#Full Metal Gantry
1 messages · Page 4 of 1
Bought piles of lucky abec3 and they are too good for me and my projects.
Since when is it about what we need 👀
Pretty sure abev 9 isn't made our size by real bearing comoanys
Also not to many 608s are flanged which is what is needed here
So while 608s are a skateboard size, f608 are not
Yeah that's what I found too, looks like NSK does them though
NSK group buy time?
Best I could find is ABEC3 for F608s
F *aye G F608-2RSR and NSK F608DDU but hard to find
Yeah so far all that's stocked is the enduro abec 3 F608 same as you
I'll call statewide bearings Monday and see what they can get
Now if only they came in hybrid ceramics
We don't need ceramics.
I do
https://plaig.com.au/product/8x22x7mm-flanged-bearing-metal-shielded-f608zz/?v=8bcc25c96aa5
I have these, them seem alright.
8x22x7mm Flanged Bearing with Metal Shields. (F608zz). Plaig Bearings are a stronger, more reliable bearing with greater heat resistance and superior life to the standard factory bearings. We stock all other sizes of bearings for RC Cars and also sell Complete Bearing Kits for many popular brands of vehicles. If you can't find the correct
I also ended up getting F608zz from ali (https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32900626732.html) They also seem alright.
Rule of thumb: don't go to Ali if you want genuine nsk.
Also, misumi should have genuine.
Even some vendors that aren’t buying direct end up with fakes and don’t know it too.
I had to go local to get true NSK bearings. Got some f608zz and they seem legit.
I can't confirm these are actually ABEC-7 but these are what I ordered.
100000% they arent
I figured, but for what they're doing they'll be fine
Abec 7 but the 5mm hole you wanted in the middle will be 4.8mm cause we put all the precision into the bearings and grooves.
enduro looks like the only abec 3 one, hard to find even then
Any idea if Fushibearings makes good bearings?
I bought them too so Id like to know too
Pretty sure good bearings companies have to have three letter names.
Fushi bearings are not that bad
Like obviously not the best there is to exist
But totally sufficient
ok good to know!
Japanese ones have up to 5 letters as I understand
I was just making a joke about SKF/FAG/NSK/NTN all being 3 letters. Sorry if looked like advice. Timken is also top notch.
Forgot IKO
EZO
NSK BOIS
Sweet, so I can get NSK 608s locally but not flanged @shut pewter for the 8mm shafts, do we absolutely need them to be flanged?
Flanged bearing are used to make idlers, the flange itself is important
The flange is used to hold the double shear support bearings in place
608, not 695
yea if u get non-flange bearings they sit in the plastic, right?
Different sized bearings iirc
698-RS, F608-2RS
Am I missing something? In the front idler towers the BOM doesn't include idlers in the BOM
Ohhhh! Of course, duh, now I see it
Finally finished! Those standoff took 7 weeks to deliver ughhh
Those look amazing.
Thanks! Now find the time to install them lol
Mine's better
I still haven't got the painted pieces back😭
I see you have EVA?
Vz cnc
ahhh
It looks chonkier cuz im using a 3010 instead of 2510
Im working on a Metal version of EVA 3, metal top and bottom plate, metal hotend mount, metal standoffs but still supported by some of the original EVA structure so you can still use all or most of the EVA 3 parts, back part should be universal being the stock back with spacers that would run through the body, im absolute sh1te with modelling but it works and the metal parts are flat so can be easily laser cut and countersunk instead of costly CNC
get vz cnc 😌
nah, $110
Nah
also I am kinda trying to adapt EVA 3
Does VZ CNC support 9mm belts?
oops heres with the standoffs
the standoffs could be placeholders to be honest but really if it was the textured standoffs it could work better, 6 and 9mm belts and I could simply put thicker printed spaces up to the belts
No
Damn. No metal tool head for me then lol
There's front mounted 1s
my friend
I am onto it somewhat
this is top mounted and would support 9mm
Glue?
Slm without any of the oomph that it offers 
nope, just doing a new printhead, adapting a plate onto EVA 3 and really itd just be designing the standoffs for the belts that im doing atm
Tell me about the oomph of slm plz
What tolerances u design with and stuff
my cads all posted with that
Ill check that out
Pros being that you can design complex geometry that cannot be machined, and have mage at a reasonable cost. Biggest con i have seen is you cannot get super flat surfaces. So some areas need post process finishing. But most can be done with very basic tools.
That toolhead looks completely wrong for mercury.
Stock eva 3 does not work for the mercury
MGN12h top mount
it's really just because the back is stock, that is mostly cosmetic, the structure would be standoffs
the cpap outlet is also not goood.
Mock up, I just added whatever was there
Have you looked at the new RatRig toolhead
It's partially metal
Night be a good baseline
yeah the original file was from a ratrig head
@humble fulcrum dont show toolhead cad around burgo or youll get roasted😂
@blissful creek tell me, what could I use for belt standoffs to allow for 9mm?
either way it's really just a proof of concept that with 2 plates top and bottom like the vzbot printhead you can make a lot work
Im getting the hotend mount, top and bottom pieces laser cut and have litttttttle idea of how it would mount aside from EVA 34m1 but it happenin
already seen it, not wanting to spend that money
ur slm parts gonna cost alotttt more.
He gave me very valuable feedback on mine
Yeah
shhhh
dont let people know I help others.
He has his ways of feedback
it means they want me to help moore and I aint got time foor all dat because I go too far out my way normally 🤣
Not young enough for burgo🤣🤣
take what u got and throw it all away. Top mounted rail is inherently bad for the way the merc mounts its belts.
Isnt takeoff compatible with goliath too?
yes.
just need a guinea pig to see if it works fine 🤣
idk if fanless is ok yet.
I don't know if the goliath setup has ban tested yet
Send me a takeoff and ill test it
Order one yourself 🤣
front mount
My goliath is still sitting on the shelf
top mount. brown aka center of effort is closer to the rail yes. but its got more inherent lever.
u also need to create a box around the toolhead for any sense of rigidity.
I paid for mine
this isn't even thinking of center of mass. U have alot worse there.
u NEED cpap for top mount to make sense.
And will be ordering another soonish, a remixed takeoff
Hmm, do you have tests comparing front vs top for this?
It's a leverage thing
yes.
Top mount is top heavy
And just heavy
So all your moves are putting a flex motion against the rail
Can I see? How much did your slm takeoff cost? I do actually have the goliath
👀
Boost issue at higher speeds with more weight
I dont want anything other than cpap
Id need a normal gantry 😭
Takeoff is around $50-80 if you tap it yourself
yea yea ur 1 the few people who sees gains from lightweight gantrys since u speed benchy instead of regular printing always.
Maybeee
It costs less than a good extruder
Yeah
I print normally too
Super lightweight does see faster speeds without skips. But that's only of your going over 600mm/s
then drop the gantry.
He is to deep into the lightweight game to drop it lol. But once he breaks his mosquito he probably will
Id keep the milled rail and swap the gantry
what do u guys think I should do with the 4040 v0 sized printer + halo, croxy/corexy speed benchy/high temp
the milled rails are done incorrectly.
drilled holes is better then the way they did.
ur linear rail is more happy.
Im more than happy to try other things
This was easily available to try
I was on a weight issue then
Kinda went overboard
there is none lmao
Well, a properly milled rail
Also need to test the round standoffs and see if they'll work for when someone eventually convinces me to do 9mm
But also need to test my removable heater wire splices coming in to ditch the redneck crimps XD
Still lots to do
I am doing a similar approach but I base the compatibility with the vz toolhead ducts. also I am focusing on getting a small filament cutter as part of the toolhead itself. I think the eva “style” it’s great for printed parts, but it’s inefficient if translated into a metal mount. I mean if you want to still use the hotend and extruter specific mounts
why not use standoffs also in the back?
So 1600 cad now? Lol
What's incorrect about them?
they remove too much material it fucks with hertizian stresses
@blissful creek what if you went all the way through?
even worse
I had an idea to hollow a rail just like Fysetc did but I'd use a lathe. Put the rail in the tool holder and put the mill bit in the lathe.
I don't have access to a milling machine, and never ended up doing it but I'm happy I didn't waste my time with that then.
and what about use a 2010 extrusion as gantry (somehow add pieces at the edges to allow mount in the xjoints)?
do a 2020 box tube. with stress concentrators its stronger.
minimising the gantry weight the x and y get more and more similar to move, the bigger the printer more the gap between x and y. So using a lightweight gantry on a 5+ makes more sense (if it doesn’t impact the rigidity)
using a lightweight gantry always reduces rigidity.
yeah, I mean, there should be a level where rigidity and weight meet up. but I guess the ultimate goal should be remove ghosting rather than speed
so if the gantry flexes, it will make for some other artefacts
It does, they're hidden ahah, but listening to @blissful creek I reckon he's some kinda wise guy and probably right about front mount, so Il look at takeoff, I just wanted rigidity really and can laser cut relatively cheaply
That's why Im starting off with an aluminium square tube, lighter, more rigid than extrusions
@blissful creek I am technically a guinea pig, but really I'd be happy to try it out
I and prime candidate
Ahhhh but I'd be using Hextrudort
idk, the takeoff seems to occupy a lot of space. I’m building a 180x180 merc… I think he was critical about the lightweight gantry not top mounted rails in general (or?). I’m kind of too invested and also close to order the plates for the design I came up with, from xometry in EU it would be 80€ if I order the plates for 3 toolheads (weird pricing system that makes it cheaper for more, 1 set was 150€)
pretty sure loss less stock dimensions
I was critical of both
https://github.com/Kizime123/Random-3dp/tree/main/SLM Stress Concentrators Box Tube my GitHub for XY beam rigidity
@blissful creek what time is it for you? arent you us based?
2am and Canada
@shut pewter gimme a spot to post my gates belts/ runice groupbuyyyyyyyy
I'm a big degenerate with my sleep schedule rn funny u say dis tbh
intuitively I can’t see how the top mounted can be detrimental on rigid, but I’ll look into it. luckily I’ve also ordered the front mounted joints by mistake 😅
Worse center of mass placement. Meaning more inherent lever on the rail so it won't be as happy.
And the force transfer also is effected
Ur also tryna bend closer to the Y rails on a Merc.
ur still everywhere
Wtf, so I search far and wide and I found these in an electronics store lol, 12 or 9mm though, could they work? For the M3X5X10mm spacers
hmm, I'll load it in the cad and compare
it does look quite compact for having 2 3028 fans, but vs a stock-ish design (also I haven't realized chube was so long and massive) it doesn't win (especially Z and front clearance)
and I even placed it higher that where it should be
Basically with front mounted you have the pull from the belts closer to the carriage, thus less of a lever
Top mounted can have the hotend closer to the extrusion though so mass is closer to the extrusion
I'd say it's a tradeoff
Front mounted works better with worse rails though
What reckon about having M3X5X12 or 9 instead of 10? Could it work?
For what?
The standoffs?
That wouldn't work, those are for the belt tensioners and need to be 10mm
You could use m3x5.5x10 or m3x6x10 but that would mean you'd have to redesign the printed parts and in this case the wall will be thin enough to show slight artifacts
probably the overall weight of the toolhead matter for this consideration. for small/light it shouldn't be an issue either way
Yeah it's for the spacers that go into the printed part, I bought the 6mm ones and will redesign the part, the 5mm OD ones take forever to areive
9mm, i think there is something with X
parts are ordered on aliexpress 🙂
I just received mine yesterday and waiting for rails, what printhead are you using?
#1006521404964995195 propably
time to start printing and sanding mine
@shut pewter does this also work for the metal gantry?
ah okay thx
Did you ever share those files?
Yeah I picked up a set when you mentioned them to me. 😅
As long as it works 😁
I also grabbed a set of them when I saw them mentioned lol
I'll have to clean up the cad and share those files
What are they used for in the gantry? In place of the bearings?
In place of the flange/bearing stacks
👍
But is there an 8mm version?
thats a good question that deserves an answer, with feedback noted here
I did find this but the outer flanges are quite wide?
https://core-electronics.com.au/dual-bearing-timing-belt-idler-pulley-8mm-bore-185mm-diameter-95mm-inside-width.html
why would you need 8mm idlers?
Nvm I got mixed up between the 608 flanged and the idler towers
I have no image in my head of where the F608 bearings would go if I use 8mm shafts ahah
metal plates
But where on metal plates?
Shove them flange up through the big hole in the two bottom stepper mounts.
Awesome! Thanks!
can I use the old motor on the metal gantry
Yes you just won’t have double shear
what motors do I need for double shear?
LDO 2504 55MM?
Yeah 55mm shaft
You can get 5mm diameter shaft which is standard or 8mm diameter shaft which beefs it up
8mm shaft is king, then you would not even need double sheer.
hmm I wonder where I can buy that in the EU
3dkatten has LDO 2504 s8 55’s
OMG almost 40 euros for 1 motor
yep, sob
Now THATS the sound of a happy customer!
But I’d rather spend 80€ for 2 2504 than spend 100€ on the beta krakens. I’ve heard mixed feedback about them. and the HB motors will be around here later next year, if ever
I’d like to have the turtle branded ones though…
yeah those hb 3004's are my next stepper buy
nema 23?
check Hectors channel 🤫
oh those right
@shut pewter what stepper towers files do I need to print if I have the fabreeko motors I cant find the specs of the motors on their site
Stepper tower printed parts are not dependent on motors
If you care about the double shear
That depends on shaft length
so do I need to print all of them?
What exactly do you plan on doing?
well right now I only have the fabreeko motors
Also which honey badgers you have
2504 or 3004?
2504
Do you plan on using a 625 bearing?
F695RS from the BOM
Do you plan on using 625 bearings in the stepper towers?
If not, you don't need those files
Same goes for the other bearings
The files with bearing names behind them are needed if you use those bearings for double shear support
If not stated otherwise
Yes
I must be missing something, I haven't received all my parts yet but have some spacers and the F695, how does the 9mm belt go onto the idler towers with the F695s if the F695s are much less than the width of the belt when combined?
Not being rude but checking the cad will give you the answers you want
you also need normal 695 bearings
basically 2x f695 + 1x 695 = 10mm
Could this be a good alternative? It's prob fine with the 3 bearings but still
https://shapeshop.com.au/belts-pulleys/52-idler-pulley.html?srsltid=AfmBOor77XJgSSlLPA0lPO3hXNdlUlAhYSgcjdSYtu_pWL56uGOFQ36d
They have the 9mm belt version there too
No
The RatRig heavy duty idlers should work
Normal idlers might not be that happy with the forces
(Well it depends on bearing quality but bigger bearings are easier to get good)
No worries, thanks!
Just get some normal 695 bearings
That's how it's intended to be
Yeah they're in the mail atm, nearly here
For printing spacers, any special considerations for filament? I don't have a printer that can do ASA so Id be printing somewhere local so I saw PC could be an option
Alternatively to ASA that is from a local printing service
Stick with the asa
if your printers hotend can heat up to 260 and your bed can heat up to 110, you can print it 😄
I absolutely do not want to deal with the stress of buying a roll of ASA and having it peel without an enclosure ahaha
But soon my anycubic predator will have an enclosure just not yet
Get a big cardboard box temporarily
I simply cannot get a box that is as tall as the predator ahaha
Solid sheet of corrugated on two back sides with a tape hinge
Probably about the same cost as local service?
Good idea but nah, yeah it'd cost just as much to print locally and I'm doing an enclosure soon for it anyway after the merc
This printer is just a big ol bast*rd
It too has all metal parts , CNC effector and fan/hotend mount
https://siddament.com.au/products/powder-5g-dispenser-bottle?_pos=1&_sid=6085f7d5e&_ss=r
this can help with bed adhesion
@shut pewter do you also have a 5mm design for the towers?
5mm in what way?
well some of us that bought the extrusion from DOLD the Groove width is 5mm
that specification is important XD
just open them in cad and make the front pegs smaller
only 6mm, but easy for someone to mod that in cad
You could try meshmixer, it's a fair bit easier but less use cases
Ok so I'm at the stage of countersinking and I'm definitely not spending $200 on a press for a single job so maybe I need to cut out a section of the spacers for the screw heads
you can get a countersinking bit
Hmm, that could work, how do I keep it straight?
theres no real good way tbh
What size but aside from 90 degree?
You need to countersink too, screws on the bottom won’t work if not under the face height. Especially on the front towers and the bottom plates of the x joints.
Yeah I ended up getting an assortment of bits, I have a whole other set of cut pieces to practice on with a regular drill, not that I want to 😫 Ive never had the need to countersink with any decent degree of accuracy
Goldy do you mean this file? I have change it to 5mm.
You can find or print a circle suck that when you sharpy inside of it, the sharpy circle is the diameter you want the countersink (usualy slightly larger than the head). Then when you countersinking you only have to worry about angle not depth. Test fit the screw for flushness as much as you need. You can always go deeper, so sneak up on the first one. They also have silly jigs that strap to you drill motor if your fear is greater than AUmazon shipping time.
That would be perfect, thanks! Il do that
It's working lol, thanks to my relatively straight hand, do they need to be flush?
Best to test with a screw and you want it 100% flush or sitting just under a little.
Oh thx I will print when I'm back from work
Nearly done but I'm quite proud of it seeing as it was eyeballed
For the stls that are effectively just cylindrical spacers, can a metal spacer substitute them or are they required?
Proper length metal spacer should work
What infill/walls for the printed parts?
Zero G/Voron Settings, so 4 Walls and 40% infill
@humble fulcrum https://docs.zerog.one/standard/print/settings
Awesome! Thanks
maybe i'm an idiot but i'm having trouble printing the bottom right 625 tower insert. The bearing support is floating on the third layer. supports or nah? https://github.com/TurtleCrawler/Mercury-One.1---Full-Metal-Gantry/blob/main/6mm/Imperial STL Files/Stepper Towers/Offset/6mm Imperial - Offset - Bottom Right Insert-625.stl
its starting to fail on the third layer. let me try and dig out a failed print.
Layer 2 -> layer 3
Ignore the bad z offset. I can't find the most recent attempt but its been resolved. the slicer is attempting to float the bearing support .4mm up in the air.
wait thats the wrong file
ohh an issue with the offset version
I'll have to fix that when I have time
not sure whats going on with it
Ok I thought I was going crazy lol
I’m in no rush at all. Whenever you get a moment. Thank you!
Did you print the non offset ones first?
the offset files are only needed if you have a gap issue
i did print the non offsets and they are about .2mm short. I already have the stepper towers on the printer but now i'm switching the whole gantry over to this. I'm currently using the offsets on the towers with the old design.
the offsets fit a little better
If my 8mm shafts don’t fit inside my 608 bearings nicely is it best to do something to the bearing or the shaft?
I would sand the shaft a bit
I've had no issues printing ASA without an enclosure. Getting the bed to 110 is the key for me. Anything less and is doesn't want to stick.
@shut pewter are the step files on the github the latest ones? I wanna add ZeroG logos to them :)
Thoughts on this accent piece to the front tensioner?
I dig it!
i like it
All the way to China!
I like the skeletal look of the normal parts, more metal than printed parts
Just get the plates laser etched with the zero g logo
I was thinking of getting 6 more stand offs and just doing away with the printed parts on the steppers too. There is probably no getting away from the printed parts on the front towers for the tensioning.
I did this on mine.. no plastic, but I'm doing my own custom AWD so no tensioning towers for me..
maybe I am going insane but was there a different endstop mount for the cnc gantry and metal parts? I am also running the vz printhead
Il give it a shot, Ive sent the parts to a local place anyway but it'd be nice to be able print ASA anyway
yeah so my hub pulley literally doesnt have enough force to pull the hub off
it just bends the plastic
and I still cant print ASA
I'm not entirely convinced the hub can be pulled off the mellow ones without a great amount of pressure from a big tool
Not too bad
It needed.... modifications, but it eventually came off! Finally
One of my mellow idlers needed an insane amount of force, and the other ones came out super easy
I had to put the nut on the outside with washer
Yeah that's exactly what I did, put the washer outside of it with a plate and it eventually came off but bent the plate ahah
Just noticed gap between towers and extrusion. -im running high tension gt3 (280-300hz)
you might want to do the 4th hole mod with higher tensions
drilling out the m3 hole between idlers to 5mm
does it make sense to bore out the back m3 post to m5?
that makes sense. otherwise maybe a printed clip?
Would there be much advantage to having the full length bolt?
just to reach a tnut
its only been an issue at higher tensions
Ahhh, gotcha
Also
I wonder if the stepper mounts for the all metal gantry could be modified to be a little further out to maybe add double shear support for the hybrid
Maybe it would be an idea to add a little tab to the aluminum parts that extends a little more to the back to add another large spacer and M5 bolt 🤔
9mm gt3 tensions are very high
That would mean you need new plates tho
they are designed to be as deep as posible on the 5 pro beta frame
the 5 plus beta frame is deeper
Oh, that makes sense
@shut pewter what you reckon?
Different mod, I am not doing anything with that.
the reality is very few people daily print at speeds above 600, most dont even go past 200 on walls for daily printing. I have my infill at 400, moves at 800.
going silly fast is really just to find new limits and flex. But does not gain you much on your quality speed settings.
Yes exactly but if you wanted to find new limits, is there anything preventing it that you could think of? Like could it support it?
6mm od 3mm Id standoff fits in the back
I have not looked at that mod, you would need to look into it yourself.
I know it fits
I tested it
No need for drilling or anything, just install them and off you go
Otherwise
A 5mm od, 3mm Id spacer definitely fits
I was talking about making the metal gantry work with th e hybrid mod
not the rear m3 screw mod
Ah MB
Sry
No update on kits in the USA yet?
Just got mine, it is, but it’s still worth it. They basically just tell you what to go learn somewhere else the whole time
I print outer walls at 120 and while there are still gains to be had, sometimes large ones, for most printing the diminishing returns start to hit fast above like 20k accel and 200-300 mm/s anyway unless you print a lot of big parts
Well I only design stuff i want, and some times expand it a bit to fit others needs.
So this mod covers my needs.
would something like this little clamp work?
Why not use a longer screw
im doing that. screws coming tomorrow. i had time and just wanted to sketch this out
itll probably lever itself out of position
Can you see if it’s the plates or the extrusion? Temporary fix you could put a m5 button head in a t-nut at the back to pull it down.
its the entire tower tilting forward. again, im running GT3 @ 280hz.
I’m going gt3 belts too so I’ll need to sort some longer screws too. I got my plates done out of stainless though so was wondering which part was the weakness but I know the extrusions twist very easy so probs that.
do you need new gear for the GT3 belts?
does anyone know where else I can buy 5mmx8mm 35/40mm Spacers because the one from BOM link gave me the wrong ones
Message the seller on ali, should be able to get them to correct it
You want to be running double shear motors
Does it really matter if I use these 9mm spacers if it's 1mm under being flush?
thats what the plates sandwich against
yes.
the spacers dont really do much in urs
Does your printed part dimension properly?
Mostly, it's like 9.8mm
Maybe even 9.9
The spacers are taking a long time to turn up for the 5mm OD But I'm determined so I put the 12mm ones I found into a drill and filed it down to 10mm 😆
I suppose that works
Well I've got 4 now, takes a while but they're definitely 10mm now
What length goes into these ? I can only see M3X10mm in the idler BOM am I missing something?
(Ignore the nut, it's just to hold it together)
20mm right?
Yeah that's the middle bolt, but what about the 4 countersunk ones?
I think it was 20mm
Kinda lost on what to do with the stepper spacers top and bottom, I get that I'm using 55mm shafts and F608s but not sure how these pieces are meant to go together and does that mean I would need a lot more printed spacers given this adds extra space?
There is a top and bottom for each stepper tower, you need to read the descriptions to get the right ones. There should be 4 seperate printed parts for the 2 stepper towers.
That's them but this piece came off from the bottom lol, no idea if it's meant to
Thats a built in support. Its supposed to come out
Phew
Do you not have cad?
Oh good point lol
All of your recent questions could have been answered by referencing that, minus the support washer there
So far so good, just placing them to see how it looks, ignore the plastic braces, theyll be metal soon
Yeah no worries, Il look at the CAD, no need to get antsy ahah
M3x40 spacer bored out with 3mm drill bit. Im sure 1/8 would work too? I ordered m3x60 screws and grinded them down to about 55mm, maybe a hair less. I put a washer under the screw head since the hole was countersunk
silver streak is from pair of pliers i used to hold the spacer. about 80% thru the spacer it will start to grab
Did you paint it yourself?
Yeah, auto spray paint, comes out really nice
Looks like a dream 😍 I will try it as well
Yeah auto spray has so many colours and effects and it's super easy to do, I'd recommend acrylic paint as it's not sticky and dries nicer, enamel is ok but finicky before it dries
I found a class 3 F608 bearing for anyone searching, it's not the same as ABEC but "Class 3" is still a lot better than a regular run of the mill bearing, the NSK F608 C3
Model is F608ZZ-MC3
Endurobearings sell F608s that are ABEC3 graded if thats an option for yah
They're expensive to ship, I'll try these, I'd wager that they'd still be pretty damn durable as they're still ABEC 1
Any grading is better than none 😂
I bought randoms for cheap af from china
some have to not be fakes right?
Ahhhhhhh
"Equivalent standards" class 3 looks like similar standards to an ABEC 5 in terms of tolerances at least
What a fustercluck of numbers, classes and just overall confusion
I asked my wife to buy the f608, I guess she went for the cheapest option with free shipping 😅, I hope this will not hunt me back
Like abec 11 off AliExpress?
@fickle prawn at least it's got larger balls then some of the bearings we use. It should be less of a problem
Finally got done anodizing everything after realizing the first set of parts I had came with holes too big. New set's holes are slightly too small but easily fixed with sandpaper. 👍
I didn't really start getting the hang of the anodizing process until about 1/3 of the way through but I'm happy enough with it. I'll do a write up on the entire process.
Probably a more even process than how mine look right now, considering. I'm tempted to try again and redo all the parts. 😅
looks great
The prep work is key, tumbling is a great way to get a more consistent finish followed by good cleaning.
Managed to get most of mine done but still waiting for the steppers, I like the polished look, looks like the M3 5mmOD spacers got lost with Ali express, kinda why I was hesitant at first with one that wasn't using choice but guess I'll have to modify them to fit 6mm OD or precisely file the 12mm (they are very hard to get flat enough)
looking back should have gone with 9mm
Why's that?
Piece of sandpaper on mirror?
I sanded mine a bit sandpaper on granite countertop
realized I need better photos
also, @shut pewter noticed the pins drop a little bit on top, should I get slightly longer ones?
these are 26mm
Probably fine? My rear ones are slightly released but less than yours. This was taken just now while it was printing.
haven't seen any issues but
@shut pewter are you able to make matching plates to my rear ones?
Having those same thoughts lol
That's what I went with on one build. Now I'm thinking all my Mercs should be 9mm. 😅
anyone got the files to have a service cnc them? Looks like i cant use stl files
use the dxf files here
https://github.com/TurtleCrawler/Mercury-One.1---Full-Metal-Gantry
thing is, I need new belts anyway because of my toolhead, but too late now
I'd personally get them laser cut, difference in price is immense
@shut pewter can I use threaded spacers for this or normal only
if you drill them out
@shut pewter Do you have any more kits for sale?
Is 5052 ok for these parts? A friend can get them cut for me on his next order because he has a lot edge that isn't used on the parts he has cut
I need to sort out what I have left, and reach out to one more person in line
I am low on spacers, but I can order what I need from amazon.
@shut pewter Any thoughts on using 5052 aluminum? I would basically be able to get the parts for free.
I think others have used it
I'm sure it'd be fine, just finish it if it's a bit rough if it's laser cut
Any difference in getting it laser cut vs CNC'd, other than price?
Some features are too small to be cncd
Gotcha, thanks, i'll stick to laser cutting then
Are you still selling these? I'd like to purchase if so thank you
I need to order more parts and figure out what hardware I am low on. I do have stepper mounts, one set of front towers, a set of front mount 6mm xjoints and 2 sets of 9mm front mount xjoints. But no top mounts left.
Ok let me know how much that would be I have 8.5mm toothed idlers so would I need the 9mm mounts?
Ohh ok I have 6mm belts
Sent you a dm
@shut pewter this was a nice touch. I'm going to glue this to my top panel like a sticker. 😅
Thanks 
Got any double sided sticky tape?
Of course! 👍 I should have said attach or adhere, I didn't mean glue literally. 😅
You got those installed quick
I spent the first evening disassembling it and cleaning. The next morning I and afternoon I put it back together in between work calls.
so many of us metal gantriers use orange, I thought I was special!
Orange is my favorite color so just goes with the territory. My other Merc was purple.
Does this seem right 😵💫
For one full set of plates in US? Thats high
Yes here in Austin,Tx. They supply the 7075 plate though. Seemed waaay high
Try sendcutsend
I'll send out tonight when I'm home. Do they do good work usually? I've never heard of them until joining this server
Yes they do and their customer service is terrific
I'll definitely look into them. Thank you
I also put together finished kits with hardware and sell them through dms. Full set is $175 shipped, waiting on more plates currently.
How does one pay 😅 also doing the 9mm belt set if that matters
Send me a dm
I hope this is okay to post here, we try to get a group order together of stepper online 2504 with 55 long 8mm shafts. I thought it might fit.
https://discord.com/channels/747612067951018075/1323345448945057914
oehhhh where did you get that. I like it
@shut pewter sent it with the parts I got from him. 👍
indeed a nice touch.. I feel a 3d printed version coming 🤭
@shut pewter what was the rationale behind using the live idlers for the 9mm mod? I want to say someone told me at some point but then I forgot
bigger bearings are better
yup
so should I be tightening the grub screws?
yes
You might need to sand the grub screw down
Should I be concerned about that gap?
Nope, you want the aluminum standoffs to set the spacing. Better to have a slight gap on the printed inserts than to have those set the height
I wish I had bought it from you @shut pewter they sent me the wrong item again
Good because I used loc tight on the motor screws and a bit of thermal paste at the contact face, was not looking forward to taking it apart.
For the x gantry, are the 2 printed spacers swapped? The toothed idlers are printed at 9.45mm tall and with 0.3mm spacers and the flange stack is 9.85 with 1mm spacers
But there is slack on the toothed idlers and the flange stack is too tall
I've only tested it with gates idlers
I thought that is what I had, it's the ones that came with my Merc one kit from fabreeko
Those are not gates
They will be shorter
You can either use more shims or adjust the printed spacers
Ahh. Got it
Part of the reason for the extra shims in the bom
Just ordered the right ones from kb3d. I have the whole thing torn apart right now so I might as well do it right
I think I'm done with metal gantry
As in: you're finished or as in: you're giving up?
giving up Ali express keeps sending me wrong parts
Dutch might have the spacers you need
Assembled all the parts, now just gotta install it on the one Merc (Thing 2). The other has the black anodized set (Thing 1). I'm contemplating making a 3rd set for my 3rd Merc but it's all rainbow-y so I'm compelled to make everything in titanium and color it accordingly. 😅
Perhaps this for the printed parts.
When I saw how many shims you had I bought shidloads and I don't regret it, shim it all, shims for all
Shims never hurt
@shut pewter how big does the countersink need to be?
So the screw sits flush
I'm at the hardware store right now but I see different sizes
okay I'm getting confused right now the cad shows this part is m3x30 but the BOM never showed I had to buy m3x30
ah okay thx
does this matter I only have m5x7x1
@shut pewter the printed spacers do I need to scale it down to 6mm?
Not sure what you mean
well the name is 6mm front tower spacer but the spacer isnt 6mm
hmm okay then my problem is something else
Pictures help
And the concern?
I need to reprint it apparently it warped
ah okay I was following the cad
The lower insert is just to hold the heatset and add the tslot tab
Those are .5mm thick in cad
Maybe i didn't rename them
yeah I saw 5x10x1
I should fix that at some point
That was my issue the other day, ended up just sanding down the spacer
For the double shear support with F608 bearings, we have potentially convinced Stepper Online to add an 8mm shaft version of their 2504 long shaft motors to their web shop. This will be available after the Chinese New Year holidays. Here are the specifications:
All parts assembled, just waiting on those idlers to run the belts, thank you again for the kit @shut pewter
@shut pewter the printed parts aren't supposed to be printed with XY compensation, right?
I printed mine without any compensation
worked like a charm
Even though I haven't installed them yet 😂
lol
I've printed like 4 sets already and now I can't remember which is which, but one of the motor mount pieces feels misaligned
I just trimed them a bit til they fit well, so now I just have to wait on these gates pulleys
No comp here when printing in ASA.
@shut pewter the picture is gone for the stepper tower
Is it working on one of the other stepper tower folders?
for these parts, the ones labeled "top" don't both line up with a hole if you use them on the top on both sides
is that normal or am I doing something wrong?
one lines up fine, the other side leaves the hole in the x joint top piece straight between the 2 holes in the printed part
I'm probably overthinking and should just put it together how it fits but I just wanted to double check
Maybe mirror a set and consider left and right? That's what I did
they're already mirrored so I guess I'll just put them together like that
the top and bottom pieces are just mirrors of each other*
They aren't mirrored on the other axis
Yes but one set should be mirrored left to right
Oh I see it's not oriented the way I was thinking. Sorry, I had to drop it in the slicer since I dont have my glasses on.
😅
It's really side 1 side 2 in a way. Top is used on bottom on one side
Holes seem to line up for me unless I'm missing something
@shut pewter can I still use the pulley alignment for the metal gantry
?
for the stepper motor is the pulley the same height as the printed version? because I know there was a tool to get the pulley at the right height just wanted to know if I can use the tool for the metal towers
not the same height afaik
but should be really easy to cad one up
Could you make it? if you want
I'm not at my pc anymore
just open the metal gantry cad and make it
its pretty easy to adjust them to fit your belt path once assemblde
Ok thx
Wait wut, mine are spaced apart, is it different for 5 plus?
he means they line up with the printed spacer when using the 9mm live idler setup
MUHAHAHAHHAHH, With All metal gantry
before the all metal gantry
doing shaper now, was at 5400 max acceleration before, cant wait to see now
it already sounds soo much better moving
Nice
17k on both x an y
would this motor work for double shear?
it should
nice now I have it wait when its back in stock
but it’s with 5mm shaft, right?
no idea
the. double shear with that will “only” be on the plastic mount (a bearing on the plastic mount). the 8mm shaft version allows to use an f608 bearing on the metal mount
unfortunately there are no bearings with the external size of a 608 and 5mm ID 😫
ugh its hard to find with 8mm shaft
if you are ok with 5mm shaft and support the bearing in the plastic mount there are also the 2504 from stepper online
3dkatten.eu has them iirc
wait i forgot who had it
Motor from LDO with 55mm long, round 8mm shaft. Phase Number 2 Step Angle 1.8 Rated Voltage DC 3.0V / Phase Rated Current (RMS) DC 2.5A / Phase Phase Resistance 1.2x(1 ±20%) Ω Phase Inductance 1.5x(1 ±20%) mH Holding Torque 5.5Kgf-cm (55N-cm) Detent Torque 20 nM-m REF. Rotate Direction A-AB-B CW Insulation Resistance 1
yeah! know! we had attempted a group buy for a custom motor from stepper online ( look at #1006521404964995195 ) which resulted in the SO support telling up they’ll make a 8mm shaft version of their motor available after their new year holiday
price shoube anywhere between 13 to 17$ a unit
tbh I think the support on plastic is not the end of the world, but I bought the f608 and already installed on the motor towers. it would be easier to just go for the 5mm motors 😂
I think I'm gonna buy the LDO next week
thats not a good thing
need a data sheet andd @ me
ill tell u if they wrong
why?
I have a pdf but I pasted here #1287514029354520710 message
it makes sense, you are probably right, without saying anything one can’t know how they are planning to adapt their current motor to a bigger shaft. needing to machining the shaft to be 5mm internally in the motor is not necessarily cheaper than swapping bearings
I asked with my choppy english, hopefully they will not misunderstand the question
Does the new motors have 8mm shaft throughout (with some 608 or similar bearing with 8mm ID), or just an 8mm external shaft with a 5mm internal cross section (reusing the bearing of the original motor with 5mm ID)?
its the actual bearing size that matters here.
the balls or the actual bearing size? I mean would it be good if they use a 5mm ID bearing with 4mm balls? (if it exists)
also you are right the only info they provided was 625zz. which is obviously not for an 8mm shaft
in the ldo data sheet they specify 698zz bearings
Yep. I'm apart of that motor project
I’d love to have one of those 😫, but it’s 40€ each + shipping here in EU
probably by the time we sort this out with stepper online HB will have the 3004 with 8mm shaft released from beta and 3do will be able to import them 😅
I’m gonna keep bugging Thomas about it
Just arrived and man do they good look thank you @shut pewter
There we go, @fluid blaze got to level 21!
Awesome, I like how that pattern turned out
Have a few more printed parts to print then going to install
Sucks gotta take belts off haha have it like perfect
That's nice
@verbal burrow did you have to buy new pulleys for the motors?
For the S8 55 2504's?
yeah
Yeah I had 5mm pulleys before
Get gates
okay so i need to find that too
i have a front gate
damn all of them are for 9mm belts
Gates brand
why?
It’s minimal cost difference and genuine is better in terms of reliability and tolerance
$6 for one 😭
the ones i sent are 10 each lmao
well I cant find any gates pulleys
It's hard finding gates 8mm bore in the eu
Those are 3mm pitch though
yea those arent the exact ones i got, mb
I just wanted to say so people don't accidentally buy them for 2mm pitch belts
Cause that won't work
🙏 gonna delete link just incase, good thinking
You could also add a warning 🤔
how do many you need for the whole printer? I guess it is usually 2
you need two for regular merc, 6 for all metal (modified pulleys need extra pieces from other pulleys)
ey guys what bearing is better to get 698-RS or F608-2RS
no
because no one else has gates profiles. They will have inherent backlash. Powge pulleys are for powge belts
gates pulleys u can get for very cheap from taobao
I just bought these 🙂
they are gates pulleys.
oh didnt know that I only read it that it was from mellow
mellow sells runice which has gates profiles and are licensed
question does 9mm pulleys work with 6mm belts?
I bought the pulleys with LDO-42STH48-2504AHS8 S55
You fine
i run 9mm belts on all of my motors regardless of belt size
the only thing what I need to buy is 698-RS or F608-2RS bearings
you mean you run 9mm pulleys/idlers?
He runs a full 9mm setup. But otherwise just 9mm pulleys on motors with 6mm belts.
I meant to say 9mm pulleys
6mm idlers with 6mm belts though
and I only run 9mm on one printer, my other 2 mercs are 6mm still, for now.
could someone send a picture of how the F608 bearings are supposed to be placed in the stepper towers? i have the flange sticking out the underside of the bottom plate and it looks like it's interfering with the frame
I might just assemble it without the bearings, use a normal tension for now and hope 8mm shafts do their job well enough until I can print the plastic parts for the stepper tower that leave a gap for the flange since there doesn’t appear to be one. I can’t tell if I printed something with support that stuck too well or I just have an out of date file but my assumption is the flange should go inside the actual tower
then I have done something wrong
when 9mm
What material are people making these out of?
Sendcutsend is quoting me 80 dollars a piece for the stepper towers out of 5000 series.
Yeah. I got quoted 80 dollars a piece out of 5000 series, I've gotta talk to them
did you make sure to check the mm box?
sounds like you uploaded in inches
I didn't. Thanks for the help there.
But 80 bucks isn't bad if I ever have to make a MercuryOne that can print two or three cars at once.
Now to figure out if getting them to tap some of these holes will save me effort.
OK now I see how this is put together after looking at the cad.
OK Well everything but the screws are on order now.
(I need to look through my pile of screws before I fire that particular parts cannon)
I used 5083
I heard @broken venture is doing full Titanium soon
I have ordered mine out of 7075
Between those parts and the stuff in the BOM I had to order it's looking like about 200 total, not too bad.
has anyone considered FR4/G10 or like carbon fiber? I guess in similar section thickness they're not near as stiff or strong as 6061
if it was a good idea, someone else would be doing it by now, huh
carbon fiber stuff is fairly flexible
i thought it was rigid? it also depends on the resin to cf ratio
Okay so I hit the books (Material Selection in Engineering Design -Ashby) and I've come to some conclusions:
We're only talking about the plates for the XJoints. all the stationary stuff is strength- and stiffness-constrained, minimize cost.
For the X Joints, we're after specific strength. The material selection index is (E^1/2) / ρ
The values for Aluminum are 2.8-3.6 and CFRP they're 5.2-8.2
In practice, quadrupling the cost of the X Joint plates to save single-digit grams in gantry mass is likely a fool's errand.
Obviously
The strength of cf is complicated
anisotropic so picking out a selection factor requires you to figure out failure modes
(E^1/2) / ρ is a gigantic simplifying assumption on my part
Not worth it here
A lot of variables, from the resin, and the orientation of the strands. Unidirectional, weave
Cost is probably within range of metal anyway
Then you have to factor in voids and flaws
this especially. at this scale water-cut CFRP isn't performing anywhere close to its listed strength factors because we've severed so many of the fibers
what bearing do I need for this?
F608
ok thx
looks like a 8mm shaft is it?
yeah
I got my kit from turtlecrawler yesterday. I am super impressed with the quality. Can't wait to finish it up tonight and see how it performs!
There is a printer project designed around usage of fiberglass panels like fr4/whatever
I got a set made out of 304 stainless, just haven’t put it together yet.
ey guys what is the belt tension with 8mm shaft?
Thats dependent on belts, not motors
I still have gt2
Then whatever gates recommends for gt2
Hmm maybe this shaft was a little bit too long
Nah, you're fine. 👍
The parts are not designed around 55mm shafts, but that's a spec that already exists and does not interfere with anything. No need to add another spec.
If you have a rear corner bracket, it will hit the corner most screw head
I am looking at upgrading my X/Y motors for my all metal gantry. From what I am reading the 2504s are the most recommended? I am looking at this one from Fabreeko: LDO-42STH48-2504AH(S55) ? Is that a good choice? I don't mind paying top dollar for the best motor to get. I have already dumped way too much money into this machine 🤣
Also, are there any issues with a 55mm shaft moving to the nebula frame and enclosure?
okay I thought it could be higher because I saw this
55mm shouldn't be an issue
If u can, get the 8mm thick version
Lukeslab has them
NOW IN STOCK This motor is the one you select when you want the absolute fastest printer but also need excellent heat resistance in an enclosed chamber, but also in dual shear with the long shaft! NEMA 17. 1.8° Step Angle. 200 Steps Per Revolution. 2.5 Amp 55N-cm Holding Torque. 48mm Body. 55mm Output Shaft (8mm diamet
Sold out rn
But there are some other shops that have them
What do you think about these motors? https://www.fabreeko.com/products/open-beta-nema-17-3a-rated-classified-steppers-by-honeybadger
For now I would be running with 2240s. I might upgrade to 5160s at some point.
Nema 17 2.5A RMS rated Classified steppers by HoneyBadger Open beta of our new 60mm long 2.5 RMS amp rated motors, with 8mm thick shafts (requires 8mm pulleys located here) NSK bearings and 55 mm shaft length. Batch 2 preorder: ships late February to early march Specs: 2.5 amps RMS with 5160 steppers 8mm thick 55mm l
I mean, they must be good with TurtleCrawlers logo on them 🙂
afaik 2504’s are still the best all ‘rounders
Do you all find that you can drive the belt without slip for motor shafts with no gound flat? I've got a pair of 2804AH in 55x5 shafts I want to use.
@primal halo you have to crank the set screw down very very tight or else they will. Both my machines run smooth shafts.
Alright I guess I'll hit the gym. Maybe a bit of the sticky stuff can be used to help
Blue loctite would not hurt
I don't think they need to be any tighter than normal
Any recommendations for sourcing in Canadia? Also if anyone did this recently, how much did it run you?
I had the same concern, so I just filed the shaft down by hand. It took a bit of work but turned out pretty nice. Just remember to wrap the motor bodies with tape so you don't get any shavings into the bearings and coils
That did cross my mind, I am a bit concerned with putting excessive hub load on the bearings/ bending the shafts. I'll need to get a little creative with fixturing I guess
If your'e using 55mm shafts you can clamp the tip of the shaft in a vise and look for some stuff you can put under the motor body so it stays level while filling. Also you really don't have to use a ton of force on the file, it should do most of the work itself
When I get mine I'm planning to print a vise collet for holding it to file, just so I don't mar the end of the shaft. wrap the body of the motor to protect from contamination with metal filings
wait, motor shafts are usually hardened arent they? might need to grind instead of filing.
Yeah, hardened shafts.
Here's a picture of my stepperonline motors after filing. It took a while but it worked pretty well I'd say. To hold it in the vise I used some printed jaws out of nylon
Round shafts are fine, zero need for the flat spot.
@shut pewter what is the most likely cause for belt drift on this mod?
Dunno, lockdown is the only one I have seen have a problem with belt walk using this mod
not closed loop belts.
@snow oar do you know what might cause belt drift?
hard on corexy
No. One side of my belts is getting chewed and im waiting on replacement to come in before dissembling
Just letting the printer eat it
its really not.
u just cut the closed loop apart. u just want it for the spiral cut aspect
But not shimming properly will do it. Even if you’re 0.1mm taller of a steeper tower or idler or xjoint, that gets amplified by distance and rotation
Square flat gantry/frame is also important
burgo going at it from the least likely cause 😂
its really not.
frame being out of square, pin being slightly tilted, stepper towers being pulled forward
Im running closed loop belts XD
"Long-Length belting is produced in Spiral form. Spiral cut belting is produced from a belt sleeve by moving the slitter laterally while the belt sleeve is rotating. The resulting belting does not have continuous tensile cords, and the teeth are not perfectly perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the belt. As long as the belt width is narrow, these properties have been found to contribute little if any detrimental effects to belt performance. Tensile modulus and strength are equivalent to conventional endless and long length belting."
how do ik if i need to shim up/down?
Do a bed mesh
The high corners on the mesh need to be shimmed up
Are you belts chewed up
Cause high on mesh means nozzle closer to bed
no
my bed isnt flat already lol
Well
ill try tho
Measure the diagonals
Im going crazy trying to figure out this issue 😭 \
so the printer bed has some skew, but Im guessing its front left?
This just looks like front is too low
Are you on hydra or normal bed?
Would probably be better suited for #z-axis though 🤔
normal
i think i actually figured it out tho. im not sure how, but before i fell asleep i logically figured out what part was messed up. ive concluded its the right xy joint for certain. i totally forgot the reason to it, but i know its right. (also, if you look into some psychology, you essentially think better before you fall asleep, but i wont explain)
im fine with the bed. I'm concerned abt belt walk
Probably stock frame issues
could be too...
I have the same problem with the plastic towers, just this morning I remembered that the pulleys on the motors themselves arent glued in place but I didnt have the time yet to adjust their position, I think that's the problem in my case
also, my right bearing stack actually has a bit of play for some reason, I can move it up and down by a mm
On a plus side that mm is a bigger difference over a span vs a pro
So I'm putting together the 6mm metal parts for the Mini Merc and there's some conflicting info. The BOM says I need 4x 30mm standoffs for each stepper tower, but the CAD shows only needing 2x 35mm standoffs. I ordered per the BOM, however I do have some 35mm standoffs. Which do I need?
Disregard. I measured the printed parts and it's 35mm. I'm sure someone else has already brought it up that the BOM is incorrect.
Measure the lengths in cad
I have some labeling issues on cad when I modified the parts from 9mm to 6mm
Something else I noticed is my printed spacers on the X joints came out to 9.7mm, likely just a result of my printer. I'm assuming the 9.25mm dimension in the CAD on that part is pretty important to maintain
The 9.85mm printed parts came out pretty spot on
Just shim add needed
I'm going to run some spare spacers I have down to a local machine shop and have them turn them down to length to replace the printed spacers
Anyone else experience this? There's about a 1mm gap between the printed parts
That a bit of a gap, but there should be one by design. Plates should be sitting on the standoffs, not the part
But that really is a gap XD
Should be thin
The only issue I can see it causing is the bearing stacks being able to move up or down
I suppose I can add a .5mm shim on top and bottom of the stack so it's center
Is there an updated pulley alignment tool for the motors? I used the ones from the regular configurator and the pulleys are badly misaligned.
No, I have never used them
We just use 9mm versions and get it in the ballpark
You have a clear view of it now, and can access the set screws to adjust as needed
I just eyeballed it.
I normally loosen the grub screws and move the toolhead around so the pulleys move into place then tighten them.
@supple quartz
Just wanted to throw an fyi out there. I have a lightweight gantry on my plus. The m5 mounting holes were about 2mm too short for mounting to the metal gantry. I just checked the linears rails. Close enough parallel and centered to not cause this much of a difference. I think the easy path forward is going back to a solid extrusion.
One could possibly move the rails out 1mm on each side but you'll throw out the belt path.
I just put fmg and printed parts on top of each other and the holes are in the same positions
With lightweight?
lw beam worked for me on 377
I already moved my y rails out. I don't know why I ended up with issues with that. Either way. I'm adjusting and will work on it later getting it racked.
I dont have a plus
but the holes on the printed parts and fmg parts are the same
so fmg shouldnt make a difference
I know they line up, which is why I was going crazy lol
I realized I don't have my 500mm solid piece here so going to make it work
@half dagger did it work with the printed parts? Same hole locations
It did, there must have been some binding then too. I have stuff all torn down and will put it back together here later.
Maybe your frame is just wider?
I measured as best as I could with a tape outside to outside of rails and looked spot on. Then same for the frame. It's why I think I'm going crazy.
I pulled the dimensions from the 3D model
Measure hole to hole and check with fysetcs drawings?
Thatll tell you immediately if its the gantry or something off with the frame
I'm going to go with frame at this point. The holes on the gantry appear to be right.
You have no idea how crazy this makes me lol
How are the holes on the carriage drilled? Centered?
But, trying to find 2mm in all of it makes me think its got to be the frame. There are variations in the thickness of the 2020 so I'm going to guess that played a factor many moons ago when I put the rails on.
Realistically it's closer to 1.5mm.
Holes are off about 0.2 on one side, so 0.1 off center
long story short, there was indeed a slight bow to the gantry. I tried fixing it. I guess I went hulk smash on it. It's not more.
I was just about to say I have the LW gantry on one of my plus Merc with FMG and it fit fine. 😆 I'm glad you figured it out though.
One of the arms kinked a little, then the other side. So I showed it I wasn't messing around.
ok, for some reason I completely ignored the fact that the belt path is lower, I am building the 6mm version, this means I'll have to lower the toolhead belt mounts as well right?
or does it sit lower as well because of the x-joints? oh that's it right? 😄
you wont have to mod your toolhead
got it, thanks, short moment of "eww, I knew I forgot smthWW
The belts are always centered along the 2020
„What’s your hobby?“
„I do 3D printers. „
„Nice, what do you make?
„I cut metal parts“
„Nice, with the printer?“
„No, for my printer“
"Eevrything I do is for my printer"
literally me lol
🤣 🤣
Do I see this right that all motor mount plates are exactly the same except the two bottom ones that have a smaller hole to retain the pins?
about to chamfer the m3 shcs holes, just wanted to double check because at first I thought they're all the same 😱
Exactly
No, the top plate and middle plate have 5mm holes for the pulley stacks and the bottom plate has the smaller holes, so the pin won't drop out the bottom..
I am considering rebuilding my merc.....
I would like to do this mod and have a lightweight/CNC gantry.
Which one would you recommend? Can anyone provide a link?
Thanks in advance
Only lw gantry for mercs if the fystec one
dont get lw gantry for plus. the lw gantries bend and will cause resonance peaks
That's why I am using custom lasercut aluminium square hollow tube,
this works well
Okay, thanks for the tips
@warped bloom
Got my machined X joint spacers today. 👍🏻
What?? not iced? I am so disappointed 😛
awesome. it took quite a bit of tweaking with the shims to get the printed parts to perfect heights
Yeah I didn't want to have to deal with that. Plus if you're going with all metal might as well go ALL metal. they're all within .01 so I shouldn't have to shim too much
i wonder if the alu tube at work i have is the right dimensions
As long as you can turn it down to the dimensions anything will work
I just used some left over spacers I had from my AliExpress orders
@shut pewter if you use the xjoints, do you have to use the tensioner towers and stepper towers with it? like, the height of the idlers and such would be different than stock parts?
Yes
Only the stepper mounts can be standalone
got it.
The other printed parts could be modded
yyyyyea, i have enough on my plate with this thing, i dont wanna tackle that too 🤣
im using the zandve enclosure mod with the voron like tensioners, and his 'more power' stepper towers
ive studied the cad and modded things to taste, and his tensioners and motor mounts are solid i believe. i just want cnc x joints.
Is there lengths where I won’t need shims? I’ve got a mate ready to turn up some spacers from bar stock 5083 for me
That or 6060/6061
He’s got some on the shelf at his machine shop
You would need to measure yourself
Ok, only reason I ask is because your BOM says 30mm spacers etc
He said he’d smash them out for me
I know I can buy them but stuff it, if I’m going good stuff, I’d rather be accurate, than “meh close enough” accuracy
Look at the CAD
Ok
does anyone have an estimate of how expensive the parts for this are? and recommendations where i could get the plates cut in eu / germany?
xometry
price I dont remember anymore
didnt we get it for free with that coupon code?
not totally at least in my case cause I didnt want to scam xometry
hmm okay
Huh? XD
last year there was an 100 euro coupon and the metal parts was just under 100 euros so many people got it the metal parts for free
Dayumn
