#math-help
1 messages · Page 44 of 1
I found dy/dx
isn't equal that given diff eqn
but answer sheet says yes
where did I go wrong
can someone explain to me what this question is asking me to do and how i can go about the first few vague steps of completing it
divide each term by e^xy to get the same answer as that of the answer sheet.
aahahah thx I couldn't saw
I'm more concerned about how you intend to divide a vector by another vector
And how you managed to get to that expression
Oh nvm that's a scalar product in the denominator, so that's okay
No, you can't """simplify vectors"""
But that expression looks very strange to me. In what context did you get to it ? (just out of plain curiosity, I'm not saying it's wrong)
I’m practicing the Gram Schmidt method !
In linear algebra
Oh yeah I remember that
No
You can't simplify vectors
Because dividing by vectors makes no sense in the first place (in linear algebra at least. There could be some obscure field of maths where that could exist, idk I'm not knowledgeable enough)
Thank you! I thought so too but I wanted to make sure
np
hey; if possible, can u guys take this rly quick survey? it’s for my ap stats project and im in need of 20+ sample size. any help would be great! thanks! https://forms.gle/cUKhwUtEGxMQQREb7
I did, hope it helps :)
thank you!!
Hii, anyone here free to help me out with this addmaths problem? It requires system of linear eqns to solve it
Hi everyone,
I would like to ask for help
Known function R -> R (real numbers -> real numbers, it's a Real number symbol) defined with a rule as how is it shown on the picture
The question is, what is the **set ** of that function's co-domain?
This one is a bit tricky you have to do that so that you'll get a answer and then just do that to get another answer then after 2 answers do that again and you'll get your answer hope this helps:)
hi guys i just want to know how did they make this?
it's hard
oh sorry the number cropped is 12 and 4
Looks like they simplified -30/-300 to 1/10 and simplified sqrt(2)/sqrt(2) to 1
Then they calculated 10pi/12 + pi/4 = 13pi/12. Therefore sin(13pi/12)/cos(13pi/2) = tan(13pi/12) = 2-sqrt(3)
Now multiply those three independant simplifications and you get (2-sqrt(3))/10
(Also the absolute value has been implicitly removed since it's always positive)
I’m having trouble understanding discrete time dynamicals. How do you come to this conclusion? Why is t an exp for in d (pt = 0.57^t) and for e it multiplied by t (p100= p0 + 0.57t) ?
Question (d) :
p0 = 12
p1 = 0.57 * p0
p2 = 0.57 * p1 = 0.57 * (0.57 * p0)
= 0.57² * p0
p3 = 0.57 * p2 = 0.57 * (0.57² * p0)
= 0.57³ * p0
...
From there it is easy to observe that
pt = 0.57^t * p0
Question (e) :
Do the same kind of development, but add 0.57 each time instead of multiplying by 0.57
The observation will be just as easy
guys i need help with linear algebra in Singular value decomposition if u know this topic well pls DM me
hmmmmmm understood that's work
Are there any French people pls ?
Oui
Hi ! I don't understand the question. Could you translate it pls ?
HELLO!!!!! Hope you all doing good, I need help with beamer LATEX , is there anyone who can help ?
all you have to do is- (excuse the writing). I think this should be correct.
u forgot the square root, so it's [-3/2 ; 3/2]
Has anyone have any example of funcions(sorry, I don't know how are they called in eng) that would work for a field? I mean something like a ◽b = a + b + 1, and two others so it can be a field. Is it even possible?
Or they must be addition, subtraction, multiplication and division?
I need to show how to check if set of ''numbers'' is a field
What's the square operator ?
It is literally a + b + 1, which creates abelian group inside of real numbers
And for example I have a triangle b = 2ab
Which creates field with previous operation inside real numbers
Now I need more "creative" examples of operators
I've been stuck on this question for a while but apparently the answer is a) but I'm not sure how you'd get that answer, do you use one of the log laws and if so which one?
You need to use the following logarithm identity :
Therefore, you get :
Because there's that other log identity :
⬆️
so in other words you'd first use the change of base log law to change Log_3 (10) and Log_4 (10) which gives you this and then from there you can tell it's equivalent to a right?
definitely tysm for the help! :)
Yes, because log_10 (10) = 1. Thus, both numerators simplify to 1
ahhh ok ok that makes sm sense
I appreciate it, thank you!
thanks again for the help!
np:)
ah sorry turns out I'm stuck on another question but for this one, I tried using symbolab for help but the correct answer is 3.2 and I don't know how or why :/
I understand how you'd get 2^log_2 (x multiplied by 5) since you use the product law but I'm just stuck on how to continue solving to get 3.2 if that makes any sense
2^log base 2(x)+log base 2(5) = 16 => log base 2 (x) + log base 2 (5) = 4 => log base 2 of (5x) = 4 => 5x = 16 => x = 16/5 = 3.2
They asked when will this function always decreasing
Like with the m you replace in the function
The bigger the x
The smaller the result
OHH RIGHT
tysm for the help!! :)
yes right😅
You want a constant negative slope (because you want a decreasing function)
Therefore, you want want a negative derivative
Therefore, differentiate, and using the quadratic formula solve for y' = 0 to get the roots of y'
From there you'll just need to determine the value(s) for m that make(s) y' negative near the roots
I totally just forgot how to solve these type of questions 
it means that if y increase n times, then x will also increase n times and if y decreases n times then x will also decrease n times
y2 decreased 12 times from 60 so x2 will also decrease 12 times
with 2 point you can find the line equation, after that you have to substitute
OH right omg thanku guys
I appreciate it
@ember kernel how did he know that there is a 0.05 value of the nickels (n) and the rest as well
Hi could someone help me with this?
the answer is D but I dont know why
Because a nickel is worth 5 cents
That's it
Hi, so f(1)=0 because thats the graphic of f(x), from that graph since the curve is turned down u can conclude f''(x) is negative so f"(1)<f(1). From that graph u can also see that it is "growing" (sorry for my lack of knowledge of certain words of maths in english) and so f'(x) is positive so f"(1)<f(1)<f'(x)
No u not, it happens forgetting!
Many thanks 🙏
U are welcome! : )
For 10a this is what I did
Even though the answer is correct, I'm not too sure why 240/12^2 is the acceleration I need to use
Can someone help me understand why it gives me the correct acceleration
Keşke üni sınavında bunu sorsalar
is n=10?
ye it was thanks for the effort but I got the answer already 😊
i just did it for practice
well with tan u can get the angle, also u need to decompose what u have, in the end u need N and the friction force to get the u
you need to apply lami's theorem here
i just did this
but im just thinking how u can get aceleration in the x axis
with that u can solve the exercise
never heard about that theorem
<@&717391911132069929> hey sorry to bother but this person multiposted probably a virus or something
hi!! could someone please explain what the tip below the question means? why isn’t the ratio 5:16?
ooooh ok ill try that thnx a lot
np, lmk if u need any further explanation on what i did
Because if the ratio was 5 black : 16 green, then the probability of choosing a black olive would be 5 / (5 + 16) = 5/21 (= # of black olives / total # of olives)
But here we know it is 5/16
ohh got it! thank you!
Can someone help me with number 13 please^o^
Use the quadratic formula
Try multiplying coefficients A and C and if there are no factors that either add or subtract to 8 then proceed with quadratic formula
hello!! i just need 7 more responses to reach my required sample size for my stat survey; it's one question, and any help would be much appreciated: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeEYt28JNqf6CPf-a1Zt5DQ2SODF7TDHRHerPOCQ-ecs10Xxw/viewform?fbzx=-7323831876303373235
rly close to finishing it,, thank you to all who took it!!
would this be considered to be an altitude and perpendicular bisector as well? the image got cut off but my answers were:
■angle bisector
□ perpendicular bisector
■median
□altitude
|| ■→selected | □→ blank||
I wanted to select all initially but there was no 90゚to indicate a perpendicular segment so I only chose those two options but now I'm second guessing (💢´ºヮº`)و“
in an iscoseles triangle, a median bisector would be everything else also
yes its simply provable using congruent triangles
np!
it was in my physics book, for when an object is in equilibrium, could share a photo if you want
If there’s no solution to this matrix, then what’s the value of a?
- 3
*2
*-1
*7
Can anyone help me solve this problem??
Hi what do I do about this if I mustn't use L'Hospital
No solution = two lines (or linear combinations of lines) have the same coefficients for x, y and z but different independant values
No need i already searched it up but thank you!
alr
mine is 2
i'm brazilian , i know a little how text in english and i know a little to calculate , but calculate in english is hard to me , hahaha
"such that" I guess ?
two perpendicular lines that aren!t vertical will always be what?
・have equal slope
・have one slope equal to 0
・have slope products of -1
・have slope products of 1
do I have to find Voltage drops here
hey, how can i simplify this? im not getting to the right solution
all of the second bit?
cos theta = sin (90- theta)
that's how they're linked
and in that case theta is (A+B)
then it just does sin(A+B)
log4(sqrt(5))
= log2(sqrt(5)) / log2(4)
= log2(sqrt(5)) / 2
= log2(sqrt(5)^1/2)
= log2(5^(1/4))
is that just something u have to know?
yeah
i always just use propeties of trig graphs
i think you get given it
bruh
in the exam
u do a levels?
yea
nice
thank you!!
what year u in
12
Dont forget to add the log2(3) to that
im doing further maths thats why haha
ooooooooo smart guy
we've done year 2 already
sheeeeeeeeesh
😩
best of luck to u
u too
what else u pick?
yes thank you very much!
bio chem maths
oooh
of course
How to draw that? This is ok?
We are trying to find the argument and module of z. I don't understand what we're doing starting the third step? and how we found that the argument equals -3 from cos(3)-sin(3)i since 3 isn't on the circle
cos(3) - i sin(3)
= cos(-3) + i sin(-3)
= exp(-3i)
(Via trigonometric identities)
And 3 is on the circle. Actually, any real value can be an argument. It's just widespread convention to use multiples of pi when dealing with angles. However, that doesn't make any other real number invalid. (3 is close to pi = 3.1415 afterall, which is """on the circle""" as you say)
i'am looking for the min and max of -3sin(x) - exp(x)
why did he put the condition : expression < 1 ?
it says condition fullfilled
ty in advance
How do I find B in this situation? Thank you in advance
Continuous and differentiable at x = 1. Use these conditions to form 2 equations in a and b then solve for them.
Ah, thank you
shut the fuck up lol
sorry i got hacked trying to fix it rn
thanks!!
The largest binomial coefficient(s) in the expansion of (1+x)^4
I must be tripping
Whenever I enter value of sin(3.14/4) I get root 2/2
How r they getting 1/root 2
Can someone please confirm I’m so lost
Just a quick calculation on ur part
1/root 2 is root2/2
is the number 72.28 or 7228?
72 x 28
oh okay
also, is the comma a typo?
could u translate, im not that good at spanish
We write times as a floating .
oh okay
Half it to form a right triangle and from there use trig ratios then times it by 2 after getting all three sides use cos rule to find one of the angles then from there just solve for X
the reason why I multiplied it its because it’s only half the lenth just in case if ur wondering why
Remember that the sum of the angles should be 180
hellp
i need help with physics
how do i solve this question: assume that a gas is enatomic and consists of 6.0 * 10 ^ 23 identical atoms. how big is the change in temperature? and it loses 90j heat energy
it is in a closed container that does not change shape tbh
Thermodynamics would fit better in #science-help
its thermophysics
That's a different name for the same problem, but it's still science
You're more likely to get an answer if you send it to the best-fitting channel
can someone help me find a way to get this answer ? ^^'
define x = a², then solve for x using the quadratic formula
Then, knowing the possible values for x, find a using the x = a² relation we defined before
oh that's very clever thank you! i will try that
also later in ur uni years, if u see such a quadratic equation, u can try by testing 1 and -1 as solution before using formulas. Cause if by any chance u find that for example 1 is a solution of x^2 + bx + c, then you know that it's actually equal to (x-1)(x-x2) where x2*1 = c
anyway I guess it's just a detail, but sometimes allows to very quickly solve such equations
can someone explain whats going on here
first line
isnt the 0.5 meant to be on angle
if its not i still dont get it
The formula is :
wait
Now just replace alpha by theta/2 and you get what you have
i understand the substitution
is this a double angle formula?
ooooooooooo
damn i see it
That's one of the fundamental trigonometric identities
Yeah
We usually use theta and 2theta, instead of theta/2 and theta
But that's the same, since the value of theta can be anything we want
np
hello, I had a question regarding statistics: is cross validation done only for unsupervised algorithms (like the k-means algorithm), or it can also be used for super supervised algorithms (like for the k-nearest neighbours algorithm)?
If I'm not mistaken, cross validation is when we separate our dataset into a training dataset and a testing dataset to prevent overfitting so I think it can be used for both supervised and unsupervised algorithms but I'm not sure...
Can anyone help me with this please? im so confused on how to start
Does this add up?
i keep getting a total of 69 instead of the 66 it says
i want to know if im the idiot or the question is just wrong
universe is supposed to be 66, am i doing something wrong here?
The number of wine merchants that only sell Gevrey Chambertin and Cheap Plonk is not mentioned, but that doesn't mean it is 0 :)
legend
That looks better, right ? :D
👉👈 😳
i will keep that in mind thank you!
"(A × B) ∪ C" How to turn it into a sentence formula ? I mean x∈ A and ....
I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean. What kind of "sentence formula" would you want to get knowing only one of its words (the set (A × B) ∪ C) ?
Maybe some context or goal would help us see what you want
I have a test can someone please explain how to do at least one or two of these
Just use the formula :
x²-y²= (x+y)(x-y)
You just need to find appropriate values for x and y
Eg for (a) :
Define c = 8 a^4 and d = 4b² (I took the square roots of each initial term of 64 a^8 - 16 b^4)
Now you have :
64 a^8 - 16 b^4 = (8 a^4)² - (4 b²)² = c²-d²
Using the formula I gave earlier, you can express that as :
c²-d² = (c+d)(c-d) = (8 a^4 + 4b²) * (8 a^4 - 4b²)
BUT you see that there are still even powers in the second factor, so we could go even further
Let's focus on that second factor and forget the first one (which we can't factor anymore)
We see that : 8 a^4 - 4b² = (sqrt(8) a²)² - (2b)²
So let's conveniently define e = sqrt(8) a² and f = 2b
Therefore : (sqrt(8) a²)² - (2b)² = e² - f² = (e+f)(e-f) = (sqrt(8) a² + 2b)(sqrt(8) a² - 2b)
Let's insert this in our previous result, and we finally get :
(At the end I just factored out constants, which I should've done in the first place but forgot to tbh)
It seems tedious at first, but it's actually pretty easy once you get the hang of it. With enough training, you won't even need to define intermediate parameters (c,d,e,f)
does this help
basically they made the denominator common
you can multiply like dat because basically youre just doing 1/1
yo thanks for the reply, and then after doing that they just multiplied the h to the top?
because its like 1/1/h so they then multiplied 1/h i think
Because that would be the reciprocal right
nah nah that gets a confusing at times but think of it like this
now dividing by h is just 1/h
1/1/h can get a bit ambiguous because it can mean (1/1)/h=1/h and it could also mean 1/(1/h)=h depending on where u place your brackets
so to avoid that error the thing that i personally do it while making calculations it to write it using the ÷ or using proper () or just separating stuff out early on so that i dont end up with some calculation error later on
oh ok makes sense
yea
i can see how that would become a problem
thank you man : )
welcome 🤗
i mean this [photo] we can translate to this [photo2] , but i dont know how to translate this [photo3] to form with x ∈ ... like [photo2]
The equality seems kinda wrong to me though
but i just need to translate photo3 to something like photo2
this is my try, but I don't think I did it right
hi I have a really simple question: how is 444...44 (100 digits) written in scientific notation?
its because the calc reads the numeircal value as thousands,millions (interms of the digits itself) so its raise to 10
can anyone correct me If its wrong ty
U cant cross multiply there is an add operation
i just did a proof, apparently this is legal
oh i was asking if it was possible to do, apparently it is
it just seems very quirky i guess
What about it confuses you
I could explain it
are you confused about finding the common denominator?
it just seemed odd to me that you can just multiply and put them in the same fraction with the squares on top. it makes sense now though
yeah bro
step 2 to 3 i believe thats fine
u just made them common denominator
and from 3 to 4 u applied trig equation
It's totally legal and not 'quirky' as you said. That's one of the many fundamental identities of maths that one must know
:|
<@&717391911132069929>
need help with this
what do u have to do?
use second line to deduce x = 3y-3
then replace, in the first line, "x" by "3y-3"
then solve for y in that line
then for each solution y, deduce a value of x with x = 3y-3
replace sin(..) with sqrt(1-cos(..)^2)
that works cause sin(a) = sqrt(1-cos(a)^2) when a idan angle in [0,pi/2]
thats not elimination
But I'm only required to use the elimination method and not the substitution. I tried the elimination but it gives me a different value.
but yea, thats the only way u can solve it as per me
wt is ur answer though
it tried smthg related to elimination, not sure bout my ans though
I think I got the same answer with a different solution wherein I tried to square both sides of the equation 2.
But still the answer is not the same when u try to use the substitution
Do u still need help?
ah idk these English terms
i did that only
same,,, I was trying to manipulate but Idk if the solution is acceptable as long as I've proved the same answer. Do you guys think my solution to this problem is right according the method used?
anyone have any good resources for commutators? We use them in physical chemistry but I haven't actually had the math behind them so i struggle to remember the rules and how they work
can anyone help me with 3c. please?
Can someone help me with this question 😦
Given 𝑓(𝑥)=2𝑥3−7𝑥2+9𝑥−3, use the Remainder Theorem to find 𝑓(−13). Briefly explain the result and its relation to the given polynomial function and the 𝑓(−13).
sec is just 1/cos
Since you calculated sin in 3a, you can calculate cos via the trigonometric identity sin² + cos² = 1
(All angles in the trig functions are x-y btw)
I need too calculate low and high point from this function could someone help?
hii could someone please help me with a doubt the exercise says to write the equation of the parabola, with axis parallel to the y axis, which has the verx in V and passes through P. I was doing 204 and it didn't come to me, so I checked phoromath to see if I was doing the wrong calculations, but I realized that the vertex coordinate was 0, so I substituted it in the term c, when I did, I put it in the equation of the point through which the parabola passes and it gave me the result , however this does not make sense to me, why shouldn't I put it in the equacion of the axis of the vertex? (I tried it that way and it didn't work)
Why should I replace it in the equation of the passing point with the parabola and not in the vertex?
f(x) is local a minimum if : f'(x) = 0 and f''(x) > 0
f(x) is a local maximum if : f'(x) = 0 and f''(x) < 0
The derivative of x^b is b x^(b-1) (with b a certain constant , and it's called the power rule)
The derivative of a sum is the sum of the derivatives : (f+g)' = f' + g'
That's all the technical stuff you need (I'm sure you know how to solve an inequation)
Thanks!!
Find the length of the Normal chord to the parabola y^(2)=4x, which subtends a right angle at the vertex.
(a) 2√3
(b) 7√3
(c) 6√2
(d) 6√3
could someone help?
ty 🙂
Yes
i dont understand why my teacher stopped here at n+1 while integrating
well since the areas between 0 vertical axis and** (n+1) vertical axis **are counted
||forgive me i dont study math in eng||
OH
tysmmmm!!
nah nah thanks a tonn im dummm mfdsj
Look at this question
And look at part c here
Here
In the second line why is it -xy
Is this some sort of mistake? What do you guys think?
I’m so baffled ur adding probabilities why is there a -xy?
Because it's -P(A inter B)
Because A union B = A + B - A inter B
Don’t u add A inter B
U add everything in the regions so why would u be subtracting the A inter B
You should check a video about that (the inclusion-exclusion principle).
It's considered known in this exercise
And it makes total sense "geometrically". You just need to watch a video to understand it
Hi
I can see it appearing in other questions, so is it just something ur meant to know?
Haw are you?
Yup, you're supposed to know about it
Ello there
Inclusion-exclusion principle
Ahhhh right thank you
Np
Textbook is so messed
It covers inclusion exclusion principle couple chapters after they set questions on it
hii,anyone know how to do c ?
can anyone explain how they went from the 2nd to the 3rd line? Where did the third expression come from?
wtf is this lmao
accident
Does anyone know why they equate the function to x before finding the equilibrium
Needs context
The question asks to find inverses of the updating functions involved and discuss the stability of the original and inverse dynamical systems
Yeah can't help sorry
nw!
Hi! I'm in grade 11 functions and the unit we're studying atm is trig functions. I've come across a problem such as the following. Does anyone know how to go about doing question 3ai?
Here's what I've tried - I've come up with an equation such as -10cos(pi/6 * x) + 15 and tried plugging in 7 for x, however that answer didn't line up with the correct answer which is 20m
The first step in the sample solution is not quite clear to me, it goes as follows:
Can anybody explain where does this come from, please?
A quick multiplication of 2+sqrt3 on both sides gives 4-3 which is equal to 1
Just rearranged
i think you should shift the function to the right by 15
Yes. But I'd like to know how to rearrange it to get the right side.
woah
⬆️
If the message above contains a link to free nitro, it is most likely a phishing link. Please DON'T click on it to protect your privacy. You can notify the peeps by tagging them ( @peeps ) and they will take care of it as soon as they can.
Wow, thank you so much!! ^^ all is clear now
Try 10cos(pi/12(x-15))+15
in ur answer, when x=3, it's cos(pi/2), which isn't a minimum
-cos(0) is a minimum tho so we want what's inside the cos to equal 0 when x=3
so u can do :
15 - 10 * cos(pi/6 * (x-3))
aka
15-10 * cos( pi / 6 * x - pi / 2)
aka
15-10 sin ( pi/6 * x)
What concepts do arithmetic sequences lead into?
it's the application of the important algebra formulas
If the message above contains a link to free nitro, it is most likely a phishing link. Please DON'T click on it to protect your privacy. You can notify the peeps by tagging them ( @peeps ) and they will take care of it as soon as they can. Please don't ping them if someone else already did in the chat thank you.
Thanks for trying to help. Unfortunately, that's not how maths work (at all) and the different steps you suggested are invalid and would merely lead to a wrong answer
@mild valve
Alrighty
yo does anyone know how valuable a usamo qual is
hii can anyone maybe help me with my math? 😭
what do u need help with
i may or may not be able to help u
idk if this is right ^
do u remember the definition of a polynomial?
nope..
it must have a positive integer exponent
every term
actually let me phrase it again
it must have non-negative integer exponents/powers
it can be 0
wait is this a test
ok then i can help u if it was a test then im kinda fucked
but do u know the answer now
i'm guessing 2?
yes
its the only option that is a nonnegative integer
just rememeber that the variables and terms need to havae a nonnegative integer as its power in order to make it a polynomial
then this one is the last one right?
wait
or the second one..
its the 3rd one
ohhh the one with 0?
ah so it's NOT a polynomial function?
the coefficient just has to be a real number, and -1/2 is a real number so 4th is valid
wait there's another question here i'm confused with cause it looks a bit messy
i swear it's not 💀 😭
come back to the definition of the polynomial
we had our exam done and now they're preparing us for the next lesson
it has to have whole number (nonnegative integer) powers
keep in mind that roots can be rewritten as fractional powers, for example sqrt x = x^1/2 or cbrt x = x^1/3 etc
ohh so the answer the first one in the options?
oh it's not ii?
yeah i meant in the option thing below haha
wait how do i know the leading coefficient?
He asked the answer. Its ii
the leading coefficient is the coefficient of the leading term
where the leading term is the term with the highest power
yess sorry my bad
ah so it's 4 for here? just to make sure-
and what's a constant term?
in descending order
yeahh
the constant term is the one with 0th degree
(without any variables)
wait that didnt sound right
Yes. Its a basic algebra expression
a constant term is just the term with no variables
ah so it's for this it's 1 (the constant term)
or 3..
oh okayy
why 3?
1
standard form of a polynomial?
it just means that it is arranged in descending orders of power
for example x^2 + 2x^3 is not standard form
because 2x^3 has larger power it should be placed first
for this u can do it two ways 1. u can expand it 2. if u know the algebraic rule for a^3-b^3 then u can go for that
fyi a^3 - b^3 = (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)
hold on i'll try it out
okok
It easier with polynomial identities
The answer is 4
ohh i thought it was the second onee
so it's 125x^3-27 ?
OHHH
Exponent of negative will receive negative
wait so what would be the leading term for this number?
oh my gosh ill save this thanksss
the leading term is just the one with the highest power
the leading coefficient is the coefficient of the leading term
There will be alot in next year called exponent rules
im in 8th
so the leading term is 125x^3 right?
correct
Ik. But let you know to prepare then
what exponent rules?
and the constant term is -3..?
check again
The constant is -27
^
i was gonna say that too but they didn't but it in the options 💀
ill tell my teacher about it
Ok
A set of principles based on which problems based on exponents are solved. You can google it, not hard but very important to understand for calculus
like just a^m*a^n = a^(m+n) stuff?
Correct
or log_b(xy) = log_b(x) + log_b(y)
oh my gosh what in the world is this...
this was from grade 6 tho
oh geometry
its congruent triangles
how am i suppose to answer these..
oh, use congruent triangles
have u learnt congruent triangles yet?
what grade u in btw
for 45 i dont know the property of arcs but it is just congruent
Both. The exponent first then logarithm
nope, they said we have to take this exercise activity to be prepared for the next lesson and this is graded too 💀
is 44 maybe B?
ohh
BHAHAHAHA
I dont learn in 6th, instead i learn how to code pascal based on algebra. I learn exponent rules in 7th and logs in 9th
okk
i guess since this is just an exercise, they didn't really care whether it was a teacher's copy or not
@left knoll have u learnt matrix transformations yet im currently struggling hard with it lol
is this one B then too?
do you maybe know @left knoll?
I did. But i havent touch for month
there's a shape for this question but not the previous one
mkay
I dont study geo since college. Only focus in calculus and statistics rn sorry
the one without a shape?
yh
thankss
no it's fine no worriesss
But i know document contain the matrix from TheGreatCourse maybe. I can send it if you want
can u send me it
what is the longest chord in a circle?
is it secant?
or diameter?
i'm kind of confused..
a secant is essentially just a line that cuts the curves at two distinct points at minimum
the longest chord is the diameter
a circle have infinite secants
in a circle u can only cut 2 distinct points with a secant
<@&717391911132069929>
guys if you have 1/a = 1/b + 1/c how do you isolate a... i know it's easy but for some reason i can't do it...
1/a = c+b/bc => a(c+b) = bc => a = bc/b+c
we 1st add 1/b and 1/c and then take the reciprocal of every term on both sides of = sign, giving a = bc/b+c
10t2 + 4mt + 2t
does someone know how to simplify this?
cant use quadratic because c is supposed to be constant but itshas a"t"
do I just take their common and am done I think thats the only viable way to factor it out
u can factor 2t out
10t^2 + 4mt + 2t = 2t(5t + 2m + 1)
yeah
Where t is the time taken (in seconds) for machining the plumb bob and m is the cost of the
material.
Simplify the expression in its simplest form.
(d) If the overall cost of manufacturing one plumb bob is 12 and the cost of the material is
2, calculate the amount of time taken to manufacture one plumb bob
12=2t(5t+2m+1)
so if the m is 2 then 2 times 2 plus 1 (combining like terms)=5
so 12=2t(5t+5)
then,10t^2+10t-12 what now?
thank you both! @left knoll
np
shud be C, cuz its doubled (a theorem is there)
o = 0
p = 1
q = 3.5 = 35/10 or 7/2
s = -0.5 = -1/2
wts the division between 2 points? is it specified?
yo
for c
why would u not take into account
doesnt have condition given test is negative
so why not do 0.96*0.98
Because we only want the probability of having the condition
wdym
it just says they were tested for the condition
doesn't say or imply that only people with it are considered
or does it?
I'm finding a = 1/2, but no matter what I do, I get negative reesults in the second part where I have to draw the function
nevermind I got it, the result is 1 as it should be
The probability of having a positive patient and a negative test
is not the same as
The probability of having a positive patient knowing that their test was negative
In the second case, we have an additional information (the negative test) that we knew happened (in the past) for sure. Whereas in the first case we can only speak in terms of probability that this situation (negative test) happens (in the future).
The two situations are different, and thus require different formulas/workings
In the first case, which is the answer you gave but with a wrongvalue, the probability of a positive person being negatively tested is 0.96 * 0.1
In the second case, which is what the question asks you for, the probability is the one in the solution (and it's just a general formula to apply)
Actually a = 1/2
Because when you integrate f(y) from -2/3 to 0, you should get 1. That's only the case for a = 1/2
I see
Thank you
Np
yes I found a without issue but I was having problem with drawing the function
I got it though
What concepts do arithmetic sequences lead into?
Does anybody know task 7. Pls
Sequences are useless in themselves.
However, they lead to the concept of series, which is used in many fields (economy, complex calculus, numerical calculus, ...)
wot
sequences ain't useless o_o
What else have you used them for ?
the evolution of any variable
AI is full of sequences of numbers or matrices for example
numerical resolution of equations
any algorithm really, probably relies on some sequence
numerical resolution of differential equations (which is used in multiple fields) rely on sequences
anyway i dont have a lot of examples in mind but ik sequences are everywhere
especially in computers where nothing is actually continuous and everything is discrete
Oh we use series for most of these
series as in the sum of the terms of a sequence?
Yup
Obviously we use sequences in the concept of series, but we rarely use the terms of a sequence alone
series are sequences and sequences are series anyway np, but i think more often we don't sum terms rather than summing them, which seems intuitive to me as not every quantity deserves to be summed
I thought u said we care more abt the sum than the sequence itself in general, which I don't think is necessarily true. But for sure exercices on series are more varied and difficult than for sequences when we're studying calculus so we do more of them
like even just the notion of U(n+1) = f(U(n)) and analyzing how U(n) changes with n is sooo common
(U could be a matrix sequence)
ehm, what's the question here?
I think its germany math but seems like he is on the test so i dont help him
Well the test is already graded so ...
in order to prove that m vectors form a base of R^n, is it sufficient for me to say that they are linearly independant?
or do i need to prove that they are generators too?
well if m>n you need n vectors to be linearly indipendant, if m<n they can't form a base
if m=n you just need them to be independant, a system of generators is just a set of independant vectors that can form any vectors of a space
which is also a base
I'm german and that's definitely not german. 😅
I mean when he asked i didnt answer because i saw he put the test paper under table so i dont help him
Yeah that's a good initiative. But on the picture you could see that the test had already been graded ^^
thank you!
hi! could someone help me understand this, please ? we know that teta = omega*t. and omega(t) = alpha * t
my question is why do we obtain teta(t) by integrating from omega(t) ?
well that's because ω is the angular velocity, and θ is the angle, so ω= dθ/dt, similar to v and x
Thanks !
hi! i remember learning in high school a method to be able to know all the equivalent angles on a trigonometric circle. For example, 2pi/3 = 8pi/3, it's just that we have turned a few more times around the circle. Does anyone know what these equivalent angles are called and how I can find them more easily without doing the whole circle everytime ?
Well one turn around the circle = 2pi
And 8pi/3 - 2pi = 2pi/3
You just need to remove/add 2pi until you get to an angle that's contained between -pi and pi (or 0 and 2pi, it depends on your school's convention)
here X is the diagonal matrix with k at the extremes and 0 in between?
thank you!
okay i'm sorry for asking so many questions but i'm very confused at the resolution of this problem:
what I originally did was to transform the right side using Euler formula which made me obtain this:
now according to de Moivre, we should have sqrt(2^8) * e^(i...)
now transform it into the sin, cos and proceed with the resolution of roots for complex numbers
but in order to solve roots for complex numbers, shouldn't we be using the square root of the module?
the mosul remains in that form
why ?
I understand this, then how do i calculate the roots?
helo
i just think it's easier this way but with euler formula you can just do z1,2=+-2^4e^(ipi/3)
no i agree it's easier
z^2 under polar form using de moivre's is z^2(cos(2theta) +isin(2theta))
then maybe u can compare modulus with modulus, argument with argument?
it's just that with the polar form you can represent the solutions on gauss plane
sorry i'm a little confused with what you mean @cyan night
this is what my teacher did, I don't know how she did it though
u have both the lhs and the rhs under polar form
lhs and rhs?
left hand and right hand
yes, it's the same thing,
writing e^i(4pi/3) is the same as writing -e^i(pi/3)
the right hand under polar form is 2^8(cos (2pi/3 +2kpi) + i sin (2pi/3 + 2kpi) i think
nvm
but she didn't write -
well she didn't but she could
and why do we go from 2^8 to 2^4 but the e^(i...) stays the same we just use an equivalent, i'm so confused... i'm so sorry everyone
haha thank you don't worry about it
ok so
first of all
when we are talking about complex numbers we know that if we are looking for the roots of a number we will always find the same amount of solutions as the root we are looking for, so if we are looking for all the z of z^5, we will find 5 solutions, in the real plane we would have only found one
okay!
to represent the complex number we use the gauss plane, to do that we represent the complex number in the polar form
we have 2 informations, the module and the angle, we imagine to draw a circle with radius equal to the module, then we trace a semirect from the origin with an angle in respect to the positive x axis equal to the angle
the intersection is a point on the circle with that angle
that is our complex number
a cool thing about this is that if we look for all the Zs of Z^a (where a is a natural number), all the points which represent all the Zs will form a regular polygon, (this is actually a consequence and not where the reasoning should start, but for the purposes of this we will postulate this fact), so all the Zs are distant from each other by an angle of 2pi/a
did you study Ohm's law?
i didn't know that
L = ΦN/I.
it's very cool!
this is the formula
I dont have these ΦN
the only given was volt source resistance and freq
ok so first of all
what's ΦN?
it's important you understand it
the turns and the magnetic flux
ok, have you studied the Faraday-Neumann-Lenz law?
nope
i'm pretty sure you did or you couldn't do this exercise
it connects the elctromotive force and the magnetic fulx
the only topic we covered for this was the electromagnetic inductance
i'd say check your notes again or contact the professor, cuz if they gave you this you should be able to solve it
thanks for the help
@atomic dagger have u figured out the complex number yet
essentially you would want to bring both sides under either both euler or both polar form
dont forget + 2pi*k
Current is charge over time, both are known, so it's easy.
The second part is also very simple; all you really need is impedance, which is voltage devided by current, but it's also sqrt((internal resistance)^2 + reactance^2). Reactance is 2pif*L. Just solve the equation and that's how you can find your L. :)
ohhh thank you been trying to figure this one out for 2 hours
wait which one is my L? for this 2pif*L
and also do I have to convert minutes to seconds for time?
L stands for inductance, that's what you need.
Of course
no I meant for reactance "Reactance is 2pif*L."
how will i get reactance if i dont have L ?
But you have U/I = sqrt(Ri^2 + (2pif*L)^2), where Ri = Internal resistance
You have to solve the equation to get your L. Ok?
Everything else is already known
Yes
i have absolutely no idea of the context of this and what you are actually asking
its asking for the median position and the median
so thats to do with linear interpolatio
n
i ccan show working they did hold on
anything is possible in this life
even if freq. is frequency that still doesn't tell us anything
cumulative frequency
top of line is the cumulative data
below it are the lower and upper bounds
and the quesion is asking for us to find the time at which the median is at
hope that makes sense
guys
just one quick question
is it always required when solving a problem to always change it to SI units
well, mostly questions are based on SI
just make sure, all are in same system. that's it
yo another question
my methods been fine so far ut idk whats going on
idk how to find x^2 mean
if u guys could help me it'd be very appreciated
Denote E[X] as the mean of X
The standard deviation is defined as sqrt(E[X²] - (E[X])² ) where X is the number of days absent
E[X²] = (0² * 12 + 1² * 20 + 2² * 10 + 3² * 7 + 4² * 5) / (12+20+10+7+5) = 203/54
E[X] = (0 * 12 + 1 * 20 + 2 * 10 + 3 * 7 + 4 * 5) / (12+20+10+7+5) = 81/54
Therefore the standard deviation is sqrt(E[X²] - (E[X])²) = sqrt(203/54 - (81/54)²)
If you struggle to understand, the mean of x² is just the mean of this table :
you know that OAC is a right triangle, OC is equal to the radius and since OA=AB and OB=radius, OA=radius/2, in this triangle OC is the hypotenuse
now just use rules for right triangles and you can easily find theta
the proportion to trasform in radians is pi:180=x:theta
ah okay i get it now,, thankss
Hint to get started : use a certain trigonometry formula that involves the angle OAB and that could help you calculate the length of |AB|
Full solution (only reveal the titles, then try to do it yourself, then correct your work with the detailed steps)
-
||Get |OB|||
||Using trigonometry :||
||sin(30°) = |OB| / |OA| which means |OA| = |OB| / sin(30°) ||
||And you know that |OB| = 15cm and sin(30°) = 1/2|| -
||Get |AP|||
|| |AP| = Radius of the bigger circle = |AO| + smaller circle radius||
||Fortunately, you've just calculated |AO| and the smaller circle radius is given to you|| -
||Get the arc length of PQ||
||Arc length PQ = Radius of bigger circle * Angle PAQ in radians||
|| Radius of bigger circle = |AP| and Angle PAQ in radians = 60° = pi/3||
I got 58.64 for the arc the way I did it was I formulated another bigger right triangle to get the side PB
IDK could be wrong I just did it for the sake of practice
hurm the correct answer is 47.12
thank youu everyone
ye did it in a rush
heyo, need some help on this question
(translation: p>=2, q>=2 , p and q are relatively prime numbers. demonstrate that (X^p -1)(X^q-1) divides (X-1)(X^pq -1))
I'll answer in FR :
X^p-1 = produit des (X-xn) où les xn sont les p racines p-emes de l'unité, càd xn = exp(i * 2pi * n/ p) avec n € {0,1,..,p-1}
X^q-1 = produit des (X-yk) où les yk sont les q racines q-emes de l'unité, càd yk = exp(i * 2pi * k / q) avec k€{0,...,q-1}
donc le produit (X^p-1)(X^q-1) donne p+q facteurs (X - truc) où les trucs sont les p racines p-emes et les q racines q-emes
en attendant, X^(pq) - 1 s'écrit comme produit de (X-zj) où les zj sont les pq racines pq-emes de l'unité, càd zj = exp(i * 2pi * j / (pq)) avec j €{0,...,pq-1}
en fait, dans ces pq facteurs, y a les facteurs où j=0q, j=1q, j=2q,... j=(p-1)q=pq-q. Càd où j = nq avec n des entiers dans {0,...,p-1}
donc les racines exp(i * 2pi * (nq) / (pq)) sont dans ce produit, càd les racines xn = exp(i * 2pi * n/p) pour n€{0,..,p-1}
même raisonnement : les facteurs (X-yk) pour k€{0,...,q-1} apparaissent dans le produit
note qu'on a pas encore utilisé "premiers entre eux"
le truc, c'est qu'on a prouvé que dans (X^pq-1) y a le produit des (X-xn) et y a le produit des (X-yk). Mais le problème est qu'on a ptet recompté des facteurs communs (genre par exemple, on aurait compté (X-x4) et (X-y7) séparément alors que c'est ptet le même facteur). donc faut voir si y a des xn qui sont égaux à certains yk. Avec de l'arithmétique,et en utilisant le fait que p et q sont premiers entre eux, tu montre que c'est le cas pour exactement un unique couplé de (xn, yk) : celui de (x0, y0). En effet, ces deux premières racines de l'unité sont égales à 1 (car exp(0)).
Mais là est l'avantage du fait que (X^(pq) - 1) est multipliée par (X-1) dans l'énoncé. Ça permet de compenser le fait qu'on a "recompté" (X-1)
On en déduit alors que dans la factorisation en polynômes de degrés 1 de (X-1)(X^pq-1), on trouve que ça s'écrit [produit des (X-xn)] * [Produit des (X-yk)] * [produit d'autres favteurs dont on se fout]
càd que ça s'écrit [X^p-1][X^q-1][autres facteurs]
ce qui répond à la question
t'as peut être accès à des théorèmes qui permettent d'aller plus vite, mais sans le savoir je propose ça comme solution
btw what do you study? university? prépa?
heyy need a help on this integral : 0 to 1, 1 / (1+x^3) dx
i got sth but the level of possible errors is too high lol
delta<0, canonical form, tan-1 ...
(im fr)
tried writing 1/(1+x^3) = a/(1+x) + (bx+c) / (1-x+x^2)?
and finding a, b, c
ouais j'ai fait ça mais j'ai juste mis b
a / ... et b / ...
pq fallait mettre bx+c ?
car 1-x+x^2 est de degre 2
et donc en décomposant en elmt simples on doit mettre un degré 2 au dessus du degré 2 ?
(je sais pas decomposer en éléments simples mdr)
un degré 1 au dessus du degré 2 irreductible
si ma mémoire est bonne (ça fait 1.5 an j'ai pas fait ça)
et degré 0 au dessus du degré 1
au num on met un degré en dessous de ce qu'on a au denom?
oui
ok ok parce que la dcp j'étais bien parti javais bien decomposé, forme cano, changement de variables et tt j'étais chaud
mais non
en tt cas merci!
bah en fait si la décomposition a marché sans degré 2 elle est ptet correcte (en gros par chance, dans la decomp que j'ai proposé, ptet que b=0)
nn justement javais trouvé a=0 et b=1
mais par intuition j'ai pas l'impression que ce soit le cas, t'es sur de pas t'être trompée ?
ah ouais c faux
jcrois t'en es pas encore la, mais des moyens rapides de vérifier la décomposition pour moi c'est pzr exemple de multiplier partout par x et de faire tendre x vers +infini (dans la decomp que j'ai proposée ça donne que 0 = a + b)
si t'as pas l'habitude oublie cette astuce j'imagine
on montre que seulement le couple (x0,y0) se repete en faisant la resolution de l'equation xn=yn, c'est ça?
je crois que je vois la demarche, merci beaucoup
prépa intégré, on étudie les polynome en algèbre 1 hehehe
xn=yk
ah oui, c'est vrai
cad "est-ce que y a un n/p égal à un k/q, avec n dans {0,...,p-1} et k dans {0,...,q-1}"
cas 1 : n=k=0 : ouais ça marche
cas 2 : au moins l'un de n et k est non nul. selon l'équation ça veut dire que les deux sont non nuls.
Raisonnement par l'absurde : supposons que l'égalité est vraie pour n et k non nuls.
l'equa de taleur donne nq = pk = c (avec c un entier)
nq est un multiple de q et pk est un multiple de p. Ils sont non nuls. donc ils sont supérieurs ou egaux au plus petit commun multiple de p et de q. autrement dit, c>=PPCM(p, q)
or p et q sont premiers entre eux donc ce plus petit commun multiple s'écrit : PPCM(p, q) = pq
donc c>= pq
or c = nq par exemple
donc nq>=pq
donc n>=p
or n est dans {0,..., p-1} : c'est absurde
y a ptet un chemin plus court, mais vla j'ai fait peu d'arithmétique dans ma scolarité xD
ah okk, gl
moi je suis à l'x
peut être qu'il faut penser à l'ordre de multiplicité des racines
l'ecole polytech? c bien, bonne chance
enfin avec des formules, toutes les phrases que j'ai écrites se font en ~6 lignes je crois
en partant de la factorisation de (X^pq-1) et montrant dans le produit où sont les racines p-emes et les racines q-emes de l'unité
merci toi aussi
yeahh
