#ark-2
1 messages Ā· Page 114 of 1
We gonna talk bout sloped roofs being 45 degrees now?
Not much to talk about, most building mods had them that way for ages
CKF, S+ and spinoffs, CORE, tons more
Console now has them
Better late than never š
For sure
It's acute but we should try not to be obtuse.
Just triangle? Might need to look from a different angle
I appreciate the artwork improvements but god. Please give us some kind of roadmap update!
For all we know, everything is on track
For all we know, everything could be off track.
Never hurts to give more updates on the actual development then just screenshots
"Everything is on track for our launch" would have been a wonderful line
Large storage boxes will finally fit under one high walls
I hope we get a better way of placing objects
Mesh and snap points were in the April feature list
Oh nice
Typically when they say that, all they get is a few flag and poop emojis and a few million rants/complaints, so I can see why they chose radio silence on that front š
With wildcards track record, unless they say they are on schedule, i will assume they arenāt, and like bruising said its not likely they would say that anyway so i guess, my thoughts are will probably have delay because thats how game dev works
What about ark mobile 2 launch is it real or fake news?
ARK revamp of ARK 1 is real.
What type of game will ark 2 be? Ive been hearing people say that it will be more like Horizon or Dark souls, etc etc.
something like that
ark but with less tech and different combat?
If thats actually the case, I am going to love it, same with my father ( who hates ark itself )
check steam ark 2 page to know more
alr
Ok so from what I am seeing, Ark 2 will be akin to a mix of Horizon and Far cry : Primal
anyway ark 2 as being delay for the end of 2024, next thing is ASA thats suppose to coming soon
mhm
just 2 months fingers crossed
I would be disappointed if it was like 'everything pushed back 6 months' delay
The new building changes are interesting, I wonder how it will affect certain builds such as crafting stations/Gen2 space tunnel bases (where lots of stairs/pillars were used)
it will affect them.
1x1's and 1x2's in pvp will be a bit bigger
you can fit more inside, but might be a bit more noticeable.
Would be nice if PvE got 1x1, 2x2 etc wall sizes to play with
will ASA delay same as ARK2?
yep 2025
They delay everything
ok time for cut next investment portofolio
That's verifiably false
I don't think we have any idea what ark2 will be like, let alone enough to compare combat to another game
we know ark 2 will be more primitive and therefore making it more realistic how it would be to live in prehistoric times as a human and im a fan of that. i never liked all the tek stuff. imo it broke the game not just balance wise but also the immersion.
How is it immersion breaking? Tek (Obelisks, Drops, Artifacts, ect) was in the game extremely early, and has always been a main point of Ark1's story
im not a fan of that either
Not really answering the question
how is it immersion breaking ? because futuristic stuff doesnt mix well with prehistoric stuff
no, im looking at it as THE dinosaur game.
yea and im saying i dont like that part and im happy that they dont necessarily make that same stuff in ark 2
You can not enjoy the tek theme, but also acknowledge that the immersion of ark 1 is hardly broken by tek (this is my stance)ā¦in fact tek is the backbone of ark 1ās lore and settings
NOT seeing tek of some kind might be seen as immersion breaking
if you think 3 glowing pillars justify flying on spaceships and shooting with lasercannons in an otherwise prehistoric world then sure
I wish the point was finished being articulated so that any one person could properly retort, that's what I think š
Oh, wait, I think I get it now, just the sentence structure is off
That still doesn't make sense at all though
It COULD have been like ark 2 - where the players operate in a post tek environment with primitive gear
But pretty early on it became clear that wouldnāt be the caseā¦and I donāt see either option as immersion breaking
Yeah, basically the "prim plus is what the game should've been and I know this fact better than the devs" mindset you saw everywhere like 3 years ago
all people i talked to either didnt bother that tek was in the game or didnt like it, like me. Noone ever said, tek is the best thing about ark.
Nobody here is saying that, either...
Same here, I was in full support no matter where the game went
early on ? tek stuff came in the game pretty late.
2016 was it not?
the first thing that was game breaking imo was the tek suit. then later on came tek rifle, tek railgun and hover skiff
Nevermind the giant floating obelisks, or the strange implant in every player...
you do know tek armor was available before ark when official right?
yeh tek armor was available on early access
pretty sure it wasnt. but if it was, i just never seen anyone with it
you might not see ppl using it cause to get element you had to do boss fights
ppl used to farm bosses for element
well i played ark pre official release
Balance breaking and immersion breaking arenāt the same. We all know that right?
for me its both. but im done discussing i feel like youre just here to argue for no reason but to argue
Itās broken balance for a Trex step to one shot any human sized player or creature. Itās immersion breaking that a wild 150 raptor can kill a low level rex in a 1v1
Iām just not sure youāll like ark 2 then? Itās gonna have tek in the environment and the story
Element is the key piece of arkās sci fi settings and storyā¦itās not going anywhere
wc already share info about refine a shield whit tek scrap
i had it 8 months before launch, bought when release on ps4
I hope we see some ark on the xbox conference
dont hope much really
they share today a glypse of future games in UE5 and no ASA or ark 2 there, i just hope wc bring that kind of graphic in ark cause those games had a hell of graphics
Trailer or gameplay for ASA
Yeah
I hope you realize Tek isn't immersion breaking because the 3 of the maps are Arks that are literally giant space stations in orbit above a post-apocalyptic Earth. Another map is a literal MMO simulation, and the last is a literal spaceship warping from planet to planet
Not worth it lol
So the game shouldn't have the giant futuristic spires, nor the futuristic supply-drops?
just make the drops parachute dropped and make the obilisks giant ancient aztec spires, ez fix
Ah yes, that wont fuck up anything at all.
to be that immersion nothing should exist not even humans just dinos š¤£
Just bring in fairies that will deliver magic boxes
meteors
Hell, only a qurater of creatures will remain if we're only doing dinosaurs.
Even less if they need to be from the same era
dont forget those dinos have to be realistic so i guess we end up whit map only š¤£
Or(serious this time) since the map is one big scrap yard with tek scattered around, create places where pieces of tek ships or something with loot drops.
Itās valid to say something like that is immersion breaking - for some folks it IS. Some people think itās immersion breaking that there isnāt a multitude of meats available
Whatās more weird is āitās immersion wise ok to have tek in the world - I can suspend disbelief for thatā
guess those ppl dint play turok
THEN say ābut having tek on my body and using the element? Immersion deadā
Or seen Jurassic park
and jurrasic world almost ended like ark š¤£
there was some theories the last movies was dinos infuse whit guns
Yeah hahah
Oh god
Think a lot of people forget immersion doesn't equel to realism.
An immersive game will make you feel like you're part of this world.
Whether the world is realistic or not doesn't matter. Cause you can find immersion in a high-fantasy setting.
To many sequels lol maybe they need to think about some prequels
Anyone who thinks ark is a simple prehistoric dinosaur survival game hasn't played ark
True that. I didnāt get the point either lol
latest dino movie 65 was great and had guns in it š¤£
you know what breaks immersion if we going that path? a human killing a raptor or even worse a rex whit a primitive bow š¤£
God I hope ASA gets rid of gamma.
theres a lot of things ASA needs to get rid of and yet i have the feeling none will happen
They need to get rid off the changing INI files on pc.
That's already the case.
You can't change grahpical INI's on official anymore
But what they should do is make two separate INI settings that PvP and PvE are separately calling towards. Then we don't have to deal with one side needing to nerf something while effecting the other side.
@tribal chasm They had an official announcement stating you can no longer use graphical INI's on official.
But you can still do so on single-player.
Which is fine.
Hmm ok thanks, I will try to find their posts about it
Well I can't find anything about it officially, do you have a rough time estimate for when they said this?
Edit: ok on the 24th of Jan, under pc-patch-notes, Cedric posted about it.
Late to the party on this, but I think things will be more primitive for us (at least to start), but tek will still be a huge part of the story.
that happen a while ago, loads of crazy nuts when on a rampage crying for wc taken out INI, check around march
good question no clue
i remember wake up and this discord was on a rampage because of it š¤£
im excited
thats because youre expecting a release
but what if you didnt knew, you could not be disappointed
I think tek is gonna be front and center very early into ark 2. Much like starting on the island at level 1, I think weāll see itās influence very early on
Yeah I think so too, especially because they did say it will be primarily primitive.
Maybe tek cave/donjon
Could there be any News on Ark 2, Animated series or ASA in The Xbox Showcase??
ARK 2 very unlikely. The others, possible, but i'm not personally expecting anything.
Omg, i usually Watch your videos, great fan man, thanks for all The Ark news and content
That's awesome! Glad you enjoy them and find them useful. š§”
i hope in ark 2 they rework the tree platforms so that they don't belong to any tribe that built them , so they're trible neutral and have no health bars so that the can't be destroyed.Then all of redwoods would be like tree platforms that you would have to destroy the bases on them to claim the platform for your tribe.
also maybe put a limit on how many platforms can be put on a map for latency issues.
Better yet, make it so you can cut down the trees with platforms on them xD
can you cut redwood trees?
only smaller ish redwood trees, not the ones you can put platforms on
so what this ppl on about???
ĀÆ_(ć)_/ĀÆ
Whe
Does anyone think there will be ark at all in the PC Gamer show today or the Xbox, Starfield direct show today?
thats the most useless suggestion ive seen so far. are you suggesting that just so you can keep farming sap?
those are Sap taps, not tree platforms lol
i know and you need tree platforms to access them
imagine you couldnt destroy tree platforms at some point the entire forest would be full of them and placed at bad spots . thats truely immersion breaking
any form of spam is immersion breaking
tbh i want snap points for any platform, structure and saddle
Well tree platforms are less viable because you have to defend not only from every angle but both above and below making it the single most open base option in the game
So make the platform itself invincible would remove half of the attack openings
how is that gonna improve anything ? its still a garbage spot to build your base on in pvp.
well yeah but don't tell him that
just using yhe trees that exist on gen1 or in crystal isles is enough imo
thats how redwoods should be over needing tree platforms imo
just build on giant branches
imagine a map where you replaced all redwoods with those trees
thatd be cool
immense verticality
more than abberation honestly
Iād far rather seen trees with natural wooden spaces (like a dense canopy) that you could build on top of. Let the tree platform structure exist as is. I like the discussion point though š
the tree platform on itself isn't spacious for a main base but it would make a nice watctower for turrets with your main base being below.I just like the idea of a tree base .
and being able to destroy the tree platform ,hense your entire tree base, is making tree bases kinda obsolete no?
People forget that ARK 2 is a sandbox game like ARK 1
Not everything is PVP focused
But it does have to be developed with pvp in mind as well
So no news about ark on the Xbox showcase event
nope
but startfield is coming on 6 of september so they better not delay ASA and give some real answer for some stuff
agree - I really liked the floating islands in the genesis 1 bog that are up in the trees...some biomes with a tight net of vines/branches that can be used to build upon would be really cool (and couldn't be broken)
that way, tree platforms would be available to pve and pvp folks (with associated risks), but you would also have some places in the game to build in the trees with less risk. Especially cool if tree platforms could be placed on large trees that are found in ANY biome, rather than redwoods (where the bulk of ark 1's tree platforms can be placed)
What game is that?
skryim and fallout meets no man sky
Shit game + (if we're talking about Fallout-4/76) shit-game + shit-game on release.
That does not look good so far.
This is Bethesda. They're able to make their gameplay showcase better then the final product.
But as expected, nothing on ASA like some people where thinking we where going to get.
I mean they did say there would be nothing on asa
skyrim was alright. kinda short though
I know, but people still thought so
Story was shit.
it was lacking, yeah
i finished the main quest on accident
i didn't realize going to the place was endgame stuff, so i was surprised when suddenly ending cutscene
I enjoyed Skyrim and both of those fallout games but they were not play-for-years games like ark has been
Like, they kind of are-ish
a lot of people played skyrim for years. It's one of the most successful games ever
it was successful every time it was released lol
that's generally when you make the most money
If it was crap why would people buy it again
?
For me, I mean. Iāve put plenty of hours into each. But I donāt revisit them that much
Same I probably put about a full 24 hours into it when it was released, haven't touched it since, but was impressed with it at the time.
Of course not, were you expecting it to? Bad move, if so
it's almost like the devs themselves said that we wouldn't get gameplay untill ''shortly'' before launch š«£

Game play and news donāt mean the same thing
Is never before seen gameplay not news?
What do you guys think about the top voted creatures for the creature submissions?
they all suck plus feels like kids submit them trying to cheat their ways in like the last bug, now this creature submissions are the real problem, outrages unbalances creatures
best part wc actually goes whit them
really makes me wander if ASA is actually an attempt to finish ark 2 and not what wc said of being so diferent style since you know they are the ones that are making the game for quite a while and only thought about it now????
Aside from homeboy's "wandering", I think there's some good ones in there, but still a few stinkers floating around that keep making it back for every vote * cough Gorgonops cough *
gorgonops is a neat little creature but it just has nothing going for it
My grandkids will be so happy when I buy them ark 2
Honestly, Ark ASA should have a season pass with some items skins / armor skins / buildings skins / dinos skins / emotes with a new currency called ''Ark Points'' which can be bought for real $
This way, they can have a bigger budget for the game and it's optional because it's skins, so, don't care if they make it
Not everything needs a pass š
Anyway don't care, it's only positive if it's only skins
How about always available cosmetic dlc? Like deep rock?
This is also cool
Or a system like Rust, you play, you earn an item sometimes in your steam inventory
I agree with most expect the season pass concept which will probably be overpriced knowing snail games and the ark points system that you can buy. Donāt want it to be a p2w game, the cosmetics are okay!
Yh I really donāt get what some of those creatures are doing in the top voting tbh
Makes you think that people have made alt accounts to get a vote inā¦.
Fasalosuchus was a bait and switch. The concept art they used and the model they ended up choosing look nothing alike
I really wanted to see a bigger triceratops or ankylosaur in the top voting. More love for the herbivores would be nice.
Dreadnoughtus could be one but then ppl would go crazy asking stuff that in the end it would be a titanossaurus that would be permanent and breedable
Yh true or another hadrosaur would have been cool too
did you see what they put as ability for the honeybird or whatever was the name?
Yeah I know and I'm not talking about p2w. Only cosmetics
And even if it's overpriced, it's only cosmetics, so, it doesn't really matter
problem whit that is next thing will be pay for land, pay for tames and so on, cause thats what snail games is praying to happen
You've seen the model!? How? Do you work at Wildcard?
ā¦they released photos of it?
...That's concept art, my dude lmao
What did you expect from the ark community? 
1st of april cc, remember that before calling others something else
1st of April seems sketch though lol
So a currency that you can buy that you can only use to get cosmetics?
I kinda want them to stick to hexagon points that you can not buy with real money, that can be used to buy all sorts of stuff.
I also want them to bring out a lot of cosmetics that you can only buy with real money. I know it is very money grabby but than itās your own choice to buy the cosmetics and it isnāt forced.
Oh look, it d-
Wait, you're not who I was expecting š¤
Did snail buy wildcard?
Their services and their game only if Iām not mistaken. WildCard is still a company on itself
Yes they are the publisher
Yeah but I'm talking, if they stay legit, only selling Skins / Cosmetics is good
Could be cool, they can make so much skins for each tools / weapons and dinos. I'm sure that a lot of people would be ready to pay for that
Even skins for Cryopod for example and stations like the smithy, refining forge, etc
Yeah but skins would be fast to make, easy to put in a shop and can contribute to more maps after, more budget
DLCs are getting sale as well
yup
remember the time that ppl actually complain about games having dlc's??? now ppl want to buy skins
People complaining about dlc was like 20 years ago lol
The reason they are in a financial dump because they give functional maps for free
Granted they are community built maps but that is too much effort for basically a mod map
yeh and looks now, ppl wanting to pay for skins, hell recently ppl pay 20 bucks to test a game before release š¤£
Yeah but it's technically weird to just take the map of someone else, modify it a little bit and then putting a price on it
Those DLCs back then are skin sets like the infamous Horse Armor
The only acceptable DLCs are story add ons like ARK did
mod maps and those community creatures should not be offical since their features is to have what their dlc's have ence less ppl will pay for them
i really dont get what wc is doing by allow free stuff to be part of the official game when is taking features from pay dlc's
They could put them at a price, like for example $5
And they keep 10%, the guy that made the map keep 90%
Studio Wildcard have no rights or what
You gonna love game publishers psychology use people's FOMO to gain more cash
How do you think I stopped playing Conan after their battle pass update
the battle pass was pay to win ?
Same with "limited skin" market
What I love about ARK is basically buying an entire chapter of the story rather just some skin
And they are getting cheaper as time progresses so I can't complaining about how expensive a $30 DLC is when Steam Sale exists
But they can do both lol, the Conan Exiles battle pass was not even pay to win, so, I don't even know why would you care about that
Their artists can make some skins
I hate FOMO
Fear
Of
Missing
Out
Like I just said, I stopped playing Conan for that reason
I don't like gamedevs that use mental psychology just to gain bucks
Granted ARK is Stockholm Syndrome: The Game but at least you don't pay for that
If you don't love the battle pass then you don't buy it
and if you're interested then you buy it, not really that complicated
even if there is some ''Fomo'' it's only some cosmetics, literally if you buy it, it's your personal choice
It is complicated if you are talking about addiction especially shopping addiction on top of gaming addiction
Personal choice be damned if that "limited edition" skin will be gone forever
Least forget we have kids taking parents credit card money for skins
Since skins are cheaper than full functioning DLCs
I'd support it only if it went towards something benefiting the player (ie better moderation, or updates :P)
At this point It is better to not have official servers
That is technically what an unofficial server will do
Naaaah, Official Servers for the win
No officials would be awful for pvp at least
yh let's waste resources on a minority of the playerbase
As bad as officials are most unofficials are even worse in one way or another
I mean... Look at conquest and official before that
1000's of players having fun in 1 cluster, vs barely 10 people on a server, with inconsistent mods/rates/stability o.O it doesn't compare
This guy gets it
Most "bad unofficial" are PVP servers anyways
I rather be with my friends than kids that inside, bully, and cheat
And the best thing about sandboxes
You can do whatever you want
Whats your point?
The point being is that "fuck official"
And fun is subjective from person to person
Dont those two statements kind of go against each other
I mean if relentless cheating is their definition of "fun" sure I guess
I think having active servers with mostly consistent rules and rates that last throughout the games entire lifespan is a good thing but i guess if you think the more lackluster moderation compared to some unofficials makes them not worth it then that is up to you
The funny thing is most of it are unofficial, non-dedi, and SP that keeps the game going
Even if WC pulled the plug on official
There will always be private servers aka unofficial and non-dedi
Maybe on console unofficials work but on pc 99% are deader than a doornail
I guess you never been on a YouTuber run clusters
Too many mods
Plus not everyone wants to play with strangers anyways
Then they dont have to
You seem to be really defensive and think that i want everyone to play the game exactly the same way and that i think nobody can enjoy unofficials when thats not true at all
Well now you know why you think "most Unofficials are dead"
Only a few wants to play with vanilla settings with no mods
Mods are the only thing that keeps this game running for 8 years
More than your typical game
Ok and thats why i like officials but you seem to want 0 official servers which i am saying i dont think should be the case
Yet you want active moderation which is what unofficials have that official dont
I want more active moderation but i dont think that having to go to unofficials is worth it most of the time
If a say a server does have admin abuse
People will just easily jump off and move to a better one, promoting better and fair moderation
Well depending how much time you put into a server if something happens and you need to change for whatever reason you cant really transfer progress between unofficials like you can on official so if you want more consistency and less risk of your server shutting down unannounced then you can take that risk on unofficials
Official cannot even keep their paid admins to do admin job compared to unofficial admins that are majority volunteers
You seem to consider moderation as the main thing that would make someone consider a server and guess what some people have different priorities for what they want in a server
Since ASA and ARK 2 will have console mods
I doubt official will last since the demand for modded content is still there
See the ARK Additions creatures being suggested in the votes
The reason being official has consistent population in consoles because ARK 1 doesn't have the ability to have mods (legally)
do we have an estimated time for ASA release?
Around August 31
End of August is the closest we have
Official will shut down soon around the same time
oooh i didn't know its gonna be so soon, i thought 2 years more at leastt
thats a nice surprise tho
hope its gonna be optimised tho š
just gonna ask you two things, who as the biggest transferable community, unofficial or officials? whit that tell me who's the minority?
WC already stated than official is the minority in the crunch
Plus I noticed the migration from official servers to unofficial especially the PVE side of the community
yeh now after so long plus announcing ark 2 and now ASA who's gonna keep playing on a doom server?
again whit all these news for sure, hell i quite before gen2 open transfers
I am still playing
There are some people who prefer the old
How do you think "dead" online games are still going
Unofficial Servers, that is why
Hell ATLAS is still going despite being a "dead" game
it gets to a point officials have to go off no douts there hell wc pulling 8 years was bit much but selling a online game that you have to rent your server to play it its almost the same as putting subs on the game
Non-dedi servers still exist
and mods aint for everyone cause almost most mods are in a way of cheating
If you think mods are "cheating" then you don't understand how sandboxes work
sure
Official doesn't mean a "defacto" or "the right way"
It means it's just run and backed by the devs
teleport resources that a dino just farm that dint stand in the inv for more than 1 milisecond, teleport anywhere, unlimited sap and soo on
And?
that was so many mods that my brother had on is pvp server that i barelly join and stop playing
People play their way
That is what sandboxes are
Hell even SP has boosting sliders
It is not if it's approved by the server
The only that is "cheating" is exploiting and loopholes
Again official is not the "proper way" to play
Just play a linear game with restricted rules with no private/unofficial servers
That is the literal opposite of a sandbox game
i guess then the game its wrongfully build than, whats the point of having any rates for farming breeding building, it should be everything done as you wish by pressing a bottom whitout 0 effort
They have admin commands to do that if you have admin access.
unofficial rent ppl have a lot more than admin command, they have complet control over the server and its their rules their friends the only amount of servers they wanna pay to make a cluster and the final decision when that ends
I do tend to, in conversations like this on, point out that minecraft is a stupid popular sandbox with 0 official servers
but between have to play under someone's mood or to pay subs to have rules and a just game for everyone i rather pay subs but in the end might just skip that game šæ
and? i dont play minecraft but if i wanted to buy it and see there's 0 offcial servers and the game is build to have team work and not playing solo i rather not buying it
everything is made for team work either pvp or pve, dont try to compare sp to official
Valheim has 0 unofficial servers yet it is still going
valheim i kill every boss whit very little dificulty
Conan barely has known official servers (because tbh that game is a kink sim than a PVP game)
They are adding difficulty sliders now
That proves that there is no "the right way" in a sandbox game
Plus ARK 2 is getting rid of the survival bit, means no longer be restricted by hunger or thirst
The point in a sandbox is to play your own way.
That's literally the marketing definition of what makes a sandbox game.
They never said this
I recall they said that in extra life
I bet that ark 2 will have eating and drinking
They said that the survival elements would be limited so probably just eating/drinking and environmental hazard like heat and cold
Basically no change at all?
Well yeah ark 1 already has very basic survival elements, it was probably to temper anyone expecting them to go all out on hyper realistic systems
Jeremy on stream confirmed they're toning down the survival aspects
They explicitly stated the retention of food and water
I heard it as WC not including the cringe vitamin system
NGL I like GS change to the system where balance vit = buffs rather than over or under = death
Also maybe make food rarer than berries literally everywhere and 1 dodo giving 1000s of hunger points per kill
There is nothing wrong with berries tbh when the cause of that is hunger and thirst rate is too fast overnight
People can survive longer than that without eating and drinking
And would go faster if you want to recover health and stam naturally
eating and drinking in games will never be realistic. "You have died from malnutrition". "You have died from scurvy".
Man you'd have to try pretty hard to die of scurvy on Ark, with all the berries around
True, could add some toxic berries to kill you randomly
Unofficial > official
Hopefully weāll get some info if theyāll release unofficial servers right at ark asa startup
I had not seen that. Source?
Part of that is active level though
Running and fighting are huge energy drains
I have fond memories of the early days, running up the mountain in Island's South Zone 2, to mine metal. Any time I would run up or down it, I would be out of water (plus the mountain itself was 'hot weather'). Unfortunately once people get to the dinosaur stage, this is removed almost entirely
Yo just dropping in to ask, do we know if tek will be as prevelant in ark 2 as it is in ark 1 and (presumably) ASA?
Less Tek and more of a primitive focus in Ark2, though that can change in later content updates
bwahahaha i just talk about this dino today https://survivetheark.com/index.php?/forums/topic/690110-introducing-dreadnoughtus-the-terrestrial-battleship/ and how over op ppl would made him š¤£
people still vote based on how stupidly op the suggestion/vote creature is presented first instead of what it actually looks like lmao. i thought people learned their lesson with the Dinopithecus gun suggestion from the vote vs what Wildcard ultimately gave them as final abilities when it got added.
but then again, the ark community isn't known for wanting to maintain balance or making smart decisions 
That is the truth
The sky shrimp doesn't have the "sky tuso" part of the suggestion lmao
Spend time in an ark chat and youād cry too. Itās inevitable
It's memes that win creature votes, that's my take
I think itās power combined with ācool factorā
Charchar disagrees
People have opinions
faso didnt have memes behind it
that was entirely how cool it is
which is fair
the only issue is that so many new creatures would be better as tlc
it's either memes or getting all the abilities as possible ala "PVP ability bingo" even if it's not realistic to the creature
i really hope that when they add new creatures in ark 2 they don't overcomplicate their taming methods cause some of them in ark are just not that fun.Like the dinopithecus or the amargasaurus have way too many steps.I remember when the thyla got released it was a standard knockout tame , nothing wrong with that.
or find ways to tame like the equus or andrewsarchus which are alternative fun ways to tame.
Kind of wrong when they're pretty boring to tame.
But I do agree that the Dinopithicus is comically overcomplicated for how shit it is.
I look forward to ark 2 never using KO taming
However, the complexity of a tame needs to be paired with an increase inā¦the tame method not being buggy or downright miserable. Removing taming effectiveness for example would help
You can make stuff like amarga taming revolve around ādonāt let it dieā instead of ādonāt let it take damageāā¦which makes sense given youāre supposed to FIGHT with it
I donāt want to be running back and forth from a carnivore waiting for it to get hungry
Ko taming didnāt make sense but it was effective
Ko taming is just better in general, you can tame multiple dinos, you can pick them and put them in a cage, you put Kibbles / meat / berries in their inventory and then you go tame something else and etc etc
Exactly
Just hope they keep some things the same. Ark was fine it just needs balancing and bug fixes
A lot of it
So glad tek is removed
I agree that the mid game is probably the best
Being in metal armor is fun, being in Tek armor is just overpowered
And annoying⦠bola became ineffective. And to get nets to have a fighting chance in pvp I have to buy another map
Yay p2w ark
āBuy genesis get tek from drops and 3k element in 30 minutes from the element biomeā
Or just play on no import servers
Import is fundamentally stupid
That... is literally KO taming lol
Being attackedā¦
You didn't say being attacked??? Unless I missed something completely
I should have elaborated. I want standard passive taming gone too
Make the taming engaging the entire time, and make it shorter but harder to execute
I'd rather put 10-15 mins of actual effort into something more engaging and challenging then "down/feed it and afk for x amount of time" like we currently got
So when is ark 2 coming out?
End of 2024 is what we know
Tbh - just wait for the announcements channel to tell you. No use relying on anything else since itās imo a guess
Ughhh hopefully soon
ASA hopefully this fall
You good?
Most people donāt harp on the exact same thing every time someone says something
Same critique I have of everyone whipping āminority of the playerbaseā commends everywhere. TASTE.FUL. USE

I do keep that one saved for special use
@mint swan If you have an issue with someone, block them. Move on, please.
I just hope they will allow raiding everyone in PvP ā¤ļøš¤š¼
... You can raid everyone now, though?
imo they should do 1 of 2 things:
a) build more caves in maps so enough tribes can have a base spot
b) make every cave unbuildable
I will totally do that
severely limiting caves and ratholes could provide with a more open base building experience but more chaos too
i wish titanoboa or basilisk could constrict...why is that not a thing yet
While there is descendants of the titanoboa that are classified as constrictors, there is no evidence to suggest that they themselves did so, but as for the basillisk... idk man lol
Not to say they couldn't make titanoboa a constrictor, to be fair
its kinda obvious that titanoboa was a constrictor, big snakes are. and titanoboa was the biggest ever. smaller ones are the venomous ones.
kinda weird they gave it venom
It's not that it wasn't, there's just little to no evidence that the real world titanoboa was, in fact, a constrictor. Most of it's remains are discovered with fish bones, actually
But the Ark titanoboa is a hodge-podge of various extinct snakes anyways, so
It should be like, 4 times it's in-game size too š
grappling mechanics aside, lol i feel like "historical accuracy" doesnt matter all that much...i mean, the dilo was based off Jurassic Park dilo lol
That's what I was saying, with this
truth be told, i just want to strangle a rex with a basilisk XD
It's a game, they can make the giga 2 foot tall if they wanted and have it be canon š
That would be a sight to see, to be sure!
Guys i heard multiplayer servers are gonna close soon because of Ark 2 or something. Is it real ?
Official servers for Ark: Survival Evolved are closing, but not because of Ark 2. That honor goes to Ark: Survival Ascended, a remake of the first game in Unreal Engine 5 with improvements and more coming in August
Oooh i see thanks a lot
And to reiterate; it is only the official servers being taken down, unofficial will be unaffected in any way
Np mate š
Thank you
if you want to be absolutely sure your source is 100% true you want to use all official Wildcard sources/sites
- coming after shutdown of ark1 on 8/31 so probably not august but hopefully close enough
Unless you are interpreting āshortly afterā to mean minutes and not days
Sources: community crunch 355&356
As far as we've been told, it's coming in August. I can't really in good conscience tell someone something that isn't true, until proven untrue š¤·āāļø
Where did it say coming in august?
356 days shutdown of ASE on 8/31 and ASA āshortly afterā
Crunch 355 ARK: Survival Ascended is a next-generation remaster of our beloved ARK: Survival Evolved, harnessing the power of Unreal Engine 5. It will be released on Xbox Series S/X, PC (Windows/Steam), and PlayStation 5 by the end of August 2023. The base game will include The Island, SOTF, and all the āNon-Canonā DLC maps (which will be added to ASA over time).
first bit of text about ASA
Look through the crunches ā¦.
They have to nerf stegos if they want outside bases (or caves with stego sized openings) to be a thing.
Trikes, Reapers, Box Paracers were the only things that could really soak tek turrets before, and very inefficiently...
Now any bob can throw a stego and have a hard time dying / easy to heal them up too
idk it's a lot more than stegos tbh, it's going to be very chaotic and easy to raid outside of player-capped servers
isent that the 1st april cc? cause the second is diferrent
Remember element will be hard to obtain too so, 1 stego going to soak so much tek for free
I did and 356 says servers shutdown 8/31 and ASA 'shortly thereafter'. I have no references for 'released in august'.
Flobs, then LATER crunch 356 says
Only officials are shutting down
"This also impacted our decision to sunset the ASE Official Network offline on August 31st, shortly before the ASA launch."
You gotta read them better
which is newer than your quote.
356 updates their previous plans in 355, which you quoted
If you have newer information, please share, otherwise, 356 stands, which says shutdown is 8/31, before ASA launches
Yes of OFFICIAL
IF you interpret 'shortly' to be 'minutes/hours' and not 'days'
not unofficial
Could be any
no changes to that, sp, etc
Yeah
356 says shutdown 8/31 and then it after. While I hope that means 8/31 knowing WC i dobut it. But now we're ust arguing over the semantics. Lets wait and see what actually happens
Ark 2 = bad
š¤
š
Oh shit, my man must have some insider info for such a definitive take
Wait how you know? Share the info you totally have
No sex update
šØ
Someone make a 10 minute youtube video about this!
Ong, I'm disappointed
Wild Card is just like having kids. A constant source of disappointment and embarrassment.
Lmao
End of 2024 for PC/Xbox Series S/X.
Today
Elon Musk recently got approval for human brain chip installation trials. i wonder when Ark Neural Interface will be released lol
Never
Today
honestly wildcard needs to figure out what mechanics they're gonna have going forward because i don't really understand some of their game choices.Like there are many shoulder pets in the game and you can't really do anything with them ,they only really attack things at very close range.Imagine being able to throw a vulture when mounted on your dino or a microraptor to dismount an enemy player.
with a simple attack command and not having to dismount your dino throw the pet and then attack command.
You know thats already a thing, right? At least on PC - Pressing R throws a shoulder pet while mounted
I didn't wanna say it lol
I may have accidentally yeeted a Bulbdog or two into molten Element trying to grab a cool screenshot and pressing R by mistake
Bulbdogs for the bulbgod
on ps4 too?
Dunno, but probably. I don't play controller
Controllers having fewer keybinds is always a problem for games like ark that benefit from them. Itās a console L
The PC L is that we canāt move orthogonally lol
Accessibility L as well
I made do using the keyboard for non-gameplay stuff like emotes and chat
Tbh the Sky Shrimp is the absolute limit on what I can do on the controller given how too much you can do with it
It doesnt help that I have to use a different input for grabbing things aside from wyverns and Tropeo on jet mode
Most of the shoulder pets are for non combat uses.
And those uses can be awesome. Otters are great for artifact farming for instance
no its just not ready. releasing is like turning in the paycheck. they wouldnt be to lazy to do that.
If small tribes is not a thing, I hope they can at least somewhat address the megatribe situations - either by allowing people to Boost servers to the point of an obnoxious amount of players (like 500 players), or adjust raiding/defending mechanics so it is designed for say 100 players (players online = turrets more damage/health) or something lame like that
Make it like other games where mechanics scale up with the more players you have :^)
something tells me they are not gonna make a single change in many of the gameplay problems
I want you to be wrong, but this is WC
Any bets on how long asa will be delayed until? š
knowing wc my bet is "soon"
A month or 2 probably
I'm going to say it's dropping sometime Nov through Christmas if they actually do all the stuff they want to. Good chance it's released on time but then has the exact problems of ark 1 and no new balancing
Dynamic navigation mesh and creature pathfinding overhaul (AI pathfinding)
Photo Mode
Nvidia DLSS
Dino/Baby Management QOL
Wild Babies
Snap point improvements (new snaps, logic improvements)
Character creation & customization improvements
Cross-platform Multiplayer & Full Blueprint Modding (I know we mentioned this before, but weāre serious, itās happening on PC and Consoles at launch, and weāve got it working internally with Overwolf technology ā this dramatically changes the nature of the console experience).
this was their top priorities on 356 cc regarding to ASA, do you really think balancing anything its gonna be done?
Scroll all the way down on the post
New content, QOL improvements, balance, and gameplay changes, including but not limited to:
I would be stunned if they managed to put even half of the stuff in
A surprising amount of the list isnāt too hard on paper - itās likely been done by mods or WC in test builds already
yeh thats why i mention their top priorities, dont think they gonna do much more just enough to sale or at least thats the felling cause they are only showing crap for the eyes nothing else so far
Same problem we had with ark 2, it's about to release and all they show is assets š wonder why
you call it assets i call it pictures
we dint even sough them moving
That's true. On the fabricator picture it should be sticking thru the stairs but it's not. hmm š¤
is ark 2 going to be like terraria 2
āAh yes just one more FINAL UPDATE and then we doneā
āAh yes just one more TRULY FINAL UPDATE and then we doneā
āAh yes just one more ACTUALLY BEING FR guys plz FINAL UPDATE and then we doneā
āoh what ark 2? We were planning on adding a resin mantis with generating armour and alien-esque reproduction
ā

Well, unlike Terraria-2 we actually have a storepage/in-engine trailer for ARK-2
yea ik
I was just making a mental connection to other games who wonāt release their second and graduate from indieness 
No, no, seriously! One ultra-final-mega-serious-last-update-ever
the code needs to be cleaned too ,12 gb for rhyniognatha and it;s bugfixes update is anything but optimal
What do you mean
I donāt think sky giga itself is taking up all 12 G
i imagine there are other unrelated things added
we all know ark is an unoptimized mess
holla
Hopefully the remake will actually be better
Would be nice if it ain't 180gb
Uhh I mean 240
Or was it 500 I honestly can't remember
Honestly all structures already been done mostly, drops are remade and no idea how many dinos but I think the might delay a week but mostly the can make it
Mhm will see the still have what 2 months?
I'm not expecting months of delay on this tho
I mean on the day it's supposed to come ill be most likely on vacation so don't really care lol
Is like 130 no dlc 550 with all dlc
Dammmm
Yeah I have all
If we can drop that to 200 or less would be nice
They didn't change models. Fabricator is size 1.0 in engine, but when it is in game it is expanded to 1.3. This is why it was smaller in the reveal.
so now wildcard is just making up magic numbers and putting them in their game. curious. š¤
I really don't understand getting all worked up over the fabricator. Did people really want to see the old fabricator sticking through the stairs? Did they feel that it proves it's clearly an arranged scene, when it is clearly an arranged scene?
I'm more hyped about the bed slippers š
Hopefully won't need a mod or something for small details like that anymore
A pile of dirty clothes on the floor would add to the realism
I think it's more about people seeing it as not a true representation of the changes and that the devs are hiding what ASE really looks like. I can understand why people made a bit of a fuss about it, but at the end of the day it hardly matters.
August.
Certainly would if it were my kids room!
Okay, but hear me out:
What if different types of metal and wood this time around?
Instead of just "metal" or "wood" we get "gold" "copper" "iron" "tin" "hardwood" "softwood" (or alien tree names IDGAF).
ark2? i mean maybe
but ultimately all thats gonna do is change how many resources need to be farmed
you can exploit that to force exploration, tho it might also make farming more tedious
Proper balancing of recipe requirements can reduce tedium.
It would also help reshape exploration. At present in Ark 1, the best course of action is to take over the area with the MOST resources, since most resources can be found in multiple places. If, say, iron could be found commonly but gold for electronic circuitry (or some weird alien sacrifice ritual IDK) were only in a couple of places, you've got some PvP hotspots.
Atlas kinda tried this, different islands/regions had different specific resources (Soft Wood, Hard Wood, ect) but they both count as 'wood' for the sake of crafting. Better quality blueprints would require multiple types of specific resources to craft, making exploration or trade required to get the different kinds of resources needed
I think it would be interesting for Ark2, especially with component based crafting actually having meaningful impact on the stats/abilities of items
Maybe resources taken from a specific biome will give bonuses while in that biome - stealth bonuses, durability, ect - so customizing equipment based on the biome you're exploring will be worth it over using catch-all 'meta sets'
Iād be interested if you could do additional work to a base that would decrease decay time
But make it very hard to do on a large base
To encourage smaller bases
Like this is steel clad poly siding over hardwood. Each panel is an hour or two of real work but doesnāt decay for 60 days
Doubt they would do it though
I like this idea, maybe there should be an alien tree that you have to harvest and then use to extract new resources
Yes, but then all the bobs complain about gatekeeping, because apparently raiding a resource spot is too hard
hola
God I hope SotF takes off and caters to that crowd though.
I mean, I do like some casual pvp too, but some people take it to a ridiculous extreme lol. Like why play pvp if you don't like pvp
Some people like combat and donāt like feudalism roleplaying
Sotf and actual ark pvp arent even close to comparable
Gotta remember official PvP is ultimately an anarchy (or at best feudal) system that has combat. Itās not a combat centric experience from a mechanical āwhat are you doingā perspective like even sotf is
Right, which is probably where most of the disconnect is with regard to those that don't want to raid resource spots. They're just meant for a different form of PvP than what standard Ark offers.
It would be cool if resource raids didnāt involve extremely prolonged turret soaking -> slow pushing -> ages long sieges
But itās probably a better idea to just make a new format thatās faster paced
It doesn't take that long though, unless they are online
Then offline raiding would be even easier
ā¦ideally PvP takes place online
But thats mainly a smalltribes problem i guess
š otherwise itās PvE with extra steps
Sure, i agree thereās a balance to be struck. But you can imagine a world where resources that are very limited have some other feature (say the interior of the genesis 1 volcano) that makes them unviable for an established base. Or have some other means of restricting the size of an outpost so the PvP is a bit more fast paced than normal
Tragic since PvP could be so much more if WC doubled down on getting players into fights. But itās too expensive to die in ark so thatās out the window lol
Yeah, I would do the same when I was at that point
Correct
Usually if you don't have a massive offline timer you don't get wiped
Well, I usually ran solo, so it was harder to do
Yup, for sure. But I still fobbed resource spots and did online raids
How is it for people in Europe to fight on US servers (or vice versa)? As an Aussie for example I literally cannot bola/comp bow/fab sniper moving targets, weapons take longer to reload...list goes on. I can't do the big honorable pvp fights in this game like people want, I am forced to use 'lame' winning tactics instead
it depends, if they are closer to EU, you can get around 100-150ms ping so its decent and you can do most stuff but in pvp you are always at an disadvantage.
Flamethrower goes brrrrrr š„š„š„š„
East coast US not too bad but west coast to Europe is a lot worse I think
but in ARK servers vary very heavily. I can find a better NA server than a EU.
Yeah I feel like some of the server locations are wrong lol
hard to tell, there is many things that could impact the server stability
I remember having had better ping in Europe server than people actually in europe
Which makes no sense
okay thats weird, though the reason could still be that those other people have less bandwidth than you.
You can make the ping spike if you have a massive cave built out or something and all of the pieces are snapped together by just picking up a ceiling
Among other methods lol
i remember when just farming berrys with bronto it would lagg the server and people told me i could get banned for doing that , though i was just playing the game
I see, thanks for the responses
yes it's a shame certain legitimate actions in Ark 1 can cause such server troubles. They should probably sort out chainsawing sheep, bronto berries, transferring slotcaps into exomeks/replicator etc
I was just farming berries I swear, I didn't know my tribemate was also rocket running that base š
if people lagg the server they usually do it to duplicate. And its a shame there is people doing this in the background for years. I hope stuff like this gets fixed in ASA though i have my doubts cuz ARK is such a stacked game with all kinds of interactions.
im not sure if its still a thing but it definetly has been for a long time.
There was a dupe you could do with transmitter like within the last year but idk if it was fixed. Probably not lmao
Ark would be such a solid game without all the cheating and a little balance for pvp š
i agree. though in ARK's defence, there is cheaters in pretty much every popular game right now.
cheating in general has become a bigger problem in recent years, not sure why.
i think the only way to prevent cheating is to do it like WoW does, by having active moderators spectating suspicious behavior from the playerbase
Cause advancing technology for cheating is faster then anti-cheat softwares.
Watched a video about it, and was interesting
People realize there is money in it I think. People cheat and sell their stuff for real dollars. Really grindy games make it worse because people with lives are willing to pay to keep up. There's a lot of money in it
Fortnite Battle Pass
A big foundational reason for why I want ark to speed itself up, especially for PvP
Lotta folks probably feel pressure to RMT just to get their foot in the PvP doorā¦something imo that could be resolved with some game design changes rather than a š¤·āāļø approach
Mat gathering is sped up. Breeding lines and getting RNG blueprints is not
I understand theft and trade are options, but the worse/newer you are the more vulnerable you are to bad trades or RMTs as youāre way to get āinā
No
Agreed the power gap is huuuuuuuuuge from someone just starting and someone with a bunch of time on a server. It wouldn't be as much of an issue but most of pvp "skill" is just having the better tool for the job in this game
that's why a lot of competitive survival games have seasons with wipes
it's the nature of a survival game
Capping breed lines at 20/20 on both sides for pvp would be a good start. No more stacked mutations. Then just give creatures a buff when fighting bosses based off of the number of melee and health mutations they have so you don't have to rebalance all the bosses
wouldn't stop you from being wiped while you are offline.
Maybe it would if they couldn't use God stegos and God flak lmao
they'd just use paracers and trikes and use a few more of them
It would be a step in the right direction
People were draining turrets before god stegos came around.
The main problem is raiding favors the attacker
and all defenses are static. And static defenses are dumb
pretty easy to rebalance bosses for ASA...it's a new game after all
not wrong
offline raiding favors the attacker - online it favors the defender. Especially with ark's cave meta where defense is stupidly easy as long as you don't get soaked lol
right, but who raids when someone is online
so true
Exactly the point and part of the imbalance š
I would say a good game design would make it so you don't need someone online 24/7
that's not healthy
I hope that wildcard add the pvx servers from mobile to asa
i kinda support the idea that NO game should encourage round the clock attention to itself
lotta people buy drugs and lose their money gambling too
doesn't mean i have to support it
no i don't think it is. It plays into a phycological weakness, and is extremely easy to get addicted to
video game addiction is an addiction like any other.
I have said the solution to this, it's how cross-arks and small tribes worked before cryopods
you have to add logistics and prep to raiding again, there is a reason why you saw 1000 bob bases around the map
destroys lives
and people can go offline that way too, the maths and logistics is off to the point where, someone has to really be dedicated / skilled / prepped to raid you
not impossible...only caves were impossible back then (or certain cliff bases)
Right but they are obviously not going to redesign the whole game lol
for ark 2 they easily could and already are
you tagged me first with the exact type of comment.
if you can't handle it, don't dish it out
it's just not true?
not every game applies constant pressure on players to return to it - for example if I close COD, I have no fear that someone will delete my progress when i eat dinner or go to sleep
Sure the second is mean, but you are claiming something is a false equivalency just because it applies to all games. When the entire premise started with good game design should not promote being online 24/7.
people get addicted to cookies - does that mean people trying to avoid exposing others to heroin are using false equivalency?
Without getting overly personal, you are defending this like I've seen people who are addicted to video games justify their behavior. Including myself in the past.
ok
i assume you're aware that games can wildly range in how addictive they are...and games that STRONGLY encourage or (in ark's case) threaten you to be aware of it at all times are certainly more addictive than others
I meant for asa, it is sounding like ark 2 will be completely different
No I said you are doing what people who are addicted do. They try to minimize, or say "Atleast it's not this" or "atleast I'm not doing that" or "This is worse than what I'm doing". I don't know you at all, and only base that comment on what you are saying right now.
"You can say that for ALL games, not just survival ones, which need base monitoring. So yes, it is a false equivalency, as you're trying to say it's only equal to a specific genre /because/ of needing 24/7 monitoring." Is an example of minimizing the addiction that ark can cause.
What is going on lol
I say to someone. "Hey man, Ark is really addictive, you should tone it down a bit" And I know this isn't how the convo went with us. But then that person says "That's true of all games, everyone does it, what's the big deal?"
I just hope ark 2 doesn't make 24/7 necessary and offline raid protection is thought through.
They can't really do offline raid protection or 'peace time' without shutting down servers for that duration
ie 'this server will only be up between these hours per day'
ya wouldn't say it's impossible, but it needs to be core to the game and not an after thought
the idea of a companion app made me wince for this same conversational reason
not true. raiding always favors the attacker. its just a question whether you as the attacker has enough offensive ressources to be able to succeed. but you need fewer ressources to attack than to defend
people need LESS reason to mentally focus on a video game
It is never necessary to be online 24/7
Um, raiding does not favor the attacker lol
Raiding in ark is heavily on the side of the defender.
Sorry the context of this was to have someone in your tribe always on
If there is 40 people in your tribe why is this a problem?
it wouldn't be if you have that many people, you could be pretty casual in that situation.
f.e. if someone is tek rifling your turrets on genesis 2. it costs them basically nothing. dinos losing hp to turrets costs nothing
Tek rifle doesn't hit from out of range of turrets...
They have to be within turret range for the tek rifle to work. And if that is the case then it's not because it's in their favor, it's because you either can't defend or can't build
nervous monkey meme with the 20 different ways people could tek rifle without getting shot by turrets
If a base is built wrong
Or they are already in
There is a reason people use tek rexes lol
It is pretty indesputable that raid defenses is in favor of the defender except in the cases of huge skill discrepancy or equal resource allocation
we agree to disagree
u can easily fly with hover skiff and put gasbag on front to soak turrets and fly away if its low health. and u get the hp back for free. bullets are expensive
Offline yes, against a bad base spot
Online, not a chance lol
Skiffs have no hp, it takes like 6 shots to down then from full hp
ur probably in a 30man stacked tribe and never experience how to defend a base solo
Nah, I have 8k hours of pvp, 6k of which was as a solo on smalls and unofficials
I have defended solo against tribes of 30 people and won.
skill issue on their part
That also
One would argue thatās mandatory to lose a 30v1 š
who said 30v1
I mean, I was using mantis before mantis were good
Me
I'm thinking they tried the Mongolian horde method of lighting campfires at night to make their army look bigger than it actually is.
Lol
It's not hard if you have a better setup
They were probably a beta full of bobs tbh
was it like Bruce Willis in Nakatomi Plaza?
Dunno what thst is
Die Hard
30 thugs raided the tower and he killed them all
80's movie. Action movies back then were even more unbelievable then they are now. But the good ones are still pretty great
Until like 2 Tek turret shots miss the gasbag and blow the skiff up instantly haha
Fr
You can Tek rifle hatchframes and stuff but you have to los the turrets. Unless they are just dumb and put them on medium or something š
My favorite way to raid is whistle attack arthro style on survivor only turrets
That reminds me, single player testing vs real server testing is very different
all the small things raiding wise will have to be re-tested for 1.5
The 100 of small things are unlikely to be caught when 1.5 launches...will probably be very easy to raid others
ikr.. thats why i said ASA should have a beta test. If there is some stupid exploit which is very likely, then that stuff will remain in the game or they have to wipe which would also suck.
Exploits wouldn't be that bad, but for some reason ark devs have a "we are never ever wiping official servers even if there is sketchy stuff going on" attitude. A beta would be a good idea lol
Official should have been wiped multiple times after all the stuff and duping methods they fixed
Pve servers I could see staying up forever but these competitive pvp servers need to be wiped when major stuff happens
i remember when you could tame bloodstalkers easily by just letting them suck you to death multiple times and do the last bit of taming progress with blood ... then they fixed this and suddenly you had to only use blood which then turned down the taming effectivness so hard that you would need a lot of mutation breeding to get the same stats. but the people who tamed them earlier had the juicy stats.
Who needs QA when you have players
@harsh spear i think everything you said just said is proof of a skill issue and you have not experience a big enough tribe to learn different metas
and now i get banned
gg admins
i think the issue is when the average player gets wiped faster than they can reach end game
or any level of competitve play
so they need to be inducted into groups of people who know stuff
and most of them have quotas and minimum hour requirements
which is a slog
basically requiring 10-30% of your week devoted to ark
and in those cases its not doing anything fun for the most part
there isnt really a bulleted list of how to get everything you want in a very very short amount of time that casuals can access either, since yeah you can bypass all the above garbage by knowing how to play
you just have to ask a bunch
or these bits of info exist online, but its not mentioned enough, so most people never get them
Watch YouTube, and play boosted unofficials to learn. Or join a beta
most unofficials are way too resource and gear lenient
the beta part is what im referring to here
and the youtube part is the most efficient
for some reason most people who play games just refuse to use youtube tho
its kinda where the sentiment of having better in game resources to learn the game comes in with a lot of games ive seen
It's a good place to practice...
It's pvp, if they don't do their research they are going to lose
yeah
but whether ultimately their ability to learn how the game works is technically in their hands or not doesnt really change that these players do quit
at least more hardcore forms of pvp anyhow
idk what the ratio of players between highly boosted unofficial pvp and lower boost/official is
and both are probably dwarfed by pve/solo
Fireballs for Ark 2.
Taming method of fasolosuchus sounds kinda cool
Sand Shark Croc
Equus x Explosive Demolition Derby
Except the other cars are rocks
Fireball solves everything
Maybe they can meet you in the middle, and allow thrown torches to set things on fire
so we get a Dodongo
Y'know, now that you say it ...
It kinda is š
God damnit. Now I gotta beat Ocarina of Time again. Thanks kris.
lol
it even kinda looks like one
swims through the sand, you KO it by driving it into a hard surface after stunning it with explosives
It does haha
Will it be pvp servers on ARK 2?
Yes, why would you think there wouldn't?
The dossier says you have to be quite mental to try⦠and I am quite mental
Wildly incorrect chat
I can't tell if they're insinuating that they buy Steam accounts (which is highly illegal) or they're just asking for someone to play with (which isn't related to this channel's topic at all)


It's not like it'll be useless to buy in a few months anyways, or isn't on sale all the time regardless š
True
Ark 2 releasing within the next decade? Seems unlikely
More likely than you think
Free pc check (had to complete the meme)
Already beaten it 3 times 
Thatās it?
I beat it more than 3 times on every platform itās available on.
dude whens ark 2 gonna release :/
Is ark 2 coming to PlayStation or Xbox and pc only
Xbox and PC only as of now. Iād imagine itāll hit PS after EA is over but nothing official has been stated.
Man it was supposed to release in 2022, 2023, and now itās 2024.
I can beat the first gohma boss in under half a minute 
In my opinion a rushed game isn't a good game
Well fortunately for you and your opinion ārushedā is the last word anyone would use to describe Ark 2s development
Yea but the longer they take the better it will be
Thatās debatable
Not necessarily. More time doesn't mean better output, I mean more time is more time for new issues.
Thatās true
Imagine how much spaghetti code they could make with this extra year haha
Fantastic way to look at it GP
Too little time makes a bad game, too much time doesn't make it necessarily better. The best code is what is written relatively quickly and efficiently. It's like trying to write a perfect essay. Spending a year on it might not be much better than spending a month on it
Better this way š
I wish they had planned ASA launch a bit better. Waited until they had something ready to release or at least show us. Then announce shutdown with some overlap. This messed up limbo of half abandoned half diehard ark1 players is depressing
Also, Happy Fathers Day!
imagen those that quit when they announce ark 2
Die hard ark fans need a break š. I think this is good for everyone
We need a DLC in ark Ascended in which the entire map is underwater, no cap
Ocean dlc for ark 2 at minimum š
I bet some did. But a shutdown is way different than announcing a far-in-the-future sequel
Never!
You mean Subnautica?
I bet you could do an ark map underwater. You would need to have shallow area and some method of regaining stamina
Some early game scuba like things. Maybe a mask that gives you air but only in a few feet of the surface
Diplocaulus could actually be useful
Aberration for example is only a cave
This DLC could be only underwater, you spawn with a weaker Scuba. All the spawn will be at the top of the water and for the end game you need to go down
i did, why should i continue to invest time on something that had timer bomb, but none would predict what follows, having this schedule is different for sure but still like you said they should get their stuff ready to release instead of rushing to release news that they cant support and dont have any clue when its ready
I instead see you spawning on small islands (like Gen 1) or on a beach biome on a couple small flat islandsā¦and the massive bulk of the map is underwater
Lots of shallow waterways like swamps, mud flats, reefs, etc as well as shelf biomes that lead into deep abyss biomes and open ocean
i would like to see a map that is a huge island cluster that you need to go from island to island to move around but also have a deep underwater system with many caves and like some early game tools that can work like early game scuba or sth .
Nothosaurus would be a perfect fit there too if it's fast and can dive well
Genesis 1 basically, but bigger
and the islands aren't just big pillars with nothing in them
Hmm. I dunno. I kinda would want the land masses on the ocean map to be unviable for building
They should really only exist to spawn on and get the bare starter basics
yeah that's a view maybe have no flyers too apart from pelagornis maybe so you can't just go everywhere without a hassle and have the majority of resources underwater with maybe a few metal nodes scattered in the surface
Genesis 1 ocean biome but more shelfs and other things like Shifter said, but anything above water or close enough to it to matter is unbuildable as it's the starter zone
(and also it's a whole map with engrams and dinos and the whole shebang)
yeah that is pretty nice but i prefer like an archipelagos map that is a island based (not the map) and underwater too
The center is pretty close to that, though the aquatic biomes are a bit left behind by arkās development
Iād like a nomadic map, where you have to travel to progress, and only dinos that walk.
basically any map with flyers, cryos, and teleporters disabled
Imagine surface space. But non buildable except maybe campfires etc
Underrated map
maybe they will do a dlc for ASA or Ark 2 with unique sea gear and animals like they did with Abberation
A sea boss is overdue..(apart from Gen 1)
Also it sucks to constantly have to look out for jellyfish near the surface ,maybe they're better off in deep waters
I proposed that sort of thing!
I think a map that has no flyers and is just... a normal map? Like Gen 1 but not specialized biomes? Would go over very well imo
For ASA or Ark 2 tbh
Basically just Ab
Same with Gen 1 tho
No, and I want to flay the person who keeps propagating this ideology
This guy
@manic panther. We chatted about a nomad focused map and experience for a DLC
That's... what I said, is it not? I want a map that isn't specialized biomes, unlike Gen 1/Ab, to have the no flyer rule. I.E. , The Island, or The Center, or even Rag, but with no flyers (as an extremely basic example)
Coolš
The oceans of ark need a major overhaul though cause apart from deep waters and maybe the swamp the only real threat is a slow shark and an obnoxious jellyfish
or eels
which also suck
you are totally correct - it's why I want an ocean DLC for ark 2
I don't want the same attention ark 1 gave to its oceans! I want a massive, DLC level overhaul to how oceans work and how they play
that could make the game 100% more diverse in the future
if you take in account all the applications
agreed. But I fear that people want ark 2 to launch with an ocean...which given the sheer amount of new mechancis and content that is promised on land means to me the oceans would be kinda half baked
(thus, a DLC I proposed should be considered, and #oceanDLC was born)
yep I'm all about that
i hope they go with the approach on adding more tiers whith ark2 as the game goes by up to like a fabricator type tier and not lock the best tier behind bosses like they did with tek
i hope instead of adding more tiers they add more content within each tech tier
or "sidegrade" tiers
for example a special smithy type or something...same tier, but new stuff
they are gonna start with primitive no?
it's primitive period - not just to start
that is their main focuse in ark 2 i've heard
that's correct that there is no tek tier and likely nothing modern
yeah so hopefully they add more modern stuff in the future
cause how is the game going to grow?
yea I think that statement applies to ALL of ark 2
I wouldnāt mind them adding more modern to futuristic stuff in ark 2, but I think they should keep that to the expansion maps and exclude it from the map arat.
unless each DLC is adding regions to the existing map
even then, I really don't want to see the tek tier return
jetpacks just ruin the survival feeling for me
Primarily*
didn't they recently say something about no modern guns either?
I donāt mind them upgrading and expanding the map. Just hope they will add another map then, that allows modern stuff, and start doing upgrades and expanding on there.
i'd prefer it stay on ASA personally
Adding the modern stuff will probably be something for the far future then anyways
yea probably end of ark 2's life even in the "worst case"
Youād be bored of Asa by then, especially because itās actually the original ark, but in a different and nicer looking coat lol
I won't really be playing much ASA in all liklihood, especially if they keep breeding based progression
but a lot of folks who are very into modern weapons and tek? I think ASA will be a great place for them
Yeah true, Iām more in to the primitive style of play
Not to my knowledge, but perhaps idk
They do keep saying that the game isn't for everyone, so my take is that the people who want tek tier to come back will be in the group the game isn't designed for.
Wc is making the game they want to make, which is always better than making the game they think the community wants
O I think that I found myself a cheerleadeerrrr
Itās way way way too early to be saying with any reliability what ark2 will or wonāt be
Remember nobody was rolling around in tek gear when ark1 launched either
And ark being a simulation has always been the story line. And it continues to be the story in ark2
I mean, we can say what they have said with reliability. Especially the parts that they keep emphasising
Lol, what. Only gen1 was a simulation
Yup. Havenāt even launched 1.5 yet thoughā¦. š
Have you beaten tek cave yet on Island?
Only gen 1 was a simulation
Only Gen1 was a simulation
Perhaps I should say artificially created environment. Not a literal simulation
I mean, except for ext you would be right, but artificial and simulation are not synonymous
Ark 2 is the biggest scam of the Century.
Seeing as its not even purchasable yet ... Yeah, if you paid for it already then you got scammed š
It does kinda feel like WC is just fucking with us at this point
Iām just waiting for Dollie to come in here like āYou guys believed Ark 2 was a thing? We got you good you fuckers!ā
Why is that
At this point jll give up dude
They sre not gonna release the game anytime soon
Also i noticed Ark 2 doesn't have a workshop which is bad news
most games announced then got cancelled regardless
it ain't scam if you didnt pay
When is scheduled release š
end of 2024
2022,2023, 2024.
2025?
I wouldnāt be surprised at this point.
Given it is still under development, it technically does not exist yet
Why is that bad news? Theres already confirmed cross platform modding support, just not through the Steam Workshop
Steam modding is easier usually
But lets not worry about that
Lets worry about the fact that ark 2 is not coming anytime soon as it seems like
Can it actually have a workshop when it isn't released yet?
Pretty sure no
Steam Workshop is a barebones mod support platform rife with issues
I mean if it had workshop it would show on steam store page so
My point is, does the workshop tabs show if the game is not yet released?
Yes
Also they said that they wanted to change the modding system from steam workshop to nexus or a exclusive modding website
So again ... why is no Workshop an issue?
Don't recall them mentioning Nexus. All they've said is they will be using Mod io. But there's doubt on that now anyway.
I don't think Xbox has Steam support/integration
So there is need for an all-platform mod distribution system
Thats not i dont think territory thats just a straight up no it doesnt
I know nothing about controller platforms š
Microsoft would never allow mods like steam workshop because steam workshop mods are always free
Also are the console veraions of ase even compatible enough with the pc version, idk
Viva espaƱa q ayer gano una nation leage
Not sure what that has to do with ark2 but ok
Can we all agree to not buy ASA or ark 2
Nope, gonna buy it instantly. Life's too short for crying over video game stuff.
Nope
I can agree on not getting ARK-2, but I will be getting ASA if it's good
I'm just kind of surprised you think going onto a channel about ark2 and telling people not to get ark2 would work
Do you now if they improve the procedural map creator in ASA ?
they are removing it
because it would be way too much effort and still have worse results than hand crafted maps most likely if they did try to improve it
I just donāt think itās a good idea to support ark devs with arks current state
Game is buggy
Worst pvp meta weāve seen (net rifle)
Producer abusing servers and studio wildcard
I believe itās not the best idea to buy ASA or ark 2 especially because they are forcing people to buy ASA to even play ark 1
for sure man, ''everybody is being forced to buy it''
This also impacted our decision to sunset the ASE Official Network offline on August 31st, shortly before the ASA launch. Despite ASE Officials representing the minority of players on ARK.
ASE will still be available to play for those who choose to; that includes multiplayer through unofficial/player-hosted sessions, the endless amount of mods on the Steam workshop, and all the game content as you currently know it. All of that is going to remain.
Which is funny, because mod tools are going to become practically the same things
If we don't support studio wildcard, don't they go out of business?
I support Wildcard to the moon and back. Yeah they've made mistakes, bad decisions and stuff, but I've had 8 fantastic years of ARK, and I hope more to come. Their publisher is an unfortunate situation, but that doesn't stop me supporting ARKs true developers, WC.
A little bit lmao, fella doesn't seem to know the difference between publisher and developer
Then there are zero dinosaur games
i wouldn't really say zero, maybe zero dinosaur games like Ark to put it better
Zero good dinosaur games that aren't for children, to be sure
I was thinking arklike, yes.
no one is forcing you to buy ASA in matter of fact no one force you to buy ASE in the first place, its all a matter of choice, so make your choice to buy ASA or ark 2 or not, either way makes little difference cause its the very choice that everyone as to make when comes to buy a game
It's Just Ark 1 With Better Graphics
It literally isn't if you've actually done research on it, but keep on saying that. 
I've Watched 1 YouTube Video About Asa
Ah yes, a YouTube video that's going to capitalize on the current hate-trend on it, instead of giving actual information.
ASA is fundamentally different from ASE.
ass?
Ye
Don't worry, the people mad about ASA and also think it's 'Ass' 
Yeah I Mean I Hope It's Not Ass
I doubt it will.
At least they're actually adding shit to it, instead of a 60$ repay for a next-gen version of literally the same game that Rockstar pulled.
Bruh The Server I Always Join Has 40 People Its Never Had That Much
it's Ark 1 with better graphics, QoL upgrades, better AI for dinos, a reworked building snap system, and some new wild dino changes
plus crossplay across every system that can run it and mods for everyone
And modding support for every platform
Oh wait, you've already said that
betting that mods will carry asa from the first year onwards
mods carry most long term games.
ye but i dont have faith in the base game being fun enough beyond the first 6 months
not enough mechanics are known to be completely overhauled yet
