#It's WORLDWIDE GIVEAWAY TIME!
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
yooo
same
rip
gl guys
I've also already overclocked the shit out of my 6650 xt so
My state banned sweepstakes 😦
💀
GL to whoever has a reddit account
yeah I also dont have a reddit account lol
Do you guys think it's a good idea to overclock my igpu?
if only you could make one
just make one 
can i get it in india too?
what do we hae to do?
Check the link in the thread
it's in the reddit post
oh thx
I mean
I still can't use gpu tweak iii to post the ss
You don't have a gpu?
By not making one I increase the chances of everybody here that does have one though 😁
(Really just don't want to make one)
maybe ill just check if I didn't delete my throwaway and post a screenshot of corectrl lol
Always fun when a giveaway casually asks you to do a risky thing with a chance to void the warranty on a piece of consumer electronics worth hundreds of dollars
huh
risky? hah
bro if overclocking voids the warranty of something I'm not buying that shit
lets adjust the voltage a bit,
precedes to +68418V
Every GPU apart from a couple high end models designed for overclocking literally says "if you overclock, you void your warranty". It's literally there when you start MSI Afterburner
No, they can't prove it with 100% confidence. But if they see you posting evidence of you overclocking, say in a public Reddit thread, they got proof enough to deny your claim
where is overclocking mentioned here
They won't look that hard.
They're not emplying private investigators to see if they can deny your warranty claim on a maximum $2k bit of hardware.
It's under category 4. That's a catch-all category that they can use for any improper use. They can easily claim overclocking is improper use
Because it's running the card outside of the manufacturer's safe limits
Every GPU apart from a couple high end models designed for overclocking literally says "if you overclock, you void your warranty".
where does it say that
maybe not literally, but it's common
the manufacturer's safe limits are defined in the VBIOS iirc
and section 4 does mention not changing sofware running on the product
I've seen multiple posts in the past of people getting their warranty revoked because of overclocking
which would be the VBIOS
Maybe MSI is flexible in that. But if you open the AMD Adrenalin software and try the automatic overclock, it literally says it voids your warranty
all of these brands literally sponsor overclocking contests
Then why does so many overclocking software pop up a scary warning about voiding your warranty?
so you can't blame them in case it does ig
I mean my MSI mobo warns me about voiding my cpu's warranty every time I open the overclocking settings in my bios
even though it like doesn't
How does ASUS, a multi billion dollar company, manage to have a third version of software with such bad grammar in a popup?
lmao
now if you somehow bypass the voltage limit and fry your processor ofc they won't cover it
but the act of overclocking doesn't void your warranty
why tf would this even be happening
it probably doesn't support integrated graphics
no, it doesn't
and there are dozens of posts in the Reddit thread of people who have the same issue
that.... is really fucking stupid
True. Looks like the Glorious PC Master Race is not above a bit of gatekeeping for their giveaways
not that Glorious in my opinion
the giveaway is for 2 GPUs and a powerful CPU yet it doesnt even support the most common graphics that people would have rn
I would just post a ss of the error and say you have integrated graphics
One of the core tenets of the PCMR is accessibility: we're open for everyone as long as you got a computer
It says it works with Laptops but seems I was wrong
Regardless of whether that's a top of the line gaming rig, a 15 year old laptop, a Linux server farm or even a Macbook Pro
Maybe they mean laptops with dedicated graphics?
☝️
a 4080 super here can go for 2k at MSRP I can easily make a lot from it, or use it in a PC since now I dont have to sell my soul for one
and I can finally leave this craptop behind
excluding everyone without dedicated graphics for a GPU giveaway is like giving away free groceries and excluding everyone who is on food stamps
Isn't the program technically able to work with integrated graphics too?
Besides a discreet GPU doesn't have to be super expensive
I wish Nvidia understood that, because they've pretty much ignored everyone who doesn't have the budget for a 500 EUR GPU
I'm running a 6700XT
It's not glorious, it's not the newest tech, and it wasn't even the top card when it came out (not even close)
you could do this with a used GT210
the 4070 is the cheapest GPU that Nvidia has from their 40 series lineup that's worth buying right now
It's also like a bottom-shelf one at that (Powercolor Hellhound)
it sucks that it cuts out a subset of our users, but like, it doesn't make sense to deny everyone a possible opprotunity
I wouldn't say that's worth buying either
Unironically that'd be the most based submission ever
"This program is so lit I can get +15% perf on my GT210"
more than $500 for 12GB VRAM 💀
I have a laptop. A laptop that is 5 years old now with only 8GB RAM and a low tier i5 with no GPU
m.2 gpu hours
weird, my XPS 13 has m.2
mine is the 2n1 model
and TB3 (tho that's pricey at that point)
specific model is XPS 7390
And yes, I know there are GPUs from other brands, but Intel is still in the "get this only if you like to tinker" stage, and AMD is so far behind Nvidia in both market share and feature completeness that they're really only worth it for people who can't afford an Nvidia GPU. The extra features from Nvidia's higher ranked cards are worth the additional price, but that's not the case for any of Nvidia's cheaper half of the lineup
RTX performance? DLSS? Reflex? driver stability?
At this point Ill take anything if its a good price.
Even a 4060ti is like 500+ Canadian....
Unironically dead wrong
AMD has better screen sharing and a couple other things
And more performance and VRAM
For less money
I don't want to use raytracing anyway, I'd lose 20-40% of my frames
FSR is almost the same as DLSS
RT is still such a gimmick it's not even funny
and driver stability is about the same across both AMD and NVIDIA now
maybe maybe maybe maybe
Like I'd not turn on RT even at 1080p because you lose like over half your framerate
yeah
Honestly wasnt even expecting to win, just thought Id try it out, but no chances
(i'm not honestly advocating this, but you could frankenstein a gpu in there if you really wanted to)
AMD just had 2 consecutive years where you had to use a driver from the first half of the year for most of the second half because their drivers were unstable. I know that, I lived through that on an 6700XT I paid 700 EUR for at the tail end of the GPU crisis
I remember everyone saying that it was soldered wtf
what gen CPU is it?
I can do 130+ min fps in CP77 at 1080p with my 6700XT
If I turn on RT the framerate tanks to like 40 minimums
yeah bc AMD is so behind in RT
"AMD has better screen sharing"? My coworkers were complaining for months that my screen was flickering all colors of the rainbow when sharing my screen through Skype with my 6700XT
wdym better screen sharing?
Unironically don't give a flying F about that
It's better at what actually matters
doesn't nvidia have the better encoder
Re-Live is a thing
yeah, Dell and there damn "we'll use the same model classification (7390) for different models"
yeah I'm not disputing what you're saying
I would never use RT personally
And it's MORE convenient than that crappy interface nGreedAI has
Anyhow I'm gonna go ahead and get to shower now and then sleep
Bye
Never again buying Dell. I chose this over a Surface Laptop and a HP Envy. Both with IGPUs too but maybe they wouldve lasted longer...
Who are you to say what actually matters? Whether rasterized is more important than raytracing? Raytracing is a more accurate representation of how real world lighting, reflections and shadows work. I expect it will be commoditized in the next 1-2 generations on all major brands and consoles
Real time raytracing is becoming more accessible every generation. Both Nvidia and AMD are working towards that, and Intel as well
tbf, i'd probably buy a dell over those, but I also compltely refuse to buy a 2 in 1, so I feel yah
Yes it is more accurate, but it also fucks your framerate
Same reason people don’t play at 4K even though it looks way better
"More accurate representation" oh please come back to me when it doesn't require a 80-class card at 1080p when most people can't even afford a 60-class
Exactly
Its great tho. 5 years and only one of the fans has an actual issue
And Nvidia already found a solution for the performance problem, and they're working on implementing it. there's a paper on it and everything
Damn, send
although I think I fucked up my soundcard cause the speakers dont work
We were told that by now it'll be the normal
And we're still at the point that it's an arguably useless gimmick that 99% of people can't even tell of it's on, or say it looks WORSE than raster
yeah, my XPS13 (standard clamshell) is about 4 years old now, and it's been a champ. I really just need to replace the battery at this point
battery replacement and a new fan
and once the soundcard thing is done with that will be fine
i had a similar issue, seems like windows update fixed it for me, for whatever reason
That's because developers are implementing it carelessly. There are definitely games where it looks better without a huge performance drop. Look at Ratchet & Clank on PC: raytracing isn't a huge drop there, but it definitely improves the quality and accuracy of reflections
Until I can play games at 70+ fps mins on a 60-class card with RT on and no upscaling I'm wholly uninterested
That’s also a problem, raytracing isn’t optimized very well rn on the software side
also just gonna say this: Windows 11 was the biggest mistake I ever made
If a developer has to support both Raster and RT in order for their game to work on the most systems RT will be a gimmick.
to each their own, I've been enjoying it tremendously
Don't look at games like Tomb Raider, look at games like Ratchet & Clank and Cyberpunk, where the developers added it as a first class feature with care.
Also true
No one wants to take the "RT only" risk (aside from Ubisoft with Avatar).
Star citizen devs rn
Cyberpunk is THE single worst game to advertise RT considering how badly it runs on most PCs
Not even SC wants to do RT only
It’s so over for me when they add mandatory RT
I dont use my mouse often. When I wanna run an app I just search it and it tends to be faster
do you use powertools run?
but the search menu SUCKS and the taskbar looks so ugly and basic
iirc they were gonna do software rt on gpus that didnt support it
Why are you so opposed to upscaling? It's gotten good enough at this point that it's just free performance with barely if any visual impact
Yes, and they do.
Which is still RT only.
Because it looks like hot fucking garbage
Like, DLSS looks so good now that you can't even tell the difference in a blind test
Haven’t they not added RT yet
i've seen rather good implementations of upscaling
They’re still working on vulkan
i've also seen awful implmentations
Oh, you mean SC
i don't think it's fair to lump everything into one group
I have no idea.
It's NOTHING but a crutch for lazy devs that don't optimize because "DLSS will fix it it's fiiiiiiiine"
I dont
Yea
ah yes, DLSS is a crutch which is why Starfield launched with support.
(it didn't, that's the joke)
There are multiple games in which professional reviewers have said DLSS rendering looks better than native. But of course, that's at 4K. I wouldn't expect someone who only talks about 1080p to have seen that
powertoys looks interesting tho
And it runs like shit on basically everything
it's one of my must have apps on all windows installs for me
yeah, but they clearly weren't leaning on DLSS to solve that :D
where did you get it?
github, through Microsoft's org/repo
I don't like how Starfield worked it out
But I respect that they're not using upscaling as a crutch
yeah they just raw dog the shit performance like men
True, DLSS doesn't look as good at 1080p as native, but at 1440p and 4K there are games like Death Stranding where DLSS upscaling (not frame smoothing) actually does look better than native rendering
that's the one
Wow who guessed that 4k looks better than lower resolutions
Missed the point of the message
Remember when GPUs were able to natively render 4k?
I'm not talking about comparing 4K to lower resolutions. I'm talking about 4K native vs DLSS Quality upscaled to 4K
So you're actually talking about 1440p native to 4k native
DLSS Quality upscaled native 1440p to 4k after all
So like
Did GPUs get slower, or game devs just no longer give a shit?
Like, look at the Hardware Unboxed comparisons, the recent LTT video on the Super cards. DLSS can and does in some cases look better than native while getting you additional performance
@dry cosmos get in here and do your gosh darn job, jeeze
Yeah no
Games got more complex and more complicated graphics.
Upscaling literally cannot be better than native
You can get close to native
But it'll NEVER be as good as native rendering
uh oh
someone on the internet has an opinion bench, and you're lazy.
About the same time "GPUs got weaker and are real shit" techniques for rendering things changed to be better.
notice how games are larger on the disk? Similar thing.
PBR go brrrr
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5B_dqi_Syc here's the video. It's not all games, but some games do in fact look better
I still think that saying "DLSS is better than native" is just outright simping
It will never be "better than native"
I mean, I personally think that depends
It depends wildly on what your native looks like
DLSS-Q will never look better than DLAA.
DLSS-Q may look better than native res with the game's stock TAA
i'd take 4k upscaled vs 4k native without AA
It's not just resolution
I suppose it's a matter of what you as a person can tolerate
But I am personally really sensitive to the sort of artifacting upscaling causes
It's really distracting to me
the 4K quality upscaling in this scene is more stable, with less flickering elements
It's from the Hardware Unboxed video I just shared
The only artifact DLSS really has nowadays is ghosting, and even that is really minimal if you use preset C or preset E
roughly 15 minutes in
Imagine claiming anything after YouTube compression
it is definitely visible throught he compression in the video itself
Yes DLSS-Q tends to look better than Native 4k with stock TAA in death stranding. But that's a terrible way of showing that.
And then trying to use it as proof of "DLSS is better than native"
Like, just look at the video
A good anti-aliasing solution > upscaling IMO
In most games, native is better, I admit that, but in some games DLSS does in fact look better than native
DLSS is an anti aliasing solution
Allegedly
We know it is because if you disable the scaling part it still anti-aliases.
yeah, that's true as well: you can just do DLSS at native to native. That's called DLAA
and it's better than just about any other anti-aliasing method out there
Wait you can disable upscaling now?
Yeah, you can
DLAA
Alright so there is a silver lining
Instead of being pedantic on the internet you should pay attention to the things that solve the exact problems you're having
you might enjoy your videogames more
I play EU4 man, I don't think that's possible lmfao
(I'm entirely sarcastic here BTW)
But seriously, @patent fossil . All I'm asking is to not just offhandedly dismiss things people claim because you remember it not being like that in the past or in the situations you encountered. Take a look at the hardware unboxed video I linked, at full screen and the highest resolution you can show. Look at the Death Stranding, the Hogwarts Legacy and the Hitman 3 segments and listen to the commentary. Those are 3 games they show footage of that they personally considered to have the then-current version of DLSS Quality at 4K provide a better picture quality than Native 4K. DLSS had less flickering in see-through textures like foliage and cages
I have done that exactly before
It wasn't really convincing to me
for example: I believe this should be a 4K frame capture. Look at the golden cage at the top of the screen
It's ñot like I haven't seen the video before
you can clearly see that the 4K cage has artifacting while the DLSS quality cage has not
You're really, REALLY trying to find the smallest thing to grasp on to proclaim DLSS as the "winner"
well both of you accept neither of you are going to convince one another and move on with your lives?
or maybe just get a room
just disengage, and move on
Same, I'm going to move along as well
xess is actually better than fsr too lol
I moved on, why didn't you?
but yeah, I agree with that as well
Like, it's fine to say FSR is a good alternative to DLSS, but it's like the 3rd best upscaling solution right now. To paraphrase a forum signature I once saw about a different topic: "saying FSR is better than DLSS because it works on all cards is like saying butt sex is better than vaginal sex because it works on all genders
Like, many people like it, but it's not a solution that everyone is comfortable with
ohhh kay... 😀
💀
yea
if we comparing upscaling give lossless images
that's actually not true. Ownership of a computer is not required.
Not being able to participate in all events is fine. There's plenty others.
Should work fine in laptops. I have tried it in a couple.
Igpu
yeah, it has to have a dgpu
Bruh
yaaaaay
I don't think my gpu is able to oc though 😦
you just have to download the app and pick a font
then post the font and explain why you picked it
What app