#lore
1 messages ยท Page 21 of 1
Animal people
an animagus is a wizard or witch that can transform at will to one particular animal
Animal people
I see a good way to do it gameplay wise, we know from the Marauders that it is a lengthy a process that involves brewing and consuming potions, invocations in certain time of the night, and loads of repetition
so that process is quite grindy... that could limit some to attain it, and the rarer the occurrence, the least amount of variety it will require
having said all this, I simply going to grind the living daylight out of Hogwarts Legacy ๐
OH WE ALL will
the amount of screenshots weโre gonna sent to each other here

I'm really looking forward to that, to see others mocking about ๐
Most magical creatures that are known can be found in the Harry Potter universe. But becoming a Vampire or Werewolf will probably open a whole new door
or rabbit hole...
That will be a tight fit
Sabastion is probably a werewolf
it is something about the sister of his, the curse you are referring to
Where did you find out he had a sister?
literally, she standing next to him when the father destroys the magic fig
family member that isn't his father
I thought that was his mother actually
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
I assumed...
too young for that
evening Fuzz, btw ๐
That was a random student girl and the teacher was the potions professor.
there's a part it shows his home life when it says about the fact he's hiding a secret
at least it looked like his home life cos the quick shot doesn't match Hogwarts and the guy who destroyed the flower that he hands the woman didn't look like any of the professors
that is not a the potions professor
looks totally different
throwing the capture in here.. i guess the looks/age could be debated xD
okay, I assumed a sickly younger sister ๐
that was my impression too
shrivelfig, apparently
I guess most cos it was just such a quick shot. But seeing the freeze frame yeah she's young, either his age or younger.
Perhaps she might even be his twin but experiencing a curse that makes it impossible for her to attend Hogwarts
like vampirism or lycanthropy
As whilst vampirism is certainly more supported, it's not exactly smiled upon
and the first werewolf to attend Hogwarts is Remus
the older relative says: "We've been over this, boy! Shrivelfigs cannot reverse a curse, nothing can..." Then he destroys the fruit like a total douche...
They said it's a family curse not just on this made up sister. Who I don't think that is, I think that person got him the plant he asked for.
How do u know if thats his father and how do u know if its his sister
How do u know
The scene is in the potions classroom.
no it is not the potions classroom
Only the background doesn't look like the potions classroom
True could be the potion ingredient store too
Tho it looks to be super late so never know
Which is why I was thinking it was the potions classroom as they could be stealing the ingredient and got caught
I mean it doesn't look anything like the potions classroom that we see in the rest of the trailer
That could be a possibility.
It does come after a section of him sneaking out of the library and getting caught
They maybe were researching it
but again the wood used for the bookcases in the background seems different
okay the draperies behind the man, who takes Sebastian's fig is nothing like we see anywhere in Hogwarts, you asked me, how do I know it is not Hogwarts, well what makes you certain it is? Has nothing to do with the potions professor, the man has a different posture, different facial structure and beard. Also, somehow more rugged, more scruffy... The girl is not wearing any form of uniform that all other children wearing in the video. I just watched it frame by frame ^^
the scene playing as the voiceover says "With a troubling family secret"
That still doesn't mean any of them are related.
I'm not a gambling man, but I'm willing to bet they are. ๐ฅบ
it'd be a bit odd if it said "A troubling family secret" and they didn't at least potentially show his family
well, here's the good news, whichever of us is right about this, we will know for certain, come December
if I'm wrong, I will freely admit that, you have my word for it ๐
There will be too many
Details about there face,clothing,expressions dont matter
oh? and why is that?
Because it has nothing to do with where they're at or if there his siblings,family members
I'm sorry I still don't get it... why wouldn't it matter if someone is not dressed per school requirement (meaning they are not at the school) or if the older man is decidedly looks like Sebastian plus a few decades? I don't follow your logic there...
Thats like saying someone not wearing there robes is not at there school
well, if you read the book or know anything about the British school system, that is exactly what that means
I doubt its his dad could just be someone who knows his family secret and the girl could just be his friend that also know his family secret
It doesnt when it happens in the books/movies
the movies were less then accurate about that part of the books, hence I wouldn't call them as reference
The books do it aswell
only if they were outside of school term
Especially when in the 7th book they don't wear there robes anymore
that might be because they are running for their lives ๐
I think I covered that...
Theres still many students that were wearing there robes and running away
In the castle..
The students are allowed to change out of uniform after classes end, just most don't as it's extra effort
okay, wizarding war aside, in the 1890s students of any grammar school were expected to wear their uniforms in good order and according to the regulations of their institutes at all time, except for private family affairs like Sunday church or luncheons, but at all time whilst at school
or if they do it is to shuck the outer robe and put on a jumper
in my case, it was still so in the 1990s
It wasnt but k
in the 1890s I would expect the dress code to be stricter
but that doesn't mean that students can't wear their own clothes in the evenings or on the weekends
just that certainly for the evenings they seem unlikely to
Unless he's an only child
Potential cousin then that he's helping
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
still isn't the norm at Eton, for example
Lol
yes well Eton isn't Hogwarts
Exactly
heck technically in the HP universe Hogwarts is the 2nd or 3rd oldest school in the country, it'd have it's own fairly ancient set of traditions
whilst I agree, I always thought the best wizarding school means something like Eton or Marlborough
and yes technically those other schools are Oxford and Cambridge and now universities, but still counts
Oxbridgewarts? ๐ has a ring to it though ๐
I mean perhaps they would have a magical section to them considering their age
cos otherwise you're telling me that in a 1000 years no student came out of Hogwarts and couldn't get a master to apprentice to to get their mastery as all of them already had apprentices, and decided that there needed to be some form of higher education system.
990s AD for Hogwarts, that makes it the oldest continuous school on the British Isles and by extension, possibly the world
Was Hogwarts ever like damaged again after the 1900s
1998 that was. It was never attacked until the Astronomy Tower incident at 1997 where Dumbledore was killed.
it may have been challenged is some shape or form during the Founders' days
at least Godric Gryffindor was a known duellist, best of his time, he would not just seize that activity because of the school
he remained fairly combative, one of the reason he fell out with Salazar Slytherin
and the grounds have extensive repellent magic against quite a few supernatural beings
weren't Dumbledore needed to lower certain wards for Charlie be able to get the dragons in for a the Triwizard Tournament?
And also the fact that Slytherin parked a basilisk there as protection that then sort of lost its mind as it lived to be the largest and oldest basilisk ever recorded
and the spell which awakens the statues in the entrance hall and calls them to guard the school
the castle is pretty well defended and it does indeed take an army to actually try and take it
I still question what was it food source during that time
I have no idea what yall are talking about
that was one of the coolest moments in the books, Dame Maggie was brilliant in that scene too ๐
Perhaps creatures from the forbidden forest and the black lake
But how did no one notice(and donโt say the pipes)
Wdym fell out with salazar?
Piertotum Locomotor
Gryffindor and Slytherin had a falling out and Slytherin left the castle for good.
over the admittance of muggle-born students
Like a battle or like you know
they were thick as thieves until that point
It seems Slytherin was arguing against the admittance of muggle-born students due to the dangers they bring, and Gryffindor, the son of a noble, thought it fine cos he'd managed to convince muggle parents before that it wasn't evil.
They had a big falling out, and potentially duelled, and Slytherin left in a huff after technically losing the duel
Ig the guards were put there to give time for other students to get inside the castle and stuff cause they were kinda slow so trolls could easily hit them but if they were surrounded they were probably hit and killed
not sure how accurate those games were in terms of strengths and weaknesses, I'd assume the new game will be less lenient, as we will fight suits of armour or statues
"Eventually, Slytherin and Gryffindor had a bitter and possibly even violent argument over the subject, it is possible that they duelled, or that a civil war of sorts broke out between the houses. Slytherin chose to leave the school eventually, but he had left the Chamber of Secrets and his Basilisk behind, and he later died at an old age. " - an exert from a writing about Salazar Slytherin's life
what the lore of the wizard world in 1890?
now say that in English, please? ๐ฎ
I said it in English I asked what are the rules of the wizarding world at the time the game took place?
in 1890s
okay, the first question does not mean anything intelligible, the second does. The answer to the second is, the rules are the same as in the Harry Potter books
not much different from what they are in the 1990s
Yeah, it's not a huge time gap between the 1890s to 1990s, really. Sure, there's some differences but it's not like it's medieval time period.
Like the law that it is not alowed to do magic near non-wizards?
btw Zocker, go to #๐ฐchoose-your-house and sort yourself out, if you like ๐
The Statue of Secrecy is still in place, that's been around since the 1700s.
Statute of Secrecy was signed into law in 1707
I knew it was 1700s, forgot the specific year. xD
a good effort ๐
what is btw?
By the way.
by the way
1692 was when it was put into place but signed in 1689. The Ministry of Magic was established in 1707.
i chose my house now
so no law enforcement before that? ๐
congratulations ๐
There was the Wizards Council who passed laws, but yeah actually that seems to be a point there was no central government to hand out punishments to law breakers.
Yeah, it'd be hard to enforce the SoS without some form of law enforcement so...Perhaps there was pre-Ministry organization that eventually formed into the Ministry as we know it.
Back in the old days in real life punishment was generally carried out by the town guards/retinue of the local lord.
I'd gather the Wizards Council was either abolished or taken into the Ministry with a different name.
yeah so from what I can tell the Wizards Council seems to have been the major players in the Wizengamot just acting as a privy council and making decisions for the whole country
Anyone know what will be in the game in terms of rules? I mean will magicians enforce laws?
Should've just kept the name and slightly changed it. Wizengamot just sounds...weird.
the Wizengamot is separate from the Wizards Council
1689,1689,1689 SoS. 1707, 1707, 1707 Ministry... just memorising...
Now you're confusing me! Flails!
the Wizengamot being everyone entitled to a vote in British politics, whilst the old Wizards Council was more like the cabinet office for the government, just a select few with extra power
?
well done, pretty neat way of putting it
The Wizards Council probably got put out of the way because there was then a Minister for Magic and his/her office and the Wizengamot was then acting more like Parliament.
When the Ministry was formed, the then Chief Warlock of the Wizengamot who was also the chief of the Wizards Council, and so after the change of government, became the first Minister for Magic, whilst the rest of the Wizards Council became the department heads of the Ministry
so they basically just kept all their power
not for sure, but the Magical Law Enforcement should look the same in structure, then in Harry Potter's time, so there should be Obliviators, Aurors and the like
I had it about right, roughly. xD
no getting out the way, just changing the names of the office of power really
Library looks different. This is over at Sallow household during the Christmas holidays
thank you for answer
pleasure
You dont know that
Dude, you're fighting quite hard to say it isn't what it looks like
you might as well be looking at a duck and calling it a bear
Who
I've seen the Harry Potter movies many times and never understood who the Minister of Magic is. What's his story? Why does it exist? Who is one of him?
he said to you, Miles ๐
Im just saying they could be wrong they do be acting as if its actually what there doing and where they are
?
All im saying is it could be a new area or an old area in the castle
I mean whilst it's alright to point out that we could be wrong, there's a difference between doing that and grasping at straws to say it
Idk a professor?
A professor who is not at the great hall at the professor tables ? Hardly
and a professor would've called him Mr. Sallow, not just simply boy
Also what would shrivelfigs be doing at sebastians house
Can't be the librarian of the time, because we saw her scolding Seb when Peeves likely ousted him from the library because Peeves is a d-bag like that.
he brought it home to cure his sister
the Minister of Magic is a secret member of the British Government, directly reporting to the Prime Minister of the time. The minister is elected by the witches and wizards of the Kingdoms of England, Scotland and Ireland. He or she can serve indefinite terms. The Minister is Chief Executive and Chief Justice in one person.
He could've easily done that at hogwarts and try to make a cure
Not if his sister is at home
Also there not at the professors table 24/7
Honestly, we're not seeing the full picture yet and taking potshots in the dark. We'll likely know more once the game releases or if they release more information about the companions.
His sister could be at the hospital wing
They are at the beginning of the year
during the feast
But the government does not know about the existence of wizards no?
the Prime Minister does, although you'd run a risk being labelled a nutcase if admitting that to the public ๐
Sure, it's pretty reasonable that we are getting sorted during Easter instead of September
Yeah, the beginning of the year feast and the end of the year feast are mandatory attendances by all staff and students.
I dont see why sebastian would go somewhere to get shrivelfigs during the sorting ceremony
although in this sense lest of the term and more of the calendar year we are talking about
oh Now I understand everything.
Thanks
I'm not talking about that. I'm talking about the sorting ceremony for the player character. The man who you call a professor is not at the professor table. Ergo he is not a professor
If hes really tempted than yeah ig it would make sense but like he could do it at night or sneak in during the day
Probably
I doubt that, but if if you do, more power to you, I'm glad I was able to help you a bit ๐
Shrivelfigs can be bought for 3 or 30 galleons (not sure which) at any apothecary
im glad you here to help
The house shown in the scene looks way superior for that dusty old hut
Then he could be at a shop?
a shop with spoons hanging around ?
unlikely a shop owner would destroy bought goods
it's in a kitchen, and not the hogwarts kitchen
It might be Sallow's house.
Could be he lives in Hosgmeade, hence the easy access to his house.
Could be ig
oh Miles, don't take it the wrong way, but you give me headaches ๐
But saying "it is" just doesnt make sense since it could or couldnt thats all im gonna say or could just be a new area we've never seen at hogwarts
I could say the same to you
sure you could ๐
Your so gassed just because someone agrees with you ๐
Well, when someone makes a logical arguement, it's hard not to agree. I'm very Vulcan, like that.
Sorry, wrong franchise. I meant I'm very Ravenclaw.
But people never realise that they could easily be wrong
But sure
๐คทโโ๏ธ
And a oop!
I think you'll find that I said some hours ago, that I will admit if I'm wrong, so far 4 people over several hours compiled several reasons for why we collectively think what we do, and you've done nothing but saying no to everything
I was about to challenge you on this, but I will not, I want to talk about something else... anything else ๐
I disagree with this, very strongly
Especially since you're argueing with a ravenclaw lol
True
I dont remember u saying that
there, time stamp 20:22 BST
now it is 21:50
My bad then sorry for the argument
And that is a winning statement right there. xD
you see, that's how I get my migraines ๐
hey im part ravenclaw, I have to stick up for us nerds ;p
Alright
Im gonna start a fight. I think more than anything the inspiration for house elves came from humans best friends, dogs. Dobby is literally what golden retriever would be if it could talk and do magic
I'm gonna respectfully disagree.
I'm gonna respectfully agree
me too
I can see your point, but the dynamic is still different.
It's better than some other theories about them though ๐
That is a hella loaded topic and to discuss it in depth could cause some trouble
I see where you're coming from with the Dobby aspect, but beyond Dobby I'd disagree
Why would you disagree beyond Dobby? Because they are treated so awful by other wizards?
More how they act with others, it's less golden retriever like and more loyal servant
Honestly to some degree the Upstairs Downstairs comparison could be made, though House Elves can each individually cover a lot more tasks than the variety of servants that old rich families used to have.
There is something to be said about that avenue of loyal servants, and it could draw literary comparison to LOTR with Frodo and Samwise with the fact that their relationship is meant to be that of an officer and his batman. As during WW1 most officers were minor nobility and most of their batmen were already servants to their officers families before the war started, following them into service because that was simply what was done back then.
but then the whole treatment of house elves comes in to ruin that argument
as I said, getting too far into the topic causes issues but suffice to say house elves should be treated kindly and I'm sure the ones that we meet in the game will be great
though they'll likely try to keep us out of the kitchens by feeding us and then sending us packing
the bad treatment of house elfs proves dog theory bc it makes no sense just like bad treatment of dogs dont ๐
not certain what you're getting at Fuzz, you draw on good examples with domiciled servants, where the system worked they were part of the family, in a weird sense more of the house or estate then the family, but they have their honour in the service rendered and were better paid then any other labourers, even clerks for the valet and above. Houselves were on the other hand, clearly a property and they tended to throw themselves into complete service, to the point they would not wear clothes unless they are expressly ordered to, nor they would clean them to signify the totality of loosing self in the service of the family...
it is a good topic though
Yeah I was trying to avoid that difference
I know about it but it's not a topic to discuss here as it's quite certainly one of the more contentious aspects of HP
so be it, but I say that, houselves invented Stockholm syndrome, and they are fabulously strong magical creatures
Dobby flinging Lucius down a set of stairs in the books compared to down a hallway in the movies, if I recall rightly. Slight differences, but you can still tell how strong they are if they want to be.
Augusta Longbottom, Neville's Gran, now she was an interesting character
Hm, I don't recall her showing up in any major degree aside from OotP with the St. Mungos scene and from what we've heard in passing about her.
she was the last one through Ariana's portrait to Hogwarts after news of the Death Eater Army outside the castle had spread. She was somewhat of an overpowered old-age-pensioner
the Death Eaters wanted to capture her and thus control Neville, who was leading a full rebellion against the Carrows. An Auror turned up to bring her in, Augusta put said Auror to St Mungos, and was on the run ๐
got to love the old lady ๐
yea she was badass
Huh, I think that might've slipped my mind.
Then again, she'd be right up there with Professor McGonagall and Aberforth Dumbledore for overpowered old age wizards and witches that took part in the final battle.
Not sure how old Flitwick was but I imagine since he was also a former professional duellist, he'd be pretty on the strong side too. Mind you, it might a staple for Hogwarts professors to both be best of their craft and extremely powerful, if not obvious about it. I mean, in the event of an attack on the school - they'd all need to be capable enough to defend the students.
So it might be a hidden requirement to be a professor, or at least - long term professor.
Prof Slughorn was older than Flitwick, I think
it would only do to be in the hands of the most talented to bring up the new generation, don't you think?
Also true. Perhaps that's where the best of their generation and craft eventually end up, in the end.
I mean, I imagine after their chosen careers have winded down and they want to pass their knowledge on, Harry and Hermione would probably end up teaching at Hogwarts too. Can't see Ron doing it though, unless he wants to be the replacement janitor. Was that an unintentional burn? I think it was. xD
I always believed that Hogwarts was an assortment of the most eclectic collection of the brightest of witches and wizards, that Dumbledore was the norm, not the exception
still not convinced if plot armour or Harry won the war against Voldemort, to be honest, Hermione I agree about
However, Snape wasn't great as a teacher but at his craft? No doubt, he was one of the best.
Don't get me started. I still find it absolutely bloody stupid that his first instinct was to stun Voldemort and not kill the obviously bloody evil git in the final battle, like...are you malfunctioning, Potter?!
At least cast Sectumsempra, and go lethal if you're not willing to outright kill him. Eyeroll.
malfunctioning.. that cracked me up ๐
I think that's part of Harry's problem, his go-to was the stunner and not broadening his spell variety. That's why they knew which was the real Potter in the beginning of Book 7 during the Polyjuice bit. And that besides, it's a war. You don't wanna go soft with the kid gloves in a war for cryin' out loud.
Yeah, I get that killing might be sinking to the Death Eaters' level but injuring them? That's far more doable and it also keeps them down for the count because injuries aren't as easy as casting the counter-spell to Stupefy.
I dunno, maybe it's just me and that says alot about me that I'd rather go for the injury than stunning my opponents. I don't play nice, apparently. xD
it just showed that Harry was still a child and war is no place for children
I taught to myself a few times, what do we get if we stun someone in mid air? ๐ค
That's a good question..I mean, he did stun an Imperuised Stan Shunpike at the start of book 7, would the broom have taken him down slowly or would he be catapulted off it and just dropping to his death? Because Harry really should've known better than to stun someone mid-flight then again, there's a reason he's not the brains of the trio.
Wow, I'm just firing burns left and right at Harry and Ron tonight...I'm usually not this keen to set them on fire. xD
keep them coming, it is not only a boggart that should be ridiculed ๐
Shall I try and go three for three on this trio? xD
xD
Actually, there's one fault with Hermione. She got with Ron. That should say enough. Oooh!
no, I can see your point, but there are no charms for taste
Eh, true.
Low-key though, I honestly thought the end-game pairing was gonna be Harry/Hermione. Especially since so many people kept saying she's alot like Lily, being the smartest witch of her generation. Then JK slowly ruined my shipping dreams. I cried, it's true...cried for Hermione's poor, poor sanity.
well, I never got how Harry ended up from Cho Chang to Ginny Weasley either
I do wonder sometimes if Ginny took her mother's story and the love potion on her dad a bit too serious and took it as a sign of I should do it too!
That's the only reason his head spun so fast towards Ginny, I can think of.
yeah, she sounds like a little poisoner, for sure
Didnโt Neville blow up the snatcher and made a boom boom joke
He might've, gods know I always thought Neville was low-key sarcastic at times when he thought people weren't looking. xD
I mean he most have a pretty high kill count
I thought they knew because of hedwig
Hedwig died in the fight once Harry was spotted, it was him doing a stunner that gave him away if I'm not mistaken.
No, he used Expelliarmus, which is his signature spell.
Ah, i was under the impression that hedwig took the curse that a death eater had sent Harryโs way, and hedwig is Harryโs owl so i figured that was it
Thatโs how itโs explained in the movie anyway, i havenโt read the book in a bit so im not sure how it plays out in there
Still a daft move to have for a signature spell. Grumbles. Should at least be throwing slightly lethal curses, I mean - people are trying to kill you. Don't be trying to disarm or stun them...I swear, Harry has a malfunction...
Well throwing harmful curses prob wouldโve ruined the characters integrity, which Iโm sure JKR wanted to keep
Like when Harry used crucio against bellatrix, or sectumsempra against malfoy. It was always seen in a bad light
Yeah I've reread the books recently and the amount of times harry is using the stunning spell is...annoying to say the least.
Shouldn't have thrown said character into an adult situation in a war, then...I dunno. I think it just says alot about me that I'd prefer to put my opponents down, if not permanently then at least injured them.
Yeah, the later books really cross the line if they were still labeled as childrens books
Realistically, yeah Harry shouldโve used more lethal curses. But Iโm sure JKR didnโt want readers to see Harry that way
Personally, I'd have preferred Harry to friggin' fight for his life properly. At least then it'd feel like he wasn't coasting on luck and friends/teammates.
Especially that foppish ending for Voldemort...Gods, no. Kill the guy, not stun/disarm him to death..That's just a pathetic ending, to me.
Yeah, as now weโre adults i wouldโve liked to see that as well
My complaints about Harry's fighting style are only just below the damn daft end-game pairings of Harry/Ginny and Ron/Hermione.
I hope future wizarding world content recognizes that the majority of their fans are adults and will follow those realistic themes
It's why I'm hoping if they reboot the series as a TV show, it'll be nitty, gritty and realistically themed as a fantasy magical show can be. It was still pretty 'dark' having an 11 year old kill a grown wizard by burning him alive with protection magic so...it kinda hits the nail on the head.
Iโm personally hoping for a mini series or something about the marauders. 7th year and into the first wizarding war where it is all gritty
At least with a tv show, they can do things longer and more in detail and in line with the books that you can't do with a movie, where you've got a select time and can't go super into detail.
Maybe more emphasis on disappearances and attacks, random killings and how the marauders are dealing with that. Might even up to the potterโs death
I think a Marauder mini-series would be cool, especially if it's going to be a lead up to a reboot of the HP series as a tv show, then it's just continuation!
Ahhh idk about a reboot
If there will be a series I hope it's not about the marauders tbh... The only special thing is the animagus stuff and the map, but that's kinda it.
And the relationship between them all
And a reboot is very unlikely I think.
and he and his friend would've died without neville
Only in the movie.
When was this
In the final battle at Hogwarts, when they finally fought each other at the climax of it all. Clearly, Potter's malfunctioning from coming back from the dead because his brain goes 'Oh, let's disarm/stun the guy who just killed me.' Yeah, real bloody smart....
Oh lol
It can be excused in 4th year, due to his limited spell list and because of the brother wand effect saving his arse but at 7th year, at the end of it all - he really should've known far more spells and his first instinct shouldn't have been expelliarmus and/or stupefy on Voldemort. Can't quite tell which it's supposed to be due to both spells being red in effect.
It literally drives me up the wall, that does.
Clearly, you can probably tell that because I went into rant mode. xD
I think the reason for using expelliarmus in the final fight was because Harry knew the wand was rightfully his so it might have doubled the power of the spell because the wand wanted to go to itโs true owner
Might not be conscious decision then and an unconscious reflex, seeking the wand on his part because part of him knows it belongs to him. That sounds better than him being an idiot and using something non-lethal on the one guy he knows deserves to get hit by a lethal spell.
It could have also been because in the graveyard Harry was teased for using that spell so he wanted to humiliate Voldemort more by defeating him with it
Eh, I doubt Harry thought about that. I just think he's malfunctioning. I mean, he came back from the dead not too long before and immediately going back into fighting isn't gonna be good for him.
I mean having your opening salvo be a disarming spell isn't the worst idea actually.
If it lands then congrats your opponent now can't fight back.
If it doesn't, well you're likely already moving and casting a follow up and your spell forced them to move, hopefully putting them at a disadvantage.
Simple but effective, it is a solid opening spell.
But it's also predictable, as said that Harry was becoming known for it.
So something I'm looking at is the wand movement for casting
and it seems like you could open with Flipendo then move into an Expelliarmus
I didnโt like the wand movement in order of the phoenix game on ps3
There are probably many other options, but I'm bothered with going through the supposed wand movements of all the defence spells just to see what feeds well into what
I say that, I'm probably going to do it in any case when I get some wooden dowels and carve them into wands (gonna get multiple cos I've only tried it once before and it was so-so before a fault in the wood snapped it)
i wish there was a wand to come with the controller some how
could use an old PS3 motion wand
I forget what they are actually called
but they were quite sensitive
if you've ever played Johann Sebastian Joust then you'll know what I mean
ive never played any video game so
Well that's a shame and a half
Okay so got distracted and forgot my original goal in entering this chat but valid question, why does being a Parselmouth have to be an inherited trait?
I don't think it's ever said how Herpo the Foul got the trait, nor how Slytherin did
is being an animagus an inherited trait?
With Herpo he's described as being the first Parselmouth, but that couldn't work if it's an inheritable trait. Meaning it had to have been a random mutation that gave him it.
Or some other way
also no being an animagus is something one trains to do
There might be a higher chance you can actually pull it off, if your family has had one because I think it counts as a magical gift, in some regards.
potentially I guess
so the first parselmouth was a mutant and then it was congenital
if I remember correctly, good old Herpo was quite odd, he experimented with toads and chicken-eggs , that gave us the basilisk, king of serpents. So I could see that being impacted on him as a blood-trait (again with the sanguine manipulations)
So basically he might have given himself a strange form of blood malediction which allowed him to talk to snakes
what I don't get is that then passing down to others
the man was a noted recluse
as in sure he was a dark lord, but he practically never interacted with anyone
I doubt he had children
yes, there is a theory that states that Herpo and Slytherin might have gotten the same trait independently of each other
oh but perhaps he may have experimented on people, as in a "So I managed to make it so I can talk to snakes, I wonder if I can make it so other people can as well?"
also, there are great snakes in Latin America too, not quite basilisk, but rather intelligent
There's also common thought of parseltongue and parselmouths being way more common in South East Asia
that is a point, after all he made the first Horcrux, in a way he could still be alive, all we know
if he is, he must be hiding in Albania, all roads seem to lead there in Harry Potter ๐
If you're talking about the giant flying Mayan god-snake Kukulkan - Serpent of the Nine Winds, I doubt any Parselmouth would be willing to get near that thing.
I'm sure Harry would, just cos he'd be like "Eh what's the worst that could happen?"
no, I talk about the 3 headed serpents that seem often bite their own heads off, because they inhabit 3 different personas, and the left head is constantly annoying the other two
Harry's the exception - he's dumb, at times. He would utter that cursed phrase.
Also, just imagine Jormungandr was real in wizarding lore... That's one big ass serpent, man!
lol
yeah, that would be awesome, the World Serpent alive
again I'm sure Harry would end up talking to it and then turning round to Ron and Hermione just being like "It's friendly, just a bit grumpy."
probably would be right about that ๐
Whilst he's not an idiot, he often doesn't look before he leaps
that may be a definition of an idiot ๐
Okay, I'll retract my idiot statement. He's just your typical bloody Gryffindor.
But yeah, the whole parselmouth thing just made me question "What are the origins of bloodline traits?"
Like how did they get started?
Not so cool if he ends up running into Medusa..She's notorious for offing people who come into her lair, dead or turned to stone..what's the difference? xD
my problem with this uber elite trait is that half the school is related to Slytherin, including faculty, so why only Tom and Harry can speak it?
In before Lily's family tree had a Slytherin background bringing it to the fore.
Surely it's possible for a Muggle-born to be born with a brand new trait, like say the ability to talk to cats or something, which would be a bit odd, just "mew, mew mew meow,"
And if not then why not? The bloodline traits had to get started somehow.
what if it was a little more common before tom riddle was a known one, and now no one endorses having the skill when they actually do
Also point...Tom made the ability stupidly feared.
if I could speak to snakes I would not advertise it, but would endorse it, it would signal something to the Sangueist hordes
i feel like dumbledore when he met tom was shocked and disturbed by his ability though, but that's from movie memory idk if it's book canon
Another downside being raised by muggles and having zero knowledge of the world he's going into - he wouldn't have known not to advertise or acknowledge the ability in public.
My theory is that for most it's too low level for them to be able to use it. But Riddle as a direct descendant through the Gaunts who turned to inbreeding to keep the trait (to the point Morfin Gaunt could barely speak in English as he spoke in snake that much) would have had it fully naturally.
So when Riddle turned Harry into an accidental Horcrux, it basically awakened the dormant gene for Parseltongue within Harry from the ancestors of his that had it. So therefore Harry got it.
Not sure if it'd then pass on to the next generation from Harry though.
I presume Dumbledore knew about the Gaunts, so a shock is a but overplayed by the film
I mean he didn't know that Tom was Merope's kid at first
me needing to read up on gaunt lore
he only found that out after a couple of years as Tom started acting really shady
Think we'll run into any Gaunts in HL? Bearing in mind, this a bit before the one's we know...
Well according to the books, they hadn't attended Hogwarts in 300 years, and that was back in the 1920s
so I doubt it
As if Tom wasn't already a giant red flag from the meeting at the orphanage.
yeah Tom wasn't great, but then Dumbledore set his cupboard of trophies on fire
I think Dumbledore was still reeling from Grindelwald and possibly thought he was preventing the rise of another...except, he really screwed that one up.
you don't take a kid who obviously has no one and therefore has acted out and stolen stuff from people and therefore treasures that stuff, and then set said stuff on fire.
seems like Dumbledore and Palpatine were playing from the same book ๐
how, it was 1938 at the time
Grindelwald wasn't yet in all out open war, just murdering some people from time to time
True but you gotta remember, Dumbledore was somewhat of a man stuck in the past.
and Dumbles meets an abused orphan with no support system, and chooses to introduce him to magic by setting his stuff on fire
man really wasn't good
Eh, I just call it Dumbledore being an idiot for the sake of plot.
in the meantime, corporal punishment in a boarding school being an everyday occurrence
Honestly if he'd actually arranged for Tom to get out of the orphanage and into a home that'd at least give a crap about him, then it would have helped immensely
Honestly, I'd think that'd fall onto the headmaster of the time which wasn't Dumbledore.
True Dippet wasn't any better
Dippet struck me as...kind of like Fudge. Wanting to do the bare minimum but get all the credit.
amazingly a step down from Black
Fudge just wanted the ceremony and the kowtowing received as befitted his status, none of the work though
Wonder if that's why Umbridge was evil as she was? She was overworked from doing all of Fudge's work when he should've been doing it himself. xD
I wonder, since Black's portrait was rather sucking up to Snape, when he was Headmaster
the Umbridge family is another red flag of the enormous kind
her brother was a squib, her father abusive...
Black's portrait may not have liked Dumbledore, but even then he said he was better than Dippet
her father was a janitor wasn't he?
Orford Umbridge was the father of Dolores Umbridge and a squib son. An unambitious wizard who worked at the Ministry of Magic as a floor mopper, Orford later became a source of embarrassment for his daughter and would later disappear from sight at his daughter's request in exchange for a small financial allowance
Why the hell did Black choose Dippet as his successor, then? Was it a limited pool for who wanted the position or...?
that's what the wiki says
I don't know if he chose him or not.
It's unclear how the headmasters are chosen
Inbefore the fan theory of 'Hogwarts chooses.'
if it's by the board of governers or by the previous head
Board of Governors choose the Headmaster, not the previous one
and well Hogwarts kind of does choose
if the board chooses someone and the headmasters office refuses to open for them, then it means that they can't be headmaster
well, the Ministry can influence the choice, as was the case with Snape
Perhaps Hogwarts saw Snape's true heart/intentions.
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
because Dumbledore was still headmaster, taking a sabbatical ๐
Must've been nice for Dumbledore, getting to do some field work again after being stuck behind a desk for so long when he got ousted. xD
Umbridge was a usurper, Snape was elevated to a vacand position
He did apparently teach the alchemy course for NEWT level if there was enough interest
I wonder where he went, I mean, knocked out Shacklebolt, Fudge, Umbridge and Dawson (or similar) and just disappeared, to reappear at the crucial time in the Ministry
also, the password was Sherbet Lemon... I like the infantilism in Harry Potter ๐
the password changed every year to his new favourite sweet
I wonder if the Headmaster had to tell the passwords to enter the common rooms
Yeah, it was given out to the prefects at their meeting onboard the train
so the prefects know how to get in ahead of time, and then as they walk back to their compartments, they tell members of their house when they can
unless you're Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff as their doors don't work like that
yeah, that Hufflepuff door is a pain ๐
We have the best door ๐
I swear to God, you lot are like the Scotsman at the tobacconist in England, when I only have Scottish notes on me. Always one appears, and with the thickest accent: Aye, 'tis a legal tender!
As the saying goes "They're like busses, never one when you want one but the moment you don't, ten turn up."
never have I heard the term before in me life 'legal tender', then I moved to Scotland ๐
anyway, the Headperson's Office is yet another strange place in Hogwarts
I hope we will be able to enter there
Professor Horace Eugene Flaccus Slughorn (b. 28 April, between 1882 and 1913) - big help! so, he is either a year younger than Dumbledore or 30 years younger... honestly woman, make your mind up!
I'm of the assumption he's a year younger than Dumbledore, due to them both seeming more like old friends than just coworkers.
sure, but the discrepancy drives me mad
How many of those discrepancies is there in the series? I never actually bothered to check. xD
Slughorn used Felix Felicis either 1907 or 1927; once when he was twenty-four years old - so which is it? 1907 being pre-WW1 and 1927 post Great War
tonnes, actually
I'm thinking pre-WW1 because I'd assume 24 year old Slughorn is just as daft as any of us at that age and thinking he needs it. xD
He very much could be either and he was already a senior professor come Riddles time in the late 30s/early to mid 40s
we have more accurate dates left to us from the ancient Egyptians... From Djoser's reign even
I'm pretty sure GRRM's timeline isn't quite as discrepancy filled as JKR's.
He definitely wasn't born in 1913, that's too late, as it'd barely give him enough time to get his mastery before coming back to teach at Hogwarts
and well the difference there is obvious, GRRM wanted to build a world, JKR wanted to tell a single story that once published proved far more popular than originally thought and suddenly had to build a world
Oh, gods that's just had me thinking... Imagine the wizarding world done by GRRM. There's be alot more horror and alot more dying!
and a lot more sex...
Hahaha, true.
And it'd be alot darker than it currently is and has been hinted at. Yikes.
But at least there'd be accuracy
not really a compliment, if that is the only way you can sell a book, by describing torrid affairs, then literature truly is in its last leg
I still swear that Rowling simply forgot about Daphne Greengrass and so when she wrote that Draco was married to Astoria, it was the editor who picked up on it and went "Oh that Greengrass girl has a younger sister then?"
Honestly GRRM's work doesn't because of the lewdness, that's barely even a minor part, but that's getting into #๐books
I read his novels up until the Greyjoy's Richard got severed, from there on I don't need to know
Yeah, it's like 'All your bad guys die and your good guys survive, we can tell what's gonna happen by page and age 5!' type of thing with JKR's books while for all the crazy bad things and the lewdness in GRRM's stuff, at least kept you on your toes.
And if you get that reference I threw in there, you get a cookie.
no great surprise though, if you knew about the War of the Roses
You know what'd be interesting, to write how the War of the Roses went in the HP universe
it'd still be a mess and follow the same major beats as the real one
yes, you've said that before, I concur, I'd like to examine that more closely
but imagine wizards and witches just off to one side battling it out like "The House of York are the true kings of England"
and the others going "Nay it is the House of Lancaster that shall wear the crown"
There's two types of dragon native to Britain, did some crackpot wizard decide to see if he could train a dragon to fight for one side or the other?
And then you've got some wanting to stay out of it and going "Why am I here? What am I doing? I just wanted to eat some bacon.." That's a Weasley, right there.
the White Queen was said to have descended from a powerful sorceress or soothsayer... That was the rumour of her time, at least
the 1400s saw the end of the Hundred Years War (which lasted 114 years) and the fall of the Plantagenet dynasty (kind of as both York and Lancaster were descended from them, as were the Tudors), for Britain is was a fairly major century politically.
especially considering the War of the Roses lasted around a 50 year period
indeed, and borne many a legend
lots of stabby both in the back and in battle
I do wonder if GRRM took inspiration for War of the Five Kings from War of the Roses, in some regards.
It sounds like it, just from how you're describing it.
yeah that was his main inspiration
the War of the Roses is literally the two main power houses in Britain who were all cousins btw, wanting to be top dog and fighting each other to be king
it was a mess and the amount of cousins killing uncles, who slew brothers-in-law, was insane
the family tree of everyone involved is an absolute mess
I've gone over them several times and it still confuses me
most exciting period for students of history, I thought
I'll agree, but damn is it complicated
Blame it all on Warwick
all the Kingmakers fault
despite the fact he didn't live to see the last decade and a half of the war
I don't think any Kingmaker could've foreseen that mess coming.
the Kingmaker believed his own propaganda, before he lost his head
Ah, executed? Seems typical of the time period.
Mind you, when you go back through England's history - it's a fair bit bloody and more than a fair bit messy.
Same can be said for any country, really but some have it far worse than others.
Elizabeth Bathory comes to mind as one of those bloodier times in the world, same with Vlad the Impaler.
Which makes me wonder in Wizarding World lore, would Bathory have been a witch? If I know my history, she was already pretty much denounced as one.
which oh speaking of, someone pointed out a French magical duke who survived the French Revolution (the 1790s one) and that got me thinking, most dukes are related to the royal family of their country, and well if the French magicals kept their nobility, then perhaps this duke could have claimed the French throne, but due to the Statute of Secrecy the muggles don't know about it so the two side split and the magical side still has a monarch whilst the muggle side goes through Napoleon and then 2 more revolutions before becoming the modern republic we know it as.
and maybe
Bathory is a interestingly horrid person even if she didn't kill the 300 people she's purported to have done.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure some magical side of some countries kept their monarchy even when the muggles didn't.
it'd make sense, the magical side is well known to hold on to traditions much more than the muggle side
It'd also make me question if some of Europe's magical side still had their monarchies, why the ever loving hell didn't they help out against Voldemort? Or were they just content to think it's a British matter, even if he would've (and I believe he tried, in some aspects) spreading to Europe eventually. I mean, the man was bent on world domination.
like I bet part of the reason why magical Britain is so united is due to the fact that before the Angles and Saxons and Jutes came to Britain in the 400-500s, the people were known as Britons and spoke Common Brythonic up and down the entire island, they saw themselves as a connected British peoples.
So when in 1707 with the Union of the Crowns, Great Britain was formed, the magical side probably thought the muggles were finally starting to catch up to them.
He definitely spread to Europe, so honestly I never knew why other countries didn't get involved.
Heck the Germans should have been outraged as Moldyshorts attacked Nurmengard Castle where Grindelwald was being held so that he could ask him about the Elder Wand before killing him.
Whilst it is unknown if this resulted in the deaths of the guards, I really wouldn't have been surprised
Yeah, Voldemort wasn't exactly trying to keep a low profile towards the end of the Second Blood War.
At minimum it should have been a political incident, at worst it could have been the start of a war
Yeah, I'm pretty sure he also caused some havoc on the European lands during his first rise in the First Blood War so they'd know his name but likely wouldn't share the same fear the Brits do of him so...
yeah
Perhaps in the background, certain alliances were getting ready to be made and put into action but didn't come to fruition due to Voldemort supposedly dying after trying to off the Potters, with 2 out of the 3 dead.
and surely the French must be like "Okay so there's a nutter going around murdering people just some 20 miles across the channel, even a person who can barely apparate can cover that distance in a single hop, so perhaps we ought to do something about it?"
The French probably wouldn't have gotten involved unless, like you said - their Monarch gave them the go ahead because, I can't see that being approved otherwise.
You know what gets me, so when they were making Fantastic Beasts, they released some background info for the magical US, and ooh boy was it interesting when they said "When MACUSA started, they had 12 Aurors recruited from around the world to start their Auror department, one of them was Abraham Potter who would later settle down and start a family in America"
I always thought perhaps Fleur was posted in the British branch of Gringotts at the behest of the French, in some ways so they've got an ear in the Isles telling them what's going on but I don't think perhaps, she anticipated falling for Bill Weasley so perhaps it became a love vs duty thing or however you'd see that argument going.
and I'm like "There's American Potters? What happened to them? Is that branch of the family still extant or are they gone?"
Not gonna lie, I'd see Voldemort and the Death Eaters wiping out the majority of the Potters, meaning some Death Eaters probably hopped over the pond to USA to try and kill the US Potters because they think the Boy-Who-Lived might've gone to live with magical relatives.
And yeah that's an interesting idea. Especially as with her Veela allure she could get info out of people easily. Then she meets Bill whom her allure has no effect on and she's interested cos he basically just blanks her, so she gets serious and then they are dating and she realises she likes this dude and oh this is gonna cause some issues in her reports back to France.
See now if that's true, then that's another incident with MACUSA, cos a British witch or wizard would have gone over there and tried to murder the US Potters cos the "Boy-Who-Lived" might be living with them.
Nobody ever claimed Death Eaters were smart, y'know?
true
Honestly, Harry going to live across the pond with his magical relatives might've not been the worst idea...although, that probably means he wouldn't be attending Hogwarts because Illvermony would've gotten to him.
Although, that makes me think..with as famous as Harry was, he should've been getting bombed with letters from fans and well wishers etc all the time unless...Dumbledore put up a mail ward meaning if any serious letters needed to get through, like say...if he's world famous as they say - letters of offers from the French school along with Durmstrang and Illvermony should've happened.
I'd think school offers would count as serious matters so that might be illegal mail tampering by Dumbledore and the other schools might think he's snubbed them for Hogwarts.
Oh definitely
It would also have blocked letters from Gringotts that would basically be the monthly or quarterly reports on his accounts (though it is still unknown if Gringotts accounts accrue interest), and potentially missives from the Ministry
It works, he was ancestor to Salazar.
JK Rowling is communicating a great lot of information about her characters and spells through their names (and incantations respectively), and furthermore she often uses to use the Latin and Greek language to do so. So Herpo the Foul in greek is ฮฯฯฯฮฝ ฮฟ ฮฮตฮนฮฝฯฯ/ฮฟ ฮฆฮฑฯฮปฮฟฯ . ฮคhe name Herpo/ฮฯฯฯ doesnt exist in Greek and more than that, it has a verb's form. BUT that changes when sm takes into consideration the fact that Greek names with the suffix -ฯฮฝ/on in Greek, get transfered in English with an -o suffix. So we guaranteed that this Ancient Greek wizard's name in Greek was intended by JK Rowling to be ฮฯฯฯฮฝ/Herpon. The word ฮฯฯฯฮฝ/Herpon is the energetic form of the participle of the verb ฮญฯฯฯ/herpo . ฮคhe verb ฮญฯฯฯ translates in English as slither. The ฮฯฯฯฮฝ/Herpon active participle if analyzed into a secondary sentence in Greek, goes as "ฮฟฯฯฮฟฯ ฯฯ ฮญฯฯฮตฮน/outos os herpee". This in English translates into "he who is slithering"!!!! Now, if you take into consideration that when you pronounce the words ending in -ing you use to cut the g sound we end up with "he who is slitherin' ". The y letter has a deeper longer eee sound so it would be more suitable for this character's name instead of the i letter, and there you have it: Slytherin. Herpo the Foul or his descendants, somewhere between his time before Christ and the 10th century AD that Salazar Slytherin lived, must have moved to the British isles and changed the name into its English version. And before you say that this is far fetched, i remind you that JK Rowling said that the exact same thing happened with the Olivanders who came from Ancient Greece around the 350's BC and just changed their name to Olivanders from the olive trees related Greek name of theirs.
on the other hand it probably also blocked a load of betrothal contracts and the like.
Makes me wonder if Dumbledore forgot about the ward or if it was intentional to keep Harry's knowledge lacking.
I'd say you probably put more effort into figuring that out than Rowling put into writing it.
Though on the note of the Ollivanders, whilst the name meaning "He who owns the olive wand" would mean that they originated from a Mediterranean country, Ollivander himself believes his ancestors came to Britain with the Romans.
Which wouldn't work cos the Romans whilst they first visited Britain around 50BCE, wouldn't come back to Britain for almost 80 years in around 40CE.
So who knows.
Perhaps his family could have been Trojan.
The city of Exeter has an ancient myth about its original kings being descended from Trojans who after their city fell came to Britain, there they built Exeter and rule as kings.
When the city was threatened by giants they went sallied out and slew the king of the giants Gromaggog.
I have that written down somewhere as when I was in college one of my assignments was to create an idea for a game based off of myth.
I knew everyone else was picking the famous stuff, so I searched for a more interesting British myth and found that.
Huh, interesting.
indeed
Though speaking of Ollivanders, we know that the Ollivanders in Hogsmede is run by a cousin branch to the one down in Diagon Alley
This may be why the Ollivanders are in the Pure-Blood Directory as the Hogsmede branch may still be pure-bloods despite Garrick who was born in 1908 and therefore before the directory was published being a half-blood due to his muggle-born mother
I think Garrick end up being one of the last, or perhaps the only Ollivander left by the time of Harry's era. Quite a few things must've happened to shorten a family that that well established into one man running a wand shop in Diagon Alley.
Ehhh with him you never know, but i doubt he would forgot about something like that. More like he went with what he considered to be greater good
See, I never like the Greater Good phrase. Greater Good for who? Yourself or the people? It's a very tricky slope to go down when you start making the 'greater good' as an excuse.
Yeeeep
Agree with you there 100% my feathery friend
Dumbledore was never malicious so i his case i would ascribe it being for the people but still its damgerous
Dumbles could basically be a Vulcan if he wished with the whole "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few"
Yeah, I'd never call Dumbledore malicious. Perhaps, he just sees the bigger picture so much he forgets that it's made up of little pictures and said little pictures have feelings, motivations and ambitions of their own. He's not quite a puppet master nor some grand chessmaster but I think he was so focused on the end-game, he forgot what was like to be going through those things, considering his long life and how much he'd been Headmaster and his other positions for so long probably were taking a bit of a toll on him.
The problem with Dumbles is he believes there is only one path forward, that being Harry needing to die for Moldyshorts to die
so he sets Harry's entire life up so that Harry will willingly walk to that death
which goes pretty much as planned
but so many things could have gone wrong before it ever got to that point that it's a miracle that Dumbles plan actually worked out
Did he never consider that the Goblins could've had a solution too? Especially considering that I'd think they've encountered Horcruxes and their ilk with their cursebreaking sect, and you never know how fond of trying to achieve immortality the wizards/witches of places like Ancient Egypt were and such so...
Probably they could have, but nope he doesn't think that they could
as far as Dumbledore is concerned, he knows best
I think he got to a point where he started believing in his own hype so much he forgot that he's not all seeing nor all knowing.
think how much information he keeps from his own side which later comes back to bite them and gets someone killed
Yeah, Voldemort and his cult were doing just as much killing as Dumbledore's inaction and secrets were.
hell he barely even explains the idea of horcuxes and then sends Harry off to go get them with barely any information on what they could be or where to look
Harry and Hermione get really damned lucky
He let Sirius rot in Azkaban when he knew he was innocent, depriving Harry from a family and tossing him to the cruelty of the Dursleys.
Muh greater good
dumbledore was no better than grindelwald
And basically tells Harry that it can only be Harry, Ron and Hermione who can know about Horcruxes...Think about how much easier it might've been having told a renowned cursebreaker and established wizard who deals with crap similar to Horcruxes for a living and is related to Ron and marrying a pretty French Veela...That ringing a bell yet, fella?
He was definitely malicious
And not only malicious, but utterly incompetent as headmaster too
Dumbles was the one to make that saying, then Grindelwald went on to use it as a rallying cry.
I notice you're not giving credit to Ron there..Mind you, he did walk out on them and basically left them to deal with it on their own. Gods know how many things could've gone wrong (and did go wrong) when it was just those two trying to do it.
Well no because Albus knew Tom to a science. And so long as Tom was going to abide by the prophecy, then Harry would always win because of the laws of Ancient Magic. Had Tom NOT chosen to abide by the prophecy, the whole thing would've fallen apart. Dumbledore even explained this to Harry in HPB because Divination is a branch of magic that only works because the fortunes it tells of are often if not always self-fulfilling. So really, Tom's fault.
So Harry could ran from Britain and come back years later, learned and knowing far more than anybody else but it still would've been down to him and Tom because of Tom's damn self-fulfilling prophecy tendency.
Yes and no.
Sure Tom is a major believer in prophecy but at the same time, Dumbledores actions led to the start of the Second Blood War and open warfare which very easily could have killed Harry before Tom did.
I say "Dumbledores actions" but it's more of his inaction.
I think Dumbledore was banking on the end-game being worth all the inaction and death and counting on Harry fulfilling the prophecy.
And the odds of them being targets to be Imperiused? Or poisoned with Veritaserum? And how many of them would talk him out of it or be prone to any or all the mistakes the Trio would and thus tip off Tom that much earlier? Therein lied the problem. Compartmentalization. Nobody can tip off anybody because not everybody would know what was happening until the moment was right.
Which is further proof that Dumbledore was an utterly depraved, malicious wicked and evil man from the get go.
Snape did the world a service by killing him
What happens in this game?
Chances are it involves ancient magic and Merlin or Morgana/Morgan Le Fay in some way or another.
Along with the Goblin rebellion.
Could have but ultimately didn't because of Ancient Magic. So long as the war itself was specifically connected to Voldemort, then Harry would always be protected by that big ol' plot armor. Tho that didn't necessarily extend to his friends or his possessions
we have some idea of the lead up, of the goblin rebellion and the dark wizards and the like but otherwise we're still scarce on detail
That would be cool! Canโt wait until summer or winter
and that's a very flimsy reasoning as to why Harry didn't catch a stray curse meant for someone else.
Hell he almost dived after Sirius through the Veil of Death
Yeah, Harry never really got majorly injured. It was always his friends and other people. Any injury to him was always dealt by Voldemort.
what would Dumbles have done then if Harry had accidentally offed himself?
I would hate that... Being descended from Merlin or Morgan le Fay. It'd be like if Harry was descended from Gryffindor himself to combat Heir of Slytherin.
Even Harry's friends have plot armour
Is โThe Cursed Childโ Harry Potter Movie in development?
No. Please no. I would hate for that to become a movie.
cursed child is a fanfic
Not that we know of.
Ohโฆthought it was official
Don't insult fan fic like that.
I'm backing this one up.
But the cursed child is pretty good
The stage show has fantastic effects, but the story is lacking despite the really interesting premise
We do not recognize this Cursed Child. Is that on Fanfiction.net or something?
Can we honestly say tho Voldy would pitch a tent and take Bellatrix to pound town tho? ๐
I think Voldemort would sacrifice his reproductive organs if it made him stronger, he probably did because the bloody sociopath would have no use, need or want to have sex or reproduce.
When will the game come out?
haha, lol no.
Come December
Though Bellatrix is likely to use magic to gather his DNA to make a baby with.
Hopefully my peers would get me this game for X-mas, Iโm too lazy and broke to buy it
Yeah, she's that type of crazy.
Though actually cos he is using a homunculus body created via a ritual, the body also has some of Wormtail and Harry's DNA in it.
which is a horrid thought
Damm, she is an maniac
HP Theory holds the belief she whipped him a love potion the night he busted her out of Azkaban she had stashed away. Which would be fitting since he himself was conceived via love potion.
I on the other hand don't buy it and here's why:
While sex CAN be a power move to be used on someone to make them submissive or w/e, the idea that Tom would think to use it as such seems unlikely...
I'd just like to not acknowledge Cursed Child at all. It's in the title 'cursed', it what it is.
If this game flop, Iโm burning my Gryffindor scarf
Nah, it likely won't flop, especially since it's the one Wizarding game we've been waiting for the past 20 some years.
Thatโs why Iโm not that scared of losing my scarf
Egads yeah no horizontal tango happened between them, it was just a spell used to take DNA and then fertilise an egg.
Personally, I don't see it happening really.
That kind of thing seems out of her field of magic tbh. She was more a fighter than an alchemist
I'm just thinking of Cursed Child as a fanfic that somehow got into the wider world by sheer fluke.
Narcissa was intelligent enough but probably wouldn't have. She'd realized that no good would come from it because Bella be crazy and two, Voldemort would likely murder them both if he found out especially given the circumstances of his own birth.
ยฏ_(ใ)_/ยฏ
Whatโs the best death eater in your opinions?
Sorry we've gone well off topic here Professor
I may have to ask you all to point this channel back towards the game now.
We're talking about changing something into the dude's love juice (gosh these censors are insane here) that's definitely alchemy involved. And Narcissa doesn't seem the type and likely wouldn't either cause she had enough sense to see that was horrifying
A dead one.
๐
I let it run for half an hour, I'm not a complete monster.
danke
Sorry Proffeser
honestly I'd thought it'd go back to game era lore when Paul here came in and started asking questions
Ok so on topic here. How much do you think we'd be able to break the Potter lore if we go overly evil? Or even as good guys
I don't think it'd be too much as I'm sure the game will have limits on how far we can go off the deep end
I don't think we'd be breaking Potter lore for two reason. One, we're living an Unwritten tale, and there's a reason it'd be tagged as 'unwritten' and two - something happens that is big but much like in FB, it's probably forgotten by the majority.
We saw in game we can kill people later on. That's gonna be a thing ppl will wanna whip out
so I highly doubt we're going to be able to send the population of Hogsmede to the afterlife in 1890
I don't think the killing curse will be a spell to fire about willy nilly.
game era lore random thought:
Diffindo is a spell which cuts
You can go evil in the game
Game takes place 1890
Gringotts is confirmed so at least some parts of London confirmed
jack the ripper meets 'ary pottah
wow, that's grim
Perhaps for certain circumstances like cutscenes or moments where it's a consequence of your honor/karma.
I'll be everybody here does at least one evil playthrough to see how far it goes
though I'm pretty sure Diffindo doesn't work on living creatures
It does
I'll do two evil playthrtoughs, one slytherin, one huffle
Is the map of the game big?
it's the severing charm, not jinx, hex, or curse.
From the looks of it, yep, really big.
as in it's designed to cut non-living matter
Your pfp is an 11/10
Deathly Hallows they had to cut Ron out of his robes after he splinched but Hermione's hand shook so the spell cut into his exposed flesh
You'd need something a bit more deadly than diffindo to cut someone.
Someone has definitely died in quidditch at Hogwarts
a lot of household charms could be used to cause harm but can't be used on people by their very nature
It cuts but I think it would cut about as much as cutting someone with scissors.
The hand shaking could've changed the spell unintentionally..
so I assume Diffindo is the same, designed to do a variety of cutting tasks around the house/garden, but not on people
That's not really a lore question
1890s and he never time travelled? Yeeeah
Just asking
more of a #๐ฌgeneral one
Aight
๐
So here's a thing, how excited do you think Binns is going to be with another Goblin Rebellion going on?
lol
Ghost's favourite topic is goblins rebelling against oppressive wizards
it can kill people
Does Albus Severus Potter have an child?
He's 16-17 as of 2022. So NO
Considering when we see him he still is a child, not that we know of
Ok
No need to get aggressive at the end Superman
I mean the question is would anyone go to him for more information? We saw how that worked out in Chamber of Secrets
I mean it seems if you actually engage him then he's a good teacher
Does he even know he's dead?
Jack the Ripper ๐
I wonder if his NEWT level classes with the fewer students are actually interesting and useful
Well if we meet Bathilda Bagshot in game at some point she might make a crack about Binns
Is Jack the ripper an official Harry Potter Character?
I mean nothing prevents from him being in a HP universe probl
Would be cool if that happens
He's likely not coming into the game, but lore wise it's possible
Game seems to be set in 1891, the Ripper murders were 1888.
Chances are in wizarding lore he was a wizard and ended up getting caught, by magical forces if he got sloppy which explains why he disappeared and stopped from the muggle side of things.
true
true, getting kissed by a dementor does kind of put a stop to your serial killing ambitions
Either that or he got thrown through the Veil in the Department of Mysteries. I'd imagine that might also be used to execute dangerous wizards and witches.
What time does the game take place?
Thanks
so 101 years before Harry goes to Hogwarts
And 1 year before Dumbledore comes to Hogwarts
Sooo how do you think we are gonna get away with using it at all? Since its alredy ilegal by the time of the game
So we gon meet new characters
2 years as he comes in the 92-93 year, so the player would have to go through the 1891-92 school year first.
Might get a cameo with him and his family at Godric's Hollow if that is a place to be visited.
Fair. Which means if this game only covers 1 year and DLCs only fill in additional mid-quel content taking place during said year, then the sequel is Year 6, with him not finally arriving til the 3rd in a trilogy with us in 7th year
Assuming we get sequels.
Considering that the game has a very minor thing disconnecting from lore, namely quick brooms, and possibly another one ( hog's head inn)
What things would you guys think would be completely okay to be not lore friendly in the game ?
Personally I'd like to see sectumsempra
It might be story expansions, wouldn't be the first time a game has done a full game-length expansion. Looks at Witcher 3's Hearts of Stone and Blood & Wine
Honestly I'd prefer 6th and 7th years to be DLC, and then a new game to be a different school
Hogs Head did exist before Aberforth got it, he just became it's proprietor after the previous one passed.
as for the brooms, well we don't know how fast they are
Certainly won't be Nimbus level or Firebolt level though.
if they can hit 40mph then that's not too far out from what we know was possible at the time
the only problem comes if they go over 50mph
as that was an after 1900 thing
and the consistently 60+ mph stuff doesn't come about until Comet and Cleansweep come about in the 1920s
then the first 100mph broom is the Nimbus 1000 in 1967
Harry's Nimbus 2000 can do 120mph, and his Firebolt can do 150mph
which McGonagall really gave a 120mph broom to an 11 year old who loves doing death defying stunts
If I remember Quidditch Through the Ages correctly, the Shooting Star would be considered a high end broom in the 1800s
Then again, she's a low-key Quidditch nut.
Which gets outstripped by every broom by the time of the 90s
XD
Yeah, I'd think by the time the 1990s rolled around anyone on a Shooting Star was gonna get laughed off the pitch.
I swear, you're a walking Wizarding encyclopaedia @vivid owl
Like, damn - I'm good but you're on another level. xD
when I say I probably know more about HP lore than Rowling, I'm only half joking
Silver Arrow was mentioned as being similiar to a Firebolt by Madam Hooch but adjusted for their time period
70mph with a tailwind
Hm, given how old Madam Hooch is...she probably went to school with the Marauders because she doesn't seem to be quite as old as McGonagall - Silver Arrow might be the Marauder era's equivalent to a Firebolt.
Which is faster than the Oakenshaft
She's definitely older than the Marauders considering she was teaching then
and yep
a good bit faster considering the Silver Arrow seems to be from the early 1920s
though I say that mostly cos it's named after a car from that time
It might have gotten its name from the 1920s cars by Rowling but its place in the timeline is rather vague
also as the maker of it couldn't keep up with demand it was replaced by the first model Cleansweeps in popularity
Possibly a Muggleborn/Half-blood created it then. xD
Because you know, regular wizarding purebloods wouldn't pay attention to muggle cars and care to name a broom after one.
if you'd asked me this stuff some 4 months back, I could have given you all this info without needing the wiki page open to double check
Which makes it an exotic broom. Kind of like how in 2014 they tried to mass produce a knockoff Firebolt called the Thunderbolt but they kept exploding from the sheer velocity and then the Firebolt II came out
Probably tried calling it Thunderbolt inspired by Harry and his status but just couldn't do it because the epicness could not be contained. xD
Heh I was right. Just slightly got the names off LOL
Yikes. I wouldn't wanna be in that Thunderbolt HQ when those angry Nigerian warlocks storm the building.
Considering they know wandless magic!?
You wouldn't even know what curses to watch out for!
You'd just have to duck under a desk and hope for the best, and also hope like hell you don't get spotted.
They're all Animagi too. How many can turn into poisonous insects?
What is up with these guys? How OP are they?
Well apparently they have had fights with British and American wizards since forever over wand use if memory serves me right tho Fuzzpot might already be on the page for it. They also have a very unique way of inviting wizards to their school
Also, do yourself a favour and look up the Moontrimmer broom. What the hell was they thinking sticking sharp opened scissors on the handle end of a broom?!
Answer: One too many drinks at the Hog's Head.
Sounds about right.
Nope got distracted by Harry Potter Magic Awakened cos it has a character with a Firebolt Supreme in 2010-11 despite them not being released until 2014
Was gonna say wait wtf!?
and then looked up the character of Ivy Warrington who apparently has a muggle father despite being a Warrington
Cassius Warrington ins Slytherin like "What?"
though he's long graduated
Can we customize our own wizard/witch?
yes
Is there an official Harry Potter discord server? And if yes, can you invite me?
sorry to say but there isn't
Seems like HL is the only official thing for fans of the Wizarding World, as it is right now.
Dang it, I spent 6 minutes to find it
Are there any unofficial ones?
Hrmmm do you guys think we will be able to select our backgroung and i wonder how it would affect the game, since at the time purebloods were still a very big deal no?
Itโs unlikely weโll be able to choose because itโs such a big part of our story. Theyโd have to completely change how people in the story interact with us and if our family is in the game (even if theyโre just mentioned) theyโd need to change that as well
Hrmm i think its implied that our family may be dead not sure tho
Yeah thatโs the thing tho. Theyโre not gonna make 3 separate backstories for that
Because theyโll have died in a very different way if they were muggles
I hope our choices make the game different from what we currently see
I hope i wont need a friend for my first playthrough
I hope so aswell, but I do wish they do it better than Dying Light 2 did...
I reckon itโs part of the main story that we get a companion no matter what, but I also think itโll be of choice whether or not they fight with us. Some parts of the trailer the player had a companion with them and others they didnโt.
Hm could be but maybe could be they just didnt have friends id rather fight alone
Honestly I just hope that us slythering will be alowed to be tricky and manipulative without being overtly evil XD
@vivid owl why do you think voldemort did not use a time turner to precent the death of his holcruxes ? This is a significant plot gap
I honestly never fully understood how the time turners worked lol.
Its just a time machine
Is it? I dont think you can go into the future?
No, Time Turners only go one way. Backwards.
And Voldemort likely never anticipated anybody finding, destroying or even knowing about them.
He was that kind of arrogant.
Called getting his hands on one. The Department of Mysteries only has 14 time turners in total and they all get stuck in a self-destruction loop at the end of the battle there.
They are ludicrously difficult to get and most people don't even know they exist.
Whilst Tom did get 12 OWLs and then took them all on to NEWT level, he did it without a time turner
heck so did Percy
just to float that Hermione whilst a genius isn't anywhere near as good with time management as Percy and Riddle were
She wanted to do everything and obviously, classes clashed.
Yet Percy did everything. Though I think he took Muggle Studies as self-study as is recommended to Muggle-borns, and then just asked Muggle-borns in his year about the stuff when he could, so he only had 11 actual classes.
Perhaps Riddle did the same but without needing to ask others due to growing up in the orphanage
Gods, I wouldn't be surprised if Hermione getting a time turner was an experiment by the DoM to see how a growing teenager handles it. That sounds like something they'd do without being overt about it being an experiment.
There's honestly so many questions as to how she got one when Ravenclaw students are known to regularly take 10 or 11 subjects at OWL level and then on to NEWT level
heck same with Slytherins
so why are those two houses allowed to work themselves silly like that without a time rewinding machine to let them get extra sleep in?
Wouldn't be surprised if it was for plot convenience and JKR didn't really flesh out that it's possible other students might've gotten one at some point or another. Or, if Hermione was just unique like that.
Because think, if they didn't have the time turner - Buckbeak dies and Sirius doesn't end up escaping from the Dementors and both Harry and Sirius have their soul sucked out down by the lake by the horde of the abominations.
So, it's all very...convenient.
indeed
Rowling never should've introduced them in the first place
You can't really change something that already happened with how the time turner works.
Time travel is so hard to get right that it should never be used ever imo
The third book does it well I'd say. Because it's a closed loop, so everything that happened the first time, is what's going to happen forever. You can't actually 'change' the future/past. This is why Cursed Child just doesn't work
Cursed Child is a fanfiction that somehow got spread into the wider world... I take it with a grain of salt, if at all. Meaning, no - I absolutely don't.
the only good thing about cursed child is Hermione becoming Minister for Magic
Oh please don't mention that atrocity around me.
In my opinion, she was always destined for Minister for Magic or becoming Deputy/Headmistress of Hogwarts, in some capacity or another. She's just too smart not to.
Don't get on at me about it, I was acknowledging it's an atrocity!
We shouldn't even mention such vulgarity... It shouldn't exist!
Who's bright idea was it to put a HP fanfiction into the wider world so much that people are thinking it's actually canon? Eugh..
Wit isn't everything, Riddle was clever aswell, even more than Granger
Riddle didn't have the temperament or desire to go through the 'proper' channels to 'rule' the country. His mad mind decided becoming a Dark Lord was the better option.
He wanted to become a teacher and applied several times
Riddle was clearly not the sharpest tool in the shed
Truly, I do think him splitting his soul fractured his already sociopathic mind into psychopathic end of things.
Granger is not competent for something like MoM
he was persuasive, cunning, charismatic even, but not the most intelligent
I wouldn't trust Riddle around children as a teacher, those are the type of teachers you go 'STRANGER DANGER!' around.
I wish we would've got a smarter villain in hp
He pushed the boundaries of dark magic further than anyone ever have, he discovered more secrets of hogwarts than anyone ever have, best student there was at hogwarts too
As much as I agree Riddle was brilliant (as he was mad) I don't think he was smarter than Hermione.. He would have analysed things better (unless his greed overthrew his wit, but meh)
Not gonna lie, Barty Crouch Jr was pretty damn smart for a HP villain. He acted out Moody to a damn T, for a whole year and Dumbledore likely didn't notice the difference.
I think even Dumbledore says so that Riddle was the most brilliant student
Like riddle just needed some common sense with how he did his horcruxes
He also invented unsupported flight. Everyone for hundreds of years failed before him
all other parts apart from the Dark Arts he has woefully neglected... he was working for a disreputable antiques shop, for crying out loud
I mean, if you have 6 hidden horcruxes and all of them can be found within a year.. are you really that brilliant?
But he wasnt the main villain
And don't come at me with plot-convenience...
He could've hid them better
Eh, Hogwarts has seen many brilliant minds come and go through it's halls. I mean, Lily Potter nee Evans was one of those brilliant minds for example. There's like one in each generation. Riddle must've just been his generation's brilliant mind.
His weakness was that he thought he was smarter than everyone.
That was from pride but. He invented stuff nobody ever could
His weakness was his pride and arrogance.
Unsupported flight is a BIG BIG deal
If you're really that brilliant shouldn't you be able to control that arrogance?
Thats the only smart thing he did
Eh, don't underestimate the arrogance of a prideful person because they might think they control it but they really don't.
which is a lack of overview. If you analyze things properly you wouldnt think you control it..
a true mastermind doesnt assume things
Or they think they do not need to control their arrogance due to being too arrogant to realize its dangers
Honestly, Voldemort failed as a villain in quite a few ways but then again - it wasn't meant to be an adult series where the villian was competent to a scary degree. It was meant to be a kid's series that went onto being a teen's series.
Grindelwald is better than voldemort
which means he isnt smarter than, regardless of the reasoning behind his downfall. You have to take characters as they are written
Well, Dumbledore said he was. He described Riddle as the most brilliant student
of his time, no?
bottom line is, true intelligence lies in the fact that you know what you are exactly, not overestimating it... Couldn't kill a baby and never figured it out why...
I mean..here's a scary thought - imagine if Voldemort was like Petyr Balish/Littlefinger from Game of Thrones...He'd really be wrecking everybody's day and nobody would be able to point it to him until he got overconfident or such.
but he isn't (I also havent watched GoT). He is voldy from HP and thats all he is. We can't assume "what ifs"..
Dumbledore said so so it means he was the best student? No he was just "smart"
He knew it was due to the sacrifice of Lily
he tells his death eaters in GoF
Just because Dumbledore says something doesnt always mean its true
Dumbledore said alot of things.
That's why he also uses Pottah's blood in the ritual to get a new body, so he would not be vulnerable to Pottah's touch
That's another thing
He invented that ritual to get a new body
It was evil yes but it was brilliant
That ritual is not new I think.
I don't think he invented it, tweaked it possibly but that'd be about it.
okay, big whoop, he knew about blood magic... never figured it out though that why Lily's Sacrifice was so powerful though
Bro Voldemort had so many possibilities to kill harry in so many ways yet he decides to waste that time and then get defeated
Because over the long, long long years of wizarding world - I'm sure somebody has tried to come back in a new body.
Hermione was the best in her year only. Percy and Bill did better than her with 12 owls compared to 10 by Hermione. Dumbledore himself said Riddle was the best student ever to set foot on Hogwarts. There have been countless wizards including the auror Dalwish who have been described to have gotten Outstandings in all their NEWTs. The HBP movie only showed 2 out of many memories that showed Riddleโs back story how he already controlled his magic at an age Hermione coulnt even cast them yet. Also even harryโs mother Lily Evans was better than Herminoe at potions. Every single teacher had high expectations for Riddle, even Slughorn said he can be Minister of Magic in 15 years.
@jovial fulcrum
Like he couldve killed harry in GoF but wastes that time to talk to deah eaters
๐
Copy and paste really?
ye
Also, just because you're gifted in your early years of schoolage. Does NOT mean you're going to be witty for the rest of your life.
fine. still doesnt mean hes "intelligent" throughout his whole life
you have to keep developing
Yes, but magic is different. It indicates the power the wizard will have at a later age.
Power and intelligence are separate from one another
I think the books did a better job at presenting Voldemort as smart, than the movies did.
This is why i think ranrok and grindelwald are overall better villains than voldemort
the books did a better job at 95% of the things...
cunning is not smart... Baldrick was cunning from Blackadder....
He was intelligent without a body to invent a temporary body ( GoF) and invent a ritual to make a permanent body while also circumvent the ancient magic shielding Potter via Lily's sacrifice which makes Riddle vulnerable to touch Harry.
he did not invent any of those
Voldemort was an awesome villain. Iconic and remarkable. Everytime he entered the room, all eyes were on him.
I'm not saying hes dumb. I'm just saying he isn't as brilliant as you make him out to be.
I beg to differ
I'd say he was up there with Dumbledore
Well, you are in the minority then.
Ok
and I say Dumbledore washed the floor with him at the Ministry
Lmao for sure
Dumbledore was also the only one he was afraid of, so it makes sense.
Atleast teen riddle managed to do something smarter in CoS
He had the elder wand though.
he did... he was also much older
And Dumbledore had more experience than Riddle, even if Riddle had the power and strength.
another thing that proves voldemort isnt as smart as he thought he was. his misconception regarding the elder wand and its ownership...
They were probably equally powerful, but Dumbledore was more knowledgable.
actually at the point of their duel, Voldemort was more powerful, Dumbledore had experience, knowledge and desire to protect on his side
Why do you think he was more powerful at this point?
Because he was able to fight against the wielder of the elder wand? That sounds logical.
Tuck is rereading the books I'm assuming?
Neither did Dumbledore though if I remember correctly, he did plan for the wand to go to Snape by making Snape kill him. Harry is the one that pointed out to him that it didn't really go as planned, when they have their talk at the end of book 7.
chamber of secrets, finished the whole of philosophers stone today
will continue till the end
Voldemort was more virile in body and mind, he was controlling Harry's dreams for months at this point and his enraged outbursts were elementally powerful
he planned it to be snape. but that didnt happen, which means he understood how it worked but it didnt work as planned which is something entirely different
nevermind, Dumbledore was aware he lost his wand to draco (I think?)
yes
and Draco lost it to Harry at the Malfoy Manor
still he couldn't break character there due to other deatheaters being there. doesnt mean he wasnt aware (I dont remember this very vividly tho)
all the while the Wand was in Voldemort's possession, with Ollivander to explain the theory of it
Either way his plan was flawed, if it had gone to Snape, Voldemort would have gotten it.
thats true
maybe, though Snape never intended to use the Elder Wand as that would have given the game away too soon
And if that plan worked.... Then he would've caused Riddle to master the elder wand. As Riddle killed Snape.
but I'm positive that Dumby was aware of that probability of that happening
He let Sirius rot in Azkaban, I'm sure he had no problems with not only intending Potter to die but Snape aswell
Well he didn't know Sirius was innocent
he did, he only didn't do anything about it because then Harry would've lived with Sirius, and that would've meant that he was no longer under the protection which he had due to Petunia having Lily's blood
muh greater good
He didn't
ye
but I don't remember reading / seeing anything
Dumbledore went to Azkaban to read Gaunt's mind, but he didn't bother to do the same with Sirius
"theory", it's not true
makes no sense, they were comrades
its c ommon sense
It's not canon, doesn't matter how much sense it makes
Dumbledore is not perfect, and they mabe didnt allow him to. There are many possibilities.
"surely Dumbledore, one of the wisest wizards of all time- and a legilimency master, could have figured out Siriusโs innocence. Unless of course..He didnโt want to. In this video, Iโm going to be exploring the possibility that Dumbledore knew of Siriusโs innocence all along, but allowed Sirius to rot in prison."
its theory. not canon. just because it makes sense or is "common sense" doesnt mean its true
and cursed child is, whats your argument ?
cursed child is a joke we dont talk about here
Besides, Dumbledore believed as everyone else, that Sirius was the secret-keeper. He would have no reason to go read his mind. On top of that multiple eye witnesses. Idk, makes sense to me that he didn't.
Also, Dumbledore tells Harry that he belives them that Sirius is innocent in PoA, yet does nothing even afterwards. And mind you, he could've done something even during the GoF before the graveyard incident. This just solidifies the theory
those 2 statements can be seen as entirely seperate
just because he believes Sirius is innocent AFTER certain events; doesnt mean he knew BEFORE said events
Does nothing? He tells Harry and Hermione how to save him. He can't do much else, as he explains himself in the book.
he just mentioned hes only at the Chamber of secrets, give him some time ;p
Read the books mate
He can't do much else. Such lies, just like what he seeing in the mirror is a pair of socks...
He cleared Snape easily who was a death eater, but cannot clear an innocent man ? Please
