#Modpack: Prominence II RPG Hasturian Era Sugges...
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Your suggestion is good, but we should've just disabled the Dragon Backpack (recipe) a long time ago, to prevent this kinda confusion. The Dragon Backpack isn't even that good, when there's much better alternatives, apparently.
Just change the egg to a dragon head tbf
or alternatively, just add the dragon egg to the loot table for the Ender Dragon
You Literally get 2 dragon eggs, one from the dragon and one from the quest line.
What are the better alternatives to backpack, more or less new to the modpack?
The backpack doesn't go into the backpack slot and is a separate wearable item, I'm unaware of other items that it would block from being used
Servers exist.
ahem Servers exist. The egg is "first come first serve" in a server, and the quest provides you one so you can fight the Eye. They were talking about being bricked most likely because they were looking from the perspective of Multiplayer.
As we always say, "check the pins." There's far better backpack choices, though some items/armors (and potion charms!) will do the same thing as the backpack in question, if not better
It says in quest to not use the egg for dragon backpack
Everyone gets one egg from quest already
People don't know how to read tho
This is an active discussion regarding the item itself, you're advocating for removal of a backpack without explaining your POV on why alternatives are better
We will not accommodate for people who are too lazy to read
Pins of #1101995173430448208
I explain why dragon backpack sucks
When the pins there already have the point of why NOT to use it, why re-explain a point that's been written before-
This is impractical. For reasons I stated already, I have given an ample argument against this.
There are numerous problems with this approach you're forcing on players:
- The information SHOULD be in the game, or deterrents in place to make sure it does not happen. If it's not, then it's a fundamental flaw in the questline's design.
- Telling players "it's available in the pin" when majourity will only look for that information AND see the aforementioned pinned information once they've made this mistake is also being insensitive to the realistic margin of human error. It should not be an expectation for a player to STUDY information in Discord pins for specific information BEFORE they play the game, and BEFORE and EACH AND EVERY ACTION. While to some extend this is expected, it should not be something you expect before every "move" you make.
- There is a Wiki. Why is the wiki incomplete? Why are you expecting players to open multiple mediums of information to play the game at its base state? Why do I need to join a Discord server, check a specific channel's pins, open another tab for the modpack's wiki, then open other multiple tabs for other non-native mods?
Now, I understand this is a modpack. There will be flaws. But when your counterargument is being snarky and telling players that you won't accommodate them when "they're too lazy to read", then in turn, some "snarky" expectations are bound to be placed.
"The Dragon Backpack isn't even that good, when there's much better alternatives, apparently.":
No explanation on what the better alternative is in the thread itself. If you make a claim, please back it up with information and not a single statement.
"Servers exist.":
Between friends, shouldn't be an issue. This can be communicated or cheated back + there is a message warning you about this.
A large group, as mentioned earlier, there are messages saying you shouldn't do it.
Pinned message conclusion:
"...dragon backpack is bad because the main buffs can be outdone by enchants and then there's two other backpacks that you can swap to plus not worth the dragon egg and too many people waste that egg on this backpack":
- It's a combination of multiple backpacks, so:
- It saves you a slot if you have not gotten into remote inventories
- It saves you from having to swap, especially in a hurry
- It replaces the need to get into enchanting/potions with it's minor buffs and removes the need to swap between backpacks. Minor buffs can help manage transitions
- (Mentioned as an alternative in the pinned message) Lapis backpack's XP gain is not enough to justify it (and it doesn't give offensive/defensive buffs), unless you're sitting in an farm with it. You can easily make the argument that the minor strength and regen can help you survive, saving you XP instead
-
You get the dragon egg back after the fight. If there are other uses for it, it should be explained in an active discussion about a suggestion. This helps people get a better perspective on if they agree or disagree with the suggestion itself.
-
While I understand the frustration that comes with helping people with their repetitive questions (And thank you for all the help you provide). A discussion needs to be open and detailed. Chucking it up to "This bad" and "read cause I've explained it" does not give proper context and is not conducive to a healthy and understandable discussion
Quest says don't make backpack so don't make. Read the quest. That is final.
Where can I "read" this information?
I've also checked the egg itself, it has no tooltip whatsoever that mentions what you said.
Read 2/2
I'm legitimately not sure if you're suggesting the information is there, but in Spanish, but I cannot speak Spanish.
@supple python please add back in the idiot proofing thing that tells people to not use the damn dragon egg please, thanks
Basically, that used to be in there
This wasn't a contest of "gotchas" being thrown around, rather a discussion on a certain gameflow. Being implied people are idiots for getting a Dragon Egg, pressing U, it not having a description, and EMI showing you can craft a dual-purpose bag with it, whilst refusing to acknowledge that you may have made an error is just bad look.
Maybe have your ego in check, or not respond if you're going to be snarky about it and refuse to properly lay out verifiable information.
(Now I get why Discord moderators/admins are memes)
People are dumb for using an item you normally only get one of
It's an item in a game. That is by all intents and purposes, an ingredient. It has a PURPOSE. If it was a collector's item, then by design, this game makes it obvious if it's either a collector's item (like a trophy), a functional block, etc.
This is not real life where using something "you get once" is "dumb". Are you telling me to swap backpacks everytime and move around stuff from one backpack to another just so I can tell people that I have a Dragon Egg that I did not use? What is that counterarguement?
But I think we're pretty much done here. Your ego is so inflated that you refuse to acknowledge a flaw in the game AND your mistake that you didn't double-check, so this is pretty much going to be just a forced pissing contest.
At the very least, we all found out that the quest does not make it explicitly obvious, when it should. ALSO: THE BACKPACK IS CRAFTABLE even in Singleplayer. It's not been disabled contrary to the claim of the first answer.
I acknowledged mistake by asking dev to fix what needed to be fixed
Not in game or home right now so can't double check
Don't use an item that's normally a one of item, very simple
Jesus christ ur insufferable to talk to
And ur worse u just cause arguments
Make the eye quest give an item that is required for crafting the dragon egg backpack
This is just rude
Sid does all this work for the modpack and discord and all he gets is shit for it
Didn't know calling people idiots is "all work" ❤️
If you're unable to read how both users who provided long discussion messages were met with absolutely horrendous attitude, then I seriously do not know how to get through your bias here
This is just abhorrent behavior from staff side, where they do not discuss their opinion, make their opinion a fact, and then chalk up a valid item as "useless" with "better alternatives" yet do not actively engage in a discussion regarding the viability of such items
This is not a help channel this is a suggestion channel where things should be discussed