#ark-2
1 messages · Page 16 of 1
If they are making that kind of money they can afford to pay devs off
They think they don’t need to do anything with ark 1 since ark 2 is coming out
,but who wants to try there next game when they deliberately waste people weeks and months of work by letting cheaters run rampant
Don’t ping the devs, it makes us all look bad
I don’t care honestly lol they look a lot worse than we do
They are the ones profiting on a broken game that just wastes people time
I agree that official PvP (especially on PC) is poorly moderated and managed
It’s literally the game with the WORST dev support out , never seen anyone just not care about there product
All games to some extent are a waste of time however, and a game like ark built around wiping other’s progress will always generate a sense of wasted time when your work is broken in front of you
If it’s legit idc but if you spend a year building a base and some dude started tek rifling your stuff from under the ground that’s a whole nother level lol
Don't know man.
Ubisoft got them beat by a league.
And Blizzard.
And 343 Industries.
Sooooo, they're not bad with their employees?
Oh yeah they are but they do pretty good answering tickets
I could care less about tickets when people are being harrassed within their company.
Oh yeah that’s a whole different thing was speaking about hacking into the actual games and cheating. That’s employee problems
Wildcard bit off way more than they could chew with trying to make ark an MMO imo
A bad workplace results in bad dev's.
They did NOT have a full staff or funding source set aside to manage tickets and CoC enforcement
That's their main issue.
They have hundreds of servers, but only have so limited admins.
Yeah they should have definitely added more on
I wish more of them played official pvp aswell as I don’t think any of them actually play there own game so they don’t really get to see what happens and what’s good and bad for pvp
Or they should've removed servers to combinate with their current amount of admins.
Would also cause less dead servers, since a lot of players like to spread out to lower population servers to gain an advantage. Causing the playerbase to be more spread out.
Another issue is their ticket system.
I don't know how it works internally of course. But if i have to guess, they don't have a auto-filter.
So, people will spam and spam their issues, or be asses and make false tickets to bury the actual people needing help.
True
I just wish they would talk about the issues instead of just acting like all this hacking isn’t happening
A simple yo guys we are working on it would be dope
I wouldn't call Wildcard 'bad dev's' cause to a degree, they do care for their community.
But like Shifter said, a small indie team bit off more then they could chew, and that caused long lasting effects.
they used to talk a lot more earlier on, but iirc it's partly our fault they reduced the communication with the community, correct me if i'm wrong tho
Not sure if it was ever explicitly said but it’s certainly obvious to me that we’re partly to blame
True, but they had people complain back then about "them listing off unimportant shit" in their crunches YEARS ago.
Wanna know what said unimportant shit was?
A list of stuff they fixed/changed per update.
Case #27598 @tame charm has been muted for 1 hour.
Reason: Posting a unauthorised Discord invite link
Get fucked

@split dove
Damn, i do miss those days.
They'd talk about minor updates in Crunches and talk about all the things they fixed and whatnot.
Then you don't play a lot of games, lmao
But those fucking people that where like "Noooo, we don't need all that useless information. Just get to the good bits" had to fucking talk.
Now we're stuck with them only listing off single fixes that people complain about for weeks upon weeks.
I love internal dev-talks. And the day they stopped posting every fix detail in the crunches, hurt my soul.
It made it a lot harder for me to track design choices and dev progress that’s for damn sure
TRUE!
Can we just (peacefully) chant here of wanting dev-logs back for ARK-2?
And NEVER be removed, even if we demand it again?
No point unless the community stops being 1.) children 2.) man children 3.) people who want to keep changes hidden so they can exploit or abuse people’s lack of knowledge
You say 'no point' but that's cowards talk!
Help me chant to summon the dev-logs back!
We shall become the Cult-of-the-Dev-talkers.

We as a community have to do a better job of screening low quality individuals before we bother asking the devs to return with more engagement
Yeah from this discord but they have their own seller discords with thousands of people
Yeah the being able to make unlimited accounts after being banned was dumb
Need some sort of ip ban
That’s why I e enjoyed playing MTS most balanced and moderated pvp servers
Ark 2 should require a valid Id, ssn, and valid proof of mailing address. That way when people cheat we can just roll up on em in their living rooms
I keep telling people that WC should turn it over to the community if they can’t moderate XD. WC can give more active communities more tools and abilities to manage themselves and everyone would probably have more fun
Why tf can't I emoji react? But anyways, rough take. If the problem players are banned from a server, then it's not an issue. Who cares if they jump around, being assholes? They would do the same thing if there were an official network, just on a new account. It's literally the same thing. Having a global ban on an account means nothing if a hacker wants to ruin people's fun; the hacker is going to do this regardless of if one of their 50 accounts was banned. I'd even argue that having it be community run only would be more work for the hackers, not to mention the ability to password servers being a thing.
And a global ban could be instated (if you reeeeeeally need it to be) by just providing proper documentation to Wildcard, official or community-run (again, this would be less of an issue with community run, as people would probably just handle it themselves more often than not).
^its true that a dev team often has the ability to bar an account from online use of their game
Not even Wildcard specifically, hell, the individual platforms could ban them lmao
Report a guy with evidence to Steam, they ban his ass
WC can do limited high evidence global bans and community servers can ban for the rest. Bans could be shared through a network or WC could link up lists of bans for cluster owners to compare
Yeah, like a blacklist of problem accounts
Other games have done this in the past, it's not hard
It’s work, but it’s not impossible
Mostly PC games, to be fair, but I digress
This is a new age, and these new consoles are verily PC integrated with how their networks work
Given ark 2 sounds cross platform I think it can be easily extended to Xbox here
It would be really cool if you could build stuff out of bones in Ark 2
we do some some bone armour used by Aratai and a Aratai using a club with what looked like a allo skull on it, it would be a missed opportunity
Bones would be a cool new material for sure
Btw, everyone add (Cult of Dev-talkers) at the end of your name, it spread the word of wanting dev-logs for ARK-2 when it comes out

i'm not saying it's bad, it's probably better to safe something like that for later
I feel like busted and motionless stryders could be cool
Can't wait to see what new animals and stuff they add
Ark 2 is on an alien planet right?
There's gotta be new creatures
Join the cult!
Like the guardians in BotW, yeah
One of us
I won't join the cult unless I'm assured the goal is possible
One of us!

Aratai and the weird chameleon plant thing?
It is, if we build up.
and since we rendered it impossible...how will we change that?
Yep.
'You' rendered it impossible.
I didn't tell the team to post less in patch notes XD
What're you?
A chicken. 
pretty sure my only comments about them have been "thank you for the transparency"
Yeah.
And if we make more members of said cult, we can get those back
I sympathize with your cause. But you'll need to covert non believers and heretics
And they'll all fall, in time.
"Now, will you join The Unity, or will you die here? Join! Die! Join! Die!"
Hang on, you got me an idea.
As the leader of this cult, i must do this
For the record, this is a quote, if not already readily apparent by the quotation marks, by The Master in Fallout 1
Just to specify before I get banned or some ish

All of his abomination glory
- Insert obligatory "The Master LIVES" here *
Still the best villain in the series.
The only one that ACTUALLY had a good reasoning of what he did.
Damn, i remember that from the Fallout Online image.
Wished we got that instead of Fallout 76.
How?
(maybe)
In all endings, he gets nuked
And he's stationary so.....kind of hard for him to escape....
Yeah, but the framework for him being alive hasn't been retconned yet, from Fallout Online
So who knows
True, but that's if Bethesda goes with what the Fallout Bible says
As of right now, of how they're treating the series. Nothing that's not published by Bethesda is loose-canon.
Cause if they where going with what we knew from Fallout 2, the Enclave are fucking DEAD
True, but the remnants were there in New Vegas

Well, that's exactly what they where.
The 'remnants' of the Enclave.
Aaaaaaand we mean enclave as in the ARK-2 enclave. 
Hahaha...ha........ha

Oh yeah, this isn't the other discord...
Yeah, this isn't the Fallout discord.
Shame on you Bruce.
First Person
To what?
Kinda got a feeling Lars wants first person. Even it is an amazing part of Ark, it is not nessecary. Everyone who hates Ark II because of the third person only thingy, need to realize it wont be the same third person as in Ark. Nothing can be judged without gameplay
can't really say it's gonna be bad if you don't know how it will actually play/look until gameplay comes out as always
even then you will probably get used to it after some time. if it's built for third person it will probably look bad if you try to force it in first person
I mean you can say it’s bad if you played ark 1 for tek and now it’s gone lol
But I do question strong beliefs that the game will flop because of something that’s so often uncontroversial
^
Family...
Hahaha he said the thing
It depends on how similar it is to ark 1 in functionality and gameplay
Will its first server also be called let's play?
lets plays are over tbh
havent seen anyone call a game playthrough as a lets play in years
though ive only really seen fps games
It’s like assassins creed. You can’t play assassins creed in first person. 😂
Depending on how they implement it I might miss 1st person view on some situations. We will see.
I like first person for tight spaces and a sense of wonder “through my own eyes”. But tbh I felt a lot of that was workable in monster Hunter World and I didn’t miss the loss of first as much as I suspected I would
I hate almost all ark characters lol
I do however very much like looking at creatures, which I can usually ignore the little parasitic person on their backs
If we played as only Aratai I’d be very hype
But then again I always found humans boring, so maybe that’s my personal bias
Same here, when can I play as a tiefling in Ark? Come on devs 
I played as one in D&D and had to sleep in a tree because the racist town thought I was a harbinger of misfortune
That being said, let me play ark 2 as a mesopithicus for maximum monké
I always play tiefling, no matter what. Just really like the horns tbh
God has arrived. 
Is that what you're calling yourself these days?
I can make a joke out of this, but i'd be banned
If it's an Austin Powers reference, you win a gold star
Is being named after a bruising Pikmin what you call yourself? 
Lel
I was always curious why he choice bruising Pikmin but didn’t use the purple pikmin as a pfp
He's a bruising pikmin, yet he has a samurai Jack pfp.
It's time
New green pikmin
Also ark2 
Only if we get confirmation of monké
No ark 2 for u
Hmmmmm
monké

Give me…alien reptile monké?
Why's the hype-o-meter at max, when Extra-Life isn't till two more months?
I’d love to see stuff swinging through the trees

Dunno, have to ask Person lol
My gamertag I made when I was like 14 was named this, and I've based all of my internet presences off of that pretty much. It was actually supposed to be PurplePikmin funny enough, but that was taken. Anyways, Pikmin for Ark 2!
All the vines we see in the trailers, we better be able to use them
I’d love to use them as a player but imagine wild creatures using them

Who?
Aratai's are gonna swing to your doorsteps
There's like 4 Persons that I've spoken to, I do not remember which made the gif
My man’s swinging in to that booty
You can’t be mad at my use of booty to describe my hard earned ark 2 loot
Doubt they would make a creature that small in regular ark terms
yep, that is why i always want to get the mod with the plague doc mask that goes well with the dodowyvern and the reaper mask because it looks like it has a tongue rather having a human face inside the mouth
uh because I just replicated the starfield gif
Man after they released the noglin I think anything is possible 😂
Next creature guna slide through wall cracks 😂
I never use 3rd person I play an rp server
They should add some kind of snake that has an actual venom so that it’s dangerous and less of a inconvenience
Titanoboas were constrictors anyway and it would’ve been way cooler if they had that instead
Or just do that for the Titanoboa
Bruh, ARK isn't going to go off of accurate history. 
It would still be cool tho
Meh
Also more dangerous
A actually dangerous Titanoboa with proper venom, yes.
A constrictor Titanoboa, not sure.
At a certain point a Dino becomes less of a mini boss to more of a inconvenience
Titanoboas shouldn’t do that
A constrictor would be cool, as would a viper/cobra
In that case, playing on a unnoficial server, you will probably have that the option through a MOD.
It’s great to hear folks like RP, and the cool thing is that ark 2 will still allow for that
I have a feeling ark 2 is gonna be a super consoleised snorefest, hope I'm wrong but I can't see it being as hardcore for some reason :(
But…ark 1 PvE is a snoozefest
That's your opinion...
wonder what the new dinos will be like
Well yes, one opinion to match another 😅
Well you stated it as a fact 😦
Another pve bob flop like Atlas in 3rd person view..imagine!!
Funny, cause ATLAS is a PvP based game
We saw how well that went
Of it being PvP based?
Yeah, we did. 
Ark pvp is good imagine if there was a ticket function in game for faster response against cheaters
Good if you like lackluster combat.
I for one, never really liked ARK's pvp.
When was ark pvp good?
as a person who actually played ATLAS in a 100+ player unofficial RP PVP server
i agree that ATLAS is a PVP game
We dont talk about bru- i mean atlas
The current dev's blatantly stated it's a PvP game.
Its balance is around PvP, and it's why a lot of PvE players get fucked over.
pretty much, there is literally no PVE content in Vanilla ATLAS
what is why it died
Yep
They fucked over the PvE side when they made the newer ships slow as fuck.
You know how long it takes to sail across the map with legacy ships, right?
It can take legit hours. 
their current update is just catering to their remaining PVP players in their official server
possibly less than 100
Yeah.
Surprised official is still even alive.
same here while GS gave a middle finger to the modders by not giving them a devkit update
and not realized that 1 unofficial server that keeps them alive
They have sold between 1 and 2 million copies. They are fine.
I liked Atlas in the beginning. Not really sure why the numbers went down so fast. But they still have around 2 thousand people playing it daily.
That was most likely from launch.
Does it say what year that revenue is from?
Probably. And Steam DB doesn’t say much about their data.
That's also a lot more lower then ARK, which had 16-Million copies as of 2019
Not comparing to Ark. Just comparing to other “indie” titles
Oh wait, nope. 20-Million as of 2021
ARK was once an indie title. 
But a really successful one.
I’m just saying Atlas was fine, but not a huge success like Ark.
Yep.
And Atlas has yet to come even a smidge close to 30% of ARK's revenue.
'Was' is the key word.
Also, Atlas has a really bad review rate.
Atlas also has 700 players currently.
Which is......not a lot figuring they have two servers that can hold 1,400 players at max.
Sure. I’m just pointing out how they still exist as a developer. They’ve made a lot of money on the release.
What does money have to do with it being a basically dead game?
But well, getting back to the topic. I hope some concepts of Atlas were brought to Ark 2.
Like the map system. NPCs.
True.
I do like the grapples in that game a lot more, and the swinging physics.
So, you remember in Atlas if you had SP-settings enabled, it'd add NPC pirate camps you could raid on Islands?
I will quote you: “surprised official is even still alive”
I’m just pointing out they can keep it because they made a lot of money.
Yes.
Cause 700 players isn't alot, and you have to split that number from two servers, and unofficial servers.
They have around 2k daily.
Steamcharts says otherwise
2k is the concurrent number. The player base isn’t 2k.
We should get back to ARK2
Like Ark: 50k concurrent. But the player base is way bigger than that.
Anyway, if you remember the pirate NPC camps you can raid in the SP-version of Atlas.
I want those in ARK-2, but better.
It says what I’ve said. But yeah, back to Ark 2.
Me too
They had nice concepts I hope WC will bring to Ark 2. Like traveling between maps.
I don't want a grid system.....
I liked the grid system 😂
ARK-2 is already going to be probably taxing as it is.
Having 20x grids doesn't help.
Until you get into the technical side, and realize a lot of Atlas performance issues stem from them. 
I’ve played ark on officials. Ark also sucks, regarding performance.
My ping was 255 like all the time
Not really different on Atlas
No shit.
But i've had ping on Atlas that was literally over 300.
Ark locks on 255. The real ping is above that.
Also.....since we're going to have to travel via primitive styles for awhile, i don't really want to walk literal miles to get to the otherside of the map.
That’s fair 😂
You already have to sail for 40 minutes to get to the otherside of Atlas.
It was longer back then, but it should NOT take that long for a game.
But we will have flyers. Atlas didn’t have any. At least while I played it.
Newer ships go basically as fast as a pteradon.
Another nice touch would be claim system and the pve areas.
For a raid party it definitely should though
no
The reason people get almost guaranteed next day raiding on ark is because people can travel the map so fast with raiding gear
Like shadowmane taming?
What do you define as fun?
Most of the newer Dino’s. Amarga, Dinopithicus, Fjordhawk. Things that aren’t just trap, shoot, place food in inventory.
Shadowmane taming isn’t bad. It’s filling the baskets that’s bad.
Agree to disagree lol, I am terrible at shadowmane taming jaja
One thing I’m wondering about Ark 2 is how the start of the first map will be, you know how you make the world and then there’s cutscene thing of you waking up and you see the gem on your arm? How will you load into ark 2?
You’re gonna be sleeping, and then you’re gonna here somebody say “hey Link. Wake up.” And then you’re gonna wake up handcuffed in the back of a cart with a horse thief, on your way to be executed by Vindiagos people.
Lmao
@cunning talon you have a leak 👀
so you wake up on a wagon right and then a nord says "Hey you, you're finally awake" and then you go on a quest to save skyrim
'You were trying to cross the border, right? Same as us, and that Parasaur over there.'

"we were caught in that melee bob ambush..."
Din Viesel
Don't ping members of WC, it looks bad on all of us
So, any chance to see anything about Ark II at Pax West?! I know chances are low, but would be nice.
could always be, but expect for something to be shown at extra life instead
As of right now, it's Switch based stuff.
But it's not unlikely.
But more likely to be Extra-Life
this is ark 3
Lmao

So, i had a little thought.
@tropic crag So y'all know how ARK more or less takes many inspirations of ideas with its lore.
Like how element is inspired by The Expanse, how (though unconfirmed) the general plot seems to be inspired by The Maze Runners. Both being people with little to no memory of the events leading to them arriving in a strange new place, both being testing facilities, and both trying to figure out a cure for a virus that ravaged the planet.
@past wind @untold ingot Y'all can also get in on this.
Though, something I've noticed is that the mutated people in The Expanse look like corrupted people like in ARK, to a degree.
But in The-Expanse, they look a lot more robotic, then the charred decaying corpse corrupted creatures look like.
Well, having never seen the expanse, and only having heard of maze runner, I don't know how much I can chime in on this 🤣
Ever played Gears of War?
Nope 🤣
Okay, i'll just DM you images then you're on the same page if you're cool with that.
Sure
So you see they're the same in vein, but hella different. Right?
I guess it is a bit similar
Right, but my recent thoughts have been "damn, they look pretty different even though it's suppose to be inspired"
Then i came to the (probably obvious) conclusion that "element" was inspired by The-Expanse, not corruption.
Cause they're also two separate processes if i recall.
So, that made me think "why do corrupted creatures look so familiar?"
'smacks lips dramatically'
They're totally artistically inspired by the Lambent from the Gears-series.
Hmm, I don't quite see the resemblance, but this is the first time I have ever seen or heard of that lol
They have the black overgrown corruption tendrils around them.
They have the central body-glow.
They're both decomposing.
Corrupted creatures just have a bit more normal mass to them, then being 100% corrupted.
Their plot is also basically One-to-One
Interesting
You think that connection might have impacts on the story continuation in ark2?
Lambent: A substance from a alien planet that humanity harnessed and thought it was just fuel.
Glows a vibrant color, hot as lava, kills you on contact.
But it turns out to be a living hive-mind that infects creatures into a zombified state. (yes, it's ark-2 related. Give me a bit)
Element: a alien substance that came from space.
Also was used for fuel, and was thought to be just that.
Turned out to be a alien, and started a hive-mind to kill all creatures and infect them.
Also, i'll send you a image of what the guys look like originally to give an idea. (should've from the start)
Hmm, interesting
So, hang on to your fucking pants cause this theory is going to going to be STRETCHED!
Well, I am doing my best to follow along, because I have never really come across these other sources before 🤣🤣
So, we already established that ARK's lore likes to take heavy inspiration from multiple sources.
(I.E. The literal plot of Genesis-2 of being a space-suit man fighting a biomass organism on a ring)
Maze-Runner thing was to more or less show that ARK likes to take inspiration from other sources.
Yeah, gen2 does seem to take a lot of inspiration from halo, to a degree at least
So, in Gears of War, it's on a alien world called 'Sera'
Now, it's never explained how humans got here, but it's clear that they ARE homo-sapiens, cause we've seen in the games their DNA.
One of the biggest theories, is that sometime in the future, humans on Earth where colonizing worlds and a colony landed on Sera, but more unprepared and had to basically re-evolve their technology.
Sounds a bit familiar?
I mean, that's a fairly common storyline for scifi
Right, but still.
Although, unless I am mistaken, there is only the one colony ship in ark
Besides the point
Sure, it doesn't really change the main storyline
So, here's my point.
This is a BIG stretch, and i'm more doing this for fun.
ARK-2 could start the same way, of humanity needing to re-evolve with new cultures and such (with the obvious issues of the Aratai)
'IF' this is truly the home-planet of element, then this could explain some of the creatures in the game and how they could exist. Meaning all life has traces of element in it.
Well, the conflict of humans and the Aratai could last long enough that it reawakens the element on the planet. Causing a three faction war.
Causing a similar situation of what happened in Gears-3, of the war becoming three-sided.
Yeah, that honestly is what I am hoping to see
Also, just to add more salt into this dumb, crazy theory.
At some point, humanity could drive the Aratai's into the planets cave-system, causing a more similar situation.
Causing the Aratai to actually find element first, and harness its abilities.
It could have a story like Brandon Sandersons skyward though, especially with aratai attacking human settlements
But the downside, is that they're getting the main blast of its effects.
Causing corrupted Aratai's, and basically a pre-Extinction situation.
If technology also progresses far enough, they could also nuke the surface to add more salt to the similarities and have the last DLC a mixture of a Aberration/Extinction DLC, where the surface is a wasteland hell, while the underground is a lustful cave-system that is also hell.
No idea what that is.
It's kind of an unknown book series lol
Well, considering that ab was the most popular map ever for ark, and we haven't seen the end of element yet, I really could envision this being a thing
Point was, i believe corruption itself is more or less inspired by the Lambents.
And that in some crazy world, that possibly Arat will have similar wars and events that the planet Sera did.
It'll be interesting to see how they manage to pull it off. Not to mention absolutely revolutionary if they manage to keep a story like that going in the midst of a multi-player survival open world game
Like, legit.
Imagine a full surface to explore that's just a hellish wasteland, with ruined buildings and mutated creatures.
Livable, but barely. With many, many hazards now effecting the surface.
While the underground is a mixture of what people loved about Aberration, but also in some areas, a legit cave-system.
But it too is hellish with the war between the last bits of the Aratai's and corruption still fighting in the deepest pits.
It's possible, cause a lot of MMO's have major changes like that in their stories.
I would really like to see another full cave map, but with more cave, and less map if you know what I mean lol
Like, more linear caves and less open ended caves?
Not necessarily linear, but yeah sort of
Hang on, i think i got an idea.
Like that?
I am thinking more tunnels and stuff, like the crystal caves in Arizona. I forget what they are called
Ahhh, i see.
But the cave i sent you would be also cool, no?
My biggest issue with Aberration was the fact there where no real 'cave' areas.
It was either all forest, very tight caves, or 'dead'
Yeah, ab feels a bit too open for a full on cave
Also feel like it would've been nice to have one of the zones a true open 'cave' and not a lush-cave.
Like, just the rocks and shit type of cave.
Also, that picture was the cave-system on Sera.
That's from Gears.
Well, one thing is for sure. Caves have to come back lol. There hasn't been a good cave on story maps since ab
True
Anyway, thanks for indulging on my dumb little theory that'll probably never happen
I mean, a 3 faction war is definitely something I can envision happening
True.
The steam pages description helps that, also.
It is extraordinarily common in scifi, just because it allows for more creative storylines
I just hope they don't introduce a third faction too early on.
I wanna focus on humans vs aratai's in at least the base-game.
Third-faction warfare in stories is more like near the end of the story type of thing.
Yeah, I would like to see that too, but I would almost bet money that the king titan or some varient of it will be coming back lol
It physically can't.
It was created by the element on earth, I could see that happening in a similar way on arat
For element-based titans to appear, the air has to be extremely polluted.
This pollution can only happen with mass-warfare of tek-based technology.
Unless arat is the home world of the element and the corruption there is natural
Again, that type of pollution requires centuries of warfare.
Corruption itself i believe is a different story.
But titans require a 'very, very' specific environment to form.
That, and Titans usually kill everything they see and corrupt everything.
So far, the planet is pretty lush.
Like salt in the ocean is fine, but that much salt in a rainforest would kill it. That's kind of how I see element behaving between arat and earth. It's fine on arat because that's its homeworld, but it kills other planets
That's if element is bad, and wasn't humanities fault for its corruption. 
Well, most of the titan forming lore is taken from speculation by Helena and Co. They might not have all the details to really say
The One Who Waits stated theses.
And she's more or less godlike, so it'd take her word on it more.
Salt isn't bad, but it would still destroy a rainforest really quickly lol
Why are you using salt?
It's an easy comparison to kind of how I envision things working
Not for me.
It's making my head hurt.
Oh, lol
"Epic Story!"
Yeah, y'all better have an epic 'and' good story, cause Genesis-2 was a bit of a letdown. 
Well, element is a xenotoxin on earth. If arat is elements homeworld, then it wouldnt be alien to the planet, and it might not even be toxic to plants and animals there.
Well, that'd most likely cause 99% of the life on that planet would have traces of element in it.
I don't think it is a coincidence that Rockwell specifically picked arat to go to, like it's not just some random planet imo
I also think that.
But again, titans require a very specific environment.
I don't see any tek-based technology running, or wars. Soooooooooo
Yeah, although the effects of that on element natural creatures is kind of unknowable. The only experience we have had with element is stuff that got changed by it
Maybe, then again, that could be speculation on Helenas part
Just saying, Marc did confirm this. 
Hmm
I’d like to point out that we traveled to Arat on an element powered ship, that was corrupted by Rockwell. That ships remains were seen in one of the Ark 2 trailers so it is very well possible that element and its corruption are now both on Arat.
Wouldn't it depend on what kinda element?
Like we know liquid element mutates things
But im pretty sure the element we put in our tek rifles and armor is more of like
Refined
Personally though I don’t think we’re gonna face titans again. I think we’re gonna face the Aratai, up until the element hive mind makes its big reveal then in the end humans and Aratai are gonna team up and face off against the hive mind itself.
While element has many different forms it’s the use of element that causes the corruption. It was the element from the weapons used by the federation and the URE that caused the corruption on Earth. The real question is whether the hivemind was born through the war or was it already in existence before hand. It’s very well possible that it could be what caused the two factions to fight to begin with in an attempt to create the corruption it wanted.
The hive mind being a titan?
Titan's are just to better organize the hive-mind into a militaristic mindset.
They are not required though.
Rockwell was connected to the hive-mind.
It's more or less how the Flood work in Halo.
The Flood don't 'need' a gravemind to survive or form.
But forming one does help them go from a animalistic instincts, to a militaristic force.
Yeah, but I doubt the final battle of the final ark2 dlc is going to be us hitting ele dust. They have to have some sort of physical entity that we are going to fight
Well, thinking what the final boss of ARK-2 as a whole is, is a task that'll go nowhere. Since we don't know the main story.
It's all speculation sure
Hell, we didn't know what any of the final-bosses where going to be for each story-map, till Genesis-1. 
Yeah, it makes it hard to predict. But that is where I see the overall thread goinf
For all we know, they could honestly introduce another, unknown force as the final threat.
That could be
Someone I think Helena had either a dream or a vision of a purple humanoid crawling across Earths bedrock and essentially disintegrating it. Could have been it’s actual form.
Yeah maybe, it's hard to say what it'll be
That was Helena, yes.
And she was describing the King Titan
That’s incorrect according to the lore info I was reading.
What where you reading?
I believe it was the lore section of the Ark Fandom
Ark Fandom is the worse place to get your lore, unless it's the notes directly
I could be wrong about the vision.
But none the less, don't use the Ark Fandom for your lore, unless it's the notes.
It’s just a culmination of verified info from the notes
Some of that stuff was wrong, the last time i read it.
"the United Republic of Earth (URE) and the Terran Federation (Feds). For reasons that are still unclear,"
While true of nothing confirmed. Santiago did state a theory of "dogs fighting over the last scrap of meat"
While just a theory, it's a in-universe theory that should've made it into the lore summary, since it's the closest we have to a confirmation of the cause of the war. (obviously stating it's a theory though.)
Wait, i'm fucking dumb
" HLN-A described both nations strangely having identical cultures and ideologies and their conflict as two dogs fighting over the last scrap of meat on a carcass"
Nevermind. 
ARK-2 part of the lore page defiantly needs an update
I remember there being some parts of the Ark Fandom where speculation was treated as fact or things mentioned in the notes were misinterpreted to mean something other than what was intended. Haven't looked at the lore page on the Fandom in a while though so it might have been fixed.
I might be getting an Xbox series X for Christmas this year, I’m saying this here because that means I’ll be able to experience Ark 2 on the series if I do get the series! Already can’t wait!
Hoping ark II will get crossplay 🤞
ARK 2 will have crossplay, but just not sure what the official servers will have.
i think it should be steam/pc servers and then xbox/ps45 servers
why not pc & console?
Theres no ps4
Probably
controller vs keyboard makes a difference, as someone who has tried both its not fair at all
makes a difference where? i'd imagine pc & console would be fine for pve servers.
or private servers if they so choose
oh yeah for pve its fine but pvp absolutely not
ah then yeah i'd agree with your intent. i could see the pvp servers having that divide. pc only and then console only pvp. but pve could be fully crossplay and privates are up to the owner
i don't think they'd be the first to follow that lead either. i feel like many games are doing that same strat
Or have crossplay servers and non crossplay server to give choices
yeah idk how much of a difference it makes. if it's significant then they'd have to work on closing that gap
before they could fully open the gates
because you know there would be gamers who choose to play full crossplay and then immediately complain the other is better
dude the gap is huge, ive tried both and the game is just meant for a keyboard. Many crossplay games (not apex which is a FCKING CRIM) allow you to plug in a keyboard to your console which would make it fair, so maybe servers could go by input device but at the same time people would hack it some how to show up as a controller player and be on a keyboard so idk
I’m pretty sure Xbox/win 10 will have cross play, which means that pc/Xbox is already going to play together
Given Ark 2 is likely never coming to PS4 (because it says next Gen consoles) and isn’t launching on PS5 it’s possible they have separate servers for PS or they just get lumped into the rest
right. i'm taking your word for it.
i'm just saying if they wanted to make full crossplay pvp servers then someone on their side would need to do an assessment of both platforms and attempt to close that gap. whether it's a new aim assist algo or modifying the UX. idk but it would be a lot of work to confidently put out a full pvp crossplay server option. it's easier to just make it blanket no crossplay pvp like you and i agreed on earlier and you'd get less gamers complaining about the other platforms
The most common complaint I see for cross play ark is cheating
Since ark 2 may have far less reliance on ranged weapons and more melee focused gameplay it’s quite likely that cross play will be less troublesome (since sensitivity isn’t as critical to melee combat as it is for gun play)
720 no scope arrow headshot montage incoming
This is on most people though, since you can use a keyboard and mouse on a Xbox-One.
I mean, for games like dark souls I have heard that controller is superior to mouse and keyboard
Any game where you need smooth twin stick diagonal movement still works best on controller
Pvp games only have an advantage on mouse and keyboard when it is shooter based, and sometimes not even then
Thats not the only reason consoles players wouldt want crossplay, wanting to limit cheating for one
After 7 years playing Ark on PC. 90% of the “cheating players” are actually people that just play well.
The most annoying issue on Ark for me is the glitches on the map. Mesh holes etc.
If UE5 allows Ark II to improve on that regard, we will be fine with crossplay.
yea
“Nice Aim bot bro”
Love getting accused of cheating. Best compliment you can give a gamer.
Arent they still making Ark II third person only?
If they fix the constant lagging issues, and actually address bugs rather than just throwing more bugged content on top, that would be the biggest leap forward
For the base game/official servers yes.
ATM I would never pay for Ark II, not if Ark is anything to go by
They need a massive investment in their hosting hardware, sort out their approach to programming and lack of attention to detail, and actually stat fixing content and problems not just churn more broken stuff out on top
The fact there is still only the original short clip as promo content for Ark II and its release is supposed to be 2023, and even the "pictures" are just still from that clip, would suggest development is also not going well.... ive a strong feeling its going to have the same issues Ark has
ARK is hard to go by what their motives are, cause there's so much shit wrong with ARK already.
Game being made on an older version of UE4, and being made by indie-dev's that, for the most part, was their first major project ever, and coding that was never meant to be pushed this far due to the unexpected popularity.
I heard they claimed half the lagging issues are due to it being a "single player platform" that teh game has been buil ton, which is simply rubbish, theres more than a few big multiplayer games on UE4, UE4 was never the issue
its how theyve used it, and how theyve dealt with issues that have arisen, rather than fixing from start, left it and built on top of it, to the extent that it now cant be fixed because its got so many layers upon layers
So thats programmers ethos, and way of work....not UE4
UE4 'is' the issue when you're using a earlier, unstable version of it.
those issues are likely to follow while its still same people making it
The issue is their shit coding
@fiery wedge It's a mixture of both.
There's a lot of factors of the issues.
and they desperately, desperately need to sort out their hardware so its fit for purpose
Is ue5 even finished or is ark 2 being made on what's going to be a "old" engine soon after launch?
Yeah ue5 is finished lol
ue5 has been out for some time now, its widely used
I haven't seen any games use it yet I don't think
There will be updates and patches to it, but it should be pretty easy to port to never versions. Ue4 was a bit more difficult at the start
they were unable to easily upgrade the engine because they made many changes to the engine itself very early on. I'm sure they won't make the same mistake again, they probably even have epic more at their side this time. or at the very least they might have a engine programmer this time around
If ARK-2 has been in the works for longer then we thought. Then they'd have to had started on the latest version of UE4.
Which a lot of games recently have been doing.
Making the game on UE4, then porting it to UE5 when it released into a more finished state.
Yeah, they made a ton of early changes to an unstable version that made it kind of impossible to fix. I have worked on websites that have had those types of problems. It's literally way easier to just rebuild from the ground up, even if you know the exact issue
Well I hope there's no porting issues
As long as they didn't do any major edits to Ue4 when they started working on it then it shouldnt be a problem. Porting between a vanilla Ue4 and ue5 isn't that difficult
Like the game is going to have bugs on release, it's basically impossible not to. But if the framework is designed well, then it won't be a problem at all
I think they announced something about this
Oh no. That was Ashes of Creation.
Same

Anyway.
My point was, while yes is 'technically' Wildcards fault. No questions asked.
I personally have given them the benefit of the doubt, due to them working on nothing bug a topdown dungeon-crawler game beforehand.
Ark 2 only next gen ?
yes, only the current gen consoles (Xbox x/s PS5)
Will ark 2 have cross play with Xbox and pc?
it will have crossplay normally
Um
You know fandom is no longer the official wiki and isn’t supported by any admins or wc themselves? And especially for lore, its pretty much the worst place to get any info
Not to mention, then new wiki just looks so much better lkl
Not confirmed to ps yet.
Bugged or not, I have “lost” 15k hours of my life on this game. Clearly worth my money.
And not considering the time with my secondary acc
Ark is one of the games i enjoy that i dont finish within 24 hours and never touch it again, and those games are absolute masterpieces 👌
@mint swan #735196255483068497. This channel is for Ark2 specifically.
Honestly I prefer the look of the old wiki, especially with how the backgrounds of the creature icons were pastel circles, whereas the new wiki has these hideously oversaturated squares.
@tropic crag @split dove @past wind Read through this whole post, and let me know what y'all think of this dumb theory.
Interesting 🧐
Is ark 2 going to be Xbox exclusive?
yes
Because if so VIVA LA XBOX
No, just Early-Access issues with Sony.
Oh ok
It'll come out for Steam, and Xbox.
okay dw ill make it xbox exclusive
What about mod support. 😟
its fine i can make it xbox exclusive
How will that help mod supporty?
dw i got it

This was long before any changes to the fandom
It's actually an Xbox Exclusive
But probably temporary, but it is exlcusive
They call it that, but that's bullshit since it wouldn't be coming to steam then.
Exclusive means it's 'specifically' on that one platform it's exclusive to.
Demon-Souls is a PS exclusive, since it's on no other platforms but theirs.
ARK-2 releasing on both Xbox and Steam, kind of breaks that. 
ark 2 gonna have cheaters day 1
Xbox exclusives are always Xbox consoles and PC.
It just means they are not coming to other consoles
Yes, but most of the time of their own Windows store on PC.
sure, but it never meant games won't be on Steam
It's already on steam
But again, it will probably come to PS and Switch eventualy
That's the issue with this.
but not on the release
I know... I've already wishlisted LOL
My point is: officially they didn't announced for Playstation or Switch
They've never stated this. 
You really think they'll release the console version before the PC version, when one of their marketing points of ARK-2 is a PC exclusive feature?
I.E being able to port mods.
Right.
I didn't say that. I said they announced it both WC and Microsoft as Xbox console exclusive
an Xbox exclusive title can be sold on PC on all PC stores
Then it's not an Xbox exclusive, now is it?
It's just on PC and Xbox.
XBOX CONSOLE exclusive
it always have been that way...
MS owns Windows, they don't care if it comes to PC.
No shit.
Think we're making more of a shitfest out of this then it should be.
My whole point was to say WC will not announce it for PS or Switch before early-access is finished. Both because MS made an agreement with them and because Sony doesn't allow to sell early-access games.
Yes......that's.......what i said?
🤦♂️
Am I being dumb, or is that not what I said?
I think that they have confirmed that ARK 2 will be coming to PS soon after
might be a PS5 only one so you guys are still screwed
It isn't. New gen only.
Yep, current gen only thank god. Also, you should change your bio 😬
Oh no
I read their bio.
Did you also have a chance to read through my idiotic rant?
I glanced at it, had a few rough days though so didn't read the whole thing unfortunately
Damn man, sorry to hear.
You wanna talk about it?
Nah, it's all good, just felt like shit, you know? The whole kit and caboodle
Ahh, that type of rough days.
Yeah, not anything serious
Yeah I get it.
Friend just got diagnosed with Covid today.
Hey had a few sniffles and coughs here and there.
Today he got tested, and right after it just BLASTED his immune-system, and now he's bed ridden.
Like, he's that type of sick that he almost sound unrecognizable on mic.
Basically, he looks like my pfp right now.
It can be pretty bad, I've heard. Thankfully, I wasn't hit too hard. My family is full of immunocompromised people, myself included lol
Family and I got it once.
It's like every other Virus and effects everyone differently.
Yep
Would be a shame if a mod saw it
Even though I should've had the same issues as my parents did. As I was exposed to it.
I only got a few sniffles, and a single horrible migraine.
Right?
While my parents though, couldn't taste and where bedridden.
I'm also the kid that licked door-handles and dirt to "wanna know how it tasted" as a kid. So I'd say my immune-system is decently well. 
I was roughly the same, just the bare minimum symptoms and such
But yeah, I think I'm gonna get some sleep, night y'all
Should i ping a mod
Night! 
Nah, if it becomes a problem then hit up Dodo Mail to have it handled, otherwise it is kinda their profile unfortunately and I don't know how the rules apply to bios
You can still get banned if you refuse to change your bio, iir

uh.... the backgrounds are the same. it hasn't been changed.
It very much has. Have you not seen the new wiki?
I did, I am an admin there. We've not changed any of the dino icons, their shadowing, or navbox icons yet.
I'll send you a picture of what I'm talking about.
Ye? Is that so weird? Lmao
the devs do look at this chat from time to time
they are watching us
if they are watching this chat for the pass couple weeks/months must be for laughs whit all the crap being talk here 🤣
theres is no ark 2
only ark 1 Dlc called ark 2
Actual tamable tek giga would be cool. I don’t follow ark 2 much but i don’t think we have tek gigas in ark.
moodddd
There are, just not enabled on officials.
This is a separate game though, not a dlc.
It's a new engine, not ue4 like ark1
and especcially performance and really start compressing
30GB update for a minor update on xbox is not acceptable
don't you usually get the storrage space back after the update? small updates are only like a few 100 mb in size, update size is mainly bc how big ark is atm
That's not just ark either, for instance PUBG basically requires you to download the entire 25gb game each time there is an update.
Yes its just changing files basically.
The massive updates for consoles is just consoles
To be fair, I used to play ark in 2015-2016 on a 250GB ssd. Now it’s impossible to have ark and all officials DLC in a drive smaller than 1TB. Ark alone has more than 500GB.
I know maps use a lot of space, but still.
They were talking about update sizes, not just ark.
Even updates for other games are still ridiculous in size, at some point it might just be consoles.
But look, my notebook has a 500GB, because of one of the updates I had to uninstall a map to finish it. 😖
They are usually pretty good at keeping download sizes really small, the actual patch might be bigger, but that's just rearranging files
Maybe that’s the price to have a lot of different/diverse/large maps.
It's a massive game. Even red dead 2 is around 200gb.
I hate to always talk about Atlas, but there, the 64 maps had a third of current Ark’s size.
I don’t know if it’s like comparing orange to apples.
Different company as well and newer version of the engine iirc.
But maybe there are new ways to deal with huge maps
Doesn't atlas have significantly less stuff though?
It'll probably be figured out in ark2.
Yes.
I hope for it
Land vs water is definitely lower
But I wouldn’t say it has less stuff
There are bigger and smaller islands on the map
I’m sure I’ve read somewhere one of the techs coming with Ark II is About maps
Will look into it later
On ue5?
Still comparing different games and companies, as well as different versions of the engine
Nanite and their new world partition technology should help a ton with rendering ingame, but it probably won't help the download size
Should I expect ark 2 to also take up 1/5 of my 2.5TB storage?
Not at the start at least
No, expect 1/3 /j
ah
I guess I'll have to fill up my remaining M.2 slot
Games these days are fuckin massive
The games YOU like are massive
I enjoy games from 10gb of space
As are storages, and just data in general. This is where the information age has brought us, get over it
I enjoy KovaaK's aim trainer and thats 5gb
?
Fr, small games are underrated
Indie games overall
Get over what
KovaaK's aim trainer is for people who religiously aim train for competitive shooters
such as myself
Its been 5 years and im still waiting for bendy and the ink machine spin-off
Another example: batim, small game, very enjoyable
Replayability though?
Indie game or not I judge games the same. No replayability? not for me
God of War has no replayability, not for me
Doom Eternal has close to no replayability, not for me
Back to ark2 
Replayability is indeed a problem, since indie games are more focused on telling their story than keeping the player playing. Though i like games like that more (fe: ark, nms) i find their story even more interesting
Oop sorry
Anyway, about my life.

I want ark 2 to be my life
I really don't want wildcard to fuck this up
4 years isn't much time
Like, for all I know it could end up like those shitty kickstarter games
Cough cough nms launch cough
But they did improve their game though, hopefully if that happens ark II will do that too
No
thats not how any AAA game should be
It should be playable and somewhat enjoyable when made public
Ark I was released before it had an year of development
Thats why i said if 
And look at the state it was in
And look what that 1 year of development has lead the game to be
I had lots of fun back then

a buggy unoptimized game
It's fun though
But 1 right doesn't make 2 wrongs okay
But if you want something finished, never buy an early-access
Devs always use the "early access" barrier to protect them from criticism
Well, they are telling you it’s not finished 😂
Unless you have maybe 5 devs spending a lot of their day actively talking to their community as if they were a regular person taking feedback then its not a good excuse
No developer does that, early access is meant so they can get feedback
It’s not really an excuse. It’s just how it is
Then they should go extra lengths to get actual feedback
From a larger amount of people
i mean community manager is supposed to do that tmk
See, people here want it to be released ASAP, but also want it to be feature complete
cms do drop by in discord every now and then
1 person?
theres 2 ive seen
dollie and blue
I have only seen 1 person talk here
its better than 0 tbf
How do you know they aren’t collecting feedback? (Legit question)
I never said they weren't
I'm just saying it seems a little of a low priority
There are so many complaints about the "third person only" gameplay
tbf the ark community cries about some of the smallest things aswell
its probably because discord feedback is generally garbage since if they do become active theyll be answering the same questions for months on end
How do you know? To collect community feedback they don’t need to really talk here
Either they have gone too far with the gameplay and ideas to go back or they are absolutely certain that their third person only gameplay is spot on
like releasing DLC
“Many” complaints is subjective
Yet they say nothing about f2p games with cosmetic purchases
we still have people telling the devs to fix ark1 instead of make ark2
fixing ark 1 would take much longer and isn't as profitable
Ark community is braindead
and its been like 2 years since they announced the game
"Noooo, there is no evo this weekend 😭😭"
that we can agree on
Anyone with more than 2 brain cells can figure out how stupid + toxic the ark community is
Specifically the PvP community
pvp the most
One of us one of us
Finding a tribe on PVP clusters that isnt super toxic is hell
I hate pvp for 1 reason: People who are braindead enough to kill peeps who have nothing and give no reward at all
nature of grind heavy game that favors people without lives tbh
😅
I dont target naked people
pvp is your free lesson to learn chinese
I just kill one if I see them
I never know what they could have that could fuck me over
but for some reason People with a lvl 450 bloodstalker do
We will have to wait to understand why they choose to follow that path. I think it was a design choice to fit the new gameplay.
I dont know their level or if they are ACTUALLY naked
on god i took spanish in hs just to learn how to speak with Spanish ark players tho this was back when i played mobile
Probably can switch that to #pvp-discussion
I dont target I kill them if I see them
It was YOU!
Why did wildcard bother with ark mobile
They didnt
they didnt
It was another company
Bother with the idea
Back to ark 2
Ark 2 mobile when
Or move to #general or #ark-survival-ascended
i think they are consulting the same company for ark2m
idr where the tweet was that mentioned it, if it even exists
they were looking for somebody to make ark 2, no answer on who/when will make it yet iirc
phone explodes
i thought the company was confirmed to be grovestreet
portable bomb
Confirmed info should be in the pins
it was in a tweet 😩
The same ones that made Atlas?
no atlas is from wc
WC had a part
Ye but what if we remove everything and make it a pixel game
Anyways Atlas is a fucking abomination
oh
We dont know what ark2 will be like, if you'd like to rant about other games move to #general
Bro chill on the off topic warnings
This is in general about Ark 2, I'm not about to start a whole other convo completely unrelated
You haven't had a warning
😶
Arknite 2

Anyway, anyone knows when WC guys will be live from pax? I will watch hoping to see any hints about Ark 2.
I doubt there will be any
PAX starts at 10:00AM Pacific
iirc it should be 12:00 pacific time
How about WC live?
Thanks. Today?
What?
yh
Wc Will talk about Ark on Switch
And I’m hoping they can talk about Ark II
You mean Wildcard?
Yeah
keep your ark 2 news expectations to extra life, maybe some info on the carchar today as a bonus
Since we still haven't seen gameplay of ARK-2.
I'm more looking forward to the Scorched ascension.
yh with switch revamp update
So is the revamp gonna come to other platforms too?
We don't know
so last gen potato boxes can run it beyond 20fps 900p
the ascencion will come to other platforms later on
We only know the Scorched ascension will be, but the revamp?
We don't know.
Was it confirmed to be 'later on?'
Yep
iirc jeremy stieglitz tweeted about it
May I ask where?
Either the crunch or one of the tweets, hang on I'll go find it again
should be one of jeremys recent tweets
Hmm, the talking about people killing beach bobs brings up another point regarding cryos and skins in ark2. Since it is possible to entirely hide your armor/inventory any Bob on the beach could have a capped giga or a full flak suit with a comp bow or tek bow or whatever. It makes ark2 very high risk low reward, just because you can't see the other person's kit. So a beach bob could very well be as dangerous as a tek suite and you wouldn't know it. So you kind of are forced to kill them when you see them. If cryos are removed, the hand held inventory is shown on the players hit box, and armor is visible, then it would make the game safer for people, and would possibly make it so that bobs aren't killed as much
"FYI ARK Nintendo Switch WILL be getting Ascension for ScorchedEarth. We'll also be adding that cinematic & all of the new story/cinematic/voice content, to all the other platforms of ARK later this year!"
The wording of this could also easily mean the whole Ascension is coming out 'later this year'
Shush on your gatekeeping. 


🍿 

Back to ark2
Argua with raq 😂
Please ark2.
Ark2 topic of the day: fixing visuals to improve the lives of beach bobs in ark2
Would it be ARK-2 related if i said "my toes are fucking freezing, but I'm thinking of ARK-2?"

pegos and itchtys should not be in ark 2
So you think that getting rid of cryos and skins hiding suits of armor wouldn't help?
just hold a torch -__-
Hope there's sabertooths in ARK-2, then I can warm up my frostbitten toes.
the aratai leader of the first ark 2 trailer was wearing a sabertooth skull sooooo
Good point
Meh, could mean they're also extinct.
true
Hate to break it to you, they already are extinct lol
Not if we bring them back. 
Yeah that's a valid point. So if one area of the map was structured so that any big base is not viable, do you think bobs would be safe there?
There needs to be some offline raid protection and a time window for PVP.
Well removing the whole capped flak == 60x better than basic flak could help with that
Orp is too exploitable, and having a pvp designated time favors certain timezones over others so it's not great
Maybe make buildings harder to destroy. Make variable damage depending on how well crafted the seige weapon is made.
I could go for something like that
The time zone solution would be to make servers per time zone.
I just don't see that helping though
Orp in general, like wipes is just not a fix to a pvp community
Pvp on Conan:Exiles was like that.
It's a massive change to the game, with minimal improvements, and loads of possible issues
Hmm, maybe, but just look at the numbers of people playing Conan pvp compared to ark
Yeah, I'm not sure how many people still play it.
What works for Conan might not work for ark just because it has a much smaller playerbasr
I mean, comparing the variety of options possible, there is no game ever made that matches ark lol
There is a huge amount of variety in ark1, that honestly the only thing I see causing ark2 issues is if it doesn't have as much variety
Rust is comparable in small part only to frequent wipe high rate servers
I hope it is not like the current state
I would love to see it become more intricate and difficult to do
even if mutations are still a thing, actually having a working cap would be nice
Having breeding actually be genome based would be cool
Bring in an evolutionary biologist to get tips or ideas on how to make it or something lol
I feel like that has been brought up before, and I think something along those lines would be cool
the skill tree could also be passed down to babies for dinos if there is one?
I think a Dino skill tree would have to be divided into two parts, hereditary and training, for that to work
I think a breed limit would be great for game play. Having to constantly tame wild dinos to continue breeding operations would be a cool new feature
would also help with lowering the afk in bases breeding
Hmm, as far as the number of dinos per tribe, that is already an issue, and yeeting dinos into bases with 0 care for them already happens. I raise almost every egg I hatch, just to have a huge amount of throwaway stuff, and as added security
There needs to be some way of Dino storage I think, but having loads of throwaway dinos is always a thing for anyone who wants them
If one tribe is throwing away old useless breeders, then I fail to see how that makes an issue really
One of my biggest issues with ark 1 is the bigger tribes are simply impossible to take down
There's nothing you can do against their tames
That is always going to be a thing. Bigger tribes will have the advantage against smaller tribes or solos in 99% of all situations
I mean, that's a good point. But throwing a tamed female Dino against someone's bred op line or base really won't get anywhere so I don't see it being an issue
Why the fuck can't I emoji this shit
I’m debating how much context I want to read
Ok, so it’s as I thought: I agree with your outcome and not your reasoning
Breeding limits that require additions of “fresh” wild tames just sound like a weird hoop to jump through that neither slows things down much or makes things more fun/balanced. So I dislike em
Yep, on that we agree
Yes, and the snow owl emoji was about the throwaway tames thing
Because throwaway tames are the backbone of what makes PvP accessible
If everyone is petrified to lose anything, they won’t engage in PvP
One could argue all the rejects during mutation stacking are throwaways are they not? Or any of the non capped creatures you breed along the way
So why wouldn’t these also be culled?
I mean you do lose the time it took to tame or raise them, like any other tame
One can argue the same for a male 2 points under cap after you got the capped male
It doesn’t, and that’s the point I’m making
I can take 10 reject paracers that I raised on the way to capping a line and soak a base and do what sounds like the same thing you describe in ark 1
And I don’t see that as a problem, because it’s a low cost and low quality raid
Alright, so the logic tracks until the end here. I see no issue with having tames being thrown at a base that have no value to the owner. There’s a benefit curve to extra/spare tames that’s going to favor low cost raids due to basic logistics principles regardless of how said tames become seen as “spare”
Because you’ll almost never raid someone if you think the cost is too high
Large tribes will often have the “meh” mentality for lost tames when they initiate raids, because the benefit of cracking some bases just isn’t that high
Your argument implies you don’t want offensive raiding to be comparatively low cost to be seen as a trivial choice
However, some choices will always be treated like this. Tiny irrelevant bases, or ones with very little reward for raiding them will only be raided if the cost of doing so is viewed as extremely low
Right now one could argue it’s too high for many players, since the common soakers and gear requires access to lines or BPs. And ofc more established tribes have had more time to grind mats and spare tames so they will always have “more available to throw away”
If your goal is to disincentivize raiding 1x1 bases, the concept of throwaway tames is not the one to concern yourself with, because that’s inevitable as tribes become more established
If you want to make people reluctant to raid every tiny bob hut, you probably want to make it logistically irritating to raid, for example removing cryopods so people have to schlep tames across the map
Right now you can bring a raid party of spare throwaway tames in your pocket. Unless cryopod systems get a hard look, that’s happening in ark 2, regardless of Raq’s suggestion
My disagreement with Raq’s suggestion is that it just adds complication but doesn’t change balance or gameplay in any tangible way as far as I can see
Right, the discussion here has been to swing your thinking towards what I see as the actual underlying cause of the correct issue you’re concerned with (which is raiding being so low cost for folks that everyone who isn’t massive gets wiped)
That “awful” is what keeps PvP servers alive imo
You misunderstood I think lol. That long horrible slog is what protects small bases with hardly anything in em. People can survive longer on PvP servers because it’s an annoying hassle to bring a tame over to wipe all the tiny pointless beach huts
I’d enjoy a way to do that, but idk if that’s possible lol
For ark 1, I considered requiring you to transfer at an obelisk and you can only transfer a tame back to the same map from the same obelisk. So transfers couldn’t be used to move things around the map
Dude if this game has it where it takes hours to move a Dino then no one will play it lol that’s pve
Yeah, not looking forward to transporting tames miles across the map again.

Fr
That’s I’ll be pointless
And it will be harder to raid without cryo pods if the base is like a crouch spot or something
Like it already takes hours just to raid a base
Well, that's 'if' crouch spot bases are going to be a thing
Also for PvP, I can see the point since you'd be able to see people from miles away before they raid you, being able to prepare.
For PvE though, it'll be a inconvenience.
Crouch bases and the like are not going to be a thing, I think it's safe to say
Alr welp nice friendly talk boys ima go cya 😁
👋 
"You can ask her about ARK-2, she 'may' have something"
Is ark 2 gonna be a free roam?
Okay, so ARK-2 is either as or even less survival-like then ARK-1.
Yeaa…..
Not too sure about that
Neither am i.
One of my biggest issues with ARK-2 being primitive, was the fear of it being basically ARK-1 type of survival.
A more primitive setting needs more hazards and survival features to make it entertaining.
Well there is the Aratai and events
Scary magical tek in ark2
Why are they talking about Thor lmao
They're talking how mystical tek-structures are going to be in ARK-2
Basically a "beyond our comprehension" type of thing.
Sure, but they're for combat.
Not pure survival.
Brontos confirmed?
They've been confirmed
Before this?
ARK-2 trailer.
The end showed bronto's off in the distance.
(first trailer, note)
Does that really confirm brontos tho?
"YES!!"
Couldve just been another similar looking dino
Water Confirmed!!!!!
Seeing how there's no other sauropod that large in ARK-1, and even on the Genesis-ship. Nor do they even have any Brachi's on any ARK.
It's pretty damn obvious.
I just feel like thats assuming too much
Those are brachios
Bronto's that've been redesigned.
I really don't think so
I really think so. 
It's a brachi
Sure.
A bronto that looks like a brachi. 
Like how Utah-Raptors look more like Pyro-raptors.
We have a 50/50 chance of being right, we'll just stay friends and not argue 
Nah, they're brontos. 

That's a Diplo
True.
so anyway ark 2 when
2023
December 31st
2025?
3124
oh 5534?
Those are definitely brachios in the first trailer, you trippin brah
Possibly delayed to 5539, to make the finishing touches
Dec 21s 2023 then pushed back to May 22 2024, then pushed back to dec 22 2025
Fact check me. I’ll wait.
it's already pushed back to 2023
Ok let me change dates lol
gotta get all them bugs!
thanks Jeremy for giving many ark 2 hints
I’m so thirsty for this game to release
Everyday seems longer and longer waiting for the ever waited ark 2
As far as if those are brontos or brachios, it was an early trailer. There is no guarantee that anything from the trailer actually carries over
That doesn't change them being brachios, to be fair
Jeremy saying trying to make the combat less cheese able
and also developing more dynamic systems for the music
(Which they certifiably are)
I am just going YES!!
we got a bit of everything today
I did not recognize Jeremy at all though lol
same
you are talking about Jesse
Ah, fair
I didn't honestly watch it yet, lol
Just saw like shitty quality screenshots of it
They're 100% brachi's.
But they're going to be called 'bronto's' 
Like how the raptors in ARK-2 look more like pyroraptors then utah-raptors. 
They may be pyroraptors, how do you know? 🤔
Excited to see what they mean of the new tek design.
Apparently, it's less "sci-fi" and more "A power far beyond human comprehension, and both to be love and fear"
So, you know.
Just like if someone from hundreds of years in the future made something out of a alien resource, then dropped it in the 21st century.
I REALLY need to watch this stream, don't I? 😅
Yeah.
ARK-2 is also going to be less survival and more combat based.
Or, less survival in the food and hunger sense.
Good, thank god


