#ark-2
1 messages · Page 31 of 1
A lot of MMO stuff was also PvE or mostly PvE back in the day, so that helped
If you cheated in MMO PvE it usually didn’t really have a large impact beyond ruining your fun
Is there a change that Ark2 won't even come for PS5? If that happens Will they keep Ark1 alive?
It won't be on Ps5 on the launch day for sure but you should expect to see it on Playstation eventually. Just not day 1.
Ark 1 was said to be remaining on gamepass permanently so its likely that it will stay open for play even after Ark 2 launches but no one knows how consistently Ark 1 will receive updates
Ok tyvm for your reply 🤗
Of course, any time.
I've heard it'll stay on xbox for 1-3 years
I've heard some people say 1 year and some people say 3
Holy....... 😬
that's just about xbox gamepass, i think it's gonna be like ark 1 where it comes to ps5 at the end of early access
(Which may also be 1-3 years 😂 )
basegame ark 2 will definitely be bigger and take longer to fully be added 
Maybe, I see it as kind of a strange situation, the potential development cycle(s) of Ark 2. On one hand, the first one took forever (on account of it being an indie dev team's first game.) On the other, it's something new from them, who now have experience and a bigger team, and may go faster than we think. Something to ponder to be sure... aside from our respective orbs, of course
I think at the very least itll be 6 months probably a year though
Is there any word on who well be playing as?
Will it be our ark 1 survivor or the big vin
Our own characters, Santiago and his daughter are part of the story.
So canonically will it carry off of the ark 1 survivor?
Unknown, just says player characters.
it's be a waste of the meta-human system from unreal 5 if we'd be stuck with vin
For sure
It's probably a safe bet that we can make our own characters 
Hopefully in less than a month we will know more. Who will record the shorts of the most important parts? 🤔
I'm just hoping they play in the gen part 2 end
Like a cutscene that connects the two
I’m pretty sure they will.
Love your pfp btw
Cant wait for the discussion on November 5th - 7th.
Same. I expect to see your return to the chat 
Oh definitely
I hope you play as your ark1 character from a chanonicle point
They are too important of a character to the lore to skip out on it
i feel like you wont because your ARK 1 bob is stuck in space with no way out of there aside from death
"too important of a character"
maaaaayyy depends because it is hard to fit YOU or at least your personality in a lore planned by the devs aide from the way bland "the chosen one" trope like Ext chronicles did
The exo mek is falling to Arat, lmao
There's no way in hell it just sits in orbit, that would be stupid and make 0 sense
But I do doubt that we play as our Ark 1 main character, that also would make little sense
Because that survivor is jacked and knows all the things, they wouldn't start us off knowing all the things
Unless maybe we have amnesia from the landing, I suppose
Even then, a clean slate makes more sense either way
Maybe the canon "Bob" from the TV show is there as a stand-in, voiced by Karl Urban, as an NPC akin to Santiago
I don't know, the steam-page does indicate we have more lore to our survivor this time in ARK-2.

Our character seems like they have a form of amnesia.
Could also mean they just left it up in the air again, akin to Genesis 1-2.
In the first trailer, Santiago seems to have his memory intact (I believe).
Well yeah.
But doesn't mean 'our' survivor wont, if something happens in the intro for us to forgor.
It could be some people remember, but others don’t.
But we could just as easily be a survivor that was in the simulation (like everyone else on the ship was) that get's amnesia because of like the landing pod or something
Possible indeed
Right.
Genesis 1-2 purposely left it up to the player to decide.
Could be the same thing in ARK-2
It was very clearly not a happy landing for anyone involved 😅
Yeaaaah
Which is weird that like, 90% of the human population on Arat has amnesia now.
BUT do you think it would make any difference if our characters have memory of the past? I mean the gameplay.
The true story of ark2, saving Bob
First of all... How can that tiny scrap of was the Exo Mek ever survive a fall from a planet's atmosphere with friction from air and hard impact of the ground
Unless they pull they Homo Deus Ex Machina and somehow HLNA do download in the Exo Mek to do some Tek magic
I doubt our bob will survive that
Exo-mek is made out of tek.
That's the excuse
Saving Private Bobyan
Ye but it fall apart and I doubt that flimsy frame can survive that impact
Tek is a hella durable alloy.
We see the some parts of the Genesis-ship is just crashed and destroyed, not actually burned to a crisp like a real rocket would be.
Santiago survived falling to earth in a pod while he was at the window and not strapped in. Bob will survive
There's that
The pod is big enough to hold on its own
Have you seen @lament pagoda model of the full pod?
A person on the loose inside a pod will get jostled around so much that they won't survive unless they are strapped in really well
Uhhhhh, yes? Is this a joke question? If our Ark 1 survivor has their memories from the first game, that would dramatically impact the game imo. And they wouldn't start us with every engram from the first game already unlocked, either
Yeah, that's where lore and gameplay would have to work together.
Besides, Ark 2 main character, same or not, has amnesia
Full stop, store page says so, so I'm taking it as gospel (because it is)
To allow us to start fresh in a lore 'and' gameplay standpoint, we either have to be a whole new survivor that's fresh. Or we're the same one that have a HEAVY case of amnesia. (I don't know how amnesia works, but I do know engrams IRL are neurons, so forgetting some neurons would work in a lore standpoint.)

On a side note, I made my first ever homemade alfredo sauce. 
I don't know, the whole piecing together the story of how we arrive on arat makes me think that we aren't Bob again
I’m not implying that having memory = having unlocked Ark 1 engrams… But just remembering what happened.
Wouldn't remembering 'be' memories?
That’s what I’m trying to understand why it would be relevant
It actually would make sense gameplay-wise that as we do the missions and events and things (that we already pretty much know are in the game) that we are rewarded with memories that we can use to "remember" engrams from the first game, perhaps
If you are talking about engrams, I get why it would be relevant.
Cause if they remember how to make tek, then all it takes is some element and a forge to re-invent tek again.
Seeing how tek isn't going to be in the base-game. This would defeat the gameplay purpose.
Engrams 'are' memories
They're all from neurons.
Not limited to it. That’s my point. There’s the notes also.
Any news lately?
No
The engrams and how to make them are tied to the survivors memories from what I understand, like the Ark 1 survivor remembers their time in Aberration via the things they learned there to help them progress to the point where they could save Earth
If you forget memories, then you're forgetting engrams, and vise-versa.
If we have amnesia, then we have a lack of engrams.
The engram system is basically just forcing new memories into survivors.
Yeah, Helena-Deus puts the engrams of past survivors into us from the start, and we unlock them as we go by reading the notes, seeing the evidence of their use, so on and so forth
Yet Vin knows how to purge his Data like he remembered how to use a Tek machine
If they go that way, maybe the ones with memory will be NPCs.
Cause unlike us, he still remembers his pre-ARK times.
They’re wearing a tek suit as well so added protection
Because I think Santiago remembers. Also those drawings on the walls of the cave. I don’t know.
Character could have also given up his telegrams like Santiago
'telegrams' ☠️
My phone auto corrects everything
Excuses
A big reason why we will not be the ARK 1 Bob
Tek grams
He's a special type of clone, most likely, due to that one lady messing with his engrammic matrix stored on the ship
, probably
Character coulda just given up tek amicus that’s what the community wanted it could be the reason
Santiago didn't give up his tekgrams, wat
Amicus 💀
Seeing how the steam page states 'he doesn't have a good relationship with tek' I'd say this is the case.
He'd have no reason to dislike tek if he forgor.
He just shut down a terminal lol
He’s chosen not to use them
Not how that works
Yeah, and? Doesn't mean he forgot
He's just seen what tek * cough element mostly cough * can do, and doesn't want to repeat it
My guess, we will all be Vindiago’s children. Family
Now we will be able to breed humans
He just caught the monster Rockwell
May I reminded you that ARK 2 is supposed to be a new game, not a DLC
You don't 'choose' if you learn a engram.
The engrams are already in your head, it's just neurons activating that chooses if you remember them or not.
Op human breeding top tier stats
It is also a sequel, continuing the Ark story, lmao
Umm kinda are
We don't know that at all
We don’t know enough bout the ark2 story to say you aren’t the main character
Well, you're the protagonist of the overarching storyline.
'You' don't start the story though, of ARK-1
Protagonist means the hero of the story, not the "character you play as"
The survivor 'is' the hero of the story.
They stopped everything, where others have failed.
Us?
The protagonists are on the notes
Protagonist is usually used to describe the character you play as, soooooo
Unless your the villain
'We're' the ones that stopped the corruption on Earth, not Helena.
I didn’t. I was raiding and being raided. 
I am talking about within the lore, not the game itself
In the notes you are not the protagonist, the authors are
Nah lore wise you are
If we were talking about the animated series, then yes, the note authors are the protagonists, but we aren't
You fix everything
The lore isn't the game lol
Helena was the protagonist of the notes/backstory of 'our' journey.
She's like the stereotypical old-man that gives the new adventurer their quest.
Yeah, she's the mentor
People, you are all special. Don’t worry
Ever hear of the hero's journey? She's literally the mentor lol
Yep.
And the notes where 'her' story.
But her story is over, and it's our turn in the spotlight in ARK-1.
Yes but overall ark1 character is protagonist because they do everything Helena just died and evolved enough to help you be where you need to be
Oldest story structure in the world
And it works
Hell yeah it does
Santiago is most likely the same role.
The mentor of 'our' fresh survivor, soon to be even more of a legend then Santiago/Vin is.
You only because a "protagonist" in the chronicles but not in the whole notes

No but the notes are the past
The notes are only half of the lore
The notes are not the game, yet again
Notes were also an after thought
Notes ≠ in-game content and story
They actually weren't, the story and lore was planned from the get-go
A protagonist means they're the focus of 'a' story, btw Mazzy.
Doesn't mean they're the protagonist of the whole universe. 
Ark1 character =protagonist and I’m pretty sure hlna saved you to Shepard the next step hence the good bye message

That is what I mean when I said "protagonist"
I mean in the story stand point not as a "player character"
Like every Fallout/Elder Scrolls games, you're a different protagonist.
You're all hero's and legends, and the protagonist of 'this' story.
But you're not the main focus of the universe, only this timeframe.
In the story standpoint you are currently the protagonist right now
Correct.
The survivor is the protagonist of the 'game.'
Helena is the protagonist of the 'notes'/past.
That is what I mean
Right.
Helena isn't 'the' protagonist.
She's just 'a' protagonist.
That's what we've been saying the whole time
Dunno, Mei yin seemed almost more important, Helena was asleep for the entire last map lol
🤣
Because Mei melee bobed her unconscious
Helena was defiantly fucking useless.
But sadly, the notes make her out to be more of the protagonist. (even tough I'd take Mei over Helena any day.)
They got a robot to replace her, because she turned into a ghost
True
Based on the game description, we are “new humans”, but there will be “heroes” like Santiago which came from Ark 1 and know things.
Suddenly awakened on a strange primal world filled with dinosaurs and humans struggling for dominance; you must piece together the history of how you arrived there, team-up with legendary heroes, and confront powerful dark forces seeking to control the fate of all life. Saddle up, and join the definitive next-generation survival experience with ARK 2!
With all the changes they made to TAS, I fucking hope Helena isn't a useless shit.
Which, from the small teaser. We already can see this Helena 'will' kill if need be.
Tbh Mei is kinda feels like what players experiencing playing ARK for the first time then decided to look up cheats in the Wiki
Tfw you turn into a ghost so you gotta make a robot of yourself with your accent and personality

Yeah, but she tamed a giga on a raptor though
I do admit it does takes skill to ride circles around a giga while whistle body block him and tranq him with arrows at the same time
This could still easily apply to either path, us being Ark 1 Bob or new Bob, Bobert perhaps
With fucking tranq 'arrows'
Not darts.
'Arrows'
That's skill alone to solo knock out a giga with fucking arrows
She was using a capped crossbow, not that hard tbh
Bow
Since she stated than her weapons are not good
She probably used primitive bows lol
It was a og bow.
Fair enough
True on Mazzy.
Probably Journeyman or shit like that
Is there a drawing to refer to? Or is that just said on the note?
I think that description is for new players to ark and it will be up to the player
I think it's in her drawing iirr
Because it could've been a composite bow
I do think it'll be like Genesis 1-2 again. But we'll see.
By that point, I don't think she'd have the resources to make one
She made a weapon herself
IIRC her missing her weaponsmith or something
That is why I concluded that she use a prim bow
Coulda got one from a. Drop
No one mentioned a "drop"
This a joke
I mean, we have no idea how long the OG survivor were on the Island
Drops aren't canon, or weren't existing yet in the notes.
Coulda been caused by Helena trying to help the survivor along with respawn if

Not from what I remember.
The OSD's are canon, 100%
You may be thinking of those.
Nah I think the normal drops are from Helena trying to make it easier along with the respawning mechanic
They never noticed or acknowledge the existence of drops aside from SE (but more of a one way transfer)
Iirr, the OSD's are stored on the ARK's and are shot onto Earth to help any survivors that have made it to Earth.
Did Helena not on Extinction?
Might've been thinking of Marc's post again.
I constantly forgot or not know about the "out of game" lore of reddit
I have no clues on those
It might've been Marc
I'll never accept the fact though that Nameless are just generic ARK created animals.
TBF they do like add a little mythology in their experiments
That includes those that are not European In origin
Yeaaah, but like.
I like the 'mutated survivors' theory more then 'generic created animals'
Not even in Scorched do they note of the drops, because they don't exist then
But they do note of something came down from the light
Instead of a drop, it's Helena or Rockwell
Yeah, Helena and Rockwell, when they transfer in
Not really a drop, per se, but I get what you mean
They came down from a beam.
And it was a LOT more bigger then the drop beams.
Tbh the drops are bigger than an average person
If that was the case it be more brighter than the drop
I mean the beams
I like the "literally chupacabra look alikes made as the exploded overseers dying wish" theory more
W O T?
I mean......
Headshot perk
Whe
WheWhe
"EGG_LEMON" really cookin one up, huh?
I have 2 suggestions for ark 2 which i hope will be in ark 2. so first is that dino’s will have no levels you get how strong it is by size and hp. in size i mean if raptor is like 1 meter tall and other one is 1.5 meters tall 1.5 meters tall will be stronger. or like small medium and big sizes only. and roar system. if like t rex roars and there is medium sized carno, carno will get scared and run but big sized carno may not get scared
No
No
I already hate the idea.
Those make very little sense mechanically in a video game
Maybe Dino age naturally
But I do hope to see size variation in wild creatures
Ah yes, it takes 4 IRL months to raise a raptor
Idk
Size variants would be interesting.
Be having that be the key to their health? Hell no
I'd rather have a RuneScape system of leveling up
Or at least a bit more to do with how the dinos look, like maybe more sexual dimorphism or something
Nah that ain’t ark then
When an Ark player says "dino", they mean creatures

Oh, but you see.
If they do that, then they'll bring the whole wrath of Twitter and idiots on media onto their ass.
We’re on an alien planet with an alien wildlife
It's 100% ARK
I don't see 'dinosaurs' in the title.
Ark has lots of fantasy creatures
And two aliens, already.
Yeeeeeeeeah, aliens and weird homebrew/fantasy creatures are kinda in Ark's DNA buddy lol
Cetus and delphis
Yep.
The astro-bros
Step bros
Yo
'What're you doing step-Delphis?'
Three aliens, if you count element
I’m stuck in the gen2 vent
True, but that's more environmental then being able to tame.
5 if you count the Ark 2 trailer ones
Make Male dinosaurs bigger than Female dinosaurs. i mean like male raptor is 1.5 meters and female is 1.2 meters
Still a living thing 
Oh wait, titans are literally a embodiment of element.
So they're technically aliens.
I think it should be the other way around
Sometimes the females are bigger
Sometimes the males are bigger, sometimes the females are, sometimes it's even.
other way around? wdym this ain’t no ant game or bee game
Yeah, with raptors I think females are bigger
With most reptiles
Like irl
Rexes too I think
You do know there's mammals and reptiles that're bigger as females then the males, right?
Yep
Hyenas
Females are bigger and rule over the males, and have an... interesting anatomical setup
Generally speaking female reptiles are larger than males
Interesting is half of the case.
“Rule over males” yeah that ain’t happening in dinosaurs ants and bees maybe
Bro, you need to learn some more comparisons
But also that is definitely more common than you think

Just asking. But what grade are you in?
😂
This is fucking 'basic' biology.
It’s fucking Jurassic Park also 🤔
Where do your read that females rule over males IN DINOSAURS
Probably safe to bring it back to ark 2
Not fcking ants or bees
Most reptiles and Chickens.
🤦♂️
Plenty of places, go read a research paper
This 'was' ARK-2 related
Until they derailed us it was, yeah
Hence why I said back on topic.
Anyway, to make this ARK-2 related.
If a lot of avians apply this rule, then it's called 'common sense' to think that dinosaurs would also be like this. Which is why bigger female rexes in ARK-2 would make sense, and be cool as fuck for the minor detail.
Back on track. Would be nice to have different sizes based on gender and age.
Anywho, it would be cool to see stuff like sexual dimorphism and size/shape variation in Ark 2, point made

"Hawks, owls, falcons, and eagles are among the strongest, fastest, most dynamic birds on the planet—and in almost every case, the female of the species outweighs the male."
All of these descended from dinosaurs iirr. So it'd make sense to have bigger females in some dinosaurs in ARK-2.
mods abusing their “power”
Please abuse it harder on this man.
KBD makes use of some dinos being bigger, but would be nice to see it in vanilla.
Children abusing their "caps lock"
He's acting like a mindwipe tonic and making my engrams scramble.
Besides shadowmanes, I don’t remember other dimorphism on Ark 1. But it could mean we will see more of those on Ark 2.

It's not abusing "power" if I've repeatedly asked you to move on, and you kept going, so I removed your comment.
Can y'all spare some engram points?
I forgot how to eat after what EGG said.
I don't think there has been any other than the shadowmanes
Shadowmanes are cool, cause they're the only creature in ARK that does this.
They're visually and mechanically different between the genders.
5, yeah.
Dodo, Raptors, Rexes, Aratai, and Plant man
are they shutting down ark 1 when ark 2 is out
No
The servers will run still to our knowledge, but everything does have a ending at some point.
is ark 2 gonna have like a pvp official like we have mow
We don't know
It will have pve and pvp, but we don't know anything about what it entails
For all we know, they could merge PvE and PvP into one gamemode, and make it region-based PvP
if it have pvp you can make a whole new mega tribe to run everything
😂
Not liking a group is literally disrespecting. 
if you have connections
This is assuming the PvP is the same in ARK-2
Anywho
It’s not clear the new mechanics
ya
Gameplay is already different, so the meta could change
We need more info to judge
Aratai's are able to raid you iirr, so MegaTribes might not be as well off as they where in ARK-1
Give us plant name
Man, that’s something I’m hyped about
I like the idea of NPCs raiding and being raided
hopefully they fix duping
Would be nice if they have Aratai camps
I’m 99% sure it won’t be the same
They’ve learned a lot on those 7 years
Whole new game, doubt much is going to be the same. We're all going to have to learn it.
If it's a whole new coding also, the way you'd dupe wouldn't be the same
Cheats in general wouldn't work the same between the games.
reapers technichaly
True actually
I didnt consider reapers since they are separately named as well. A reaper queen, reaper king, subterranean reaper king/queen, etc.
Is it dilos? One of the frilled creatures has smaller frills when female
Megaloceros, supposedly (according to the tip in the loading screen) dinos have gender based colors, not many examples in Ark 1 though for sure
True. And antlers.
Ovis also 🤔
I sure hope that's the case, that they attack more if you're in one of the mega tribes (if they don't entirely remove the ability to have megas in the first place, fingers crossed 🤞 )
Having raids adapt to how much shit you have would be great.
Forgot that one, true dat
Not only would it act as a natural balance, but make it that small fishes get only a few scouts attacking their base. While big ass alphas have to worry about full scale warfare of 30-50+ Aratai's, and actually have the worry of being wiped.
Oh yeah, they are different aren't they?
Oh yeah
I’d prefer 100
Endless Aratai raid until they’re wiped

They literally get half of their whole species to wipe your ass
Aratai start using racers 🧠🧠
This is why I support human NPC's.
Cause imagine having also a shit load of humans in the battle, basically recreating the ending of the last LOTR movie.
I think it'd be fair to have the amount of players in the tribe determine the amount of Aratai in the raid, like if you have a full 100 server cap mega tribe in your server, they get raided by 100 Aratai and all the tames that 100 Aratai would entail
This too, Aratai AI "learning" from watching PvPers PvP
I'd say double whatever is in the tribe, since players will always outsmart A.I's.
Using their own strats against them
100 A.I vs 100 players seems unfair to the A.I.
Eh, not with adaptive AI
They have dinos too, don't forget
Yeah, but will they live long enough to even adapt?
Maybe give them a fob that they "set up" in the night before
They keep respawning til it's destroyed?
While also really hard, they could do something that every tribe has their own game-master A.I, akin to the GM from Left-4-Dead.
I meant A.I director, sorry
Yeah, like a separate director AI for each tribe's version of the Aratai that they fight against
That'd be a way to adapt them.
But that might get costly on the backend quickly though
The A.I itself is adapting to the players tactics, while throwing the dumb pawns/Aratai's at you.
The Aratai's themselves aren't smart. But the A.I that controls their strategy is.
Yeah, that's the issue
Would definitely be cool to see, and simpler than each Aratai having a separate learning AI as well
But maybe still too costly serverside, idk
Their goal is to revolutionize the survival genre.
That'd be one hell of a way to do it.
Yea but it also means the first alpha has the easiest time
You dunk on a “baby” AI and get alpha, rip to the next alpha that gets dunked on by the hardcore grizzled AI
Not what we where meaning.
Every player in theory would have their own AI watching them.
It'd adapt to 'their' specific tactics.
First alphas would just be the first ones to get fucked.
oh yea that's just gonna make servers become fire starters
Ahh, but it would revolutionize survival games, with now needing to survive against a real fire.
'The game becomes real'
Well, no. The thought process for me was that, at a tribe's creation, they are assigned an AI to govern their "version" of the Aratai, let's call them a chieftain for now (and yes, if a player doesn't make a tribe, they just get attacked by the world/server's general Aratai AI. Or maybe you have to be in a tribe mechanically from the start? Idk, just brainstorming). The chieftain analyzes and records (to a degree) the movements, actions, (basically everything) and dinos that the tribe uses, and then tries out strategies that either counter those actions (if the actions recorded were directed at a previous Aratai raiding party) or are similar to their own strategies used in raiding (the Aratai "watched" the tribe raid another tribe, let's say).
my point then is identical to the one I made to Bootleg
And it just escalates from there, so you have to think outside the box every time your tribe goes up against it's version of the Aratai, or you perish and lose alpha status, maybe even soft resetting your chieftain because they don't consider you a threat anymore
a dynamic AI per tribe sounds hella server intensive
Oh for sure
It certainly would turn the server-box into hell
I know that it would, there's no doubt, s'why I stated as such right off the bat
But it'd be funny, huh?
I'm gonna be pissed if the new arena like place doesn't have people cheering, and screaming 'Kar-En-Tuk'
- shoehorned Gabriel Iglesias joke here *
This would work mostly only for single player, or servers with only one tribe. And it still wouldn't be amazing due to the capacity of ai currently
Wtf is this shit they're talking Abt lol
Server would crash be real lmao
The-Pit (or whatever it's called) better be a fucking gladiator arena.
I wanna beat someone, or some thing to a bloody pulp with my fists while a crowd is cheering on.
As I stated, yes. Server would be "crash real lmao", then probably a little "crackle pop BOOM"
Worth it though
i think dens are confirmed against creatures
None the less, I want a crowd.
in the PAX stream it sounded heavily like dens were PvE events
I have a character in ARK-1 called "Bibibop the Neanderthal" that has put 90% of his levels into melee.
Motherfucker hits like a truck
Hey! I have a question, is a level 45 trike good?
My bad
Np
I hope ark 2 wont be a mess like cyberpunk 2077 lmao, i have high hopes
I also hope it doesn't suffer a bad launch due to overhyping and bad shareholders/corpos
I got a feeling that when ark 2 is out of early access Star Citizien will still be in early access lol
Ark7 will get out of ea and star citizen will still be ea
Oh for sure
Chris Roberts is a silly little scam artist of a man who probably has no actual plans to finish the game
Let alone this century
let alone this millennia
Let alone this timeline
To be fair, I played through the entirety of cyberpunk at launch on pc and had a great time with it. Only encountered a few minor visual bugs, half of which were due to my graphics drivers being out of date. The main issues with it were just the overhype and the fact that it never should have been released on last gen consoles. ARK 2 has far less hype and no one is really expecting it to be released in a perfectly polished state, partially because ARK 1 still has plenty of bugs and partially because ARK 2 is gonna be in early access for a while. It also isn't being released on last gen consoles.

Same here, but on a Xbox One X. Not one bug to gripe about for me since the One X could handle it pretty well
And now, on the Series X? Fuhgeddaboutit.
It wasn't 'reaaaally' the bugs that where the breaking for that game. Since it's CDPR, they're like Bethesda and launch buggy games and fix them post-launch. (or every other studio now a days)
What was the issue is that they allowed the game to be sold on last-gen consoles that couldn't handle it.
ARK is already shit for me on my original Xbox-One, I can't imagine how Cyberpunk would be on my poor console.
Yup. As I said the main issues were just overhype and the fact that it really shouldn't have been released on last gen consoles.
Aye, it at least showed the benchmark between the original One, and the One-X. 😆
Which was the shareholders and the execs fault, not the developers themselves
CDPR are great, their higher ups not so much
Yep.
I rarely have blamed "developers" (the people actually making the game)
My issues always/most of the time lies within the people with the ties and suits.
lmao truuue
Vastly different from Bugthesda, who have full control over what they release and when 😂
As much as I love Bethesda's games, I really hope they swap to an engine that isn't held together by duct tape and Todd Howard's tears.
💯
The engine is actually fine.
It's the fact that they don't use it right, even though they're the ones who 'made' it.
Have you used it?
Yes, but not much
Just feels like using Source, personally. 🤷♂️
Great for mod support, horrible for actual game making
Fair.
Try making a game on it
ARK 1 has bugs - Wildcard swaps to a new engine for ARK 2.
Cyberpunk has bugs - CDPR swaps to a new engine.
Meanwhile Bethesda wrapping another layer of duct tape around the creation engine and stapling multiplayer onto it...
Oh yeah, that shit was NOT meant for multiplayer.
Aren't they using UE5 for ES6?
And yet, even modders made a better multiplayer then they did.
Nope.
Oh wait, they are using a "different" (in quotations) engine for Starfield and ES6
Creation-Engine '2'
Which, if done right could actually be good.
I swear I saw/heard about them using nanite or something in a dev diary about ES6
Nope, they're using CE-2
Thank god you're actually getting your criticism from a personal take then videos.
I hate when people try to make the argument of "it's bad cause it's just a updated version of Morrowinds engine"
-Meanwhile, Unreal-Engine 5 is literally an updated/revamped version of Unreal-4, which is a updated/revamped Unreal-3, which goes all the way back to Unreal-1.
A lot of engines do this.
There's actually a whole family tree of game engines
Interesting fact: Titanfalls-engine is a modified version of Source, which is modified from the Quake engine!
At least they aren't going backwards or stagnating and using CE1 lol
True
But yeah, hope they use UE5 in the future
Doubtful
Best part about Bethesda's slight adjustments to the creation engine + reused assets, is that it makes each Bethesda game a paid mod of the previous one lmao
Paid mods... oh god, never remind me of the dark times
Oh those times aren't over yet. Creation Club exists :)
And still gets new mods
Honestly though who uses creation club? You can get higher quality mods that do the same thing on the nexus
Not for Skyrim, it doesn't, haven't checked Fallout 4 though
Console players, basically lol
Why spent like 3 bucks on a low quality power armour model, when I can get one in 8k off the nexus
The edition that came with all of them for free was nice
Meant I didn't have to buy it for the Xbox again without getting something worth it in the process
Do you mean anniversary edition? Cause they weren't free.
Sure they were, if you didn't own the game, you bought the version that was the game + the anniversary edition and got them essentially free
I didn't own it for Xbox One, so I bought that one
Last time I checked they added drastically to the price, even when you got them and the game at the same time. Weird
Still mad about how anniversary edition broke all the actually good mods ;-;
You think that's bad?
They updated 'AGAIN'
Yeah, they keep doing it
Just let the game fucking DIE
Every update now breaks most of the mods
☕
Was only like 40 for me, weird indeed
I still am waiting for the mod author/porter/who-the-fuck-ever to update Moonlight Tales so that I can actually fucking transform
Hope no mods end up like that on Ark 2, unsupported and forgotten
The update that came out alongside anniversary edition was the worst cause it changed the code to make stuff load faster, but then broke every script heavy mod by making their scripts run too fast. At least the other updates get patched quickly, but it took ages for all the mod authors to fix their scripts and there are plenty of great mods that still haven't been fixed.
You know, the more I think about it, the more untapped potential ARK-2 could have.
Yup. That would suck.
Like the mission system, with them (hopefully) being in their own instances. This could make it easier to have a slight choice-based story with in ARK.
Or more heavily scripted sequences.
That'd be really cool
Yeah, the console versions of Moonlight Tales and Moonpath: Journey to Elsweyr (I think that's what it's called, can't remember) are still heavily broken, as are like 90% of my perk tree, vampirism/lycanthropy, and world space/questline mods. It sucks because I would still be playing Skyrim right now almost every chance I could if the mods worked. They really did a number on us console peeps 😕
Bro even with all the mods in the world the game still gets old and boring.
if ark 2 is literally just a dlc im gonna be pissed
Probably check the pins, it's a new game.
Can you petition discord to force people to read pins for a channel?
Would help in these situations
Everyone wins
People ask less silly questions so I can not read them, and they get their questions answered instantly so they’re happy
0 losing parties
What if they can't read 
That’s most of the ark community given how many questions used to be answered in the CC and yet people didn’t read it or asked for less information
I’m still stun locked that we asked WC to be less transparent
*to me, you forgot that part
Is Ark 2 gonna be playable on the One X? Or is it specifically for the Series S and X?
Specifically with the Series-consoles.
Next-gen game.
we fucking LOVE unnecessary effort
Unironically, yeah.
I fucking hate when they show 'too' much in their DLC trailers.
They're like the only company that 'over' shows DLC's.

You sure about that chief
They're like the only company (that I know/remember) that 'over' shows DLC's
There are more companies out there that show off most (if not all) of the new mechanics, skins, and just content in general way more than Wildcard does
Ubisoft
EA
Literally any AAA company, basically
It's really not that hard to find
People like to know what they're paying for, it's not really a bad thing unless it's like a singleplayer game's story DLC
And they spoil the big twist in the fucking trailer
Makes me question how many games y'all actually play lmao
Ark 1 is a shit, now imagine make a second game
If you’re on PlayStation you don’t have to, since ark 2 isn’t launching there 🙂
ZING!!
nice, eat aimbot
Well if that’s the complaint you’re welcome to just not play official PvP
Thats why im on playstation 🙂
Only dupe there xD
But im joking im excited for ark 2
Your name holds true if you believe that Playstation only has dupers, lol
Transparency doesn’t mean “reveal all content”. It means telling us what’s being worked on or maybe insight into why certain things are being worked on
@stray elm
I love being transparent.
People can't see me.
Like I said, people like to know what they're paying for. But I will also say I'm not one of them folks who likes to have the whole game laid out for me in the trailer, either.
The CC focused on how to deal with meshing and upcoming creature votes is more my drift
It’s transparency into the process and the knowledge we’re being heard and responded to
Ah, ok
😂
Wonder when I'll finally be able to just react to shit normally again... HINT HINT
Did you earn the right to clown emote again? I’m not sure you have heh
It's literally just an annoyance, doesn't serve any purpose when I can still react with extra steps
Dare I say it's useless
Just like the real swamp-fever
SHAZAM
You got em there
(I hope there's actual diseases in Ark 2 that aren't garbage btw)
(Just to keep it on topic 🙄 )
"Mega Rabies"
Rabies, but all the scary parts of rabies is removed!
Rabies is the closest thing to an IRL zombie virus that can infect humans, and It's reduced to a fucking health drain
Not even a rabies
It's more like organ failure.
Imagine an actual rabies virus in ARK-2
Minute organ failure, at best
Once you die from it, your body keeps walking around to infect others. But fears water.
Now I unironically want rabies in ARK-2
Like a 'real' rabies virus
@tropic crag Your thoughts?
Yeah, but you'd have to die for it to get to the cool part
With cordyceps, the cool part is that you don't die
You just aren't in control any more
Well.
Ants do once they get to the mature stage.
Once the cordyceps starts sprouting out of their heads, their dead.
"Cordyceps fungi excel at infecting and killing insects. One particular species, Ophiocordyceps unilateralis, has become famous for its ability to turn ants into zombies. It grows through an ant's body, creating a network of filaments that commandeers the insect's muscles."
Same thing with rabies iirr.
Once the virus fully takes over the host, they're dead.
None the less. Both are horrifying and badass in their own ways.
Though this is also fiction, so they could make it like the 28-Days-Later virus and make infected people, rabies or Cordyceps, still alive while it controls their body.
Still also want tamable alien slime-molds in ARK-2.
Yeah, only once they're fruiting do they technically kill the host (and become completely stationary). But yeah they could just change aspects of them for game reasons
Holy shit Bruce, I'm dying from old age while waiting for your ass to type. 😂
Oh, right on time
I want a realistic/alien version of slime-rancher.
Instead of collecting cute, rounded slimes with faces.
You're collecting masses of tendrils slime, coming for dat ass and trying to consume you alive while passive feeding it.
I'm not super hopeful, just because most media and such can't actually seem to depict a reasonably realistic version of what one would be like. They just go straight for the DnD or slime girl route, it sucks
Yeaaah, but one can hope
We're also in agreement that if they continue creature-votes for ARK-2. We're going to spread the idea of 'alien slime-mold' to everyone, and try to get it in the game. Right?
Oh for sure
Gud
slime girls are about as realistic as a large spherical body (ie, not)
Don't give me any thoughts, Shifter.
Next you'll make me want to vote in the ability for shapeshifting for said slime-molds.
what I actually want to see are more plants
Plant girls?
bruh this is ark, not some anime game on steam :/
Aye, you started it. xD
I think plants got severely shortchanged in ark 1, with only the four crops, plant XYZ, and R that provide more than berries...it would be epic to see more harvestable crops or even just harvestable plant resources in general to play with
"They just go straight for the DnD or slime girl route, it sucks" also: Bruce started it
You know how DBD got a official dating sim?
Well, Wildcard is about to capitalize on that shit with Aratai's. 🤣
I'm sorry hold on

Them Aratai's got those Ara-thighs.
I'm sorry, I'll stop.
my eyes need scrubbing
Why?
They're already shining!
Wearing those arataights
I don't get that one......
Tights
Could saddle attachments be apart of the game
With like durability and functions
Like a saddle attachment for a rex that gives it front legs to increase its speed
this is an idea that's been speculated here. i for one would love to see it
Oh cool
there's a lot of potential there
like for example, armor could be an attachment. Or maybe extra storage, light, weight reduction. many possibilites
This may be the case, since Santiago's rex in the trailer had a custom saddle.
Which the trailers use game-assets iirr.
worst case scenario it's just a skin
That's one of the best cases
At least it'll exist.
And not just be a Santiago exclusive, or trailer exclusive thing.
paid skin
After what Snail-Games did with paid-skins in ARK, and how Wildcard gave them the middle finger and made them into actual creatures. I don't think that'll be an issue for long.
So much potential for the crafting system
So much potential in general
wait, what creatures are you referring to here?
ping me if you respond
Some of the tek creature skins (tek quetzal, tek mosa, tek parasaur etc) are paid on consoles.
Tek creatures
Originally, they where paid 'bionic' skins, when ARK came out of early-access

ah those. if you really want the skins, you can also spawn them via admin commands lol
bionic giga
Bionic giga has never been a paid skin
And yeah, we don't talk about how they said those skins were supposed to be free for all after a year of release... oh wait
technically "it's free"
but you need to cheat it lol
Yeeeeah...
How then do all the bobs I kill have all the skins
i want more unique creatures since it is gonna be an alien planet
the pt's look sick
love that little butterfly design on their wings
hopefully the cinematic doesnt cap and actually includes it in the game
May the PT’s be as strong as their butterfly pattern indicates 😍
I want under water shoulder pets
More amphibious mounts pls (that aren’t shadowmane OP)
Koolasuchus pls
I'll actually be typing up a full list of dinos I'd like to see in Ark 2 soon, classified by either returning tames or new ones, only dinos/Ark 1 tames obviously because the aliens are going to be original, and thus I have no insight there. But when done I'll post it here for sure, I think there's a few some people would agree with me on 😉
Ping me with the list. You splitting it into returning ark 1 and new prehistoric creatures?
That is gonna be one scuffed ass list 💀
I’m wondering if I should make one. Then again I kinda think I want to know more about ark 2’s mechanics first
My list
Thylacoleo
Megatherium
Otter
I’ll only take megatherium if they rework it completely to embody ground sloth energy
Yuh
Ark 1 megatherium is basically just furry bug gimmick to me 🙃
My biggest hope is to see an enforcer like creature that has satisfying momentum conservation on its “blinks”. Doesn’t need to be the enforcer per se, but I’m very down to see a broken down derelict enforcer if that’s the way I get what I want
Yes, the creatures I want to see return and the new real prehistorics I'd like to see be added
Leaving out aliens and hybrids because it's their job to surprise us there
It’s safe to say that any list you’ve got doesn’t include new creatures WC is making
And I suggest you make one too, can't really have them put what we want in the game when they don't know what we want per se
I have the opposite because it’s shorter
That was from an old trailer. Judging on how the raptor, dodo and Rex got complete reworks I would depend on the pts looking like that
List of stuff I don’t want to see or creature mechanics I don’t want to see
i really hope they stay like that it looks really good
and a welcome change to yer old triangle wings
I am going to bet they are going to get a rework honestly
From how they look in the trailer for Ark 2? Pressing X
All fliers are likely being reworked
The flier nerf was a big controversy because people had something taken away. In ark 2, it’s just going to be the new standard
He's only talking about their visuals, I thought
what nerf
THE flier nerf?
Oh boy
bro i didnt even realize they got nerfed wha happen
wait move out of ark 2 btw bc
flier nerf has nothing to do with ark 2 🤓
Time to nerf em again for ark 2 
THE flier nerf (ark 1) may have less to do with ark 2, but it’s the direction I want to see ark 2 go even farther in
Get them filthy fliers off my ding darn ark 2 maps
was the flyer nerf the thing that you could level up speed on flyers
A reasonable chatter that doesn't go off topic? What has the world come to
just simply built different
so anyways i do think a different design on pts would look cool
When I show up the chat talks about ark 1 insofar as it impacts ark 2
So the ark 1 flier nerf discussion is directly relevant because we want to see it taken farther in ark 2 🤓
i believe there should be like an animation or like make them slower in takeoff
i wouldnt like it in pvp but itd be way more balanced
and real as like all those dinos back in the day took a while to get off their toes
heavy ahh
A slower takeoff only solved a tiny piece of the problem, which is just yeetin across the map ezpz without travel being an in depth affair
Fliers need to feel vulnerable, because irl birds and stuff really are
Maps functionally shrink with fliers, and that lowers the quality of the map and the experience by a major degree
I do think flyers should have to have a vantage point to jump from to get started, not just jump off the ground and fly for days
Unless it's like the argy where it's built for that I guess
But the pteras defo shouldn't
The argy is a problem as far as I am concerned lol. It has too much weight, too much melee and too much hp for a flier
Well, all flyers should have little to no weight in my book, so that right there kinda helps
And a big bird should be easy to hurt but also hurt you if you're dive bombed and grabbed in those meat hooks
Like it should hurt bad
Yeah, but and argy isn't going to dive bomb a rex
Maybe also make them drop things to kill them in the wild? Maybe that can be a new strength to make up for nerfing health and weight?
Well no duh, it would only hunt things it can carry, would it not?
I don’t see why it couldn’t dive a rex
Birds don't just attack elephants or lions lmao
Blue jays and other birds attack larger animals all the time. It’s just insanely risky
Maybe when tamed, but a wild one should see the risk and not go for it, unless the rex is on it's last legs or something
Or there's several things already attacking it perhaps, tries to swoop in for the kill
Wild argis in fairness shouldn’t really approach a non corpse
Would make sense, sure
Or I suppose a “small” creature they can easily bag, like a player or dodo
Which was kinda my original thought process
Only tries to pick things it could kill and eat within a few seconds or so
And obviously they'd still land to feast on leftover bodies, since I'm also hoping that harvesting a body isn't so ridiculously easy and takes time, and that wild dinos only eat til full
It would be cool to attract argis by leaving a corpse and waiting
Fliers should not be able to carry much weight realistically in terms of the argy atleast since it is a bird, but it needs to be able to carry a reasonable amount so you don't have to use the flier with no armor, no weapons, no resources just to reach the weight limit
Sure, but right now I can carry an entire Toyota sedan on an Argi
True
Hawks and eagles irl actually have high carry weight for their size
It should be able to carry a player, their weapons and maybe 100 or so pounds of resources. Not a 12 ton dinosaur or 16 wheeler
I’m pretty sure there are eagles that carry baby dear
For their size yes but they can't carry 2,000 pounds or their hollow ahh bones will snap
It should be reasonable but being able to carry an anky is a stretch.

Also, to be nice to you all, who gives a shit about realism here?
Well then the Andy becomes usless
Fliers carrying too much makes the game too easy, and it’s time to not do that. It’s nice and simple
I’d rather have long hauls by land that you do infrequently
I feel like dinosaurs like the trex already struggle to hold up their weight so adding a thousand extra would not make any sense
🙋♂️ (a little bit, in some respects)
Krab
I’m dreaming of herbivore caravans carrying stuff around the map, let me enjoy my dream
I forgot if you were OK with quetzals and argies or if it was just wyverns
That would be a lot cooler honestly.
I'd enjoy a caravan of trikes, stegos, and ankylos carrying my stuff all over
I think the quetz is ok if it either takes a heavy combat role or it is weight heavy for a Flying Fortress sort of tame. Not both
I think climbers are gonna be precedent
Quetz platforms will only be a good thing if turrets are not the form of defense
Don’t forget this is a game. They have to balance the tames accordingly
Ankies are early game tames. They can’t be too powerful
I disagree, ankies should be a more powerful mid-late game tame
I do think we need a new class of tames that specialize in hauling
Right now tames that excel in harvesting also are usually the best to haul the resource (with some exceptions from the skiff and gasbags). But it would be really interesting to have specialized haulers that pair with gathering mounts
Or just a couple cart structures
Tames/vehicles, though I’m always wary of vehicles in ark
Well, you would need the tames to pull the carts
I’m flexible with the method the tames express their hauling, so a cart is a valid option sure
Sure, my point is ankies are early game tames on Ark 1. And they should be balanced to that.
On Ark 2 they might put other tame to fit this role
Like shifter said, they need to create intermediary tools to fill the void
I mean that is what the metal tools were supposed to be
They are just too easy to get
There’s less reason to create creatures for different progression stages when there are no wipes
Better to instead have creatures perform different niches and open new niches to people as they progress, instead of creatures with objectively superior counterparts becoming available at higher levels
I mean if it is completely pvp centric sure. But for pve, people basically wipe every time they beat a boss
Not on official to my understanding for PvE
That's a fair point
True, but official pve is by far not the most played version of pve
Sure, but then again I can’t ask WC to make official settings tailored to those folks who will change stuff anyway now can I 😂
Well, you weren't discussing settings, you were discussing game design
The game design definitely needs some sort of more consistent progression for the large number of people who play ark specifically for that
Game progression makes good pvp
But they all need to have ways to counter the next progression so that advanced tribes can’t just bully bobs
Ark 1 did that with a constant flow of new DLCs
I don’t think Ark 2 will change that
Ark1 did not have a good progression system lol
Agreed, but they never focused on the lore (my opinion)
I don't see how focusing on lore makes for better game play progression
It makes more sense to me to follow the lore. 😂
But playing pvp and following the lore wouldn’t be great
It might but idk
Pvprs aren’t much for lore typically or they don’t want it intrusive on gameplay
To which I kinda agree
I used to play pvp. Wouldn’t be ideal for sure. 😂
The lore makes for a fun story, but it doesn't add to game play progression
Progression means the RPG aspects
I don't care what they do.
I just want my tamable alien slime-mold.
Leveling up, getting new armor/tames/etc
Don’t you think releasing new ascensions/engrams/items/creatures is the best way to keep ark through time?
I want arathighs in arataights
Ark plays just fine with no lore, as evidenced by all of the free dlc maps
I mean, I’m attached to this game for 7 years because of the new content. 😂
The issue is that progression elements shouldn’t offer unique gameplay in only one stage imo. Kinda like how cool spears are and how utterly useless they are after about an hour of playing
That’s not progression Charlie, that’s the DLC/content release schedule
But they never get any love
Progression errors in ark include the aforementioned spear example, or for example the fact that at level 20/105 (assuming no ascensions) you unlock metal tools…and there’s nothing better except perhaps chainsaws and mining drills (which are soft upgrades since chainsaws don’t work underwater)
That is a different unrelated topic lol
RIP the bow/crossbow/slingshot
-me who still uses pikes
Ok I didn’t know that. Scratch the pike example
It’s the same for all other flyers
Pikes are just jacked spears.
Their hit range is FAR
Just maker sure your chara has long arms and big hands
It’s not required just helps
I was thinking about levels/engrams/ascensions. What do you mean by progression then?
Remember the level system is different in ark2
Progressing from beach Bob to be able to take on the map with impunity...
And it seems like the knowledge points may be tide into the possibly returning mission system.
SHIT
You know, the actual game other than just bosses lol
I need coffee.
I see. That need a big redesign for sure.
I do see where everyone comes from that "people don't play ARK for its lore"
But I for one am kind of happy that some gameplay elements are 'TIED' to the story, from what it seems like.
Hopefully it'll be a good system.
I was thinking about progression over time (years). I mean, I always thought that the Giga came too soon to the game. It would be more interesting to have such a powerful creature some years after release not on the first months.
That is the redesign we were talking about lol
The actual progression from map to map is something that few players actually do
I also hate doing that lol
It would be more interesting to never have such a powerful creature lol
Starting from scratch and adapting to a tough environment is a survival game at its finest
Yea Charlie seems to think progression means increasing the maximum player power level as the game gets older
I hate when games do that lol
I mean, it is the least interesting aspect of pve, and the most vital of pvp
I think you could disable transfers from one map type to another and PvP would still manage (if that’s what you mean)
We need more “PVE threats”. The Aratai might have an important role on that.
Would be nice to be unsafe on our bases 😂
A sidestep from the point but sure
I’m actually more bothered by the map being safe than I am my base. I play PvE so I don’t get offlined, and I don’t need the wildlife breaking things while I’m asleep
That wouldn't work lol
You couldn’t have islands only transfer to other islands? Why not?
It would address the “alphas can’t be challenged” issue and the “power creep from new DLC makes p2w complaints and ruins old maps” issue
It would also make the older maps mostly obsolete each time a new map releases
It would make them separate
It would make them basically a separate game that would die out on each new map
It wouldn’t make them obsolete: free transfers do that by allowing new tames and items to crush the old maps
This is pvp we are talking. Older maps still have good base locations
If you make it so new maps can't transfer to old maps, then people will stop playing the old maps
There is no official statement on that yet
But by allowing transfers people flow and move and nothing feels stagnant
Free transfers are vital to keeping pvp going. Map to map balance needs a little work is all
Yeah title be easier with the new engine to
I am not ready for new... just saying. I only started playing a few months ago. I enjoy it but I have so much content that I still want to do that a new full game would seem silly to buy at this point.
If you want my 2 cents
They will
On Steam description says: Massive Alien planet (or something like that)
You'll have anywhere from 6 months to 3 years to wait for ark 2 as well, since you're on PS.
Im sure you’ll be fine especially if your a ps4 player
I see. You believe old maps should only retain value for play space rather than player progression/items/tames. That’s valid
You have plenty of time, since ark 2 won’t launch on PS
Center is good for its fight
For pvp absolutely
But any good pvper basically uses all the maps anyway
Every map has progression to offer
If only PvP wasn’t a long haul anarchy siege sim
It isn’t most of the time
Only big tribes take about a day total
Mega tribes maybe more
I mean, big raids should take longer imo
I can’t wait to see notes removed. What an awful mechanic for progression lol
Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait.
Shifter....did you just say you hate progressing through the maps in order?
I hate taking the same character through them, yes
I prefer a scratch start on each map
Isn't this the very thing your server is dedicated to?
That’s what pve servers are
I lost the vote to transfer almost nothing and have fresh characters heh
Compromise be like 😂
I do love democracy. 🤣
Who tf wants no transfers? And why
Shifter
In my personal play yes
You’re gonna make him PvP reee on me Spartan. I can already see he’s frothing
All part of the plan
I love making others suffer
I mean for a normal pve map, no transfers is fine. But for a storymode run through, the entire point is the map to map progression lol
Trolling does correlate well with sadism, so there’s that
It's also in the name
@blissful perch face when he ascends and is automatically uploaded
If we get a region-based system in ARK-2, I could see transfers not being a thing. But future DLC's being new regions.
I would prefer that approach honestly
There’s certainly something cleaner about it, and ofc that’s how all MMO titles work lol
My only issue is server renting
If they're going to do that, I think they need to not go as fucking much grids that Atlas has.
Provided 100% that it is not a lame story progression npc filled nightmare like all the other games I have seen like that lol
A grid the size of Genesis-2, that's in a 2x2 grid would be enough I think.
Atlas maps really should have been computer generated
Ehhh, if each region is basically all the same biome yeah
I mean this is ue5, the capability of much larger maps is a thing
I don't mean Genesis-2's biome.
I mean the 'size'
Yes, but hardware limitations are also a thing
I want to stand on top of the tallest mountain and only see jungle, or stand on a volcano and only see an ashfield
ue5 makes it a lot easier to handle
especially compared to arks wonky version of ue4
UE5 is a powerful software.
But not everyones PC's would be able to handle a HUUUUGE game.
And I know nanite is fucking broken, but it even has its limits.
So is coding things to not eat up performance
I want to see nanite stretched by how massive ark2 maps are.
If you have a fat ass base in ark 1 it derenders things you're not looking at
You can also just slow down travel to make maps feel larger
I mean, there are games more with more graphic fidelity than ark that also have more people and a larger map
I do also.
But I don't want them to 'exceed' the limits of nanite, only just push it.
You’re losing quality 100% of the time when you demand massive maps that can’t be hand modified
It’s harder to QC too
I mean, if they are mostly the same biome it is a lot easier
Still exists in the servers database.
There are solutions to that too lol
The same biome has no impact on QC for mesh holes or other terrain abnormalities
Ok but we're talking about your systems performance not the servers
It may impact quality not dropping as badly if the map Gen is sufficiently robust though
Uh, no. We are talking about the servers performance
What do you think is going to be the server if you're in a single-player game?
Your own system will.
Who cares Abt singleplayer
A lot of people but you.
Ugh, it’s true that we are limited by Xbox specs
Yes and I'm sure ark 1 was too wasn't it
doesnt xbox have red dead redemption? I have heard that map is way bigger than arks maps
Ark 1 was designed prior to console release, and yes it did get pigeon holed into console restrictions
Iirc there’s way fewer complex mobs on a RDR2 map though
That's why xbox's crash constantly on series x unless you turn down settings. Cause the devs totally handicapped the game for the system.
Yes, but not by as much as what you're saying for a ARK-2 map.
It's like 3 Genesis-2's.
Gen2s issues werent entirely the size of the map, but rather the complexity of the map lol
It was part of the size.
If you go onto the edges of the map, the game literally starts tearing itself apart.
If a map is gen2 size and consists of a single biome type then it would be a looooot more efficient performacewise
Gen 2 IS basically three biomes
And boring
Shadows start to fuck up, and more glitches.
Not really, gen2 has all of the missions which basically are their own biomes
I’ve been memed
Missions are conducted within realistically one of two biomes (rockwell or eden)
There are some instanced missions, but I’d hardly call them new biomes
That's away from the actual playable map.
He means missions like star dolphin lol
They still exist as ingame assets and take up space
That same restriction is coming to ark 2 lol since we’re getting story missions
They also have different controls and ai and everything when compared to the rest of the map
They take up space, yes.
But that wasn't my point.
Genesis-2 is width wise, a big map that tears itself apart once you get to the border.

