#math-help
1 messages · Page 50 of 1
Ah ok nice
first the point (0;2) is part of the curve so you know that
y0=2
then you solve using you second information which is the point y(2)=5
so
2e^k2=5
e^k2=5/2
k=ln(5/2)/2
got it, thanks
Sin(pi-Q)=sinQ
So you can find all the 3 sides of the right angled triangle
Eh why is it needed to find all 3 sides first?
You need cos and tan right
Yea
So cos is adjacent/hypotenuse
I meant. You can just look at sin and tell the other side is 12. But im guessin this is for an exam where u need to show the steps
But the unknown angle isn't in the triangle tho
The angle in the triangle is pi-Q
How do they equal exactly-?
Angle CAB is pi-Q
picture it on the unit circle
so picture an acute angle
pi-x is just its reflection on the y axis
which means its y value, or "sine" stays the same
CAB is pi-Q
Uhh yeah
yes so why is there a triangle below the x axis
its not needed actually
I thought need to look at it using the unit circle thing?
yea youll the logic is the same
how can I find the limit of this sequence? I already know it exists
I also know the limit is (x+1)/(x+2)
I need to know the in between 😭
Hi guys I have a fairly easy question(probably im missing something obvious) - how do you prove that the function f(x) = e^x + e*x is injective
I actually found the answer for this ^^' if anyone is curious they can always ask me
Both e^x and x*e are strictly increasing, continuous functions (which is enough to prove injectivity if I recall correctly), so their sum also is strictly increasing and continuous
Ah I did forget about the use of monotonicity in injectivity! Thank you sir!
math peeps there is a website to help u solve math problems incase u didnt understand the whole thing
that doesn't mean anything
because what is "x"?
we have X(n+1) = f(Xn) where f(x) = (x+1)/(x+2)
quick study of variations of f :
f(x) = (x+2-1)/(x+2) = 1 - 1/(x+2)
so f'(x) = 1/(x+2)^2>0
so f is increasing
knowing that f is increasing, we wanna see if (Xn) is increasing or decreaisng :
X1 = f(X0) = f(1) = 2/3 < 1
so X1 <= X0
so you can easily prove by induction (récurrence) that X(n+1)<=X(n), using the fact that if X(n+1)<=X(n) then f(X(n+1))<=f(X(n)) because f is increasing, meaning X(n+2)<=X(n+1)
now that we know (Xn) is decreasing, let's find a real number always smaller than (Xn). an easy one is 0 (because if x>=0 can see that f(x)>=0).
U prove with an easy induction that X(n) >= 0 for all integers n
(Xn) is decreasing and >=0. So it converges to a limit we'll denote L. to find L :
we know that for every n, X(n+1) = (Xn+1)/(Xn+2)
so for n->infinity : L = (L+1)/(L+2)
so you solve this equation and u find that L= [sqrt(5)-1]/2 >0 or L = [-sqrt(5)-1]/2<0
but since for every n, Xn>=0, that means that L>=0
so only the positive solution is possible : L=[sqrt(5)-1]/2
lol I just realized u alrdy found the answer
but i like to write down the steps of the reasoning clearly and one by one, so fk it no regrets for having typed this lol
yep that's enough
to be fair u don't even need "continuous" for injectivity
but continuous helps in other things (especially finding images of intervals by F. Like finding f([a, b]) is easy when f is continuous and monotonous)
help 😭
hello ) could you please help me with the task …
prove it using an absurd,
assuming x=!y you can divide by (x-y)³ since you're sure you are not dividing by 0, so now you have (x-y)²=-1 but that's an absurd because the square of something can never be negative
therefore x must be =y
assuming x,y are real numbers
Anyone in calc 2 can send me the identities used for integration by parts and Substitution and the half angle identities, please if u have it in a book or notes or anything greatly appreciate it it’s for chapter 7.1-7.3 if in the us
can't you just... search them on google?
Yes yes but there’s a lot that come up I need the ones that are used for the topics I’m just trying to memorise them before the test, teachers usually give them out my teacher didn’t so If someone’s teacher did give them I can just study the ones Imma use
Im going through the textbook to find what I can but not everything in the textbook is needed
I don't know if it is helpful but I ended up wit something like this: (x-y)^5 + (x-y)^3 = 0 --> (x-y)^3 * [(x-y)^2 +1] = 0 . (x-y)^3 = 0 because x=y, and anything multiplied by 0 is equal to 0.
Hello people ! How is everyone? Hope y'all are doing well... I need help with the topic of trigonometric and derivatives. I'm studying arquitecture.
in each triangle, you can assume that the 3rd angle is 180degrees - the other two angles
so beta = 180° - 1 - 2, delta = 180° - 3 - 4, alpha = 180° - 5 - 6
oh wait.. i just noticed my solution is incorrect..
if those triangle sides thar seem aligned, are indeed aligned, then :
call a, b, c the angles without name
from that dot in the center, there are :
-the angle a (red area with 1 and 2 in it) , and another angle a in front of it (white area) [because of my hypothesis that those triangle sides are aligned]
-the angle b, and a similar angle b in front of it
-the angle c, and a similar angle c in front of it
=> and since all those, together, makeup 360°,then :
360° = 2a+2b+2c
so a+b+c = 180°
now <1+<2+<3+<4+<5+<6 = (180-a) + (180-b) + (180-c) = 540 - (a+b+c) = 540 - 180 = 360
Can someone please explain where did the sec²x highlighted in the circle come from?
Chain rule, tan^3(x) = (tan(x))^3
is there any good math book you guys can recommend for a high school student like me? plz
yes that is what I ended up doing ! for some reason my teacher wrote that the limit was (x+1)/(x+2) and I was confused where x came from, which is why I asked for help. but I'm just going to leave it as the positive root we calculated
thank you very much!
thank you too I understand!
can i ask to those with depth knoweldge in mathematics, what truly is an integral
i ask this as i feel i have stumbled upon something new found (although unlikley)
just say it
"what truly is an integral" is pretty vague depending on what you're actually thinking about
no no i dont want anyone to steal it as stupid as it sounds
what is happening when you integrate geometrically
you mean Riemann's integration?
i dont know what that is
ik i sound out of my league here
but i need to know if there is more to integration than just area under curve
oh ok ok ik this
ofc
didnt know it was called that
ok when we integrate we have infinite of these?
correct?
now what is happening for area above curve
we take deltax->0
ok ok ok
if we want to find area above curve
lets say x^2
then what is happening
so integration above the curve
i mean
there's really no limit
unless you want to stop at a certain point
like y=5
sure
lets stop there
its definite
ok
whats happeining
geometrically
@supple island
you integrate 5-x^2 between -sqrt(5) and sqrt(5)
but whats happening
you are doing the integral of 5 and the integral of x^2, you know that the area "above" x² is the difference between them
yea but what is that
you can also imagine it as the integral of -x²+5, so a parabola pointing downward raised by 5
then imagine it using riemann
the little coloumns guy
i mean i didn't do anything strange, it's quite literally the same thing
you can just imagine the same thng in 2 different ways
can anyone help me?
that Riemann thing is too advanced I think
an integral of f(x)dx between x=a and x=b
is basically the "algebraic" (meaning it can be negative if f(x) is below the x-axis) surface area between the x axis and the f curve, from x=a to x=b
Isn't that how they introduce you to integrals?
hmm I don't remember how I was introduced to it in high school
in uni that's how they introduced it to me
it can also be seen as the sum of little areas f(x) * dx (dx being very small) from x=a to x=b
and it's close to the notion of "primitives"/"antiderivatives" (which is the opposite of a "derivative")
that's how I'd sum up the intuition behind integrals (it requires actual lessons, not a discord chat, to master it)
thanks
how to prove this?
you can square it and continue with it
i would work on this intuitively:
on the trigonometric circle, on this specified interval
0<cos<1
alternatively
1>sin>0
if you try to find to maximum and minimum of
cos+sin on the interval [0;pi/2]
you will find
if cos is at its maximum (=1)
sin is at its minimum (=0) (and vice versa
so the minimum of sin+cos=1
therefore
1<=sin+cos
now for sqrt(2) its the same way of thinking but instead of finding the minimum you try to find the maximum of the sum.
that is reached on the intersection of the line y=x with the trigonometric circle so, at the point (sqrt(2)/2 ; sqrt(2)/2)
so, sin +cos = sqrt(2)/2 + sqrt(2)/2 = sqrt(2)
so,
1<= sin + cos <= sqrt(2)
evening, quick question: i need to check if ax^2+ax+2 has any solutions for x which are real. how can prove this?
How Can i solve
4 sin²(x) + cos(2x) + cos(x)
that isn't an equation, I guess u mean ax^2+ax+2=0
mb
then if a=0 : 2=0 has no solution
if a!=0, then it's a quadratic equation. it has a real solution if and only if a^2-4 * a * 2 >= 0 (it comes from the "b^2-4 * a * c>=0 of ax^2+bx+c"), meaning a(a-8)>=0, meaning a<0 or a>=8
thanks m8!
1+3 ??? pls help meee
Can anyone help me with statistics?
Q: for C(n,r) state the restriction on n and r explain why these restrictions are necessary
1+3 = 0 in the base 2 modulus set
Just apply mindlessly that formula ⬆️ and simplify whatever you can afterwards
Example : using the identity m²-p² = (m+p)(m-p) or other similar formulas
Please help me with this question
The answer I got is incorrect but I don’t understand how
The correct answer is this
@crisp lodge
At street level, the parabola has a span of 123 m, the foundations of the arch are 165 m apart. The road is 12m above the foundations. Calculate how high the arch is and how long the 3rd suspension cable is.
i dont know what i should do i am done with this ,_,
do they mean those cables?
how to integrate this
you can use u substitution, with u = e^x
and when ur more experienced u'll notice it's e^x * Arctan'(e^x) so a primitive of it is Arctan(e^x)
(calculus) when solving revolving volume problems using disks, why is it y and not dy, arent you filling up the shape with disks with a changing radius? why is the height "dx" changing, or is that not what the variables mean
nvm i got it
does anyone have an idea of what to do here? I can't seem to understand how Euler's formula will help with this. The problem is in the context of the Discrete Cosine Transform
let the terms be of the form, e ^ (ix) = cos (x) + i sin (x)
x varies linearly, so you have a GP on the left
use formula for sum of GP on left, then equate real and imaginary parts
Does someone need help with your math problems? I am using Gauthmath, it has LIVE tutors who will give answers and step-by-step explanations 24/7 for FREE. Here's my invitation code: KCGGJY.
https://s.mathme.xyz/lp/invite?code=KCGGJY
stop
60o
for it to be a kite then angle BCI = BNI <=> BNI = 30o
IBC is a right triangle so BIC = 90o-30o = 60o
ohh i see so BCI and BNI are 30 degrees
but why is it that we need to subtract 30 degrees from 90??
I'm quite confused.
sum of 3 angles in a triangle
is 180o
and there is already a right angle (90o)
ahh okay sooooo where is the other right angle?
that is the angle IBC
the intersection of two diagonals in a kite forms a right angle
Factorise the denominators beforehand
That way, you might realise it's possible to simplify some terms
okay got it thankss
oh i see but where do i put the 60 degrees?
alright! i get it nowww thank youu!
ah btw can triangle sum theorem be used??
yes thats what i did
alr thank you again 😭😭😭
no problem
that formula is wrong
also "solve" is a verb that's too often wrongly used
anyway
basically u use the formula :
(g(h(x)) ' = h'(x) * g'(h(x))
here h(x) = 1+x and g(y) = y^2/3 [which gives us f(x) = g(h(x))]
so h'(x) = 1 and g'(y) = 2/3 * y^(-1/3) meaning g'(h(x)) = 2/3 * (1+x)^(-1/3)
so f'(x) = h'(x) * g'(h(x)) = 1 * 2/3 * (1+x)^(-1/3)
a mathematically uglier, but simpler, way of seeing it is :
df/dx = df/d(1+x) * d(1+x)/dx
= [ 2/3 * (1+x)^(-1/3)] * [ 1 ]
You are standing on a hill looking at a castle that is 175 feet away from you. The angle of elevation to
the roof of the castle is 8° and the angle of depression to the bottom of the castle is 14°.
Find the height of the castle.
^trig hw
anyone know how to solve for x? im not sure what proportion i set up
Its just pythagoras theorem
There are 2 right angled triangles
Using them you can get an equation for x
ohhh ok thanks
I’m watching a video about integration by parts and the Instructor is saying that before we use integration by parts we should check to see if the integral is in the table first, does anyone know what the table is referring to, I looked up table of integration and I’m not too sure about it
yeah you can use proportions which i believe is quicker
triangle ABC and HAB are similar a-a case (both have a 90 degree angle, and they share the angle ABC)
=> BH/AB = AB/BC or 36/60 = 60/x you just need to solve for x
sorry for late reply, thank you so much!!
no problem
😅
It's the 4th time you've asked this and got no reply. I'm suggesting you ask your teacher about it because it looks like nobody here's able to help you
Does anyone know how can I find if a function allows continuous extension to a certain point?
For example a function f defined on R\ {0}, and we want to know g(0) the continuous extension of f.
My idea was to derivate the function to find if it admitted a continuous extension, but I don't think that would make sense since 0 isn't part of the domain...
if lim 0+ f = lim 0- f
then you can extend it to g with g(0) = that limit
it's best to imagine this in curves instead of just formulas
like if u have 2 ropes, one on the left of the vertical line x=0 and one on the right of x=0
the only way u can only join them by adding a point at x=0 is if they're already almost joining (lim 0- f = lim 0+ f), and in that case u do so by adding the missing dot (at the right height : g(0) = lim 0 f)
ohh thank you i understand the concept now, but then how do I find the expression of g ?
g(x) =
f(x) if x!= 0
lim 0 f if x = 0
there's no unique expression for all x in R
u distinguish the 2 cases in ur definition of g
(and it still gives a continuous function, even if it has 2 different expressions depending on whether x = 0 or not)
I only need to know g(x) in the point where the function is "missing" though right? For example if it's 0, I need the expression of g(0)
yes
I alrdy answered that
here
it's g(0) = lim x->0 f(x)
you have to compute the limit
okay thank you i understand now!
if lim x->0+ f(x) = lim x->0- f(x) = 666
then g(0) = 666
right, so in cases where the function has two different expressions on the right of 0 and on the left of 0, I calculate both limits, is that what you mean?
well u basically do when u need to
for example for f(x) = |x| / x for x € R\0
u see that lim 0+ f(x) = 1 and lim 0- f(x) = -1
so u can't extend it to a continuous function
even though f has "the same expression" on both sides
same for f(x) = [sqrt(1+x^2) - 1] / x^2 for example
(im surprised that I found this example lol)
i see ^^thank you very much that was confusing me!
So um basically yeah
helpp
Here in number 7
The domain of the function is (-infinity,-1]and[1,infinity)
And range is also the same as domain
Is this correct?
it seems to me that the function is also defined between -1 and 1
tell me why 0 isn't included for u
the domain is R, the range is (-inf, 2]
Okay I didn't saw x<1 I thought x>1 so the domain is R
But why the range is (-inf,2]?
look up the definition of range
that would not have made sense, because then f(x) would have had 2 different definitions for x>1 (and x<-1)
Okay I got it
I was doing the math on my head I should write it down o did so many silly mistakes and messed up the whole thing
Thanks!
anyone know how to solve this ?
assume p(x)=ax^2+bx+c and using the conditions given you can find a b and c
ai imma try that
so ive subbed it in and i tried using the quotient rule now im kinda confused on what else to do
Hey guys I really need some help with this problem if youre able to help me out
I get all of the work until the bottom of the page
it says each slice only has to travel up and out of the tanks spout... How is that so?
Wouldnt each slice have to travel from the bottom - up... So some y value?
Any help appreciated
OOOO
I GET IT
NVMMMM
ITS Y + 1 LOL
I dont really understand this concept of geometry
i believe a heptagon has a sum of 900 degrees of interior angles?
x = 900 - (sum of the angles)
Can anyone teach me limits?for class 11 th level??
Hi, can anyone help me to solve this?
sub cos pix = t
use youtube there are plenty of good teachers
take e ^x = t
can someone help me with this question
im not sure how to start
nvm, I think i solved it by plugging in P(-1) and proving that P(-1) = 0
anyone wanna help me here?
factored out, try using long division
thx
Hi! I’m trying to find for which values of alpha and beta will the function be derivable in x =2.
I already know I’m supposed to calculate the derivative of the function whether on the right or left side or x, but my calculations never give me alpha or beta so I’m confused. 😭
Like this. But alpha is outside of the square root so alpha cancels itself… I also can’t simply replace the expression with the values given to me because they will all work
(x+2)⅓
In this function stationary point (1,1.44)
How to find the interval of increasing and concave down?
do the second derivative and study the sign
Increasing (0,infinity)
And concave down(-infinity,0)?
do the derivatives and to the limit, if f(x)=bx f'(x)=b
the intervals should change at the stationary point
I'm confused if the interval of increasing is (-2,infinity) or (0,infinity)
Which one?
this
ok
wait
it's -2
Or increasing (1,infinity)
And concave down(-infinty,-2)
how is it 1
F'x=1
you have a problem only in x=-2 for the derivative
F"x=-2
in which point?
If I do 1st derivative the ans is like 1/something and f"x=-2/something
yeah i mean it's pretty different
I tried to, but alpha cancels itself 🥲 and when I do the same thing with the first expression I obtain f'(x) = Beta
Yep
That's correct
Now you gotta do b=f'(2)
I get Beta = [ sqrt(h^2 + 4h + 9) - 3 ] / h ... How can I go from here?
oh wait
okay nevermind I get 2/3 + alpha = Beta ... I know that at the end I'm supposed to find that alpha = -5/3 and beta = 2/3 but I'm not sure how to solve this equation now ?
Alpha Is not under the root
You get b=2/3
ohhh omg thank you so much it's been hours i'm stuck on this
this isn't correct
as dx=dt/t
what you actually get is integral of 1/(t^2+1) dt which is arctan(t)
e^x=t
so dx=dt/t
e^x=t
e^xdx=dt
tdx=dt
dx=dt/t
happens
yup
how would i prove that the cosine rule (where a is 90 degrees) is just the pythagoras theorem
Could anyone please explain why this isn’t correct?
Can someone help 🥲
If the number of ducks and rabbits in a house is 17 and the sum of the number of legs is 44, how many ducks are there in this house? A) 10 B)11 C) 12 D) 13 E) 14 @rancid mist
Here's the question
oh is this complete question?
pretty much u will end up with only one eqn
Yeah it's kinda basic but i just can't do it
Can u explain
Oh thanks
ah sorry lmao
i was high just make two eqns x + y = 17 and 2x + 4y = 44 and solve it u will get it
Btw there is can't be mutual option
İ already found the answer thx anyways
Solve the following system of equations by substitution method:
3.3x + 2y = 11
2x + 3y = 4
are there any maths textbooks or books that any of you guys can recommend for me I am in year 9 /9th grade
- Isolate y in the first equation (rewrite the equation to get y = ... something that depends on x)
- Replace the occurence of y in the second equation by the expression (y=...) you found in step 1. That way, only x will remain in the second equation. Isolate x to get its value (it should be a constant number)
- Now that you've found x, go back to the expression you had for y (y=...) and replace the occurence of x (contained in the "...") by the value you got in step 2
And just like that it's done
It'll always be those steps when solving systems by substitutions.
Also, note that :
- I isolated y first, but I could also have chosen to isolate x first. The solution would have been the same
- I started off with the "first" equation, but the order of the equations in a system doesn't matter, so I could also have isolated y in the second equation for step 1, then substitute the expression y=... in the first equation. Again, I would've ended with the same solution
okayy
can someone verify my answer?
You chose u correctly, but the integral would be e^u
Hi could anyone please explain why this is the wrong way to integrate this?
because you cannot distribute the division like that
you right, thanks
@delicate fractal Oh oops thank you so much
hi, i need some help with this question
the pattern is that the numbers basically concatenate (so third row evaluates to 166,500,333 and fourth is 166,650,003,333)
to prove this, you'll have to express all three numbers in the nth row in terms of n
for this you'll need a basic idea of GPs & some summations
then add these three numbers and from here it should be easy to prove the pattern
guys do u know any 5 digit perfect number
Could anyone help me to understand this solution for number 13? We were supposed to find the volume using the shell method, but in the solution they draw the rectangle perpendicular to the axis of rotation and for the shell method isn't the rectangle always supposed to be drawn parallel?
Can someone help me on this
post it in the science help channel i think it's more appropriate
Thanks!
pls help
Does someone know how to solve this 🥲
a is just the derivative of V
i don''t quite undertand what b is saying thou
yep
Wait ,,, are this question same like above?
they are similar types
How is it same?
the previous qn part b involves rates and so does this one
and differentiation is like rates if im not wrong
is b) just dv/dt = dv/dh*dh/dt?
sorry im new to calculus
thats what i think also
but the context is so weird HAHAH
yeah its relatively simple compared to other related rate problems
use the volume formula
then differentiate both sides wrt time
Why is it weird??
Volume formula?
Hxw?
i dont get why the volume is decreasing LOL
Ohhh
have you figured out the previous question you sent?
but did they giv no other info for the height?
oh wait @floral jungle i misread
it said sphere
Wait
i misread with the next q
u just need to use V formula for sphere
4pi/3*r^3 i think
Im not good at math and i tried ask my friendn she showed me this
Is this coorreect?
Ohhh yeah same i wasn’t checking the q
thats correct
remember chain rule cuz they are all a function of time
Where’s the part tht showed chain rule in the answer? 😅
I mean ik but i kinda confused with her solution
thatss the thing anout related rates
Ohhhh
therre are things that relate to each other through time as well
like here u used the formula for the volume of the sphere to relate radius and volume
and thus their rate of changes
later on their will be problems that relate variables using other stuff like puthagorean theorem or similar triangles
Wait i can ask is the answe worth to get 6 marks? Or are there any missing steps ?
idk cuz i dont really mark but the solution and methods are correct
idk about the formatting errors or such
So Whenever the q ask me to get rate, i hv to use chain rule?
Ohhh really ok then
in this unit things are usually a function of time
the shell method is used to find volume of 'the area under curve and y-axis rotated about the x-axis'
thus the rectangles are horizontal in that case
Can someone help without the question c) ?
almost same line equation as b) except the gradient is -1/4 instead
first, calculate the gradient of the tangent in x=1. u know that the gradient of a straight line (in this case, the tangent) by the gradient of the normal to the straight line itself is -1. knowing the gradient of the tangent to the curve and the product with the gradient of its normal, you can find the gradient of the normal
english is not my first language, so if you still have any doubt please tell me
a better formula would be y-b=m(x-a)
with this you dont have to solve for c
so in c) the equation would be y-10 = -1/4.(x-1)
This?
yes
Okay tysm and wht should i find next? Is it x
thats the equation itself
Ohhhh
yeah thats what i meant by not having to find c :))
Is tht the final answer?
well you can simplify it but yes thats the answer
by bringing the -10 to the other side
Oh well tysm !!
np
Hey can someone help me with Q2h and Q2i? Ping if you do help and thanks in advance!!
to be short i'm gonna say log as logarithm in base sqrt(2)ok so log(ab)=log(a)+log(b), so you have (log(sqrt(2))+log(x))^1/{x}= (1+log(x))^1/{x} we know write y=x-1 so lim for y->0+ of (1+log(y+1))^1/{y+1}=lim y->0+ (1+y)^1/{y+1}, and lim y->0+ {y+1}=lim y->0+ y, so our expression is lim y->0+ (1+y)^1/y, we rewrite t=1/y and we have lim t->+infinity (1+1/t)^t
which is =e
i should have written that on paper lol
would have been easier
it's been a while since I've done trig, so I will instead redirect you here: https://brilliant.org/wiki/trigonometric-graphs-amplitude-and-periodicity/
hopefully this clears a bit up for ya
Is it possible for those two lines( tangent at the first point and normal at the second point) to intersect? I genuinely cannot see that
Yea it can happen
Do you need help or just someone’s validation for your statement?
yes pls help me
i already know that both points do not lie on the curve
the correct point is (2,4) and (1,3) right?
(2,4) and (1,3) yeah
so i have to differentiate the equation, okay
thats for the slope of the tg line
so at x = 2 the slope of the tangent is 4*2-5 = 3
hence the slope of the normal is -1/3
and then you can create the equation for the tangent and normal and set them equal
alright
okay i understand that, but what about another point? Does it intersect with the tangent?
i dont think its saying that the point intersects the tangent
but the normal to it
intersects the tangent
my answer is ||Q (8/5, 14/5)||
im not too sure tell me what u get
mine is Q (3/2, 5/2)
i used the other point and created another equation though
was the equation for the tangent y = 3x-2?
it is
and another one is y= -x +4
-x?
i think the slope of the normal is -1/3 not -1
wait
actually one sec
sorry no
its still so confusing
ok so
the tangent at x = 1 is 4*1 - 5 =-1
so the normal's slope should be 1
y = x + 2
i think
so the point is Q(3,7)?
oh that's kinda make sense
here sorry
i am also new to calculus
red is the curve, purple and light blue are tangents, black is normal
i need help with the pythagremthrom join chill room
hi hi!i currently need help in understanding simple graph theory / basic graph theory. Im having a hard time grasping the topic if there is anyone who took general math. send help :<<
isnt it y = x + 2? You put x + 4
that's fine, your explanation actually helped
alright thank you so much 😊
sorry i couldnt help u i had work to do but glad someone helped u out!!😊
thanks so much @cyan night
gg
i think you can just compute the first and second order derivatives and plug in?
are you having difficulties with computing the derivative
You can substitute the y in the equation with the expression they gave you (the one with the log) and then compute the first and second order derivatives. When you arrive at the point when 0=0 then you have showed that ln(lnx) is a solution
Remember that ln(lnx) is a compound function so you have to derive ln(lnx) first and then multiply it by the first order derivative of lnx
chainrule
exactly, didn't know how to say it in english ❤️
what language is ok?
just asking cause i might be able to speak it
nah just need a quick method i could do that but takes years ngl
although @left knoll ur explanation is very good
i think thats the only approach?
really?
i havent studied many calculus approaches
oh ok
k ig if there is no shorter method ill do it the normal way then lmao
but ty everyone
i'm italian, idk if you are too tho
i think that's the only approach to solve it
nevermind....
yep yep ok tyy
c ?
yeh ur right
wrong cuz u kept it "5"instead of turning it to" - 5"on right side
and u didn't put the conclusion : what's the set of solutions of the inéquation ?
@cinder yacht okayy ... I understood ... thanks a lot :)
I will do the corrections
can any1 do this its based on bayes theorem
can anyone check my answer please
and do I need to prove the extremum? The triangle is on the positive side
x(49-x²)=49x-x³
you did 49-x³
also the area is (x+c)(49-x^2), because we don't kown the coordinate for A
You can expand the serie using the gauss formula, then you have lim n(n-1)/2-logn, and you can say that log n < n for all n greater than 1. Then, as n goes to inf, that holds, and you can get that the sequence in your limit is greater than n(n-1)/2, so because that diverges, yours diverges too.
oh I just noticed it
how do I get the c ?
Hi can someone help me with Q3bi? The answer in part a is what I got. Ping me if you do and thanks in advance!! ^^
you don't, it's a parameter, the farther we put A the greater the area is
you have L, H and you know how many sides the polygon has, you also know that it is composed by n triangles
Ah yeah
Hm
Oh wait I have to use the cosine rule?
Or sine rule, either one I don't rmb which
none
you got L and h
isn't the area of a triangle Lh/2?
Yeah
hm
so you have n triagles
of which you know the area
and the polygon is just the sum of n triangles
oh.. so I just have to plug in the x value?
you do (x+c)(49-x²), find the derivative and then the whole thing again
I still don't get how it's gonna get the ans
you have the area of a triangle, you have n triangles, what's the area of n triangles?
(LH*30)/2 ?
yep
this is the answer
Wait what
you don't have to do anything else
oh i thought you were doing the iii lmao
ok so
I see, thank you so much 😭
@random flame we start from the tip of the triangle, we know we have n sides, so we have n triangles, and we know that the sum of the angle of the n tips =360
Yeah
so 360=nx
so you find the angle x
we also know that the sum of the angles on a triangle is 180
so 180-x=2theta
and now you have theta too
Hmm
to link L and H we just use the properties of a right triangle
So x is 12?
if n is 30 yes
After I did that I wrote 180-168-12 and it gave me 0
Sed
168 is cuz of the angle that's already given
Maybe my part a is wrong-
I did this-
Then how abt the 168 that’s already given here?
it's not theta
Wait a minute
Wait an actual-
OH MY GOSH
ARE YOU SRS- ;-;
All this while I could've done 168/2
yup
np
Now I know that I need glasses 😂
help
with b
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combination this the lession
In mathematics, a combination is a selection of items from a set that has distinct members, such that the order of selection does not matter (unlike permutations). For example, given three fruits, say an apple, an orange and a pear, there are three combinations of two that can be drawn from this set: an apple and a pear; an apple and an orange; ...
this the main formula
Pythagorean theorem is to ez
Well Pythagorean theorem is middle school stuff
Kaitlyn wrote several positive numbers smaller than 7 on a piece of paper. Riya then crossed out all of Kaitlyn’s numbers and replaced each of them with their difference from 7. The sum of Kaitlyn’s numbers were 22, and The sum of Riya’s numbers were 34. How many numbered did Kaitlyn write down
Someone pls help TvT
the formula is (22+34)/7 = 8
the explanation of the formula isn't immediately obvious tho
you want help solving the integral?
well before i spoil the answer what have you tried
Only this cus my mind is blur
Let u =
Ohhh yes
then du = __dx
I remember
right so that’s what you need to use here
you can also split this integral into two integrals
Ohhh but where
How
using the linearity property of integration
i would write it out on paper but i don’t have paper
but you also don’t have to do that
anyways for the u sub
do you want me to just tell you?
or do you want to try to figure it out
Just tell me the whole solution pls 🥺
lol okay
😅ty
x - (1/x^2+1)
i mean sure but if you’re going to be in calculus you absolutely need to know how to do a simple u substitution such as this one
it is essential
Sorry i cant focus in class 😢
I try my best to understand now
it’s just the truth
Is this the first step?
that’s the answer
How 😢
and also dont forget the arbitrary constant
since your integral is indefinite
Well I asked you "do you want to try to understand or do you just want the answer" and you said just the answer lol
Yeah the answer
Ohhh
Send it @analog stirrup
Hey can someone help me with this question? I was thinking of Pythagoras theorem but wasn’t sure how to slot it in this? Ping if you do and thanks in advance!!
anyone available to help with cal 2?
Yeah, post the question here
Pythagorean theorem is indeed not needed here
- Denote x the horizontal distance between O and A. (In other words, x is the distance between the center of the circle and the left side of the rectangle) Through Pythagorean th., you can get
x = r cos[(360°-310°)/2] where r is the radius of the circle
(I leave the details of the calculations that lead to this result for you to understand by yourself)
And w = x + r
One of the lines in the figure is tangent to the g function at point A, the other is tangent to the function f at point C, and the tangents intersect at point B. How many degrees is the angle m(CBA)?
im also curious to see the solution for the problem above i managed to find the equation for the tangents but idk how it helps i think we can use law of cosines
you can find the rect AC, then you find the rect BD perpendicular to AC, now you have CBD and ABD as 2 right triangles, you know A,B,C,D, now you just find the angles DBA and DBC with the properties of right trinagles and sum them @dreamy oasis @cyan night
idk if this is viable cuz the numbers could be a bit annoying
since you do sin^-1 and stuff
well if you can do that then finding BC and BA arent too hard either
then do law of cosines to find angle B
CBA
i think finding the equations of the tangents still useful
If you have found the correct equations, can you write? Also, how do we apply the cosines theorem here?
im in class right now but be sure to manipulate that the intersection between the tangents have the y-coordinate as 0. the cosines theorem is used after I manage to find AB,BC and AC and do AC^2 = AB^2 + BC^2 - 2AB*BC * cos CBA which you can find CBA thereafter
you have to manipulate that y coordinate because in g(x) there is that a right there that we dont know
also im not sure if my equations are correct we may need to both check
Alright, i'll try if i can't solve i'll ask again
ok
@dreamy oasis so did you try it
@cyan night heyy sory for late reply!! I tried to find the slopes of the lines using derivatives, but I came to a point. I wrote the equation of the line tangent to f(x), but I could not write the equation of the line tangent to g(x). Do you have any other ideas?
@cyan night @supple island
yes ok so here is where i think their intersection having a y-coordinate as 0 comes into play
the slope of tangent line of g(x) which is g'(x) at 23/6 is 1/3 as u found
so the equation is y = 1/3x + b
you set f'(x) = g'(x) = y
their equations
the equation for f'(x) at -13/4 as u found is -1/2(x+13/4) = y-193/16 or y = -1/2x +167/16 (assuming your calculations are correct)
But Why do I have f'(x) and g'(x) equal to each other, don't they both have different slopes?
from here we can deduce that y = -1/2x + 167/16 = 1/3x+b\
sorry i used the wrong terminology it should be the equation of the tangents
not just the slope
which is here
and we know that y = 0
so 0 = -1/2x + 167/16 = 1/3x + b
solve for x and thus for b
after you determined the equation for the tangent lines, are you able to proceed?
My english is poor that's why i am slow but i really dont understand
How do we write the equation of the line tangent to the g(x) function, or let me ask you where did the b come from?
its ok
so the general form of a tangent that i often use is y = mx + b
m is g'(x) which is 1/3
y = 1/3x + b
Can I ask what class u r in to solve this problem?
me?
Yea
i am in middle school
i think @supple island is undergrad
8th grade
Ohh
I'm in 10th
The question looks difficult 😕 we haven't solved such question in my entire school life
i am also just starting calculus
i think its also an incorporation of other skills
yeah its ok if you arent able to solve it because you arent familiar to the concept
Yea
if you understand it, and you are already in 10th grade, you can solve it without much difficulty i believe
you never stop learning
People here are so beautiful
My exams are going on and geometry is difficult for me
Becz I never practice
Yea and algebra too
It's basic geometry like problems based on circles, Pythagoras and coordination and also similarities of triangles plus trigonometry
You know I am indian therefore syllabus is difficult
Yup practice is key to be perfect
What's rigorous?
well hard and precise questions
Yup that's pretty true
i heard of the jee stuff
Yeaa
a billion people country and very competitive
Gosh it's hardest exam
After cracking that exams once you give another exam named JEE advance u get into well known Indian engineering college
Named IIT
In India IIT worth Harvard
Correct
post your question, someone will probably answer
5.x²-15.x-350=0
i need an explanation for this, pls
Start dividing all terms by 5, to simplify the expression
Then, apply the quadratic formula
tho i need to get 2 answers, for x1 and x2
Yeah, and the quadratic formula provides two answers
d = b² - 4ac
x1, x2 = (-b +- sqrt(d) )/2a
The two solutions come fromthe +-
my mind broke
like, in a good way ?
im assuming her mind broke cuz she doesn't know what b a and c are?
and +- maybe
Plaisible
I have explained
You can solve this by factorization method
If u don't understand what I did with that -70 pointing 2 arrows down to 7 and -10....free feel to ask me
does anyone why James is not uploading any videos?
wtf
the owner of this server
who used to study for hours everyday on stream during lockdown
ohh sorry
sorry dude i know noone here
how did you find this server then ?
wrong chat for this
idk some friend invited me and here i am
Hey guys, do u have any idea how to use the absolute convergence theorem for this integral?
smth that can work is
|x|<=e^(x/4) for x large enough
|e^(-x^2) |<= e^(-x) for x>=1
|x^2 sin(x) - cos(1/x)| < e^(x/2)+1 for x large enough
does anyone know how to prove this?
no its 2a
know that sin2x=2sinxcosx and cos2x=cos²x-sin²x
so you have 2sinxcos²x/(1+cos²-sin²)(1+cosx) but 1-sin²x=cos²x (since cos²x+sin²x=1) so you have 2sinxcos²x(2cos²x)(1+cosx), simplify and have sinx/(1+cosx)
now applying this again we know that sinx=2sinx/2cosx/2 and cosx=cos²x/2-sin²x/2
if you do that and simplify you'll find exactly tanx/2
hold on could you explain how you got to 2sin²xcos²x(2cos²x)(1+cosx) again please?
you have sin2xcosx on the numerator
which is 2sinxcosxcosx
so 2sinxcos²x
on denominator you have (1+cos2x)(1+cosx)=(1+cos²-sin²x)(1+cosx)=(1-sin²x+cos²x)(1+cosx)=(cos²x+cos²x)(1+cosx)=(2cos²x)(1+cosx)
oh right okay i understand that part now!!!
huh is it really possible to simplify it if 2sinx/2cosx/2 isnt squared?
you wrote too many /
idk what you asked
after this you should have sinx/(1+cosx)
so you got 2 sinx/2 cosx/2 and on the denominator you have (1+cosx)= (1 + cos²x/2 sin²x/2)
but since the nominator isnt squared you cant simplify it or can you?
the denominator is (1+cos²x/2-sin²x/2)=2cos²x/2
you simplify the 2 and cosx/2
leaving you with (sinx/2)/(cosx/2)
OH ofcourse, my excuses its 1am the lack of sleep is taking me out. thank you for your help!!
np
Hey there, I'm new here but can someone explain to me how this works? My lecturer gave her notes to us but I can't seem to understand them. It's about linear equations and matrices.
you need to solve the equation and find x=[1-2]t and to prove somehow thta y...is not the solution but idk math is not my subject...hope it helped a bit
Replace x1 by 1 and x2 by -2
Boom you just proved that 2 -3*(-2) = 8
Do the same with x1 = 1, x2 = 1
You get 2 - 3 = 8, which is wrong. Thus (1, 1) is no solution to the equation
The equation takes a vector as input. The first item of that vector is named x1, and the second item x2
in what year are you guys in
Guys
Can i ask a simple math question
So which one is the lower speed
Going 2 kms per 5 secs
Or 5kms per per 5 secs
Omg am losing my mind
No wait its not like that
Well try to compare it with this one knowing its the fastest speed
Ik it doesn’t make sense but yh
1 km per 10 secs is that faster
So which one is the lower speed
Going 2 kms per 5 secs
Or 5kms per per 5 secs
According to this
@naive seal
@polar sun
this chat is dead lol
holy sh*t
my brain lags reading this
2 kms per 5 secs
is a lower speed than
5kms per 5 secs
and 1km per 10 secs is slower than both of those (because it's the same as 0.5 km per 5 secs)
Thank u
U got the same timescale, so if you cover a bigger distance in the same time, of course you're faster
If you'd flip it, 5km per 2sec would be faster than 5km per 5sec
Thanks a lot @ember kernel @errant scarab Now my brain can rest easy...For now.
thought it would be 2 but this question's way harder than what the eye can see
You're so funny and quirky haha lol
it should be 2 but if watch closly, i can see the number 1 is bigger than number 1
in conclusion, 1 + 1 = 11 because the number 1 is string and the number 1 is number
languages that allow concatenation of strings and ints must be cursed
i won't say it is java||script||
hi! im having a really hard time here can anyone help me understand?
well your just wrong
its 83 obviously
You think out of box Musk
It's easy
mhm...
Q A)
- arc AB, arc AD, arc BC are minor arcs
- arc BAD, arc DC, arc ABC are few major arcs
- angle AOB, angle DOC , angle AOD, angle BOC are central angles
- Angle ODC and angle OCD are inscribed angles
- arc ADC and arc ABC are semicircle
Q B)
- M AOB = 80°
2.m arc AD =40° - m ACD = 20°
- m BCD = 240°
- m BDC = 260°
Did u get it?
omg thank you!!! yes i tried looking up tutorials on youtube but it was really hard to understand i kept rewatching it for like 40 mins but i think i got it
thank you again!!!!!
U can ask if u have doubts 👍👍
I still remember the good old days of learning circles.... intense math flashbacks
anyone know arthmatic progresstion
I guess you meant arithmetic progression ? Ask here your questions about it and someone will answer
ohk
The question reads that a, b, c, d and e are in arithmeric progression
That means that :
b = a+p
c = b+p
d = c+p
e = d+p
... where p is the difference between two consecutive terms of the progression (I forgot the actual name)
In other words :
b = a + p
c = (a + p) + p = a + 2p
d = (a + 2p) + p = a + 3p
e = (a + 3p) + p = a + 4p
Subsitute the b, c, d and e in the question by those expressions and you get :
a - 4 (a+p) + 6 (a+2p) - 4 (a+3p) + (a+4p)
= ... (just compute the sum)
= 0 * a + 0 * p = 0
@final wave
Correct and the difference between two consecutive terms in AP is called common difference denoted by letter d
@ember kernel
a fun (but not allowed cuz not a proof) way to think of it is
"there are 2 unknown variable, and they want us to sum linear combinations of those 2 variables. so those variables must get canceled out.
so it's 0
another one : "there are 2 unknown variables, and they want us to find a numerical value for the sum.
so the sum doesn't depend on those 2 variables.
so the sum is the same as in the case a=0 and p=0 (the null sequence : only 0s)
so it's 0"
ofc the only real proof is the one Quentin wrote, but there are ways like this to guess the answer
Yeah that's what I thought after realising all the terms summed to 0
Like, at highschool level they would otherwise explicitly ask you to express the total sum in terms of a and p
yeah same
oh thanks guys
i dont understand the part in cyan green
like why can i just subtract without taking lcm
That's straight up wrong
how so
i got that from here
Idk why they did that
But that looks awful
never add or substracts numerator that don't have a common denominator
Maybe there's some "intuitive" step I missed, but otherwise there are mathematically speaking 2 major mistakes. I really hope it's the first one, otherwise your teacher should just get fired on the spot
What's the question ?
help! what possible topics are good about measure of position in conducting a statistical mini research for students?
this question
Dude use brackets
The expression you sent was not the one on your screen
It should have been 27^(3n-1) / (3 * 9^(3n+1))
i am sorry!
Np, you're still learning
But yeah that's kind of important to know
The best method I see here is converting 9 and 27 in terms of powers of 3
its C
So you only have three bases of value 3, and you'll be able to simplify everything
kk
Remember that :
x^a * x^b = x^(a+b)
x^a / x^b = x^(a-b)
(x^a)^b = x^(a*b)
With these three formulas you should be alright
Wow that's one flexible thumb for sure
i would like to ask why is there are +1 at the beginning of the question
isnt tha t normal
thats because
Mine's stiff af ^^