#MIT (2025-2026)
1 messages ¡ Page 17 of 1
im not lol
i know how it works
the fact that sm1 like that didnt get does refelct poorly on MIT
not really
it does
i mean ur free to think what u want
majority of ppl in the math community think otherwise
It really doesn't
i think their objective was shaping the new class, and if that means not admitting some top candidates, then so be it
eat a bucket of icecream
im broke
life is unfair
u can thikn its unfair
but thats just how the process goes
private colleges can admit any1 who they want ngl
even low gpa its their choice
that's just how things are, any applicant or student is powerless it's up to the adminstartions and admissions, there is nothing fair in apps
the one who makes the decision has all the power
Yeah true
We just gotta deal with it
I donât think it matters in the wrong run
Could you give a short summary of how they compare students and look at them then? Not really familiar
Depends on the school, you never really know
Best bet is cds but even then
This
It's not
Not unless you're at a non-target or going for QR
QD and QT are almost exclusively undergraduate roles
You're not really compared 1-to-1 with another student as a result of holistic admissions, where you're considered as a person/whole. It's pretty hard to compare students like that. However, your accomplishments/grades might be contextualized by comparing to your school group
Alr alr ty
Would UT be considered a target iyo
I see
iirc UT is partnered with JS and Cit so that might come in handy
Ah I see
What kind of role r u going for
If QD then turing is highkey a no-brainer
Yea QD
Didn't get turing tho, but it's whatever
Most UT quants are turing but not all, so not impossible
Fair enough
well, first of all, they dont directly compare
luckily, mit AOs have written about exactly how they look at them
Is anyone on the rd youtube livestream? :D
Alright thanks
Something that I have noticed this cycle is that essays > ECs
Many people with broken ECs got rejected but many people with not so many high tier ECs got in because of really good essays
And of course academics are a no-brainer
Which kind of confuses me as well
I would think that ECs are a better predictor of future sucess than Essays, by a large margin
you're overthinking anecdotes
holistic admissions
ECs dont show fit
Stop analyzing your rejection, it wont do you any good
most colleges want people on their campus that seem like theyâre genuinely nice to be around and will be good friends to current students
if your ECs are really good and theyâve inflated your ego because of it, go to princeton
Colleges like MIT know that their education is good enough to make almost anyone successful. Thatâs why MIT has the highest ROI of any college. They can focus less on things like âpredictors of future successâ in ECs and instead look for applicants who show potential in their attitudes
Also a kid who has really good ECs might act in their essays or interviews that they have done it all or know it all (they havenât). Those are the types of people that wonât have future success if they donât have an appetite for learning
I see that makes sense thanks
Anyway, just because MIT rejected you doesnât mean any doors have closed later on in life, and no school rejection is really going to do that⌠the amount of opportunity in the country greatly exceeds the amount of HYPSM/T20/T50/T100/T300 grads
So many really bright people go to state schools and go on to do great things
This is so close to the actual acceptance rate
Anyway, Massachusetts isnât even a real place so donât worry about any âuniversitiesâ that claim to be there. No one has ever heard of MassTech before, so I wouldnât care about some ârejectionâ they sent you
i think the issue is that i literally know ppl who bs'd their mit app didnt try at all and was never a goal of theirs
like they were ones who bs'd npo's and cuz im just a chill person with every1 they would just tell me abt this shi
and they got in even using ai on their mit essays and stuff
thats just how the college game works and they even were laughing after getting in because mit was just never an expectation and smth they did for fun, they wanted an ivy
its just interesting to see ig but like u can never expect anything someone who prob worekd their entire ass off in hs grinding for mit got flat out rejeced whereas sm1 who bs'd their app got in (again thats just a friend of mine i have no opinion but they said themselves they got lucky and thats what they told me im not gonna say their name or any other info for privacy reasons)
There are some ppl like this. Itâs like the ppl who said they didnât study for the test but ended up getting a 100 on it
its not that đ
like they just fabrciated work they did for their npo
made up stuff for the mit app because it was way diff from every other school
Holy crap
i dont want to comment its not my place and its whatever they are my freind but she even said she got lucky
i dont even feel deserving after seeing ppl more cracked than me get rejected
i dont have as good stuff as them
they dont go to the same school i did a rlly small volunteering project early in hs and thats how ik them
but i was good enough friends where we would talk abt apps and random stuff
like i think its okay to criticize the app process but end of the day mit gets to pick who they want and u cant say they shouldnt have taken we have no say
but it just does suck to see so many hardworking cracked ppl with insane shi have no chance basically
It's MIT's loss trust
As much as it sucks, i've seen cracked people honestly do even more cracked things at "worse" schools
cause y'know give a cracked kid free time and they'll go nuts
there's a reason I used quotes
yea ik
but yea this girl just tells me shi cuz she doesnt see me as comp
i dont go to her school but we're friends
she wouldnt ever go to mit and if she did she would do some humanities major
shes def gonna make some ivy cuz shes just sm1 who is an app grinder
think like making sm random npo but larping the shi they do
Gang who would get into MIT and then say "I def won't go"
and just getting board with no work
isn't the MIT applicant pool basically people who would def go if finances worked out
eh
i think other reasons
i may not go if i get a better school with a better location and logistics
closer to other relatives
since im on the other side of the country
yea she isnt sm1 u would think mit would take
she applied for fun
Lowk this is my gripe with CMU cause it's like off in yee yonder and I don't know anyone in the area đ
thats why i said it sucks sm1 can grind all their life
have no chance
a lot of factors r out of ur hand
đ ain't no way
if u dont have certain traits/hooks
she did lol
i have nth to comment
since its an odd situation
I don't doubt you lol it just sounds whacko
not rlly
i heard some other interesting cases this year
its cuz she only applied to mit cuz she had time
but didnt know that mit app is diff
than other schools
i remember being on a call with her cuz she was asking me q's
Lowk MIT was the first app I wrote đ
and i know she made up ecs cuz she didnt have enough
what i mean to say is that im just a bystander
ill observe i dont think its fair she knows it too
Making up ECs for 4 spots is crazy bro
but it is waht it is
i dont involve myself for thingsl ike this
it sucks but thats life
There's a certain extent of why care
the system works in ways that it does
can't do much
yea because it prioritizes certain stuff
just kinda float along and hope it works out ig
yea but
what i mean to say is that
dont blame urself
u can grind as much as u can
have best stem awards and ecs
and just get rejected
im an npc bystander
Tbh I know a big time cheater who got into a really good school and can't do much about it cause the evidence is mostly verbal non-recorded and circumstancial
c'est la vie
you can try all you want with these situations
it wont stop
the amnt of ppl who have cheated and such
They likely won't, maybe will call the school to verify if it's super crazy concrete allegations
I mean I know a guy who choose Princeton over MIT because he liked the enviorment better
hm
I guess there are people
I've never heard of anyone denying mit but lowk the people I know are hardcore stem kids so yeah
I also have a cousin who went to Stanford over MIT because Stanford is less rigorous so he would get more free time to build personal projects
He's doing quite well at Apple now
The thing is ppl make up things on resume too
Yeah that's lowk a diff audience from the people I know đ
Most of the people ik are the borderline suicidal hyper-workaholic nerds who basically just torture themselves
Yeah
Honesty is not always rewarded, and dishonesty is sometimes rewarded
Just the system
But I do appreciate ppl who lie (not saying u should lie
They just have a big heart
It's like I straight up won't be able to sleep at night if I do cause it just feels so wrong
And fear of getting caught
I remember Gohar talked about this
If they find out you lied they can rescind your degree even after you have graduated
For me it's lowk not even fear of being caught ngl
It's just like the sense of doing something bad
Auto admit to mit
Personality and quality should be a big big factor in admission
No way to check it imo
Idt I have ever met someone thatâs mean or bad that studies at mit
Lying on College Apps lowkey takes thought cus you can't make it too obvious
Like you can't say you won the IMO or smth, gotta find a boundary
also like imo your personality development is also kinda rng cause it's just about how you were raised/ the environment you grew up in
they ainât gonna do anything about it
if itâs all verbal anecdotes then ur cooked
I think a better methodology is bending narrative to the parts of the truth that can be beneficial, and painting a picture based off of smaller realities to form an overarching character
Colleges look for specific character traits and placing emphasis on those is vastly more important than lying about competitions or whatever that realistically the AOs have either never heard of or don't know anything about
college will likely investiagate
they have no reason not to
the issue is if they cant find anything on their own it means nth
but even small things they can confirm with the hs
and are reasons to rescind
u wont hear abt it because no one is going to tell that they got rescinded its usaully rumors
the guy from clulely got resinded from harvard no1 rlly knew abt it until he became famous
i mean i saw like 50+ acceptances this year so far and the vast majority of them had some sort of institutional hook outside of their control
i think cuz had a valid point about institutional priorities but just worded things a bit too strongly
of course there definitely are self-selection biases, reporting biases, etc. but i do observe a general trend in admissions shifting towards other factors other than race since sffa v. harvard
such as rural, underrepresented genders, socioeconomic status, etc.
ultimately these schools are private so theyre not obligated to be strictly "meritocratic" so 
and "meritocratic" in and of itself is difficult to define
because context matters
i think you should report this. theres people on the MIT waitlist who would really do great things if they got in
i believe MIT is known for giving awards to those who get in
it's js a nuanced thing - i can understand individuals who are part of overrepresented being frustrated at their disadvantages but it's just how the private school system works with balance
like assuming theyre lying on their appli as in fabricating ecs and awards then thats rlly unfair
yea again she also told me other friends she knows also got in
who bs'd
it wont change much im not someone who inteferes in other affairs
i simply just watch and observe
i dont think its meant for me to be doing anything
geez i js hate how bad it is towards students who actually work hard
i accepted my role as an npc in society maybe one day i can progress
there were so many deserving ppl ik who got rejected from mit
yea def
i feel like this is the situation where you do step in and report the person
the waitlist only happens
after everyone gets admitted
it wont change anything now
this type of mentality is what lets ppl like that get away with it
yeah this is true
i mean im not gonna do anything
i just dont see myself being friends with somebody like that
you think they investigate every complaint and finding on their admitted students that goes through their doors? Itâs very unlikely that theyâll take it more seriously than just a spiteful person
but i do understand why you're hesitant to report
mit admissions is a bit questionable this year
yes def they will
interesting tho
for them to take it seriously it would have to come from a school official
u undereestimate how much AO's care abt honesty
for sm1 that got admitted
they have no reason to not audit
it takes 1 phone call
wait yeah same
it depends how much proof since some ppl can deliberately sabotage and fabricate information
but honestly hopscotch i really think you should report this
it just doesnt feel right letting them take away spots from deserving people and waitlists who already have a low chance
ok đ¤Ľ
did u lie on ur app lol
it depends but i know of sm1 who got reported for lying abt years on their app and position and they did get rescinde
it was a school nearby
u wont hear much because no1 will say they got rescinded
its usually through a freind and is heavily gatekept
no I just think you overestimate how many people are spiteful and send crap to the AOs that they investigate every complaint they get about admitted students from random parents and kids
The upper class is typically fake it til you make it anyway
Those kids will get weeded out quick in MIT
when did i say this?
obv ao's know ppl are spitefull
but ur acting like they wont audit or verify
esp with the decisons alr made
its not a lot of work for them to do this and has been doen b4
again no1 will know how many ppl get rescinded at top colleges every year its smth that no college would release either
but no1s gonna actively say they did and prob wouldnt tell their freinds cuz its like "aura loss"
i was replying to the other person saying i should do smth again its not rlly my place to say anything
if mit got tricked thats on them
nah
bro if we're being fr ppl who larp and get in
will do fine
thats how it works
u can take easier classes
mit is just that one school where everything is hard asl but im sure there are easy classes u can take
its not like a liberal arts college ivy tho
eh
darthmouth legit said they made esaier classes cuz they took unqualified ppl during the pandemic
usually theyre smart enough to lie and get in/survive
they just wont excel like the deserving people will
mit's loss in the end anyway
if they continue this trajectory they objectively will not be able to maintain their current prestige
yea the issue is that
the college app process isnt perfect
but ppl will def bs enough in college its not hard
ppl lying on apps is gonna happen
even reporting 1 person wont change anything
its a flawed system but thats just how things r
đš
i mean how he is wrong
i think it is concerning that they arent admitting the cream of the crop
flat out rejection is crazy
one kid who got rejected was a flat out genius if u spoke to him abt math u would shi ur pants
just next level in the field
"they rejected a genius i know and admitted 2 people who i don't think are deserving so mit admissions is flawed"
that's not what i replied to anyways, mit's prestige is not going to suffer because they admitted one "genius" over another
i never said that tho
yea obv mit prestige wont suffer
i think op means to say is if they continue doing this
well that's what i replied to
i have no comment tho abt it
no im saying that if its easy for sm1 to bs mit app
then AO's obv can be fooled
that's true, the failure mode of the admissions system across america is admitting lying applicants
it's not rejecting geniuses
they did reject a genius
that's also not really a critique of mit but just all colleges in general
na itâs the rich affluent legacy well resourced and connected kids đ§
yo theres a reason everyone in the math community was shocked
there were also ppl more cracked who got rejected
rejection stings for people you personally know about
ur acting as if the application pool isn't filled with these types of people lmao
hes basically a celeb in the math community
it would be quite diffiuclt to know him personally
theres a reason ppl r talking abt him
ok well you're feeling slighted on behalf of himlmao
IDK i've never heard of this mystery guy that mit should've 100%accepted
except no bad words, no comments
again maybe ur not in those communities
did u grind math comps?
if ur a warriors fan u may have heard of shaun livingston but if ur not and ur a casual u may have no clue
right, cuz math competitions are the pinnacle of human ability and getting a spot anywhere you want is a logical conclusion from getting insane awards
do you think mit should just admit everyone who competed in national/international olympiads?
im not MIT again i literally told u im an npc
i have no say and no one else here does too
mit makes all the deciscons not us
u can feel a certain way but ur not the one admitting mit admins are
ok and there's also multiple nobodies you have never heard of who have self studied subjects to grad level
you don't know what happens behind the scenes nor what the application pool is like
yes i just said that
i said its fair to just say it was unfair
but it wont chagne anything
and not to devalue someone who got in
so if you don't believe this then i think it's completely fair to say that mit did not make a mistake rejecting someone because they are "notorious in the (?) math community" and are a genius
which is why i told everyone to stop doing that
its not just that
if u saw his accolades
i told u its like lebron not winning MVP and no all nba teams in 2012
or if leonardo dicaprio never won an oscar
ok so do you think mit rejecting anyone participating in, say, the imo is unfair?
USA domestic imo?
with medal?
usa imo team with medal i think its unfair and a p big robbery but u have to respect the deciscion made as they are a private college and can do whatever they want
domestic >imo
these guys/girls r the smartest ppl in the country for math
i mean USA imo team lol
usamo is what you mean
oh thepeople who progress into the imo from the us
yea
yeah that's a very crude generalization
being good at imo-style problems does not automatically make you one of the smartest people in the country at ``math''
what does that even mean
it does
at least respect the level of hard work, skill and dedication that the ppl on the imo team have
theyre next level
so you're telling me this while also not understanding what ``math'' is
analogy
sure
u can be good at math
and not be good at imo level
it lowkey does, the level of pattern recognition required is đ
yea
idt u understand
dont disrespect pls
i would never get to that level
and p much no one here will
ok great and theyll succeed anywhere. mit is not obligated to admit them and it's not particularly unfair for them to think the people they admit are better than tthem
its insane level
i literally said mit isnt obligated lol
but its fine to think its unfair
re-read it
Like on TOP of mental discipline, you have to have some sort of talent to stand out in a competitive country like US
yea
its insane
an avg human being is more likely to score on lebron than to beat sm1 who won an imo gold medal
ur disrespecting the various people across the country who have self studied through various subjects to the graduate level in math, and are actually doing what mathematicians would call ``math'', because they didn't gain notoriety by specializing in some niche olympiad-style math contest
im not
again you're making an extremely crude generalization of what math is
i said imo is best of the best
u can also be good at math and not imo
2 things can be true
but imo ppl r top of the top
theres a reason mit admits all of them p much from us IMO team
they realize its an honor to admit sm1 who made IMO
no but you are, because apparently these 6 imo people must be the best (high school) mathematicians in the country and thus they beat out everyone in the application pool and deserve immediate admission to mit
p much
best math kids in the country
i thikn any1 in the math community can agree
yeah that's just ridiculous lol you don't know what ``math'' is
ANYONE with enough hard work can "learn" math to the graduate level btw
i think u fail to realize u can grind all u want but never reach IMO level
its similar to the olympics
like aside from college talk
its like a passion for ppl who do it
these ppl are doing IMO because they love math not for college
i don't care about the IMO, i care that laypeople end up conflating what actual mathematicians do with what these contests aredw
IMO is prob the most prestigous thing for a teenager in the math world achivement wise/awards
terrance tao
he won a fields medal later in life too
Of course the IMO syllabus is not the same as real math, but the problem solving skills are very well transfered
one of the smartest humans in modern day history
won imo at 13
the skill diff between terrance tao and avg imo winner is bigger than skill diff between avg imo winner and avg human being
ok i could make the exact same statement but for going to the imo.
why havent people by and large across the country have studied math to the graduate level then, if it just takes enough hard work?
because its hard, a lot of ppl dont like math
and its same reason a lot of ppl dont go to russian studies to graduate level either
cherry picking one great mathematician and saying he won an imo medal at 13 doesn't make your argument any more vali d
most ppl dont want to go into academia
no i jsut randolmy mentioned lol
i wanted to glaze him
being able to do timed contest exam problems quickly in elementary math subjects is not something that transfers as cleanly (as you are making it out to be) to what people who pursue math in undergrad/grad school do
because 1. olympiads give a quantifiable score that translates to medals which help in college admission 2. It is just simply much more fun, it is a competition
competition math rewards speed, pattern recognition, clever tricks within constrained problem sets that you could easily scaffold knowledge off of, while research math rewards patience, tolerance for extended failure, creativity in undefined problem spaces, and intuition in choosing what's worth/able to be worked on
so, again, they're not the same
just because you can quantify how good someone is at contest math doesn't make you "one of the best mathematicians across the country"
im sorry u feel that way but it is a valid way to show
IMO is one of the greatest achivements
in fact i really dont think mit is doing enough to get these kids (not even a joke)
I was stating the reason why olympiads are more popular
it is goal oriented
sure, but being part of those 6 doesn't automatically mean you are the best mathematicians across the country (because what does that even mean?) and that mit's institutional priorities should be thrown out the window to accomodate these people
theyre great and awesome and are extremely talented, but so are many people in the application pool
do u think the all nba first team are not the best 5 players of that season?
just because you've heard of the imo and that it's a really competitive thing to be able to participate in doesn't mean it must automatically take precedence over literally anything and everything that mit aos see as impressive
i don't understand your nba analogies
apologies for not being a basketball fan
no i just know what the nba is lol
It is not just about being able to score good on the exam day. The amount of problems you have solved to gain that intuition, and the pattern recognitions kills are the ones that matter
but like not know much abt lebron is p hurtful
well you know
i feel every1 should research and study lebron's life
yes and i don't discredit that at all
lebron, terrance tao and sm1 else r the big 3
we gotta find that 3rd person to nominate
but you guys are discrediting the thousands in the application pool who have put in similar amounts of work to what their passionate at because it doesn't generate a name for them
HIII
I am talking from my physics Olympiad background, which I do agree is much more transferrable to uni level studies than math oly, so I may have a bias there.
that's why a lot of research people get in aswell
it is not just the olympians that get into college
yes
talking about how admissions is unfair and wrong because a person was not admitted even though they have x, y, z insane public awards and a, b, c insane ecs and whatnot discredits these types of people
i never discredited anyone
look at this
regardles of what u think u have the right
the founding fathers fought for freedom
but lets just not disrespect IMO winners
that's fine, but he thinks this #1400589854861033642 message
^
of course theyre well suited for mit but screeching about how mit admissions has done a horrible injustice by admitting someone with some insane award discredits "the thousands in the application pool who have put in insane amounts of work intto what their passionate," just things that don't generate a name for them
if you want to seethe about admissions, arguing that people lie on their apps is a much better angle (although it's not mit specific)
because those people could straight up be lying
how do you efficiently and reliably check someone's knowledge?
by their awards!
i feel like hearing this argument is rlly interesting as an mit student who knows some oly ppl at mit
are u curerntly an mit student?
co2029
i got in do u mind if i ask u some q's later
if you want to seethe about admissions, arguing that people lie on their apps is a much better angle (although it's not mit specific)
i would literally feel subpar if i were in a room of imo medalists
feel free to dm; i can't promise to reply because i am currently crashing and burning a little bit
i dont think imo kids should be taking same classes as regular ppl like me if i do end up going to mit
ur weird and apotheosize oly people too much
bet tysm
i do feel like this
but i was talking to a friend who i didn't realize had an oly background and i was saying that i thought surely the oly kids must know all the content in the math class and he was like "no???" and i'm like "how do u know" and he's like "bro i mopped twice" đ
bro obv
they wont know everything
but their brains work faster
like its just next level
right..
sure a lot of ppl who arent imo are also super smart
i think perhaps you need to go outside and touch grass
not just olympiad people, also research people. I mean there are LOTS of crackpots and larpers. and only reliable way to check their knowledge and skills is to look at their awards. that's it
(oor technical interviews)
if you want to seethe about admissions, arguing that people lie on their apps is a much better angle (although it's not mit specific)
I think it really just boils down to the fact that we are all unique and hence go after our own unique goals! A medal doesnât change a persons status to above-human, it just demonstrates their dedication and love for what they do (usually) :D Eventually we will all find our niche, some just do so earlier and in more âacademicâ fields that others
Idk what you're tryna say
systemic lying on college apps is a separate problem and not something im accounting for
yes 100%
every human is equal obv and like just because someone has IMO doesnt mean theyre better. anyone can be good at mit and i know so many ppl who told me they didnt fit in originally but have been so successful working with such smart ppl
what i mean to say is its like meeting a celeberity like lebron at mit
these r ppl internationally recognized
winning one of the most prestigous math awards in history
its lowk just an honor knowing someone or being friends with sm1 like that
this grotesque misrepresentation of what olympiads are is what makes them so toxic and repulsive
at least this year, first semester all of the oly kids took 18.701: algebra 1 and a good chunk of non-oly frosh also took it and did well (including me). i lowkey don't know what the oly kids are doing second semester but i think it's 18.600: stats and 18.510: intro to set theory and logic and both of these are standard classes
there are definitely some kids who do insane things like take elliptic curves and diff geo first semester. like, my friend took these classes and there were only 3 other frosh in elliptic curves. this friend is not oly but i think the other 3 were oly
well, yeah I agree, sometimes the competition part overrides the general learning and passion for the subject parts which makes mid olympiad people straight up aholes, but the top participants know that olympiads are not the whole story
there are definitely some kids who do insane things like take elliptic curves and diff geo first semester. like, my friend took these classes and there were only 3 other frosh in elliptic curves. this friend is not oly but i think the other 3 were oly
how do they bypass the prereqs?
I have a feeling you like lebron xD But yea I get what you mean, but I recommend that you donât fall too far into âidolatryâ⌠Admissions can feel really random but at the end of the day there was prob a big olâ discussion behind every application sent in, so while we may never know why or how somebody got admitted, people who admit for their living saw them as fit. And hey, maybe the Olympiad people you mentioned werenât admitted because MIT felt theyâd for sure fit at Stanford or Princeton better (who have amaazinggg math programs), so itâs not necessarily a bad reflection, ofc
im just a normal person like nothing special abt me i dont have anything insane i just know im smart but not that level of cracked by any means and ive known my entire life and im okay. i dont see anyone as better but its just like these ppl are next level idk how to say. ill never be as good as them but just having the opportunity to listen, work and sit next to them in class is crazy. ik what u mean like its not good to just put oly ppl at that level but like imo is just like that there are only a few ppl who medal so its just like that.
on the one hand it is kinda crazy to realize that people i know are literally imo. on the other hand they're like. just ppl. like if ur weird about it that's weird imo
and besides there's all kinds of things where you'll be like "i can't believe <person i know> is <blank>" besides oly, like
you just go đ đđ 𼺠and it mostly works. like 18.100b: real analysis is a prereq for 18.701 but everyone just skips it. either you ask the prof or you just register for it and hope noone complains lol
yeah ur literally just idolizing these people that's highkey weird đ
i thought you weren't allowed to skip that one stupid cs class
depends on the dept. math prereqs are not real. 6.102 prof is just rlly annoying about prereqs đ
great im never becoming a cs major đâď¸
yea deep down ive always been riducled and knew i was never the best. ive already accepted that fact i think im okay smart but nothing crazy just a normal person. like even now i dont think its fair that ppl way more cracked than me didnt get in but idk how to feel abt that. like if i were to go idk if i could just know im studying with imo ppl its just a weird feeling. i dont think theyre better as humans but in academia and what they excel in like theyre def every good at waht they do
Woa no mean to interrupt but that is very cool. I reallyyyy wanna get ahead in the math area of things so I have space to dual major so that actually is epic to know. Are you working towards your Pirate certification? Hee hee hor hor
that's nice to know (about the math dept)
đ¤ˇââď¸ i question why you think that oly is incomparably amazing. i think you'd find that you'd discover a lot of people who are insanely cracked in a lot of different ways
it's okay 6.101 is like 4 hours of work a week anyways if you know the content. also i figured out how to do python bytecode sillies and i think i'm gonna slip it into my next lab for funsies
yea obv everyone who got into mit is rlly cracked lol
ill prob be the dumbest person there
wait i should totally do the pirate certificate but i keep missing PE reg
in what other ways can they be quanitfiably cracked though, im just asking because I have a poor imagination
nah, it just feels annoying to take courses for 1-2 years that i would say i probably mostly maybe wholly know the content of
bro just add it on top of everything else đ¤ˇââď¸
like you can just add it as another class
okay yeah, "quantifiablity" is a separate issue
isnt there a unit limit for freshman yr
i do think that oly is one of the most quantifiable things, so if you're looking for amazing with the restriction that it can be compressed into a single number then there's not rlly anything better than oly
on the other hand, i know people who have discovered novel classes of vulns, for instance
idt i could fit all the math courses i wanna take with all the cs courses i wanna take, so id rather just fully dedicate to oone
yeah đ¤ˇââď¸. kinda sucks but just add it on sophomore year
also it's like literally just that one class
what do u wanna take?
do u go to mit?
I want to too but iâm 99% sure Iâll die in all of the required PE classes đ
30 years old?
Im going to walk out of fencing with puncture wounds all over me đ˘
you can just do over iap
so ur in my year
i think i put it on hydrant and it fills out the first 2 years
swag master are u co30?
yeah he has the tag
you should send
Yes i am!! I am soooooo over the moon happy
I was thinking about that but I cannot take sailing in the winterâŚ. One drop of water and Iâm gone
wait hopscotch are u mit '30?
OH TRUE GOOD POINT
i took intermediate ice skating and it was very fun!
That sounds like the coolest thing ever but Iâm so un athletic that I need to put limits on my pe classes or else Iâll get like CTE
Almost died playing golf multiple times which is like the hardest sport to die in
Iâll just stay inside
cte?
r u smashing ur head on smth?
Like what you get after one too many tbis
Ice skating, probably yes
ik what cte is
i love ice skating,,,
Did you join the 29â discord when admissions were released last yr?
Im wondering if itâll stay up past cpw or not
(i happen to own it) (there was no officially run server for '29)
as far as i understand how the officially run servers work, it'll stay up indefinitely
Omg woaw so I assume they stay open then Lol
yeah it's almost like people can like. talk face to face or something /lh
i think its because
most of the girls all use IG
when the school year starts
in college
most of them only keep the discord for club related stuff
little purpose left cuz then a lot of guys prob wont use
Is there a big mit student body social media presence?
idk i don't rlly use social media
club discords are active
yea thats what i meant
depends on what social group of campus
yea i mean what i heard
east-side things are all signal for the most part
i think more guys use discord
like even for this im assuming more and more girls will stop using discord
with no need after app season
based on discord data available online
đ¤ˇââď¸ this is definitely true
maybe one year i'll rush a sorority
some places are facebook messenger even đ
Lol i was just looking at the Bunnies at MIT facebook group
i think that was uncs
facebook was p popular b4
cuz of the group chats and alumini
i think ppl will just stick to ig
i think significantly more people studied math to graduate level before going to uni than got into imo
While I donât go to MIT I found at least at Davis platforms were more by activity type than gender similar to what emi said
Like the average hobby club was more likely to be on discord while the pre professional type clubs were more likely to be on slack
Davis also had quite a few class discords that would pop up just for that semester
the exclusivity of the award doesn't make it any more valuable than doing hard things like tha tr
the exclusivity is a result of the competitiveness
both are very valuable and great achievements ofc
yes and it's cool and impressive to be an imo competitor, but seething about how admissions is unfair (?) for rejecting an imo participant like the other guy discredits the work of the thousands of other people with similarly impressive feats, those who you've never heard about because the activities they pursue don't generate a name for themselves
Yeah agreed
Physics and Philosophy too probably. At least the theoretical aspect of Physics
You can find textbooks on any subject. I self-learned Multivariable Calc in a couple of weeks for example with Khan and a book
not saying
what subjects can you not easily teach yourself though?
i mean easily as in not much harder than with person
Probably very hands on things
Uhh like engineering I guess
Because you need materials for that
Non-theoretical aspects of engineering
"enough" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence
you can also grind out math competitions from the age of like 4 (like most imo people do) and do very well at math camps
But if you want more abstract stuff, I would suggest indigenous languages of papua new genua with 69 different noun classes
Anyone plan to do Putnam, IMC, or ICPC in Uni?
I lowkey wanna do Putnam just because how difficult it is, I have no experience in math competitions though, only phys oly
The problems look very nice
Same here
I tried to do AMC but my school didnât let me
So this will be a first, I will do some self-training over summer. See you at the comps if you end up doing it
Ok naa
prob Putnam and ICPC
Maybe yeah
But curing cancer is much better though
u cant cure cancer tho
i mean maybe a specific type
also its rlly not gonna just be 1 person
but im not rlly gonna tolerate any disrespect to imo
its fine if u disagree abt yday but like imo is not smth to take lightly
we're all humans equal
But some olympiads are objectively better than others :p
but yea in terms of math i am
Alr Alr gl
We will probably be competing in some comps
i think any1 who thinks theyre on the same level of an imo medalist
should rlly rethink everything through
its like saying u play basketball and could be as good as lebron
I think I'm on the same level of an imo medalist ||in terms of how chronically online I am||
I was surprised by ICPC results
I expected MIT to be high up but last year it was like 11th
like i get what u mean
the thing is i alr know where i am in society
so thats why im saying this
Booo MIT
everyone's equal but
imo ppl sweat so much for what they are good at
ur discreting the sheer amnt of work, skill and dedicaiton they had to go
blood sweat and tears
Number 1 was Peking
can u press the x to decomrpess hte link so the chat is more coherent
idk if everyone is born with the same innate talents and whatnot if that';s what u mean by "equal"
like humans should be treated equal i mean
oh yeah ofc
There
but froggy the frog
is acting like
any1 can beat lebron
just cuz they play ball
lol
only michale jordan can
kevin durant
and kahwi
and damian lillard
and michale beasly
but aside from this like
But for physics I'd say getting ipho gold and mastering UG physics is basically the same
yea i think what froggy means to say is that
we shouldnt glaze olys that much
which ig could be true
That's not the case for imo though, the two have different syllabuses
but i think the IMO ppl are basically like
mega celebs
in the math world
like a list actors
Not really
The general math world is more concerned with research. So the mega celebs would be top tier researchers
well yea
so id say IMO medalists are prob
similar to
rookie of the years
so lebron in 2003
More like junior actors maybe
Idk this convo ain't going anywhere
Anyone here plan on going to academia?
Wdym going to academia
Do research?
Yeah like become a researcher or professor
i would if u could get money
Yeah I want to actually
the only way to rlly make good money
is if ur terrence tao
where u can get a half a million dollar paycheck (salary) from UCLA
plus payments from super rich ppl
his yearly income is def over 1 million now
since his ucla salary is around 700k
W
I will either go into academia or Quant. Havenât decided yet
same
i want to do quant as well
just for the money
Good luck đŤĄ
iâd say that getting imo qual from the US puts you at top 6 in the US (out of high school students) at competition math, but not math in general yeah. tho there could be overlap and people from imo could also be top 6 at math in general in the US (out of high school students)
yeah math oly is specific tho
Whatâs imo
international mathematical olympiad
and theres also math courses like graduate courses
and math research
no donât say that
everyone here is way too cracked for me
i never did well in olys
a lot of ppl way more deserving than i am prolly didnât get in caltech
i feel like im gonna be the worst there
but who knows tbh
accepted to caltech for astrophysics + applied math despite failing to qualify for the aime for four years in a row đ
my research got me in mainly i think
and academics
and LORs
and essays
iâd hate to meet the current US president tbh
Slime him out for us plz /hj
I didnât even know what olympiads were until early senior year đ
Looking into it more now, in retrospect, I would have LOVED doing the biology or math ones, but I guess it is nice having what you enjoy be free from competition, if that makes sense
Man I wish I got the chance to compete in one
My school never approved my requests to start an AMC program
Will fulfill the dream at college with Putnam though đĽ
i drink soda i eat pizza
Iâm actually scared for Putnam tho đ
We got this. I started prepping over Spring Break
It's a hard goal, but my goal is to be in the top 5(Putnam Fellow) at least once
dang bruh, you are locked. I'm lowkey scared to commit lol.
you got any past comp math experience ?
Last Putnam first place got a 110/120 đĽś
Yes I have done many, but I wasn't able to do the main AMC/AIME/AMO track
what r u using to prep
Putnam and Beyond?
I got this book
Before actually prepping with practice questions, I figured I would actually train on problem-solving itself, since that's really most of the work
Once I learn the strategies from here and practice them, then I will start actual IMO and Putnam questions(and use the strats)
From what I have heard, that book skims through stuff pretty fast, so to learn the material, I was planning to get individual textbooks of each subject and just use those to gain a deeper understanding
As a coincidence, I have already been working on Linear Algebra Done Right, and it turns out it's on the test. That worked out well
Highly recommend that book for Linear Algebra, it's available for free on the author's site https://linear.axler.net/LADR4e.pdf
What do you expect
I think weâve had some in this server before
Not for you to know
đ˘
Honestly so many a2cers win awards that I hear are prestigious they all muddle together
And the reason they muddle together is because none of the people who win them seem abnormal to me as people
So I donât end up remembering that they won those things
Do you do imo hopscotch
I knew nothing abt olympiads pre A2C that if somebody told me they were competing in one I wouldâve congratulated them and asked which sport
One thing I have realized over the years is that many a2cers think if they attend a t20 they will be exempt from ever doing anything dumb ever again
Yet every year I have college kids from hypsm to non flagship state schools asking me how to go talk to someone in class they have a crush on or how to get rid of their first major hangover
damn
Me too đ đ đ I found out literally this Octoberish
I also just now realized you were saying âdo you do imoâ to a user named hopscotch and not making a joke about the existence of imo hopscotch
Too much to keep up with đĽ
Its okay I would do international math olympiad hopscotch if it was an option anyways XD
Commas save lives smh
the guy that got admitted from egypt this cycle had the highest IOI rank in arab history
man this applicant pool is too competitive for me lmao đ
When I first heard IMO I thought it means âin my opinionâ
Not even lying I have met two people on Discord who claimed to be IMO medalists
Both turned out to be larpers
Both in Goharâs server
Not really
Itâs probably fewer on average. There are 6 participants but not all of them get medals
there's one in my math class
Ur at MIT?
yeah
whats the gap
between him and every1 else in the class
đ¤ˇââď¸ they're pretty goated but idk how you want me to describe it
like did u get imposter syndrome
also do they acknowledge theyre better in class
i think better is not the right way of thinking about it
no? actually i tthink they made me have less imposter syndrome
because they just seem rlly chill đ¤ˇââď¸
one of the friends i went to hs with is also at mit and he's absurdly cracked at math
and the thought of people who are more cracked at math than him made me feel very imposter syndrome. but it turns out that he's actually just very cracked
Damn W can I ask your ECs if you don't mind
idk i lowkey did random shit
Did u have any national or international awards? Lowkey I think my awards are what cooked me
no not rlly
My highest was state
prob my best single thing was a lor from the ceo of a cybersec firm i interned at
Oh damn internships are huge that makes sense
Cracked
I notice again how random admissions is though, my friend did something similar but got rejected
It seems random to u but it's not very random to AOs tbh
You don't get to see the whole application and ecs are only a part, along with other nuances like IPs
What's the full form of IPs
You mean like what it stands for?
yea
Institutional Priorities
Oh
first time hearing about it
Mind giving examples? Still want to learn about admissions a little bit more, since it will be helpful in grad apps in the future
i think its how some schools prioritize different qualities in applicants
some are drawn more to leadership and community service/character, others like to see research/professional/work experience, others pure academic rigor/performance, and some like when applicants have a uniqueness to them that helps them build a diverse class
many schools have multiple priorities but may put some first
They're certain priorities that an institution needs to fulfill to keep their rankings high, promote social wellbeing & mobility, along with diversity, and keep their board of trustees happy or whatever
i.e. First-Generation, Low-Income Students, Students from Underrepresented Geographic Regions (All 50 states is pretty important at some schools), Legacy, Development Cases, & Recruited Athletes are pretty important for a lot of schools, and then obviously each school has specific priorities like Yale wants to really develop their STEM department, so they may be more inclined to take more STEM students/there might be some additional context given that they want more STEM students and then there's programs like YES scholar which also make it more enticing for the student to attend
Does mit have English major
yes
lowkey idk how i got in places
i will say a lot of people seem to be cross admits, like i got stanford too
i just dunno why i got in anywhere
alr ty
Do you know if ECs and awards are weighted based on personal economics situation? Like for example if Student A and Student B do the same stuff but one is high income and one is low income, will ECs of the latter be scaled higher
Just wondering because it would make sense
You probably had really good essays.
I think one of the big factors in my rejection were the essays, because I straight up rushed them on the due date
My Stanford essays were my best, so hopefully I have good results for that
Maybe they just had a good application lol
It's not really a component-wise evaluation
Your application is considered as a whole
No because they were saying they don't know how they got in with those ECs, the next biggest thing is Essays so I was proposing that must be very good
It was just speculation from the comment
But yeah it's holistic so the entire app must have been goated
I see
The reality is save for if you view your admissions file and they show comments where AOs directly say what they liked abt your app (which idk if mit does that) you will not know
And that same reality will happen when you get an internship or a job
Except they wonât even have an admissions file you can try to look at
@dense tangle this is also why itâs not worth asking around
I think MIT shreds ur app after ur decision
AFAIK schools donât usually shred the entirety of your app bc they have to legally show its âserved its purposeâ to do so but they donât have to show you your admissions comments
They legally only have to show you what you submitted
Which if you saved your application before you submitted is gonna look about the same
what happens if u chose not to waive the right to see letters of rec
is that a sign of death for ur odds
i heard thats very bad to do that
Not entirely but your rec letters become almost worthless
Waiving ur rights only means u cant demand to see the letter tho i think
If u ask and they accept they can show u afaik
oh word
But double check
In the application you'll be asked if you want to waive the right to review confidential letters of recommendation. What you should you know about this waiver?
- Waiving your right lets colleges know that you do not intend to read your recommendations, which helps reassure colleges that the letters are candid and truthful.
- Some recommenders may decline to write a letter for you if you do not waive your rights. Check with your counselor or teachers to see if any of them follow such a policy.
https://appsupport.commonapp.org/applicantsupport/s/article/What-is-the-FERPA-Waiver
Correct
Kids always panic abt this
Youâre not breaking the law bc your teacher voluntarily showed you your lor
You just donât have the legal right to see it if you request your admissions file once you enroll
Which for all colleges Iâm aware of means you will not be seeing them when you request your file
Is there any good boba places near mit
application will genuinley be fried
U can test it for us
đ
Apply
And then be a chud and eat yummy food with your friends to lower your cortisol
And then stalk your portal religiously for the slightest change to spike your cortisol
And then skip to December 19th and open your portal nonchalantly
Hope this helped
thanks twin
Yw
Adopt a blue kitty, thatâs how u get into Harvard
Write your personal statement about Skibidi Toilet
Easiest way to get auto-accepted
Exactly
yeah
I believe in you :D
Hannah Mira Cairo (born 2007) is an American mathematician who gained recognition at age 17 for disproving the longstanding MizohataâTakeuchi conjecture in harmonic analysis.
its like
not all that
theyre just like
normal people
IMO medalist \neq some kind of godly being
they're pretty normal kids, idt the average person would be able to distinguish them from a precocious high school math enthusiast
what kind of a person larps as an imo medalist
what leads a person to do this
yea shes a prodigy lol. she prob didnt have the resourecs to do IMO and stuff like that. if sm1 trained her at a young age for IMO she would prob have medalded.
i would
amnt of ppl like this r very rare
ur right tho there can be ppl insanely good math that dont do comps
math comps arent everything in evaluating best math
maybe
this also assumes that one would want to go to the IMO
note that comp math is not every math nerd's cup of tea
it just didnt translate that well in a 5v5 game which is what nba is about
lebron isnt the best 1v1 as bum fraud has no handles
yeah i mean probably
"average person" is doing a bit of heavy lifting here
but hes t3 oat nba player because its a 5v5 game
what i mean to say is that
u wont get teh recongnition
evne if u are good
but i think its pretty hard to distinguish between mopper and imo team member or something idk
IMO is a status ssymbol best of the best like like MVP
I am IMO 1% t15 HYPSM medalist finalist nationalist Ask me anything
send proof or larp
r/woosh
one thing i also noticed is many IMO ppl burn out
the constant studying since age 4
I didnt study actually
its why many fields medalist never did competitive math or placed at IMO
i signed up as a joke-
if u burn out too early at a young age
it may have a p big impact later on in life
this isnt the case for everyone
yea obv
this is the case for some but definitely not the rule
when i say smth like this im not saying its true for every1
i think most ppl r gonna use their common sense
when reading that
well, also note that comp math is not every math nerd's cup of tea
yes obv!
i said that too
i think what i mean to say is there r pppl here like mr. froggy who just act like IMO means nothing
its okay to accept the fact that ppl r worse at math and some ppl are better
so many ppl i see try to grind olys and get sad when they dont place but im just confsued why
most of them just do it for the apps and are not even passionate at all
so many ppl barely study and think an A in their precalc class is enough to do well on the AMC or such
u cant be that upset when u didnt grind so much for smth is what i mean to say
lke in general for anything
i backread and i dont think this is what frog said?
mr. froggy basically said that
er
IMO isnt everything
not really?
that the imo ppl
are not that much better
than other students
which isnt true at all
yes and it's cool and impressive to be an imo competitor, but seething about how admissions is unfair (?) for rejecting an imo participant like the other guy discredits the work of the thousands of other people with similarly impressive feats, those who you've never heard about because the activities they pursue don't generate a name for themselves
this is like
pretty true ish
i dont think at any point did frog say something about equating imo medalists to other students?
idk
i dont think anyone will argue with you on this
again
that's why only t6 IMO are auto admits domestic
MIT is a college in the US hence prioritizing american IMO
they dont need every1 else who is IMO
i dont see how this is related
im saying that
IMO is better tbh
esp IMO gold
ur top of the top
i got in and i think any1 with IMO is better than me
i will openly admit this
better than what
then why arent you in the server
i dont know what mit saw in me but i think thats where fit/instituationla priroites come in where they dont want every IMO tryhard
my acocunt my parents manage for schools clubs and stuff
do they not think the mit class of 2030 server might be a good server for you to be in
bro i cant have a bad impression ppl think im an immature loser
theyre gonna backread everything ive said even tho its just chill talks
what
i dont want ppl to know anything abt me ill manipulate stuff so they know what i want them to know
ok
i think what frog is trying to get at here is like
something i agree with
which is that like
you shouldnt idolize these people like theyre deities or smth
like sure theyre good at math?
but i dont think you need to like
actively think of yourself as inferior to them, this is kind of an unhealthy mindset to have
what i mean to say is that why would u join any professional thing esp college with anything that can be linked back to u
or something
there will be stalkers who read all ur mssgs
friends who will do that
and find details abt ur life
u need to establish a clean slate b4 college esp
because i want to make friends
not that u did anything bad
yea me too
bro im saying if i join and sm1 reads all my mssgs i random servers
thats just weird
also im not even commited still waiting on other stuff
but
i hope u get hte point
as if everyone else in there hasnt said weird things ever
so what
bro i dont say weird stuff đ
im saying just randm convos
why would u want sm1 to just reads ts and they know u in college
as if everyone else in there hasnt had random convos in other places ever