#Hypothesis of Common Ancestry among Mobs and Humanoids
179 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
This thread is not a theory in itself but instead a straightforward analysis of the evidence to be used in other theories.
Part 1, analysing humanoid skull shapes and limb sizes:
The Minecraft skeleton is a good source of information for analysing humanoid skeletal similarities
The Minecraft skeleton has a decently large brain size but smaller than a villager
We will analyze and label parts of various humanoid skulls including guesswork on the villagers brain size and brainsize
if the thread is inactive that just means i am researching
and making data
keep in mind the fossils in the diagram are scaled down and do not represent the real size, the giant fossil has been shrunk to what a normal individual without being giant would ressemble
all the research will be per pixel comparisons
yeah
those abnormal skulls are a result of some tribal traditions to shape the skull by making a newborn put their head in something to change the growth pattern
But how had they come by their elongated skulls in the first place? Burger has a theory: artificial cranial deformation. The practice—in which infants' skulls are bound repeatedly, with their heads growing into the constricted shape—happened throughout the ancient world, notably in central Asia by the nomadic Huns.
thx
could creeper be related?
nevermind
they are animal plant hybrids, it must be a creation of something
creepers are far removed from the humanoid tree
from the tree
they are a flammable or exploding fungus experiment by people in desert pyramids making life
they arent really part of the family tree since its artificial
quick note: nether fossils are not the same as overworld fossils
information of note: the overworld fossils generate in deserts, swamps, mangrove swamps
so its possible there was a semi aquatic mobs at one point similar to the sniffer
Among mobs drip
yes. but it would need to split up before the beak evolves
nevermind, sorry for the ping
this one looks the most like a beak
yeah
opps, wromg chat
yes but pigs snouts arent bony
time to analyse brain size
BRAIN SIZE OF HUMANOIDS AND FOSSIL SKULLS [per pixel, multiplied 3 dimensions]
192 - piglin
180 - villager
108 - human/steve/alex
18 - normal sized ape fossil skull and living monkey skull
8 - mammoth/cyclops skull thing
40 - pre-piglin[presumably] skull
30 - the fossil with the wide face.
the piglin has the largest brain out of all and the mammoth has the smallest
minecraft fossils are around 8000 - 4000 years old relative to when the player first joins the game
they probably weren’t created in desert pyramids
its like how depictions of chariot on ancient greek potter doesn’t mean that the greeks invented chariots
just because the desert pyramid has creeper imagery, it doesn’t prove that’s where creepers were created
true
wow
The creepers couldnt have been created artificialy (without magic), because it would requier a civilisation to be industrialised to produce so many creepers that they are a common sight in the ow. And we see that no civilisation ik the ow was industrialised (except the illager empire of the arch illager that had 1 factory made by an entity).
But it also makes no sense that the creeper is natural
So we concluded on thiss server that the creeper is an canonical enigma (its also an enigma in the lore)
it is really that enigmatic?
Yeah
how so?
first: creeper must be able to reproduce. second: when like all the surface cities got destroyed, what makes you think a factory would survive?
also, for the theory itself: could allays and vexes change the tree?
Evidence for the existance of surface cities with factories ?
common sense (not the factories), i mean, where do you think they lived?
On the land itself (as nomads), in villages made out of wood and hay, the structures we will see in archeology and the currently existing structures
my point is, we cant really know if there were some but we cant also know if there were none
you think a society made out of nomads had the power to build nether fortresses or mineshafts?
A civilisation of nomads created the biggest land empire irl
which?
The mongol empire
hm, i dont know anything about them so i cant tell
Also, did you just say society and not societies ?!?!??!?!?
you say during a literal zombie apocalypse humanity wouldn’t unite?
Yes
There is no way humans would unite during a zombie apocalypse
why?
yes but not when the thing is the entire survival of humanity

You have a lot to learn
i think you too
maybe just temporary
The 1st thing humans do in a calamity/catastrophe is starting a war lol
yo, we have a bloodlust but we arent retarted
zombie movies just have this future so the plot doesn’t get resolved before it even starts
did you just called yourself retarted?
which one?
the second biggest one
.
do you remember the hole in the ozone layer?
where humanity worked together to prevent a giant catastrophic event?
Working toghter ≠ being united
Also, what fricking hole in the ozone layer ?
there was a hole in the ozone layer over antarctica, science saw this and found out a specific chemical did that. then many countries worked together until there was less than 99% of this chemical spread into the air
and now its shrinking, could even be closed
like around most of them
How many ?
idk, there are like more than hundred there, and i think now there are more or less countries
Anyway
It still proves my point
Because most countries joined thiss project
But not all
idk if all of them did
Check out the heroes who saved the ozone layer at https://futureoflife.org/future-of-life-award/
Lots of global problems seem intractable, but there’s a formula for success that we can follow.
LEARN MORE
To learn more about this topic, start your googling with these keywords:
Ozone layer: A thin layer of ozone concentrated in th...
I know I arrive late to the discussion, but I feel the need to argue that this isn't a valid point
We are talking about a world medieval-like age
Humanity couldn't possibly unite under any circunstance, because there wouldn't be efficient means of comunication
oh, no that’s unrelated to the theory, seal just stated that humans wouldnt unite/work together and rather fight against each other during such catastrophic events
good point, but like, arent most people dead? and how do the illager communicate? i mean, they even have their own flag
Well that's a good point
thx
And thiss statement is related to the idea that humans could live in 1 society (in MC)
Even now we havent united irl, even tho we have efficient means of communication
no
but its like against the idea that humans would rather start a war than helping each other in a huge danger
Yes
Its my statement, who are you decide its relation to other things ?
Because it is the case
Humans start fighting against each other then uniting during an apocalypse/crisis
Also
Also humanity didnt unite in your examples for "apocalypses/crisises were humanity united"
In fact, there was litterly an event called the "cold war" at the time
Were the world was not united at all
Vanilia MC is a simple game. Alot of things are just representations of multiple things in lore. Thiss probaly is the same for the banner, that is littery just the face of an illager
yes but how would you fight against two opposite super powers with nuclear weapons?
You meant "unite two opposit super powers with nuclear weapons", right ?
Then what you are saying makes no sense
?
1st: why should you fight them ? (Considering the geopolitical situation at the time)
2ne: what has thiss to do with me saying that humanity wasnt united at the time thiss small pox and ozone layer stuff was happening ?
its not really about being united, its more about people just fighting each other in the face of it
The conversation started with you claiming that humans could be united in MC
Later adding that the "zombie apocalypse" would cause them to be united
I later provided the cold war (a perfect example for why humanity would not be united in 1 society) as an example, to counter your example of "humanity uniting against an crisis"
yes, but you stated "Humans start fighting against each other then uniting during an apocalypse/crisis"
Yes, because its true
and that was what i was arguing against
and i showed you an event where people were facing a crisis and united
By providing an example of an apocalypse that was prevented during an time when 2 superpowers indirectly fought against each other ?
Working toghter is not uniting
...
ozone layer that nearly got destroyed?
Didnt cause humanity to unite
Just to work toghter
do you think that unite means that they unite to a single country?
Yes, because thats what unification is (in politics)
(And because the conversation started with the claim of there being abel to exit 1 society)
"the allies united against germany during ww2" did they joined together in a singular countr<?
No and they also didnt unite
They even were in conflict betwen eachother
so how would you call it?
Seems like I confused the word unite with the word unify and thought it was the same
You did the same mistake tho 
i guess so
I still think that humanity during a crisis or apocalypse/crisis would rather start conflicts then unite to stop the apocalypse/crisis. Considering events in human history like ww1, the bad harvests in 1860, the bad harvests that caused the french revolution, the decline of the roman empire and etc
whats the bad harvest in 1860? also the french revolution was unavoidable, they suffered decades and since the royals couldn’t provide anything they decided to fight
In 1860 there were alot of bad harvests in europe, causing revolutuions, protests and uprisings across europe
Like the democratic and pan-nationalist uprisings in germany for example
The reason why the people got anrgy and made the french revolution was because they were hungry and starving. And they were hungry and starving because of bad harvests at the time
Yes, the french state was already fricked before that, but the revolution was caused by bad harvests
I have to correct myself
It was in 1848 not 1860
In 1860 the revolutions, uprisings and protests were over
👍
hm, wait, the civilizations really united, minecraft legends calls the player „the hero who unites the overworld“ and mojang calls the ABs the ancient civilization, notice the singularity?
Legend momment
"Mojang calls the ABs the ancient civilization" that's a misunderstanding
Litteral interference by the hosts momment