#is normal that blur by tekno kills quality this much?

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

peak quail
#

reduce the amount of blur

#

anything below 2

#

1.2 seems like a good place to start

peak quail
#

dont rec in 720p then

#

tf

#

who has a 720p monitor

#

you can't

static arrow
#

render in 60 fps

#

use 13 cqp while recording

#

you can also try internal shaders with 2x render res

#

it will drop fps but you will get sharper and smoother edges

static arrow
#

why 2400 fps

#

960 is more than enough

#

why do you use small gui

#

nah

#

you need to use normal gui

#

small gui hotbar has like 10 pixels

#

in 720p

#

this is normal gui 720p

#

isnt it

#

this one is small

#

so the point is

peak quail
#

honestly no one is gonna focus on the hud depending on the gamemode

static arrow
#

your hotbar has too low amount of pixels

peak quail
#

boxing and

#

whatever this is

#

yeh

static arrow
#

also 1080p normal and 720p small gui isnt same in size

peak quail
#

1280x720 has smol scaling

static arrow
#

720p small is like 1440p normal

#

yea

#

its like your pp

#

good

#

render quality has nothing to do with gui size but i wouldnt use small gui

#

it did for me in 720p recording

#

this server is a liar

#

use 13 cqp

#

and high profile

#

and you can try the internal shaders thing

#

for yearsssss

peak quail
static arrow
#

i have 1080p monitor but i still use 720p in minecraft

static arrow
#

but it helps

peak quail
#

720p doesn't look super bad

#

but blur overdose causes quality loss

static arrow
#

the internal shaders?

#

yea it drops fps

peak quail
#

why is that bad

static arrow
#

but like not as much as if you played in 1440p

#

in 2x res scale

#

1.5x is also good

#

gives a bit more fps

peak quail
#

disable anti aliasing

static arrow
#

nah

peak quail
#

use only render quality

static arrow
#

render quality

#

turn off fxaa

#

yes

peak quail
#

@static arrow i just noticed

#

why dont people use internal render res

static arrow
#

well i dont think its as much sharp as native 1080p or something

#

but its way more efficent than playing in 1080p native

#

idk about after effects

#

there is a small line between having too sharp or too blurry smooth picture quality

#

you can watch this vid to understand what im talking about

floral ruin
#

18 is the lowest you’d reasonably go

#

It’s already visually lossless

desert tangle
#

what server

#

this looks off

static arrow
#

2400 fps makes it weird

desert tangle
#

the player has like 2 blur frames and the word is completely seamless

static arrow
#

how much fps do you get while recording 480

desert tangle
#

is that a polling rate issue or what

#

ok yeah no wonder LMFAO

static arrow
#

125

#

are you living in 2000's?

desert tangle
#

it's like your mouse movement was capped to 125FPS

#

while your sword may be smooth

#

if you record in 250FPS

#

and move your mouse around

#

you'll see your mouse moving every 2 frames

static arrow
#

@desert tangle

#

do you have any tips for low file size renders for discord only

desert tangle
desert tangle
static arrow
#

2k will use more cpu

#

and pointless

desert tangle
#

just keep your polling rate above the FPS you record in

static arrow
#

use 1k

#

its the standart

desert tangle
#

do 500 then

#

well, as you can see, yes it does matter

#

whatever floats your boat then

desert tangle
desert tangle
static arrow
#

probably

#

he was flicking his mouse too

desert tangle
#

simply put yes

#

you can record at other resolutions than your screen but doing higher than your monitor's often looks scuffed

#

if you use reasonable encoding settings and upscale there's not much else you can do to help with bitrate

#

depends on pc

#

doesn't matter much honestly

#

#898175855736528896 message

#

vladaad tested that a while ago

#

you're way above recommended

static arrow
desert tangle
#

it's hard to compare clips on different map because it can affect encoding a lot (some blocks on your pack may have a shit ton of detail vs a 1x1 pack, that'll affect)

desert tangle
static arrow
#

yeah i tested in 720p and 13 cqp was a bit better

desert tangle
#

you can record a rawvideo 720p video and have motion blur to it

#

upscale and encode it 20 times with each ranging from 10-20QP

#

upload them all to youtube

#

see at which point it becomes a diminishing return

#

tested all ranging from 3 to 35 QP iirc

#

this shit makes it all outdated and much more complicated to really measure what ranges into diminishing returns

image.png
#

@desert stratus @whole dock am i brain farting or is that correct

static arrow
#

im still using 26.1 thing

#

should i move

desert tangle
desert stratus
desert tangle
desert tangle
desert stratus
#

yes

desert tangle
#

or just filesize

static arrow
desert stratus
desert tangle
desert stratus
#

though x26* has better quality with slower presets even at the same crf level

#

it's especially noticeable at really low bitrates

static arrow
desert stratus
desert tangle
#

@static arrow do u have preview lag

whole dock
#

in x26* and nvnec slower preset == higher quality and bigger file size @ the same qp/crf level

desert tangle
#

when editing

static arrow
#

i dont

#

vegas 17

#

maybe its because i record in 240

desert stratus
#

i thought it was slightly higher q and much lower filesize

brisk yarrow
#

upscale