupiter, I think Saturn is the same. Because rotation
2 minutes is fine
The most experienced take multiple videos and then derorate the image, I'm clueless about the process so ask @somber stratus for details
2 mins is fine. The length of each video doesn't matter if you choose to derotate. Tbh AS!3/4 can deal with up to ~5 mins just fine.
While I choose to agree with you ... were you one of the folks who said I should go down to 90s when I said I was dropping from 3m to 2m? 🙂
Hey Steve! Long time no talk, been very busy
Tried Saturn for the first time since February
Got a titan eclipse
750 FL, I need a real Barlow
I chose not to use my trashy one because it probably would do more damage than good
These are with my old scope 900mm but a trashy refractor, they aren’t that different…. I need a better Barlow like I said
Hey man, 2 questions, 1. Do I have to worry about how long my Saturn clip is for stacking? I know there is only so much point in more than a certain number of frames but how can I find that number? I don’t think I should worry abt field rotation with Saturn and I’m not trying to pull detail.
- Is it possible for a 6 inch to see the gap in rings yet?
No idea. It's highly dependent on aperture, seeing, and the target at hand.
8", usually average seeing, Jupiter/Saturn/Mars.
Did trash seeing once, yikes.
So I wouldn't be surprised if I did, but it's key to have context. For Saturn I've always said 2m is fine, as far as I can remember.
Each planet has different optima.
This is the whole idea of derotation. You capture say 15 x 2m and derotate them as to integrate 30m of data.
Fair. That's what I was thinking too since my main target at the time was Jupiter, I was told that Saturn is similar. Didn't really get to discuss Mars.
90s sounds right for Jup.
Ohh i see, can that help show the gap at all? Because of when i came into astro, I have never seen gaps in the rings
Possibly.
6" is enough to resolve the cassini div, but it's poorly oriented atm
indeed
This doesn’t apply if they are different exposures right? I took Saturn in so many different ones from 4:30-6 am
It is possible if you weight the stacks accordingly but it’s a bit of a pain.
Typically you just stick with the same exposure time
I would rather wait until tonight haha
What do you recommend?
I have found 8ms is pretty good
~10ms is a safe bet. Anything from 5-15ms is fine.
Cool, thanks Tom
I usually have mine set at just under 10ms, 9.75, and have found that it's safe.
Cool
Saturn images were not bad, by the way.
I also have a Celstron 130SE ... 130/750 ... so 5" F5.77 Now if I could only find the image of Jupiter that was taken with it.
Wasn't bad for the seeing.
Thanks man
With pipp, is ser or avi better? Or does it not matter
I take my stuff directly to AutoStakkert. It'll stack the frames in the ser or avi.
Is a push-to upgrade wort it for my 12” dob?
Sometimes I have trouble finding planetary nebulae
I found one at 150€
Second hand
Less than ideal seeing on that
It was very bad, Canada just screwed me with wild fire smoke and the Sahara desert is also hitting me with dust
I can’t win
You have my empathy and sympathy. Coming from someone who also has less than ideal seeing.
Tom could you get pluto and sharon like ik it sounds funny but what abt getting them as 2 little low quality specs
He will not, Pluto is too low from his location.
I mean, that is probably the only thing limiting him from imaging it.
Interest too, he doesn't do much of niche imaging. 
y'know I feel like people underestimate just how small and far Pluto is
like, vastly.
It's only about 2/3rds the size of our moon, but orbits on average around ~6 billion kilometers from the sun. Mars, for comparison, orbits ~230 million kilometers away.
the fact that Hubble could barely resolve Pluto as a few pixels, I doubt even the most incredible amateur planetary rig could resolve Pluto as anything more than a single pixel, possibly not even a gargantuan observatory telescope could do it.
Except for Tom ... I'm convinced that the laws of physics would bend for him if he wanted to image Pluto. Him and Damien.
"Oh those guys? Here, let me move the atmosphere around, huh, that is pretty distant, well I guess we can throw some more light. I'm sure that we can work something out so the mirror can resolve it a little larger and better."
Meanwhile if I want to image solar or Jupiter. "Yo, Steve's out! LET'S GET THOSE CLOUDS AND JET STREAMS! How's that you little $&@#$! Aw you can still see something? Here, take some wildfire smoke and Sahara sand! $#@** you Steve!"
Ahem.
We have a lot in common
Everything ok?
Declination is too poor. Only rises to like 14 degrees.
I did vesta just a handful of weeks ago bruh
And for the record I’ve imaged Venus nightside, Uranus rings and mapped Ganymede in the past.
It's all in the frequency ma boi. Discipline.


Holy crap
Not tryna be weird but how old are you?
You're being weird. Why does that matter ?
Just curious lol
17
I saw the Ganymede map, impressive. Tried to image Ganymede with my 8". It definitely didn't resolve as well as yours. Smaller aperture and seeing likely wasn't as ideal as what yours seems to be.
Finslly investing in better gear
@white prawn
I think we good seeing and this my 6 inch will do worlds better than no Barlow
Seeing, I’m getting hit with Canada wild fire smoke
Out of nowhere
Well actually it’s out of Canada.
Wdym
I'm uploading it
Looks weirdly denoised
Yea I think a bit of basic noise reduction and then just camera raw
I de rotated too
Looks like primarily camera raw denoise was used. That makes it look very plasticky
Best to let derotation do all the denoise or if needed use a little bit of gaussian blur
Can also use despeckle but makes it look very artificial too sometimes
First of all calm down on the pings pls and second look at ur dms.
Can I please get some feedback on my moon shot from last night
Anything I should change?
Idk. Slightly to sharp near ina imo
Bit too much sharpened, colour looks great, is it a mosaic?
What did u use to sharpen?
The overall looks nice. Try adjusting the darker regions so they look more natural. Having everything at the same brightness, in an HDR style, often looks exaggerated. The colors are pretty nice, although i would try to bring more natural tones, less orange, more cyan and brown and little bit more blue.
May not be the best version but here's my typical color balance.
Registax
I agree I like the natural look as well I was going for a more rough and sharpened look this time around
It was only 25% of 15,000 images
Tonight I took 90k
So we’ll see how that comes out
Thats also a lot
Huh?
I generally reject 95-99% of the frames
My line crosses at 25%
?
So per panel close to 1k?
Yea
I am assuming you stack induvisual panels and then stich them?
it will be better with less grains
Here were some separate high res shots I got last night, prob about 3,000 frames each
The grainy effect you had in your mosaic
Where
Zoom in on lava lake
Oh ye I should have fixed that part
Stack less
There are stacking atrefacts
I’m doing 20% tonight
Show me
Not seeing it
Are you using autostakkert for stacking?
Yea
Try astrosurface once
Why
Wanna check if it is stacking error
I already deleted the files
Aww man
And I’m not tryna download a whole software rn lol
Nvm
I don’t see the artifacts
Look closely on the side of craters, its duplicated, everwhere
Everywhere its duped
That’s the crater lol
Shifted bit to top right
Yeah thats the crater
lol
where is this?
What one?
same part (test stack of abt 500 frames)
left
Theophilus Crater
i see
Somethin' ain't right in your stacks.
Some motion blur or miscollimation going on.
Motion blur
And also go smoother on the wavelets, the diffraction is too visible.
Exactly
I thought it was stacking error
Lmao that's not a style. Just an error in either the acquisition or processing. Seeing can produce something like that too so i don't rule it out.
