#circle theorems
31 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
X=38
how
<JHG = 52/2 = 26, since angles at the circumference are half that of at the centre
<OJG = (180-52)/2 = 64, since OJG is isosceles as 2 of its sides are radii, and base angles of isosceles are equal
<HGJ = 180-64 = 116, since <OJG and <HGJ are cointerior angles, as OJ || HG ( is parallel to)
hence x = 180 - 116 - 26 = 38, as angles in a triangle add to 180
how do yk its talking abt angle jhg on the circumference
since both angles are subtended by the same arc (JG)
or do you mean something else
what does subtended mean
like this
ig you can think of it if it forms a triangle with the same line of JG here
i couldnt do that q myself ðŸ˜
It means made
im guessing you mean q10
i) well you know the C_2D and C_2B are both radii, so DC_2B is isosceles, so then x = 90 + y/2
ii)since angles at circumference are half that at the centre, you get that the reflex angle of <AC_1B = 2x, so the acute angle of <AC_1B is 360 - 2x = 180 - y
for the thing to be a cyclic quadrilateral, we need that <AC_1B + <AC_2B = 180
plugging in our values for the coords we get that
i guess it can be a bit tricky to visualise the step to get reflex of <AC_1B, so another way to think about it is by getting the cyclic quadrilateral PABD, so <APB = 180-x, and then as <APB and <AC_1B are both subtend by arc AB, you get that <AC_1B = 2 * <APB
i dont get ii
which part?
if you draw a point p in the drawing above, you get that APBD is a cyclic quadrilateral
as opposite angles in a cyclic quadrilateral add to 180 degrees, <APB + <ADB = 180, so <APB = 180 - x
as both <APB and <AC_1B are subtended by arc AB, <AC_1B = 2 * <APB, as angles at centre is double that at circumference when subtended by same arc, so <AC_1B = 360 - 2x = 360 - 2(90 + y/2) = 180 - y
for a quadrilateral to be cyclic (looking at AC_1BC_2 now), we require that its opposite angles must add to 180 degrees, so we need that <AC_1B + <AC_2B = 180, subbing in the values, we get that 180 - y + y = 180, so AC_1BC_2 is a cyclic quadrilateral
i thought all vertices need to be on circumference
we are looking at converse of that theorem now
so normally say if you have a circle and you draw 4 points in ityou get a cyclic quadrilateral
so then you know in that quadrilateral opposite angles add to 180 degrees
however
say if you take a quadrilateral
and its opposite angles happen to add to 180 degrees
you can then draw a circle on which all 4 points lie
so it is a cyclic quadrilateral
this is called taking the converse of theorems, for some theorems it doesnt work, but for all the circle theorems it does
@upper delta