#Full Metal Gantry
1 messages · Page 5 of 1
I've got two sets, one out of 6061 and one out of 7075, I just don't know what the exact differences are. 7075 was harder to chamfer though
Or maybe I'll just need to buy some better tools
7075 should be more than 78 though
A little bit but not much I think
How is the finish when you get those parts?
What do you have to do to make it usable for the printer?
It's not going to be a consistent finish with xometry. They send it to a job shop market. Think Uber, but for machining
I've only used SendCutSend personally.
I cannot speak for other services
There's a bit of diy finishing needed with this mod
holes were good on my sets and the bead blasting was consistent on them
So what finishing did you have to do?
countersink the holes and spray paint them cause I wanted them black but did feel like paying for anodizing
but the post procesing is explained in the documentation
Ye maybe i should read that xD
yeah probably
Is it all in the github repo?
yes
Aight
how is it so cheap for you?? i put all the parts in and its 107€ :/
You do not need all the parts, some might be ezcluded depends on your belta route
doesnt seem like the price goes down much when i remove parts tho lol
the price scales so weirdly xD
what parts are optional?
on laserboost the parts added up to 73€
thats pretty good
did yall get it in aluminum? what about stainless steel? does it just make the finishing harder without actual advantages?
yeah ppl get it in alu, usually 6000 or 7000 iirc
alu is lighter while still strong enough compared to stainless steel
Front mount x-joints vs top-mount x-joints
You do not need both
Turtle, I’ve bought 8mm shaft, 55mm long 2504ah’s and am hoping to use those over the 5mm variants. Do I need to change the BOM to suit? I’ve bought 8mm shafted gt2 9mm toothed gears
You only need different pulleys and if you want to go double shear(which I would recommend, I don't see any other reason to get those steppers), you need a f608 bearing and print the proper stepper tower inserts
Perfect, double sheer is what I was hoping for so I don’t bend shafts
Whats double sheer?
When you have steppers with a longer shaft you can add a second bearing on the bottom of the stepper tower to support the shaft when running higher belt tensions
#1287514029354520710 message
oh right i forgot you were writing about it xD
I prefer 8mm over the 5mm variants, since the bearing is actually housed with metal instead of praying on the plastic holding
Hey all, currently working on a toolhead for the Orbiter V3 since it's a new design. I started with the vanilla mercury one but now I want to incorporate the 9mm belt mod for FMG. Does anyone know if the belt plane or belt centerline is impacted by this mod? I am assuming that the only change necessary would be to widen each belt clamp symmetrically about the centerline by 3mm, but I couldn't find any mention. For those who have done this mod, is there a preferred toolhead design?
i would go e34m1 since its got nicer belt clips, but past that, youre spot on
Oh cool it's like a mercury fork of EVA 3. I'm gonna make mine overly complicated for fun even though that one looks pretty well thought out.
I’m trying to figure out what else I need, I’ve ordered f695s and 695s for the idler towers and the xy joints because I have 5mm dowel pins, should I have bought 8mm dowel pins and bearings as I’ve got 8mm gt2 pulleys
you'll have to get new 5mm pulleys for the xy joints. I don't think you'll be able to find 8mm id bearings to fit
yeah you'll need 4 5mm id ones
Ok cool, the bearings though I can’t use right? The 695s?
for which parts? because the f695s get pressed into the plates on the xy joints
not if you want to use them for double shear
To prevent the shaft from bending
youll need f608s i believe
yeah just double check the notes in the bom for which youll need for double shear
the 608s fit the main hole in the plate and the 698s fit in the printed part
Yup, getting it now, just saw the notes, would I be able to use zz instead for the rubber seals?
i used zz for my 608s
Would you do it for the 698s?
I have a feeling this might be old news, but with the 9mm gantry and the gates pulleys as live idlers, the non-toothed portion of the pulley hits the belt that isn’t wrapped around it
Did anyone have any issues printing the 9mm parts? I am getting a weird bending in the part
I get weird artifacts like that when I try to do scarf seems with ASA.
@supple quartz these guys have the F608ZZ and class 2 so it's equivalent to ABEC5-7 and realllly good quality https://g.co/kgs/tZBXutB
I normally go to statewide for my bearings as I have a business account with them
They don't sell any F608 that are above abec 1
I’ll swing past there when I’m back in Perth
for the counter sunk screws, can i just use a drill?
if you use a countersink drill yes. did that as well. carefull you dont go too far
😅😅😅
Anyone done double shear 9mm lately? I'm wondering why one of the spacer blocks for the motor towers has this recess in it. 635 2RS setup.
I keep forgetting to fix that one file
Ok so it's alright if it looks a bit crunchy from underneath?
Only the one should have issues like that, or are those all the same file?
Yes it's all the same file. I was just experimenting with cooling settings for overhangs
the support file for the 22mm bearing got mixed into that one by mistake
9mm Imperial - Bottom Right Insert-635-698.stl Is the file I downloaded
or some sort of work flow mixup
Can I throw it in CAD and just remove that feature or do you think there's more to it?
yeah you can
this gantery can handle higher tensions right? i was wondering if i should go GT2 or GT3 9mm belts
Yeah, those files should have the supports still stuck to the bed when you pull it off XD
I'm not sure that is a concern for the gantry, even with stock plastic pieces the hub load forces on each shaft shouldn't be anywhere close to the limits for the material. There is a concern that only supporting your steppers by one end may bend the shaft at very high tension, in which case the full metal gantry may help you via double shear support. Keep in mind the static tension is not really the concern, but if you plan on whipping a heavy gantry (m) around at high accelerations (a), there could be high tension in the belt as a result of inertial forces (F) f=ma. And if you do want to push it to the extremes, a wider belt will mean less stress (tensile stress = F/cross sectional area) and therefore less stretching due to inertial forces. GT3 Gates belts have the advantage over GT2 with durability, high temp operation and stiffness. Meaning that if you applied the same inertial forces to the same sized GT2 and GT3 belts, the GT3 would stretch less. Will that really mean much? Probably not a ton, you can calculate the forces involved if you were motivated to. Unless you are gunning for extreme performance it might not be strictly necessary. If its not a big price difference GT3 is propbably the way to go.
Any advice on how to remove this gates pulley hub?
There shouldn’t be anything weird about it, I just don’t want to risk damaging the pulley
check pins
Thanks king
🤦♂️ except I already took my gantry apart
Someday I’ll learn
people have done it with pliers and other tools
anyone know what length the set screws should be filed to? Or what size to buy
The ones I've ordered are M4x3, they touch the other belt very slightly but I don't think that matters
it does
i got the same and sanded down the ends
m3x2 i guess
I think there are no 2mm ones
But M4/M3*3 and some slight filing should make it clear the belts
ik. you have to sand them lol
so i will be sanding regardless lol
If you are not impatient, I can print and mail you the tool. 😅
But then I realize this was like 2 days ago...
I’m still looking for a way to do it if you still don’t mind
Sure thing, PM me?
PM'd
can we machine these with a 3 axis CNC?
It can be done, but advised to laser cut by turtle
oh they're all flat planes?
from my experience, its fine. Turtle, the designer, might disagree
Its a flat plate bent by send cut send. Im sure it can be machined. Id only try it if that is chesp for you. Its like $40 from sendcutsend
For two sets it was cheaper than one
i know someone who, in the near future, might be the proud owner of a mid CNC machine
we tempted you yesterday in VC? 😂
i was intrigued in the first place because the lab attendee at the high school i went to has been eyeing some CNC machines
i can't find a place to put that drill press thingy i just got, cnc ain't happening before i move houses
you seemed to have enough room in your office
If theres room to walk, theres room to put stuff 💀
That was the living room
And the 3d printer was on the dining table
living room? perfect place 😂
Your mixing up orders, Hydra motor mounts are $40 for 2 printers Worth. Full gantry in 7075 is $90-100
Oops. I read things quickly
Shoutout @rough stream for the pulley tool
This seems wrong but I’m going to use it anyway
You need to pull the thin side off of another pulley to replace what you just pulled off of that one
Like so
RIP, all my pulleys are in lubbock
And I am in Dallas
Cool x joint though, looks good. If I ever put together an anodizing setup, remind me and I can make the bare aluminum parts red for you
Thanks! But I actually have the set up for anodizing too, just got lazy. I anodized my other FMG set black though. 👍
I’m just one tub of sulfuric acid away lol
Sooo, I’m dropping a bomb here https://www.omc-stepperonline.com/nema-17-high-temp-stepper-motor-55ncm-77-93oz-in-55mm-8mm-round-shaft-insulation-class-h-180c-17hs19-2504s-h-v2
Product description: This NEMA 17 stepper motor features an 8mm diameter shaft with a precise 1.8-degree step angle and 55Ncm(77.93oz.in) holding torque. Delivering 2.5A per phase, it comes equipped with a 55mm round shaft and 1m cables. T | Product model
I’ve had these motors for like a year, unless the price is the bomb
yes, we harassed them bout the 8mm shaft, before as a custom order, but since we were from US and EU all over the place, they decided to add it in their shop
it took them alsmost 4 months though
what are the benefits of full metal gantry
it comes up to ~45 bucks per piece if i find another 4 people to get it cut with
More stiffness/heat resistance, the option to run 9mm belts and it just looks really cool in general
i don't think eva34m1 supports 9mm belts so i probably won't do that
anyway i'll leave it up for later
with hfp prices it sorta seemed competitive, that's why i wanted to ask
I'm running a dragon burner+beacon on mine and it's been great so far
Oh and also double shear motor towers for higher belt tensions
that i'm interested in. Is the design double shear by default, or is there another mod for it?
No, the files are included in the repo. It's recommended to use motors with 8mm shafts though, so you can use an F608 bearing that sits directly in the metal part and not in the printed insert
is there a shaft length requirement?
hmmm the 2504s have 5mm shafts i think
There are 8mm ones available from omc now
i might try to machine the inserts
bit too late, ordered it a week ago :/
You could also just edit the DXF files for the stepper towers to accommodate f695 bearings for motors with 5mm shafts
if that works that's good
I think the stepper towers are around 46mm tall. But all motors I know have 55mm shafts so you're good with those
Yeah no, those won't work
Don't worry, I also have two of those motors laying around since upgrading to FMG 😂
yeah maybe in the distant future i swap them out
i'll have to buy motors for the z axis some time since i don't have 3 of the same motor
but 2504s for those would be overkill
Just a little bit
yeah! we asked for it, they took 4 months of writing back and forth, but they finally released these, because of us 😛
ships from china though :/
could've done the regular 55mms i guess, i was just told LDOs are a safer bet
What's your point? Less than 2 weeks for most stuff these days from China
30 bucks in shipping
That's because they are not building shipping into the price, making it cheaper
They could just list them at $35 each with free shipping
yes, as opposed to the ones shipped from germany from the same site. i don't know what else to tell you
What bearings do we use for double shear?
Ordered the wrong pulleys
Yo what
Damn I knew I saw it somewhere. I looked right over it earlier
Thanks G
ordered 5 plates instead of 6... 🙂
close enough I'm sure it's fine
anyone find 2.5mm M4 set screws on ali?
sanded mine down
I couldnt find them anywhere smaller than 3mm
Someone posted a mod for it: https://discord.com/channels/747612067951018075/1292801318326501399.
Hey all, related'ish to the above, I've tried reading back about anything that might have been said about recommendations for toolheads especially in regards to going with 9mm belts.
I'm running the E34M1 right now on the Nebula frame and would like to do this gantry setup. It sounds like that mod for EVA3 is working fine for the creator, but I'm wondering if there's maybe a preference here for a different toolhead? Of if you all see the EVA3 as a good combination with the full metal gantry and 9mm?
Full metal? Go with a CNC VZ toolhead.
I'm running a Dragon Burner with Rapido Hotend and Orbiter 2.0 and I'm pretty happy with that setup. But I'm not trying to achieve crazy speeds though
Go with e34m1 9mm mod with gt2 belts
zerog cnc toolhead doesnt support 9mm
technically can if you replace the posts with standoffs
it will misalign belts causing artifacts
I would go with a front mount toolhead that's supports 9mm belts over eva3
do you know any by chance? 👀
Takeoff, obviously
anyones that dont cost $600?...
Yeah the vz toolhead with standoffs seems to work for @broken venture
in theory, it would cause belts to misalign meaning the middle of the gantry and the end would have a dif tension
I never looked at it, but that’s doesn’t make sense to me
Can you shed some light on your theory
Mine are perfectly straight
I dare someone to try and move belts when they are at 200+hz of tension against knurled standoffs
Just have a single belt clip for both belts to keep them spaced correctly, and theyre fine
It would be more with 9mm since that gives you 18mm of grip on both sides of the toolhead
If belts would move, I would notice it before anyone with 9mm belts
The forces are also pulling it side to side, not up and down
let me visualize it before yall hammer me 😭
I want it too
i got it down to much cheaper
i think you can get ~25 parts price if you split it into 2 whole plates
I was still trying to get the files
put this twice, then it has the right number of plates i think
make sure to double check tho
yes
and then also spacers
or did we already have spacers
i don't think so
I could get it with you, just wondering what you are seeying
i won't get it for a while
also might need a dfx file reader, because the one with libre office is shite
and besides the shipping i think a single set is cheaper than two
perhaps will see
xometry pricing is weird, let me know if you find a dutch alternative
I was gonna go to a local lasercut shop
I already approached another one for the aluminium plate, but they did not respond. figures
though the one I am going to ask now will respond.
I am just wondering about the tolerances of the holes for the aluminium bed
mostly wondering about positioning
if yall do a group buy from xometry i would be interested too
Laser boost is the best over in the EU I believe
I still need a program to open DFX in, currently, freecad does open the DFX but it does not look like the measurements are correct
I just wanted to check if there are any tolerances given
last time I ordered something without giving tolerances, the people put holes 2 mm off centre
ah ok, thats fair, then I must have been misunderstanding.
Dwg files are a format for drawings
I am mixing things up once again
wtf 1 of this gets quoted 37€ by xometry
2 of them are 34€
wtf is that math xD
ikr
some parts you can get a discount for up to 6 pieces
i think its a cut area thing
idk not worth reverse engineering
i gotta think of more things to get cut lol
laserboost seems a bit more expensive
they offer bending tho, so thats cool
I am currently scouring through the github, but the STL files are not the plates I am looking for I think, because it all seems like it should be machined.
ah no I get it now, I think... ay ay... still need to print
Don't use xometry... laserboost
for quality?
so is the instant quote a lie?
No
But laserboost is cheaper
And you don't know what quality you will get with xometry
Or plate thickness
i understand the quality concern, but the quote on xometry is quite a bit lower
with many of the parts in 1 dxf its only 34€ for everything
on laserboost its like 45€
maybe they scaled it wrong? 🤔
if you have the time, I can ask a local business here for a quote, which they were pretty receptive when I came over. they do laser cutting and milling. who knows, though if they are more expensive than laserboost... well...
I am just picking through the step files now, because I was misunderstand the whole assembly of the full metal gantry.
i would guess they are more expensive for these small orders but idk
You need at least 2 of every part
I could ask for prices with 1 set, 2 sets or 4 sets.... if they are receptive ill share, if not well too bad.
A EU group buy was done when I first released this
ill check it again
any reason why theres 3 of these printed parts next to both motors in the step files? 😄
hum hum, I was not brave enough to ask
Bearing options
ah so top mounted it is
For us long shaft bois
gt2 due to the extra tension needed with gt3?
Short version as to why front mount? Or maybe a pointer to a good reference as to why and I can go rtfm? If I'm understanding correctly though front mount advantage is about weight balance and center of mass mostly?
yeah gt3 is about 300hz
VERY tight
it willl break plastic component
Thanks.
most toolheads with 9mm support are front mount
only top mount option I know of is the modded eva3 setup, and I think it just has to many design compromises to make it work for the mercury, the 9mm belts do not help those in my opinion.
👍 That's the perspective I was wondering about I think. I've had a good experience with eva3 so far but am kind of worried it becomes the week point quickly with fmg.
For context, I'm not interested in a record breaking speed demon, I want fast'ish (movement 500, infill 250, walls 180 and 120 at the moment), I want stable, I want durable, I want high quality and accurate prints. I only run a single machine. I'm a nerd and this is my hobby, so fiddling with it is fine, having it out of commision is fine, etc.etc.. Breaking the stupid thing because of some silly compromise or lack of research and attention is not. Having to fight against the system is not.
I'm thinking fmg and 9mm for all those reasons. Am I barking up the right tree?
@shut pewter you got that file for the metal spacers yet? 😁
A4t if you aren't using cpap. Xol if you are
Instead of being square your belts are triangles but the angle of the belt from the pulley to the toolhead changes as it moves on the x. For the merc toolhead it’s minimal but running a front mount rail on stock merc one.1 parts had it around 3mm out of alignment from extrusion to belt in the Y plane.
I ran my merc like that for a bit before I modded the stl as it was before the cad was released, don’t remember getting any crazy artefacts though but wasn’t pushing the printer much then.
What frequency are we looking at for 6mm on 8mm, bearings shear supported motors.
can someone send me the hub puller? i cant find the stl
It's in the pinned messages
thanks
#1287514029354520710 message
Always check the pins
@shut pewter do you think I will need to swap the rear m3 stand off to a m5 bolt if going 9mm gt3 with 304 stainless plates? I’ll be ready to install tomorrow if I don’t need to mod them
Its less about the plate material, and moreso the fact that gt3 uses super high tension. That back bolt is needed for sure. I hollowed out an m3 standoff and used a long m3 screw
I did also just swap back to gt2 and so far havent noticed a difference
Tbd on that
Thanks, I’ll go the hollow m3 stand off and long bolt!
I've only used 7075 aluminum, your on your own if you use stainless
"done" for now. 😅 Its working great so far, lets see how she prints.
Thanks, I have them at 200 hz right now. I will look at that.
I think I still have mine on 110
hmm, I remember there was an extra possible bolt for the rear motors, using a longer screw somewhere… but I can’t find it here or in the github, maybe I’ve imagined it?
Only really needed for gt3 belts, you run the rear m3 thru a spacer into a tnut instead of 2 m3’s into a stand off
ahh, yeah, I remember correctly, but I wasn’t sure I’d run through the holes just to ruin things, as usual
I see, but it can’t hurt even without gt3. I’m running gt2 6mm belts, but I see the extra support as an advantage… dhu, I don’t have a countersunk m3 that long 😩
With gt2 tension it will be fine, the m5 bolts are not all in the same line so will hold it down enough. This has more points it’s being held down and is extremely stiffer than the plastic parts that are normally used and have no issues.
well, the thing is, I have bought 5mm slots extrusions, so I’m planning ahead which screw goes where because I’ll have to tear down thing later on just to add t-nuts (or spend and wait for proper 5mm slots type tnuts), so I’m thinking all the possibilities I’m missing
I was thinking that holding the back down (even just lightly, not as a requirement for tension) might cut down on vibrations. I don't have it yet so obviously have no hands on knowledge of it. 🤷♂️
Did you have to send the 8mm motor shaft to fit it into the double shear bearing?
The pulleys slide in the shafts quite nicely, but the bearings here is no way to make them go in
which bearing did u get?
F608
I have an 8mm rod and the bearings fits just right, it’s the motor shaft that is super tight
I’d push harder, but it’s a motor, it’s not supposed to get that much strength in that direction
Sand it
The motors shaft bearing are pressed on the rotor shaft, so once you don't try to press it on with the motor assemble you should be fine... BUT as Turtle said it is MUCH easier to sand yourself some clearance..
I’m planning to but I still have to do it. it’s less straightforward than with dowel pins where I could just spinning it with a drill, there are several aspects of the thing, 1) laziness, 2) I don’t want to send it unevenly, 3) I don’t want that small shaft dust goes somewhere in the motors internal bits 😅
Sand them upside down
And theoretically you could hook them up to a board and just have them spin for you
Don't over think it, I just folded sand paper around the shaft and spun the sandpaper around it by hand for 30 seconds at a time
And I just hold it how ever is comfortable. The bearings are sealed and your not creating that much dust
hmm maybe I should just go for it, I have wet sandpaper, but water might just do worse than a bit if dust 😅
I don't use water
Also only need to sand the end
The bearing doesn't need to slide freely along the entire motor shaft
and it’s done
it wasn’t that hard, but as usual, super hard to fit, until a tiny touch of more sanding and suddenly it feels too loose
Wanna know a secret?
If you use spacers instead and longer m3 screws, you can add T-nuts under and add more anchor points
Keeps it from pulling the motor up and forward from the belt tension
I can see a gap under that XD
It’s all I could think about when bolting the thing on. But I only have up to 35mm on M3 😩. I wonder if I ditch the M3, and enlarge the holes through to M5, if a M5 spacer would fit. eyeballing it could still clear the flange tower close by
I kept the M3 so I could do the spacer between the bearing stacks
Get all 5 points
true, so I only need a bag of 45mm countersunk M3…
I can keep the standoff, it’s annoying that I’ll have to screw it all in
actually maybe it’s 50mm screw, I have to check
Also keep in mind most ali express standoffs arnt completely tapped through
Usually end after 10mm
ok a bag of 50mm M3 FHCS on its way, hopefully will be here before the summer 😅
why do we need 6 toothed pulleys? i only see 2 on the motors and 2 on the x joints
you need sacrificial parts FOR the xy joints which you harvest from the other two
hmm okay
if you have spare 20t pulleys like 6mm, you can also harvest from those
thats what I did
is there an overall consensus about gt2 or gt3 belts?
and would i need different pulley sizes for gt3? the teeth spacing is the same right?
Pulleys are the same
In general go gt2
GT3 are more expensive and require higher tension which means double shear support on the steppers
they require higher tension? what if you use them with less tension?
was planning on going double shear anyways tho
i already ordered the belts too lol
but i was looking into the pulleys now
Gates specs them at higher tension
I would assume they have more play than gt2 at lower tensions but I never tried
i cant seem to find any m3x5x10 spacers on ali
maybe im searching with the wrong terms idk
its all either threaded or not round
search washer, not spacer
3dkatten also has custom idlers now
Custom 20T 2GT 5mm ID idler for live shaft idlers so you don't have to use two pulleys to make one yourself. Each pulley comes with two 3mm long M4 set screws. For monolith 2.5mm long grub screws are needed so they will need to be shortened slightly. 2.5mm long ones will be available shortly.
theres a link on the github
yeah i ended up finding that exact one lol
i ordered the lasecut parts from both xometry and laserboost
we shall see whats better
I got some of those custom live idlers, I really should install them...
Dont think it matter much
as flush as possible. in my experience, the lower belt teeth caught onto there and gave really bad resonance issues
It does, it will get caught on the belts and mess up your resonances. It will also make belts slip
for the front idler towers, should i sand down the dowel pin or try to drill out the hole in the aluminum a bit biggeR?
What? Isnt the geared part for belt, and the smooth one for the screw there?
Or I misread something
Please sand the pin
Do not touch the holes on the brackets
Otherwise your next pin could be too thin and wiggle in there
too late drilled a hole in the stepper
Good luck soldier
anyways i realized that i need to sand them abit for the bearings so started that already
Least plates are cheap if its an issue
not at laserboost...
they have a minimum order quantity so i payed 90euro for 1 plate when i forgot to order it first time
Did you actually get parts lasercut with this file? Laserboost canceled my order saying they dont accept nested parts lol
bruh
no i didn't order them
cringe
Xometry didnt say anything about it yet
Material is cheap
Prolly mostly about timed needed on machine and manual stuff
And smol order punishment
Also shipping is wildly expensive
Payed over 30 both on laserboost and xometry
they have a minimum order quantity, after u put 2 it or more it becomes reasonable. as for the parts i added a bunch for either tapped or or not and how many taps
but they gave me a few emails about them because i shouldve put different files for the mirrored parts even though they are the same
idk how much this matters but their parts did come to 2.9mm instead of 3
The price isnt only dependant on part amount, mostly combined part size i think
Bigger parts are also cheap
maybe do a group purchase
id do it but i just got short shaft motors & i want to do dual shear by then
i'll keep them for a while
Both, sand the pins to got the bearings.
Use a spare pin as a reamer to open up the holes as needed.
you wont realise until you assemble it. The belt goes in the toothed area, but the other belt will be quite close to the pulley. It is that belt it interferes with
Oh, the belt which doesnt go to this pulley but to the next one, got it!
Makes sense, thank you
no problem. I had to sand mine down to approx 2.5mm to get it to fit flush
currently trying to source screws that are already the right size
I have 3mm set screws, I haven't tried one yet.
I filled my original stock ones down the slow way
so did i.... by hand.... with sand paper.....
How is this happening? I don't think I understand. Is the belt coming off of the teeth so much that it hits the set screw?
The set screw can hit the other belt
no, the other belt can sometimes snag them.
i sanded my set screws down
These have to be the best numbers I have ever seen on this machine, been consistent to so far. @shut pewter Thanks for your efforts on this project.
Is a European group order forming?
It has been forming for a while lol
Well, I have some ideas to mod/implement, 70% of the parts for a Hydra plus build including 8mm-55 steppers. I need to push me to get to 100% and do it. My difficulties are down to where to place the printer as machine (should it be my "nice" printer, my "hot" printer, my fast and big printer or a never ending project) and to print ASA reliably (I have a prusa mini and XL as "printing printers" an unreliable ender 5 and a not fully enclosed two trees sapphire pro clone)
For me it’s my nice, hot, fast big and never ending project printer 🤣
@shut pewter just nesting these up for my second printer, I commend you on the files
No issues or errors that need cleaning up, which I've found to be annoyingly rare over the years!
This is the way
yeah my printed been "done" for 20 times now
OUR printers
aye ma'am\
Ahhh finally got to install the metal x joints and towers 💪💪💪
My OCD is pissed right now
Annodize them dammit XD
I know🤣🤣... Should have made them black but as impatient. I have another set. Maybe I'll anodize those
The motor mounts need to match the rest, everything else including the toolhead and extruder are silver
Just strip the motor mounts
The printed inserts not matching are the real issue
And the damn white tension squares XD
are the printed tensioners actually strong enough?
i feel like they might bend with high tension, no?
ohh those are from the old setup lol
You mean the black ones?
ah those... yeah I agree
too much red
will replace those when I upgrade the motors
first the metal gantry and SLS hydra arms.. Arms are in production
so yeah... last year I printed the left one on the last couple meters of red, ran out and had to swap to black🤣
Sacrilege!
For that little 5mm is was worth it🤣
I’ve been thinking about going full metal gantry, is it a good performance boost with the rigidity or is it mostly just for the pleasure of having more metal on a printer? Also I’ve been eying the awd mod and I’m wondering if that’s worth looking into too, or if I should just stick to the simple all metal gantry setup?
Full metal is for people looking for reliablility and rigidity. Its also lighter than the printed version, so a little bit of extra performance to gain.
If you want to do dual shear gt3, thats also the reason why
You do NOT need AWD, it does not offer the performance gains youre expecting
What is this and what’s the benifit?
Gotcha I won’t worry about awd then, thank you
GT3 belts run 200+hz of belt tension compared to GT2's 110hz base.
You add a second bearing to prevent motor shaft bending at very high tensions
Ah I see, I’m assuming more intense belts means faster speeds and less artifacts right
Not necessarily less artifacts. That always takes tuning to deal with
Gt3's have less stretch, so they can handle higher accels much much better
Less "whiplash" effect on the toolhead
Also all high temp by design
So GT3's have their place
But thats also why 90% of poeple stick to GT2 belts and lower tensions
Gotcha that Sounds like something worth upgrading to. I’m trying to save up to go all out and finish my merc and I wanna do the most I can with it
Thank u for the explanations
Any recommended motors to buy? Or can I replace the shafts on the motors I have? sorry for so many questions
Mine in the picture are fabreekos new "Classified" motors
I would highly recommend LDO 2504 55mm's if you looking as a start
LDO NEMA 17 MOTOR HIGH TEMP LDO-42STH48-2504AH(S55) The 2504AH series of motors by LDO has proven to be the absolute best compromise of speed and quality when printing. Available in 55mm long shaft for use with Dual shear style and AWD conversions. Specs: NEMA 17. 1.8° Step Angle. 200 Steps Per Revolution. 2.5 Amp 55
https://www.fabreeko.com/products/open-beta-nema-17-3a-rated-classified-steppers-by-honeybadger?_pos=2&_sid=99ea20bdf&_ss=r
These are mine that I currently am running
Nema 17 2.5A RMS rated Classified steppers by HoneyBadger Open beta of our new 60mm long 2.5 RMS amp rated motors, with 8mm thick shafts (requires 8mm pulleys located here) NSK bearings and 55 mm shaft length. Batch 2 preorder: ships end of March Specs: 2.5 amps RMS with 5160 steppers 8mm thick 55mm long shaft 60mm l
The classified ones sound interesting, I’ll have to look into those
They're 3A rated motors, so they require a lot more to max out
Rated for high voltages
2504's are the best to start and learn with
Im on 2 external drivers and 55V XD
Yikes yeah I’m not at that point yet so I’ll stick with the 2504s then🔥
Youll be very happy with those, 2504s are the best performance to price available
Are you on 6mm or 9mm belts?
Honestly don’t rememebr but whatever the fabreeko merc kit came with
So 6mm
I think 6???
I should be keeping a build log so that I know what the hell I’ve done with my printer
I would highly recommend picking up some 9mm pulleys for the motors. Itll make your life 1000x easier
Yeah I was hoping to go the 9mm route, sounded like a good idea from what I’ve read
Nah, just do 9mm pulleys with your 6mm belts
Oh I see
Or if you want to do 9mm, get 12mm pulleys
So that the belts don’t rub right
That extra room makes aligning things so much easier
Pulleys are usually always the reason belts bounce because theyre not perfectly aligned
That extra wiggle room allows you to not need to get it perfect with the 6mm pulley
Allows the belts to find the natural spot they like to sit
Thanks for the tip, I will defo have to make that switch then
Theres a lot more to do, but thatll get you very satisfied
I’m waiting for the nebula hardware kit to be available at fabreekos site and then Im gonna Have to splurge on everything and get to work
Then you also dont need to worry how tight you make the belts, itll stay straight
Something else will break first
Also, just something to consider.......
Are you wanting to do this before or after the frame?
All at the same time honestly
I’m gonna stock up on what I need and just do it all together
If you open the rear motor mounts cad, youll see how they use M3 screws and standoffs by the bearing stacks
If you want a little more rigidity, You could swap those out for spacers and 50mm M3 screws.
Then add T nuts under and create another mounting place
1 sec
Only works for longer Y extrusions on nebula
VERY VERY helpful with those high tensions that wanna pull that whole motor forward
Neat tip, im getting the 370 extrusion kit so im assuming those extrusions are what u mean
Sounds like a very good idea though to keep that motor frame stuck down
Yeah, you just need the longer extrusions, since the stock frame doesnt have them long enough and the motors hang off the back
Right ok makes sense
Thanks for the advice again, I’ll have to write this all down so I don’t forget because gosh my memory is horrible
No problem 🙂
On the speed part, for daily print quality I am not where near maxing out 2wd.
I can still get decent quality printing faster but then I start to question part strength as layers adhesion suffers.
The stupid speeds are only good for bragging rights and showing off.
are you suggesting using m3 50mm screws and threading the bottom?
The motor towers are 45mm tall, you use 50mm and add a T-Nut into the extrusion underneath to add another anchor point
You need longer Y extrusion if youre using the stock frame
Thats why this only works with nebula
I’ve ordered the LDO nebula kit
Won’t be here for a while though
But in other news, I got the broken tap out
Ended up having to bore it out, and add a threaded insert, into place, but as it’s only holding wago joiners, I’m not exactly concerned
It’s not a structural part
im just using the stock e5+ frame, but an extra mounting point there definitely makes sense
you think i could just extend my y extrusions with some short extrusions held in place by 90° brackets?
otherwise ill have to print something there
Its better to use 1 piece to guarantee flatness and strength
Longer extrusions arnt too hard to source
and you only need 2 of them
idk the e5 plus has weird y extrusions, they are 2040 with the corners cut away
i dont think i can source that easily
and a 2020 extrusion there would definitely weaken the frame quite a bit
Or 55mm if you are on full metal Gantry with 9mm belts..
Or that
I had dllpdf do a custom 2040 replicating the notch for my nebula, it has to be milled precisely to be any use, but it made my frame super rigid as it locks the 2040 upright, the notched 2040 y extrustion and the 2020 outer upright together at a perfect 90
No it is a 2020 in the standard nebula
just do 4040 everywhere 🗿
how much did that end up setting you back?
I think it was 30 extra?
@severe glade @unreal lake
this is what I did.
yeah thats nice
Turtle has never played it nice, but I still think the notch is actually a better design for the nebula 370. Two 2020 extrusion over 600mm in length supporting the gantry is weak sauce. You don't have to notch it, but at least do what @rough stream did and use 2040s. I notched mine and it made everything super rigid and forced that joint of the frame to be 90 degrees in three directions.. shrugs
Doing the 2040 also doubled the amount of fasteners into the uprights and also that back gantry beam for the Hydra upright. I like it so far. We'll see if I have any issues after it's all assembled. 😅
did you get shorter z extrusions to stay at the same height then?
No. I'm using 500mm integrated lead screw stepper motors and a front mounted toolhead. I believe this gives me as much Z as I can get without any issues anywhere. Even with a top mounted toolhead though, I believe the Hydra has more than enough height off the arms to compensate for the additional 20mm of vertical travel. Only thing I lose it about 20mm of space above the gantry.
aight cool, seems like an easy upgrade then
I'm guessing this is your full metal AWD mod?
That would be correct.
hell yeah my lasercut parts from xometry arrived
black anodized
how much did you pay
with taxes and shipping 103€
oh yikes
shipping was expensive
did you upload everything separately
hmm
did you just pay a lot for anodizing or something?
with 2 files i think i had like a 40 eur quote
yeah why tf did i get it anodized xD
35€ excluding vat with no anodizing rn
i wasted so much money
nope, in china
hmm
apparently not that much, maybe it was laserboost where the shipping was expensive
20?
7,80€
are you sure its not germany lol
yes
Definitely from china
idk lol
aliexpress
i paid 110 euro shipped for mine, unfinished
The fun story is 1 set is 102 euro, 2 sets will be about 120, etc
its actually the other way around with xometry
up to like 4 units it gets cheaper (not per unit, total price goes down, its insane)
How it is "the other way around"?
nice file lmfao
backstory: someone i know said they'd pay good money for a fallout collectible playing card that also works as a bottle opener, so i thought i'd get a quote for a card shaped cut
You seemed confused... Parts are always cheaper with higher quantities. Your paying for setup costs.
total price is cheaper
not just part price
Doesn't matter
ok
wdym, total price going down with more parts is definitely not right
ofc the price per part goes down, but the total price should still be more
It's a automated quoting system
its an automated quoting system with a bug then lol
huh for some reason i bought 2 pulleys with 8mm bore
why did i do that 🤔
are there any motors with 8mm shaft?
Yes, 8mm shaft, 55mm long for double shear. LDO has them and Stepper Online now too
can you link stepper online?
https://www.omc-stepperonline.com/nema-17-high-temp-stepper-motor-55ncm-77-93oz-in-55mm-round-shaft-insulation-class-h-180c-17hs19-2504s-h-v1
i found this one
Product description: This NEMA 17 stepper motor features a 1.8-degree step angle, a holding torque of 55Ncm(77.93oz.in), and draws 2.5A per phase. It comes equipped with a 55mm round shaft and 1m cables. This motor boasts an insulation clas | Product mode
are those actually good? @stuck belfry
it doesnt have an 8mm shaft tho
i can barely find any long shaft nema17 motors
the only other ones are https://3do.dk/en/motors/1235-nema17-super-power-42sth48-2804ah-s80-2.html
Product description: This NEMA 17 stepper motor features an 8mm diameter shaft with a precise 1.8-degree step angle and 55Ncm(77.93oz.in) holding torque. Delivering 2.5A per phase, it comes equipped with a 55mm round shaft and 1m cables. T | Product model
i think the 9mm bom is missing 4 F695RS Bearings
I slept already, but turtlecrawler sent the link. Given the model it's based on, yes they are good but I did not start my build yet so I can't speak from my own experience.
@shut pewter the 5mm spacers on the aliexpess link don't fit M5's i got 4 bags of them at different lengths none of them fit so you might wanna remove it or update it
It's the only option
Does look like the page is down in the US at least
Not much I can do about that
which link specifically? i got some spacers where i had to remove a little burr on one end, but they fit fine otherwise
Also looks like most of not all of the links are down for the US.
Not sure on reliable alternatives right now.
Did you get smooth spacers
Post pictures
nope
4.15ID 8.03OD
They drilled those to be threaded
no threads inside xD
oh
Probably just got mixed up in a box
idk guess my luck since i got 2 bags of each length
I would probably just print some parts to hold them in a vise, then drill then out to 4.5mm or so, then 5.2mm
Lathe would be ideal, but most do not have access to one.
ye aluminum drills nicely
my countersink bit went in like butter
@shut pewter i guess you forgot to count the flanged bearings used in the 9mm x joints
please update the bom so no one else ends up missing some bearings 😄
I'll need a reminder tomorrow, have a friend coming over in a little bit and won't have time to fix it today
Really won't tomorrow either, but I a better chance tomorrow lol
aight xD
20 should be the correct amount
forgot those
how important are good quality bearings btw? i just ordered some random f695rs bearings off amazon, is that fine?
Easy for me to overlook that stuff because I end up with a lot of extra hardware from doing dev work
Its the factory. Mine also just came like that. Chances are they closing up and just clearing inventory before vanishing
any updates on this I currently have a Orbiter v3 (with toolboard) on my ender 5 pro and am contemplating upgrading to Mercury if I can keep my extruder
e34m1 might have a mod for it
or maybe eva 2.4, as its pretty dated and might have something
maybe I'm looking in the wrong places but I haven't managed to find one for the SO3 I did make some quick mounts to fit it and my btt eddy on my exoslides so If I have to end up drafting my own solution I'm ok with trying it, but a tried and tested option does seem like a better choice ( I'm having enough y layer shift and other movement issues that I'm contemplating throwing away the entire motion system if not the whole printer)
SO3?
are you using exoslides on merc?
what current are you running your motors at?
Smart orbiter v3
Nope not on merc till I can figure out a carriage system hence my question (currently running klipper off of a pi 4)
I tuned the currents a while back so I don't remember what I set that at exactly (at this point it's probably worth it to re-do that) I'm waiting for belt clips to arrive so I can replace the belts with gates belts
The printer has had pretty much everything modified or replaced on it short of going corexy (dual Z, bed, bed heater, klipper, toolhead(twice), bl touch then eddy)every time I fix an issue a new one pops up,😅 I'm getting dangerously close to reenacting the printer scene from Office Space 🤣
I manage to get the test prints perfect and then once I'm a few prints in the failures start sneaking in and stacking up
🤷🏻♂️
On the upside I'm getting great at re-tuning and rebuilding the machine 🫠
On the downside the stock electronics enclosure has 2.5 completely stripped screws😮💨 from all the times I had to remove and replace it
stock enclosure should use m3 if Im correct...
Yup now one uses m4 (because creality pot metal doesn't hold threads all that well if you remove and replace a screw enough times)
you could go cheapo and just straightup stick din rails to the back of the printer
Not the worst idea honestly if I don't end up going with mercury, the motors and their drivers/board were next on my list of parts to upgrade/replace (let the sunk costs continue!)
Unless I decide to just vhb tape everything in place
you can start with electronics enclosure without going mercury
Yeah the enclosure is on the books as soon as I can get the printer printing again: mercury is if the lower friction options don't work (in order: tensioners [done: didn't help], new gates belts, vrefs, drivers/electronics)
I would do gates during merc conversion
also, drivers/electronics likely wont help much unless youre running higher speeds than stock
I am definitely running faster than stock (~120mm) is it much faster? Idk🤷🏻♂️
ah. stock creality board starts to suffer there lol
Yeah that's my suspicion, I have removed the load from the extruder completely from it so the only things it's for is the xyz motors and bed heater at this point (the extruder is on the SO3 toolboard directly off of a USB to the pi)
I would be scared to anyhting over 60mm/s without communication to the drivers 😂
I was able to get some surprisingly good prints before the current issue cropped up the exoslides and lots of input shaping plus full decoupling from the table really helped
(The printer is sitting on a 2" upholstery foam block with porcelain paver on top)
Inspired by this video:
https://youtu.be/y08v6PY_7ak
I'm not a huge fan of 3D printer upgrade but this piece of concrete paver is something I put under each of my machines that I run every day. Let me show you how you can severely reduce the printing noise in your print room but also in the rest of the house with this solution! I also performed a test to find out how different print base solutions...
this is a good idea
I would recommend getting rid of cablechins once converting to m1.1 as they can add drag
I probably will once I upgrade to a stiffer carriage the cable chains really helped by isolating movement of the cables to inline with the axis of movement which helped solve an earlier issue where the stiffness of the cable bundle was able to impart enough off axis torque to the too head that I was getting almost a mm off of level when the carriage was away from the center of the bed
wow, that bad? interesting. I would be thinking it might add more... I do run my cables pretty stiff, but with higher spec motors, currents, etc. so idk how it would go with stock setup
One thing to note: with the moment arm of the top mounted carriage does induce enough torque on the printer that it is worthwhile to maybe add some additional ballast to the base to help dampen the motion
Yeah the are stiffer than the stock carriage but nowhere near as much as advertised
As for the chains I have sure that they are not interfering with the motion when I installed them but I can see where a less meticulous instillation can cause problems the y axis chain is pretty loosely attached at the bottom and the x axis really is mostly helping with increasing the bend radius the cables experience (I did not print my own and I'm glad that I didn't, some of the files I've seen don't have nearly the bend radius restrictions that the commercial ones do)
Here's how much movement you're getting from relatively small movements with what is probably an insufficient mass on the bottom
WOW
that is quite the extreme case. Could you try putting it down on the ground with no cement/pad for comparison?
I can, once this print completes (or fails)
I did input shaping with the printer on the ground in that state, It actually doesn't look like there's much going on so I'm assuming the energy turns into vibrations
The paper is quite dense and heavy but the foam is quite soft so from the perspective of the webcam everything is rock solid despite the flimsy half printed camera mount
(Vhb tape and kapton take can be marvelous things)
🤪
can you show some graphs?
Sure Let me go look at my pc
I don't have the graphs for these anymore but I belive these were with the isolation
let me see if I can manage to figure out how to generate some graphs from this
~/klipper/scripts/calibrate_shaper.py /tmp/resonances_y_*.csv -o /tmp/shaper_calibrate_y.png
yeah I was trying to do it without using winscp to dump those files back on the pi and mobaxXerm to re-generate those graphs
so pretty similar main peaks with some noise across the band with the dampening that I assume is the accelerometer not really having an accurate frame of reference
ideally I'd have another accelerometer affixed to the bed and I'd subtract the difference between the two but so far doing the input shaping off of the damper seems to be pretty effective
you want your ADXL as close to the nozzle as possible
I the SO3 has one integrated on the tool board and the the other one I use clamps directly to the nozzle
(kusa pro v1)
I personally dont trust toolboards. especially on plastic toolheads
fair enough the SO3 is all metal and from my testing they output numbers close enough that the final input shaper values come out identical
ah, true.
the reason I want a second accelerometer is because I don't really care how much the printer vibrates in an absolute sense I only care how much it vibrates relative to the print surface
I only care how much transfers to my print
and ANY vibrations can btw
including a wobbly table
your best case scenario is having a tungsten cube strapped to the bottom of your pritner 😂
too much mass on the bottom can cause the system to be over dampened which would cause the paver to act like a solid table and reflect those vibrations right back into the printer
I'm not printing anything all that big, flimsy or tall typically so as long as my bed adhesion is solid and the printer doesn't hit anything the bed relative to the print head is rock solid
wobbly tables tend to reflect vibrations between themselves, the floor and the printer so imho the foam helps
I'll head back there as well (I got out to find the charts)
thanks for the reply and convo btw!
anyone looking for the live idler set screws, nindejin on ali sell 2.5mm ones which work perfectly
just shoot them a message asking for them
So you have to ask them specifically about them?
Got a link by chance?
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/4000380804647.html
This is the link they gave me for the order. It wasn't listed on their page
https://a.aliexpress.com/_ExI6ouG
I sent a message about this and asked for 2.5mm length

What price did they give ya?
€8.59 for 50😅
I only need 4 lol
But i wanted to swap from my hand sanded ones lol. I had to sand the hex side down to make it fit. Which made it prone to stripping
Let me know how you get on
I tried to get some but there were issues so I gave up for now. Might try again in the future.
what did they say?
Well, at first they told me to order the M4 x3mm and let them know so they could change it to the correct length, but the order processed so fast that the store rep couldn't adjust the order and told me to cancel it. Then he tried to send me a special one time link to order the set screws but because of the current situation between China and the US, it wouldn't allow a special order because of the high tax rate in place. So I said forget it for now
Feel like I should’ve opted for getting them polished maybe? Or am I overthinking it
They’re pretty rough, is it smart to sand them down with like 1k grit or will that mess up the shiny finish…
if anyone can weigh in on the dimensional accuracy part of this i'd be interested too
polishing metal isn't hard but i dunno if the material removed would cause any problems
I run mine through a tumbler overnight, or even 24 hours at times
then 2 other tumblers that polish them up, but those are shorter runs
where did you get your tumbler and how much does it cost?
Hf, not cheap
The little one is loud and doesn't work great... I just use that with crushed walnut shells for polishing.
15lb one is great, but $$$$
I use that one with the green resin triangles from harbor freight along with a little bit of water.
Im considering trying to DIY one
i sanded mine a bit, nothing perfect but looks better
Sweeettt👌👌👌 carbon steel 😈
if I'm going with a metal gantry is it still worth it to get fabreeko's kit and add stuff to it?
if you're going for double sheer support and higher belt tension then no unless you can talk to them about adding motors with longer shafts
gotcha thanks
This probably isn't good
Did this happen because there is nothing other than the printed part holding it on the top?
Or did I put the kit together wrong?
...... I swapped the top and bottom plates.......
... Well it's a good thing I made spare parts
The pins that support the bearings should go into the top plate as well
It lasted for about 6 months at 250ish hz, it will be a world of difference with the double shear steppers and the part actually assembled correctly, lol
Nabbed ceramic hybrid bearings from fabreeko as well as the new classified steppers
Why aren't your pins sticking up past the printed inserts?
The inserts are not meant to take any of the load
I mixed up the plates and put the bottom plate on the top somehow
I was surprised it lasted as long as it did
It's all getting rebuilt with the new motors, bearings and double shear
Ahh okay
The best part is that it was printing great like that
Probably not for much longer judging from that crack
The lesson learned: you can assemble however you want it still will work perfectly well (for a while)
bump 😄
also what size of heated inserts do i need for the front tension towers?
oh i didnt see it says m3x4x5 in the bom
tho that feels a bit small, i think it could fit longer ones
those don't have much load on them, the load is taken by the M5 screw
when adjusting the tension u only need to loosen the M5 abit so that heatinsert doesnt need to be too strong, just be able to screw in and unscrew
the parts are designed for that size so longer heat inserts will push plastic into the groove for the screw
I've been able to tension to over 300 with them
Whoop whoop. All metal! 💪💪💪😎
Might want to put this in the metal Hydra thread instead.
Yup😅
There that's better.
Following up from my previous post, both stepper mounts where very close to catastrophically failing, but the only sign was a bit of dust from the belts.
I had messed up assembling both mounts but the plastic held on for dear life
how bad would it be if i took out the front 2 posts in the front towers :x
9mm GT3 doesnt fit
Gt3 fits for me
oh yikes i just checked mine and its rubbing
Did you get fat posts
no, thin ones. they were one of the listed links
mine are exactly 5mm od
same here
i might have countersunk them slightly wonky so that could make a small difference
but its rubbing quite a lot
ye i guess ill try that too
if that doesnt work ill 3d print something to replace the 2 front standoffs
did u make the metric files by any chance?
yup
could that be it? im also on metric
i guess ill start the cad and inspect it lol
i dont think so
there arent separate imperial and metric dxf files
ah right
i wonder if its better to take a file and remove some material on the plates
itll need a very small file tho
dont have that xD
I ordered my LDO nebula kit
Nice 💪 it's a fun build!
I’ll see how it goes, because I’ve got more aftermarket parts, than not, so I was like bugger it, I’ll buy the frame kit too
Should be quality frames👌. I've had it cut during the beta stage.
Nice
did someone use the ratrig bearings for the 9mm fmg?
Upgrade your V-Core 4 with these heavy-duty idler pulleys, designed specifically for intensive users!Featuring larger ball bearings, these idlers are built to withstand more wear and tear, ensuring a longer lifespan and more reliable performance. Specifications:- Inner Diameter: 5mm- Outer Diameter: 13mm- Outer Diamete
I think turtle uses them in his build
But are there even advantages when using them compared to normal bearing stacks + the live idlers?
Not really
ok! no point buying it so 😅
I think a few people. cant remember names, but ik someone...
i think i just figured out why it doesnt fit for me lol
my belt is gt3-2mm
all my belts are gt3-3mm
1,5x the pitch makes a 20t pulley much bigger lol
i cant seem to find any gt3-2mm pulleys tho
i know some ppl here are using gt3 belts, where did you get your pulleys?
So 3mm pitch?
well i think 3mm pitch wont fit
unless i go with less teeth
i would prefer to go with 2mm pitch, since i have a 2mm pitch belt and then a 20t pulley would have the same gear ratio as normal gt2 setups
but im not sure gt3 2mm pitch 20t pulleys exist
im assuming you have 3mm pitch belt and pulleys?
i need to rebuild my left X gantry though it shakes a lot
no idea
2mm pitch on the pully
but im using gt2 ones
3mm gt3
belt
but yeah my graphs are trash
2 vs 3mm pitch
Gt2 vs gt3-3
i saw those but i was worried they would hit the other belt
so your gt2 pulleys didnt fit?? thats weird
for the front towers you mean?
for those im using smooth idlers
on the X gantry everthing fits fine
oh ye right
nvm what i said lol
the front tower is where it didnt fit so i removed the front 2 posts
I ordered some GT2 9mm belts
I wasn't able to take the gt3 to above 200hz so ithink gt2 will be fine
i also don't like how heavy the gantry becomes when i move it by hand
have you seen gt3 2mm pitch pulleys? i cant find any
Hey gt2 pulleys
Get
The specs are a bit of a mess with gt3 having 2 pitch options on the belts
yeah
i have a gt2 belt as well, do you think i should just go full gt2 then?
or does gt3 with gt2 pulleys still have some advantages?
also turtle i think there is an error on the 9mm metric step file. I needed 2 extra 1mm spacers under the left idler otherwise it wouldnt be the same height as the rest of the system
Nope
so, this from mellow is gt3 with 2mm pitch, right?
it doesn’t say the pitch anywhere in the description, I was just looking for a gt3 belt and now I don’t know anything anymore
Yes. the 2mgt is the pitch
just measure the distance between teeth
should be easy to tell
The confusion was getting gt3 3mm pitch pulleys
Hey turtle, can I ask you something. What STL's do I need to print for the 8mm shaft double sheers for 9mm belts?
the ones with F608 bearings
nothing else?
Depends on what bearing you go with
What’s the best cheap way to source the hardware for the full metal gantry…
no good way thats cheap. youre sinking $300 at a min into this
Well cheapest, I have the plates already but I just need everything else listed in the BOM
but gosh I wasn’t expecting the full metal to be that pricey
I’ve already blown like 600 preparing for nebula and hydra😞
thats actually a really good price dang
Still got panels and hardware to order so that’s another like 300 going into it sigh
Im gonna be so broke but whatever im calling it an investment
under $1k for this type of build is amazing!! be proud of your shopping skills, I need to learn better ones clearly 
I’ve honestly just been buying fabreeko kits and it sets me up pretty good🔥
im already 1800 in to my build.....
I don't want to talk about this subject
Let's just say I get weird looks when I tell people.
i know that feeling, but ive got nebula, 10mm mic6 build plate
@shut pewter Checking the following:
https://github.com/TurtleCrawler/Mercury-One.1---Full-Metal-Gantry/blob/main/6mm/README.md (lists M3x35 standoffs - qty 6, no M3x30 standoffs), while
https://github.com/TurtleCrawler/Mercury-One.1---Full-Metal-Gantry/blob/main/6mm/Metric STL Files/Stepper Mount STLs/README.md (M3x30 standoffs - qty 8, no M3x35 standoffs).
Seems like 2nd BOM is not accurate - based on CAD file it should read M3x35 standoffs - qty 6? Please confirm.
he just put the wrong name. dimensionally theyre 30mm
Quantity is off as well, that is why I am checking it
NP - I am building only stepper mounts at the moment and saw the issue with BOM. CAD helped to identify correct materials.
I keep finding new projects and struggle to work in older ones 🤣
Totally understand. Keep on!
djesi mali 😉
To be fair your new projects are pretty cool.
I'm trying to share more often as well vs waiting till things are more complete
So leads to small details getting missed
does this mean I can get u to buy things 
Just ordered my laser cut parts (78.94 for full order in 7075 with both sets of xjoints if anyone is curious) but I have a question; I'm starting this from scratch (no zero merc to start with) and will be figuring the toolhead out as I go but other then the BOM for the FMG, what parts of the Zero g BOM do I also need to buy/source?
The FMG BOM for the most part is separate from the zero g BOM, so you will need basically everything listed on the zero g BOM in addition I believe, but also depends if ur going down the route of hydra and the nebula enclosure as well as anything optional you might want
not doing hydra yet, I'm already on klipper running off a pi4, I have an Smartorbiter v3 extruder(with toolboard) and I already have dual z for my bed: at this point I'm just looking to upgrade the motion system/electronics
You'll need T-nuts and a few heat inserts and whatever parts for your toolhead
has anyone else had problems using the pulley tool?
the tool is breaking before the pulley core even budges
i have used it before for 6mm pulleys and it worked perfectly
The nut got pulled in, so i used some washers but even those got pulled theough the plastic
some pulleys are harder than others to de-hub
im printing it again, idk how else to do it
well, this time it wasnt the plastic that gave in
the m5 hex screw completely stripped
i used a ton of torque but the damn pulley didnt even move
i think ill design a tool to put in a vice
if that doesnt work ill have to try other pulleys
I am not in a built yet. Is it to pull off the pulley, or to put it on? Worst case would be cutting off the pulley and heat it in an oven to put it on (like it is done in heavy machinery and cars)
Its to pull parts off the pulley
I was also thinking about using heat, but that would end up looking very ugly i think
I got it pulled off using a very simple tool i designed and a vice
Turns out a vice is better at crushing than a screw lol
Some load distribution I guess
Hello guys, I've replaced my stepper towers to full metal ones over the weekend. Just now tried first prints, and have following problem. Belt(s) are rubbing on motor pulley, creating severe layer shifts. However, it is not constnt issue. When I wanted to re-adjust pulley position, belt was centered. I'm manually moving the printhead and seeing belts changing their heights. What could be the issue?
Need pictures
(please disregard pins, those are slightly longer)
belts are tensioned at 114Hz and similarity is 95.5%
and where is it rubbing
might be a frame squareness issue
I'll double check it - if it comes out straight, any other tips?
could just lower the pully
unless it hits both
or just dont worry about it
it can only walk so far
ok, I'll recheck frame squareness and make small adjustment to lower A motor pulley, and re-test. Thanks!
I'll let you know it issue was resolved
Or just throw in a 9mm pulley and forget about it
i tightened by belts to 230hz now
do they keep the tension over time?
also it has much more friction than i expected
What belts are you using?
gt3 9mm
gt2 prolly has less friction, right?
Double check the back of your stepper towers haven’t lifted of you haven’t bolted the back down
You have double sheer bearings for the stepper too?
i bolted the back down so no lifting
whats the max recommended without double sheer? xD
kinda forgot about that
the fabreeko merc kit ones
honeybadger 42HS48 25044A
im wanna get long shaft motors for double sheer but didnt buy any yet
can i do 170hz without double sheer?
110hz is without double shear
unless you have 8mm shafts
there is a calculator pinned in here
Turtle, can you explain what they mean by the frequency? I've been seeing it more and more
It's a way to measure belt tension
the tighter the belt, the faster it swings
so when you string a known length of the belt the frequency is a good way of measuring tension
@severe glade can i see your build? youve been exciting me with all your questions 😄
sure, one sec