#ark-2
1 messages · Page 11 of 1
There’s nothing intuitive about torpor or taming. Force feeding narcotics and food having different effects on your tame for example…straight up not clear
And ofc that’s if you weren’t one of the tons of folks (myself included) who tried to tame an alpha raptor or carno
I guess I like the free play/roam aspect of the game. Options to choose what you want to do with out a target lock etc… I also like the option to switch from 1st to 3rd person. I feel that the first person view provides more depth to the game experience
I play so much of ark 1 mounted I couldn’t give less of a shit about first person lol
I’d probably riot like many folks do here if they dropped third person
no sane person rides dinos in first person
The 3rd person aspect is fine. I don’t care for the 3rd person pvp
I’d love a game like ark where players can’t actually make or use weapons
Only if I need to quick view areas near me
My two first tames were a dodo and a carbonemys using a slingshot 😂
You can only damage folks with tames 🧐
By the time I found an alpha, I didn’t try to tame it
Mine was a dodo and I think a trike, fists and slingshot respectively. But we had an alpha raptor stuck on a rock so we tried to KO it. Ran out of arrows XD
My first trike was on official pvp
I almost give up
Didn’t even have the narcotics entram back then
Actually I’m hyped for that experience above again 😂
Having to guess and knowing nothing about the game
I like intuiting things. I like it way less when I feel like the only answer is to fail repeatedly lol
“Hey you can do the same steps to tame a regular and alpha raptor except LOL you can’t tame an alpha raptor despite having identical UI elements and the game eluding to the idea you can tame almost anything”
having to ''respawn again'' 50 times to figure out how to do something lol
To be fair, when I first started back in 2015, even a rex was out of my league. 😂
Impossible to knock out (for me) and would take too much time to tame. I was playing on official pvp.
I had a steep learning curve back then and it was great
don't forget having to keep a therizino unconscious for a whole day aswell lol
This evil creature wasn’t there on the release
Yea I dropped official pretty quick so I didn’t try an official rex tame
They it dies on the 20 min walk home 🙂
A bronto took 23 hrs iirc. Old 1x rates were torture
even more if it required 1000's of narcotics lol
I think what made it balanced had less to do with grind and more to do with the maximum power level a player could reach being soooo much lower
You didn’t have to beat any bosses or go to special regions to farm element or mut farm for 10 thousand years for the perfect line for everything…
I'd like to see adaptive balancing in place for most items / tames. Whether it be implementing direct counters or methodic counters.
Meaning post launch?
I think the best way to do adaptive balance for PvP without upsetting folks too much is season based PvP. That way you have cutoffs where you can make larger balance chances in response to the previous season’s data
Otherwise it’s very much “make a change -> hope it works in the wild -> gather sporadic data -> see what changes can be walked back or not without insanely negative responses -> repeat”
Hi
I think changes on a seasonal basis could work as long as they attempt to balance prior to seasonal releases.
Hi jubjub, this is where I reside till Ark 2 releases
Ya don’t come back the game is soooo bad atm the now are letting Pc players into Xbox severs and the have the pc hacks
Not much point then is there lol. But I can’t imagine hotfixes for balance emergencies should be as delayed as they are for ark 1
Like…stuff shooting outside turret range should really be a within 72 business hours kinda fix if it’s just a value imo
Hear me out.
Since the Aratai's are just space-orcs. What if we get a Nemesis system for them. 
space-trols it is then 
Lol, imagine a mutated sub-species of Aratai's that are just giant trolls.
Aratai ganks when
You don't need Tek nor modern/industrial technology to even make super colorful dyes
The Egyptians made assortment of colors with just primitive ingredients
There is also a museum for rare colors that are made from natural sources
What I want for the ARK painting to be as basic as it can be like MS paint, minus the color sliders and with limited palette (like the admin dyes)
Especially with the whole "making dyes out of 3/4 kinds of resources" immersion going on
Image conversion should be build in game as well
A lot of red-dyes are from grounded up insects.
I hope base building in ark two isnt so much as a base, but more of a fort, with a more primitive building style. Palisades and palisade gates would be a cool feature.
Not what i meant
I want the entire game sequel to be sort of stuck in a single age and be mote focused on the primitive side of ark
dyes? Idc
Id likr a wide selection just not too much
Yeaaaaah, no thanks.
While i agree that the base-game should be primitive focused. One of ARK's unique factors is that you progress through different ages as you progress.
Removing that outright through the 7+ years of ARK-2's lifetime is going to be a no-go.
A more developed level of progression would be cool though. Ark1's progression goes from primative, skips the medieval and industrial, and goes straight to information Era and futuristic. It would be cool if it spent more time around ancient and medieval, at least until the next dlc
I wouldn't be unhappy if we didn't see tek until like a third dlc
This is why i think every DLC should be a age theme.
You'd literally have a whole map/almost new game based around that age. 
I wouldn't complain about that, but it would make it terrible for pvp, if all the new ages were locked behind a paywall it would be bad lol
Have counters for unga-bunga people. 
Sounds insanely boring lol
You want a static world environment to keep up with people with weapons ranging from spears to advanced firearms? It just doesn’t work
Runaway player power is the #1 biggest gripe I have with ark 1. I’m very eager to see it eat dirt if possible 😇. It ruins the adaptive survival elements of ark that I find enjoyable
Pretty sure they've already confirmed that ARK-2 wont be a static world. 
They objectively did confirm that. No wipes = world is the same
I don't see any issue with a survival game like ark leading into an empire building type game
The world does not progress alongside the players
I’m not sure what to begin to say…I mean I guess we can make COD a text based role playing game too? It’s just wildly off genre 😅
There was that myth of empires game that was an empire building survival game, and supposedly they stole their whole code base from ark
To be fair. Halo was made into a RTS game, and it worked.
The halo franchise perhaps
Unless there’s a secret Halo main series game I missed that was an RTS?
Halo Wars is a prequel.
And Halo-Wars 2 is essential was the first introduction of the new main faction.
What I’m seeing of Halo wars is a precise proving of my point
What's your point?
It’s NOT a main series halo game. It’s a spin-off in the same universe
Mixing game genres isn't a bad idea
Yeah.
And i still want my ARK Rts spin-off game.
It’s a bad idea to randomly swap genres entirely though in your main series games
I don't think that's what their idea was.
It isn't really a genre swap
Objectively it is a genre swap
There is objectively no RTS elements or mechanics built into ark
More of an extension to what already is in ark
I think they meant 'you start from nothing and need to survive from the start, to building your own empire'
Which we already do, to an extent with creatures
Empire implies some sort of organized conquest…which would be a bit bizarre given ark’s sandbox nature
Don't give me that face.
You know it counts.
Mainly because it is ineffective, and people don't know how to use it properly. Whistling is rts in a primative form
Sorry let me rephrase. remotely not shoehorned in RTS mechanics
There we go
It all depends on the aratai
With that logic, thinking is an RTS mechanic, as is moving to dodge a bullet
"organized conquest" isn't that just PvP when played legit?
Since there’s no win condition, I’d say no
You don't need a win condition 🫤
Why not?
If you can show me a single sandbox RTS I’ll consider that argument
Having an express win condition narrows the vision of a game like ark
You’re asking ark to conform to a genre known for having concrete win conditions Raq
That doesn't explain to us why you need a winning condition for it to be "organized conquest"
Uh, no, I am saying ark can implement some of those concepts to give a more immersive endgame
I simply assumed building an empire required organized conquest because an empire eludes to having some sort of large scale land conquest
Spore is a fantastic example of a constrained game with concrete but flexible win conditions
I already did mention an example of it a bit ago
There’s multiple ways to win that allow you to employ unique strategies
Mmm what game?
I think it is called myth of empires, or something like that. It took lots of code from ark and turned progression from survival to building an empire
I actually like the concept Raq is suggesting. But i'm not sure if they meant a 'full' RTS system.
Cause 'i' was more thinking basically expand what you already can do in PvP, but with a larger scale wars and larger buildings, and more micro-managing other stuff.
Isn't that game dead though?
I don't want a full rts like civ6 or Warhammer in ark, but I would love to see some more large scale stuff
Yeah it is, but mainly due to copyright infringement removing it from steam
Right, so in-person type of RTS?
Where you're still a physical character. But you can operate large scale wars.
Yeah, but also the infrastructure
Explain what that funny last word means.
I don't particularly mind large scale wars, but I really like it when games offer infrastructure creation
@blissful perch So, whatcha think if this idea instead of the full blown turning ARK 2 into a RTS game later on?
One big problem with ark1 is that all the infrastructure you need is a couple crafting benches and a cave with power and turrets
I would like to see more options
I have no idea what infrastructure means
I’m reading about myth of empires
Pretty shady what they’re accursed of doing with ark code
the basic physical and organizational structures and facilities (e.g. buildings, roads, power supplies) needed for the operation of a society or enterprise.
Ahhh
Yeah, as a company and a game they are pretty trash, but the concept of the game is sound
(and people think Wildcard is bad)
People think every studio is bad because frankly they don’t know what they’re talking about
Or bother to understand the 'why' of stuff
In either case, I would love to see more games of that genre. Building from a survival game like ark and creating the infrastructure of an empire. Ark has the capacity to make that happen, but they just haven't done that yet
It took me this long to find a half decent article describing this myth of empires game
They did state "build your own dino-aided civilization" so we'll see if that means anything, or just a zing.
Aaand it doesn’t say squat about the empire building
It would be pretty fantastic to be able to make a dinotopiaesque civilization
That might be their aim
I’m guessing the goal for ark is smaller and more compact “functional” bases
Yeah, I don't k ow if it ever got finished. The game got shut down really fast
Basically
I never played it, I just read about it a bit
More time spent exploring and less time spending tons of time squatting around in a giant breeding pen
I’ve seen almost nothing about an empire system. Seems to be some sort of land claim system and NPC stuff…but it doesn’t look all that complex
Having loads of exploration in a game is great, but what happens after a year or more when everyone has all the map memorized and want more to do
I can’t say how well it works without watching a video, and I’m not down to sift through crummy reviews before I get a good one
You make another map
That’s what happened with ark 1 🤷♂️
And then when you run out of maps you make a new game. We’ve just watched how well that played out lol
The time frame for exploration of a new map, even a hard map like ab is like a month or two at best
Problem not identified. Do you think ark 2 owes us thousands of hours of novel content?
I would be dissatisfied with it if it didnt
Gonna go ahead and say that’s an insane take considering ark 1 failed to provide that and almost all games fail to provide that
Ark1 definitely had thst, but it was all tied up in the breeding/rng loot drops
Ark 1 can have you spend thousands of hours, but it sure ain’t novel
You monotonously repeat the same task you’ve been doing for the bulk of your time. That’s hardly novel content. Given how people snap it up, I’m skeptical it’s required to seek thousands of hours of novel content to keep up retention
So adding more infrastructure to the game, and more things that you can do that aren't monotonous...
I’m saying monotony sold just fine, and you’re gonna be insanely hard pressed to beat monotony down at the multi thousand hour mark
Anything is gonna feel dry if you have to do it for that long, it’s just a matter of how fast
People do it because that is what there is. If there was more depth to the late endgame it would be better imo
The complaint would be the same
Any action when repeated ad nauseam is gonna get that reaction
That may be the case, but that holds true for any game 🙄, or anything really
Yes, which is my point. It’s an impossible expectation
Make the gameplay fun and people will repeat it. Doesn’t need to be insanely unique all the time
An impossible expectation to have more infrastructure in the game?
I feel like you latched on to one thing I said and ignored the whole point of what I was saying lol
I mean infrastructure also seems to fly in the face of how the game works, but if they made PvP faction based and had people make territory nations you could have infrastructure
But if you can’t reliably claim and maintain large open plots of land I’m not sure what interesting infrastructure you could add. I assume you want large NPC/tame groups and corresponding power and defense networks?
I honestly don't see how that would be a problem if done correctly
I’m not sure how you’d do that correctly without some pretty major changes
Implementation of a couple simple ideas would make it work
Walk me through what simple ideas would get us from ark 1 PvP to this idea
I wasn't really thinking from a pvp side for this
I mean this has gotta work for PvP…since PvE is much more flexible to this idea
PvE you can do whatever you want if it’s fun... since you can choose as a dev how you want the environment to behave. PvP you’re constrained by what other players will do and how they’ll attempt to exploit the experience, and that’s much harder to account for
That is true. With a more advanced land claiming method like the capture the flag mod has it would fix the land claim issue. Building settlements with garrisons and removing overpowered handheld ranged weapons would do a lot to help with the pvp side
No matter what way you look at it pvp will dissolve into a chaotic lawless wasteland of people fighting unless it is organized differently, so I really wasn't worried about making that work lol
I just see any infrastructure/empire mechanics as either 1.) a way to incentivize massive land hogging PvE bases or 2.) a content lock that forces out small tribes in PvE and PvP
If I’m on a private server it sounds fun…but with a lot of people it sounds miserable. It would be nice to see the MMO dropped to make that happen but I’m not getting that impression
If the amount of land grabbing is limited, and there are interactions between groups, I don't see the issue
I mean the goal of an empire is to expand though right? How would you expand an empire if you had heavily limited land grabbing?
Pick a different word than empire then, like civilization or something
I could raid someone to wipe them I suppose if i capped out on land claims but what makes that different from ark 1?
For pvp obviously a limit to owned land makes no sense
I’m not trying to be obtuse but I’m trying to figure out how gameplay would change if at all
If there’s no limit an alpha tribe can just own all the land right?
On pvp sure, but that already happens so I don't see the issue
And land grabbing already happens in kind of an unchecked manner on pve with pillar spamming anyway
With a proper infrastructure and land claiming system, it would disallow pillar spam on pvp, and have the option for more types of player player interaction like trade routes, etc
Having ui to allow for hiring guides out of random players for larger settlements to protect trade routes them from aratai raids would be cool too
It does
ARK-2 just sounds a bit basic.
Needs a undertitle
a more automated system that allows small tribes to exploit larger tribe infrastructure, and a generally larger map, might work well enough
👀
ever since caravans were mentioned i feel like its an ingenious way to balance ark pvp if only they make caravans the primary way to move resources, and said caravans being slow enough to exploit
You mean... like a TC? Which I've suggested multiple times? 😅
Yeah, sort of like that
ofc the map would need to be massive and resources more concentrated in certain sections of the map but thats not too hard
Like Rust, which has the formula down, minus the dinosaurs? That has wipes, too, though... soooooo
I am thinking more on a pve aspect though, not really pvp for this
what does tc stand for
I don't k ow if it stands for anything, it is the structure in rust that claims base locations
oh
Tool cupboard, it's a structure in Rust that you put materials into (usually the same materials that your base is constructed of, bigger base = more daily materials drained for upkeep so your base doesn't decay) and it works really well imo and should be the one thing that Ark 2 borrows from Rust, if anything
i dont really see how itd be super relevant unless resource drain is heavy enough
though thats just a numbers game
this is all to prevent bases taking up too much land right
Yeah, I think it should be the only thing ark borrows from rust, other than how expensive explosives are
i think this is pretty balanced overall tbh
In rust it doesn't prevent you from taking all the land there is, it just makes it expensive to hold land
since its not like bases are size capped, just requires more and more upkeep
ye and thats good
It works great for pvp, it wouldn't work for pve without some extisive changes
Not really no
I mean, I guess on a primative level it is
Gotta defend the tool cupboard like a generator, basically. Hide it away somewhere where no one can get to it
It would certainly work for PvE, tf? Rust has PvE lol
Because in rust you can spam a million of them everywhere and claim a ton of land at almost no cost, if structures weren't able to be destroyed by other players

id just set up a hard decay timer that instead of being some timer that you automatically reset, its damage a structure takes over time if not near a TC like structure
There's a limit to how many TCs you can have, boom, problem solved
No lol
rip
It's always there, no matter what. You need it to upkeep your base, no matter the material it's made of
Like a generator and turrets would do, in Ark 1
i mean whether its available in early game or late game
Same concept
Yeah, the concept of it is sound. But pve players like to build big expensive bases and not have them dissapear if they dont farm 24 hours of metal every day
Well yeah, you spawn with the blueprint in Rust so
do you need to level up or get rare resources or whatever
oh ok
It's made out of wood and some stone and metal iirc
If they want a big extravagant base, they'll have to pay for it. Pretty sensical to me...
The cost of keeping a pve base around would have to be really small otherwise the amount of farming that would have to be constantly done would be overkill
Not really
id agree, its a lesser of 2 evils imo, iirc official pve is a wasteland of people taking over maps with structures but i havent actually played on it
easiest solution would just be to change how fast decay works between pvp and pve
If you want a huge ass compound that takes up a lot of the map, you better have a tribe to farm with you or have no life, either or. I don't think that's bad any way you spin it 🤷♂️
or to remove entirely from pve if they just NEED those big bases
Since the no lifers are gonna no life, can't stop em
but idk enough about pve to really say
PvE would be fixed 100% with the TC added for sure
The big draw to pve is that you dont have to no life the game. If you force people to no life pve just to be able to build a decent base, itll basically drive more people away from official lol
but is structure spam a really big issue on pve
Official PvE* that is
It is THE issue on pve lol
if structure spam is a massive issue this seems like the easiest way to prevent this
Yes, it is lol. Hop into any official PvE rght now, I dare you. You'll probably throw up
I do like the idea of a rust like tc for pve, but just one without a cost of maintanence
but then doesnt that just make people spam TC everywhere
Hence the words huge and extravagant I used earlier, lmao
there needs some sort of upkeep even if minimal
Limit it to 3 or so, so that people can claim only 3 spots, with one main tc, and two subsidiaries
i suppose that works
A normal, reasonably sized base would be fine and easy to maintain
Why shouldnt people be able to make huge and extravagant bases?
depends if it prevents other people from playing
What prevents other people from playing is pillar and foundation spam, not big bases
admittedly, such a base that prevents others from playing would be larger than render
They can, but they have to pay the price... did you miss that part? I specifically stated it earlier
I fail to see how that helps anything, and I only see the issue it causes
What issues? If your base is the size of north trop island on The Center, you should have to pay a heavy price to keep it that way
For pvp 100%, for pve I would prefer just a standard timer
If you are limited to 3 tcs, and those have a limited range, then bases like that wouldnt be possible.
Not necessarily, the range of the TCs can be adjusted with my personal vision of how they would work
The idea of pve is to encourage more people to play, not to shackle those that already do. I just really dont like the idea of an upkeep cost on pve
Well, then pillar spam is going to continue, either that or a really robust TC based system
Or a land claim type system...
well the tc doesnt really change anything for smaller tribes besides moderately increase resource costs
Again, I am talking only about a pve mechanic with limiting the number of tcs
i dont think anything changes on a small scale, just on larger ones
For pvp obviously a different approach would be necessary
Which is what a TC is, to be fair
you only have to farm for a proportionally smaller base usually
PvP, sure, I can understand that POV. PvE? That makes no sense. PvP should be a structured wipe based mode anyways, so there's that
that depends on how defense works
i mean a small tribe is always going to get wiped by someone with more resources
Upkeep tc work in rust because it takes like 30 minutes or a decent amount of luck to get shot into endgame weapons. There is a reason rust wipes last like 2 weeks. It is an entirely different game than ark. Ark progression takes a bit more
Not in PvP, lol
reducing upper limit for base strength probably is beneficial in the long run to prevent entire servers from essentially being shut down by massive bases that each take 4 hours to raid
Have you played smalls?
just need to reduce resource costs to restart again
so as to make the game somewhat worth playing xd
For pve it absolutely makes sense. A nolifer just has to claim and wall of the best metal spots, and then no one else would be able to farm the upkeep for a metal base. On ark an upkeep pve tc would act effectively as a gatekeeping strategy unless rare resources were easy to get
There's already no building on certain resource spawns, so that's a non-issue but ok
perhaps not always then, but how common is your situation in general
Getting really close to grasping at this point, imo...
I mean, I held an ice cave solo against 4 separate attacks of 10+ people on 1x. All that matters is location and game knowledge, up to a point obviously
Either way, I am really hoping ark2 defenses consist of more than just proper turret placement lol
So, base size doesn't matter, if the players are better and more coordinated then you will win, obviously. Making your earlier point meaningless
This one
Ok, and?
ideally TC would be sufficient to support the average base
How so lmao? I've been here from the get go, I started the TC convo bud
and decay wouldnt be fast enough to destroy a base in 1 day
If a raid were to last for 24 hours to a week, which wasnt uncommon earlier on in ark, a small tribe being able to keep up with upkeep on a large base would be practically impossible
I have played both ark and rust quite a bit lol
No, you can't offer a legitimate reason for TCs to not exist, past "oh well it takes more upkeep and you can't set up proper defenses", which is dead wrong.
knowing that raids can last more than 48 hours straight feels disgusting xd
They are different games. With rust small groups make small bases out in the open. Ark allows for a small group of skilled players to be able to compete against overwhelming odds and win by using proper strategy
Then they didn't store enough mats in their cupboard, sucks for them
I had a point when I was raided non stop by 3 tribes for 5 days. I lost because I ran out of bullets and mantis
yeah i dont think that should be possible lol
Why not?
though theres not much of a way to prevent it in ark
idk just not having a break for a week straight is just weird
No durr. I've played both as well, owned servers on both too. They're more alike then you're letting on, but go off I guess
Thats what pvp on a perpetual server is though, there is no way to change that other than orp, which is way too broken for sustainable servers
yeah i know
no way to prevent it
guess thats what time zone requirements are for :p
They have similarities, but not enough to justify huge upkeep costs imo
Ark relies a lot more on having a secure base. It is also a lot harder to make a comeback than it is on rust
Huge upkeep costs are only for huge, unnecessary bases though. Again, you've missed my point completely 🤦♂️
In pvp there is no such thing as a huge unnecessary base, and I thought we already agreed that limiting landgrab on pve fixed that as well
Hey Bruce, you know the Nemesis-system?
Pointing out the few differences doesn't negate the similarities, but y'all are gonna beat that horse beyond it's expiration date so I'm out for now. Deuces 👋
Yeah, the one that's trademarked or whatever? From the Mordor games
The coding is trademarked, the concept isn't.
But since we're practically going to fight space-orcs. I wonder how a Nemesis like system would do in ARK-2. 
I am all for a tc based system. I just think upkeep costs for them are better left to rust. I would much rather worry about making fertilizer or gasoline to keep a base online than having to waste that much raw material just to keep a base from decaying randomly
What is a nemesis system?
It could work, but I dunno, if respawning becomes un-canon or at least un-supported in the climate of Ark 2, that won't really work
Since half of the mechanic involves dying to certain enemies ya know
I mean, if fighting aratai, I guess that would work
I like the idea though, out of character/game, at least. Maybe have it just be like a between the player and the game type of thing, not referenced in game perhaps? But then, you couldn't really tie any buffs or loot to the ones who killed you, without it being weird that is
praying they make aratai npcs you can use to automate tasks
i mean theyll spawn naturally hopefully
istg if they make aratai breeding animations
In short, a villain generator (will explain more)
I am more envisioning human npcs to automate tasks really
Ah, okay
why human npcs though
Its just a hunch
aight
I really doubt that will happen
In Shadow of War, you have orcs that are autogenerated in everything.
From their appearance, to their personality, (yes, each one has their own unique personality to an extent) to their own strengths and weaknesses.
I feel like this could be a cool way to replace loot drops
If they want the Aratai to be the main villains. It'd be a good idea (at least personally) if they got you more invested in that, even if you don't care for lore.
And so, that's where the Nemesis system would take its place in ARK-2.
'Roughly' each Aratai is procedurally generated with a mixture of different stuff.
That's ironically how you get the best loot also.
i do want to have npc that can automate tasks, ill be fine with breeding them to minmax their abilities in different areas, minecraft does the breeding part and nobody complains so it should go fine with customers
Different tier orcs have fewer weaknesses, and more strengths.
And the higher rank they are, the better the loot when you kill them.
Thing is, people are fine with it in Minecraft cause the community's headcanon is that Villagers aren't humans.
I dont want aratai to be the villains though, I would prefer a more complex story/gameplay than just us vs some villain lol
well thats why we should have this done with aratai instead i suppose
I also want them to be more complex, but that should be a 'hinted at the beginning, but explored later on' type of thing.
As of 'right now' / the base-game, they're the antagonists.
I shouldn't say 'villains' but 'antagonists' instead.
True.
"Dark forces" is a bit sus
actually, i guarantee they arent the actual antagonist just because modern story writing never allows the real antagonist to be the one you see first
So if anything, they're the antagonist for the first half of the game, before being replaced by the main big-bad.
Kind of like the Flood in Halo-1.
like most stories these days really
Yeah.
Which i like, if done right.
its not bad, just common
Which ARK-1 kind of also did.
makes things predictable sometimes
Overseer was the antagonist of The Island, Rockwell of Aberration, then Element as a whole is the antagonist of all of ARK-1's story.
I dont know, maybe its just me, but I dont want a big bad, other than the environment
other times i dont care enough about being a petty shitter about predicting the story and just try to enjoy it lol
'no'
idk how well an environmental enemy would work
ark kinda moved away from that too early
That's the issue with my dad.
He tries to predict everything before it happens, and it's like "bruh, just enjoy the fucking movie."
they could probably reinstate that again but theyd need the game to be WAAY more survival focused than anything else
And he doesn't keep it to himself.
And he's so fucking on point, that whenever he has a theory. He basically spoils the movie already.
my parents just dont pay attention so when they do that i have to correct them over something mentioned multiple times since the start lol
i think the whole abberation college students is probably the closest ark has gotten to this really
i dont think even island had much focus on the environment as a danger for more than a couple of the first notes
does extinction count?
There should be an overarching antagonist. With the environment being a pseudo-antagonist.
fighting off element creatures is essentially on the same level as fighting off dinos but is man v beast a type of man v environment or should it be considered separately
either case those two above are probably the closest ark got to making the environment the villain
story wise
Why though?
Y’all’s parents watch movies with you?
i watched the matrix with my dad yesterday
Cause ARK's universe just doesn't really suit the environment being the main antagonist.
This is ark2 though. It isnt governed by an overseer trying to make survivors capable of fighting the king titan. It is an alien planet...
An alien planet that could have a mysterious origins.
And element is still a thing, since the soils of the Eden Ring where filled with them. Hints why stryders where made
are there any good fiction stories about tribes fighting each other with emphasis on the environment
I personally feel that is reaching too far lol
Not at all, but sure
Any good fiction story imo has enough of a focus on the environment to make it believable
but that doesnt really make the environment the center of the story no?
Aratai are the environment... That doesnt make them villains
aratai are closer to people than standard environmental threat imo
But they are an 'antagonist'
Antagonist is entirely different from villain though
Right, and i've stated i should've said they're the antagonist then villains.
aratai probably wont be the main villain in any case unless theres some big bad aratai we all need to fight or something
I dont really see the need to have a big bad in a story though. That just makes it kind of cookie cutter really\
wish ark 2 story was closer to how district 9 worked out with the aliens being forced to live in slums because they couldnt fight back and had no where to go
You think ARK 1's story is cookie cutter?
i mean isnt there only a handful of unique plotlines in literature
such that every story is a version of those plotlines
To a degree yes
You have sometimes the most greatest, but oddest opinions. And i both fear, and respect that.
Yes, and the "big bad" is the most primative of those storylines
I dont know how to feel about that lol
i think it includes the simplest plots, but its not necessarily always part of simplistic stories
Its a very unbalanced way of looking at a narrative
but yeah im not saying we need another rockwell, just some ideas for where ark2 could go
Like, i feel like Element as a big-bad wasn't bad.
It's a hivemind, so it's not a individual.
Whenever you're fighting a element-based lifeform, you are fighting 'element' itself.
And element has been around since The Island, and an actual threat in Extinction and beyond.
wdym by unbalanced
like lacking in certain key factors required to make a good story?
All stories that portray a big bad character portray an unbalanced viewpoint in favor of whatever moral standing the author chooses to proscribe for the story to the detriment of stances. It is a narrow viewpoint that doesn't really allow stories to have much depth.
Obviously with some talent it is possible to make a good story that way, but usually that isnt the case
So yeah, I hope there isnt a big bad, and that the story takes a more ingenious approach
That makes a more balanced approach yes, but is much harder to pull off
i mean we already see a source of conflict between aratai and human thats already somewhat understandable
humans barging into aratai lands gonna be some massive allegory for the colonization of the americas or something xd
I think that is true, which is one of the main reasons why I dont want to see the aratai in general viewed as a big bad in need of extermination. That concept just doesnt sit well with me lol
i mean we wont
i doubt WC will go all in on some 40k type lore tbh
just based on them seeming to be left leaning
there will be some way humans and aratai unite against a different threat
i cant imagine a single threat that hasnt already been tried by WC though
we already have entire ecosystems be a singular threat against the characters, and individuals, and empires, etc
we beat a simulation how many times, 3 or 4?
3 i think
1 lol
Its not a simulation though
This is where i'm hoping the 'darker forces' come into play.
Forcing the Aratai to unite with Humans.
the reason you approach both cmc and overseer is the same though, just to ascend to another realm
i dunno what those could even look like tbh
Not really-ish?
Corruption 2.0
Or humans could be the darker force, or the goal could be a mutual alliance with the aratai, and a containment of dinos to stop them from destroying the environment
that could be neat
You go to another ARK, sure. But it's the same reality.
I doubt humans are the darker forces, since the way it was written is that the 'darker forces' is a threat to 'us'
the darker force being ecological collapse tho
its not really mentioned in a way to point towards such a threat but itd definitely be different
"and confront powerful dark forces seeking to control the fate of all life."
Sounds like a form of Element to me.
or just the source of element
Exactly.
Arat, or the main celestial planet could be the origins of element.
I believe it was actually Rockwell that sent us to Arat, since he said "now that we've arrived to my new domain"
Could be his hivemind mind wanting to return to their home-planet.
makes sense
Hmm, that is an interesting concept
i wonder what the aratai are then
since they dont seem to be corrupted
which is strange when earth was entirely corrupted yet not even the source of element
They're natives.
The steam page already confirms this.
yes
They're just aliens that evolved like primates.
but i mean what is their relationship to element
They might not have one.
if arat is the source of element
but thatd be nearly impossible especially if element desires to control/corrupt life
unless life on arat evolved to resist element
Or evolved alongside it, like the creatures of Extinction.
maybe
It's odd if actually that is element, since Marc established that element isn't inherently evil, just doing what it evolved to do like a virus. 
im of the belief that the creatures in extinction were managed by the proto arks in order to prevent them from fully corrupting though the gasbags is the only creature i cant really explain, and gachas ig but those are a meme
HLN-A also semi-confirms that element just adapted to the tek-war.
"Element can adapt to its environment in 'unpredictable' ways"
element is probably some sorta gray goo type of material tbh
It's purple though?
gray goo is just the concept of a self replicating machine
ye the little robots that devour planets
except in this case its probably also somewhat of an AI
Since one of Genesis 2's characters theories that element was sent down as a gift, or test.
i still dunno how those on arat could deal with whatever the element or source of it is
I dont remember reading this
and given ark2 is supposed to be more primitive i cant imagine theres some secretly high tech society
what would the source of element on arat look like
or maybe its not even on arat but on one of the planets
The transhuman states this at one point in the Santiago notes
perhaps the debris that made the rockwell side of the genesis ship fell into the actual home of element
Damn, you're now making me think more of element being a highly advanced gray-goo
I looked it up, and now i remember that concept was used in Godzilla Earth
i definitely despise the concept of "home of element" like the original source is purely artificially made when "element is naturally everywhere" like actual periodic table of element in actual meteorites is fine
Element being on other planets doesn't confirm it's natural. Just means it has spreaded to other planets.
It can still go either way.
other planets, sure but in actual space, like in the asteroid belt it's "natural" in a sense
Wasn't it established by HLN-A that the asteroids where torn off from the planets a LOONG time ago to drain the planets the ships stops at for resources?
So them being on astroids is cause they where chunks from the planet.
i never seen one that mentioned planets aside from the space bridge about "finding hospitable areas", but she do mentioned asteroids a lot
Could be wrong, but i swear the astroids where from the planets
Element just being naturally occurring feels weird to me
Like something so active in its goals shouldnt be natural imo
i mean in actual space science, planets form from multiple asteriods
Yeah, it does.
Maybe element is just an exotic material that fell from a higher realm and is simply a far better candidate for dominating a world than conventional biochemistry is
Doesnt homo deus already live on a separate plane of existence
Maybe element comes from there
Technically speaking, the vast majority of asteroids are from planets, or rather protoplanets
That doesnt really make sense though. Their existence isnt another universe
Well where is it
All we get is that homo deus exists in a realm beyond humans
Is that just some digital universe created by the arks?
There is no well established theory for the formation of the planets. There are some well educated guesses, but that is all they are
From what I have seen, it only mentions that they are able to observe, but not interact. That doesnt imply the existence of a separate existance
I remember many references in the notes to Homo Deus ascending to a higher state of being, one that couldn't be perceived by normal humans, so idk about that whole different universe business but that sounds like another (albeit imperceptible) dimension, as in like 1 dimensional, 2d, 3d, so on and so forth
Since it's theorized that there's about 8 dimensions to reality and all that 😅
Idk seems essentially the same as every story of ghosts able to watch the world but never interact
And said ghosts arent really in the same realm of existence
Only somewhat id say
But still mostly in a separate place beside our natural reality
I wont say what im saying is whats going on for sure, i just argue that theres isnt any reason it couldnt be whats going on. All to hold onto my hypothetical supernatural element hypothesis :p
In either case, element is called a xenotoxin, that means it is from space, although the wordplay in the one who waits 13 could be interpreted to mean that element is directed by something similar to a homodeus, and that could be the darker force mensioned in the steam oage
Hmm
Maybe another alien race was able to achieve a homo deus like state?
I would say the aratai might have but then why are they so primitive
Or perhaps a third party entirely
Also the transhuman in the Santiago notes on Genesis 2 had their own theory that element was sent down
Why are we so primitive now, after our encounter with element? 👀
Maybe it sent them back to the stone age too, out of necessity
Because element is bad. Real bad.
Not necessarily, that's like saying guns are bad. They're not inherently bad, they're made bad by those using them
They take on the intent of the user, as did element, when being used for war and destruction
No. Guns aren’t controlled by a hive mind doing all kinds of weird shit.
Guns aren't alive, sure, but the concept is the same regardless lol
I kind of wander if Ark 2 is going to be something that is a combination of Ark 1 and Fallout 76. the base survival and server mechanics of Ark 1 with the open world rpg mmo of fallout 76. at least from what i heard so far there going to focus more on the story in Ark2
I just hope they don't pull a Fallout 76. and kill to much of ark than do a 180 when its too late and half your fandom is gone.
Stop wandering or you’re gonna get lost
yep but you find great thing when your lost
I couldn't get past the first sentence because of that
But on the real, they aren't going any harder on the story than they did with the first game, that we know of. So no reason to worry there
Not to mention, isn't Ark already sort of an RPG MMO? Just sayin 😉
hopefully because that would be cool.
i just hope it doesn't stray to far from being ark
So Junuary 2023 or December 2023 ^^
is ark 2 sotf confirmed?
All confirmed info is in the pinned messages.
so sotf is completely discontinued and may only come as a mod
We don't know.
You might be able to reach out to the devs on Twitter, but anything else we don't know other than the pins.
‘Confirmed’ not going to be offered on official launch by Dollie here. One of the only pieces of info not in the pins XD
Sotf never really took off, I would be surprised if they even considered doing a remake for ark2
Convo is here
It could have, it was around the time pubG went big
It was before pubg though wasn't it?
Not by more than a couple months IF that
But I think it was during the time pubG was getting big. Wc was trying many things before they settled on the SE -> DLC approach. They tried procedural maps, Sotf, and community maps first
will ark 2 only be prim? lmao
if i cant get a mastercraft fab sniper im gonna be fuming
Optimal outcome
1.) change grind heavy blueprint system
2.) remove insane range hitscan weapons
3.) keep things at a reasonable tech level that’s scaled to the environment 🎉
I sure hope in ARK2 it's possible to look for servers (particularly unofficials) easily. Browse them, sort/search by mod, maybe filter by rates, things like that within the UI instead of joining 712 different discords found by reading other platforms (survivetheark's ads, ark-servers net, etc.) just to have access to the link of the modlist and the basic cluster info.
There's gotta be a better way.
It’s hard to be a server owner and avoid weird toxic random folks without some form of screening via a discord etc
Yeah, in-game server browser needs some significant updates which I expect to happen especially with cross platform mod support
most times anyone can join a server to troll if they want to ; a lot of servers don't have a password or anything, and the only people taking the time to browse websites/discords are the people who try to make a good, sensible choice about where they'll play next
your server is otherwise still available via the server list if someone types its* name in the search bar just to come and cause chaos there if that's really what they're into
(also it doesn't mean there wouldn't be a system in place to help server owners do some screening if they wanted to, but players ALSO should be able to do some screening)
ARK 2 News
@ARK2News
First half of 2023, here we come. 🦕
very unoptimal outcome lol
i liked the whole bp system
maybe change droprates a bit so we get less ascendant diplodocus saddle but other than that bp system was peak
Do you have evidence of this happening?
Or is it just one of those “I’m the best, if anyone has something better than me they obviously cheated” things?
kinda the admins fault if so not the games features
bruh admins can do anything
its not the bps fault that admins spawn in op stuff for players
but they can still spawn stuff in lmao
it doesnt matter with or without bp
if the admins are corrupt then it doesnt matter whats in the game they are gonna spawn the best stuff in anyway
like turrets or op dinos
bro when did this happen lmao
what tribe had that
and if they did they would get wiped completely
quit playing bruh lmfao

Guys this discussion channel is for talk related to ARK II, if you've got issues with somebody being banned, take it up with Customer Service at the appropriate area. #reporting-players
Considering you can make whoever you want, I don't think nationality will be an issue.
.
We literally screen recorded his screen, and sent in a ticket and devs did nothing
Ark 2 support will be the same
I was talking about the new combat locking system in Ark 2!
This is about the future lack of support for ark 2
Considering we don't even know what it's going to have yet, I think its safe to say we can move on.
Either move on, or move to #general. Thanks.
It is safe to say ark 2 will use the same crappy ticket system as ark 1
If the Aratai can throw fireballs I’m gonna be salty
We dont know. Move on please.
Ok let me rephrase that, who thanks ark 2 use the same crappy ticket system as ark 1?
Tbf we arent
Me: goes to eat lunch
Ark 2 chat: chaos
as usual
Why’s this always happening when I get on
It’s not like I haven’t talked CoC enforcement to death for ark 2
We need something new to talk to death
let's go over the dynamic world events 
Well…I do ask folks to try
Ark 2 Finna be trash
Really hoping there will be specific tames that are only able to be found through the world events
U main this channel lel
Perhaps depending on player performance during the event itself
Game's gonna be the same as ark 1 gonna have crazier hacks too right off the jump suiiiiiii
As soon as I see the word “finna” I lose all respect and desire to communicate lol
I love statements like that because they don’t invite conversation 😂
Would rather most tames arent the knocl out method
Dang
To me fighting something shouldnt befriend it unless under other circumstances
Disagree: I think a super cool tame method would be fighting a creature in “fair combat” and making it bow to you
It's Finna be garb fam
No kizzy
Cope more pls
Hold on let me get this right: “Ark 1 kinda garb then fr fr tho with all the cheaters tho”

Can we purge this guy?
Cheats will make its way on ark 2 in no time as well that'd besides the point
Lmao
Please stop trying to use commands.
Well that was amusing
Sorry. Didn’t know it was an issue
Allowed commands for server members can only be used in #735196568218501173 .
Rigged
Admin commands won’t be available to all official players in ark 2 #rigged
Ark 2 won't have spaghetti code, so I believe things are going to change
My man you’re in the ark discord. Did you not like ark 1? Or are you specifically expecting something particular will be wrong with ark 2
i think option 2
It won't have spaghetti code? Who made the spaghetti code? The ark devs. What will they make again? Spaghetti code
I’m actually expecting unspoken option 3 of a random gut feeling of not liking it because it’s a new game not a DLC
Same devs same problems
Will you buy the new game just like ark 1 though?
Pretty sure they didn't create UE4
Since it seems you bought ark 1 and are interested enough it in it to be here? Just trying to identify your interest in the series
That isn't an argument
“Ark 2 will be terrible just like ark 1”
“But I loved ark 1 and played it a lot, it was a great game”
U think unreal 4 held a gun to them saying "make spaghetti code" lol no they did it themselves it has nothing to do with the engine it's just na excuse
I mean yea I’m sensing rant here
Any bit of pushback anywhere is considered a rant I suppose
Basing it all off of experiences with ark 1 with this little info for how ark2 will be isn't the best way to go about it either
Keep the positive echo chamber going my b 
I have a strong feeling the aratai are gonna practice witchcraft and have fireball throwing capabilities
No, you just wish for it
No
Your push back was “the dev team is bad”. Not super useful pushback. If you want to push back, pick an actual concrete issue that you’d like to see changed that would change your stance
I wanna be able to throw them. I don’t want people throwing them at me.
Stating facts is useful when predicting future outcomes
You purchased ark 1 just fine, and will likely purchase ark 2. Hard to say a studio is inherently bad if you buy both games they make
It’s gonna be so satisfying when this guy gets the purge treatment
Not buying the second game, especially full price lol
I mean I’m giving you a chance to provide ark 2 specific feedback but you’re not taking it XD
Why does it matter it's ark 2 related lol
If you're not buying the second game, are basing everything off of ark 1, I dont know why you'd decide to join here just to disagree/cause discourse with everyone else
If u want specific feedback I'm not impressed with the potential combat change and lack of content there will be in the beginning compared to ark 1 plus its bound to have issues considering the dev team behind it
Because I can lol
You think on release it will have less content than ark 1?
Ark 1 had like 20 creatures, 23 hour taming, and hardly any content in each tier when it first came out in EA
Prefer you didn't. Keep it ark2, not ranting on ark1.
I am ranting about ark 2
It's not out yet, and we have little info in the pins. Hard to rant about it.
It's been a week hasn't it
So u can only be positive when talking about ark 2
Best plant, please be tameable in some way
Gotcha lmao
Yea idk why some people think you have to be positive
You do have to talk about actual features though…obscure “this game sucks” language doesn’t really mean anything
If I can’t tame that plant I’m getting a refund
I want more tameable plants
Didn't say you had to be positive, but keeping it in line would be nice. Ranting about devs and disguising it about ark 2 is still not ark 2.
I mean yea that’s annoying but also it’s impossible to discuss anything if you just say “I think WC sucks” and dance away into the sunset
Am I wrong
.
I’ve spoken about ark 2 related concerns I had with WC’s management of ark 1
You just have to tie it into ark 2. Not super hard but that’s just how the chat works
Yes
Oh no, i wasn't joking.
Some of the point you made where valid, but others have reasoning behind them.
Like the fact that you're ignoring the pretty valid reasoning of ARK being the buggy mess was due to the game being made by amateurs that never expected it to blow up as big as this.
(the ToS and CoC enforcement is a different story)
Fuck. 
man that trailer looked almost like Ark 2, on Gamescom
could have passed for an Ark 2 trailer
Get nae-naed. 
What trailer?
I don't know the name, it showed a broken ship in space, landing via a pod, guy lands on planet with a spear in hand
it was different like a shoddy copy of Ark 2 but it was passable
Give name!
Help me find it!
I need to know!
Found it
What was it
Okay, yeah it did look kind of like ARK-2 at the ending. But it defiantly wasn't ARK-2 related due to the fact that the ship looked a lot different
"Stranded: Alien Dawn"
I’m on an equus tryna game it... it’s so hard lol, I’m also hearing hyenadeons 😔
It’s gonna be a long tame
I think ark 2 could have some of the gen2 creatures because supposedly the ringworld crashed on the same planet that vin diesel did, and it was fully intact
I wouldnt mind shadowmanes
That would be cool
unless they made the sabertooth actually good
ark saber is so underwhelming for what it is
Honestly
Would rather have something like smilodon be the thylacoleo of ark 2
The only thing it’s good for now though is caving if you have a decent saddle
"Can I copy your homework?"
"Yeah, but don't make it obvious."
Any tips for taming an equus?
Wrong chat bud.
Oops
The thing is there are so many base game dinos that just suck and are useless
or just look ugly
Mb ty 4 telling me
Which is why i think this game shouldve never been dinos in tue first place xd
dinos make no sense
Ill have to relearn ark lore
What was it… humans found element and destroyed earth so they made arks????
Right???
More or less. Element becomes corruptive and caused mass extinction.
But its the future right?
There are whole planets in Genesis 2 taken ahold of Element.
Yeah.
2200s, I'm pretty sure.
where did the dinosaurs come from then
They were just on the arks I guess
They were the best match for humans. Kept them on their feet and made sense logically, if they were going to start over I could only assume.
Like to have animals
They were fabricated on the arks
The people behind the ARKs and Genesis-Ship tried a lot of different combinations, but the human-dino combination was most effective.
The arks created creatures to challenge survivors in order to deem them worthy of going to earth to beat the king titan
No.
The creators made those creations. The only creatures we know of that were made by the ARKs to my knowledge are the Reapers, which were self-defensive.
Whats funny is that all the fictional creatures are 8 times scarier than the majority of the dino roster
Except the obvious few
Objectively yes. The creatures were also intentionally made “amicable to taming” to facilitate partnerships
Gigas are horrifying, I don't care what you say.
I know. 🗿
Anything that lives in the water is also quite horrifying.
Especially Cnidarians.
I derive no fear from most of the fantasy roster beyond the normative human cautious/fear response of the unknown
Most of the fantasy roster is pretty cool.
Wyverns roaming freely on scorched is horrifying, they can fly to the easy zones!
Trex that can fly and shoot fire sounds scarier than an actual trex but ok
Not even the giant eyeballs are that spooky.
A mosa though, that's horrifying.
Also invisible lions that are the size of busses
I mean you’re normalized to a Trex so that reduces the fear
I know
If a Trex ambushed you I can suspect you’d likely jump
Not really scary, Manes are mainly annoying.
I'm more scared of taming one than being killed by one.
But most ark creatures are large and obvious
Which is why i want the dinosaurs to be scarier because currently there so meh to me
Make the shark bigger
And i dont mean just what they look like but how useful they are in certain situations
some of the creatures are just miserably out scaled by new ones
Yep
But the dinosaurs make the game
You could remove the fantasy creatures and keep ark. Gut the dinos and that’s curtains
Id like every creature to have like… some function that is actually helpful
Ye i WANT to prefer the dinos
But the fictionals just kinda outclass them
Not every creature should be helpful as a tame. Some creature’s purpose is to be a threat in the environment, and I like that
Maybe not in raw stats a lot of the times but have just better charm to them
Most of the fantasy creatures trigger a novelty response
Ye
You’re comparing people’s novelty response to their actual enjoyment of prehistoric life
Sure not every creature has to be useful i get that
Can it atleast look nice or have gimmicks
You can make all creatures useful but many people will still gravitate to novel creatures
Cave creatures, all of them lol
I get that obviously
i just want to actually get something or feel something when i look at certain creatures
Even mr dodo
Dodos have utility
Fastest egg layer, and they don’t need a nearby male. In essence, a chicken
Ye but dodos were actually quite strong for what they were
What i mean is
Not actually stupid either
They were basically pheasants were they not? A chicken can peck or claw your eye out too
Ye
Just didnt know to fear humans really
Im not saying buff dodo but like
Make each dino feel more unique
I love the lost island and fjordur dinos
But they are newer so thats just a given
I’m kinda meh on the amarga
Probably more. Given the AI is actually improved
Ye
I’m hoping for a smaller and more detailed roster
I would hope for around the same roster as the island?
With some removed and replaced with new dinos
Im hoping some or just one of the dlc dinos comes back
and like 1-3 fictionals
But i rlly dont care for fictionals coming to ark 2…. Yet
Monke, desmo, or andrew id like to see come back
There is a 100% chance we see them. Alien life and all that
I wouldn’t say 100%, but yeah there’s a chance.
The collapse happened i believe in the 23rd century.
Plant lizard and Aratai. 100% chance 😆
So far, we’ve only seen terrestrial fauna. I’m not sure this lizzard/plant is alien fauna.
How is it not alien fauna? Do you think it’s an earth chameleon?
But ARK itself is set hundreds, to possibly nearly a thousand years after Earths extinction. (though, no confirmed time of course)
The lizzard/plant I’m not sure it’s alien.
There’s a possibility. I’m not sure.
I mean the Aratai are 100% alien
Yeah, that’s true.
I'm just going off of what I remember from Diana Notes on Ext. I have shitty memory.
There's no species on Earth that mimics so well a venus flytraps mouth like that lizard in the trailer.
Defiantly alien.
Some folks don’t know about the aliens already revealed. Ignorance is only a poison if it’s intentional
Ok then. In that case, 100% there will be alien fauna.
Oh, that's probably the reasoning right there.
Santiago if i recall right states that, for element to get this out of control, it has to be fueled in a war that's centuries long. 😅
At least two especimens
Such as the I'm-Blue-Da-Ba-Die-Da-Ba-Dies.
That's what I'm calling them for now.

Wat? 😂
The Aratai.
😂
Well, yeah.
We're on a alien planet that has a ecosystem.
A ecosystem requires lifeforms to sustain it.
So yeah....kind of obvious that we're getting alien animals.....
I demand an Aratai Emoji.
YES!
🗿
Lifeforms ≠ animals but for a video game sure that logic works lol
'you fucking get what i'm saying' xD
I mean. Yeah, you are right, but it was possible they would just say most of the fauna isn’t relevant and just put the terrestrial fauna in the base game.
Plant lizard?
The lizard at the beginning of the first ARK 2 trailer
Another plausible argument: terrestrial fauna overcame the alien.
Huh.....Dead Island 2 is still a thing.....
There are arguments they can use
What you mean 'terrestrial?'
Everything on land is a terrestrial lifeform, no?
From earth
That’s called “earth”
That's called 'Earth' fauna.
Terrestrial just means a lifeform that's on land.
'Terre' as in 'Terrain'
I mean earth and land are largely synonymous atm
But when referring to other planets they are no longer interchangeable XD
adjective
of, on, or relating to the earth.
"increased ultraviolet radiation may disrupt terrestrial ecosystems
Hmm yes.
You're going off of a outdated old definition.
'even though we call other solid planets 'terrestrial' planets'
Mars is considered a 'terrestrial' planet.
Last time i checked, Mars isn't Earth
Terrestrial just means you can walk on it
Doesn’t meant you can breath on it
Am i wrong?
I mean very loosely
Yes, very
Some planets have solid oxygen as their surface. I wouldn’t call that terrestrial. Usually terrestrial implies a rocky surface
Which is also the nickname for terrestrial planets.
'rocky planets'
The planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars, are called terrestrial because they have a compact, rocky surface like Earth's terra firma. The terrestrial planets are the four innermost planets in the solar system.
Nasa
thats what i said
You missed the word “rocky”
You can walk on a planet with a solid ice surface
Is that not terrestrial?
Although I think in this case NASA only identifies terrestrial vs gas planets
Because ice or not, ice can’t exist on a planet without a rocky base XD
Idk not a big planet guy
It’s a cool field. Astronomy is second only to biology imo heehee
I am a biology major 😎
I graduated with one! Always happy to see another bio boi
I major in the 'i don't have one' field.
Howd you play ark in college without failing 🤨
Private server with friends
Ah
Only 2 days in
Make schedules.
And yeah…. Dont play official pvp xd
I tried official ark and instantly realized I’d never be able to juggle the time it asked of me
Big life waster
😅
Or just official as a whole
i did play it when i was in highschool but realized it sucks
I like unofficial pvp cause i can have a good time goofing around
I quit ark in order to get my hs grades in order
Damn now I feel old
Yeah i never played ark legit
😰
i want to play on a pve server but cant find one with enough ppl
so i can just chill
When im not studying
All the cool servers are depopulated
I enjoy playing with a group until we burn out, then coming back again with sometimes a new one
Relying on random folks to fill my experiences tends to be a bit risky lol
Xd
Same is gonna be true in ark 2
Hopefully not as grind heavy
Hopefully ark 2 aint like official pvp
I hope so damn hard we get private server access on launch day. But idk if that’s happening lol
Whens ark 2 release???
2023?
Far away but hopefully not that far away
I’ll be on too lol, but prolly private/SP. I’m gonna be busy as shit 2023
I’m hype for slime rancher 2 and a couple other titles but ark 2 is gonna be a big release imo
For me its just ark2 really
Very eager to blind play it too. I pray the UI and other features actually allow me to do that lol, I got so ticked off learning ark 1 in 2015 XD
Rip
I already use yt for all games
Figuring out it too much of a time drain if its not shown in game
I only use YouTube for advanced mechanics or understanding if I want to buy a game
I generally prefer to learn the game from the game whenever possible. But ark had so many confusing ins and outs and no ingame explanation of anything that YouTube felt essential
Ye
What I’m excited to see in ark 2 is a lot of reworked and retooled systems that actually feel intuitive and interesting to explore as you learn them
So many new players sneak up behind raptors not realizing they have an oval detection radius lol
Better ui is the dream
Ark 2 going to be released in the first half of 2023….. Probs going to be June then 😅
Could be June 2nd, since that's when ARK-1 originally released.
by then it will have already been 8 years of ark 👴
Yeah.....
And when it gets out of Early-Access, it'll be 10-years.
10 years for ark 2 to leave EA, so actually 18 years of ark 1 🧐
i bet most of us will probably have a family of our own by then 🧐
I’d hope so 😊
The imprint/raising time just takes a while
Is there anyone here that is willing to write a whole 5-10 paragraphs or so to catch me up on everything I need to know about Ark II? XD I do be slacking the knowledge on ark 2. Like anything I need to know and anything that will happen would be good. (I’m pretty sure no one is gonna do it lmao) would be appreciated tho.
Use the pins
I didn’t know the pins would have that. Alr thx
There's a steam page for ARK-2
That doesn’t get too much into detail
That's as much detail you'll get
Ight
Hopefully Ark 2 has the Dino names as real life dinos. Like Ark is close to it but not really at the same time.
I hope Ark 2 supports 8k 😂😅
or has 8k I mean
What'd you mean by that?
like
Trikes could be named Triceratops cuz they’re actually triceratops
Or smth.
bad comparison^^
That sounds like a waste of time.


