#Planetary Imaging
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
Nice image
2 watermarked versions of my saturn and jupiter. Gear: 6 inch newtonian Alt Az Star Discovery GOTO mount. Neximage 10. Stacked and proccesed in registax. Water mark with snap seed
Ken's
damn that’s good it wasn’t that one though
what the
can someone help me process this ive been trying but couldn't get the ring portion correctly
why do you have 202 APs?
you want 20 ish
quite likely
depends how large saturn is
you want 15-30 ish with minimal overlap
theres not much data here so you cant get cassini.
yes
this is what im getting
How’s my processing now?
bruh
Bro is in orbit
I cant wait to get my new cam, today i started working so i will save up money for it, but im sick and i barely walk
where your tracking go
ive never had any
Where did your atmosphere go
Blud has no atmosphere
He is a alien, he shot this on the dark side of the moon prob
Saturn with the Hubble Optics UL16 F/4.5 Gigadob
????
I wanna image so bad but i picked up a flu
i got a 8"
if its live view i am selling some of my body parts to buy this scope
watch the dumbell and ring nebula
and contracted a disease that makes you want more aperture
it has no cure
Not yet. I got clouds tho
my disease is reversed... i want a more portable setup
Love it, a little blue in my opinion
Uh
We all start somewhere don’t we 
I just handheld my phone against my 8“ so it’s basically just one singular image
For imaging Jupiter or Saturn untracked with an 8“ dob, do I go for the highest magnification I can go and let it glide across the screen for like 8s or do I use less and then I can let it stay in for longer and later crop ?
Looks like seeing was dooky
Lumix gh5
Indeed Saturn was low and it was a bid windy
@proud mulch I also have a 3x Barlow
I should make a tutorial on how to shoot planets with a phone
So I don’t have to explain it
No Barlow VS 3x Celestron X-Cel
thats just wrong
Jupiter actually does have an atmosphere, the biggest and thickest one in our solar system
huuuge atmosphere
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmosphere_of_Jupiter if you want to learn about it.
The atmosphere of Jupiter is the largest planetary atmosphere in the Solar System. It is mostly made of molecular hydrogen and helium in roughly solar proportions; other chemical compounds are present only in small amounts and include methane, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and water. Although water is thought to reside deep in the atmosphere, its d...
yeah jupiter is essentially only atmosphere
Man I wish we had the 2017 atmospheric belt disturbances 
Hey I can now say I’ve beaten a 16”
Yes pls
A 16" imaging through thick clouds and horrid seeing

I have a 5 mile wide break in the clouds for 3 hours, for one of which I might be able to get this shadow transit and the GRS
🙏
Magnitude 5 star is in frame to the bottom left too, could be funny to claim I found a new moon
Doesn't matter he still wins
i win
No me mine is clearly better

Oh also, does field rotation affect the sharpness of planets? I’m on alt-az and I’m wondering if autstakkert somehow accounts for that or if an eq mount is that necessary
No mine is better
It’s like I’m imaging from under a lake
Briefly hit 5/10, absolutely brutal conditions
I consider this to be acceptable seeing
Terrible seeing
Planetary nebula
Mhm yess yes, come to the DSO photography side
#1127675764356173885
This yours!!?!?!!!!!
What progres bro
Wtf
This is crazy
Crazy?
Wait no
Im not starting again
First jupiter in a while, with my 5inch/asi224mc
swag
It does
Hey this is a really good image
I like it
cmon join the deep space side man!
Thanks! I also took a timelapse of the transit but I'll need a little more time to process it (allost 1 million frames
)
woewie, thats a lot of frames.
😔
Just use winjupos
We need Dso imaging forum
Eh could someone potentially stack and edit 2 videos of Jupiter and Saturn. I can’t be at my pc anymore but would love to see what I got 
Virgin DSO imaging vs Chad Planetary Imaging
‼️‼️‼️
True!
I made one
Idk how much it’ll be used because they typically just talk ab it in general but
Yeah
yeah
Atleast it’s there lmao
Someone name a nebula (that has been named already) and I’ll try to give it a better name
I wouldn’t really recommend a DSO imaging forum since its more popular in this server, mainly the main talk in some forums, some planetary
This is how big the planets are in angular size (using maximum sizes)
@proud mulch Dude, tell me did you capture this with neptune c ii
Not his, not cooked :)
"actually it doesn't exist yet-" 🤓
🤓
This is cursed
Yeh
In reality Venus is closer to Mars in angular size when it's actually good to image regarding clouds.
Yes I did
I’m talking absolute max size, like as close as it gets ever
Dayuuummmm the progress
Saturn from last night
2500+ frames - 15% stacked
Orion XT8 and QHY 5L-II M
My barlow is ass and paired with iffy seeing im not getting the most out of these optics.
Also im still getting used to offset so the bright band on saturn was overexposed a bit
First light with CH4 filter
I need to try ch4 juppy some time
Nice
Saturn looks soo good in ch4
Maybe someone should try a ice giant with ch4
2nd time ever attempting imaging, and the first time I’ve ever seen a distinguished line between the rings of Saturn and the giant. It may not be much, but it was my ‘holy sh*t’ moment that will probably catapult me deep into AP. No tracking, just a DSLR T-ringed to a 2x Barlow on a 900/114 f/7.8 skywatcher reflector. Ngl I’m a little proud of myself
saturn and jupiter first time
Good luck with that 😂
Yeah there’s way too little signal there
Could do it with a an eq mount that can keep the image steady at a high focal length for at least a second I guess
But yeah, good luck with that
well, it would look like a very bright white dot
because uranus and neptune is made almost etiraly made of methane
that is how they get there signature blue color
You're probably overestimating how bright they are
could be. probably am
only person maybe that can do this is tom
tw astro//tom
I used 50ms exposures for my CH4 Jupiter, and I have to use around 20ms exposures with around 600 gain for Neptune without CH4 filter
And the CH4 filter is only a 20nm bandpass
The ZWO one that is, others are even tighter
It's probably possible, ice giants in CH4, just really hard I think
really? haha, fun coïncedence
alright, so pretty much not possible for us
Yeah
Here’s what it looks like with an 850nm+ pass
And that was a good frame 
uhm yea, i get it, but you cant even see the shape.
Pushing maximum gain and 100ms exposures at f/30. In live view it was an actual structure you could see. Effects of limb darkening were apparent with enough time and averaging em out
Just as an example of how insanely dim it is beyond 750nm
but in ultra violet it seems to be consistent
@uncut glade
sorry for the pin jokabas
but another question
how would a terestrial planet look like in ch4
A reprocess of one of my best saturns from last year. The Solar system pic isnt to scale and the mars is from last year. The lower left jup and upper right Saturn are from this month
nice man!!!
heyy atreus back
What do y'all use to measure seeing conditions?
Similar to ir, just darker and lower res
i wanna image and process so bad but i got so much hw and work
Simply quit school
Did you stack it?
eyes
the good ol' mark 1 eyeball
if it looks like you're viewing it from space the seeing is 5/5
Amazing how accurate that statement is
very high tech
Not yet. Moving to college, will do when I’m settled in lol
This is a good resource, it’s my reference point nowadays.
Can confirm 
80% of 10000 frames, signal is so low that all i could do is resolve the disk.
C11 with 850nm+ bandpass filter. Pipp somehow detected it still.
what planet is this lmao
Uranus, mb
Neptune would be impossible without at least 16" of aperture lol
This is super, super aggressively denoised just to show the disk.
Also I’m talking about this one where it’s actually decent @uncut glade
Jus treat it like a Dso and have a long ahh shutter
You might just be the first to get them all in CH4
If Tom gets Neptune with an SNR high enough to not be grainy around the edges, in CH4 I will venmo him $40 immediately lmao
You would be dealing with I discrete photons at that point, a night of great seeing or better is the only time to get it.
I still need the actual filter. This is just a 850nm+ long pass from player one. A CH4 narrowband would have something like 1/10th of the signal from what I can tell
I mean, just getting over the QE losses at that band pass, physical distance, and current elevation would be insane, combined with the angular size? It would be near comparable difficulty to detecting volcanoes on IO.
I would be BEYOND ecstatic to be proven wrong, but it just seems like it would need at a minimum, hours of data in great conditions
You can get the disk with perhaps a 10".
It's quite a bit bigger (% wise) than Ganymede.
Individual photons probably not far off lol
What should i chose, Mars-C II, ASI224MC, ASI385MC, ASI678MC. I wanna do mostly planetary and some dso on bigger objects
585
gotta stretch it then. get that nice starvis and 12x6mm sensor
It depends how much i save up
Good morning. I got this image a couple nights ago. Clear but seeing was rated 2/5 and Saturn was at about 20 deg alt. I was using my ADC for the first time. Is this the best that can be expected given conditions?
@somber stratus (hope you don't mind the ping) @fading plume
Just looks like bad seeing. ADC can't fix that unfortunately. Does saturn actually get much higher than that for you? I think it might still be possible to get nice seeing at ~25-30 degrees alt, just has to be a very good night.
tbf it's pretty good that you got cassini at all
I think it does come a bit higher, later on. I remember it didn't come up as high as Jupiter last year, but I think it did/does come up to 25-30 degrees, right now at insane hours. As in "I get up at 5:30 and don't want to wait to 2 to image and have to put stuff away and get an hr of sleep" insane. 🙂 I look forward to what I can do now that I've seen this preview though. The bands are showing up pretty well even in this.
If you want to play with the data, it's in #1144139582456221757 🙂
Been almost a year since I last saw Jupiter
That’s about the best I can get with 5 inches of aperture 
#older_system_pics message you’d be surprised
Aye some are pretty good. I reckon my limitation is mostly seeing cause I had better results with a slightly smaller scope during opposition
This was with a 127 maksutov last year
Looked good visually with a Barlow but light loss was too great to properly image
THATS INSANE WHAT
DETAIL ON GANYMEDE
That guy is the master of collimation because theres no other way to get that good detail
Perfect collimation, seeing, good sensor
@indigo oak the scale is really nice on that it is like a visual view on the split second when detail actually peeks out from the fuzz
Grasshopper?
Lol
Nice bug
I've done it by doing multiple images and then setting them together in sequence as a gif.
I did about 9 one time. Then I ran out of battery.
I kept messing around with him and I chose to take a picture without his consent
But what are they gonna do? Bite me 
I didn't say it was long. I haven't successfully done a smooth one like what you're probably thinking and what I was aiming for.
I got foxes, wild pigs, wolfes and even bears walking around my house (only saw a bear once around my house)
Yup, thats why i got a big ass balcony
Try, the images need to be 7/10 minutes apart, you need to get around 1 and a half minute videos, stack them, process them, and then you can make it into a gif
You could do it pretty easily with pipp
I pick those up
These too
Yea join then output as a video, you can do either lossless compression or lossy for less file size. If you want to reduce the file size further you could use handbrake to encode it better. But the gif is fine too.
Under output options:
sure you can reorder the images in the source files tab, i think theres options in another tab to do more complicated things, under animation options tab
nah looks fine I think, I think you could do a bit more sharpening?
I think astrosurface has some way to do batch processing, but I haven't used it
might be something on the website?
Ah just 250 stacked frames per image? That is really low then, no wonder.
untick the white/black point options in input options? If they are ticked? Pipp shoudn't change the brightness?
oh sorry i meant processing options
untick both, they change the histogram pretty sure
Did you collimate?
Damn, did you atleast watch astrobiscuits video?
Yes
Did it help?
Kinda
Still cant adjust the secondary to not be oval
Its not the primary, can you see the optical tube evenly
Also i forgot to tell you but when collimating point your scope to a light source (not the sun) it will be easier to collimate
It is kinda at a light source
The right upper screw is too stiff for me to rotate but the others arent stiff
Its okey
Listen
So unscrew the stiff one, and try screwing in the not stiff ones
But it looks like your secondary is very easy to collimate, and your primary is a tad bit out
Its just logic
Ig imma try
Just play with the screws until the optical tube is even on the sides
Nothing works 
Hmm how does the rear of the tube look like? The mirror portion should be attached by some screws to the side of the tube. You might have some leeway to collimate the primary that way.
the sides i mean
These?
Yep, the screws would have a mm or so leeway, to move the mirror up an down a bit. Probably not enough but might work?
I am gonna try
Doesnt really seem to affect anything when rotating these screws
Those probably hold the primary mirror cell
Well yes, that is their job, I meant when you loosen them a bit you can physically move the mirror up and down a bit. so you collimate it that way, then screw the screws back to lock it in
Whoops
Dude how many attempts did you do and you still havent learned how to collimate?!?
It cant be that hard
I collimated both of my mirrors in 5 minutes and you cant do it after 5 hours
Isnt my secondary already an egg?
Dude i dont know, your red boi is weird, but im in love with that mount
My red boi really is weird
Yeahhhh, instead of the red devil its the red weirdo
And my scope is black and slow (f7)
I meant it in a non racial way*
My scope is red and fast f4/5
Dayum

astrobiscuit has a weird opponent
Hahahahahaha
Still a pretty nice scope if not the collimation
Is it a 6 inch or 8 or even 24
5 inch
150/750
6inch?
Yeah
I put the png files back into PIPP and tell it to output as GIF. There may be better methods.
Girth matters

💦
Let's stop this here
I meant aperture
y y yeah...
Hacker I barely got it at 2700mm
From my ig story this morn don't mind my talking lol
The best single stack. The derotated set of 5 wasnt much better than this
@tidal crow 😬😬😬😬
That collimation my man
Ibhad some dust spots on my barlow
I smell 4 uncollimated newtonians
some… 
Whats your aperture?
Real
Dude that live view is absolutely amazing!
thats some good seeing
Yeah same happens to me lol. I set up and clouds come. I bring it back it. Clouds go away
i scrolled too far 💀
MEGANERD
Also might want to still use derotation because slight color noise
HUBBLE
DUDE HOW
WHAT GEAR
Howwwwww
14in dob eqplate+handtracking
Qhy5iii178c+5x barlow
You better
what ratio if i may ask
Also Io there 👍
Reprocess a little softer
noitce
Love the Io detail too 
noice
dayummm and with a relatively old sensor too
I call the 224 old how out dated really is the 178. Im looking at getting a new cam soon maybe a uranus c
I have the Uranus C and I love it, I do with the sensor was larger.
If they ever release a Uranus-M or other IMX-585 mono camera, that would be an awesome tool
Thats actually in productino
Will probably be released in 1-2 years first mono 585
Source?
Sony is making the Mono 585 now. It's going to take a little bit for an astro cam to actually get sold though
Interesting
What’s the best time to view the Pythagoras crater? Like when it just came into view
I'm so excited dude. Thanks for the link!!
bit foggy out tonight
Is there a tool to show the times of saturn moon transits? Enceladus is crossing rn but it's too low for me. Would love to be able to try to bag one without dumb luck
Stellarium is used for finding transits usually
Got it
I've still got 2 hours or so to bag it, here's hoping 39 degrees of altitude is enough 💀
Dunno. Ask them for a sample and try it
Nope. Not hugely at least.
My answer was funnier. And would have been hilarious if someone did that and got a sample.
And then never return it. Genius
Honestly I would return it if that was a condition of receipt. Or pay for it if I was happy.
It has always been like that, secondary mirrors are egg shaped
You should join #1124173514585423973 and help us make the jupiters rotation of clouds like voyager did
It was not lol, but I got cassini division in 75% of my frames, so new record on seeing quality!
Had to do some horrifying things to get my focal ratio right
Used a 3x barlow after an f/6.3 reducer to get ~f/19 lol
It worked is the worst part
sampling was dead on
seeing those pics makes me kind of want to try planetary with my 6" newt lmao
no one gonna stop u dude
ik im gonna need uranus c and a barlow then we ready
a
I’ve always hated refractors for some reason
Refractors are better, i had one but sadly sold it beacuse it had a shitty mount
Cuz you never used any
Fax
Missed some great seeing because my slow-mo controls don’t work 
I Tried but it didn’t work
What I also did
Skip them then
you should
not sure though
Try it
My latest 6 inch newt image
I don’t know man I think teoman was hacking
Oh jesus now you're gonna make me addicted to planetary imaging 
Huh emojis now work?
Image
Are you able to see my 
Did you fix the collimation
I tryed
Lemme ser
I kinda did
See
I need to learn how to collimate
ASTROBISCUIT MADE A VIDEO TO HELP YOU ABOUT THAT❗❗❗❗❗
Ehh, its a bit off but better
I tiny bit off because i carried it around for a bit

Wait, is your secondary even correctly pointed at the focuser
What kind of Barlow would I get? 2x or 3x? I'm looking
Kiss him, marry the handsome boy
Yes
And what software is mostly used for planetary?
Sadly from my balcony i cant see saturn so i have to be right beside a forest (there are a lot of wolfes, foxes, rabbits, wild pigs...)
Firecapture

Firecapture or sharp cap for imaging and registax for stacking and proccesing
FireCapture for capturing the videos
PIPP for pre processing
Autostakkert for video stacking
And Registax for processing
Some other additional softwares too if you wanna get extra
Only registax?
You forgot to add the creature: skinwalker
There’s others like astrosurface
depends on cam but probably 3x for an f/4
I see, that's fine with me. What about Barlow? How do I know which one is the best for me?
Nahh man thats why i carry my m4 with me
i think its 3-5x pixel size is the f/ratio you need
Uranus C Pro?
that the one you have?
nope, I have canon EOS 1000D which does not have the recording compatibility.
Buy a granade launher : china lake too
if you got a uranus c pro it would work for planetary
The beast with a full box of military equipment (my parents are in the military)
Uranus-C Pro is mainly for deep Sky isn’t it?
with a 3x barlow you get up to f/12, with spacing like an ADC you'll get to f/15 that you need
Nope. It's for planetary
the Uranus C pro is geared towards DSO since its cooled, but at heart its still a planetary camera.
How do you mean, ADC?
atmospheric dispersion corrector
Meaning?
corrects dispersion of light from the atmosphere, so it focuses properly. not essential but helps a lot for more serious imaging
If it has liveview you can record a video using something like eos camera movie record. https://www.astropix.com/html/equipment/canon_one_to_one_pixel_resolution.html I use it with my 600D and it works pretty well, outside of the lowish 30fps.
1:1 Pixel Resolution in Canon DSLRs for Planetary Photography
I hope thats the airsoft one
I see. So best for me right now would be a Uranus C Pro with a Barlow 3x?
you intend to do DSO too right?
Maybe. I'm kind of in a hard spot between two lol
uranus c pro does both

I see. That's efficient.
For barlow I use this formula to figure it out:
6 times pixel size in um divided by focal ratio.
But the optimal sampling is around where each pixel sees 1/4th of the dawes limit of your scope. You can just extend a barlow to be more powerful to get a 3.5x barlow out of a 2x for example
extending a barlow too much might make it so you cant reach focus though. gotta be careful
Hm, got 4.35 with Uranus C Pro, would that mean I need Barlow 4x?
yep ~4.35x, Could get a 3x and extend it to that through.
I see, do you have any good 3x ones in mind?
yep would have to put it further in the tube, pretty sure.
Do you already have a barlow? I used 10cm of spacers to extend my $20 2x into a 4x and it worked alright. I think celestron x-cell 3x is one of the best barlows for planets, but I think most other decent ones would work.
I do have one but it is Plossl, and does not state how much. Plus I don't see a way I can mount Uranus C Pro on it.
Wait what, but plossl is an eyepiece type?
as long as it's not plastic i think it would work. not sure how well through
All I know is this magnifies my zoom.
ok, never seen that design before but if it's a barlow you could try using it?
Uranus-c pro comes with a 1.25" nosepiece thing so it would go in like an eyepiece into the barlow.
I see. That'll have to work since it is 1.25"
Question: How do you guys get a perfect focus on the planets?
I rotate the focuser slowly
Since you have a tracking mount it should be pretty easy, can focus using a feature on the planet like cassinis division(if you have good enough seeing ofc). Since I don't have a mount I just use a bahtinov mask, not entirely sure how perfect it is through.
Ah makes sense, how would that work for Mars as the features really isn't visible? And Jupiter?
It really depends on the scope and camera
I think you can go off surface detail on mars, on jupiter I think you can go off either the moons or the cloud bands.
I thank you for helping me. Just trying to understand things before deciding I want to expand on the planetary imaging side.
Use autoalign in FC to focus. Worked wonders when I still had my manual 6” dob. And I still use it for focusing now that I have a tracking mount
FC?
Ah is that the feature where firecapture keeps the planet in the center of the window? Unfortunately I don't have a cam that firecapture supports(DSLR, raspihq cam), but ty
Oh, thought you did
Last question, or probably for today xD: How do you guys slew to planets without using NINA? Or do you guys still use that only for slewing purposes?
I don’t need nina, I have a goto dob
You can see planets naked eye, can just aim my scope with the finder
With a manual dob too
i use NINA to slew but thats because my eq mount is onstep and i never made a hand controller for it
Ah, I use a tracking mount with an 6" Newt.
thought HEQ5 has a hand controller
@hasty hull in this server does some great work with a 6” newt, it’s 100% possible. Requires a fair bit of patience though
Yep, I'm aware.
You're probably right, is laptop only needed for the camera?
I mean, I do have one
Yes.
Oh, that's good then
Cat that comes to say hi whenever I look at planets
There’s an Astro Cat where I live too!! Her name is Luna and she walks around the neighborhood all night
Wish the cats at my house were as social as this cat 
Wish my cat wasnt lazy
Did you even try to sharpen that?
Yes i did
can you send me the stack
It is the final image tho
i want to try and sharpen it
Just the raw image after stacking? Right?
yeah
did you actually save it as jpg?
god damn discord compression makes my jupiter look like rubbish
probably i dunno. I use registax and pressed the "Save Image" button
try saving it as bmp. I use Autostakkert so i don't know how stacking in registax works
And wow. That is really really blurry
What % of frames did you stack?
50%
it was kinda focused
running out of options here
i didnt use lucky imaging tho so thats why
how long was the video?
that's strange
low framerate
Still, this is 90% of 2000 frames with a 90mm refractor and a zwo 120mc-s
My scope is a 6 inch newtonian that uses a goto alt az mount to track and the celestron neximage 10 D:
What fl?
750mm
may be one of the reasons. Still should give you some solid results
yeah...
With a 6" at 750mm focal length i'd still get some pretty decent images
I'd bet it is a focusing issue
and the fact i wasnt using lucky imaging too.
Hi planetary nerds, I'm doing a bit of work on Seeing and I have a few questions.
First, is there some kind of map, table or formula to have an estimate of the typical seeing value of different areas around the globe? Or at least a relation between temperature and humidity and the seeing?
Second, I guess the effects of seeing are similar to applying a gaussian blur with a radius of fwhm/(2sqrt(2*ln(2))) but I also know different wavelenghts gets affected differently. What is the relation between the wavelenght and the seeing amplitude, proportional to 1/lambda, or 1/lambda^2 (as in the refraction index formula)?
Thanks for your help ^^
I use https://www.goodtostargaze.com/m/ for both planetary and deep sky. Idk how accurate the seeing and transparency calculators are but they seem to be somewhat right
Good To Stargaze
Any tip to get a good photo stack of saturn with manual hand tracking 
Getting a stable pic
What equipment are you using?
Also, if you take let’s say 9 minute vids on Saturn (30k frames), would Saturn be blurred by its rotation?
Because I take 10k frames and my Saturn is super noisy
I stick to ~3 min vid, normally 2:45. I've been able to get 8K frames from that w/ my setup (ASI585) so it's not the number of frames.
When imaging, be as careful and smooth as you can, that's all I've got. It takes practice.
200/1000mm newtonian scope with a eq5mount
Ok
Use 5-10ms exposures, 60-80% histogram is fine
What camera and capturing software?
Just using a canon t1i with nothing else on the telescope
Camera fully stock
Yeah so basically what Steve_C2 said, and also try to figure out how to get the most frames possible
I could really use collimation and an adc 😭
Collimation? I'm not seeing anything off. Colour ... that can be fixed in post.
My c8 is from 1975 and i dont believe it was every collimated, or at least collimated recently and when I unfocused a star I could see the secondary wasnt dead on but it wasnt bad. Also the red and blue fringing on edges may be a combination of no adc and CA from a cheap barlow im not sure.
Ah, I see. I didn't see the effect of imperfect collimation, FWIW. RGB Align in preprocess can fix fringing, which again didn't stand out to me. However, it's something that I used before I got my ADC. And accidentally after, as well.
ah ill have to try that. Im more of a deep sky guy so im fairly new to planetary so all these tips are very helpful
Glad to help.
Collimation plays a role in fringing the better your collimation is the less fringe you will have an adc cuts out all fringe but having as best collimation you can manage should do most of the work
Yesterday my collimation was spot on, the seeing and transparency was awesome and i expect some good results
Yesterday?
Wth discord
Ye
I couldnt stack it
Send the data
Registax just glitched
...
i cant...
how
google drive?
yeah hold on a bit
k
You done?
almost. my wifi is slow af
Ok no hurry
i am gonna use my friends account i hope thats fine
i mean why shouldnt it be fine
anyway
Yeah sure
gogol drive storag ended 
sooo you have no storage?
ahhhh
welp
if you cant send it try stacking again, and dont stack in registax, stack in autostakkert
The data doesnt even load in
Use pipp to crop the data, autostakkert to stack and registax to sharpen
If you need help we can do it thru the call on discord
Let me cook
Oh
Its overcooked
The same probleme happens
If not i can help you thru screen sharing
No need . I will find a another way
Ok
Is moon allowed here?
I guess yeah
I need some help with some planetary imaging
I’m trying to get Saturn less noisy without being it too dim in the live feed while also having good frame rate
The lowest I can go is probably 300 gain and maybe 10-25 exposure ms
How do I make it have less gain while also having a bright Saturn in the live feed
Also FC is the capturing software
The best I can do
I think that's a classic "either or" situation.
I resolved encke in my first stack LMAOOOOO 💀
Absolutely insane lol
Higher gain decreases readnoise at the cost of dynamic range, you actually want to have a decently high gain. What camera do you have? Saturn is also fairly dim so you can't get as high fps as other planets. picture is pretty good through, not ideal seeing so you might not be able to sharpen it any more than that.
Neptune-C II
300 gain seems to have pretty low readnoise, this is the chart of readnoise from https://player-one-astronomy.com/product/neptune-c-ii-usb3-0-color-camera-imx464/ The page loads a stupid amount of large images through so be warned.
Probably the best you could do? saturn is quite a lot dimmer than the other big visible planets. I have to use a shutter speed of 1/60th for it compared to around 1/300th for jupiter
@dark cargo Thank you!
@steep apex use the histogram to determine exposure and gain. 60-80% histogram. If you think Saturn is too dim in the liveview to see, use the screen adjustment feature to increase gamma/brightness. It only affects the preview, not the data recorded
I image Saturn with ~8ms exposures and around 500+ gain.
The histogram rule, is that for ease of processing or is it for like, actual SNR purposes I don’t know about? Because I’ve been imaging at about 30% histogram to punch through my seeing
I found that lowering the gain and exposure more than you need also helps
by that I mean you can take a pretty dark video and then brighten it up
did that today and I found it helped a lot
That’s awesome
You guys think getting more frames (thinking 20k-30k) would pull out more bands and resolve Cassini more?
20-30k seems like more than enough. How’s your seeing?
Fair-good seeing, what I can resolve with only 10k frames is just the central band and Cassini
Saturns fairly difficult tbh, never rises high for me
The first and only time I’ve managed to capture it in the 2 years I’ve been doing Astro https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/794651916646350859/1007516260533280768/unknown.png
To say you resolved something, would it technically be accurate to say that even if it was 1 pixel wide?
Like say, imaging features on ganymede that are 0.1" wide, and your pixel scale is 0.1", and the feature is apparent in that single pixel as a color or contrast variation, does that count as resolving them?
Or is that just a detection?
2x2 pixels counts obviously, but I'm just wondering because the definitions seems up in the air, no pun intended ;)
Wouldn’t say so in most cases
Like plenty of stars are under a tenth of an arcsecond across and many people’s pixel scales are even smaller than that
But you couldn’t have resolved the star even if your resolution is theoretically enough
Second, likely far dumber question, even with lucky or speckle imaging techniques thats not possible? I don't see how we can resolve detail finer than that on ganymede, like Tom's blue image from opposition, but we can't say we've resolved asteroids that size?
Thank you for the response btw
Something something diffraction limit idk the in depth explanation, but resolving a small detail on a disc is much different than resolving a disc the size of the small detail
Which is why getting Ganymede/Io detail is much easier when they’re in transit across Jupiter
Because they essentially become a part of Jupiter’s disc then
Ken why u call 8” smol scope

6in and below is small, 10 and above is big. 8 is just the middle ground in my opinion.
me with my 6 inch newt 
I have this video from the last transit I captured but I have no idea how to process it, registax's batch processing is a mess and the harsh orientation changes (from the equatorial table reset) make it quite hard to align
guys, what softwares do you guys use for getting best frames from a footage, stacking and taking videos?
I use autostakkert to get the best frames for planetary and to stack
i see, autostakkert for stacking but what software do you use to take videos?
I use DSLR so don’t use any
Fire capture looks good
Or sharp cap but have no experience with both
depends on your camera, if you are using the 1000D, I recommend eos camera movie record, theres a link to it on this page: https://www.astropix.com/html/equipment/canon_one_to_one_pixel_resolution.html
1:1 Pixel Resolution in Canon DSLRs for Planetary Photography
All my planetary images were taken using it with my 600D
I'll have to find a way to somehow attach my Barlow though
Just put the t-ring into the barlow and put barlow in scope, should work fine.
is CC required for planetary imaging though?
Also you might want to extend the barlow to make it more powerful with your setup, I use this formula to figure out a decent barlow power for planetary: 6 times pixel size in um divided by focal ratio
figured mine out, around 4x.
Nope, you'd be imaging from near the center of the view anyway coma won't be an issue unless you image on the edges i guess?
Ah true, i see.
I don't understand.
I can't seem to find a way to attach the barlow with t-ring to my camera.
Does the t-ring have a nosepiece?
good goooood.... Embrace the spacers.
I needed around 10cm of spacers to turn my 2x into a 4x, and that is from the top of the barlow to the t-ring
the outside is the extension, and the middle part is barlow connected to a t-ring
hope it's clear tonite so i can test if this actually works lmfao
No my bad, the outer part is 1.25" attacher, and i have a extension tube so it can be even longer
failed the vibe check
Bc of procesing area
you can move it i'm pretty sure
ik ik. does not help tho
boom. The good old Iphone 8 moon
very realistic stars sir
They are indeed from another image I took. Just not from this night 
Idk how else I should have done it
Fair lol, I like the softness of the edit compared to some i've been seeing
best frame from some temporary good seeing, is that encke on the bottom left?
Or am I losing it
Wow that’s good
Ok im processing it now and I'm super excited about the results, but I'm realizing that during transport my collimation failed. The left side of my scope was off, so I'm getting ghost limbs and parabolic moons 
It's a slight issue, not major, but a little bumed
Move to new mexico
It goes from mag .5 to like 2 every .5 seconds naked eye
This thing named Irwin is the cause
Hopefully it’ll calm down in an hour
Or I could just record and deem I’ve seen the worst atmospheric wobble ever to be recorded
New pickering scale
-1/10
Airy disk is just a straight up circle an arcminute wide
How do yall fix color balance with saturn
This is what the raw data looks like when derotated, and even with color correction in registax it looks like this
The fringing is killing me
RGB align?
nah
you should be able to defringe with photoshop
should too on pixinsight but idk how to do that
somethin like this ig
@uncut glade
Oh word, didn't know it could look like that, I'll get photoshop access when I hit up the computer lab tomorrow
I already did RGB align sadly, came out like this from capture
yeah its just optics ig
@dark cargo i had an question, would it be generally better for planetary imaging if i were to use CC? since it'd mean i'd have more room in my fov to use for planetary imaging instead of being limited to only the center
Actually if you are using an F4 scope, it's probably a good idea, faster scopes have more coma pretty sure. No idea how to manage backfocus etc with it through. If you have a tracking mount I think you'd be fine just keeping it centered, even jupiter won't be much more than 250x250 pixels
Just as expected. But yeah the backfocus might be issue even if I use barlow. Hope it's clear night today so I can test.
Thank for your input!
I just color grade in Lightroom, or just wait for Saturn to be higher
I’ll try that out too, my problem is that this was at altitude. 40 degrees is all I got :((
Ok I have it just as bad
Still working on that, going to try to use some computer labs at my college for Lightroom
Having good seeing rn. This is just a screenshot from the live vid
would anyone be willing to process a stacked saturn of mine, i tend to over cook it?
I'd be down to try!
If the quality graph looks like this, what percentage should i stack? (5k+ frames)
I generally do a stack at the point where the graph intersects the vertical 50% line, and then double that to test SNR vs detail
Horizontal****
So in this case, at like the 5% and 10 percent marks
@dark cargo hope i'm not interrupting by pinging you, i don't know what time it is for you, but i'm looking at jupiter using my liveview and i cannot see any details other than it being a ''orange-ish'' glob
I might try using CC
nevermind, can't find a way to attach both
Thanks man
Just went out and tried my new setup, 8” dob, 585mc, ADC and televue 3x. I’ll share the stacked image and if you want you can process it as I’m not very good at registax 😂
@uncut glade So for this one i should stack 20% and 40%?
focus? exposure
i've been messing around those two yes, but couldn't get it to resolve the bands on jupiter 
SATURN
Here is my data (20% 40% 60%) if someone would like to process them and figure out which stack is the best i'd appreciate it 
my very poor attempt at imaging jupiter
I’m gonna have to kindly ask you guys to give me good seeing conditions 🙏
I'm going to have to ask, what did you use?
I had really nice seeing tonight
What where you viewing
Moon, Jupiter and Saturn
That's what I would do! It's always worth playing around with your settings until you find a good balance of SNR and detail for that days session. I might even consider doing a 13% run with that. High quality and good signal still
Well this was with 20%, a quick process as I’m not very good with registax but it’s my best Saturn ever
Very nice data…the features in Saturn itself are good! Your processing looks good
i think there's some signal in your noise
If you are collimated and the scope had some time to cool down outside it could have been just terrible seeing. Also for that picture you posted below were you not using a barlow at all? At 600mm fl with big dlsr pixels the planet will be really small, actually at F4 its gonna be pretty hard to get the right barlow power.... Actually damn really hard as your pixel size if 5.7um, using the formula: 6 times 5.7 divided by 4 = You'd want an 8.55x barlow..... I think it's possible to get that by stacking barlow or something but it would be really cursed.
@safe compass stacking Barlow could work and with surprising results. One of my better Saturn images that I got from my DSLR was taken through 2 - 2x Barlows stacked.
Stacking 3 2x Barlows would get you close though if I'm doing my math right.
Woah that would be a little cursed.
CC, Canon EOS 1000D on 6" F/4 newt
Nope, I couldn't find an way to fit Barlow with CC, because I was seeing some intense chromatic abbreations
Will definitely try that, although I'm not sure because of the fact my newt can't focus 3 colors in one point lok
But my guess is I set the ISO too high, 800 for it.
is it normal for pipp to output a 136gb file after processing a 6000 frames video
Yes. If you didn’t crop anything or debayered the footage.
ok thanks
Saturn of the 30/08. At 23:20~
- Moon Titan in the lower left corner and Tethys just above Saturn's ring.
.
📋 Exif:
🔭 114/900mm, eq3 with onstep. Barlow 2x Omni + 6mm svbony eyepiece.
📷 Sv905c (224 2.0)
⚙ 400x400px 130 FPS ~
08/30 saturn to the 🦅 🇺🇸 
OHHHHHHHHH
THATS WHY JUPITER APPEARED WHITE
Don't do planetary with NINA
NINA auto-stretches everything
What did you use
thats odd because uh
thats exactly what NINA outputs usually
an autostretched image
wait
which file viewer did you use?
its not even attached to my laptop with an cable or anything
just an average Photo
just microsoft or windows whatever?
oh okay that'll do it
they auto stretch RAW images to make them brighter

for some reason
yeah its annoying
dam it how do i not make them do that
thats a good question I just used a different file viewer
like?
try faststone image viewer
same image but viewed through different file viewrs
you can see how windows absolutely deep fried it
da fuq
yep
it automatically autostretches
bro istg how do i stop it autostretching
@coarse aspen what fileviewer do u use
Faststone image viewer
What are you using to capture?
my dslr
canon eos 1000D
with 6" newt and CC
You need a Barlow, my dude
This is the best I could do w/ my EOS 2000D and 8" w/o Barlow.
just some random crators with my 8" and phone
I noticed a blue spot in that image. I know that Uranus hasn't been far away from Jupiter. So is that noise, a star, or did you wind up capturing one of our ice giants by accident?
a noise
it's too dark blue
ye probably a noise
Aw.
i doubt a six inch newtonian would resolve it, but definitely good question
True point. I wouldn't call that "resolved" as much as "spotted" but that still would have been neat.
i forgot uranus was next to jupiter at the time of shooting this lol
This is what I had for my later planetary imaging:
And it's $20 less now than what I paid for it
The Orion High-Power 1.25
I see.
actually, no. you've left me doubting whether it is noise or not
I need a Goto so that I can point it and track planetary instead of manual "shaky-track"
Definitely not Uranus
It’s way too far for that to be possible and I can already see 4 identical blue dots in the image
It’s noise
pretty sure uranus can be resolved by a 6" with enough magnification
might not get details but..
uhh let me see if willaf got uranus with his
ah yes willaf did image uranus
#older_system_pics message
looks like he got a tiny bit of detail with a 6"
that does...
bring me motivation and hope to be the best 6" newt user in planetary imaging
5x Barlow my dude 🙂
yeppes
Yummy seeing
damn specs?
Kinda blurry tho
This mf. (6 inch newtonian,celestron neximag 10 + skywatcher 2x barlow.
Yeh, you only need to improve your stacking and processing skills and its good
Yup
NIICE
Does dew covering the mirrors count tho??
I got this with my 5 inch skywatcher and my phonr
Goto mount wasnt freaky that time
Yeeeeeee
Red spot 3rd the junior is visible
Lucky you, my weather is bad rn, its windy and cloudy
It is clear for me but guess what. School is tommorow for me and i gotta go 1 hour back to town
Im waking up early
Very early
Yeah i know, its my first day of high school tomorow and i already know that the people from my clasroom are going to be a bad influence to me
Ngl im scared
The school started 3 days ago but the weekend saved me a bit of time
Every mom says, but mom aint no therapist
I would love to go to my moms job to pack boxes. 100 box is 20 euro. Not bad job lol
Not bad
When i was working at a gas station i got like 10 euro an hour
I still saved up like 400 euro in a week
10 an hour? Niiice
Yup
The box packing is painful. The box cardboard is very thin and its cutting my hands
Sometimes blood
But i mean thats a snack
Yeah, cleaning windows on cars broke my back and killed my arms
Blood is tasty
I was so desperate for my asi224mc that i even went sick to work
I cant disagree. My blood is sweet. (I have no medical condition dont worry)
I was so desperate for a proper planetary camera so I went for Uranus C with my birthday money
I only have adhd but thats a mental disorder, i have a friend that has hemophilia
Im hoping to do that too
Lucky, you didnt even have to work for money
Yep I'm basically waiting for it to get shipped so I'll have fun imaging
That's true, but I still do feel guilty kek
My shop didnt have it at stock so i gotta wait a week more
From where did you order it?
From their website, Player One
I bought it because it had free shipping.
Ouch. The delivery costs oh. FREE?
Yes, free worldwide shipping
They have free worldwide shipping for those products that cost more than 199.
But tax?
who pays taxes tbh 
I wanted to order mars c but i didnt beacuse of tax
Uhm, we don't do that here
Apparently no tax too 
Or idk, never hurts to check though
Sadly shipping to croatia does have tax and shipping fee
Huh weird
In croatia we call it PDV
In lithuania we dont call it. The taxes are too expensive to a point you cant verbally explain that
💀
The goverment is def not trying to find me
Anyway. Lets forget that
That weird bird came back
Its very loud and i hear it only at nights
What software is that and how do you do that tracking?
FireCapture with the Cut Out tool
does that increase the fps and only capture the cut out?
Not sure about the FPS but it helps your ram keep in place, and yes it only captures the cut out
The Exposure setting will help your FPS, keep that low and you’ll have a lot
So i can keep full resolution on the camera so i can see the whole frame but it will only capture the cut out? Would it record as if it was a smaller ROI where i'd get more FPS or will it still have the same FPS as a full frame?
Not sure, I haven’t used ROI.
You might have to experiment with that
if data transfer speed is the limitation and not exposure time for frames per second, then an ROI will increase the maximum fps u can get
@tardy iris @steep apex on my ASI585 I use ROI on sharpcap, and what @vapid depot is correct; smaller ROI will get more FPS and less dropped frames.
RAM buffer also prevents frame drops
The bottom right bright blue dot is Neptune
Anyone gonna do Neptune opposition
It’ll make no difference lol
I wanna die
