#Planetary Imaging
1 messages Ā· Page 30 of 1
how
Colour > auto
@low tendon
is that in pipp? pipp turned it mono
Nvm then
pipp said smth abt mono
Is there anything it says when it gets stuck at 8% or does AS!4 just crash or what?
What do you mean it gets stuck
Do you see it get stuck at 8% for 2 seconds and decide it froze and close the program?
the loading bar doesnt progress
For how long
2 hours
Does the software itself still respond
ye
And youāve tried stacking in Astrosurface?
he has field rotation
alt az š
field rotation
How long are the videos that you see field rotation? Would 90s show it?
its in total 5min worth of40 sec vids stiched togheter
So stack each 40s vid separately?
i meaan 10 sec vids oops
and then?
Are you trying to rotate?
im trying to stack a lot off data to get a really sharp shot
thats not how it works
?
we gotta stack only the good frames to get a sharper pic
Stack each vid separately, toss it into WinJUPOS, see what happens.
However, with Alt-AZ you might wind up having to just make a gif that shows the planetary/field rotation
ik bbut mmore data has MORE good frames bro
WinJupose has moon derot?
If you have field rotation the angle of view moves.
i see
I've heard of people using it for other planets.
not moon tho
it can do other planets dont know abt moon
@low tendon @left spindle I see a moon opt in the menu
oh
has to work then
this is 25% stack of 10 sec so imagine 25% stack of 5minn video
ok but i donnt want no gif
THAT. LOOKS. PROMISING.
I haven't rotated with WinJUPOS. I did my rotation by making a bunch of tif images then making them into a gif with Gimp.
ye but i dont want a gif
WAITTTT WHAT?!!?!!? THE INDIVIDUAL VIDEOS ARENT GLLITCHED WTF PIPP CAUSED THAT
I started w/ a gif then did an avi.
Also note - I handled that in the way that I knew how to do it and learned along the way and would still have to bring up the tutorial to do it again. If there's a different way to do a rotation that yields the type of file you want at the end, I'm not aware of it, and that doesn't mean that it isn't out there, it just means that I do have less experience making rotation files than others.
š
FCKING PIPP DDID THAT
u didnt choose planetary right?
DUDE
i chose close up moon
huh?
nvm i didnt'
phew
thhats not pphew that means we dont know the probleem
dont choose close up moon it converts colour to mono
choose nothing then process it through
ok
that should fix it
so i can turn the gif into a pic?
Or you can take the individual stacked files send them through WinJUPOS for a pic instead of doing a rotation video
Short answer, yes
oh ok but i will need some guidance on how to do that
which is easier?
also do u reckon i can get blue lake wwith that resolution?
Probably WinJUPOS. @vapid depot sent a link at one point with step-by-step how to do a derotation using that software. I will have to find it later.
100%
yay
i barely got it with lesser resolution
ok ima start stacking
on my mobile so hard to judge from my angle. @left spindle is probably right though, based on what I saw when I was sitting in front of the computer screen.
Sigh. Real life chores call again.
cya
wait a min
for for winjupos i sharpen before, right?????
i dont think you need that for moon tho
i also got mars data with same seeing at zenith so its gonna be CRISPPPPP
AND JUPI
Yes. When I did my de rotated Jupiter image I sharpened not all the way before I sent it through WinJUPOS Just enough so that boundaries could be seen. After WinJUPOS gave me an image, I did a final sharpening.
nice
ima stack mars now
okay
how much data until rotation is a problemmon mars?
7min?
10 minutes?
yeah should be abt 5-7
oh ok
same as earth
WTF MY MARS DATA IS GONE
š±
NVM PHEW
phew
gtg sleep byeee
gn
Doubt WJ will work
Donāt think it will work for lunar closeups
Wouldnāt know how at least
my mars stack is quite pixelated but when i drizzle the stacking freezes
it stops stacking
Found the clip. Mind confirming that you don't mind if I send in a DM? Just being extra sure that sharing it won't violate rules. Thanks!
y would i not wwant u to send it to my dms? send it ofc
should i drizzle?
Same. Still havnt seen a soln arpund that. I think its a ram thing (mine's also 16gigs)
I wouldn't. I usually don't. I haven't since I moved from DSLR to astro cam.
No this looks more like tiny APs and the moon moving through the fov too much
you got bismuth crystals growing on your camera sensor
cromch :3
i love eating bismuth crystals....,,,
real ^~^
ur profile says you use a non motorized eq3
how do u do untracked DSO at such focal legnth
with such detail
and 0.3s exposure
im going to get onstep
yes
like next year
bc no money
its not that expensive
if you get it all yourself instead of those dumb kits its super cheap
I HAVE 50P TO MY NAME
the motors are like 10 bucks each and the gears and belts are like 10 bucks in total
Ā£0.50
allowance?
oh alr
thats the best mercury i have seen tbh
its a hard target
yeah really hard
yo can u help me out
what u need
is this too much movement?
idk looks fine
you won't get a good stack on the edges
idek if it stacks the parts that goes away
I'm not a planetary dude
i will crop
this is what happens when i stack it tho
damn did u allign it
you need to get the app to allign it so nothing is drifting
what app
its all in one
you would probably want that one
wwhen i try to allignn in pipp it removes aall but one frameš
gives me a 0 second vid
1 piic
i also have field rotation tho
its not much but its there
@low tendon increase your AP size a lot first of all
You used way too tiny a size
Second, when you press analyse, does it actually find an anchor?
Or does it fail
i used 400 annd still same thing
you would probably want to try astrosurface
yes but i have field rotattion
how do i solve it
it does
am i doins smth wrong? Stacking worked when i stacked a single 10 sec viid
wait did it fail??
Yeah
Thatās the problem probably
If you scroll through the frames after analysing and it failing to find an anchor youāll probably see the frames jumping all over the frames
there are some few yes
how can ii solve tthis???
In AS!4 thereās a feature that when enabled has AS!4 look for an anchor point itself, which works well sometimes
Otherwise keep trying to place an anchor in different spots and analysing until it works
You can adjust the anchor pointās size with the number keys
Place it on a contrasty spot thatās easily distinguishable from the rest
wait a minute..im using AS!3
uhhh
Download AS!4
yes just did
Do the thing
still same thing, i let the program choose an anchor still fail
You can try having PIPP stabilise the video perhaps
pipp doesnt work either or im doing it wrong, i dont get it tho, why does this not want to stack?
it removes all frames exept one lol
Try astrosurface
ok but how do i solve my field rotation
Record for less time, moon is bright. Donāt need much time
ye but dont u need more time for a sharper pic?
Sure but not to the point you canāt stack it
ok
i managed to stack 2 of the vids toghether
idk how to process it tho
here it is if someone wants too process it as i learn to process moon pics
Use astrosurface
Wait
Is it the same data?
Wdym
we discussed abt it (the field rotation issue)
I only stacked 2 of the 10+ vids bc of field rotation
oh
That data is the 2 vids, ik it has some issues but I just crop them out
okay great
tried combining all of my mars data...
does anybody know how to get rid of these joints?
like to align the surface brightness
they're all kinda different
yo bro
do u drrizzle your mars pics?
oh my mars is quite pixelated and when ii try to stack it with 3x or even 1.5x drizzle it crashes, can u pls try to stack it with drizzle?
ok thx
I recommend .ser format over avi
Nothing to do with pixelating, just for future
ok
are u gonna drizzle it now?
oh
@low tendon
stacking with drizzle 1.5x
40%
of best frames
or what percentage should i pick?
2 or 5
2%?
analyse and u will see y
it wasnt bad isk y its like that
moon same night look
yh
???
thermal stabilisation
wut
ohhhh thats y it looks like shit and so does venus
if u have a dob it should thermostab quickly
i have a mak cass so i have to leave it for a few hrs preferably because of closed tube
hmm do u think 3x would be worth it or nah
too much?
hmm lemme try
idk why but drizzle 3x has some weird artefacts
1.5 x has some of them too but not much
dammit
thank u so much
does thermosteb make pics shharper?
Yes, sometimes optics become pinched because of temperature difference
happened to me
jupiter without thermostab
jupiter with optics at perfect temperature
mine looks alr
but in my case i might actually be out of collimation at 1st image
i have a mak cass so its rly important for me to leave the scope for a few hours before imaging
it thermostabs slowly
did you do 3min captures?
before i took the mars pic my scope was left outside for 2 hours and i got a dob sonot the problem
oh its not the problem then
seeing was fire tho
where r u from?
Do yall think a DSLR is acceptable for planets?
greece
also mars was at zenith
prob unlucky
yeah atmosphere is unpredictable
best process of my mars without drizzle wasnt that bad
nvm it was
can i try processing
š š
thatt would be great, wannna also process my sharp moon?
here is my completely raw moon, colour is shit and a lot off artifacts so needs crop
thanks, ill try processing it
thank you
did u like my data?
PIPP website is down (at least in germany) can someone preprocess this for me?
PIPP website has been down for years
Also preprocessing is a very broad term no one knows what you want to be done to your data in PIPP by asking to āpreprocessā it lol
never done planetary before lol
huh
i get those too
oh nvm looks like someones already got you a link
is this edge rind on venus?
Yep
gosh darn...
is there anything i can do about it other than using post processing techniques
using just 6 inches is all i've got
Check your collimation, Iāve had a similar problem because thermal stabilisation caused my optics to be miss collimated
did u try my mars data?
i was busy, ill have some free time today
Have to capture my own Mars data heheheg
nice
a very complex algorithm developedby nasa to improvetheir images. It works best on undersampled (pixelated) images.
autostakkert, siril, dss they have drizzle option
it demands a powerfull pc
I see
I need it
Wait
I'll try
LOOSEN THE CLIPS
With the barlow
YOU'RE STRANgLING IT
Pinched optics
Could it be because of temperatures of -10°C
Iāve thermally stabilised the scope for 1-2h but still
Still wonāt hurt to loosen the mirror clips
On a mak š¤
If anything the scope being cool should lessen the pinching though, no? Mirror shrinks when itās cold
Might be the corrector plate screwed too tight
Didnāt know, no idea how you solve pinched optics on a Mak
Still thank you for helping
I wonāt touch the scope and when the spring comes and itāll be warmer Iāll check again
Here, borrow mine
I donāt mind he can borrow mine too
what is the best filter to pair with w47 to shoot venus clouds?
UV IR cut cuts off some uv and i dont like it
ill be trying to image mercury, what are some useful tips for that? seems like a unique target
like should i use a 2x barlow or should i run at native f12
Eroupa and Io last night, first time imaging in a month
Itās incredibly small and close to the sun, you will struggle, whatās your focal length?
1500 you can probably make out a dot
Do you have a Barlow lens on your setup?
No
I mean I do have one but donāt use it
So that's native focal length image?
I wonder if something is wonky with the optics to get the color effect on Jupiter that you're having. I helped @near quiver with a similar problem involving his Jupiter images. He switched out the Barlow lens and the color wound up being fine.
Sure.
Yeah, something's wonky with the color somewhere. š
š
@white prawn I donāt get it, I even bought an IR cut filter
And it doesnāt seem to rly do much
Could it be my telescopes lenses?
Do you have a different camera to try? If that was an astro cam, can you try DSLR?
Looks sharp
Thank you bro 
banan
A
My first recent pic of Venus
It was so low near the horizon I could even see the turbulence
Preferably youād want to shoot it during the early sunset
So itās higher
Depends where you are
But you want whatever your shooting straight up
Wouldnāt help to much
Seeing is terrible during the day
Daytime seeing is worse then regular seeing
Yes
But depending on where you live on earth, early sunset can have different orientation for planets
For me, Jupiter is highest 1 hour after sundown
So what I was saying is
It depends where you live
But you want to be straight up
Best seeing
Looking through the least air
This is Venus at about 20 degrees above horizon
For my case daytime seeing is for the most part impossible
Whatās your scope?
Manual 8ā dob
Optimal for Venus is about 30 mins before sunset in my experience
Sun at 10 degrees or so
Convection stops by this point but Venus is high up.
Good to know
Yes I meant Jupiter haha, also, hi god of the planets, I bow down to you šš»
Took this with only 1800 frames in my friends yard
Not super amazing was messing around computer was at 3%
This probably my best tbh
Bruh
Bro, Tom is best in the world
I mean
Donāt get me wrong heās really good
But saying heās the best
Is a stretch
Heās top 3 planetary
Top 5 imo
He basically has a universityās equipment
Not many universities have a 24ā
Indeed
Especially in my country
Welp
The largest telescope in my country is older then Hubble
Ehhh
Itās personal opinion
I respect that
How ā¦itās better?
Itās hard to compare photos from different times and different locations
And I donāt think that is Tomās best Saturn
@somber stratus do you want to add some input ?
Tomās photo was taken 2 years after this one was, so your comparing 2 very different Saturn positions
Making it seem like itās a lot better
I agree
The position definetly matters
Yeah
I donāt really think thereās one single metric that can determine if someoneās ānumber 1ā tbh. Like Iām better at some areas than others, same with Damian. That being said Itās definitely not a fair comparison here, given all of these were taken in Barbados and Mars was much closer and therefore larger during the 2016 opposition.
Also Damian is known to use topaz here and there so itās not a fair playing field on the processing side either one could argue, even if it might look less natural. Sharpness again isnāt the only metric arguably.
How to color correct on astrosurface?
W balance and put the roi around the planet
Alright it
I canāt figure out why my color is so off
Why is it pink!
I have a feeling itās because of it being one of those achro refractors
i agree
Honestly it shouldn't do that "just because" it's a refractor. Though if it does then I guess it's on par w/ Celestron's cheap stuff being complete junk worthless garbage.
Yep
Jupiter gettin' groovy wit it
Would anyone care to remove this nasty edge rind from mars? I've attached the final image along with the data should different techniques be used for both
I am also unfamiliar with the derind tool in wavesharp
I can try to run a Gaussian blur in Photoshop, you'll have to wait some time cause I'm in university rn
Woah, had no idea Jupiter looked like that in 2010, I wonder what other strange atmospheric phases it's gone through without being photographed or observed.
Wow almost looks like if it was ai generated
bro this forum has 30k msgs
which scope and camera do you have?
Celestron Starsense 80AZ š
Terrible
Looks ugly lol
is its diameter 80mm?
relatively good resolution though
anywho who would like, can give this a process its 33% of my mars fresh stack, pretty good data for a 3" manual frac imo
yeah I'll give it a shot
Wait, that was with a 3" frac?
Thanks
Yeah
grs looked way bigger then
Is this yours??!??
that's stellarium lol
Itās not possible to find Jupiter mid day right
Without tracking
mine looks like that
shouldn't be too hard
those appear when you click on the planet and track it
Ohhh
Zero gain?
idk you gotta figure it out in the live view what looks best
got the start of it
but seeing went poor and rain showers forecast so I packed up
You are on another world @somber stratus
What does raw video look like for you? I saw some of your Instagram but how much processing is really done?
Nice
The seeing was bad for me too but I managed to get 20 mins before it got too close to a building and seeing worsened
Usually no processing. IG tends to compress it though
Thatās incredible man
Yes it does
Same for mine
One sec, I'll grab a vid
no wavelets or anything?
Letās see if I can resolve io with my 5 inch scope
the raw videos
Iām sure you can, I can with 3 inch
IR610
but the final image is processed?
of course
Honestly incredible
oh ok lol sorry I wasn't understanding for a second
Thatās some crystal seeing btw
I'll process tonight's best vid
yeah was quite good. maybe 8/10 on that IR
RGB
His raw looks same as my best ever final image š¤£
I had 10/10 seeing like once in my life lol
Thatās incredible
my best ever seeing:
im still waiting for that time
it looks much better than mineš„
this too
Hey Tom, you are the planetary expert, why would my Jupiter come out pink, it never comes out with orange or itās real colors, I suspect itās my cheap lenses itās a Celestron astrosense80mm manual refractor, but what do you think? My camera is an asi715mc and I have an ir uv cut filter
Tonight.
Insane
Probably the closest to 10/10 I've had. "Old" 16-inch scope with Jupiter at 40 arcseconds.
This photo has a sad story cuz Iāve lost some data and all I have is a badly processed derorated image as well as this animation
100x better than mine haha, what do you use?
You mean my equipment?
Yeah thatās really good seeing, I think there are even surface details on the moon present in live view
That's Io so not much surface details to be seen but Ganymede would have some for sure, if it were in frame
by the way have you tried doing animations of change in cloud structure? I think this would be really interesting to see it in detail
Probably the best vid of the moons I have. Again 16".
Once, a long time ago. I don't have enough consistency in clear skies to do anything prolonged
Might get two images then it'll go stormy for a few weeks
I'm lucky if I even see the moons in the live view at all lol
understandable, I only got 5 captures in 5 months because of the weather
this is the live view today
lets see what i can bring out
Siril?š¤
Yes
is this good for a 6' scope???
Celestron nexstar 127 slt sv137 2x Barlow uv ir cut and player one Neptune 664c
Siril
What are you using it for?
Makes sense haha
Hey Tom, do you auto focus or do it by hand?
Usually small adjustments and looking at r g and b separately. Also in some rare cases I use wavelets there 
You custom make your scope so
Iām just used to Sirils interface
By hand with the 16", and hybrid on the 24". I have motorised focus on the 24" (as it's too high for me to reach the focuser), but I manually tune it with a hand controller.
Nothing automated in terms of tuning the focus. I do it all by eye via the live view.
Got it
The preview adjustments in Firecapture are particularly useful though
can boost contrast and increase brightness without influencing the raw data
I use sharpcap, is Firecapture better?
For planetary, yes imo.
please stop being good
Using your 24" dob, how does Jupiter look when just doing visual? Is it anywhere near as good as a raw video like this (or perhaps even better)?
this is raw video
I like the quality. Wonder how to address the color. š¤
ah yes i color cottected
no i did not,,, weird
see how it sometimes turns red for a second
idk why it does that
Jupiter from a couple nights ago
what scope?
Next star 8se
really nice
thank you
3 mins
2:45 ish
i think the rotation is present here
i try pushing limits
i see
or is it just me
I kinda doubt 1min vs 3min is gonna make a difference for him with this scope IMO
yeah i understand
that one is about 1.6k frames
i do 1 min captures but not a lot of frames
interesting
instead of high gain and 7-10ms exposure
how was it
less noise
Will be the same snr, but less sharp because longer exposures
less sharp?
Better to stick with ~5-10ms
i usually do around 8 ms
Yeah because youāre āfreezingā the atmosphere less effectively
any idea how dark or light or what level of gain for best final image, i do lucky
Exposure to ~5-10ms, gain set so histogram is around 80%
ohhh i didn't know there was a histagram on sharpcap
can you show me what a histagram thats at around 80%?
would look like
it just means when the histogram is 80% over to the right
right but what does that look like?
idk about sharpcap but firecapture literally says the percent right next to it
I donāt understand what it means to be at 80%
As you increase the exposure and/or gain in the software the histogram will increase to a higher %, 100%+ is overexposed, saturated pixels i.e. lost data
Ohh Iāll try it then
You see the percentages under the histogram right?
Yes
Histogram at 80% means the histogram cuts off at 80%
when the data lines go past this part
You see how it goes down as it goes to the right
So it hits the bottom?
You want it to cut off at 80%
Thereās not much to it
really clean
dude thats still insane
an eclipse on jupiter
nicee
yesir
waiting for some good images with it
haha yes
lol
Did I capture a cloud on mars?
or is it just an edge artefact
no, the bright spots on my image are surface details
makes sense
i want to shoot clouds on mars with a w47 and uv ir cut tommorow
should be more forgiving
than venus clouds
with the same filter setup
doing an rgb composition would be cool
i want to try that
Thanks, but i currently dont have one
Dark surface spots and stuff
Cool
here's mine for fun
So good
Top left good
top right better colors
@somber stratus will you be capturing this?
This is too late in the night. Jupiter will be too low in the sky
why cant astrosurface set tiles?
Because Autostakkert is better
real
probably because it's too dark (only 1 in 4 pixels lit and even the blue channel isn"t super bright)
i was quite surprised by how dark mars was with a violet filter
if increasing the tile coverage doesn't help, use global mean stacking but autostakkert will be better
Oh that's mars
good luck 
captured it at a really high gain although should have done longer exposure
was afraid something higher than 20ms would make everything blurry
rgb looks good tho
yeah replacing blue channel with violet capture was a bad idea
especially when violet looks like this
It's done a decent job at capturing clouds.
That Saturn pfp is insane my dude
Canāt deny, yeah
hello
Looks like itās probably Olympus Mons.
Why is it present only in the blue channel then?
whenever i try to stack through AS4 on my laptop it never brings up that screen where you select an anchor point and place those boxes over the moon/planets
has anyone experienced that before
yea that
also these weird artifacts (i've autostretched the stack)
What should I be doing to it in pipp?
Also what color space do you guys use for planetary and dso?
And for dso?
Gotcha
Yeah 8 bits is largely enough for planetary but I always use 16bits for deep sky since it makes calibration more reliable
Uranus-C
Player One Mars-C II
Cant afford lol
Why get that and not zwo whats the difference?
I mean i can get it from aliexpress
Im new to the whole camera thing
The Player One gear is less expensive (and some folks say more capable) than the equivalent ZWO gear. Also, ZWO gear is designed to work best with ZWO components, such as the ASIAir. Which is nothing but an up-jumped pi with some open source software being used in a proprietary manner, which is contrary to the terms of the use of the open source software. An inexpensive and low powered mini pc is actually better than the ASIAir
Ah ok
Is aliexpress reliable for cameras
I use it for general stuff but never stuff over £10
I personally would go directly to the merchant or an astro shop rather than aliexpress for anything that I want to trust to work.
i bought my touptek guidecam from aliexpress a good amount cheaper than what touptek has it for and its perfectly fine
Some hints of surface detail on Ganymede?
Thinking yes
Understandable. I have my line of thinking. Do with the information as you will. š
How the turn tables
@summer pebble Although it is mostly edge rind, there is definitely a dimming at upper-right. Could be influenced by Galileo regio, but also could be miscollimation. Hard to tell.
Insert whole resolve vs detect debate
English saying. Wasn't too long ago I was saying the same thing to you 
Is the mars-c better than the mars-c ii?
Amazing
Last night
Itās an animation
3ā Manuel refractor
No thatās me bruh š
oh XD my bad
Haha
I would expect it to be as such.
Ah, I see
Maybe viewing it all could help...?
What camera?
My best seeing
Zwo asi585
Yep!
Nicee
Love the results, why arenāt you a mininerd yetšš»
You can't really get mininerd from planetary alone unless it's like Tom level quality or something
Oh alr
But the quality for the equipment used?
Like getting really good results for the aperture of the scope or smth
I guess itās difficult to rate
Alr
not sure tbh
how tho š
how what
why the bar so high
planetary is just much easier and cheaper and doesn't require as much knowledge/experience to do
than DSO imaging I mean
makes sens
Ahh I sss
See
Or blow mine out of the world
I have attempted dso imaging, but everyone elseās images blow mine out of the water. Not to mention that or bad technique and stuff
Have you posted those in #1127675764356173885 yet? That might be enough to get you mininerd ngl
Oh I have not. Iāll do it later perhaps
Jupiter & Europa in 610nm in broad daylight with the new Uranus-M
Is this yours?
Yep, it is
is a 6 inch skywatcher virtuoso goto tracking scope different from an SCT, what is an SCT?
The virtuoso is a Newtonian Reflector Telescope on an altaz mount. An SCT, or Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope, also has mirrors but in addition to that it has a Schmidt correcting glass plate in the front.
Yeah pretty much what he said
sorry if I beat you to it and stole your answer š
Scts in short are primarily suited for planetary imaging due to the high f ratio
Nah itās good
i see
Newts tend to be cheaper than SCTs. SCTs have a longer focal length, but also a bigger central obstruction which means that a newt of the same size (with barlow to get to same focal ratio) is actually slightly better.
Jupiter last night under a little above average seeing conditions
Celestron Nexstar 8se and a Canon EOS T3i (600D)
if you want this get the heritage instead
Werenāt you the guy that jumped in saying donāt buy it and never said why?
@rugged knoll
And I already bought it
Gets here the 12th
How many frames stacked and how long was recording?
I feel like you could get better surface detail but itās rotationally blurred (could be wrong)
You canāt stack over 2-3 minutes of frames from start to finish
yes and i did say why
in my experience the mount just doesnt work well at all
and i explained what about it doesnt work in that conversation
it could be possible i got a bad model but imo shipping a basically defective mount is unacceptable
Do you mean planetary or dso?
for planetary i would just use the mount turned off, i mean dso
Ohh
Wait I want the tracking for planetary though
Whatās wrong with the mount?
YouTube reviews all seem to do well
Did you rebalance the mount after putting your camera on it?
quite literally every extra feature it has that the heritage doesnt
yes, i tried absolutely everyting
its just a defective mount
if yours ends up working fine that still means skywatchers quality control isnt good enough to stop a defective mount from getting through
Yeah
it turns on and moves and stuff but the things clueless š
What š
never knows where its supposed to go even when properly aligned
yes
I hope yours was just born stupid
i do too cause if yours ends up like mine then thats gonna be two virtuoso paperweights
i love how the problems only showed up after i couldnt return it anymore so i was stuck with it
š
Around 50-60 seconds.
Unfortunately I dont know the total amount of frames
Oh nevermind I still have Autostakkert open
1450 frames
I believe I'm ever so slightly off in collamination too
but I have my telescope sitting outside waiting for it to be darker
I see
I fixed the collimation issue.
So much better lol.
It was slightly offset up and to the left, so I'll try to video jupiter again later if it clears more.
Show?
3 inch Manuel refractor hehehe
My, bad I didn't take a photo š
Looks like you're getting the hang of things.
I suppose elol
should i undersample when shooting mercury?
shorter exposures = more best frames (f12)
vs
more zoomed in and probably more details BUT longer exposures and less best frames (f24)
then probably f/24
hit em with the hubble f/ratio
is mercury even high enough to image rn?
I'm gonna wait till it's at its highest for me and then I will image it for the first time 
W
My friends mid day mercury
I got Mercury yesterday
Woah
Incredible
