#ark-2
1 messages · Page 53 of 1
What twitter? Their snail games USA one? I can't find anything so I'm tryna ask lol
i dont even want a release date i just wonna see 2 minutes of gameplay to see what i have to deal with the next 5 years when it released xD
It was a Twitter space I wish I could share here but I have both the Twitter and twitch link on hand
Can u dm them to me pls?
Sent
Thank you!
Given this mindset I’d hope that they just increase rates across the board
What exactly they’ve said about Ark 2?
You also got to remember, they teased ark players with that teaser, and for what, to most likely delay the game again and again, that’s what doesn’t make sense. Lol
Why couldn’t they show us the original teaser now. Lol
Well what's most concerning for me
Is that wildcard are keeping ark 1 up, developing ark 2, and making the ark anime
Which OBVIOUSLY costs alot of money
And ark 1 really isn't making profits anymore, and we all know atlas and pixark etc aren't making nothing in terms of cash
So seeing how they're more then likely in a negative cash flow, and snail games is suddenly trying to advertise ark 1 and push that to people for some reason
Concerning.
Investors.
Especially that they're doing it after the studio they look over still hasn't shown any work despite it bring paid for
Oh yeah, also the snail games twitter retweeted the ark 2 news fan account tweet saying "Do you think we will see ark 2 at the game awards?"
Why would the official snail games studio retweet that? It's almost like they expected something too...
We saw some Ark2 during the Game Awards, 1 sec of the trailer meh
Oh yeah! Also, they lost 16.3 million dollars from atlas alone!
(that's some recent news I also learned)
A couple of different things
1 it's in development. The one thing that I'm not sure what they meant is they said they have an announcement coming in q1 so not sure if that's ark 2 or not
They talked about web3 , their new game engine a new game and so much more
Of course it's in development, nothing new there lmao
Lots of tinfoil hats are being put on lol
Unless you have the numbers, you shouldn’t make those assertions
I mean, AFAIK, they are already making money from Ark 2, because they made a deal with Microsoft
I don't have the numbers myself personally. NeddyTheNoodle does though, where he goes over snail games legal documents on video and states out they lost 16.3 million in impairment losses due to atlas alone
So It would only make sense they have a negative cash flow right now
Not to mention, that's just objectively false, they still make sales on the game and it's content daily
Doesn’t seem to be factual, I’m sorry
Then there's the case of whatever portion Nitrado pays them for server sales...
He has the legal documents being shown on video? How's that not factual?
Judging by the numbers of steamdb Atlas sold 1-2 millions of copies and they are actively developing it
You know you can easily make up stuff online, right?
True, but for your last message, how many players are on atlas right now?
How much if their playerbase have they been able to retain?
I think like 1-2k concurrent players
Not much
But it happens with AAA titles
The fact they are still developing it and they have their servers up, makes me think it doesn’t make sense
You need to look into what impairment losses are, my friend. Not the same thing as sunk costs or anything like that
But the subject here is Ark 2
So, Ark 2 is already providing cash flow, because they have agreements
His video has his sources in the description if you don't believe me. All I know as absolute fact is, they've been losing a lot of money, and the things they have been working on such as ark 2 still aren't being shown so far down the development line.
So far so good IMO
You really need to look up what impairment losses are
You shouldnt treat it as a fact though
He also mislinks like half the things that are there in that description, lol
Just virtual numbers, no real money involved
Even if I'm wrong, if somehow "losses" means they magically made money so be it; However, if they made 1-2 million in sales but only have 1-2 thousand players? Somethings wrong with the game
Nobody's perfect, but he definitely could have explained what they are so as to prevent this situation 😅
Pretty much, in layman's terms
If income income is based on concurrent players, they have their pockets filled with money
Because Ark has a sustainable player base for ~8 years
They just overestimated the game's return investment is all, didn't actually lose 16 million lol
Virtual numbers, at the most, their shares went down in value
Yep
But 16mi, I don’t know man…
Also, the pirate game was more successful than their magicians game 🤣
It's still bad, but not nearly as bad as homeboy is claiming it is 😂
Not to talk about Ark alone
And Ark 2 already having a deal for gane pass and console exclusivity
I would love to “lose” money like that
Yeah, Ark 2 has definitely already made big bucks from that deal alone
And it ain't even had gameplay shown yet 🤣
That’s another thing he doesn’t get right
Whe
The fact we don’t have a gameplay, doesn’t mean the investors don’t have needed info
Phill Spencer is already playing as Vindiago 
No doubt
They won't have info on how the game itself works lol, except for maybe a select few
THAT'S why he looked so happy, yesterday 😂
No, not that, but numbers, status etc
Yeah, they probably have seen some of that.
Yeah, plenty of info...
We don't get that info because it isn't relevant to us lol
Past rates from Ark 1. Proof their concepts are worth the money as well
There's pressure coming from the other side as well. These companies are fighting for those rights to new games in general. They are buying in without knowing everything, which can lead to flops. It happens often
Yes i'm a flop 
However you guys are wayyy more knowledgeable on this subject. It's been a fun read
It is to me, I’m thinking about buying Microsoft, but I fear Ark 2 might get them bankrupt
I dont mean to interrupt your convo that much
Devs don't tease ark 2 for TGA --> Game doesn't show up at TGA --> Devs never said when they would reveal gameplay --> Wth man it must be delayed till 2025 bc it wasn't at TGA
Interrupt away lol
I think we aren’t. If we were, we wouldnt be chatting on arks discord 
Agree; I’ve seen lots of horrible investments in indie games that flop. What WC has going for them is historical success in the form of ark 1, which may reassure investors in ark 2
Yeah. People seem to forget that ark2 hasn't even concretely announced yet
You mean concretely announced to be in TGA 2022 right? (Which I agree never happened)
They already have that platform built. It makes sense for companies to fight for exclusive rights well before gameplay can be shown.
Maybe. But it takes more than precedent of a successful first game to get investors hooked
Yeah, sure, but Microsoft or any other corporation wouldn’t blindly invest. For example, that game pass banner we’ve been talking about here, they were probably informed by all the companies their games would be out within 12 months. That’s one of the infos they don’t share publicly, but they will share with their investors
Well yes, especially for sequels. Since the idea is that you’re no longer a super risky first game studio. At the stage ark 2 got exclusivity they were pitching concepts rather than a finished product…which is pretty dang normal for investing. I agree
What likely happened is Microsoft asked “is this game eligible for our event” and WC said “yes”. There’s likely wiggle room on the release dates and ark 2 fell within that range
For sure, even more to sign multi year agreement to be on their service and an console exclusivity
I don’t think so, but that’s fine
Is exclusivity really that great?
Yeah, it takes A LOT for Microsoft to be convinced that it is a worthwhile investment
I don’t know how things work exactly
Microsoft certainly isn’t a Kickstarter program but I don’t see them as severely risk adverse
There are pros and cons. An exclusivity with Microsoft opens a lot of doors
To me, it feels more like a security line rather then going out knowing you'll be able to rock it on all platforms.
It can be, especially if you need up front funding for your game
My understanding is that you wouldn’t bother signing exclusivity if the short term funding increase failed to exceed the projected gains of just releasing everywhere
To start with, you get lots of money beforehand to fund your project
Ahh. Selling the soul
No, selling their product
I've watched enough shark tank to know that's a limiting sale
The capability to have liquid assets in developing and hosting the game is much easier with a big corporation like Microsoft involved
Microsoft is also a major platform for ark…so excluding PS is a minor loss in playerbase compared to losing Xbox and win 10 (and ofc dropping steam is probably financial suicide for ark 2)
They will have access to 30-40 million players through game pass, day one
I wonder what kind of loss that is tho
Yes, but it takes more than a day to setup all the servers, and that is needed up front before any profits are made
30-40 million people with access to their game for a fraction of $1 month
A calculated one. But it’s an estimate based on the size of the ark 1 PS community and the size of the PS5 community/growth
Are ark servers ran on microsofts servers?
Ark 1 is to my knowledge all run on nitrado. I’m 99% sure nothing about ark 2 servers is known
Crackhead
Ark 1 on Xbox is, not all of unofficial though
Makes me wonder if the funding from microsoft will cover the bandwidth usage increase. If they arnt selling their game outright, will they make enough?
Unless we're speaking strictly official, of course
I assume loops asked about official servers only
That’s not the price of game pass 🤣
There's going toi be a lot of random players downloading and playing because they have access
Does game pass also include DLC?
(For this discussion let’s say ark 1 dlc)
Yes, it includes the first season pass at least
Idk if it has Genesis pass nowadays
And it only just started to include the first one like... last year? Maybe the year before?
Wonder if they will do some type of cheeky hybrid. You get access to single player story mode, but will have to buy the full game to play online?
Highly doubt that
Ark 2 really pushing their story mode
Where'd you read that?
Vin Diesel discovers family
It depends
Some games do, some don’t
Ark 1 doesn’t include DLCs
Yes it does
ive seen other games do that. And i'm just wondering how they're going to fund a game where wayyyyyy more people have access to without spending money on the actual game.
The question is about ark 1 for game pass, since it’s safest to assume ark 2 will use an identical pricing model
Really? They have put the “complete edition”?
Last time I checked it was just the base game
Idk, I just know that the first season pass is included last I checked, may be ultimate survivor edition now
Afaik, gamepass words because Microsoft pays to put games on gamepass. So the general pool of all gamepass subscriber money is used to pay back the studios
I'm sure the $20 i spent on the game 5 years ago has covered some of my bandwidth usage, but how will they get money if it's part of a game pass?
(see above)
i did 😄
Yeah, that’s how I understand their model
Through what Microsoft paid them to put it on there in the first place
And will continue to pay them as per the contract
Well gamepass ≠ exclusivity to my knowledge, so that’s two different revenue streams from Microsoft
true. I figured there was some good explanation, it just had me wondering
Yeah, they have signed both
Yeah, but they paid them the exclusivity charge and the game pass inclusion charge, I'm sure
I do think contrary to Bruising that official servers are a net financial negative for ark 1 lol
TBF, makes no difference to me
Just marketing
We also don’t have a community crunch for today? No ark 2 news I think
Love 'im, Triple X is one of my favorite movies of all time
I was surprised to see him in it. I think it'll be fun to see it all play out.
crunches are usually later in the day
I usually don’t see a CC until later today. But either way, don’t hold your breath on news. It’ll come when it comes
Yh just wishing they will release something now lol
Don’t have my hopes up that much
But it’s usually on Thursdays, right? I know they’ve posted on other days, but it’s usually on Thursdays
always on fridays (unless something special happend)
Fridays (PST) yes
Fridays
Any money that I pay to keep my servers up goes to Nitrado alone (due to the deal with WC for Xbox servers), and any money that goes to them specifically for Ark servers (Xbox or otherwise) has a portion sent to WC
Im excited for the updates. I cant wait to hear when around it'll be out so i can start holding my breath
I think they're making or have made the return investment, imo 😅
Sure, but I have a hard time believing WC isn’t in response paying nitrado to host officials
That has probably evened out by now, at the very least. Do you know just how many unofficials there are? Even just on Xbox?
It's kinda wild just how many people wanna run their own server 😂
It really depends on the rates WC gets for their network (data I don’t know)
True, I don't know either, but I'm pretty sure they're ok in the long run
But nitrado wouldn’t take such a deal if they didn’t gain financially from it. They aren’t dumb
Well, that's debatable... lmao
Bad and dumb aren’t always the same 😂
Oh, I know, trust me
Speaking of which, really hope they don't do that shit again, locking us into only one hosting service
(Specifically Shitrado)
Even PS has Gportal 🥲
Xbox stayed losing on that one
We really did
I have no doubt Ark already paid its costs and is an important cash flow for both WC and Snail games
The fact they are calmly developing ark 2 is a good indication of that
Official server maintenance, like it is for almost all games as service models, is likely a net negative as the game grows old
Obviously it’s not a soul suckingly major negative financial outflow, or they’d have cut official servers down ages ago 😂
@drowsy ibex
How many people wasted 3 hours watching the game rewards just for Ark Content and got nothing. Be nice to have something ?
I mean, that's on you 😂
Nothing was promised, just wisps of rumors
Quit clownin'
They also showed Starfield and probably a bunch of other games that weren't mentioned in TGA
i would like a christmas screenshot
someone earlier mentioned a snail games interview but idk if that was relevant
So no Ark 2 news then?
none yet
Ark II release early 2025
unrealistic
Ark 2 isn't coming for a while I think, is there any gaming show as big as the awards coming up in the next few months? If it was close then they surely would've announced gameplay and a date in front of a million live viewers
They have no reason to independently announce it now for months, unless they were for whatever reason trying to limit the audience it goes out to
the shame is on you dawg
That makes no sense… a lot of games I was waiting for weren’t showcased there and they will be released as scheduled
no they dont. if they dont want to they dont need to. sure, it will create hype for everyone, but if the date is far away (like pokemon scarlet and violet which release date was announced 8 months before release) it will lose hype again anyway.
There’s no rule that sets a game has to be on TGA when it’s close to release 🤣
"As scheduled"
What's ARK2's schedule if I may ask?
2023
Lmao ok dude
First half 2023
Not confirmed
If you take into account the gamepass banner, yes, h1 2023
All we know is "2023 bro idk"
estimating release date is not easy, some obstacles and wanted subjects in game may be harder than others. pokemon released on release date with an unfinished game. to allow wildcard to make a good impression after the ramp of ark, they need to do it good. promises will only lead to more dissapointment.
As they said un the Xbox event "they will show Game that will come out un 365 days from that event" you can now it, and its a contract with Xbox
That wouldn't stop wildcard
I genuinely don't think anything of theirs released on the scheduled date
they can delay It, yes, all i now is i love this Game and comunity an the salty arround here lately is very nasty
Actually, the banner says: all titles targeting to release over next 12 months
Thats It
It is an ideal timeframe, but not 100% sure
Just to be clear or people will come here on June 30 to say WC promised yada yada
If I were them I would release the show a month or so before ark 2 to try and get an Arcane or Edgerunners effect
Because that still exists
Some dumb people that dosent now the difficulties of making a Game and whit a growing egine with many versión changes
They dont apreciate the work behind
Jurassic World created a trend where Ark fit perfectly back in 2015
Sorry if there are some errors in my words im spanish lol
It's not that it's the fact that they announced it way too early, then pushed it back to 2023 instead of 2022
Well, they are all costumers. Marketing people need to balance the hype and avoid disappointments as much as possible.
5.1 ue5 had some relly changes that they sure wantes to implement
Why do you think announcing 2 years ago was too early? Maybe what they did wrong was to announce the probable year of release.
I think if they had announced it in 2020, without setting 2022 as the release year, they would be in a better position IMO
Some incredible ganes like BOTW were anunced 5 years before its release (and was delayed )
Yeah, I don’t think 3 years between announcement and release is too much…
But maybe their mistake was to set 2022 as release year, too soon in the development cycle
And lf It comes out un the first half wont be 3 complete years at all
Yes, that ilusion with that date made all this disagreement with dates
Did it release today?
No?
Then it will release later 😂
Where's the not knowing? You already know 😂
They literally have told us, too. 2023. Not that hard to just check the pins, or read up like, a sentence, since almost everyone else comes and asks the same dumb questions
They also did just say that the next thing we'll see is gameplay, so the rhetoric of "they don't tell us anything" is a crutch, at best
thats asking a lot for those people man, you gotta think like them to understand them somewhat
I shudder at the thought, don't make me do it, please
I’m pretty sure they have shared what they can. And they will share more when the feel the time is right. No developer will share everything. Some info would just do more harm than good.
I’m not trying defend them, but help people to set their expectations right around here
If you feel tired of waiting, just go do something else. Doesn’t worth to get sick because of a game release 😂
You’ve been given complete transparency, which is that no concrete date exists beyond a general year of release. Just to clarify that transparency and “all possible knowledge” are not always identical
Also not worth it to get 'sick' on a game release to play it and skip work/class 😂
Add to the conversation that Wildcard is most probably on a NDA with Xbox, and maybe that's why they are not saying anything right now.
Maybe they will be able to share more this January who knows
mom?
Trying to save some lost souls 
I want ark 2🗿
🗿🤌
I don't think so
the last event is around the corner.
The last events were already bad
just colors and some new chibis
BUT there will be a large update this month, I guess
with Scorched Ascension and some new H-LNA stuff
i thought that was in game already 😂
should probably have known that
I don't know, maybe on consoles, I'm not sure
But not for PCs
I thought only Switch got it
me neither, i have not really played ark lately
so we got nothing about ark 2 in the game awards?
Nothing lol
shame shame shame shame
It’s not sadly
The first cutscenes spoken by Helena are on switch atm
they do that on purpose to create hype early, its scummy but yeah
I don't know, man. I think not setting a date is better than having to postpone. What I mean is, I guess they really intended to release this year, but it wasn't possible.
My gut feeling, of course
ever heard of BATIM: the dark revival? was announced 3 or 4 years ago and still nothing
humans when they realize they can do other stuff while waiting:
😆 i can do other stuff and hate wildcard at the same time
happy holidays
it may have been a problem they needed some more months to fix and the game is ready for release early 2023 and them not sharing info is because of the NDA, but this is EXTREMELY optimistic
IF they were constrained by an NDA, I guess we would have seen this Gamepass banner
but who knows
I just think they are playing safe
we did no?
there was a small clip of it on the xbox game pass ad
They aren't creating any hype lately, and still people get disappointed. Now imagine if they start announcing their plans and something happens?
No man, it didn't
that was a clip showcasing the Samsung app
and it happended to show Ark 2
very generically
yes, it is, but was a clip showcasing the app
nothing related to ark
yeah I may of confused it with the game pass showing ark 1
Still has no bearing on if they are under NDA or not, so uhhhhh
Useless convo is useless 😂
I don't think it's relevant
I will tell you my personal guess is Ark 2 releasing H1 2023
Same here, easily
i think the same, IF the game has been going since Extinction im sure it's close
Increase rates for ark is going 0.5 percent higher, so it'll be 1.5
1x today is equivalent to 2x back in 2015
I think they will keep the small tribes rates (3x) for Ark 2, or the equivalent to that
4x
I'm pretty sure it's 2x. After the first evo event (2x) they never set the rates back to 1x IIRC
but sure it's been more than 7 years, there's a huge chance I'm not remembering it right
It's actually effectively 4x. They've put it up to 2x twice.
not all rates were raised the same iirc? It's 2x the 2015 experience or raising or something and 4x gathering to my recollection...but it's been ages since I saw those numbers
I stand corrected. I remember they did it once. The second time I don't remember. 😂
Maybe that's it
because I don't remember the time to raise gigas and rexes cutting by 4
They are, besides a few things like rock pickup that would seem silly, the same across the board
gathering, xp, taming
that makes sense
changing raising and breeding have a much bigger impact
The raise and breed times have been fine tuned on a per-dino basis for years, though, to be fair
I don't know, man. Besides the first cut by half, I don't remember it changing outside evo events. But all I used to breed back then were gigas, rexes, spinos and pteras.
They have changed certain ones occasionally
Like I said, per dino. The tuso is the last one I remember hearing them change
It was around tlc 3 i think they changed a decent amount
Or maybe when drakes became breedable
Shortly before or thereafter was the tuso one, iirc, to make them in line with gigas I think
Well, but looking forward, I would like to see them lowering the raising timers, BUT increasing the mating intervals.
Agreed
11 days for a huge dino like a giga is too much
mating intervals are so dang lame though lol
It's a necessary gameplay limiter imo, otherwise people would have armies of critters in the first day or so
.25x evo bring back classic rates
I mean, taking more than a few hours to the baby to eat from the feeding through is crazy
A giga takes a day
8 hour bronto tame

Berries
Pain
🤡
The raising times are fine
been there done that
And I would be fine not having to do it again
I will say at least for PvE rates could be higher
Even for PVP is doable
But PvP higher rates could be alright too
just make tames less op in general
It really depends on what they want PvP to be
Not really
Raise capped stegos
A lot more than usual
Soak bases
But these mega tribes have all been around for years you aren’t getting in the biggest tribes bases regardless of what you do
I'm not a dev, so I have no ideas how to balance the pvp
BUT I know I don't want to spend days raising one single tame
Develop an anti cheat and get rid of tames that shoot shit
Velos are the only real counter for turtle spam
Game wasn’t too broken till manas came
Then straight downhill for pvp at high levels
my idea is making them less op
Velos or soakers?
Or just tames in general?
I'm not so sure "capped soakers" will be a meta in ark 2
When nets were created it makes it a lot easier to counter these op creaters
we don't even know how the defense systems will be
I don’t think creature in ARK 2 need to be as strong as ARK
That's my point
Especially if they’re adding souls like melee combat
Creatures need to not be able to super breed into 1 shot killers
yeah, that's why I think metas will be different this time
Hopefully
I don’t know how to feel about souls combat for PvP I’ve never been big on it
Conan was okay
But never cared for it in the souls series game
not just that, but the super farmers should go too LOL
anything to replace the stryder wouldn't be good
or the magma
Yeah resources need to be harder to obtain
I liked old ark back when it first released
Low resource yields
Very low actually
Made it feel like a survival game
yeah, right?
the alpha bases had like 30 turrets
now, in a few days people have full tek bases
It took months to get that too
I don’t think the game should be a super super grindy game but it should feel like an actual “survival game”
Evo events wouldn’t have to be a thing if the rates felt balanced
Also mod support for console and pc mean less official players and more unofficial which is also healthy
me neither
I want balance
I like officials, but the fact you need to be a super hardcore player made me get tired of that after a few years
I moved to unnos because of the quality of life they have
But one of the big cons is they are not so reliable: lots of crashs, wipes etc
I'll never play Officials if it's anything like Ark1 is. I just don't have that kind of time to spend 😂
Unofficial make that irrelevant
I get why they want official to be a grind but that’s the main thing that populates their game
Yeah, not saying it's wrong, just not where I will be spending my time. Props to peeps that consistently play and enjoy it though
they went on a never ending balancing war
but the final results aren't good
now it's easy, but in 2015 it was too hard
they raised the rates and also made things too easy to gather
like elements before and after extinction
or metal before and after aberration + karkinos + ankylo 😂
and so on
Grinding Element via boss farming was pretty crap though
yeah, true, but extinction just made it too easy
don't you think?
raising rates from bosses would be better, I guess
and I'm not even talking about genesis 2
that map just spoiled everything concerning farming/grinding
Element Veins are quicker and better yield but could be stolen by other groups, while locked boss arenas are fixed difficulty but have the pain of farming artifacts and tribute items
If I had to choose, I'd prefer the Veins method for Ark2
What, I assure you it's possible to steal from people fighting bosses
Not during the fight - after, sure if you knew where they warped from
but you get my point
genesis 2 just spoiled it for good
Oh for sure
element isn't rare or hard to get anymore
yeah
It was just two biomes that were far from unique
Gen2 was the Devs saying 'eh, you guys have suffered enough, go have fun in the sandbox'
Space is cool but resources didn’t have to be that abundant
Stryders being able to farm that much stuff was stupid
PvE has stryders parked on every resource spot so people can just bed teleport to them and farm then leave again
PvP just has all caves with good resources blocked by turrets
Unofficial that actually have good rules and an active population are super hard to come by
Hopefully cave building won't be as powerful/necessary
Cave building will be necessary if there’s aimbot like it is now
Well if they keep the game to a more primitive experience it won’t be as bad
The new crafting system seems good too
Component based crafting
I wonder if they'll try to make pvp more casual friendly, by making raids less destructive to your overall progress, somehow.
probably not, im guessing you will still be able to foundation wipe people. but how hard that is compared to ark 1 we do not know
I’m assuming foundation wiping would still be a thing
Case #30337 @wind jewel has been muted for 1 hour.
Reason: Posting a unauthorised Discord invite link
theres no way theres no full wipe
anything i need to know abt ark 2. Like any new news that wasn't there 2 months ago
Nope
Nope
Sure there can be, a really nice method of safezone storage was suggested that sounded good enough, either an instanced worldspace (akin to the home caves on Path of Titans or ESO or something) or a safe inventory pouch (akin to the gamma crate from Tarkov or similar, Grounded actually just did that in the new update too in a neat way)
Having a safe area for anything in a game like ark is a shit idea. The safe area should be the base you build.
🤡
If bases are harder to raid and judge whether it's worth to raid or not, like Rust, then I'll concede to your point. Otherwise, no thanks. The main issue people have with Ark PvP at the core (ignoring cheaters and things that are obviously not core gameplay) is that nothing is really permanent; all your progress can be wiped away by one asshat no-life with a metric fuck-ton of c4 that he ground up while all the functioning members of society were working, or doing stuff with their kids, or sleeping. I can guarantee you that, because that's how all the tribes on my old servers quit, including mine. Getting wiped by one dude who has no life is the dumbest thing that can happen imo
By “get better” do you mean quit my job and stay home and online for 20 hours a day to make sure some guy doesn’t soak my turrets and help himself to my loot?
Fr, like I applaud the attempt, but uh
Gatekeeping content and mechanics as well as... how safe you are in PvP behind how much of a life you have is a no-no
It does suck you just lose everything to a few people who legit don’t do anything besides play ARK and sleep. A big problem for me is time otherwise PvP would be my preferred choice
What else i am supposed to do next with ark and sleep?!?!?
That game model is accessible only if building up is quick
Luckily for literally nobody but round the clock players and megas, ark does not boast quick build up times

Anyways, I do think ark 2 will revamp raiding in some way to make pvp more accessible.
Hopefully they make it more skill based somehow instead of what it is currently which is just overwhelm the defenders with more players
Hopefully there's little to no CC abilities for tames (shadowmanes, cough) and that being able to pick people off of tames is limited and hardish to do
'Cause raiding in ark was ruined the moment nets and manes were introduced. Being able to completely disable any tame within your turret range is beyond stupid.
I thought 2 was pve only?
It's marketed as a pvp game on the steam page idk where you got that from
I saw a video about it was said it’s going to be pve with A.I that can attack you
Don't believe YouTubers' lies
just bc pve is getting improved compared to what it's now doesn't mean pvp is excluded from the whole game. also sidenote, if you want 100% accurate news look at the steam page or any other news shared by wildcard
I might just misunderstand the vid or it was just highlighting the pve changes
As of now it is marketed as a pvp game just like ark already was. I would expect lots of improvement to the pve side as well
ah man, i can't get that rex stuck on a rock anymore. i need to actually think on how to take down the smarter ai 
I would like it to take a bit longer to place structures in ark2, the speed spam of building is something 8 would like to see done away lol
I'd like builds to actually place where the outline shows. The number of walls and ceilings that were mistaken replaced is unreal
I’d much rather keep quick placing and slower “arming time” on turrets
My favorite is when you place something and it just disappears into the Great Snap Point In The Sky
It should take between 3 to 6 seconds to place a structure lol
I’d rather a more strict limit on placing them next to hostiles or wild creatures
Since it’s so lame to watch someone erect a trap on top of a bear trapped dino
Bear traps should deal a lot of damage and make a creature untameable
Yeaaaaah no thank you
They shouldn’t deal much damage. I’m interested in it blocking taming though
Since it’s the lamest way to tame something I’ve ever seen
Bear traps should sever feet off of whatever steps on them
They don't do that irl, so why would they in game?
They do trap things and make them really mad and hostile though
Yeah well irl you'd die if a rex bit you but u don't
Creatures don’t magically bite 6 times stronger irl and soak up bullets better either after a few generations of mutations
Okay the biting stronger thing after a few generations is realistic tho
I just think it’s dumb to walk over a trap and instantly take a massive chunk of damage…especially if they can be littered around a base
People breed animals irl yk lol
Yes, like c4 traps or mines in every other game...
Yes, within biologic tolerances
Ark breeders would be seething if they had to obey biologic limits 😂
Use ur eyes lol
Often called the most skill lacking and annoying feature of said games?
You can “use your eyes” to see a turret wall too. Doesn’t make it fun gameplay to have to soak it
Baiting people into traps is a very skillful maneuver wdym
It's also lore that the creatures in Ark have been genetically engineered to be more susceptible to domestication
Yea but what about just littering the ground with 100 obvious bear traps? By the time someone disarms them all they’re filled with arrows from defenders
There has to be some form of defense, and I would much rather have damage dealing things like bear traps and mines rather than giant turret walls
Junkrat mains 
Bro, break them lol
Objectively not the same as being genetically engineered to magically create more damage out of thin air, but sure
…which takes time. Again, like if I told you “just soak it” for a turret walk that people are actively defending
I meant more against bear traps making them untameable
It’s possible, but is it fun? It certainly doesn’t sound different
Ah gotcha.
But yeah, wild vs tamed/bred stats is kinda silly
Yeah well raiding shouldn't be a five minute adventure
Esp with mutations
I’m fine with that. But it sounds like you want bear traps to be strong enough to use as a protective force field ahead of your turrets
Low cost, high reward if they work, and you majorly stall your opponents even if they get found and disarmed
I mean, I want turret walls to not be a thing
I just said to break them instead of holding e to disarm them?
By what biting them?
So what stops you from just walking along biting the ground to disable any traps
I am really hoping ark2 is a melee based game, where shooting, turret walls and explosives aren't a thing. Or at least are really really expensive
So do you want traps?
Yeah
I want the game to be slower paced and more challenging
The easiest thing to do for that is remove note buffs. And while you’re at it, grant 0exp for killing babies
But I want it to be actually challenging, not just glitchy challenging
Then make the xp system not take a literal month of daily playing to get one level
That literally doesn't help lol. You level so fast in ark just by doing random things
I’ll let you two sort that contradictory set of opinions out
Takes me almost a month to go from 171 to 172 on 1x
And Tek pods don't even give xp, neither does crafting after 135
Leveling should be directly related to exploration, but exploring should be harser
Literally only get xp for killing stuff
Imo it makes no sense to get exp from killing stuff. Like somehow you kill enough raptors and know how to make a boat.
How would they do that? Give you xp for walking a certain distance? Or for visiting specific areas/biomes?
I’m down to remove the rpg from the game entirely, but I doubt that’s happening
Many survival games require funding blueprints or crafting to unlock other recipes. Entirely outside an rpg leveling system
Finding an important note or something, that gives you the engram to craft some3
I don't want player exp to be related to crafting
Oops, all Tekgrams
I want engrams to be locked behind notes, with the good ones to be locked behind hard caves
I’d far prefer missions to notes
Either or. I am not picky
Scouting a massive map for notes just to get crafting recipes is so annoying. Unless the game gives you direction
I just don't want them to be from leveling your character
Ideally your character doesn’t level up at all
But I think the ship sailed on that one. 🤷♂️ it’s a shame, would be fun if character stats stayed low and what determined progress was gear and skill
Leveling makes sense, but only if it isn't related to some exp thing
I would rather you get tiny amounts of exp from doing things, but get most from actually completing objectives of some type
This isn’t a realism argument. If it was, everything would have levels and it would be one of those debatably good hyper realistic survival games
Ew
You’d start being able to do barely anything and would have to spend months doing the same task to be able to make it better
IE: cringe gameplay
Ark2: RuneScape Evolved
Leveling isn't good game play. But it is important to feel a progression
Leveling is fine for gameplay, there’s an entire genre of successful games that do that
Having it all gear based works for a single player game that doesn't have kit looting
Pokemon players rn
But it's not good for something like ark
Your character level is a sign of wealth actually
I would rather it be a sign of skill or dedication lol
Eh, less the levels more the stats.
Oh it very much shows your dedication to the game.
I got a char to 190 on 1x out of a rathole. Yeah there is dedication, but no skill lol
The stats are the levels. I understand that yes a 450 can be garbage or all correctly capped, but the design being discussed is the same
Rathole on 1x? I'd kms.
I cba to finish up alpha gen 2 missions and my notes to get to 190 unless they decide to make the game good again.
I’m down to not need the leveling system is the point
But I’m also very uninterested in being directed to notes on the map to be able to craft stuff: that’s better off in a singleplayer/coop PvE game (likely one with a story)
What if the leveling system is just engrams?
You mean no stats? I’m down
Yeah no stats just engrams
But I’d like to see leveling provide “basic engrams” and the missions provide knowledge points that unlock skills and “advanced engrams”
In short, yes I’d far prefer that system
Imagine there's no leveling and the only way to unlock advanced equipment is through missions
I’m not opposed to that, but it does seem rather harsh
It would certainly be interesting if most crafting recipes were locked behind missions. But imo that would kinda kill the sandbox idea WC seems to want to keep
Imagine if the devs scrapped the creatures hits connecting with each other mechanics and creature combat is like ark 1s
how many player can be in a tribe in a smalltribes server
6
For what reason would I imagine that?
turrets were a bad idea imo
Their impact could be lessened by only allowing so many to be placed in an area
Or reduce the damage of consecutive turrets that are targeting a single entity by like 20-30%
They already have a limit, but it’s too high. Also, it’s hard to balance that. The tank creatures are too Op right now, reducing damage it only make it easier to raid bases.
The good thing is I believe the new game will have a totally different approach to those things.
Easy fix to that lol. Remove the player added stat leveling
Ir just change the meta. 🤣
I don’t know how, but the game developers might have a solution
That would change the meta lol
If you could only get stegos to 9k hp, then you would only need like 10 heavies to be moderately safe
I mean, sure it would for Ark I, but I don’t believe Ark 2 will have auto turret.s Primitive combat and all
It might have more plant based options, maybe npc based things
Don’t think so
I think they will focus on mounted guns
Cannons and harpoons for example
I personally don't want guns at all
Ballistae, catapults, ect probably. Or another organic solution like Plant X
Yes
The aesthetic of how it looks makes no difference if it's the same in practice. Catapults that are not manned are no different than autoturrets
X plants are ok the way they are currently
i belive it will be whole primitive again with no guns or just real prim ones
But the way I see it, it won’t be the same
They are slower weapons
Not so accurate
Yeah, there is just the issue of scaling lol. I really hope ark 2 doesn't have gear that is 200x better than basic gear lol
That could work
I just want armor durability to actually last. Ark1's current armor takes like 5 hits then it's useless
And as soon as it breaks, you're extremely vulnerable unless you quick swap. Armor swapping should be trashed as well
I think you didn’t like the idea of NPCs mounting the weapons, right? Like on the pirate game I mean. 🤣
Unless you get a good set, then you can literally walk up to 3 heavies and survive lol
If guns are a thing? Yeah that won't work lol
If guns aren't a thing then it could work
I don't really like the idea of taming humanoid npcs on ark though
Because of the concept or morals? Because they could be paid soldiers.
On Atlas you have to feed and pay them or they will riot
Because ai for human npcs in game is too dumb for me
I have some friends that are dumber 🤣
But well we will see
I’m open to any innovative concept they bring to the table
When ai for humans in games actually is ai, then I am open to it. Until then I would rather not lol
I mean, I'd take aimbot turret NPCs over half my teammates in Overwatch any day ...
Well, it's easier to code aimbot npcs than to get skilled at the game lol
The math for it is really easy
Judging by the aimbotters ... too true 😂
It just takes basic trajectory math, with would probably take me less than 2 hours to code up. It takes thousands of hours to get skilled at games lol
Ark2 if it has projectile weapons, they have to be bows, and they have to be inconsistent at range
Otherwise npc turrets aren't viable
gotta love when i have to deal dmg as well when i tank bc my dps are ''special'' when it comes to dealing dmg 
It's everyone's job to deal damage though.
But if a Support gets more damage and kills than a dedicated DPS, thats a problem.
I’d far prefer it if armor had near infinite durability but reduced damage by way less
Or as durability decreases, damage reduction decreases too. Maybe to like 1/2 at nearly broken
That’s what he said
Or at least it was I understood
Not really, there was no mention of armor to durability ratio
Anyways I like what you said. Less dura = less damage reduction.
It makes more sense than Ark1's 'perfectly protective armor', until you get bit by one too many Compies and everything breaks and you're unprotected
Never been a big fan of the armor quality reducing as the durability does, it's either broken or it ain't ya know? That's how it works in real life, for the most part
There's different tiers of broken though, right? If a phone screen cracks but can still be operated within reason then the phone isn't useless
What'd you mean?
I don’t like this kind of approach, that things needs to be like IRL. It’s a game: alien planet, dinosaurs etc. A game developer should focus on playability and balance, IMO.
Idk, I just think armor should have a set value and that's it, either broken or not. Maybe make it so that it being broken, it can still be worn? And have the reduced armor be from that? That sounds like a nice compromise
Like, if all of the leather-straps on flak armor are ripped off, then I don't think it's usable.
Exactly what I said, I guess? I don't understand the question...
Armor doesn't get less useful the more it's used, so there's really no common ground here
It's broken or it isn't, simple as
Mechanically, yeah that's how it should be.
The only other way I can think of is like Fallout, where once it gets to a quarter health left, it degrades its protection by like half.
You do know he has no say in shit like that, right?
Don't get me wrong, I'd be alright with indestructible armor - but we all know survival crafter games loooooove those durability bars
Nowhere did I say the armor had to be indestructible 😅
It was mentioned earlier by Shifter
Near infinite is not infinite, either
I'm just thinking the most likely scenario
Reading is hard, 'kay?
Clowns back in the chat got my IQ dropping faster than a bola'd Ptera
I've never had an issue with durability with armor in games
Understandable 😂
It's been a wild ride since TGA the other day
I don't know where I stand on armor lol. The issue with high dura armor is that it basically makes the player invincible. Like I have run a wall of 50 heavies in 140 armor 3k dura flak, and survived long enough to blow rockets and drop the wall. You could have armor at 500armor, and 500 dura and it wouldn't do half as well. Along the same lines, the exosuit is almost more useful than a normal tek suit because it has infinite dura. In my experience, most cases are more dependent on the dura of the armor not the actual armor value.
So I don't know if I want to see high dura armor or not, only thing I know is that I want the ratio between high tier armor and primative armor to be less than 200+ which it is right now
Any armor (like the actual armor stat) above like, 100, maybe, is bustedly OP, I'll say
The actual statistical advantage there needs to be looked into for sure
Personally, I'd love more environmental/element protection with armor. 
Fur armor having damage reduction to frost-based damage (if there's anything akin to like a mana) while having increased damage to fire-based damage.
Because it's not well balanced at all
With them not going harder into survival mechanics, I highly doubt this
More rpg elements would be okay
Which it seems like ARK-2 is steering more towards.
Like the main rp thing I want is to be able to use the type of armor that I want to, and not just always be stuck with the same flak every time
True.
I'd love if more armor had uses.
I was also considering suggesting this…I’m not sure how you’d communicate it to other players though
Like every wipe, or every time you start on any pvp server the mission is to get better flak. All other armor is useless. With gen2 giving free infinite dura tek suits even the op tek suits aren't as valuable anymore
That’s one of the funny things of balancing efforts for Ark. They took out the rocket launchers BPs, but never did the same for the armor parts.
Well, that one actually made sense, lol
It did indeed, my point is, they shouldn’t have stopped there
Lots of OP stuff were left
Armor should be able to be built better, the rocket launcher was legitimately busted. I don't think it's the actual armor's fault, either, just the wonky calculations
Yeah being able to 2 shot walls in 1x was pretty broken
That and if you hit somebody on their tame they'd usually either die or almost die
Like the stats for armor, with how they work, essentially anything above 100 is just... total damage mitigation
I remember there were rocket launchers BPs from fishing that would HK metal structures. They were op af
Nah, if you get headshotted by a decent fabi without a good helmet around 300+ armor you'll take like 50 damage from it still
Well, anyway, most of those issues might be gone just because those items won’t be available on Ark 2.
I definitely think that weapons having qualities (like the rocket launcher issue) is a little on the weird side, it feeds into a few of the issues the game has to be sure. I may be even coming around on the armors too, I guess 😅 . Idk, if they were going to get rid of stats like that/in that way, and go for a more RPG approach akin to say Skyrim or BotW, then they would need a lot of different types of weapons and armors, over 3x what they had in Ark 1 undoubtedly, which just may be the way they're going with the varied mats and combinations system we've heard about
I feel like the modular weapons and stuff will just have different materials give different buffs depending on where they're used
Or will just be cosmetic altogether. But most likely the first if it's between the two.
It SHOULD give some lateral progression so people can experiment and come up with new similar tier weapons and armor
the fact its 3. person is until now the only thing i need to ..well accept xD
i mean sure the first thing sayed was u can easy download a mod that makes it also first person but i dont know if i would like it if its not on the vision of the devs
like the more time passes i am getting scared of the .. 1 or 2 minutes of shown gameplay xD
I don't really mind 3rd person too much, but having the option for 1st would be nice. Probably a mod in the first few weeks/months
Yeah but not every server would use it, neither would official.
oh god i never thought about servers..
like..i always host my own..for kinda myself.. but ark 2 will probably be a bit more complicated with settings and crashes to figure out what happend xD
like is it even a multiplayer like ark 1 ? it seemd more story based with main chars and stuff..
well whatever comes out at some point i will get it and play it for probably about at least 3 k hours ..so well xD
They confirmed online pvp, so yes, it'll have servers
what if they use serverless technology!
Is that even a thing?
mhh i guess we can only speculate until further information but thats why the channel here is a thing lol
I'd assume a serverless system would be 'no server boxes to waste room'
but ..i mean a game like ark even in ue5 needs ALOT of stuff to work in the background
Yep
ya it was a IT joke
like when i play the first one on my own i have some probs when its hosted on a server its like ...a new game lol
oh well xD
ooff ..like...i am playing ark since 3 k hours..since it was in early ..alpha i think... i never really played pvp.. oof a huge thing i missed out
It never came out to the public in alpha
3k is also small fish. 
mhh i only remember needing a nasa pc and it was 4 frames but i still loved it xD
i literly saw the evolve of the game state at this point it was crazy 😄
yeah thats the good old time where the menu was like diffrent.. i ..oh god..
i dont think my pc is ready for ark 2..
Skill issue
i need like 2 of the graphics i have now xD
Ah yes, double graphics
twice the graphics cards, double the housefire size
I have a charity called Pixels for Peasants. Going to be busy with ark 2.
maybe we will get "some" info out of the new update on the 14.
Triple the explosion radius of an atom bomb.
I doubt it, next thing "new" we will hear about is probably SOTF.
also a good thing that its reworked 😄
They'll probably do ark 2 reveals when they're done with ark 1. So anytime after December.
it is what it is :3
what if they show us ark 2 game play as a Christmas gift to the player or a as a new years gift to the player ho nows the future is not for seen yet
ark 2 gameplay reveal Christmas day confirmed
lol
Only for the good kids/adults. Video unavailable for those on the naughty list

at lest i got some of you to lol
Anyone considering share or uploading the gameplay reveal on Christmas will be automatically retrofitted to the naughty list
And submitted to the 'Nog for conditioning 
Really hoping for literally any gameplay before launch this is getting sketchy
al i want for christmas is yo...2 minutes of normal gameplay maybe 3 😄
eggnoglin
.
Ark 4 when
Hey
Plz where found official annoucement about ark 2?
We always research to know somethings.
Like if the first release will be on real pc version, or only the emulate version of MS store
Check out their steam page for information
So apparently we aren't the only ones upset for no ark 2 news on game awards
Other xbox games coming in 2023 weren't talked about either
Well the next event is xbox showcase next june so it looks like they're gonna just release it out of nowhere soon
Everything confirmed is in the pins at the top of this discord.
What makes you think it will be soon?
aaron greenberg said we dont have to wait long to see more of the upcoming xbox games
I seriously don't know why people blame the devs for no ark 2, its all up to xbox marketing teams
Thanks a lot
Steam is not official for me.
I remember metro Exodus...
Well check the "Redefining the survival genre" from wildcard then
It's on pinned too
whats going to be min requirements for pc anyone know
Will need a NASA computer with 5 brontobytes r/w & net speeds
We dont know
@drowsy ibex ik you know about ark 2 tell me NOW i promise i wont tell anyone please
XD
If only it was that easy 😂
😂
Bro I actually believe that once Xbox gets ther nibs in anything they wana control it lol I don’t doubt they are doing exactly what u said ngl 😂
when i read everything i get the question ...on steam and pc it will be early access but is it the same for x box? it reads like it will be full released on x box and pc will get an ea first? xD
It’s EA on all platforms
Steam, Windows10, and Xbox at the same time.
okay so it will be all early access okay
Playstation does not get it early access
Are they going to delay it to 2024
We don't know
Kind of a silly thing to ask, when it isn't even 2023 yet, huh? 😅
^
ye but they still have not showed gameplay and its nearly 2023
calm down bro things will end up as best they can be
they physically cant perpetually put off release cause they need money after all
hope i will survive the next time until release lol
...You... you do know that 2023 is an entire 365 days, yes?
dont die
(I'm really hoping people know what a year is)
2023 will most likely be release in any case, but theyre definitely a good while from it
they may just not need hype atm
and all of a sudden bämm release withut any clues xD
which means a lot of work going on atm
That's the best kind of release, imo
keep in mind they are trying to port it everywhere and get this thing with significant mod support
i mean i am still waiting on beond good and evil 2 so i know patience xD
for all we know they could be closing up on dev for base game and just trying to port it everywhere
wait Bruising, you seen the latest tweet from CudaCores? heavily suggests they're on a NDA as we've already speculated
TBF we have some clues, it will be 2023 and the game pass banner points to an H1 2023 release
h1?
I have not, can you send and @ me in the other Discord?
first half i believe
oh
Like I said before June 7th Is my guess based off some data.
*one iffy data point (fixed it) 🙂
which data tho
Why the 7th specifically?
Xbox event, 99% bet
ive been too busy mismanaging my homework to keep up with this shit
One thing you should have in mind: even the day they have set as their goal isn’t 100% assured
I'd call them targets lol, they do have meaning and SHOULD be followed where possible
but like most targets, they can be missed
It's based of previous expansion dates, Microsoft previous dates and some steam dB data.
Pax is in March so doubtful they do anything there
You shouldn’t limit the possibilities to big events
They have their own channels to publish the gameplay
previous expansion dates is insanely shoddy evidence...since those dates have been all over the place (many) with massive delays
E3 is June, but Microsoft Is in the middle of setting up an event in q1. Which lines up with snail games announcements
Yeah, they don't have to do it at any particular event, don't know why that's such a big misconception around here lately...
The thing is that info in big events goes to lots of people, not only ark fans
Sure, but they can always publish the gameplay and spread it later on
Still wont reach as many people
They can do it at any event. If they do it at pax still lines up a June release
It is an option though
I don’t see why it would reach less people if they publish here on discord and later on a big event
Oh i though by "spread later on" you ment spreading in their own channels
a front page steam announcement is as large an audience as you can get on PC
that release will be published EVERYWHERE
what is xbox event
And you know every youtuber for ark will spread it like wildfire. They don't need the big event again. Is it smarter? Maybe
It's being said RN that there may be an xbox event announcing xbox titles release dates and gameplays very close (january february)
People are eagerly waiting for any news. I doubt it wouldn’t spread fast. 🤣
As i said before, i missunderstood
I think that blizzard/Bethesda thing is holding them, IMO
There's a tweet by Aaron Greenberg saying we won't have to wait too long
Yup Microsoft is talking about an event rn.
Probably it's that yeah
I saw it, but they might think it will be resolved soon, the issue I mean
Yeah so January we may get a Gameplay reveal, who knows
we get it when we get it 
Well obviously xd
(The fact that it needed to be said declares that it is not, in fact, obvious)
Bruh
All I'm gonna say is, I really hope that Microsoft deal for Activision goes through. I don't believe that they're going to overstep their boundaries and make CoD and other such franchises Xbox exclusive like the FTC says they are. They've literally already committed to putting it on Switch, for gods sakes 😂
And I heavily believe that it's Sony's fault that they didn't get anything set in stone ahead of time, they could have definitely shelled out to get a contract for CoD and/or Ark 2, of that I have no doubt
IGN, Gamespot, ARK youtubers and many other gaming channels will surely do a great job at having the gameplay trailer reach out to alot of poeple

Xbox said they'll make CoD available on PS for the next 10 years AND make it release on the switch which is a huge win for switch players
Yeah, the fact that Sony won't accept the deal is their problem, idk why the FTC felt it had to step in. Super misinformed move if you ask me
Ah, the FTC stepped in?
Please remember to keep it Ark 2
Yes ARK 2
so its story mode only
no im jk
no is noxy story only lol
It will have pvp. It is not story mode only. It is a sandbox.
Is ark 2 a goad game?
idkj
You could do any better?
Sure could .Plus not piss off the people buying my product.
if i had mmillions and a team of creators it would be easy
You guys have no idea what goes into creating a game.
well according to my 80 years of game creating i could make ark 2 for 100$ and a pack of poo and a good pc all i need
Im sorry mr expert, could you tell me how online works in coding?
umm not at the moment
what happened to the animated series?
Wrong channel, use this one instead: #ark-animated-series.
(we don't know if it is still planned that the animated series will be released in December, but nothing from the Wildcard side, said that it will be delayed, so it should release in a few weeks.)
it was in post production since june this year, so it could still be on time
Tell us how it works then lmfao
I'm glad this channel exists im hyped for Ark II !
"will ark2 have pvp" is easily the most common question here now
is it pve players who are really hopeful or pvp players who have a comedically bad interpretation of wc
shucks
failure of the education system mostly.
Savage
Will ark 1 be out of beta by the time ark 2 comes out?
Like we haven't heard that one before.
Can't help it if everyone steals my joke
both sides always assume that wildcard favors the other and only makes the game to adhere to them its pretty funny
wildcard on one side that there side lol
Am i saying i could do it better?
It's an objective fact that wildcard responds to official tickets on PvE servers faster. You wait for weeks or even months on pvp to get a response. I've met people who used to play PvE and had gms come over within days whenever there were issues.
I heard people who never got a gm to respond to a ticket too
Did Ark 2 release yet?
No unfortunately
ark 2 come out when
What about now?
Yes, there's an alpha version right now for you@lime forge

If ark 2 comes out. Would they delete ark "1" ?
“When” Ark 2 comes out, they’ll likely keep Ark 1 servers open as long as it’s viable. The official servers will not last forever though.
What'd you mean?
if they delete the game from steam or smth
When has a fucking sequel ever done that?
@stray elm overwatch 2 did it. Its obviously not common but just an example
Fair.
But Overwatch 2 is just a paid-updated version of Overwatch-1.
ARK-2 is a whole new game, and product that'll have nothing in common with ARK-1 other then the title, and the barebones of what makes an ARK-game.
So I don't see them taking away ARK-1 from the store-page.
Especially when they have fan favorite stuff like Aberration, reapers, wyverns, etc, that might not even make it into ARK-2.
Well you see different planets in the trailer, I hope they will make those planets inhabited with alien and fantasy-like creatures.
Well, they can already do that on Arat, but I do hope the other moon is explorable in a later dlc.
If everything from the Genesis-2 ending is definitive, and same with internal dev-kit names, then it seems like Arat is orbiting a gas-giant, alongside another Earth-like moon that could be Arat's sister.
Did you forget to take your blood pressure medication?
Irrelevant, but yes
Btw I believe one of the aratai was wearing Wyvern gloves in the first trailer. Could be wrong though
Just checked the trailer and he definitely has the Wyvern gloves skin on, which might indicate that we will have Wyverns in ark 2
it does look like it, but wyvern gloves usually have just crystals on them, not the bone version. so i'd say that design just took inspiration from them
I think the skin could be altered slightly, might also be a skin that you get from a Dino now, who knows
I’d love a prehistoric animal only map but I wouldn’t mind having a few fictional creatures that easily fit in, such as the Wyvern, rock elemental, desert wyrm etc.
Lol
Alien life
Given the setting tho I think that’s a bit of a pipe dream outside of a mod map 😅
When is the gameplay trailer coming any idea?
No i know
Im just not telling
You are one of the good boys too?
I am 🙏

thats different
overwatch 2 is the same exact game but with a 2 attached
arkII is fundamentally different from arkI even down to its core mechanics
besides, playstation players wont even be able to play arkII for a few years likely
Overwatch 2 is free though?
I don't play overwatch 2 but my friend who does says it feels like an update rather another installment 💀
Overwatch 2 is taking the first game and revamping every character and teams sizes for a more fun gameplay loop. There's very little crowd control in it compared to the first game, almost every character has been changed and there's now systems in place to where it's much easier to solo carry and snowball.
It also has a cleaner, more modern hud. So, you know, everything that a sequel brings.
when overwatch 2 first came out, it was just overwatch with a 2 attached, and some gross f2p microtransactions attached
It still is, lmao
Overwatch 2 is a disappointment and hardly considerable as a sequel, especially seeing as how the first game is no longer playable and it was, quite literally, an update to the base game
the year is ending. not a single announcement
and back it 2020 they said it's 2022
already been 2 years
Xbox has been very silent for some reason
and they are making shіt nobody asked for
they did my boy Doomfist so dirty untill they buffed him after 2 months of being the worst tank and one of the worst heroes in general
who asked for voicelines in notes?
and let me gues, 1 month later DLC announcement The Chasm?
It was made for the new switch version, ig they did that because they want to boost its marketing by having exclusive new stuff
a better marketing boost would be removal of sarco nose teeth
ark and mobile are their only games alive because they have no sarco nose teeth
Sarco nose teeth may be the most niche request I’ve ever seen here
These things look terrible. Lets see it looking... good... just a model revamp would be nice, I've seen a lot of ability ideas around here which is nice but the model is the worst. IT HAS TEETH ON ITS NOSE MAN. TEEEEEEEETH. - average tlc feedback
and maybe fix 500 gb size
There’s no reason to model revamp any ark 1 creature with ark 2 on the horizon
compare the playerbase of sotf, atlas and ark park with the playerbase of mobile and ark
Again, ark 1 official events end this year. Very clear that ark 1 support is not going to be endless
Sotf is gonna perhaps see more players after the rerelease effort in the coming months
because they are fixing sarco's nose
If sarcos are IN sotf. I don’t think they were in the OG. And if WC ever wanted to waste time on sarco noses in ark 1
they were
The ark 1 creature in most dire need of TLC is the saber, and after that the spider
iirc the TLC model for the sarco fixed the nose teeth, but he likes to beat the joke to death
they already tlcd saber
True. It’s called thyla 😂
just a small model update and left it to rot after that with new creatures coming out/old ones being rebalanced
the saber had a new model, a sound pass and a 50% fall damage reuction
in sotf they are almost completely furless, they only have fur on their neck
and make the argy sound
I honestly wouldn't expect an ark1 tlc on dinos, and I wouldn't ask for one personally, because I would rather they focus entirely on ark2 atm