#ark-2
1 messages · Page 90 of 1
We’re only allowed to have linear points of view here. You either agree with pikmin and spartan or you get cancelled. There is no in between.
Are you going to say anything useful, or just talk shit?
Theyre colors….i have eyes and i want to believe i have a grasp on a nice palate
Bring up a flaw, and bring up a solution to it, and be open to differing opinions lol. Like there are literally too many people here who are tired of everyone doing nothing but bringing up flaws. Like yeah the game has bugs, we all know that. It's not new lol
A little bit of both…
Hardly
And i had other alternatives but everyone i guess is too good to care to have listend to half of what i typed
You haven't brought up a single one, other than removal.
I mean, maybe I am wrong but your big talking points have been to remove features from the game, and your solutions to it haven't been very thoroughly articulated.
It just drowned in a sea of arguments
Reply it
I read the whole chat for 6 hours, didn't see it somehow, reply it so I can jump to it
Wth
What?
Okay, what's the argument this time?
Reply to it lol, you can't do links
Reply the message, links aren't allowed here for the most part
.
That is a different thing altogether
It’s called dynamic skinning, and it’s on my wishlist for ARK II
U clearly have no idea how the game works, colours are not the same as skins, every skin has its own colour
Honestly, I think both would be nice
You could still get the colors but there is a chance for rare skin mutations
Mutations will probably stay
The genetic skin condition idea is far better than wild event colors.
Skin patterns ≠ colors, imo
Having physical mutations that change the creatures skin to be more rough, while having color mutations to add flavor.
and i just think neon colors wouldnt fit the game if its art style was more realistic
Honestly, skin patterns with color mutations sounds dope
The only neon colors I’ve ever liked are the aberrant variants
Ark has never been a 100% realism game, and I hope that stays true
Yeah, please don't be realistic.
I don't come to ARK for it's realism.
Fine with me, i just think less saturation in mutation colors would be better for positioning and pvp
I mean, say what you will, but I hear a tooooooon of pve players go crazy about colors on their dinos. Getting rid of it in favor of more "realistic" colors in a game that is not realistic would make a lot of people riot lol
To be fair, most colors on aberrant dinos are sick af
How so?
Also do remember every skin comes with an increase in file size
While dynamic skinning can help a lot with this
I agree with that actually.
Or maybe add more then just saturated mutations, then people don't have to have Barney the dinosaur for a 70k melee mutated rex
If you don't want colors, you don't have to use them, but a lot of people do like them
It’s not feasible to have more than 10 skins per creature
Well if we delete Ark 1 and all of its dlc we’re gonna have SO MUCH room for activities
This is true
This is true, but you could use some sort of basic ai that creates patterns or something
That is essentially what dynamic skinning is
A normal-map iirr doesn't add much to a file size, and so you change the normal map of a creature and the size wont be that large.
Im assuming the graphics are better, and if the game is brought up to a more realistic standard
Id also speculate you cant change certain features that boost ur advantage in pvp because it ruins the feel of the game
If the graphic are more realistic and better optimized a pink trex would be supper inefficient for ambush and other tactics
I just had to think through how to do it lol
Dynamic skinning detects where a creature is spawning/some other user input variable, and based on tnat automatically applies a texture to a given model
because ark one has meh graphics, making those colors have insane pop and it looks ugly in my opinion
We've seen graphics.
The ARK-2 trailers are in-engine, so that's roughly what we're getting
God I hope you’re right.
Like if you can get rid of ALL shadows and extra foliage
Sure neon pink rainbow dinosaurs all the way because it doesnt matter anymore
To be fair, they removed the ability to change that INI like two months ago
Like bruh. How am I supposed to sneak up and knock you out if you’ve removed all fog, and 90% of the foliage I’m hiding in.
Like if THAT is how the game relatively looks funny rainbow dinosaurs would be the most immersion ruining mechanic ever
Agreed.
Choice is good
Tf is going on
I think the issue is that they mostly have 'only' vibrant colors.
I think if they added more variety between saturated and non-saturated, it wouldn't be that bad.
Being third person only also somehow breaks immersion. It's almost like the devs are more concerned about making their game than they are with making a Dino simulator lol
I know
And im not saying completely delete those bright colors
I think there are plenty of animals that can be colorful without killing the games theme
Immersion is also a very subjective term.
People find immersion in third-person, or with saturated colors.
Just not like… mammals and giant dinosaurs
different patterns would be cool
the saturation I believe Should be brought down on the animals it makes most sense too
micros? Dodos? Sinos? Whatever go wild
I don't know.
If I specifically breed to get Barney the dinosaur, I should get Barney the dinosaur.
But that should be me trying to actively get said color, not a 90% chance to get a bright ass pink or red.
i think thatd be cool if the game made camouflage more important by setting ini and such
As long as its not as eye blinding as the sun im ok with that color choice
Crazy colors should be an option through painting. I’d rather not see wild event colors roaming around because it’s 2 weeks before Christmas.
i think the current color saturation is disgusting on a lot of creatures, with exception to glow
I wouldn’t mind so much if they were at least somewhat rare
make it minimalistic at most
Like you can have those colors…. Just tone it down….
But having to find a snow owl that’s a decent level AND not sickeningly green is a pain.
so like, dinosaurs had special bits to show off in courtship like skin flaps and feathers
I think colorful dinos add variety to the game
Bright colors for something like this would be cool.
If I can't make a neon pink and green Rex, what is even the point of life
Yeah
you paint the rex
No problem with bright colors on the parts of a dinosaur that probably were bright like display organs
as long as they cant be distributed to other regions
I really don't have a strong opinion on Dino colors, as long as they are good, and work with the game, it really doesn't make much difference to me
Honestly, take that and run with it. When the other people have barney gigas, and you have camo patterned, appropriate to the biome color schemes, you'll come out on top most likely. But, the barney giga people shouldn't have their colors desaturated or anything, just because someone doesn't like them. I'd say it takes more skill to get the camo/easier to hide colors on a dino, at least in Ark 1. Here's hoping colors in Ark 2 are more selectable, in some way. I think I understand that bit, at least
I just dont like when the colors mess with the lighting
if camo is important basically nobody will run barney giga except for funny youtube gags
but you can still have barney giga, just by painting it
How do the colors mess with the lighting?
Being bright and arks bad lighting
I want entirely different skins for mutations. Fuck wacky colors. Get a mutation? Now your Rex has extra spikes. Way cooler.
i dont usually like realism but id like more natural tones on the dinos to match with the more realistic graphics im expecting from the game
Happens in the isle too Albeit in a different manner
That
like even if they were natural pink giga is less efficient then the camo giga
I could go for this, as long as they don't make it into every Dino is a gremlin because they did no prior testing lol
At least from how the isle works (bright colors that arent overdone but make the game harder)
Yes more skins
Maybe like 3 for each dino idk
idk feels like heavy art work
Well they’ve had plenty of gd time
Making instanced skins reduce the variety. Making models and textures that can be manipulated is way bettef
Harder i think
if the skins can be colored i see no issue?
Like i dont want straight static skins just different patterns
Thatd be fairly lame
idk depending on what model changes were talking about might mess with hitboxes a tad
Animated skins, (skins that glow and stuff, but animated series skins would be cool too)
Like I said, I don't have strong opinions on it lol
We have animated raptor and parasaur skins. I’m assuming that’s what he’s talking about.
i guess
No
I mean like skins that move and glow and shit, skins are static, but memory could be the issue
Wdym… move and glow….
I'm not following
We don't need CoD skins in Ark
Yes we do
You mean like primal fear type skins?
Now that shit is obnoxious to look at, I'll admit
(I dont think there should be event skins to begin with)
People like them, and wildcard likes them, wygd
Hate forever
Don't like them? Don't use them
i do but they make my eyes hurt ez
Okay, honest request.
Can we separate meat from humans to 'human flesh' and 'raw meat' to other animals?
I wanna know what is and isn't human flesh I'm eating.
Cause ummm......currently it gets all mixed up....
Nah tacobell meat only
Yeah, what's the in game praticality?
I don't know.
Maybe you lost health if you eat human meat, cooked or uncooked?
Hopefully you are talking in game 🤨😂
I am now re-reading it, and the context does not add up
I dont think you lose health when u eat ppl
I think you just go insane
Allowing ppl to tell you eat ppl
And to avoid you
No shit.
But I wouldn't add a whole sanity system to ARK unless it had more uses then human flesh
I mean, I don't know if that is a pressing issue. The bigger issue is that when I cook a Rex steak I can't actually see the steak
That sounds like a lot of work omto revamp a system lol, there would have to be more to it than just increasing the number of meat types just because
Adding complexity just for the sake of it is never a good idea lol
Spoiled works just fine imo
nah but thats the thing
It has to trick you Thats the whole gimmick
Disguise it by naming it regular meat
Whatst ge point of making this complex meat system
why
Adding a new meat
1 meat
Because you cant eat every animal, and i think this should only apply to like at least 3
Wtf
or just have them not drop meat...?
But thats not fun
You could have the name change be permanent after eating it one time maybe
i don't see how randomly getting harmed by eating meat you didn't even know was inedible would be fun
youd just get sick
Neither is an annoying game design made simply to troll lol
Erm survival game
like how eating random berries makes you lose water or just… knocks you out
why not meat given from a specific creature?
In actual survival, you know what type of meat you are eating lol
I’ll eat any animal.
I’m so high up the food chain, the first thing I think when I see a new animal is “I wonder what it tastes like”
Yes but these are dinosaurs these new group of humans are interacting with
You cant tell me theres gonna be one guy in a realistic scenario who doesnt know its not safe
People eat lizards and birds all the time. As long as you cook it, it's usually safe lol
fugu fish
You can even cook ants and eat them just fine
Fugu
That doesn't sound like Rex to me lol
Fish
?
im saying like a handful of creatures should be inedible that ppl have to find out the hard way
Like 1-3
Seems excessive for no good reason
There are a few animals if prepared inproperly
He likes to watch people suffer
It could have other uses no?
Like damaging poison
coat ur arrows in toxin from the meat?
So youd have to insepct the meat to permanently discover its properties or accidentally eat it
That's not usually how toxic arrows work lol. Usually you have to actually have toxins lol
There are animals with poisonous meat
and also yeah id be down for an animal that produces toxin to use for toxic arrows
they could have puffer fish
Cause paralysis toxins are found im dart frogs and in blow fish so i mean either could work
You could make beezlebufo do that
i mean its a survival game idk why we cant have a couple things to test people
That one was genius wdym
if someone irl ate a blowfish and died on the spot i see no reason why a bob wouldnt do the same fr
its the little stuff that counts
Like if its something you obviously shouldnt eat then i dont see why that shouldnt be a thing
Because some noobs would do it anyways and not think twice
It honestly doesnt really add anything to a game that is supposed to last years
From meat. Yeah
Why is the fact it comes from meat the issue
Like how most toxic animals work
Glands in the skin
@untold ingot retreat to the hideout
How is that an insane take thats like a reasonable idea
thats what they do with dart frogs
And the reason ppl die to blowfish when they eat it
Gonna need a lot of blowfish to drop a Rex 😂
Why didn't it come in before lol
Too busy using realism to make sure dinos only have realistic colors - but we'll suspend belief for the sake of blowfish
Why have realism in funny alien dinosaur orc game
Thus is when toxic tranq knife comes in
That is the only proposal from him I like, toxic tranq knife
i think it should just be a toxin then, unless you can maybe trick a creature into eating it
Sandwitch go back to the hideout
otherwise it's like organic polymer, you have the option to eat it, but nobody does it
it's fine i have protective gear
Yes
Im for fun. I personally dont find those colors fun as well
Ontop of those colors being too goofy for ark 2’s new style if it stays true
What was your suggestion?
The one people didn’t understand
Literally everything i say these people cant comprehend different ideas
Oh, I assume the poison was something to do with the dart frog talk
Yeah
Basically there should be like an animal that has a different meat/or like a substance
And basically youll have to study it/or eat it do find out its properties permanently even if u die.
Because if you dont study it itll basically appear as regular meat
You can apply that to weapons like they do with dart frogs
blowfish work the same way sort of
or you could have that work with like
Dilos or beezlebufo
or you could have a snake for venom… although snake milking would be ineffective for such a purpose
there are going to be more kinds of weapons right?
not just arati, scrap metal, and survivor
they should just implement the upgrade bench mod into base ark 2
that is an evil mod
running caves for random loot drops is evil
True but you have to play the game how it was intended!!!
you should be able to upgrade your base gear based off of your crafting skill
water jar blueprint,,,
Yes
Also you don't have to play the game as intended cause
Mods.
I would like an easier way to get nice blueprints if blueprints are to make a return.
All of you are deranged and make Lotus look normal. Never write down anything else to save my eyes from burning. 
Let me see if I can help you with perspective taking. I now think that every ark 2 creature needs to be exclusively highlighter neon colors because Arat is an alien planet and its influence is slowly making the creatures more radiant
Everyone agrees with my opinion because it’s an alien planet so ofc the color palette should reflect that. It’s common sense
Speaking of colour palette i'm hoping ARK 2's selection of colours is much better than ARK's limited options.
I’m really interested in more realistic manual coloring
It would be cool to color structures too
Yeah and it would be totally awesome if your painting a wall and someone walks in front of you and you accidentally paint them 🙂😃
Weren't they going to release a roadmap of what is to come in all of ark, so also ark 2 and ark anime? When is that coming 
sigh @winged dome come forth and toast
A roadmap this month is supposedly coming and boy am I hype to see it
If jeremys word is still accurate we might get the release date and platform for the animated series and maybe something regarding season 2, even though i'm more excited about the Ark 2 portion of the roadmap.
''I know folks would like a more specific date than '2023', but I can say it wont be too far into 2023 for Season 1 & Season 2 should drop in 2023 too!''
👀 interesting, thank you!
You already know the portion for ark 2 will be a tiny square
And somthing like tsotf cross-platform will be the biggest square
And waste everyone's time
You can refund it from steam ^^
Ark 2 be good or lawyer
Classic retaliation
what money?
its not even on sale yet
Any new news on when actually coming out ? Early access or anything???
Just 2023. May get more info when the roadmap releases.
December 25th
They won't release anything on the roadmap is my prediction
My prediction is just the release date of the gameplay
Well I'll have to buy it to know if it's good or not and since it's a 3rd player only I'm scared it's going to be crap
We will get a release date for a release date of the release date
IF we get an actual release date of the game it'll likely like fall 2023 or winter 2023
so dont buy it and wait for gameplays?
🤨
Na I'm getting it I don't wanne see any videos to be honest
To be honest I'm mainly joking I don't care about the money
Waisted enough money on ark anyway

watch when the road map stream comes out there going to say ah sry guys ark 2 won't be coming this year it will be sometime in 2024 maybe
I mean I'm not expecting anything else than that
I kind of feel like the delays are justification enough for them to start showing some footage of the game, maybe show a little dev work happening, but it's highlly likely that's the case. If they are trying to push it back a little further, it's probably because UE 5.1 isn't that old yet, and they want that newest build integrated.
yea i can see it for ue 5 stuff but really they showed the first trailer over what 2/3 years ago and really nothing to show after that
Yeah, and it really sucks. They have the perfect window to finally get some real marketing done, the streamers and Ark channels in twitch and youtube could blow this up for them and get some good interests really churning, but they have literally offered a few insignificant screenshots and a trailer which doesn't properly represent the game. I don't understand why you'd let people lose interest in Ark 2 like that, its literally driven alot of our group away from the idea of buying Ark 2 if it ever comes out.
yea like rn there 3.1 ppl watching or streaming it now
Ark 2 is gonna be one of the biggest games when it drops
I think you meant: if they’re trying to push it back, its because they haven’t got a ready and stable game yet
Potentially, but here's the rub, if they are converting Ark to UE5 then that poses a potential road hazard as well, Ark players especially in pvp tend to want to hold onto their bases and years of work, so that could bite em in the arse lol.
I mean, I’m a very patient person and I’ve been following star Citizen since Kickstarter before the game was even actually out and I’m still playing it and waiting for things to come out and they have like streams every two days in a week and they’re just talking about things to come things that are happening now
Official servers will stay already confirmed
That to Roy 🙂
🍻
I feel ya Shadow, been on board with Star Citizen for years now as well, literally jumped on about 3 days ago and flew around for awhile. :/
lmao @simple vortex I'm not sure they ever really said "when" the roadmap is coming out, would make sense given their tendencies 😄
Well, a lot of people are saying that’s happening this month that the roadmap stream is coming out
I'll believe it when I see it, alot of people said they were gonna have gameplay footage at the game awards (both of em) and zippo 😛
hmmm fair ahaha. we'll see, i guess!
yea i heard that to
the pc game awards and the year end games awards
The roadmap is coming out this month but no-one has said it will be a stream.
🍻
I'm not even gonna reinstall the original Ark till its in UE5, so at least that will be potentially something we'll find out about. I don't particularly like Souls type games so that's a big turn off for me personally, but I'm trying to keep an open mind for Ark 2.
i'm still not convinced it'll genuinely be a souls game, i really hope not cuz that's what ark is about for me. i'll see it when it's out ahaha
yuppers, that's all we can do, wait and see 😄
In any case, I gotta run, gotta go see my tax dude and get this wrapped up, talk at ya all later 🙂
exactly! and either way, i'll get it regardless ahaha. i enjoyed ark 1, i'm sure they'll make an enjoyable ark 2 as well
ah, good luck and cya!
ya it was a good talk well im off to play wo long
Easy answer is that it won't be a souls game. It's an ark game with souls type combat, that basically just means melee fighting will be a thing
yea that's my expectation too
Ark 2 will be just as shit as the first 🤣. Let's face it. Meshing is likely to still happen where they will do little to stop it
give us s+ building system and im happy
''We're excited to announce that we'll reveal a development roadmap across all iterations of the ARK Franchise next month.'' idk how you guys thought it would be a stream by reading that.
Also NDA's (Non Disclosure Agreements) exist and seeing as they signed a timed exclusivity contract with Microsoft/Xbox could have also required them signing a NDA. The signs of it are there with some of the devs wanting to share stuff but being unable to, wich is why we probably haven't gotten that much news yet.
Also the whole ''Ark 2 will be just as shit as the first'' is very unlikely, as i recall Wildcard being a super small indie company with little funding when they made their first big game (ARK 1) in 2014-2015. but yeah, you probably are a ''master coder''. Wildcards team has grown a lot, become more experienced and now has more funding then they could dream of in early Ark 1 development. but keep being mad about something that requires them rewriting the base spaghetti code to fix, even after them having done as much as they could without rewriting the whole base code of the game. also, mad you're getting what we had to endure for your exclusives? but Xbox is actually nice and will give Ark 2 to playstation after a while, can't say the same about Playstation tho.
I bet the roadmap will be like
Base launch…. Consecutive updates up until a certain dlc. Then qol updates until the next one. And then the show or whatever on the side
Huh?
And I think the Platypus is a fish
I want forest esc building
ark building is too clunky
And in the forest you still have elaborate megabases, theres just a lack of tiers/diversity because its usually all wood
You don't like anything in Ark, you should just go play another game
i dont liek forest building
Also the forest system wouldn't work in Ark
dose not fit ark
In regular ark sure
this is a whole new game and i would gamble 100% they will not use the same code
the forest building (primarily some of forest) has great building but has doo doo variety
yeah but its gonna be same mechanics mostly liek sons of the forest is simillar to the forest with core mechanics and features
Gamble? I'll take that bet
or ksp1 is simillar to ksp 2
ark has too much spaghetti code to be reusable
what and they can re use it for ue5
same argument always
yeah, why else would they make a new game, not like the old code is so busted and we've had Ark 1 for almost 8 years.
every time im in a channel talking flobs just appears half way through the conversation
the forest/sons of the forest is a cooperative game. You just have to play against AI. For pvp, it wouldn't work.
i watch from the shadows, debating if losing my brain cells is worth it or not
Because its clunky and doesnt functions like most games? Its poorly optimized and a good example is its high storage usage
I think since this second game isnt rushed so they actually re wrote the game from the ground up
Hopefully
im aware im saying that sons of the forest and the forest are simillar like with core mechanics and features and ark 2 will probaly be simillar with core mechanics and features with ark 1(either you dont understand my message or i dont undestand yours)
Which doesnt mean it WONT be like ark 1 it just means itll function better
kerbal space program 1 and 2 is another example of this
right but your always here
yeah but you started this will ark building it will be the same as ark 1
They already said Ark 2 will have building blueprints made by the players and we will also be able to upload them.
of course it will function better (eventually)
But the Forest mechanics where you throw resources at it to build the base might not work in ark
I dont fucking know i just said i WANTED forest esc building and you said “i dont like it”
I think sons of the forest functions better with building but has no where near the freedom or variety ark has
im also saying it wont be in ark 2 it will be ark 1 building ( or something very similar)
sure
Well, you both have the right to voice your opinions on this matter, so what's the issue here?
yeah would not fit ark is a sandbox open world survival game and sons of the forest is more of a story survival game
You did tho
but people can just answer to you here
because it's an open channel
Ark 2 will be unrecognizable from the 1st. There's is no gameplay feature that defines ark, just funny dinos
A feature that defines ark: CTDs
Which it wasnt
Ark 2 needs to have a lot of CTDs
debatable
Hopefully
CTDs?
Crash to Desktop
When ark closes and you get that wall of text of errors
core features and mechanics like building and taming will be similar so unrecognizable is a bit exaggerated
I think itll have the same patterns but function differently
Yeah, like why call it Ark 2 if you will develop a completely different game
It will be an improved Ark
like im hoping most taming methods are not knockouts and drugs because that doesnt make any sense
But it's been 8 years, so a lot will change of course
but core features will be there
but improved
its funner though
Is it?
No
i hate egg taming
It's like, I don't know, when GTA went from 2d to 3d. A lot changed of course, but you can see it's still GTA.
there are better ways to tame things
that being
It depends...
I think the best form of engaging fun taming in ark 1 is ark additions
idk what the taming in that is
Ark 2 will have world events, maybe it will be possible to get baby gigas on missions
dont play modded (apart from certain mods)
If you could more or less knock out or bond with an animal in a not annoying way
or dying gigas and recover them
not this dont get tames from stuff like that
But I doubt gigas will be there
too unfair and not balanced
Id assume gigas would be like
at least on the base game
Dominate the giga to tame it by beating it more or less
but you cant exactly do that it would eat your face
Actually they've said there will be missions to protect hurt creatures and things like that
Video game and drugging animals and waiting is fun? Like easy but not fun
shadow manes are unique, but annoying as hell
Look: "defending endangered creatures to earn their trust, finding dens of parent creatures and their young, and more. Whether you choose to engage with these events is up to you, and each can yield unique rewards and challenges."
but probably not things like giga biggest would probably be trike or carno
giga is probably a rare event
things like that
99% sure gigas won't make it
im guessing to balance it it would be fairly hard
but it shouldn't have big op creatures
For balancing reasons, I don't think gigas or carchars will make it to Ark 2
im more concerned about base spots for pvp
At least for a few years
Rare events for special creatures
If they can be saved in blueprints i dont think it allows ppl to make cheese location bases
Lets be real
i want car char too i think creatures newer than fjodur should be in ark 2 so they have more time in the spot light
Itd be impossible to line up a blueprint base in a crack between a cliff lol
Unless they make it smaller and weaker, I doubt it will happen
I already think they should downsize giga
there is easy fixes for things like this
Still be bigger than rex but not godzillas leg sized
I think Rexes will be top apex creatures for a while
They need to keep stuff out to add as new content later. A constant flow of new stuff helps keeping the game alive.
But, again, people think things like a giga (as it is now on Ark 1) are too op
Anything stronger than a rex might be considered too much
Its…. Fine…. I just think its too big
i dont mind the stats of a creature as much as i do its artistic take on it
Outside of pvp yes
Gigas in pvp are honestly only good at meat running. They are like the definition of glass cannon
i want rock drakes back because there my favorite creature also the new floating rock landscapes would be cool to ride on a rock drake with
how would you kill someone riding a beast like that? 😂
Imagine Souls like combat with a giga
it bytes things behind it
bet elden ring players could be a giga with a sword
of course they promissed new combat system for dinos too
Don't get me wrong, I don't want gigas in the game lol, at least not as they are in ark1
No, lol
Not with the aoe bite
It also depends on how good the movement is
My point is, if they tone it down, it will be just a different rex
so they might focus on the rex first
This is true, but personally I don't have an issue with Rex varients, as long as they are rare in the wild and live in different areas
Whats wrong with it still bigger than rex but not being 2 rexes tall
Size makes 0 difference
me neither, Im just being objective. If they can bring us 100 creatures on the release date, I hope they chose very different creatures
Giga, spino, and rex are the only carnivores that add variety
Every other large carnivore is more or less just a rex or a giga
Damage output is the issue
Have you seen a side by side of giga and rex
It can be very easily diversified to not be a rex clone
Ur talking about stats though no
I'd rather see more Arat creatures than 10 different "rexes"
That's like saying have you seen the size of the titanosuar compared to a paracer
Totally different functions
thats not what i was referring to
i mostly meant its characteristics
I dont think giga looks anything like rex
And i think charchar shouldnt be in ark 2 as a side note
See, me just being me I really don't care about the size or color of dinos, as long as it looks mostly okay it's fine. What matters is the functionality
Carchar is more interesting than the giga
Meh
By far
I agree
I do think there should be several types of Frontline carnivores with different specializations.
but these dinosaur game designs have like… an oddly hard time thinking outside the box at all
I referr to any game that has dinosaurs in it
I think ark 2 designs are the best so far
Giga and Rex are the only creatures that add variety!
... but all the other creatures are just like them!
Make up your mind my guy
Tbh, ark defined the box lol
You dont know basic dinosaur anatomy!!!
Basically
3 types of large carnivore plan
Tyrannosaur
Characarodontosaurid
Spinosaurid
Are you a paleontologist?
Thyla with a stealth attack is way different than rex. They just got so overpowered you didn't need to use it anymore. Limiting stats may make it necessary to learn the traits of your tames.
biology major is that enough
''my source is that i made it the fuck up''
Basically theres three types of large carnivores that are very unique from eachother
And all of those dinosaurs in each group are basically the same dinosaur but different sizes
Average skill issue guy
If you're a biology major and you actually believe that, then its time to switch majors
Completely ignoring the entire point of your own science
You know every human is Homo sapiens so other than me everyone is more or less me!
I am referring to large carnivores
Is this your fact, or is there a scientific source to it
To which? 😂
Scientific source and just basic knowledge
Apex predator ✅
It matches so well!
Give me the source.
Charcharodontosaurids all have the exact same over all design
Clearly I am the same as Homo erectus too! Same genus, different species
As a rule I don't accept basic knowledge or common sense arguments, because they are usually a plea to ignorance lkl
So just have one? Giga, already a household name in ark
Yeah homo erectus have 5 fingers, an ass and a large cranium
Sooo many similarities
No mention of a brain though, but we already have a pretty good example of that ... 😂
Hats off to you sir I revised my whole class 10 biology!
I don’t type things unintentionally 😉
No no no, cut the Carno, just keep Rex, Spino, Giga. Man is correct
Shit dude
People are so fucking deaf here
A genus is too wide a classification
doesn't make sense to add 1000 very similar creatures because they are different IRL
Does it matter? This is a text channel
Hard headed sure
You have to make a convincing argument here lol 😂
See I am not a biology major
But personally I feel a Suchomimus and a Spino, although big
Are distinctly differentiable
A game is not made to keep within biological standards
Im trying?? Im saying those 3 types of large carnivores can be represented because they do different things. But when you look into the groups they are too similar and become copy and paste
Like we dont need giga, acro, and carcar
It is made keeping game used and niches in mind
I agree with you that we don’t need Carchar etc.
Yeah thats literally what im saying
But I don’t agree that a genus should be a splitting factor
Genus can vary WILDLY
Let alone a whole fucking family
Ur house cat is not a tiger
Sure, I mostly refer to sizes
Doesnt mean they cant have allosaurus too
From a gaming perspective, the Carchar is more interenting than the giga
cause gigas old as fuck
would make more sense to bring the Carchar than bringing the giga
see thats where i disagree
For gameplay purposes we don't need 5 Rex clones, and we certainly don't need an ark1 type giga. But with different specializations and abilities I see no issue with various tyoes
also, I don't think they shouldn't bring any of them to Ark 2, at least for a while
i think they are too similar
I like variety lol
just make the Rex top Apex creature. And, maybe, an Arat top Apex creature
I hope the allo comes back top 5 dino
It's really not. It's a separate type that has a totally different gameplay and strengths
Unless they are cutting other important creatures, I don't have anything against it
but as of now, I doubt making variants wouldn't canibalize other creatures with different features
Ik but its quality and design surpass giga by years
Giga couldve at least got a tlc
the first announcement trailer had a Aratai using a club with a allo skull, so they could return
I hope so
I am going to stand on the side that more variety in dinos is better than more tlcs, but I know people disagree with that
Needs an allo skull to be crafted
Just do both…. Or just make the old dinosaurs good the first time
They will be for ark2 lol
Yes
I don't, but I just want a new "class" of dino rather than just a new variant
I doubt they can deliver everything on the initial release
What do u mean by variant cause i dont think a more accurate giga is a rex variant at all
Sure, tbf though, with recent Dino releases they have been creating new classes lol
It might not matter much in pvp if you use a carcha or a giga, but in pvp it 100% matters depending on situation
Desmo is another one. It doesn't really replace other fliers, but it adds a new twist to gameplay
I mean, we need more mid tier dinos and low tier dinos, and they should be important for the game
as of now, people just tame the "top tier" creatures and that's about it
Dodo being shit food makes no sense in ark 1
Basically a chicken
should be like a lite ovis
Like back in 2015-2016 we need low tier and mid tier creatures because we needed them for the kibbles
True, the quality in general of the dinos needs to improve for sure.
it wasn't enough, sure, but I just want more importance for the initial creatures
Yes
The old kibble system better not make a return lol
I hope is there more of a class it's not based on size but like how they hunt and such
Not saying that 😂
Less power creep, more side-grades for newer dinos
just using it as an example
This is why I don't want auto turrets and battery turrets. As well as nerfs on fliers and removing cryos
give them a role, not necessarily just kibble farming
True, in ark as of now there's no mid game. You just go from beach to tek
Idk about that but i think it isnt gradual at all sure
I want dinos like raptors to even be relevant in endgame lol
that's my point. Raptors, Allos, Ankylos etc
I go from start to tek in less than 24 hours solo on 1x settings. Yeah it is that fast
That's fine to have "magmas", but don't kill the old creatures entirely
Hopefully with 'souls like combat', larger dinos won't be able to bite behind their legs while facing forward - so smaller flanker tames will be viable to some degree
Only the giga does that LOL
And the Carchar I guess
I want to be able to make people rage quit with a raptor and cloth pants agaisnt their Rex lol
Hopefully we don't have Unga bunga bone clubs and Unga bunga clothing
Stupid caveman stuff
there will be
it's in the last art concept
From the announcements we already have Unga bunga clubs lol
The unga bunga stuff is the funny/fun part of ark 1 tho idk
Early game ark moments are iconic i will admit
And those moments should last longer
But of course, it should be funny. Not just an infinite boring grinding
The late game and the early game are the best parts yeah
Early game for being funny and not getting into full grind mode
Late-finished game where you are just basically god where ppls lives are in ur hands
But idk late game fun is 50/50 for me
Late game, not so much. At least for me it was just breeding lines and grinding BPs.
Not that I dislike breeding, but it isn't so funny
Well... not so funny to kill beach bobs
and major attacks are just a lagfest
or trying to connect on full servers
They had to learn
I never liked that, it's funnier to let them get stronger first
If you have to kill bobs to enjoy late game pvp you are doing it wrong lol
I know I just don't like Unga bunga stuff
The pvp for me was ppl telling me what to do to not lose everything
I am pretty sure you weren't at the relative top lol
I was a handful of times but short lived
Never alpha tho which is why i say relative
It was more fun to play it like how it wasnt supposed to be played
If you weren't an alpha on your server, you were nowhere near the top lol
I mean still relatively highb
Like you really have no threats other than the biggest tribes is how far i ever got
That's like day 2 or three lol
Ye
Not the best
Most of it was mostly because irl friends are way harder to play seriously with, felt less like a second job
As long as regular pvp isnt such a chore for the 2nd game itll be, better… i think
Official is so ass though
damn dude, have you sleep yet since yesterday?
Sleep is hard to do
I got 8 hours of sleep
Cool I get like 4 hours every 3 days
Issue
Needing 8 hours everyday is a skill issue
I still want my tek scrap. Component based gun
Imagine component based bullets
Crumpled up aluminum wads as bullets 😂
Explosive bullets
Think bigger, millions of combinations
Yeah, just making a bad joke 😂
Component crafting is probably what I'm most excited for - like you said, millions of combinations and hopefully meaningful stat adjustments based on components
I highly doubt there would be millions of combination taht are all completely unique, also, it's basically a guarantee taht people will just find the best combination and just use that, then the system is gg and pointless
Ideally there will be some situationally superior choices, but a good 'overall' option thats a little behind
Well, at least people will need to explore the map to do the meta
AFAIK the componets will be all around the map
Also depends on how many customization 'slots' we get per item. Sword and shield seems to have Blade, Hilt, Blade attachment, Shield base, Shield Front, and Shield attachment, maybe more
but it is cofirmed the components will be all over the map
Component based comsumables
yeah

but like on Atlas, it might be spreaded
I'm not disagreeing where components will be found, but a single item can only be customized so far
And ofcourse, useless components are a fear
But component based consumabl would be a menace to society
Not really, they can release new components with new updates
let's say a sword has 3 slots with 10 different components for each slot = we will have 30 different combinations
but if they release 20 different comp. for each slot = we will have 90 dif. combinations
and so on
also, space drops might bring special components you can't find on the planet
Right - but I mean for a sword there only like 3 main slots
Blade, hilt, and attachment
What we actually put in those slots can have endless combinations
Yeah, but I don't see the issue here
also, character engrams/skills can be used to change the weapons stats
Me neither ... there is no issue 🤔
Speaking of witch...
I dislike the idea of a skil tree
some people love, some don't. never ending discussion. LOL
But ark doesn't have one. Maybe they will keep it that way.
keeping just stats and engrams
I'd prefer a skill tree over just flat stat increases, but to each their own
Isn't the skill tree confirmed?
No
By being crackheads we deconfirmed it
see, it's not common sense LOL
Skill tree is confirmed, its on the Steam page
Stg if they lock the ability to use certain components behind skill tree
'Gain both experience points from gameplay, and knowledge points by accomplishing key objectives and overcoming unique challenges, to progress along a massive skill tree filled with new active abilities, perks, and passive benefits.'
wait a minute, just checked again their post back in june:
characterprogression_sub.png
Gain both experience points from gameplay, and knowledge points by accomplishing key objectives and overcoming unique challenges, to progress along a massive skill tree filled with new active abilities, perks, and passive benefits.
I hope they do just to spite you
Jinx, you owe me a clink
What would the diffrence between these pints be
Oh well, I'll go study up ths steam page because I'm rusty
no idea, but apparently we will have two point systems. One probably for the stats (HP, Stamina, Weight etc) and Skill tree (taming?, movements?, fighting skills? etc).
I hope Brazilian Jiu Jitsu will be a thing 
Or Muai Thai
Saw a wiki listing for confirmed creatures of "Unnamed plant lizard". Anyone have a pic of it?
It's in the first trailer
Or just search from me 😂😂😂
@tulip garnet ^^
The mouth opens like a flower, the trailer has that I do not
The skill tree should absolutely be required in order to use certain components
Lotus do I need to spray you down with anti clown mace again
Sounds like you gain levels by doing things and that gives some skill points. But you can also discover skill points.
My guess is Discoveries will be a separate set of unlocks than standard level ups
That is waht I am hoping.
I am hoping player skills like combat or abilities and such comes from experience, while engrams and building comes from exploration and finding key points, or taming key dinos
I can also see maybe locking some upgrade components behind Discoveries
Maybe first time killing boss gives skill points instead of levels. Allows you to develop skills you normally aren't good at or use.
as long as discoveries arent hard coded to a place and you have multiple ways/places to discover it
otherwise people will just block it
You just might
Or make discoveries in no build spots. Or for that matter, most of the map could be no build. Force people to travel more. Didnt do well in gen1 but a bigger map may help that
Every 10 min. im opening discord hoping to see the roadmap
quit being like that, expect it in a community crunch
announcements exists for a reason
Lizard looks too much like a lizard idk
when i think of alien creatures think of like, evolve
Could be anything tho like 50/50 for me
You have an addiction
Aliens can be literally anything
man finds a way to complain about everything it seems ☠️
you think of...humanoid creatures?
the bulk of evolve's creatures are humanoid
It's not easy to do speculative biology...it's as much art as it is science. Even harder to have someone create something that has no basis in earth's biosphere in terms of body plans
Dolphins and elephants are evolved. We just don't understand their culture.
🍿
Exactly, why would you know how to make a saddle for a creature without at least encountering it, or taming it? That's my thinking on it, at least
Eh, we kind of do actually.
If I recall right, dolphin culture is kind of similar to early-Neanderthal culture. (without the benefit of fire and such, since.....ocean)
I think there's been cased of dolphins using rocks to crack open oysters?
I know dolphins use pufferfish to get high.
That's a real thing, google it.
They are smart, yes. But advanced? Definitely not
Oh hell nah, they're not advanced.
But that's why I compared them to early-Neanderthals.
They have object-permanents, and that's a BIG step in advancing as a species.
Object permanence? Most creatures have that, lol
I would argue that we humanize dolphin culture and say we understand. We have no idea what their afterlife is to them. Saying the use of objects make them advanced is defined by our culture.
Wait, that's not what I was thinking of.
What's the thing called when a species knows something that appears useless, like a rock, can be used for other things, like weapons and tools?
But they have intelligence enough to use tools, and have been documented to suffer from mental illnesses like depression and such, so their brains are coming around for sure
Well, hard to think that they have an afterlife when they probably still don't have that as a concept.
Should probably move on.
Wait, so why where dolphins/elephants originally brought up?
Let's not.
Either way, I don't see dolphins making it into Ark 2, so yeah
Its a good debate for me. Just cause we dont understand doesnt mean it doesn't exist. We even have some theories that evilved beings are not even corporeal... so tools are useless and primitive.
But yeah. Not an Ark 2 debate.... yet. Thats a DLC
Absolutely none of that has anything at all to do with anything in ark.
Anyway.
I hope the Aratai's have their own culture and language and aren't some generic aliens that act just like humans, like every fucking other sci-fi media.
(I'm looking at you star-wars/trek)
What?
It would be cool that part of the story is finding out what they value. And then using that to create allies.
I'd laugh so hard if they're actually naturally more passive then humans are, but just have no self-preservation, hints their sick piercings.
One DLC would be the Trail of a Thousand Tears
Okay, I kind of wanna know why you veggie'd me, Bruise?
Is it not weird to see literal humans that're just green with two floppy tendril thingy's dripping down their heads for hair?
Like, the twi'lek are literally just blue, cream, or green colored humans with floppy tendril things coming down their heads.
Pretty sure an alien would look a bit different then that, even if humanoid.
I brought up dolphins and elephants as a rebuttal to evolved creatures must be humanoid. We can continue this debate in 2 years when ark 2 is finally released
Like.......no?
If a species has a appendage to be able to grasp objects, then that's already a huge key in advancing.
Another species that's smart are octopuses, and they're pretty far from humanoid.
Maybe the bad aliens on arat are not the people... but the octopus!
TRUE!
There's plenty of non-humanoid species in both of those series, just because the majority of them are (which, btw, is scientifically because of how carbon-based life is most likely to form/look) does not mean that they're "generic"/"lazy"
The fucking octo-aliens are brainwashing the Aratai's!
Being humanoid is not scientifically the most likely form a carbon based creature is likely to look lol. I dont know if I am misinterpreting what you are saying though
We assume arat is carbon/ nitrogen based. Could be Ar based or Si. And that is why humans are taking so long to evolve
Never said it's lazy, it's practical. Especially in Star-Trek's case where it was low-budget.
I meant 'generic' as in it's overdone. And I feel like newer medias should be more creative with their alien designs then more or less a carbon-copy of a human. (which has been the norm it seems like in recent times)
Snakes or worms would be lazy. Super easy to draw and animate.
I fucking love star-trek.
But I burst out laughing when I see that one episode in the original series that they had a alien canine that was literally a fucking pooch with little-tiny toy antenna's on them. 💀
Its gonna be interesting to see how much 'intelligence' they apply to all the animals. They've already said hunting by senses is happening... and others have speculated pack mentalities. It'd be cool to see the aratai start a stampede to destroy your base.
Soap is gonna be very important!
Omg we will finally get to SHOWER
Somebody said we may have to cover ourself in Rex urine, I am gonna hope for the soap LOL
I’m talking about evolve the game
New building... bathhouse!
❤️
No more burning armor cause it began to smell!
Just do it like the drunk girl on Vine, "I'm washing me and my clothes"
Maybe the Romantic hairstyle will make a comeback!
Hopefully new hairstyles
#gasbags4ark2
Evolved gasbags
More shoulder pets = more good
As long as there's either
- Actually useful aerial insect tames
- Reapers (or an equivalent, in both coolness and utility)
or 3. A slime
included, I'm game
See... this is what I miss. Low tier creatures being relevant.
Hey, Im relevant
We need a slime in ARK-2.
are you a low tier creature? 
Maaaybe?

Something that ARK 2 should do is having alien lifeforms, but not oversaturating the gameplay with aliens, have it being balanced, like in every 5 dinosaurs there's, also another thing they should make is that the oceans are worth exploring, having more underwater biomes with their own exclusive creatures like idk, Baryonyx just vibes in rapids, or like there is like this passive alien manta in coral reefs.
Slime mold for Ark 2? 
Give us slime-mold for ARK-2!
I think that ratio isn't reasonable for a game set on an alien-planet
every 5 dinosaurs
or every 3, but my point does get across,
and it could just be that the ARK dino's just whoop ass of some of the population
I’d prefer 1:1 or even 1:2 in favor of aliens, but I think that’s just not feasible
(I don't know, I'd like more aliens then dinosaurs)
Or maybe the same ratio
I can work with 50/50
Yo, question, is your pfp a pokemon?
Sure is
Yeah, that works.
I was hoping so hard After seeing the ping…
Called it.
I’m not being sneaky about it lol
Imma make a how ARK 2 could be better than ARK 1, might just be my likings or something idk
As long as you read the pinned stuff I’m down to read such a thing
This would make sense, but that would depend on the timeframe at which the game is set and how they approach it. If the game is set years after the ship crashed and dinos really are invasive and the like then a 1:1 probably wouldn't be that likely.
At least in the immediate region around the ship, and possibly for quite a few miles
It really boils down to design time lol
If they have 100 dinos from ark 1 to consider and only 110 slots lol you can imagine that’ll set the ratio more than lore
Yeah, that seems pretty likely
I just think it would be cool to see the ecological dissonance with a closer to 1:1 ratio
Honestly I don't anticipate too many aliens, especially not ones that can combat dinos. But they might surprise me lol
I mean if it didn’t already exist a mana could have been an alien
Pretty much any DLC creatures post-Scorched can be easily considered alien
'cept maybe Snow Owls, aside from frosty shenanigans and infrared vision, they're just thicc owls 😂
If you mean alien as in 'not native' then yes-ish?
But if you mean extraterrestrial, then no.
Some of the creatures may have Earthen-like counterparts, but I can definitely see a Gasbags as being an alien creature. Or a Noglin
And its probably pretty reasonable to believe that an Earth-like planet could have some pretty similar evolutionary chains for creatures
Earthen-like counterparts there a creature that look like bootleg o no the world is dead run lol
I understood none of that
Gasbags are literally tartigrades
Noglins where made by Rockwell.
Yes, I realize this.
But take either o them and say 'Its an alien!' and I wouldn't have any trouble believing that
Mmm
Same at this point I’m counting down 😭😭
Agree fully with this point
As do I
Anyone else ready to here more and see some gameplay for ark2?
Soon™️
Yippee ark2
I cant wait till december 25th
Imagine
What was not supposed to come out june?
I doubt it tbh
that's just how death blades talks, you'll get used to it
And yall call me the insane one
That's because you are insane 
Do I need to break out the screenshots?
Sure
“OUR LATEST CONCEPT” that’s confirmed that Ark 2 ain’t nowhere near ready 🤦♂️
That doesn't necessarily mean the latest one they've made but could be the latest one they've shown. I mean i'm sure it is further back than many think but that is no way a "confirmation" as it is more interpretation of the wording.
🤣
I’m guessing it’s indeed the latest one they have as it would be absolutely pointless to reveal something that’s already been changed makes no sense, concept usually means that’s the original idea that’s in its initial development stages
But that's an assumption that the concept they showed "has" been changed since it was made. Not all concepts will require changes. They have a bunch of concepts ready to reveal every few weeks which is what they've been doing. Those concepts could easily be months old. Again i'm not denying it is likely the game is being pushed back but there's no confirmation in that sentence whatsoever.
i guess we're gonna just flat out ignore that most of what they show is already done in-game? the concepts are just to visualize what it will look like before we get the gameplay. ''So much talent and love for the craft
@survivetheark. The in-game one is even better looking btw'', but i guess we're gonna ignore that bc it's concept art they share before the gameplay.
I know wildcard do things a little unconventional but no one is daft enough to release a concept that’s already been changed what would be the point obviously releasing a “latest” concept which would suggest it’s the current one
You are still thinking inside that box. "our latest concept" doesn't necessarily mean it is the latest concept they have produced. You need to understand the world of interpretation of wording.
They have shown Ankylo, Brachio, Stego, Carno, and the latest they have shown is the weapon system. These concepts are likely one's they have banked ready to show every few weeks, just like the rest that they will show.
That weapons system concept could be from months ago and hasn't required changes. Doesn't change the fact it is their latest concept they are revealing.
I know a few Meeks. I wonder if they’re related.
Boop
Beep
Bop
Hear me out rails 2 fat lines Ark 2 but with magic
Nice try but that’s you sober
What is it with you and magic
I don't want no magic in my Dino game
Tek scrap ak is all I want
Component crafting guns
Component based bullet crafting
Ark is already magic wdym
i dig
i always wanted shaman type bros
No shamans
A rat magic
They can simply explain the “magic” with savaged tech and elements (or something similar)
With dragons and hulk and goblins that turn into hulks, teleporting fish cats too
Arat has floating terrain of large sizes
There is some magic in the planet
Don’t give me any gravity bs how do u walk then?
I am pretty sure any weird explanation will be attributed to element
Magic is the most likely answer
But it is
It probably makes no sense regardless
i want my evil blood magic
I want to build my tek scrap m4
I wanna build wonder weapons like ts cod zombies
Go on
go on about what
Your blood magic deamons
Just accept the magic Lotus. It will lead Ark into the future
I want Sci fi
How about neither?
Ok I'm listening
I feel like magic in games isn't that great though
Arat is a moon?
Yeah and paddy knows how to make it work
You also don’t like art
No?
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
Why did ppl say it was a moon
Fair, I like Sci fi better
||im ganna put the aratai in cages and make them help me build my base, then they can go free afterwards||
Hmm, I would say not like, I would say not understand lol
I feel like this is a quote from someone famous from a long time ago lol
If you don't understand it
It indeed is
I don't really agree with it though lol
I do. Off topic here but it's why social media is crazy. Too many people railing against magical things they don't understand and find that threatening and/or come to the conclusion that it must be nefarious.
An advanced technology is something that can be understood and replicated.
By people who are educated in it
Even by those who aren't with enough study
You study some form of tech right? I'm guessin comp sci?
And physics
ok so your mind is wired for it, and you also understand the value of experts
not everyone gets that. Not even close
Wouldn’t enough study make them educated in it?
Magic is typically described as unexplainable, and I don't think anything is unexplainable
Being unexplainable is explainable
It's magical from the perspective of someone who doesn't understand and will not put in the time to understand it.
fantasy and fantasy creatures is a "big" deal of ark but i wouldnt count on magic in ark 2
I have zero idea how coding works yet I don't scream it's magic
My mother and father sure do
That's a them problem
That doesn't make it indistinguishable from magic
I'm just saying, there is truth to the quote and it's not literal magic. It's the perception of magic by the individual
There is a key difference from appearing like and being indistinguishable from. And that is the explanation factor
magic is just alternative mechanics that arent trying to obey particle interactions
it allows you to do so much more
Idk enough about magic to dispute this
I wanna tho
I take issue with that one word.
my point is that physics and realism is always limited
magic isnt
and magic can do anything you want while looking cool
Gimmie a spell book and let me smite my enemies breed lines already
It's really not though lol
it is
When you see quotes like this, look for metaphors.


