#Ender 5 To Mercury One.1
1 messages Ā· Page 3 of 1
like, the motor can be also mounted above/below and use something like the stock y axis rods to place the pulley where it should be
stock ender 5 I mean...
A couple of people are working on that with some success.
but I can see the rear motor mounts design might be used as is, I just need to swap things around between left and right and remove some flange stacks... if only we could tension the belt somewhere else š
and I don't know how to use this thing,,, that' it I'm opening it in freeCAD
Green: stepper
Red: Reverse Idler
Yellow: Tensioner idler
Nice! do you think the pulley has enough grab on the belt like this?
Nope. Is this better?
yes, maybe even more, so to make a U on the pulley
Yeah, can move the tensioner idler back even more
wait a sec...
but, it's going to need a good support to keep the belt tensioned without using the extrusion
what about using the whole motor mount as tensioner?
I feel the tensioner need to be on the 2020
requires a completely new part
put the motor on the tensioning tower
the issue is that the tensioner need to be quite symmetrical, otherwise you'd risk to bent the mount on the vertical axis during adjustment, but maybe if you have 2 M5 instead of only one
I think the belt is backwards?
oh indeed
OHHH I'm looking at the belt as is
Hrm. Okay, so what if the rear idler is movable.
Make that the tensioner and the rest fixed?
I feel like that adds a lot of complexity to the design
Agreed, but I'm rolling with it because it's interesting š
and fragility as well
moving as a whole piece sounds better
but only one screw to keep it in the frame?
I would add a second one but I don't see roon for it
also because there are constraints on the belt path once few pulleys/idlers are close together, maybe you change the efficiency by moving only one of them
maybe on the side of the extrusion
If the stepper is turned you can use that M3 screw hole for an M5 to the frame.
The m3 for the stepper that's right above the extrusion
Turn the stepper parallel to the frame
the side is a good idea but printing becomes a pain
I wonder if a piece of 2040 is enough for it to fit on the side
screw an extra piece of extrusion to the side, making it a 2060
not sure if it has the correct spacing
and using an m5 screw instead of the dowel in the front flanges?
You do not want to do that. Voron switched to dowels because the threads imbalance the bearings.
ok.. m5 with the threads only at the tip than š
Shoulder bolts would work, yeah
I still think this is simpler. Turn the stepper 45 degrees and use that pillar (purple) for an M5
do you have room to rotate it?
and you are right
It'd require some modification, but we have the STEP files now
we are speculating, we have all the room in the world :D.. I don't have that room in my printer
Ahhh, that room
I don't see this idea working on an inline enclosure like yours. @stone valve 's enclosure would work better with the walls away from the printer.
yeah :P, sorry not native, I hope you understand. I don't have that space in my printer
You're good, dude. I gotcha. š
If you do ever implement this, I suggest 9mm belts. That's a lot of motor on 6mm belts.
but at that point we need to revisit the all thing, idlers and all
at that point give up make a different printer that already has it
What if you put two steppers on one pulley?
I think vzbot still uses 6mm belts for awd
Shorter belt path, though. Less tension.
Each stepper is only pushing one belt across a shorter distance with one idler
I used the left rear motor and placed at the front right, so nothing is correct on the pulley/idlers and the tensioning would be on the front bar
you can just mirror the back right no?
oh, you're smart!
don't know how to do that yet though
need to go now...
the tensioner is the correct one, ideally it's the same as the stock, I'm going for a mod that you need to print one thing more and it's more or less plug and play
(a small additional bom, but that's a given)
So I wired up the skr mini e3 v1.2 in the backpack (since the spare V3 doesn't cooperate with can), just to discover than the tmc2209 on that board are the noisiest thing I've ever heard. They can't stand 1.41 amps either.... I brought this to myself going through the reshuffling without testing each component first (if I tried before the spare skr e3 mini v3 with can... anyway). But, it's no a big deal, the skr pico is actually cheaper and I alway wanted one of those... so pico is going in the. backpack... it should be here tomorrow/friday. It seems extremely simple to hookup with can
one could argue the skr pico is better than the skr e3 mini
@proud cliff don't forget the transceiver
it's already there, I only need to crimp jst and remove the dupont
I take it youāve looked at the voron 2.4 awd?
I did not, I eyeballed the idea of reusing the back towers mirrored
doesn't work you need path for the belt to return
They move tensioning to the back so the front can be static
Stepper towers with a moving motor mount to tension the belts?
Would a bit of designing to get there, Iām looking at my modded steppers forgetting the m3 bolts holding the motor hold it together too. But should be doable.
I'm tempted to try to design a tensioning tower to attach the stepper to
yeah it's currently some.long M3
Yea mine have no m3ās cause the motor is dropped
ah right forgot you had the motors dropped
is this a new version of the tower? with the added support?
Nope, we're brainstorming how to do an AWD Merc
aha... what do you mean by AWD?
4 steppers instead of 2. š
for the back ones? really...
or two extra on the front?
Two extra on the front was the thinking.
aha... I can understand that. to eleviate the pressure of of the back ones
Not sure they're gonna pursue it, though. It would need a lot of work to accomplish.
indeed š¤
Cartesian AWD would probably be easier to do, and by then you might as well build a VzBot š
Imagine threading the belts through 4 stepper towers š²
haha that would be a brain cracker š¤£
cool idea though!
I'm just building a k3 for a fast printer
the honeybadger one?
Yup
It's not that big, at least weight wise
ah just visually looks big then.. Looking forward to your build. That is one crazy ass machine haha
damn I would love to follow that build, got a build log for it somewhere?
Over on the fabreeko discord. It's stalled a bit. But I'll probably work on it this weekend
@solar bridge would you mind sharing the server link? noy finding it
will need server invite
they also used 4 nema 14, instead of 17, right?
They have both
I actually was thinking something along your dropped mount, but above the printer (since in the front would interfere with hydra) but it really add complexity, maybe @frail swallow is right saying it needs a bigger belt
9mm
I was thinking that too, but you would need to change the frame really. As youād need longer uprights to attach to
unless one could add a mount with 2 stepper in the back after the klicky probe, where the toolhead doesnāt pass anyway š
by what Iāve seen most enclosures add extrusions there, not mine obviously
@gleaming trout you tempted me ⦠also who knows how long the free shipping would last š°
That's small, so I think it will stay like that
I confirmed the skr mini e3 v3 is working in uart. for some reason it really doesnāt like canbus this one š. So I connected rx/tx to a serial dongle and use it via the keystone usb port. This made me realized the wires I made before were causing the motor noise! so I quickly fixed them and reproduced the 45k accel 500 speed I was able to do before, in relative silence⦠looking forward for the pico tomorrow, maybe that why I can pass the 45k, the pico should be marginally faster than the skr mini. but we will see
fetched the skr pico from the post drop box near by. Iām loving the look of the boardā¦.. are the board stackable with other pico/rpis? the design seems pretty flat. For sure Iāll get another one in the future to replace the last standing skr mini (I think I can sell this as itās perfectly working)
I think Iāll use the 20mm standoff to stack a pico and the asus tinker board, saving even more space in the bay⦠I think with this I can really clean up the wiring
or print shorter standoff, Iām sure something is already out there for stacking rpis
They made to stack on pi on top
I see them easily stacking on each other as well
BTW pico holes are M2.5 so an M3 won't fit, you can make them larger though
I just ued a 3mm drill bit manually
maybe some printer standoff with narrow 2.5 mm ends... I've seen mounting towers, I have to measure how deep the el bay is, but at least 2 boards seems reasonable to be stacked and fit in the bay, maybe 3 (just for curiosity... but this would be an appealing setup for people with a 5pro and wanting hydra with a small footprint -eg you want the space for a 5v psu-)
plus you could make the mount with a fan and a cooling duct to cool down all the boards
I ordered some brass standoffs for mine
yeah, I have many 20mm brass standoff, m3 though⦠but I think Iām going to do a-la flow4enol and drill through 3mm
Open them up!
@stone valve how did you went about with the drill? is it relatively safe?
for the pico holes
just drilled the second one today
let me get a pic
I used one of these, a regular drill works as long as you're careful and go sloooooooow
huu, wait, I could slowly go with an m3 tap, by hand
there's margin for maybe even a 4mm hole
I think itās the safest, the tap bit is really sharp, and will easily eat up the metal/pcb instead of put pressure on the edges/board
Go for it
You can also bore it out with an M3 screw
That's how I mount mine
ahh ok, maybe thatās what Turtle meant, I tough he was warning me of some danger (I am prone to screw up)
Ahh, I bet that is what he meant.
thatās how I usually bolt in stuff on the din rails š¤
still got some fever, itās actually worse than before + the witcher is out⦠the pico will not be handled today. another day of downtime
placed the pi/ connected everything, flashed with can, and to my surprise I even got the configuration correct at the first try!
now I need to print a propeer mount for the pico in the back
I don't want to fuss around with a perfect design, added a bunch of ziptight holes randomly, eyeballing in a correct position for some wires (still fever, I've got some nasty manflu, I don't want to think, just doing stuff)
forward looking todo:
- print and install new backpack electronic plate (the one above)
- shorten all the cables in the backpack that needs shortening, bolt securely an zip tight everything
- flash canboot on the back pico (right now is normal klipper on canbus comm) so I donāt need to worry about physical interaction with it for update (plus side, the thr and the skr pico have the same klipper firmware ⦠need to double check the canbus pins if they are also 0/1)
- close the backpack properly so itās still āsafeā to be around the printer while on
- make a mount for the camera, I have a creative live something usb camera. internally it has a 40x25 mm board, I will make a basic angled mount, and install the camera at the top right, inside the enclosure
- design a door/cover using the 6mm plexiglass slab I have around (probably carboard door to mockup in the meantime)
oh, yes, and finally, get another pico, and refactoring the electronic bay
also the pico driven a/b fails to reach 50k. doesnāt skip at 500@45k. So same as before. it must be something mechanical (rails quality, frame squarenessā¦)
I donāt really care, since if Iāll manage to print >=10k accel Iāll be happy (stuck at 6k right now)
47k works, 48k starts to skip
before
mcu: stepper_x:24300 stepper_y:5076 stepper_z:-24032 stepper_z1:-24032 stepper_z2:-24032
stepper: stepper_x:510.500000 stepper_y:-2.500000 stepper_z:30.000000 stepper_z1:30.000000 stepper_z2:30.000000
kinematic: X:254.000000 Y:256.500000 Z:30.000000
toolhead: X:254.000000 Y:256.500000 Z:30.000000 E:0.000000
gcode: X:254.000000 Y:256.500000 Z:30.000000 E:0.000000
gcode base: X:0.000000 Y:0.000000 Z:0.000000 E:0.000000
gcode homing: X:0.000000 Y:0.000000 Z:0.000000
after
mcu: stepper_x:24303 stepper_y:5075 stepper_z:-24046 stepper_z1:-24046 stepper_z2:-24046
stepper: stepper_x:510.500000 stepper_y:-2.500000 stepper_z:30.000000 stepper_z1:30.000000 stepper_z2:30.000000
kinematic: X:254.000000 Y:256.500000 Z:30.000000
toolhead: X:254.000000 Y:256.500000 Z:30.000000 E:0.000000
gcode: X:254.000000 Y:256.500000 Z:30.000000 E:0.000000
gcode base: X:0.000000 Y:0.000000 Z:0.000000 E:0.000000
gcode homing: X:0.000000 Y:0.000000 Z:0.000000```
I was a genius not to remove the protection film from the panel before installing it š
I am not sure what happened but the heatbreak fan stopped to work all of a sudden and since than both psus switched off for no reason (all off), twice, and than I was able to run the printer motors, lights, all other fans⦠all together so I would exclude too much drawn⦠I will check later tonight the not working fan
dead fan maybe
can it trigger the fuse randomly?
the āfuseā is a glass 10A fuse embedded in the switch. I removed the circuit breaker
it would blow and need replace so I donāt think itās that
did it blow a fuse?
not that I know. everything works without any intervention
a part the fan
do you have a spare?
maybe I noved something in the bay that make the connection unstable, I need to check the wiring sooner than expected
yes, I have another one, plus 2 creality stock 40x10
try one?
yes, Iāll get to it later tonight.. I was hoping to print stuff in the meantime.. but nope
heatsink fan is the only fan one canāt really be without š
none of them works right now making the effort to get the slowpoke working
I need to print a new x endstop piece for the merc
canāt you just flash a stock firmare from creality?
if thatās a thing
heh thrre is
I have an old repo of marlin
update might be painful but I have the configs
I am a moron, the fan is fine, I just re-installed on the wrong pin š
so the shutdown was unrelated. I hope I didnāt do any damage on the hotend heating up without cooling for some minutes
maybe 20 minutes
printed overnight and the printer didnāt shut down, so I donāt know what Iāve seen yesterday. but I swapped the spool, and the one it was printing with was tangled after few rounds (right when I decided to leave it alone probably). the sherpa mini filament sensor didnāt stop it right away, as it printed few very bad layers, but it did shortly after
I couldnāt unwound the spool even by hand, so that was clearly the cause
tighten up the enclosure, reached 40C, and the thr36 reached 100C, the print was killed⦠@solar bridge how hot your thr is running (if you run it enclosed)?
wait the thr has temp sensor?
the default rp2040
I dont remember seeing it on klipper
[temperature_sensor thr36]
## THR36 CANboard temp
sensor_type: temperature_mcu
sensor_mcu: thr36
max_temp: 100```
Iām trying to pull some official specs on the thr boards to see if I can push over 100C, a loot of marketing, very little useful info
if the mount will resist at that temp š
where the hell are the docs for those sensors
The RP2040 series is available in a QFN-56 package with a -20°C to +85°C operating temperature range.
so 100...
itās skirocketing
I think I have to remove the cat shroud š
or maybe the cat shroud could have a fan version š, @frail swallow
There is one! Just...it removes the cat face.
I'm running it with 30mm fans on both of mine
95C at 34C chamber temps? Oh my that's not cool
so is there one with 4 inserts for the fan?
I suspect itās too crammed, all the wires and the shoud is compressing, no much air exchange for the heatsink to be of any help
Agreed. The fan definitely helps.
amazing, I only have a very loud 30mm fan š©
no 40mm?
paused and removed the shroud
Nah, too big, too noisy, not enough need
Nice, definitely the cause
maybe i only need to cut a grid in the shroud š¤
You just want to save the cat face š
I really like the cat face, but maybe it needs less plastic there
yeah š
I'll see what I can come up with. Maybe make the cat face out of empty space and put a grid around it
This is as it should be š
ok, temps under control, I think I am possibly running also a electronic bay temp issue as well, the tinkerboard runs extremely hot, historically for me was always around ~80C⦠another print stopped for a random ātimer too closeā on the canbus network (reported on the thr36), but it might be the sbc is running too hot, Iām without camera now š©
the thinkerboard is fine, but itās not as powerful as the rpi4, plus is not running 64bit code. and canbus. I donāt have any network error though
so now Iām looking into cooling down the electronics bay, the sbc is the most challenged electronics, the skr mini is only running Zs at 0.5 amps each and used as usb to can bridge, it doesnāt run very hot
SBC without camera is running at ~65 C, totally reasonable temp. I should look into which rendering the camera is using, It should be possible not to use cpu for this
or maybe I should just track down a pi4b 2Gb with reasonable prices
but thatās the operating temperature, not the max chip temperature, I think š¤
max chip temp is when it dies
once you go above operating temp things start to go bad
yeah, I want to set it just a tad before that
I wouldn't let it go above 85
but the operating temperature is the external temperature, that would be ~40C. but yeah, it clearly have heating issues⦠I donāt know how happy the asa mount would be during some few hours print to be close to a 100~110 C heatsink
ok, thatās the baseline temperature of the thing even when it wasnāt enclosed
youād get a lot of prints stopped at 85c
if not all
just now even without shroud it reached 90C
I will buy another one
for me it's like a CPU, anything near 90 is trouble
and maybe others when the price offers is a bargain
it can also be that temperature reading is not accurate, itās not actually 90C
I could in theory attack a thermistor to the heatsink and compare
there will be a difference
the shroud with a fan seems the safest thing to implement
I would go that route
and start it above 85
yeah, the thr can scale it, I just have an empty fan slot
I donāt know How to configure it in klipper though
do you want to control the dual fans individually?
maybe thatās what was happening to your issues as well, the thr controls the extruder motor, the driver might have gone mad with a properly sealed enclosure (mine is still leaky, less than before.. but stillā¦)
it was filament binding
coming out of the drybox
issues went away as soon as I corrected the path
I had to respool a roll yesterday
considering looking for a tool for doing it systematically
one of my cat was trying to chew on some loop while I was untangling a mess⦠I just cut it than And swap the filament
I have yet to find one tangled
had one instance and it was due to my error
if I had that kind of issues with a specific brand and I was sure it wasn't me I would just stop buying
I tried the Hilbert curve pattern as first layer, it was painfully slow, but I felt the results gave more adhesion vs line parterns. it also give a very nice uniform finish, where the fast pattern might show some of the bed imperfections
that was probably my error
I have yet to try that, but it's on my plans
I do get a nice finish with the oseq sheet
same, I ended up with the line pattern, for a 8x5cm the first layer time was more than 1h
ouch
but for small piece that needs extra adhesion, I might consider it
at what speeds
I left it default
donāt remember, but the hilbert curve is such an intricate pattern that is constantly changing direction
my current baseline for first layer is 60
yeah I know, this is where high acceleration is good
first layes is at 50 for me
a decent speed
200 from the 2nd⦠you can really see the changing pace š
speed benchy 300 fist layer, it was quite scary
it also managed to stick
asa
next time Iāll tape it, I had an hand busy to stay on the power switch
Once all my other todos are done I have to look what settings make to breach the 24min mark. I think my printer has it to make at least around 10~15min
the filament sensor works like a charm, I am impressed. for what it is itās fantastic. I only need to print a cover for the switch, I am thinking to modify the tradrack endstop cover, just to protect the heatshrink on soldered bits a little more nicely
I also need to make some gear competition, I fee like the RIDGA gear gives me more quality prints
š thanks for posting this video! I'd been thinking about my accel performance a bit more... was wondering what speed you're using for this 47k accel test?
I think it's max_velocity in printer.cfg
hey :). I used 500, and 50mm bound (since it would slam around klicky and other mounts without any boundaries)
max velocity I have a ludicrous value⦠let me check
itās 600.. but the test will@use only 500 (it will start skipping with higher speed as well)
we both used that disgusting ep2 lubricant, so it canāt be the issue. the weight itās probably better in yours because of the lightweight bar
And that let me beat my personal best benchy time, now at 8:45
it boils down to motor and rails
I am stuck at 24min benchy š
I will try 22k and 700 speed test, to see if I can go that fast. it might be that I canāt
I'd be curious to hear about your results!
Vez just put out a video on a 30k and 600mm challenge
Iām waiting for the lightweight bas as well, and I just printed a mount for the bambu clone, that seems to be half the size of a rapido
Niiiiice
and maybe swap the 4020 for a 4010, If I find the nice round gstime⦠So I hope Iāll push the weight a bit down in the future
Good times!
Iāll do the test tomorrow. I wonder if some would make a script to increase acceleration/speed by small steps and record the skipping steps amount, and stop when skipping more than 16⦠and make a proper graph out of it (it might be dangerous unsupervised though)
Seems like it would be a nice improvement
it might be something telling about the printer mechanics. some constant motor/rails/weight will have the same effect, however we can only guess the motor power and measure the weight. I am not into mechanics/physics but in genetics we model random stuff we donāt know, and works around the variables we might know š
aligning the mounting holes of the bambu(clone) hotend with my spare nf crazy, shows the nozzle placement will be more or less the same (if not slightly lower)
the mount prints ok using very small plastic (~30 min), I only butchered both copies I did when removing the supports
and I need to dry my filament, it was stringing party yesterday
total weight with a random 40x10 fan is 46g (a kitchen scale +/- 1)
nf crazy weight -no fan attached- 73g
so this with removal quite a lot of weight on the carriage
itās crazy, you can feel the difference even by lifting them
I even used oversized m3 screws for the fan, m3x35 instead of m3x 25 for the 4010
I donāt want to go to remove the rapido to check the weight, this was a quick and dirty -put numbers on what I felt- but I would be surprised if the rapido is much lighter than the nf crazy
Rapido HF only seems to be around 43g
unless the plastic + hsi + bolts + fan is less than 3 grams, it will beat also the rapidoā¦. but would it work?
will see
he he.. I wish, not yet, but the weight difference is incredible
I told you
I'm sure that two of your buddies here will place an immediate order once you say you like it
I'm tapped out ATM. But it'll go on the wishlist. š
...whatever it is. EDIT: OH! the bambu! yes!
You're his third buddy then š¤£
lol, we're all lemmings in these monster build logs
"That looks cool! Imma do it!"
I swear, I'd be done... š¤£
That old bot made it look like I was grinding WoW
I was like level 30 in two months or some ridiculousness
oh no he found our secret
as for the bambu hotend, only if nozzles are swappable and has a flow a lot better than the crazy
so I can justify it to myself
nozzle are swappable, flow rate should be au-pair if not higher than the crazy. how the bambu x1 would do quality benchy in 15 min otherwise?
I have some backlog since I was sick for the last week, so either hobby fixing and actual-job todos š
and yet Iām considering swapping the hotend to just see how it does.. doing the least productive thing I could do, as usual
wow @rancid crown 22k and 700 is faast, then printer made it without skipping
I tried going to 40k but as soon as I raise speed above 200 skips a lot š
22k and 800, the motors starts to be loud š®
Btw how fast are you moving z?
hmm, very slow 12 vel 200 acc
28k 800. Iāll stop there
Tried 75mm on z I'm surprised it works
Damn I'm jealous
naaa, I forgot to copy the console output, and I already tuned all off š®āšØ
I can't get mine moving like that without stupid skipping
Guess I'll have to order the new steppers
I might be wrong, but the printer got a lot more stable once I installed the enclosure on the frame. itās not perfectly squared, but itās sturdy. I canāt lift the thing, it must be at least 30kg. I need to weigh it
Yep, made it without skipping... I printed a benchy at 18k 700mm/sec and it went pretty quick! I'm probably not trying to print any faster than that... š
pretty productive half hour of coding python to use OpenSCAD, I am planning a bazel for the plexiglass, here is a screenshot of a top corner from the bottom (openScad has the ugliest rendering ever possible)
the code I used is very clean! I like it! ```python
import sys
from muscad import Volume, Cube, Part
class CornerBazel(Part):
def init(
self, height=2, edge_len=100, widht=40, glass_thickness=5, inlay_ratio=1 / 2
):
""" """
self.add_child(
Volume(width=edge_len, depth=edge_len, height=height)
.fillet_height(height / 2, front=True, back=True)
.fillet_depth(height / 2, top=True)
.fillet_width(height / 2, top=True)
)
self.add_hole(
Volume(width=edge_len - widht, depth=edge_len - widht, height=height)
.fillet_height(height / 2, right=True, front=True)
.align(bottom=self.bottom, left=self.left, back=self.back)
)
self.add_hole(
Cube(
edge_len - (widht * inlay_ratio),
edge_len - (widht * inlay_ratio),
glass_thickness,
).align(bottom=self.bottom, left=self.left, back=self.back)
)
if name == "main":
corner = CornerBazel(
height=10, edge_len=100, widht=40, glass_thickness=5, inlay_ratio=1 / 2
)
print(corner)
I probably will find out after spending countless hours a major flaw in this cad designing technique, otherwise everyone would do this, right? it's so much more convenient than dragging and editing shapes into a canvas
just added some M3 bolts, it was as easy as to add additional holes python self.add_hole( Bolt.M3(8) .top_to_bottom() .align( center_x=self.center_x + width, top=self.top, center_y=self.center_y - width, ) )
It has a place, for sure. But so does Blender and stuff like regular CAD software. š
added a bottom place, and rendered on top of each other in freecad (slightly better rendering, I asked for different colors but that got lost in translation apparently)
the issue I'm seeing is that the parts/object logic I implement in the code, doesn't get exported in freeCAD, I only have a bunch of primitive shapes, from freeCAD I could export a step file, and import it in fusion š
for instance, unless I add some sacrificial bridge or the like, I don't know how those counterbores are going to print... maybe it's a specific thing I can learn how to do in the "normal CAD"... or maybe I can also code it... let's see
Check out the ZeroG step files. They do a 3-layer trick to bridge those counterbores.
Looks like this:
that's not scad code...
or they moved to python?
did one of these somewhere a pain do draw
itās a python api that generates scad code
ahhh, easier to read indeed
(personally not a python fan but I take it over scad)
Yeah, they are. They get easier as you do more, but I'd really like to be able to select a face and run a script in Fusion to "overhang-ify" a counterbore like that.
can you do that? I wasnāt able to move, translate things like I wanted, the simplest operations š
also I compulsively hit enter even when I shouldnāt, so I have to re-open the same menus over and over š¦
or, a small 5v fan always on attached to the bltouch 5v pin š¤
There is a plugin to do those in fusion. Dutch tried it, we felt it best to continue to do them manually.
how do you actually do them? just sketch rectangles and extrude?
It added to many sketches and features, and wasn't easy to change after since each one was its own so of sketches and features
Project the inside and outside circles
Then draw 4 lines
2 across, and tangent to the center
Then 2 more inside the first two lines, also tangent to the center
Make the center circle construction
same way I did them then š
Then extrude the proper regions 1 and 2 layers
in a lot of different sketches and features
Optional step is to chamfer the inner circle at the end
now that I think about it, the design I sent to jlcpcb had those features (SLS doesn't need them) š¤¦
Oooh, that's an interesting twist. I'll check that out.
@proud cliff how's the bambu hotend going? good flow?
still havenāt mount it, I need to remove the current connector and crimp different ones⦠I know you people are going to kill me, but Iā m thinking to use just jst-sm for the cartridge and dupont for the thermistor (because thatās what I have)
well I'd prefer JST-SM than XH
managed to understand where to declare the colors :D, frame (green), bottom and top bezel (blue and red and in between the slot for the plexiglass)
I only need to understand what size of magnets I have and embed them in the things
I need to define some parameters to compare the bambu with the rapido. First I need to tune it. SonI could go about to make some flow calibration round with the rapido and di the same with the bambu (does it have a name this thing!?). I am undecided if I need to install a chr-clone in both
I also need to run a resonance tests for both, maybe the weight change matter (I doubt)
and print a calibration cube with both, eventually the speed benchy
-meanwhile I still need to fiddle with stuff in the enclosure š«-
just wired the bambu clone, not mounted yet, it heats pretty fast
to be honest the crimping of new connectors went smooth, but itās definitely a critical point. the wires are just long enough, you canāt afford to lose any mm. the material of the sleeves is quite weird, the heating cartridge sleeve is some sort of wax tube, that slides in/out the wire. anyway. it seems I surprisingly didnāt screw it up the crimping, so I guess anyone can do it. but Iād suggest to just solder in an extension
newbie here... how do you do a speed test like that? custom Gcode?
Following the guide here https://ellis3dp.com/Print-Tuning-Guide/articles/determining_max_speeds_accels.html
Ellisā Print Tuning Guide
oehhhh very nice! thanks! š
daayummm.. ran the basic speed test at 5k acceleration two iterations... got me shaking 𤯠. what a rush haha
hahahaha from 0 to 100 reall quick... I'll slowly ramp up to that š¤£
making a bit of noise. noticed this during printing too when moving to the back left in a cross manner. .
not sure what that is though..
i'll figure it out š
did the standard test : TEST_SPEED: starting 2 iterations at speed 10000, accel 5000
10k mm/s?
weird thing is... this was the command: TEST_SPEED ACCEL=5000 ITERATIONS=2
this was the output: TEST_SPEED: starting 2 iterations at speed 10000, accel 5000
nooo
printer wont hit 10k speed without crazy acceleration
let me look it up.. just turned off the printer.
isnt the 10K velocity? not mm/s
velocity is mm/s
uhhh duhh
acceleration mm/s²
excussseee me
lemme check... think I have a setting set too high
[printer]
kinematics: corexy
max_velocity: 10000
max_accel: 8000
max_z_velocity: 5
max_z_accel: 100
does look too high
max_velocity: 10000 this one right
yep
whats the max you can get on a merc?
realistically it won't reach that speed
well it should be tuned as well
ellis guide makes a reference to that
aha... a new rabbit hole opens... lol
sounds good.. thanks for pointing that out. and glad I did not destroy the printer lol
IIRC ellis guide recomends to tune accel first then speed
there thats better
good to know... I will get on that right away!
double check it please don't trust my memory
no worries.. I will read that documentation!!!
learning something new every day .. thanks! š
still hearing that noise... strange.. do not hear it when I move the gantry on X and Y very fast
movement is more smooth though at 500
it kinda reminds me the stealthchop noise but it's not as agressive
yeah I think it is that too.. stealthcop is enabled.
rails are smooth and square to X
oh disable it, you will get much better acceleration too
motors become a little noisier
when I diable it the motor make a hissing noise that scares me
it's fine
you sure? I thought that thing was about to catch fire at some point with that hissing noise haha
oke lemme try
oke good to know
A B motors don't for some reason
ohhh this is waaaayyy better... and the sound is so smoothh I love it!!! feels like i got a whole new printer lol
so much better š thanks a million!
no problem glad I could help
video wont load though but the movement is smooth like butter... š
now off to bed!!!
oh good! not here
and sounds a million times better!!!
yeah, thatās unfortunately doesnāt work well with corexy. I am still hoping itās possible to use it in super slow/dead silent mode, but probably itās just a thing to forget about
I think so too... I do like the sound though when stealthcop is disabled š
indeed! A beast sound
which motors do you have?
ok, same as mine, not HB branded though, Iām jealous š
Nema 17 1.8 degrees 48mm body motor
feels like they are unbreakable
they push like nothing else. we compared up in the log with the 2.8A version, but the 2.5 holds more torque, they seems to be better⦠weāll never know without a direct comparison
Naissss.... I made the right choice šš
it definitely need a pid tune, and I am not sure I hot-tighten it enough, but the nozzle position is almost the same as the rapido. Sexbolt touchdown happens slightly on the left, so Iād need to calibrate a little bit, with a 0.4 cht-clone nozzle, it managed to shoot 25 mm3/s (with the āextrude 50mm and hear the skippingā method)
the mount calls for a ptfe +14.6mm, so with the sherpa mini Iāve cut a 38.8 mm ptfe tube
again, feeling the rapido and this , I estimate this have half the weight. I donāt particularly like the mount, but itās very minimalistic and it does the job. the eva 3 mount seems more solid, but also a lot more plastic
I have bought random stuff, another skr pico (20⬠discount on btt shop in ali, I couldnāt miss it) and a replacement for the thr, you never know. So the new pico will replace the skr mini in the el.bay, and stacked on the asus tb (same form factor as a pi). So I can also finalise this 6+ months building process
Once I rearrange the bay I will probably print some small wire slotted ducts to stuff and hide the wiring mess š, and call it the day
I was already mentioned that I should print something for Christmas⦠I would hate to not have a fully functional printer by then š
Ok, found something odd with the bambu clone. It's very fast to reach temperature around 255, but if I ask 275, it barely manages, I have some hard time printing of even pid tune with higer temperarue (the part cooling fan cool down the nozzle too much I suspect)
testing the watermark method š
Have you checked around to see if this is common yet?
I'm curious to see what you find.
no, most thing I find is bambu related, but the slope of the heating curves with and without fan are totaly different, I can see this as an issue (I had it before, when the duct is not perfectly setup for the nozzle)
hu, I changed the type to Generic 3950 and it seems to do better
this is a 40$ hotend, which seems to keep up with the rapido and such. I am still not sure if I'll replace the rapido with this, but it definitely looks promising. I miss the 1 hand nozzle change, but I like the weight difference
no one hand change is a big no for me, especially on Christmas when I need to print some filaments that like to clog the .4 nozzle, have a .5 hardened but looking back should have gone with .6
particulary difficult to tighten since it has a 4mm bolt, and my sets of good keys stop at 6mm, but I agree, it's really a good help not be worried of the heating block
it's off my list, the crazy spoiled me with the one hand swaps
why they have to provide pairs of wrench made of worse-than-cardboard material, that they are only good for damaging something
tbu the eva hotend is pretty easy to disassemble, if I wasn't that lazy I would take it out and hot tighten this while not mounted (much easier)
I keeps having huge temp and shutdown. I touched the heatsink and it wasn't colt, it actually was a bit loose,,, maybe that's the issue
I'll do few test, but if this keeps up I'm better off without heatsinks
Maybe I should apply themral paste
hmm, I'm only peaking, but it appears to be printing very nicely
mine has no heatsink and is not that hot I would say try without
yes, Iāll remove the heatsink next, the fan in the shroud will probably hit the back wall when probing the nozzle. so I probably wasted some money getting 3010 fans
the yellow one goes up steadily
I'm printing a guitar capo, I printed one yesterday with the rapido, just to see the difference
no specific tuning, I've left the PA values from the rapido (that were also very close to the default in Orca)
I had to pause because the temp was already 87C. It only went down when I cooldown the extruder
not right now, but I'll make a test
from schematic looks very close to the rp2040
but on the backside
knowing that the rapido pulls a lot (not sure about the bambu)
ahh, I need to remove it from the mount than
it should be around 50W only
maybe I should have gone for an ebb instead š
but as @gentle garnet mentioned, this boards are "consumeables"
I have gone through some already...
print stopped again it went back to 85 after the pause š©
it heat up even without heatsinks, letās see if gets that hot again
nothing, the printer keeps disconnect after a while
I'm trying again to post the error message this time
try to check that mosfet
I had an error like this "Missed scheduling of next digital out event"
can I change/fix the mosfet?
it's just an idea to debug it further
keeping the temp alone it's fine, I't all together that heat up the board
it might be a bad mosfet that heats more than it should, might be the rp2040
bofore I've heat up at 275 an nothing else, the board was. stable around 60C for ~10 min, without increasing
60 is where it has stabilized for me ( lower temps)
now I've got "MCU 'thr36' shutdown: Timer too close
This often indicates the host computer is overloaded"
I do want to try heating bed to 110 and hotend to 300 but I'm waiting on the bed adjustment pieces, that managed to get delayed
there is an ebb42 available locally, I can fetch it tomorrow, maybe I can install it in diagonal š¤
the apace of the 36 screws is the same as the oppiste screews of the 42 boards, the only thing is if there is enough clearance on the bottom
looks tight
FWIW: My EBB42 with heatsink and the shroud fan blowing is at 47C right now. That's 6C over ambient in the chamber.
nope, seems fine
Turtle mount is rised by 5mm
so it drops just right inso th mount
do iiiiiiit
it seems the thr is actually bigger than the ebb42 š
šø
20 here, 20 there
yep
It's like $40 here
I canāt even finish a print now, mcu shutdown after ~30min
it's getting worse?
it shuts down when the thr tempmis above 80C, but it could also be the sbc not fast enough
or anywhere a connection getting loose
so step 1 is to try a new canbus board, I could try to disassemble and check all the connections with this one
doing nothing goes to 30C, so pretty normal
iāll pick up the ebb42 tomorrow after work, itās already arranged š¤. Hopefully itās not a scam
it started to act a bit since I changed the cable, I must have touched something I shouldnāt have
those temps are still too high
I agree, thatās why itās the primary suspect
I wonder if i could use it for something else. maybe I have a 1 motor canbus task that I can use
š”
a motor that opens and close the door š
woooops
cause or effect?
the sleeve of the + melted
awg22
the back looks fine, a part that thing, look like it grew a bit
Ah...melted?!
oh dear does not look good
the screw terminal is a goner for sure
do you think the lump I see is normal? I donāt remember how it was anew š¤
if itās just a bed terminal thing, I can replace it, maybe
jst-xh might be good for l/h but I doubt they are safe for +/-
3A
the rapido draws alone 4amps
jst for power no
from schematic I had the impression that it was the mosfet location
but nothing there
is there anything on the other side of the board?
not really
ok, Iāve run some kapton tape where the terminal melted, and see if it was some loose connection that heat up
not sure though why Iām doing this
I donāt have another terminal to solder in, I should replace it instead, I know š©
on the bright side, I was lucky, this could have gone much worse, like š„
I have some connectors, but they are huge, this is a tiny screw connector
4.2mm between pins
no, thatās external, I think itās 3.3 pitch
@stone valve another 5⬠in connectors
they should have made it like this, male female⦠if itās the same pitch
not doing anything stupid with the thr36 right now. Iāll get a ebb42 tomorrow, and I will try to make that work š
I think that's the safest plan
EBB42 comes with nice, big Mini Fit Jr pins for crimping.
huuu, I never crimped mini fit, would I screw it up?
if you've done micro fit 3 or jst sm, you can do mini fit jr. It's pretty straightforward
Just a scalled up MF3
They also give you ten pins and you only need 4
microfit, never, jst-sm a milion times
Tabs for insulation, tabs for electrical connection. Crimp both. š
and also the connector is included, right?
Yep, two in fact
hotend it MF?
screw terminal for hotend, unfortunately. I pigtail it with MF3
I've actually started adding MF3 pigtails to my thermistor, fan, and heater cartridge. I can disconnect the hotend without reaching around to look at the toolboard
I was thinking the same, I have a 9 pins jst sm, once I consolidate the setup I might do somthing like that
It's come in handy several times already
I should have done it
Might not want to use JST SM for the heater pigtail, though. SM doesn't do well with high heat + current
yes, the hotend might leave screw in
only mf3 kit around costs 55 euros for 460pieces
I've never put it in the priority list
just get a set of 2 pin ones
you don't need much more than 2 and 4 pin in most cases
this os from 2 to 5
And you really only need them for the hotend, right?
Amazon (here at least) often sells 10 packs of 2 or 4 pin MF3 for like $10
Then you could keep using JST SM for the rest
here 50 euros for 10 connectors on amazon (4 pins 5 male 5 female)
nonsense
why would I need 1800 pieces!
and why they don't make decent bundle, are they made up with gold those things?
@proud cliff they're damn hard to find in small amounts without paying a kidney
donāt buy them all, leave some for me now https://www.replimat.eu
HSI and magnets are expensive though
yes, I got a box with 100 6x3 magnets from amazon
I hope Iāll be ok for a while
though, my front door enclosure need around 60 š
Whuuut that's insane
12.6⬠for 100
UTOMAG Multi-Use Neodymium Magnets, Pack of 100 Round Extremely Strong Magnets, 6 x 3 mm Mini Magnets for Magnetic Board, Fridge, Whiteboard, Magnetic Board, Pin Board, Includes Storage Box These 6 mm diameter neodymium disc magnets produce an amazing pull of 0.8 kg and each magnet has a triple c...
they also came in a nice metal box š
at work we only buy the gold molex pins š
Those are so expensive, even for Molex
hmm, I need 3 endstops pins, and I am a bit confused about this
@frail swallow do you have an ebb42? how many endstops can I get? are pc13-15 3 separate endstops I can use with a common ground?
You have to share the ground pin
It's dumb, but that's what happens when a design is copied
Thr36 is actually a unique canbus design
Thanks! Iām planning to switch over to the thr36 when I get replacement terminals (next week hopefully)
Also the i2c header can be used as pin, so I could have 3 endstop without crimping grounds together
to me the dupont pins do not exist
so you have to share the ground on the endstop block
it's just dumb that sharing
I would do that, tbh. The I2C and RGB headers both are options. I wire up my 30mm fan to the endstop connector, IIRC
those minifit thing connectors are huuge, I could even crimp it with a scissor⦠but I had to find out that the last pairs of wings do NOT need to be crimped š . luckily I immediately spotted the issue and I did it only on 1 wire
I crimped with the standard tool I use for jst. just need to be gentle not pressing too much
sweet it even works
now, the rest of the things to install and configure š
I was spooked by the micro/mini word. thatās not mini in my world
You should see their larger connectors. They're huge.
neighbours had a party, kid woke up and it was the end of my party⦠hopefully Iāll be able to connect everything this evening
Aww. Poor kiddo, and you, too.
@frail swallow how do I remove the minifit crimp without the removal tool? is it doable with tweezers? (I assumed the connector would pass through the heatshrink, it doesnāt)
Iāve seen someone using a ferrules instead of the removal tool, people are so smart
you didnāt buy the $40 MFJ removal tool? š
yeah, they should have provided it with the ebb42 š¤¬
I paid well 20$ for the ebb, they should have included a 40$ tool, right?
Ah...you'll prolly want to use the other connector in the pack
the back side?
looking it up
Hh, the connector, I was thinking another pin, I see, yes I have 2 of those
will try later if the kid would ever go to sleep⦠apparently sleeping patter are very precious
how old is he/she
Awww
by the way, I am astonished about the remarkably bad instructions on btt ebb github page to flash the board, They basically describe how to use scp, and donāt say anything what to do with the firmware š. I had to scroll around various sources before finding something I felt reasonably simple: compile klipper; connect usb; press boot buttons combo; dfu utils to flash from the sbc (the usb keystone is a life saver more and more)
I need to test the fans and the hotend, the switches are all sorted. I only need to remove the connector to add some heatshrink around the infill of this can cable, and zip tight everything
hopefully 2.1.1 will be able to print again soon
Now do it again but flash CanBoot instead... Unless you prefer to go through this hassle whenever you decide to upgrade the MCU's firmware in the future.
I'm surprised by your statement, EBB36/42 are the most common CAN toolhead boards and there is a plethora of information about how to flash them.
no no, Iāll flash it asap, I have a plan to have 2 picos and a canboard on this machine, So I can automate the update klipper flashing with canboot
second pico is on the way
So, break it down to me - are you in some race to have as many boards in this machine?
no, just I need 7 drivers + the extruder, and for some reason I like small boards š.. but now if I fix the thr36 Iāll get the spare one, and I could ditch the extra board and dedicate it to the MMU, and drive each motor with a can board
I am merely phasing out the skr mimis for the picos
Take it from someone who's been there - don't. Builds should contain two boards, and two boards only. A manta (or equivalent mainboard with an integrated SBC) and a CAN toolhead board. Anything else is a pure waste of time.
Because of timing issues? Or problems in general?
O see the complexity scale up, the manta-bundle + can is very elegant and streamlined
Just the power distribution alone is a lot easier
Because of simplicity. Because it makes wiring easier, and saves the trouble of needing extra pieces to get what is needed for the machine to work. Consider such a mainboard as a 3-in-1 - mainboard, sbc, 5v buck converter. Now imagine how much wiring you save.
All my newer builds (2nd mercury, tiny-t, pandora's box, and soon f-zero) use this setup, and trust me, I'm not looking back at the most convoluted Mercury in existence (my first build).
by the way, can the manta provide different 24-in to the various components, in a way to tun off every mcu and leaving only the integrated sbc on? I found this a very handy aspects of my installation
I very much agree, but was curious on your reasoning. Not having buck converters alone is the reason I bought my Octopus 1.1s.
Not unless you defeat the whole purpose. You can choose to have the SBC site powered by 5v using USB-C, but I don't see the point
ok, no, I wouldnāt do that
New builds with octopus make little sense when the manta m8p is in existence. It has mostly everything the octopus has, and if it doesn't have something - you don't need it. For example, the only thing "missing" from the Manta is a MAX amplifier chip; you won't need it since you're using a toolhead board. See my point?
Oh I've had these boards awhile. They're recycled from old builds. But before that they were SKR 2s.
maybe now that the rpi are slowly coming back for reasonable prices, I will get some cm4. For some reason I never liked the cb1/alternative. I know they are adequate, but it wasnāt enough to get me into it
That's ok. This is purely my opinion. I know some cats like to make things more difficult then things should be (heck, I've been there!)
on multiple boards, I'm running 3, 2 picos 1 thr
Yes, I'm looking at you Mr. Docker container! š
hey it's simple after its setup š¤£
Also I really enjoy play around with stuff⦠If I actually had to use my printer I would probably never did half of the things I tried š
also Mr. Engineer Docker Container! I had to study this shit š
That's fine dude, as long as it works for you. For me - getting things simple makes much more sense nowadays
not getting offended š
Oh I don't print anything on my machines. I just seem to collect them. It makes me happy..
a side note on docker, it actually makes my life easy since I have a home server with a lot of stuff no extra hardware, might ditch it if I ever get a pi dedicated to the printer
I see for me itās getting there as well, I really looking forward to close the builds, and my next one will be simple AF. I have been there, and you are right, multiplier boards, multiple psu, itās a hell a lot of useless wiring
but I canāt ditch everything now, it has to be finished
Home server.. brr this term makes me shiver a bit. I was a Windows Home Server user for a few years, back when I thought PCs were exciting
ewwww Windows
Yeah, was also a RedHat 4.0 user in '96, back when you actually needed to BUY the CD because broadband didn't exist
letās get to try and remove some minifit crimps from the case š
@gentle garnet I'm not even going to mention the distro I'm running
hoo, that lasted quite some years, I remember having a mini towers of CDs for Debian woody in the early 2000s, maybe 2004 š¤
Mandrake, I know
š
wait wasn't it extinct?
Of course it is.
mandrivia is now?
ewww macos
See, that's the same as running 5 boards in one printer and being happy about it š
You are underestimating it.. I moved from Gentoo to macOS, because I didnāt felt the dual boot was practical anymore⦠I didnāt struggled that much
the board guy is @proud cliff
I can't use mac without feeling insulted by the system, last time I played with it I wanted to resize a partition, the system would say there was no space, boot linux fdisk and there it was a lot of free space
got pissed at it never touched it again
penguin land is more fun
I am still fond of useless-complexity, eg when my students came with a presentations made in beamer, it warms my hart, but they probably sucks š
but we're getting sidetracked and invading @proud cliff log š¤
ohh nooo!!
thatās never happens
You're doing it wrong if you've reached a point when you needed to resize a partition. I get it, you want "control"? Well, don't use a Mac. unless... you want something to work for you instead of you working for it
want to talk about useless complexity? I once learned about Java reflection, 1 fun year...
that's the point, control found it on Gentoo maybe a little too much sometimes
That's ok, again... Maybe, one day you'll get over it š¤£
but like you said I'm happy with it so I'll keep going until I'm not hapoy
I won't say never, but unlikely, I'm too stubborn
Things change... I'm feeling fine saying that because I've been there, done that, then made my mind... On lots of aspects š
I changed my mind on a lot of things as well, I'm a little ashamed to say this but I used to be all windows fan š
2.1.1 itās up and running again
no can network issues whatsoever, even the occasional error during homing/z_tilt
I had to use the spare minifit connector/crimps, as I mangled the pins trying to remove them from the case. I decided just to start over š¤¦āāļø and remove the connectors another time
but I like minifit, micro fit canāt be smaller than jst, so Iāll look into cheap kits/offers
@gentle garnet , sorry for bothering you, but with the new canbus, ebb42, I had some horrible stringing and the thermistor at cold nozzle reads 7C, while with the thr36 print quality was acceptable and the temp reading was ok also at room temperature⦠Fo I have to remove some jumper in the ebb? I donāt have any fancy chip in the boards (no max31865) but I have seen a pt1000 jumper š¤
No worries buddy š
You actually use a PT1000 RTD on your hotend?
If you do, set the jumper and add pullup_resistor: 2200 to your [extruder] section
That jumper adds a 4.12K resistor in parallel to the default 4.7k pullup resistor.
that the termistor that comes with the bambu, afaik itās not a pt1000
thanks!
It most definitely is not
I tried removing the jumper and the temperature readout got normal. Iām so dumb, I probably printed ASA at 300C, no wonder it got stringing
Did you have the pullup_resistor defined in klipper?
huu, and the print also left a mark on the bed, so it must have been really really hot š¤¦āāļø
nope
Then you definitely had the temperature measurement way off š
should I have the pullup_resistor set anyway?
If you don't set the jumper - don't. Klipper defaults this entry to a value of 4700, which correlates with the 4.7kohm pullup resistor on the board.
...also you don't need to set that jumper unless you're using a temperature probe with smaller resistance (such as the PT1000).
On a sidenote, I wish I was able to shove a PT1000 into the hole in the hotend, but it seems to accept only their own thermistors, even other glass bead thermistors can't fit (I don't feel like modifying it)
a small tapš¤
That hole is 1.4mm diameter and very close to the edge of the heat block, I don't have means to enlarge it
hopefully some manufacturers realize the form factor is working well, and makes some similar designs that accept off the shelf thermistors. the heating cartridge is a good idea, probably itās going to be adopted by others as well
with the pt1000 jumper on (top) and without (bottom) š
I didnāt put the text lol but triangle labs released this
And put this with it, should fit in the bambu clone hotend?
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mOlpUJI
that looks very very nice!!!
Yea I have one of each sitting in my aliexpress cart
and they made already non-bambu-compatible bambu clones hotends
https://a.aliexpress.com/_mKUnsNi
with this one could use it on a vzbot nount as is, if itās as light as the original hotend, the gantry would fly
temptedā¦. this hobby is crazy, gets you side tracked in details, and youāll never be able to finish anything š
I have come to the realisation that my printer will probably never be āfinishedā. It will just be constant state of beta of all my mods lol
That's one reason I have two I'm working on...and a third I have yet to upgrade as a "just-in-case"
I don't see how this throat is exciting? The clone hotend is tiny with a lower weight benfit, but then you are about to attach a regular heater block for going back to using a regular heater cartridge and common thermistor?
You're looking at this wrong dude, the hotend will still be limited by the ~28mm^3/sec MVF, so unless you go lower layer height/smaller nozzle you're not going to print much faster even with the "gantry would fly" benefit.
It uses the flat heater pad but can use a normal beam style thermistor
I see - I only opened the link to the bimetal throat. Still looks like a peculiar endeavor, and I'm not sure of the benefit it'll bring, apart for the use of a common thermistor cartridge.
Thatās about it, looks around the same size of the bambu clone heatblock though.
Well it has to be slightly larger, though probably not a concern in terms of weight.
However, the bambu hotend (and clones') embeds the tiny bead thermistor within the heatblock, whereas in this TL heatblock the thermistor is in the opposite side. Again not much of a concern, but one can expect a slightly lower accurate temperature reading.
Bottom line - for anyone who doesn't think of melting plastic above 290c - the clone is a proper solution. If one wants to melt plastic at temperatures above 300c, this definitely is not the product (and possibly not the correct printer/platform either).
sure, but less mass means less inertia, and maybe less ringing? the compensations are great, but itās better if one need a little compensation vs a larger one
I've not seen ringing in years... And let's agree your case is more favorable than mine.
Now, if you consider MVF, that will ultimately have a much higher impact on the actual print time than being able to move faster. A hotend capable of 30mm^3 will max out before reaching 400mm/s print speed (at 0.4/0.2), this is way lower than what your machine is capable of even today!
Quite a few are copying that heater element setup already
The new rapido uses it
The new dremel printer that is being developed uses it
It's efficient, it's light and to top it up - it's safer. It won't melt heater blocks, unlike heater cartridges. Even 40W cartridge can potentially melt an aluminum block, given enough time, broken thermistor and broken firmware
working on the door, I think I am ready to actually measure what I need, the script generates top/bottom bezel (in the middles there is the glass), as well as a frame to attach to the enclosure. it's fully parametric, to the extent that if the bottom bezel is deeper than the magnets used, it will generate som filler in the top part
I don't know what the optimal thickness of plastic material between 2 magnets. I've set the default param to be 0.5mm (so the total thickness would be 1mm)
Are you suggesting that I need to buy a 40+mm3/s hotend?
š¤·š»āāļø
š honestly, I rarely max out the 20
just for the stupid speed benchy testosterone-driven competition that I'd get a super hotend
There are a few who do, but most feel they need more better.
Personally, Iām off the fixation-on-numbers bandwagon
look a the annex K3, they use some "standard" HF hotend, and it's the faster printer I've even seen
Honest question - what would you do with it if you had one?
honest answer, stupid fast benchy just because š
Sensibleā¦
I don't lie myself anymore
Me neither. Thatās why I have no problem admitting that I keep building 3D printers as a collection, and not for any other purpose.
bragging on discord about it⦠because nowhere else people would get the brag
Oh that works. No big deal..
Imagine the look Iām getting when I tell ānormal peopleā that I built my 5th machine
but I guess itās more appealing the showing a big fat hotend, people would think Iām trying to compensate for something
Lol
just the description "big fat"
It going to lie, it does raise an interest but the next question I get is why, and the next question is how much money I make out of this.
OBVIOUSLY⦠I donāt have a proper answer to either. š just because doesnāt work in my circles, and saying that Iām earning nothing from it makes it even worse
they just think you're wasting money
Ok so the worst people are the fakers. They appear to show interest at first so you think you found someone youāre going to get on board, but then you realize they only do it because they are polite š
Right???
Itās like being 16 all over again and being turned down by someone š¤£šš
š¤£
imagine put a price to the machine you build⦠I donāt understand -and Iām skeptic itās not a sort of scam- those that resell built printers (talking v0, v2.4ā¦) for slightly more money than a cheap kit from ali
in the local marketplace⦠Iām talking about
People ask me how come I don't sell the ones I don't use. Simply because I feel I can't (won't) sell any of my machines because I invest much more than money on them.
I successfully sold the original ender, just packaged it today
but its a different thing
the merc hell no
Even that I can't do. First - can't justify investing the time to build it from scratch. Second - it's impossible for me to build a lousy printer, so I'll have to invest some money on upgrades to begin with. Third - after investing time and money I won't be able to sell it and I'll have to keep it. So... I keep it - safe, in the parts bin.
maybe 3.81 connectors š. why they have to make such tiny difference
I canāt judge a 0.1mm difference by eyeballing
so magnet size was nailed, I had to press hard, so itās a tight fit
also the magnet placement in the various pieces is spot on, those are 2 pieces hold together by 4 magnets (I had some issues in the test print as you can see)
talking about drying filament my asa went all hissing and vaping
I should dry the filament more often, 6h in the filament dryer (the not perfect, but better than nothing), from 60% to 17% RH. the new print came out perfectly
I need to bust out my dryer
I had some second thought about the door frame, it holds together because it clamps on the glass, but maybe I should also bind the neighbours pieces... I code a puzzle jig, it would look funny š
Make a different pattern for joint, so they only fit in one order. LOL
itās fun š
I just added a small cylinder shape of center, so a side will have it protruding and the other will have a matching hole
it works!
but 1) I still have issues with the filament and 2) I have to rethink the counterbore helper tricks and maybe reduce the fillets, those 2 things together (in the corner) didnāt play well
@frail swallow you know better about design, do you think the artefact I get all around the fillet it's because the holes are interfering at the base of the overhang, or it's just some printing setting I should adjust?
or the overhang was too steep, maybe
seems like a overhang issue
higher cooling on the overhangs might help
how steep is that angle
hmm, I've reduce it already, let me see how it was before
it doesn't look that extreme to me
but it will print in mid air close to the holes
So I hope by reducing like this would help
also I was lazy an I sent it without fix for the counterbore, it works, not nice but it does it
a lot better
It's not what you expect: you're using a fillet instead of a chamfer. Fillets only work well on vertical or top surfaces.
If it touches the build plate: use a chamfer
fillet works as long as its not too extreme
Fussing with the counterbore will help, too
Yes and no. To get it to work, it has to be small enough to be close to a chamfer.
To keep the overhang from getting to far out, basically, so a chamfer is just always a safe choice
hmm, haven't managed to make the chmafer attr to work... maybe I'll have a look at it
ok, it wasn't that hard, I can see with a chamfer is less busy when it meet the vertical fillets
and it seems safe to print, true, thanks @frail swallow . It's fancier with the fillet, but if it doesn't prints nicely its not so useful š
that was 10mm fillet
me neither I have to print the stuff to see how it does š
Give it time and practice and you'll be able to guess more easily how stuff will print.
Okay, gotta run errands. Good luck today.
Also fillet then corner than apply the chamfer
way too big
I have successfully printed 2mm but I never create parts with big fillets
I mean, it could have worked if I was printing it the other way around
ok, defeat, I'll try later. So adding anything around a hole with the python API is cumbersome, because they are defined as unfillable holes. I've exported the step, but can add anything around the counterbore in the correct way š
Are you wanting it to print those overhangs nicely around the holes?
Or, put differently, would it help if I added them for you?
oh yeah, I put the step just hoping some kind soul would come to the rescue⦠but ultimately I want to learn how to do it. I was planning to follow MakerMuse steps in a tutorial/video š
What if you make the counterbore, then the overhangs, then finish drilling the hole?
How to define the lines, step by step
P.S.
I think I know the theory, but Iām lacking the skills in fusion or other cad tools to understand/find the right tool š
if you're using that python lib it might be very doable to write a function for it
Exactly. Given outer diameter and inner diameter, it spits out four lines
I might be able to help with that (even though I hate python)
I have to ask...why do you hate Python?
indentation is what defines if something is inside a scope
I like my brackets
write without worrying about formatting IDE does it
I'm giggling. I thought you'd say something about the global interlock.
and the fact that it calls none to null
and the correct way to compare to null is " variable is none" not "variable == null"
I have to try and redesign my script not to use āunfillableā holes, so I could add materials in the hole
Itās easy to start, but than there are a milion details š
I like the whole openscad approach as in doing it as code but for CAD I'm too visual
you know, it could be much much much worse, R Iām looking at you!
but R is not a language, soā¦
See, I was thinking C++ and void/void_t/NULL/'\0' and so on...
I donāt worry about the formatting, I use black to format the script for me
the code, I love black, it removes all the waste of time thinking about how to indent and format nicely stuff
not if you want to say what's inside a certain if statement
that's my complaint
(sorry Java has given me some habits)
same with Kotlin
I simply hate Java, itās so convoluted. I like python because you just start in 30min you have an half backed proof of concept, it might not be the perfect tool for everything, but you can do everything
Don't try C++, lol
I like Python for the same reason
I did š¤¦āāļø
Java has improved a lot, it can even run a file like python
java whatever.java
yes still needs a class and the good old public static void main....
IIRC also has a REPL
hahaha, there is no way to contain the memory consumption of java programs sent to the cluster pbs queue, eg you want to only use 8gb, and instead it takes all 256Gb of the node⦠the only way would be to have docker and limit the memory in the docker runtime, but the cluster doesnāt support docker.. šš¤¬š
so every time there is a tool running java there is the danger of it hijacking the node, and kill every other job
nope
has to work I have limited memory consumption even in giant kubernetes clusters
i suspect it might be a pbs java thing, they just donāt like each other
there's another flag for another piece of memory that's virtually unlimited
might be
permgen or metaspace depending on version
Iāll try!!
It would save some money.. it isnāt cheap to rent a full 256Gb node just because java doesnāt care about other programs
feel free to DM me about that as long as you can control java arguments it can be done
A lot of todos, I need to design a mount for the camera pcb, I feel I like a view 45 degrees angled down, from the top-right of the enclosure, however I like how I can see the nozzle in the current location (front bar)
but the camera there is just awkward for closing the door
@proud cliff hows the heating on the new toolboard
once I configured it correctly (correctly type of thermistor and removed the pt1000 jumper) itās perfect
I mean the mcu on it
ahhh
itās cool
it was definitely either the terminal or something in the pcb
the stm32 runs cooler than rp2040, apparently
thanks @frail swallow , the counterbore printed perfectly, and also the chamfer worked out very nicely
I had issues on my top layer, but we are not going to see that too much š
also the š§© thing, they click perfectly within each other, now I only need to make also the straight pieces, prints some more in different colors, cut the panel and assemble the door
and close the backpack
and care the wiring
and make the camera mount
š¤¦āāļø. Iāll never finish
You'll get there