#ark-2
1 messages · Page 71 of 1
Oi. You owe me a name change. We had a bet fair and square. Don’t avoid the topic.
guess you dint notice i stop talking to you since you mention you wanted yo make a bet right? too old for that sorry
I asked if you wanted to bet and you said sure
Kids these days man I stg
any news on A2 being FPV or still just 3rd PV?
Good man 🤝
It's still 3rd person
@thick moat Ahh cheers, well thats "poop" then 😦
so already judging third person only without seeing it's in game gameplay look again? who knows, it might be implemented well and be immersive, yes third person only games can also be immersive if done right.
Also not trying a game simply bc it isn't first person is some of the dumbest things i've ever heard, you'd think we were used to third person with dinos in Ark 1, but i guess when everything is third person it's a deal breaker
👀
You hate to see it
hope third view aint that crapping view behind the back and more to the right side like gears of war etc
I hope it's right behind the back of the head like when you are stuck behind someone tall at a concert.

The last of us is third person and that’s a pretty immersive game id say
nothing beats 1st person though
I have a thing for the animations on 1st person, it feels satisfying
Mhm 1st person is my preferred
same, i won't mind 3rd though
gonna be funny if the game as moves from dark souls and be on 1st person, roll=puke 🤣
puking simulator
any first person mods quickly made within the first week will probably be bad camera swaps, compareable to quickly forcing something meant for TPO to FPO will always look worse than the TPO wich it was designed with in mind
third person only also allows for better player animations.
The Ark 1 first person animations for players aren't the greatest 😅
Tbh that’s ok though. I’m down for a dope mod 2 years after ark 2 comes out that adds first person if that’s what people want to make
There’s tons of amazing mods for ark 1 that are impressive but very clearly never stuff that’s going into vanilla, and I’m about it
It depends on how it’s done. The UE5 port could be a launch setting or “free” DLC rather than a forced transition. It also depends on how UE4/5 support is handled
Could be they're releasing a UE5 remaster because ARK2 is getting further delayed 👀
could be, could also be to keep up hype until it's released later this year
Ark 2
I want Dino armors
more water dinos and more varied water ecosystem - there is ton of land dinos, quite a few flyers but not many water dinos
3rd person is the new normal so I hope for more weapons - more types of melee mainly, wanna beat T-rex by myself
Also as there will be human NPCs I would like similar system from Conan Exiles, where you can enslave them and make them help you with crafting and stuff - like faster crafting or bonus stats
And the most important at the end - Fewer bugs and crashes, and if there are, fix them and do not leave them
I also wanna big Dodo that I can ride, not dodorex, normal dodo but bigger
I hope they add more automation
Dont want it
would bring too many bugs in my opinions
and if they do it i want it as either another game or DLC so we can still play normal one if we dont like UE5
That is for sure why they are doing 3rd person. More water dinos would be very cool, or atleast make water more "necessary" resources that can only be found in water.
yeah, there are few water resources but not many
also if i could build underwater base
Hmm that would be nice and for PVP it would make it more interesting
dont play PVP tho
Since defo no scuba
why no scuba? They could come out with a "primitive" version
Straw pipes
or you get some sac from a creature like a gas bag
Diplocaulus
Honestly survivor sucking from diplocaulus if drawn realistically would be NSFW 💀
only because you're a level 7 pervert
Diplocaulus
would make one of the most useless creatures useful
I wouldn’t make such art in the 1st place
I was just teasing you
I know xD
Tho perverts are rampant in the ARK community it seems
Did u see the rapid rise of the Lion in the creature vote?
I have 69 of them in my conquest tribe
It was in exchange for Onlyfans subscriptions’ by a twitch th- streamer
wtf are you guys talking about at this point
perverts mostly
pushed from 2022 to 2023
Then I expect some announcement like June 23rd
then another going sorry we will not make it
new release date October 15th
releases and we gonna say - wish they made another delay
ngl 💀
How do you know all this stuff? you must be psychotic!
he probably thinks he could've done it faster, delays happen and people moaning about it isn't letting it come out any faster lol, also crunch hours are just bad practice as i'd rather have Wildcard be fully motivated and excited working on Ark 2
shred that keyboard
Well they seem to know when they want to share gameplay now, or at least a general time since they are starting to build up to it with more frequent teasers. And its not like the ark team ever really shows off any super early stuff so if they are going to share gameplay “relatively” soon im guessing early access cant be that far off might still be past the june due date though
Ya we're all hopeful, probably a reasonable prediction.
Rather they delay it to 2024 if its not done than releasing a half-done game like most game companies do these days
early acces ehem
it still has to be playable
Its an ark launch so probably not
At minimum servers will be at 200 ping
Meh I'll just use my own server then with 10 ping
obviously but we are referring to the content of the game aren't we
Not saying that its impossible but they dont exactly have a great track record of good launches
most companies today just release games half done without all the content, so that's what im getting from ur msg
To be fair, many games have problems on launches
and those are ''full launch games'', at least Ark 2 is honest with it being Early Access
yep
pay $60 for the latest battlefield put out 1 year too early due to greedy publishers
if they wanted to release a full game we'd probably have to wait 5 years longer
Maybe. How long did ARK 1 take from going to full game? like 4-5 years?
2 years early access
one thing I really hope for them to get right this time is optimization and reducing bugs
Really? felt like longer, tho my memory sucks
3.5 if you count extinction as actually finished
nah it still felt like an early acces after the release tbh
yeah, the poor optimization has really made ark feel like crap
But what does it taste like
still awesome in many ways but yeah I hope they improve on that too
if they optimize it well and have minor bugs it will paint a good picture of wildcard and people will gain trust with them
yea
Well we will see
Like we all know their track record is not all that great in those areas
yes that's why I hope they have learnt
let's be honest: ark 1 was their first big project, Ark 2 will be their currently most funded project and the team is much more experienced and larger compared to when they made Ark 1's base foundation in 7 months, bundle that with some spaghetti code and ya got Ark 1. they hopefully made the base code over a longer time period and UE5 being easier to work with and i can see it being more optimized and less buggy
do we know how many devs from ark 1 are still with wild card. The lessons will be carried on by them not management.
architects, etc
I’ll wait until we actually have it
Hypotheticals are fun and all but its not the actual game
Well yeah its ark mobile lmao
Has nothing to do with Ark 2
ARK 2 will not have a first-person mode and will be presented only from a third-person perspective. is this true?
yes, but that doesn't automaticly mean it will be bad
oh no wonder you died lmao, but still dying doesn't make it bad
they dropped L
let me guess, you won't get it bc of third person only? Third person only can also look good, so i'd keep your final opinion open until gameplay is shown, it isn't the end of the world without first person lol.
it's also being built with third person only in mind, and i highly doubt the delay is to change to first person bc nobody knew it would be TPO until the teaser with the delay and the steam page being shared on the same day, so that dumb argument falls flat as well 😂.
But hey, you and the others in the minority that won't play something bc off the camera angle can still play it in first person if you use mods that are just quick camera swaps
That’s what I’m sayin
I mean the fewer people who play ark2, the more chance there is for me to be alpha lol
You talk like a beach bob. 
What engine will ark 2 be on?
Unreal Engine 5
release it faster plx all the games out there now sucks
so you want a rushed product that will suck? even it were thrown out to meet a target date you'd probably still complain that it would be buggy and unoptimized. simply put: you can't rush good games
It’s the classic triangle of time vs content vs polish. You can only pick 2
Ark 1 imo chose content and time, and I’m content if ark 2 chooses content and polish
same, i'd rather have better polish and content than ''toss something new out every 1-2 weeks''
I’m flexible, but I want to see the time be well spent
If I’m waiting ages for a return to a buggy and poor QC product it’s gonna sting
For me I think its going to be time and polish, I dont expect ARK 2 to have like 200 dinos or whatever on launch
They're gonna go the same path as ARK 1 did by adding more dinos as the games progresses through early access period
Valid take tbh
nothing wrong with that, it will need to be more polished than Ark 1 anyway and new creatures keep us invested longer
Quality over quantity is better imo
As a person who hasn't experienced getting a dino every week or month during early access back then, I'm excited to live that experience with ARK 2
I don’t think it will be the case, and that’s a good thing. I was playing ark 1 on its release day, it was a mess, you won’t want that. Multiple updates in a day isn’t ideal to play. 🤣
hope they have kibble cause i dont wanna spend 7hours taming a dino 🤣
Ark 1 took six months to be released in early-access. It won’t be the case for Ark 2. Hence why I don’t believe they will update it as much as they did back then.
multpiles upates werent a problem, the rubberband and crash whit rollbacks now that was a big problem
thank god the base code for Ark 2 will hopefully at least take longer to make than the 6 months base code for Ark 1
Putting things into perspective, Ark 2 is a work of more than 8 years (counting Ark 1).
They are experienced devs. I mean, if you look Atlas, it didn’t have all the issues we have on Ark 1.
Like the mesh holes, for example.
it was ultimately what they originally wanted Ark 1 to be as well, but didn't have the knowledge, experience and resources back then during Ark 1's initial early access launch to make it a good reality
Also the players PCs and consoles were a lot weaker than today.
yup, i'm glad older tech won't hinder Ark 2
Not the bugginess obviously lol, but I meant the constant flow of new dinos ig 😅
I'm just gonna ignore officialls and go for unofficial, its way more fun and.. mods
I hope updates are gonna be significantly smaller in size
dont like unofficial, the idea im at the mercy of someone's in control of the server dosent go well plus its more likely the server be isolate no transfers
fair enough, also in unofficial theres a chance the server might shutdown which happened to me once when I left a server and decided to go back.. to nothing
that really depends on whats being patch really
Yeah definitely a better code, and with a better code we get smaller update sizes I believe? idk I'm not a gameplay programmer to know if thats related 🤔
for file/update size it's all down to how good it's optimized iirc, just my guess as we're both not experts on that field
They should learn from the mfs that made jurassic world Evo 2
That shits like 9 gigs only
Like how bro
Ohh yes optimization, which unreal engine 5 is good at I think
Just looked it's 8 gigs lmao
Yep I played that and it's incredible! had a lot of dinos to play with and still less than 10 GBs
still amazes me till this day
likely due to it being more optimized and not needing giant super detailed maps like Ark, as it's basicly a decently detailed park builder map you place structures and creatures on
Yeah its waayy simpler and less complex
Many people on Playstation use keyboard mouse?
probably a super small minority
I just want a companion app in ark 2
hiding here while general goes up in flames 
i wonder if we will get a creature that can blow stuff up in ArkII
would be lit
no pun intended
Dinos that just explode
Like creepers
Did anyone ever figure out you can soak player only turrets with a magmasaur? No shots required
it could be done by having the creature fire a combustible gas of some sort
then give them an internal lighting mechanism, or a different gas that reacts with the first one, to create explosions
kind of like the hideous zippleback from how to train your dragon
Make sure to keep this channel relevant to Ark 2.
Simple way would be new element corruption type
Time has made it volatile and will cause dinos to explode when damaged or aggravated
High doubt there will be corrupt dinos
just speculation and suggestions
Tbh that kinda stuff would have been cool on extinction now that I think about it ¯_(ツ)_/¯
I'm down for a shoulder pet size creature that fires something destructive
I doubt there wouldnt be, in some shape or form
element is arks main antagonistic force after all
pretty major update for ark 1 addresses a common ark 2 concern. I mention as much: comment deleted. I won't retype but I'm not sure what policy I violated
uh what
No tek might mean no more element
dw, carry on
probably because it wasnt relevant to arkII
that is incorrect
it was directly relevant in my message but again, nbd
idk
Tek was still on the ring that crashed so tek still there
yeah
I think element in the form of ark 1's element is gone
we may see dust tho as a rare crafting material or mission item
doesn't mean it'll be used in any form of crafting
Dont get me wrong, I'd love there to still be tek and element. That's just not what it sounds like from the devs. Atleast not on release
I'm gonna be pissed if tek comes back at any time in ark 2's lifespan
I pray WC can keep the game's power scaling curve reasonable
tek armor can be left behind but skiff....
Qol tek is something I'd like to see return, I will say the tek rifle and mek had too many exploits for my liking
tek bow was way op but for pve it felt good the ability to tranq dinos whit shards alone no need to make tranq arrows or darts
the skiff is probably the single most critical tek thing to remove
behind maybe the tek chest
but yeh in the begining the very least will be kinda like island butno tek engrams so no tek there
but but i love my mobile home 😭
skiff was the only opportunity i had to ever use a minigun turret, kill a alfacrystal wyvern whit that 🤣
In qol of life terms, skiff, teleporter and cryos are things I hope to see some substitute for eventually
i do hope they cut off anything like a cloner or at least make it a unique structure so can only be one per tribe, those things on pve can go messy really fast whit dumb ppl
I hope the tame manager renders cryos entirely obsolete
Hmm maybe the modular building will help with this
Like an outpost you can build to transfer your tames from the main base
i'm flexible. I just want the pokeball stuff removed
I dont know lol. I dont ever want to see portable cryos again lol
if i wanted to play Pokemon, i'd play pokemon with dinosaur esc pokemons lol
i cant wait for the real ARK 2 antagonist
the common cold
Idk, I doubt you could find a better qol improvement atleast in Ark 1
Sure you can. A standalone structure that can upload dinos not in use. If you need more than one dino at a time, then the game wasnt designed very well imo. For a raid, you should have to bring an army with you (making supply lines actually important) rather than just instantly building a massive fob with dozens of tames in it
I meant in terms of ark 1.
In terms of more than 1 dinos, dinos abilities having unique and important roles is a major part of ark
I'd hate to see that go
I don't think it'll go, but I don't want having 6 cryoed dinos in hand or upload something necessary to play
never in ARK 2
joined the discord just to cry about inis being removed? lmao this shit is pure comedic perfection
IKR
i think i'm stocked up for 2 weeks with just tonight
im enjoying seeing all these tears
it's really rehydrating my comedic reserves, i think i'm stacked up for a month
a lesson learned for ARK 2
give just the accessibility options and Low Memory Mode
no more Visual INI
only things you should be able to change are graphical settings, not ini files that remove like 90% of the objects to find someone on pvp. view distance shouldn't be changeable as well
i dont mind the slow down of light effects to prevent visual sensitivity
i mean view distance is already as an option
plus filmmakers like Ned use FOV religiously
people on pvp can also just put view distance on low and it basicly does the same as ini
i dont mind for the view distance to be adjustable
same, but it shouldn't be as changeable to Ark 1 low view distance
Orbit Camera/K Mode however should not be meshed like Conan does
tbh we need "spectator mode+" to access good stuff like NVidia Ansel, meshable Orbit Cam, and Extreme View Distance Adjustment
imagine people use ini on the beauty of UE5 Lmao
knowing the ark pvp community, they will try to find a way to get the smallest advantage
we have nvidia ansel
unless u are talking abt ark 2
ye but for SP only not MP
What date does it come out?
Does Snail games have rights/ control over Ark 2?
iirc they're mostly just involved with publishing the game, they bought Ark and wildcard during the lawsuit early on in Arks life. so msotly just control over the publishing, but they wanted to add microtransactions to ark 1, but the devs heavily protested to add any microtransactions/nfts to the Ark series whilst they're still around. so mostly just control over it's publishing
Essentially wildcard is one of their subsidiaries
and only Ark is really making money compared to all the Snail games lol, hard to have your main money makers to be made if you won't let them make it without forcing them to add microtransactions/nfts into the game design
I read somewhere that they chose to write off their existing non-ark ips. That might be speculation though because not much actual info is out there
I think cosmetic microtransactions are fine as long as there is a way to farm them out without currency
nah i prefer the DLC way
at least we can get more content from just a limited time skin that lures FOMO sensitive players with crippling shopping addiction (i.e.: me)
i remember WC goes on a strike if MTX are in ARK 1
i hope it keeps it that way, no more bowing down to the greedy overlords
and last time i checked they are actually well off, financially
like c'mon they can afford Vin Diesel and David Tennent as VA
I only just recently found out about the Snail games controversy and it was quite scary
it is
just hope they don't ruin ark 2 with their bs
i am leaning to doubt until WC do something about it like one dev actually left their publisher and they are still fine
''Lots of creative interpretations going on, here! NFTs and crypto in ARK and ARK 2 will never happen on our watch and are not in the plans at all''
be happy Wildcard ain't EA, they would've added it in a heartbeat for some quick cash from crypto/nft bros
Publishers seem like relics of the past
tbh they are needed Devolver Digital is a publisher, not a dev
and that is the only few good publisher i can find
at least it's no Nintendo like jeeeeez
The interfering in gameplay controversy or something else?
something something megatribe favoritism
Lols
Well, as a publisher, if they've "bought out wildcard," that gives Snail games a lot of control. They can do horrible things to these devs to force them to make ark 2 how snail games wants
I thought the same...
Havent they owned wildcard for years?
since 2016
1 year after Arks release? Rag wasnt even out yet
Rag was firmly in development, I'm not sure what your point is
The point is they own WC since the beginning
^
During a games launch month, it makes roughly 80% of the profit it ever will. This has become less true over the last 5~ years, but concern about ark 2's launch when their publisher is very clearly corrupt is quite justified
as there is hundreds of millions of dollars on the table
I wouldn't say very clearly 😂
well they want to Tackle the rmd side of the game. why should other people get Profit "they themselfs can make"
I'm not sure anything have happened. Not everything on youtube is trustable.
who would go on the internet and just tell lies?
I'm pretty sure they sold alot of dlcs between now and then. I've havent seen an overtly shady things
its talks about adding Nfts into the other game if they get their way
What? Lots of people. 😂
People lie on the internet all the time
Lies are easy to spot, as they have no evidence and often aren't corroborated. But when thousands of people independently come forward, with evidence and no link to each other, all saying similar things, it would be supremely arrogant to dismiss all of them as lying.
LoadedOuthouse 
I'm sorry, but the evidence isn't good IMO
I've seen all the videos and I'm not convinced
"it must be delayed to next year bc steam changed dates from just 2023 games to coming soon"
Make sure to check the pinned messages here as well, to go ahead and just discount the clickbaity YT content.
See, but people will say the evidence is good
I like the new stego art
The concept art so far is fucking beautiful
Sick as hell
Thick chin ads 20% dmg reduction lol
I want to see more concepts, I liked everything so far 
Right
I'm excited for the improved combat, what we have now in ark is servicable but there's not a great deal of depth to a lot of it
More concept art and tidbits leading up to the gameplay is a nice rough time-line and kinda reassuring that it could still be out this year
What dinos do you they they'll show next? I'm betting a ptera
Dilo
Cookie clicker combat 
trilobite
Dodo 
A singular iguana
Giganotosaurus 
Spinosaurus
Can't wait to see what the spino will look like
unfortunately it became useless
Heard the new therizino looks like the one from the most recent jurassic park movie
You mean Jurassic World? What's the difference from the theri we already have on ark?
ya it's a complete a-hole like in ark 1
It was also blind in the movie, using echolocation
it looked absolutely ridiculous.
Will I really be able to play Ark2 this year?
do you believe?
they better show a reaper concept that would made me happy 🤣
I believe.
stop trying to play it and play it!
Aaaaaaaahhhhh!
was your comment removed by a bot?
lol
The second ark2 is playable tho
I'm taking 2 months off work and ignoring all my social connections
make that 2 years
💀
Hey man if my youtube channel takes off (because I'll be doing content creation for Ark while playing it) then maybe I WILL take 2 years off lol
🙏
🙏
Best to wait till the release date to schedule any time off
All I need is 2 weeks notice lol.
Lol
With wildcards track record itll there will be a date announced a few months before release, then another saying the release was delayed another month, then one saying an another week. Then the build didnt ship in time, so its 2 more days
dude i also want to do content for ark 2 when it comes out
What are your strengths?
im a chaotic ass mf and im pretty decent at pvp stuff
Do you have any content creation experience/portfolio?
a little but not extensive it would be my first deep dive into it really
I am so inexplicably excited for Ark2
Frick dude
I've done a cinematic for my content creation alias, done two remixes of the main theme, and am currently gathering assets for specifically tutorial-style content creation
im also really excited to play the game
The issue would be that it's very hard to determine the top players lol. Usually when they do something like that it means the want marketing, so top players would be youtubers. And I think any actually good player would contest that heavily lol
In either case, the whole release with be early access, so basically a beta
It's in one of the trailers, you can see it live lol
The anky looks difficult to ride
Yeah yeah but...
You know lollll
I'm stupid forgive me :/
Anything is rideable if you're brave enough
Is it confirmed that Ark II wont come to ps5?
Like ever? Wouldnt mind if it released for playstation few months later tbh
Not confirmed
so there is a chance
Highly unlikely it will never come to PS

If by a few months you mean 12 to 24 months after release, then probably. Depends on the exclusivity period
There are 2 mods on ark the primitive and the normal with tek , dont hate if ark2 is the same because you can see the top players playing normal, very few likes without tek and turrets
Hmm if they released a beta to folks based on player skill in ark 2 (since the game is entirely different and uses different skill sets from ark 1) you’d likely be the last one to get a copy
Also the somehow mind blowing reality that top players are likely not always the best beta testers
Top players define the meta and help you find balance exploits…but if you’re hunting for bugs or designing solutions they usually don’t do a good job
Now there is a novel idea lol
i gotta see ark 2 spino if all the designs be looking that different
also hope we finally get to ceratosaurus in the game too with the new dinos being added that were not in ark 1
Ark2 spino is a confirmed shoulder pet though
Wait what? I heard of it being a living pistol like in that high on life game
Its early access the beta test is the initial launch
The term “beta” isn’t really the same for everyone. For some, a beta means a game that’s feature complete but needs polish. For others it means a product that’s got the full core functionality and gameplay loop but is missing content
I agree early access is very similar to beta testing in some ways, but in other ways it’s kinda different from the old beta testing way of doing things
For me EA is more so a between of alpha and beta, beta is a version that needs some adjustments and is pretty much ready for release imo
Really depends on whos doing the early access and what type of game it is in the first place
It does help that there are hard definitions and criteria for these things 😂
Tf? Discord trippin lately
"Beta, named after the second letter of the Greek alphabet, is the software development phase following alpha. Software in the beta stage is also known as beta ware.[7] A beta phase generally begins when the software is feature complete but likely to contain several known or unknown bugs.[8] Software in the beta phase will generally have many more bugs in it than completed software and speed or performance issues, and may still cause crashes or data loss. The focus of beta testing is reducing impacts on users, often incorporating usability testing. The process of delivering a beta version to the users is called beta release and is typically the first time that the software is available outside of the organization that developed it. Software beta releases can be either open or closed, depending on whether they are openly available or only available to a limited audience. Beta version software is often useful for demonstrations and previews within an organization and to prospective customers. Some developers refer to this stage as a preview, preview release, prototype, technical preview or technology preview (TP),[9] or early access."
We've been doing softare development for almost 80 years now. We have definitions for these things.
Ok so what about feature incomplete early access releases. Which is what gaming currently resembles in large part because we moved away from static releases and towards games as service models that often expect development post release
"The alpha phase of the release life cycle is the first phase of software testing (alpha is the first letter of the Greek alphabet, used as the number 1). In this phase, developers generally test the software using white-box techniques. Additional validation is then performed using black-box or gray-box techniques, by another testing team. Moving to black-box testing inside the organization is known as alpha release.[1][2]
Alpha software is not thoroughly tested by the developer before it is released to customers. Alpha software may contain serious errors, and any resulting instability could cause crashes or data loss.[3] Alpha software may not contain all of the features that are planned for the final version.[4] In general, external availability of alpha software is uncommon in proprietary software, while open source software often has publicly available alpha versions. The alpha phase usually ends with a feature freeze, indicating that no more features will be added to the software. At this time, the software is said to be feature complete. A beta test is carried out following acceptance testing at the supplier's site (alpha test) and immediately before the general release of the software as a product.[5]"
It could also be that a developer is just underhanded and dishonest and calling something a beta that's not yet ready to be called a beta
They should be downvoted into oblivion on platforms like Steam
I don’t see why if they’re honest about the game state being less complete
Then it's an alpha release
It’s all called “early access” though. And it’s treated the same on steam
ya not a good practice. Too many games get abandoned at that stage too.
Was responding to "We don't have definitions for these things". We do. Greed can make people ignore these things and it would be next to impossible to ensure every product is "feature complete" on platform. Without early access people would just release a game incomplete and promise updates later.
We don’t have working lay definitions for them given how functionally the terms are blended in common speak
I think the problem you are trying to solve isn't going to be solved by a definition. If a platform says you can release without being complete you can end up with software on the platform at any phase of development.
It’s a fine practice. It’s interesting because it’s a very real demonstration of capital investment in action. Not every product is going to be a superstar and not every product is going to deliver on all promises…it’s a great way to observe real market risk lol
People need to vote with their wallet and reviews to police these bad practices.
I didn’t really mention a problem beyond the issue that people conflate feature complete and incomplete games as the same thing of “early access”. Maybe steam can fix it by having two different bins for traditionally alpha or beta released games
They do, just badly. It’s “new” for people to have access to an entire scope of wildly ranging products in terms of completeness and honesty
I got the first early access game ever on Steam called "Towns"
when it released years and years ago. It was abandoned
It’s the way of the world imo that not everything is a hit
it was a hit, they took the money and ran
And ofc even the greatest ideas can be stifled by bad dev teams or unlucky circumstances (I’ve observed some great games not get complete cause the lead dev died for example)
Fraud is a risk you pay for buying into early access imo
The less content there is, the more risky the purchase
Early access has games which are blatant fraud scenes and games like ark (often made possible by the funds early access brings in)…I think it’s a major net positive as gaming moves away from AAA and towards more creative projects
For the record, I wasn't being sarcastic. If I was, there would've been a tone indicator (like so, "/s") 😅
I wasn’t either
I was the one insinuating we lack working definitions
But... we do. These definitions are definitely what I would use, and would expect anyone else to use
We really don’t because of steam early access blurring the lines
Steam's definition of early access is archaic and unique to them, though 😂
Hardly a definition I'd use for the whole of the industry
It defines how gamers talk about the process, so I’d say it’s pretty important
I play on Steam, and don't conform to their idea of early access. I'd also bet that most (if not all) players from other platforms would disagree with Steam's definition as well
Their idea of early access is extremely ill defined so it’s hardly a question of conformity. The truth is people don’t seem to be able to differentiate a feature complete beta from an alpha build of a game, and imo early access is partly to blame (since it lumps everything into one label)
It's not like everyone who's ever played a videogame has played it on Steam and had to read their definition of early access lol
Skill issue on their part, doesn't change the fact that we have hard definitions
In the slightest
I’m gonna guess almost nobody sits down and reads steam’s definition of early access lol, they just see games all the way from alphas to final products labeled as “early access” and go from there
If a hard definition fails to describe something, it matters 😂
Observe the phenomenon of “connotations”
Eh, I'd still hardly put it on the fault of the definitions that they're not all-encompassing, that's not their point
The fault is on steam for not splitting early access into alpha and beta categories
If something is an exception to the rule, or bends the definition, that's exactly that; an exception
And we shouldn't drop the definitions just for exceptions yet to be defined
That'd be silly
But the reality is that gaming is no longer in concrete alpha -> beta -> release development for almost anything anymore
How so? It's pretty much still that way in any field of game design I've observed 😅
Again, exceptions to the rule exist, but by no means are they the new rule
Most early access games I’ve seen are feature incomplete betas
New underlying systems and features are added over the course of the beta, but everything must be polished so crashes are minimized and graphics aren’t white/black box.
Your confusion kinda proves my point
And ofc what I said above combines both definitions
It wasn't true confusion, I literally just mistyped
Alphas are feature incomplete and lack a lot of key stability. Betas are feature complete and are missing final polish
This new style of development combines the two by offering greater stability sooner in the process but having to build features while in the “beta” state
i think this is the most asked question but iam still gonna ask it.
When is Ark 2 coming
still just this year, now get out 
at least they're gonna share more concept art and tidbits about Ark 2 before the gameplay trailer with a possible date
i thought i saw a topic where they said it will be released in June
That's still just an alpha then, by definition. I don't think I'm pickin up what yer puttin down, so to speak
So you’re saying that alphas are defined solely by their feature completeness?
When
I'll pay them 1 grand for 2 concept arts
Or, free deer meat
Because the second paragraph of this implies a certain lack of stability is part and parcel of an alpha, which we do NOT see in most current public games that are in early access
"The alpha phase usually ends with a feature freeze, indicating that no more features will be added to the software. At this time, the software is said to be feature complete."
It doesn't have to be lacking stability, though? Nowhere does it outright state that it has to be
So beta is entirely ignored at that logic? Since most EA game’s final update of 1.0 adds features
The logic here
Nowhere is it stated that a game has to have a beta phase, right?
Another exception to the rules, albeit a rather common one these days, I'll admit
Which, at that point, it us no longer a rule
Companies pull this stuff because they get away with it and we let them.
And what of “released” games that add content or features post 1.0? Were they secretly in beta?
Hmm by that logic every game that adds features after 1.0 is a beta. I’m not sure that’s an accurate take on the games as service model
No that's expanded. Features should be laid out in promotional material.
I’d say for example that WoW is a finished game. But it gets more features because it operates as an ongoing project (a game as service)
expansions
Yeah, those are expansions
So if I offered an expansion’s worth of features/content for free as an update instead of a DLC would that mean the game was in beta?
not if your current game has all the features advertised on release.
and you've met them, a free update would be an expansion
No? That'd just be a free expansion
no mans sky is doing this
What if advertised features are not all met but the game is classified as complete? A fairly normal process if an advertised feature is found to be infeasible or ineffective
then don't buy the f'ing game then. Jesus
You're just going into semantics, now lol
what if the game is complete but we got sucked into a parallel dimension where it has a different feature set. hmnmmm what about that?
Probably a beta tbh. Not feature complete as advertised
But what if the parallel dimension doesn't have a definition of beta?
🍿
☕
I’d use the lack of definition we have in this dimension probably and say beta is loosely defined as an incomplete product as specified by a development studio
gonna sip on my coffee as well
Tbh it depends on how broad the term feature is. Such as Multiplayer is a feature, not a new map is simply an addition to said feature. The difference is a feature would be a subsection in a software development description, but the addition would be a sentence, paragraph, or a table entry.

Agreed. And not everyone agrees on what constitutes a feature (versus content)
But I think we can all agree that the definitions here take precedence over whatever hare-brained ideas of "early access" and "beta" and the like that some random person thinks up, eh? Let alone based upon Steam's archaic cataloguing systems 😂
I think we can agree all definitions are pointless because games are no longer developed in a single clear cut fashion for sure
🤦♂️
We have standards for everything, not everyone follows them, those that don't usually suffer in quality and do poorly in market share or end up with legal issues down the road. That's not just game related, that's pretty much true for all industries.
But just because someone deviates from a definition or standard doesn't nullify it.
And like many things, standards change over time. Much like they have for game development
They may be need for some new definitions that better describe the process shift from the early 2000’s to now
But they are still standards. And standards aren't changed by one person saying so. The software development lifecycle has not changed, even with the introduction of agile, at it's core it's still the same.
The core has dramatically changed
Games have almost wholly shifted away from one and done development and towards games as services
most software has, but it's still bound by releases
same life cycle as they were doing in the 2000's
Not really. Closed door one and done releases are largely dead beyond a few AAA products
even in the 90's software was updated, much slower, but it still was a thing
The life cycle of a game no longer ending on release is a pretty major change to lifecycle
If you mean DLC disks adding bug fixes I’m not sure I agree
You could download a patch off the website too
Because that’s my primary 90’s-2000’s experience with most post launch changes (if there were any)
I was there as well.
Clearly. I doubt someone young would say this
I remember having to download patches for Neverwinter Nights, it wasn't any different than today, tbh. It's just more streamlined
Unless I’m crazy, those first two were games as service, as was half life because it had official servers at the time
Could be confusing half life 1 and 2 tho
I remember patching my parents business program for their business.
oh corel draw has a fatal error that was patched
specifically remember that one
Wait, wouldn't this completely invalidate what you said here? As those types of games (as a service) were what you'd described as a major change? But if this has been the way it was the whole time...
It’s not like someone flicked a switch and instantly changed how games were made
Transitional products bridged games like pong (which we all agree are one and done games) and what we see today
This mans a genius. I'm out.
Yes, but it's always been this way, software changes and is updated all the time. Hell, Half-Life and other such older games still get updates
I’ve never seen a pong patch
Doesn't mean it doesn't exist
And now we've reached our conclusion, thanks everyone for coming to the play, hope you had a good time
🙇♂️
I reject your reality and substitute ark 2
That guy on YouTube that’s converting and testing Ark 1 in UE5 posted a new video.
One thing I liked is how snow builds on the ground, instead of just textures.
Bro is doing God's work
Bro is doing Wildcard's work
Thought that was their lawyers in the current copyright case
Curious what servers Wildcard is going to use cause they did say they weren't going to use Nitrado.
are there any other major server providers
wonder if theyll just buy their own even
perhaps easier to maintain when you arent reliant on 3rd party especially if they suck with stuff like ddos protection
but idk if this is possible cause need servers worldwide
If I recall correctly I think they mentioned talking to Ubisoft
Google, Microsoft, Amazon
for gaming specifically?
They rent the servers and you can setup wherever you want
Microsoft actually a high possibility since they have a time exclusivity for Xbox and PC
Wc will probably choose what’s best for their profile
i didnt even know about shit like playfab till now
apparently microsoft gaming server host service
vaguely remember amazons
And they would also resolve for the Xbox this way
Yeah
what are microsoft servers like quality wise
the games hosted by them, good ddos protection and performance and stuff?
Good and spreaded all over the world
defo international
hopefully way better than nitrado
wonder if nitrado is just cheaper
Man, all those three above will be better than Nitrado, for sure 🤣
Well for context gotta go off topic a bit... When GTA Online first Christmas updates PSN went down for months when Xbox came up within a week.
Yes, it’s probably cheaper
Or at least it was for what the envisioned for Ark in 2015
all this sounds good provided they use microsoft
Maybe if they knew it would be a huge success, they wouldn’t have made that deal with Nitrado
did they state that they arent getting hosted by nitrado in a tweet some time ago?
I didn’t see that
Plus being with Microsoft would mitigate the delay on unofficial servers updating when Ark gets an update lol
mightve missed it somewhere
Me either. Didn’t see anything about that
wheres this from
It was around their massive article release
Two things I’ve seen people talking here, but didn’t see anything official: moving away from battleye and Nitrado
The founders note you mean?
Yeah
Let me look for it
Dear GOD I hope not
I think Microsoft Gaming Servers would be best option cause it would streamline unofficial servers updating with official and be easy since they have a time exclusive release for PC and Xbox already.
let's hope theres also a different anti-cheat iirc somewhere they answerd it will be a different one
Didn’t you misunderstood the part about mod.io?
There’s nothing about a new server provider in this post
Do you remember where?
I didn’t see that
I don't recall if it was in that note, but it was mention around that time period.
Either way I really don't want Nitrado back anyway, so I hope it true. The delay on unofficial updates was annoying
Does anyone know what provider they are using for SOTF?
Yeah, Nitrado I'd hope are out, they kinda stinky
Me neither, I just want to know if it’s official
at best i can recall it should've been a reply on a Ark related twitter post from recently, either from the Ark one itself or Jeremy, Cedric, Dollie or one of the other prominent ones
Ok, I will trust you 
That will be good, if they change both the servers provider and anti-cheat
i forgot to screenshot it as i didn't really think too much of it until a few days later 😅
i remember seeing it too but i dont remember exactly where either
i can confirm that its true they have different anti cheat planned at least
good, i'm not the only one probably going mad
They definitely said somewhere that the anti cheat is being changed, might've even been in here
But idk about the server host part
Found that on Twitter:
Q: @ComplexMinded are we getting a better anticheat system for Ark 2 or still using Battleeye?
A: In discussion, but the anti-cheat is planned to be front and center / much more robust.
More than 2 years ago
Not sure they have decided already
I dont think Microsoft have some good Anti DDoS or Big Filtration
Nitrado have some.
Anti DDoS is a big part of choice.
Simple ip check lol
I hope Sinomacrops are on all maps in Ark 2, that has become the first dino I tame on a server lol
Tell that to official players LMAO
Microsoft servers rarely get ddos'd, if ever. Ark official servers? You hear about them getting ddos'd every time you speak to an official PvP player, lol
Anyone got predictions of how transfers will work with dinos without having to upload them? Since there no tek, there not gonna be cryopods likely.
Hopefully, the same as they do now, but forward only, never backwards (as in back to older maps)
Who said there's gonna be transfers?
We have no ideas what mechanics will and wont return. 
There gonna be multiple maps so you're obviously gonna have to be able to send your character and dinos if for nothing other than transcending the story of each map.
We can only hope, there may be just one expanding map, or changes to an existing one, we know nothing in that regard
Again, we have no idea how anything will work in ARK-2.
They could as easily have multiple maps for expansions, to changing it to a whole new system. 
Because image official players if they get told you need a separate character per map having to deal with a level grind on every map. That another reason they'll obviously have a way to transfer, may just have to upload dino in obs and not be able to inventory them.
So with ever expanding maps, would you just be prevented from entering an area if you dont have the dlc?
Again, we have no idea how they're doing it.
I'd think so, yes.
It'd be no different then currently preventing others from going to DLC maps when they don't have it.
what? That no where near the same... That like saying FPS players can't matchmake in a public lobby once the first DLC drops, you have to make your own lobby on the map you have.
That the comparison you just gave ^
That's exactly what happens, though? In Call of Duty, if you own DLC, you get put into a separate matchmaking pool
Man, did you hit your head?
It wouldn't work like that.
You'd be able to log into the map server, but you wouldn't be able to explore the DLC regions.
It's literally what every MMO does.
Lol, so you're assuming I only meant for DLC maps?
You don't match with people who don't have the DLC, in your example, which is exactly the same principle
That where the disconnect was, it for any base map on release.
I don't understand what you mean then, sorry
they are getting xd
You gotta be able to transfer your character at minimum to any map you have rather is base maps on release or your DLC maps.
Because if people get told they have to start entirely over on a new character for every map, then official will only have a fraction of players on it cause no one gonna do that grind on every single map in one cluster.
And Microsoft will have to do Filtration for them then
I don't get what either of you mean
Players will play the game, no matter the circumstances
To think no transfers will stop anyone is an L take
Now I agree you may get restricted to uploading or leaving tames on the map they're tamed on, but you have to be able to transfer your character if they don't let you inventory your tames in cryos due to it being primitive plus
They don't "have" to let you do jack shit, lol
It's their game
If no transfers is the rule, that's the rule
And again, I don't know if you're half reading my post, but never said people won't play the game, I said people won't play official at the rate they do now, they will go find an unofficial server where leveling isn't as much of a grind. Yeah official will maintain a certain amount of committed players to that grind.
Now, do I see transfers returning? Personally, yes. Does that make it confirmed? Gods no, and it'd be silly of me to think so just because I want it that way
And I'm reading your posts, just can't understand half of them is all 😅
Okay I can't post a screenshot of Ark 2 trailer, there a diamond seen in the wrist of skelaton hand the dodo pulling, that a positive sign of evidence that we're still gonna see transcendence storyline which would support keeping a single character
the only majority official holds is mainly console players as all unofficials for them are just boosted rates, and the elitist official pvp players.
I think that with mods on consoles more people will go from official to unofficial, and that official players will become the minority.
That a good possibility, I'm gonna try and find a good discord run one for that reason.
So you dont know how work Anti DDoS.
I dont think Microsoft will do better than even Nitrado.
i know i'm going rented server day 1 if it's up to just play alone with my friends, better to do that than suffer on official with it's current occupants
I find it extremely unlikely that there won't be some form of transfers on official. It might be more restricted than in ark1, but it's very likely to still be a thing
This is off topic just for context... You didn't play GTA Online first year did you? When it got DDoS during Christmas update PSN stayed down for months, where Xbox came back up in less than a week.
I am hoping for more character permanence in ark lol
That a strong example of how good server security is from Microsoft, they got it back up in 3 days where PSN was down for 4 months or so
GTA Online was back up in 3 days on Xbox cause I had both PS3 and 360 at the time.
Playstation probably had to develop the fix.
Sony issue was they didn't charge for online, they finally caught up since requiring PS Plus
I remember that, wasn't sure of the timeframes but sounds about right
But anyhow lets get back on topic before a mod jumps in
Dont know anything about gta, but I want transfers in ark2 lol
Oh for sure, me too
Facts or I'm adding a requirement to my discord ran custom cluster lol
I'm running a server cluster regardless of if official is bearable or not, screw official all the way
I hope maps work differently and main dlc maps are just sections of the first map, but I still prefer transfers
But if that's not available at launch, I'll gladly play solo either in SP or via official til it does
I don't mind official for say, but I do want to get in on modded dinos and maps for unofficial.
Don't see a reason why they would change the map system tbh, it's one of the good parts imo
I am pretty sure nekatus is already working on making a map for ark2 lol
I play PvE anyhow so my only ill will toward official was the pillar spamming to lock in real estate.
Because they can do maps thousands of times bigger, and I like big maps
BIG
I do too, but no reason they can't have big maps and have it like it was in Ark 1
With transfers and the like
Imagine the island gets a cave dlc that adds aberration under it, or new islands or continents
It'll take longer to develop the maps, sure, but I'd easily wait a year between DLCs if it meant we got another Aberration or Extinction tier map but this time it's 5x the size
Extinction tier? That's like almost ci or ragnarok tier lol
Extinction was a cool ass map, admit it
really?
Far better than CI or Lagnarok
Aberration was cool, but extinction was kind of boring to me.
Can't, because it was a bland wasteland
I just didn't like the crashing every 30 minutes, my only issue with it lol
It is the least enjoyable paid dlc imo
(Which eventually was fixed)
Switch has their own team so it whatever with that console, I need companies to start only developing for PC, Series X/S, and PS5 though cause PS4 and Xbox One is holding back potential
extinction = OSDs and veins, oh and if you were into pvp the titans.
Current gen only, so no worries there bud 🙂
Yeah I knew Wildcard made that decision that why they're rising to level of me getting their game the way I am for Rockstar
That goes to Scorched for me, easily
xbox players have had 2 years to upgrade to next gen, playstation players will have even more time to find a ps5 🤣
Dying on spawn to either a mantis, direwolf, or terror bird? No thanks 🤮
Finally, somthing we agree on
Not to mention the shoehorned heatstroke mechanics that never worked properly, and the other shitty weathers that were OP as hell
I've died to sabers and hyenas on spawn
I got Series X on release without a pre-order, Walmart I went to had 10 and only 4 people were there getting one at the early morning release
My argument would be at least there were weather events lol
If they are shit weather events there's no point
Meh, shitty stamina draining weather that doesn't effect wild dinos is shitty
Nothing could convince me otherwise
I want more crazy weather for ark2, but yeah the weather quality has to increase
And wild dinos better be effected by it, istg
the only thing that harms both wild and tamed creatures is just lava and drowning lol, they are immune to everything else when wild
One of my main issues right there
You want weather to be there but not be a hinderance, real life != fun
Everyone complains about that, but then fall damage will affect tames that aren't being ridden lol
Whe
Oh no, I want it to be a hindrance.
Not me, it'll get old fast
That's the end of ark if they add that
That, and things getting woefully underpowered upon taming them, such bull
I want weather to make it so fliers can't work
I have been hearing that a lot lately
🤣 so have i
If you fly during a thunderstorm you'd just get dismounted
As opposed to every Dino being stupid op upon taming
A lot more dinos would die if they did that. It'd be the number one cause of dino death.
I might be putting expectations on parkour for Ark 2 due to being a DL fan.
It could work under one condition that the maps have few hills
Fall damage is only an issue if you're either not paying attention or are risky, wouldn't change if the dinos took it while unridden tbh
If the pathfinding on tames is better I don't see why them taking fall damage is a problem
That too
Lol, if I ran off cliff while mounted to a land dino like a rex I just stood up and waited for him to land on the ground then mounted again. It was a little cheesy.
But we don't know about pathfinding
Also, I'd rather have dismounting before i hit teh ground to be an out to a situation
I am just imagining a bugged ai code though, one that is supposed to make dinos stay away from cliffs but actually makes them prioritize jumping off cliffs. Would be really funny to watch lol
That was what saved me in so many situations while I was on official.
Insert drug induced rant
Babby mode engaged if you do that jump off the tame at the last second thing for any reason other than a quick laugh
I once lost control of my car and it fell off a cliff. I quickly climbed through the sky light window and stood on the car. If I had still been in the car the car would have been destroyed, thankfully I acted quickly and car was fine.
That is such an exploit that I want it gone lol
Nah, keep it
Unmounting to survive a fall off a mount not an exploit if they never put fall damage on dinos. It just being smart.
it's already been stated pathfinding will be a whole lot better
But we don't know if that's true or a bluff
Yeah that's why I am hoping they fix fall damage
That's the definition of an exploit, just about
You are literally exploiting a game mechanic lol
Card counting is an exploit ig
Semantics discussion incoming!
An exploit would be glitching into a wall or some small area to be at a advantage typically for PvP.
You outed yourself in the first five words there
PvP players wouldn't share it if they did it, unless someone did it to them first lol, then they'd share info about the exploit
Not taking fall damage after jumping off a mountain is also an exploit lol
Just using a dino lack of fall damage is not the definition of an exploit and anyone who thinks so is the same people who call people cheating for sitting in an corner on FPS, or using combos in fighting games with a minimal counter/reversal. You're just mad you didn't think to do that.
I should be banned then 😂
Either way, hope it's fixed in Ark 2, such a crutch of a mechanic and overall just dumb
I agree it's dumb, it doesn't give anyone a huge advantage over anyone else, so as far as abusing game mechanics go it's very very tame.
Not if you're technically not the one falling, giving a dino it own fall damage was an easy fix that they just never felt was a big deal.
If you have to bring technicality in, then it's an exploit lol
Technically, you should be taking damage there, as should your tame, if you really wanna get technical
I'm betting they tried it but there was probably a whole bunch of issues, especially graphical, because of lag between client and server to give dinos fall damage, and probably exploits too.
so they said "F it", it's part of the game
This could and probably is the case. I am hoping they find a workaround
Lol, no it exposing logic of someone using their head versus someone breaching a broken spot in the map to hide as what an actual exploit is.
One of those requires utilizing a broken feature, the other is something that could have been added and never was cause it wasn't a big enough issue.
Love it when people say use your head, and then give contradictory statements lol
left and right side of the brain
Vying for control
I'm down to get back on topic, it wasn't me that complained about someone using a free trip down hill.
Harsh weather effects is a yes then
I'm always for adding in weather
As long as they effect everything, yes
I want to be in the middle of a raid, then weather comes in and saves the defenders
I'd be down with a a tornado to come through and you'd have to put up a protective wall around your base if you're in the area it lands
I'd love to see creatures hibernate/come out of hibernation depending on weather states, or at least go and hide/go out to hunt or something along those lines
You are wandering around. queue server lag as 10000 dinos run for cover then you get hi lt by lightning lol
I hope the AI tribes that will also be a factor can be found roaming in groups like their hunting for supplies and not just in their camp area, so they're just as much a threat potentially and not just dinos
While singing "Can't wait to hibernate. A big long nap makes a dino feel great"
8 am imagining warzone dmz for pvp lol. The npcs are more dangerous than the players lol
As a PvE player I wouldn't mind that, have them be able to go anywhere on the map so unless you based in a spot requires a flyer you will need outside defenses around your base.
If portable cryos are a thing, you won't be able to only base where fliers go, unless you only use fliers
True that
I hope anything like cryos are gone for good
You need to move creatures around, you will need to take them on the ground
That would fix also how op it is to move things between servers
Yeah, there has to be some storage for tames otherwise it clogs up servers, but they shouldn't be pocket gigas lol
I would be okay with being required to upload dinos at an obelisk, I just hope they still allow transfer. That'll be a deciding factor if I am okay with a near official rate unofficial cluster or not.
ark mobile installed a tame limit for tribes
everyone gets like 40 tames per person
would suck for mass breeding
People actually play Ark on mobile? o.o
There won't be obelisks, but I get the point you are making
too many
That the only thing I got to specify transfer, they could make damn near anything symbolize transfer. I'm predicting like a 20ft totem pole lol
what percent of dinos before cryos would be out in a base for breeding only
cause now its essentially 100%
Their common trend with recent maps is just tiny terminals lol
Yeah like extinction terminals
And genesis
its better usually to have 30 terminals than 3 main ones
Yep, because it's either that or glowy drops falling from the sky
drops alr kinda do this but expiration is super annoying
Eh because Gen2 revolves around so much tek I doubt they'd use anything there considering Wildcard themselves said Tek was the worst thing they added to their game.
I honestly can't disagree when you can use a tek suit to hover above a giga and tame it with no threat of being hit.
wonder what adding different maps that revolve around completely different playstyles would be like
Creatures storage is the way to go. Also they’ve talked about a new creatures management system, which might mean creature storage/breeding pens etc.
Yup, this would be good lol
How so? Most of the maps in ark currently have the same playstyle
That what makes me hopeful of having a way to inventory dinos cause breeding would be a pain in the ass
yeah thats what i mean, changing that somehow
idrk how cause it depends on how playstyles work
actually now that i think about it
having whole maps dedicated to a playstyle would suck
i think gen2 space biome is the most id have
where you primsrily use it for farming
and the rest of the map you do the typical surviving
so maybe regions of the map dedicated to breeding and farming but they only work on a timed sort of basis
farming alr exists ofc
I would love for different playstyles to be possible and viable.
You'd have to be able to kill your own dinos while breeding when you got something you didn't need to not overload your tame limit while breeding.
Not to mention the issue of dino being stuck in the floor cause they grew up from a baby and didn't align right on the floor.
idk how to diversify within pvp or pve
Can't tell you how many times I had to cryo a dino cause it wouldn't get out of the floor.
like a huge part of ark is the freedom to do whatever
Can you imagine being a developer for this game and reading everyone's hopes and dreams then having to look at what's been created.
i have no doubts 90% of this channel is literally beyond what any game company can implement reasonably
Well, either they are looking at it saying "these guys have no idea😇" or "these guys have no idea🥴"
losing a baby cause it meshed 💀
That founders note had me sold having parkour and dark souls style combat with primitive style
i think the biggest part about parkour will be climbing
no need for flyers to access much of the map then, or grapples
massive space left for more important things
I'm thinking about making my base a parkour to get in and out and fairly difficult lol
I just hope they don't add the dumb Conan stamina for climbing
I'm thinking more DL parkour
And I’m 90% sure no one is expecting they will implement everything we want 😂
I love conan
If they did, we would have 10 different games
I will concede if it looks cool, I can ride dinos, it's tough, fliers get nerfed, there is weather and no cryos
id prefer for flyers to be more of an endgame thing and heavily nerfed
Me too. We will adapt.
Anything else will be a big bonus
True, ark 1 you could be up in the air in half hour depending on server rates.
ignoring gen 2 suit
you just rushed an argy withing the first hour and everything else is useless
then you can kill alphas and nothing is a problem sounds fun
Being in the air for half an hour isn't a problem. Being able to carry your house, business and pool while being in the air is the problem lol
being in the air definately was, it allows you to bypass so much of the game and get end tier dinos quickly
Talking about nerfing flyers. I think would be nice to have wagons/carts to be able to carry more weight using land Dinos.
yessss omg
Tbh, I can get endgame tames from the ground just as quick. Fliers are just safer. And I want that safety gone lol
problem is that this safety is way to easy to access
But I also don't want any wyverns or dragons at all lol
No, that's not the issue. The problem is that the safety also comes with infinite weight and cryos
You have to admit, scouting from the air was way superior.
A Bob on a pt is still a Bob. If he can't cryo things and can't carry a full kit, then he never progresses
I believe we all assume no cryos cause we already know there no tek. Cryo stuff was learned with normal level where tek had to be transcended to. I think it probable that cryo won't be a thing, but they could surprise us and put those just as a way to put up dinos for breeders and stuff
A structure that can store dinos in an upload type of way is fine. A portable cryo is not okay
Ark 2 be like atlas without ships and a sea lol
There a lot they could do, they could make up something that looks and fits better but works the same
upload structures already seems to advanced for this primitive game itll be
Call it a stable then
there better be a sea lol
yes and no, they did have "tek" lying around
it's possible to add that "advanced" feature but keep everything else primitive
"magic"
The implants gets disabled lol
I think it more backing down from us using stuff like the tek suit, once you got a tek suit there was 0 challenge essentially that didn't have a player aspect to it
This. I would love a sea, and I would love to be able to make actual boats
Do you know Atlas? Atlas has no tek but you can upload creatures to pens. It’s not really tek, just a way to implement it on a game
plot and magic
id love a more sea creatures that maybe also attack each other and dont just totally rampage once you are in render distance
Yeah
It might not be right at the start, but a sea dlc that plays like a land map could be epic
I do believe if we got a gun, the most it would be is a longneck, beside that bows, crossbows, melee tools
Especially if they have dlcs added onto the main map so you go from building a boat actually into a giant ocean
well weve only seen plenty of primitve type weapons like bones and obsidian daggers so i assume longneck is a pretty rare chance
Again (😂) they might go the atlas way. They’ve worked on the land and after a while they worked on the sea and deep sea.
I just want to see the map get bigger as the game progresses
But I also want to see nekatus make something epic
If we go by their Steam description, it will be massive
itll probably just be a variety of arrow types id guess but in the end i just dont know anything about the game yet
Honestly talking about looking at under water world, we have that, it like a whole different world in some of the under water on Ark 1 just have to be able to stay down there long enough to experience it.
i want more biomes, gimme a thick bamboo jungle with raptors
Yeeess
I want it bigger. 
I thought you said 'thick Baboons' for a second there
Giant grass fields big enough to hide brontos and rexes, that can't be removed from graphics settings
honestly im down for that too
Like they could have just one cluster for pvp and one for pve at the beginning. Each cluster being the whole Arat.
Thicc-ify all ARK creatures
🍑
Or just release new dlcs with new Arat regions
yes tall grass aswell
That seems awesome
I'd love a concept of a DLC map set on an artificial floating environment that's set within the gas-giant planet Arat is orbiting around.
true we dont know anything about the 3 plantes weve seen
Ark 2: going to Moonrat
was it 3?
If any of you guys played Halo-2, something akin to the first Arbiter level where you're on a hanging facility, above a gas-giant, but in this case it's a hanging biodome.
but i guess the atari which will be the main enemy only live on the main planet
Arat + 2 moons I guess
which makes the moons unlikely for story dlc at least
Arat is a moon, btw
People said there are some clues on the SDK
Who knows.
There might be some ancient alien technology that allows us to teleport between the planets without needing Tek.
We don’t know actually
Forerunner type of shit
Sometimes they do that on purpose just to throw people for a loop
We are guessing they are primitive because of the first trailer, but… who knows
And the Aratai's actually seem to be the suito-antagonist, not the main ones.
my understanding is people complained that tames kept dying to fall damage for slipping off cliffs and falling insane heights and instantly dying
Possible 
which...sounds pretty awful if it took 24+ hours to tame some of the original roster
well tbh they look like mindless trolls but anything can be
Giga's took like 8+ IRL hours to tame before patches.
Trust me.
'I fucking remember that pain'
I just hope tranq taming isn't a thing lol
what do guys think will the file size be bigger than the current ue4 ark?
Or if it is, we don't have to wait an hour to fucking feed the creature
Yeah, but it was an one minute trailer. Who knows
If it's well optimized and compressed, I can see ARK-2 actually being the same size of the base-game. So like 100-ish GB's
I believe, at least, it won’t be the only way. I mean, they talked about those world events involving endangered creatures
And we would need to gain their trust
maybe like 25% id guess the rest might be different i hope
Everyone gonna be disappointed when ark 2 comes out
I don't want it at all lol
I know this isn't ARK-2 related. But I kind of wish they'll add the quick-switch feature that the Tek-Bow for all bows for ARK-1.
Or at least have that for ARK-2, cause I fucking hate going into my inventory and switching rounds.
i had this weird thought of having to clean a brachios toes to tame him xd
I would rather the base taming method be like immersive taming
From what little we know, it seems like it's going to be egg-stealing
true we saw the egg pouch
might be a clue
All points in speed, run around with a whip
I'd bet solid money there will be a variety of tame methods
Not just that, but they confirmed that's 'A' way to tame some creatures in one of their CC
In the Founders-note, they confirmed some stuff that isn't in the store-page.
Not much, but did confirm egg-stealing will return.
i love egg stealing
Speed needs to be capped at like 120 lol. All these speed goblin gremlins in ark1 lol
I do too, but it does get a bit boring.
But with new stealth mechanics and shit, this'll be interesting. 
its the hunted mod all over again
Without an omnipresent radar, they can make the defending wilds so much more dangerous and get away with it
Please do.
Also, do you know the egg turned into a fully grown rex on the second trailer? I mean, at least that’s what I believe. 😂
the hunted mod had a couple major flaws imo: 1.) weight was horrendous 2.) the emphasis was entirely on breeding
They also confirmed Random-Events.
One of them are 'injured animals'
So, while not confirmed. My own thoughts of that might be a choice-based action.
Either A: kill the downed animal for an easy meal/resources.
Or B: possibly help them recover and gain their trust.
what do you mean lol
First trailer the girls took the egg. The Rex chased them. They scaped.
im not wasting my money im gonna watch people play it first to see if i really wanna buy ark 2
Second trailer the Rex is grown and they are riding it
They lost the egg. 
sounds good, id also like some carnivores to only eat corpes and maybe corpes spawn in the wild too
They also confirmed random water spouts, and herds.
Someone also slipped up and accidently stated 'migrations' in 2021's Extra-Life
'woops'
I thought they said migrations in the steam oage
maybe season similar with cold and warm
Yeeep
and not the random the island temperature where you scorche to death on a random thursday
Yeeeeeep
I believe that was suppose to be seasons, but it felt weird.
Seems like the idea of ARK-2 is to basically remake what they wanted out of ARK-1, but couldn't due to technology and financial restraints.
but that was also the "arks" doing so a more natural weather can only be expected
also i guess thered be a LOT less carnivores due to natural stuff
ARK's are stated to be more natural with their weathers in-canon.
So nah, that was just weird gameplay stuff
ah alrigjt
Really hope so
Remember, ARK's are suppose to act as artificial environments, and in-canon, they're damn good at appearing as real as they can.
Ark1 was overrun with carnivores
by design (both WC/lore wise)
yeah because the arks kept spawning them
Yeah I just hope the design changes
in reallife it doesnt work that way
and because more carnivores probably meant more engagement. They're generally more flashy lol
I do hope if they're going to balance, or remove the amount of Carnivores in ARK-2, to get more aggressive Omni or Herbivores to take their place.
I still want 90% of the shit to kill me. But out of pettiness then survival.
Oh, I don't disagree with that lol
but with more teritorial( and perhaps aggressive) herbivores having few carnivores wont be an issue
I want to feel like a peanut without a shell with squirrels around, but I don't want stupid amounts of carnivores just because they are "fun"
never made sense i could run into every herbivore and they dont give a shit
Just watched it again. They didn’t show them losing it. I still believe that Rex from the second trailer came from this egg. 😂
It’s not a red egg, but still 
A brachi can be as scary, if not more then a rex.
damn santiago set that mature speed high
Not really
First trailer is from 2020. The second trailer is from 2022
