#ark-2
1 messages · Page 97 of 1
Which Ark 1 was only just capable of, by like a hair
But I wouldn't consider Ark 1 an MMO personally though, that was just to pull people in imo
It’s a soft MMO, because it does have tons of servers you can jump between
But what’s weird is that many people never interface with that and just play a single map at a time…and imo the game works better that way when you aren’t constantly jumping between maps
Yeah, there's something to be said for the "MMOs" that have sub-100 people playing, but have shards/separate servers and the like, it's certainly hard to put games like that into either category definitively
Also imo ark doesn’t need to be an mmo to work
@mint swan #735196255483068497.
Ah sorry! my bad
Ark doesn’t even work half the time, so call it what you will
the only time i can think of when ark doesnt work is reloading ammo xd unless you understand other things as not working
talking more about high level design there, but I assume you mean bugs?
Wdym doesn’t work?
Its works fine for me
got early access lets go
🔫 gimme it
||leave scene after spreading misinformation||
sigh ''files misinformation report''
You silly, believing Ark chatters ☝️ 🧇
🧇 ☕ 
Don't believe Ark2 chatters, only YouTube is a reliable source
Be sure to Like, Comment, and Subscribe for more info, and ding that bell for more updates in the future!
we don't hate oceans, we just want them to be done well like gen 1 and not like any other oceans
???
I'd love to see pack/herd animals moving/flocking together more like irl.
Another area that we’re particularly excited about is the World Event system. Rather than simply having a more-or-less static environment with easily predictable or repetitive occurrences ala ARK 1, the new World Event system is designed to ensure that unique things are always happening around the world, whether you are there or not. Events include procedurally-dynamic scenarios like watering hole gatherings, wounded creatures, tracking the signs of advanced prey, stampedes, herds, defending endangered creatures to earn their trust, finding dens of parent creatures and their young, and more. Whether you choose to engage with these events is up to you, and each can yield unique rewards and challenges.
there will be herds and stampedes, and much more
the founders page has a more detailed description of some stuff from the steam page, while describing some stuff not listed on the steam page.
yea so true this World event system thing sounds interesting
they said no Tek at launch atleast
there will be ''tek scrap'' tier, but there will be no useable tek like in ark 1
here
that was just to show what the component based crafting will be like visually
yea it is
I like her
yea exactly
imaging that we need to steel her eggs to hatch xD
🍻
wait for 31st you might get some infor
There it is 😂
not yet, but with the roadmap being shared on march 31st we could potentially have a release window, this will cover Ark 1, Ark 2, the animated series and Sotf
its not gonna be in 2023
xD
ofc not for playstation
not even steam
so that much trust we got in for WC? xD lol
i got no trust in companies announcing dates at all
and not only me
some youtubers even went to say it could be delayed years
i hopne not lol
ah yes, let's believe some sad Nooblets video made to try and keep his channel relevant
I understand that pretty much but since its early access we could guess maybe December
if you listen carefully hes pretty much right
could be wrong tho
ppl had changed they are thought after announcing ark1 UE 5
ppl guessing they will put more time on Ark 1 UE 5 than ARk2
i'm just gonna say for some of those still confused about the concept art. it's already been stated the concepts shown are done in-game and are to tease leading up to the gameplay.
it's still just the Ark 1 team working on it, iirc nobody from the Ark 2 team was sent to the Ark 1 team to help with it
concepts are nice, but its far from footage from the game like every other game does
and you sure about that?
maybe they just plan on releasing concepts
it's just a engine upgrade, not like they are making another dlc
true still but changing engine will cause lots of bugs
ocean was a blue desert
it needs to be an ocean
gen 1 ocean but more ressources and more alive
not everything in the ocean has or wants to kill you
if they release ARk2 on June/july then we can see new dinos teasers on Charity Event
or Ark2 Gameplay on Charity Event xD lol
I love Ocean a lot
my few bases all near the ocean or on it
yeah because you need a breeding spot for the creatures not because ocean is a nice place to go to lmao
Ark1 Player: Dips toe in ocean
Every ocean creature: "And I took that personally"
why I like Ocean is, ofc breeding the dinos also, no need to put walls all over to cover up the base for wild dinos and no neighbors near also my dinos so safe
big problem is have to go far to get the resources
that big negative thing building on ocean
yea exactly and
i hope no more gamma settings in ark 2
yea if they fix water thing might be nice on Ark1 and
yea exactly they really should priority Ark2 but lets see how things goes
lol same thought
I had till this moment
the most recent number i think i found off some investment website was like 35
but that was also 2019 i think
but they were advertising a lot
xd
for Vacancy so they might got enough ppl
200 is a bit high
because running few games need a proper team
i can imagine 60
some reasons why they're upgrading ark 1 to UE5
- to keep playstation players invested until Ark 2 is on playstation
- to keep people on old consoles around a bit longer until they upgrade
- to give the ark 1 players something nice
like 50 to 60
yea PlayStation thing is true
since PS5 came they really want something from Ark1
but I think more ppl = less work for company because if u finish just single play games and you can see in the credits how many ppl worked on the game and Game like Ark, there should be enough people to fix the bugs
yeah but how you gonna pay them
need to constantly release onto new platforms and drop new dlc
or get a loan
Ark2 surely they planned for 2/3 dlcs already
well ofc they get helps to start the game
start the project I mean
just seems pretty risky
end product will be always great
but yeah theyll get a stupid amount done if they got that many people
sure, but it could be great with less
Ark on PC/Xbox/PS/Switch and what else?
less mean more stress for employee
Pix Ark made from WC right?
No. Snail Games.
Just those from Wildcard.
ah I see, ok thank you
not if you spend more time
#oceanDLC ≠ I hate oceans
What you described though is how to create the level design for the ocean…and yea a large volume of water on top of some sand is pretty easy. But if you want reefs, caves, any sort of terrain features or resources that does add work. Especially if it needs new assets that are intended to only be seen in the ocean. BUT, if ark 2 oceans are going to be up to par imo they need far more than that
A good ark 2 ocean, one id enjoy, would probably be enough work to be a DLC. It would require a retooling of the combat system to accommodate aquatic combat, an entirely new branch of resources, missions, tech/buildings, creature skills, events, creature behaviors and interactions, etc. I just don’t think all that is feasible for ark 2’s initial early access release. And I’d argue anything less will shortchange the oceans again
(Or will result in half baked oceans and terrestrial gameplay and lord knows I’d hate that)
a properly done ocean will imo always be better than any story map ocean that isn't gen 1. would you rather want a shitty ocean for the sake of having a ocean, or do you want a well done ocean like gen 1?
Gen 1 was imo the best ark 1 could do with an ocean at the time
Fjordur also has great oceans
we're mainly focusing on story/wildcard maps, as ark 2 oceans will be Wildcard oceans
I’m going to be focusing ocean bases this time around, I had cave bases and such on ark, but this time, I’m going aquatic
🧜♂️
#oceanDLC may make that dream so much better
We don't even know If we cab go aquatic though. Lots of talk about no tek in the future
(and there's no promises that they wont readd tek in a future DLC.
)
Id prefer they do the Atlas way. They released with a procedural ocean and after a while they revamped the ocean.
This way it would please both
TBF Ark without an ocean would be a bit disappointing to me
Oceans and caves are an important part of the ark gameplay.
well caves are confirmed and i bet theyll look sick and scary cant wait
ocean is just meh, i could live without one but im also terrified of it so
im biased
You won’t need tek to explore the oceans - you can easily imagine alien materials
or we make the diplocaulus return for underwater exploration, and make it have an actual use without scuba gear
yes gimme my diplo
Or tames like it tbh
i just want a moth and a camel so i can build a little cottage home
Again it’s not really the level design I’m worried about - it’s the mechanics
Yeah, release it even without proper mechanics, just the basics. Then revamp it. Atlas did it. It’s better to have oceans when first released.
Kinda disagree, hence the #oceanDLC move
Release it in a crummy state and people think it’s garbage and it encourages half assed development
Atlas literally doesn’t work without oceans lol, so yes it makes sense to a degree they did it the way they did. But ark 2 by no means requires oceans
why would they make it bad just to revamp it lol
thats just more effort for no reason
There’s value in concepting and testing but I think with something that’s SO different from terrestrial play (given the souls combat side) I agree Laser…why would they make it bad lol
tbh i dont know how souls like in water works
has it ever been done in dark souls or any other game using souls like combat?
🤷♂️
Ocarina of Time
Frankly I’ve not seen it. There’s obviously aquatic combat but it’s tricky
Go play monster hunter tri
I feel like they're just saying it has Souls-like combat to get more people interested
I can't wait to see how buggy and broken those "Souls-like" mechanics are gonna be
5 business days for me I have the weekend off 🙂
@vital jetty They definitely need more ambient creatures. By that I mean creatures that just exist to make the game feel more alive and more real, like, not every creature needs to have some special ability or can be tamed, just add several types of fish, birds, insects, give a reason behind all those weird wooping noises we hear in the jungles on the Island rather than just background sound effects.
The ocean should have the most creatures to make it feel more alive, there just aren't enough in Ark 1 and it makes the oceans feel really boring and empty
I think you're right about making the oceans shallower, maybe they could have much larger coral reefs with heaps of different fish and stingrays and less aggressive creatures, maybe a smaller shark species or two just to give it some level of danger. But there should still be deeper parts with the dangerous stuff and the better loot
That’s my point, they released it without proper deep oceans. We could dive yeah, but pretty much limited to shipwrecks. I want an ocean, even if it means not many creatures populating it. Better than nothing. Also I believe an ocean is a given, I don’t think they release without.
Also, it’s possible to release a DLC improving it in the future.
I don’t know if you are answering to me, but I’m not implying they should release a bad ocean. I just any ocean. If they want to release it with a half complete ocean (not many creatures, caves etc), I would be ok with it.
I just think that makes no sense to release an ocean exclusively in a dlc
90% of the maps have an ocean and the oceanic creatures are nice.
I mean a DLC with an ocean map (be it a new one or an addition to the base ark 2 map) just makes the most sense
We’ve so far seen nothing about aquatic creatures or the ocean so I’m not so sure it’s a given (again, speaking only for ark 2’s initial launch)
Again, I'm still wondering why so much preparation for a roadmap.
We haven’t seen much at all, actually.
But all we HAVE seen is terrestrial, and it’s possible that’s sort of what we’re getting
Wouldn't the pteradons be aerial?
We also see Archa's for a split second in the original ARK-2 trailer
But it’s like 2 minutes of footage and 5 concept arts. But, anyway, we will see what their approach will be. Still think caves and ocean are a given.
Well caves 100%, since we literally saw one with the Araneo concept art
yea I really like to see caves and ofc might be few caves
Gotta land somewhere 😂, but yes point taken
next week we will no more on ark 2 then we no now
pray wild card dos not leave us out to dry
I agree with not leaving us dry.
But....I don't understand that first sentence.
Next week, we will know more about ark 2 than we already know.
Thank you for being a translator.
He spells words phonetically so probably easier to read it aloud
We know more about ark 2 next week
"While we put the finishing touches on the ARK Roadmap" what a joke 🤣 the way they said that feels like they made a ark dlc 🤣
They added a tree and maybe a stop sign
or the roadmap is in the shape of a tree
That moment when your photoshop subscription has expired:
We'll find out when we get the road map, that's kind of the point
I can't wait okay I'm excited 😭
Been bored for months I need me a new game
😂
Not gonna lie if it's 3rd person only I'm scared it's going to be a shit game
like they said it will be
mods can make it 1st person they said
Oh good
Mhm
otherwise it will just be abused some way
I hope its coming this year still but most likely not knowing them
A well will know pretty soon
the issue comes with how long itll take for 1st person mods
we'd need the devkit for ark 2 probably which could take a while
Depending if the community wants it it happens pretty fast as a lot will try make it
Yeah
This makes me thing like wow this roadmap is gonna pretty big.. finishing touches? they're definitely cooking something good.
Why is everyone assuming the news are going to be big? You are just setting yourself up for disappointment.
Don't assume anything. Practise patience. Take the news as they release them. Your worthless assumptions are based on nothing.
Problem its they dont have road map
They just lie and Ark 2 release its going to be 2025
Your math is a little off here
Megachelon and Moeder come to mind, but that's about it (because the previous three maps had no oceans, since they realized it wasn't important to the overarching story at hand)
They've said it should be pretty easy to make a FP mod pretty much day one, so there's that
let's do some quick maths, 9 out of 12 maps having oceans definitely equals to 90% (defo not 75%, but whatever we got to make ocean look more important)
spoilers: it isn't even a big focus on any map that isn't gen 1 tbh, just a ocean bc we gotta add a ocean sorta deal everytime. 
People can be hopeful, chill homie. Now, if anyone here was saying something like "holy cow omg they said finishing touches that means it's going to be HUGE they may even just release the game right now" then sure, the response is warranted lol, but nobody here (at least, nobody that's demonstrably sane) has said that, at all
Yeah, the Gen 2 "ocean" and the Crystal Isles "ocean" are honestly not the best, if even oceans
Just feel tacked on imo
It wasn't a literal statement, just a metaphorical number to say it's relevant to Ark 1. But anyways, we will see what will be their approach. I Still think the Ocean is an important feature to the gameplay
We speak in facts here, boiiiii
No but seriously I was just moreso trying to point out the fact that the original storyline set of maps for Ark didn't require oceans at all to get their rocks off, and they were some of the best maps in the game (Aberration being, imo, the best map for overall map-feel and balance and such)
And it still ended up having some of the best/coolest aquatic creatures in the game, I mean, have you seen the karkinos or the lamprey? /hs
Really though, it did have some nice water areas, without necessarily having oceans, per se. Really a big fan personally of the crystalline bog that borders the red zone, very cool area and the biodiversity there was amazing
Not to mention the rivers, which were kinda nice (but did admittedly overspawn coel, for some reason, even occasionally blocking other spawns and being one of the weirdly best XP farm pre-Extinction)
ah Bioluminiscent biome my beloved (and sometimes hated)
I hate Aberration and Extintiction. The only map I really liked (and doesn't have an ocean was Scorched). So I'm biased here. LOL
HOW? Tf? You have lost good boy points this fine morning
But seriously, not having aquatic creatures would be a bit disappointing to me, because I think it's an importante feature. But, we will see.
Extinction I can understand, but Aberration? There's a reason why most maps going forward have an Ab zone, lol
Aberration is annoying to me. Once I got in there by mistake, you can imagine how hard it was to get out without a transmitter LOL
Yeah, because people hate aberration, but love a lot of the stuff it brought 😂
I mean, the map is annoying, but the content is amazing
Well, and that's why I added the bit about biodiversity on Ab, you should really go look at the crystal bog, it's got more water creatures than most people know what to do with
I would love to see a bioluminiscent biome in ARK 2, i like the natural lighting
Ok, let me rephrase then, I want aquatic creatures. You can call their habitat huge lagoon, I don't really care how we will call it.
That's just a skill issue on most people's part, if you don't know where every drop on the map spawns, then you don't get to complain about the drops imo lol
And that's fair, and we've already had several convos about having rivers and lakes, even shores, but not necessarily an ocean if they can't figure out/make all that work from the get-go
I know actually. I played there for like 6 months after released. But it is annoying on a higher level when compared to the other maps. After you get settled is just fine like any other map.
We want quality over quantity, basically, when it comes to biomes
That's fine to me. But it's concerning if the planet is massive, but doesn't have a huge biodiversity.
Really, we have no idea what they're planning to release. It's hard even to conjecture. LOL
Fair enough
The problem stems from people with nothing going there and being swarmed by raptors or ravagers every time they go to move. Most people can look up a drop point online and wait, but the wait can be quite long on aberration. I know it'd be just as fast to get some hide gear, a crossbow, and a spear and actually go from drop point to drop point and find one, but as an aberration veteran who has seen countless people requesting help, you have to agree it is a bit of a design issue that takes away from the fun and wastes players time.
Agreed
I mean, not really. The whole "can't move without being waist deep in ravagers" bit is always overstated, the spawns really aren't that bad. This is coming from someone who's done a no ridden dinos playthrough of the story maps. It's really not all that hard to get from the portal to a drop without encountering a single dino, you just need a parachute or two usually and to stay on the upper walkways if possible
Only issue then is not spawning literally inside of a basilisk, which I will admit is a major design flaw for the "easy" spawn zone, putting one of the harder dinos right smack-dab in the middle of it
But that's just Ark as a whole 😂
I love aberration, it's my favorite map, I personally love it and have no issue travelling on it. But the amount of people who get lost or stuck there points to there being a design issue. It can be overcome, but when you are designing something to get people hooked and for replayability, you don't want to make their first impression of the map dreadful.
Again, I love aberration and main it
Yeah, I suppose I could get that. But if you start Ark 1 on Aberration to begin with, you're kinda doing it wrong anyways 😅
i too love abbberation, do i know how to navigate it? no
and i take a basilisk at spawn over 30 violent scorched creatures every day
Aberration looks really really cool! People probably go there having no idea what they are getting into
And that's completely a them issue, not the devs' fault whatsoever, right?
well no it is a dev issue, because you don't want someone to have a bad experience.
If I were to do aberration, I would have a starting area with raptors at most, maybe a few carnos, and a terminal for getting off the map
But they made the choice to go to the map first, when the base map is the first one highlighted and therefore the one you should start on, no?
That would solve most of the problems with ab.
Again, I understand that the basilisk should not be in the starting area, by any means, but the rest of the creatures are fair game imo
add a way to get off the map in that area, and we're good
Fair enough, I suppose
And there is that drop just below the bridge, that's what I usually use
But I'm also really lucky apparently, because there's supposed to be sarco and piranha spawns there
I usually go to river that goes to blue zone, there's a cluster of 4-5 drops by that waterfall area. The river not filled with karkinos and spinos
If I'm stuck and naked and need to leave
Yeah, that's a good one too. There's one just up the river from there, in a little underpass, I use that one quite often if the one on the walkway up and to the right of spawn isn't there
Near the little metal spawn up there with the water in it
But yeah, here's hoping Ark 2 has actually properly labelled spawns and not just arbitrary "easy but not really" type spawns
''the bog biome would like to know your location''
Funny thing about that one, in singleplayer, Gen 1 actually had different spawn points for the biome, as in the kapros and raptors would be spawned further away from the initial spawn points. So it was the easy spawn, but still not easier than the ocean to be fair
Is ark 2 third person only
As far as we know, yes
Fourth person only
Ok
What would that even look like? I'm scared
Omnipotence
i'm guessing like the sims type of camara
Y'know, everyone says that since there's no gameplay reveal yet then there probably won't even be ea this year but they forget that wildcard has a habit of revealing stuff then launching it like 2 weeks later
people also seem to think they have to reveal gameplay 1 year before launch, wildcard does like to drop gameplay closer to launch or 1-2 months before it drops.

Imo the issue is that Ab was made as a wonderful stand alone experience…so the fact that is had to be shoehorned into the “everything has to be transferred” MMO piece of ark really ruined the magic
There are so many ways now to circumvent AB’s level design from other maps…it’s just frustrating to see my favorite map done dirty like that
Well, and if you just play it as intended, you never run into that issue, at any point
You can ascend from The Island to Scorched, then Scorched to Ab, then Ab to Ext, no problem
And even to the Gens too
Only when mechanics and such that are non-canon are introduced (like transferring back from Ext to Ab) does it pose a problem to have the transfer feature imo
First person was never even a essential part of what made the core of Ark, what made ark ark is the dinosaur survival experience it is.
Ohhh noooooo!
In Ark 2, 1st-Person-View has been abandoned, we get only the boring 3rd person view!
Source:
youtube watch?v=0Nk7FFNZcnI
Which is something I hope they take the time to fix in the UE5 update, it really is just a tickbox like flyers, but per dino afaik
Nice breaking the rules there, bud. And all for a stupid post, too
Ark2 2024?
Great, who sent their followers to troll this time?
I’m just asking if its been delayed
improving mechanics and adding new mechanics comes at a cost, losing first person isn't as big of a deal as people want to make it out to be. seeing as you're mostly using dinos wich are TPO unless you for some reason go first person on them, point being is that third person only for everything is better in the long run.
i bet some idiots wouldn't want change bc it comes at the cost of first person and autoclicker combat in a third person focused sequel.
You'd know the answer if you did a cursory google search, or checked the Steam page in the pins
But my apologies, I'm just used to large groups of trolls showing up all at once lately
Just asking a question don’t need to be mean 🥲
🍻
ark players am i right? ☕ 
I'm sorry to ask this but is the release date known by any chance?
First off: Nobody knows information, it's been on a TBA status for a while now, and the roadmap reveal is coming soon and also- May I remind people here by the first Ruleset section 1, 2 and 5 ? Thank you very much! 🙂
still just 2023, we might know something more specific with the roadmap being shared on march 31st
Why stupid? I refer to information given on Youtube.
We've known since last June that it is 3rd person only.
Oh. I admit, i just learned it now, through that video.
Yeah, and you also circumvented the filter, hence the rule being broken in question
is that not an incredible loss, if 1st-personn-view is gone?
Not really, no
You should watch my videos then! 🤣 (yes selfish plug 😝 )
If nothing has been shown it’s a bad sign that it’s either not close to being finished or they don’t want to show it I have high hopes but still worried without footage
Oh look, its this exact conversation again
I just arrive my bad if this just happened
Hmmmm, I don't know. For me, it is the First-Person-View that let's me imerge into the virtual world.
Same
third person can also be immersive if done right, not every game has to be super immersive
Honestly, I would love to see what the third person can offer, first person got me spoiled with hit detection alot so I welcome all change at this point 🤣
Bluebyte's "The Settlers" ("Die Siedler") is 3rd-Person-View, but that is not really exciting.
I think, I will stick to Ark 1.
True but nothing to prove it will be
There's plenty of games that prove this, you have but to look with your eyes and a source of internet access and you'll find them 😅
what
RDR2, Mass Effect series, State of Decay, etc etc
how can you compare die siedler to ark!??!?!
Yes but I’m talking ark not anything else ark
That's... a rather shallow way to think, but ok
I want, that it is "me" to walk around in those virtual worlds. Not just a game character. If you understand, what I mean. I wonder, what caused the problems that forced the developers to abandon the great immersive 1st-person-view. and even delay any real gameplay previews.
How? Thrd-person-view. 😄
Try playing a souls-like in first person and lemme know how that works for you
I'd like to believe the reason is "ShooterGame" but that might just be me being used to being able to 360 noscope and actually hit something 👀
I really want to have high hopes but with the combat and only 3rd person it just worries me how we haven’t seen anything
And still, 3rd person view...
Like 20 years ago, as you self say.
Welp, I'm out for the evening, peace
"Souls-like First Person" yes I've seen that 🤣 doesn't work, causes massive inertia
that is not even 3rd person its just top down view
same with the new player traversal mechanics
Fax
You do know Ark2 is advertised as souls-like, right?
So thats the reason there isn't going to be first person
Well, I don't want to talk against Ark 2. All I say, is that I self won't go anymore for Ark 2. I will stick to Ark 1.
thats like saying ark 2 is gonna be like the game barbie puppy rescue cause it only got 3rd person aswell
Yes and most people don’t like the idea of that with nothing to prove it’ll be good they will continue to be worried
like huh?
I am not a soul, but a player who wants to be immersed into a virtual world.
I’m torn between this being trolling or not
Does everyone know that all mounted ark 1 play is by default in third person? We all agree that’s pretty standard?
No this is not trolling just worried for the game
I don't want autharitans feeling uncomfortable by my critical opinion, therefore I am leaving this channel. 🙂
yes
Same when it’s released in 2040 they’ll see bye guys have a good day 😀
Me: is stunned by a comparison between apples and nuclear firearms
Chatter: I don’t want to make people uncomfortable with my take
My man the issue is that I don’t know how the comparison is drawn to begin a discussion lmao
And nothing of value was lost
me when 2 people i dont know leave the chat : 
I don’t mind new chatters…but the burden of legitimacy lies with the person who posts the hot take lol
Remember, its not the people we've met lost, its about the clinks we've made along the way
this is a new lvl of stupid or low
Ok, so they were in on it together then, that's what that last quip spells out for me
Why so often must we deal with trolls? I just wanna discuss potential design mechanics 🥲
this is sadly the reality of the ark community and their sub-divisions
Me reading chat: 
Me seeing your reactions: 
I am surprised how y’all are so shocked
Spend a day in #general you will be shockproof until the day you die
Lifetime shock immunity id worth it
General is full of troglodytes
Idiots are transient, doom (and shock immunity) is eternal
General chat in most any discord is a death sentence
Woe be unto ye who walk there, etc etc.
The general chat in my discord would probably make half the people in this discord rage like a mf
I did say most, ones with just a few close friends are usually ok
get back to topic before Countrybee uses threatening peek again
I got ringworm on my leg today #ringwormsforark2
Understandable winks heavily at several chatters
OH SHI- uhhhhhh Ark 2 should have bioluminescent bodypaint that you can gather as algae in certain lakes
WHEW, there we go
Normally I wouldn’t say this, but…

You do not recognize the bodies in the water
Wait I misread that as putting on paint and pretending to be algae lmao
Mammal reveals for ARK II when
we have humans what do you mean
Pass
Never mammals < dinosaurs
didnt we see an equus skeleton in the araneo picture
or we still not sure what it could be

Inferior creatures
tbh mammals always ugly
Except the bat because that things op
pls no non story map creatures

no griffins no bats no nothingd
Cause the devs decided to put a FAT ASS box for its pick hitbox
deinonychus is ok cause its dinosaur
I wouldn’t mind a balanced Andrew and Demsodus tbh
I don't want fliers that pick shit
Desmodus shouldn’t be able to carry anything bigger than a Lystro
That too for a few minutes at best
Pt can pick an enforcer btw
You’re thinking of balance, that is not my point
I agree the balance sucks
Speaking purely from a design and creature variety standpoint
Picking things is boring from a gameplay perspective anyways
Me daily
I escaped general and never looked back. Sounds like I was lucky
That's why I eyed the statement, was very unintentionally worrying without further context lmao
You are indeed shockproof, my ground type friend 🫡
Oh snap, thank goodness
You would’ve become more shockproof, “evolved” one may say, if you’d never left
If I change my pfp to Vibrava you know I’ve lost my way
What about flygon?
Maybe one day you’ll be as shockproof as your great grandfather
He has to earn that one
Flygon is only his grandfather
Imagine skipping Vibrava. That’s like me saying I’m gonna be a solo alpha tribe with no tames or turrets. It’s blasphemy, it’s impossible, and it’s lunacy
His great grandfather was so good nobody exactly knows how he looks
🍿
I’m getting popcorn for when Fox’s wild takes come, hold on one moment
Alright
🍿
Let’s hear it fox
Any announcements lately?
There's the announcements tab, but I don't know if I'd say that was created very recently
🍻
Same nobody can break the love for that map
She was definitely shown off pre-release, iirc it was during ExtraLife of the preceding year
Mhm yeah hate that as well
Here's hoping that they take the opportunity to fix it with the UE5 update! 🙏🤞
(And that something comes up, causing them to have to wipe official MWAHAHA
)
almost like every other story dlc either had no ocean or didn't focus more on water like gen 1 
Ab technically had the most water as a DLC until Gen1.
Scorched was a desert, and theres not much water in Ex
ocean my bad
out of the 6 story maps only half had oceans, and only gen 1 had new underwater tames, a underwater boss and bigger focus on ocean itself, same goes for the other biomes in gen 1.
What point are you making?
Its true Gen1 had the most additions/improvements to aquatic gameplay, none of the other DLCs added anywhere remotely close to the oceanic additions Gen1 brought. He never said Gen1 is only oceans, just its the best example of a map with oceans as a major focus (being its own biome) instead of an lesser biome/afterthought
Thats a personal opinion, people are allowed to have those
And I agree - If oceans in Ark2's release are going to be like the Island's poor excuse for aquatic content, I'd much rather they leave it to a DLC with an actual ocean focus
🍿
What statement my guy? Its literally just personal opinions? 😂
You have an opinion, I have a differing one - what else is there to get?
Gen 1 has some strong points, but you know the major negative?
Let me spell it out
Lack. Of. Biome. Connections.
I'm not saying your wrong, no one is wrong when it comes to their own opinions
Implement that and your great land/water transition is destroyed
The inherent problem with water in video games is that when people think ocean, they think, mighty, blue, vast. Unfortunately due to memory and size limitations such a replica is not possible. Therefore the only way to do a proper ocean is in an isolated environment, where your whole map can simulate this, somewhat
I feel this is the reason many are asking for Oceans in a DLC
Look at all good ocean games, Subnautica, your favourite Gen1 Ocean, all are isolated oceanic maps
It gives a much fuller effect than contributing 10% of your map area into a steeply falling unreal ocean
this ended whit UE5
Not even UE69 can remove device limitations
Not everyone has sweaty 128 GB RAM gaming rigs
16 GB is only so much memory
but just made it possible to have bigger environments whit way less requirements
Not big enough, maybe make the 10% to 20%
lol ok
Ocean is already the biggest real life biome
I'm not disagreeing that the Devs can make land and oceans well fleshed out in one map, but if they make it like the Island's poor excuse of an ocean then I'd rather forgo it entirely for a dedicated/focused DLC
Which I already addressed and stated here 😂
dude just get in your head, ppl want to spend more money on stuff that should be on the original product
Your point has been addressed and I shared my opinion about what I would like to see - what more do you want? 😂
Likewise, for complaining no one is 'getting your point', despite it being addressed repeatedly
Lets all just move on and get back to the real important stuff, like clinking
Not a clink, no longer interested 
The Gen 1 ocean is also far smaller than the other oceans and reuses a TON of existing ark 1 assets and mechanics. Nobody reinvented the wheel making genesis 1 oceans. In fact the success may be related to the fact that it came out years into ark’s life
Thank you for highlighting the #oceanDLC talking point 
Most of that knowledge sounds like it will NOT translate. Namely the combat system and the way events work (/the events themselves)
I’d say that alone is sufficient reasoning to suspect an ark 2 ocean will resemble ark 1 island ocean quality in terms of how lacking it would be compared to terrestrial gameplay
They’re substantially raising the bar lol. Their skill increased AND their ambition
They were stretching their ability to make the island seven years ago and seem to be doing that again for ark 2
Right, and they scaled up the project massively to match that
I would say it’s a loony take to argue ark 2 is a “safe” project: it seems just as ambitious as ark 1 was in 2015 when it came out. While that seems to be a WC approach that I take no issue with, it does mean that I’d rather they focus on their core gameplay (terrestrial) and then dedicate the time needed to make a clean, well built ocean DLC, rather than force it in at the last second before launch
Why? They made a new map and called it scorched earth and sold it for money
They could release DLC as added pieces to the large ark 2 map or as separate maps and it would be the same functional thing in terms of new content
And ofc given we’ve seen zero mention of aquatic combat, creatures, or mechanics…I’m just not so sure it’s being developed in parallel to the terrestrial combat and event mechanics
Right, so they made a paid DLC model. You think they won’t do that for ark 2? It makes sense to have a paid dlc model if you’re going to make huge content drops like ark 1 again
If they expand the map to include a massive ocean…I see that as identical to adding a new map
Just make sure it isn’t an actual ingame physical pay wall lol since that’s horrible design
Well hold on, ark 1 in UE5 is an entirely different prospect. That stuff has already been designed and built, it just needs to be recoded
Ok so if you want to change topics to ark 1 UE5 sure. But I doubt they’ll release that in pieces
I’m guessing it’ll be one big ue5 launch for the whole game
It is. You’re assuming oceans are intrinsic to ark 2, and I am not
False equivalency imo? One is an update to an existing game, and one is an entire branch of new content for a new game nobody has yet paid for
It’s like saying charging a fee to get optimization updates = aberration so it’s ok (or vice versa)
…uh that’s a pretty wild take
???
That’s like saying the genesis missions should be free because it’s a new function they pushed back because they weren’t able to add that complexity to the island
Did the game advertise FREE OCEANS WITH PURCHASE? i don’t think so
I’m asking oceans to come later because asking for them now is imo likely to be asking for a pile of garbage
Or it comes at the expense of terrestrial gameplay (the even worse outcome)
No1 mentioned making it a paid DLC?
Just it’s own separate map or equivalently sized area
I did lol. But to his example, it would be like the entire map of rag coming out as a paid DLC and offering exclusively new content
IE, like every other ark 1 paid dlc
Wouldnt underwater combat be very similar to aerial combat? Pts are already confirmed
You’re assuming again the ocean is intrinsic to ark - which is an assumption
It’s not half the map not being done…the entire ark 2 map would come out at launch and it simply wouldn’t have an ocean
The new DLC would therefore be a NEW place to explore that comes out later, when WC has had more time to develop new mechanics and features
Probably not: since my suspicion is that air combat won’t have the same “all levels” environment and level design as an ocean. Events also likely wouldn’t have to be made explicitly for the skybox
As long as you recognize that’s a personal opinion and not a fact, that’s fine
They would just need to make some tweeks to the aerial combat and use it as underwater combat
Wdym by all levels? Altitude?
I explicitly state my assumptions…I feel like I’ve had to dig up yours my man
The skybox for fliers generally is pretty close to the ground - only the quetz in ark 1 really occupies the high skybox. So it’s way easier to design. That and ofc the sky is (assuming similar to ark 1) empty unlike an ocean
Yes? It’s all been about my argument in favor of a specific design approach. Since I’m not WC and can’t speak for them
You implicitly have assumed oceans are a default to ark and ark 2…which has resulted in the appearance of an argument that reads “I’m entitled to an ocean on launch”. I disagreed with that premise and thus pushed for #oceanDLC
Even if the skybox limit is 5 meters off the ground, you still have to deal with altitude. And, if by empty you mean no obstacles, we could have very tall trees or mountains, or a flat ocean floor
oceans are a little cringe
its hard to implement a fun biome that has to be massive but cant be utilized without leaving it constantly
you need more underwater caves
small ones even, little ledges or whatever
just more places to go afk in
Empty in this case means no scenery that’s explicitly tied to the skybox. Your tree example is a grounded asset and the mountain is a terrain feature. Obviously they interact with flyers, but it’s not quite like the ocean
then you can justify making an ocean resource cycle that can be independent from land
and then you finally have a cool ocean imo
atm oceans are just a pearl and drop source
and some few good base spots
nvm, oceans are more or less comparable to current land bases
since even land bases require insane overhead now
So how is the ocean "not empty" in this case?
though at this point youre interacting with the game as a whole and have bigger issues than the ocean being fun or not. Game stopped being fun at this level of consideration
biomes dont even matter much in ark besides as thematic guidelines to implement bases
Immersion and creature variery
You need spawn zones at different elevations, different events and resources that spawn throughout those Z coordinates, possibly a way to force creatures to maintain a specific depth in order to maintain immersion, and a means to handle entirely seaborne combat (for example, in the air when your player is dismounted, they act identically to a player who jumped off a cliff rather than in an entirely new way)
arks immersion is either decent or nonexistent depending on the context of gameplay
arks got no immersion as far as multiplayer is concerned
not including dedicated worlds
and maybe certain specially modded experiences with highly regulated multiplayer
My point is that theres no need to reinvent the combat mechanics as air combat will likely be very similar. All those other things arent that complex and arent a sentence to "garbage ocean" or neglected ground mechanics
You definitely would need to reinvent combat mechanics to meet the “souls combat”
My assumption is air combat requires a mount - aquatic combat does not. So you couldn’t reuse that piece
From scartch yes, but underwater combat will likely be very similar to aerial combat, which is sorta confirmed by the presence of pts
do any soulslike games have 3d player combat
seems like all of them are ground combat usually
I dont think two bobs will be able to fight properly enough underwater for it to have a separate combat system
I don’t know enough about the combat system to get to that level of detail
likely that the game is gonna be primarily tame based combat still
perhaps smaller dinos and players get their abilities upscaled to be more relevant so as to justify new combat mechanic implementation
Humans arent agile underwater, so my assumpion is that we will only be able to lock onto the target and maybe do a short combo of basic attacks. No dodges, parries or anything like that
Sure, but even that would have to need an entirely new set of animations and behaviors
Since again in the air…you’re falling but it’s basically whatever you’d already need to make for ground combat
Mounted combat, sure. But we're talking about player skill based combat in a (almost) zero G environment, which is wildly different
Think Gen 2 space biome, but you have to implement a form (or lack thereof) of dodge, different attack styles, what weapons can even be used, etc.
just tie a rock onto your feet to do a dodge underwater, easy fix 
I dont think unmounted humans have enough underwater mobility to deserce a complex combat system like the mounted one
Now I want to be able to mafia people and tie rocks to their legs and dump them in deep lakes
Thanks for the mental image 
Id just make it like current underwater ark 1 unmounted combat
blame lotus for part of my current mindset 
I’m not sure you could DO that given it looks like new weapon types are being added and they may behave entirely different from ark 1 weapons
Well, then what the hell do you do when you're underwater with no mount? These are pretty important mechanics that you're suggesting are just... simply thrown away with reckless abandon 😂
Well I concede we may define “garbage” differently
What Miettinen suggests would certainly work for a janky early access ocean…but that’s precisely what I’m trying to avoid lol
And it’s quite possible janky is preferred to nothing for many folks…but my fear is that it’ll be built janky and remain janky because people get used to it
Dont go underwater with no mount? We cant even throw a proper punch underwater, how are we gonna dodge, stagger, parry or do decent combos?
Yeah, aka the whole point of contention here lol
Then how do we tame underwater creatures, or defend ourselves when our mount dies? We just have to suck it up, and not tame anything down there, making the ocean (functionally) useless? I thought that's what we were trying to solve...
Im not talking about the entirety of ocean mechanics, im just saying that its not such big of a future project to make an ocean dlc as you say
Well, then how do we solve the issue at hand? Also I'll be back in like an hour
My guess is an early passive tame like the dolphin. Oceans should high risk high reward, so if your tame dies, there shouldt be much left to do
Stay away from dangerous areas and come well prepared
I like the new stuff it brought, I like the rock drake. Also I think the rockwell ascension mechanics were relly nice back then. But I hate how annoying it is to navigate through it, the fact it has no obelisks (easily accessible), the nameless... etc
I'm not saying it's impossible to live there, it's actually pretty easy, like on any other map, once you get settled, but it's annoying to start there. Just to do simple things.
Extinction I hate because it made elements too easy to get.
the suggestions others give above would make aberration more friendly to the begginers. Like I've said, I went there by mistake (you know when you are changing maps and the game selects another map?!) and I wasn't ready to get out of there. It was annoying just to get out. LOL
To be clear - I agree an ocean can come out with the initial ark 2 launch. But I’ll be sorely dissatisfied with it unless it has a suite of features that I’m not sure can be developed outside the scope of a DLC. It has the potential to be an entirely new sphere of content. Or it could be as flat and mechanically behind as most of ark 1’s oceans
Can you enumarete what you would want?
I think I have? Unless you missed one of the chats. But I feel like you were there
I probably did
today?
No, some time ago
This isn’t a new topic - I’ve been in favor of a deep dive into improved ocean for a long time
I don't remeber. I just remember you saying you would like an ocean DLC, but I don't remember you say what you would want.
I hate to talk so much about it in here, but Atlas did that
it even has a submarine
but it came on a big update
Atlas by definition needed a janky ocean to start - since a pirate game needs an ocean lol. Ark 2 has no such requirement
Did you ever used the dev kit?
I’ve seen it, but the kit broke my computer
I never, but I heard people saying Arat is an Archipelago planet
If the map is really massive and the planet an archipelago, I guess it will have an ocean
It’s very plausible we get oceans, and it would be a misrepresentation of my argument to say I don’t expect or desire them
Sure, I've even rephrased what I want
I don't even need an ocean, if they give us a huge lagoon with aquatic beasts, I would be happy 😂
Yea you’ll see in the older conversations, and maybe where I DM’d you, that I’m talking in similar terms
I mean, under all those floating islands they can just put a huge lagoon with waterfalls
i even suggested letting the diplocaulus return for waterway and lake/lagoon exploration, that way it has a use in a primarily primitive setting.
"i even suggested " love this part, it crack me up in tears 🤣
Is release date still 2023 ish?
Trust me you’ll see this chat go bonkers if anything new came out about the release date
ark 2 should have mantleing and sliding for better movement for the players
also no pay to play dlcs
I'll agree on the first.
But hell no on the latter
ho her think they need to make the ark rd map look like a tree
that's already confirmed, in this fun trustworthy thing called the store page
Advanced character traversal mechanics like mantling, free-climbing, parkour, sliding, and swinging!
YAY
looking at the steam page can answer some questions you could potentially want to ask later on.
yes, for now it's still just 2023. but we could potentially know a more exact date/release window with the ark franchise roadmap being shared on March 31st
there one questions it cant tell us and it is do we no if flobs a boss and wan is the game coming out
if we have a library arena i could be a boss, seeing as i mainly refer people to sources of knowledge 
sow the boss of knowledge in ark 2 good name for you lol
i can see it now players coming to you for news in side ark 2 boss fight lol
you kill them with the knowledge power
Continuing with the ocean rant, your previous talks about ocean mainly focus on having reefs or shallow sea. I want actual deep sea. If ark2 is on an archeapelago, then having a reef extending down the island drop-off is fun, but would have to be there on launch. I want the actual deep sea expanse. Just an endless amount of very deep water, with the ability to make sailing ships. While I am in favor of an ocean dlc after launch (adding new creatures ships and maybe biomes underwater) I believe that there has to be a big ocean on launch first
I'd prefer it if the ocean was filled with spoons
Bc it would make it easier to drink
If they use Ue5.2 for procedurally generating terrain, I don't think it is unreasonable to ask for a big ocean at the start
i say they need to have salt water just like are world dos
I mean, rivers flowing into salt water giving it an irl look with the colors mixing could be epic
lets start with realistic rivers first, that actually have a starting point and actually flow
I don't know how fluids work in ue5 yet lol
I fully agree son
I mean, they said that rivers will flow
not the the island " im a river that goes into 2 directions with no source " typa river
Rivers better would be awesome, a better ocean would be absolutely amazing
If every river is like the canoe race, then it'll actually make using a canoe fun
What's a canoe?

Flabs is here
I want to see either European style ships, or even better Polynesian style boats for sailing the sea
i just want to be able to make a Polynesian spa
Flobs do you like ark?
I don't know what that is, the image it brings to mind is a pineapple in water, but I am betting that isn't right

look it up Raq
atm the closest you can get is building on those hot springs on rag
I don't see how you can make one though, it would have to be a hand built poi
a pool is a start already
Sulfur flats on ext lol
Those are geothermal
sometimes i forget extinction has them, as the only real thing you'd try to go there for are OSD's and like 2 element vein spawns
That's about all ext is good for tbh
row row your bout down the water fall you die lol
Game coming out next year
Lots of games coming out next year. I bet there will be more than 3.
or just one big game all are in side it lol
🍻
2023ish? 2023 give or take a few years
Yeah, we all know, if they don't release today, it 100% means it's not releasing before 2033. 
Not usable
i cant think why the new planet (do we have a name)
becuase unless we brign it in the ship, or an asterold hit it like one hit earth
You don't know that
It's the most talked about topic in this channel other than tp only
Because that is what the devs said
They said it's going to be more primitive
But to have element be such a big part of ark 1 and then just discard it and have it play no role in ark 2 would be kind of odd in my opinion. But neither of us can say with certainty what role element will play in the game.
The devs said it element (and maybe tek) would be sinister and dangerous
Jesse confirmed tek is staying (which in turn means Element) within environments.
Doesnt mean tek will be like ark one though
Will definitely still be the best tier though
I dont mind the idea of tek but the budget halo stuff was mid as hell
Design wise the scrappy tek on the rex saddle is far more appealing to me
Hopefully cryos don't exist
hard to say...but it did look that way from the concept art
Honestly hoping its like primitive plus 🤣🤣
False, they said no tek tier of usable items, not no usable Element
Remind me how you have usable element, but no usable tek?
You can use Element to tame/transform the Ferox, no? No reason there wouldn't be other organic consumers of Element out there, or other things than just tek that use it to do things
Element could also be used for very primitive gear, if melted. 
Basically, a non-functioning tek-tier.
That's... not Element, at that point. Also, how would we melt it if we know the boiling point is far higher than most metals we can acquire? Unless of course it's a very poor alloy I suppose, but tek is always touted as space age metal lol
Lava.
You don't melt things by boiling them though...
Technically, the melting point 'is' also a boiling point
As if you melt iron for long enough, it will start to bubble.
Iron melts at 1510c, and boils at 2861c...
Melting point, boiling point, same difference
You get what I was saying either way
It's actually not, that's why it's a different word
"In a technical sense, they're actually very different. But since you fuck with me Bruise, I'll fuck back"
Yeah, but I have to be a stick in the mud
I know
Apt description 😂😂
I just realized how bad that last part sounds. 
Welp, not going to edit it and have it as a mark-of-shame.
Tbf, using that word always sounds bad
Well fuck, you're fucking right about me saying fuck in a wrong fucking bad way.
Hang on, what's my fuck count at.
YOOO!!!
4,442 results!!
Way too high for a healthy normal person
What if you reach it?
Good thing I'm not healthy, nor normal. 🗿
Then I will accept bans
That's the thing with bans, you don't really get to accept them or not lol, they just happen
Don't you know?
If you say 'no' to being banned. They can't legally ban you.
That....
It's like killing.
Someone can't legally kill you if you say 'no'
"Say 'no' to murderers!" -Spartan073003. 👍
👀
🍿
Don’t pop so much someday something you don’t want popped will get popped

when is ark 2 coming?
Simply put: To Be Announced
But assumptions are either late this year or somewhere around next year
atm just 2023, we might have something more specific with the ark franchise roadmap being shared on March 31st
🍻
2024
2026
Probably
(Fun fact: No one knows.)
The roadmap will make everything clear
🍻
Only 5 more days until we know more (or not).
I'm predicting release window for Ark1 UE5, Platform and date for Animated Series, and updated release window for Ark2, along with some more concept arts
And announcement of Ark: The Boardgame
The first 3 are practically guaranteed items. The last one came out of nowhere. ARK Boardgame? What?
Ark Xcom pls
2035 
Imagine what cinda games exist in that year 😳
That might be the end of ark2 and we get a ark3
😳
ark tower defense when
Wait, you haven't played the hit tower defense game, Ark: Survival Evolved?
(Specifically PvP mode, but)
(Also I dare you to argue that PvP isn't just basically a tower defense game mode at higher levels, change my mind)
nah, sounds lame
not enough darts
it can also be cave defense game 
Ah yes, a fellow BTD enjoyer, welcome
Bloons when they hear about pop culture: 
monkey when darts :
Very nice (totally original) take that has never been stated before and is totally not going purely for absurdist, generalist shock value
GG I guess
we both know they're gonna play Ark 2, unless they're still on old hardware or playstation 🤣
or they're just so in love with outdated stuff from Ark 1 and don't want a more quality experience
I’ll be on ark 2 lol
Same, I can only play the same thing so long, I love Ark 1 to bits but everyone in my community is getting a little bored with it
and as far as we know Ark 1 UE5 is just gonna be a engine and texture update, nothing new and the same old shit but prettier
Yeah. We will be getting a bit more playability in that regard, and also the rhyniognatha when it makes it's way to us
But I think those will just barely tide us over, like the carcharo did
every time i tried feeding it corpses and was almost done with stage 1 it would get brainworms and run away

Sadge, git gud I guess 
the ai was trolling me ngl
Still need to make that clip for Mazzy, maybe I'll tag you when I upload it too 
In that case, you can stick to this channel #ark-survival-ascended 👍
to the player ho say they will not die in ark 2 you are lying we will all die
can't die if you never spawn in though 🧠
“You can’t die if you don’t live” - Bob, The
i'm not convinced this game will ever be released/finished
Me either
It promises so much great amd changing stuff
I just hope it goes alright when it‘s released. Really looking forward
Ik bro I'm really ready to play it
This game will def be finished eventually
I think the roadmap will “draw a line in the sand” so to speak
Ark 2 sounds genre defining if they actually do that stuff well
Which was kind of ark 1’s curse, iconic idea, subpar execution
The ai might be what makes or breaks it for me
I think it could define 'a' genre, but generally I don't think they'd be able to pull of 'reinvent the survival genre'
They confirmed that the survival aspects aren't being expanded on as much.
Which.....then how do you expect to reinvent the genre, when the mechanics aren't even going to be much like said genre?
I could see it redefining possibly souls-like games, or the standard for AI's in video-games.
But I don't see the survival part
At its best itll be a better monster hunter
Well, you still survive against the dinos, right? And it's still the primary genre of the game (I think), survival-craft
If they reinvent any aspect of the game, they could claim as such and have it be technically true
Ark had enough survival aspects to be sort of filling
Basic but not the focus
Focusing in the combat and dinosaurs themselves is def the best route
I kind of like how ATLAS is doing their vitamin system now, and I kind of wish ARK-2 would implement it.
Basically, instead of annoyingly killing you, which makes it kind of a pointless system. (then refilling once you respawn) it'll give you debuffs, or buffs, depending on how well you treat yourself.
And these effects will pass on onto your next life, so you don't lose the debuffs or buffs from them.
As long as they can improve upon the man vs beast trope it can be pretty good
something about extreme pve is just captivating
Why early game ark is the fun part of the game
And why far cry primal felt much better than it actually was
Oh, I agree.
I don't doubt ARK-2 wont succeed in the captivating part.
I just don't think it'll be as 'reinventive' as they want with the survival aspects
I never mentioned survival aspects
just what they list on their steam page is defining
I guess i said genre defining but i think thats vague
because ark just kinda exists inbetween
Yeah, when you said 'genre defining' I thought you where talking about how they're marketing the game to be 'reinventive to the survival genre'
I mean in terms of the ai animals it does IF they actually can pull it off
Yeah, that's what I meant as well
One flaw most of the games has but isnt really a clear issue is that the ai will break eventually lol
Also, yeah, Ark do kinda be one of the survival/farmsim/RPG/MMO/FPS/RTS/PVP/PVE/etc. games of all time lmao
Forgot to add farming, actually
And survival
Eh, not interiorly.
If they have a system in-place for ARK-2 that wipes the creatures from maps regularly, then that would keep their AI fresh from breaking.
Fixed it
Most games especially ark have those impactful moments because man vs beast. But they die once you see how predictable it can be
Same applies for any game even the new forest game,
ARK-1's issue is that they only have wild-creature wipes whenever a event is starting up.
They wipe all wild-dino's then new event colors can spawn
Wipes was not what i was mainly referring too but sure
You said the AI will eventually break, no?
Breaking i should say, i mean bugs, simplistic, no charm
Ahh, I thought you meant like the AI starting to break after X-amount of time of existing.
Yeah, that's what I was talking about wipes
Wild-creature wipes is one solution that helps this issue.
He means moreso players finding a way to "break" the AI, more or less, I think
Is ark going to be released on April or May
OOOOOH!!
yeah
Is ark going to be released on April or May
We don't know
Alr
Also the ai behavior once you stop and actually pay attention doesnt feel like its trying to be alive
Ark 2 sounds way more promising in that regard
I have no doubt we'll see stuff like that in Ark 2, 100%
Imagine they say they added an anti cheat and 10 seconds later a Chinese dude already has everything learnt and finished the game
anti cheat notoriously has work arounds
ARK-1's AI are the most basic of the basic for a game.
If a game is poorly made theyll be a way
True
Ik and for its staple being dinosaurs when you care to invest your time into it loses soul
Not only self preservation, but pack mentality, and possibly even deeper things like mutual respect, truces during hard times to benefit both creatures, etc.
Their behaviors are 'walk for 5-10 seconds, stop, find new spot and walk again' until they see you, then it's 'see's player, walk towards player, attack player, if player is not seen for x-amount of time, continue wander.'
But I may be thinking a bit too far ahead of myself, here 😅
Far cry primal has the best animal jumpscares though
I need some of that, also its confrontation animations i need too
animals that actually fight instead of sticking their heads into eachother until one dies
said every dinosaur game ever
so baffling every dinosaur game cannot escape having the most simplistic attack systems to date in the modern age xd
I mean, there's some out there that are better, just gotta look for em
You go looking intentionally for garbage, you're gonna find garbage lol
i mean my highschool life was playing the dinosaur games i found most of them
ark had a variety so it wasnt as bad
and also i wasnt forced to be a dinosaur for hours like others
Favorite game where you play as the monster ever was evolve
but then i just started playing actual real mainstream games and everything was fine
open world games are still my favorite with red dead, skyrim, and far cry primal being the top
Far cry primal i like because of its aesthetics, in the end it it a copy and paste as always because ubisoft
Ark 2 i want to be good because on paper sounds like something never really been done before
Hell, Ark 1 was basically what I wanted from a current Turok game, more dinosaurs, less dino men 😂
But yeah, Evolve is great, sad it had such a poor post-launch support plan
I'm depressed no new Turok game is out
Last one we got was shit.
Classic Turok is literally proto-ARK.
Tribal-man fighting against both dinosaurs and aliens.
I'm depressed that the last good one you can only get as an emulation of a gamecube version with 0 upscaling or texture/mechanical fixes
Me when we literally cant get any new dino media thats actually enjoyable since at least jurassic park 3 (even then)
Oh wait no nvm primal exists
i lied
I guess i define something as being able to be enjoyed for most of its existence
So is it safe to say that Ark 2 will be better optimized then Ark 1, therefore being "easier to run?" Ik a lot of newer games are more demanding but ark 1 was already at that standard, so if Ark 2 is better, will it be overall smoother?
We have no idea
hm ok, and on another note, what actually makes ark 1 so laggy? like everyone says it is unoptimized but How??
giant bases make things laggy
i play single
In short, the game's coding was intended for a much, much smaller game then it is today. And by adding update to update onto it, it keeps straining it. (also official servers are run by Nitrado, which just naturally have shitty servers)
They had intentions to go back and revamp the coding, but this was halted due to a lawsuit.
and i dont think that necessarily has anything to do with it until u use that variable
Andddd thats why the base game is actually decent and all the dlcs make it annoyingly large right
that's disk space, not lag though
That's due to poor compression.
Still fits under the "unoptimized" category imo
You're not wrong
I mean yea, no run of the mill system is gonna run it perfectly but i feel that if it was optimized Ark 1 would be much more popular
so is it just poor coding in general?
Yeah, more or less.
A team that never expected the game to get this large, and the biggest game they worked on before was a tower-defense game.
Basically.
i mean isnt it kinda true that ark will make even a 3090 lag sometimes
Eh, I have a 3060 and I'm fine.
i have a 3050 Ti but its on a laptop. still very smooth even with mods
not a big stickler on quality so i mean i run it on medium with some settings edited
This game better not be $70 with a battle pass
🍻
Ark will charge random maps for it for 20 pounds each
U seen how expensive the maps are on ark1?
Price, ghost soap and farah, all dem for 50 pounds.... Activision is losing it tbh
I think its 74 pounds when not in offer
They've been losing it.
A video-game shouldn't be 70$ USD.
I barely believe a game should be 60$ USD, but I'll accept it if it's the launch price, and it'll go down
You know fucking Black-Ops 2 is still 60$ USD on steam?
Cod is 2 and half star rated, maybe cuz they charge ridiculous amounts for stuff that can be easily obtained
Activision needs to go back and check their xbox 360.cods.... as those were more successful then the cods they are releasing
Black-Ops 2 is a decade old game.
No 10+ year old game should be 60$ USD, unless it's a remake.
Sadly, that's incorrect financially.
😔
Newer CoD's have made more money then their old ones.
They care about money rather than entertainment
Just got an email saying steam is being sued for exact thing. Big class action lawsuit
That is literally every AAA-studio
Ikr😂
Where?
Hang on I’ll ss
Deadass Activision make more money than nfts
And that'd be Activisions fault, not steams.
Activision is the one that put on the pricing.
Seeing how NFT's don't make much money, that's not saying much
Won't be surprised if they drive bugattis
True true
Tbh Activision is a joke
Despite the hate their game is still very popular somehow
Couldn’t find the email I got. But I think this was one of the websites. The link I had was for this year not sure which this is
If steam was being sued, it'd be all over the place on the internet.
I had it on fb and tic tok popping up so wasn’t sure. I sent you the link you can check it up see if it’s legit
You haven't
That’s how I found it I didn’t randomly come up with that
No, I mean you haven't sent a link
Wait, yes you have
I fucking hate this new Discord system that I don't see a number on my tab.
Dmd you I’ll send you the video I seen too
Could be fake I’ve just been seeing it
Could be a scam to get accounts too 👀
Yeah, honestly I think that's more likely
I wouldn’t say that, but it’s certainly dated. For 2015’s standard the AI was pretty compelling
But I agree with the Pax take WC had: ark 1 is a massive prototype. So I’m extremely curious what can be built upon design wise for the next title
When we first released ARK: Survival Evolved in 2015, we had no idea how big it would eventually become. It was beyond our wildest expectations that 7 years later we’d be developing an eons-spanning narrative across multiple games, a TV series, and starring none other than Vin Diesel as key ARK hero Santiago. And yet here we are, together with our wonderful players who have stuck with the ARK universe through thick (RAGNAROK!!) and thin (FLYER NERF??), now having a canvas far bigger than ever before. That’s what ARK 2 is – the biggest canvas ever for primal survival experiences, a next-generation framework to play out your own survival stories.
Put simply: with ARK 2, our goal is to make the game that we all wanted ARK 1 to be – now that we’ve had the time, resources, and knowledge to do it right. So in 2023 on Xbox & PC Game Pass, we’ll look forward to seeing you all in this new world of primeval creatures and legendary heroes. Just keep an eye out for Vin – he likes to play on his Series X more than you might expect, and his skill at wrangling a Giga is unequaled…
Flobs memorized the whole founders note at this point
because of how many times he had to post it here
i got this shit on standby copy paste mode, and most of the stuff i could write down based off memory. but hey, pasting it in here is faster.
because Vin Diesal have family and which is Giga dont have it lol
It doesn't get more basic than ARK AI, sorry. Wander around aimlessly, neutral or always aggressive, fight until you die(only updated and added to certain creatures), run into/fly over water if being tranq'd. What else is there? It really does not get more basic 😂
Ye
even in 2015
Some wii games had better ai
Which for ark 1 is an issue but the game had a lot to do (its just how you did it was the fun part) so its overlooked
i just hope we get some nice 3rd person animations
for ark 2
and npcs
for story/immersion
we already know we're gonna have hostile npc's with the Aratai (orc looking humanoids) that will act as the hostile PvE force wich alongside the creatures they will use. Whether or not there will be friendly npc people besides Santiago and his daughter we do not know yet
Hostile 'Aratai' hunt & attack you riding their own tamed creatures, as they seek to drive human interlopers from their world.
we might know a more specific release window and more with the ark franchise roadmap being shared on March 31st (this friday)
The truth is just around the corner
Ark creatures had an aggro category (for example wild raptors don’t target wild rex), they currently attempt to seek a valid path to their targets rather than plot a straight line, they stay in pack formations with reasonable accuracy, some apply their buffs (easiest example is wolves) before combat, etc. I’m not saying it’s ground breaking, but it’s not like it’s the bare minimum
In 2015 I can’t really name a survival game with better creature AI that wasn’t either a sim or had like 3 creatures, with the exception of subnautica (which has a small number of unique and robust AI behaviors, but also has the sort of “group AI” that ark uses for aggressive, neutral, and passive)
Maybe the forest? But I’ve never really seen them interact with non player characters
scroll down to the founders note portion
Its a random walk into a mediocre pathfinding on an event call, it's not that impressive in ark1 tbh
It's better than Conan though
No omnipresent radar -- animals now track and hunt by sight, sound, and smell! Hide from predators with visual camouflage and environmental obstructions, and learn to mask your scent! Dynamic pathfinding enables creatures to intelligently maneuver around obstacles and player-built structures.
i'm just posting it here so i don't have to later when someone else asks
Hopefully the pathfinding is better, but even if it's not the other improvements will make it nice
For creature-scale combat, suffice it to say for now that when you attack something with your T-Rex in ARK 2, the results are visceral: the animation of the attack actually hard-impacts on the target (not “passing through” it), the victim’s flesh is torn, and the target physically reacts at that location to the hit – all to convey the feeling of the raw power of such a ferocious creature!
that's all they said about creature mechanics that isn't ai
Yo digo que en Ark 2 los personajes no caminen ni corran cojeando
The fact they mentiones this indicates something truly special if they pull it off
This fact right here makes me probably the most upset that every game where the main focus are its creatures really cant do dynamic combat in any capacity
Its all so souless
funny thing is that is what sets ARK apart from the other games of the same genre
it's more soul less to copy Dark Souls with nothing to set it apart
Ark 1? No
Ark combat has no soul other than a massive variety
Its all the same, static
And that is why all the Souls clones(with nothing new) are quickly forgotten.
name one survival game that lets you take control everything that is trying to kill you
that is not everything
Your reffering to the concept, i refer to what actually happens
as much as i love spamming left click into the enemy
this proves the point
hell even From Software themselves dont want their new Armored Core sequel be a souls clone and kept what makes the game successful
True
Never argued that wasnt bland as well
What i like is the dynamic attacks
which isnt really done by most games, ESPECIALLY dinosaur games
if they just focused on all that fancy smanshy "souls combat" with nothing for what makes ARK, ARK then it will fail like other souls clones just like ATLAS with hardcore RPG
doubt theyd do that?
may depends
atlas was just kinda…. Shat out
but in defense they implemented some cool features for an ARK clone
it's just underrated
ark 2 sounds like a game changing game
that's pretty much how marketing does
meanwhile valve shows off their new mechanics for CS 2 as a trailer
Dinosaur games try to have fun combat challenge (impossible)