#Planetary Imaging
1 messages Ā· Page 11 of 1
Do you think it's a better idea to screw the filter on the camera, or on the adc or barlow?
I tried it on Venus once but for some reason it looked really bad when applying wavelets
Good question, I always screw it onto the camera nosepiece but I too wonder if ADC or barlow would be better
Even with histogram at around 50% when shooting?
I know that crap on the filter becomes larger in the fov when put further away from the sensor
Yup
I always aim for 50-60%
It's an interesting question but actually I think it doesn't really matter. And like you said stuff on the filter becomes larger the further away from the sensor so maybe putting it as close to the sensor as possible is better, thus on the nosepiece
A useless narrowband indeed
Wake up. New Jupiter dropped.
I got clear skies 3 days ago but I was too lazy to get up
Outrageous
Festoons 
I haven't noticed any difference yet, we'll have to wait for more images to see something, I hope to be able to register Jupiter in the next few days
SEB looks thicker to me.
I looked at some files from last year and it seems to be a little thicker.
It thickened throughout the year, and appears to have continued. This also happened in 2010-2012 if I remember. Seasonal change
I think I asked DP about this during summer last year. Maybe it was the NEB, not sure.
Also this brighter part of the NTrZ looks so much thicker. Maybe thatās just IR though, will have to see.
10k messages in here now
Nice



Sold my 200mm! Soon I will be with a 300mm
Yes
GSO 12" F/5
frac 
Manual
600mm club when?
When I finish engineering college
Bruh Iām imaging
And Iām pretty sure someone in the neighbourhood is making a fire
I can smell it and itās screwing up my seeing
Really getting to grips with a consistent & reliable colour process that doesn't look terrible. Only took 2 years.
And another. Completely different sky conditions so the output from the camera was quite different. Still maintains roughly the same colour palette without any manual tinkering.
Am I the only one who is particular enough that I have to get the planet "righted" in my view?
Wym righted
he means as keeping it in a right angle
for example, the big red thingy on bottom and the bands horizon
You mean North up
Yeah, like that.
Depends what you like. South-up is technically convention but either works. I like to rotate to an arbitrary angle depending on the composition with the moons.
Just for aesthetics
I typically position the cam so it's north-up; this is the first I hear of a convention, let alone that it's the complete opposite of how I would arrange it.
You can rotate the image in post so North is up
With WJ for example
At least imo it's easier to just have the camera in my scope so up on the HC is up on the liveview
Having the camera so North is always up makes it weird to control the scope
It's historical in nature, this image is technically right: #1019937457095065731 message
But yeah no idea why that came to be.
I know it can be rotated in post, but is there a particular reason for convention to be South-up? Oh, scope control. Hm. Might try it south-up sometime. I didn't notice anything weird about control; then again, right now I manually control the scope so I just twist the knobs in the direction they need to go and not worry about how it should technically go as much as keeping the image in sight.
Doesn't really matter in the end. Do whatever you prefer
It's just as per monitoring of storms
I prefer what makes things easiest. š
north-up would also do. It's easier to align images to the horizontal bands, so helps their study.
And of course WinJupos outputs as north/south-up, regarding images taken in more recent times.
WinJupos?
Program that people use for derotation. It also has planetary ephemerides. http://jupos.org/gh/download.htm
WinJUPOS - Download site
I would argue north-up has replaced south-up as convention for years now that visual has been replaced by imaging for serious observations.
Even when I started ten years ago i would say more images were north-up vs south-up.
And now the gap feels much bigger.
Thatās fair. Yeah I just knew back in the day it was south-up. Either are accepted though as you say.
will lower ISO reveal more detail and not make it look crap
pretty sure it needs more dynamic range?
or is it intergration
How high was your iso
6400
Wtf
Why so high lol
The moon is bright af
Yeah Iām p sure you can get a better image
Was your exposure 1/4000?
Like the shortest possible exposure
The moon is really bright you can just do exposures of under a second
Donāt we all
If only there was an alternative with the same aperture⦠
Home made mirrors
April 8th Jupiter Map
March 1st for comparison
My impression or the GRS decreased?
i've overlaid them in PS, and looks about the same. The widening of this white section is most notable i think
Oval BA has definitely shrunk though.
This barge has grown, now outsizes the GRS. Completely motionless too wrt the coordinate system.
And @ruby tartan hello, what do you use to get the map like that? Right now when I image Jupiter I just take a 3min video and extract the frames for subs, then stack/process from there. That way I don't have to derotate. I'm sure that WinJupos is involved, but what else?
Oh lol those are Juno maps, constructed from the orbiter. NASA/JPL associated.
I wish we could match Juno...
but sadly not
Just need a bigger scope
I hope to be able to capture Jupiter by the end of the month, the sooner the 300mm arrives the sooner I capture
I hope to be able to capture Jupiter by end of the year, more money i get, sooner the makutsov arrives.
I'm waiting for it to come up in the evening, this fall. Tried to image it in Feb and ouch. Pastel looking quality. I've been told that an ADC could help.
In the meantime I'm reprocessing stuff that I took last Sept. 9/9/2022 was really good seeing.
I'm leaning to SCT and looking to 14" - 16". Trouble is one of those costs at least 1/4 the cost of my car and I can't afford that much.
Barge is visible in Clyde Foster's May 11th image too.
matched coords
My job just can't afford my hobby.
my pocket money can't either
Here's a q. How do we know that Jupiter is spinning as fast as it is? How do we know it's not just cloud rotation and the planet isn't just practically at standstill?
At a guess, probably the oblateness. Wider at the equator than the poles. A ratio of the polar/equatorial radii could be used to obtain a rough rotation rate if the mass/density is known.
Whereas with Venus for example, the planet is a near perfect sphere as it rotates so slowly. The clouds however do circle the globe much faster.
Also, i guess you start hitting an issue with "how do you define Jupiter's surface, as there is no solid ground?"
What else other than clouds, can you use.
I thought the core was solid at some point
Sure, but we can't see it.
I'm almost certain it's the oblateness that is used. I guess with sensitive enough instruments, you could measure the blue/red shift of the limbs, but this is very hard.
Kind of amazing how we've measured stuff w/o seeing it. It would be pretty neat if we could get something that could go to the solid surface and send stuff back up. Even if it only lasted a couple of minutes, like the Venus explorer that the Soviets sent
The inside being completely still and the clouds spinning around in just under ten hours would generate tons of heat from friction. Jupiterās rotational speed at the equator is 60% faster than the ISS orbits Earth.
Would that light the clouds on fire and set it as a star?
to not mention the pressure.
lol nope, not enough mass to fuse hydrogen into helium
To be fair, I wasn't thinking of fusion as much as just generating enough to light the atmosphere up and that being enough heat to subsequently burn the planet.
but yeah its good question what happened if a fire were to spark inside the atmosphere of jupiter
Might take a lot. I know that the remains of a comet hit the planet a while back and there were a few new spots in the atmosphere for a few days but it didn't ignite.
What kept the fire from spreading?
Fire needs 3 things to start/continue. 1) oxygen; 2) combustible material; 3) spark. Any material can be combustible at high enough temps, for example, meteor/ites. However, without oxygen nothing burns unless it can produce its own oxygen (thermite for example) or burns in a way that doesn't involve oxygen (stars for example). Knowing that and not knowing the exact composition of Jupiter's atmosphere make for interesting exploratory q's.
im not sure but oxygen can be replaced with another compound right?
as long as its an oxidizing agent
I forgot about the triangle lol
Not sure, not an expert, but oxidizing by its name involves oxygen so there's that.
yeah oxygen is the most common oxidizing agent
but combustion can be replaced with other compounds tho
not sure how abundant they are
I wonder how horrible a diy 3 mirror system would be
Horrible to build
But would theoretically give you decent results
For dso
Not really worth it for planetary
Huh
just restart discord its a bug
Why not? Seems to me the images would be crystal clear
Will try again in a few hours with a nice 88 degree pass!
Space station attempt, still having some issues with the slewing with the sat tracker app
Also it's out of focus by a bit lol
Is this manual tracking?
No, it's using the sat tracker app with goto. But I was having some issues with the slewing so I had to push it around a bit to get the iss in view
I see that, great work 
Thanks, but tbh this was a fail lol
here is my best one yet, from last year
I wished I payed attention to captions moreā¦anyways good luck on your attempt in a few hours!
Haha no worries, thank you. I'll post soon!
WOAH
damn takes lot of skill to do that
even with the goto
Thank you š @soft skiff
Damn i am a long way to be able to do that once my dob comes
Just keep trying, you'll get a good shot of it one of those times!
yeah thanks!
Main benefits you get are a faster speed and a larger image circle
But at the cost of an increased central obstruction
So it wouldnāt work out that different if not possibly worse than a newt
As newts central sharpness is actually quite good
Ah, I see. Increased central obstruction would be a challenge then. "Looks good on paper, practical application can be less than desirable."
Yeah



i got this with my S22 last year
30x zoom
New Clyde image
that festoon though
Chris Go
daylight jupiter? insane
oh didnt think jupiter was up in the night
Twilight, so not night per se.
you from philippines?
oooohh
i see
i was curious cause im from the same country
@somber stratus, you already had a 12", correct? Could you send your best pictures to see what I can expect from this telescope?
Sure but they were taken in 2021 at an incredible 25° altitude. I will find them
one sec
Ok
Jup (23°)
thats insane
jupiter looked cooler in 2021
Nice, I hope to get good results this year
I hope so too. I think your seeing will support it.
Encke division should be common to be honest.
Maybe not actually with the current tilt of the rings.
And by altitude too, Saturn will pass zenith this year
New image of Jupiter from a friend here in Brazil
Nice
definitely highest res one so far
462MC + IR685 is kinda inefficient but does the job
Lookin good
I swear you are going to take one of the most detailed images of Jupiter shot from earth one day, your just so good at it
As long as Damian Peach is alive, no one can
Heās getting damn close
I bet that if he had a huge scope, as big as the one Damian Peach used to get the shot (if he doesnāt already) he could get it
real
Jupiter
The solution is to get a bigger scope than Damian Peach
And on a big mountain for less atmosphere and good seeing
Just chuck it on Mount Everest and hope for the best lol

Not only is he the best planetary astrophotographer, he is probably the drippiest one too
i have never seen such drip in my life
yeah no, tom stands no chance
tom can be second best on earth
He's getting a SW 16" like mine afaik. He was asking me about it a couple months back.
Not sure if he has committed yet.
š³
@ruby tartan Raw Jup data with the 12". Shot above was just a single stack so you should get something better if you derotate.
And sample of seeing. Was a good night.
Damn, thatās an awesome suit
Had a first attempt at ISS imaging tonight, sattracker worked really smoothly, just forgot to check if my powertank was in a good position for the real pass and it wasnāt so the cable got tied around the base at some point so the dob couldnāt slew further lol
Quickly switched to handtracking but I lost it for a good 10-15 seconds, right around when the iss reached peak altitude
So these are only the frames taken during auto tracking
Those are gorgeous! I canāt see any disturbances from the seeing as well, great acquisition!
When itās about 2/3 of the way through the video, the individual panels create some kind of visual perturbance, with stacking I bet you could resolve panels as blobs!
Nah, thatās just cheating
Jkjk, thatās actually sick
Haha thanks, these frames are already stacked though
Might have another chance tonight and if I do Iām gonna try it with a 2x barlow for 3000mm fl
Should be a lot better already, given Iām using the right exposure
That makes a lot more sense LOL
I was so curious how your seeing was that good haha, well at 3000mm you should be able to see some more on the panels ;)
Hmmmmm
This is planetary imaging?
How
pls let me know, I gtg sleep
This was my Saturn back when I had my 6ā
Might give you an idea
Taken in good seeing
You could also just image it and see what you get
Aim for 50-70% histogram
Adjust your exposure so that seeing effects arenāt extreme and adjust gain until you get 50-70% histo
Put your preview fps to like 10fps to see seeing effects
Hints of it, hard to differentiate between ringing and encke div
This doesn't exist in reality, its from the Cassini div and effects of sharpening/decon
Encke could be a similar ordeal with the background black.
But i do agree, probably have detected it here. Just making a point.
I was always skeptical about being able to capture encke with an 8", but a friend insisted it was possible
But I think I may have captured Encke in this image, as I was very close to the opposition
I agree given you use a newt
However, if it was an 8" SCT, then no. These have terrible ringing
It was an 8" newtonian
Yeah i know,
I was saying, in theory if someone used a SCT then X to doubt.
Should be able to get it nicely with the 12". Look forward to the results
I'm so glad I didn't buy that 11" sct from that old fart from the telescope shop when I was trying to order my dob
I mean there was no chance I was gonna do that anyway, but still
C-ring? pretty easy, you just have to overexpose a stacked image
but the whole picture would be ruined no?
You can just adjust the curves instead
Idk, I usually donāt try to extract it
But itās very easy to ādetectā per se
Especially around opposition
what curves are you referring to?
Curves in editing where you can adjust dynamic range & contrast etc
Oh
My best Mars data from 2022 opposition, have a go: https://discord.com/channels/794642864218439681/1108541828707385344
@somber stratus, have you tried capturing Ceres yet?
What are those really dark spots?
This?
On the 5/14-17 one under the northern bands
This?
Yeah
Thinking about it now, I don't know how to explain what it is, I think @somber stratus can explain it
Maybe an eclipse of a moon?
Those are festoons. Appear blue in colour
I think they are upwellings of material from below but I honestly donāt know what causes them. Might research it now
Saturn this morn
Another iss attempt last night, handtracked this time because mount wifi was acting up
f/9.8 3000mm
Oh lets go I was right haha, details on panels! Awesome shot
I was also a little overexposed last attempt which didnāt help
And I couldāve had a much better result had my scopeās wifi worked properly
Might have another chance tonight and might try it with the 3x barlow then and try to get the wifi to work properly
Very nice attempt! Iām wondering what they were doing to the outer panels
Wym?
The flare in the middle?
Thatās a reflection
This is completely normal as per the position of the Sun at the moment, relative to the ISS orbit. It's the most efficient orientation of the panels as to reduce self-shadowing.
If they all pointed flush with the Sun, these left panels would cast shadows on the other two, lowering efficiency
Happens in July too
This barge is massive!! @ruby tartan
Danm
Measures 21,000km
via WJ
1.6x Earth diameter
It's been growing for the last few months actually.
My 12" needs to arrive as soon as possible
No carrier wants to transport the 12", because of the size, I will have to pay 20% of the value of the telescope just for a carrier to bring it to my house
I lie, it's actually visible all the way back in June 2022. Just very small.
Barge?
Yeah, massive.
Cyclonic (low pressure) colourless features in the NEB that appear stationary, if you're asking what they are.
Okay, I'm going to have to look through photos that I've taken if it's been visible since June 2022 I might ahve something
Visible here in August. Near-central. Measures 15,000km.
I'm surprised i havent noticed it until now. I guess the red-coloured NEB material moving around the northern edge of it makes it super obvious here
It's showing up in one of my eyepiece projection shots. Dang.
Not sure if that's the same barge, depends what date.
Geebas don't show me that, makes me feel incompetent.
Dec 10 2022
Let me look at the alpo maps to check. 1 second.
Here's another, same night. Same mess, diff % of subs stacked
You're seeing the one denoted by the red arrow. We're interested in the blue.
This is a map from the ~10th
Just checked in Stellarium regarding the moon shadow position. You're definitely seeing the red.
Do you have another image?
I'd say "how can you tell, the GRS can't be an indicator in either case, but I see how just looking at that. I may have to review, potentially process more.
Yeah, can just about tell based off the appearance.
moon position & time confirms it
MAYBE these two? Likely not though. But it doesn't have GRS and I was focused on "Oh cool I got three moons!" Let me know if they're candidates for "should reprocess soon"
Date?
9/29
nevermind, file name has it.
yup
Nope, it's the exact same face as last time š
It's fine, looks to stay around for a long time hereafter. Should be able to image it in June/July coming up.
That and I'm sure I have some somewhere that might not have been processed. There were nights that I just imaged for a bit and never got around to processing.
You know what's really sad though is that I bet I have one that does have the barge b/c it's between two gobs of blue but the processing was so junk that it just doesn't show detail.
The blue festoons are incredibly fast moving in the atmosphere. These are transient, it won't correspond to the same region.
Hi guys, would a uranus c + 3x barlow be suitable for my 8" dob for planetary?
Hi Iām a beginner and wondering if this shot of Venus is ok and where I should improve. Shot from heritage 130p
These shots are amazing, I am so jealous of your visualsš here's the best one I have and is from a 9.25 with Uranus-C... not even close to you guysš¤£
@heavy mirage I might have to start attaching my uvir cut filter to my adc or barlow. When I stack the w47 and po uvir cut filter my camera doesnāt slide down the adc as far as it does with just one filter, which would cause the focal length to be a tiny bit longer than my ir images on Venus
Iām not sure if it has any noticeable effect on my bicolour images
But it was something I noticed a few days ago
When putting my camera in the adc
Yeah, I'm gonna put the po uvir cut on the adc next time and just the w47 on the cam
What barlow do you use?
nice shot, when did you get this
Celestron X-Cel 3x
But Iām gonna put the uvir cut on the ADC otherwise Iād have to take my entire imaging train out to switch from 610nm to uv
I don't remember exactly but maybe last year
Or maybe the w47+uvir cut on the ADC together, but need to check if that fits
yup, late 2021.
I noticed this too
terminator on the left, and (fading) orange EZ
Means post-opposition 2021, so Autumn 2021. Does this sound about right, I'd be surprised if you thought it was last year? š @stark abyss
Yeah its probably a good idea, asked what barlow because for telecentric barlows like the explore scientific or powermates, the distance from the barlow to the sensor doesnt change the barlow magnification.
Got confused because you said ādoesā but yeah, thatās the issue the extra distance to the sensor causing a slightly bigger magnification
It's best to place all filters at the front of the barlow as per internal reflections, although it doesn't make much difference.
Yeah my bad, edited it
Yeah np
Do you do that? That would be such a pain tho seeing as the barlow is the first thing in the imaging train
Having to take the whole thing out everytime you change filter
Tom has real uv so he doesnt have the problem of the camera sticking further out I think
i don't use a stack yeah. Also my P1 cams came with a shorter 1.25" barrel so when i use RG610+UV/IR it fits inside the ADC anyway. My Omegon ADC has a little more space too.
But slapping on the front barlow still works fine.
I'd just leave the UV/IR on the front of the barlow. Then just change camera filter from W#47 to RG610.
I.e Violet+UV/IR for UV, and RG610+UV/IR for IR
Then you dont have to take out whole thing.
But 610+uvir cut makes shit for me
Lol
Iāll just do the adc thing
If it fixes the magnification problem then Iām good
@livid sierra yeah, that's one of the issues I have too, so I might have to do what you're saying, ofc it also may be possible to get a shorter nose peice for the camera but idk if they exist lol
Oh wait tom just said his came with shorter nose pieces
@somber stratus why did your cams come with shorter nosepieces?
idk, it's just slightly shorter than the ZWO ones
by 1/4 of an inch maybe
not alot
@somber stratus is that barge visible if the GRS is at the extreme right edge of Jupiter? Maybe I meant to say left.
Does anyone here have a 10" telescope?
Thatās some bad seeing right there
I wanna try Jupiter but itās still got such a small elongation
Thinking about it now though, I could extend the arms of our drying rack, hang a big blanket over it and use it for shade
j3rry does
@somber stratus, New Clyde image
Lol
I'm planning a heist, who's with me?
As long as we both get one
Yes, in germany
Risky, but i'll try to wake up tomorrow very early to shoot an hour before school š¬
Is this a solar day?
102mm refractor
10mm eyepiece
Camera: iPod
nope, thats a solar... rotation... a solar day is when the earth rotates an additional bit (4 minutes) so that instead of doing 360° it does that little extra to point towards the sun because it has shifted from a position where it currently isn't, further along this orbit.
cool thing is the year is not exactly 365 days, its 365.24~ causing a leap year every 4 years, but guess what, THERE'S MORE! even accounting for leap years there's still a small deviation (3 days every 400 years) so in 1584 pope gregory decided "hey we gotta fix this" so every century year thats not divisible by 400 we dont do a leap year
but you cant fix something that is completely broken, so to realign the calendar they just fast forwarded a couple days and from the 5th to the 14th of october 1584 nothing happened because that time literally did not happen, they went from 5th oct. 1584 with the julian calendar to the 14th oct. 1584 with the gregorian calendar
basically 10 days just missing from history
many people make a joke where they tell you to look up how many people were born from 5th to 14th oct. 1584 (0 people)
to scale 
hello
does anyone here have an old philips toucam pro II (pcvc840k), because I am having some problems connecting it to sharpcap and I dont know where to start.
There's a similar story with newton's birth date no?
England, like always, decided to be goofy lil kid in the europe playground and didn't change their calendar from julian to gregorian for a couple hundred years, meaning Newton was registered born 25th of december but 4th of january for the rest of the world...
silly england as always
Now itās one full solar rotationā¦
Thanks to Kerbal Madness and ANAKLO for the info
Same equipment as last time
New Clyde images
@ruby tartan @somber stratus
new jup image from me. Slept in so no nighttime lol. 36 degrees alt.
wow great
sun was up
Nice
Send to ALPO
Grindset
Shitturn at 15
Meanwhile it's past 40 here and I can't find time to image it
Negative grindset
what is that program to do that
WinJupos
hell yeah brother
I'm not alone for once
@ruby tartan Am i tripping or does it look like there's a grey-ish streak in the SEB?
something like this
Like this?
Yeah, kinda
The discolouring
Especially at far right.
I think this is actually post-GRS turbulence. GRS is just behind the right limb.
š„¹
dont be sad because we're losing it, be happy because we got to see it and the losers in 2050 wont
probably not, its been shrinking for decades
its gotta spring back up
if you look at pictures from the 90s or early 2000s its massive
1991 Jupiter
the GRS
1890s from Lick Observatory.
That thing was a giant back then!
the fact that some dude in the 1890s took a better jupiter picture than me makes me want to cry
Long boi
This graph is misleading with a y-axis minimum of 10
yeah but thats still about a degree shrinkage per year, at that rate it will be gone by 2035
Yeah for sure
Although I doubt it will stay at the same rate. Not sure if itāll accelerate.
Conversely, it could be more stable when itās smaller, and survive much longer. Literally have no idea. Weāll see
i could see it going either way, but im with you on it not staying the same
Agree. Iām 50/50 as to whether it will speed up or slow down
either that or it could get less and less stable as it shrinks and collapse at an exponential speed and collapse much sooner
Yup
most of the results im seeing are using the same "20 years" number
What about the 1870s?
Crazy how much JPEG compression there was in the 19th century.
Ok Iāve got the 1870s beat
Wonder what the bands were like back then
I donāt think they were any different structurally, but probably change in color like they do now.
'CATCHER' - The History of Astrophotography Blog - The successful imaging of the diverse set of objects contained in our Solar System represented the biggest challenge to date for the pioneers of nineteenth century Astrophotography
1879 mustāve been a oddball season with the bands. Wouldāve loved to see a high-resolution image.
I also think that was also the first year the Great Red Spot was observed to be red.
They still have better images than me
Speaking of events I wish there were high resolution images of: this dark spot on Jupiter sketched by Giovanni Cassini in December 1690.
Even their sketches are better than my images 
its actually insane such good photographs existed so long ago
Yeah amazing
Poopiter this morning at 11 degrees alt. Quick process of a single 2 min video. Still gotta get through a few more videos for final image
can someone help me get a better image from this saturn data, I managed to get this picture but I think you guys can do better than I did. Here is my final image:
and here is the data
I took the video today at 4am, with my 6" newton and my phones camera. I stacked 15% from 7000 frames and I used normalise stack 75%
here is the .avi file too
STrZ looks much more pronounced this year. Love to see it.
(White band south of GRS latitude)
Looks like grs is moving down into it
Seems a bit lower than last year
More likely the SEB shifting around the GRS, rather than the GRS itself
I.e SEB has drifted north.
I see, that makes sense
how would the explorer 150p (not pds) on an eq 32 do for planetary imaging?
fine I guess
@cloud copper I know the eq32 isn't very good but...
getting that and the scope for £100 hopefully
it would be fine
Gettin some plato rn
Is this a decent planetary setup?
And my curent telescope seben 150/1400
I am planing to use the camera as a planetary cam not as a guide cam
Spent hours trying to find Jupiter today lol
Did not find it and gave up eventually
Did you use stellarium?
Lol
Laser finders really hate me, lol
Every time I bring my scope out it is very far away from where the scope is pointing
@somber stratus how do you focus on the ISS? do you focus while its tracking? i tried last night thinking infinity focus would be relatively close but it was quite far off
i would actually be happy to get an answer from anybody, tom was just the first person that came to mind lol
side note, god damn tracking the iss is hard
i mean my tiny sensor isnt doing me any favors but i probably got about 10 frames
Star or planet is sufficient
really? i focused on venus and it looks way off
but to be fair ive only seen the live view, it might just be blown out and i mistook it for being out of focus
ok actually focus isnt that bad
nevermind im an idiot
i set the exposure pretty short, i made venus dim
but i think it might still be a tiny bit too bright
Exposure should be well under .5ms
To not get the motion blur
let me finish running it through pipp then i can see if its any good
i think i actually got about 200 frames with it in, which is way better than i thought
ok its definitely overexposed
i thought the solar panels would be way brighter, theyre actually the darkest part
its not too terribly overexposed though
yeah panels are really dim especially in visible light
ok, well, from my incredibly crappy first attempt, can anybody help me identify some features
im struggling to figure out what orientation its in lol
northern limb
For now, venus would be the best to focus on, but I think Jupiter would be the best
Youāre saying that when you focused on Venus, the ISS wasnāt focused?
nah it looked out of focus but it actually wasnt too bad
Single stack of UV tonight through a 2m gap in the clouds. Practice for tomorrow ig
hey anyone with a uranus c have any gain and exposure recommendations for saturn?
Exposure 10-30msec, gain <300. Whatever gain is required to reach decent brightness, but try not to exceed 300. Depends on the setup.
I capture multiple 90-120s videos. Stack these in AS!3 as normal then with the stacked images I derotate them,
(to whoever deleted a message just now asking about Jupiter imaging)
Sorry was just gonna re-write the question, thanks!
But try not exceed ~14mins total capture time (7x2m) as derotation starts to get artefacts
Also, I sharpen my stacks before derotation. Usually use minimal denoise and āoversharpenā them. Derotation will denoise them though averaging (stacking the stacks per se).
So is de-rotating better than lucky imaging for planets?
Itās still lucky imaging⦠the individual 90-120s video captures are lucky imaged - with the best ~25% stacked in AS!3.
Derotation combines multiple of these individual images to further decrease noise.
Alright, thanks for your time and the info!
Derotation is essentially an additional processing step, rather than an alternative one
If that makes sense. Np
I tried focusing on a star or something before and whenever the pass happens it turns out to be out of focus. For my best pass ever, I focused on the ISS during the pass but that was when sattracker actually worked
interesting
if that is the case all of mine should have been better
as i've only ever used stars
Haha, maybe you're right then. It's always so stressful when the ISS passes, I probably rushed focusing lol
But, if your tracking is gonna be good next ISS pass. Try focusing on the ISS
Just to make sure
got it thank you!!
.......
he went through all the effort to get that image but he couldnt figure out what it was called
Still so amazing feat.
The modules are so pronounced, wonder what he could do the the ISS
Sheeesh
Guys do I need multiple videos of saturn and than derotate them or do I take one long one.
Keep in mind that Im using my phones camera
best space station image
Venus nightside just now

Is this at peak altitude?
Or towards sunset?
Neat
My 12" is supposed to arrive tomorrow, I hope it arrives
Gottem

@somber stratus @livid sierra I know this I'd gear based, but what exposure would you recommend for Venus in UV?
I sometimes go up to 10ms in UV but no idea if that's a good
Depends how bright it is. Ideally 10-15ms as normal for Jupiter.
Anything under 20ms works
Mine are usually somewhere between that too
Great, thanks. What about IR? Same same with lower gain? Or do you go for more frames?
Will do! I'll try it out maybe tonight
Good luck!
Thanks!!
I was surprised 0.6ms at gain 0 was needed to properly expose Venus with my QHY5III200M a couple nights ago. My ASI290MM was used at 8ms and gain 10-30.
200M has tiny full well, thatās why
š©š
When is the next triple eclipse on Jupiter?
Aug 2032 iirc
Fake news. Three transits but only two eclipses.
2032 is correct at least.
Next one is in March 2032.
Make sure it's up where you are or else it doesn't matter. I get it in daylight.
Gotta get them to line up. Only proper way of doing it.
OCD compels that the shadows form a line
Thanks for the info
I miss it by a slim bit š
Put in your guesses for how accurate the GRS position is.
And how big it will be.
lol
Damn that image is so clean 
From where is it?
It's a simulation from WinJUPOS.
Oh 
Dodge dangit that barge eludes me.
The neighbors were prolly like "this guy is on crack"
Yea lol
Your place looks so good though
Nice low horizon, not many buildings around
I reckon the grass causes some dew issues in the morning though?
Yeah, it does. But it's not a problem later in the summer
I'm lucky to have an open field out in my backyard basically
I'm not so lucky with my backyard 
Yeah that looks amazing
How far from your house is it?
well, it's literally like right outside the backyard. Maybe 50 meters
This video gives a good idea
thats so good, my backyard is only surrounded by high bushes 
Ah shit dude thatās so awesome
Thatās pretty cool
What do you use to get your dob level on that grass?
Yeah! I used to set up in my backyard, but then a year later I had an idea to move out there
Who needs good seeing when there is LSD?
Ch4 saturn looks so trippy
Try UV
Unfortunately don't have one, up to Tom and Duif
Doing color captures
Seeing good 8/10
Look nice af
Lol. But what's it good for
For fun.
Duif confirmed to be anti-fun.
Pretty decent
What alt?
I wish I could but it was partly cloudy
But the clouds are so beutifull
And nature so wonderfull
You know
Usually I would be angry at clouds
But its not ok to be angry about anything
Maybe its ok
But only when its ok
That's the spirit ma boi
Yeah, I made it with my dad
We made a small stencil of one of the triangle edges, then used a router to cut it out on plywood with the stencil as a guide
The screw itself is basically just a nut and a long screw, everything else was 3d printed
Could right now be the best for imaging the shadow divisions?
For what?
Does this look like anti fun
#1019937457095065731 message
Falling in that nearby hole would be anti-fun.
The shadow will be thinner next year so the gaps will be harder to resolve.
Never say never
I didnāt.
Funny joke.
See
Brh im still geekin on tht lsd
What do you see
The walls are breathing in synchronisation to me
Send me a pic of your pupils lol are you really goin off that lsd

are you a cat
idk
Naaaah what no way thatās real
what is real
Face reveal
I love yall so much
eye reveal 
saturn wip
Single Raw frame of Venus
6-2-23 -- 6/10 seeing
Orion XT8 Dob
Orion 10mm Plossl
Orion 2x Barlow
Samsung Galaxy S10+
is there really much benefit to derotating Saturn?
My first planetary image taken with a dob!
8 inch Dob f/6
Redmi K20 Pro
Kellner 9mm eyepiece
UnTrAcKeD ;-;
PIPP/AS!3
What is better, a 6" newton or a 127 mak?
Depends on how you look at it
6ā has a bigger aperture
But mak has a longer focal length
Aperture probably more helpful because it can support longer FLs when you add barlows
Yup, true
as soon as I saw those eyes I was like this mans off some tabs but why share it in an astro server lol
Dunno felt more social for some reason
Remembers me of the time i saw the whole century passing in the nightsky and taking a piss felt like the universe was running through me
You felt the universe inside you? š
Yes and it was a good experience lol, not in the meaning you probably ment but damn that was the craziest piss i ever had
Nice
Lol
I had a psilocybin experience where at my peak a freind showed me a image of the milky way he shot an insane mosaic and I just thought of how beautiful the universe is and how amazing and rare life is.
Jup this morn, during broad daylight. Double eclipse in progress.
IR610
raw frame
Imagine how you would feel taking a piss while looking at the image
Better than my entire stack
Data in #1021002743080558642 if people wanna have a go
Hi guys,
Trying to take a video with my dslr attached to my scope, says Iām not able because there are no lenses detected.
Any idea please?
My dslr is a cheap eos 4000d.
I canāt find anything in settings Thanks in advance.
Nik
Some spinny Venus action
Iām taking a video not a photo. Needs to be in camera mode
Venus taken with my Xiaomi redmi note 12 pro
130/900 reflector
Stacked and processed in PIPP, AUTOSTAKKERT, REGISTAX and Lightroom.
My 12" arrives tomorrow, I hope
Best week for the 12" to arrive, I have work off Thursday and Friday, and I don't have a college class, so it will be time to capture Jupiter
There's a dial that can allows you to do a video in manual mode
Imaged Saturn from a parking lot just now
Just got done putting everything back in the car
Seeing looked pretty good for 15-20° alt
On the moon too which was at 11° but I just did some visual on it
Bugs are eating me alive but Iām finally back out and imaging
Any idea what could be causing those artifacts along the top right? Itās like a second limb is appearing lol
Nevermind it was focus
šš
Finally getting some meaningful UV data... still using the a cheap #47 + uv/ir cut, but I'm happy to finally getting some details
Details match what I got last night too.
Nice stuff
Thanks!
You used a color camera right?
No, 462MM
OSC cams are inefficient
25% as efficient to be specific
Right, I was just wondering why it's grayscale but that make sense
Second Saturn of the year, quite a big improvement over last attempt
Very nice
very nice
very nice
Very thanks
Guys, what should I buy:
-Mars-c
-Mars-c II
-Ceres-c
Yeah the mars-c ii is the 662, kind of the followup of the 462
Probably about the same
Donāt think it matters that much which one you get
464 is a bit different tho
Bigger fov
And different qe
Let me check my calendar
Those storms are known as Great White Spots and usually happen every 27-30 years. The last one happened 12 years ago and earlier than the pattern suggested so who knows?
Past GWS have alternated between a stronger storm at the equator and a weaker one in the mid-northern hemisphere. Assuming the pattern continues the next one should be at the equator.
There are HST photos of the 1990 GWS. https://esahubble.org/images/opo9011b/
6969
Probs when it had a misaligned mirror
Dang, interpolation worthy? @somber stratus
You can tell how the clouds move. I'm sure interpolation will make something pretty intriguing
these are same regions i think, or at least same formation
So I opened up Google Maps and noticed something oddā¦
New discovery ā
Lol what exactly? @thick heron
Lmao
I don't see anything else ??
Keep lookingā¦
no thats normal keep looking
see anything near the caribbean ?
I found it
In your dreams @somber stratus
God dude you guys make me look dumb lmao
I'm humble, I'll pitch in $21
I'll donate $22
$23 take it or leave it
You all are making me look bad. 
ill pitch in $25, but anonymously so i dont get people asking me for money
Lol, $20
you know if enough people pitch in $20 it would actually work
Well, property probably cost around 200k lol
Yikes, just looked on Google it looks like property there is pretty expensive lol
yeah i mean its all premium stuff
we would be better off getting an observatory in chile
Tried doing Chilescope a few times for planets in mid-2018 and it was nothing but poor seeing and clouds. 
We finally used our credits on the Carina Nebula and the dark skies are OP.
Change of plans.
Iāll throw in a scope: #š¤©-show-us-your-rig message
The views through that must be gnarly
At f4.2
Imagine M51 looking like a faint photograph under a dark sky.
How it is for planets is TBD.
They are basically glorified DIY projects.
The altitude motor engages with a velcro strap on the bearing. 
Ours has worn spots and needs replacing.
Yeah I can imagine! Through my 10" I could slightly make out the spiral arms of m51 but only under good conditions.
Try direct drive!
Prolly expensive af though
Or maybe a tight chain instead of the velcro
But I guess, if it works, it works!
Hmm⦠create a new system from scratch with direct drives or $20 Velcro strips⦠
(We already have new Velcro strips)
The more pressing question is how will the 25 year old motor system interface with a PC? Certain versions can be upgraded to support PC control, but ours is too old for it. 
Haha, like I said if it ain't broke, dont fix it lol But I'm sure that overtime upgrades will be worth it
Looks like you'll need the manual to those motor drivers to see how they interact
above average seeing, 20 degrees alt
Should I get up at 4 am for Saturn? Would be my first time imaging it.
It's the best, just for the experience
early morning looking at saturn is the most peaceful experience fr
saturn just floating there at 200-300x with good seeing is something all should experience
Is that 'Oumuamua?
not when its cold
3am ~August Jupiter slaps though.
Peace is a mosquito buzzing my ear early in the morning. š¦
collimation ok? Hope i dont become atreus 2.0 
you get used to it
What did he do?
he has collimation issues
hes famous because of that
Tom knows i think
Well, I have to collimate after every slew or after a couple hours of tracking.
I think my EdgeHD14ās primary mirror isnāt properly bonded.
Even with the secondary cranked down tight itās way out after a flip. š
no
way off
Order placed! Couldnt buy mars-c, it was a bit too expensive
Is it worth it or is it too bright? The ISS will be at magnitude -3
A little too bright to notice possibly, I'd give it a shot if the night is also clear. That case you get to shoot something if you kiss iss
Thanks!
@somber stratus you should do an animation of Venus like youāve done before but in colour
i bought a can of bug spray just because of this
Bug spray is standard here for any night over 70 degrees, but sometimes it is not enough and I also need a Thermacell next to me.
sounds rough
The worst part is when they sneak in the house.
mosquito repellent doesnt work for me
they still bite
citronella candle helps but theres still mosquitoes
7/10
Please get an ADC 
Also, imaging Venus at night. Not based.
Getting somewhere.. I need to get a mono camera
You are using an IR cut with the w47 yes?
Depends what uvir cut you are using
6 perhaps
Idk how badly compressed this gets through the cord but I reckon this was an 8/10 seeing not sure
I just use astrospheric it said above avg to excellent
6-7
And the result
Jupiter from the same night , donāt think I ever posted this anywhere š®
I used optolongs, it has a bit of transmission under 400nm but not sure if it's good enough for this purpose
You're not using a DSLR for those images, eh.
Ah, do you know how much exactly?
ZWO cuts at 400nm which wasnāt enough. PO uvir cut cuts at 380nm, which is significantly better
Can I have some of your UV data maybe?
Asi 120mc-s. Trusty old thing that usually guides my dso setup
I thought it randomly broke one night but it was my asi 533ās usb outs lmao
Didnāt even snag anything, and the securing pins came out of the 533 when I went to plug-in the 120 again š
Yeah definitely, the seeing wasn't great tbh during my runs but I'll send them once I get home
you ever use a 4x barlow before ?@heavy mirage
Noo, but I've done 2x and 3x together for 6x
