#Graph functions
132 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
it is a transformation of f(x) = 1/x
the graph f(x) = 1/x has the asimptotes of x = 0 and y = 0
this one has asimptotes of x = -2 and y = 0
you can work out the translation using that
then use that to formulate a function for that graph
whats the equaiton of f(x) tho
1/x
no this is a translation of that graph
so the equation of this graph is not 1/x
but a translation of 1/x
st it is possible for x = 0
basically the quesiton is ur given that graph
and its called y=f(x)
and i have yo suggest a possible equation for f(x)
yh
yh
idk
diagonal line
then draw the translation
2?
yh
ok
so now
the same kinda principal applies to the reciprocal graph
y = 1/x doesnt intercept the y axis
but that does not mean its translations will also not intercept the y axis
in fact
oh ok
dyk why the graph y = 1/x doesnt intercept the y axis?
cause those are its asymptotes
yes but why are they its asymptotes?
undefined
no
exactly
thats why it doesnt cross the y axis. cause the y axis is the line x = 0
however it does tend to the line x = 0
thats just because as the values get smaller what happens to y?
in terms of how its value differs from consequtive x values
which one is bigger 1/2 or 1/3?
1/2
1/0.1
cause to simplify it
no
u can times it by 10
look at denominators
yh
without doing any calculations
u can determine 1/2 is bigger than 1/3
without converting them to decimals
because of the denominators
what is it abt the denominators that makes 1/2 bigger than 1/3?
think of it like this: if you have more parts of the same whole, each part will be smaller
oh yh that makes sense
hence why as x approaches 0, y approaches infinity
but x never reaches 0
because it is impossible
anyway
back to the q
if the asymptotes have changed
but the shape of the graph remains the same
what kind of transformation are we looking at?
yh
so f(x+2)
wait wdym
as in
1/x+2 ?
f(x) = 1/x+2
so thats the answer?
yh
np