#Bird Photography
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
You can surely say it’s a personal item
bags are limited to 40cm
itll be the last time im using the 70-350
Go on insta and tag Ryanair
Why last
200-600 and 16-50
You are missing 50-200
I know
I’m disappointed
might get a 70-200 some day idk
Sell zv e10
yes that too
the plan is as follows
- sell 70-350 and rs3 mini
- trade in zve10
- buy a6700, maybe as a bundle with the sigma 18-50, if so i will sell the 16-50 too obviously
I have it on eBay for 115€ because it’s in like very very good condition and someone asked if they could get it for 60 💀
after that
- buy thinktank backlight 18/26l
- buy lens cover
- buy tripod
I got a 90€ suggestion but I don’t need the money that fast so I suggested 100€ but idk no response
No tripod at all rn?
I hate tripod ngl
i have one but its not good
i dont use it that often anyways
Same
i have one too for airshows
My tripod is also a monopod
I can screw one of the legs of
I can even attach the like bearing head of the tripod to the monopod
And I can invert my tripod
I love that thing
It’s a bit like shaky sometimes but it’s ok
my tripod head cant even hold the 200-600 in place 
the legs feel like they would break any minute
I have a similar problem
If I put it on a tripod to shoot the moon and lock it I need to put the moon fully out of frame and then lock it and when I let it go it sinks down and my moon is in center again
same
But it holds it there
Its just that aiming it and licking it his I would need to aim the camera by just rotating the ball bearing
Because the gravity would already be doing all the shit before
Alright imma go to bed now, my eyes are not being awake no more I am so tired
And idk I am forgetting words
i should aswell
4h 30 until i have to wake up
Damn Gn
18 to 26 isnt as big of a diff as i thought
Have you set the camera on a plate or tripod, or did you flip the screen out to get right down to the ground for that shot?
Both ig
Im on a kayak, sketchiest thing I ever did
I was in the middle of a lake, these birds practically never get close to the shore apart from when nesting but I didn’t want to disturb said nest
i dont have a preference either its just going to be which version is cheaper and available
i am so fucking tired
horrible sleep
didnt start sleeping until 2
3km
do you speak spanish?
it is for me aswell but i had to wake up at 5
what hour it's for you now?
9
about to fly
i'm from spain
where
germany
london
why are you gonna fly to london?
London stinks of piss, shit and food

idk
Scottish highlands and hebrides clear smelldon
i've never gone to london
Ive been there twice
why
Cause why not?
idk
anyone on #💡・open-feedback
for my bird photo
Why didn't I focus properly??? 😭 😭
Camera said not today lol
I don't understand anything but it's cool
@undone slate have you also looked into the Nikon d850 as your next camera
I heard you talking about cropping a lot and I was thinking that if you wanted to crop a lot maybe it's a better camera for you
You should look into it though
I don't know if it's better than the Z6 III because I also want to do astrophotography.
It's a better camera just worse af
how much does it cost?
I think I prefer a mirrorless one, because that way it doesn't scare the birds.
Wait I'll DM you instead of clogging this chat
ok
I saw a goose incubating her eggs in the enclosure, where they have geese and ducks. When should I return to see her goslings?
Yes definitely
when should i return there?
Maybe a couple days
Yesterday I almost died trying to take a picture of a goose, but oh well
by the end of the month?
Oh yeah definitely
maybe i die ☠️
Because if it attacks me
The goose doesn't mind me approaching because she's used to it, but won't she be territorial when she has chicks?
shame it wasnt flying towards me. been meaning to get a duck landing while they bank in
Is there any way to take a picture of a duck in the water at water level?
yeah
hold your camera above the water
But I can't see the screen then
@green canyon Did you see my picture of the goose?
How long you in London for
till friday
im on the bus right now and im 99% sure a kid infront of me just shat himself
that has got to he solid material
or wet idk
I dont think ur meant to dm to talk about this
Am I not allowed to DM?
Is it for like protection
ballerina goose 😂
What kind of bird is it?
greylag goose i think
ok
?
Well, I'm going this weekend if I can.
In fact, I live 4 minutes away
Have to use this ffs

theres a lot of distracting stuff and the birb doesnt really stick out
I don't know if I can do anything about it
my Z key on the other keyboard was acting as if it was pressed on even tho it wasn't cause i accidentally dropped my drink on it 🙁
lightroom delete tool
the pink thing and branches
but that's not ugly
and make the bird centered
it's natural
it distracts and makes the photo look worse
yep
the flower could've been nice if there was any kind of background blur and if it was at the center of the duck
and saturate it maybe, especially the bird looks pretty gray
average sony AF performance when grass is in the frame
When I return at the end of the month I will try to take a similar photo, but in focus.
canon 🥰
missile 🙂
And let's see if any baby geese have hatched, although I hope it doesn't attack me because yesterday I was almost attacked by a goose.
still pretty cool
unusable
sony AF 
That's very frustrating.
k bro
i have a few exit shots but lik
nikon 🥰
i dont like them
Well this is a really insane week planned
3 days at falconry and 2 days in natural reserves
i came to my grandparents and theres lot of goose along the way
i think they're good
wow
btw idk if u saw my message in shopping help but 600 F/4 IS III is much worse than RF and IS II
Yeah this is a good week
which natural reserves
i don't have lightroom

yeah i did
A local protected area and idk for the others one
you dont need lightroom to saturate
what do i neeed
it's shocking how awful the IS III actually is
you can saturate in your phones gallery
i don't have phone gallery
hais no full green
and if you have a newer samsung the ai delete is pretty good
i have pc
zzz today is ass
you can saturate in darktable

or any free software
darktable it's pretty difficult/confusing idk why
tried to find one today but didn't get lucky
try gimp or something
i need to go to the opposite side of where i was today
but people told me that gimp it's bad
there might be some black grouses close to my grandparents im gonna go look for them
try pixlr its in chrome
cool
i started with it
this shot is also unusable
grr
i hate when the bg is 2 different colourts
i gotta PS the whole bg
I don't know if I like trial subscriptions.
what if its a gradient
its free??
Could've been nice if i didn't fuck up the focus
should've used full zone af instead of spot
yeah some premium subscription you can use it for free
And for the duck photo, do I have to remove the flower and the branch and increase the saturation?
atleast remove the flower
probably might be better
gray?
That orange tail doesn't appear in the Google photos.
its the other foot
thats why its a ballerina goose
not saturated
ohh ok
ok
When I remove the flower, it doesn't replace it with water.
yeah pixlr doesnt have a good remove tool
i meant lr remove, but if you dont have it you can just keep the flower
?
the white on the neck is fucked
is that a feeder?
how do i change that?
its a solar panel its standing on
what
i'll hopefully see one when i next go to the gorges du verdon or somehwere good
This Sunday, if the weather is good, I'm going to the Fragas do Eume, but I don't know if there are any falcons, maybe some buzzards.
A bit
interesting...
havent you been saying that for like a week now?
doesn't look like a falcon habitat
i've been there...
Have you ever been?
no luck?
??? i posted loads of griffon vultures pics
no but i looked at google maps
they like rocks
Well, I saw that there are goshawks
I had classes from 12-15 years old
Albeit I lost most of it

I was supposed to go to Spain with my high school but covid hit
like this?
yeah thats good
and like aarvs said decrease the highlights because the birds neck is blown
How do I select only the neck?
Should I use websites that upload high-quality images? Or does that make it look worse?
lower highlights from whole image
or find some free masking
ok
looks like it was painted white 😭
no texture on the fur
and reflection looks weird now because its way brighter
Jeez overblown much
Anyways I keep seeing this one brahiminy kite
And I don't have my camera
😭
idk
Click "nearby places"
Or look in ebird for it instead of merlin, ebird will show a map
North East Asia iirc
There was one in Norway last year, first for Europe
Oh yes Merlin has a map
Cool
its ok i fixed it
What a job
back home
on the way home there was a swan really close to the street bathing
it isnt fully focused
and its cropped like crazy
probably cant save it
what 
what bird is it?
Brown Thrasher
swan (screenshot not really this bad quality)
I know it'll fly away if I try and grab my camera 
idk it feels weird doing it in every single image
i do it on most too
that's how you make an image look really good most of the time
not all of these i did it perfectly yeah but those are all my edits since i got photolab
all are nice excepr for the 2nd one, fake sun is overdone there
yeah i did linear gradient there
because i couldnt figure out radial then
now i know though
fake sun
i use linear a lot
mine is dxo i dont like to use it its weird
i cant do radial gradient if theres no blurry background btw
better example
because it uses Ai and subtracts automatically

nice shot
i didn't like photolab when i used it
i do radial mask a lot for in flight shots
makes the blue sky background more interesting
Thats a lot of sun for very little highlighting on the bird
I'm personally not a fan of fake sun. A lot of people don't do it correct either
#🦀・creatures message
for example, looks like the sun is in the wrong spot in this photo
In what situations can I use A mode for birds?
wow
And another question: why does my camera blur the background so much only when I zoom in?
What's it called again
Uhh
Lessens the depth of field in the photo
Are you trying to say bokeh?
More distance you can see the less the image is magnified to fit in the view, lessening how much depth there is between subject and background. Bokeh is amplified the greater the distance between subject and background are
No
Uhh
Let me find it
There isn't a name for it I was being a bit stupid
What is the ISO?
get lower to the ground if u can
400
i was in car and already left
is that super cropped?
yes
i see
When I go to Kenya next I really want to see one of these
The distance was long.
2nd one overexposed?
I’ll be able to fix that in post
Looks worse than it is cause Its a picture of the screen
Sky in the first one for example is blue but it looks overexposed cause of me taking an image of the screen
right.. but the more you zoom out the less distance the camera can perceive
As you zoom in the camera better perceives the long distance and it amplifies the bokeh
The less magnification you have the less amplified the distance is
wdym by magnification?
https://youtu.be/wO0q3HdAiak?t=246
basically the technique in this vid
My Wildlife Photography Editing Workflow | Make your Photos POP In Photoshop
Ever come home with a wildlife photo you're proud of but feel it lacks that extra oomph? Join me in this journey from an acceptable shot to an outstanding masterpiece using Photoshop for wildlife photography editing!
🌲 Composition Tweaks: Starting with a crop (hit '...
it's a nice easy way to boost a photo usually
Let me save this just to never watch it
just not possible for me to do
i cant afford ps rn
idk about these radial gradients
probably don't need ps, just need to be able to do radial gradient masks. i use lr
also cant afford
I did it on my feeder photo
i cant do radial
It works somewhat
https://www.dxo.com/dxo-photolab/u-point/ - looks like referred to as control point in photolab
yes
but it uses AI
it automatically subtracts stuff partly
makes it unusable sometimes
i prefer a more spotlight approach usually
lmao the cardinal
i mightve gone a little overboard with this one but playing with gradients is fun
good lord, the clarity of that eye.
haunting
how do u get the images to look like this
umm
Something with the tone curve
does the background blur look too fake
I literally can't do it I can't move it like you are meant to
is this better or the first one?
I love radial gradients
Terrible sensor 
i tried one in that desaturated style and one that's what i would normally do, which one is better?
lol marginally different, i prefer right though
Yeah idk if it uses ai but it automatically subtracts
you can acheive the same with brushes, just downloaded pl to try it
Ik
I also did that
It’s just annoying though
Invasive bird, it's pretty but it was hiding.
what's DR?
Imo adding in some fake lighting to this extent works well if theres an existing ray or flare that you then exaggerate. If theres nothing i find faking it on the subject itself with intersecting gradients and then having some subtle radial sunlight or god rays works better. Or at least it looks more natural.
On this last one, instead of a radial gradient i think faking god rays would make it pop just that much more
Does the video you linked cover this technique? Like pushing the background back by desaturating it or going to grey and then making the subject pop. Sorry im out atm and cant open the vid, wanted to check if i should bookmark it for later so i remember
I bought some flowew for my patio that hummingbirds would like
generally it's masking via excluding the subject and specifically desaturating / decreasing greens
black kites and royal kites are back here
too strong imo
which one
I agree
Sorry, didn't realize my msg got deleted b/c it had a link in it. The video doesn't really show that method but I have a link in my profile to my link tree > LR Editing Walkthroughs with those photos uploaded and the editing steps I took, if that helps. If you have lightroom you can save the presets too
ffs
time for me to go out birding
Weird looking birb
Someone told me there's a tawny owl singing every sunset near his home i'll try it today to get it
monthly ish check in
I went to arizona I guess
I have like 17k more pics to go through but here are some so far
spow was cool
what lens?
500 f4 G VR
the chonky boy
im too broke to get the 400 2.8 TC so had to settle for arm day everyday
Smh, my 1st actually nice bif pic and its completely out of focus
Yes
Did you have the 500/4 with the D500 or did it come after the Z9?
I used the d500 with it for about a year or a little more
er a little less
idk
here are some pics from the combo though if you care to see them
sorry for photo spam everyone
very nice
so if you go with the FL
its only sharper
slightly better af
better stabilization
biggest thing is the weight and size over a 600/4 I think
and I think the new coating on the front should help it stay a teeny bit cleaner but otherwise its lighter
I think its very comparable size-wise to a 600 f4 tbh
I mean I think its around the same size as the G right
afaik it is
comparing the FL ED 500 and 600 the 500 is 6.8lbs and 600 8.3lbs
but yeah Id say if you can get it for anywhere under like 3200 usd it would be great
dang
and I think the 500/4 fits in my current bag while 600/4 doesn't
oh interesting
yeah......my setup with the z9 now is over 13 total I think
it was a pain dragging it across the country
but worth it for the f4
lots of very nice shots
and great considering I didnt spend much on it
next lens hopefully will be the 400 2.8 E FL VR
would love that one
I finally was able to use my 500 with a tc, and man its like plenty if not too much reach for me now
so having 400 at 2.8 with the option for 540 f4, would be so fun and I think perfect for what I do
wym they're right there
Why does this look like you took a picture in a dream
Phone camera is dying
this is a fire pic lol
1h here and still 0 photos
Time to move
Couldnt get close cause of the 3 big ass dogs
It's a hawk
brown hawk yeah?
supposed to have those around here
or red idk
Forests are the hardest area to have shots
looks like an osprey to me
it does
it dove into the water below my house fishing for something a few times
That's indeed an Osprey, sick
google says theyre uncommon where i live and that they return from africa in april/may to spend the summers here hunting around lakes
pretty cool 
Yeah they're pretty uncommon all over Europe. There's breeding pairs all over, but generally they're a rare sight due to low populations
In the Netherlands we have like 12 breeding pairs or something like that
Oh nvm it was only 6 in 2024, with the first ever breeding pairs only in 2016
Red kite my beloved
i like this image
landscaper in me enjoys these with wider crops instead of right up in its face
background was soft and pretty here
first time since moving here i get to actually capture anything decent of a bird of prey, seen eagles, hawks and kites (i think) a bunch of times but never with a camera ready or just been too slow to get em
eagles are cunts, theyll spot me from 200 meters and then piss off lol
Now that the big birds are starting to show up more imma need to go back up the mountain
Yeah very nice, good background separation as well, which I find hard to get in these kinda shots
700mm f5,6 helps but the distance from the bird to the background forest is also like a solid 200 meters which helped
didnt get to edit this one today :(
Yes 99% of birding session
It be like that
I like this photo but man this background is wild
I already asked this, but I'll ask again because it wasn't very clear to me: why didn't my camera properly blur the background of some of the goose photos if the background was far away?
I only blurred the background well when I zoomed in on her face, but other than that, it didn't.
cause your sensor is tiny and the lens not good
you need to be very very close to get any kind of blur on that kind of camera
i was like 1 meter away from the goose
they aren't ugly
And why does it blur properly when you zoom in?
it's a shitty point and shoot, lower your expectations
tried a more moody/spot edit following Vox's workflow. Definitely something to try more of, rather than pushing for brighter and more "complete" edits
Did you swap the natural light direction
my very first good shot of a jackdaw
i really wanted to play with the foreground and background
well, it was top lit. I lost myself in masks trying this new approach. couldnt figure out where things went wrong so just went with what it came out to be. heres the original. I tried to go back in and fix it but it was proving too much c:
The light source appears to be either behind or overhead the bird but theres a strong highlight on the foreground side of the bird as if a flashlight is being shone on it. But if that was the case the branch is completely in shadow as if it is lit from the back or overhead without any frontal lighting
Thats the hard part of light manipulation that these videos don't go over... they just say "oh I'm going to put my gradient top left" but they don't typically explain they chose that to retain their highlights from their sun thats overhead to the left
If you're gonna do moody with that composition and lighting I think you can achieve about the same visual effect here without creating false light directions by doing a spotlight effect
you'd retain the natural highlights but darken the rest of the photo even more. Wing/Underbelly of the bird should be dark not bright theres no light below.
Or just bring back the highlights on the branch I think that'd do well actually
yeah that makes sense. Looking back, I focused too much on the 'spot' effect, so I applied a radial gradient to the face to make it pop. That obviously threw the lighting off. Just subtracting the bird from that gradient helps remove the artificial lighting.
What was throwing me off was the bounce light at the bottom right, which made it seem like the spot worked. anywho heres a quick fix following the points you raised. not the greatest but It feels like an improvement c:
I like that better. Its less dramatic but the light is more correct. Brighten the top half of the bird and keep the head highlighted
You can select the background and make the greens more forest green again for drama
Thats much more similar to what I was actually just sketching on my phone to show you
It's difficult to stay on track with everything. especially when you go in with a particular aim or look in mind. A fundamental, such as keeping the lighting correct, easily gets lost. I'll try to wait a bit after an edit, just so I have a fresh look at things. It may seem like this is being too picky, but I'm kind of annoyed I missed that
Don't be annoyed lighting is really hard. I personally don't enjoy editing a lot so I don't mess with dramatic edits anymore despite how great they look and their popularity
editing the light is something hard at start and can be messed up really fast
100%. Especially when the photo isn't fresh in your mind. I found myself editing months later and going "Huh. I can't even tell or remember where the light is truly coming from"
learnt the hard way 😭 . Still, I found the process enjoyable and its opened up a bunch of new avenues to explore with future shots
appreciate the feedback!
you have the raw ? to show you an example of edit
Now that you're aware of it scroll through #🦀・creatures and look at how many people create fake light directions that don't match the actual source
Definitely a common oversight
meanwhile me analyzing every pixel of shadow to see where the light exactly come from 
Ah, not looked through that yet. Seems like a solid place to get inspiration
Its not the biggest photo killer (well, sometimes it is.) if you mess it up but its one of those things that'll elevate you from a natural vs over edited look
heres the raw, I think its attached correctly
And fwiw really good shot btw. I love that bird
jackdaw!
light is very sensitive so be gentle with cursors this can be a mess really fast (too fast)
The last moody edit I remember doing I was in Photoshop with a 2 pixel brush burning and dodging things. That was probably when I decided I disliked editing and just enjoy the photo setup and capturing process
i can easily take pics of jackdows
now that leaves are coming back i could maybe get some nice ones
lightroom is better for photo edit even if photoshop is more advanced but for editing it's a little bit too much
icl i just prefer photoshop to lightroom
Ive been familiar with PS for years so I was doing big edits in LR then small ones in PS. Ive come to love LR now though and everythings in LR
I like how Lightroom isn't for minute details; its clunkiness helps you look at the whole image and make "big" edits. I use Photoshop for other things, and I know that if I were editing on it, I'd be going into every crevice trying to get things to be pixel-perfect
lightroom need so much more ram than photoshop
i don't have lagging issues on photoshop but lightroom just feels so slow
@unborn frost here a first result
try editing this one 🙂
try fixing the CA
light too strong
Needs Satoro Gojo eye
?
pretty significant difference based on editing choice. It's obvious but goes to show how theres always room to flip things and go in a complete different direction if you get stuck
man u make me wanna go see the jackdaws
imma go tomorrow maybe
yeahon photos sometimes you need to try other things
What f stop was that jackdaw?
wait icl lightroom might be dealing with blown out highlights better for whatever reason
f/6.3 for both shots
Dang for me to get that kinda bokeh I'd need to be in a zoo
so much abundant foilage everywhere hard to get that kind of separation
clarity to -100 
bokeh 🔥
i call that the double distance factor
the background need to be 2x more far than the original distance between you and the subject
likr that you can have this kind of bokeh
@grizzled nebula
foreground can be really creative when used properly
Thats nice
here an example of good use of background and foreground
The kind of trees birds like to land in for me 
look CA gone
I just got a really nice soaking wet blue jay but I think my lens stabilization was off. Hoping 1/1600 froze everything nicely. Ive been playing with turning lens stabilization off because I think its slowing down my tracking from bird stationary to flying
Nope, again bad sensor. I would never use it 
Day 2 of hating on the R6 II sensor until someone hits me with the "its the same sensor as the R8"
Canon : you want a new sensor ? here a new body with the EXACT SAME SENSOR WHO COST EVEN MORE

my eyes can't stand purple
My battery life sucks so bad
literally sony
I honestly can't even spot the CA in the photo unless I zoom to like 250%
for FX and a7/6 series
A1II and A1 have the exact same sensor
one is 3k more
yeah bc theres more software but the a1 iii is with a global shutter
i wanna see what the R3II will be like
still same sensor
but with a better overall optimization
yh but... still same sensor 
R5II better sensor than R5, R6III better sensor than R6II, R6II better sensor than R6
also canon sexy evf on newer pro bodies
give me R5II evf or i retire
well it's a little bit logic bc it's newer
not logical for sony 
sony could've come out with some insane new next gen super sensor but they decided to keep the same one
why changing something that's already good enough ?
The high speed OLED EVF is so nice
good enough is not enough
like canon with a global shutter sensor ? oh wait that's from sony 
it sucks
the low light performance is ass and if 2.4ms is not enough you should stop photography
still better than a bsi sensor
I wish I saw some falcons
i wish i could see some too
just for 24mp for you it's bad okay 
i mean low light is apparently ass
Messed up my settings and ended up with a 1/2500 shot, IQ still looks alright
btw i confused with the a1 iii (only rumors) with the a9 iii
this is probably what i would have done with a shot like that. that deep matte style is definitely not something you'll be able to apply to all photos
I have seen rumors about about a fully stacked a7rvi
Highly improbable, but I guess that would be what I would expect from a a1iii
it's just seems weird cause if it has an insanely good readout speed the A1II will just be outdated already
not really bc it will got boosted with software tech
63mp ~12ms is what i've seen from rumours but that seems very unlikely
you can't boost the mp with software
if they fix the AF with the A7RIV madre mia
I fully expect them to raise the price to silly levels
just look the a1 and a1 ii same sensor but more software and AI chip
a7rv was $3,900
so they can do even better now plus with the V2 ai chip
$5,000 for the next one?
6k maybe
then this statement is incorrect
yeah, I'm out

honnestly if it's insane maybe it'll be worth the 6K
R5II can be bought for 2.8K..
"pro" being old people with too much money
A1II is 5K at the cheapest
and who thinks they are insane photographers but don't know what ISO or speed is
how old is old, asking for a friend
my age + 10
idk 60yo ? (30yo for messed ppl
)
Relative to the person asking 
i am 67 years old
At least for men some studies suggest 30s is peak physical and mental performance. So 45+, 50+?
$1 its gonna be blurry AF and not worth my time once I import it
Make it 2$
nah 5€ better
Insane shot btw
the crow or other bird specie : OH GREAT HEAVEN A CAMERA
Thanks, I hate these birds on my feeder. I turned the siren on while holding down shutter
if it is what af zone did u use
Precapture?
Nah my sd card 2smal for precapture
I was one handing my phone and the other my camera 
Precap has ruined my brain
I use 1 point on AF case 4
I see incredible pictures of flying birds and my brain only says "nah its just precap, not that great"
I mean I don't really see a need for precapture (called raw burst in Canon)
I just hold shutter down and let it take 2,000 photos until my subject moves
this is the way
real pros get a z8 and a dummy battery and leave the camera on auto while they go make a sandwich
too powerful
I can do that on my R8
real pros pair a Z8 with a 600 F/4
i wrote a software for it 
yh that's jus the old version of precap
the new one is clear
Isn't 400 f2.8 better?
depends
I guess the R8 isn't loved enough for it
it's only on the newer cameras
R5II, R1 and R6III
this is the goat
he's an old photographer 
i'm going back to camargue in a few days but with someone again 
R8 is a 2023 camera when was R6 II?
2022 i believe
nice bird perch
Ok so Canon just hates people min maxing budget 
well i have the same AF as u
Yes
yh nah i have the shitty version too
Did you set a custom AF zone for birds or what af area do you use
spot af > all
But when the start to fly from stationary I lose em
custom mapped button
To switch to whole area?
wide af is just a big spot af
Man these birds fly at 30mph I aint able to switch that fast 
just map a custom button it will switch everything when you press it
I'm playing around with my settings, thinking of trying this zone
Anyway, subject detection is so good now that I often pick whatever an it works fine
You use whole area?
When the subject fill most of the frame yes
i use the expand area 4 af zone and full AF zone and also spot AF when it's small birds
canon subject recognition is the best 
always on spot af and when flying large af switch
I just mapped my record button to whole area subject track toggle
So I can swap one spot and whole area
why using large af on perched bird ?
cause why not?
they don't moving they do nothing so it's just legit to put spot af
to get a more precise eye af
canon AF detects the eyes perfectly
yeah bc you have ai af

i mostly use expand AF (4 Dots) cause it's not too big and is quite good for tracking
great idea
yup, wanted to just try it out, and this one looked somewhat menacing, so I thought, why not? c: The biggest thing I've taken away is not to shy away from editing the background itself if it requires it. Also picked up how to be more selective with colour adjustments as opposed to just using temp and saturation/vibrance sliders
(And don't mess with the natural light source)
yessir
yeah, definitely. at the least, for that style your starting photo should have a **lot ** of natural light, i.e
I think Mango said earlier, so when / if you do add a spotlight radial, you're not creating highlights from * nothing *, but accentuating what's already there
also getting this stylized is very polarizing. i have friends that absolutely hate it, whereas i love it lol
Yoo gang thanks for answering my AF questions @grizzled nebula @magic crown
I finally got a small bird from stationary to in flight
Its kinda mid bc I wasn't expecting it to work but it worked
U should do a wider crop and move it to the left top third so its staring off into space 
square
I feel like this one would benefit from some white balancing, it feels a bit too much green/yellow
This is what I had in mind (edited from the really bad gallery app of my phone)
i'll re edit tomorrow, i'm too tired rn icl
Obviously not the same mood though
i can barely keep my eyes open or stay focused
lol I feel you
gn
Whopper
Osprey
Mid
Lightroom's auto culling despite being beta is nice as heck man
No longer am I combing through 4,000 photos myself
I got this soaking wet blue jay in the rain on my fence but since I'm in a storm 12.8k ISO
not really an issue except that denoiser is going to make the feathers look like melted together plastic
This photo is complete scrap right
dont send a raw file
i cant open it
You want a screenshot over it?
there are many things wrong with this to begin with tbh
I'll build the smart view, 1 min
its savable
I like it minus the noise. That is a zoomed in screenshot over the photo
do a wide crop, and clean up the image abit with ai remove
Like the branch that looks like the wing is melting into?
yes
but honestly your camera angle can be improved
its too high, too much white whatever that is in the frame
So, setup a ladder and look down on top of it more?
I can do that
at the moment I just come running when the bird feeder says a colorful songbird is on it
youre too high
or idk
js set it up so you have a green bg
yeah works
I've been tempted to buy a bird blind and sit in my yard 
I've been getting blue jays, cardinals, and painted buntings
New city is a ton of suburbs, not a lot of woodsy access to where I can bird spot more naturally. Such a shame because Florida birds are crazy
Non destructive Vs destructive
Lr saves every single change that you do
Photoshop has layers
Good luck!
Gl
Cute birb
Just my county fair
I need help
For a top down Bird Shot
How do I prevent my camera focusing the ground
Because I already have Center Focus and it even recognizes the eyes when I manually focus them but it defocuses still if I don’t hold focus
The birds were fully centered
is it on tracking
well play around and see if its better with or without
and also the lock on what was it called
af sensitivity
^
basically af all the time even when youre not holding any button
but is it on...
No
hm
sometimes i find that it works if i dont ask it to track birds
just track
like subject af detection off
also try play with the af area
i mean it is harder to track if its small in the frame
It was wayyyy bigger in frame before
And it focused once
I just found another pic
Yeah I just switched
I don’t think the kestrel will come back though
I had the same problem on a kite
This is the closest I got my camera to focus it
im so buns at this 😭
anyone?
why?
I'm going to a riverside forest; is it difficult to take pictures of birds there?
if you zoom in more youll get more bokeh me thinks
idk why im bad thats what i wanna know 😭
yeah they are pretty more scared than aquatic birds but you can get maybe some good images
this is pretty nice
u just dont have a ton of subject background separation
perhaps mask the background and do a tiny bit of negative clarity
it's a nice photo tho
yeah looking at my photos thats what ive been struggling with, need to position myself better
whats ur setup?
yep it's all about moving around but also gotta make sure the bird doesnt fly away lmao
d7200 + 100-400
right now im happy if a bird even near me in the first place lol
but slowly starting to realize that getting one gud photo > tons of pics that ill never look at again
yea i cull pretty hard
I use the assisted culling in LR now its actually pretty awesome
i need to learn how to delete more tho i usually just dont choose them and let them sit
does it work for birds? i tried it when it first came out and it was shit
Whatever I don't edit gets deleted. I don't have much ssd space left
i think it was only good for human portraits at first
Its worked on all animals for me. I started using it about a month ago
hmm neat
I quickly scroll through the rejects and bring back any that I think I can save like if a not super sharp bird has its wings doing something cool
do u do eye focus?
But usually cuts my 4,000 photos down to like 150
No I only use the subject sharpness detection
This was a reject because the bird's head isn't crazy sharp but I brought it back for the motion for example. Sometimes it misses things like this but it does pretty well
I set it to 70% sharpness which feels aggressive but when I have 4k photos 
I only want 1-3 edit options of each subject
I should do this, this is a good strat
I like the photo
Do you think I can take good photos with my camera?
u have asked this like 10 times already
it is possible yes
mmm idk
Selective denoise, only denoise the background fully and denoise the bird slightly
Guys I’m going out birding for the first time in like 6 months
denoise does this automatically
it doesn't mess with the subject as much
My mobile always fucks it up, pc denoise is so much better
yep i only use lightroom classic
How do you do that?
Someone tell mine to stop being silly then
good luck!
ok AI denoise actually did really well this time. I even tried to force it at 100%
I do have photos though where it makes the wings look like melted together plastic
like the body of this one under the dark wing
Bruh I was gonna say ts
why did you stop
And what is the reason for that?
Any tips for taking photos of them in the riverside forest?
It’s not that I stopped but more like I didn’t have time for it
I went out once for owls this winter but otherwise I was too busy
Not trying to shut you down, this is coming from a place of trying to improve but is the noise that bad? 🤔
In all fairness I’m looking at discord on mobile so I don’t know how noticeable it is on PC but the picture looks fine to me unless I super zoom in on the bird….
The background has decent noise, denoise will smooth their bokeh out
It’s crazy amount of noise and the only improvement for that is either if the situation allowed it lower iso or better denoise though denoise is not a thing of you improving, it’s about technology
i mean it kind of is, there's a huge amount of color noise
Yo
Do u use eBird btw
yes
