I think a mod based on this idea might be cool. Maybe you can make another furnace variant out of blackstone which reduces various common resources such as netherrack, diorite, and maybe even endstone to useful resources: tiny, tiny amounts of iron for netherrack, either a % chance per item for a nugget or some new item that can be combined into nuggets, quartz for diorite, etc.
#CLOSED
160 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
You know, basalt is high in iron
it is
but I think netherrack is more likely, for a couple reasons: first, like I said, that it's very common and easy to gather, and second, basalt deltas are extremely dangerous for the non-fire-resistant piglins – did you know they're the only nether biome where bastions don't spawn?
also, I just looked it up, and basalt contains only about 15% iron by mass; for all we know, netherrack could have even more
bastions don't spawn in basalt deltas because they are very buggy when interacting with structures
sure; that doesn't mean it can't also be because basalt deltas are dangerous
bastions are entirely made with basalt deltas materials, including basalt
so whoever built the bastions quarried a bit of stone and left
Basalt can also spawn in soul sand valleys
And can be created infinitely like cobblestone. Are piglins known for mechanical knowledge?
but you need ice for that
i don't think there's ice in the nether
It is interesting that basalt requires ice and soul sand, but soul sand slowing is also increased by ice.
i think water and ice use to exist in the nether
but with there being no exit as in the bedrock roof. all heat just builds up and made it to what it is now
lava falls from the roofs a lot. those basalt pillars could just be lava that fell from the roof, got cooled by the cool atmosphere, and covered by souls overtime. basalt deltas could be ancient snow biomes like the taiga that got covered in soul and fire as the nether heated up.
Not reading that essay. LOL
Then why bother responding?
Then why question?
because you are saying dumb things
Because I took the time to read your message.
or they just stole it from fortresses
but then from where the fortress iron came from
humans built them
I think that the piglings can be left behind humans in the nether and that they had basic gear but got stuck in the nether (maybe bc a ghast broke the portal) and they had to eat mushrooms and nether "food" and turned into piglins like the pigs turned into hoglins.
why do they turn into pigs specifically tho
bc the mushrooms are infected with a sort of virus
but what do mushrooms have to do with pigs
the mushrooms on the blue and red nether biome has virus and like I said maybe some humans got stuck bc a ghast broke the portal and they had to eat the mushrooms and now they turned into piglins
There is evidence in legends that piglins without fungus become zombified piglins.
and when the pigs were sent by the ancient builders to make sure the nether was safe they ate mushrooms and got the virus and became the hoglins
for the third time, why did the virus make them turn into creatures that resemble pigs and not some creature that looks nothing like an overworld mob?
Piglins kill a player and they trade it with other players
idk who knows? Like why do ask why the virus turned things into piglings and not something else well only destiny knows that's it.
whats "it"?
Like gold and other stuff
There may be a large issue with this theory
Netherrack really isn’t made of any real-world substance
Especially iron
It forms through the reaction of soul sand with ghast tears
And as far as I am aware, piglins do not produce iron
In fact, they likely harvested it when they were in the overworld
For what is likely years
If you try reaching the end of this rabbit hole, you will be stuck in the same loop
?
Means that you will start all over again without even knowing
Yeah, because the piglins didn’t use iron from the getgo?
We see that in legends
Only gold and netherite
Of which the iron was likely used when they were there in the overworld
wh– where did that come from
why
????????
I can't think of a single in-game interaction that supports that
where did you get that idea from
genuinely like… what am I not thinking of
my theory is assuming that only the main game content is canon (mostly because that's all I play)
Alchemy and how the nether arguably represents Nigredo, Albedo and Rubedo
And that assumption we know to be wrong thanks to confirmations by the devs
Google Docs
It has been theorized that the wither is not only an undead monster of souls in suffering or despair, but also an entity such as the Heart of Ender. The evidence in favor is found in things like the sound that is heard when summoning it which sounds throughout the world in the 3 dimensions at the...
I think here you should find that theory
doesn't retro not pay attention to dev statements for lore, since they're sometimes contradictory?
To my knwoledge, he dosent pay attention to them because it would break the narrative that he has created with his videos, invalidate his previous theories and make it harder for his audiance and new viewers to get into the topic
Which is why he did not include MCD, Rotai, MCE or MCL in his theories
Even tho all were confirmed to be canon, with MCE and MCL having special situations (MCL is a in universe legend and the things canon in MCE are just stuctures and mobs, which can be canonicaly found in vanilia MC)
And no, to my knowledge there are no contradictory dev statements, espacialy when it comes to canonicty
We even know that there are people checking those dev quotes, from 1 time when the author of Rotai said that his newsest novel RotP was canon as well, but then later informed us that Mojang contacted him and informed him that its not the case
oh come on, no links?
Yeah, you need the Diver role
sigh
"How to Think About Minecraft Lore | Deep Dive", 1:54
You are long enough on the server to be able to ask for one tho
it doesn't sound like that to me
He said it on thiss discord in multiple discussions with us
still, I think the reasons he gives in this video are compelling
also: 3:36-4:39
Just watched it
And I wasnt talking about those quotes
I was talking about those on twitter and discord, which came to be from direct engagment with the community through talking with indviduals of them. Not just posting information for the community to read
Also none of the contradictory quotes of MC.net and the youtube channel are about canonicty. All quotes about canonicty do not contradict eachother (until the day comes when a 2nd novel becomes canon)
Also a pretty reliable dev seems to be Marc Wattson, which has proclaimed himself as a "MC lore nerd" and has made many seemingly reliable lore related quotes on twitter an discord
And then there are the nintendo switch articles, which directly talk about MCDs lore and to my knowledge have never contradicted eachother aswell
I don't think retro's point was just that those specific quotes are contradictory, moreso that that fact proves dev statements can't be trusted
Also I disagree with RGN that all lore can be found in the main game
Like, how can you find the existance of necromancers without MCD or Rotai ?
huh?
Or how can you find out that some of the sounds in the ancient city music disc came from a MCD enderman like mob called the endersent, without MCD ?
Dungeons
Also MCD, Rotai and etc make it way easier to find out other things
Like yes, you can find out that illagers live in tribes in just vanilia MC, but you need some deep knowledge of history to realise that without you reading how Rotai just outright says it
ok
why does that HAVE to be the case? you're talking like the existence of necromancers and that music disc thing are objective facts that prove MCD is canon
MCD is canon, because every dev quotes about MCDs canonicty says so
There is no contradiction
In the search for the Mojang version of Minecraft lore, we use mojangs sources.
How do you agree yo disagree about actual information
And retro is confirmibly wrong
Thiss has even reached the point when some quotes even show signs that the devs are already slightly annoyed by the question "Will/is MCD canon to vanilia MC ?"
Because yk, they already answered it 5 times
The Game theorists and their consequences on theorizing have been a disaster to the human race
And it was always yes
ohKay then…
seems I touched a nerve
It’s a Ted Kazinsky joke
And what about the statement of an author that was contracted by Mojang to make a canon novel ?
That novel being the "Rise of the Arch Illager" (Rotai), which is the prequel to MCD
Like, we know that he was involved in making the lore
And Mojang is willing to correct false info being posted
And we know what he says is true, because he corrected himself when he said that his 2nd novel "Return of the Piglins" was canon and then got informed by Mojang that its not.
And the fact that anything else he said was not corrected and that he does not lie proves that he is reliable
And he said exactly what a dev from MCD said
That Rotai is canon
And that dev from MCD said previously 2 times that MCD is canon
Which follows the 2 statements of Marc Wattson (MCD dev and self procliamed MC lore nerd) that MCD is canon
Which makes sense to why there is a necromancer laugh in the recent MC trailer and endersent sounds in the ancient city music disc
So basicaly, we know the answer to the question: "Is MCD canon ?"
And the answer is yes
Tbh, its astonishing that, after 5 seperate confirmations, 3 direct indications and 2 indirect indications, its still debated if MCD is canon or not
And most importantly, 0 confirmations or any solid indications that MCD is not canon
he left this out of the screenshot of that jeb tweet
No I didnt, its the 1st confirmation
he as in RGN
Ah
And yeah, we literally can see how Jeb is trolling and arguably somewhat confirming it by starting with yes, ending with yes, and overall say more times yes then the one time no thats meant to confuse one (like devs like to do when it comes to lore)
But then Keso literally clarifies with Yes, and yes you should
I'm seriously considering just deleting this post
I just wanted to share a simple little theory and next thing I know people are pinging me saying you fool, obviously netherrack is equivalent to rubedo in classical alchemy and therefore contains no iron whatsoever!
(also like… really? that's your undeniable dev confirmation that MCD is canon? jeb "lead dev" bergensten giving a noncommittal answer and then a random dev saying yes? either that's exactly the sort of contradiction retro was talking about in the "how to think about MC lore" video or they're both saying it's canon if you want it to be and not canon if you don't want it to be)
you know what
I'll close it
tbh i tend to want avoid mentioning the spin offs in these kinds of posts
just to be fair
theres other examples
is just that it contridicts the statement about the devs not being trusted
theres more concrete ones
If you think that you just share a simple theory, then you dont seem to understand what a theory is.
A theory is not a story or something like that, but argument based explanation that tried to uncover the truth of something else. And a fundamental part of a theory is that one can be proven wrong by others, because it ensures that only those theories that are able to prove themselfs when critisised are the ones who are accepted as true. And yeah, excluding for example MCD and MCL, which are provenly confirmed to be canon and are even fricking made to be canon will put you at an disadvantage. But thats the consequences of your own actions and no fault of others who now confront you with it, since you decided to not learn the information in it (which can easily be done through youtube videos and the MC wiki, with no need to play the game)
So basicaly, making a theory has 3 steps. Write the theory, publish the theory and acctualy prove the theory. And the reason why proving the theory is the last step, is because only after publishing it will you be confronted with arguments against the theory that you naturaly failed to consider (because, we all have diffrent perspectives so its impossible to consider every single factor).
So yeah, you cant just "share a simple little theory", because theories are fundamentaly designed to not be treated like that.
If you want to share a simple little text, then you can just write a headcanon story and overall do storytelling. A story is not meant to be disproven like a theory. Making stories about MC is even encouraged by the devs, while theories never have been (except those who arent acctualy a theory and just a story falsely refered to as a theory). And then you will not have the issue that others will provide arguments why you are wrong
Also, who said that you are a fool ?
Also, I said multiple times that there is 5 confirmations that prove it
Stalex25 just pulled out the worst and most unreliable one, because of it having the trolling of jeb, as indicated by the ";)". But evem then its clarified at the end that MCD is canon, so there isnt any contradiction here
Also, bro you cant just use another theory to disprove a theory. Because we do not know if your theory is correct
You need to make proper counter arguments instead
Does this theory have the dungeons tag or not? I'm on mobile.
Issue. Netherrack can not be smelted into iron ingots. And no, the ovens we have in MC are not capable to have 2 end products even according to their design. Because yk, they only have one space and exit from which to put in and take out a ressource, besides the space beneath it which is for fuel
This is also tagged headcanon
It has the headcanon, other and joke tag
And yeah, I didnt saw it lol
You guys aren't meant to debunk it...
Yeah, our bad
@gentle cove I apologise for any stress I caused, I did not see the headcanon tag, which was a mistake on my part
(I could argue that I was mislead by ColonialEagle, but nah, I still could have looked up the tag)
I changed the tags, because y'all were treating it like a joke
originally, it was just the theory and main game tags
I tried to delete this whole post and prevent people from adding stuff but I guess you can't do that
I would appreciate if you just pretended I was successful in doing so and left me alone now
You can close posts I believe
I tried that
whenever someone sends a message it reopens
here, I'll do it again – send another message
Try locking it?
I don't have that option
CLOSED
Ok
I am sorry that it seemed like we treated it like a joke. Maybe Colonial did, but in my case it was not my intention
And now I stop talking aswell
I in fact did not
i used that one bc it contridicted RGN's evidence that dev quotes are unreliable