#Planetary Imaging
1 messages Ā· Page 12 of 1
Cool cool
With the adc I'm essentially using a 5x barlow when using the 3x
If ur at f/4.7 with that 10ā newt I feel a 4x barlow could provide nice results with good seeing
Ahh nvm
But yeah I see what you're saying
Lol howās tracking at those high flās
Idk how accurate those goto dobs are , must be good enough
Pretty good tbh, with roi and feature tracking I don't even have to touch the mount for a good 20 minutes
Wouldnāt expect that
Ikr
I wouldnāt find a need for an eq mount unless u wanna do timelapses
If I had that level of performance from that
If u were nearby Iād say letās throw that on my eq6r š
Lol yeah that would be something
I just make sure to level my base then the tracking is great
For timelapses, you can do feild derotation. There are honestly some perks with a Dob base, no alt limits, much easier to setup and more straightforward
Agree.
The only thing is tracking and feild rotation
Field rotation is the only thing, but this can be fixed with a simple script
Yeah, I was about to say that
Wth!! How could you! (Hope you sense the sarcasm)
Iām sO sOrRy
Report for bad behavior
Thanks Iāll look at it later alr?
I might stay up all night Friday and image Venus, then Saturn, Jupiter and Mercury in the morning 
With this seeing
Iām gonna try š¤
can I try to process this?
Iāll try and find the stacked file @onyx garnet , saturn or Jupiter?
saturn
it's a nice photo
Bet, Iāll find it rq. Thankfully im organized
Great
thanks
looks good
3 min video at 44 fps . probably like 60% stacked
š
anyone in here use firecapture? i love the organization of planet profiles w camera settings it has
lol yeah gotta check output paths
fr
have fun w the data. asi 120mc-s, c6 sct , and $20 shorty 2x barlow used
the first time I used it took me some 15 mins to find the video
lmao damn
120?
yeah
starguider
I wish, but i'm almost finished with my astro budget for now haha
Jupiter under the best seeing Iāve ever had
with 120?
asi120?
Yup
Only planet can I own . Iāve tried planetary with an imx 533 once though
I sold that for dso and now have a 1600mm though
jesus
I need to get ready for my uranus c first light
god I did not expect such good photos from 120
epic
wahfsfsa
bro
I collimate with an artificial star and bobs knobs
dats crazy
I got a uranus c and a couple of filters, should get similar results to you
upgraded to it from a phone cam
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/794654599792951358/1066895802460545104/i_love_mars.png
this was what I got with my phone
I don't think it's that good
but epic
Yeah itās eh
but my saturn one was better
if I can find it wtf
Mars thru my c6 , first light
Nooo , but yea got it just in time lmao. I think Collimation was off so I tried to paint over some edge artifact
epic
damn
So u havenāt imaged yet w ur setup?
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/794654599792951358/1080385388717285426/20230301_134807.gif
here's my jupiter w phon
Damn the edges were always rough w phone
with uranus c? nope
only venus (result was shit)
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/794654599792951358/1102731820400918528/IMG-20230501-WA0010.jpg
here's w uranus c.. uh shit result
zamn
damn
Yeah if I didnāt put all my money into my dso setup Iād have a banger planetary one
Probably a c11
ur planet pics are already so good bro
Ty , planetary is a nice intro the hobby tbh
indeed
Really focused on it for a bit then deep sky tugged at me
not sure what went wrong
I can't do deep sky sadly
wha
This guy images from the Singapore rooftops with a quad apo setup š
wait I know him
Oh nice lol
he's from the local store
he gave me a discount
Thatās awesome
yeah
I got someone from NYC into deep sky imaging with a mono setup
he also operates the 15" clasical cass at the obsevatory
3nm filters and a 1600mm pro
Am5 and redcat. Wish I had that mount lol
lol
I do wanna try m51 some time
though I will suffer horribly as I've never done dso before
I don't even know what program to use for dso
nice
Sold my nexstar mount to help get this oof
I'm using the nextstar mount
Nice yeah that tracks well enough tbh
yep
You could use something like NINA
an adaptable sequencer program
Controls everything from a camera taking dark frames to a whole observatoryās night
oh cool
Itās free too š
must be laptop?
mini pc or laptop yeah
Ahh felt
1 of them is the law.
o
Oh my goodness
yeah
What was the outcome of them coming
I showed them the moon and they got angry on the woman that called
pretty sure they were going to the nearby doughnut shop, quite popular
she called me a 'global warming terriost missile guy'
quoted
Bonus points if you were in your own yard though.
nah we live in a hdb
but I was in a corner shelter that allows only 1 person using it at a time (idk why they created it but alr it's decent)
mf came over and was like 'what are you doing?'
at most people look at me for a while, sometimes they ask whether they can look thru, but that little s took it to the cops
Wow.
it was a really bad night
and I had to settle it myself, parents was busy and only came an hour later
by then the cops alr left
Lmao thatās funny
It isnāt that bad
Eh. I prefer to not deal w/ law enforcement. Your outcome was fine, I'd just rather be spared headache.
And I'm sure if you would have shown her the moon - or even a planet - it wouldn't have helped. "You're a round-earth conspiracist!"
yeah she didn't want to see the 'missile' I had planted
Wholesome
š„³š„³š„³š„³
Optolong uv filter is good?
Nah. Garbage. Has IR leak
I use Bessel U
Any photometric UV is good. By definition it canāt have IR leak
Or shouldnāt*
Optolong U-Venus is bad. Not sure if they have a separate UV filter
I want to buy one, but I don't know which one to buy, and I still have to import it, so I'll have to pay a fee
Where is the PO uv filter
PO were making one but no idea as to its bandpass
It will probably be a very good filter
PO is working on a UV filter??
Cool
Bigger than I expected
I need to collimate the secondary mirror now, but the lens I bought hasn't arrived yet, I'll only be able to take advantage of it 100% at the end of the month when the lens arrives
pog
Gso right?
Yes
Nice, those are really good
Brexit means Brexit!
It's a high level joke
Doing manual tracking with dob is harder than I thought
It is with long focal lengths
Exactly
Any tips to fit the planet on the screen more easily?
I only have 10s to capture
Let alone 6000mm with a 12ā dob
Before the planet drifts off the screen?
Yes
Yeah most people who handtrack just nudge the scope every time the planet leaves the fov
I myself held the dob constantly keeping the object in the centre of the frame but that was with a 6āā¦
You can try doing feature tracking (you probably already do) and let the planet drift from edge to edge of roi then nudge it
Edge to edge of the full frame not roi
Yeah and also fc has a feature to centre the roi on the object once it reaches the edge of the roi
Yeah, that
Maybe that could help
Sharpcap also has something similar, but fc prolly better
Actually Iām sure that makes handtracking much more bearable
I didnāt know about that feature back when I had my manual dob
I will try to collimate the secondary without a lens
Is it far off?
I already use
Ah, cool
Ye
Yeah thatās not good
Looks like secondary not in line with primaru
Yeah
Need to move secondary further in
Tbh same, holds surprisingly well too
Tom taught me a really good technique which I kinda put my own swing on with the Bobās Knobs
Yes really though
Ok
Maybe the other way around @ruby tartan
You just wanna see the all the clips that hold the primary when looking through the barrel
Yeah
And have an equal amount of black space all around the primary as seen through the focuser
My collimation is a bit off but primary clips are all visible
Deleted my perfect collimation pics just an hour ago or smth
Yeah donāt you wanna have a perfect black circle around the primary?
Thatās what I do
Yeah, I believe so
Looking through the focuser of a perfectly collimated newt looks so nice lol
My secondary got touched by one of my neighboursā kids the other day :(
Luckily just on the edge
Stillā¦
It hurts
Better?
I think it will only be possible with an allsky lens
I'll wait for Saturn to test
i may or may not hand track planets at 9000mm fl with my 12"
has the same specs as yours and i use a 2 and 3x barlow
huh? you have a 3000mm dob?
rip, whenever anybody is looking through my telescope i always tell them to keep their hands in their pockets unless i tell them otherwise
it might be a bit overkill but it does the job well
Perks of a closed ota dob I guess?
yes
Yeah well heās 3 years old and I had my scope conveniently pointing at a white wall right over the backrest of my couch
His brother was looking through the collimation cap and then he figured out that his brother could see him in the mirror and he stuck his hands through the spider veins
Immediately grabbed told him not to but I guess it was already too late lol
(I was about to collimate it thatās why lol)
uhh no? its 1500mm and i use a 2x (which makes it 3000mm) then a 3x
i use both
Oh I see what you mean
Thatās not a very common technique but if it works it works
Yes
Looks like secondary need adjustment too
Looks good
Only 1000 frames
IR685
1000 frames too
I tried to capture Jupiter, but for some reason I couldn't focus
Another IR685nm
š
For now Iām gonna just leave it since it doesnāt affect the quality of my images luckily. I think Iāll clean it once my mirrors get super dusty and dirty or when I might sell my dob at some point to upgrade
Mima's shadow?
Inconclusive with that SNR
Also, would have to a very short capture of ~30 seconds.
Same appearance as these spots
It could be Mimas' shadow, but also could be noise.
I will look at each stack
Promising preliminary results with the Uranus-C this morning
Very nice, this is all rgb data?
Nvm I see in the title
/file name
š
I think I can improve the collimation with this hole
Should do the trick
Like this?
Yeah
12" dob first light
@somber stratus you don't use a laser for primary alignment ?
/secondary
I kind of do both, first with Cheshire or collimation cap, I only do this once every few months. But each time I setup my scope I use laser collimator
Idk what anyone says I love lasers
lasers can be out of collimation themselves, that's the only issue
Yeah you gotta collimate the laser itself, but after that collimation is pretty easy
TW I have a few more questions regarding lucky imaging for Jupiter, so you do 90-120 second vids and then sharpen and de-rotate them
What do you do after? Do you take multiple and stack them all together?
Same here!
Your collimation must be impeccable to get the images that you get, so i will continue to trust this collimation cap
Boutta put this bad boy on my UMi
would this cause noticable stuff if im just using for planetary
with a very rough coolimation
Saturn image I took this morning
Was 20 +something deg but sky was already quite bright from the sun so itās not the best
Also Jupiter in IR
Was hard to find
rlly nice
Thanks brotha
Wow those 2 cloud belts are thick this year
I wonder if they'll merge, thats really interesting
Question for you all... Can I shoot the moon with an orion xt8 and just a 533mc pro without a barlow?
and be in focus?
Probably but I mean you might as well try right
That would be an interesting event
xt8 can focus with a dslr so it can probably also focus with a 533
hmm ok ok good to know
@idle hollow @coarse aspen I have an Orion SkyView Pro 8" and 585. Full moon will not fit in capture because of magnification. Focus is beautiful though so I expect it won't be an issue.
533 is far wider, it'll probably fit the full moon
also a square sensor
that would fit it perfect
yeah
nice moon
sharp
I just cannot use my DSLR for planetary/lunar anymore though.
Thank you!
good exposure, nothing blown out
Almost any mirrorless camera can reach focus with a dob.
My 462mc reaches focus with my 8ā dob at native fl.
Again, thank you! I'm glad it came out well.
That never happens
sad
ir685
mine cant
This decent for a phone? (Taken when I was still starting out)
yes
did this too w my phone
I upgraded to a uranus c, big upgrade
Took this with my mono guide cam last year. What camera and barlow would you guys recommend for a 8 inch f/6 dob? Idk what planetary cameras are good (Budget: 600$ or so)
uranus c + celestron xcel 2x
Thanks man š
no problem, happy to help
@thick heron i used to use citronella candles but I just became one with the skeetos 8 huge texas skeetos on my arms while handtracking at high fl thats what I call a hoot and a holler
I see your 2x and raise you to 5X
i see your 5x and ignore it, i like my sanity
TBH I'll see how the 2x works, then 3x, then prob experiment w/ 5x
good plan
I'm so used to using the 5x b/c I used my DSLR for planetary and needed to. Might not need it so much w/ a 585 ... though could be fun anyway.,
fck around and find out
That's usually a warning though. That you're going to get your butt kicked if you do something wrong.
I'll choose to take the phrase this time as encouragement to make some butt-kicking images I suppose. š
im not saying dont use the 5x, im saying get ready
get ready to stack all of them for a 30x

Oh yeah, I'm not taking anything bad away from it.
get ready for the grs to fill your entire frame
If I can get the same sort of resolution as the Juno orbiter, that would be really nice
nah. it will somehow still be lower resolution than tom.
if i did that with my camera i would have to do a jupiter mosaic 
I think he starts with a bigger scope
More aperture = more detail
Geebaz
Guys I think I could see exoplanets pretty easily with my setup, I got a 12 inch dob with 1520 mm focal length and 2 3x barlows, 2 2x barlows, a 5x Barlow, and a 4 mm eyepiece
Ez

But can you spot Saggitarius A*
I may need another 5x or 2 but yeah that should work
This would be 45,600x zoom btw lol
holy i thought you were joking
i mean im obviously not gonna use it to look at anything but i figured id put all the barlows in for craps and giggles
i figured out that if i extend my backfocus to about 0.2 meters i can focus on something 3m away
started out with three barlows (1 3x, 1 2x, 1 5x) but then i started to get (sorta) serious about planetary so i upgraded to celestron barlows (2 and 3x) so now i have way too many eyepieces
holy cow
turn it into a microscope lol
seriously
No way is that going to be able to get anything focused. Whatever is being viewed will fly right outside of the FOV
well yeah
if it could actually focus and show some reasonable level of quality it would be astronomically difficult to stay on an object
Bro got that loooong shit
š
i calculated and got 68400x
put it on a eq8
probably good enough for some lucky imaging at 0.01%
What will you achieve with this 
3% transmission
guys, any tips on how can I improve my lunar images. This was taken with a 6" newt and my mobile phone. I stacked 200 frames and processed them in registax 6 but Im still not that happy with the results
Get better seeing or reduce the percentage of pics that'll be stacked.
And, how'd you take frames? did you take pics or did you record?
Plus, of course the mobile phone is kind of limiting you at this point
Views on this please and any tips to improve
equipment?
8ā dob and iphone
that's pretty good for a phone
wait let me show you what I did w a 6" and my phone
colour sucks, but details yes (for my pic)
oversharpened
save up for better camera than iphone, then you'll get better images. good image with that phone after all.
it is what it is
I'm actually ok if it's oversharpened, brought out the details more in editing.
true but colors become nonexistant
oh
yeah it's not great
but it did well for mars tho (for my expectations), was quite unexpected
really? i'd like to see the mars
1 sec
Damnš
Yeah i will,just trying to get as much details from phone as i cam
#1020657687291252797 message
I recently upgraded to uranus c, so I get a fat upgrade
but phone will do
unexpected wow
Nice,i wanna get a nice barlow and couple eye pieces before i get cam
x cel barlows one of the best
Yeah i shortlisted that too
Jupiter is drunk apparently. What in the world is happening to the SEB. Look at the slant to the right of the GRS. Thickness at left limb is ~2x that at the right limb @ruby tartan
Huh
This is what I did with my 6" and phone
Disord messed up the colors
not bad
Venus in UV with Uranus-C #47 and UV/IR cut, single 2 min video, 20% frames
Should have even better seeing tonight for another take
damn wtf
wtf? curious what a map would look like
Cylindrical maps: https://alpo-j.sakura.ne.jp/Latest/j_Cylindrical_Maps/j23mapsL3.htm
It had a thin section in 2021 too adjacent to the GRS.
Yea I was tired haha
@fossil schooner magnification isnt everything exoplanets are extremly small ive seen people image exo planets a few times bigger than jup it was a faint dot in a starfield even with hours of exp
@cloud copper invest in a planetary cam even a zwo 120 will produce better results
Cool how the seb just flipped its thickness over 2 years
Im happy to say that a new planetary cam should arrive in 2 days. Its Ceres c from player one
Swank
Is that good or bad XD
Does the job
Nice
I was just joking around lol
Cant tell with this server lol
Needs more xcel 3x barlows
its a 2 and 3
more threes might get me some surface detail on an exoplanet
see what the aliens are having for lunch
God dang! What in the actual detail
hes getting apod every day
TPOD at this point
Mmm pixels
Venus from 5 days ago. 8ā Dob SVBONY camera. Sharpcap, PIPP Autostakkert, Registax. Meh seeing.
very rough Jupiter during sunrise this morn
You have some hot pixels I think
Yeah but atleast its not affecting the detail on the surface
Anyone know what causes these ugly ass artifacts in WJ?
When derotating
I've been getting them often lately and I have no idea why
@somber stratus since youāve gotten great shots of Venus and the dark side as well, you should try a hdr version of Venus for fun
Itās very difficult as thereās a good portion of the planet thatās impossible to image
Nightside close to the terminator
So youād have a weird gap
Hmmm
@thick heron new nightside camera dropped
what is that?
Diy planetery cam
using a webcam?
Ya
š
what telescope you're using to capture it
130mm eq
celestron 130mm eq one i guess?
StarTracker?
Ya
ohh
a nice one tbh
you bought the motor drive one or no motor drive?
ohh
they have the separate kit there you can always buy that later
nice one
Like, between the bright side and the dark side?
Yeah
Everything in between entered the Twilight Zone.
The portion of the image that is blown out when imaging the night-side is larger than the entire bright-side would be so there will always be a portion of the image that is impossible to image, that would be the gap.
Itās basically nightside thatās right next to the terminator
I.e that black region in image above
You would have to let it rotate then comp it in manually right?
lol nice focusing skills you have
nice one bro ngl
I also have a telescope by same company same mount just a 114/900 for planetary
What cam?
Ooo
Web cam
Nice
Btw
Dose any know a good cheap bag to keep telescope in
š¤Ø
For a star tracker Newt? Nope. You'd want a case. And a vehicle with sufficient back/trunk space
Dude I also use webcam (Logitech C270 modded)
Nice
Ya
my setup for planetary (also some images taken from it)
Wait
Did you uploaded a vid on ur telescope? On yt
#StarTracker #reflector #telescope #unboxing #overview
Link for this telescope:
https://tejraj.com/st-114900-eq-telescope.html
Aaaaaaaa
....
no
some other person
Iām very angry that itās not actually a star tracker like the swsa 2i pro, it has slow motion control and if it were to be tracked, it would be a motorized/tracking mount
Jkjk

is encke division possible with a 6" SCT
any filters, barlows?
No
damn it
was it daytime and were the weather conditions good
it's usually shit here in singapore
Ya the weather was on next level literally no clouds time between sunset and. Night
The time when u can just see Venus
I just bought an equatorial platform, it should arrive in 20 days
Does anyone have tips for using it?
New cam and barlow just arrived
Tnks
When firecapture is not recording I get 200 fps but when I am recording its stuck at 10, why?
did you set the fps limit to 10, or your memory drive cant save fast enough
i wanna buy this barlow is it that good ?
Yep, its good
I set it to max and than it just switches back to 10
send me like a screenshot so i can see where its showing 10
And it changes from max to 10
lower the exposure time
I am using a ceres-c camera with and IR cut filter, so do I capture in RGB or in IR?
Lower exposure time and use smaller ROI
and how can I set the ADC to 8 ?
Wym
an ir cut filter cuts out the ir signal, it removes it so you need to record in rgb
ir pass filters let you capture in ir if im not mistaken
it defaults to 8-bit iirc
Return of Biscuitās spies.
Some good seeing, I'd say 7/10
Thatās 10/10 for me
Nice sharp frames occasionally. My seeing is just a continuous blur. No good periods
This is approx 8/10
Maybe 7 during best parts but you're right
thats a 5/6
imho
same as what ken said
Looks like 4-5/10
Maybe when you have 60+ degree altitude this would be a 5, but for 30 degrees this is good
Well maybe slightly above average
Honestly I'm tempted to d/l that and see what sort of image I can get from the frames
Lol that's my phone recording the laptop screen, not raw. I don't think it'll be worth
Gotta keep the "Mad Lad" label somehow
Agreed
Jupiter very quick and rough process thats why colors are kinda off, single 2 min video 10% best frames. Hopefully will get through the rest tonight
Nice one
It looks a lot like this one I took with my 6ā last year
Regarding detail ofc, not colour
Jupiter really didnāt change a lot from last year huh
Yeah, the changes from 2021 to 2022 were most noticeable so far. This year and last year not so much lol
Still have 4 and a half months till opposition, ya neva know what could happen until then
Did a reprocess on Sat and Jup. Orion XT8 and SVBONY SV105 (50 USD webcam basically, aka it's shite)
Canāt tell, probably a plane though
Helicopter. Or plane and the angles are just right that the wings aren't evident.
Nuclear warhead
it actually has that shape 
Although I guess it'd have to be propelled by something other than a plooming rocket thruster
Video compression may be hiding something
maybe, but even with my eyes I see the wings every time especially when its basically directly above
this just looked like a rocket booster basically
Interesting
It was probably a helicopter, although I have no idea if they fly that high
also usually you'd hear them
that's pretty high, damn but why would that specific helo fly there
Another video, slow mo
well same video
but different part
kinda looks like rcs thrusters
If I ever see this shit again ima manual focus
a stack of some of the best frames
They allow up to 7 days of playback for free, shows most aircraft I think.
most likely it was this
plane
that's the only thing that was in the area at that time
going south just like what I saw
Exact same equipment. The 105 is crappy sure but good for its price.
I miss last year saturn position
Ive taken videos using my 533mc pro and 8" dob. They are mp4 format. What do I do first to provess them?
I have no idea what software I need to get
Dam, you know what... My Barlow may be the culprit.
I only used it with the barlow
Orion shorty 2x I believe. The optics may not be bad, but from my tests its gotta be holding back the optics.
Run em through PIPP to convert to avi or ser. But why did you record in mp4 anyways?
Interesting
I've seen 533 listed as a planetary camera on player one's website
So
If I understand
585 - for planetary but can do DSO
533 - for DSO but can do planetary
Isn't it just fascinating that
That what?
I believe there are two different versions with and without cooling system
At least I think ZWO has both
The cooling system would be more suitable for dso, the other one for planetary
We usually end up using a camera for the opposite of what it was intended for 
New JWST image
Better resolution
Oh wow, I saw some of the earlier images but just that detail in the poles is stunning
Iām trying to get into planetary stuff. Mostly just looking but one or two images just to show what I can see would be cool. I donāt want to spend a lot of money since I focus more on nebula etc. I thought of getting the smaller one Astro biscuit suggested because I can find it on eBay for a good price. Is it worth getting and is it possible to mount a camera to that thing just so make a quick snap. Of course I would use a better tripod haha
So what is this filter supposed to show? Super dense gas?
Really cool ring details though
it is CH4, just not the absorption band you're used to
so i have 5 stacks of an image and want to know which one to use for post processing, out of some 14-15000 frames i have 1%, 5%, 8%, 10%, and 12% stacks which one would be good for sharpening? thanks!
Thats for you to decide
Process each one and decide which looks the best
oh ok ok so thereās no like āit has to be 1%ā type thing got it thanks!
for my second attempt at saturn itās looking very promising
Yeah it depends a lot on the conditions during capture. Although you usually want at least a minimum of 1500 frames or so.
You basically just gotta balance noise with sharpness
The more frames the less noise, but you lose sharpness. The less frames, the more noise, but you get more detail.
And this varies greatly with how good your seeing is.
What I like to do is after AS3 sorts my frames from best to worst, I then scroll through the frames to see where the quality starts to deteriorate, then I stack that percentage.
first one is 12%, second is 1%
ahh ok i see hmm
it's not too bad so should i work with the 12%?
The difference is visible when you sharpen
You said 15k frames right? 12% should give around 1800 stacked so Iād say youāre good.
12% is looking much much less noisy so i think i'll stick with it yea

wavelets are so confuzzling idk what im doing
any tips for wavelets? idk what layer to increase they all look off if i do it too much
I generally used layers 1-3 in Registax
And don't overdo it if it doesn't look good lol
I'm not sure what you're talking about
Something astrobiscuit suggested
omegon Telescope AC 60/700 AZ-1
Not really worth getting that telescope if you want to image planets
It has a 2 inch aperture
Most people get at least a 4 inch telescope and even that's like pretty small
In fact I would advise against getting that telescope if you want to image planets
I doubt it'll be a fun experience with that tripod and optics
Size matters
idk if you missread my message but my main goal is just to see the planets and take a look without spending much money
Ah okay
Well if you're content with seeing the planets as slightly bigger dots than with the naked eye then go for it
i used all the layers it came out pretty well!
I had a 90mm refractor and I couldnāt really see much detail, only Saturns rings and Jupiters moons. I donāt know what you are looking for but Iād recommend at least 70mm
im more concerned about this lmao it looks so funny but it actually kinda works
but isnt 70mm smaller ? 
Mind sending me your stack? I can look at it
You were thinking of getting a 60mm, right?
Yea I just thought because u said u had a 90mm and did not see much and you would recommend 70mm
I got confused mb
Oh yeah, looking back it is a bit confusing. I meant that even at 90mm I couldnāt really see much, so I think anything under 70mm would be kind of disappointing
Yea I get you
dms or here?
Whatever you prefer
Alr I'll look at it in a bit
thanks
@clear pier your 150p doesnāt have a motorized mount, right?
Ahh alright
it's the tabletop dob mount
I have one too but motorized
ohh i see that's really cool, what mount is it?
Just asking because you can achieve incredibly better images with the addition of a Barlow lens. This was taken with a 3x Barlow and a ZWO 120mcs
Skywatcher sells it coupled with a AZ goto mount for around $460
Also kunal are you using a uvir cut?
HUH i should've bought that wtf š
i have a ~2.2x barlow with a uranus c
it's the gso 2.5x but it really is about 2.2x apparently
nope need to get one soon
Yeah get that and a barlow next
It has some problems lol
Uvir cuts aren't that expensive, but don't go cheap on the barlow
i have a barlow yea my saturn and jupiter were taken with the barlow
GSO's 1.25" 2.5x fully apochromatic Barlow increases the magnification of each eyepiece and effectively doubles the number of eyepieces at your disposal
Low profile maintains a comfortable viewing position
Air-spaced, three-element, fully-multicoated ED lenses with excellent color correction, sharpness, and image brightness
Precision-mac...
Oh alright, I thought you didnāt have one because the image you sent here looks pretty similar to the ones Iāve taken without it
Zenith is overpowered lol
oh i see i guess im just bad at taking images then š
what's that?
Itās like the point directly above you
dang that's really good thank you, can you show me what wavelet settings you used if it's not too much trouble?
Lol Ken are u good
Iād get images of Jupiter at 70 degrees
yea this was really low
damn that's insane
does that use wavelets too?
yeah but i used the sharpen feature, more simple
also btw 70mm refractor, for whoever said 70mm was gonna be disappointing
ah ok got it
What was the whole setup
WO Z73, 2x barlow, asi290/uranus-c cant remember
severely undersampled lmao, like F/9 or smth
Yeah so it was with good quality optics and I reckon your avx
yeah ig but pretty confident it can be handtracked
William optics aint cheap š
That's what I'm saying
@lyric peak was talkin bout some ebay shi
The other dude wants to buy a 60mm omegon refractor with a cheap tripod
ill try one day with my astronomy stores cheap 70mm
Lol
anyways i think imma image saturn tonight
Noice
Also that doublet purple tint gonna be bad
why does jupiter have a halo
there's like a ring around it
im not insane right
did i just sharpen that much lmao
Like that dim ring around?
Sharpening artefacts. I just remove them in gimp or whatever.
gimp? ok got it
Black paint brush
LOL ok
Or you could mess with levels but that sometimes clips the planet
frfr, i just crop the planet out and paste on a black background lmao
LMAO
Both have levels but registax is like ancient at this point so just use gimp
okok lol
we still love you regi š«¶
Ive actually moved to wavesharp recently. I think its like the same people that made regi but its 64 bit
wavesharp is pretty good i think though cba to switch
does it have batch sharpening?
Whats that
tell it to apply sharpening settings to a whole bunch of stacks so you dont need to input them one by one
Idk I havenāt tried
Main thing I like about it is the wavelets apply in real time, like as youāre scrolling.
Just feels smooth
Raw Jupiter frame
Oohh
why is that better than my stack i swear to god
Bad seeing/small mirror
6 inch, meh seeing didn't take enough frames
Barlow's?
the gso 2.5x so it's about 2.2x
this is my stack
and edited
i just took 2k frames it was not a lot
You can also create a black layer underneath, and use circle mask with feathering.
Tis a scam
How dare they
hey any recommendations for a uv/ir cut filter?
donāt wanna spend too much
im in the us btw
managed to salvage a 2min capture, rlly rushed lmao
Man, if it was clear it would be soooo good
playerone has one??
Bruh 
Of course
oh dang ok
šš«
so zwo and p1 no difference?
Whereās the scope
Took it down lmao
Zwo transmits 400-700nm, P1ās transmits 380-700. I have both because I use the P1 for Venus UV and ZWO for everything else
But I donāt think that 20nm matters much in general
oh ok so zwo is better overall for planets and dso?
I just need that extra 20nm for the UV signal
It really doesn't matter tbh
so whichever is cheaper basically
Yea
Yea I guess
ok ok cool thank you
Oh itās under that tarp at the end of the video
Can anyone name any planetary stacking and processing software forMacBook/MacOS other then Lynkeos?
I canāt get wine to download so I can't open windows applications
You call that bad?!

its bad for a 16" in excellent seeing

mans got the capability to double james webbs focal ratio
I wonder what dehaze would do to planetary images
whatās the longest time you should take a video of jupiter before rotation becomes an issue?
and is derotating a good option?
5mins
Yes
how does it work and would that help make things sharper even on a 5 minute video like you said?
Basically it flattens jupiter images into a map and stacks the maps based on the rotation change
oh i see i see does that help make things sharper?
Increase the signal to noise ratio
And you can do lucky lucky imaging - choosing the best stacks
ahh ok i might try it then, what app is it in, winjupos?
Winjupos
An hour?
oh ok nice thank you
Unless you're using an EQ mount, I wouldn't do more than 2 minutes due to field rotation, it depends a lot on the focal length
Bit long imho
Esp with moons in transit
I never go above 2m
There is no real benefit of doing 5m vs 2m. Youāll just have more of the 2m captures. SNR will be the same as youāre not changing the exposure/gain settings
Stacks will be sharper as thereās inherently less motion blur
hmm ok ok and i donāt really need to use derotation then?
No. Still derotate. Just capture <2min videos at a time.
I usually derotate ~8 or so 2min vids
for 16mins total
Nice
ahh ok got it
i was gonna do some imaging at 4:30, woke up and it was cloudy 
even though every app and website i checked said it was gonna be clear
relatable asf
and i checked my 2 weather apps on my phone and they said 0% cloud cover when the entire sky was blanketed in clouds like come on
Thatās why you donāt go to sleep at all
That way you canāt wake up to disappointment
Itās just a raw frame he was showing
Crazy sharpness
True
Still the fact he got a better raw frame than my stacked is just⦠š
Well I mean heās imaging with an actual astrocam
Opposed to phone camera up to eyepiece
What do you expect
Good seeing
Should be even better tonight fingers crossed
True
But I never see live video this good
This isn't even that good tbh lol, maybe a 7/10
7-8
Playing with old data again as weather trash atm. Trying to get the most out of a single stack. 15 seconds integrated.
oh stop flexing on us noobs
lol 15 seconds
Integrated so the recording was probably a lot longer
105-sec
Oh, you too? Doing the same, here. Tell me what you think, both are reproc'd.
Whatās your setup? Colours look good off the bat
8" Newt, Canon T7, 5x Barlow.
Gonna credit @mossy juniper and @near quiver with their feedback on my colors.
Looks good but i think youād get more out of the scope aperture by using a proper Astro cam & dispersion corrector for instance
man what am i doing wrong with planetary lol
ohhh thats what, youre using 2.5 times my focal length
Which is why I bought an ASI585. Kind of scared to get the AD corrector, seems a little complicated to use. But I can't get Jupiter low on the horizon in Jan w/o one, I tried.
Nice. Yeah ADCs are a pain at first. Takes some getting used to
I didn't get the ASI585 until March though.
Still trying to get used to the astro cam. I got some decent shots of Mars in Feb/March. I have to process them again. But what I'm struggling w/ now is getting a clear preview when the planet is in focus. The shots I took of Mars when I processed them showed some detail, but the preview screen just shows a red dot that when in focus is not blurred out.
On the other hand, I took a couple of lunar shots and BOY-O.
Could have just been poor seeing. Mars was also quite distant by March-time.
I just haven't had luck w/ getting a good preview image on planetary. The Mars images were, well, evident in the fact that I am still getting used to processing Mars. For a distant planet, not bad.
Thing is, I have no problem whatsoever with preview on my DSLR, even with poor seeing. Just w/ the astro cam. First try was with a Sv105. That one actually crashed SharpCap pretty consistently. Likely firmware, but I sent it back and got a refund. But it really wouldn't show a good preview, even if the end result processed image was great.
I havenāt had experience using a DSLR so Iām not sure. My preview has always been representative of the final image with the Uranus-C
