#updated post on taking a 300 to fix the miss guided previous one

9 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

wise lodge
#

Well your 300 guide is not much better vs. the in game 300 guide.

Your both not telling people how many fighters they should move next to the tile.
Do you know the ideal amount of hero to use vs. 300?

Your both not telling people what level their commanders should be to fight a 300 tile.
Do you know the ideal level amounts to use vs. 300?

I know the answers to the above things and the fact people don’t really mention them makes me think the guides are bad.

——————

The ideal amount of heroes to use is 4.
If a player beats a level 300 with less than 4 commanders, they are a good player.
If a player beats a level 300 with 4 commanders, they are a standard/average player.
If a player beats a level 300 with more than 4 commanders, they are a bad player.

Why is 4 the standard?
Simple! There are 2 Defenders!

You should expect the following:
1 Attacker killing 3/4 of 1 Enemy Defender.
2 Attacker killing 3/4 of 2 Enemy Defender.
3 Attacker to Finish up any Remainder Defender Troops.
4 Attacker is needed in order to Siege Down the Health so you can Conquer.

—————

The Ideal Commander Levels to have vs. a 300 can depend on your gear.
A level 300 has level 50 Defenders.

If your using Max Star Blue Gear, you would want to be with in a 3 level range.
So you would want as an example 3 Combat level 47 heroes + 1 Siege Hero
(Siege Hero level can vary depending if you plan to use him as “Back up” or not)

If your using Max Star Purple Gear, you would want to be with in 5 level range.
So level 45

If your using Max Star Gold Gear, you would want to be with in 7 level range.
So level 43

wise lodge
#

I can take a lvl 300 with only 1 hero, but I am skillful player + have high respect + have gold gear + have refinements.
A player in similar position as me wouldn’t need advice on how to take 300, nor would they need a Guide.

The 300 Guide is for players who are struggling to take a 300 tile.
An those players need guidance on how to do it.

The ideal amount I gave is based on assumption the player has only R5 respect + Gears with Stars, but no Refinement.
You have to think like a beginner.

You never taken a 300 before.
How many commanders do you need to beat it? 5? 10? 15? 20?
Your guide & the guide in the game doesn’t say.

You have to give some minimum prerequisite amounts so the beginner can aim for something.
The amounts also have to be reasonable.

A Whale Beginner could potentially beat a 300 with 1 hero if he whale it up enough.
A F2P Beginner wouldn’t be able to because he would only have Blue gear.
So you have to give amounts for different types of players.

wise lodge
#

I am not being insulting.
I was trying to help you so you could add context to your Guide.
Otherwise, your Guide is being Ineffective and hypocritical.

I hope you make changes/adjustments to your Guide so people can extract some value out of what you wrote.
Otherwise, your Guide will end up ignored like previous Guide and Beginners will be forced to find alternative 300 Guide’s.

hasty void
#

You've already added to it

#

Frankly though as I don't see the relevance in trying to tell what player what level and gear to shoot for and you know much better I'm just going to delete the post and let you go to town. As the additional tips I had seem to cause you to be frustrated and I don't have an interest in going through that just to give input to the community. It's unfortunate but true.

#

Good luck with your post, I'll keep things to myself and in game team in the future

wise lodge
# hasty void Frankly though as I don't see the relevance in trying to tell what player what l...

I wasn’t Frustrated, Anger, Insulting, or anything of the like.
I was actually Happy, Eager, & Curious.

At this point, I am just disappointed.
The In-Game 300 Guide was poorly constructed.
It didn’t really help people.

You criticized the other 300 Guide saying you was going to fix the miss guided previous one.
I came to your post because I agreed with you.

The other 300 Guide is bad and I thought you was going to add a degree of effort to fix it.
I was trying to see what you would say so I could compare notes.

I have taken dozens of 300’s, but I don’t mind refining my skills to take them.
If I can take them more efficiently, It would be of some benefit.

However, I read your 300 Guide and you was just as vague as the previous guide you was supposedly trying to fix.
You had interesting points with no explanation which had even me baffled & confused.

You said you take 300’s with Monostacks.
I have never used a Monostack army to take a 300.

What Monostack troops did you use?
What Commanders did you use?

You gave no explanation so even I don’t know.
I was trying to learn.

Than you delete your post and tell me to make a 300 guide post?
I have no interest or time to make a 300 guide.

Most bizarre thing I have ever seen

hasty void
#

The vagueness is based off not knowing every commander and piece of gear in the game. The advice was about resetting, focusing mono troops, playing for a beneficial commander.

The only extra I would ever consider adding would be what troops counter what others, but as I play mainly rp it wouldn't be generic it would be for taking on evil commanders.

I'm not a big enough whale to put out a 30 point guide. However what I have learned from this experience is instead of taking any benefits to newer players you had a different expectation after criticizing and adding your own. I'm not going to leave up a post to have banter with someone, it's not worth the headache.

#

In addition mono means 1 enemies with 1 troop can be stunned, madness burns a turn as I listed in the aforementioned post. I think anyone playing the game has enough of a skill set to look at the commander and change things accordingly which is why I offered advice on just focusing mono stacks and counters.

I appreciate your feedback though and I hope anyone that reads these comments makes a post that encompasses everything you need/want out of it. It just won't be me.