#ark-2
1 messages · Page 80 of 1
It’s a possibility, for sure, but I would go differently 😂
Locking levels and features and items to people with DLCs
Ark does that, but not so clearly
3 of the four ascensions are exclusive to paid maps
but just locking stuff behind paywall without other new additions is not the vibe
And what I’ve said above wouldn’t change the way Ark does that. It would only unlock the maps for people without DLCs
Ark already locks tames, levels items behind paid dlcs
they are new maps tho, xd its not just spawning new stuff on the island after a paywall
From my point of view, it wouldn’t be just spawning new stuff on the island. But I see how people would see it. 🤣
Better locking by regions then
“Pay for this new continent and gets new cool stuff, but we are not selling the items, we selling the new map😉”
thats what a dlc is get over it lmao
people would be more mad if a map wasnt added
idk anyone who actually got mad over that stuff you are pointing out
Im suggesting a new model where the map wouldn’t be locked and you said it would be just like what EA does. 😂
Im just saying it’s different
That’s the catch here. 🤣
i cant think of a single game rn that just releases a new map for free
non story maps dont count
imo
I think you didn’t get my point. The new maps are irrelevant. The new ascensions, items, features and tames are what people want.
huh?! who thinks new maps are irrelevant lol
i loved scorched for example, and abberation, its cooler than only having 2km forest
For Ark 2 I would just let people travel freely in the map, but would lock the cool stuff, what they already in ark 1, in DLCs
Maps alone are. What makes them interesting is what I’ve said above. Features, items, ascensions and creatures.
I would just let explore the whole map freely.
noone buts a map alone without features
And lock just some items and features behind DLCs
Did they change their idea on the third person only
you think people would like abberation if its just the same creatures and the same trees as in the island
no, get used to it, it's the best option with the new mechanics
noone wants that
as long as there is no more intense zooming out xd
idk what the perspective is
Man, I’m just suggesting they should let everybody go the “Ark 2 aberration” but those without DLCs wouldn’t be able to use some of the new stuff
Unlock the map, but keep everything else locked
that makes 0 sense to me
Fair enough
but i cant change your opinion anyway
You won’t indeed
third person only doesn't bother me, idc about perspective for third person only as long as it's not super bad, we're all sure they tried to make the new mechanics work in first person, but it probably wasn't as good seeing how they switched everything to third person only
Agreed. People don’t even know how Ark 2 will actually be, but they think first person would be a good idea.
They wouldn’t remove if it wasn’t bugged.
same with the ''souls like'' combat, we ain't even got gameplay yet and people thinking it's straight copy pasted from there. iirc Bluestone said ''souls like'' was just a buzzword used to describe it, at most it takes inspiration from it. Sidenote: i played God of war 2018 and that's third person only and also has ''souls like'' combat. even after multiple new saves i still enjoy the combat
Free DLC maps would like to have a word with you
How do you feature lock without locking the map? If a new creature is added to the wild on a map anyone can play, how do you only allow paying folks to interact it?
Maybe purchasing would unlock spawn locations, it wouldn’t spawn otherwise
Yeah, and the part where the DLC items and creatures are locked behind the paywall... uhhhh, last I checked, free maps have those 😂
There isn't a single engram you can't get without DLC
I’m ngl even if ark 2 was 150$ I’m still buying 🫣
Same here, if it looks good and fun and such
Which I'm going to imagine it will, more than likely
I’d say WC has gone to great effort to eventually grant free players all their content
With the exceptions of the story maps and their respective gimmicks that make them special
Oh for sure
Minus like, the few measly levels that the paid maps grant, which don't really give much besides a level point that doesn't really matter at that point
I’ve never heard of someone buying a DLC just for an ascension
Same here
It's nice, but by no means necessary to get those levels just to be able to play the game 😂
It’s not required to buy any DLC, but in PvP you’re obviously gonna be slower to build up and you can’t chase people down unless you have tribe mates with the DLC
But the idea of hard locking content but keeping the same world map means any form of power creep is gonna get real ugly real fast. The benefit of that stuff being on other maps is that the power creep can stay on the new map (until transfers open at least)
besides a few paid dlc specific normal and mostly some tek ones
That’s my whole point. They already do what I’ve said. What want is, for the reason we have now the whole world of Arat to explore, they shouldn’t lock the regions of the planet behind DLCs.
Behind levels, items (engrams), features etc.
They can even lock the possibility of ascensions behind the DLCs (3 of the 4 ascensions of Ark 1 are in paid maps already).
Only after a long while. You can’t assess the DLCs just in the end of the game cycle.
Back in 2016 scorched was an OP map. Today it’s s irrelevant.
Ragnarok killed scorched (it has all exclusive engrams and creatures).
Island is technicly a paid map if you really think about it, you gotta spend money on the game to even use it 
Well, all 4 ascensions are behind a paywall then. 
oh darn, ascension is completely pay to win 
That makes no sense is my point, and it wildly restricts what can be added
Since a map can’t change without wiping people’s bases, that model in essence permanently feature locks the ark 2 map into one static state
Also uh wut. You can’t lock a feature behind a feature. The idea is that two equal skill players, one of which paid to get an advantage the other can’t, is a terrible scenario. In ark 1 that’s resolved to a degree by free maps that bring features to free players and allowing people to freely share DLC content except the map to each other. The map is the sole DLC exclusive and thus is critical to its function
I cant believe ark 2 is going to be 3rd person only. Stupidest idea ever, will not be playing.
Lets take all the immersion out of a dinosaur survival game!
@blissful perch 🍻
let's just ignore every game that's third person only that's actually immersive then, otherwise your sad argument wouldn't be possible
first person is more of a crutch for immersiveness than anything else
the world and how it the player interacts with it and it interacts with itself are more important in my opinion
im just interested to see if the camera goes ovet the shoulder or its like behind our back
if we can change that
we drink to third person too? Could have sworn it was just release date lol
probably further back than right behind shoulder
a beer is a beer
it may auto flip depending on scenario (for example when you mount a tame, etc)
same crying we see commonly
or piss
🍻
im not into piss personally
me neither
i think release date is the only clinker thatll last
people kinda quit complaining about tp a while ago
the last dude is exceptional
look so ark 2 has a 2 in it and is third person so ark 2 will be released in 2023
Fair enough, I just think if the map is really the whole world of Arat, it would be odd to have geographical locks (a barrier?). Anyways, I better wait and see the new world map system.
tho i would like first person to have more of like a danger feeling idk if that makes sense
then that is a tiny ass planet
if only it had first person 💀
ark 1 i never played first person unless on foot
imo it could be like fast travel regions or something where there isn't a physical barrier
ark1 has 5th person
...
the slave farmer
yeah i really wanna know how they create the world bordee
walk me through this...you're saying first person doesn't feel dangerous? I'd say the limited FOV by default makes it more dangerous
maybe its still something with the implant range and the ship
it is more dangerous thats why i like it
and i would like it in ark 2 seeing our new parcour style in first person
being chased by a raptor not knowing if it catches up
i agree that losing that isn't ideal...I think the best movement in gaming (natural selection 2) can be done in first person
but the benefits of third person are pretty large, and I think WC owning that choice is a positive
as long as they only choose one
having both there will be some kind of advantages or abuse with camera cause im sure there are plenty of bugs coming at us
its still wildcard
yall think theyll add in orbit cam again
maybe if it doesn't zoom out insanely far and clip through terrain
I think that you could just use the normal cam at that point though
ya
since most of the time unless you are trying to see through walls its for taking screenshots
well, it also allowed much wider view at the cost of control
i used it a lot to look for shit near me
esp when afk or just holding w
or not afk but still
yeah but I don't think it should exist
even in ark 1, its just we are too used to it
well I guess you can't move the ark 1 third person camera to the front but its not like I would every want to with how ugly players look
fair enough
plus it gets annoying toggling it when youre on a big tame and the orbit cam is as far as normal 3p
not a huge issue but the cam wasnt a huge plus either
I didn't say anything about other games being third person. But if you think 3p is as immersive as 1p or the OPTION TO CHOOSE then good for you
I dont use 1p on dinos but on foot 1000%
just bc the player third person in Ark 1 is bad doesn't immediately mean the one in Ark 2 built with TPO in mind will also be as bad
it's worse to have first person if the combat mechanics aren't built around first person. You can have exceedingly lazy tells and combat animations in first person, but if you need to react to both opponent tells and your OWN combat animations, you'll never see them in first and thus will suffer a great deal in combat
Official going to be strictly 3rd person in Ark 2, but they are allowing mod community to re-enable 1st person for unofficial servers.
looks like i'm never touching official
As Shifter pointed out 1st person could pose you a problem with the combat system not being designed for it if it depends on seeing your own as well as your tagets animation
if it's the same pvp community i ain't ever even thinking about official. gonna do a private server anyway
I play/played Ark 99% exclusively in 3rd person either way, the only time I ever went 1st person was to cryo smaller dinos.
So works for me
player perspective isn't that big of a deal for me tbh, i'd rather have the game be made in the perspective that fits best with the game design that looks good as well when you play it, rather than trying to make something meant for TPO work in FPO and it ending up being worse than if they went with just TPO for the whole game.
Fix old! No new!
I think first person makes some ppl nauseous idk if that’s why they’re changing it but still
I do like the option to choose tho
Third person is better for souls like combat.
I play ark in 3rd person I like it more...
Good, I hope official isn't even offered in it's current state tbh
Horrible rates, suggest everyone runs an unofficial ASAP
I would be really surprised if that is the reason lol
Rates on official are horrible? Imo it's too easy to stock up
Parkour in fps games can and does make people motion sick/nauseous, yes
You telling me that you wanna sit there for a fuckin WEEK raising... literally one dino? Ok, go off I guess 🤣
I am pretty sure they made the change due to the different combat system
So am I, but the motion sickness mitigation is a cool side effect, no?
Pretty proactive of them, rather than reactive
Yeah, I am not complaining. First person in ark1 is already bad enough as it is lol
Would love if they released it with the FPS mod enabled first just to prove the dipsticks that think it'd fit wrong 😂
Was my plan from the start anyway, private server with friends where I can adjust settings whenever I have to
Hey man, those 5 min camera swaps will surely be better than the game design meant for third person only. 
I just want ark to be a game with low rates, and no stupid expensive bps
I want ark to decide what it wants to be: if it’s gonna be an MMO focused experience on insane long haul progression rates should be low as hell, but progress needs more protection
If it wants to focus on survival, rates should be higher so that you feel like a given play session isn’t wasted on mindless grind that’s intended to falsely extend gameplay
I mean, it's kind of both lol
Recent ark has shifted into the super high rates, just because people are bored with farming and want late game stuff earlier
ND because bps are stupid expensive usually
same lol
Exactly why I want ark to be a bit more clear
I just don't want to have to have a stockpile of 1million metal that I farmed in an hour that can either build and entire base, or make 10 saddles lol
The issue right now is that high rates mean there’s nothing to DO
If there’s something to actually go out and DO, rates can be higher so you’re actually experiencing something
Y’all better make this shit have 3rd person
If you don’t I’m reporting y’all to the government 😤
Ark 2 is based around 3rd person..
Oh I thought someone said it won’t have 3rd person
It might have been 1st person
Not 3rd
That’s just a weak mentality
Yeah and if you wanna be for sure go to ark2 on the Microsoft website it’ll say "Best-in-class, third-person action
Advanced character traversal mechanics like mantling, free-climbing. parkour, sliding and swinging! An emphasis on 'Souls-like' melee combat driven by player skill, with target-lock, blocks, dodges, combos, staggers and special attacks."
Bad camera angles usually
If your brain can’t tell the he difference between irl and a game,that’s pretty weak
I think your idea of the science of it is a bit weak lol
Skill issues
what is going ON
Dying light?
Getting motion sick/nauseous only happens if people don't learn how to stabilize a camera when developing the game.
No clue
Can't get motion sick if your already motion sick from being drunk 🧠
Bruh
A little late on the map talk but I think if they had a wrap around map like atlas uses it would be stellar. No need for borders that way
I mean it is a planet they are saying it is. It would be epic if you could travel the whole planet
Absolutely. And with the capabilities of UE 5 oh man it could be great. I like to imagine that they’ve been using atlas as a stepping stone in n the development of Ark 2. The way they handle switching servers is amazing compared to the obelisks in ark 1.
Whatever it is, I want the map to be gigantic, with a desert canyon that is huge, a giant dangerous forest, a huge grasslands, and a giant ocean
I think we’ve had this conversation before. I agree whole heartedly
Yeah, we are probably among the few that want a biiig map lol
Everyone else seems to want a tiny map
Bah. You can still have smaller land masses and then, like in atlas, cross the ocean to get to a new land mass. It is a planet after all.
I want the small land masses the each be as big as gen2. And the water to be 10x the size
I want it to be so big that you can sail out to sea and not see any land
Have you seen the size of the single player map in atlas? Its around 625x the size of the island. Now that would be epic in ark 2.
I have never played atlas
Well it’s buggy as hell but some of the mechanics are stellar. The way you travel around being one of them.
Traveling in a straight line could easily take 2 hours traveling at 15 knots just to wrap around to your starting point. And you would have only touched 25 of the 625 grids available.
Sorry a correction it’s only 169x larger then Ark. it’s 13 x 13 grids the size of the island.
I was way off. But still huge
Nah, otherway around
ARK-2 is only 3rd person, with no 1st person
Ok broken record I know but the map size in atlas single player is 35490 km squared. Just checked. That would be an epic map size for ark 2. 😁
Yeah, the single-player map of ATLAS with it all being land I'd be down with.
It's huge, but not fucking gigantic as the official server versions are
Currently officials have cut down drastically in size for testing purposes. There are larger unofficial maps like 17x17 but no official maps that big
If it had an ocean of similar size it would be okay
If there's a whole huge ass map idk who's paying for my 4090Ti Super XTX++ but it ain't me 😂
A giant lag spike when you switch off hibernation to allow half the things to work 💀
I don't want a tiny map either, but most devs look at what the average Steam player uses
So a 1660 and 16 GB RAM will likely be able to push Medium at 60 fps
Those are the top charted hardwares on steam now
Believe it or not most people don't even have 30 series cards 👍🏽
UE5 is supposed to be more performant, so should be fine I guess.
Theoretically it's more performant under the exact same scenarios
But we must consider this is ARK
Bah the map system works great for atlas and that’s still running UE 4
We'll see with ARK 1, UE5 upgrade.
You mean multiple servers for one giant map?
Yeah, they might take successful ideas from both ARK 1 and Atlas to make ARK 2.
I’m hoping so. Server transfer is almost instant in Atlas
All you do is sail across the border and boom, you’re there.
If the whole map isn't loaded do you know the number of issues that pop up?
In ARK 1 itself
It would be servers. So the same problem jumping from one to the other but a smoother transition
And pray who will pay for these servers?
Wildcard. 
(with official servers)
Joke of the year 10/10
I am never. Fucking. Playing. Official
If singleplayer goes I am going with it 👍🏽
Single player is all inclusive. Official is covered by the developer and unofficials are paid for by the owner or multiple owners of the cluster
Just like ark
No, I mean that if on Singleplayer, somebody wants to play with hibernation off (i.e. loading the full map) how will that person pull it off?
Well you can’t. That would be crazy
Why would you need to have everything spawned in 10 servers away? That’s like crazy talk
The size of every server is more then double the size of ark map
In ARK I, unless you load a whole map at a time, several things break:
- Creature & other worldwide scans
- Creature spawns and respawns
- Fixed point spawns (loot drops & artifacts)
These are a few apparent and major ones
Yes but you are talking about having more then one map loaded in at a time.
If you have to reload the game every time you switch between these interconnected "maps" how is it any better 😂
U just have to press a few lesser buttons
It's a nice QoL feature I guess
For me to move a raft and a handful of tames to a new map all I have to do is cross the border with it and have a 1-2 second load screen to move. Can you do that with ark currently?
In single player?
It’s a huge pain in the ass to move everything in single player ark
It’s a much better way in my opinion.
Ideally I would agree with u 100% but considering it's WC those 1-2 seconds make me fear
Well crossing a server border in single player is the only thing not glitched out so they got that one figured out.😂
hopefully
Well that’s if they even implement it in Ark 2 which I’m hoping they do
With Ue5 it is probably possible to move across huge sections of terrain without a loading screen. The issue will come if that same map is spread out over various servers on official
Already stated my piece on the "huge for no reason other than to be huge" map ideas, and it went a little like this; 🤮
People actually believe ARK II will become a success from a developer that havent even finished their 1st product after 8 years? 😄
Yeah. That seems to represent the quality of all your opinions too.
it's almost like making games is hard or something
Please dont be that guy! You simply cant argue against that is beyond all critique that a developer to THIS DAY - Still charge money for an 8 year old game, that they don't want to fix - We are talking 5 year old bugs/glitches that are very well known - That I will guarantee you that they are not looking at whatsoever!
So you actually put in hope for ARK II? With Atlas and ARK I being your go-to argument to defend them?... sure..
They did finish Ark 1 though. They’ve already openly stated that most issues in Ark 1 would require them to start from scratch to fix and that it wasn’t a feasible option at that point.
I don't think all bugs can be fixed with the way ARK 1 is built, but maybe UE5 will give some help there. Anyway, kudos to you coming into the ARK 2 channel to poke fun at everyone looking forward to it. /s
That is nothing - But a very bad excuse - Maybe they should have fixed it before adding several new maps, new dinos etc.
Oh - So this channel is simply only for the "I LOVE ARK SO MUCH" opinions?
They’re hiring. Put in your resume and help em out with your vast experience.
I believe that the little company that tried to do a couple of huge genre projects learned from their early years and are ready to create an amazing game with the knowledge and experience gained in their endeavours. It really doesn’t matter if they succeed, there will always be haters out there to complain that past efforts weren’t enough or the current effort was not what the “fan base” wanted. In the end the only thing that matters is that they accomplished what they wanted to do and there are players that have enjoyed what they have created and continue to create. So go play gta 5 or COD or something that you would rather be playing instead of coming here and spewing your negativity over something that is. So far beyond you.
Some of these bugs and glitches lots of people would really complain if they were fixed lol. Specifically the mutation cap lol
Ngl if they have a low cap/ no mutations in ARK2 I'm gonna be disappointed
You can voice any opinions and people can voice opposition to your opinions or opinions of your opinions lol
I think mutation stacking is a main attraction and beneficial feature to ark overall. And that is not a popular opinion among most who frequent this chat lol
I think it's too much lol
The 255 cap is ridiculous honestly
It wouldn't be bad if it was for minor improvements, but when a capped Dino is literally 100x better than a tamed on its a bit dumb lol
beneficial?
stat mutations are the whole reason why PVE is lackluster and PVP is just a gatekeep contest with the only way for new players go play official if the servers are wiped
and may i remind you those stupid stat mutations are the whole reason why there is a "market" for virtual dinos on ebay
I picked up the game originally because it had base building and mutations. I've also spoken to other players that started playing because they thought mutation breeding was cool, so imo I'd say it's a benefit as far as a draw to play
it's cool as a mere concept but it's downright broken to the point where the game is just monotone
and also your point if stat mutations being "beneficial" is nothing more than a personal thing
same reason why i keep playing ARK because of the taming
ARK 2 can do just fine without the stat mutation
in fact it's beneficial to the gameplay loop to not have it
As for the gate keeping and market side of things. It may be different on pc, but for xbox there is very little " gatekeeping ". Typically on 1 or 2 muts above market. I'm currently in 5 ark market discords and have been a certified trader myself, but never trader for anything besides in game items. Most new players can trade arb or c4 for any top stat dino.
ARK is a survival game not a grind market sim
I disagree, I think removing it would stagnate the game for PVP and require increased creatire releases to give players a reason to play between dlcs
Sure, but spending a few hours to get the best items in game is definitely not " gate keeping"
lmao it's already stagnated currently where is the "benefit"?
at this point people just wait for either ARK 2 or ARK 1.5, not keep breeding for mutations
hell i have seen people begging to be raided just to be liberated from stagnation
My opinion is from when I quit playing 1 1/2 years ago, but alot of people would play because they genuinely liked breeding for mutations and the competition of continually upgrading your dinos is enjoyable
citation?
Lol
i dont see people go play ARK just for mutations alone
they usually go for raiding bobs with their super capped tames or eachother
Maybe you just have a different experience from me and a majority of the people I've played with
And that's ok
That gets boring fast tbh
yee the "majority" is not just the "XBox/Win10 PVP players"
Of people I've played with* you must've not caught that
that is my point why there is no benefit to keep the stat mutation
You think we just raid Bob's? Is your point
With the focus on story in Ark 2 I’m sure there would be plenty to do other then breeding
and you missed the update
sadly linear story is just linear, it gets real boring real fast
Who said it was linear?
Having a few stat difference when fighting top tribes is the point and why stat mutations is nice to have
i am basing this on Gen 2's voiced stories and i'd say it's kinda linear
The story in the first game was amazing and most players didn’t even realize it was there. I know a guy that has put 8k hrs into the game and didn’t even realize there was lore
He just thought the game was rust with Dino breeding
so basically just a few circle of tribes raiding eachother.... hence the "gatekeep" i mentioned
it's basically just tribes with the same stat army with no longer variations that give any tribe advantage anymore because it's already capped
If by a small circle, you mean openly available to most players, sure.
Your gatekeeping logic doesnt match reality
the thing is... most people dont know the lore exist until Neddy The Noodle made a cinematic (or the other audio reads before him) lol
One or two stats above market doesnt constitute gatekeeping when anyone is free to try and get mutations
technically that is the reality
it's either just a few tribes play legitly raided each other or some scrub with money bought a capped line off of ebay
now tell me... who is getting the benefit again?
I’m on board with the gate keeping thing. I tried to break into small tribes pvp and we made great progress only to be wiped by another group with super Dino’s. The only way it’s accessible to everyone is to join the already established groups that have them.
I agree to disagree with you
i already showed you the real reality my guy
you dont even need to be a steam player to experience it
No you stuck in your own broseph and arguing with you is futile
So agree to disagree
🤣
Its 3 a.m. and I just mentioned it to prove a point, which you did for me lol
That we can argue and disagree
still didn't answer why stat mutation is still a "benefit" despite the obvious OBVIOUS flaw, in both PVP and PVE, across all gaming platforms, PC and Console and Mobile (if i want to be generous)
WC never intended to make the 225 cap in the first place
People who enjoy breeding will still enjoy breeding as long as they get something unique out of it.
color mutations my guy
That’s my point.
i am talking about the obviously broken stat mutations
color mutations is fine
Bro I dont want to continue this arguement with you but the benefits *** IMO*** :
- The sense of continual progression
- Edge in combat during raids/defenses
- Added dimensionality to the game
- A sense of accomplishment in the game
- Some players actually enjoy it.
Breeding is still viable without mutations. I’m agreeing with you my guy
At any rate Ark 2 will be a new beast and not everyone will like it but I’m hoping we can all enjoy it.
- until it becomes stagnant to the point where people begging to be raided just to liberate their duty as a breeder
- there are better ways than just super dinos, like locations, base format, turret placing, and even acknowledging the dino's abilities
- basically became a one dimensional game lol with a linear game play loop of "breed > sleep > grind > raid" and lost the "sandboxyness" of what ARK is trying to be
- not anymore when everything is easy or monotonic
- enjoyment is subjective
- you never answered the part where PVE is pointless when you have super capped dinos
Yeah, hope they show new tidbits soon
Tldr
I am honestly inclined to agree with most of Maz's points.
The 20 mutation cap needs to be strictly adhered to, not easily circumventable
breeding as an endgame mechanic to keep players playing is only valid because ark endgame is garbage due to how easy it is after a couple steep progression jumps
the only progression that meaningfully exists is breeding whether you like it or not, and its built to just be gambling time away for slightly bigger numbers or colors
Remember, mods will exist for all platforms now
So even peasants will have access to a large supply of content
I don’t disagree with your point…which is that ark 1 really leans hard on mutation stacking for extending gameplay engagement. The hope is that ark 2 can build other systems that satisfy the needs you highlight here in some way and nix the horrendous mutation system
Gotta remember there’s also a sampling bias: many of the people playing ark these days kinda HAVE to like something that takes years to complete, and breeding is that something
And that is why mods being available in all formats are now in ARK 2
a far better content expansion than just making one (should be a cool) feature like mutation more monotonous
Mods should never be used as a replacement for vanilla content
It is not, like I just said
An expansion
Removing content from ark and making ark 2 more shallow, then saying “mods can add depth back” is a flawed idea
And tbh some people started with modded ARK, so it's not really mandatory unless it's more of a "play with friends" thing
I don't say breeding should be removed
Just the idea of keeping the literal broken feature like the stat mutation as a "vanilla content expansion"
Ah, in that case sure a mod that adds mutations stacking would probably appease some folks
The worst case scenario (mutation stacking is unchanged) could even be mitigated to a degree if WC adds formal settings to circumvent it in SP/unofficial…in ark 1 you must use mods to make that process manageable
Along with this player leveled stats need to go
Since players will have skill trees dinos can slso have mini skill trees
“Strong Jaw” — Dino deals 3% more damage
“Thick skin” — Dino doesn’t give a fuck takes 5% less damage
Ark1 pvp is very restricted to people who have been playing for years. It takes a lot for a new player to get used to it and figure out how to get lines. Typically they just give up. If ark2 has a breeding system the same as ark1 the. It'll turn out the same. A slowly shrinking pool pf players that doesn't really get bigger.
Ideally the curve on ark2 will be more logarithmic in progression for pvp, instead of the hyper exponential curve it is rn
The XP graph is a pseudo straight line till lvl 110
Multiplies to around 10^5 times its initial value by the end
The “midgame” is non existent
That in an of itself doesn't cause an issue for pvp
In any game the good pvp happens at a high level anyway
It has to be rough to get there, but something like 1/2 of 1x rates without notes should do thst imo
The space between late game levels is too much though
The problem with ark is the people at "end game" can and will reset players trying to reach that point.
ark pvp that is
Imo that's not that big of an issue
Constant unofficial server crashes when the server is restarted, and maybe adding mods to console like how pc has mods if this is possible.
I get the feeling that you aren't getting constant ark2 server crashes, so you might be in the wrong channel lol
Maybe also compatibility with keyboard and mouse, and maybe making the game cross-platform for PC, Xbox, and Playstation.
Oohh, you are making suggestions?
Yeah.
My bad
It's ok
Mods are supposed to be on all platforms, and there should be cross play available, what that looks like on official remains to be seen
We just don't know about Playstation
True :/
Server stability definitely is a big thing that needs looking at. I think a lot of it will get fixed by making it harder to build, and not requiring such vast amounts of spam and such to stay alive
When do you guys think ark 2 gameplay reveal will come out
First or second half of 2023
First
My current guess is April 28th
basing it off the fact they said ''Since the announcement of ARK 2, we've watched the community's excitement and anticipation rise as we continued to work diligently in the background to define the new survival experience. Despite anticipating our next showing of ARK 2 to be a gameplay showcase, we see the hunger and eagerness for more ARK 2 information, and we get it. We’ve decided to give you a peek behind the curtain and begin showcasing more ARK 2 tidbits regularly as we lead up to the first gameplay trailer. We hope you enjoy these appetizers, and we can’t wait for you to get your hands on the main course'' it shouldn't be that long anymore i reckon
We dont know
all we know is we're gonna get some teasers before they show the gameplay
And if there are waiting for it to be in a pretty decent state i cant imagine that the launch would be that much longer
i hope they don't pull a battlefield 2042 where they said ''the game was turning out better than expected'' and it being broken enough to reach Mars on launch
Well tbf no triple a company would ever openly say our game is a fucking shitshow
I’m preordering ark 2 don’t care if it’s bad at launch I’m still playing it exactly at launch date
event ho most of them launch like that now 🤣
Most devs wouldn’t
Because even if it sucks they still spent a lot of time making it( probably)
yh, i'm good with delays as long as it's improved upon compared to what original release was gonna be like
All i will say is dont think of it as ark 1 third person because that is pretty bad for players especially
And souls like combat is not the best
but ark 1 spam combat is any better?
I mean I guess I am biased because I don’t play pvp
Its pretty good, but it really depends on the type of weapons we get in the game
idc about anything else if we can make allo skull clubs from the first trailer
I very much doubt that it would be limited to just allos
only thing we kinda saw for now, and my main weapon of interest i want to see
There are a lot of people who like souls like combat. It does make fights way more interesting. People don't like change though, I get it.
That was one of the main parts that has me hyped the most and I'm a PvE player. I don't play any PvP either except for SoTF.
Left click spam ftw 💪🏽
I am pretty hyped about the souls combat tbh
I find it to be a more enjoyable gameplay
Sarcasm in case it was too subtle
What many are failing to understand is that Souls-like combat doesn’t mean it’s gonna be a dark souls like gwme with that level of difficulty
8 hope it is lol
U want my skill issues to be out in public 😐
That's the fun part of Souls combat
You have a skill issue
Then you get better
Now it's not just a spam sim, it's a skill sim
If you get killed by another Survivor, just git gud, whatever your definition of gud is
I’m fine with souls combat as long as the horrible souls leveling and death system isn’t in ark 2
If I have to sit and wait for a loading screen each death and have to figure out what a bunch of obscure stats do I’m gonna be pissed
It did say souls-like key word "like" then specified dodge, targeting, combos, and special attacks
So from that we can come to a conclusion until more info that the combat will probably match in that aspect not leveling and loading screens while respawning
I really do enjoy games that make it hardish to progress lol
As long as it’s more monster hunter than dark souls I’m happy
For combat yes. For gameplay loop I hope it's nothing like either of them lol
I’d cry tears of joy if it’s monster hunter with building tbh
Monster hunter world was almost the perfect game for me, it just needed a little bit more in the way of crafting and building and it would easily best ark 1 as a product (well, and maybe add taming lol)
About movement, I hope the players will be able to move around the map more easily than in Ark 1.
I want to move around like Tarzan
I hope it's not easy to move everywhere lol
Movement should be fluid and smooth
Yes, but not super fast like ark1
TRAVEL SPEED should be capped sharply so the map doesn’t shrink
Not everywhere, but things like climbing should be there
Ark 1 on foot isn’t super fast
Climbing and grapples like atlas sure. But swinging like bloodstalkers nah
It is too fast imo
On foot? Not saying riding Dinos
On foot, IMO, isn’t great. Too slow, too limited.
On foot at default 100% speed isn’t too fast
Gremlin speed I hope is flat out removed, which should help
Remove gremlin models as well
200% movement speed is faster than any ground Dino lol
Its almost as fast as a flier lol
Assuming that’s removed, the mantling system seems excellent
Remove maewings and a few other gliders, and keep flier stamina limited (or enforce some other limitations on them) and I think we have a sweet spot
Mantling is nice, but hopefully it's not like cod with .5 second ttk with a mantle that takes 5 seconds
Flier wings should also receive more dmg
I don't think flier Stam should be nerfed. But I do think their weight and damage should be
Again I’m assuming fluid mantling rather than start stop like other games
Also, a major reduction in ranged weapon strength should free that up a bit
Yeah, that needs to be a think
If nobody can pick you off with a fabi, that would help
Games are just too easy with ranged damage
The fact I have no idea how will be the World Map, makes it harder to discuss those details. But if the map is really massive, most of op stuff from Ark 1 will just be ok. Like flyers stamina.
Atlas has no flyers at all
Depends heavily on the game
Damn call of duty is easy i guess
But ark has melee (mostly) tames and ranged (mostly) players…which is a rough asymmetry that hasn’t been properly explored imo
Bad example: COD is stupid easy
Tbh yeah it is lol
🚬
Only "challenge" are some DMZ bots 
Sure it has. Irl that concept has been explored quite a bit, and now we have exclusively ranged weapons. Soooo
They mentioned botw when talking about that sort of stuff although i doubt it will be as free as that game
Players are worse
Thats why it is primitive
Gun too op pls nerf
Not by much lol.
Snipers
It’s been poorly explored because I’ve not seen jack done to really dig into what that does for gameplay
I mean vodka
Reject hitscan, embrace projectiles and melee
If snipers are as hard to use in ark2 as the are irl then it would be good
Add vodka and I'll be happy
Those have been trash in warzone for ages lol
Natural selection 2 explores that asymmetric gameplay through level design and balance. Ark doesn’t seem to really do much except give players what works (ranged) and accept that most creatures are gonna be used for melee (tanking/close range combat) or should be given ranged weapons to be used like players 😂
Im talking about multi-player jackass
What is your unhealthy obsession with the game
Snipers suck there too lol, marksmans is where the meta usually is
Says the ark player unironically 😂😂😂
That’s the game I have the most commitment and time spent on: it’s not ark
I have about double my ark hours in natural selection 2, and there’s good reason for it
So you don't even like ark
You should be brewing
Bunch of bobs lol 😂😂
I think ark is innovative and remarkable, and I had fun with it. But it’s not my #1 game. Ark 2 easily could be
Remarkable? Did you find my stash?
I want games like ark to make me figure out how to survive or overcome hostile situations with a diverse toolkit
Early game ark 1 kinda does that. Ark 2 sounds like it can really deliver
You said the survival is shit
I just want fun pve that I can okay with friends and feel challenged bynit
It's been a long time since I felt challenged in a game
Ark for me just kinda hits all those Skinner boxes just right, so I keep coming back despite long breaks
In ark 1 after the early game for sure
Yes!
No other game imo gives such freedom of exploration and building, freedom to try new things in different ways
Minecraft 🧠
Minecraft doesn't lol
Too square for my taste
Minecraft is nothing but building, and you literally said that @blissful perch
Ark gameplay is more varied than mine raft
You’re tripping if you don’t think minecraft has the most freedom for almost anything
Exactly my point
Besides building
ark base game is better than mc
Being able to demo and place everything doesn't mean it has more freedom
but vanilla mc isnt really the main thing
I was fighting shifter yesterday over this exact topic
Ark’s got more challenge than minecraft vanilla, but there is endless potential in minecraft that ark will never achieve
What?
people play servers and mods
Like what lol
idk the percentage of whole playerbase
Name anything, and minecraft can have it
but arks range of community content is way behind minecrafts
So minecrsft can't even be fun without somebody making the game better with mods
doesnt help that minecraft has the intrinsic advantage of more players
Has it
Riding dinosaurs, or an actual challenging gameplay
With mods, has both
Got meth
Has it
Key word, with mods. You need other people to make the game fun for you
No it dosent
Both of what YOU suggested is in vanilla
... There was a whole argument the other day about how if you have to use mods to play it, then it's not a good game lol
The argument is that mods don’t substitute for base game design
My argument summarized
This too
Minecraft isn’t meant to be intense, because it’s meant for all ages
If you WANT intense, a non vanilla experience, you use mods
And ark base game design is more varied and interesting than minecraft
This is why I can't win arguments, I can't manipulate words like raq.
It’s more challenging, but it’s actually worse in many ways. Building is extremely restricted, you spend the bulk of your time farming materials, and much of the end game is tied to a single mutation system that’s more entertaining in an idle skilling game
The huge variety of creatures is the one thing it smokes minecraft on, and even then most use the same AI
So what if building is restricted, that isn't the point of the game
I mean, in minecraft you spend all the time looking for resources too, or wandering around endless segments of squares that all look the same.
And the mutation system single handedly ruins parts of the game that would otherwise be awesome
It's a different type of grind between the two, ark just has more fun abilities
You thought I was joking?
You’re either joking or out of your mind, so I assumed the one that makes you look better
You don't have to build to have fun in ark. You have to build to have any fun in minecraft lol, because that is like all there is to it
Building is a major element of the ark gameplay loop. It’s mandated to do in order to complete the bosses
How?
There is also much less of a pvp scene in minecraft, so just by that ark kind of wins
Beat a boss without placing a single structure in ark
Ok but not building castles like in minecraft
That’s because it was smart: it knew anarchy PvP like ark official was completely impossible to moderate and manage so it left it to unofficial networks. The unofficial PvP scene in minecraft is huge
Lol, challenge accepted. I can tame an argy, get an argy saddle out of a drop. Free smithy. Tame shadowmane. Ez dub. No structure placed
Beat ark sober, that's the real challenge
Ok, do it sober now
That problem, discovered by players playing unofficial (since minecraft has no officials) and solved by players, has not been addressed by ark yet
I’ll be impressed if you can knock an Argi with a club or slingshot
But maybe you’ll find enough tranq arrows in drops to do it with a bow
It's not hard to do
You make the YouTube play list and I’ll concede
Taming a pt is easy, use the pt to kill raptors and carno to get tranq arrows
I know it’s possible. But it’s highly outside the gameplay loop
Play ark sober
I play every game sober because I’m not an alcoholic 😇
It can be done. Minecraft can't beat the boss without mining lol
Yep
Having working brain cells? 😂
You need drugs to enjoy video games, it's a universal common knowedge
I play games for entertainment so if it’s not fun I simply stop playing
Sadge
(No mods, I am not promoting drug use)
It's a fact.you will bore yourself within an hour
Most ark pvp players are alcoholics
In game yes
Like the unnoficial cluster Arkoholics Anonymous
I challenge you to meet an ark official pvp player that isn't piss drunk
Me
Heh?
What about the many 14 year olds
I am an official pvp player, at least mostly. And not only have I never been drunk, but I have never even drank alcohol lol
If they are all drunk it would explain needing aimbot 
The 14 year Olds drink their dad's booze 🧠
Stop lying
I'm not lol
My man’s projecting 
this place slowly turns from discussions to more intense word battles every day and i love it
Gotta pass time somehow
more like ark 2 fighting now
I'm trying to quit! I would be on pot or more realistically coke
Tbh, it's always been that. It's just been awhile since I came to really stir things up lol
having the time to play official pvp is a rare thing
your either super rich or have no job
Super rich?
Lol, what
That's not how official works lol
waiting to be raided
Most often, the 30yo mothers basement virgin stereotype
People have tribes for a reason
Ice yet to see that
It's only smalls that is like that
The reason i can safely play official pve
is there a tribe limit on normal official
No
You can literally have thousands of people in a tribe
I let all the people who decided to waste their life on this game do all the grunt work
70
thats weak
It’s true that most avid PvP folks are unemployed for some reason or another. Kinda normal for any gaming sweats tho
ark 2 better have servers with 300 people
70 is the server slot count. Typically a tribe will own several servers lol
Doubt it
can you switch between them?
like with your char
Have you never played ark?
i have no idea how pvp works
And unlike me, don't try to turn their life around
Yes you can transfer to any of the thousands of servers, with your char and gear and dinos and everything
i remember i had a phioma
that saved me from my first ever raptor
it was horrifying
If server transfers weren't a thing the game would crumble
Pve and pvp
How they'll work that in ark 2 is beyond me
so i guess there are servers where a tribe completly dominates the whole map?
Pve would survive, but not on official. Pvp would die immediately
and noone else can get on
PvE with no transfers would be amazing. It’s really only required for PvP
Literally every server lol
Exactly my point
Game would get boring fast, I have exterience
And do you REALLY want to breed a new Rex line every time a new map drops?
I mean. Nah. You can play unofficial with no transfers, but what if people want to play the story, or don't like restarting all the time
Transfers need to be a thing. Game balance needs to be fixed so that you can't dominate a map transferring over with gear
i mean thats how the guys in the storys did it too
they could transfer nothing when ascending
ofc they didnt breed mutations
but they cant just take their guys with them
In the story Mei tamed a rockdrake with arrows... Clearly different than gameplay lol
in the trailer mei yin jumps and the broodmother and kills her wiith a sword xd
I enjoyed playing each map from scratch in the story so 🤷♂️
No alcoholic characters, inaccurate gameplay
Obviously mutation breeding ruins that, but if it’s not in the game it makes way more sense
Yes, but it shouldn't be obligated that people do that every map
It shouldn't be so easy to beat the map transferring over though. The wild stuff should always be stronger than tamed stuff imo
i have never finished it sadly
You probably have a couple of months to finish it
I mean as long as character levels can stay between maps it seems pretty manageable
theres a new story server starting in a week ill do it there
prefer it with a totally new server
single player doesnt have the same vibe
also i will eventually fail at the boat missions in gen 2
I think pve transfers should be limited to one tame, the hotbar and ammo, a set of gear and some consumables.
and i have never set foot in gen 1 either haha
Idc either way, because official PvE doesn’t appeal to me…but it’s an idea
Last time I did a story run, it was an unofficial server with S+, once I mutated some Rexes and Megalosaurus to max stats, the rest of the maps went by a lot quicker ...
Mandating new breeding each map slows things down
But it was fun roleplaying as the server's comicbook villain
Yeah, if I ever do another one, I'm not going to transfer tames
8 am hoping that official pve is better and has some pvp action, while not being total anarchy pvp.
We hard banned mutated tames on our cluster and it did wonders
Game actually felt fun and playable
how could you change world domination of a single tribe
i dont see a way
PvE I believe isn’t like that
i thought pvp
That's why it's pve lol
Wut
I don't want to fight no players
Raq is speaking about the PvE in PvP servers
The black market in pve is already bad enough
No, I am saying I want some pvp in pve servers lol
Just like some random fights
Fuck no
I think they just made shit up
Thinking we would believe anything they feed us
Could be lol
Nah I'm pretty sure it is
'They' who, lol?
The illuminati, who else
Ah, gotcha. Thanks for clarifying
all know its still wildcard it wont be june
give it september
January, take it or leave it
Ark 2 out yet?
🍻

Or, hear me out, there won’t be such definitions as pve and pvp. There will be pve regions and pvp regions. 🤯
PvX basically
Don’t wanna play with toxic scrubs & cringe kids
Then don’t play Ark 
Games have tried that before. From my experience you end up with the pvp zones being pretty much dead.
No, play Singleplayer.
You fake Poglin Ganger
What if you are toxic and cringe?
I am cringe not toxic
You are not safe then
Makes sense 

That’s not what happened in atlas, they just need to balance things for each zone. But I understand what is your point. It’s risky indeed
please no xd
no that's the iron brotherhood that killed brood, Mei and Helena fight the monkey with a Giga, the anime has a different story than the game... anyways
as long as thee is no stat mutation that made PVE trivially sad then i am fine with it
i can look pass the BS 3rd person only if i have to (as i am struggling to make my building pretty in Valheim lol)
They’ve already said that’s something a mod can add. Unless you plan to play on officials, you might be able to play it in 3rd person.
I would love pvp and pve zones but unlikely
I mean, Ark 1 had the declare war feature. If they work on that, it’s a maybe.
after how they handled the devkits, modded 1st person view will be hell
like you have to wait for a full week just for a simple arse feature to be updated lol
I think first person view will be hell in Ark 2 and that’s the reason they decided to remove that option. But for those who want it no matter what, there will be a mod for sure.
bad reasoning to not having it as standard when ARK 1 and ATLAS are fine as it is
the mod will be hell however because what i just said earlier
Well it seems Ark 2 will have a totally different movement system, not just the combat system. And for that reason, first person wouldn’t fit.
also how can be a literal dev made 1st person be "bad"
then that kinda prove that WC is incompetent as a dev if they relied on the modders for a simple feature that they themselves already implemented in their own game
It’s a game design thing. They don’t feel it’s good for gameplay, so they remove it.
ATLAS and Conan says HI
hell Mirror's Edge says hi if you ask for parkour
My assumptions, of course
Again, new movement system. I don’t think it will be like atlas or Conan. That’s the only reason I can think that makes sense to remove it.
i rather have optional first person like before instead of outright removing it and rely on the modders to do it
Mirror's Edge and Dying Light says hi
Ok, but it won’t happen. Unless they change their minds at some point
ME is hell
Dying light also hell
But anyways, not my game, you have to pressure the devs so they can change their minds
With proper design considerations, I really don't think forced 3rd person is going to be as bad as everyone thinks it will be. Especially if there's a lot less of a focus on ranged combat
Will ark 2 be out one Xbox one?
nope, only xbox Series X and S
Big sad
sad for the people that still haven't upgraded, it had to happen so the game wasn't held back by the old tech from previous gen consoles like Ark 1 kinda was and it can be the best it can be with current tech
Bullet jumping?
He's high, don't listen to him
I prefer ranged combat almost always
i want creature clashing
if i wanna shoot guns i can play any other shooter game there are thousands
but fighting a rex with a raptor thats were its at
I'd prefer melee, mostly because I don't have the reflexes for twitchy aim shooters
Gimmie my open world, base building Monster Hunter
i remember widowmaker in overwatch, grapple in the air quick snipe and kill
great times suprised i was able to do it
but this is dinosaurs
🦖
any game can have building and combat, but the dinosaurs is what brought me to Ark and what keeps me on Ark
You have time

Family is everything
ARK is everything more than family
ark 2 kill you or you kill ark 2 what one coms first lol
Ark is family
Family is Ark
Family is the homies in Ark2 chat waiting for their next clink 🍻
What I love about world was exploiting openings and learning my opponent. You can’t really do that when the combat is ranged weapons from distant opponents with no real tell or animations to work with
Who needs friends when you have family
Friends are family if you think about it the right way 🧠
Same, even though I have the reflexes lol
There definitely gonna still be ranged weapons if nothing other than bows and crossbows
Those are okay as long as they aren't significantly stronger than melee weapons
I imagine them having blueprints like now to depend on that, I just hope Ascendant equivalent as the max blueprint is more rewarding to get than it is in Ark 1, I think it was little to simple to get highest blueprint in Ark 1
Power creep also made Asc blueprints a lot more common than they were on the Island
Hopefully Ark2 has higher quality items actually pretty tough to get
I hope there are no blueprints lol
I definitely want different levels of blueprints, just need them to have a little more to do in order to get the good blueprints
I don't want bps, because inevitably they force harvest rates to increase. And I don't want that
Being required to go harvest more is actually something you should have to do in order to sustain high level gear and weapons
The higher quality gear you use, the more you should need to keep on hand to maintain those items
I want creature saddles to take damage where you have to maintain and repair saddles every so often.
Yes, but the bloated numbers from ark1 isn't something I want to see again
Having to get 10 of a hard to get resource is better than getting 70k of an easy to get resource
Ark1 resource costs are so inflated in both cost and stat that it's ridiculous really
I disagree with that, I think being required to stockpile regular resources is essential to keep all resources useful and not 80% redundant. Also if it was just a small number of one rare resource to maintain high level gear you do realize the Alpha of a server on official just going to hoard over that area.
You disagree that resource costs for saddles and armor is inflated?
That last part is the biggest reason it would be better to just make it a higher number of regular resources because making it so alpha of the server can build over an area that they know is needed to maintain high level gear is far worst than stockpiling regular resources since you will be already using them so I'd rather have to harvest 5 figures plus of resources
Can’t wait to defeat the bosses of ark 2 with family in 2030
The resources should come from Dino spawns imo. Stuff like spino sails, Dino bones, Rex teeth etc. The type of thing that doesn't Spawn in one individual place every time
As far as building over resource rich areas, you literally cannot avoid that in pvp. If someone does, then raid the spot. If you can't it's usually a skill issue and not a game issue
Dino spawns are affected by bases being built in ark1
But they mention things like migrations in the steam page, so I am hoping for a more dynamic Dino to environment behavior
No, I got it, I think you missed the ark1 😂
Ark2 will be different than ark1, and one of the main differences I want to see is getting rid of the stupidly high resource costs for bps. As well as the crazy stat differences between armors of the same type
I think that is a fairly reasonable request lol
Good weapons and saddles should be hard to get because the resources are rare and hard to get, not because it takes 6 hours of mindless farming the same basic resource
If it somehow works to just automatically shift spawn location cool, but I won't hold my breath on that considering I don't think it going to work like that for spawning. I think at best that would only effect dinos already there.
I am not going to limit my hope to stationary spawn points for ark2. Not only does it no longer fit with the lore, but they already mentioned mechanics that could change it. So I want to see that happen.
It would require a good ai for dinos is all
Either way, making a pathfinding that adds bases into its calculations is not really that difficult
I mean, I dont have experience coding things like that. But I think I could write something similar down in just a couple hours
Its just basic path finding. Doesnt even need machine learning
I am pretty sure that rolling code is not the term lol
It would just require some basic recursion
And the basics for a recursion algorithm that would apply to the pathfinding is literally taught in the first programming classes in uni
I think the term you are looking for is recursion. Rolling code is a security feature in garage doors lol
Recursion is really easy though lol
Like if you get in the complicated math of it (and a game path definitely should) it makes it a bit harder to plan out. But the actual principles of it are simple enough to teach people that have never coded anything before
In either case, I am betting the hard lifting for pathfinding is already done. All it takes is an application of it
I mean the topic was having better dino spawns and how that would work to reduce the number cost of gear lol. So I dont think it was off topic
Migrations are pointless if you are meat running everything, so regardless of how fancy spawns are the insane ark 1 BP costs probably have to go
Simply killing the creatures required for 200k hide would break down the entire purpose of improved AI and PvE…since you’d have to mindlessly kill everything to farm that amount of a common resource. It would be far superior to need trophies or other rare resources
Tbf at this point in the game I just buy hide from gen 2
What's kept me on the game was the server wars and stuff it was very intresting at the thine
Time^
i have a new discovery about this channel, its alway joe bradock against anyone else lol
?
Usually “hot take” vs everyone else
more like ''hot take'' or ''unofficial rumours'' vs everyone and official info most of the time
Ok that’s true, sometimes people just say incorrect shit lol
or make the wildest theories even when official sources say otherwise
The first one here was that “no tek” meant no glowtails or gasbags
what in tarnation
i honestly shouldn't be that surprised, we're talking about the ark community after all
🤷♂️ just saying it’s always been a thing lol
when did they say " no tek"
pretty sure it was in one of the community crunches or tweets just after genesis 2's launch where it's title was ''what's next for Ark? Not tek that's for sure''
Plus Ark2 has been described as 'primitive focused' since initial reveal
cmon man, you know basic reading and brain processing is kinda rare here ☕ 
Research indicates that the average ARK player has -35 IQ
the majority at least
This is not rumours peer reviewed stuff 💯
I think the extreme recorded was -249 IQ
those extremes are common in general and tsotf
But the average perceived IQ is 200
Atkeast they have the mindset
'I am a
among
'
@winged dome how many bottle did you consume so far
Easily round 50
It's funny, but I don't actually drink - just clinkin' for the good times
Back on topic please
Because they meant lost island which has no tek
They never said that? It was a tweet
It was a community crunch
It was actually pinned here at one point I thought, though I cannot find it
they meant ark 2. It was in a similar thread to the one that stated ark 2 is primarily primitive. This is backed up not only by the direct tweet about what was next for ark but ALSO from the Pax interview where we can see WC is trying to shift tek away from being more friendly in the environment (landmarks and technology we use and rely on) to being more hostile (ie we can't control it)
I hope not only Tek Stuff gets removed like Tek Suit and Tek Skiff but also that you can no longer travel servers. This whole , i grind and then upload all my stuff thing, needs to go imo.
Official going to already become minority due to cross platform modding that Ark 2 will offer, that would be the engraving on the headstone for official cause the sheer grind would turn everyone off if they couldn't transfer within the same cluster of official servers. Unofficial it doesn't matter cause you can just find a server rate you like.
your point makes no sense. people will play official no matter what. and transfering has nothing to do with grinding.
Be forced to create a brand new character from scratch and level it has nothing to do with grinding? 😂
Bare minimum that I agree with would save it
i think they should also give the option to mark a character as your "favorite" as you can do with servers. and then you can always see which server its on. I know so many people that lost their Character cuz of the sheer amount of servers that exist.
That's stupid, nobody would play that shit because once a tribe takes over a map then they can't do anything else.
thats literally current ark. that has nothing to do with that lmao
That's not current ark though, because there's transfers.
I hope they get it to work with unofficial servers to this time, because only official favorited servers showed up in the server search tab for favorites.
every map in small tribes that has a decent spot is taken. so transfering doesnt solve that at all ? youre save nowhere
Wtf are you talking about
transfering just makes shit worse. it allows for alphas to transfer and raid across multiple servers
No, it makes the game playable at all because you take over entire maps if you're relevant whatsoever.
Tell me you only play PvE without telling me you only play PvE
I actually support a character only transfer system that Siggi is suggesting. It'd be like using a bed to fast travel to an outpost where your inventory needs to be empty.
wtf are you on about. noone takes over an entire map. youre probably just playing some stupid 1000x servers so your opinion has no value here since im talking about official servers
if you mean alpha spots, yes. theyre always taken
?

Ark 2 isn't out yet, so no one's taken over anything
If they go the way I think they will, you won’t have to use “obelisks” to travel to other maps because it will be a big massive map. You will just need to travel by foot or riding your tamed creatures.
Just to be clear, that’s my opinion. There’s no clear info what they have planned to their new world map system.
Based on the wording I'm seeing on the steam page, regarding instances and cloud data, I'm assuming you'll merge lobbies with people as you move into different areas, or something to that effect.
I'm very excited to see how they deal with online official multi-player.

I would love a massive map concept like that
How about being able to transfer servers with your character
Siggi mentioned a idea I support, make it blanket character transfer and have it same as fast travel with the bed in Ark 1 where you need an empty inventory.
I'm curious if the new tame manager will work similar to how old ark 1 transfers worked
such that the tame manager could hold X creatures in "cloud storage" that could be pulled one at a time on cooldown from anywhere
between that and character transfers you could pretty much neuter mat transfers while allowing people to move smoothly between servers/maps
there's a valid argument to be had that once an alpha takes over a map, transfers don't really change that structure ever again. The only people to wipe alphas are themselves going to function as map owning alphas for everyone else. The leader changes but the functional day to day is the same
At this rate I'm gonna be hitting clips in ark 2 b4 sotf
Obviously those tribe wars between alphas/megas are probably superior to complacent alphas...so transfers to mitigate that makes some sort of sense. But I really lean towards wipes or other ingame limitations (such as strict base caps, etc) being a superior solution for toppling server ownership
Better then pods imo
Or ark leans away from the segregated survival maps style gameplay and goes more into the MMO map where everyone is expected to play official and PvP is zone or mode based. But I suspect from Dollie's comments here a while back that ark 2 pvp will be like ark 1 in that servers/clusters will have the ark 2 map all pvp or all pve
Oh God I hope they steer clear from that
As much as I liked the mmo element. Your idea would be aids
Honestly if they must add dino and item transfer make upload only and leave it inventory empty still
I’d prefer the MMO be dropped entirely and each server be like arkpoc
Until they add a server hop Dino simular to fjordhawk and beds
Full wipes monthly, the goal is survival, and if you become the alpha you can brag you won a season
Then what's the point
I play to do the missions (really it's because my mates egg me to get on)
Same deal in ark 2 then
You have nothing to show for your time wasted, is what I mean
You don’t have anything to show in almost any video game for time wasted 🤷♂️. The move would simply make ark a repeatable survival challenge experience rather than a weird psuedo MMO
You don’t need meta progression in every game
You usually do, even if it's small
I feel like for PvP I could see a forced wipe on a set time, but for PvE majority of people prefer to build for looks rather than defense
You kinda dk
You kinda don’t. League, one of the most played games, has no meta progression
It's repeatable when you get wiped
Man’s never heard of a hobby or a pastime huh
I wouldn't know
It feels more like work then anything
If you want wipes go play arkpoc or a dedi
So let’s gloss over the projecting and get back to the subject of wipes
Indeed, by my logic the norm would be arkpoc and the special format would be a “long war” or “perma” cluster set
Boils down to how lengthy the progression scheme is and how intense the MMO/RPG elements become though…if it takes 1k hours to get anything completed wipes make no sense as the default
That was my second question
The reason rust works is becuasey ou can get everything in a few hours
Your second question was “why play a game”
Why play a game where it feels like you get nowhere
Because the game itself is something to derive enjoyment from
The enjoyment out of video games for me is achieving somthing
People don’t play chess because there’s a loot box you get for winning. They like it because they like playing chess
What the new dino?
And having that wiped would piss me off
Nothing new revealed just yet…let’s see in a few hours if the crunch shows us anything
I don’t think it would as much as you think it would
I already know it would
It boils down to what’s being lost. If it’s trivial or if the gameplay revolves around something other than collecting rare things, a wipe would be nearly meaningless
Okay but imagine playing monster hunter and not being able to make new gear
A few hours
Not sure I grasp this comparison. Monster hunter is entirely grounded in repeated hunts for specific rare items and materials
Some decorations you may never find in your entire play time. That sort of rarity is the direct counter design to a wipe based model
The fabled hard frost res deco 😩
A game crumbles if it dosent feel like you work towards anything, yet somehow battle royales exist,
Because they have skins in a battlepass
Indicating your grasp of game design and the market is limited 
Cosmetics would work fine in a wipe based model
But tbh battle royales are pretty dead rn
Apex had a strong upswing a year or so ago
Fair. But would you play a singleplayer game like dark souls if it wiped every time you logged off? (Ik old games used to do that, and look what happened)
Yeah that's the only one that has a decent playerbase
It's dead too, it was a trend
If the game was designed around single session play, sure
People don't even fucking play warzone
Battle royales as a market are 100% oversaturated
Forgot that even existed lol
But there’s a serious market for games that everyone starts equal, plays a round…and after a winner is declared the game resets
I never cared for BRs, yet for some reason I qant sotf on console to drop already
Strategy games
It’s an extremely normative gameplay design
Ew
Change that structure ever again? Like, wipe it?
Wipes is one method. Blocking tribes from owning a whole map through other means is another
I mean whatever you make will just get wiped by the tribe unless you're actively fobbing or something
I have a genuis method to handle pvp
The objective in those games is usually to win, its a much shorter time frame than a game like ark
So what we do is we send mental help professionals to the house of people who play pvp ark, or rust
And it got stale because of a lack of long form progression
Depends on the person and also people dont always play games for long term progress they can also play it for in the moment action and excitement there isnt a ‘right’ way to structure a game
What emote is this
Some games are meant to abuse people’s loot box/gambling craving more than their dopamine from excitement or engagement
Others satisfy the need for novelty or immersion in a story
I need engagement in long term progression, I want to feel like I did somthing, even if all I actually did was sit in front of a screen pressing buttons on a controller while drinking whiskey
But you really want sotf, a mode which has none of that
Ikr
When does that even come out for consoles
I already know I'm gonna play it for a few games and then lay it down
Its gotten delayed like twice now
It comes out on console when lotus stops being schizo