#lore
1 messages · Page 14 of 1
Harry wasn’t a true Horcrux anyway.
More an unwilling and unknowing host to a parasite
Horcruxes need to be made with intent, Harry is a pseudo Horcrux at best so it doesn’t work the sane way a proper Horcrux does. It only affected Harry through Voldy’s influence
The Dursleys were just bigoted.
didnt petunia send Dumbledore a letter requesting to join the magical world so she musnt of been envious till her understanding of rejecton from the world
yah. thats when it started.
ty ty
Imagine though if somehow they were near a horcrux. One of them was wearing the locket since Harry’s birth. Imagine how more bad they would’ve been.
The way the books described it, Ginny was increasingly easier to manipulate by Tom's diary, the more she wrote in it and the closer Tom could get to her emotionally that way. At times she couldn't even remember what she did and had no control.
Ron on the other hand had his hopes and expectations destroyed when the search for the horcruxes didn't go as he hoped. And he was described as a bit pampered by having 3 warm very tasty meals each day, so the horcrux intensifying bad emotions seemed to have had more impact on him than on Harry and Hermione.
Don't think these two were related because of them being Weasleys.
E
I agree. But it would be funny is it was some sort of Weasley disorder. Less resilient to magical artifacts. It’d be quite bad for Arthur’s job though.
I think they were horrible people, my personal belief is Harry’s natural kindness and generosity seemed to shelter most from the effects of the Horcrux. That or since he was the one with the least amount of Voldemort’s soul in it he would be less potent as the locket or diary.
Considering Harry never affected anyone else around him to make them act like terrible people I would like to wager that the Dursley's are in fact just miserable people. It was a fun theory though. I hope Dudley is doing better. Seemed to be the only one with a glimmer of hope at the end. Though it was also interesting to see Petunia seem a little bit more human in admitting that she mourns for her sister. (both instances I am talking about were deleted scenes) Makes me think that part of the reason why Petunia didn't want Harry to be found was because she didn't want to lose him too. She saw magic as this thing that takes people that she cares about away. And she calloused herself over with hate to protect herself from feeling abandoned or scared.
As for the last part. We do see Harry’s aunt reject Harry’s mom when they were little (the scene where Harry’s mom conjures a single flower and shows it to her sisters, but her sister acts disgusted). I personally think Harry’s aunt views magic as “wicked”, less extreme than a puritan during the Salem witch trials, but similar type of person. She isn’t going to try to burn Harry at the stake, but she views all magic as wrong in and of itself.
Your belief seems to be invalidated by Petunia literally BEGGING Dumbledore to be allowed in Hogwarts in her letters.
This is the facade she uses, and possibly Vernon's views. She is just jealous of "perfect Lily" getting yet something else she doesn't have access to
That’s true she did ask to join as well… maybe see turned sour gapes and once she couldn’t join she decided all magic is bad. We don’t know when exactly the flowers scene takes place. I presume it was pre Hogwarts, but perhaps it wasn’t. Maybe Lily was showing her sister something she learned at Hogwarts while she was on vacation and back home. What is your takeaway of the flower scene and Harry’s aunt’s disgust?
I think the way the flower scene was shown in sequence with the other memories, and how it was told in the books, it is before Lily and Severus came to hogwarts.
I think she wanted to go to Hogwarts so bad because her sister was going. Again a fear of being abandoned by her sister. I don't think she understood magic or quite cared for it in the first place ex. the flower scene. She didn't want to go to Hogwarts cause she thinks magic is cool. She thinks it's scary and weird. And by proxy her sister was doing something scary and weird. I think the whole setup of her being jealous was a front to her actual emotions that she doesn't want anyone to know about. She became bitter when her sister was doing fine without her big sister. Petunia probably thought Lily couldn't get far without her but when it was proven otherwise she felt pushed aside. And then the real resentment came. So she wasn't jealous cause Lily was a witch. She was mad for being left behind and for being made to feel like she was unimportant to her sister.
Eh, I’d be jealous if a sibling is magic. And when that sibling used magic I’d feel left out.
But she hated magic. Her gut reaction was to call Lily a freak when she first saw magic. She didn't think it was cool
I don't think anything about the Dursleys is as surface level as they are portrayed to be because that's just not how characters are written in this world
Likely only because of her jealousy.
I mean who would think doing cool magic things would make you a freak? The only type of person I can think of is someone who thinks magic is satanic. She was just jealous. It’s evident when she mentions how her mother was so proud that they had a witch in the family.
Petunia would think that. Anyone that doesn't like something that they don't understand would think that. As would Petunia's husband. A man that has no interest in magic at all and has the same beliefs as Petunia.
The whole reason why magic has to be kept a secret
What would have happened if crucshanks kill peter
Magic shouldn't be kept a secret. Wizards should just rule the world.
Salem witch trials say hello
LV doesn't rise again until later if at all since he isn't found by PP in this scenario. He only had BCJ looking for him also and we dunno BCJ would have found him and he'd need someone else to look after LV while he did his rebirth plan with the TT in GOF or he'd have to come up with another plan.
would hermione and ron even like each other if scabars died
if he died and reverted to a fat bald man, maybe?
I still think that harry and hermione are a better couple
eh I always got a sibling vibe from em
I always got a more friendly hated from both of them espesially in the movies
at the end of the half blood prince and the whole deathly hallows part 1 in the movie i always jsut wanted to shoput OMG JSUT KISS ALREADY for harry and hermione
from harry and hermione?
ye mostly ion the movies
see I read the books and never got that vibe
they did ron dirty in hte movies
yeah
maybe he'd revert to his human form upon death?
Maybe. Animagus forms are weird to gauge. Hopefully he wouldn’t if crookshanks ate him. But if he reverted it would cause some doubt about Sirius’s crime. So it probably would be preferable to canon if he reverted*.
If he doesn’t revert they never trust Sirius. Never get to use Grimmauld Place and the real Slytherin’s locket remains hidden and Voldemort is never defeated. Lol.
For those of you who believe in wizard muggle harmony, why the secrecy? If muggles can’t be trusted then they need to be dominated.
Clearly you belong in Slytherin house. Only certain muggles can be trusted with the secret of wizard kind. Insecure people will always be afraid of those with power especially people like you who feel the need to dominate people. I believe in wizard muggle harmony and at the same time feel that separation is best. Certainly muggles should stay out of the wizarding world just as certain wizards should stay out of the muggle world
I don't feel any need to dominate anyone. But if there is a wild dog that doesn't play nice what do you do with it? Also how can you be for harmony and separation at the same time?
Unfortunately you would have to isolate the wild dog. As for harmony and separation, it solely depends on the individual. Only certain people can handle certain situations.
If you have seen the Fantastic Beasts franchise, Jacob Kowalski has done a good job fitting into the Wizarding World despite being a muggle
The muggles deserve to live in a wonderous world and not be blind to the realities of this universe. How they handle this information is up to them. But if you misbehave, you get punished. The dog does not get his memories removed, he is either put down or trained to be a good dog. You can isolate him but there's no growth there, just like death. The best course is to teach him how to be. Same is true for the muggles who can't handle the fact that there are powers that are mightier than they.
The first step in teaching is to establish the teacher/student relationship. If the student does not submit to the teacher, he never learns.
Think of all the muggles who live drab lives. Who are not aware of the magic inherent in this universe.
So if wizardkind wants to be virtuous, and not withhold the truth from the muggles, then they will naturally have to be dominant over them. That's just how it has to be unfortunately.
This is only until the harmony comes about naturally. It will be a long time of this uneven relationship until the muggles could collectively accept that there is a natural difference in power.
Actually the reality of this situation is the reason for my greatest grievance with the HP world; that magic is only hereditary/can't be learned.
When does this game occur in the HP timeline
100 years before the game
Ah
Holy crap we found irl Salazar Slytherin
He means 100 years before the Philosopher’s Stone. Late 1800s to be exact
Salazar lived in a time when muggles were committing countless atrocities against wizards. I don’t agree with his pure blood stuff if there’s no impact on wizard birth rate based on blood status but I get his hate for muggles. I’d say I’m more like Grindewald lol
This is a god write up on Salazar.
I’m pretty sure Salazar supported the secrecy statute right? His distrust of muggle-borns was based on keeping the secret iirc.
Wasn't the secrecy statute much later than the founders?
He prob hate it and see it as hiding and being weak and it wouldn't remove risk of muggle borns outing the WW to the rest given they accepted muggle borns at the school which he did not want.
I was very suprised with the "renaissance" feel of the castle's inside environment in the game, compared to the more"medieval" style in the books and film. It doesn't really match the exterior of hogwarts, does it ? Except for the sharp triangular towers. It made me think a lot about how much of the castle actually would evolve from year to year. I can definitelly imagine 18th century furniture and decoration inside an older building, but some things like the merlin window is a bit strange to me. I like how the plumbing system and steam heater looks like its been awkardly added on top of the stone
To me it looks pretty much the same as the movies
https://gamingintel.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/hogwarts-legacy-courtyard-with-dumbledore-umbridge-weasley-brothers-1080x608.jpg.webp Movie on the left, game on the right
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xBAeOTHtZVg Video with multiple shots from the movies
Its a magic castle, it can look however it wants I guess.
If it was accurate it would not look like it does in movies or games back when it was first built.
Prob magically changes itself to keep up with the changing architectural styles in use at whatever time
Or does a hodge-podge of styles on its whim
Random: I found a gramophone in one of the rooms at Hogwarts. They were first invented in 1887, just a couple of years before the game. That teacher who brought it there must have been really modern at that time.
Imagine Harry’s lesson with Lupin in 1993 and Lupin turns on a CD Player 👀
A CD player wouldn’t have worked though.
Seeing as electricity doesn’t function properly or at all around magic
And the Wizarding world regularly assimilated modern (at the time) things, like when plumbing was just starting to become more mainstream. Sane with the Hogwarts Express. They just straight up stole it and the track to use for transporting kids to and from Hogsneade
Ok! I didn’t remember that from the books. That explains a lot, I guess.
Niffler patronus, is this possible?
yes it should be
ur a muggle in real life pls get a grip
Uhh these aren't my real views it's just a way to talk about lore lol
@hot berry would you screenshot your traits on the gear? Trying to run gear but for some reason not doing nearly as much damage as you are
Sorry this was meant for builds
Is the laundry included somewhere in the castle in Hogwarts Legacy? I have found no such location.
There are all those laundry bags we loot from
You just made me think of all my cool gear as unwashed second hand clothes haha
Nothing wrong with second hand though (better than buying things new 🌍), but I like to wash them at least.
I have ocd. So I wasn’t too happy when my character opened the bathroom door to the toilet and got splashed 😄
I made sure to jump into the lake asap 🙃
I see! I have been working with people with OCD so I know how hard it can be. But yeaaah, why are the toilets so filthy!?
I mean, sure it makes the bathrooms feel ”old”, but still, no - they feel old and abandoned 👀
Wouldn’t the house elves clean them from time to time?
Mines only a little bit fortunately
Glad to hear that 😀
House points are useless, you don't get awarded something useful
Do you have to get something in return though? 👀 You got to win the housecup and experience that moment in a cutscene. Isn’t that a reward? 😇
Can you take it the trophy home? Nope exactly useless
Well, if that would be what you would want to do with it, I think they could have added a feature like that 😀
But I’m surprised how much focus there is in the discussions about ”rewards”. It’s like everything has to have a measurable reward or rational purpose attached to it, ”otherwise there is no use in it”.
What about the experience in itself? The feelings in our bodies that these experiences generate? The reflections that arise?
nah itll be forgotten
I’d agree more with Valbo’s take. Even in some major sports you don’t get to take the trophy home. You hold it up for the photo then it goes back to a case somewhere or is exchanged for a tiny trophy.
or a dumb ring
Imagine a dakimakura in the wizarding world
Yeah I mean, I think it boils down to “appreciating the journey itself, not just arriving at the destination” kinda.
“Life before death, strength before weakness, journey before destination.”
"Water before bag, bag before milk"
One where the picture can move?
I have a question about H.L, so who actually ||burned Isidora's potrait|| in|| Feldcroft||? was it Ranrok's and Rookwood's lot? cause wasnt she more useful to both alive than dead? or was it that she doesnt have time to flee or doesnt know that her painting will be destroyed? cause it seems other than MC, only the ||Keepers know of her knowledge of the repositories|| so hencewhy redditors seems to torn between either ranrok's and rookwood's, and ||The Keepers||? thoughts or ideas?
My opinion might be a spoiler so im gonna cover it.
||I’ve come to the assumption that maybe the keepers were the ones who destroyed it after all. There was great emphasis from the mc when they commented about something being wrong with the portrait, and I feel like they wouldn’t have been so surprised about it if it was Ranrok or Rookwood’s lot. It would make sense…especially since her magic and ideals were something they didn’t want out in the world.||
||Ranrock would have to know where the Undercroft is and there's no indication he does so odds are it was the Keepers, though I don't think there's any indication they knew of it either but they are the obvious first choice||
Quick question. Do we need to use spoiler tags here? I thought this section was part of the spoiler “header”. I just want to make sure for myself, so I don’t ruin the game for anyone else.
Lore is in the spoiler group so I would believe you don’t have to use tags.
hello, I just did the mission where you get avada kadabra, and in the last question Sebastian did to me I respond "I think is a dangerous spell" or something like that and he doesn't teach me the spell, I've lost it forever in this run?
You can learn it if you don't turn him in
Isn't really a lore thing more a gameplay thing
I see. You just copy pasted it in 3 channels. Wack
Just don’t do the sensible thing, let him free, and you’ll be able to learn it in the undercroft
Letting him free is the sensible thing.
That is not letting him free really, just choosing not to report the murder. Debatable whether or not that is sensible
Are we not gonna acknowledge that Professor Garlick probably Poison Ivy'd the last professor out of his position
He did that to himself.
he had a rather lot of unfortunate accidents all at once
and Professor Garlick gives off poison ivy vibes
she likes plants more than people
Nah, the old professor also didn’t care for plants the way a more typical herbologist would.
He was accident prone and just wasn’t careful enough, nor did he care enough to treat the plants with respect
Garlick is also just too nice a person. It’s not the kind of real growth she’s so into if she had to cheat her way to getting the job
I think she's more like being in the right place at the right time. If you know what I mean
She was the best choice.
Skilled, passionate about plants… also not tied down by wizarding family or expectations due to her Muggleborn Heritage.
Plus she has a trophy.
Yeah because she was really, really good at Herbology, a savant even
Once a student reaches 16, lessons are offered in Hogsmeade to learn try and earn your license to Apparate
One learned it with the 3 Ds: Destination, Determination, and Deliberation. The students needed to apparate into a hoop by focusing their mind on the hoop and then spin around with the intention of appearing in the hoop.
You could sign up for the class if you were 17 or if you were to become 17 later in the same school year.
It was taught in the Great hall or on hogwarts grounds if the weather allowed. The anti apparition charm was removed in the section of hogwarts where they trained, for the duration of the class.
So how does our character magically learn how to do it
Besides being all powerful and magical and special
You mean the Swift dodge?
That’s not Apparition. That’s just a magical dodge.
I thought it was a form of apparition
Like when Grindelwald and Dumbledore fight, they phase out and reappear multiple times
What is that?
You mean the Smokey affect seen in the films? Just a visual representation of Apparition that’s easier for viewers to follow.
Because it would be impossible to follow if it used how Apparition is supposed to look, which is shown much more faithfully in the game when you see characters Apparate
Very interesting. Great info
No, I meant in their “final fight”
When they both disappear to dodge an attack and then reappear
Yeah that’s more like how Apparition is in the books.
The Swift Dodge the MC in HL can use if you unlock the ability is just a magic dodge, it’s not Apparition
Apparition is supposed to be near instant appearance and disappearance to and from your starting point to your planned destination.
Ah ok
I’m writing my own spinoff of Hogwarts Legacy and want to use it, but didn’t know if it fell under the category of apparition.
Thank you
I’m glad that my unhealthy amount of lore could be beneficial to you lol
And I’d be happy to read it if you’re comfortable sharing. I love being a beta reader
I have four chapters done thus far, but they’re not very edited. I’d be more than willing to share regardless for some feedback
Just let me get some more things down and I’ll dm later
Awesome! Looking forward to it! Take your time, no rush or pressure 🙂
When a student is expelled from Hogwarts can they apply to one of the other magic schools, or do they automatically get sent letters from those schools, or are the schools collaborating and enforcing the decision of the other schools to remove a student from being taught?
Considering expulsion means also getting your wand destroyed and not being permitted to get a new one… I doubt it.
Moving to another country would involve needing to inform the Ministries of both your home country and the one you’re moving to. And being granted permission by both to do so, which if you’d been expelled. Would probably mean whatever school that other country would send students to, would also be informed and not invite you to it,
🤔 that's why Hermione considered it worse than being killed 😅
Lol yeah it basically ruins any chance of a proper magical education.
Can anyone explain to me to me more in-depth HP7 pt.2 where you see Snape's memories and him talking to Dumbledore. When he sends the Doe to the forest to help Harry find the Sword in pt.1, didn't Dumbledore already die in the 6th book? If so, how would he have that conversation to begin with? Or is it different in the book?
It was a memory of Snapes of a conversation he had while Dumbledore was still alive.
The Doe Patronus was Snapes. He’s the one that sent it to show Harry to the sword
But what I mean is, if that conversation happened during the 6th movie, why was it cast then into the 7th movie when *Dumbledore already died before that point?
It’s… a memory? As in it’s from a time before the 7th movie
It’s one of Snapes memories that he shares with Harry to try and explain why he did what he did up to that point and to give him the context he’d need to finish his task
I'm still confused. If he casted during the 6th movie, but the patronus Snape casts is in the 7th movie is that just an error or I'm missing something still? Sorry.
Because Dumbledore dies in the 6th right? And he casts it during that conversation? But Harry didn't see the Doe until well after Dumbledore's death no?
Snape shows Dumbledore his Patronus which is a doe to show that he still loved Lily and wanted to do right he her
The Doe is Snapes Patronus, not Dumbledore’s.
You can cast the Patronus charm whenever you want. Snape just cast it again to guide Harry to the sword
Sorry just to clear up the confusion. This is what I mean:
[6th movie]
Dumbledore & Snape have that conversation in the 6th book.
Snape casts the Doe Patronus.
Snape kills Dumbledore.
[7th movie]
Harry is on the run and gets to the lake where Snape's Doe appears.
So why would he cast it during the 6th movie and it appears in the 7th, is my question?
He cast it to show Dumbledore he still loved Lily sometime during or before the 6th movie.
At some point during the 7th movie, he casts it again to lead Harry to the sword.
I don’t get what’s hard to understand about that?
The Patronus charm he cast in the memory is not the same Patronus charm he cast to lead Harry to the sword
what is the weed of hogwarts?
Do you mean Fluxweed? It's a plant used as an ingredient for the focus potion.
I’m drawing a blank. How did Snape know where the sword was? I know the fake one was in the vault at Gringotts, but way was the real one hidden in the lake?
Snape put it there per the instructions of Dumbledore’s portrait
He couldn’t give it directly to Harry in case Voldy discovered it though his bond to Harry
It was originally hidden behind Dumbledore’s portrait with the replica on display in his office as a decoy.
Then when it came time for Harry to need it for Horcruxes, the Portrait instructed Snape to give the real sword to Harry without Harry knowing it was from him
Therefore he hid it in that lake and had his Patronus guide Harry to it
Thank you! @random moon
You’re welcome!!
Any opinion on if Dumbledore was fully prepared to sacrifice Harry if that was the only way to destroy all the horcruxes?
Absolutely he was. The original plan was for himself to die “undefeated” (as he’d asked Snape to kill him, meaning he accepted death willingly) and the Elder Wand to lose its power.
But Draco disarmed him while he was weakened by the potion, which kind of ruined the original plan.
The only reason Harry survived the Killing curse is because he was the true master of the EW.
If Dumbledore’s original plan hadn’t been spoiled by Draco, Harry would have 109% died there and then and Dumbledore was fine with that if it means stopping Voldy
In a way. Draco unintentionally saved Harry’s life or at least altered the plan that would have led to Harry’s death… interesting
Yup!
quick question, does a spell have a time limit? Like a I know a charm can last years upon years but does a curse last after a caster dies?
In some way, yeah
so it lose its full effect after the host dies but it still remains
As I recall, most of the curses do vanish when the original caster dies or manually disabled it.
Like we got one person for two consective DADA teacher after the battle of Hogwarts
if that's the case, if MC kills Rookwood before finishing Sebastian's quest, doesn't it mean Anne's curse could be lifted?
Cliffhanger right here because we never know.
hopefully they'll continue! they can't leave us hanging like this!
We can only hope.
Again, like I said in the other chat, since this game's the best selling game in Febuary and this year up until now, it would be super unwise for them not to make more contents and a sequel
I can't imagine company wrapping this up and saying, nope, on to the next
it would be quite stupid and quite frankly, I don't think anyone wants more death threats
Let’s hope so
Yeah. some narritive contents and sequel is all I want to ask.
How about another 75 Merlin trials all the same type ☠️
That would be a cursed wish 😂
oh hell no
If Tom Riddle hated his name so much why did he make an anagram of it in Voldemort? That’s just Tom Riddle with extra steps mr voldy.
Probably did it for fun and then said wow I’m super clever.
Anagrams are fun to play around with.
It is pretty clever ngl good on JKR
Curses like the one Rookwood put on Anne aren’t the kind that disappear with the original casters death.
Is seems more like a blood curse. Which continue regardless of if the original caster is alive or dead
Well he may have died outright. Its unclear. It may have just been cos HP chose to die and not fight in that moment that let him come back as AD says may have been the case. But after that yeah, if not for him being the EW's master, he'd be dead if he took on LV in a straight fight without shenanigans.
kind of like nagini the snakes story or even astoria greengrass??
Yah, there's no indication her curse will end cos of his death. Its one she will carry the rest of her life unless its removed somehow.
Alas, it doesn't seem to be possible and if it is, its not known to wizardkind
It would seem not all curses can be broken in HP verse
Oh god no. To the dungeon with you!
What if, because of Isidora and her ancient magic powers, MC could have saved Anne.
Because doesn’t MC have those powers?
Port key plz hire me. I focus heavily on plot holes and I can fix them in a sequel
Isadoras spell only removed the ability to feel pain, and every other emotion.
No saying that would cure Anne as her pain was physical and due to a curse. I actually don’t think it would have helped and would have just left her as an empty husk unable to express physical pain, or any other emotion. Just empty
I am somehow feeling so attached to Anne lol
are vampires a thing?
In the Harry Potter world yes
Are they traditional vampires
May I ask why you wanted to know that ?
Nothing bad just would like to know if your writing a fanfic
Because I’m a vampire irl the very spawn of Dracula and I wanna see if those books were for me
🤣😂
I was just curious
I think he wanted his name to be feared. His pseudonym being an anagram makes it so he can have his name feared while not having to keep something he doesn't like
Ironically a name that reveals his fear of death
Gives himself a name that reminds him of the thing he fears above all
And anyone could learn he's TR if they took time to just re-arrange the letters
That's just it. Why would they try to rearrange the letters when most people can't even muster the courage to speak his name? Even after he was supposed to be defeated
Hogwarts isn’t real
Someone could do it just for fun. Like a kid whp's good at anagrams or something but yah. Someone eventually would come along who has the courage to ignore the fear sorrounding his name.
Maybe dumbledore did and just didn’t tell anybody
We all know the real reason was just so JK could have the surprise twist at the end of book 2 anyway tbf though
I thought Voldemort's name was enchanted, so if you spoke his name, he would find you. That's why no one wanted to say his name.
I think it was just in the last book where he had that? He knew only his enemies would say his name
Yea in the last book with the help of the ministry resources the name was tabooed and was trackable
what would they cover in the series that wasnt already in the movies?
well each season would be based on one book so that would cover more, but i don't think that's the point
not complaining, just asking 😄
remakes are just for bringing stuff to a new audience etc. obviously gain more money too
the more wizarding world the better
if they do it right this would last 7 years, but knowing hbo they tend to take a lot longer to create their tv series between each season
if they do make it, hope it doesnt get cancelled after a season or two
if they hire 11 year olds to play in the first season they would end up being 20 by the time the last one comes out
if they make it good enough so people like it they wouldnt cancel it
Probably more of the subplots like e.g. Nearly Headless Nick's deathday in CoS
Plus they can probably add their own material in too as filler
Voldemort should've just throw baby Harry out the window by levitating him but nah he did the hard way
I vaguely remember that for some reason magical children are more robust and less likely to hurt themselves physically. Like Neville falling quite a distance and the only thing that was injured was his wrist
Don't they fall off their brooms from great heights in Quidditch and only come out with a broken arm or a sprain lol
Yeah, like his uncle algae dropped him from a second floor window I believe to test his magic.
I’d die happy if Craig Mazin was a show runner. His shows are awesome.
Hire a few Chernobyl actors. I could see Adam Nagaitis as Remus. Idk why. But to add onto this idea, Tonks could be played by Jessie Buckley who played Adam’s character’s wife in Chernobyl.
Here me out: Tonks is played by a different actor every episode, with something caracteristic we can use to know it is her
Good idea.
But I was just thinking for if Craig Mazin was the show runner.
Crap now I’m wondering what Hogwarts houses each Chernobyl person was in. 
When my two special interests collide.
I wonder if we could get ahold of the key and claim vault 12 for ourselves?
It’d be pretty difficult. The only one who knew we had the key were the now dead banker and Ranrok’s goblins.
Hmmm you're right we never do pick it up do we its just left in the door. I had it in my head Figg retrieved it at some point
Imagine innocent people dying just to save one guy
I'm talking to you Harry
which guy?
the only issue is that tonks tends to only change her hair not her full appearance
i know she does change her full, appearance like when she becomes the old lady but normally she changes the colour of her hair so it would make sense to change actress every times
Would probably be similar to what they did with Neil Patrick Harris for Count Olaf
Lots of make up and costuming but still obvious it's the same actress playing her
We can't share screenshots here? Why? 😄 Wanted to share something interesting I found in-game
Have Neil Patrick Harris in the show would definitely be a good fix. Have Neil play all rolls. 🙃
I wonder why Ominis’ younger sister wasn’t in the game
She would’ve been a first year according to the HP wiki
Probably because she was evil so Ominis stayed a way from her.
How big do you think the vivariums would actually be if they were real? A field, a city, an island? Personally I"m inclined to think they're an island in size and all link to different spots on it
I think it’s a huge island too
It's the room of requirement so I guess as big as they need to be
It's ROR, the only limit in there is your imagination.
Well are they part of the room of requirement or are they something someone lost. Does the room need an item available to provide it and has just had a lot dumped in it over the years or can it magically create anything out of nothing e.g. the vivariums or newt's suitcase?
As long as it's not one of the exceptions to Gamp's Law of Elemental Transfiguration like food, it can be created from nothing.
hmmm, I may need to add the room to the list of things wizards and witches casually gave intelligence to then abandoned to find its own way
Its me sorry guys i got a little too silly with the cruciatus curse 😔
Ominis: how are you a ravenclaw?
Im an absolute book and chess worm
Thats why
That reminds me, how the hell does he do his school work ?
Like i get he has a special wand and shi, but i doubt he can read with it
Or if he does, he'll look absolutly ridicoulous while doing so
Maybe special books or something
I like to think (but its more hc than actual lore) that there is some kind of ink that is able to project itself into the "reader's" minds
Or voice
I was so evil even slytherin couldn’t handle it so they put me with the truly deeply evil kids, the one born with darkness and crime in their veins, the kids that remind the teachers about the homework
This is is why I don’t understand how Slytherin gets all the hate
Well, voldy for some reason.
Reminding teachers about homework is worse than Voldy
Maybe some sort of brail spell lol
Voldy: false
“He who shall not be named” is not as bad as “Words that shall not be said”
Thats why ravenclaws are the real villains
I agree
Ron Weasley voice "Is he a wizard or not?"
I'm pretty sure they can get quills that write for you
Also howlers are a thing so it's not too much of a stretch for the professors to provide him a book that reads the text for him
Actually come to think of it why would ominis even have a need for writing stuff down besides his OWLs
If not quills It could also be because his wand naturally helps him. I know his wand helps him to travel around, idk why writing would be a challenge if he uses his wand instead of a pen/feather?
It wouldn't be a challenge but why would he need to do it
He still needs to study and do homework?
Studying would basically be making notes for his own benefit. Most likely he has an alternative system than traditional paper and quill.
For homework, surely the teachers could just formatively assess him in class instead.
Probably just reading too much into it but I think in the real world blind students would get some kind of braille keyboard to work with instead
Yeah I’m not sure. Professors could also give him alternate assignments that may not include as much writing and more demonstrating. He is a powerful wizard after all, so it could be he already knows a lot of the spells he is learning, along with potions, etc.
Yeah like most of the subjects are practical anyway with the exception of arithmancy, history of magic, Muggle studies, possibly astronomy he wouldn't be required to do
Oh yeah as a fifth year they'd obviously assess him differently for OWLs
I had special needs accommodations in school, so I relate to Ominis so well
I’m not blind. I have epilepsy
I think game intented epilepsy as a spell
Crucio maybe?
🥶
On the subject of crucio I am currently wondering if Salazar Slytherin did the same pain magic Isidora did. That door which opens to his sanctum is powered by pain and the black shifting coating on it is very similar to the black shifting coatiing Ranrock gets on his chest when threatening rookwood
WAIT, is pain magic what was used on Anne do you think?
No I think that was just a dark curse from Rookwood
but we know its what the goblins are using and it looks very similar to slytherin's door
The Slyherin door is unlocked using crucio, which causes pain when cast on the target and ends once the caster stops. Isadora's spell extracts emotional pain and all other emotions aswell leaving people in a vegatable-like state. Two completely different spells.
The curse used on Anne causes periodic physical weakness, fatigue and pain and doesn't stop after the caster dies. Also a different spell.
This is why we needed to sacrifice Rookwood and use the DA Relic, but nooo
I have a feeling its not that simple. Odds are its sacrifice a loved one. And thats assuming the Relic even does what is advertised without any sheninagans or twist etc. You can't trust a dark magic artefact to be as advertised when it comes to stuff like removing dark magic or curses. Thats against the nature of dark magic.
The quest line ended poorly.
It ended in an open-ended manner
If that’s it for Sebastian and we never hear from him again, then yea, poor ending. If they add dlc, it was a good ending
I don't think we will. I think the point the devs intended for the storyline was dark magic will lead to ruin or tragedy no matter how well intentioned
|| Idk about that. Even in the “bad” ending, our character still lives “happily ever after.” Same with Sebastian, unless you betray him. There’s room for a happy ending. ||
Well there's tradegy either way, he lost his uncle by his own hand and his sister in the process who no longer wants anything to do with him and he will have the guilt over for the rest of his life.
As for the MC, they lost their mentor, possibly their friend Seb if you turn him in, and depending on your choice may have either resigned themselves to a life of isolation as the Keeper or potentially become a dark wizard with power unseen since god knows how long and get imprisoned or killed down the line to preserve the canon timeline.
You'll either get bittersweet ending or a dark ending
It doesn't really fit the canon either way since obviously the map chamber was never mentioned as being a part of hogwarts
I don't think the scriptorium was either
The endings can leave open many outcomes, ||either you become the Keeper and keep the map chamber secret or just destroy it, or hide it, the staff keep it all secret for the rest of their lives and tell no one else or if they do tell later staff, said staff kept it secret, and if you absorb the power, then the chamber being there is moot. The scriptorium is easily kept secret by Ominis and Seb and Anne, if she knows of it. Though tbh that place really should have been found along time ago given were the entrance is and how to reveal it. Just light some specific torches at once? How many people go down that corridor in need of a light? Many. Not the best hiding spot for an entrance to his maze puzzle.||
Do you think the stone portals we use a few times are one way or two way and can be used to come and go?
|| I’d never attempt to use ancient magic to cure Anne. You’ve seen what it does. ||
||Depends on what your doing probably. Isidora was taking away human emotion and the goblins were using that to empower their abilities. Here you'd be taking away a dark magic curse not touching Anne's personality directly.||
|| If I made her worse, it’d destroy the PeteSebOmini friendship. Can’t do it. ||
||So you're afraid . . . fair enough||
Y E S
Don't get me wrong just noting it. There's people who wont get a cure for something because they've lived with it their entire lives and afraid of change, not that they'll make things worse but just change.
Huh
|| Sebastian would want you to try ||
Sequel bait idea we make the cursed vaults of hogwarts mystery to protect the pain repository
Wait... what makes you think that Isidora could have taken dark magic away? She just wanted to remove pain, which is the only link with Anne's curse...
That was my point we've only seen what ancient magic does in a vague way (building pillars and the vault at gringotts) or in the very specific way Isidora uses it. Using it to remove dark magic (if it even can) is not something we've seen even attempted so we don't actually know what it could or would do in that situation
Honestly I think Sebastians quest used to be a part of the main questline. Too many coincidences for them not to be. So I think they definitely wanted the 'remove pain' to be a parallel to what Anne was going through, and thus make the decisions your character makes much harder.
I think it's safe to say that removing Anne's pain with ancient magic would end in the same result, as that seems to be the whole point of the conflict they were trying to build with the two stories
Also it's implied the keepers are showing us a specific viewpoint to persuade us that ancient magic is a bad idea
Oh I trust them about as far as my 15 year old girl character could physically throw ||their paintings. Everything about them rings warning bells. I have no doubt Isidora was causing problems with her drawing human emotion out of the people she "helped" but the keepers are very much we know better and we must impress it on whoever comes next. The trials to earn the right for knowledge where we risk our life, the fact they've had months to discuss us and the current situation yet they keep stalling to do so. Even the map chamber with its massive paintings looking down on you to reinforce the fact they are the larger than life authority and you the humble suplicant. I doubt their evil but they want you to seal keep the knowledge of ancient magic secret for the greater good and will do everything they can to ensure it.||
Also (as pointed out by a video I watched) || it's mentioned Isidora's painting was burnt almost deliberately and yet Rookwood/Ranrok have almost nothing to gain by doing this as they only care about the repository. If anything they would be interested in finding out more ||
Yah from my understanding of current story of HM, we still don't know who made them or why, only who put the ||Crown of Myneme|| in ||the last vault|| and why and there's no idication they were made by them for that purpose.
|| Not if he knew the consequences and if it could make her worse. ||
Looks like you guys are writing classified documents
That's not really how Sebastian would think. He's kinda desperate and even if it was a 1% chance of success I think he would go for it
I mean he's willing to turn to the dark arts even
Dark Arts aren’t bad
Plus, || If he knew what it could do to her, I don’t think he’d do it. If he needs proof, I’ll take him to the pensieve at this point. ||
saying that after seeing Sebastian's fall is like Darth Vader saying "The dark side of the force doesn't corrupt".
Everybody except for Death eaters/Voldemort says the dark arts are bad, and a shortcut to power that ends up costing more than it is worth. Voldemort's answer to that is that they are too afraid of the power they contain, but the dark arts are undoubtedly corruptive. Just look at Voldemort himself, who is but a shadow of his pre-dark arts self.
In Hogwarts Legacy, we are once again served the same soup. Ominis warns that the dark arts corrupt, hence why he wants to stay as far from them as possible.
I don't see any reputable source showing/saying the dark arts don't corrupt, but plnety of things showing the opposite
Tell that to the keepers || Who happened to use it to stop evil. ||
Oh and tell that to Ron
And Voldemort wasn’t corrupt, he’s just naturally evil. His goal in life is to live forever, that’s not corruption. It’s what he’s wanted from young
I mean, he lacks the ability to even feel love.
Yup, I'm not saying they should never be used, simply that their cost often ends up to be far more than you believed. Being willing to use the dark arts, known to cause pain (as highlighted in their introduction in the wiki: The Dark Arts,[1] also known as Dark Magic,[2][3] or Dark Side[4] was a term that referred to any type of magic that was mainly used to cause harm to, exert control over, or even kill people and creatures.), might cause dependance (**The Dark Arts were generally regarded as corrupting to those who use them (which is part of the reason they are called "dark"). **) in an effort to defeat a dark curse (which is not even within what we know it does) based on the word of an old dude known for being frankly quite evil, seems like quite bad mental decay
|| Bakar seemed alright. Ron seemed alright. It all had to do with the wielder. ||
I was talking physically. He was always evil, but his outside changed to match his inside, robbing him of part of his manipulation skillset.
And both of them only used the dark arts very rarely. They didn't use them willy nilly, but evaluated when they should be used before using them. As for Bakar, he is horrified after having done it, but it is clear he thinks it was necessary
are you saying snape is mentally stable?
Snape used it
I mean, yes
Sure, he’s a bit angry and depressed, but that’s not the Dark Arts fault
Well... Snape in the first war is shown differently than in the second, and we don't know what is part of what. We rarely see him use the dark arts, mostly his own spells.
I’m only thinking about Avada. If we’re talking, Dark Arts even Harry used them
But once again, any evidence that some people immersed themselves in the dark arts and were not corrupted? Like Sebastian started going through the books to see if he could find a mention of what attacked his sister, and ended up learning all three unforgiveables, and using them when anything else would have worked
Yup, but not extensively, which is my point.
There are plenty of people who drank alcohol and are not alcoholic. Plenty of people who drink alcohol and can drive afterwards. But it is shown as well that alcohol clouds the mind and can cause dependance.
|| Well, Sebastian used Imperio and Avada Kedavra once in my playthrough. ||
yet still used imperio reflexively? When any other curse would have worked?
|| He didn’t use it to do “evil” with, he used it to save his sister. ||
Bombarda? Would have worked. Expelliarmus? as well. Levioso? idem. Glacius? yes. Confringo? Yes, and he said previously it is his favorite spell. descendo? Yes. arresto momentum? Yes. Transfiguration? Yes. Depulso? Yes. Accio? yes
Hell is paved with well meaning thoughts
Idk, the Devil is a bit selfish
Doesn't matter, what this means is that you can mean well and do horrible things.
Isidora didn't mean to rob people of their feelings either
Idk we're given a biased perception of her
kind of, yeah, but people still open the receptacle.
|| Despite seeing the harm she was causing, she was still blind. Sebastian saw the fault in his mistakes immediately when they went south. ||
Like she's not even that corrupted.
|| And tbh, the Uncle attacked us, so I can’t see this as a mistake. ||
nope. He said directly 'I needed to do that'. 'What have you done?'.
He only recognized them when he was confronted with the consequences of his actions. He didn't lament what he did, but how people reacted to it.
Let me hope you're never attacked by someone trying to restrain you rightfully, then. Like the uncle attacked with restraining spell when he controlled and woke up an army of inferii not a kilometer away from a village
can you see how badly that could/should have turned?
It’s a natural human response to try and justify something you recently did. You don’t automatically go “Dang, shouldn’t have done that.”
It requires a bit of thought, because after all || The uncle DID attack us ||
He didn't even know what he did, and it is clear that Slytherin lied about what it did.
but even then, when you first confront him in the undercroft, possibly days later, he still says "I had to do it".
|| Levitating me above AND dropping me into Inferi, attacking two students INSTEAD of Inferi… that’s a bit rude imo ||
he also attacks the inferii, iirc
And he doesn't drop you in the inferii either. Once you're levitated, he just ignores you. You drop afterwards because the game needs you to be able to miss a dodge in that phase
Also, he uses some deadly spells on me that I’ve killed a few poachers with…
Sebastian is one of the characters that make me rue the fact this wasn't in a ttrpg campaign. I would have sided with Ominis much sooner, stunned him in the catacombs, and taken the relic. Then, I would have tried to discuss things rationaly with him, and make him do an unbreakable vow that he isn't going to do any dark magic again without talking it with Ominis/me first.
only after you got him to half health.
like you send him things like transfigured inferii to the head, confringo, diffindo,... and he is still convinced he can take you on without hurting you, so does so. After you roughed him up a lot, he realises he will have to knock you unconscious and gets rougher.
|| Not to mention that Solomons arrogance, something he bashed Sebastian for, caused the Inferi to turn on us in the first place. ||
Like between the 3 companions, Sebastian is only a smidgen above Natty in my opinion. He is rash, like his uncle, racist, unable to take a step back, and likes to run into battle. He is the perfect example of a gryffindor dunderhead, and the only thing that makes me like him slightly more than Natty is that he has a reason for acting stupid.
Sebastian should have been forced to swear that unbreakable vow in Slytherin's scriptorium.
And never allowed to leave with the relic. But we can't do that, can we?
Oh, not this “racist” thing again…
The only way he is truly useful to us is in unmasking Isidora's side of the keeper/isidora conflict
He’s literally there most helpful character in the game
well... having tried it, he still wants to kill as many goblins as possible, including at the possible expense of his life, after beign told goblins were not responsible for his sister
Before* not after
fig?
After. I tried that
Only before if you rush to him. I did his entire storyline after the main quest, to check what would happen
I told him about ||Rookwood|| before even imperio.
I'd much rather have Poppy on my side than Sebastian
You did it out of order then. There’s a set way to play the missions, that’s why they unlock at a certain point
Idk how though, tbh
and you can ignore that. Most games plan for it.
You have to complete his stories to advance the main story
nope
Some of them, you do
only his main quest stories, those linked to Isidora
you don't need any of the ones linked to Slytherin
His main quests are the only ones where he fights Goblins
nope
If there’s others, which one is it?
imperio, remember it? The village is bursting with goblins afterwards.
But even then, if you encounter goblins on your way, which you can do, it will happen
Ok, well, “racist”, as you call him, or not, I can see why he’d want to rush in and kill Goblins
you do know you can abuse companion quest to gain companions for some time?
yes, but not necessarily insulting "honnest goblins" at the same time.
he insults lodgok after his death in one of his side quests, iirc
|| Lodgok was a bit of an idiot ||
anyways, we likely won't agree, but to go back to the main point, you have given me example of people who drank a little wine, and were fine afterwards. They might have drunk and driven, and were fine.
There are tons of examples of such cases with drinking and driving. It is still clearly not something you should do.
Same goes with dark magic.
That’s where we’ll disagree, as we always have lol
Actually Seb attacked him first. Solomon took the relic and destroyed it, then Seb shot a spell at him, then the fight occurred.
He shouldn’t have destroyed the relic
Relic was too dangerous to be kept intact. He should have done it after they got out of the cavern, not while in midst of inferi. That was a dumb move
And I’ve recklessly driven about an hour after a seizure.
It was a go kart. I was at my friend’s house and I begged his mom to let me drive the go kart
Even though she knew I had just had a seizure while in the pool
There is no should or shouldn't. There is only power and those too weak to seek it.
I did not know that, can you do that with Fig as I'd like to keep him around if possible
Keep him alive as long as possible.
You might be able to during rookwood castle quest. However, it depends on how much freedom they decided to give you.
ah i'm already past that unfortunately
So what do you do exactly? Start a mission with a companion and just free roam?
It should be interesting
Don't hold your breath until we find out who's directing and acting in it though
The Witcher series was ruined by the directors after all
It works for a few quests, but you cannot free roam too far, nor can you teleport. You can still fight other ennemies, and capture bandit camps.
How can they do this to us?
Ya but jk still retains creative control. Unlike the witcher writer who signed away all his creative control and royalty rights years ago and still rages about it all these years later
JKR is not really a good movie writer.
Don’t get me wrong, she’s a pretty good book writer, just not necessarily good at writing movies…
Praying Craig Mazin is the show runner just to have the possibility of Chernobyl costars working together again
I could see Adam Nagaitis and Jessie Buckley being Remus and Tonks respectively
Yeah Andrej Sapkowski made a huge blunder
Like they would've given him royalties and he chose a flat 10k instead
It's not fair to back out and say you want the royalties when you weren't willing to take the risk to begin with
Stephen fry as Dumbledore
Fingers crossed
Here me out: Ian McKellen as Dumbledore
I would actually love that
If we have Fry we gotta get Laurie too so we can have A bit of Fry and Laurie 😁
I'm so down for that.
And he's brittish, on top of that. I would have liked to see Christopher Lee, but Ian McKellen would be a good replacement, if very different
Sadly. Sir Christopher Lee has passed away.
Yup, hence why I suggested Ian
Laurie should be professor Snape haha
Hear me out, he apply his character from House where he was very good at playing a dry, sarcastic type character it would fit well with Snape
I can't see it, but at least it would mean they would have some lines together
Unless Laurie plays McGonagall
I guess it kinda depends on which version of Laurie you're thinking of. He made a career out of playing camp eccentric characters but he also can be the complete opposite if you look at what he does in House
I think his ability to deliver some funny sarcastic put downs to the students would make him work
I've seen him on both sides
An alternative could be playing Peeves too
both his over the top characters in Blakcadder and A bit of Fry And Laurie, and multiple seasons of House
But then Peeves you'd have to give a lot of screen time for
Peeves is a good one, though maybe a bit old haha
I do hope they stick to English actors as much as possible like in the movies though
Miranda Hart for Professor Trelawney
Hagrid is gonna be a tough one
Basically every characters who had a major role in the movies will have a hard time selecting cast.
That would never happen
True, but I think some will be easier than others. But some of the actors are definitely more iconic than the others
Ian McKellen is too proud to act for TV
It never hurt to just wish for.
The only reason he did Gandalf was because he respects Tolkien
It's just not his nature to do films/TV otherwise
He's also like 80? If they plan on going with the show for 10 years then there's a high risk of a repeat of what happened in the movies
That too but I think he's too proud to agree to it anyway he's a classical actor
You need someone old enough to be Dumbledore but also not old enough to cast the role until Season 6 finish...lol\
That's why I think Fry could work
Daniel Craig could be another option for an older character but not Dumbledore he's a bit too rough
Fry has the wisdom but also the eccentricity to play Dumbledore
Yep
Not dumbledore, but they could definitely play someone else
Martin Freeman... Idk
Yeah, that's what I'm trying to say
Maybe Nick Frost could be Hagrid haha
I'm not seeing anything for him tbh
David Tennant is a good fit in the universe too
Ik he played Barty but he can definitely play another role
Not seen Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz?
Do you think they are gonna do a mass audition like the movie did
I kind of doubt it, but they also need a bajillion kids, so maybe
Well, I can only think of few British actors and actress for being a Chinese.
I meant for Martin Freeman
Simon Pegg even voices Prof Black in HL so he'd definitely be qualified to take on a role
He portrays him quite well because he comes across as a clumsy headmaster but in a funny way
Yeah, it was a brief, but I like his performance, especially during polyjuice plan
What about Radcliffe as Dumbledore?
Original trio are definetly old enough to cast the 19 years later scene naturally.
Right?
That would be terrible imo hahah
they shouldn't reprise their roles, they should if anything be one of cameo characters
yup, or be in a completely different role. Like having Emma Watson as Bellatrix Lestrange (if they can pull it off...)
She did( kinda)
Too young
He's old enough to play a teacher but not the headmaster
have you seen how good prostetics can be?
Hmmm but using prosthetics to make him look older for a major side character instead of using an older actor doesn't sit right with me
I keep looking at Adam Nagaitis for Lupin.
And now I’m thinking of his Chernobyl character as one of the marauders.
I'm pretty excited about the TV series. Really hope they get good actors though.
If theres any video game that deserves a movie it’s this.
🥲
I’d totally try out for Anne though.
agreed
hogwarts isnt real
what? noooo 😦
Well, that would explain why I never received my letter
Nah, dobby was stealing your mail
You didn’t receive a letter?
Muggles.
Dabby ate them all 
Your profile is so Slytherin, yet you’re a Ravenclaw
Is that him?
SNIFF mmmm smellls greeat!
Welp, here comes my annual “Yer not a wizard, Ben” depression
sorry for replying to an old comment but why harry potter as dumbledore?
Don’t you want a little more cognitive dissonance in your life?
sorry but what tf does cognitive dissonance mean lol.
Like a « dressed as harry potter » Daniel Radcliffe, with an obviously fake beard, that everyone calls Albus Dumbledore and everyone treats as Albus Dumbledore, investigating Harry Potter’s disappearance ?
Correction, it has to be in regards to your actions, so not applicable here, sorry.
oooh ahah
My bad, misstranslated a concept
still what you mentioned earlier happens to me so many times lol. not to long ago i almost fell on my ass cuz i was playing vr and i wanted to lean against the irl wall which i knew was there but since i moved around i almost fell. and another time i wanted to put down my controllers on a virtual desk lol
I want to torture my brain with the fact that this is obviously Harry Potter, but ALSO obviously Dumbledore
i mean it would be nice to see dan return but then make him a cameo or play himself as an adult
Heard a story from a VR place where a guy tried to lean into a railing at the very start of a team building, lost his footing, banged his head on a metal post, and had to be brought to the hospital via ambulance…
Where is the fun in that?
i dont think it would be a positive thing for the series if they made him play dumbledore
Or Adult Daniel Radcliffe as 11 years old Harry Potter, with all other newcomers bare the trio played by 11 yo?
true but like i just said it wouldnt be good for the series if dumbledore was portrait by harry potter lol. just look at the new season for the netflix series crown. where the actress for umbridge plays lizzy and everyone is saying they can only see umbridge in her
And? That’s where you have to just lean extremely hard into it…
no like actually have the og trio play themselves in the last cutscene at 9 3/4
If you pivot into it enough, you might get quite good absurd moments…
Why play themselves? Once again, are we really going for realism? Wouldn’t it be better to just go for completely surreal things?
fair enough
but like if they actually where to star i'd like to see them play the adult versions of their characters
either way regardless of wether or not they appear at all in the series im for sure gonna watch it lol
Why would it be better
Why not? We get tons and tons of gritty shows nowadays, why not a fun and light hearted one?
The people who are making it probably are counting on making money from it can counting on old harry potter fans. Not sure full on fun and whimsical is what most want.
Some fun and light heartedness here and there sure, (people loved fred and george), but if people think Harry Potter, comedy is not the first thing that comes to their minds
Preachhhhh
So tired of feeling more depressed after watching TV
Or getting my heart stomped on
Like Picard season 3
I think capitalizing on nostalgia will be a safer bet than trying to do a marvel-esque spin on the hp-universe
Why Marvel-esque and not Python-esque?
Thought marvel-esque would be more viable because the comedy is only sprinkled in here and there. Full on python-esque like mainly focused on comedy would be too radical of a shift - very risky hit or miss
The books start whimsical and get more dark as each book passes
If they truly want to be faithful to the books they will follow this lead
Do they? I remember them always starting depressing, at the beginning the reader was always reminded that this special protagonist orphan is being abused and neglected by the last relatives he has.
More like the magic world starts whimsical and gets darker as we see how it operates gov wise and the racism in it and corruption etc
It's possibly also to do with it being written from Harry's perspective
As Harry grows more mature he starts seeing the world in a darker way
It's no accident that Cedric's death and Voldemort's return happens in Harry's fourth year which would basically be a coming of
age type year for wizards
yah that too
though some parts of DH are from other povs or from omniscient pov like ch 1 of DH
im not a big quidditch lore person but and i dont know if there is a cannon explanation for why the snitch is worth 150 points but i think i might know why back in the earlier days of quidditch there was no snitch but there was also another sport called snijit (i dont know how to spell the bird name) hunting which caught incredibly fast and is what the golden snitch was made to imitate so 1 day in a quidditch game a guy whose name i cant remember let a snitch into the quidditch game and said he would give 150 galleons to the player who caught the snijit but they couldnt just make quidditch catch the snijit so they made catching the snijit worth 150 points so that migth be where they got the 150 point for catching the snitch from, the 150 galleons given to the person who caught the snijit
They should’ve revised it in later years to make the game less unbalanced. The snitch is basically an instant win button unless the rest of your team is totally outclassed like the World Cup. Should have made the snitch be worth like 50 points.
*snidget
And yes, they probably should have made it differently, but also, why are their goals worth 10 points? Like why do you count in increments of ten and not 1?
prob so that the goal aren't even more redundant
i think its better for it to be worth 100 point i think 50 is not enoguh since you need to remember that the game arent the 30min at most games thatt we read and see in the movie a lot of games last hours and sometimes days and the longesrt ever game was almost a month if i remember correcxtly so the snitch isnt was easy to catch as harry makes it out to be
There was a situation iirc in a former quidditch world cup were a team was down by more than 150 points so the seeker was defending against the snitch so the other team couldn't catch it
The snitch would make more sense if it was worth only 50 points instead though then it makes the game strategy more interesting
In a modern ruleset they would add a time limit on also
Kinda like how cricket has a T20 format
This might be a dumb question but is the snitch an instant winner or does it js give you 150 points....how can you win without the snitch?
No.
Yes.
By having a 160 or higher point lead while the opponent's seeker catches it.
Two schools of thought with that.
A 16 goal lead is basically a blowout so you might just want to end the game anyway.
Or, nobody is gonna be that unaware of the game situation since the captain can tell the seeker to hold off
Also, I hope with the game they have 5 v 5 multiplayer matches or it's a missed opportunity
None
@primal topaz spamming the same message into all channels
So, dumb question.
Can Reparo fix a pair of shoes that are practically coming apart at the seams?
I thought reparo can literally fix everything( in a way)
No,not all things. It can’t seem to repair a vanishing cabinet and it can’t repair something damaged by fiendfyre or other powerful curses. Also it can’t repair living tissue. And only one wand can use it to repair other wands
those are so pretty, if i was still engaged i'd get one 💀
im sad cuz i wanted some sort of nuance or positive details on salazar, but so far he really is the creepy evil man that the books always said he was. like, that room thing with ominis?? jesus
He just have different opinion with other three.
He thought Hogwarts is not for Muggle-born while other three thought it is.
So Salazar believes staying here will not benefit his idea, so he left, with a little surprise of his own.
He also left behind a death trap of a room AND a murderous basilisk that would only spare pure bloods. And lest we forget, this is a school. For children.
I was really hoping for something to redeem Salazar, especially since this game isn’t attached to Harry and therefore free of his limited POV, but man, that quest killed me
One thing that may help is, everyone is the hero of their own story
So to Salazar he was doing the best he could muster in the defense of wizardkind, he may have even held an opinion that was common during his time and the other three founders could have been the weird ones
Least downplaying Slytherin member: Salazar did nothing wrong really, the founders just had a polite disagreement and Salazar left a murderous creature in the castle full of children and teenagers :P
Well, he thinks Muggle-born are unworthy( blood status man)
True. That's what he thinks.
Well didn't the people kill witches and wizards back there just for who they are?
Muggle
Witch hunt across European countries during 14th century I think
Yeah they were alive during that period
who, the hogwarts founders? no, they were not 😄
hogwarts was founded in the 10th century
I find it odd that the other founders were accepting of half bloods but then again the students were children
Do they?
I mean they got into a disagreement with salazar because wanted to kill all the half bloods
No, others got into a disagreement with Salazar because Salazar thought: 1, muggle-born should not be accepted into Hogwarts; 2, students should not hesitate to use deadly curses when necessary.
And he's extremely pissed with Godric Gryffindor.
Then he leaves a snake so that his descendants can kill children lol
Only those who think unworthy
Yes
Update: the HPFanfic subreddit is gold. They pointed out in a post how it’s very possible that salazar’s specific concerns 1000 years ago were not the exact concerns of blood purity in hog warts legacy or in HP’s time. And when we consider the fact that the letter we find in hog warts legacy is written In contemporary English, it’s kind of sus
So I do think salazar was probably nuanced and not quite a POS, and later on his descendants probably screwed with things. I don’t think he personally would construct a room where people would starve to death in his own castle with three of his powerful besties also living in that castle.
Yeah, that's what I intent to believe.
Also, someone else on Reddit pointed out how Salazar might’ve been from Spain, and that during the time period of 900 ish AD, Scotland was being raided by the Norsemen.
So you guys
Catholic Salazar Slytherin from Spain
Salazar is a Spanish name yeah
Olé
But how do you explain the chamber of secrets
That was 100% made by him as only descendants of Salazar speak parseltongue
Maybe it's possible other descendants misappropriated it to store the basilisk
wasnt it stated that Salazar personally left the basilisk in there?
and if so, if he was not a bad guy, why even leave him there?
He mistrusted Muggle-born students to the point of proposing that they should not be accepted at Hogwarts. When he expressed his opinion to the other Hogwarts founders, they did not agree with him. In response, he left the school, never to return, and constructed the Chamber of Secrets to house a Basilisk, so that one day, the Heir of Slytherin could purge the school of Muggle-borns in his name.
Yeah I don't think there is anything nuanced about that
That's a clear signal of intent
I think the disagreement with Godric Gryffindor finally result him doing such a rational solution.
I don’t think Salazar was like a perfectly soft sugar donut who could do no wrong. I absolutely think he had a bit of Mega Jerk in him to put it lightly
But I also want to think his thoughts on what was a “threat to wizard kind” wouldn’t align much with what Voldemort or other modern blood purists would think. And I also wanna think he had some redeeming qualities
Some explanation I’ve seen for the basilisk is that it was a defense against Nordic invasion
If we want to go into fanon stuff, yeah, indeed, there are two possible explanations for the basilisk:
- Being there to protect the school, not attack the students, and then becomming mad due to lack of contact/prolonged contact with Voldemort
- Being put there by someone else.
Yes some did. But it's safe to assume the eleven year olds who displayed magic ability who were potential hogwarts students weren't part of them.
Also the state of believing a proposition is not something one arrives at by a voluntary/intentional action.
The process of adopting a belief is becoming convinced by something, either by good or by bad reasons.
One can intend to act as if one beliefs something even if one really doesn't, but you can't really just choose a belief
I think you would be correct in saying Slytherin's concerns 1000 years ago are not the exact same ones we see in Harry Potter, in the sense that Slytherin didn't hate muggle borns because they were inherently filthy, but because they committed a lot of atrocities on wizardkind.
I think if Slytherin met the Malfoys, maybe he would've tolerated them, but the Malfoys seem to just hate muggle-born wizards because they have muggle blood and that's that. Slytherin seemed to hate them because muggles did a lot of awful things to wizards, so not exactly for the same reasons as the Malfoys, wouldn't you say?
So, I think there is some nuance in his views, but Slytherin is definitely evil for leaving the basilisk to murder muggle-borns. It's almost as if he left it out of spite for the other founders, since no one agreed with him, especially Gryffindor. I would not, however, fault Slytherin for being mega pissed about what the muggles did to his kind. To my understanding, Slytherin experienced these cruelties first hand.
I'd still oppose Slytherin for blaming evil on innocent children, though, which is what the other founders did. Obviously, that's not good 😆
These chat gpt scripts are amazing ... lol jk
None of the work, all of the content 😎
Hey fam. Ollivander’s was in diagon alley for Harry right? Or am I crazy
You’re not crazy. They probably put it in Hogsmeade so they wouldn’t need to make a diagon alley. Since Hogsmeade is right by the castle and Diagon Alley is like in the middle of muggle land.
If we are talking about real world history, children that were suspected of witchcraft would've almost certainly been shunned from society
Possibly even persecuted just like adults
Ultimately though the whole witch trial move was just a front to negatively discriminate against certain people that "looked" like witches
Let’s just hand wave it and say the store moved to diagon alley later
Isn't it implied that the store owner is a relative?
Maybe it's just a family business that spans Britain
Relative as in an uncle rather than directly their father
Logistically it makes sense to set up a wand shop there anyway like students are definitely going to be breaking or losing wands constantly
It is an easy hand wave. Stores tend to move.
We are talking about HP lore in which these muggle born magical children not only as you rightly say would be persecuted by muggles but also face the scorn of bigots like Salazar because he would irrationally hate these children as well for something they didn't do. So much so that he would let loose a monster to murder them.
I read somewhere in canon lore, that Salazar's belief was not the norm at the time period.
Yep - found it - Slytherin’s discrimination on the basis of parentage was considered an unusual and misguided view by the majority of wizards at the time. WizardingWorld.net
It was written in current english so we the players could read it. Canonically it would be in Latin or Bythonic or anglo-saxon runes or something.
Can you post the link?
The term ‘pure-blood’ refers to a family or individual without Muggle (non-magic) blood. The concept is generally associated with Salazar Slytherin, one of the four founders of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, whose aversion to teaching anybody of Muggle parentage eventually led to a breach with his three fellow founders, and his resi...
My current theory/headcanon is that certain magical texts have the ability to choose if they want to be read or have that decision be made by their author and can either auto-translate themselves to be more intelligible or more obfuscated
Which is why a man that would have spoken in middle English at best had notes in the scriptorium that could be read by modern children
Because jk Rowling really seems to want us to understand slytherins intentions as being malicious
Man, taken at face value this article blows so much out of the water
Especially this
is there any connection between the mckinnon wizard family and the mckinnon muggle family?
I mean, yeah, not everyone has to be the sweetest sugarplum at heart, some people are bad xD
I'm a huge Harry Potter fan and just started the game today and I was wondering if the Rookwood we are told about in the beggining is some sort of ancestor to a death eater cause this name rings a bell
Yep.
Nice thanks
so i have a theory that ronenlad actually opened up the map chamber to the keepers? then he killed the fifth keeper which is why we never see him in game?
sure dude, you do you 😒
||isn't the 5th keeper at the bottom of the well? it would explain the ringing i hear when i'm close||
||its the pharoahs curse isnt it||
ok. i try and promote healthy discussion in the lore channel and get people like you being rude. not sure what sparked this malicious behaviour but it sure isn't welcome in this community
Does anyone recognize the symbolism on this stained glass?
Specifically the dot counts on the starburst above the moon
the semi eclipsed moon stands for the unity of beastfolk and werewolves in the harry potter lore. i assume it is an easter egg to do with the minitours in the forest and werewolf secret if you play inside the forbidden forest at midnight?
yes. thats right.
Ooh okay, clock hands
you got it, dont forget about the minitours though
islam doesn't exist in the harry potter universe. mohamid was burned at the stake in the salem witch trials
Nintendo did something like that for a Zelda game and they had to remove it
Akim... WTF!? that's not true
look it up...
Source?
I doubt JK would have something like that canon
Anyway I think the resemblance is a coincidence
Akin, you have some serious explaining to do bubby
I think it's safe to assume religion doesn't exist in the wizarding world though there are no references to anything
gunther is typing! everyone hold on to your horses.
sorry gunther didnt see you there lol
a reply would be nice
slipperin... if you need a reply. maybe say please?
Reply to what exactly
um me
But there's nothing to reply to
how rude
guys. just. please get along.
Ah this is incorrect apparently the wizards celebrate Christmas
I'm happy to discuss the lore with you here 🙂
Counter evidence : https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Islam#cite_note-wikipedia-1
this is a fanmade website lol
ok well jk rowling herself said otherwise
That was at 1700 years old though
he's magic idiot
gunther its ok
And wouldn't it contradict the quran anyway
You can scrutinise the linked sources on the wiki if you wish
gunther we're on the same side
but i for one believe islam to be false (as far as harry wanders)
you can't argue with what's on pottermore though. these are jks writings
not so made up wiki page
The wiki is pointing out names of characters and a brand from Pakistan in one of the films
Well as I said you're welcome to check the sources if you're unsure
how can you be unsure after i sent you source material?
Potter more is fine too but that was 1700 years after the quran would've been written so I don't think it's evidence that Islam wouldn't exist
It's just saying that that's what happened to him
I am quite surprised JK wrote it actually
maybe they thought it to be taboo?
almost unbelievable you could say
The Salem trials were done by the west presumably
i guess anything is possible in the harry potter universe
this is not a coincidence
maybe, as far as i'm aware that's the only lore that she wrote about it
I don't know why it says still performing miracles either I'm not sure if that's what is written
if rowling said so then it must be true
a good auther covers all baises
Probably her trying to be inclusive but this is a gross misjudgement
She could've just said some wizards/witches practice Islam and left it there
It's ok
may i call you gunther
That's fine
Also there's wizards that wear turbans so I guess they practice Sikhism too
Besides quirell obviously
His reason for a turban was to cover up Voldemort
In the first book?
Yeah that one
tom marvelos
tom marvolo riddle?
He wears a turban all year and nobody thinks anything of it so it must be quite common
Tbh as a kid I thought it made him mysterious
Fair enough. That's even worse than I thought lol
jk rowling the dirty dastard
I don't even know where the pure blood came from
you guys know way more about this franchise than i do lol
who knows
i guess she just wanted to give backstory?
maybe it was her reason for the lack of inclusivity in hogwarts
Tbf the characters she wrote were pretty representative at the time of writing
such as
The Parvati twins, Dean Thomas
none of which practice islam to my knowledge
Seamus as well from Ireland
Not Islam I agree but it's pretty representative of British society
is he the one who gets the spell wrong and blows up?
Yeah lol
he was funny
ireland mentioned 🇨🇮🇨🇮🇨🇮
I think the books would've been fine as they are if she hadn't tried to retcon anything and just left the fans to interpret any other details
yea
does anyone know if islam is included in the harry potter universe?
wait, ive been in this chat before
somethings off
you smell it too?
ok guys cool it
i don't think it's wise to joke about that. some of them are clearly not and are infact playing videgames
sorry
JK already said all religions except Wicca are represented at Hogwarts.
i have no idea where this is stated but im tired
If you refer to my comment, its an interview she did.
i thought she didn't really do interviews any more
this wasn't recent
oh right. sorry i'm a little on the stupid side.
yeah newsflash lol
yeah, i mean islam features but as she stated, it's only practiced a little in the far east
Basically all religions but Wiccan are represented at Hogwarts
and wizards are as religiously varied as Muggles
isn't that contradictory to what she wrote before? sorry i don't know much about harry potter this is all quite confusing for me
well except wicca
rowing believes in the oars and the capsizes, i dont know about the griffindoors
wicca isn't represented at hogwarts at any rate
Basically wizards can be as varied as muggles on matters of religion or atheism
strange
you'd think wizards would have their own religion
why
religion by definition is ritual practices based around worship of something/someone
salazar pretty much confirmed that there was no afterlife
the fck?
yeah
what are you on bout?
and counter point - resurrection stone
literally calls back souls of the dead
so there's an afterlife for certain
what form that takes - who knows
well if it's just a ritual practice of faith then the tribal wizards likely had their own rituals to explain their side of things
the souls in question summoned back didn't talk about it
i'd find it unlikely that there isn't a wizard exclusive religion
well at some point they surely had them but they have to actually worship something or someone.
Dumbledore called it the next great adventure
Like if a wizard worships magic, then i guess thats a religion to them though not an officially recognized one
in one of the addendums written by jk, she said that when salazar peered into the veil, he saw only darkness. souls exist, however exist in an eternal limbo absent of any afterlife. they can be recalled, however feel as if no time has passed as they are unaware of their existence until they are recalled
source?
also salazar is defo wrong if so
cos we know there is one based on the ressurection stone
I wouldn’t take advice from Salazar
And LV is confirmed stuck between life and the afterlife in Limbo by JK
hence why when the resurrection stone was used the brothers wife got sad as she knew she was not for this world, and time was meaningless to her
the story is also written by a man who wasn;'t there at the time
who lived centuries after the events its based on
cap
even if peverell's wife didn't wanna be in the living world, doesn't mean another soul wouldn't want too
Limbo - where LV is stuck forever after he died
i dont believe you dandy
You can literally read JK's answer on it
why is dumbledore there i thought he was a good guy?
say what?
i quote sirius "i cannot linger here. life does not continue after death as you see it. you shat blood, i eternally shat blood"
does he really say that?
yes, book 7 i believe
It doesn’t sound like something in that book
?
i'm sure i've read it many more times than you have
yes yes, the shatting part stuck with me
i must have skim read that bit then
Nah, I think you guys are trolling.
teehee
yah they are
you can think that, doesn't change what jk wrote
i don't have a very good memory of the books
Um so basically snakes and Islam don't get along well, snakes being a symbol of evil so it would be shocking for JK put that religious figure in that house
Was he a child attending Hogwarts? Or already like 300 years old?
Soooo out of left field
Although it's a little sus you won't post a link
Screenshots won't do, how do I know that you didn't open up the source editor for shenanigans?
i think i'll be leaving the lore handling to the experts i have no idea what is going on lol
I mean one can just google JK Rowling Harry Potter religion Wicca and get the links
@worthy trench I mean that I tried to google what this dude posted and came up empty handed...
Where's the address bar? This is suuuuper sus.
What did they post about?
It's in the post I replied to
I honestly don't recall what the topic was about. Was it religion in the WW or the Muhammad/Islam thing?
Nor do i recall exactly what post you refer to when you replied to it.
Here
It might be she retracted it due to controversy idk
Especially given pottermore as a website doesn't exiy
Or its a deep fake from 4chan
Reverse image search hasn't returned anything
cackling
No way that can’t be real
It’s like the whole “hog warts students used to vanish their bowels when they had to go to the bathroom”
i dont think we've found anything to DISprove it though
Its fake no doubt. It says he's 1700 years old. So that tells me its fake. Also I don't think for a second JK would touch Islam in her lore in any way.
I get how you can doubt the screenshot is authentic. But how can you be 100% sure it's a forgery just from a character supposedly being 1700 years old in a fictional universe with magic. How does one thing follow from the other
The main proof would be the absence of any link but sharing screenshots. Screenshots contain no useful metadata…
The add to that the fact that searching for any sentence in google gives you no result…
Even an outdated link should show up in the wayback machine
Absence of a link is proof the screenshot is a forgery?
It may be reason to doubt it is authentic, but saying it means that it is definitely fake is stretching it
On top of this, nothing matches:
- this would mean founding hogwarts earlier than lore says, as the foundations of Islam are more ancient than hogwarts.
- Muhammad would have joined hogwarts at 1000 years old roughly.
- Nicolas flamel wouldn’t be well known.
So sure, none of those are proofs, just things that make you extremely wary.
As this is the internet, anything that sketchy should make you pause, and not propagate the info further
I'm curious so Imma just ask. @magic isle can you englighten us as to where you got that screenshot from (did you make it yourself when the website was still up, or did you get it form someone else)?
I agree about "pausing" and "not propagating" something that you're not sure is accurate, but that isn't the same as claiming you have no doubt it's fake.
There is no archives, articles etc talking about it
It was either removed silently and any objection was withdrawn before it made the news or it was never up to begin with
Here's what I mean about source editing:
Here is my fake article:
Here is the ORIGINAL, REAL article:
Here is how I was messing around in the source editor of the page:
I changed the text and changed the background
All I had to do was right click the background and inspect (Q), or i could do "Ctrl+shift+i"
Original here too
Plus the math in the alleged article is all wrong, The Salem Witch Trials occurred in 1692, and the prophet Muhammad was born around 570 CE, and Hogwarts was probably founded in around 900-1000 CE
This is so silly though, that dude's screenshots are blatant misinformation at best and I'm not going to talk about it anymore
The age itself is far beyond anything else seen in canon lore for one and JK has been careful not touch religion in her books and lore so that's also why.
Also the fact it says he went to Hogwarts, he wouldn't have gone there as an adult and he's not from England, Wales, Scotland or Ireland.
As someone brought up, someone no doubt edited the site using source editor
That was me, I'm that someone that brought up source editing
The dates not matching is better evidence in favour of doubting the screenshot.
The fact about him being from another country is irrelevant unless you want to claim you can't think of anyone attending hogwarts who wasn't from the British Isles.
Your confidence level isn't proportional. The fact that it is possible to source edit (and for some people trivialy easy) can be evidence in favour of doubting the legitimacy of the screenshot.
It connot however be used to remove all doubt from the claim that the screenshot is a forgery.
It's reasonable doubt basically
are there any spells that work on ghosts?
including ones not in game
i know ghosts are not completely invincible since nick was petrified by the basilisk but i am curious if there are any spells a wizard (dark or otherwise) could use against one?
What I mentioned was enough for me to doubt it utterly. 1700 years old? Not likely. Slytherin, definitely not. Do I think JK would touch on the Islam religion's history in her lore. Absolutely not. She's knows how some in the Islamic will react to that. That's all enough for me. Then I see people mentioning incorrect dates for stuff. That just further solidifies my stance.
Well after Myrtle died she haunted Oliver Hornby until the Ministry stepped in and then she went back to Hogwarts. So they must have some way of controlling the ghosts.
If someone really wants to nip the matter in the bud, just tweet JK on it.
And I know poltergeists aren’t ghosts, but Waddiwasi was used to shoot chewing gum up peeves’s nose.
Poltergeists are not ghosts as you say. They can take on corporeality to some degree at will it seems given they can interact with physical objects etc



---o