#Planetary Imaging
1 messages · Page 31 of 1
I think you're at a less FL than me, so I think that can be a factor too.
It wasn't too bad
But yeah, that's definitely a large difference.
With Mercury out of the way (in poor conditions), I've finally imaged the planets
Not sure if you've said this already, but what camera do you use?
I use the zwo asi585
Oh yeah true
Does zwo120mc good?
Main cam or just guide camera?
Main cam
Go for something like the Neptune c
Can i capture nebula with this?
Imx178 is just referring to the sensor. Some cams have the same sensor but are differently built, which can affect how good it is to a certain degree
Yea. Unless you plan to lucky image though, you'll need a star tracker
What setup do you have?
I dont have really fancy setup
Just celestron 80eq with diy ra goto system
That's a pretty good starter setup
Oh thats good?
I caputred jupiter with my phone with this telescope
Heres planetary with my phone
I dont have really good phone also, just samsung a53
Is this good for a 5 inch and a zwo 715c?
Ayuh.
That's a good amount of detail; it almost looks like what I can do with my 8" in decent seeing, but shrunk down a little. Good work.
Thanks!
hey, im wondering
i had a celestron 80eq and im using dslr and phone, my issue is when doing planetary images with my dslr, planet is too small, is it any good option between upgrading it to 2x barlow lens? or should i use eye projection, since i have 10mm eyepiece
That is actually really good photos with just an A53
thank youu
just transferring files
Progression of venus
It's really cool to see just how much change there is, regarding its apparent size in the sky (assuming these were all taken at the same magnification)
this is the place to talk abt moon right?
Yeah you can
my first ever mineral moon https://discord.com/channels/794642864218439681/1348478606762049537
Yep! The size of each image relative to each other is accurate
Ohh… that’s why it looked so big last time I saw it… I thought I was just tripping
hi is there is any tips for beginners i use only my phone and a 114 mm telscope and i want to take photos of planet like jupiter etc and nebulas
i have 2 nice pics to derotate of jupiter but also a 3rd one sliiiiightly less sharp, should i incluude it or will it make the pic worse than with 3?
idk I've never derotated before
oh ok
have u derotated before
no idk how
can u help me a bit pls?
i lost some sharp jupi data but win jupos still has it when i logged in, how can i recover it?
can u maybe help me?
@flint siren this
deleted accidentally
on ssd
??
this is what i mean by win jupos has it
really?!
ok thx
Gonna try to image my first galaxy tonight with my dob
(M82 or 81)
sry for bothering u again but i wanna ask one last thing, i sharpened my pics to derotate but itt still failed, ddo u know maybe y?
On my derotation I sharpen "just enough" to let it see some detail, but don't fully sharpen. Then I sharpen the final derotated image for the full thing. @somber stratus, @livid sierra, @sharp ridge, or @vapid depot might be able to provide better guidance on that. I know if they said that I did something wrong and I got lucky for having a good derotated image, I'd listen to them.
Looks good
To what extent? I've been told to sharpen "just enough" so the software can see the boundaries, and to finalize after the fact. Worked out for me. If that's not right and I should basically final-prep everything before I send it through WinJUPOS then I'll do that instead.
i literally told u i did😭
thats a dif pic
i didnt use it
i removed 1 pic and it worked
the pic i removed was taken 10min apart but the other 2 only 2 mins apart
oh ok
heres finnal result
ok
yo tom
problem? 🤓
Also I'm 90% sure I've mentioned here before how much to sharpen before derotation
multiple times at that...
maybe not in this channel specifically, but the server in general
dont think ive been into pllanetary long enough to hear u talk abt it
im new to this
idk who told you "just enough" but that's not particularly good practice.
Yeah, didn't mean you specifically. Apologies if it came across like that. Was referring to long time members
with the same repeat questions
lol
nice result here btw
thx, seeing was mid, i had some INSANE seeing 3 days ago and i shot jupi then too but it turned out terrible for some reason, worse than the mid seeing one, atleast i got some crazy sharp moon pics with that 11/10 seeing
This is all there is to know btw. It's common for people to denoise each single stack too much and then it's hard (or impossible) to get that detail back after derotation. It's an art of using the least amount of denoise possible such that derotation will still achieve a smooth result.
Yeah seeing can be odd like that. Can look stable but the stacks come out mediocre
seeing when i took the moon pic was CRISP
good seeing? how the hell haha
thats insane, this is mine with a 3 inch
Manuel though
Same camera
Yeah the seeing was exceptional at the time, thats really unusual for my location tho. That jupiter with 3 inch is insane
thank you man, im reprocessing rq, my setup is so bad
yeah first one better
Ngl the last one is by far my best animation
I’m hoping I get to understand it in time for lunar eclipse
It starts about 2:30am for me Friday morning
I wanna make a eclipse animation of moon going from normal to red back to normal
i should check it out, maybe its happening where i am
Where do you live?
What camera will you use
State/country
Same one, idk if I’ll be able to fit the moon or not might switch to my phone
Asi715mc
need to learn it, beacuse with a tiny camera it should make a high res moon mosaic
just need to change my terrible eq2
yeah but with my widefield one
the planetery setup is just one of those long newts with a bad mount
Haha gotcha
Cant wait to see your jupiter results with the 6 inch!
Thank you!
I think I’ll try Saturn again too. I know it’s bad time in sky but I’m not satisfied with mine from 2 months ago at all
140k frames 💀💀💀
Yeahh overkill I know
Uhhh idk I have a Manuel so I took a lotttt of put them together in pipp
Like 25 mins ish idk
Unless you have crazy huge scope Saturns rotation won’t matter so
Although I didn’t know there is little different between 90k and 140k
At that point you know it doesn’t help
Oops i was about too ask about that
how can i measure things on the moon with win jupos?
@flint siren do you know?
how to make the measuring tool work
@somber stratus how are these for a 3 inch manuel scope? @mossy juniper
Lookin good yo
3"! What scope is this?! This looks phenomenonal man, good job. That's some impressive detail in there, you obviously had some fantastic skies that night eh
100%%
Celestron 80az
150$
That's friggin awesome. Pushing that scope to the max
Yesir
I’m getting a 6” tmr
Wish I had it today haha
6" newt?
yes
@mossy juniper
😅
Would be smoother but I stopped to talk to a guy asking about the hobby mid way through
I was in public so
It’s an animation)
Haha you can see the point where you stopped to talk and by the time you got back to it field rotation had kicked I
Yep haha
found a lovely mars capture from feb 28 i completely forgot about, 2 big clouds visible
can i have ur stacked non processed image of Jupiter? (The Io Transit)
i wanna see what i can do w it
Which Io transit image? Do you have a date
alr lemme find it
@somber stratus Jupiter 26-Feb-25
here's the best single stack
thankyou 😄
also mb for asking but could you take a look at my jupiter data? (Io Transit) First image is IR second one is Full Spectrum
here is my attempt at it 😛 (i suck at processing)
okay fixed colors alot better
@somber stratus before vs after
What program are you using?
used registax6 for sharpness and windows photo editor for colors
Nice, any particular reason you don’t use the white balance in Regi?
uh not really. just never dont bother learning smt new when i already have a method that works 100% fine
Lately I’ve been using AstroSurface more and I much prefer it’s wavelets compared to regi
A lot of people like stacking in AstroSurface but I’ve stuck with as4 for that
ik that astrosurface isbetter
really?
I don't know many who stack in astrosurface
what do you use for stacking?
Autostakkert!4, like most people.
Could u check them out?
@somber stratus ?
Your R channel is out of focus. Not sure what's up with that
The ir or normal data?
The first one, though the full spectum one has a load of CA (blue is out of focus)
I assume you're using a frac
explains the IR being out of focus too
frac?
I didnt use a ca corrector
refractor
hmm
Or well dob to be more exact
did you use a barlow?
It's a piece of garbage then.
Yeah ik. Got it for 30$
explains the CA
Yup
also your IR filter has blue leak.
You have told me that before lol
It's very likely an achromat so yeah
This is pretty pronounced CA though. Hardily subtle, even for a cheap barlow.
unlucky
Well jupiter was only like 50° above horizon
CA isn't related to altitude, it's an optical issue of the barlow
Here is the processed image btw (processed by Zol)
You're probably better off without the barlow tbh
until you get a higher quality one
I am not. Trust me
Here is without 😭
Could you try to process it tho? (The ir data)
This
@somber stratus any good 3x barlow recomendations?
It's probably overkill but I guess you can't go wrong with Powermates from TeleVue
Arent those expensive af?
I think their 2.5x is 300€ 
😭
Celestron XCel LX 3x barlow is really nice apochromatic barlow that I've been using for a while now
new it's like $120 but I was able to snag one second hand for $60
Oo
If I find one for like 60 then I might also get it
I have the XCel 3x too, and is very good
cheap too
Uhhh dont know about that but yeah
It's my primary barlow for the 16". I use a 4x powermate for the 24" though
It's ~$90 no?
More like worth the price
not too bad
120 acording to @fathom oak
Ah, even still. Worth it. Quality comes with a price
$120 is not overly expensive in astrophotography
yup
Yeah ofcourse but its still money😅
Fixed up the B channel with some not-so-scientific channel manipulation.
Oh alr
I wanna know what the IR data looks like with the right processing
All the IR is out of focus lmao. It's just blue leak that's in focus.
Its sharper tho? No?
Well when i look at the videos the ir data obv looks alot better
Cant look at tifs on phone:/
Can u take a ss of it.
?*
16 or 24"?
16
24" with the 4x powermate. Similar performance wrt CA
B is lower res due to seeing.
Depends how you define 'oversampled'.
I run both scopes at an f/ratio that is equal to ~6.5x the camera pixel size in microns.
Critical sampling for blue light
Like how small are your pixels compared to the smallest detail you can poossibly see
I believe it's 4 pixels covering the rayleigh limit
Definitely hampered by the barlow quality
Do I take this as a compliment or not?😭🙏🏻
Also you have the picture of the day
On astrobin
Untracked makes things difficult though. I've seen much better coming from an 8", but those are tracked and using several tens of minutes of derotation.
Yeah. The video i did was 1min and 3sec (somehow kept in the fov)
Can u send the best u have seen with an 8"?
WHAT?! How?!
I mean this is the limit tbh. Good summer Texas seeing, and Jupiter at just under 50 arcseconds.
Yeah
Btw I saw a video of someone using an 11" for the planets.. and uhm he Kinda got as sharp images aa ur 24"..
Planets taken this summer vacation with C11
Thanks to @twastro for processing mars data
Here is the video
The jupiter images are crazy..
I know Ken personally. He does some great stuff
Oh. Lol yeah. I was shocked when I saw his live view.
I swear you would prob know damian peach personally😭
Just a matter of time until I get excellent seeing with the 24" ;)
Winter here is pretty rough with seeing.
Yes, speak with him often.
Yeah
Yeah tho 1 issue here in northern sweden.
During the summer (for like 2months straight) we dont get any night.
Awsome!
Btw can u image HH30?
I think you would be like the only person in history to pull detail out of it
Mb for sending a dso image in Planetary imaging
Its like slightly smaller then mars in the sky...
@somber stratus ?
I'm sure it's much smaller than Mars if that's all the res JWST can pull
Well the disk is like 4 arc sec across
Yeah..
Its like mag19
Btw here is the size. Calculated bt my friend Gandalf
You should deff image an Exoplanet
@somber stratus whats ur tiktok?
Huh, I haven't used it in years.
Oh
Still got an acc?
Need to give u creds somehow lol (posted the image u processed on tiktok)
Here
Hey, whoever took these did a great job!
that GoTo dob will be a lifesaver
haha yes, if im getting this with 3 inch i can't wait for future
Sweet, you may also be able to do DSO in a pinch
Here, have a mars.
amazing
Also. I. Hate. Edge. Rind.
Here, have an Orion in the planetary channel
If you're gonna leave DSO on planetary, do it right.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f3/Orion_Nebula_-_Hubble_2006_mosaic_18000.jpg****
😁
also there was this random object blocking my view tonight and I cannot fugure out what
It might be pluto
chekc stellarium
oop, its Iapetus
Some previous image of Jupiter I have
maybe someone might want to take a look at the single stack...?
@somber stratus Any advice on dealing with field rotation while making animations with a maneul mount? @thick heron
At no point did I give permission to post the result on your own social media
But you do you I guess
Mods get him
I use a custom python script myself
Nvm, I see it’s my process of your image, not the other way around. Misunderstood you at first.
Ohhh damn haha
Can you manually do it? I’m trying to rn
Im wondering what tools do you use
I have same diameter like your telescope
What is your scope?
what scope?
Its my data 😭
I think it's fair to ask before posting elsewhere with someone's name attached to it. If I was asked to process data I assume they just want to see an alternative take on the raw data.
Not really. I mean you can, but it looks wobbly most of the time
Thanks Oakley haha
I see, thanks.
I’m very inexperienced with coding and stuff so I think I’ll just try my best to put it at the same plane using the storms on the planet
I have about 40 frames
Videos *
Back a while ago when I still used my scope on its dob mount, I took this 8 frame animation and manually rotated the frames in registax to help with field rotation. The result is slightly wobbly but I think it's alright
One tip I used is to toggle the "view zoomed" window in registax and zoom it out to like 1x or something so you can see the whole planet in it. Then rotate the planet so that the cloud bands are parallel with the crosshairs on zoom window
just as a little guide to know how much to rotate
It’ll take a while
what program are you creating the animation in?
pipp
try turning on the object stabilization thing
what is that? the planatary setting?
in processing options turn on Object/Planetary mode and enable object detection and center object in each frame
kk
thats only for final animation though right?
i dont have to do that for every frame
?
yeah
tbf I don't know for sure if this works or not
I just noticed that i didn't turn on "center object in each frame" for my gif lol. I'm gonna retry it with that enabled and see if it's smoother
let me know
I don't think it helped lol
mine wasn't very wobbly tbf
you should try yours still
Yoships have you seen mine?
Zach and I planned to both shoot the double eclipse and compare our results
I'm using 8" newt
What are your thoughts on it?
Yeah that might be a good idea
yeah my seeing is trash since I live in the middle of the south east US jetstream
yeah I think I like this better. Thanks for the feedback
here's a quick screen recording of one of my raw videos
so you can see my trash seeing 
can you show me exactly what to turn on?
i dont have that option wtf
I think my camera has an IR cut built in unfortunately. It's the ZWO ASI120MC-S btw
Weird. Can you show?
wait did you mean IR cut or IR pass?
What else do you click on the first tab?
ik both would be useless if mine has a IR cut built in but just wondering
weird. Anyway it shouldn't matter because the important settings are still there
ye ik
did autostakkert not put the planet in the middle when stacking?
it did
but the original roi's are slightly different each frame
so weird
You said that an IR filter would help during bad seeing. Was just wondering whether you meant IR cut or IR pass
at this point i might just accept field rotation
why would that be?
thats 12 frames btw
because they are from 3 different files
each with slightly different roi's
close but not the same
You should shoot with the same ROI for all of them
not out of focus enough 
Haha
no duh 
what did I do bruhhhh
I'm tryin to learn
Does "IR filter" just always mean IR pass?
You mean cut
no I don't
Idk then
ok
I feel like IR cut could also be classified under "IR filter"
that's why I was asking which you meant
sorry
I think I just live in the wrong place for planetary lol
No you don’t lol
Heroic we have same sky’s
It’s fine
Is summer seeing better?
Ohh
Oh
Notnhere
Not here
We have high humidity
Yeah
Oh wow what
Didn’t know that
If there is humidity but the air is still?
Is it good seeing?
I see
I also got this the other night (same night I captured that rotation animation) and it's probably my best image of the GRS
What is GRS
Great Red Spot
wait what
Imagine
my screen is different
thats how mine looks
ive just loaded the chat, so mine is how discord has saved it
Looks pretty decent
I have a crazy idea u can try
It's already been done. Don't even need to write it from scratch.
make image measurements for every of these 33 frames in winjupos ant then "derotate" with jus a single frame 33 times, each of these frames should be aligned
That works but it's a bit tedious
I tried this with mars when i wanted to compare its angular sizes
Yes, but I can post the script
yeah can't deny lol
It was myself and M63 from r/AP who wrote it. He did the heavy lifting and I've just optimised it.
You just need a python installation. I run it via Spyder but can be done in cmd too I think.
So if I download a python instillation then what? I copy and paste it and just start it? Do I have to move files like
Download that. You need to change the parameters each time, e.g planet name, date/time and file locations. This is for my lat/long too so you need to change that.
Download python and Spyder (or Anaconda Navigator which also has Spyder). Open this .py file I sent in Spyder and then you should be able to run it.
Thanks
as long as the python installation has permissions to access your OS. Can't remember where that is but it's during the installation.
i downloaded python
I double clicked this and it finished installing and everything, how do I open it
Oh wait I forgot it
Got it
Open up windows powershell real quick to just to check something. Just search "Powershell"
Okay
That’s powershell
type "pip --version" without quotations
A space after pip?
And click enter?
ye
coolio
Cool
You need to install some packages to run the script. I'll get the commands for you
Alright
pip install scikit-image
Do I run it on python or powershell?
All good
Copy and paste this?
Okay
should download some stuff
yeah it's currently installing
Oh okay got it
now do astropy^
I'd download spyder btw as you have to edit the script a little bit each time you run it. https://www.spyder-ide.org/
And it's easier this way
Almost done
Once you have that installed you should be able to navigate to the folder you've downloaded my .py script to, or just drag-drop it.
I really appreciate the help Tom
np
Spider is almost done
its been sitting there a while near the end, spyder
there we go
This opened up
These are the only things you need to edit. Your files need to be in WinJupos naming format (which is enabled in your capture software, be it Firecapture or Sharpcap if you haven't already). Then you just copy the file address into the top "imageDirectory", then same again for an empty folder where the field derotated images will be saved. Set a reference time which doesn't need to be anything specific but I tend to choose one of the same timestamps as one of the images.
Then lat/long in decimal degrees. This should save once you've edited it and run it once.
'planet' is self explanatory.
Hopefully it works first time without issues.
Cool. Now drag drop the .py file I sent earlier. Download and just slap it into that window
Yep done
Now just edit the parameters as described here^
should work, in theory
this to run it btw
If they aren't in WJ format, yes, annoyingly
I’m not sure what WJ format is, however I will read what you said
yup. The script will read the file name so it needs to be in this exact format
What comes after isn't of concern, just the date to start the file name.
This may be a dumb question but
What capture software do you use?
At what point on here do you start typing it, also sharpcap
Just the D:/example needs changing
Do I have the “
leave the quotation marks and r
Easiest way is to just copy the address directly from your image directory. I.e open the folder as normal in windows file explorer. Right-click the last item and "copy address as text"
Ohhhh
D:\ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY\250312\AS_P4
That’s so much easier
e.g
Then create a new folder inside that as "DFR" for example, then do the same again
My brain is hurting, but I’m learning slowly
this is where the rotated files will be saved
yeah it's a bit complex at the start but you soon get used to it
Once you learn you always have so
yup
So is your directory different than mine?
Yes, it will be different everytime. It's where you keep your files
My dumbass changed the file name when I made it lol
The stacks
So ima have to manually type it back
I’m honestly really confused😅😅
Where do I find this
I’m in downloads
Find where your images are.
Done
Right click 'Allysa' here for example
Then highlight this and ctrl+v to paste
I'd make a new folder inside this one (as you normally would). I.e make it inside 'Allysa' and go into it.
Do the same again, but pasting it onto the line of code below
Alright
You're basically setting up an empty folder which the script will save the new files into. It's all so that it doesn't overwrite your original files.
Here?
I get it, just never learned before lol
Yes, but you need to delete the D:/ too, that was just my example D-drive.
same with the line above
should read just r"C:\Users...."
And the second line has the new folder? can't see here as it's clipped off
cool
I named it Allysa results
yeah that's fine
Now change the lat/long to your location
doesn't need to be insanely accurate but within 0.1 is nice
Alright
Easiest way of doing it is just google maps and zoom in on your observing location. Lat/long is shown in the URL
Then round them to nearest 0.1 if you like
to avoid doxxing lmao
Alright
All this is saved for later use btw. It's just painful setting it up
Ctrl+S to save the file as normal
WJ naming settings in Sharpcap btw @lyric dome
Thanks
Now change to 'jupiter' on the line below
as this is set to Mars atm
Also you have a \in front of the C: in your folder address. This needs to be removed
Then you're ready. Ctrl+S then run it.
Where is this slash?
Do you mean this?
Should be r"C:\Users\...."
Yes
Reference time but this can be left alone. You might find an upside-down Jupiter but they should still be all aligned 
Alright haha
Are your file names all in WJ format?
Uh like the input file?
You'll probably have to manually update them which is painful
Do you have the date/time for each?
Are they labelled by minute?
I’ll show
ok
I mean after this I can just send you some of my data to test it on to check everything is working
They all have the time and stuff on top right
Top left *
That’s from original video
Oh that's really useful actually.
Yeah yeah
Just go to the midpoint of each video and use that timestamp
I crop it out when stacking though
Cuz stacking does NOT work with them there hahaha
I’ll do that
Will take a minute
So what exactly am I changing the file names to?
2025-03-12-0227_2 would be this one.
It's YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM_.M
the last number is the hardest
it's decimal minutes
0 = 0s
1 = 6s
2 = 12s
3 = 18s
.
.
.
9 = 54s
But don't worry about being out by 6 seconds, just pick the closest
Also a prerequisite of the script is that the camera isn't rotated in the imaging train during the entire session btw.
So for another example, this would be 2025-03-12-0224_5
or at least over the period of time you're aligning a timelapse
What exactly do you mean?
5 probably as it's closer to 30secs, but yeah.
Thanks
Can't be taking the camera out and changing filter. It loses rotational consistency. The rotation seen from stack-to-stack has to be solely due to field rotation.
Yes it is
Cool. I mean it's pretty common to have this, just letting you know
Alright
Also It's best to apply this script after sharpening as it can introduce interpolation artefacts if applied to the raw stacks, which are then subsequently sharpened.
But whatever, for testing purposes it's fine
Yes I did
I’m busy so I didn’t do them individually I just applied same wavelets to all
Better than nothing but yk
Once you've edited all the file names you should be able to run the script.
post any errors you have when you get to that point
Yes sir
but hopefully it runs first time
Yeppp
if successful it should spam this in the console
hmm
Any idea?
Go to powershell again and type pip install scikit-image again
should say it's already satisfied
Ok
Go back to spyder and click this
it wont say conda, ignore that, just want to see what it says
Oh ok, cool, change that
go on this then check the drop-down
there should be a python installation of some kind
maybe
I haven't had this issue before
Not that no. You need to find where your python is installed I think
Ok
Type python into windows search
right click (show file location)
should come up with some short cuts
right click that shortcut and open file location again
Cool, now copy that address as we did before and paste it in here
Just go to browse file location and navigate to this folder
I see
then click on the python exe
inside that folder
to select it
Should be something like C:\Python313\python.exe
I don’t think I copied the right thing
No I’m just typing
No, navigate to it
Should probably do that
this folder
then select the exe
I’ve made it this far
apply this setting change then try run the script again
Please don’t give up on me although I do respect your time
I have another idea so dw if this doesn't work.
Calm. Ok now just install these directly.
pip install scikit-image
pip install astropy
in the same console
seperatly right?
I used to, before WJ had built-in field derotation
probably WJ tbh lol
This is useful for timelapses though
Dope
Are those downloading again?
I know a bit of C# from game dev but no python
They are either finished or downloading yes
Yes they finished
Ok now file>restart
or just close the app and run it up again
but make sure to ctrl+s the file
to save the changes you did earlier
grrr
So now what?
python's not being much of a bro right now is it
ok go back to the settings and select default again
then do pip install the modules in the console, again
then try run it
Where is the settings?
bottom right
😭
setting somewhere else then
Found it
And you said click default?
Internal
then apply
then pip install all modules again
then restart
then run
What do I type
these?
ye
hmm
Okay we have a different era but that one is gone
show
It’s not 😭 did I type it wrong or something
weird
I have patience
show the whole of line 16
scroll across here
yeah, remove DFR
Kk

Thank you man
I suddenly love my equatorial mount a lot 
So fricking cool
Bahahaha
Good thing is
I’ll never rename a stack again 🤣
I’ll just sort in files
Tom was probably in bed trying not to fall asleep and the second I finished he was out cold haha
lmao cool man have fun
Rio. I haven't tested Nexy on anything other than Jupiter yet; when I was able to get that image the seeing was horrid so I didn't try on Mars. I considered myself danged lucky to get the Jupiter I did with Nexy because I think it got a little more detail than Rio's image.
@somber stratus
I finished changing all the file names
I’m gonna restart
Didn’t work
Ah 😭 why
I didn’t touch the damn thing
Do you know how this works?
It says something wrong with row 38
@somber stratus oh my God. I am doing jupiter rn and I think this is the best seeing I have ever had.
The live view looks almost as sharp as my processd jupiter
Yeah it’s the same problem as before
Probably missed one. Not an issue going forward once you have the WJ filenaming enabled in future sessions
However I checked and they are all right?
I’ll show
Not sure then. It’s an issue with the file names not being long enough I think. It’s trying to turn the decimal minutes number to an integer then x6. Probably an issue with the naming you’ve done
Yeah, the one with 10
Found it
Needs to be 0-9
Like i said it shouldn’t be an issue going forward once you have the WJ naming enabled in sharpcap
Yesirr
i think i messed up on order of file names, however i like it and im going to use this in future
its so much faster
look! 😄
Io Disapearing Behind Jupiter
Nice
Thankyou:D
