#UCLA BizEcon vs USC Marshall
31 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
are you in state?
UCLA not close
Either tbh
No
Can you explain why/
May I know why?
For business USC
UCLA doesn’t even offer a business undergraduate school i
Marshall is both an actual undergraduate business school and a larger network, along with smaller classes
Only con is area, outside of the campus it’s surrounded by dangerous areas @ night (and tuition)
UCLA
- nicer campus
- strong outcomes that match or exceed USC
- better exit opportunities
- full tuition at USC will increase over time
UCLA is stronger, and cheaper
I’m not sure about exceeding USC in business opportunities
Eh this is much less of a factor than u think
From whag the OP said they want to do finance / consulting and USC feeds more per capita
Yes but they do that because UCLA has significantly more people of different majors
They also specified that exit opportunities are important to them
USC is really really good for business obviously but at full pay it isn't worth it over UCLA
Statistically unless you’re going to Harvard or penn the amount of people in typical finance exits are dispersed relatively equally
Because it’s more about the job you have once you get out of graduation that allows you to get exit opportunities
I don’t disagree about tuition though
A lot of money is coughed up, not sure about OP family financials but it is a lot of money
Thanks for the advice guys, enjoy HS
The way you wrote your post seems like u prefer UCLA
Oh lol I thought I deleted this thread
Appreciate it though, Im pretty much set on committing to USC Marshall
Congratulations, ik you’ll do well 😊