#lore
1 messages ยท Page 20 of 1
I picture him an Eeyore type of character, to be honest
not evil or supremacist but eternally lazy ๐
lmao. we could be providing him crucial information about something that could endanger the school and he'd be like, "whatever."
the opposite of dumbledore.
cushy job on account of family connections ๐
pretty much an anti-Dippet, anti-Dumbledore era that would somewhat explain the marked difference after Headmaster Black
"so YOU'RE the reason i have to fill out all this paperwork to catch you up on FOUR years of schooling??"
I don't think he's lazy, more just eternally grumpy about having to deal with annoying kids.
do remember he was a teacher for apparently some 20-30 years before becoming headmaster
and was known to be a grumpy person most his life
Id love that for us.
Unlike dumbledore with his reassuring nonsense, just straight up "idgf"
heheh yeah. XD
it'd be even worse if the player is actually muggle born 'cause then he'd be twice less likely to tolerate us.
Thats what i aspire to be
that I do not find feasible on account of our ancient magic
Maybe mc is... Goblinborn
dragonborn or nothing ๐ก
i mean... ancient magic sure does resemble dragon shouts. ๐
I do want to find out more for the other schools, they sound so fascinating especially Uagarou and the Chinese School of magic with their robes colour change ๐
don't know of a Chinese school, there is a Japanese in the Far East, Uagadou is the African one, they produced very powerful wizards
My bad, the Japanese one then ๐
And yeah, Uagadou did create the most powerful wizards and witches I believe ๐ They are the only school that can use wandless magic
also not true, the wand was a European invention, other continents, including Native American and Asian, beside the Africans used wandless magic, accidently any magical being can use wandless magic
I meant school wise. It is the only school that actually teaches wandless magic, putting aside all homeschooling
again, the Japanese school uses and teaches wandless magic, Ilvermorny is founded by European immigrants to the Americas and we know nothing of the Brazilian school, but it seems to practice a dance like rite for calling on magical powers
I don't think that it is mentioned anywhere that the Japanese school is teaching wandless magic.
it is deductible as the first time they've seen a wand when the adventurous Hogwarts students, whom were trying to fly around the world on their brooms, were blown off course and ended up in a dire situation when Japanese wizards from their school came and rescued them. After nursing the European wizards back to health, as a thank you they thought them Quidditch which they came to regret greatly in the years to follow as the Japanese were practicing in the biggest of hails, as opposed to the European practice ๐
i wonder how the wand politics works if those who studied at uagadou were predominantly wandless-- it just shows how arbitrary the decision was to forbid elves and goblins from accessing wands. sure, humans can perform wandless magic but by banning wands from others is merely built on the ministry's desire to maintain superiority and status quo.
that was hardly unique to Britain, it was all over Europe, and we know from Queenie, that they would simply obliterate Jacob just because his a muggle, who knows about magic...
(forgive me as i am not familiar with fantastic beasts) my point still stands, the wand regulations and hierarchy of beings is arbitrary as heck.
yes that is true, in line with European colonization ideology
๐
this is getting a little too meta.
makes me wish these systemic issues were dealt within the books.
oh but why should they be dealt with? history is what it was, we should learn from the examples, not forbade them
that is fair, but it is a little frustrating for me knowing even in the 2000s these issues have not been addressed with any formal abolishment.
i hope that quirky charms professor is the slytherin head!
also, what is "Dnc"? :0
I'm sure she's head Hufflepufff
Cuz they always seem to connect herbology with hufflepuff for some reason
Ik
Do not care
ah, fair. i do not really care what house sheโll be either but a ravenclaw could be fun then the usual stereotypical hufflepuff!
hard work
Herbology Prof is the era's heartthrob, nuff said ๐
Id laugh if shes a slytherin
Slytherin symbols on the cloak of the charms prof says otherwise
I just want her in RavenClaw because she ho-
A great teacher
i understand that reasoning but i find myself partial to hufflepuffs in that regard. ๐
i may be biased because my partner is one
Likely due to how earthy our common room is said to be.
Though it's likely due to Sprout being the head at the time, it's the only description people really have of it so it's all they can go off of.
Personally, I'd rather not have the Herbology teacher as the head of Hufflepuff. I want somebody who stands out more and doesn't give off the classic Hufflepuff vibes. Somebody like the Potions professor as head of Hufflepuff would be pretty cool.
I think it'd be interesting to see the herbology teacher who seems super nice to be the head of Slytherin, just cos imagine if that was the case, it'd be a major change in how people would potentially see Slytherin
Understandable
i totally get what you mean! that is why i got my fingers crossed for the charming charms professor. ;3
Exactly.
You guys can take the Herbology Prof, and we can take the Potions prof (Who I assume would more fit the classic Slytherin house vibes.)
It'd be cool to see the personalities changed up, but also the class that the heads of the houses teach.
The likelyhood that every herbology teacher is a hufflepuff, or potions teacher a slytherin seems very slim to me.
Also cos Slytherin has so far had 2 heads of house who are potions professors, can we not have a 3rd one please
Honestly though I'd just like to see variation
Potions professor??? Nah I cannot see that. Maybe the one professor that is seen in the great hall scene.
He could have a gruff outer shell but actually is a huge softie. Never know.
Trueee we can only figure it out end december!
Would be funny if hes hufflepuff hahaha.
my money is on the charms professor
same, he had snakes on his robe in the trailer
His attitude seemed pretty slytherin-esque as well. Not in a cunning, devious, evil way like we're used to, but more with a focus on confidence and ambition. He seems like he wants his students to be ambitious enough to reach their full potential which would make him an ideal head for slytherin house.
You got all that from him walking into the room, throwing up his hands, and saying welcome to charms?
Just my first impressions of him lol, I could be completely wrong
Maybe, I guess we'll find out when the game releases lol
So freaking hyped xD
Same, haven't been this hyped for a game in a long time
"In some pureblood families, such as the Blacks, the house-elves would be beheaded when they were too old to carry tea trays. This practice was invented by Elladora Black." charming people...
i wonder how long house elves live for
based on Kreacher, probably a couple generations of humans
human generations range from 20-25 years or so last i researched.
okay, you got me there, lifespans I meant to write
yeah that makes sense. probably a few centuries
Sirius Black II was born 1877, which makes him 13 years old in 1890, and a 3rd year at Hogwarts from the 1st September onwards.
this Sirius is Harry's Godfather's great-great-grandfather, the son of Phineas Nigellus Black and Ursula Flint
the famous potioneer Sacharissa Tugwood was born in 1874, which makes her 16 years old at the start of the game and she either will be a 5th year with us or a year above us, she had her own chocolate frog card, she was the first person to use magical beauty potions, many she developed herself
Going to be lots of interesting people at Hogwarts for us to meet
my hope exactly
True.
Also, plenty of interesting folks outside Hogwarts too. Victor Rookwood, anyone?
I'm doing a wee light reading on squibs
I'm imaging that in Hermione's voice and seeing a massive pile of books and Ron going "You call that 'light'?" xD
no mention in any shape or form that it is remotely possible for them to learn magic as evidenced by the futile attempts by Argus Filch
yeah, pretty much what it means ๐
Yet it seems some squibs can make potions, which requires magic in a different way
That could possibly be closer to Wiccan-esque potions than Wizarding World, from what I think of it.
there's the whole thing that the ladle acts like a focus, guiding a persons magic into the potion, so obviously there is a level of squib that can do that but yet still can't draw up enough concentrated magic to cast a spell
they can use magical objects too, and can form familiar like relations with animals
perhaps Filch is one of those and why he tries with the Kwik-spell course is cos he can infuse a potion with magic but yet can't seemingly get a lumos to work
And can also see magical creatures, like Dementors.
yeah
so squibs do have some level of magic, there is just some problem with getting the magic out
yet for some reason potion making works for some
That'd explain why people thought Neville was just a step above squibs when he started out, turns out - he had an incompatible wand.
considering that Arabella Figg is keeping a menagerie of half kneazel, half cats.. ๐
She's still a crazy cat lady, if there ever was one. xD
it's rather unexplained and I'm not sure it's something that would ever be fully explained, but squibs at least have more magic than a muggle
it was said explicitly that it is the magic in their blood, that is present that makes them different from muggles
It's like a full glass to a glass half-full kind of thing, if I had compare it. Half-full being squibs and full being wizards and witches.
also, there is a paradox, muggle-born wizards are most likely descended from squibs yet not a single squib we know who had a child
Or glass half-empty, depending how you see 'half-full/half-empty' thing.
Possibly it skips a few generations until it reintroduces.
oh ๐
I was trying to say about how I don't thing "muggle-borns" are descended from squibs generally (some may be) in that if so it'd make magicals there own branch of humanity like Neanderthals.
They'd be able to intermingle with normal humans but would otherwise have different genes and potentially even skeletal structure
whereas I like to believe that muggle-borns are generally new magic appearing in people randomly
that way it's not always a bloodline thing
yeah, I'm with you on that, let's say that the concentration of magic in the blood can be accumulated by successive generations creating a new witch or wizard, sounds better then the 'Santa Sangue' ideology
although now that I see it in writing, it dangerously edging close to the midichlorians ๐
if we are making star wars analogies, when it comes to magic i believe in the โit exists everywhere and anyone can tap into it if they open themselves to itโ theory.
I'd assume you mean like say they are exposed via an outside source (be it a magical living nearby, or some natural magic) and that said magic seeps into them, collecting into a magical core, in them it'll never be strong enough to be recognised even as a squib, but if their children experience similar levels of surrounding magic then they'd be changed by it as well
which I'd say is more of a radiation analogy
lol
magic is just radiation and all magicals are mutants
they've mutated to be able to harness the radiation that they are constantly exposed to
actually that's not the worst idea
okay, now it is another professor, with name of X that comes to mind ๐
I'd more look at life within the Chernobyl exclusion zone and how it has been effected by the long term effects of radiation there.
Hahah.
Like we don't really know a lot cos there aren't that many studies (staying in the zone for more than 2 weeks at a time isn't recommended as was found out by a load of Russians recently), but the animals there might be slowly adapating to deal with it over successive generations
but yes, essentially I mean that the magic that affects a living being can send all of its worth down to the offspring and so it goes
and say magicals are like that, over generations of exposure to magical sources, they adapted to deal with it and even harness it
magic does not dissipates, merely the ability to harness it
So, we can probably expect to see some Fallout-esque adapted animals in the that zone then? No? Wishful thinking.
yeah either via consistently having a family marry outside of other magicals, or via severe levels of inbreeding to the point where the children may lose the needed gene to use magic.
honestly conjecture, but still interesting idea
and there are the unfortunate instances like Arianna Dumbledore, where the magic becomes overwhelming and uncontrollable, like a thunderstorm
Alas no, they just have shorter lifespans currently and are more likely to get cancer, but we'll see in a hundred years.
Yeah, Obscurials are the poor sods who's body and mind can't handle the magic within them so it seeks to lash out and escape, from what I understand of them.
yes, that is correct
Just imagine one morning, a guy is going for a walk and comes across an undiscovered two-headed deer. Did I just step into bizzaro world? xD
severe levels of inbreeding, essentially the magicals are the Habsburg of Spain...
I was thinking about them
I mean luckily there aren't consistent levels of marrying 2nd cousins or even aunts and uncles, so it's not too bad, but it was bordering on getting there
Yeah, Black family slowly bordering the Gaunt family on levels of insanity.
reminds me of my CK2 campaign where I managed to spread my family over most of northern Europe and could happily marry my own 7th cousin who had the same surname as me. lol.
as evidenced by Bellatrix Lastrange and Andromeda Tonks
Talk about "keeping it in the family"
one of my favourite breeding game
I usually run out of duchies to award to my cousins ๐
I always did think the Black family motto was twisted over time. It could've meant 'Always Pure' in magic rather than blood then they fell into blood purity and the motto changed.
mind you, 4th cousins share about 2-5% of their DNA, and 5th cousins less than 1% of their DNA, so it's only out to 3rd cousins that you seriously need to avoid
could have meant "Always Pure" in beliefs or in actions, or in never using dark magic or in only using dark magic, or in a variety of ways
Also true.
or it could be just a twisted Sangueist ideology from the beginning, hard to say, really
btw, I call it Sangueist form now on, pureblooded supremacist is just too long to type ๐
That actually sounds better, to be honest.
Also sounds like a vampiric branch of magic, haha.
certainly better than "Magichorism"
being a smash together of "magic" "ichor" and "ism"
ichor means blood
so magical blood-ism
yes, I understand it, it's just so... I don't know, almost German ๐
it does
but Rowling wrote a lot of notes on bloodlines and blood related things, think about Lily's protection on Harry, blood magic / ancient magic
Dumbledore's sacrifice to be let in to the cave of the inferi, also blood
We'll put it to a poll
Do you believe Pureblood Supremacy should be retitled as either:
1๏ธโฃ Sangueist
2๏ธโฃ Magichorism
lol
and yeah a lot of European works have bloodline stuffs in them
Blood magic, I'd imagine is quite esoteric and important. It's just unfortunately, Tom Riddle/Voldemort didn't quite understand that, broken as he was both in sense of self and mentally.
1๏ธโฃ for me, it's the shorter word ๐
I think what Lily did was something pulled out of an old old Potter or even Peverell notebook.
utterly reactionary, maybe not even conscious, although Slughorn called her a singularly talented witch
Family Magics stuff, which whilst I'm not one to follow the idea of family magics being sentient magic within a family, I do believe it's basically a load of spells and potions that family members have made over the years and then never told anyone outside the family.
So my thought is they knew Moldyshorts was coming for them, so James said "Lily, you're a genius, he's access to the Potter archives, we've got 700 years of Potter family secret magic here, plus some stuff from the Peverell family, have at it and see what protections you can come up with for Harry"
So she did and voila we have Harry surviving the killing curse
Possibly. Could also be why, personally - I think Dumbedore tampering with it might've backfired on Harry in a way, negatively affecting the Dursleys. I mean, I'm pretty sure he's never really called them his family, nor called Privet Drive his home and so wouldn't that basically mean the supposed blood wards or protection was flimsy and weak? At least that's one theory for it.
yeah, now that is where I question Dumbledore's judgement, he asks for the cloak as he doesn't trust James to stay put, but if he is in hiding, wouldn't he been safer fully armed and cloaked?
Well, we know wizards can get a bit...off the older they get. Dumbedore, being older than most might have some slight malfunction.
Agreed, the blood wards that would have probably protected Harry his entire life were instead altered by Dumbles and bound to the Dursley's house until Harry's majority meaning when he turns 17 they crumble, though they were already weakened by Harry not calling the place home.
I prime example of the road to Hell is paved with good intentions
Dumbledore in a nutshell.
But yeah, it might have had a massively negative influence on the Dursleys due to two reasons a) not being actually related to the Potters for the family magic to kick in, regardless of Lily's blood and b) not being magical.
The fact that the man still uses the phrase "For the greater good," some 50 years after his defeat of Grindelwald, the man who used said phrase as a slogan for the murder and enslavement of muggles, yeah it's not great
sure Dumbles created the phrase, but Grindelwald is the one it's known for
One could argue Dumbledore was stuck living in the past, because he couldn't let go of things and was trying to make up for it only to make things worse...or if you're determined to see the worst in him, he's a dark lord in light disguise.
The thing is he sees only his way forward
so even if a better alternative appears, he wont take it because it doesn't match his view
That'd be the arrogance that comes with living a long life, holding his positions and believing his own reputation over time.
I think even before he got those positions he had that arrogance
also the arrogance of being smarter than everyone else in the room ๐
It was revealed that after his mother died and he had to look after the family, he found it infuriating because he thought they were stopping him from doing all the amazing things he thought he could do
True, you could argue Hermione has a similar arrogance to her due to just how damn intelligent she is. I think that's just a somewhat natural thing for incredibly intelligent people..
I think he had the Elder Wand a little too long, started to see challenges where none existed
I agree and disagree in that Hermione gets a lot of her bossiness from not having had friends, especially those who'd push back against her need to know it all and her controlling nature.
Possibly the wand affecting him too. I mean, for cryin' out loud - it might as well be a cursed wand, soaked in the blood of it's victims and wielders and has a subtle, insidious effect on those who wield it for too long.
it comes off as arrogance because inferior people lack your confidence
Also true.
Harry and Ron aren't actually any help for Hermione in that case as they just accept her control and will happily say she's smarter than them even when they can do things she cannot. Ron with his strategists mind, and Harry being an excellent teacher.
I think she slowly grows and matures from that as the series goes on, but yeah. I can see it.
The fact that she mellows out so much is mostly due to self assuredness for her, she knows she's good enough
I still don't think she'd be a good match for Ron though, gods I can't get over that pairing or the Harry/Ginny one. It just feels all kinds of wrong, to me.
I think she mellows out because JK knew that a too smart a girl is not attractive and Won Won needed a serious relationship ๐
okay, so how about relationships, what do we know about that in the wizarding world?
I don't mind the Ron/Hermione relationship because they are comfortable in their roles. Ron isn't ever jealous or upset at Hermione for being smarter than him, he just accepts it and does what he does.
relationships in the magical world?
well most seem to work like normal
Hey! I disagree with that. Being intelligent and too damn smart can be attractive, it just requires certain types of people to be interested in it. Certainly, wouldn't be Won Won with how often those two argued like cats and dogs over just about everything. That didn't scream sexual tension to me, that just screamed clashing personalities and butting heads as people are won't to do. Gods, the home life would be murder and Ron would be sleeping on the couch more often than not. Jeez.
except that there is a history of abuse and misuse of potions and mind control in the name of love ๐
though, here come the Blacks again to throw a spanner in the works with the fact that Andromeda was originally meant to marry Lucius, as in a marriage contract, a betrothal, but she rank off with Ted Tonks and Narcissa had to instead.
Ahem Molly, anybody? I'm pretty sure she low-key confessed to that in PoA and it did give the girls a giggle...
wow, that was written in one breath, right? ๐ I get it, but I think that JK thought that most of her audience needed a more positive personality
Oh and we have the extra info of Dorea Black was meant to marry some minor French noble, but instead fell in love with Charlus Potter and ran off to marry him, though didn't get disowned for it.
Yeah Molly did admit to giving Arthur a minor love potion to get him to notice her. But only once.
Though still not good
Probably because he was a Potter, and a Pureblood at that.
then there's the whole Merope/Tom Riddle Sr. thing. That poor man literally had no say in the matter at all. No wonder he ran the moment she stopped dosing him.
Not gonna lie, I'd get the impression Andromeda would've murdered Lucius inside of a month if they'd gotten married. She is one of the scarier Blacks, apparently.
Yeah. I think he is meant to be the younger brother of Henry Potter (Harry's great-grandfather) though it isn't confirmed. But he's close to Fleamont in age only we know that Fleamont was an only child.
do you think we will see any of the lestrange family in the game?
Probably, but that wouldn't have been any great loss.
Potentially, we could see Leta's parents, or uncles, or whatever.
well, I can tell you I'm happy I'm not a spotty teenager with love angst in the wizarding world surrounded by my peers ๐
They're not that big of a name, only reason they got a big name in the series was because of select few. And I think they're a foreign origin family, much like the Malfoy's.
although not cos Leta's father was the French Lestrange and not the British ones. Which makes it weird she went to Hogwarts but eh.
She was sent to Britain if I'm not mistaking, so
Bellatrix Lestrange nee Black didn't help matters, in that regard. She probably sunk all good credibility that family had down into the gutter with how mad she was.
not any weirder then the Gryffindor girl we will get
Yeah, she's obvious of Indian origin. Much like the Patil twins of Harry's time.
I thought the thing with the boat was meant to be to America in truth. During WW1, but actually cos it sinks it could be the Lusitania in 1915 which was torpedoed by a German U-boat.
Although, speaking of Bellatrix - was she crazy to begin with or did her dive into dark magic and/or something specific set her off to be that crazy? Because looking at Narcissa and Andromeda, the sisters were supposedly a tight knit bunch until they fractured so where does her crazy come from? You can argue all Blacks are a bit mad but then again, Narcissa didn't seem to really have the Black Madness and most of Sirius' madness was from being in Azkaban for twelve years so...
Natsai Onai is a West Indies or Golden Coast (maybe Yoruba, but I'm not an expert) name of African origin
Huh, I was under the impression the accent was Indian but then again, I'm not that familiar with accents to say nor with foreign names.
Bellatrix was in Azkaban a few years longer than Sirius
thats what i thought too
Yeah but she was already missing a few marble before then. She was as loopy as a fruitcake by the time she attacked the Longbottoms
Also true, but she was also supposedly crazy before Azkaban and I don't know about you, but people don't just suddenly go crazy. There's usually a trigger event, or something for it...Oof, just thought - what if the family fracturing from Andromeda running away with Ted Tonks was the event. Especially with how reportedly tight knit the three girls were.
and Azkaban didn't help
Wait, you're right! She was sent to America... Though there's no info on how she got to Britain
Could have been the start.
Huh, so then was the ship sinking meant to be the Titanic?
Also why was she on a ship?
I'd say so, I think it might've been around that time.
She's a classy type with taste for the long voyage? Perhaps.
father was a... I can't say it because of the bot, but you get the gist
Her father, then
maybe it's cos of kid brother and that babies can't be sent through the floo or by portkey without being harmed by all the spinning
Yeah, floo and portkeys don't sound healthy for young kids or babies.
which is perhaps why Lily didn't apparate away with Harry (as it's unkown if the cottage had anti-apparition wards)
Oh, that does make sense!
as I was implying, father was the parent of the year from 1880 to 1945 straight
so many wizarding parents going for that "Parent of the year" contest
Walburga edging out ahead with what she did to Sirius
did you just found another plot hole? ๐ฎ
It probably did because Voldemort didn't apparate to the front door, he had to walk it a distance so..the wards must've been extensive if he didn't want to risk it, and also that'd have probably alerted them.
It would make sense for them to have all types of protective spells and wards, since the whole point of that was to make them so hidden only like two people knew where they were
Potentially, but as revealed with Hogwarts, the person in control of the wards can set exceptions specifically for themselves, such as the headmaster being the only person capable of apparating on Hogwarts grounds (until the apparition lessons at which point the Great Hall is excluded from that ward to allow a safe practice space)
Question - who set the Fidelius charm on the Potter's house? Was it ever mentioned? Because I'm under the impression that the secret keeper, the caster and the people living within the household would need to be gathered together to pull the spell off, as it's a notoriously obscure and difficult charm.
So as the controllers of the wards, wouldn't Lily and James have been able to set exceptions for themselves?
I think it had to be Wormtail, and his betrayal was perfect
and yeah the Fidelius is sometimes unclear on how its cast, whether it needs a separate caster who assigns the knowledge into a person
its just simply an unknown as we've never seen it done
I..I doubt Wormtail could've cast the spell, he doesn't seem to be powerful enough to cast that charm. Lily, possibly - she was supposedly a budding Charms Master/Mistress.
Dumbles apparently cast one over 12 Grimmauld Place
but it's not said how
also what happens to people who already knew the information before the charm is cast
I doubt they just forget
Also, in before the fan theory of 'Dumbledore cast the spell - knew the secret keeper was Wormtail - still let Sirius be imprisoned withour trail! HE'S AN EVIL OVERLORD IN DISGUISE!' bandwagon comes out to play.
Fidelius charm is explained as an extremely old spell, one of the most ancient of all, this bodes well for us, I should think
Correction - crackpot fan theory. Ahem.
I've seen some bring it up that Bathilda Bagshot may have known the Potters whilst they lived in Godrics Hollow (which btw, I think that cottage is meant to be Dumbledores old one from when they moved there from Mould-on-the-Wold) and had potentially even looked after Harry whilst they were fighting Moldyshort's forces.
Yet what would have happened when the fidellius was cast? would there just be a block in her mind creating an empty patch when she tries to think about what she was doing on those days?
they hint as much when Hermione and Harry goes there to visit Nagini ๐
yeah
It'd make sense, if you want to really go with Dumbledore looking to Harry as the grandson he never had and vice versa. He could've given them the place to stay, checked on 'em from time to time and looked after little Harry now and then. Especially with how invested he was to either stop the prophecy from coming to pass while Harry was that young or to manipulate events because..y'know, that's kind of his thing, to a degree...I wrote all that and then realized you were talking about Bathilda Bagshot..dammit.. xD
my understanding is, as with Grimmauld Place, where the Order of the Phoenix knew where it was, others simply could not find it, and the people who knew were shielded by the Secret-Keeper
"Dumbledoreโs Secret-Keeper for the Order, you know โ nobody can find headquarters unless he tells them personally where it is โ that note Moody showed you last night, that was from Dumbledore."
โ The Order casted the Filelius Charm on 12 Grimmauld Place
This is more believeable than it'd first seem.
Dumbles thinks Harry is a Horcrux but if he isn't then raising someone who'd die in the attempt to fight Riddle is good cos it allows Dumbles to swoop in and finish him off and claim the credit.
But Sirius is a threat to that. He'd care for Harry and Harry wouldn't be too willing to walk to his death if he had a loving home to go back to.
Think about it, Dumbledore is the most politically powerful person in the Wizarding World. He's Chief Warlock of the Wizengamot and so can call for trials. He's the Supreme Mugwump of the International Confederation of Wizards, and so can call for international trials.
Yet despite this after he has evidence of Sirius being innocent in his hands, he does nothing. Making Sirius spend more time on the run and less time able to be with Harry.
Also note the Longbottoms didn't go into hiding under fidellius, only the Potters did
if you're Moldyshorts, what would seem like it's more important, the defended thing or the hidden and defended thing?
obviously the latter, so he goes for the Potters
Or the Longbottoms didn't trust Dumbledore and just hid under their family wards and such, only to either be set upon from within by someone pointing the crazy Death Eaters at them or they were under a Fidelius and once it got taken down, then they were attacked.
when Albus Dumbledore (primary Keeper) was killed, the members of the Order of the Phoenix automatically became Secret-Keepers for the HQ - another exert from the fidelius charm wiki
I think we can safely say that Dumbledore was trusted by the Order of Phoenix, implicitly so, but that doesn't mean he was infallible or that Voldemort was not a powerful and cunning foe
And with the Potters it's easier to control what happens to the child as well, the Longbottoms had plenty of other family that'd argue to keep the child and would put up a fight that Dumbles would have to deal with.
But with Harry, well it's just Sirius and Remus and both are prone to emotional outbursts in different ways, Sirius to anger and Remus to sadness and grief. Both could be blinded by their emotions for long enough to whisk Harry away, as did happen.
On the Order trusting Dumbles, they kind of had to, he was their leader considering her founded the organisation.
True, for however absolutely broken and nutters Voldemort was in mind, body, soul and spirit - he was still powerful, cunning and downright vicious.
as for Sirius, Dumbledore was removed from the Wizengamot with Fudge as minister, due to the latter's jealousy, and that degraded Dumbledore's ability to save anyone
Fuzzpot, you might be onto something and that's a little terrifying
Dumbledore wasn't removed until after the Harry's 5th year
Dumbedore might not be an evil overlord but he's for damn sure a chessmaster and puppet master, pulling strings.
meaning that's 2 years he could have done something for Sirius
that's ignoring that Sirius never got a trial originally
surely Dumbles should have found that odd considering he sat for every other trial
not so, Barty Snr sent loads of suspected Death Eaters to Azkaban during the first war
without trial
Yup. Personal rights went right out the window during the war.
How many excuses and reasons and platitudes did he say over the books when Harry asked for the truth? Only for it to be properly dumped onto him once Sirius was well and truly dead, after a traumatic night of fighting off Death Eaters, injuries and seeing his Godfather die? That's..some next level crap.
In fact, I don't think the Wizarding World has a concept of rights. In 2nd Year, Hagrid was sent to Azkaban without a trial as well, for the sake of allowing the MInistry to look like they were doing something about the basilisk attacks.
if bleeding Bellatrix and the like got a trial and they were caught in the act of torturing the Longbottoms, why wasn't Sirius given a trial for being caught at the sight of Pettigrew blowing up the street?
The Ministry isn't exactly a paragon of virtue, nor is it correct by any means. Looking at that damned ugly golden statue in the Ministry's atrium.
Most likely the money of the family protecting the individuals. Sirius was an outcast. He only became the last Black while in prison.
Heck if Karkaroff was allowed to call for a second trial from within Azkaban to provide evidence against his fellow deatheaters, then why did no one listen to Sirius's attempts to ask for one?
so many questions
I like the theory that Lavender Brown kept slipping Ron love potion, and the times heโs not infatuated with her are the times she couldnโt give him any. Itโs 0% true, but itโs fun to dream
Yeah, Barty Crouch Snr really did cut corners there, sending possibly innocent individuals to prison to suffer under the Dementors rather than actually find the truth. The bloody fool.
what I find worrying is this self mutilation tendency of Wormtail, a finger first, then the hand...
but yeah Magical Britain has a major problems with rights and the like
Rats can live without their tails
oh wow I just realised something horrid, they wouldn't be signatory to the abolition laws.
ooh boy, that's not fun
Magical Britain is certainly a cesspit of all things wrong, from certain points of view. But let's be honest, it could also be something in the water because I'm pretty damn sure they also had a large, stupidly large almost, amount of dark wizards and witches throughout history than any other community and country.
luckily William Wilberforce did that in 1700s so job done on that front
They were cutting corners in the 6th year as well, arresting people as suspected death eaters constantly. From Stan Shunpike the Knight Bus conductor to dozens of others. The ministry was always more concerned with looking like they were doing something than they ever were with actually doing anything.
1800s, 1807 was the first act, 1831 being the major banning the owning altogether. It's not that long unfortunately.
To be fair, the same thing happens in our world with governments๐คท๐ผโโ๏ธ
Though it was in the 1770s that a judge found that whilst owning was allowed outside Britain, within Britain they had to be free and paid servants. This due to an escaped person running to the police and actually getting help instead of simply returned.
J.K. Rowling, before Twitter, was definitely a solid source for informing children and young adults what to expect. From Hermione finding out from Rita Skeeter that newspapers exist to sell copies, not necessarily to tell you the truth, to the governments being inefficient and not interested in getting the actual important work done.
The Ministry being so ineffective is apparently meant to be an allegory on the War on Terror and the security policies that did very little to actually provide security but theatre.
Much like Gotham, in the Batman comics and other media - there's almost definitely something in the air or the water in Gotham. Possibly cursed land, too. Gods know Gotham had so many things wrong with it, so the comparison is kinda apt for Wizarding Britain. Wouldn't put it past a dark wizard or witch, like Morgana Le Fay for example to curse, befoul or otherwise influence the sphere of magical alignment/influence. It kinda makes sense, in a twisted way.
But that's where we start to edge very much towards real world politics so back to the Wizarding World we go
Such a curse wouldn't be out of the ordinary. Defense Against the Dark Arts was a cursed job position.
true
it's never said if the curse lasts even after Moldyshort's real death
I mean maybe it could, it was already 53 years old by that point
I'm curious, why didn't Dumbledore bring in Bill Weasley, a Cursebreaker, to solve the DADA curse?
The issue with Stan is he said he had insider information on the Death Eaters
Curses usually continue to work even after their casters death, though it would also make sense for it to just fade away due to old age
if you believe Hogwarts Mystery as full canon then the character of Patricia Rakepick was an independent cursebreaker before teaching at Hogwarts. Meaning she potentially tried as well.
It depends how long the person wanted the curse to last, I'd imagine. With how vindictive Voldemort was? He'd want it to last until he took it down. I could imagine whoever cursed/influenced/befouled Wizarding Britain to have the stupid amounts of dark wizard/witches that it has throughout history - must've been extremely bloody powerful, like..Merlin-level.
The Defense Against the Dark Arts curse didn't exist until Dumbledore turned Tom Riddle down for the position.
Since there's no one to fuel it anymore
Well Durmstrang has a cursed wall that has the Deathly Hallows symbol carved into it, which has been there since 1898 when they kicked Grindelwald out, it was his parting gift to the academy.
Might be the ambient magic in the castle, fueling it in that case.
Hogwarts Mystery takes place in the 1980s, from 1984 to 1990 specifically.
Rakepick is meant to be the Defence teacher for 88-89
Well, I imagine that Bill Weasley's job is a high-risk job with lots of casualties considering how much variety a curse can bring. Look at the DADA professors. Quirrel died when Voldemort abandoned him, Lockharte gave himself amnesia, Lupin resigned because everyone found out he was a werewolf, Moody was a Death Eater who got kissed by Dementors, Umbridge was taken by angry centaurs into the forest, Snape killed Dumbledore and left, and the Carrow Twins got killed in the Battle of Hogwarts.
I mean we know that enchantments can last pretty much permanently. For example Godric Gryffindors hat, otherwise known as the Sorting Hat.
So perhaps a curse could last indefinitely if done correctly.
So, unless Hogwarts got rid of the DADA class altogether, they may be stuck having new professors each year, and the pool of candidates who want the job decrease significantly every year because no one wants it anymore.
Umbridge actually died in Azkaban, Snape was killed by Nagini, the Carrow twins are in Azkaban
Hm.
Perhaps if Moldyshort's tied it into Hogwarts itself, then it'd be powered by all the ambient magic there, keeping it going even after he's really dead.
Nice. But I'm referring to the year they left the job. I was wrong about the Carrow twins, but Snape died when he was Headmaster, not DADA teacher.
Personally, Harry could in theory break the curse to it being Voldemort's curse and he's already defeated Voldemort so if he took up the DADA position to break the curse, he could very well succeed.
That curse may be why Harry never took the job of DADA.
okay, back to the lore of the past ๐
Can I say how upset I am that Harry didn't become the DADA teacher after some 20 years as an Auror. He straight up loved teaching the DA, and was really damned good at it.
I could see him breaking the curse.
I agree, he'd be the perfect fit.
But yes as Lahros said back to the past
I think he was like a guest teacher at some point?
which ugh, past
Wendelin the Weird.
Or maybe the original Hedwig. He did get the name out of his history books.
as my brain is on Defence teachers, does anyone think the Defence teacher may be Galatea Merrythought or do you think the woman in the trailer is someone different?
Merrythought did retire in 1945 after all
Length of curse is probably proportional to the power of the caster
and how the curse is made I'd say, but that's a whole different matter
Besides, our character is going to be sensing and manipulating ancient magic. Whose to say that we won't be dealing with ancient curses as well?
Joy...Wizarding Indiana Jones, we've become. xD
so magical prowess, the intent of the caster and method are all key factors in what the effect is going to be for any spells
I've found that in just about any magical fantasy for magic - intent is always an important key factor.
We will hate snakes. Especially if a basilisk makes an appearance. I doubt it because Harry has to kill the one n Hogwarts and it won't be active until the 40's when Voldemort is a student.
A snake pit isn't out of the question though!
nothing wrong with snakes
Gods know Indiana Jones fell into a few of those in his time.
the problems are the acromantulas, that canonically should not be at the Forbidden Forest until Hagrid gets his pet
Eh, I'm pretty sure Acromantulas might exist in more places than just the forest.
I mean, the place in the trailer where the character was blasting a spider, certainly didn't look foresty.
they may well be, but I don't want to see a daddy-longleg, let alone an acromantula in the castle or on the grounds
Arachnaphobia?
slight discomfort at the sight of one school bus sized...
Eh, fair enough. I still get a bit jumpy at seeing the Skyrim one's.
I've no problem focusing on killing them but still, not a pleasant sight so I can understand that at least. xD
I hated LOTRO for their numerous giant spiders ๐
Major off tangent here but I went to look up Saint Hedwig as I know that there was one, only she's apparently the Patron Saint of Brides and Widows and Silesia (a region in Southern Poland/northern Chechia).
Though she was canonised back in 1266 so that's a good bit of time.
especially when I was playing a hobbit
I'll agree there. LOTRO's spiders can go burn in a fire, especially when you're a Hobbit and everything looks bigger.
I think anyone would be in truth. A car sized spider would scare me poopless.
Didn't quite have the same problem playing Middle-Earth: Shadow of War and seeing Shelob and her brood though. Possibly because I was aware of Shelob being capable of transforming her size at will. xD
ditto, I even like summoning her brood myself
you were saying? ๐
Ahem. Lemme retry that. I liked doing that too, being all "You get a spider and you get a spider! Spiders for all you ugly orcs!" With much more yelling emphasis...
Saint Hedwig of Silesia, how does she come into the Wizarding World?
Absolutely no idea. The reason I went looking was I'd read something that the reason that Hedwig was named Hedwig is that Saint Hedwig is the Patron Saint of Orphans and so it'd be like she was looking over Harry.
But looking up Saint Hedwig, she's not the Patron Saint of Orphans.
Didn't it say way back in PS who Harry had named Hedwig after?
It was a name in one of his school books, so..potentially a similar situation to Cliodnha that we all had a chat about yesterday? Or whenever it was.. Time gets lost, on me at times.
So looking it up, there is a "novena" prayer (not sure what that means but okay) to St. Hedwig in which she is described as the patron saint of orphans
and well the real Hedwig did pay for the building of multiple orphanages, so perhaps
but it's not a main part of who she is and mostly seems to come from the one prayer
Also, I'm pretty sure Hedwig might be a name from another country too? Possibly Germanic or something..it'd fit, I think..I might be way off the mark.
I mean, I'm not functioning at 100% right now because it's near 6am and I need sleep sooner or later..
Hedwig and Henry had lived very pious lives, and Hedwig had great zeal for her faith. She had supported her husband in donating the Augustinian provostry at Nowogrรณd Bobrzaลski (Naumburg) and the commandery of the Knights Templar at Oleลnica Maลa (Klein Oels). Hedwig always helped the poor, the widows and the orphans, founded several hospitals for the sick and the lepers and donated all her fortune to the Church. She allowed no one to leave her uncomforted, and one time she spent ten weeks teaching the Our Father to a poor woman. According to legend, she went barefoot even in winter, and when she was urged by the Bishop of Wrocลaw to wear shoes, she carried them in her hands.[5] On 15 October 1243, Hedwig died and was buried in Trzebnica Abbey with her husband, while relics of her are preserved at Andechs Abbey and St. Hedwig's Cathedral in Berlin.
Yeah, I think I'm gonna pop off and drop to sleep. It's been nice talking lore and theory with ya, folks. Take care, until we next get caught up in this web of lore intrigue again. xD
by all accounts a truly pious woman
Yeah that's what I've read through as well.
Yeah, that's some Mother Theresa level pious there.
and goodnight my dude, sleep well.
Well at least Harry's owl wasn't named after the patron saint of abuse victims, that might have been even more on the nose if he'd called the bird Germaine or Monica or Rita (the 3 saints for that)
Also before I go - ***RISE, RAPTURE, RISE! *We'll go down with our sinking paradise! ๐ต
And I'm gone.~
lol
The problem with HP I think is it sort of borrows more than builds, like with Cliodhna there, and the like, but it borrows from myth be it Christian or not.
Wheras actual history and its impacts are kind of ignored
when you want to expand, it becomes obvious where the story lacks
The Statute of Secrecy was in 1689 right, so a really valid question did the magicals take sides in the English Civil War?
If so then which one?
Yeah, GRRM and Tolkien world-building, it was not. If she had that kind of world building, I'm pretty sure the series would've been bigger, longer and far more in details and depths. I swear, I'm going soon. I'm just finishing up eating some chocolate biscuits.
the problem is research, and having this at hand
world building is a problem, we see that everything has a rather quirky solution for the kids, but what governs this world is a few bumbling fools and happenstance, the Ministry being reactionist, rather then proactive... etc
I have like 20 research tabs open to write what I think is going to be like an 80K word fan fic when it's done, it's only around 17K currently
The ironic thing is, I've seen HP fanfiction that do tons of world building and do it really damn well and makes it to a point where I'd go 'bloody hell, is this fanfiction or the actual series?' xD
Unless it's Percy, who a year out of Hogwarts was running the Department For International Cooperation by himself whilst Barty Crouch Sr was under imperius trapped in his own manor
Poor Percy, overworked so young and early into his career, hahaha.
Percy can get stuffed in a box, for all I care
I swear we need an expansion to Percy to make him a Schindler like character, happily keeping Muggle-borns out of harms way via copious amounts of paperwork
He seems like the person to do it
Instead of Schindler's List, it'd be Weasley's List. xD
And yeah, Percy is definitely not most people's preferred Weasley.
Percy never talks about it, thinking it was just a simple matter, something he did cos it was right and doable and legal.
Same, I've read fanfics where Percy has a far more involved role in the story and it works.
WL and survivors move to Albania, because for a poor obscure country it comes up surprisingly often
Albania and its magical government seriously needs to be investigated for harbouring dark wizards
happens too damned often
Also, if you want to really torture and kill your enemies..drown them in paperwork because, damn if that isn't an insidious way to go about it.
I have a hunch that our backstory is linked in some way to Albania
don't know why or how...
Yeah, Albania comes up far, far too often. Like, why? Is there like a dark magic nexus or something in Albania that draws dark wizards and witches like moth to a flame?
Sorry to swing it back several steps in the convo but this paragraph in the wiki for the Statute of Secrecy has got me going "That's wrong."
In Great Britain, the newly-created Ministry of Magic attempted to liaise with the Muggle British Monarch (then jointly William III and Mary II) via a special Ministry Delegation, begging them for the protection of wizards under Muggle law.[5] The failure of this attempt at official recognition and protection seems to have been the final straw that forced wizardkind to voluntarily move in the opposite direction toward secrecy. ```
The reason why that's wrong is the Statute was signed in 1689 the Ministry was founded in 1707
so the timeline doesn't add up there
Uh.. buzzer noise. I'm sorry contestant, but you've got this wrong! And here's Fuzzpot to tell you why! xD
also if the hints of nobility are correct, then the Blacks for instance as a "Noble and Most Ancient House" specifically that "Noble" part, would be able to request a direct audience with the King to entreat with them.
1707...The ministry is still fairly young for a government, then...doesn't excuse the stupidity, but still.
So, Albania Emperor Zog I and Enver Hoxha the maniacal communist supremo, yeah, Albania might have been hexed if not cursed
1707, wasn't that also when the Union of the Crowns act was formally signed creating Great Britain as a nation, as the British monarch became the King of Great Britain rather than the King of England and the King of Scotland as had been before.
or am I thinking 1701 under Anne
1707 it is
Wonder if that has some bearing on the wizarding world making the ministry.
at the time the British crown also held the Irish crown, and the Ministry of Magic does also cover Ireland as well
heck Magical Ireland is basically just considered a part of magical Britain
egads I bet muggle-born Irish aren't happy with that
history being like "So things happened and it throws a wrench"
This is where HP lore gets really nebulous is around the edges where it interacts with history.
Or more importantly how major defining moments in history interact with it
Anyway, I've eaten my chocolate biscuits so I'm now off to bed. Take care, try not to your soul sucked out by Dementors while I'm gone. xD
Will do, sleep well
well, technically speaking to this day the Kingdom of Ireland is part of the United Kingdom
Like the War of the Roses, that was a major major thing in the 1400s, pretty much inescapable, how would that have split magical Britain?
would they have even taken part?
the Free Irish State and consequently the Republic of Ireland is a peculiarity as it does not exist, according to the Collins Constitution, although that has been complicated by the Lisbon Treaty
War of the Roses..I'm not familiar with it..it sounds familiar but my tired brain isn't comprehending..I'll think about it when I wake up..
Lancaster vs York
Red rose vs White rose
the War of the Roses is an English civil war between the House of York and the House of Lancaster two branches both descended from the Plantagenet kings
Spoiler alert, York won ๐
Hah, ah - thanks for the brief history lesson there. I love this channel, we get HP lore, wizarding lore and real world history to talk about, haha.
When the Tudors came about, as they were descended from both houses they took up the symbol of the red rose within the white rose
But it's a fairly major thing in British history and is a massively complex web of marriages, plots, murder, and warfare between distant cousins who all wanted the throne.
that last for like 30 years
fun fact, Edmund Tudor's grave in St David's Cathedral, in South-west Wales has yellow roses on it
huh
Now, no - for real - I'm going before I get sucked into another deeply interesting discussion on something else. xD
Stop being so interesting, you two! xD
no chance ๐
Oh gods, don't go all Hotel California on me!
oh? is your mind Tiffany twisted?
Remind me to send you a link when I wake up to an interesting horror take cover on Hotel California that I found the other week. Gives me chills listening to it.
Oh so Lahros, another tip for the Malfoys being ennobled is that the first Lucius Malfoy apparently tried to court Elizabeth the 1st to marry her.
Meaning he'd have to be an Earl at least as there is no way the queen would even think to allow someone less than that to attempt it
where did you read that?
Oh joy, we almost had Bad Faith as royalty.. xD
I was like "What, I thought the Malfoys only had connections to the early kings of Britain through William and his sons"
early
lol
I thought the Malfoys came from France, descended from the french Malfois.
Or something like that.
as if Edward did consider himself Rex Britannia (or King of the British) in the 900s
yep
came over with William the Conqueror
foy is a Scots word, just so you know
and was given land by him for aiding in the conquest
Makes you wonder though, what did they do to earn a name that translates to Bad Faith? It sounds like a tale behind it.
Possibly a tale of treachery and plots...
The meaning of FOY is a farewell feast or gift
Wait, have I been going on the assumption the name translates to Bad Faith and it doesn't actually mean that?
and with the Auld Alliance between the Scots and the French, you never know
perhaps the French Malfois were "Bad Faith" but when the branch that came to Britain were landed, they sought to change their name and looked for a suitable word from Britain that could fit.
and so kept the Mal but changed to foy at the end
so "bad gift"
I mean not much better but hey ho better than bad faith right
Robert The Bruce was actually Robert du Brus, pronounced the same way, except the t in Robert is silent
Yeah, i mean Bad Faith pretty much tells you this be a family branded as traitors or something.
Or at least that they have lost the trust of someone important
depending on when the French Malfois came about, perhaps it could have been Charlemagne who named them such
may I state it weird that Charlemagne's brother was called Karloman, yet Karl himself is who we call Charlemagne
lol
And given I think, that the Malfoys are pretty well brushed up on their family history - anyone calling Bad Faith in an argument or such is bound to hit below the belt with them, because it kind of is a cheap shot, reminding people these were once named in Bad Faith before the name change.
yet his name is why many later French kings are called "Charles"
if you are next saying that the Malfoys are the rightful heirs of the French throne on account them being Carolingians, I think I'll leave the server ๐
nah
you seen Useful Charts video on that?
depends which dynasty you want to follow from
Capetian Anjou is the one to go for ๐
Anyway, I'm getting gone..for real, for the second time. Stop finding interesting topics to drag me back in with!
Honestly we're mostly just spitballing at how magical families mesh with real world history
Like I'm still wondering how the War of the Roses would have played out with Wizarding families potentially related to families on both sides of the war
Can we get a game in that time period please?
Like I think for sure the magicals would have supported Charles the 1st in the English Civil War
but earlier civil wars like the War of the Roses or the Barons Wars are much more of an open question
a few mythical rulers in Europe: Charlemagne, Friedrich Barbarossa, Roger the Fox, Guillome un Batard (William the Conqueror), Sancho of Aragon
The further back we go, the more the future Wizarding World games is gonna end up looking like a magical version of Assassin's Creed. Insert deadpan face.
And with that said, I bid you all a good morning and a good night. Finally.
War of the Roses that seems to me York on account of Elisabeth of York, her mother or grandmother was said to be a witch
on the Baron wars... my money is on the Barons and Magna Charta
the English Civil War, I also cannot see the wizards siding with the parliamentarians...
but what about the numerous wars in Scotland, the Lord of the Isles' conquest of much of the Highlands, or the Orcadians invasion of Caithness, etc
Yeah, it seems many of the old Wizarding families are tied into nobility in some way with their manors and estates, or in the Longbottoms case, a literal keep
If they had been ennobled and landed then they'd be expected to build some form of manor house or fortification upon their lands.
if they didn't then their muggle peers would be looking at them quite strangely
indeed
Queen Mary was a witch and had a wand of her own. There was a portrait of her hung at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. and that's Bloody Mary for you
๐คฏ
so much for no titles... I do not believe it and that is that ๐
I was going to use the Potters as an example, although it is unknown if they are titled, their ancestral home is meant to be the village of Stinchcombe in Gloucestershire.
But Gloucestershire was a barony of its own until at least 1342 when I assume it was made into a county and the owner of it given the title of Earl
though, it does say that it was made up of "in 1166 comprising 279 knight's fees,[1] or manors."
shouldn't Gloucester be one of the March Lords?
Whilst that is before the Potters time, if that number stayed similar until the late 1200s, early 1300s when the Potters came about, then maybe one of those manors would be a Potter Manor.
and you are right and from my research of noble titles the title of Marquis was created "In Britain, this title was created in 1385."
copying and pasting hence the doubling up there
sure, I'm still stunned by Queen Mary, to be honest
but I mean okay it's a 25 year from when the last Baroness de Clare of Gloucester died, so perhaps her successor was a Marquis
which might make Elisabeth I a squib...
and then if so, that'd mean Gloucestershire would be split up to have a couple of barons under the Marquis potentially, so then perhaps Potters could become the Barons of Stinchcombe in the early 1400s
holy wow, I know I had originally just put that time frame as a "That'd be cool" sort thing, but that works remarkably well with the real historical information
so I'm keeping that for my fan fic
*Marquess
Marquis is French equivalent to the German Graf or English Earl
Marquess is one below a Duke
what I've read is Marquess is the female term
oh no you're right
double checked
women is Marchioness
one of these days I'm going to Dm you ๐
correct
oh wow actualy Gloucester became a Dukedom
so definitely gives room for the Potters to become minor Barons within the county
it sure did, Prince Richard, the most senior agnostic descendent of George V is Duke of Gloucester now
So after the last de Clare died in 1360, it looks like the Barony/Earldom was empty for 25 years before the whole thing was elevated to the level of Dukedom and given to Thomas of Woodstock in 1385 until 1397
after that the House of Lancaster had a go at making it a dukedom in 1414-1447
then Richard the 3rd claimed it in 1461
then it's almost 200 years before the next claimant
it seems the title keeps going dormant but I can't find anything solid for any lower titles, any baronies within it, though I'm not exactly digging deep here
Duke of Gloucester, Earl of Ulster, Baron Culloden, currently
subsidiary titles, they are called
Oh I meant within the land borders of Gloucestershire more than extra titles that the holder has
as in minor nobles who'd be sworn to the Duke
so say a Barony within Gloucestershire that would be the Duke's bannerman technically.
that is my point, with the current Dukedom being its Fifth creation, the usual geography does not apply
and by the way, since Thomas of Woodstock was from House Plantagenet, the Dukedom is under the English Crown, that of Edward the Confessor
fair fair, though I guess my interest would now be that first dukedom
that means it is a direct grace of the Monarch
ohwell, I guess I can get away with making the Potters barons of Stinchcombe for my story.
It sort of fits the lore of the world, and it fits kind of well in with the history of the time.
So I'm gonna claim it as possible, and add it into my story at least.
Gone away from lore for the game though
not really sure how to swing it back to that
but hey ho, we've basically established for certain that prominent wizarding families were most likely landed, and therefore that could play some level of role in the game (though I doubt it)
you can make the Potters or Peverells landed gentry, Lord of the Manor, baronet tennent of the Crown
In 1377, at the age of 22, Woodstock was knighted[3] and created Earl of Buckingham.[6] On 22 June 1380 he became Earl of Essex in right of his wife.[7] In 1385, he received the title Duke of Aumale, and at about the same time was created Duke of Gloucester.[8]
Hmm, well it says he died in Calais, I'm going to and the timeline means we were at war with the French, so maybe a Potter went to war with Thomas of Woodstock, and he granted him and his sons a title in return for services rendered
that does depend heavily on Thomas of Woodstock's potential military career
would not have been in Thomas's power that, it would have been the King's to decide upon that
Which the section of his wiki titled "Dispute with King Richard II" is kind of telling that that probably wouldn't have happened
oof
bursting my bubble
yeah, I warned you ๐
I can hand waive it a bit I'm sure.
lol
doesn't have to be perfect, just good enough to pass more than a cursory look yet less than a dig through.
Baronetcy is the way forward
To sort of keep of follow on a thread from that, we see a few different ruins in the trailer, makes you wonder if we'd be exploring any of the old manors and castles of some now extinct wizarding nobility during the game
mainly Slytherins though ๐
Sorry, I do talk a lot
To wing it back to the Potters and potential lore but mostly my conjecture for my fan fic, if I was to give them a Baronetcy in the late 1300s under Thomas of Woodstock and King Richard II.
Then I could have it made into a full barony under King Henry V if yet another Potter were to join the English army, potentially help foil the assassination plot against the king in Southampton and then help the King shield his favourite brother Duke Humphrey of Gloucester in 1415 during the Battle of Agincourt after he was injured.
There we go. I can do that and it works history wise.
you are dead set on the barony, it seems. It was rarer then you'd think. But it works.
It's mostly cos mostly Baronets are addressed as "Sir" or "Dame" and I want Harry to carry the title of "Lord"
so, Baron is the rank that is needed
right though, I've run off on my little tangent with that for far too long.
someone else come and give another topic for lore for the chat, one that actually ties into the game.
Wizards are mentioned to be male members of wizardkind, while witches are mentioned to be female members (although the word "wizard" can be used to generalise). This is technically incorrect, as the male version of a witch is called a warlock and the female version of a wizard is called a wizardess. Discuss
I tend to prefer the term Wixen when referring to magicals
but that is an interesting tidbit that I never knew
actually didn't even know "wizardess" was a term
works the same way as master/mistress, manager/manageress or steward/stewardess
it may sound strange, but it would be the correct term
The term Warlock is also metioned in the harry potter books as a grade or titel, if I remember correctly? ๐ฌ
Chief Warlock of the Wizengamot or somesuch, yes, it rings a bell
The Jarvey was a magical beast which resembled an overgrown ferret in appearance. The Jarvey was capable of Human speech, although true conversation with a Jarvey was impossible. The creature used short, usually rude, statements and phrases in an almost constant stream. My kind of creature. ๐
Lahros, yet another note for the Wizards having Titles as the character is specifically called "Lord Stoddard Withers"
Not surprising, considering he was late medieval. Most likely a noble, like Sir Nick and Sir Cadogan
We've basically been collecting evidence to state that wizarding families like the Blacks for example should have a head of family who'd be referred to as say Lord Black
and using the lore that exists to back it up
whether this makes the Blacks barons and therefore just Lords is unknown but as they are meant to be one of the most powerful families then potentially they'd be Earls
I'm pretty sure that I remember reading about Dumbledore telling Harry that the pure blood families considered themselves "practically royalty". And, they had coat of arms, something only actual nobles did
So it's logical that they behaved like nobles, with head of family and all that
Though Blacks might LARP and behave as nobles, they were actually not real nobles as far as our knowledge goes
If they are, then say Phineas Nigellus Black is an Earl then his full title as headmaster of Hogwarts would be: the Right Honourable Headmaster Earl Phineas Nigellus Black.
Biggest chance of being a noble was for the Malfoys, not the Blacks
their family is known as "The Noble and Most Ancient House of Black"
since the Malfoys actually got land by the king
yes they did
though I don't know if they just got land or got titles with it
either way, we know for a fact that Sir Nicholas and Sir Cadogan were actual nobles
if granted land by a king it is highly unlikely that it would not come with a title, it'd be basically a massive insult to not ennoble them whilst also granting them land like that
if they had been granted land to make a manor upon by a lesser noble, then sure, they'd just be "Lords of the Manor" and that's it, basically rich people with a nice house.
There are very few known wizard nobles
But granted from a king especially for services rendered during the conquest of England, that's pretty much just saying they were made peerage
true
There's Merlin, Nicholas, Cadogan, Vincent Duc de Trefle-Picques, Draben and I can't even remember more
but this is why Lahros and I have been collecting evidence of it throughout the lore, and then tying it into actual British history
so the thought is that probably most of the really old families have some form of ennoblement but it may just be small, either a baronetcy or a barony, only a few may be earls, such as the Malfoys and Blacks.
But really we can't say for sure
the problem is Rowling whilst certainly taking inspiration from myth, really sort of just ignored actual history.
which is a problem the further back into history of the HP world you go
as before the statute of secrecy, the Malfoys were known to be a consistent member of the kings court of Britain
one Malfoy tried to marry into the royal family
yeah, and failed
but to even make the attempt he'd have had to be at least an Earl (count) so that he'd be able to properly try and court the Queen
it would have been highly improper otherwise and social suicide
something a Malfoy wouldn't do
or, maybe Malfoy thought that being a wizard would do fine
I doubt it
Well think about it
He was wealthy, he was a wizard, more than anyone muggle can offer the queen
remember that marriage is a political alliance
I mean sure Malfoys are stuck up, but the man would have looked at the other Earls and Dukes and the power that they could bring without magic, especially the Dukes who tended to also hold lower titles in other countries as well
and whereas Sir Nicholas was referred to as Sir, since he was a knight, Lucius was not called by a title
some of them would have been able to call thousands of men to their side, including probably some wizards of their own
so without the title, and the therefore subsequent lands and men, what does simply being 1 wizard bring?
Malfoys may be arrogant, but they aren't that dumb
Though as you say, they aren't referred to by title
though mostly this seems to be Rowling not knowing history and the fallout from that lack of knowledge being applied throughout the lore
Alas, no one is perfect, but that's why we do research
It's kind of the downside of creating a world that is real world adajcent unless it all bolts together perfectly gaps can appear.
I think that Blacks had a head of a family, but not because they were actual nobles, but because they modelled themselves off of nobles due to being purebloods
I mean there will always be gaps, but there's a difference between gaps and the gulf that there is for a lot of stuff in HP lore
Like in the first Fantastic Beasts film we're told that wixen were banned from fighting in WW1 yet Theseus and a few hundred others went and did it anyway and upon return her was claimed as a war hero.
Makes you wonder about any German wizards who did similar
but also to go to probably the most major conflict in Europe in the 1800s before the game, the Napoleonic Wars, they were huge. A lot of people don't realise the scale of the conflict but across a 20 year period some 6 million men were mobilised with around a million of them dying and a couple million more being injured.
How did such a huge conflict affect the Wizarding World?
No idea
You can't say they stayed out of it, especially in places like Spain, where they were fighting for their very nation.
but before the Napoleonic Wars, there was one french wizard who avoided the french revolution
he was a cavalier
well that's at least something
It just bothers me that for such massive events the Wizarding World is like "Yeah didn't notice it"
wait no
that was another wizard who was a royalist, not the french
but either way, there's some nobility
So we know of a French duke who was a wizard who survived the purge of the nobility
yea
which a decent amount of normal nobility did as well, though they were all generally lower level
though that raises questions
why didn't he fight with magic for the crown ?
this gets complicated more and more
or in the military and happily joining the revolutionaries
Napoleon himself was a minor noble and military and revolutionary
then became the Emperor
so
yea but Napoleon was not coming from french nobility
Minor French nobility yes, from Corsica maybe but it was still French and he was still minor nobility
But to your point of why they wouldn't fight, that is a good question, cos well it seems the Statute of Secrecy started in Britain (for some reason despite us not being that heavy on the whole witch trials thing), it means that the Wizards who wrote it, the last war alongside Muggles that they'd fought was the English Civil War. Which had been fought with matchlocks but they weren't the greatest things.
In comparison to the flintlocks of the time of the Napoleonic Era, and the improvements in drilling for musketry, I wonder how well a wizard could even hold up against a few soldiers armed with muskets.
Let alone the canon that Napoleon himself was so fond of.
Well, protego diabolica, fiendfyre , apparating etc
but they only have to put imperius on the enemy generals and then they won already
most combat spells can be dodged to some degree, or at least you have enough time to point cast a shield, but a musket ball, well that moves one hell of a lot faster.
true but that's meant to be a rare ability with most people not even knowing the incantation let alone the wand movements
so say you're an average wizard, you know a variety of jinxes, some hexes and a few curses.
You're up against 10 soldiers armed with muskets who are trying to arrest you for one reason or another.
Someone fires a warning shot and things go hot.
Winning is possible with clever use of transfiguration for cover and apparition to move about, but that's tiring, and you're against 10 - 1 odds against trained soldiers
it's a lot more difficult than most would think I'd say.
a blastic curse nonverbally is all you need
blasting *
that's how pettigrew did it
if you can then yeah, but it can be dodged if they see it coming and at best it takes out 3-4 guys in a single hit as there is no gas main to hit (this being the French revolution after all)
the blasting curse has to hit something before it explodes
yes, and while htey can dodge the spell hitting them directly, they can't escape the explosion radius
a bombarda doesn't seem to have that big a radius, maybe about 4-5ft across tops
im talking of the same spell as pettigrew used
he killed 12 muggles and created a massive crater
he used a normal bombarda but it hit a gas pipe
that's what caused the big explosion was the gas main
no
gas leak was only the excuse wizards came up with to sell the story to the muggles
see again that doesn't make sense cos looking that up it says he used the blasting curse which would be "confringo" but we've seen others use it and it doesn't have that power
well movies are movies
even in the books I mean
well they never specified that pettigrew used confringo
but a powerful blasting curse
but yeah okay I guess it's possible that he used a variant curse
though you know
soldiers especially in napoleonic wars do not shoot unless given order to
imperio the commander, have him start to shoot his own men
muggle weaponry is no match for wizards until ww2
that's again stating that your average witch or wizard is going to know an unforgiveable
which I doubt
my point though is that the muggle events do have wide ranging effects and have unintended consequences when people who weren't meant to get hurt do get hurt
And sure you may say a musket isn't a match for a wizard, but it's a heavy lead ball moving a little shy the speed of sound. Even if it misses the bang and puff of smoke from the gun might scare the wizard.
I may like to study the period of the Napoleonic Wars but I'd hate to have to be a soldier during those times.
fair fair
btw, have you ever felt weird that the british wizarding government was a ministry ?
We see that Rowling try to paralell wizarding world and real world, thus you see for example wand permits in usa paralelling weapon carry permits, macusa has a president paralelling yank republic , but britain is and was a monarchy, yet they only have a ministry
What if wizards lost a war against muggles and ministry kind of below the muggle government ? ๐ค
Well it says that they applied to the King William III and Queen Mary II for protection in the 1680s before the Ministry for Magic was created, failed to come to a satisfactory conclusion and so in 1689 created the Statute of Secrecy which then was signed internationally in 1692 and then the Wizards Council ended and the Ministry of Magic became a thing in 1707.
But as far as I'm aware, the monarch is still technically the head of state
and the Minister for Magic is meant to report to her just like the Prime Minister does
So I don't think so
Problems arise in that they were obviously still paying attention to the crown because in 1707 the Union of the Crowns act happened, merging the Scottish and English crowns into one and creating the crown of Great Britain. Which at the time ruled Ireland.
So the Ministry of Magic was created as the British Ministry and encompassed Ireland as well.
hmm makes sense
It seems like charms professors always act as though they were hit with a permanent, overpowered cheering charm when you consider filius flitwick or the one in hogwarts legacy
While herbology looks like a young witch in her 20s. Was her name mentioned in the state of play?
Well there are some short conversations with him. Trying to think of examples except the part in dh where hermione takes his portrait with her during the horcrux hunt
Nah gotta be Merlinborn
I do agree, the reference to Merlin is way too often.
I agree. Sheโs indeed โฆyou know what i mean... a great teacher
Horace Slughorn was also different from how people see Slytherins
I don't believe it was but for obvious reasons a lot have guessed at it being Weasley.
I hope whoever is the DaDa prof that they are old and grizzled. I want them to be super jaded like moody
Like give us an ex aurora that has seen to many things and stares off into space at times in remembrance when they teach about spacific topics
I still think that itโs likely that hermione is a descendant from I-canโt-remember-his-full-name Dagworth-Granger. A line of squibs and hermione being the first witch in the line
Was it hector?
Wasn't it a cadet line of the blacks?
disagreed
Merlin was referenced once
and even then, a figure of speech
plus we seen his name on a window. but that means nothing, because there are arts for famous wizards
we also seen the fat lady, if the commentators would've mentioned the fat lady, people would speculate that we're her descendants ?
but Rowling said that magic is genetical
Lucius Malfoy the First was courting Queen Elisabeth the First of England, while the biggest bombshell is Elisabeth's elder half-sister, Queen Mary of England (called Bloody Mary) was a witch, had her own wand.
Essentially Fuzzpot and I were combing through the Magical History and tried to match it to real history to prove that JK's allegation about noble titles in the wizarding community was not a thing, false.
in my mind we found ample circumstantial evidence to corroborate our idea that certain wizarding families carried titles that of the high aristocracy, while others were knighted
Hm, interesting.
JK has referring to the Blacks as the "Most Noble and Ancient Black Family" that was the base of our inquiry
I find it weird that Rowling made Queen Mary to be a witch, considering the true reason why she had the nickname "bloody"
yes, but who knows, she also states that her father, Henry VIII was muggle, leaving Catherine of Aragon a witch
so, we found that while she is forgetful about British wizarding families' titles or downright propagate against it, she is quite happy to show off French and Spanish high aristocracy being laden with magical families
It's like it's just random as hell.
it is random as hell
we have no reason to suspect that was not the case in Britain
I would not take JK's words in this sense as gold
She's more impulsive than consistent and logical tbf
This is this, that is that, even if it makes no sense
Yeah, don't take the creator's word when she's impulsive than consistent because things can turned upside down on it's head, pretty damn quick.
as Fuzzpot correctly stated, the Malfoy that tried to swoon Queen Elisabeth had to be at least an Earl and member of the court to not be ridiculed and consequently ostracised by society, a mistake a Malfoy would never do
so were the Peverells ennobled?
unless he used magic to bypass that
I think if he would have used magic he would have been successful
but it also makes no sense since Malfoys were so connected in muggle aristocracy and royal court , and yet we are told they are pure blood
was Slytherin more in his time then just a founder, was Rowena having a diadem meant something for her social status as well?
Uh...apparently, the Peverells were connected to the Potters so if it was with a marriage contract, it's possible the Peverells were on the same standing as the Potters but as we know, the line did die out because it was absorbed by the likes of Gaunt, Potter and probably some more.
yeah, there are multiple cross overs to the Black family
Peverells were also connected to the Slytherins
I imagine this is where a Malfoy pops in and goes "Shhh! We like to pretend that part of our history never existed!"
and I also like to belive, that the Slytherins are descendants of Herpo, since Herpo's name in greek literally means slytherin, and he was the first parseltongue and creator of basilisks
Quite possible. Wouldn't be beyond scope for a family change countries because of events or something in another.
a strong indication that Herpo the Foul was indeed a progenitor to many wizards, including Salazar Slytherin, Voldemort and Harry Potter
Especially if Herpo was the cause and the rest of his family was like 'Nope, no. We don't know him. Move it people, Britain awaits!'
the Roman Empire would have been a good vehicle upon which a transfer from Grecia or Magna Grecia to Britannia would happen
A quite different angle: Whereas the Malfoys had a huge manor and some lands granted by the king of england, the Black ancestral home was a bum. Hardly a thing for an ennobled family, no ?
plot hole at its finest
I disagree, one thing is a country estate, which we see with the Malfoys and quite another a townhouse in the capital, nobility had both of them
Very true. The Roman Empire covered vast swathes of land so they might've travelled quite a bit and settled in Britannia.
Yes, but from a family that would consider itself royalty, you would expect a palace
Especially since the Blacks originate from France
prime example is the Duke of Westminster, he literally owns the City of Westminster, Brough of London, no great country estates, yet he is the richest Duke of the land
A noble family of french origin, I would expect something more Versailles and less Grimmauld place
the latter is in fact more common
This is a family of extreme wealth dont forget
btw Tuck is that Sigismund of Luxemburg that you have as Holy Roman Emperor on your profile? ๐
No, Charlemagne
fair enough, it is a small picture
If I were that rich, if I considered myself royalty, if I considered myself superior due to being pure blood, I wouldn't live anywhere short of a castle or palace. Especially if I were ennobled by a king
yes, but not everyone thinks that bigger is better, sometimes secure is much better than big...
They are wizards, they can make anything secure. Unplottable + fidelius charm
they could have the cake and eat it too
it did not happen like that in real historical families, why should it happen so in with the wizarding ones?
clearly the Malfoys did it that way, the Lastranges too, but others didn't
yet the Blacks held more prestige than both of them
maybe, I believe the Malfoys held the most prestige
the Blacks may have been equal to them at some point, but they certainly fell short in comparison
think about the money Harry had in Gringott's after Sirius left him the Black fortune and that was still nowhere that amount that Draco inherited
well the Malfoys only had money because of that wine
inconsequential, the main think is that they had it
but I diverge, back to landed titles and titles of the courts
I still think that they were not ennobled by muggle royalty
but basically modelled themselves off of nobility
we would need to examine the circumstances of the norman conquest of England 1066
if the Blacks, like the Malfoys came over with William the Conqueror, it is stands to reason they got the same treatment
the Doomsday Book explains in great detail for the real History part, how it was facilitated
Lord of the Manor is a baronetcy, a landed title where the male is referred to as Master until maturity and Sir from thereon, whereas female is referred to as Mistress until maturity and Lady from thereon
that would be the first step and a very common one
so, just to reiterate I am merely recounting the real events here, and applying onto the wizarding world as long as the Statute of Secrecy 1707 was not in effect, that changed everything
but we have 700 years of history to play with, Conquest of Ireland 1144, Conquest of Wales, the 100 years War, War of the Roses, English Civil War just to name the most obvious ones that a wizard or a family could distinguished themselves in service of a muggle king or queen
it was not frowned upon that much before the Statute of Secrecy
Yeah, a really specific event must've happened to set off the SoS that caused the wizarding communities and their enclaves to really retreat from the world, especially if that point they were doing quite well comfortably alongside their muggle counterparts.
indeed, but that is another problem
we know from muggle history that magical beasts were freely roaming the lands and it fell upon wizardkind to rain them in, or rid the world of them
so even if we are discounting the obvious wars, I humbly submit that Saint George of the Dragon might well have been a wizard
That could be possible. Don't forget, magical enchanted swords aren't impossible. Take Gryffindor's Sword for example.
now if you're looking at it from that angle, and the obvious nod in heraldry between the Duchy of Normandy, the Kingdom of England, the House of Plantagenet and Godric Gryffindor... (red and gold, lion)
I still believe wizards that used swords might've used them in place of their wand and/or in a duel wielding style.
Wand in one hand, sword in the other.
wickedly cool image, I must admit ๐
Gryffindor would've had to have been the best at that, to have killed every contestant that came his way because of course, duels and fights back then would've been to the death.
mostly but not exclusively, you could "yield"
True, and since Gryffindor was known to be honourable, he would've accepted someone yielding instead of to the death.
so, are we in agreement that the wizarding society carries high and low aristocracy in equal quantities to the medieval muggle society?
Not gonna lie, I also imagine if a wizard was talented enough with a sword he could imbue it with an element for further devestating attacks, kinda like Thoros of Myr from the A Song of Ice & Fire/Game of Thrones. Just imagine, wielding a sword that you can imbue with your preferred element, whether it's fire, frost or such. Would make people wary of trying to go blade to blade with you, in some degree.
yes, absolutely
Yeah, I mean there had to have been some severe crossover between them otherwise they wouldn't have the Sacred houses or the Wizengamot.
I imagine the Weasley's used to be part of the aristocracy at some point before they lost it. They wouldn't be titled a pureblood family or have a known house rivalry with the Malfoys otherwise.
House rivalry/blood feud, however you want to word it.
having been participating since the channel was opened, I must say I really feel like I found a place to let my inner nerd out until I can roam Hogwarts Castle myself ๐
Same. I've been in here far more than any of the other channels recently, hah.
But to be fair, we do have plenty of interesting topics and conversations in here that tends to go off in tangents or run away from us. xD
guilty as charged, Your Honour! ๐

As far as I'm concerned as long as you can claim you are discussing the lore of how the world is in the 1890's and how it came to be that and the history of some of the families that may be in the game I won't complain.
oooooh
I believe that this is more like a place where we can talk about all lore prior to HP time.
As long as you can make some link to the game somewhere, even a vague one it'll be fine.
Understanding the history and culture of what is going on help us to see what we might expect recreated in the game
I wouldn't say equal quantities. Muggles always outnumbered wizardkind
Plus don't forget, that most of Europe was religious so they wouldn't have tolerated wizards anyway
Not like Muggles could do much. At least in small numbers or in rural villages.
That's good enough for me.
I just had a thought come to me while I was making some food in the kitchen. Are there any notable half-breed/creature blooded people in HL's time period? Like, half-giants like Hagrid or Veela like Fleur? I'm pretty sure the wizarding community might be largely dominated by wizarding kind but half-breeds are likely to occur so...thoughts, anyone?
Just a new lore came out
I Disagree somewhat. A wizard could claim that their powers are gifts from god and the spells they perform as "miracles".
It honestly wouldn't be too difficult for them to do, especially if they are backed by already existing institutions of power such as being ennobled themselves or having a noble family.
Also so we discussed yesterday about Saint Hedwig who is a secondary saint of orphans in the area around Silesia where she funded several orphanages.
Well Harry gets the name for his owl out of a magical history book, meaning that in the HP world, Saint Hedwig may have been magical and that some of the "miracles" she performed could have been magic.
And as the daughter of a duke of Bavaria and wife of the duke of Silesia, she was extremely wealthy and politically powerful.
Obviously the more general populace would have been somewhat less open. But the nobility would most likely allow it or even offer patronage if magic benefitted them.
Considering some of the stuff real life nobility pulled, they can't really talk much about having discarded "witchcraft" when many were known to consult with local soothsayers and the like and were all for good omens, and other "magical" beliefs.
Except that wouldn't work, as the Church would've put them down. Or to be more precise, would've made the king to put them down.
They could say those were miracles, but then they would've been condemned as heretics and sentenced to death
At least until Henry VIII
since we are talking about England
Only that there are literally hundreds of Saints and thousands of beatified people who performed "miracles" like healing the sick with a touch, or turning water to wine and so on and so on.
And none of them were "put down"
they lived their lives then were canonised as saints after their deaths
yes, through the power of God, which the Church deemed to be real miracles. Not with magic wands
anyway, the two worlds are getting too mixed up in this convo, I'll stop
Merlin
if they could claim it as how they performed their miracles, I don't see why it wouldn't have worked.
Well, king arthur was a briton, so they were pagan
Though idk, I guess this is a subject in which we cannot bridge the gap between real world and hp world.
In HP world, William the Conqueror was happy to tolerate Malfoys and receive magical service
IRL he was a devoted Catholic
The problem with Merlin is that the King Arthur myth comes from around 500 CE
Cos the idea is that he was a defender against the invading Angles and Saxons
and Jutes
HP timeline he was closer to William the Conqueror than to the angles and saxons
Ever heard of Coloman the Learned, also the Book-Lover or the Bookish? He was King of Croatia and Hungary in and around 1100 AD, he rebuffed a Papal Nuncio and the Pope himself by putting into law in the lands where he was king, that strigas (latin word for witches) do not exist, therefore it is pointless to pursue them. So, no, the Pope do not make Kings getting rid of miracle workers... Christian hysteria was quite high as the Crusades were on those years.
Except the Church never taught that witches were real. That's an urban myth actually. But we're not allowed to discuss that here I belive
not sure where you've heard that, certainly not the church I know of...
I mean, protestants did belive that, as they persecuted the witches, but the Catholic Church did not, lol
that is simply not true
What the heck have I wandered into this time?
Yes it is. Even Saint Augustine taught that "The Church has no reason to seek out or persecute any witches because their powers do not exist"
The Catholic stance was always more nuanced than that mate... Dabbling in occultism or palm reading and other stuff, "witchcraft", were condemned because it is superstitious and against the first commandment, but the Church never belived that there are "witches" who have inherent supernatural powers... That is a myth, just like the myth that the inquisition has killed thousands of people.... The witch hunts were done by protestants, mostly lutherans in Europe and puritans in USA
Anyway, let's not discuss it further here.
Witchcraft had long been forbidden by the Church, whose viewpoint on the subject was explained in the Canon Episcopi written in about AD 900.
The Malleus Maleficarum, usually translated as the Hammer of Witches, is the best known treatise on witchcraft. It was written by the Catholic clergyman Heinrich Kramer (under his Latinized name Henricus Institor) and first published in the German city of Speyer in 1486.
But sure, let's discuss something else.
it irks my sense of justice to claim that the inquisition did not kill anyone... 40000 people were executed by them during and after the Cathar wars
Yes it is forbidden because it is superstitious, and you cannot have supernatural powers.... And it breaks the first commandment. Lying and murder is also forbidden.
And the Malleus Maleficarum is not Catholic Church teaching. Just as Luther's 95 theses were not, and he wrote the thesis when he was a clergyman aswell. You forgot to mention that the Malleus Maleficarum was banned by the Catholic Church, as well as the author's other works along with it. The author even got removed from his position by his bishop.
Cathar war was a crusade, something different. And technically even the inquisitions did not kill anyone as they handed the condemned unrepentant heretics over to the secular power who performed the executions.
oh I see, so it is fine to crusade over a difference of opinion and butcher cities, lay waste to the countryside and then burn the survivors, Deus Vult? Those people were accused of and sentenced to death for the "crime" of heresy and witchcraft. Either you don't remember correctly or you've had a seriously lacking education on the subject, I'm sorry to say
regardless, it has little connection to Hogwarts Legacy, so I move on
Yes it is correct to eradicate heretics. Cathars most of all, as they were not only danger to souls but to civil order aswell. Absolutely.
Was gonna say, you've gone too far guys
yeah, a bit got carried away
Interesting back and forth, but not the right track of conversation. Let's get back to HL and Wizarding World lore.
anyway, as i was saying; bobby the elf was a house elf in the hogwarts kitchens 15 years after the battle yavin, making grilled cheeses for the rebel alliance during the anaxes occupation following the imperial massacre on antar iv.
๐คฃ I'm sorry, just..what?
"A hag was a savage being that looked like an ugly, old witch but had more warts. They had four toes on each foot, had a taste for the flesh of human children, and possessed rudimentary magic, similar to that of a troll." - will we see hags in HL?
Excuse me, when did Witcher hags make the leap to Wizarding World? Because that low-key sounded like the Witcher's version.
and then there's this one who permanently made herself beautiful via a potion
which wow that's one hell of a potion and must be super difficult to make
Getting skyrim hag vibes from that
https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Annis_Black this one is a fun one ๐
Though it seems that most beautification potions are temporary, like polyjuice
heck the brewing of them may be similar
Also yes, she doesn't eat children, she just looks after them
though interestingly if they were such a danger to children then there is no way that they'd be allowed in Diagon come August when children would be getting their stuff for school
but Harry sees multiple most years that he does his shopping
he even sees a couple when out on Hogsmede weekends
so I guess there are mostly safe, they probably just like eating raw meet
when they say human children, I see muggle toddlers or smaller ankle-biters...
maybe being magical somehow sours their taste?
Possibly. Magic might be radiation, remember? xD
good point, leave it to a Ravenclaw to take notes ๐
Ftw.
Salvio Hexia is a damned decent sounding incantation for a hex repellent charm
Although, it also sounds like you're firing a salvo of hexes. xD Like, that's what I think hearing 'salvio'.
yeah, it has that effect on the ears ๐
I wonder, how is it Severus Snape's self-made spells even in the game? I'm pretty sure someone mentioned Levicorpus and as I recall, Snape created that.. Unless they're going with the well, actually - he recreated them or something.
"Merrythought returned to Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry to teach sometime around 1895, though what subject is unclear. (...) The Headmaster during her early years was presumably Professor Phineas Nigellus Black, although she also went on to work under Professor Armando Dippet." So, I think she might not be our teacher, but Phineas's tenure as Headmaster is looking good at the moment ๐
Sectumsempra and the healing of it was his, also, a lot of recipes of potions were improved, not totally new
so most of the things that Snape did were improving the effectiveness of things
for example crushing an ingredient, not chopping up for a potion
Sectumsempra's pretty damn lethal, for a created spell by a teenager..jeez..
Also, I'd imagine it'd also leave a scar too, regardless of if the counter to it is applied.
he improved of one of the corpusis... can't remember the base of it
Yeah, I'm thinking they somehow got their mitts on his spell. Wouldn't put it past the bullying gits.
They stopped after their 5th year, though still not great
at least they did become better people
again, if you are a bully, better do your homework and whilst your mates beat up the poor sod, you go through his parchments, in case you see something good ๐ (obviously a joke, don't be a bully!)
I don't think wormtail grew at all, not physically and I did not see a mental growth either
Ah...I might be wrong. Here's three spells Snape created - Liberacorpus. Sectumsempra. Muffliato. Although, I could've swore blind in the HBP book Harry cast Levicorpus on Ron while he was asleep and not Liberacorpus...My mind must be going...
No wait, I'm right. He did make it.
Levicorpus picks a person up by their ankle and dangles them around
Liberacorpus is the counter to Levicorpus.
I think we can see maybe a less effective version of these in the game
like, I dunno, not dangling the person, just hanging there in mid air
https://screenrant.com/harry-potter-severus-snape-magic-innovations/ This is where I found the more accurate things about Snape. He's actually done more than people would've thought. He might not seem it but he seems to be a hidden comedic genius and extremely talented at potions and creating spells and counter-spells. Huh...
it is unknown if the spell to move a persons body "Mobilus Corpus" can work on a conscious person.
there is the lore of the incantations, there are several connections there made by the ones comprised the list, sometimes the assumptions are correct, sometimes they are a leap, but it is interesting, nonetheless
i hope its phineas black.
it makes too much sense canonically as he was headmaster to dumbledore and directly between the two is dippet.
Theres an entrance exams to play Hogwarts Legacy
Severus Snape perhaps just said one thing, like "I invented those spells." while in reality, he just found it somewhere, erased the source and made himself look better than he is in reality. Or he found somewhere a spell, changed and improved, but that doesn't mean all credits is all his.
so basically EM waves? Sounds quite strange imo
Thats kind of a theory since we dont know
I didnโt even know vampires existed in the wozarding world ๐คฆโโ๏ธ but it would be awesome if we could become a vampire in the game https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Vampire
I don't know what the wozarding world is. Please explain it to me.
never heard of the wozarding world either i wonder what that is
It would create an eternally underage situation and I doubt wb wants to handle that drama