#ark-2
1 messages Ā· Page 46 of 1
or just generally put tames
I remember my firs one, up all night and then get it to juvie, just to pass out during a meat run while filling the troughs and it died by the time I woke up
you could solve this by making the map enormous too
like imagine gen2 without tek suit
Not like it mattered tho, itdd probably ask for dimetrodon kibble or something stupid like that
and like real terrain and not some goofy mountains here and there
That's crazy, I don't want that. But I also wouldn't like something that allow us to carry 300 dinos in our personal inventories.
Pop em in a basket
Lil dino picnic basket
won't matter if theres gonna be tames that traverse it as fast as the meawing does to get around the whole map, for gen 2 it took a few min but basicly any other map is 1 min to the other side
Corrected: I woudn't like
yeah maewings shouldnt exist
like we all love them but thats only because ark1 already makes map size irrelevant
I think on Ark 2, if you want to move dinos, you will have to do the old way
with slightly slower tames
Honestly if the pathing on the dinos is fine, that shouldnt be so bad
just like pegos, seagulls, troodons, microcraptors and jellyfish i want to see them crash and burn in the opening of ark 2
i love them too much for making ark1 as accessible as they do travel wise
it is easily the most efficient travel mount
We were able to carry small dinos in pens, built on platforms (quetz, brontos etc).
shit just got faster and faster with every dlc lol
you dont even need to breed them and they already are faster than everything in game
But equally if breeding isnt overhauled raising is gonna be a nightmare
literally parasaur difficulty its amazing
Not even that I just think itdd be cute to carry like, a basket of dodos around
It will, I'm 99% sure
or trap it with some bilboards
Make it an easter event item
i never got such traps to work
skill issue fr
It can be done, but my point is, please WC, don't bring any items like Cryopods back
I suppose in time we will see
God that reminds me why they made cryopods actually
breeding can be done in specific structures/buildings
Servers, PVE servers at least used to cap out on dinos
Atlas does that. Even Ark does that with mods.
they should instead of cryos introduce a dino storrage stable building that you can upload your creatures in, but can only download back after a ammount of time. sort of a primitve expensive transmitter
I think the limit was 5.5k and if you ever hit it, you cant tame, you cant hatch eggs, you cant breed and the server would lag immensly
i dont really want any fancy dino storage, just more decent sized crevices would be fine
That's what I think would be the best
Then they added crypods and pop
or make more elevated base spots that take a stupid amount of time to get to
Problem never came back
And that's what I think will be the new "Creatures Management System"
cryos should've been more expensive tbh for what they are
so like the jungle on crystal isles is good if it werent for crystal wyverns and every speedy flier/glider
I think for certain some degree of creature storage is neccesary
people should be able to set up a base in more spots
They were so cheap to encourage people to pod their tames cuz it was making servers laggy
that actually might be a massive plus for cryos
It's not just the cost, but the ability to carry a lot of creatures in your inventory
Sooooo, if ARK-2 has a creature voting booth.
Y'all mind sighing my petition for slime-mold?
idk how much server lag was caused by having 4000 tames wagging about
and instantly toss them out
No im voting for the sentient dodo basket
i dig glowy pulsating slime armor
Introduce structures/pre-built buildings where we will be able to storage our tames
yh, an actual unique tame
yes on the condition that its glowy
Hear me out.
The sentient dodo basket 'is' slime
Fair.
It can live in caves
sure
The more you speak about this slime of yours the more innapropriate it sounds
What color is it?
It better not be white
Any color ARK-2 supports
maybe its amphibious, lives on the shores of cave rivers, uses its light to capture a species of small flying fish that uses light to escape and reach the wider world
Ooooh, kind of like a Angler-fish, but more closer to the shore.
now i want flying fish in ark
yk that wouldve been a cool idea if water was relevant
Those are real, so we could have a alien version.
fuck dolphin tho
Me after a friday night
There's legit flying fishes.
They more glide then fly, but still
He is a fish
Can he fly tho
Strap a jetpack on him
We need tek in ark 2 so vin diesel can be a flying fish
@developers you better be writing this down
The downside of having no-tek
I don't mind if it shows up in a narrative sense, but I'd prefer not to have players utilize it outside of specific instances
...what
slime molds are impressive due to their animal like activity in an organism that normally exists as a spread of loosely collected cells. Intelligence is not used to describe slime molds XD
Intelligence isn't what I'd call it, it was just the first thing that came into my head.
There has been studies that they can remember pathing of mazes.
Which is impressive for something without a brain.
impressive for sure. I do respect fungus quite a bit more after learning about slime molds
I've heard they're fun guys to hang around
I think this game is a rumor i think all WC has done is have fun making CGI with Vin Diesel in it.
I bet if it does exist it looks exactly the same as Ark 1 just with better texture resolution.
If ark is so good why isnt there an ark tw-
Oh.
there making ark2
That's the joke
Lol
who knows, will be there pvp in ark2 or it will be pve only?
"Online PvP" on the steam page.
and better server stability duh
well i might be asking for too much
ah yes i see great hollowing comes to ark 2 community š
Will ark 2 be updated to unreal engine 5.1?
The nanitr rendering now supports foliage which if wildcard doesn't update to 5.1 if it's possible then it's a hugely missed opportunity
Bro ark 1 was made in 8 months using unreal engine 4
With 25 employees
Wildcard now has close to 100 is using unreal engine 5 and has way more knowledge surrounding unreal engine
On top of that they have been making it for 4 years
And way more money
the lawsuit that inspired wildcard to make scorched earth paid ruined the game tbh
The game only feels complete with all the dlc maps
I'm hoping ark 2's maps will be free/cheaply priced
the alternative financing model is some form of subscription, since ark runs as a games as service...either battle pass/loot box style optional payments or more standard subscription fees to use official servers
since...you need money to develop a game and run servers for it
are you talking about the first party PS game?
When we will see the gameplay for ark 2Ų
when you see the little "1" number next to announcements, followed by an announcement showing gameplay
for this year yes
longest possible is prob fall 2023
any later and like, idk where they get their money
will ark 2 be free to play early access or will we have to pay to playtest their fucking game lmao
i still cant believe switch is that huge of a success
?
free to play EA is meme technology
Free early access is reasonable
no lol
I shouldn't be paying to play a game early
you don't have to, it's literally optional
Companies pay people to beta test their game
EA is so people can buy the game far ahead of schedule (or support a prototype that isn't finished) to help with development and FUND it
^
i forgot that Wildcard was in fact ea rich and just wants to scam players duh /s
if you want free beta testing, expect to be required to sign NDAs, be on a schedule, and have a very small number of testers...because it's a completely different concept from early access
imagine being scammed by a product you were fully informed about and bought anyway š. WC you sly dogs
it's the fault of WC being greedy tricksters
If we are talking about possibilities, well, it could be today. They never confirmed they would attend TGA. Also, they never said where the gameplay would be published.
thatd be weird though
Why?
because its tradition to drop big announcements at shows about game announcements
plus more people will see it there
yh, game awards has more publicity than wildcard dropping it out of nowhere on youtube
ye
A small gameplay isnāt really a big announcement actually
i mean it reinvigorates hype by letting people know the game exists
assuming the gameplay shown is actually appealing
Unless they have the actual date for the release, I donāt know if they would need that kind of publicity
most people probably barely remember ark2 now outside this community
maybe
thats why i got concerned when nothing was dropped during extralife and recently that game review
though ig we wouldnt see it release any time earlier than summer next year regardless
has wc ever even dropped dlc during the first 5 months of a year
something in may maybe
Ark 1 had virtually zero marketing and look where we are today
thats fair but ark1 is the only halfway ambitious survival game imo
also ends up being the biggest
it found itself in a very empty niche
or at least i assume so, idk if there was other sandbox survival back in 2016
rust ig?
as far as i know only gen 1 in February 2020, all other dlc except for gen 2 were at the end of the year
but rust is just pvp, without pvp i dont think anyone cares about it
aight
My point is people still overestimate the impacts of such events
Developers are more and more hosting their own shows
Itās cheaper and easier to make it happen
cheaper?
And yeah, I believe Extra Life was the perfect opportunity for it, but it didnāt happen unfortunately
you just send your video to the event team...that's pretty cheap
and they handle drawing the crowd of general viewers who in turn may be exposed to your game
Iām pretty sure you have to pay for the spot
I'm sure you do, because it's financially appealing to be in a large event
much larger ROI than trying to release a marketing/promotional piece to your existing (active and engaged) playerbase
Let me say it again, if they have a date to put in the end of this gameplay footage, it would worth the money spent
disagree
But just showing some random gameplay footage with no dateā¦
Thatās fair 
the date is nearly meaningless if it's more than six months out, since people won't be able to act on a date that far out anyway (and WC as well as many many other people have poor history of keeping up with distant dates)
all it does is create a false expectation
Also, we will see. First week of December they will hint something, if they are to attend the show
Thatās my point, using TGA to hype the final moths until release
But like I said, we are entitled to have different opinions
ok but we have no idea if we're in that home stretch
My whole point is this, if they are not getting ready to release soon, wonāt worth to pay for the TGA spot
My opinion, of course
ah, well then I extra disagree š
the ROI on one of the largest high profile annual PC gaming events is likely pretty high, even if you won't release until an undetermined time the next year
Ark 2 2025 I can feel it
doubt that
we'll know with the community crunch of the 2nd, if they don't say anything... i wouldnt expect much..
How much is ark 2 going to cost
It wasn't announced yet
We don't know.
But seeing how it'll come out in Early-Access again. Possibly 20$ to 50$ USD.
But this is just my own thoughts.
When Ark 2 release the game will be old, 3 years wating

𤯠Shocking! A game taking 3 years in development?! Wow! Impressive!
Even 3 years is not that much, given the ambition of ARK 2 and all the features.
3 years is pretty short for development of a huge game.
Though, ARK-2 could've been in the backburner since Extinction.
I hope it's been 5-4 years in development
Tbh I feel like it has been worked on since extinction
Then we suddenly got genesis
Genesis was defiantly the start of ARK-2's marketing.
But it's hard to tell if they started during Extinction, or Genesis
HUMANS
They mentioned it all the way back around scorched
they did?
Before
So it would have to be after then
Yea
There's always been talk of an ARK-2 even before ARK-1 was released.
But 'actual' development is what we're talking about
Id imagine some scrapped stuff for ark 1 will also make it into ark 2
So it kinda depends on your definition
I need to find it again, but I read this old ass interview between (I think) IGN and Jesse.
And IGN literally fucking asked if there will be an ARK-2.
This was a interview 'before' ARK-1 came out
What a stupid question to ask lol
Fuck that interviewer.
I wanna know about ARK-4
Fuck it, the last game of the series.
Unironically though, I wonder how ARK will end.
Either with a whimper like Halo, or an actual end to the franchise.
Honestly I wouldve been happy if it ended at extinction
Same, but it also would've been weird to never explore the universe again with the Rockwell ending.
Hard not to, when Aberration itself still exists.
Unless said theoretical universe also removed Aberration.
Rockwell is still stuck in the gaurdian chamber, cant leave, abberation eventually caves in and is forgotten about
Hence all the quakes
Rockwell is the Overseer, so he's able to do a lot more then just sit there.
And what happens when Humans find Aberration, an ARK littered with the very thing that we just wiped, now infecting the soil.
The other arks destroy it because thats their job
Alternatively tek nuke 2 rockwell boogaloo
It's their job to get rid of the element around 'them'
Aberration doesn't use its EMP blast, cause it's broken. So no ARK can reach it.
Tek-Nukes would require element, which would just cause spores to go into the soil again. Causing Extinction 2.0
Yknow this is raising a bunch of concerns when it comes to the fate of earth after extinction
Oh yeah, which is why I thought the lava-planet in the original Genesis-2 trailer was Earth
Yeah, if we go back to Earth in ARK-2. Unless they figured out a way to wipe out element without element-based technology, then they're fucked
Id like to believe theres the capacity to stop the element spread from abberation, but more likely its probably just contained in the contaminated zone between functioning arks
Alternatively rockwell has ravaged the planet and then escaped the wastes to gen2
Thing is, the ARK's will break down over time since they're no longer needed
Nah, Rockwell made a B-line to Arat Prime
But I find that relatively hard to believe because presumably the huge number of tamed dinos would overpower him
Again, he canonically runs to Arat-Prime and uploads his conscious to the Genesis-ship
Oh ye I know im just speaking theoretically here
Ah
Could make for an interesting what-if story tho
"rockwell doesnt go to arat prime and instead remains on earth, slowly biding his time until he comes out and attacks once again!"
Rockwell is still the Overseer of Aberration, so he might just be immortal.
He could've waited and sat on the crashed ARK for years until the normal ARK's broke down.
While he's waiting, he infects any creature and human that comes near the ARK, building an army
What do you mean by infects?
Corruption, mutated, malformed like the Corrupted Survivors in the Rockwell Prime fight, etc
Yeah that would work, ive only glimpsed them personally
Now youre making me wanna write
The corrupted survivors are fucking horrifying.
They have their guts hanging out, no skin, fucking like 12+ feet tall, and use their spinal-cord as their sword
Oh
Average resident of england
The corrupted survivors where more scary then Rockwell himself
Personally ive only done the fight once and failed
Alpha?
Beta
Damn, imagine failing at the easiest boss in the game
Went in with one of the stupidly overpowered basilisks from when gen2 launched and nothing else
Oof
Acid pools on the floor turned it to shreds despite having like 130 thousand health
Yeah, it's tick-based damage.
And with a fat basilisk it does alot of ticks ._.
Doesn't matter how much health you have, it'll do more the longer you stay in it
Those fuckers are deadly on a 10x boosted server
You can have a rex with a few million HP, and the damage will just adapt to it.
So I saw unfortunately
I believe it's like 5% of your HP per second.
In short.
The goop-balls are the highest priority in the fight.
With an actual army
It's a pretty easy fight once you get those goop-balls down, and don't get cornered by like 20 corrupted survivors.
The alpha missions for it are harder then the alpha boss itself
No kidding
Ill never recover from the time I spent doing star dolphin and that damned canoe race
Which is sad.
I love how cinematic it is. But I still wished it was harder then 'goop balls'
Don't mention the C-name
I have trauma over that mission
Its not as bad when you realise you canoe backwards just as fast as you do forwards
The soundtrack, once a beautiful piece, only instill anger.
Just gottta have a strong drift game
Never ended up finishing survive the ark tho, thats the only one I needed
Then my character got deleted ._.
Get nae-naed
;-;
Where ARK 2 gameplay
Nowhere
Hopefully soon
In a time, at a place
The later the better
I feel like ark 2 shoots itself in the foot a bit.
Ark's can be literally any theme and create any creature from life or fantasy depending on the overseers wishes.
This planet is just... this planet. And as a result bottlenecked in terms of what can believably be there. But that's just my take lol
Yeah for sure, but they can expand what is on the planet by making original sci fi / fantasty creature
For me the most important point is dinosaur, and I don't want to see wyvern anymore xD but for everything else.. doesn't matter for me
Like shadowmane etc
Aliens can be literally anything š. And ofc the genesis ship had many blueprints that we didnāt see on the eden or rockwell rings
In the end there is only scorched earth and free maps that use "mainstream" fantasy creatures
Wyvern/phƩnix
Even then, itās really only the griffin that lacks an ark touch
Iām down to see them all go. I much prefer speculative biology to flat fantasy
Me too
I'm not in love at all with fantasy creatures in ark
Like I said, wyvern š„²
I think the wyverns are fine (the original 3)
Balance aside, they look at least somewhat modified to be an āark wyvernā
For me the wyvern is just an easy way to just **** the game
Oh yeah they are beautiful
Really fitting
What are the original 3
i wanna find a old defunctional voidwyrm i can use for resources
They are stupidely strong
I look forward to when all of the voidwyrms are defunctional
Getting a wyvern = no need for any creature in the game except an army for boss fights
They can fight better than a rex and they fly
Fire poison lightning as someone said
I think those are fine. My beef is with slapping a billion more into the game
they were less unbalanced when you couldn't breed them, as is with basicly every mutated creature and you had to risk something to get a new one
Crystal wyverns were made breedable under the pretense that they did half of the damage and attacked twice as slowly, as well as the breath attacks being generally weaker
Regular wyverns do not have such weaknesses, the fact that theyre breedable makes them absurd
They got nerfed stats as a result of being made breedable, punishing all players who didnāt want to use mutation stacking
I stg I hate mutation stacking š
Dont even get me started on the voidwyrm
I Hope that this don't carry on ark 2
Useless peice of trash
Which is evene less reason to get one
And more so since the tek suit or a maewing is superior
Yes exactly
Which I hope we don't get again
You wanna hand raise instead?
I really do think that abberation and extinction creature (except the managamr for PvP) were the best designed one
Especially the rock drake
Glad we are on the same page here
Really hard to get, need to learn how to use it
Strong but not op, really usefull only in abberation
Where there was nothing else
Everytime I play ark I go on this map first
Its the best map
Yes by far
I hope we see more enviroments like it in ark 2
They did a great job with how they did it on fjordur
None of the map has made such an intricated connection in gameplay between items, creatures and map
Yeah Fjordur was really nice too, but missing something for me
The teleporting kinda got to me
You must like gen 1 ? 
No like, I didnt like it
Can you imagine how cool itdd be if you had to like, drive over a huge ocean to get to jotunheim, or fly up to the huge tree to get to vanaheim
Oh yeah, that would be so cool
Didn't like it too š
This map is full of beautiful plage
Place*
Never know where to put my base tbh
To me it felt like no matter where you put it you were missing out on something important
Yeah that's kind of my feeling
Going around the map for hours with my rock drake just to see if I was REALLY sure
Its a shame too cuz the map is great otherwise
Yeah I do think so
Can't wait to see ark 2
But I really wish they take their time, and make something really interesting
Look as loong as the people who made maps like abb, fjordur and gen1 are working on the map on ark 2 im sure itll be fine
I would like not to feel that the Map is empty
I Hope that you are right 
Thatās what happens imo when maps get huge
You lose a lot of the loving detail that smaller maps like Ab had
No. Huge maps make for low detail empty biomes
Travel time and subjective map space tho is everything
A good developer can do both
*a developer with a metric ass ton of time and resources can do both. Fixed it š
No, but they are short on time
Yeah true but they can push it back
I mean, theyve pushed stuff further back in the past cough extinction cough
Have you seen the community each event they donāt drop the game š
Yeah I know, honestly the issue stems more from the community than the devs
For me another issue with bigger Map is the lack of interest in exploring
Id always much rather they take their time and release it properly than listen to the community and do another ark 1
This may be biased by the fact that I've played Conan exiles for a while, but often time in ark you find a place where there is something interesting (castle in Ragnarok, ruins in the center, a lot of places in Fjordur like the dwarf Fortress) but it lack something worth exploring inside
A secret, a special item, anything
Being able to build anywhere be like š¤·āāļø
Yep š
Artifacts are wonderful things
We should have dungeons and such in ark 2, but to do that we have to block building and other activity that gate keeps them
Yes in order to make them truly cool to explore
There is not an artifact per interesting place š
More artifactssssss
Seriosuly tho lootcrates could be nice
Perhaps cave exclusivve dinos
Or maybe enemy npc like, hideouts
I donāt mind artifacts or loot, but right now they can be easily monopolized
If they were special mission secrets that you could find while on missions or in special instances dungeons, theyād be more appealing imo
maybe they could put exclusive materials for customizing weapons
deep into the dungeons
Or artifacts/eggs/anything interesting. Dungeons imo are a far superior late/post game repeatable grind than mutation stacking
ye i hope they rework mutations cause they suck
Boss fight suck
*boss fights have in the past been boring
I think the rockwell fight was the step on the right path with shootable projectiles and I think genesis 1/2 added a dismount portion that make the fights a bit better. But ark 1ās movement simply wasnāt ready for more engaging fights than that
I wish all of the fight looks like the rockwell one, it was near perfect for this game
And extinction at least was really impressive the first time
Agreed. I hope Ark 1 was really a laboratory for WC and they will address the most concerning failures of the first game on Ark 2.
Saw a lot of hype on YouTube for the Pc gaming show
You will a see a lot of hype coming from YouTube for no reason actually
Itās called click bait
It was, theyāve showed old trailers
Nothing new
Ah okay
it was, just a super fast 10 sec compilation of both trailers
Yeah, a PS version isnāt confirmed yet
Why wouldn't they do it
I can almost guarantee they would have it out within two years
Timed exclusive with microsoft, sony not liking early access and each platform build takes time away from new additions to the game
It doesn't matter if Sony doesn't like early access, nthey agreed to Ark 1, and it doesn't matter if there isn't any cross platform play
Ahh so I see, making too many versions would be making the same mistake ark 1 did
Actually, Xbox version came a year before ps version, I think
I know it did
It will be the same this time, probably
Thats what I said
The difference this time is the Xbox version is coming day one
You were saying a PS version should be realeased on 2023, but that wouldnāt be possible because of the early-access requirements by Sony
No, not 2023
I said a ps version should be a thing, I never said it should be at launch
Ok then. What I think is, eventually they will announce it. The reason they didnāt now is because isnāt a priority
Yea me too, but Flobs was saying reasons for why Microsoft wouldn't make a PS version
Did Wildcard announce ark one would eventually come out to PS4?
And what he said is a factā¦
I know it is, thats why I'm bringing it up
I donāt believe so. Older Xbox generations wonāt get it neither.
I was saying ark 1
only current gen consoles
Ark 1 is on ps4 š
During the initial release date, did wildcard announce it would come to PS4?
You guys aren't reading š
The release of ark 1, did wildcard announce it would be coming to PS in the future
Back then
I donāt know, Iām a pc guy š
Thats an L for me
But they did it in advance I believe
I'll Google it lol
It was announced in 2016 that ark 1 would be coming to ps, but it was put on hold until 2017, when the developers of ark let Sony know the game was completed for Ps players
So it was announced a year after the game was released, hopefully Wildcard will make a PS version in 2024 after Ark 2 comes out
No because like ark 1 itās an Xbox launch exclusive
Whats your point
Probably something more like this
It wonāt release the same time as Xbox/pc
I've already said that
Why is everyone assuming I mean at launch before reading š
No I donāt think they did either, announce it during ark 1
Legally they wouldnāt have been allowed to
Sorry I think I caught up now š
Hello
Hello
Is it true that ark 1 server is shutting down next yeat?
no, did you watch a loadedcrysis video?
No my offical friend told me
official servers will slowly over the years be taken down, but ark 1 servers aren't shutting down the moment ark 2 drops. unofficial servers will always remain bc the official servers are owned/moderated by wildcard themselves
Oh
He lied or is confused
Wc didnāt announce anything like that
I hope they'll make server for ark2
he's on official, it was to be expected somewhat
Theyāve actually released new official servers
:0
They definitely will
Can you use ini in ark2?
We donāt knowā¦
i hope not
If i play ark without ini my ping would be lik 150
Ini files werenāt really used to fix the performance issues š
Hmm
Specially on pvp
My pc is weird
it was to make pvp even more ugly looking š
I hope they'll add mana or shadow in ark 2 lol
šŖ¦
š
i hope they stay dead with the Rockwell ring becoming ashes in space
Big L yes
Maybe new creatures will replace the old ones. Donāt get to attached to ānamesā or ābreedsā.
Maybe mana isnāt coming, but something similar to it
:<
Iād love to watch ark 2 PvP if it beats ark 1 PvPā¦but I die of boredom watching ark 1 PvP most of the time. Itās a bunch of speed gremlins, offline raids, or mat grinding and itās super boring to watch š. I know itās more fun but I just donāt see it
the leftclick spam combat also doesn't help
š
No hate btw: I just want something more juicy to watch lol
I used to like, but itās old af now. Same meta. So tiresome.
I would love a total revamp for pvp
I never liked š
If u care about pvp why add mana or shadowmane, actually worst take known to man
Because they are meta. š
They make the game boring and lame as fuck
Coming from someone with 5500 hours on pvp
Agreed. Iām just saying why most pvp players will want them
Maybe. But all pvp players I know donāt like Ark 2 because it might change the Metas.
i feel like pvp is like just a thing in the game because of a very small group of people
I hate how much of the playerbase is pve
Because everything is unbalanced for lcp
Pvp
I hope they will have two branches for Ark 2. One for pvp and another one for pve. Pvp should get new content less often, aiming stability.
Ye personally i think ark 2 pvp is gonna be pretty bad bcs of the locked pvp that's not how skill based pvp is supposed to be its gonna be like dark souls but with dinos lol
Locked pvp?
Like dark souls
Atlas has a souls like combat and it isnāt ālockedā
There is a diff name for it but I can't remember
Only the fist fighting has aim lock
Ok, but the current pvp combat system is also bad. I will wait a gameplay footage to judge the new system.
Souls like
Being a souls like game doesnāt mean it will be like dark souls
Not really but it's just the kind of pvp is just already not wanting me to play I like the pvp style of ark rn
It's the only game with these features I have ever seen
It shouldn't be changed I like the more prim style that there gonna do but not the pvp
Ok, in that case, it might not be for you I suppose, if you like the current combat system I mean.
But if I were you, I would wait for gameplay footage
Ye prob but I'm still gonna buy it and try it maybe I will like it even though I don't like atlas or dark souls in my opinion
Well see it's still a long way
Isn't there gonna be game footage with the game awards?
For honor combat system for ark 2 fr fr
nothing so far has said wildcard will be at the game awards or will show gameplay there
Kinda hyped for that
And hopefully more news about the ark animated series cuz I really wanna watch that
it has been in post production since june this year, so it should be close to done
I hope so š
iirc during the Pax stream in September when they and Gareth Coker talked about the music for the show he said it was i think 75% done and that the last bit tends to go faster
it's not, pve and pvp are both big
just over the years pvp diminished a lot because new players getting wiped off the servers
yeah but its like very unfocused on by the devs
how
idk tbh
all the balance changes affect pve more badly than pvp
its hard to explain
mana nerfs, turret limiting adding heavy turrets, all that
hm
just to name a few
yeah right now it definetly it is
but it's because of the cheating and the current state of officials
theres hackers on ark?
oh yes yes
damn, hows that fun
No
it's pretty ducked lately, people using speedhacks esps aimbot duping
Like go play creative???
thats dissappointing, hacking any survival game literally takes the whole premise of the "survival" out
hope so
at least with the new engine meshing might not be a thing anymore along with duping
theres gonna be a new engine?
good, as a new player i think the current engine is kind of old school
yeah the change of graphics and performance will be huge
I suggest you check some videos out, it's kinda crazy ngl
UE5 is insane from what ive heard
yup
Imma go do that actually
You don't wanna know how much hackers there are but if you do play on Playstation you don't have a problem with that only steam and win10/xbox have problems with that on smalls and steam on 1x and smalls but its loaded with hackers
It is it just sucks cuz I bought a series s bcs I wouldn't be able to play ark 2 on my one s and ark 2 won't be playable on Playstation atleast not what I have heard off and seen
Yeah, compatibility with ps5 isnāt confirmed yet. Only versions confirmed so far is pc and Xbox.
Kinda sucks for Playstation but I think it will be on ps5 it just has to be released xbox/win10 and pc will prob have a early release
I believe in that too, but until they officially announce it, it will be uncertain.
Ye true
But I wouldnāt expect it before 2024/2025.
True they should've chosen the right console š
The right platform is pc 
I have played steam version but I switched to win10 just bcs of the amount of friend I have on there
Playing ark with a controller still has me shaking
What do you bind all the whistles to? RMB + D pad input? Gyroscope? š
You can't bind them š
They are locked on a specific thing
You can bind them on PC afaik, why not on console š
It's not that bad, git Gud scrub
things you say to controller users who play a game meant for PC
Ye its not bad if you're used to it but if you play keyboard you can multitask
Ark is actually meant for xbox/win10 and pc
I play controller
š¤Ø
*ark 2
No ark1 aswell
Ark 1 was entirely made on and for PC and consoles were added later just because
It shouldn't be on Playstation and switch idk about mobile
Mobile is basically a separate game
Yes. Tons of different systems, p2w, all that good stuff
I've seen vids that there are no heavies and autos in foundis its seems fun but I cba to play with those graphics
You can also use a fremium item to bring a tame back to life
Ark 2 should really only be for next gen consoles and PCā¦a phone or a switch would probably not survive running a game that complex
Tf š
Playstation hasn't even been officially announced so for now it's only pc, xbox series s and x
Iām talking about the future
Just like itās a good time to raise the min spec requirement and have actual ground clutter in PvP
No more ābush for thee but not for meā BS
They did. 
I've played ARK on both Pc and Xbox.
Honestly, they're both fine in their controls.
Shifter needs to get gud
Either way, I'll be accused of schitzo moment
Fear me
I played ARK, ATLAS, Conan, Last Oasis, and Rust on my XBox 360 controller with controller drift/lock... In steam mind you
I have mad respect for last oasis for junking their old struggling game design and trying a new approach
Fail or not, thatās a ballsy move
THIS
another reason why we need separate balancing
same with ini bs
Why should that be separate? PvE needs bushes for stuff to hide in too
No BS ālol everything is easy to see because I removed the bushes to save 5fpsā on either format š
idk I was thinking abt the frames tbh, it may annoy some people
There are other places to optimize imo
And ofc the bushes can be low poly lol, they just need to actually obscure
Itās still not great, since obviously low quality will be the PvP standard, but thatās normal in any game ever
But turning off ground clutter that could be used as cover is basically the same as turning off walls or boxes in a shooter lol
You are a schitzo
Hopefully the way things render at distance is more intentional in ark2, and the game breaking ini in encrypted
Hopefully nanite will help with this
Nanite is pretty fucking jacked.
I watched a demonstration video, and it took I believe like 2-Trillion polygons in a world to finally make the FPS drop.
And that was before proper rendering, and just using pure Nanite
It should help with the first part
Yeah.
Performance I'm not really worried about in ARK-2.
Unless they fuck up big time, Unreal-5 has a lot of systems already in place to help performance.
My worry is the actual glitches.
ini for graphics really should be encrypted. it wouldnt be terrible to do, but it would make hard ini intractable for most people
You think it'd be possible to have online and single-player ini-settings separate, and make the online ini encrypted?
I mean, performance is and will always be a main concern for me, as the network/hardware limits of any pvp game typically decide who the "good" players are out of a batch of similar skill people
Yeah that would be possible, I dont know the details of making it work, but you dont even need hard ini in singleplayer
I am not talking about the ini settings like game.ini and gus.ini. Just the graphical ones that give insane advantage to those that use them
Right, just something to either allow the settings of your save, or decrease your settings lower then the settings-menu will allow you to.
Yeah, I believe the graphical ones should be allowed to change if they're tied to your own single-player game.
Online graphical ini's shouldn't be changeable.
It shouldnt be able to remove leaves from trees, even in sp
whats the point of a jungle if its not even dense with foliage
cause theres no foliage to be seen
Thats a more complex issue lol. Even without ini and just moderately low settings you cant hide
Why not?
If its your own save, why does it matter?
well thats a render issue too
having certain settings on low decreases render distance
or i think its literally just a render distance setting lol
Well, the issue is because the game handles sp and online using the same basic algorithms and code. Make it accessible to change certain things in sp, and they will be hacked for a multiplayer.
Well you cant get rid of render distance
ik, but you can probably change how things load visually
And that's where my original take of "can they separate the coding of the two ini's?"
theres gotta be a cheap way to load in rocks further no?
even if they look kinda shit
The answer to that is technically yes, but the game engine will continue to treat them basically the same
If they have a sp ini that only effects single-player, and a online ini that you can't access. Then I don't see the issue with that.
I would think otherwise if you tell the engine to read only the sp.ini if you're on a single-player save.
You are able to modify the Unreal engine if you know C++
Yes that can be done, but the issue is that the engine needs to read the same things regardless if it is sp or public. If ini can be fiddled with in sp, then it can be replicated and forced into the public version too\
you could try redeveloping everything in a different way in sp ig lol, game size might be a little bigger
redevelop visual assets for sp and multi
The actual code of reading the files is easy, but by having a player editable sp version basically hands hackers all they need to hack public ini
There has to be a way around that.
I believe you're able to change the ini of Red-Dead 2 for your sp-save, while it doesn't effect the online of the game.
That's because those are two completely different executables, lol
that would be the point then
itd just increase game size
actually, drastically perhaps as dlc is added
They could always have the option like Red-Dead to install online or the single-player separately.
idk seems like a lot of extra crap when you can just lock ini and have sp visual mods
Fair, there's that also
since its coming with heavy mod support
Perhaps a total hard lock on ini isnt the solution, but key features such as fog and trees should definitely be unalterable beyond just reducing quality
Totally forgor that.
nah im for hard locking ini
itd work with visual mods
just make sure your game can run ultra low
I do agree with that.
actually does ini even significantly boost performance
i never had much gains from ini when i used to use it
same here
though my main issue was cpu
That comes with challenges of its own. Sometimes you have to edit ini to fix crashes
Its not often, but it happens
You can turn off the visual foliage.
im gonna be overconfident in ark2 devs mot having so many visual bugs
So you get only the tree bark of a tree, no grass but the grass texture on the ground, etc.
Well, the one time I tested a hard ini I went from 30 fps on ultra to 160fps. So yes it does incredibly increase performance
Its not an ark only issue. I have never had to fix crashes with ini in ark, but for other games (star citizen) I have
i5 9400f
That'd be why
then i personally wouldnt even worry about it, its an edge case thats so far outside that even ark for all its spaghetti code doesnt get somehow
but yes im being overconfident
somewhat
prebuilt š
Skill issue
What graphics card?
1660ti
Ah
Motherboard?
?
What type of motherboard is it
oh i havent checked
Cause if it's not some jacked shit, you just wasted 100$ USD on that PC.
doubt
Your cpu is worth around 120$, sometimes lower to like 90$
And that GPU is like 200$
Let me see how old these are
Ah, they where actually brand new by that time.
So I guess I can see 500$ USD at that time
my Gpu is worth $3k and my cpu is $800⦠and u guys r complaining abt wasting 100 bucks
Can probably take the PC specs content to #general or bring it back on topic. Thanks.
Ark 2
Ark2: Waiting Evolved
In ark2 we get to carry people
Ark 2: Off topic
Ark2: releases in 2026
Everyone says why and they say "oh cuz few glitches here and there we needa work on"
Imagine if they pushed it back to 2023 just to include a paid dlc at launch
I hope we will get loads of Ark 2 news as a Christmas present in December š
Imma ask santa for ark 2 news
We donāt have a Santa here unfortunately hahah
The only reason it's pushed back is to give them more time to polish it for the early access launch. And last I checked wildcard isn't facing a lawsuit that can bankrupt them this time to the point they had to let scorched be a rushed paid dlc release. I don't want another Battlefield 2042 situation where the game will be playable 1 year later bc they had to release it at a early deadline due to the publishers being greedy
when did they started to develop ark 2?
Developpement at least started in 2020 when they announced it, could have been earlier but we don't know anything earlier than the announcement at the 2020 game awards, plus the fact of next time wildcard reveals anything ark 2 related it will be gameplay
thats mean the game will not be 100% completed even at launch cuz perfect games needs 5 years to develop
or more
It's gonna be a early access game again, I think they want to add a whole lot more to ark 2 but want us to experience it now rather than in 2 years when it's all added in
so just like ark 1
Basicly, ark 1 launch but improved
I'm ok with that. I'll have fun even if it's not fully completed cuz it's ark
Early access titles can make you feel part of it's development and ark did that rather well imo
Now the team is more experienced and knows where they went wrong with ark 1
yeah ark 2 will do the maximum a dinosaur survival game would do
Wildcard can be overambitious at times, but now they're more capable of bringing that vision to life after the experience with ark 1
the only thing they can do to make a perfect game is to optimize the game and fix all the bugs we had in ark 1
which what ark 1 was lacking
That's what happens when you have inexperienced devs working on their first big game using spaghetti code where most problems originate from. Even if they try to it will take years and the ROI won't be as much as making a new game on a new engine that will take less time than re-writing all existing ark 1 code. But they did get a lot of stuff fixed over the years
I will be so happy in future, when all the ark 2 believers brake their bones on Wildcard AGAIN. BCS they won't never fix anything and I will stay ark 1 waiting on you all coming back BCS Ark2 gameplay style will be so fking ugly. No tek, No cryo, No support and pvp-ripped on a pve server
Ark 2 no future
Disagree
Two things here. First itās break here, brakes spelling is used for braking like the brakes on your car. Break is used when something is being broken. Secondly, if why would we come back to Ark 1? You still playing on an original Xbox waiting on us to come back from the 360?
ark 2 will have grappling no? ez sell
last oasis did something amazing with grappling hooks
Grappling was cool on LO but I don't think that style fits with ark tbh
@lime forge I am playing since beta and I don't lost my brain. If you like gaming sado-maso style, your choice. But I am Not horny on that
English only in this server other than the lfg channels man
Ark 2 will be a slightly better version of Atlas without the ship/boat stuff
Bold of you to assume there wonāt be any ships.
Iāll assume it too in solidarity with Lehrer
Itās expected out of an ass like you.
I have to disagree. I think you did š¤
I would rather paying for playing teso than start fresh on an everythere pillard map. I will rofl laughing about you victims that pay 70bugs for ark 2, BCS 10 000 people will trying to log in on just like 100 server
At the same time
Is it confirmed that it will be an exclusive?
For launch, yes
Oh ok
Cuz I was gonna say
They wouldn't kick a quarter of their fanbase in the balls like that
Bcs it will be a quarter and and half
They did get paid to not release on PS I assume
I just gave an estimate
And I expect given the ark community that the delay wonāt really drop PS sales
Exclusives are shitty imo, especially keeping spiderman games as exclusives
The release of Cyberpunk had looked like kindergarden against the mess that ark 2 will be
Agree, but thatās how consoles compete
Cyberpunk actually made a good comeback tho
Too little too late to save the PR mess
Eh not really, I've seen cyberpunk grow in popularity again, especially with their anime
So we maybe will to play all together on ark3 again
People remember cyberpunk as a botched release project more than as a redemption arc
Fair
ye no mans sky is a better example
Iād say NMS is similar but has had more time to repair relations
Perhaps after a few more years cyberpunk can be viewed like NMS as a redeemed product
true but the repairs have still been a lot more and a lot faster
I was the only one of my friends to double down on not refunding NMS and Iām glad I didnāt. The devs cant market but they were visionaries imo
Same with ark 2 tbh. WC are visionaries but I do question their marketing and PR strategies at times š
ark 2 doesnt make impossible promises as far as im aware just saying things that most ark players dont want in a sequel like third person only and dark souls type combat
True. Iām talking more about massive DLC delays for WC
impossible
Where is Fantasy dlc, featured orks, ogas, werewolfs...? Deleted bcs of lazyness and trying to press the content in a dlc, that they recalled into Atlas and thrown out
Iām lost
Werewolves in ark 1 or 2 would be terrible
We had fantasy DLC: itās called Ab
maybe not ferox is already kind of a werewolf
But ferox OK, or what?
Itās not a person
true but its the same idea
Iām eh on ferox, but Iād not really call it a werewolf. At best itās a vaguely similar concept unique to ark
also true but i think werewolfs are possible for ark if they dont transform out of humans
which kind of wouldnt make them werewolfs anymore
Wat
In Conan is no problem with any kind of slaves. Had should be added as desease like swampfever, wild Vampires/ werewolfs could bite you and you get buffs at night and debuffs at daylight (like Skyrim)
My exact logic
The ferox is not a werewolf
It's an artificially made creature who has an addiction to element
yes but if you take it down to the basics then its a innocent creature that turns into a beast when X happens
Keep it in Skyrim and far away from ark 2
Like you cure swamp fever
They don't even have a "silver weakness"
yes because it isnt a exact copy of a werewolf but its the same basic premise
ARK has their own reason why the ferox does what it does
Lycanthropy is not one of them
I always thought it was more Dr Jeckel Mr Hyde
It is a were-jerboa
Combined with stitch
No, the Ferox is just Gizmo
ferox is ferox
But not werewolf
yes but noone said it was a werewolf
just using it as a example of how werewolfs could possibly work in ark
Iām very against high fantasy in ark. Maybe it can be swung in ark 2 as āalienā, but Iād really prefer sci fi
im on the edge of it im fine with like maewings and manas but i dont want a lot of mythical creatures
My wyvern say: buuuuuh!
If that were the case people will use this "werewolf" as a pvp thing
Wyvern is fine why
It's in lore that they are artificially made
Idc about lore
Not a curse like werewolves
Never have, probably never will. Griffens are explained in lore and I still hate that theyāre in ark
You gonna cope, like I am try to cope that Vin Diesel exists
I hopefully donāt have to cope if Griffens donāt show up in ark 2
Just like Iām glad tek suits are getting the boot
idc much about mythical creatures bc arks dinos already look mythical
For now
āTheyāll come back in a DLCā is cope technology
titanosaurus is litteraly kaiju size and giga isnt a giga anymore
āWhatās next for ark, not tekā implies to me that all of ark 2 will be tek tier free
Titanos are big IRL
Not wanting High fantasy ā wanting perfect realism
the fun wacky factor
I donāt want fireballs and elves, but Iām fine with creating animals that donāt exist
The carcar is less realistic
we will see ig but tek coming in a dlc is pretty likely
Source: dude just trust me
then ab creatures and maewing should be fine right
Thereās no indication that tek will return
Correct
how can i source a personal prediction
theres a pretty huge ship that had a shit ton of element on board on the planet
Youāre fine, Iām just memeing since some people have tried to convince me of ark 2 tek in a DLC as though thereās evidence
And it broke. And also lore doesnāt matter
Gameplay > lore 100/100 times. Gameplay is chosen first, lore follows
ah yes the dlc we know about even before the game released
''the open world will have decorative tek structures, that means tek must be coming back soon''
^S tier cope imo lol
Same with [insert non-Eden creature here] in retrospect
i wish it was like that
Which is why I roast people who say that too
Basically ARK 1 before notes
For ark, it is
i hope to see a opening cutscene where the ring blows up and every rockwell ring only dino they wanted is seen turning into ashes š
they specificly stated decorative in there
Would be pretty epic if we saw a cutscene from the gen 2 ending and how there is still scrap from the ship floating around in space.
They did specifically say there will be tek in the world, even if players canāt use it
exactly
So thereās no argument that we will encounter tek and element
Or maybe a few of the ark 1 survivors scattered around the island
oh you don't want me to recycle the Tek that is already exist and somehow functional?
But will tek suits and rifles come back? Iām suspecting nah
im hoping for some tek gear but not like in ark 1
Not only does it contradict the combat mechanics, but it also ruins the primitive game forever. So I suspect the most youāll see is tek scrap as a material
metal weapon tips like in the first teaser
I think people somehow confused a primarily primitive game to mean āprimarily primitive at launchā
Thatās simply untrue: ark 1 was primarily primitive at launch but never purported to be primitive. Ark 2 however has stated it will seek to remain primitive which to me seems like it refers to the life of ark 2 including all DLC
im probally not even going to play ark 2 that much tho since it doesnt really sound like my style but the lore is still interesting
Lore can be interesting and still be a lower priority than gameplay
true but its not always the case
Not all games have good lore or good gameplay lol so thatās true
Idk how any of you guys expect to use tek if you donāt have any tekgrams
We donāt even know if there are engrams let alone tek ones
you play as santiago the dude that basicly invented tek
Delete that before youāre judged
no
Santiago is a third party NPC
that makes me even more happy tbh
you do not play as Santiago. Heās voice acted as a character like HLNA that joins you on missions
Maybe if you make your character look exactly like vin the the character creator all of the tekgrams just are unlocked
š« 
but then the dude who basicly invented tek is still a ally
And he isnāt sharing it sounds like
It looks like heās actively shutting down the tek he finds š
Yeah but he doesnāt want to use it because last time people used tek they fought a war with it and it didnāt end well, and if you expect humans to be able to go without waging war on each other what planet are you on because it is clearly not earth
idk santiago might just make some giant tek structure like on ab again which would actualy give santiago returning a real reason
No cryo, No tek trough, No possibilty to seperate when dinos grown together
depends if he still has memory of that
Dino storage does not require tek to work
With some basic creativity you can make dino storage not require tek
The cryo ball does
No tek = no cryopods but ā no dino storage
Pretty sure he has all of his memories from his first life, and when he was helping build the gen ship which is how he got in the database to begin with im guessing
Youāve never used a whip?
Soul balls or what?
Did you ever breed 100 big dinos in a 10x 10?
And try to seperate them without cryoballs?
Ideally thatās no longer needed because mutation stacking is dead, but regardless, you can use something as simple as a stable building to store tames in
Thatās not anything Iād want or try to do
Wildcard could extend the wild levels to 300 and the new max Cap to 900. And a lot of dinos had not bred up to lv 360. Want to see Monster- vultures, dilo, diplos, dimorphs
Why?
Why Not?
All max level does is change the stats to make foot players worse
And you will never see sympathy with me for a raised level cap. I hate mutation stacking
Iād pick a tamed level cap of 300 for ark 1 and that would be that
Na, just If you don't know how to play. They could even seperate Island from this lv extend
But starting on gen2 is like, why do we have Island?
Youāre literally scaling tames to be stronger and not scaling foot players. What I said is objective fact
This at least is fact if you raise max level
Human are basically like dodos on ark, so giving each player 3 points per level gain should resolve the problem
So player level 30, 90 points to set
So you want to buff both tames and player stats? Youāre aware that 10 hp -> 100 hp is meaningless if 10 damage -> 100 damage right?
Given 45 in speed and you can outrun nearly anything
Thank you for bringing up another crippling design flaw with ark 1 game design
Ark 2 should have no movement speed points
I want to extend the levels for dinos to a new max, and in comparison give 3 points per level for player
Yes, and Iām saying thatās clown technology. Youāre just adding stats to everything. What does that actually solve?
Youāve made soaking easier and breeding take longerā¦which both seem like bad things
Ark2 will get the crippling fight mechanic from eldenring
Speed gremlins is the most crippling fight mechanic Iāve ever seen
Maybe ark should have resolved this issue with making the PvP part not that hard assholes style. If Pve had a nice competion mode would be good, would make PvP senseless
āāNot that hard assholes styleā makes no sense
PvP is the pole where all sociopaths and psychopaths can follow their basic instincts and can play like they want to be in a big bang Boom. So If you play what you like, and you like to destroy people for fun, what is it telling about your mind? It's just triggering the territorial behavior sleeping in a few of some naked monkeys
I hope this game is cross platform. this would be huge merging community's.
I think itās confirmed PC/Xbox cross platform
Best Ark players I have ever met are on PVP servers. For me its the place you go when you want to get better at the game.
This is the way !!
unlucky im a sociopath and a psychopath then what can you do

Yeah you need more game knowledge on pvp than you need on pve
But pvp isnt for everyone
yeah it's too easy to lose everything compared to the effort you gotta put in
Like Southpark, bullys should kill themselfes
everything relies on how much hours you are active
Even then, servers wipe, which i dont like (no wipe pvp servers arent better)
But this is ark 2 channel
Wipes for ark 2 would be S+ tier for PvP
server wiping should be a standard, even on normal official, not in the style of arkpoc but more months, the longer the server goes, the less new players will attract
Bob gets it
I like coming back after a year and seeing my character there but still, wiping is more beneficial than being able to come back with the same char tbh