#math-help
1 messages · Page 47 of 1
Somehow it is still confusing me
Yes pls
Gimme an example
You are a teacher?
You just took a random number?
Yeah but from where comes the 3
Yeah but I could add 4 too?
Instead of 3?
So you just added 2/2 there cause you can?
Can I add 3/3 instead of 2/2?
WTH
Yes?
So i have to take the 2
Ahhhh
Wait I understand. Let me tell you. And you can tell me if it is good or not?
I have x^2+2 and if I derive it. It is 2x. So I take this 2 and multiply it with both sides
Wait I will write it down
Is that right? I mean the meaning behind it?
I know. It is just for me. I always have steps in math 😂
Even this little step
See you 🙂 and thank you
Will be someone else here to help?
does anyone here know how to solve logarithmic inequalities? ive never seen a logarithm in an exponent in these kind of exercises
it's in the form x^a > 8 with a = log10(2) ( a known constant)
to solve it u do ^ (1/a) on both sides
so [x^a]^(1/a) > 8^(1/a)
ie [x] ^ (a * 1/a) > 8^(1/a)
ie x > 8^(1/a)
and u replace "a" with "log10(2)"
can someone explain this please
u got x = ksqrt(y)
if y is increased by 44% u got
x = k * sqrt(1. 44y)
x = k * sqrt(1.44)*sqrt(y)
x = 1.20 * k * sqrt(y)
so x in increased by 20%
What does the + sign in (b) mean? Union?
Got it
Yep that's the set of all possible linear combinations between vectors from V1 and V2
Thank you
can someone PLZ explain this to me u dont have to like go into practical solving
just give me a ran through everything
mention me if u have time to help ty
got that, but how do i get rid of the a in x > 8^(1/a) now?
is this right or it must be 3/2?
u don't get rid of it, that's just ur answer
nah man thats not the answer, the answer in my textbook is ]1000; +∞[
If u look closely the 2/2 wasnt added it makes up 1 (2÷2 =1) it was multiplied after that 3 was taken common in denominator then it was multiplied by 2 of denominator so it became 6 an the 2 of numerator was multiplied by x so next line u got 1/6 × rest of that ( hope u understand and don't mind the spelling mitsakes if there is any
Oh yes now I understand it. Thank you
Why are the messages deleted?
Welcome buddy glad u understood
I dont know
@glacial dust
aight aight ty
any good websites to practice calculus. college level. just started studying calculus. a website which gives progress features or topic specific questions would be helpful
khan academy calculus ab is not bad
o college level?
yep
i have been using pauls online math notes and its really good for revision
Welcome to my math notes site. Contained in this site are the notes (free and downloadable) that I use to teach Algebra, Calculus (I, II and III) as well as Differential Equations at Lamar University. The notes contain the usual topics that are taught in those courses as well as a few extra topics that I decided to include just because I wante...
oh okay. tanx
"tan x"
do they practice questions
alright. and noice math joke btw
kk
damn this is very easy to use. thanks so much
damn i feel stupid then, but let's see :
a= log10(2) = ln(2)/ln(10)
so 1/a = ln(10)/ln(2)
and we know 8^(1/a) = exp( ln(8) * 1/a)
therefore 8^(1/a) = exp( ln(8) * ln(10) / ln(2))
= exp( ln(10) * ln(2^3) / ln(2))
= exp( ln(10) * 3 * ln(2)/ln(2))
= exp ( ln(10^3))
= 10^3
to not get confused, I was taught to always view log_a(b) as ln(b) / ln(a)
and to view x^c as exp(c * ln(x)) especially when c isn't an integer*
there's probably a shorter way than what I did, but what I did is what I do when stuck with logarithms and exponents
is csc short form for cosec
a faster way to see it would be, since (1/a) is an exponent of 8, to write it as a single logarithm of base 8
so 1/a = ln(10)/ln(2) = 3 * ln(10) / [3 * ln(2)]
= ln(1000) / ln(8)
= log_8(1000)
so 8^(1/a) = 8^(log_8(1000))= 1000
yep
nah man its all good!! thank you for taking time out of your day to help me. just a question: how would you solve it if you were to add a log on both sides like this? i havent seen "In" yet so it wouldnt be smart for me to solve it like that
oh yea, log10( x¨ [log10(2) ] ) becomes log10(2) * log10(x)
and log10(8) = log10(2^3) = 3 * log10(2)
so the inequality becomes log10(2) * log10(x) > 3 * log10(2)
you divide both sides of the inequality by log10(2) (knowing that log10(2) > 0, it doesn't change the sign of the equality) which gives :
log10(x) > 3
which is equivalent to : x > 10^3
"If A is a 8x5 matrix such as dim(Ker(A)) = 2, then the dimension of the vector subspace generated by the lines of A is equal to 3. True/false" The answer is true, could someone explain to me why ?
OH WOW, thank you so much!!!!
théorème du rang
dim(Ker(A)) + dim(Vect(A)) = nombreDeColonnesDeA
2 + dim(Vect(A)) = 5
merci beaucoup!
de rien
Algebra 2 how do u define always sometimes never?
I don't understand the question sorry
Always means the equation holds for any value for x (or a)
Sometimes means the equation only holds for some values for x (or a)
Never means the equation holds for no value for x (or a)
@simple bough
Ohhh ok thank you have a good day then thank you again
Np, you too
does this have answers to the problems?
Not all but mostly yes. I recommend it too.
also does anyone know what dominance means in terms of calculus
am asking in terms of this
Well the definition is literally in the screenshot
the definition is in the screenshot
the unofficial meaning is that e^x is strong as f**k
like how e^666 is soooo much bigger than 666
and e^(-666) is wayyyy too close to 0 ( (compared to 1/666 for example)
since e^x is so strong, e^x is the big boss that determines where a limit is going if you have a multiplication or division of e^x with something relatively weak like x^k
when x->+infinity or x->-infinity
tysm ur explanation was perfect!!!!! 😆 ♥️
i didnt understand what it was trying to say
ur welcome :3
In common language that means that e^x diverges "faster" than x^k (e^x gets very big much much quicker than x^k)
Point of inflection : y'' = 0
That is, (2+x) e^x = 0
Since e^x is never 0, you can divide both sides by e^x to simplify the equation to 2+x = 0
Solved
ahh ok ok ty
for a relation to be a function, each x-value must correspond with only one y-value but in the textbook I'm using ...
Is there an explanation for this? Or is it only an exception from the general rule applied for a relation to be a function?
https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Solutions/CalcI/ChainRule/Prob9.aspx
can someone explain me this solution
imagine it as a^x, yoy write it as e^ln(a^x)=e(x*ln(a))
and then you do the derivative
In the table, you'll notice that each input x has only one corresponding output y, which makes it a function. It doesn't matter that the outputs are the same
This relation could not be a function
x | y
-5 | 2
0 | 2, 3
5 | 2
because as you see, it is not clear what output we would get for the input 0
help me solve these questions...😖
can you post a bigger pic?
Hi
I'm always enthusiastic about helping people understand difficult concepts and helping them solve particular questions, but you might not realise that you're asking us to do your whole assignment, no questions asked.
Is there something you don't understand in a specific question ? Are you stuck at some step and you don't know to get past it ? These types of questions I will answer to. But "please do my whole assignment" is too much to ask in my opinion.
I'm saying that because that may (or may not idk) be how other helpers feel about your question
no it's " y''=0 and changes its sign"
I had forgotten about the 2nd condition, thanks for putting me right
hello people of the internet; I'm supposed to decide wether this function has or doesn't have one single asymptote.
And I have no idea how to even start?
Am I supposed to determine the domain first? Because I don't know how to do that without knowing the value of b
please help
there are 2 types of asymptotes :
-asymptotes when x-> +infinity or - inf, those are often horizontal (sometimes inclined)
for the horizontal, there's a horizontal asymptotes when lim f(x)=a constant when x->+inf or - inf
so that's what you gotta compute
-vertical asymptotes : those can happen when there are points of "disconnection" ("c" for example) in the domain, and when lim f(x) = +inf or -inf when x->c+ or x->c-
so you gotta find the domain, and ur right it does depend on b here. because when computing "delta" of the denominator :
if delta<0 : x^2+2bx+1>0 all the time so D = R
if delta = 0 : x^2 + 2bx + 1 = (x-x0)^2 where x0 is the unique solution of x^2+2bx+1=0, so D =(-inf, x0[) U (x, +inf) and x0 is indeed a point of "disconnection"
if delta>0 : x^2+2bx+1 = (x-x1) (x-x2) : two points of "disconnection" where u gotta compute the limit of f(x)
hiya! thanks. but i don't understand why x^4-x is not x^3. x^4-x^1 = x^4-1 = x^3. I didn't mean that if u differentiate x^4-x you'll get 3. I wanted to simplify x^4-x^1 before differentiating. why does that not work if u dont mind me asking?
x = cube root of -8. = -2. but this is still wrong. idk maybe i did smth wrong or...idk.
you went from x^4 - x^1 to x^4 - 1
what happened there
to the power of 4-1
what you seem to mean is that x^4 - x^ 1 = x^(4-1)
isn't that the indice rule?
right?
yeah
the rules that you do have are : x * 4 - x * 1 = x * (4-1)
and : x^4 / x^1 = x^(4 - 1)
the rule you used is some mix between the two, which is wrong
x**^4 - x^1 = x^**(4-1) is false (it concerns POWERS)
x * 4 - x * 1 = x * (4-1) is correct (it concerns MULTIPLICATIONS)
power and multiplication are not hte same
oh mb i was thinking of x^4 divided x^1 = x^(4-1).
thank you
let me know if you have any questions with differentiation
it can be a confusing topic
Trial and error
There's no other way to solve it
when it's so hard u can try special cases
like what if a=b=c? well u find out that would mean 8a^2 = 4a^3 <=> a=2 so a=b=c=2 works
idk why but I get really messy answers for the x bit. would appreciate it if someone can show me the working out to get the answer for x.
Is [ exp(ixn) ]^2 equal to 1 ?
Only if x is a multiple of pi (0, pi, 2pi, 3pi,...)
Because exp(i 2pi m) is equal to 1
Posting your question in the appropriate channel #science-help might help you get an answer faster
- Start off by isolating x in the first equation to express it in terms of y
- Then replace the x in the second equation by the expression you found in the first one. Carefully simplify the expression to be left with one solid fraction (the one in the answer). That's your final solution for y, as it is not expressed in terms of x
- Go back to the first equation and replace the y by the final value you got for it in the previous step. Carefully simplify the expression and you'll get the final solution for x as well
It's very normal if the equation get messy after the substitutions, that's why it's important to simplify them as soon as you can everytime to make future calculations lighter
how do I find the average rate of change for h(x)? I've gotten to this work but I can't figure out how to simplify that huge chunk on the top
Here’s my work:
Recall the expression a-b^2 = (a-b)(a+b), so that 9-(x-2)^2 = (3-(x-2))(3+(x-2))
Could I please get some help with question a. I understand why you would translate it 1 place to the right, but how are the y-axis intercepts and asymptotes found? Also, how is the domain R? The first image is the question and the second one is the answer from the textbook. Thank you.
m
Can you help me guys with this?
And what YouTube channel is good at teaching Calculus 1 ?
- gradient is negative reciprocal
- use point gradient formula to find equation of line: y-y1=m(x-x1)
Good
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6AVa0vSrCpuskzGDDKz_EQ
found this amazing channel
worth it!
enjoy 🙂
Yes
Do you know where i can get some more calculus questions to practice with?
A book
Or a channel
@gritty cloud a good book is schaums calculus
james stewart is another good book
michael spivak is also a good book
3blue1brown seris on youtube called essence of calculus is a good way to introduce calculus to yourself
he goes into a lot of depth
@gritty cloud fighting
?
Can someone help me with Q8a? I got an ans that is close to the book’s ans. I’m not sure whether it’s just me or the book having a stroke qwq
Ping me if ya do help and thanks in advance!!
This thing is due tmr and there’s still more questions I haven’t done-
This was the working I did (yep I cancelled it but pretend the line wasn’t there-)
why did you factor x^3-x+6 before computing dy/dx
but other than the fact that it made u waste time, the answer seems correct to me
an even faster way to do it would also be to say that the tangent at P's equation is y = mx+p
since it's parallel to the y=2x-5 line, then m=2 (they have the same m coefficient begause they're parallel)
so y = 2x + p
plugging in y=6 and x=-1
we get 6 = -2 + p so p = 8
Ohh
Okay thanks a lot!!
It makes sense
Am kinda ded at Q8b now- idk what’s the question asking for
Thanks 💜🌹
If you draw a coordinate system and mark off the points P and Q, and then draw normals from both those points, they will intersect at point R and form a triangle, which you are supposed to find the area of
A normal from the circle
I dont remember enough geometry to tell you how to do that right off the bat
OH lol
Bruh I wanna legit give up, this is due tmr
It's 9:16pm where I am
And I'm already tired ;;-;;
ive been typing the answer for 10 minutes and it just vanished f
RIP that sucks
Rip ;w;
for a you got y=2x+8
then
the tangent to point Q is parallel to that of point P
so bothe have the same slope
Do you have geogebra by any chance? I would've honestly just used a math program to solve these im too lazy lol
that is 2
so then you have the formula for the derivative of the function that is
f'(x) = 3x²-1
you solve for that equals to 2
Wait where did 3x^2-1 come from-
so 3x²-3=0
its the derivative of
x³-x+6
Oh-
u got it?
Yeah
I rmb smtg abt second derivative of a function in class
But the teacher wasn't emphasising on it so my mind decide to throw that away ;-;
then youll get x=1 ou x=-1 (you already used x=-1 for P)
so you find f(1)
youll get 6
so Q(1 ; 6)
that not second derivative its the first one
second derivative is when you derive the function a second time
Wait I got f(1)=6 -?
yeah yeah i made a mistak
Oop issokay
Wait so that's it?
Oh okay it's correct-
Bruh I spent almost one week on this
H o w
Thanks man
I’m sorry for crowding this channel but I’m stuck at Q9-
It’s not even worth staring at my working, I just followed the textbook’s examples
@random flame still need help?
Yes please qwq
ok so chain rule that mf and then use point p and q to find their respective equations
keeping in mind what ever gradient u find at each point
negative reciprocal it cause its a normal
perpendicular
What's negative reciprocal-
Is it like m1 * m2 = -1?
negative reciprocal is -1/x
Ohh
if x is orginal
Okay
negative then fraction it basically
ok then
once you have an equation for each point
p and q
make them equal to each other cause they interseact
i cant spell, jesus
bro all good, u got this
I don't think I can find the equation for point P
If I do 0^-1 it gave me maths error
Which technically means no solution for IGCSE
Yeah I did that cuz negative reciprocal
After chain rule, it's 4(x-1)^3
I'll send my working
yea
Ik it's abit all over the place but that's cuz I wanted to save space -^-"
u never found the original gradient
Huh-
Oop issokay 😂
Write wrong @random flame
?
the gradient being zero is weird
@random flame
what does write wrong mean
If I sub in x=1
no ur maths is correct
one sec
Okay uh
wrong all @random flame
how is it all wrong?
Aight sure
his derivative is correct
his substitution is perfect @dense fog
where is his mistake
Genuinely asking since i may be missing something
I think man's tryna drag you off course
maybe
Do what ya wanted to do first
ok ok
sorry give me some time to figure this out
Issokay
ok so just up to q 10 right?
I got a whole lot of other questions to do
I'm far behind the class cuz I got busy organising school camps
Then now I'm just ded
i think the question is literally broken
since everything u have done is correct @random flame
Impossible
does the answer give working?
Nope-
Sometimes this book's ans gets strokes and doesn't give the correct ans
That's what literally happened while I was doing Q8
I was solving a solved question for a week
ok one sec
i think i found something
i could be wrong
sorry again for this taking so much time
ok can i ask how you found ur equation
for the second one at least
since i think that may be one of the issues
Using the (y-y1) = m(x-x1) formula
But then the gradient supposed to be smtg like 1/x?
i think either i have missed something
or the book has messed up
what book are you using?
ok there are no worked solution pdf available
let me try the q from scratch
sorry once again
Nono it's okay
I can wait
I've accepted my fate to sleep later than 12am
This is the last yr of high school after all-
🙏
i found our issue!
:0
I AM AN IDIOT
BAHAHA AREN'T WE ALL IDIOTS/j
i forgot that 0
You should test basic math @random flame
does not have a fking reciprocal
LMAOOO
so use 0 as the gradient
Wait wha-
Ah yeah
yep
Haha
and then ur other equation is perfect
i mean solving simultaneously should have done the trick
look i think i have definitely missed something here (my excuse is that i am tired and it is 1am where i am)
can i redirect u to someone better
Ok
like he is a god @random flame
@qu\
is this the issue?
Yeap-
he has helped me a ton
Aight thanks man
a genuine sait
Go get some rest
sorry once again @random flame
ill try

Anyways back to this hellhole-
Legit thank you man
ok haven't done this in a while but i'll give it a go
You've been a legit huge help
Aight sure thanks
😊🙃😉🙂
nah man i think i confused u more
Nah fam you gud
Goodnight
WHAT WHAT
He said use x=1 as an equation
Y'know how x=1 is part of the coordinate P right
Yeah so apparently that can be used
OH WAIT NEGATIVE RECIPROCAL IS -1/x
I THOUGHT 1/x LMAO
NO NEEDA THANK ME MAN I'M JUST IN PURE SHOCK LMAO-
We all sleep deprived ppl who still somehow function 👍
Anyways THANKS AGAIN GUYS
SRSLY
Y'ALL AMAZING
Baii
Idk if this is how you're supposed to do it but I found a valid solution
@cinder heath
oh thanks
3 equations? I only know how to solve systems whit 2
That's exactly the same methods as systems of 2 variables, but with one extra variable & equation
anytime!
Hi! Is there someone here who is engaged in Olympiad mathematics (or an advanced school course)?
Yes
@ember kernel In my Internet space it is difficult to find decent lectures on functions, functional equations, functional inequalities and the like. Do you have something to share (lectures, sources, books)? I'd appreciate it
I've managed the first part of part a where it says to show a product of numbers of the form 3k+1 gives a number of the same form, but I'm not sure how to deduce? I think I can do it by cases by considering what remainders mod 3 the factors of such a number would have but I don't think that would be deducing 😅
any help on how to do this?
anyone knows a great math/math-related course available on Coursera?
Hi ! Sorry, everything I know about calculus was taught at school/uni. I have no pdf/book/lectures that could help you
yo i need some help
could someone help me write a recursive formula for part b of this problem
i have
(0,0), (1,1), (6,36), (35,1225), (204,41616)
and the problem is
Part (b): Find a recursive relationship expressing (xn,yn) in terms of (xn-1,yn-1) for any n≥1.
??
write a matrix with the coefficients of all the variables
so thatll give you some matrix M
so M(x y z) = (8 1 7)
multiply by inverse matrix of the 3x3
on both sides
then you will get sols for all 3 variables
If it can help you :
6 = 6 * 1 - 0
35 = 6 * 6 - 1
204 = 6 * 35 - 6
And yn = (xn)²
is there any mathematical way to find that
Trial & error + intuition
I checked two dozens of recursive formulas to get this one
Starting by realising that 36 = 6² - 1
And that 204 was close to 6*35
Easy
The equalities 1 = 1² and 36 = 6² seemed obvious to me
And I just needed to verify that 1225 = 35², which is the case
(x(n))²
Can you show the whole problem?
That is the whole problem
There’s nothing above that its just another question above it
same as 3k+1 yes
ah kk
okay, let's start with the assumption that there are a finite amount of ks, such that 3k-1 is prime
stuff like (1,2 and all other values thya are prime with that form)
3,4 from matrix
if we were to treat kz as the last final viable number such that (3kz-1) is the last prime possible in that form. Funnily enough, this problem uses a lot of part a, which it looks like youve solved. by creating a variable c, which is equal to k-2/3. Substituting this for every k in the set, you end up with the form 3c+1. Taking the product of every possible values of 3c+1 that are prime, add a particular value that guaremtees that the oroginal value of 3k-1 is preserved and then use proof by contradiction
@coral sierra
The name of the book is “A textbook”?
a textbook of engineering mathematics 👀
sem1
author name is important
it's like that so i
@left knoll btw chole bhature are tasty lol 😆 😋
Ay no homo broooo
Kinda sus ngl
But yes they are delicious
Q9d where did I make the stupid mistake
x=y²-1 isn't y=sqrt(x+1)
it's y=sqrt(x+1) combined with y=-sqrt(x+1)
Oh shoot ur right tysm I knew it was dumb mistake lol
also can't you just do the integral in dy?
I wanted to try this way
ok
?
Ignore that lmao
Being dumb
At the end of the left column, there's also a u² that comes from nowhere
After inegrating a function with regards to a variable, you shouldn't have tha variable in the expression of the function anymore
The u^2 just means unit squared
It something we have to do
yea its just a rule that you have to do it for exams otherwise we dont get the mark
its stupid
It is
Plus it's confusing as you're also taught to use u for the substitution variable
exactly
i think im making another stupid mistake, just cant find where
Thanks anyway for your responsiveness.
what's the question?
Dude
You computed 24 + 16 = 30
^^
find shaded area
jesus christ
my excuse is that its 3 am
and i am tired
can anyone confirm this is right?
I'll answer in 2h, to make sure your test has ended by then
._.
Okay then
Hey, everyone Can anyone suggest any useful resources to understand linear algebra I'm struggling quite a lot 😅
G. Strang's textbook on linear algebra
This book is so well-written, and very comprehensible
If you can't afford it, Strang's whole lectures (he worked at MIT) are available on YouTube for free
Check them out, they're great too. Whenever I didn't understand something from the book, I would go watch the lecture of the difficult chapter to have it explained to me. Here's the link :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7UJ4CFRGd-U&list=PL221E2BBF13BECF6C&ab_channel=MITOpenCourseWare
MIT 18.06SC Linear Algebra, Fall 2011
Instructor: Gilbert Strang, Sarah Hansen
View the complete course: https://ocw.mit.edu/18-06SCF11
YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP63uMA4q8GaU6Eg5nzeOc8tx
In this video, Professor Gilbert Strang shares how he infuses linear algebra with a sense of humanity as a way to engag...
I can't stress enough how good this source is
Thank you soo much 😆 That was so helpful
Can someone tell me what I should look up on yt to learn this topic
Literally have no idea what this is
complex numbers
I think it's related to the domain of the function like for example 1/x is not defined on 0 . Maybe this video can help https://youtu.be/djT6-YamHaA
This algebra video tutorial explains how to find the domain of a function that contains radicals, fractions, and square roots in the denominator using interval notation. This video contains plenty of examples and practice problems and is useful for students in algebra and precalculus.
My E-Book: https://amzn.to/2UTLsbR
Video Playlists: http...
can someone help me with this, it says show your solution also, thankyou in advance♥️
Mean = sum of all numbers divided by amount of numbers
Median = middle number when the numbers are sorted in ascending order
Standard deviation is the formula in the pic
i need help with this, can someone help me? thankyou
@winter dove what does set 1-4 years mean?
i think its the year like first year, second year, third year, fourth year
ah ok that makes sense, the wording of discrete distributions is so bad imo
im so sorry
can u help me with it?
i can but im kind of busy rn with some homework 😬😬
sorry
im not free for the next 5 hours so
if someone doesnt help you by then, i will, but most likley someone will do it before me
if not ill do it
oh its okay, the due is still on the next day
thanks for helping me, im glad
you can take your time first☺️
thanks girl*, ill try to help if i can 😊
in my country it was called "Sets and maps" smth like that lol
try looking for "bijective injective surjective functions"
i think i fixed the issue 😁
Help me pls !!! i have a problem : prove that f(x)= x^6 +x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 is Irreducible polynomial in F2[x] . How can i know that polynomial is Irreducible or reducible ?? .I have seen some video about that but in this case the deg(f(x)) > 2 , i dont know how to solve this .Thank you very much .:(
this might sound stupid but isnt this literally impossible?
I found dy/dx which is =12(2-x)^-2
then I equated that to 0 since it says that it crosses x-axis since y = 0 on the x axis
I think I messed up there but Im not sure
@shrewd swan
what is the ques?
mark ab = 5
why do you need tan90?
Tan90-x
its supposed to be tan(90-x)
Oh
Cute chapter
Tan90-x is cot
Ye
yes
They didn't tell that in school smh
???
yes
Deleted i think
They did..you were absent
sin(90-x)=cosx
cos(90-x)=sinx
tan(90-x)=cotx
cot(90-x)=tanx
cosec(90-x)=secx
sec(90-x)=cosecx
This type of question is deleted i did anyways
Yasho big brein
I challenge you to write all the formulas of trigonometry
that is defo out of his syllabus
BROO IM IN 10th
all of this is in 11th ya
ye just put it there so he can refer
Chilll
ik
copy pasting the picture just sent
What...
Very nice
This part is deleted
U mean that topic is deleted?
i think complementary pairs is deleted
So cbse is cutting parts
oh yea since last year
I did this question wrong in an exam. Is the answer d?
because a and c are just the means I think?
can anyone help me understand triangle proportionality? like AA~
Express sinh in its exponential form
Im not sure how you even simplify the negative 5 in the radicand with 6 cube roots of 5
it doesn't seem possible to me without using imaginary numbers
WAIT NVM
-1 cubed is -1, so i can just factor it out of -5
still do?
and could you please send me the rest of the exercices, i have a test on complex numbers on Wednesday 😅
for a its number of individuals in an age group/number of individuals
for b its the same except its in percentile
the last one u cumulate as you go down the age groups
how to like show the solution? or how to solve it?
like can you show it in a table way?
yeahh you can
it is easier that way actually
in A you just divide it right?
the frequency is 3 divided by the total of frequency?
when you sum up all the frequency, its 191 so, 3 divided by 191?
am i right?
in B, you just do the same, like 3 divided by 191 times 100?
3
__ * 100 ?
191
i'm somewhat confused on C, how to solve it?
yes
you just add them so for
11-20
it will be the frequency of 10 and below + the frequency of 11-20
can someone help me with this sum?
sum:
two angles are supplementaire .four times one angle is equal to twice the other angle .Calculate the size of the angles by means of a system of equations and using the substitution method
??
x +y =180(cause they re supplémentaires)
and 4x = 2y
then u solve that
sorry bro i mean supplementaire
i edited ir
ok
noo
4x-2y=0
ohh ok
(along with the firdt equation)
you mean this ?
x+y=0
{
4x-2y=0
noo the first one is still equal to 180
ohh ok
x+y=180
{
4x-2y=0
@sullen verge ohh thanx
happy to help
then to solve it you find y according to x
or x according to y
then you substitute
in a percent form?
The area of a circle is halved when its radius is decreased by y.
Find its radius.
2y + r2
(2-r2)y
2 + r2y
(2+r2)y
(2+r2)y
Since the radius is decreased by y, so the new radius is r-y.
We know area of a circle is pir^2, so the new area is pi(r-y)^2
Now it's given that the area of the circle gets halved when reduced by y, so pi(r-y)^2 = (pir^2)/2
The answer is 2 I think
Nope
oops, nvm. Thank you
send ur questions here. there are alot who can help u
if i remember it correctly its like subtracting. f'(2) from f'(5).
You just draw rectangles and calculate the areas. The rectangles must be one unit wide and their heights must be f(2), f(3) and f(4)
So yeah, it's basically just f(2)+f(3)+f(4)
does anyone know why its D
Read off the values at f(x=0) and f(x=2) and add then together, what do you get?
ahh -2 + 2 thank you
Does anybody here understand the process of taking the derivative of the norm_2 of a vector with respect to that vector itself? Having a hard time googling myself to an answer.
the directional derivative?
d/dw(a*|w|_2) is the expression
I'm not sure if I can just do it as 2aw as the final expression
I'm pretty sure that in this case norm_2 is just norm so discard that part
what this mean lol
Does anyone know why this is 65 and not 55
For a 2€ coupon, a restaurant allows you to pick your ice cream dessert, out of 10 distinct flavors. The
dessert is served as ice cream balls, with each ball costing 1€. How many different ice cream
combinations can you make?
Note: you don’t have to spend all 2 euros.
Note: the option of choosing no ice cream balls (no dessert) is not considered and doesn’t count.
and a is just a scalar?
correct
can you provide the whole text?
It's combinations, often denoted nCr. It means how many different samples of size r you can make from n different elements.
And the order of the elements within the samples is not relevant.
thanks alot bro
It's just a small part of a larger assignment, but the part encircled is what I want to take the derivative of:
Which I've identified as the norm (they hint about it as well)
well no, it's not the norm
it's quite different, wj is the j-th component of the vector w
But isn't the norm of a vector it squared with itself, which ends up being that expression like this:
oh ok that's waht you meant
ok so you don't actually derive by w to find the minimum
you need to find the gradient=0
i think it is (sorry for the late reply)
please tell me this isn't in higher IB Math
did you try to multiply and divide by the conjugate?
I need help with this question, I got to an equation
n = m+2 - 30/m+1 which was given as hint, idk what to do after that
okay, so they have given that n is a natural number, which means n is a whole number
what does that imply?
m^2 + 3m - 28/m+1 must be a whole number then
which means?
the key thing is to realize, for a fraction to be a whole number, the denominator must divide the numerator
or in other words, m^2 + 3m - 28 is divisible by m+1
you can continue to work from here
also dont forget that it n is a natural number
that means it must be positive
oh yeah this clears everything, I got the solution, a lot of thanks mate
just wondering, (A) is false and (B) is true right?
no problem btw
i got m could be ||5,9,14,29|| because m > ||4||
correct options are A and D
wait you have got a point B is correct and A is wrong
but here for some reason
if you havent got it i can explain to u how i got B
correct options are given A and D
and C is correct henceforth
I got it
umm how about we reread question
which of following are FALSE
lol
🤣
you got a point xd
that was a trap lol
yepp
x+1 = A(x^2+1) + (Bx+c)(x), how do i find b and c in this?
got the value of A, but after that i am a bit lost
Use the fact that each power of x can have its own equation
Because obviously x^m and x^n are different if m and n are different
That means that ax² + bx + c = dx² + ex + f is only true if a = d, b = e and c = f
Do you know what I mean ?
ah i get it thanks alot
someone help me im so bad at logs and exponentials, where do i start
Express eveything in the same base
Here, you can see that 27 = 3³
Now, using the property 3^a * 3^b = 3^(a+b), re-express the equation as 3^x = 3^y (you need to find the value of x and y by yourself)
Since exponential functions are injective, 3^x = 3^y implies that x = y
You can solve for n from there
hi, I was given the following situation: n = 60, f(A) = 0.3, f(B|A) = 0.5, f(A,B) = 0.15 (f(X) = relative frequencies). Is it possible to find f(Not A, B) and f(Not A, Not B) with the information available? I would say no, because there is no information given about the distribution of the remaining 0.85 = 42 entities in the "Not A"-row. Is this right?
I just can't
Try to rewrite the 2 to something and look at the expression again
Correct, not really sure how this is a proof, but you can try with different neighboring integers that the higher the numbers are the lower this difference will be
So sqrt(10)-sqrt(9) will be smaller than sqrt(9)-sqrt(8) etc...
ohhhhh
bro Ive been stuck on this for a solid hour thx so muhc
guys i think this isnt math but is it a problem when your start smoking weed and then start watching lord of the rings
No lord of the rings is great
which q
4th
ok gimme few secs
These are my calculations, wrong obv
D i got as 2/5
3+(n-1)5 = 78
What happens when -4 goes to the other side -_-
Sorry lol
Instead of skipping a step, add four to both sides
which sum soln is this ??
if fourth then application is wrong
You tenth kids be more careful with signs😭
🫂
Yeah fourth
i wanted to show step by step
You can correct it now and see if you're able to reach the ans
be careful with how you read the question , cause you have solved it wrong
10thies solve ncert
Yeah
Rsa best
Rd sharma that guy 🤬
but concepts are best with rd
and explanation is really good
if you put time into it you can really understand chap in rd without teacher
it gives u many questions of same type tho
ye time thoda waste hoga but still concepts will be on point
i did the whole book , helped me but like for marks ncert hi padhna pada
zamn
You have a decent handwriting✨
for 2 mins itll be okay then itll go to hieroglyphics mode
which sum
here's your answer
i need the question to give ye your answer bro
The same question man
what's the question
i sent the solution right
75 divided by 5 isn't 12 bro
That was literally all 😂
ye just realized bro
haha
i was thinking bout that for a long time lmao
anyways you know how to solve it now...
I do 😼
Man I'm too slow with math
good luck
isnt common difference given in the question
keep ur phone down , u dont neeed it
Bhai 4th sub question I meant
ohh
It's not the phone I get stuck on simple things
and only meow noticed it
6th term is 6 pehla term is -4 d nikao what the isssue
Now I got it no issue
Bhai Han samaj gaya
oki
ye i think he got it , i went and did the forth sum thats where the entire confusion began plus i did wrong division
i wanna punish myself so bad
u dont punish urself for bad maths , the regret is enough boyo
but this is 4th grade math 💀
Hello there, wanted to ask how i "reduce" this
x*(x+4)-(x+2)^2
thanks in advance
well
try to develop it
then quite a bit of terms cancel out
What I would do is try to get a polynomial of the form ax²+bx+c, and then factorise it using the quadratic formula (or an identity)
okay thank you very much i'll have a go at it
anyone here who is good at probability?
i'm struggling with this problem
basically
given 100 candies: 50 milk-flavored candies, and 50 chocolate-flavored candies
and 2 boxes
I simply have no idea what to do
now you have to put the candies into the two boxes
then you'll get blindfolded, the candies will be mixed up randomly, and the two boxes will be swapped randomly multiple times
when the blindfold is removed, you will choose a candy from the box
if it's a chocolate one, you win
if it's a milk one, you lose
question: how should you put the candies into the box so that the probability that you pick the chocolate candy is maximized?
does anyone know how to do 3k please i am confusion
try to reduce the bases to have only 3^something x 3^something then you can simplify that to 3^(something +something). then when the bases of LHS and RHS are both 3, you can solve for the equation with only the powers.
and if you reduce the bases to have only 3^ then you will get => 3^[(n^2)+3n] = 3^[3n+(1/4)] and if bases are the same then you can just get this equation => n^2 + 3n = 3n + (1/4) and 3n's cancelled each other then => n^2 = 1/4 and you will get the result as n = +1/2, n = -1/2
With the given conditions, it looks like a uniform distribution in my opinion,so any method of putting candies won't change the probability of picking up either one of these candies. But I'm curious to know the solution.
Use substitution.
ln_w_ = z
Hence w = e^z
Hend dw = e^z dz
This becomes an integration in z instead of w now. Therefore the limits will change from w to ln_w_
ln1=0, ln_e_ =1
I need the soultion please 🌹
For second image replace all the h with 0
Wait is there more to the second image?
Looks like first principles
1st image:
Y = (X-4)^1/3
Dy/dx = 1/3(x-4)^-2/3
Sub in a for part i)
And sub in 1 for part ii)
Sub into derivative i mean
which part are you asking
