#ark-2
1 messages · Page 62 of 1
Yea idk i feel like the story will be mandatory tho
Mandatory is fine with me as long as it’s done on my time and not gating large amounts of content.
they want people to have their own player driven stories, im sure they want it the other way around
ARK 2’s main narrative tells the story of a father and a daughter (“Meeka” played by Auli'i Cravalho!), of betrayal & broken promises, and the strength of the family bond – and of course, it’s a story of badass giant dinosaurs. But even more importantly, this is about players’ own stories – like any good persistent-world online survival game, ‘Survivors’ in ARK 2 each have their own unique path through the game, as they form their own tribe, make their own friends, and attempt to build their own creature-aided civilization.
With ARK 2, we’re seeking not only to enhance the game’s narrative and world-building, but also retouch and improve on all aspects of what constitutes an ARK game.
It's just the main narrative
ok
It's still an Open world survival sandbox game
Yeah, I think making the story about our characters would actually make it linear and story driven. Where making the story about an npc and his kid leaves it as optional.
I honestly love that so much
It's in part what made love ark, all the stories I made on servers are unforgettable to me
👀
I think role players of ark are going to love ark 2,even people who don’t like ark that much are keen to see what ark 2 is about, let’s hope it lives up to the expectations
I would do illicit things some new Ark 2 news
Let's hope that they say something on the 27th community crunch
And if we are very positive they may say something this weeks CC lmao
But very very very positive 
Maypends
Most RP-ers go for skins and aesthetics
Me and my friends occasionally do some sort of rp and with the new environment a primitive rp is going to be very beautiful
I can never even find light RP servers so hopefully Ark 2 has a lot more
all modded experiences should be more common
I didn’t even know there were rp servers haha
Every RP server that exists is super heavy and strict that’s why they don’t get much attention, because not a lot of people are looking for that unless they are experienced in RP
Lol all rp servers I found are pretty light
At least from the spanish community, we take it a lot less seriously
Half the ones I find are 18+, on top of the already strict rules lol
Ark 2 will probably bring a lot of people in so no doubt every community will also get bigger cause that’s just how it works
Light RP is down right impossible without PVP server rejects just raid a random "RP"-PVP server and screw everything over
There is a reason why the restrictions exist
not enough servers use all the unofficial maps
That is more on the side of "servers being too expensive"
why would that affect using maps that arent official ones
crashes?
and other issues since tmk most mod maps are made for sp
Possibly
Most mod maps are more to the modder's preference ||this is also the reason why I am against "lore canon" the mod maps||
announce something !!!!!
No !!!!!
Will the story of ark 1 continue in ark 2?
Yes
U dont want an announcement?
we all want announcements, but we don't want them to happen bc angry impatient people keep sending angry messages that won't be read by devs anyway 
I mean unless they do something very bad ARK II can’t be worse than ARK I, so it’ll be better
i mean they're already not rushing it out to make quick money so it's more optimized for launch wich i respect
Idc what it takes. I want the new info.
you think i don't want info? at least we're kinda more patient than others
I guess
do you think we will have peace music in ARK2 besides battle music and transitions?
Ark 1 has it, i don't know why ark 2 wouldn't have some as well
I’d also love it if fights lasted long enough to appreciate the music 😅
I'm sure they will
Ark 1 is devoid of music when you aren't in combat, or you spawn, or the day reaches a certain point. I don't know what are you talking about.
They did MAKE the music, but yes not even all the combat music is easy to hear ingame let alone the peaceful ones
That being said, music is tough to justify in a game where you rely on sound to not get jumped by a raptor
i meant that music could play when at your base, building and managing. Not in the wild.
That’s kinda hard for the game to read don’t you think?
What triggers would you use to determine “I’m safe in my base”?
yeah
HLNA quote trigger when you made a shelter
A quote versus playing music (or looping said music) aren’t quite the same in terms of audio
i don't know. It was just a half baked idea of mine. I'm thinking a special structure, but that sounds extremely silly on second thought.
Half baked is nbd, but I think it’s trickier than you’d think to get peaceful music to play when it’s actually peaceful haha
Though I’d cry laughing if the “why do I hear boss music” meme makes it into ark 2
TBF it makes the tense part less tense when you have a song to distract you
I'd be more laughing if a small ass ant caused it
there is peace music but it doesnt activate often enough
The afternoon and night trigger is what you meant
There’s four I think? Dead, spawn, dawn, and dusk
if thats what it is then mb, i still count it as peaceful music
It is, but I think Haumea is after longer tracks rather than the very short ones played for those four triggers
The dawn trigger kinda jumpscared me more than the combat music
first spawn, respawn, join, morning, noon, night.
It’s like you guys missed the interview with their lead composer dude
Music in Ark 2 is like the largest portion of info we’ve been given haha
The energy is so low and awkward in the stream, it's kinda given that it's forgettable
Are we counting the cinematic and ascension music?
Thought we were promised gameplay 🤣🤣🤣
This was long before the gameplay promise
I mean the vision is one thing. I’m not sure how it’ll feel in practice
||do you think the name of the planet Arat has to do anything with the Hungarian word arat, meaning "to harvest" in singular third person? or is it obviously a coincidence?||
They named Arat after a place on Earth.
I think if they wanted to use a word in a foreign language to name a planet they wouldnt go for a conjugated verb
Yes
AH my mistake hahah
Yo my twitter feed is on fire rn
News of an xbox showcase late january
ohh shi here we go again
Just stop
reliable insiders have confirmed it and its going to happen on january 25th
You’re gonna start an uproar.
People are gonna be super salty when nothing comes of it.
Well Microsoft is gonna announce it so its going to happen either way
And how do you know that?
news headlines have reported it
Give me one reliable source to search
insider gaming
Jez corden (reliable insider) said microsoft should announce it soon
i just look it up
Announce what?
you my want to go a look up to see what news is out there
Idc about the event.
It’s all over the place. It’s a rumor. But it seems believable.
You’re gonna have everyone expecting news
Xbox accounts have been hinting something since TGA
Jez said theres an event back in december and now its seems to be true
They said they'll give us a closer look at Redfall, Mincraft: legends, Forza motorsport and other games
I still can’t grasp the point of the rumors
TBF, this channel is all about rumors and hopes 🤣
Like we can’t be blamed considering the lack of info they’ve given us
Like look at this one: “they’ll give us a closer look at…” and ark 2 isn’t on the list
What else are we gonna talk about?
Xbox skipped the Game Awards and this is why
🤷♂️ I had my fun talking about game design
That’s true indeed. The rumors don’t say anything about Ark 2
well it dos not ether but wild card do not have to say
Not rumors of when ark 2 info may or may not drop. Because who tf cares about that? Even if it’s true 100% of the time, it’s gonna be an @ in announcements and you can just read it whenever
BUT if the event really happens, I’d expect WC to use it
Yeah nothing about ARK 2 however we need to keep an eye out for any type of hints from the devs
But here’s the thing: who cares
If you miss it live, you can watch it like 30 seconds after when it’s announced
the next time we her ark 2 is game play
I CARE!!
and the xbox event is not that big
Wait, what're y'all talking about?
I don’t care until I see the @ ping in announcements, because that’ll be where the actual news is
If one of the devs hint you know its going to happen
Everyone expected WC to use the last event, and the one before that, and the one before that.
I didn’t…
Read my posts back then
Statements made moments before extra life and two other events in 2022 where nothing happened
The developer insider is a different kind of event
But don’t worry, eventually you’ll be right
And you’ll say “see? This is why you use rumors”
Just gonna say, I do personally think they revealed ARK-2 way too early. 
And if it really happens, I thing the changes are higher
Exactly
shifter can i sand you a videos
You should send sand
Remember Other xbox exclusives didn't appear at any of these events
"I don't like sand.
It's rough, course, and it gets everywhere.
And I mean 'eeeveryywhere'"
Don’t 🙂
If it says “rumor” I’ll pass out asleep
som of the post in the video are reill post on game webstis
Some of you guys are like the wish version of loadedcrysis I stg
Except they make no money farming attention smh
I still have no idea what Death says sometimes
That’s why they’re the wish version and not target
Same
…you’re telling me the WC event that’s historically dropped information on new ark content was expected to be silent about ark 2? Is that what I’m reading?
there a post on twiter from Aron greenberg on the event
I didn't mean to cause an uproar but i saw the news and thought since ARK 2 is meant to come out in the first half of 2023 I thought maaybbe they could appear there or not..

They have yet to confirm that.
Ark 2 is only stated for 2023 by Wildcard
It's just fan speculation that it'll come out in the first half.
it say this shoyld be a fun week excited for the days to progress that what the post says
You’re a symptom, not a cause. The cause is infinitely irritating though because of the symptoms
They can't talk about ARK 2 on the extra life you know this
to far a way
People have imagined the terms and conditions of an NDA they’ve never seen and I’m laughing so damn hard
My fucking god, what have I caused. 
I should've just kept my mouth shut when I had a 'theory' of "Oooh, since they stated in the next '12 months' of the Bethesda-Xbox showcase. Then that 'could' mean ARK-2 will come out in June or before."
Huh. I've never seen an Ark fan this optimistic
I tried, and you kept it open smh
Aye, to be fair I've always have stated 'could.'
I've always tried to make it out to not be a defenitive thing. But people being people will take it out of proportion.
Always
Not entirely true, it’s something published by Microsoft/Xbox. They expect, for some reason, that Ark 2 and all other games on that banner shared on their last event, to come on the first half. But Wc never confirmed it.
The issue I took with ya was never about accuracy, it was about “is this a can of worms worth opening”
I've said this once, I'll say it again.
"We have no actual official confirmation of 'how' involved Microsoft is.
They could either be full fledge part of the development, or they signed an exclusivity deal for money and fucked off.
Microsoft's words mean nothing until we know more information."
Ayo, can I date Santiago?
yes
Can Santiago be my little Valentines? 
youre his little valentine*
Ara-Ara
WildCard is to blame for all of this. They’ve starved us of information and then they give us a single channel to discuss 3 paragraphs of information over the course of 3 years. Obviously we’re gonna be grasping.
That’s true. I’m just saying it wasn’t a fan speculation, but an info provided by Microsoft. Be it good or bad info it’s Microsoft’s responsibility.
I’ve had a lot of fun most of that time with the info we have 🤷♂️
i just use this channel to discuss game design
I just use this channel for the shitposts. 
It’s just boring as hell to read chats of people circulating news rumors. Otherwise it’s pretty fun to chat game design
Whaaat?
You gotta admit Shifter, some people have some 'entertaining' takes on ARK-2.
We’ve literally discussed Ark 2 so much that our made up concepts for what it could and should be have came back around multiple times.
If theres one to blame it has to be Microsoft horrible marketing
Oh for sure. It definitely beats rumors of “we’ll hear something next week I swear dude just trust me”
ARK 2 WILL BE A BOUT bootleg only home
I have 29, will that work?
send good photo then ok
Nah… I wouldn’t say WCs marketing department is any better 
Like why can’t we get some concept art?
I've sent you image of rupees.
Give me ARK-2.
I’ll take a fucking doodle of a dinosaur on Ceds Jimmy John’s napkin. At least it’s something to talk about
Right now?! Because they’ve promised gameplay would be next. If they share any kind of concept without gameplay, we will see riot.
Dollie: "I'll be transparent with the community"
-Turns fucking invisible.
Dollies transparency “nah maybe next time”
Transparent = absence of colors = no info at all 
Transparent af
give me ark2 roll animation
Kind of hate how they shot themselves in the foot of "next thing we'll show is gameplay"
live life hard 💪
Spit on my shoe and tell me it kind of looks like a new creature you’re working on
Like, depending how far away that is, we'll have to wait fucking months for the next information.
they released ark 2 into the light too early
Honestly, I would've loved if we got more concept-art in the meantime. 
@stray elm @south lance @lime forge @blissful perch stop tweaking out
That’s very true. Unless they had something targeted to be released soon, it was a bad move
No U
Hence why I say their marketing is bad
nyeheheheheheh ima eat your edibles
then ima eat you
If they stated next 'big' thing we'll show is gameplay, then that's fine since then they could've showed some concept-art in the meantime.
Now they can’t Share anything before they have some gameplay footage
S tier bait
They said the very next thing
Well like......'they can'
But I'm not sure if they 'want' to.
I think they were going to reveal at the game awards but microsoft was like nope
It's true
I’m starting to understand why lotus always goes on his wild conspiracy theory rants
Stop being a tweaker
Again, we have no confirmation how fucking involved Microsoft is.
Whe
They can, but they shouldn’t, because they would have lied again, you know?
I’m talking about bad community’s response to that
I’ll take a lie and some concept art over another 8 months of silence
Fuck it, let it rain hellfire while I enjoy my funny Aratai concept art.
you just need some good mod maps
Why do you think I rant like I do besides the obvious stuff
I’m with you. Just saying it would be a bad PR move
They 'are' a bad PR move
True
unfortunately all the mod maps have disgustingly small biomes
LI?
Mod maps suck, the community isn’t nearly as talented as they think they are.
did lost island even release before it released officially
i thought it was always in develipment
It was
They're involved like what
Imo Fjordur had big biomes too
I agree with santawell. Getting some concept art would be great
fjordur was fine
We don't know 'how' involved they are.
It's stated nowhere officially how involved Microsoft is.
They could be controlling some aspects of the game, or simply gave Wildcard money to make it a timed exclusive.
becouse they are trying to stuff all biomes in them to satisfy the community's agenda.
I don't know where to get that information but I'm sure its out there
If it was anywhere it would be right here
Why
Yoo this channel is wild istg
Information from “out there” is what started this whole debacle.
Bob Stallone is typing...
But as a gamepass title, I would say they have info on the expected release date.
Yesterday i was looking at the post from June that revealed ark 2 features, and on the paragraph where they announced the delay they state
We are currently working on our expansive sequel with all our might! But we have postponed the release date to 2023 in order to create an adventure that will be unforgettable for everyone, respectful of our team’s health, realize the potential of upgrading to Unreal 5, and to introduce revolutionary full mod support for console players! ARK 2 will launch in 2023
it's interesting, what do they mean about realising the potential to update to UE5?
Sorry for the block of text but I wanted to talk abt this
getting crazy because I was the first to break the news 😂
Pretty sure the ark 2 prototype was in UE4 because UE5 wasn’t out yet
Break factual news and suddenly things will be more interesting
Not releasing, but realizing
yeah and doesn't this mean the game is close to being able to be played and they needed to delay to realise the UE5 and mod.io support?
No?
You didn’t break news. You spread rumors like cream cheese on a tortilla
Okay sorry next time I'll bring you concrete statements from Jeremy himself or.. dollie idk
Not my interpretation
i mean that's what I understand from there, that they delayed due to those
I believe they meant they would have more time to improve things
I’ve got myself so worked up that I’m not tired anymore and it’s over an hour past my bedtime
As if they're gonna say anything besides teasing us and ARK 1 stuff
Fuck. I’m gonna hate my life at work tonight and it’s all wildcards fault
yeah may be the case, something to think abt though
You could visit the wizard and just all night it
Nah. I don’t fuck with the devil
The wizard has it all
If the wizard doesn’t have Ark 2 news he can go somewhere and something like a something. Just make up your analogy to insert there.
The wizard has ark 2 news
wizard 101
i hate it
well
it forces them to make a huge map which i like
if the map was 500 sqkm then you can have your 20 biomes
how can ark be better than ark2 💀
oh idk, maybe to be better than the unoptimized buggy mess with questionable game design choices that is ark1.
A sequel is meant to improve on what the first one did
Thats the whole point of any sequel out there
assuming it just was, sure, its gonna be the cost of like 2 or 3 dlc at ea anyhow
luckily its a bunch more too
they can restart and build a game on a new foundation instead of dealing with ark 1's spagetti code.
xbox can finally play modded servers
Finally! The feature I'm mostly anticipated for in ARK2
I far prefer small maps with longer travel times and more love in each biome
A big expanse of empty is boring. A small handcrafted experience where things feel alive is 👌🏼
On a big pop server, it gets crowded
Depends on the map type tho
Especially huge creatures like Giga, Rex, and Saurpods
I always mean size in relative terms
Genesis 2 is objectively massive compared to Ab, but a flierless Ab before drakes feels massive despite being tiny
TBF Ab is a maze
yeah but a big handcrafted experience is better
I mean yes lol but by that logic I want fully immersive procedural maps
this is why i like the cocnept of ark2 having dlc sections that all connect to each other
If they made the map with connection to a good world building then yes
its all supposed to be a single continuous world after all
The issue with having a DLC requirement map is
1 pay wall/pay to win
2 if it's free, there will be compatibility issues
i mean most players without the main paid dlc just have a tribemate get all the shit they need
also they are permanently unable to get certain levels but thats specific to how ascension works
What if that said DLC tribemate quits or take a break
you get a different tribemate to do stuff for you
usually its not too hard anyhow and youll have a base on a free map
And gets raided by a tribe that is protected by a literal paywall and you can't raid back
as it stands youre probably already screwed if youre small/new enough that most of your tribemates dont have dlc
though whether the dlc is directly connected to you or is on another server, not being able to raid back still exists
Having a DLC map that is literally connected to the main map is a bad idea
Conan tried that but scrapped it in favor of having a separate map DLC
I can propose a Last Oasis map style but that is just a glorified ARK cluster
i just dont want a map to be small enough that i can go through the whole thing on foot in a week
I mean if you remove flyers or any ability to speed up traversal on the bigger maps like CI and Gen 2
That is pretty much what you looking for
eh
No need to patch over some DLCs that will break the game
the meta breaks with or without this
wc will never be able to properly balance pvp
the game is too free
Scratch that I prefer breaking meta
meta... is a joke anyway
on this point tho, i have basically traversed 80% of CI on foot in ~2 weeks casually, if i had a kit i probably wouldve done the whole map in that time
it takes like 2 hours ish to go across each biome
^if you arent impeded by cold or cliffs
which is really just a grapple issue
Every ark 1 map can be explored in about 20 minutes in singleplayer with one PT
thats a w fr
🤷♂️ I’m just saying that travel times matter as much or more than the sq km of map size
Fallout: New Vegas is a very small map, yet feels decently large due to you needing to walk everywhere. 
yeh its works cause aint multi and you dont build
Ab worked and it’s small. Bad argument
sorry ab is far from being small
Ab is very small.
It's actually no bigger then The-Island
Ab just has a lot of height and depth.
unless youre afraid of blue zone ab aint small at all
^is it smaller than the island if oceans are included?
He’s talking about sq km. The ACTUAL map size. Ab is one of the smallest maps by square km
If we're including the ocean, then The-Island is actually bigger.
Again, what makes Ab big is the traversal. 
If you compare the actual dimensions of the two maps, they're around the same.
Again, Ab just can go higher and deeper then The-Island can.
the island is pretty big
well if you count top side its big
in general its kinda of big
but anyway for a game thats multi whit free building it need size and as for resources yes travel speed matters, it would suck to spend 2h going back to your base after farming something precious
A large chunk of Ab (the surface) is unbuildable. Another large chunk isn’t in the play space, whereas the whole square of the island is play area
Instant travel makes the PvE a joke
not instant travel on ark that would sucks unless its made by you like on ark 1
Just don’t have all the resources in a single area and that helps with conflicts over where to build
Ark 1 has nearly instant travel
With any of the current gliders/fliers you can cross most maps in 5-10 minutes. And that’s corner to corner
yeh but you gotta earn the engram and build 2 teleports
He's talking about how fast fliers are
got any good pve island map servers?
Certainly not for ARK-2.
well thats whit a flyer im talking about resource transportation
Which…you can do on a flier
yeh but tiny bits or suppose to be tiny bits of weight
I didn’t even mention stryders or using other tek because they won’t be in ark 2
The Island is very small. It seems bigger because all the creatures are slow. Take a DLC creature onto The Island and you'll explore all of it in a ridiculously short amount of time.
Exactly: travel times shrink maps
well you have quetz for weight but after the fly nerf that was bronto whit wings it was bad for transport resources
even more than it already is
well lets not forget you can make now huge but i mean huge size maps whit unreal 5 so i dont think they will start whit a map like the island now
“Bad” because people gathered with whatever was fastest
Argis were faster after their TLC and had more metal weight for example. 🤷♂️
i used to farm metal whit and anky + quetz before that argy tlc but even whit argy still depends what map and distance of metal from your base
having the ability to earn a way of having something you can build to make a teleport to your base would be nice
No I’m quite all right never having teleporters
I’d rather be able to haul more back in a single trip and make less trips
Make me take 2 hours to do a mat run but have it be something I don’t have to do all the time to stay afloat
not seeing that happen, ark 1 was a resource consumer and ark 2 will be too
Source - dude just trust me
Because the eternal gathering trips nature of ark 1 is intrinsic to the series 😂
I’d like both. Handcrafted + procedural land. The bigger the better. 
DLSS was anounced by wildcard in 2018... Still no dlss? and Ark 2 with DLSS??? 😆
you want to fry our pc's and consoles?
fry why?
you gonna probably need a 3080 or 90 to play ark 2 minimal 🤣
uhmm 2080 will do at 1440p with dlss
i own a 4090 and know dlss will be needed since wildcard does a very shitty job optimizing games
well they add the excuse of the engine now will see
Yeah, just another pr mess
i have a 3090 suprim but dont wanna stress it whit a game like ark cause thats way too many hours working constantly
Nah… the best DLSS so far is the third version. It doubles the FPS on CPU bound games (Ark is a cpu bound game).
hay charliealpha you aver her of a guy name juice head
my ryzen 9 5900x dint make much impact on genesis 2 map even on rockwell fight altought i was getting more frames than the rest 🤣
sup blades
i found this video can you let me no what you think of it
if is reail new or not
That’s the issue. Ark hits harder on one core. The DLSS helps a lot on that. But unfortunately it’s an exclusive tech for the 4000 series.
oreos
The next Xbox Games Showcase 2023 is expected to be January 25 at 9 AM PT / 12 PM ET.
Doubt we'll see ARK 2 though, when Dollie says it's still a while out I feel that means a few months rather than this month.
see i was Right
You were a rat? 🐀
no i meant was i was Right
We'll see. 
I 'hope' we'll get something
Cause honestly, the more and more of lack of information we get, the less I'm interested in ARK-2.
stay tune for more news on ark 2 with bootleg at 10am lol
I still have no idea what you're saying
Well there was no right or wrong, we all knew about the rumoured Xbox event in January.
most on her did not
Yeah, I didn't. 
i'm not expecting anything ark 2 related from it, but i'm gonna watch it anyways for updates on other games i'm looking forward to
I'm personally looking forward to Sons-of-the-Forest more then ARK-2 at this point. 
dont you men you what to see the game that a bout you flobs the game coming to you lol
i her it will be a fun game
how could i forget about the classic ''waffle baking simulator'' game starring me, made by me and voice acted by a pidgeon
i no way you eat it
Did you see the gameplay thingy that IGN put out? I am in love with Kelvin
Please move offtopic to general.
Can I DM you?
hay gp do you think the way be build and the way we com to no how to build in ark 1 will it be more or les the same in ark 2 or will there be more things for build are home like nails or there thing like that
with ark two there will be no big cave loading pauses right?
We don't know if ARK-2 will even have caves
if it did one will be name the boot leg cave
I don't get the joke.
Why would anything be named after me?
is name after you if a player go in to the cave they loos a leg

Good point. I hope it will though.
I mean no cave’s would be a real hit to the heart
damn ppl really want go primal, bows caves and trailer already show wall paint so yeh 🤣
Decor and customisation is important 
i want a fox skin sow i can be a fox lol

Would be weird if there were no caves don't you think
Not really
Sure, they're normalized in ARK-1.
But they're not important.
The last two DLC's didn't have caves.
Do you consider our digestive system to be a cave?
I want caves
They are fun
If I’m a tiny person yea
"a large underground chamber, typically of natural origin, in a hillside or cliff."
I would more consider his biome to be 'big ass meaty tubes'
I'm going moreso by a reasonably modern classification
What isn't modern about that?
✅ Usually wet
✅ Cold
✅ Dark
✅ Maybe a lil stinky
Could be warm too I guess but
Either way, hard disagree that caves aren't important
AYO! A lot of stuff can be considered a 'cave' with those implications. 👀
Half the game is spent getting things from or going into caves, how does that denote "not important" is all I'm saying
Cause in ARK-1, really the only reason to go into them is for exclusive stuff, like artifacts or tames.
Resource wise they usually hold nothing special.
And the only reason why most people build in them is for tactical reasonings of A: having indestructible meshes around you. B: to stop people from progressing from the map to get tek.
Depending on what they want out of ARK-2, the progression could be tied to missions instead of caves, and the tames could be placed somewhere else if they wanted to.
True, the only reason I go into the pearl cave is for artifacts, actually same for the tek cave 😂
I'm just saying that it's a little silly to not want caves in the game with what... admittedly strange reasoning you've submitted thus far, other than the building bit which could easily be remedied
Not to mention, some creatures would be extremely out of place if not found in caves, imo
Oh, I'm not saying I don't 'want' caves in ARK-2.
I'm just saying they're technically not 'essential' to ARK.
And I disagree, what with them being absolutely necessary in Ark 1 to progress, aka essential
Sorry, I meant essential to ARK-2. If they're going a different wrought of progression.
I mean, the fact that we see a cave in the very first trailer tells me a different story, tbh
I would not be surprised if there's an instanced cave that is for story related elements, like talking to NPCs or storing small amounts of things, or even changing your build, like a respec cave
creepy alien caves on Arat, i'm down for that
Not gonna lie, was kind of disappointed with Rockwell's innards.
Place looked more like it was made out of gum then flesh.
what are u talking about dlss started with the 2000 series cards, they support DLSS 2.0 and 4000 series support 3.0
the gain from 2.0 is like 30-40 fps
3.0 is like 60+
iwhen ark 2 coming out
still just 2023, no specific month yet
@tropic crag What'd you think of more creep factors in ARK-2?
i agree. I've never had any huge mishaps around base, and have never been unlucky accept caves. I feel like you need to have some amount of unlucky to the game. That's why i like caves.
I agree caves aren’t essential to ark
If missions can keep the challenge higher than the normal overworld, caves are no longer needed. Cool as a biome and a terrain feature ofc, but caves are no more integral to ark than a swamp or a mountain or an ocean
i could see the world event system being a reimagined take on the interactable events/missions that replaces caves but isn't the always repeatable style like genesis missions.
We already know they will happen and occur and that it's up to us to decide to interact with them or not.
Some of the examples from the founders note are very interesting
World events are going to be an excellent alternative to the fixed location events of ark 1 that were camped and farmed like so many metal nodes
There are though
Volcano biome has caves on gen1, gen2 has some too
i would not say an ocean is essential
I was mostly referring to just natural caves on the map, depending on how the map is structured, it would be weird that caves didn't exist on arat
agreed.
I was talking about the DLSS3. Regular DLSS is just ok, doesn't work that good with cpu bound games like Ark.
no biome in particular is essential was my point
Ah, I see.
I'd be pretty hard pressed to think that our first encounters (pun intended) with the alien wildlife wouldn't be scary enough most likely
That's... an interesting take, to put it lightly, lol
I'd easily argue that survival games (sandbox ones especially) need biome diversity more than any other mechanic/feature I can think of, besides maybe a food and water system 😅
I think their point was no single biome is essential in ARK.
Just biome diversity.
Maybe I don't understand, but saying that no biome is essential and then saying biome diversity is is a little contradictory, lol
He's saying no 'single' biome is essential.
We've had maps without individual biomes like forests, deserts, artic regions, etc.
thank you for explaining while I cook dinner
But those were part of the greater whole (Ark 1), were they not?
biome diversity is "ABCD > AB" where ABC and D are biomes
Some maps don't have them
I'm arguing A being excluded in favor of a new biome E is totally fine and isn't an issue
if ABCD becomes EBCD, it's fine. A isn't what's special
Scorched doesn't have a forest.
Aberration doesn't have an artic region.
Genesis 1-2 doesn't have a desert region.
and these hands don't have a soft region
point being, having many biomes is good, but no specific biome is essential imo
no tek biome 😔
Hell, all of those can be scrapped for original, alien-based biomes. And will still feel good as long as it's diverse.
i dont think thatd be possible
We're talking hypothetically here.
Eh, I still want caves. Theme them however the hell you want, I want caves
Oh, we where talking about biomes in general. 
Again, I'd be happy to see pretty caves in ARK-2.
But it wouldn't be the end of the world to me if they where removed.
Well, yes.
But I believe Shifter moved it towards biomes in general.
.....Touché
Caves and large bodies of water are things I want, but also canyons would be nice
Meh screw caves
He screws caves, you heard it here first
Sooo that's what they mean with 'Rock-Fuckers'
I mean... The caves needs a fixing
Caves are mid game mechanics
Then why're you fucking them?
No building, boom fixed
Lotus is certainly fixing them in his own 'little' way 
The wizard will give me free supplies if I do
You know what?
Fair.
Anybody else think ark 2 is gonna be proper dog water or just me?
nah tons agree with you, just not the majority of people in this channel
seems to be the most common thing gamers are capable of
in what way? im curious
Instead of improving the game they already have they move onto new projects which in conclusion means one of two things, they don’t know to fix it or just don’t want to
they cant fix it
improve what
fixing it would be creating a new game
meta has been gone
they are doing the right thing here
theres nothing to save
"Game development be like-"
they are suppose to only make one game and never set sights on making a better game?
hmm. But we both agree ark 1 is far from a perfect product right?
its not just far from perfect
Yeah, they could've just improved the game made on the decaying engine, those lazy bastards! /s
At some point, a game becomes so outdated that it's no longer financially, or technologically worth updating anymore.
Yes
are 1 is not even close to perfect
please do tell me what game is perfect?
its literally unhealthy
its my favorite game but its not at all close
Can I ask how many of you have played official? Or at least have 1k hours on official pvp
For me 16k
like half the people here are some thousand hours on offi
This is why Windows has different versions, this is why game sequels are a thing.
Things just don't last forever.
As if that matters at all, lmao
ARK is a nearly decade old game.
It matters
yeah you can get a lot of playtime in
It really doesn't
Explain to me why it does not matter
Explain to me why it does
it does not matter too much if you are a hardcore player
you opinion doesnt matter if you dont play on shitty settings?
games generally want to please the masses
there is no masses here
this is litteraly the number 1 survival game
most people dont play survival mmo
wdym no masses?
Better validates your opinion you can’t come in here talking about something without ever have experienced that something, that’s like me talking about pve and not once playing pve

That's a far lie.
It's in the top 5, but not the first
is it a lie though?
Try bringing it back on topic, please
Medieval dynasty is pretty fun
Actually, ARK is 6th place of most played Survival game
Yes
I think we are on topic
Minecraft technically has first place.
But if you want to count only 'real' survival games, then Valheim is right behind Minecraft.
Not on Ark 2, no
ark1 as it is only could be fine if they culled off pvp tbh, pve is what the game could handle way better because balance isnt an issue
This whole discussion is about 'why does this person think ARK-2 is going to be bad?'
yeah
^^
TRUE
theres just so much content that was intended to be useful but gets powercreeped in a year
diplo at least was always known to be useless
If they have diplodocus
diplo was useful on legacy to soak
but then you could get shot off turrets and the dino died
And to transport a whole tribe
shot off the dino
It's the only 11-seeter creature in the game.
but thats only cool in pve
The andrew was the worst and best addition to the game
Are any of you currently playing official pvp?
I dont know current meta
I used to, but retired years ago.
huh
Yep
Keep it relevant to ark 2
I'd say some of the worst litmus tests for ark 2 are asking players who devoted so much time to ark 1 they find any deviation to be an affront to the series
^
as long as it has cross server pvp it will be good
Okay, 'now' it's swaying away from ARK-2
you wouldnt play 20k hours if you didnt think the game was basically perfect
the more hours you have the less perfect you think it is
I'm sure WC has data on average playtime, but the top 1% of players by playtime will be a crummy way to identify what will be a huge hit in ark 2
and its sorta a proof of concept that balance isnt nevessary
ima talk about ark in the ark chat
it's prolly a bell curve
you can see the issues pretty early on
people with 0 hours know nothing, at some point you can pretty clearly see things are broken, and at a certain higher number of hours you simply don't care lol
after a while you find the practical ways to handle those issues
and eventually it becomes second nature
I hope in ark 2 they dont add broken dinos. or if they do they need to buff the other ones
Everyone in ark 2 is going to be bobs again and I'm really excited for it.
if only that mattered
it only lasts for an extremely short period of time, and poof it's gone
I'm already a Bob in ark1 😂
ark 2 launch will feel similar to ark poc
No
everyone is going to take ark2 launch very serious
so when a bob is like "why should something take so much time to raise" thats not even an issue that could make sense to you because youve optimized breeding so hard and are already in tribes that are full of perfect hatch tames
But no tek. 
In Bob we trust 
In what way? The game will be totally different
the "fresh wipe" way
@granite heath no.
Does this make me god on my cluster, if my current character is the default survivor called "Bob the Human?"
in the way that everyone is going to be min maxing their time.
it's true, and tbh it's sad
its going to be fun
then again, that's the PvP grindset
I mean, it's hard to min max when you don't know anything about it
no explorer notes would be 👌
I think I'd be nice to keep them for lore purposes. But removing their double-XP shit. 
things like pvp grindset is why gamedevs dont need to give a shit anymore
agree on both points. Which again is a bit sad if the game is meant to be a sandbox
someone will always bankroll your garbage cause they wanna get good
I anticipate that there will be a small percentage of people who know the entire game within 24 hours of launch
for PvP? Nah they really don't
GCM in single-player be like-
I don't have time to do that, so I doubt I'll do official pvp
i cant bring half my experience with this shit here cause its from the mobile landfill
I bet people are going to be mass taming females right away lol
Which really sucks because it is fun
It'll be funny if breeding isn't viable lol
though you could argue this is why valorant exists and so many pvp devs want to get into espoets
When is ark 2 set to release?
this year
It would be cool if tamed dinos could compete with bred dinos
Hope they add better taming than just run up and spam E or KO it
When I used to play PvP, when Extinction dropped me and my group tried to go onto a server as fast as we can, while having one person in a single-player telling us all of the new stuff, and flying around the map for decent spots. 
God, I hope that doesn't happen in ARK-2
Yeah, I second that motion
maybe the higher bred dinos get too domesticated and lose certain stats lol
Ko taming and basic passive taming is the worst
well ark 2 might be different
It gets so boring?? Let me sit next to this dino for 2h spaming E.
ark 1 the standard is KO
taming in ark1 was developed well for how easily tames are lost
but there are a lot of different ways to tame dinos in ark 1
its easily The most mass producable taming method, KO
They've more or less confirmed taming is different in ARK-2. With the Founder's-blog part of the ARK-2 CC
maybe each dino will be different
or maybe the new standard for taming will be different, like all dinos can be tamed the same way a diplo can, passive or ko.
the only issue is how long it takes
since i dont think KO has the accelerated feed rate that passive gets
or maybe all dinos are tamed like otters
That's the point, I kind of enjoyed the different taming ways they started adding.
Whoops I hit send instead of turning off ping. Sorry.
some dinos are too hard to tame for how useless they are
i dont want to touch half of those taming methods because none of those dinos will be worth the effort because some goober had already bred them to cap on day 2
They had heavy emphasis on a random-encounter system that everyone will be able to experience.
And one of the random-encounters stated 'injured animals'
So my own personal guess is that we can either take it for an easy kill, or tame and recover said injured animal. 
They also flatout stated we'll need to steal eggs from nests. So nest stealing might become the new KO system
they are way too much effort for their value
with how devalued tames are, i like the methods to be cheap and easy too
Yoinking eggs isn't always fun either, gets super repetitive too.
fucking nuke breeding efficacy, and how mass producable bred tames are, and then fine exotic taming methods are cool
if i were to give it my best guess, ko will still be standard. because it is part of ark lore to ko dinos and feed them.
maybe have exotic raising methods
certain dinos arent just hard to feed cause they need 30000 meat a minute for a day or because they need something thats impossible to harvest easily
Speak for yourself. 
Yeah, it was annoying with Wyverns since you couldn't breed them.
But now they're not so bad, since you can just find pairs of high levels and breed them in captivity.
like all babies act the same
its just shoving food into it until it can eat from a trough
maybe some parasitic baby would be cool
Adding breeding is the only reason it's not bad anymore.
maybe they have different taming methods for different types of dinos. like herbivore, carnivore, flyer, bug, etc
like reapers
ya
people know the easy strats and its just extra steps
its annoying
only 6 months left huh?
till june ya
hopefully it means info soon
im surprised you were ablr to get the link through
magic
i copied it, before the mod deletes it
you are nooblets?
@lime forge
they should not remove cross server stransfers
They should be altered tho
How the fuck did you post a link?
how do you think
I think no uploading would be nice
glitch in the matrix
ye
Nooblet's have also been salty as fuck for the past few years.
So they're obviously going to be a bit harsh on ARK-2. 
also
transmitters made transfers opressive
and tps
if people are trying to hard wipe you they bring tps
and set up a massive fob basically the same defensive level as a normal base
you have to place spam on every spot a good base might be
people can just transmit all their good stuff before you finish raiding as well
yeah
Thats an opinion but he's just an ark player like yourself, why would his opinion be discredited or something cause you dont like him?
nooblets is a pve player
It's discredited when you're not thinking of all sides, and only negativity.
Ayo, that gives us a bad name. 
But he doesn't only think negatively. In fact in the video he praises what he thinks is good
pve players deserve opinions too
I know
I'll need to watch the video, but he's been only shitting on ARK for the last two years, and so I kind of stopped watching him.
I watch him for tutorials, not for him to go on a rant 'then' start his tutorials. 
If only all Ark players knew this lol
Fair
Lol
most people are pve
but pvp players love cross server pvp
conan servers all die so fast
Lets not get confused.
no transfers
Where can I go to complain about a false warn
Most people on official are PvP based.
But if we're counting single-player users, then yes, a majority are PvE based.
Not a huge amount difference, like a 52% out of 48%, but technically ARK does have a slightly bigger PvE community as a whole.
I will play ark 2 if it has no transfers, but I will quit in a month
Warnings from the discord?
Ye
Dodo-Mail
wdym?
It's like 20% bigger or more last I heard
Could be that high
Point is, there's enough diversity that both sides need love. 
Got warned for "bypassing the filter" that I didn't even know existed cause their f'ed up server just let me post it.
I feel like they need to improve pvp in a way that pve players want to play it
I am hoping there is more accessibility for casual pvp too
I just feel like a game is not fun if you are not competing with other players
why does everyone not like pvp?
If it's the same pvp community I might just try it out once and never go back 😂
Cause not everyone like being competitive.
I agree, but I don't want to compete with the entire world while working my job and doing school and life on top
If you want a purely competitive game, then Call of Duty exists for a reason.
you can have a tribe
I mean he has some fair points
ATLAS bombed yet it is ambitious at it's time
The Souls combat proved to not compatible with ARK now that FromSoft nerf the Multi Boss fights from an ARK like slog fest to "wait until your buddy dies" AI
How the fuck does that make it 'not' competitive?
this type of game
Some people just don't like the idea of wasting hours to build up, then getting wiped the next day.
ark, rust, conan, citadel forged with fire, v rising.
That is arks redeeming quality, but most good tribes are too structured for it to be fun
Some people want to enjoy the other mechanics in the game then the meta.
pvp survival games
Conan's PvP is fucking dead
It's mostly PvE players now, with PvE-based updates.
Rust survives because it wipes weekly lol
Funny, cause it has transfers now. 
Zombie update go brrr lol
And yet, it's still dead.
Hopefully you aren't making the statement that no transfers is balanced lol
no transfers kills pvp survival games
No transfers is never balanced
it does not kill rust because of wipes
And Rust is a purely competitive game.
It has no PvE features, hints why people like the PvP of the game.
"Cause it's only fucking PvP"
I like the idea of limited transfers, but there has to be transfers
Aberration
Aberration was a good start of limited transfers
Well, not being able to transfer a slot cap of gear would be a way
Isn't supposed to be more primitive
and there will not be transmitters
Player only transfers, no items or dinos
That’s garbage could never fob
no thats bad
Damnnn
Nah, that'd be boring.
There is no way to fob a mega tribe without bringing supplies

True, it would be hard for bigger tribes. But I am thinking more for casual pvp
I can see 'no transferring dino's or items once it hits a certain stat threshold'
I couldn't see that
The Devs already fuck over 1x never fix shit and kill the game that would 100% finish it off
there are ways to implement systems so tribes dont get so big. look at rust decay system.
Let official die
I just hope it's not 250gb lol
Wasn’t even a thing until 2017 though
I think more ways to limit server claiming needs to be a thing
Yes, it's called 'wipes'
Nothing wrong with large tribes and that is often why players come to 1x fighting with 70 people on a side is so fun when cheating isn’t happening
I don't like wipes lol
Atlas has a interesting system that (normally) they wipe their servers once a year, and create a new season
Didn't ask. 
Notice fobs didn’t exist as we know it people just held their servers and never got wiped
no im talking about having to put resources into your TC so your base does not decay
Like i have said just have wipe servers and non wipe servers
I agree with this. But the issue of entirely claiming servers is a big issue

Wipe servers in ark are honestly less popular than no wipe ones
I don’t think there is a problem with it just think that the exploits to drop server so you can’t fight it is a problem
PVP who cried about wipes need a reality check
They gonna get wiped regardless
So why try to keep your progress and give yourself an unfair advantage against starting players/tribes
ark 1 servers can only hold 70 people, I dont even feel like they wanted that many people in a tribe
It makes casual pvp not a thing. So it kind of shuts out an entire group of people
I don’t raise tames that take 10 days and raise fridges of Dino’s so they get wiped we play to hold servers fight wars and enjoy the game
There is empty 1x servers everywhere
Half of ice caves open
There is no such thing as "casual" pvp on official servers
Only on restricted unofficials
should the game be faster paced like rust? where you really dont care too much about your base because you can just make a new one? no I think bases should be long lasting
^
An ice cave is not casual pvp lol
what do you guys think about caves?
in general I think nobody should be able to build in caves
Caves as base locations is broken lol
tames take to long to raise for “casual PvP” if you can’t hold 1 cave you can’t play 1x
no c4 
It’s 6x all caves can be wiped online they fine
That is my point
cave pvp is not fun
But that is why it’s 1x and tribes are uncapped
you can hold a cave with 1 person
Cap
I did that in my time lol, I held a 1x ice cave solo for like a month. But then life got busy
Fort and shadowmanes 2. 69v1 you can’t hold 3. Caging 4. You can throw more tames than them
I really hope the cave meta isn't a thing in ark2 though
It's really not a fun way to play
when is it ever 1 v 69 lol
Pushing most caves is enjoyable only island ice is boring to push
I’ve seen 70v2 before on 1x
That's how I got wiped lol
the 2 should not stand a chance
"Breaking news: all caves on Arat have mysteriously collapsed in on themselves"
I want caves, I just don't want them to be viable base locations
also for pve its bad
The problem with 1x bases is that racers are to strong
I want no build zones in every single cave
Just no cryos and no tps makes caves not viable
That makes a cave unraidable
You can’t throw a tame in a cave
Which makes loot 100% safe
You can't throw tames out either
You can’t run 100 heavies
I don't want defenses to be heavies lol
well ark 2 is different, maybe no crouch caves
Ark2 is more prim focused, so hopefully auto turrets aren't a thing
what will they do instead?
So you want Dino’s to be the only defense?
I hope plant x makes a return, it prob will.
I don't have a system in mind yet
velos
I really think some people should play 1x or smalls and then comment on what PVP “should” be
Plant based turrets or something, so that flame arrows or similar things work
Not specifically y’all just some shit I read earlier
Some of the shit I read was crazy AF
I agree though
Basically same. I have played literally every way ark can get played. I think it's not currently fun
Pvp should be drasticly different than it's now
I think the only problem is the cheating
Ark would be 10x better if cheating wasn’t an issue
Ark pvp currently is pushing turret limits and fighting with spam. It's not really fun
I liked when plats were meta
Well, it is. But there is no variety
alpha plat on rag
Fortnite with turret capping soaking with mek rush is decent but pushing caves is fun AF
or the plat next to the castle
Yeah, but it gets old fast
Running with Deino in pearl pushing crystal ETC
I like the idea of land claiming with structures
Only thing that gets old fast is the cheats that drop server
I don't think it works well lol
Almost nothing works well lol
There are too many exploits in the current game that hopefully get planned better in the next one
^
I like when the best way to raid a base is to drain the turrets with a soaker. I dont like quetz bombing, rocket running, or any cheese
Exploiting and cheating is the biggest fix for me 2. Fix is not adding BS like Astros
Proper turret settings prevent all of those unless you have mass people to rocket run
Astrodelphis are one of the few tames I’m hoping to see return. Such a cool creature.
I like there being multiple ways to raid. But it should be an actual fight. That rarely happens outside of 1x and big raids on smalls
Have you played official ark?
I meant in caves
Yeah why
tek turrets are a good counter to rocket running
Astros and shadowmanes I hope are completely removed
Those are the top 2 I want to see return haha
lets think about prim plus meta, I think it relates more closely to ark 2
its just plant x spam lol
I think Astros and shadowmane are the level of quality I want to see in ark2. They are well made, if too op for ark1
Astros are absolutely aids to kill and shadowmanes can solo rage a giga and if HP can get 220k and take less DMG they are both broken and didn’t add to the game
What I don't want to see is gigas and capping mutations
they are too strong
I would love it if gear discrepancies aren't as dramatic too
I want cap mutation but the points to be at 100-150 and not 254
op dinos that aren't even dinos lol
ye
they tried to add the most op creature that lived and couldnt think of one so they made one up
That’s in Ark 1, there’s no reason it needs to be like that in Ark 2.
but it goes with th elore
I don't want it. Because it ends up being a race to see who has the most efficient afk gets the better creatures lol
It's not an enjoyable way to handle power scaling imo
maybe a skill tree on dinos?
I think mutations should be more strategic and take up slots so you can specialize a dino in multiple ways.
yes like a skill tree
conan has random stats assigned to mnpcs
That is what I am thinking lol. Instead of stat levels, the qualities of abilities that a Dino has is more interesting
And would be less broken imo
it needs to be more clear when and how you get mutations. ark 1 requires every single dino you own to be in a google sheet.
I don't want the game to trivialize the pve side in pvp just because you have a good afk timer
Would make the game cap out when you tame a Dino
Since you can’t make any better stats
And as we've already seen it's super power creep territory I'd rather get changed into a skill tree for dinos that can't get bred down so every creature isn't a "afk breed, raise hatch and destroy everything" from breeding and every Dino can be used uniquely
its easier to balance dinos if they are not all at different power levels which are decided by how much the community breeds them.
If there is a system that allows you to breed in traits rather than flat stats. It would be a more interesting game
Problem is then the “trait” of strength or whatever is either going to become a stat or you will get a few traits and then your done
I am basically entirely against the level/point method that ark uses currently
Whatever system they use I believe it should be a long term based system
I do agree, but not take litteral years to max a dino
On a competitive level Ark is better when it takes time to work to get max stuff
I mean, I could write up an algorithm that still has duration, but isn't as completely broken
RN with the current state to max a 3 day raise Dino Desmo it is going to take longer and total time about 8 months most likely to get 254 points into HP
gigas are still not maxed yet
Sorry my brain died it’s going to take less time
are they?
They have been maxed for over 1 year
I did not know that
The issue I have with stat mutations is how utterly outclassed early tames are compared to a Dino that someone afked
It’s not AFKee every mutation you need new females and the amount of time to stat push is insane and respect to breeders
It is an incredible amount of effort especially for gestation Dino’s
breeders are crazy
I was a breeder lol, it is afk with timers, and that's it
no im not
lol I mean crazy in a good way
lol
Did you stat push?? Or just breed?
The basic principles of capping a Dino in ark1 is trivial
I capped velos on 1x
1st getting 0/0 tames takes time and effort 2nd cloning or raising females and then getting them up with stats and getting them updated for every mutation is a lot of work
yeah
