#General Suggestion from my side Your
1 messages ยท Page 1 of 1 (latest)
"like they do"
you are acting like this is our fault in some way
or is a common experience
you took no steps whatsoever in trying to make the modpack run better - allocating more ram, actually looking into what the issue is usage-wise, asking for support in literally any channel
all of our modpacks have upwards of 20 performance mods
i can run medieval mc (300 mods) better than i can vanilla minecraft
there is nothing for us to "look into"
theres no issue with ram or anything on my side. neither is my pc slow in any way. and yes, that is a common experience i can assume. because my 3080 is above average pc performance, same for my processor and my 32gb ram + pci4 ssd
300 mods with 4gb allocated will result in a negative perfomance impact
you ignored every single thing i said and decided to complain more instead
i have located more ram = it does nothing
how much did you... locate
okay send a screenshot with f3 open ingame
and its not used 100%
it was a suggestion from my side. and you go like "no it cant be the mods fault". YES, it is the mods fault. i run vanilla alot better
100+ fps with same settings
and this is <60fps
i never said its not the mods fault?
LMFAO
i've repeatedly said that having 300 mods is going to cause a performance impact
minecraft was not built around having 300 mods adding thousands of lines of code, mostly made by different people
and my suggestion was: check your pack performance wise aswell when you apply them
it is a suggestion to make packs more enjoyable for everyone
its
not our
problem.
i am trying to diagnose your issue but you'd rather complain
its not your priority that people enjoy your packs?
you have come to an arbitrary conclusion that your experience is shared and that it impacts the modpack's quality in some way
i mean, i just suggest you to look at fps when you do your packs. just my 2 cents. i dont need help with my performance, i can disable mods and look into it myself. was just a thought and i expressed it here
disabling random mods will not magically fix your FPS.
this is not our issue.
things like spark profiler exist for a reason. we include it in all modpacks.
nobody can help you if you refuse to cooperate
i asked for a screenshot with F3 open and you've repeatedly ignored me
i have lost interest in better MC for today
thats a real shame
because im not going to diagnose another MC version. im tired of stuff like this with MC
thats why i suggest, have an eye on performance aswell when doing packs
becvause my PC is not potato and it runs dogshit
it shouldnt to be a good experience
everytime we update any of our fabric modpacks, 100,000 people download the update
you would think that
if one of those updates made performance so bad that it's noticeably terrible
there would be a lot of people complaining about it
but nobody is complaining about it.
i think most minecraft players do not have a PC worth as much as mine, yea. theyre used to play at low fps
every complaint about performance is because people do not understand how to optimize a computer
but minecraft can be better
i build computers for 25 years now. i think i know a bit
built computers for 25 years but can't spend two minutes to properly diagnose an issue
the time you've spent complaining you could've gone into any channel and asked for performance help and it could be fixed by now lmao
dont feel offended please but it was just my 2 cents. the pack does run bad (this time i played better MC fabric)
it objectively doesn't
i wont ask for performance help anymore. i figured it out already. people just keep repeating the same all the time (ram, read pinned stuff) nothing of that changes anything xD
as i said. my vanilla game with sodium and my shader (continuum) runs at 100+ fps
with mod pack <60fps
its a mods issue. or its just too much for MC to handle
but i experiences that the mod journey map alone did kill performance. so, i made the suggestion
you "figured it out already" but nothing has changed since you sent your og message
if journeymap is causing lag, go bother the journeymap devs lol. and minimap mods are going to be laggy. it's just the nature of minecraft as a whole
it's not built to have a detailed minimap
i get 650 fps with my modpacks
so i dont see an issue with fps issues for myself
maybe there is an issue with your pc?
this happens almost every day where someone with a really good pc will be like "why fps low :(" and every single time it's something simple they are overlooking
a screenshot of F3 is all I have ever needed
sometimes curseforge doesn't actually allocate the ram. because curseforge sucks.
sometimes their game is using graphics card instead of GPU
sometimes they're in an area with 1000 entities and 900 particles
this is on BMC forge with several other programs open that eat a lot of memory, while the game is still loading chunks
forge is much worse than fabric performance-wise because of things out of our control
and i can guarantee my PC is worse than yours
then my settings are wrong in a way. i just suggested to take fps into consideration when doing mod packs. because my vanilla runs much better than my betterMC. just my user experience without analyzing for hours. i put 8gb ram to mc in GD launcher btw. my MC options.txt is the same as for my vanilla. my shader options are the same for vanilla (copy paste)
we do take it into consideration and your saying you are using shaders?
then all is good^^
you are using shaders correct?
but chorb straight away felt offended and spammed me
no reason to be offended. just say you take it into consideration and we done^^
because everyday he has to deal with people saying stuff that is not true
to be blunt - you were being ignorant & refused to be wrong
and you are saying you are using shaders then I can almost guarantee that being the issue for your fps
but my options.txt and shaders settings are exactly the same in vanilla than in better mc. thats why i was wondering
how would that help? you are using shaders with mods
when our modpacks first release, they have very few mods. the mods that do exist are either very small or large, established mods that have existed for years. none of these mods will have a considerable performance impact.
as we add more mods over time and update the modpack, we would know if major performance issues started to occur.
and depending on what shader it would perform worse
theres a lot of factors that can come into play here with your specific issue. it's very hard to pinpoint without screenshots or a spark profiler.
and thats why we get annoyed when people like you come in asking us to do shit you know nothing about and thinking we dont look into fps.
What do you think we do? Just add mods and hope that things work without testing and no care if the pack runs shit as long as we get downloads?
stock bmc fabric. nothing changed. more background programs open than before. google using 3 gigs of memory. in a jungle, next to an ocean, both very intensive biomes https://chorb.is-from.space/javaw_Aaz6XwL2RA.png
16gb ram, 8gb allocated
intel i5 2.9GHz
gtx 1650
and i'm using curseforge. at the time of the screenshot i had 94% ram usage. minecraft was only using 3 gigs.
we can not stress enough that this is an issue on your side. it's very demeaning to spend hours adding & testing performance mods and actively updating a performance guide for some guy to arrogantly decide that the performance guide is useless and that it is indeed our problem in some way
you probably came here with the best intentions. i appreciate that. i would also appreciate if you were more open-minded about the thought of you or your PC doing something wrong.
this is very likely an issue out of your control. you were blaming me & our studio's ability to optimize a modpack for something your computer probably decided to do by itself.
its all good
i did some testing and it is indeed not much different
then it was probably the area i was in or its not a straight fps but a "my pc needs to load alot thats why its fps arent consistent issue"
vanilla + bettermc
yea it goes up and down because unlocked fps
when i play i limit it to 60fps
then its not 100%
then your GPU is the bottleneck
yea with 130fps in complementary shaders it becomes a bottleneck
๐
but i want solid 60fps because electricity bill
and streaming
what's the point of saying "i have 32gb why does it don't work" when using the same amount of ram (8gb) i'm using when playing with my laggy potato pc 
i do not know how you do your packs (performance testing) and since i got sick and tired of having issues i thought it was ok to suggest that. if you already do it - and get offended now. my bad. i thought a suggestion could not hurt. obviously minecraft and its different launchers + instances + 1000 shader options make it exhausting to get the best out of it
more ram =/= always better
java will have more junk to deal with afaik if you put too much
and who knows how much ram which modpack needs - idk at least
then why don't you try using more "just to try"
6 to 8gb is the minimum for most modpacks, don't except to run it perfectly with a shader and non optimised visual settings with that
my shader settings i actually did optimize with a guide and testing it myself too. took hours^^ and i did try different amounts of ram. even 32gb but ram was never an issue if you have at least 6 or so
thats why "look the ram guide" gets me frustrated
so many people in MC think RAM = everything. there are tons of guides on youtube like = how to get 1000 fps - just put all settings to off and alocate more ram
thats bs xD
its not helpful at all because often its just A setting or A mod that can ruin your day. no reason to disable all fancy looking graphics
its like saying "just stop eating" to a fat person. too simple
using fancy graphics lmao xD
i like fancy graphics ๐
what is rubidium renderer? isnt iris sodium what betterMC is using? and 1.16? just wondering
rubidium is a Sodium port for forge
Iris is for Fabric
our 1.16.5 Forge modpacks use Rubidium
ok^^
confusing when i check my own screenshot. in better mc it shows "fabric active renderer Indium" and on the right side "Sodium Renderer"
also, some mods suggest or require java 17 or 18 and others or vanilla java 8
i have no idea what java i should use when and how i even do that
also an issue when you wanna limit fps in rivatuner because java.exe =/= java.exe
Indium is an addon for the rendering optimisation mod Sodium, providing support for the Fabric Rendering API. The Fabric Rendering API is required for many mods that use advanced rendering effects
if you are on any version past 1.18.2 you need to have java 17 or 18. 18 is recommended
before 1.18.2 you need java 8
1.19.2 is compatible with java 19.
but when you go to the java page it gives you java 8 - isnt it?
isnt that "the java"
not really
i dont know how to change my java version. glad my mc seems to work
minecraft comes with the correct java version under most circumstances