#Why is this 4060ti worse than RX6600 & 3060ti?

19 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

glossy heart
#

Spec list:
CPU: Intel i9 13900K
Motherboard: ASUS ROG z790-f
RAM: Corsair Vengeance 64GB 6000MHz
Storage: Samsung Evo 980 pro
PSU: Corsair RX1200x shift
AIO cooler: Corsair h150i

GPUs:

  • Gigabyte WINDFORCE 4060ti 8gb
  • EVGA FTW Ultra 3060ti 8gb
  • MSI Mech AMD Radeon RX6600 8gb

So I managed to snag a 4060ti prebuilt (cpu, ram, SSD, mobo, a whole desktop) on Facebook marketplace for $200. After figuring out that the GPU was not faulty (this would be another long story), I decided to plug it in my main build to check that the GPU works fine. So I ran time spy on the card, and I got really underwhelming results.

Scores:

  • 4060ti: 6094 / CPU: 12719
  • RX6600: 8063 / CPU: 21671
  • 3060ti: 12524 / CPU: 21548

You can also see in-depth data with the links from 3DMark and photos of the benchmarks attached here:

The first culprit would be an unusual performance from the CPU, but why? Why did the CPU decide not to go all in?

Even if the CPU performed similarly, does the 4060ti perform worse than the 3060ti? And even the RX6600? Do EVGA FTW Ultra cards come overclocked already? Or is this a result from a faulty GPU? I need some insight, I’d appreciate any help

IMG_4600.jpg IMG_4599.jpg IMG_4608.jpg IMG_4605.jpg IMG_4606.jpg IMG_4607.jpg IMG_4603.jpg IMG_4604.jpg IMG_4609.jpg
3DMark.com
I scored 6 615 in Time Spy Extreme

Intel Core i9-13900K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB x 1, 65536 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

3DMark.com
I scored 8 901 in Time Spy

Intel Core i9-13900K Processor, AMD Radeon RX 6600 x 1, 65536 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

3DMark.com
I scored 13 363 in Time Spy

Intel Core i9-13900K Processor, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti x 1, 65536 MB, 64-bit Windows 11}

tulip cargo
#

have you tried running replicates

#

oh

#

thats why

#

you ran timespy extreme

#

not time spy

#

so it'll perform like garbage

#

time spy extreme is 4K iirc and normal time spy is 1080p

#

@glossy heart

glossy heart
tulip cargo
#

yes of course

#

lol

#

i was confused as well

glossy heart
#

The answer was infront of my face the entire time

tulip cargo
#

based on the averages youre right where you should be

#

6610, 6689 average

#

also explains lower CPU score since it is less CPU bound and you are bottlenecked by the GPU

glossy heart
#

Absolutely, I ran the cpu benchmarks and I got the same score from a different run 8 months ago, I thought my cpu was cooked

tulip cargo