#psyker-class
1 messages · Page 661 of 1
all staves are cope
thats just factual
staves got done dirty
it is what it is
Personally i take that with a pinch of salt, because my experience of successful runs would show vastly different data
when a very popular gun is also very effective in the tierlsit, it is the mark of a OP weapon
pray for wizard sticks
What is your finding?
The data is basically useless unless you also consider all other combinations
You can assume the data is going to be less accurate for rarer weapons like revolver psyker and agri shottie zealot. And probably las pistol
Does X weapon win a lot because those games had a lot of Y in it
Well for example i would say success rates with Boltgun are higher than Hellbore overall, and yet Hellbore for Vet is S tier an Boltgun isnt
Where is this meme from
Same as i would say Purga Psykers would have a lower success rate overall than Trauma or Surge
but thats the point of a large sample-size, it average out those factors
i can make a reddit post with 250,000 games and make up my own tier list
from reddit thread
I personally have experienced gunkers and trauma doing way more work at higher level 🤷
Hrm helbore is rarer indeed but I can't remember I lost a game with a helbore in the team.
Too many bolter guys just mag dump.
I mean unironically do so and post actual data and it will be a valuable anecdote to contribute to a larger corpus
I lost one yesterday with Hellbore user :/
copeatus much ? 
But there's so many variables in this
Every other class.
Dayum it wasn't me. I haven't played helbore this week.
thats my point theres no data at all i can just say whatever i want
The weapon itself
again, a large sample size, will average out those issues
Yeah but even 2500 isn't big enough
It's not trash
I mean, from my perspective, from the past 500 games i've played, i could just pull out a recon lasgun = S for all classes with access to it because we won most games with that thing in the team
it's just that no one knows how to read data
I trust reddit with my life. Purg is trash tier.
i think he should have posted the raw data
yes u can make anything up
Assuming a truly random sampling you honestly don't need huge numbers for statistically useful output. The reddit thread is not random sampling tho
THey also say purg is OP
Its ok I think the main weakness is it cant do anything to spam specials
but I am hoping everyone here is smart enough to know kanty shotgun isn't the best gun on veteran
Pls source
it is pretty useless
I dont talk alot in this chat becus glasses
I can use it to point and laugh at people who think gun psyker is better
Consider the permutations of:
- classes included
- weapons included
- map played
- spawns
- build used
2500 games isn’t even enough to fully explore that space let alone make serious statistical claims from it, it’s absolutely gargantuan
nah, it's pretty good to see playrate vs winrate on objectively OP weapons vs low playerate weapons with high winrate
almost nothing can be meaningfully concluded from it other than this guy writes long paragraphs
Reddit moment
there is no raq data
Lmao
that would be true if you're looking for a 100% accurate concrete proof, but it doesn't mean that the data that is there is 100% meaningless, it can still indicate a trend
So its just "trust me bro"
2500 games of hishock is alot

thats why i said i can say i did 2.5 million games and make a tier list with recon at the top
everything else F
that's some serious cope to just assume he's lying
Or he's just collecting data that doesn't represent reality.
Tbh
I assume everyone on reddit is lying
Unless they can prove it
The raw could also be falsified if posted 
if he posted a video, nah bro, it's been photoshopped, CGI
All of reality can be falsified, in fact, and ergo we live in a simulation
you mean like spam kill special units? no, not quite as fast as like a bolter vet or something true. purg staff goes brrrr tho if things clumped up in a mixed horde
The list specifically doesnt take into account if the person with the weapon was actually a useful part of the team, or sandbagged the entire round either
Sure. But at least then that's something you can look at and draw our own conclusions.
or 34 games and then he faked the other 16 games data and then said he did 2500 games
Why would redditor lie? Reddit and discord are famously reliable source.
Like I'd rather
See a list of "here's the win rate I get with this weapon and this set-up over 1000 games"
Than "here's the win rate randoms in my team get that I can't quantify at all".
surely that'd be worse, it'd be more biased to your personal skill
Big Voidstrike is falsifying the data to hide how op it its and avoid nerfs 
like, at the simplest, it doesn't factor in perks/blessings etc. that is fundamentally useless
because a bunch of weapons are just outright twice as strong with certain blessing combos
i too saw this post, and was like "what?!" at some of the results. gotta be bad data
as if everyone's not running the same 2-3 blessings per weapon
I mean its a more consistent factor than having all these random things that the guy doesn't know come into play.
revolver the most op gun? kant shotty? on vet? lol what
yeah, and thats worse
i used the voidstrike in one game at level 16 and won topscoring, therefore the voidstrike is in S tier because it has 100% winrate and carry capability.
That's... a way worse data set, though?
i mean they're serviceable, but the besT?
yeah, they're not. you'd be surprised
disagree = wrong
But you can't see most of the data so you're drawing conclusions based on things that you can't see 
but then you'd be lying about your data
Because its not just the weapon we get data for here
2500 auric games means the poster (if all the games were won) would be level 2000 in darktide
Or rather don't get in this case.
and as far as iknow the highest level player is roughly 1700
what
To be fair they didn't necessarily win all of those.
the post said auric games played of hishocks
In fact
IF the winrate was 100% for every game
They probably lost a lot
just like how the OP could be lying
fundamentally i think categorizing stuff as a "tier list" is just going to mislead people. a bunch of people in those comments are misinterpreting what "S Tier" and so on means
i've played hundreds of games
why would OP lie and say kanty shotgun is S tier but with an extremely low playrate?
Yeah this is the real issue with whatever OP is doing
even if the author specifies it is specifically about recorded winrate
How dare you
he chose a stupid way to categorize it
Why not just post the win rates??
I make long paragraphs too
categorizing into tier list was dumb
BOLTER IS A D TIER GUN ON ZEALOT CONFIRMED
This is true.
All this tier list says is
REVOLVER S TIER ON PSYKER
surge is the best staff!
revolver on zealot > bolter on zealot

the data on its own is whatever, from my personal experience kant shotgun vets are either really good players or functionally useless, and ive hardly seen vets use it in general
wrong
Unironcally though
i can't press F on revolver and kill 7 crushers
That's not what the Revolver is for
ironically though
the revolver is so that you can run around and feel cool
you know shit's real when derpy disagrees with something
Revolver is great
Youc an whip it out
Knock a fool down
Go back to meleeing
Ez pz
oh I know it isn't, i'm just guessing any psyker insane enough to take revolver is a mentally insane pro who needs to challenge themselves
just slide backwards with bolter
Pygex was running revolver and he apparently liked it
or absolute shit tier, and most people dont fall into either category
Said it was pnics
(and also dont use revolver on psyker)
u can just take a revolver and then just main illisi and bb its pretty ez
revolver is best on a zealot, imo. Its a perfect elite sniping/problem solving weapon for them that can pull out fast and go back to melee
Something something stack warp battery n shit to buff revolver damage to hit breakpoints
is it so hard to accept revolver is the S tier weapon for psyker and you have been playing psyker the wrong way >
It's still bad though but I agree.

And then use AB for horde clear
I love using the Revolver on Zealot
i mean, mk3 helbore I think is accurate
Come on reject whip out ur crazy gun!
So I can go bang bang and knock a dog off my friend
Flak + Unarmoured on this, yeah?
but mk3 is not a fun or easy to use weapon, but it is extremely effective
(I got really fucking lucky with Blessings)
Mk3 helbore sux
shredder crutcher
i'd keep maniac so you can make up for the 60% maniac damage
honestly, i dont think so. one of my most effective builds on zealot for high difficulty is revolver/rashad axe. You can kill/duel anything, quick elite sniping to take out those specials before they do anything.
its not the best gun in the game or anything, but its super solid
I like agri shottie as a revolver alternative on zealot
i mean bolter is better than revolver
you just have to play around the pull out time
im gonna be honest the rashad just carries that loadout
caxe + whatever is super strong
but that is also partly cause pinning fire
It does really shit damage for the ammo it uses.
doesnt have anything to do with revolver
eoeoeoeoeoeoeo brrrrrrrg
The Revolver is absolutely an ammo waste
tierlists are generally worthless cuz theyre subjective and i dont personally care how mr xyz on reddit ranks 47 different items on an arbitrary scale
meaningless
Game with 4 top meta weapons on vet vs each other
on zealot? Nah. Not at all.
Slow, unwieldy, takes longer i think to reload and you can't reload 1-2 bullets and take out an important unit.
on vet bolter is god tier, but i don't even like it that much on zealot. You can kill/duel most units the bolter kills easily with a rashad axe
The ammo is my biggest issue with revolver personally
yes except
Zealot F
scales bolter
to an insane level which is needed for bulwark and crusher packs
cause you can't really melee into multiple bulwarks
The power of faith going crazy if just shouting to the emperor makes gun shoot better
Mk2 better than mk3 helbore.
Nuh no crusher and boss damage
you just need to play around the pull out time
this useful at all? and if so what to change?
it's dead on accurate entering ads
scales every ranged weapon. Not that useful when dumping ammo with the zealots lower ammo capacity, compared to vet bolter feels bad, and i can duel those crushers and literally 3 shot them in the head with a rashad axe no ammo useage.
Sure, its a good "oh shit" button gun, i'll give you that. But if you play well and know the quick swap timings and hipfire aim on the revolver, idk. Its EXCELLENT on a zealot when used right
it's literally not ammo dump when you clear multiple bulwarks/crushers
and you can still pick off things with it, just harder to aim
agri shotgun does that better at that point
and can still kill them with revolver + f if you really wanted to
cause you aren't really using Rev for cara damage
I think Revolver on Zealot is like, B tier for me. It's got ~sustained damage with the shoot one > reload one thing, then has burst damage for mag dumping. I've had a couple moments where the high cleave comes in handy, it feels like a Plasma Gun with the pen sometimes. It has a niche that isn't common to find but when I bring one I don't feel useless.
so agri shotgun>revolver
nah man, not even close lol
loading that slug in each time
miss me
revolver is unmatched for versatility/quick solving specials on zealot
i truly think its an A or S tier zealot ranged option
when used right
like you reload a revolver shot everytime
and I can shoot the agri 13 times
Absolutely not if were scaling it off of other options.
and then i can reload 1, fire, or 2, fire fire. its way more versatile
Agri holds like what 12 slugs in the clip
🤷
no
1 slug at a time
it holds 1 slug
but slug loading is faster than reloading
And it reloads faster
but it's the same or better on everything except carapace
not if you're reloading EVERY SHOT
The bolt action on it isn't that much of an impediment
thats so much action economy lost
if you guys think the agri shotty is as good as revolver on damnation high sgt idk what to say lol
play more zealot?
? you reload faster so you reload during downtime, just like revolver
we can disagree
i'm literally a zealot main
but its not even close
since the buff?
revolver has shit blessings and blessings carry agri over buffed revolver
no respite+ fullbore
easy life
Disagree = wrong but presented unironically
im not saying other options arent good
go maniac flak. same shit as revolver except for penning armor
im just saying the revolver > agri shotty
except you aren't using your revolver as anti armor
yea
it's okay to be wrong
agree to disagree
fellow kindred
you're playing high sgt, and damnation maelstrom with the agri shotty? just making sure
we aren't playing different modes
with different breakpoints
is it harder to get a good agri? yea
Typo, you accidentally flipped the sign
not chastising
just making sure
makes no sense to debate if we are talking about different game modes with different breakpoints
LMAO now you are just coping
huh?
It's hard to compare them directly because they bring different utility. I'd say the thing the Agri brings a more versatile kit due to the nature of it, the Revolver is more burst damage focused with high cleave on the shots. They have their own little close/medium-range-precision damage kits.
the only thing I can give revolver is it's carapace damage, and that it's easier to make a great one cause you literally don't have to worry about blessings
Revolvers are pretty bad imo
but agri with no respite+ fullbore beats it out every day for the playstyle you are suggesting
i mean, it 1-2 taps most specials AND penetrates. The amount of time i take a single shot and kill 2-3 specials lined up is not small
It's swag. Not my ideal perks and blessings combo tho.
its carapace dmg isnt even something i think about
i use rashad axe for carapace
unless in a pinch
so does like, agri?
doesn't pen but it doesn't need to cause you have over 2x the ammo
and you reload faster
reloading every shot, sure. with less penetration
Haven't had trouble one shotting specials or gunners with agri slugs on 5. In auric definitely apreciate having more shots before reloading even with the bolt action because there's so many specials / shotties / gunners at once
it really does and lmao
= less reloading action economy overall
than putting a slug in the chamber EVERY SHOT
and doing the animation every time
i can pull out revolver, fire up to 5 rounds, even from the hip, and be back in melee instantly
agri can still be used on normal shots close to medium close
Agri can load shots faster technically. However, Revolver can burst 5 slugs back to back. So in a case where you're only using 1 singular shot and then reloading, the Agri has an upper hand with specifically the reload.
and it also has a fast swap speed LMAO
its not a big deal, when you can use it that way, then slide reload when you have space a few seconds later
the overal action economy
is way less
than loading the slug in every shot
yea bro
You can also do it 12 time before doing a real reload, pretty nice when there's a lot of crap on the map
hard to have an intelligent debate when you're questioning basic gaming lingo
you do you with your agri lol
not trying to convince you not to use it
cause agri just has to slide rounds in
you have to take out your cylinder and dump rounds
and put it back in place
I never heard action economy in a game that isn't a fighting game
or a card game
fatshark needs to have a public API for game records
cause I'm not a maniac
so we can look at people's profile
ya but then i would rather use a kant, which does a lot more dmg with its normal fire mode and the flame round is a lot more versatile
to skillcheck them
Reading comprehension fail, it's your use of the term being questioned 
APM doesn't really matter outside of fighting games or mmos.
but that's a different use case all together
kant is anti horde for stuff like thunderhammer
not talking about APM, but action economy = how often you have to stop to do an action and take attention away from your normal movement/fighting/killing/defending to do some sort of 'upkeep'
Its probably more an rts term than an FPS term, addmittingly, but can be applied to really any game. i see it used all the time
you are overvalueing revolvers action economy and/or undervalueing agri shotgun action economy
Everyone knows what action economy is why do you keep explaining it lmao
anyways, as an experience revolver player since beta
this doesn't need to turn into an argument, you like the agri shotty on zealot. cool, i think revolver is better. As long as you're winning matches and having fun, doesn't really matter. I disagree but realizing we don't need to turn this into a thing, i gotta go back to work anyway
I think I know what I'm talking about for probably my most used weapon still
you already did tho

bruh, bc i was questioned on it like 3 times lmao
and then APM was brought up
which wasn't what i was talking about
Because you used it wrong lol
APM and action economy are used for the same thing.
not really? but related
You typically even find APM to determine action econ.
the fuck are you on lol
action economy is resource based, APM is mechanical
apm doesn't really apply to games outside like rts imo
Is it good enough for T5 Maelstrom ? I've only been a deimos enjoyer so far and I'm thinking of switching to Illisi
but in those games they're related, to an extent sure, as your apm can dictate your ability to have a bigger "action economy"
yes
finesse is a bit low rather have lower mobility and warp resistance
Unless I have a different understanding of either APM or action econ they're used for the same thing ime.
but otherwise it's fine
Coloquially yeah, but actions spent and time spent aren't necessarily the same thing. Agri does require more apm but doesn't have a worse action economy - you can spend more time shooting and less time doung other things with agri than revolver situationally
ya, you'll be totally fine. Finesse being a little low you might notice the attack speed difference (I think finesse is attack speed on illisi, correct me if wrong) so might need to be a little more careful against hordes. but it'll do fine. Illisi goes brrrrrrrr
Which is why everyone is loling at the claim revolver has better action economy 
you see i think it's fucking funny cause I know the damage numbers and timing and you are hear arguing theoreticals and hypothetical action times
I wasn't saying they're the same thing I said they're used for the same thing.
I guess revolver doesn't fall off as much? does that make you feel better
Ty guys !
Autopistol truly the best staff
true
not vet bad class
but no respite fullbore is pretty nice
i doubt it
wanna bet on it?
vets got real pissy after the slap on the wrist nerf to power cycler
yeah vet will be like zealot = weak
Vet going to be lit once there's a commando build Pocket sand!
so have fun while you can 
at most, I see like. pinning nerfs. 50% dr on unwavering. Less people taking ammo/grenade regen for team,
Probably just nerfed.
Not removed.
you don't think a 100% more damage taken change is getting dumpstered?
currently they take 1/4th the damage and deal 1.5 times their normal damage while ulting, and ult can be maintained basically forever
and uhh, limiting refreshes
cause vet is the most played class and also a majority of crybabies off of this discord
i hope fatshark has the absolute B A L L S to subvert expectations and they actually end up buffing unwavering stance
power cycler nerfed caused a ripple that reached my ears and I wasn't even playing darktide or in this server during that time
why does void staff feel terrible to use
holy
Because it doesn't kill anything but hordes, scabs, dregs
and tbh you kinda need blessings to make it feel good
I hope Vet gets reasonable nerfs and not just outright removals of options. Unwavering Focus being a ~25-35% DR is what I'm guessing. Has impact but isn't absurd, builds well with Sharpshooter stuff.
like flurry + transfer peril
i mean we are getting more options with thr skill tree
once you get flurry+ transfer peril t4 i heard it's pretty fun, even if it's not good
Went for blazing spirit / warp nexus for more dps
so nerfs should be fine
Suspect vet is going to have to give more up to become an anti shooter God
perfect time to balance everything well
trauma blazing outshines it and purge exists
better to lean into void's unique build of flurry+transfer peril for infinite spam
My money is on this patch imbalancing stuff more lol. Will take time to account for all the new play styles opening up
ik but I actually do like void for what it is but....
Lots of stuff is probably gonna get balanced for having ~22 skills to pair with it instead of just 5.
gun psyker suddenly becomes meta
I know the overall power of our builds will skyrocket but no way does some stuff stay the same.
Already is
Rumor has it that one of the Psyker branches is a Gunker theme, not confirmed though.
I mean why would u want to deal with the hassle over ammo hogging?
If flayer + warp charges + a busted-ass full auto are still in its all gunker needs
I just had one using the autopistol

I was trying out the void meme build that was mentioned to be good in auric missions
Every time I use Wrack and Ruin
It summons like
Mostly because shredder can kill an entire rager patrol in one clip 
Me when I see void staff perma cc a chaos spawn
void
good
yea
vet shredder can do the same
when I play thunderhammer, every surge psyker and bolter vet
just focuses them down
yea thats a problem if u dont get enough hits before someone steals your kill it feels ass
on top of not having warp unleashed
And not having Warp Flurry felt horrible
thats why I don't zealot anymore cause everything dies before I touchem
Had a game where scoreboard mod said I had ~80 overall score solely because I had 3 vets killing my Thammer's prey before I could get to it.
Was kinda boring. I only ever had an impact against a boss and I didn't even do the most damage lol.
score is pretty meaningless
It is a way to emphasize my experience and support exactly how it felt.
You just need one vet for everyone to get ammo regen, psyker gets nearly as much bonus damage with warp charges and also gets brain bursts. Not saying autopistol gunker is as good as vet but am saying it's better than most staves
I don't ever use the scoreboard mod to show build viability, but rn I'm using it to show just how much I couldn't do anything.
i mean u should look at the statistics rather than the score number
scoreboard is good for relativity
you can see the recon vet and check scoreboard to confirm that yes, recon is bad
im talking purely about the score number
What's the perks for Trauma
scoreboard doesn't account for someone who joining in late
so someone can say a shredder vet is bad cause he has x amount of kills when he joined in mid game
Oh
and poor vision
Damn
Ah yeah I will proceed to list every single damage number during the game instead of just using the number that summarizes the score for me. Yeah totally. Thank you.
Wait are you gonna keep the list going?
Is ok I suck at figuring out what I wanna do too
I got no real vision
damn i was just answering autisticlike
Lmao
np
vision is probably the hardest one cause I can't pick out enemies from the environment easily
I was being sarcastic btw
Is ok just make everything look like it’s meant for the N64
Then no frames will stop u
Not even with glasses?
Don't worry, I can't either
yee
#BlindGangUnite
Lmao who needs frames when you can't see shit
and like, vent purge and lights out I barely play
i have glasses and like that helps
I'm starting to understand why vet players can't hit shit
cause i'm legally blind w/o them

basically non function vision except for reading close to my face
Oh, I still top frag as every class don't worry
just use counterfire

Lmfao
Huh so I’m worse than a blind person, I gotta digest that
So YOU'RE the guy taking all my damn flamer ammo
tack a giant magnifying glass to ur screen and move it around to spot baddies

I feel like you probably misunderstood why I put a scoreboard number into my message. I'm not using it to show a lack of viability with my own build, nor am I using it as a way to improve my build. I'm specifically using it to highlight just how much I couldn't do anything during the match, not at the fault of anyone it was specifically just due to having 3 vets obliterate my build's focus.
At least said blind person’s wearing one of the best heros as a pfp
Correct
Oh shit 200 IQ

i do LOL
I KNEW IT
counterfire best feat
Oh damn
Oh, I'm not that bad
legally blind is not true blind
When are they putting fungoid cave shaman spec in the game
i'm gonna explain it cause occassionally people get confused
I just can't see beyond 2 or 3 feet. Its just all shapes
I'm like -1, -1.5 or something so I can even weapons qual at a range without glasses depending on weather
I wanna enhance my magic with halucinagenics and a spore squig
Driving without my glasses is an effort in public endangerment
Damn
colored blind as well? imagine tho

My 32in monitor doesn't help 
It being at 31 inches also probably doesn't help
but I need my desk space
true blindness is having no vision, legally blind means that without glasses or another medical tool I would be treated as if I was blind and endangering people
I knew a guy who found he was color blind for the first time at 25 when he took the color test for the army
Poor man thought everything was green and blue or something

like, if I drove without glasses or contacts or surgery, it's a felony
i'm, not really colorblind?
What a criminal
I'm pretty sure i'm not in any way

Still boggles me that there are people who can't hold images in their head. Or that can't manifest an internal dialog
Most people when driving anyway
Heyu
Cracked af

The worst thing ever is I cannot see beyond ~2 inches without glasses, which means I was robbed of ever reading while laying down comfortably.
lol tbh fuck those modes. Fun once in a while but not really fun enough to make me choose them. Althought the game looks dope in lights out
once upon a time I had a veeeeery weak minds eye
it has been gone for almost 20 years
Just get the people with 18 voices in their head to share some
Spread the wealth
are u capping
My inner voice lisps 
Nope
Dream psyker hoarding all the danged voices smdh
I've been on both sides of the aphantasia fence
vent purge with sniper spam
so fun am i right? 
that is fascinating
the issue is that if there is persistent skew in a particular direction the results are actively misleading rather than merely uninformative. for instance if the player in question only did meme builds with psyker, their weapon tiers for psyker might be weird and wrong
mfw i walk past an entire squad of scab stalkeres cause it's lights out
and i just don't fuckin see them
Max brightness
mfw the scab stalkers actually stalk for once
bf 2 🤡
I wish fatsharks lighting engine weren't so dogshit
I have to play with global illumination on low
it breaks every single room in the game
I want a game where the flashbangs actually cause epilepsy
They're either PITCH BLACK
True realism
or ALL THE LIGHT
so, ive always wondered if its possible this is often a condition of difference in "description". Like one person says "I can see it in my head" and the other goes "I can't see literal images, im mind blind!"
but obviously its a studied/scientific phenomena/condition so i know im incorrect, but its always been something interesting to me.
Is there like, a measurable way to test if someone is "mind blind"?
just curious, if any questions im asking are insensitive just say so
Shitty ass lighting engine 😠
That's REALLY weird, when I close my eyes I can see the back of your eyelids too!
I have no idea
I can just self report
Oh I haven't noticed it being bad
I cannot see objects in my head
But I don't pay attention to lighting in games

bloom 
so like, i dont think im mind blind personally, but when i think about "seeing" an object in my head, its more like an imagined thing im just -thinking- about. I don't see a literal image
i feel like this is the norm
I wonder what skill or ability you replaced it with.
Kal I always knew you were part of a hive mind
maybe really good artists can see more literal images?
and thats why they're so skilled at art?
What's bloom?
so if u close your eyes you dont know whats in your room? would u know where things are?
Just don't eat the corpse starch if you don't want to be part of the family
I just use what I'm drawing as a self-referential tool
"That doesn't look right"
Changes it
so on and so forth
At least on that front i know some "mind blind" artists that are super good. Composition is a technique
makes the edges of objects very shiny
Oh, apparently its measured through like
brain waves
The minds eye will spark the same areas as the literal eyes
Or something to that effect
then you must have -some- minds eye, bc you know how an apple is shaped and can draw it right? or no, memory is different?
its pretty fascinating but i dont fully understand it. Like how can we be sure you don't have a minds eye, and its not just a failure in observed descriptions? Like one person who says they have a minds eye is over-describing their "mental image" and this makes someone go "oh i don't see that"
so it IS testable
and yet the other guy talking here was claiming that using exclusively data of your own play is somehow better than using a wider sample ^^
My memory is like a library
ohh, ok, gotcha. So they can actually measure brain waves
and know
crazy
A horribly disorganized one
but a library nonetheless
Pull out the "book"
"read" the description
put the "book" back
But I don't see anything
its just all words
@haughty scarab
So like, I know an apple is red, round, has four feet, two dimples - one top, one bottom, top dimple is filled with a stem
The flesh is yellow
the skin is red
But none of those are OBJECTS, just words
And I can draw from those descriptions
how do u remember faces
When asked to picture a red cube if i close my eyes i see red and 3 visible edges of a cube. Trying to draw what i see with my minds eye is an exercise in frustration though - to draw anything well i have to use technique
Instinct
but if you close your eyes and try to trace the image of an apple in the darkness, are you able to? even if you don't "see" the apple, can you imagine drawing the shape/outline of it in your head?
Nope
Instinct. Since my response wasn't fast enough. I just "know" the face.
But its not like its physically catalogued in my brain as a picture
Maybe you've just lost conscious control of your mind's eye but still passively draw from it? I'm no neurobiologist tho. This topic did remind me of an article about ppl with no inner monologue tho
or even a rough representation of a picture
Makes it hard to remember things like eye color or the shape of lips though, even if I'll recognize them immediately in person
Since its just a vague impression
¯_(ツ)_/¯
My partner is 'face blind' she draws identity from a whole host of non face clues.
Inner monologue is optional for me but also more comfortable. I have to focus to think without using words but often need to because it's way faster
my inner monologue has a really annoying lisp 
I read fiction really slowly because I'm basically translating everything into a movie in my head
I used to have one as a kid
I fixed it
but not in my brain

Really fuckin annoying
Now that's fascinating
When I think, I activate all the same nerves in my tongue
without moving it
But I can definitely FEEL my tongue trying to move
and that's the instinctual response, the formation of the lisp
painge
so would trying to remember an attractive woman whom u only got a glance at be hard?
I'll remember her ass 
Everything else is gone with the wind until I see her again
then it comes back like a freight train in person
damn
OH YEA THE CHICK WITH THE NICE ASS
Help a guy pick out a cabinet
This whole convo is fascinating
And I greet him 6 months later like zero days passed by
I was good at commission even if I hated scamming the shit out of people

No no, you TOTALLY want this cabinet paint thats 5x as expensive
(And the same cost to manufacture)
leme guess, 60 yr old man?
i wonder if its a skill you can learn to have mental pictures
Naw
I got a lot of 30 somethings
moving into their dream home
looking for budget kitchen options
You know, doing all the HARD house labor before the wifey pops out the gloop of mass we call "babies"
See this is why i avoid contractors whenever i can, and supply the materials when i do
I do not envy women
All I have to do is stand up and piss

It's also why im sore af this week from digging up my yard 
my backyard looks like a prairie
it was way too hot this spring and summer to do any real yard work
So I just kept up the front yard 
My back yard was overgrown when i moved in two years ago, finally going to tame that shit and build a deck and garden
I'm a convert to the sit down pee. Your life cannot be so busy you can't spare five mins for a sit down and phone check
Do yall feel like Trauma sometimes won't stagger the ranged dregs / ranged shooters as they just simply walk through your circle of death
I piss in like 30 seconds
its really not a big deal
Same, take 5 anyway
After my kidney stone I always sit down and piss.
Hit reg stinks since crosplay patch for me. Not unique to trauma for me tho
all mammals do, no matter their size. Interesting fact. Even an elephant. All mammals take -roughly- a similar amount of time to drain their bladder.
Has to do with how bladders grow, and the pressure to stream to liquid ratio is made the same so they 'work' roughly identically no matter the size of the mammal
its fatshark
me when I swear on my life that I had pushed a pox burster coming from a mile away
Zero server issues
we all know that isn't gonna be true
press 5 to subscribe to animal bladder facts
4/10
Darktide will be new horde shooters
Really sucks when i non-reg a thunder hammer or something
SMH
Absolute vibe killer
I think what annoys me the most is when the audio cues doesn't work when u have so many things going on
I had 3 phantom hits IN A ROW on a boss last night using Thammer
i was so mad lol
Power Maul, Crusher, Thunder Hammer, hell even the power sword
Its all fucked
hitreg is big ass
and fatshark has done nothing to address it

I'm pretty sure my 0/40 with women is a better percentage than my hitreg in Darktide
i mean... id actually agree with that. if you want to know what weapons are best for you, your own play is the chief resource on that front. idc if someone says void is bad, i like big balls and i cannot lie
it will be magically fixed in the patch
yeah, because fatshark will have to restart the servers

So the memory leak will go away
and then it'll slowly creep back

dsrktide 2 wont have these issues
but we're talking about sharing data, if its only personal to you then all data is worthless
That actually does make sense, but only if it's just you looking at just your own data
hmm have they shipped over the vt2 veteran devs to darktide yet
literally vt2 gets more content than darktide
like, whats the point of doing any kind of statistics of comparisons, if you're just gonna say "well, for me personally, the devil-claw is better than the illisi"
"shield is the best wep hands down 
I could care less if someone says it dog shit!!!"
I mean, if you want to make that argument there's nothing wrong with that. This is a discord we're here to shout into the void
But obvs that data is useless trying to compare performance by any standards approaching objectivity
I have reached peak stupid
Love blood fountains
ehhh, it just seems like alot of cope to me to say "well, there's all this data, but it has 1% error-bars on it because of other factors, therefore I'm going to dismiss all of it, and definitely not because it says my favourite is D-tier"
wheres the data tho
Lol well, the data we have availabile does have much, much more than 1% margin of error
And I'm one of the people arguing its not useless
|| spoiler there is no data ||
sure, but my point is that its not 100% error-bars
Also technically true, we don't have data just poorly categorized information
Of questionable provenance
But yes hopefully the reddit list inspires people to collect similar data sets. And actually post raw data
if he posted the spreadsheet, you'd say its made up
nope
if he posted videos of the games, you'd say he was cherrypicking
Lazy straw man
they were literally saying this earlier
u cant say “theres all this data” when theres none
if u make claims u have to back them up
its a reasonable ask
if you want to make a serious statistical argument about the game you'd need a sample size in the hundreds of thousands or millions -- which the devs have. anything else is just preferences being expressed with bad math
You do not need a sample nearly that big if you are taking proper samples. Which the reddit list creator acknowledges they can't
your results have to stand up to scrutiny it cant just be a “trust me bro revolver is best weapon for psyker”
what the stats show isn't strictly which weapon is best, but rather which players using weapon X are most successful
Trying to present the info as tiers even with caveats was a bad idea too lol
revolver is clearly top not because its objectively best, but because only experienced players tend to run it
Flame staff is best because purging heretics in flame is optimum strategy and nothing can change my mind
how do u know? maybe he got lucky and won 2 games with revolver out of 2500
he said he discounted ones with too low sample-size, those are the ones rated "U"
yea and what is the bar for low sample size? 0? 1? nothing mentioned
no data again
We don't know what qualifies as too low to reddit op, they didn't post methodology
And there's no raw set to check against
wait so where is the data lol
|| there is none ||
i doubt that if you saw the full underlying dataset it would change any of the conclusions significantly, I have a hard time believing someone who went to all that effort just to lie
This was found on Reddit right
now this is the actual cope
hey man, maybe the data would be good, maybe the data wouldn't be good
yes, literally everything posted on reddit is untrue
They don't need to lie to misrepresent statistical information, real statisticians so it all the time
It's what peer review is for!
well yes this is true. most things posted on reddit are just bullshit lol
i agree with that
sometimes they even make mistakes in their own analysis
hey, i'd like to see the underlying data too, but the fact that its been summarised doesn't mean its all 100% meaningless, it just means its not as precise as you'd like
it does because there's no data
summarize = i made this shit up
it is meaningless if it doesnt have any supporting evidence
if you post the data and THEN summarize it; then anybody can look at the data to cross reference it
I agree with this. It's an anecdote to consider alongside other info. It's not enough info to say, though, that revolver psyker is best psyker or whatever
the summary is the evidence, they're posted in their tier-bands according to % winrate
that is not evidence
I did some data gathering. To summarize:
not quelling peril and exploding yourself into a group of enemies kills more than other methods
that's not evidence lol
Or even that it accurately reptesents revolver psyker win rate
how would posting 100 rows in a spreadsheet be any more or less evidence than a single sentence saying "X has Y% winrate" ?
are you seriously asking
why would you trust the spreadsheet more?
Because the sample size matters lmao, this is literally stats 101
if actual evidence vs someone just making some shit up
well a spreadsheet matters
because he didn't post playrate
he only said playrate on some things
because that takes more effort than just writing one line of some bullshit
maybe it's fabricated, who knows,
I highly doubt somoene would go through the effort to make that long of a post for a lie
if I count something 1000 times, and tell you the final total, is that any different to writing out each of those 1000 individually? its the same data, just represented differently
but it's much more trustworthy than one line of bullshit
absolutely lol
because i would rather count it myself than trust you
to count it
i think the author is an idiot
I mean without proof there’s literally nothing to state that it isn’t completely made up. At least making the logs public would’ve led to more credibility here
if you don't trust me to do the counting up to 1000 right, why would you trust me to correctly capture each of the 1000 rows?
and should've posted the data, but I also don't think anyone is that mentally unwell to write a fake tier list
because you can have a calculator
maybe its not even fabricated but what if he accidentally missed out 200 rows out of thr 2500? what if he looked at the wrong row? how can u know his conclusions are correct then
and add things up
there may also be inconsistencies and correlations in the data that you skipped, that I care about
for example, if you only cared about counting things up, but I also care about a certain other data point( ie: date or team comp)
which is very valid as a concern
this is unfortunately pretty tame for reddit
but thats somethign different, that's not about trusting the summary, thats about doing different types of analysis
i don't. that's the thing
he did post data on purge vs surge staff
What are we arguing about now?
but that's the thing is that i trust raw data
data
a bit more than someone's conclusions
in which case you wouldn't trust the underlying data either, so what difference does it make?
cause nothing starts an arguement like data or lack thereof
i would potentially though
lol
oh shut up and leave dis alone
I love data
I would make my OWN judgments
I also want the raw numbers
on the data
rather than listen to some idiot making conclusions that dont necessarily make sense
I don't think the list is an outright lie, only that it lacks context
And from all my findings I can say that surge staff is S tier, everything else is dogshit

Thanks for listening
he's not drawing conclusions though, he's just aggregating the numbers
Eh I saw the post and I’m taking it with a grain of salt
aggregating numbers = untrustworthy, the numbers used in the aggregation = trustworthy ?????
nothing else deletes hordes quite like the surge staff
bit without the numbers
Creating a tier list is literally drawing conclusions
he didn't post any of the numbers besides the difference in winrate from average
he did say some weapons had lower playrates
Even if we assume everything he does is completely accurate, the conclusions he draw are just way off
^
But again most importantly knowing sample rates is insanely important for attributing the value of information
if I told you the average temperature for last month, would you refuse to believe it until you saw a written record of each day's temperature?
not even way off, I'd say lacking context
he is making conclusions though.
lol
what the fuck
That’s not the same thing?
are you smoking mate
"S: The weapon has a ~10% higher win rate than average.
A: The weapon has a ~5% higher win rate than average.
B: The weapon has an average win rate.
C: The weapon has ~5% lower win rate than average.
D: The weapon has ~10% lower win rate than average.
U: The weapon has insufficient data from low use rate."
even worse
Saying the average temperature of a month, vs win rates of wte weapons and then what tier they go into
that's not making conclusions, that's just aggregating
To get a little ad hoc here: yes, definitely, absolutely
Are like different things
if mk3 hellbore had the same playrate as shredder and bolter
it would be way lower winrate
yeah actually lol
that's not aggregating cause there is no way to peer review
do you know what peer reviewing is?
lol ofc
what if the moon was made off cheese
Also it depends on what you said
trust me bro
it's made of cheese
and if you'd seriously refuse to believe a simple stat like last month's average temperature, I don't think I believe you
stop putting words in people's mouths and using hypotheticals
What happening? Is someone using that dumb reddit post again for build advice?
it's cringe
If you told me the average temperature in summer was 0
Yeah I’d question it
Same thing here
but
Revolver S tier, Bolter D tier a bunch of discrepancies
No this is like saying the temperature is warmer or colder
¯_(ツ)_/¯
no numbers
Uggghhhhh I've been forced to sound like you the last twenty minutes, please tag in
if i told you the temperature on the 1st was 0, on the 2nd was -1, on the 3rd was 1, etc, you'd believe that??
if you told me the average temp was 20C, maybe i'd believe it, but if you told me the average was like -15C; then i would want to see proof LOL
LMAO
I love Reddit
How dare you
I am supreme redditor
Got Reddit gold for ranting about darktide
no, because it's hot as fuck where i live
idek who has what stance.
im having toughness sustain issues on heresy any tips
so i would say you're making shit up
Ok lets agree on something
Uhhh what build wat weapons
exactly, seeing the row-level data wouldn't make you believe it more
It's fairly based on your weapons. What are you running?
jesus christ you are so dumb
when he uses a hypothetical
let me grab a screenshot
easy there
Kk
don't let someone drag you down to their level and beat you with experience
Insult spotted, opinion disregarded.
You are dummy because you don’t like my surge staff

working on a better sword but my luck is bad
ahh darcy deleted the syndrome people tweet
you have really low cloud radius on purge
and you want burn at 76%
don't take on stack gain
take quietitude or warp absorption
So, Warp Absorption will give you way better Toughness is you're aggressive, Quietitude will be better for passive playstyles.
If you weren't exaggerating before you think the info is useless. My stance is that the info is an anecdote that can be useful when added to a larger set but also needs to be more transparent. The other guy is arguing the info shows revolver psyker is best psyker and we don't need to see no stinking data
other than that you just need to grind and craft more
Essence Harvest is exclusively useful for Gunker, otherwise it doesn't offer much.
that wasn't at all what i was arguing, completely missed my point
your first target on sword is also really low
i explicitly said, multiple times, that its useful as an indication, but not 100% accurate
should i run this guy instead?
Ah yes wonderful trait description
i think you just need to craft/find more blessings from melk shop
also don't play on malice, hover around malice for weekly missions and just jump into damnation
no you got pissy and used hypotheticals when dis wanted the raw data
Up to you. I would grind some blessings first, T3 and 4 stuff helps a ton. Trauma vs. Purgatus is a preferencial choice and heavily changes playstyle.
alright fire staff it is
"also don't play on heresy*, hover around malice for weekly missions and just jump into damnation"
huh? i said i want the raw data too. i just also said that its silly to totally 100% dismiss it if you can't see the underlying data
I mean, I think it is fair to dismiss it
what does a good staff look like? in terms of perks and blessings
because the conclusions it gives will mislead inexperienced players
it shouldn't even be tiered
tbh
Try feat build 3/1/1/1/1/2
i 99.85% dismiss it
Or 2/1/1/1/1/2 you are probably using the weakest toughness feat rn
focused channel, warp nexus for flame staff
It should also show sample size and not just say "i swear i adequately discounted undersampled data"
focused channel, warp flurry for others
like the data set makes sense for say, mk3 helbore on vet
we do know it's a high skill, low playrate weapon with great effectiveness in the right hands
The data is foundationless. It's purpose is completely "this is neat data for popcorn viewing". It has a giant chunk of disclaimers saying as much, just lacks a TL;DR. Using that data for your own benefit will not directly influence your win rates, again because of the whole foundationless issue.
and it's mechanics will drive people off into other weapons like plasma
but kanty shotgun for vet?
yea that isn't some hidden meta
Information not data, to be that guy 
exactly, If there was a raw data google excel i'd be down
OP just posted winrate variance and dipped
do you think the winrate numbers would change if you saw the excel?
this-
I think it's pretty fair to dismiss claims when there is nothing but anecdotal evidence to back the claims
whats a good gunpsyk build, preferably with any autogun or lasgun
I suppose it could be either. I view it as the equivalent to a research paper, and because there probably is data that was collected to determine the numbers I see it as data, but it's reasonable to say that because it lacks the source data it's simply just "information".
what the fuck
like god damn stop saying stupid shit it's annoying me
I want the context behind them, the playrates, the actual winrates, not just the variance.
Eh, i say if they don't present data there's no data to discuss. Except to discuss the absence of
hard to say, id probably have to see the excel sheet to tell
No. I think if there was real data; I would think harder about whether to dismiss the data; maybe like 60% chance for me to dismiss and 40% to accept; compared to when there is no data, it's automatically 100% dismiss the claims as bullshit


