#Please help me make my CS list
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
UMD,Purdue, UW Madison, UT Austin
Applying to CS + x at uiuc makes it easier
Since you are interested in data science CS + stats would be worth a shot
purdue and ut austin are reaches for OOS with sub under 10% acceptance rates
Rice
thanks; I was also wondering if my classification of reach/target ect makes sense
I don't know a lot about non-USA schools. but here are some thoughts.
Princeton curriculum is pretty defined, so you won't be able to pursue as many classes on subjects you like. Same with Georgia Tech. For CS, I would look into other top unis like Brown, Yale, JH, Swarthmore, and Rice rather than Cornell + Princeton. Cornell isn't a bad option though. UCB, UIUC, and UCLA are all great options. UMich and UT Austin are also pretty good.
You are applying to a lot of UCs as targets and safeties, but not all of them are great for CS. UCSD, UC Santa Barbara, and UC Davis are good options but Riverside, Irvine, Santa Cruz, and Merced won't be great for CS. It's one application, so you can choose to apply to those if you want, but Instead I would consider other targets/safeties like Oberlin, RPI, UM College Park, UDelaware, UFlorida, UW Madison, WPI, and Virginia tech, to name a few.
thanks; my school has a limit on 10 applications (UCAS and UC each count as one) so Im not sure if i should try to focus more on reaches in the USA and hope UCs and UK schools can be my targets/safeties
WTf are u on
UCR, UCI, and UCSC have very good CS programs
that being said the other reccomendations are good
Irvine is decent, but UCSC and UCR i'm not so sure...
UCR has a 30% CS acceptance rate for a reason
https://www.usnews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-science-schools/computer-science-rankings - UCI, UCSD, UCSB and UC Davis are ranked better - my point is there are better schools to apply to as safety/target for CS
ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ
If he's already applying to the UC's, its just a click of a button
It is true that UCI, UCSD, UCSB, UCD are ranked better but that doesn't mean the other schools are bad for CS
Also these are grad rankings
the undergrad list is here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/comments/yrhu3m/us_news_2023_ranking_of_best_undergraduate/
the only UC outside the top 50 is riverside, by a few spots (and merced)
Arbitrary rankings mean less than actual concrete results like salary imo
So the UC's rank among the top in both
berkeley - 3
Santa barbara - 16
santa cruz - 18
UCI - 25
ucsd - 29
ucla - 31
ucd - 50
Thats a terrible reason to say it isnât good. Firstly, T20 isnât some magic number for every ranking ever made, it was just the cutoff for years in the national universities ranking where top private schools that had a small student body with low acceptance rates and very high grades and test scores were. In law schools for example, T14 is the cutoff, because those schools have consistently been top feeders, so not sure why T20 would matter so much in CS rankings. Secondly, US news rankings are somewhat baloney, because the biggest thing they rely on is professors rating other schools, which just perpetuates past prestige. It doesnât indicate how successful a school will be for someone. Some schools that arenât in the T20 for CS have salaries comparable to Berkeleyâs CS salaries, like Rice, Duke, or Harvey Mudd.
Doesnât matter though recruiters look at that and thatâs what they use for recruiting
And btw who tf said to u the cut off is t14 lmao
The cut off is T25 for sure
If you really want to see how successful youll be there you have to visit campus and see how you like it and the ppl there
#1128241236390707332 message
That is the list u should use
Law has pretty much solidified what the T14 schools are with their medians and such. And itâs a joke to assume someone from Duke, Rice, Brown wouldnât have as much recruited opportunities (they clearly do based on outcomes) as someone from UMD because they arenât T20 in CS
And this list shows the top feeders
There are a lot more flagship schools that are ahead of other UCS like UC Irvine and Uc merced
Iâm not saying they are bad they are great
Look at the adjusted for enrollment and then go adjust what percent of undergrads major in CS or Math
But there are other schools that have greater success in CS and engineering
And then tell me Iâm wrong
Ok weâre not talking about law this is CS
And u can look at this
This is the main recruitment
And I donât see schools like rice on the top
Yes USC is very good and maybe underranked on usnews
Which one
On my link??
Yep
USC, HMC, Rice, Duke, Brown Georgia Tech are ahead of Berkeley in that category
All lower ranked in CS
Ok Brown is an ivy so makes sense
This makes sense
Except for Rice
Everything else is good
You canât directly compare a school with 4000 undergrads to one ten times itâs size
Ok yea I see Harvard is like 26
But doesnât matter
Harvard is Harvard
And Columbia is good too I think
Or compare schools that have 30% CS majors to one with 10% CS majors
Like say at Duke or Harvard
10-15% are in Cs
In GT, 26%
Not really fair even compared with undergrad enrollment
Itâs like 80% lol
Have u seen the discord
2888 are cs majors
But regardless I see ur point
But for getting jobs idt it matters how many cs majors there are
At ur university
Itâs not like college apps where they only take a certain number from ur school
Again, schools with drastically higher enrollment should be adjusted to enrollment size, and those with more CS majors should be adjusted to per Cs major. So that you see: âwhat are the chances a student graduating with a CS degree from a school gets placement?â
That last sentence is the important thing we want to know yes?
Idk
Not some total number comparing a school 5x Harvards size with double the percent in CS and saying well it places more
Like obviously
But if u do well at a T20 cs dchool
And know how to network
Not that big of a deal
And btw
For schools like Purdue and maryland
U have so many instate students that are accepted and donât even try that r not actually cracked
So thatâs what causes the adjusted ranking to be less
Cuz basically more than half are instate students and itâs significantly easier to get admission to those
But if u take say the oos students for those colleges that are relatively cracked then Iâd say the rates would be in favour of the T20 schools
Schools like duke and brown and northwestern donât care about accepting as many instate students so the numbers for recruitment seem better when adjusted but in actuality itâs not that much difference when compared to t20s
Iâm not sayinf they are bad they are great
But the t20s are too
And if you are a relatively diligent and hardworking student you will do well at them
Iâm not saying UCI has a better program than Berkeley, or that you can directly compare all of them. Iâm saying that itâs ridiculous to look at the US News ranking and assume for everyone applying, that a school will be better at outcomes and placement based on that ranking. Itâs not true whatsoever, and rankings should only be used as a general guideline, especially since there are fallibilities for some ranking systems. Look at things you actually care about: salary for major, placements, grad school, student life, etc
Ok but Iâm just saying UCI for 70k is not worth it esp as a international school
But usnews is used by recruiters so thereâs not much argument on it
And btw they are changing the usnews rankings soon
The guy at Google is not sitting at his computer going, damn, this guy graduated HMC and not Berkeley? What a scrub, no interview.
Well no but T20s will have more respect than HMC
just because of their national prestige
Increased weighting on a schools' success in graduating students from different backgrounds; and
Removing the following factors as ranking indicators: alumni giving, faculty with terminal degree, class size and high school standing; such factors will be included in school profiles and comparison tools for students
You live in a strange world if you think UMD would âimpressâ a Google recruiter more than HMC
Because of this schools like uiuc Purdue and gtech will get more highlights my ranked
This slams private schools
Like all the private T20s use their large endowment, small class sizes, and all top 10% students to stay at the top, thatâs why theyâve been T20 so long
So thatâs not good
So schools success in other schools like uiuc will shine
That will has tremendous success
And they wonât look at endowment
Like Mich say for instance gets so much endowment
I mean yeah but all those schools you think are at the top now because of their prestige will not be. I personally donât care but Princeton will be slammed hardest of all
Yea
But MIT will take the spot
So tbh doesnât matter
MIT in most other rankings is #1 in the world
And then Caltech maybe itll be t5 nationally
If enough of them do much worse, because people will realize the rankings have only gained credibility by placing HYPSM at the top for decades followed by the Ivies, no one will look at them anymore.
Thatâs the reason they have so much credibility
Is because you expect Harvard and Princeton and Yale to be at the top
And they are
So the methodology must work
But that reasoning will falter if they bomb
Yea true
There prolly will be a good amount of public schools entering the T20 now
Berkeley should def be t15
The only way they stay there is if they weight the faculty rating BS more
The survey that goes out and says, what do you professors think of Harvard
Thatâs already boosted all the Ivies for so long
Well ig but im saying public flagships schools will go up
Schools like rice Washu etc will go down
Even northwestern tbh
Not much but still
CMU will be crazy
T10 for sure
Not sure, as can be seen the outcomes are really good
WashU?
Not sure on CMU
nah
Yo their outcomes are basically top
They have placement in a few areas
Nothing beats it
Outcomes are only top in CS
Good in engineering
Thatâs one field
Music, art, etc arenât
Drama is
Exactly
Music and art arenât
So schools focused on STEM have better outcomes in general
Just cuz of the opportunities in STEM
Well yeah but CMU has music and art programs
True
But their main focus
Is STEM
esp CS
with crazy placement high salary for CS of 250k etc
Same with uiuc and othe flagship schools
We will have to see but the only reason Duke beats out WashU and Rice anyway right now is the faculty rating, not placement or anything like that
So they would get hit just as hard
Endowment and class size keeps all of the privates high
But not anymore
According to the article
So 2024 rankings wonât take that into consideration
ngl idt any UC is a safety for intl
What chance of admission would you consider a safety?
i thought the standard would be around 70%
UCM has an AR of 86% but i think thatâs for instate lol
UC Arâs for intls can get prettty low
Acording to college Vine's chancing simulator even as an international I have a 98 percent chance at UCM
ik its not accurate
but it should give a rough estimate right?
I consider safety 50%+
But it obviously depends on your stats
You have great GPA and SAT though so they are for sure safeties
Not really
considering you are international
everything is out the window
international throws a bunch of that out the window unfortunately
oops yeah you are international
Still, a lot of colleges with high acceptance rates even with the international buff will still be safeties for them imo with a really high SAT and GPA
When I google acceptance rates they are similar or sometimes even higher for internationals
Is this just because they are ussually more competitive people applying?
they aren't
usually
rare exceptions are out of state vs international SOMETIMES