sullen jolt
I've been taking a bit of a break from Gleam. Today is my first time opening my projects up since about March. The LSP server is definitely running, and I'm getting other features but no syntax highlighting. Anybody have any clue as to why?
require('lspconfig').gleam.setup({})
Gleam v1.11.1
Neovim v0.10.4
mighty turtle
If I’m not mistaken you’ll need to use treesitter to get the syntax highlighting
sullen jolt
I do have treesitter intstalled, how do I configure it to enable syntax highlighting?
torpid notch
:TSInstall gleam should do it
sullen jolt
I've done that, no change :/
torpid notch
anything of note in :checkhealth? and are you on the main branch of treesitter by chance? or master
sullen jolt
anything of note in `:checkhealth`? and are you on the `main` branch of treesit...
I'm on master
- Language client log: ~/.local/state/nvim/lsp.log
- Detected filetype: `gleam`
- 1 client(s) attached to this buffer
- Client: `gleam` (id: 1, bufnr: [1])
root directory: ~/Documents/projects/gleam/alarm/
filetypes: gleam
cmd: ~/Documents/projects/gleam/alarm/gleam lsp
version: `gleam 1.11.1`
executable: true
autostart: true
any change with :TSEnable gleam? and :checkhealth nvim-treesitter should have all checks for gleam
sullen jolt
Hmm now isn't that interesting..
Installation ~
- WARNING `tree-sitter` executable not found (parser generator, only needed for :TSInstallFromGrammar, not required for :TSInstall)
- OK `node` found v20.19.2 (only needed for :TSInstallFromGrammar)
- OK `git` executable found.
- OK `cc` executable found. Selected from { vim.NIL, "cc", "gcc", "clang", "cl", "zig" }
Version: cc (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
- OK Neovim was compiled with tree-sitter runtime ABI version 14 (required >=13). Parsers must be compatible with runtime ABI.
OS Info:
{
machine = "aarch64",
release = "6.15.0-sc8280xp-arm64",
sysname = "Linux",
version = "#2 SMP PREEMPT Mon May 26 11:54:54 UTC 2025"
} ~
Parser/Features H L F I J
- c ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
- gleam ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
- lua ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
- markdown ✓ . ✓ ✓ ✓
- markdown_inline ✓ . . . ✓
- query x ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
- vim ✓ ✓ ✓ . ✓
- vimdoc ✓ . . . ✓
Legend: H[ighlight], L[ocals], F[olds], I[ndents], In[j]ections
+) multiple parsers found, only one will be used
x) errors found in the query, try to run :TSUpdate {lang} ~
The following errors have been detected: ~
- ERROR query(highlights): /usr/local/share/nvim/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/query.lua:252: Query error at 14:2. Invalid node type "missing_node":
(missing_node
^
query(highlights) is concatenated from the following files:
| [ERROR]:"/home/liam/.local/share/nvim/lazy/nvim-treesitter/queries/query/highlights.scm", failed to load: /usr/local/share/nvim/runtime/lua/vim/treesitter/query.lua:252: Query error at 14:2. Invalid node type "missing_node":
(missing_node
^
And no apparent change with :TSEnable gleam
torpid notch
hmm... could be an issue. can try :TSUpdate query i suppose?
dunno if that matters outside of parsing actual treesitter queries, but can't hurt to try lol
also to confirm, you get highlights for other treesitter languages?
i would also try :TSUpdate gleam if you haven't already
sullen jolt
Yeah, let's see.. I tested JS, Java, and Rust. I don't know which languages use treesitter off the top of my head 🤔
torpid notch
i don't see those listed under your checkhealth above, so i suspect they probably are using the regex highlights?
what does your nvim-treesitter setup call look like?
sullen jolt
Okay yeah, I had the setup call empty. I added
highlight = {
enable = true,
}
and what do you know 🤦♀️
I'm 100% sure I had syntax highlighting before, did this change recently or am I stupid?
torpid notch
well you're definitely not stupid. but i do believe this was always required 😬
torpid notch
glad it's working, at least!
sullen jolt
Me too lol
static cosmos
I hope they make it easier to set up tree sitters