#math-help
1 messages · Page 42 of 1
Yes
Thanks to the commutative property of multiplication, a•b = b•a can be simplified to ab without ambiguity
Therefore, h•Q•(1/2) can be simplified to hQ/2
Thank you very much! Thats a big help for me
what type of math are you doing 👀
that is a very important fact
My last math lesson was like 6 years ago and i need to catch up because i didnt need any math during my whole bachelor
Just forgot everything
well good that i know it now. Just creating a basic rn to learn more via youtube etc
looks like a big ass congruence modulo problem
Hi! I don’t understand why we say that the derivative of cos(x) is -sin(x) but here the derivative of cos phi is -(phi)’ * sin(phi)? Why isn’t it just -sin(phi) ?
phi is a function tho
if u want, (x)' = 1
so actually derivative of cos(x) is - (x) ' * sin(x) = - sin(x)
Yeah that's chain rule
Technically speaking, (sin(x))' = cos(x) * x', not just cos(x)
But since x is mostly used as the variable we differentiate with respect to, it leads to x' = dx/dx = 1, as Coly mentioned
Here, it's not the case
Borrow $200000 at 3% p.a. Compounding monthly. If your equal monthly repayments are $3000, how long will it take to pay off the loan?
mind helping me with this?
The question should have the duration the amount borrowed is compounded, ….. compounding monthly for 3/4/5 years
yeh ty
anyone familiar with latex plzz I have to submit it in 3 hours
shudnt it be c?
it should be c
phi is a function
Even the derivative of cos(x) is -sin(x)dx, but we generally divide dx on both sides to get dy/dx
The acceleration will be zero when the velocity remains a constant; when the velocity-time graph takes the form of a straight line parallel to X-axis
slope is 0
acceleration always slope of velocity vs time
thank you
how to solve this?
[cos(x)]' = -sin(x)
-sin(a) = m
(...)
You want the solution or help with understanding?
solution first
then understanding
so if its a solution and i get it, i dont need understanding then
-4y + 3x = 8 = -4y = -3x + 8 = y = -4/(-3x + 8) = y = 3/4 x - 2
you basicly isolate the y on the left side
in this question, m will be 3/4 and b will be -2
so in the end -4y = -3x + 8 = y = -4(-3x + 8) = y = 3/4 x - 2 will be the answer
The question asks you to put -4y + 3x = 8 in the order y = mx + b, so the dsolution is y = 3/4 x - 2
It's the equation of a straight line
put that in the graphic calculator and you will see a straigh line intersecting the Y axis in the position (0, -2) and with positive growth
this
the whole thing
So that the teacher wont know you just copied the ending solution
Yeah, that's not wrong, it's what we did, but showing the in between steps
It's also incomplete and not what you want
oh ok
For example, if you have y+x = 5, if you want to "put the x on the other side", in reality you need to do this; y+x -x = 5 -x so that the x's on the left side negate each other
That's what the calculator you are using is showing
But usually we omit thoes setps since they are usually so elementary we don't really need to write them everytime
lol we need to
Sorry, didn't see you had the middle school role
So go ahead and write them, the logic is the same
And you will get the same result
im in highschool
forgot to change
there
can u write the steps
@fair harbor
Im kinda confused
I am stuck on this question
Any help is appreciated 🙃
-4y + 3x = 8 =
-4y + 3x - 3x = 8 - 3x =
-4y = -3x + 8 =
(-4y)/-4 = -4/(-3x + 8) =
1y = -4/(-3x + 8) =
y = 3/4 x - 2
@quaint imp
pretty sure it's C)
at the end is that a multiplication or x
can you tell/show me how you did it?
x
replace sec(x) with 1 / cos(x) and tan(x)^2 with (sin(x) / cos(x))^2 and you should be able to follow from there
@fair harborlet me try
What are the distance between each square?
Line A: y = 4
Line B: x = -3
Step 1, count the squares
ok
For either line the there is a value that doenst change
this means that the equation doesnt care about the variable that changes
For example
look at Line A
For anny x, y will always be 4
So the equation is y = 4
Same for Line B, but for x this time
but thats not an equation
ohhhh
wait....
i get it now
why not? You could write it like this if it helps you understand: y = 0*x + 4
@fair harbor thanks buddy i actually did it
np mate
( 3,1 ) substitute the value of y in second eq to get x and then get y from value of x
Find the value of x and y by any method of your choice and the value of x and y will be the point where it intersects
so its (3,1)?
solve it
dont divide, substitue y
with what
substitute the value of y in the second equation and solve it
1st eq is y= something in x js put this in firstequation in place of y in 2nd one
so substitute for anything?
what is eq
equation
wait
no the value of y is given in first equation
substitute that value
yeah so I can substitute y with any value
ur understanding of substitue is wrong
?
in eq like these u gotta remain in boundary of question js use the value given and solve ez
see the solution
what is that after the brackets
y=-1/3x +2
-2n+3y+3=0
-2n+3(-1/3x X 2)...
@red spruce
bro u confused rn , read som theory pls
from where did u got n
why u even doing that
Sorry wrong variable
no like why solve it
anyways whats after that bracket
u js need to put first one in second and solve
- 3
bruh i dont get u what do u mean
same
yes now put x= 3 in eq 1
and u get y= 1?
do i multiply the fraction by 3
yes ofc
ok i got y=1
this speed is slow man
so the answer is (3,1)
yes
Bro i was confused
about what
yeah the typing speed
this whole question and it takes time to type
it is one of the basic question of linear alegbra
i just started to learn about it
which grade are u in
Damn what a bad explanation
?
?
To solve any problem of point of intersection, u have to clear one of the variables, for example y. Leave y aside example y=x+2, then replace that y in the other equation example 3x+2y=-3 replace 3x+2(x+2)=-3, so you get the value of x. Once you get x you can get y, those two values are your (x,y) intersection point.
ohhhhh
thats better
if u were here listening to the explanation this whole time y didnt u help
Hahah, i was studying xd
bruh
chain rule i think
chain rule + product rule
maybe u missed chain rule
I was seeing a solution to a Trigonometry problem.
(sinA)^2 + (secA)^2 = (sinA)^2 + (cosA)^2 + 1
Is it actually mathematically correct?
The question was
Prove that (sinA)^2 + (secA)^2 = 2
can sum1 explain Bearings to me pls 🙂
Hi guys. Is there a Math Lord here i can dm?
not me
are you sure this was the question ?
Yeah
but if you put A=60° then it becomes (√3/2)^2 +(2)^2 which is clearly not 2
so this cant be an identity
Yeah, the question is probably wrong.
How do you find the quadrant of t?
Say for example 9pi/4
If the reference number is pi/4, then...
quadrant I
the unit circle is 2pi radians
divided into 4 quadrants
each quadrant is pi/2 radians
Yes
How is it QI?
Yes but what if it's 31pi/6
hm i dont think so
but i dont think it would take too long, right?
31pi/6 - 12pi/6 = 19pi/6 - 12pi/6 = 7pi/6
which reference's angle is pi/6
forget that
just until 7pi/6, and when you are required to find the trig ratios (sin cos tan) then use pi/6
Or just use 4pi+(7pi/6)
my method is that i do the same thing
i subtract 2pi until it fits the unit circle
then when it ends up with a negative angle
i take 2pi to subtract
for example
-pi/6
is the same as 2pi-pi/6 = 11pi/6
Okie okie wait a sec
aight
So i just imagine how is it look like if i^i. And the result is at the image, can anyone can explain why i^i = 0,2078...
Just type i^i into youtube and watch the recommended demonstration videos
I think that'd be better than any textual explanation
Help me please
Help me
a)
T0 = 1
T1 = 3 * T0
T2 = 3 * T1 = 3 * (3 * T0) = 3² * T0
T3 = 3 * T2 = 3 * (3 * T1) = 3 * (3 * (3 * T0)) = 3³ * T0
Therefore, without any calculation, you can observe that Tn = T0 * 3^n.
Since T0 = 1, you get your exponential form : Tn = 3^n
b) Oops, I accidentally did it in (a). You just need to plug 1, 2 and 3 in the formula.
c) Now, instead of having T(n+1) = 3 * Tn, we have U(n+1) = 3 * Un - 1 (because we remove one bacteria after it reproduced the day before)
d) Replace U(n+1) by 3 Un - 1 and you get the equation 3 Un - 1 - a = 3 Un - 3a (yeah I also distributed the 3 on the right hand side)
From that equation (simplify the 3 Un on both sides and rearrange the remaining terms), you get 2a = 1, which means a = 1/2
I did it in a rush so don't hesitate to ping if you see something wrong, but anyway the general thinking process is there and that's what matters the most
I'm willing to, but can't if you give us nothing to work with 🤷
thank you!! @ember kernel
Hey, the second term becomes 1 since cosec(x) is just the reciprocal of sin(x). For the first term, since there a cos^2(x) in the denominator, we can write sin^2(x) in the numerator as 1-cos^2(x) (since sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1).
Separate the two terms in the numerator, we'll get sec^2(x) - 1. So, the final answer would be sec^2(x).
very special integral
arises from the calculation of the energy radiated by a black body
can anyone solve it ?
can someone tell me the answer and the reason for it ?
Unsolvable with our basic functions. I typed it in Wolfram Alpha and the result contains complex functions
do you know the formula for the perpendicular line?
is it the reciprocal of the slope
reciprocal and different sign
which means when they multiply it is equal to -1
so the slope of the perpendicular is -3/2
oh so -3/2= to the slope of 0, -12 and x, 0?
so it has a slope of -3/2
and it intersects point Q at (0,-12) which has 0 x value right?
0 x value meaning its the yintercept
so it has y-intercept of -12 (the same of the original graph), right?
right jamal
jamal
yes
so whats the equation of that line?
then point (x,0) right
whats the y value of (x,0)?
0 right
plug 0 into that equation
to find x
jamal
plug y = 0 in
sorry if i was unclear
(c) and (d) make no sense (why would getting close to a give us f(b) ???)
we can't do (b) since we don't know if f is defined for values before a
Therefore, it only leaves us with (a), which makes sense when you think about it (when x tends to a, f(x) tends to f(a))
The graph of y=⅔ x - 12 intersects the y-axis at
Q (0, -12) and is perpendicular to a line joining Q to the point P ( x , 0). Find x
The dude spent some of his time trying to help you. Least you must do is acknowledge his answer and, if you haven't understood everything from the explanation, ask more questions or be honest (say his explanation is unclear). Here, you're just ghosting him :/
XDD
Anyway, here are the big steps :
- Slope of first line = m'
- Slope of perpendicular = m = -1/m'
- The perpendicular line (let's name it f) can be expressed as y=mx+p. You know m and you know that Q belongs to f. Therefore plug in (x,y) = (0,-12) and solve for p
- Once you've got p, you know the expression of f : y=mx+p
- You know that P belongs to f, so plug in (x,y) = (x,0) and solve for x
- Done
If you struggle with my explanation, please ask questions. Don't just copy your question again --'
yup
does anyone have any tips for find interquartile range?
whats that
so the answer is 3a and 4d....? i understood y you didn't go for f(b) in the 3rd question BUT i didn't get how u decided it was right continuous (a+) instead of left continuous(a-) and if i am right the same logic is used in both the questions
It is right continuos because f(x) is only defined in the right of a, in [a, b]
So a+ and not a-
So 3a and 4d because in question 4 f is only defined in the left of b, since it is [a,b]
why is f(x) defined on the right of a and not on left tho ?
Imagine f is something like these, it dsnt make sense to study for a- because f is only defined in [a, b]
If u had f defined [0,b] and considering that a is bigger than 0 and smaller than b then it would make sense to study for a+ and a-
But if the function isnt defined at the left of a it dsnt make sense to make the limit to the left
This is not the case in ur question assuming it is related to what u are studying this might be helpful it says it exists the limit on the above cases and in the below it dsnt exist limit
ok got that...thank you for anwering my questions...it means a lot :))
No problem : )
Can anyone please help me simplify this equation?
Dunno, why I can’t do it🙁
take common 1/ (1-4x^2)^2 from the denominator of the first term, then it will cancel with the denominator of the second term. then simplify both numerator and denominator and you will get (1+4x^2) common in both which will get cancelled, and left with 4/(1+4x^2).
hey, could someone please help me simplify this?
is the answer just A?
im not shure, sorry im rly bad at this stuff
try drawing venn diagrams i got my answer using that
ty very much, ill try my best
here now u just need to find the
common part
in both
ok thanks for your time 🙂
At first use (a+b)^2 formula. Then multiply the equation by 2. Then use 2(cosA)^2 and 4(cosA)^3 formulas
Can elaborate your answer to part c? I don't get it where Un came from
Since Un is the number of bacteria after we removed one, I just defined Un = Tn - 1
@ember kernel heelp how did that became 18(4t2-1)
do i have to find gcf then divide them but how am i supposed to get 18
do i have to multiply 4tcube to 6?
In the left brackets, 3 was factored out and multiplied to the 6 in the middle of the expression
Also you forgot to use brackets in the first two lines of your answer
And (second line) it's u = 4t³ - 3t, not y = ...
Otherwise your expression y = u⁶ (just on the right) makes no sense since you never define u
we multiplied 6 to the exponent of 12 which is t3
?
but what about the 3t which is inside the parenthesis as well
You didn't get it
Give me 2 mi.
ya ya sure take your time
Always remember that log_a (b) is the exponent you need to apply to a to get b
Since you're looking for the value of an exponent, it is relevant to use logarithms
8i =(x+2i)(y+2i)+1 ……..help plz
B
thanks for the answer and sorry for answering late!!
i'm not sure if i can ask physics questions here, but I was wondering if anyone could tell me what differential equations are for ? from my understanding, they are equations which have functions as solutions. And so in one of my lessons, we have the "differential equation of the movement of oscillation" but i don't understand why. I understand how we calculated it, just not what's it used for.
Differential equations are equations (thanks captain obvious) that :
- have a function or set of functions as a solution
- make use of the derivatives/partial derivatives of the solution-function in the expression of the equation
Quick 1D example : y'(x) - 3y(x) = 0 is a differential equation (because of the y'), which has y(x) = exp(3x) as the solution
2D example (more difficult) : (df/dx) + 3 (d²f/dy²) = f(x,y) * exp(2y)
Differential equations often arise in physics stuff (fluid simulations, heat diffusion, wave propagation), and we mostly need to solve them numerically due to their difficulty. However, some equations can be solved via calculus (just like the example I gave you)
We almost never come up with them or invent them ; most of the time they appear by themselves in physics problems, so we can't do much but try to solve them to get to the results we want
i see, thank you very much !!
No problemo :D
To find the minimum of a function, you need to :
- find the values where its gradient is 0
- at these values, identify whether the function is a max, a min or a saddle point
Here, you need to do the same, but the "function" you want to minimize is a gradient.
Therefore, you'll have to work with the gradient's gradient, which is the second derivative, and see for which values it is = 0
||(The answer I gave you is only valid for one-variable functions. If you're dealing with multiple-variable functions, you won't use a second derivative but the Hessian Matrix). Ignore this remark if the function you're working with has only one variable||
No problemo :D
Function increasing <=> Derivative > 0
(ax + b/x²)' = (ax)' + (b/x²)' = (ax)' + (b x^(-2))' = a - 2b/x³
a - 2b/x³ > 0 <===> 1 > -2b/(ax³)
Now, you want to multiply by x³ to make it appear on the upper side of the fraction.
BUT since you're dealing with two different cases :
- If x³ > 0 (which means x > 0), nothing special happens
- If x³ < 0 (which means x < 0), you have to switch the inequality sign from > to <
Depends
Yes if x³ < 0
No if x³ > 0
You need to treat both cases separately
Also, it's but my humble interpretation but I think you need to calculate these values in terms of a and b, without subbing any value for them
Ok
4 - 32/x³ > 0 then.
First let's divide by 4 to simplify the numbers
1 - 8/x³ > 0
From that, you get 1 > 8/x³
Now, let's make the x³ appear on the main line (in the upper side of the fraction) by multiplying both sides by x³
CASE 1 : x³ > 0 ===> no sign change
You get x³ > 8, which is true for x > 2
CASE 2 : x³ < 0 ===> sign change
(this is logical : take 3 > 2 as an example. If you multiplied both sides by -1 without changing the side, you'd end up with -3 > -2, which is painfully wrong)
You get x³ < 8, which is always true (since we're in the case x³<0, which means x<0 ===> x<0<8 is always true)
Therefore, the inequality is verified for any value of x < 0
CONCLUSION :
Reunite the results you got in both cases into a single answer :
4x + 16/x³ increases for x such that x<0 or x>2, which you can also write as x ∈ ] -∞ ; 0 [ ∪ ] 2 ; ∞ [
(The latter way of writing it is a more rigorous notation, but it expresses the same thing as "x<0 or x>2" . If you haven't learnt about it yet, just ignore it)
And you're done :)
No problemo :D
and they're not thaaat weird
like if in real life you say smth like "the more money you have, the faster u'll earn money" that's maybe the equivalent in math of saying << f'(t) = f(t) >>where f(t) is the amount of money u have at the time t
so that's a Differential equation, where it says that the bigger f(t) is (AKA the more money u have), the bigger f'(t) is (AKA the faster money grows)
(and solving that "Differential equation" is figuring out what sort of function f could possibly have those properties. In this case, in math the solution is exponential (multiplied by a constant), irl we would also say "money growth is exponential" lol)
they translate things that we think about outside of math, like the relationship between a quantity and the speed at which it evolves
shit like that
Hey, the denominator should be in the form of (ax-b). So, write 2x+3 as 2x - (-3) to convert it into that form. Then b/a becomes -3/2.
Ohhh
That makes sense
If the 3 was already in that form you don't multiply it by negative X right?
You just leave it as is?
not sure I got what you mean
3/2. Since it's 2x-(3)
Does anyone know how to calculate the overall rate of increase of a set of numbers over some years?
does anyone know how to do this
well to start
you can write an inequality for y
you can use the y values and the given equation for y to find two bounds for an x inequality
from those two u can get the third
is it like this. y=8?
No, that’s not an inequality
you should first get familiar with the definition of an inequality before attempting that question
otherwise you won’t be able to solve it :p
thats why idk how to do
well i told you where to start
first familiarize yourself with what an inequality is, then do the steps i mentioned
i could just give you the answer, but then you wouldn’t be learning !
ahh okay then. thanks btw
Sure thing, if you want help once you’ve given it a shot, let me know and i’ll answer if i’m awake
?
Help!
Try to put 5 and 7 into roots of the same type
You've got roots of types 1/3 (cubic root) and 1/2 (square root)
Common denominator for those fractions: 6
Therefore your answer will be in a 1/6-type root
Now, you just need to find the equivalence between the 1/6-type root and the ones you have. You'll observe that :
7^⅓ = 7^(2/6) = (7²)^⅙ = 49^⅙
5^½ = 5^(3/6) = (5³)^⅙ = 125^⅙
Now, just multiply the two to get (49*125)^⅙
Oh god I've been thinking about this for 10 minutes before realising these are * and not decimal points
Factor 5^n out of everything (in both parts of the fraction, so they cancel each other out) and you'll be left with something that doesn't depend on n anymore
I can't believe your teacher really used .'s instead of *'s while writing on a computer. It made it so difficult to understand these were multiplication signs ;-;
omgggg i thought they were decimal points lollllll
lollll exactly it was difficult to understand
woooooww u are smart!
thanks a lot for helping!!!
Does anybody know LU decomposition (linear algebra)? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LU_decomposition
In numerical analysis and linear algebra, lower–upper (LU) decomposition or factorization factors a matrix as the product of a lower triangular matrix and an upper triangular matrix. The product sometimes includes a permutation matrix as well. LU decomposition can be viewed as the matrix form of Gaussian elimination. Computers usually solve squa...
Hi how would you graph f(x)=x^2(x-6)^3? Like what steps would u take to graph it only knowing the equation.
No problemo :D
Start by finding intersections with the x axis
Thank you soooooo much🥰
Yes so i know a zero would be 6 but thats all i know
What about the other x^2?
Method 1
(Quick but imprecise)
Calculate f(x) for some values near x=0, sketch the points in a cartesian coordinates system and link them with a smooth curve (you know it's smooth and continuous since your function is a polynomial)
Method 2
(Long but precise)
- Calculate the y-intercept
- Calculate the roots of your polynomial
- Calculate for which values f'(x) > 0, = 0 and < 0
- For values such that f'(x) = 0, check if the points are minima, maxima or saddle points using f''(x)
- Calculate the turning points where f''(x) = 0
- Calculate vertical, horizontal asymptots (you won't have any since you've got a polynomial here)
Now, sketch all the special points you've calculated on a cartesian coordinates system. You could also add some additional points in-between for more precision.
Then, following the signs you calculated for f'(x) and the turning points you have sketched, draw your function by linking all the points with an "approriately-sloped" line
Method 1 will give you exact values for certain random points. It's almost only valid if you know for sure that the function is continus and does not present special characteristics (asymptots,...)
Method 2 will give you the exact values for the most interesting points (roots, y-intercept, extrema, turning points, asymptots). Furthermore, you'll get the exact form of the function (even if the scale might not be perfectly represented), which can be very useful depending on why you need to draw the function. That's the best option possible for hand-drawn quality graphs
Can anyone give some hint to this problem
You might want to watch G. STRANG's lecture on the matter in his MIT 18.06 course, thoroughly accessible on YouTube
I highly recommend his playlist
quentin any tips for like being comfy to solving problems and building that confidence to solve questions these things are actually the ones stopping me to keep ongoing
Training, training, training.
Also, when you don't understand something, try your best not to skip it, but actually pay attention and ask around/search online. If you understand it once, you're good to go for a good while
Yeah I've understood the concept but have problems with answering questions on my programming task
The answer is in the last line
But, besides multiplying the 3 terms in the brackets 6 times to themselves, idk what tips you could use to get the result
Hi guys
I need help with a subspaces problem
Idk if this is a subspace of R^4
It means
Where a>0 and b<0
It's not a subspace 🙂
is there something wrong in the ques or hv i done something wrong? 😅
I cant figure out the language lol
If the question was asking you which recorded amount of rainfall was the most frequent during the year, your answer would be 18, but in this case the question is asking you what the highest amount recorded in centimeters was for a single day. 38 is the highest recorded amount of max rainfall for the year and the one dot tells us that this number was recorded for only 1 day. That makes 38 the right answer.
Hopefully that made sense to you. It made a lot more sense in my head and apologies if i didnt express it well to you😂
yo, does somebody know how to find the weight in newtons?
Mass * 9.81
Solve it using unitary method
im guessing its 3.63
since if u convert 1kg to grams its 1000 then u devide 1000 by 4 its 250 u devide 14.50 by 4 its 3.63
@left knoll
Thats right
134 calculate the perimeter
I got confused lol I edited
oh
wait...
breadth?
@left knoll
@left knoll
@ember kernel
Quentin it says in ur name u do math help...so i pinged u lol
I think its asking for the length/the hypo
breadth means width
Calculate the area
i did its not giving me the right answer
oh
hypo?
u need to find the area of the triangle nd then convert it into square feet
hypotenus
ik
What was ur ans?
i did
hold on
Yes dont forget this conversion
Meter to feet
here ig the answer should have been 134cm
how did u get it?
perimeter?
Yeah. I do help in math. When I decide to :D
lol apology in dms
Yeah, but I prefer to indicate that here as well. I only answer when I feel like doing so and have spare time. I always feel good getting pinged (because that means I'm doing an at least okay job), but that doesn't increase your chance of getting an answer from me
im so sorry @ember kernel I really didnt mean for u to get personal im sorry this is my fault😔 u always do a good job helping ppl out and me and everyone uderstand that u r busy also
use the pythagoras theorem
Well, you just need to calculate the volume of a sphere with radius of 0.4 cm
and the Volume of the cilinder with height 1.6cm and radius 0.4 cm
and... add them toghether
You dont have the formulas?
Thats to calculate the volume of the sphere
And you can use this for the volume of the cilinder: V = pi * radius^2 * height
👍
Thanks.
Dude there's no need to be that sorry you know
can someone give a hint about this problem please.
maybe this will help you on your way
does anyone know any free resources online that cover continuity and differentiability from the basics?
it didn't disappear, the equation was divided by 4
xd
think abiut odd and even functions
Hello
Hi
Do you want the value of this??
U have to prove the whole thing is 1/16 right??
Yeah
Wait let me try
the first term in brackets is half of the second term in brackets
i was about to use double angle but i thought it was dumb
So what do I do after that
im thinking with you
but u asked for one here too, I apologized in DMs and then u said to state it here too
hmmm...yea
haha i understood the mistake no worries thank you!
= 1/4 ( cos 2pi/5 - 0.5) ( cos 4pi/5 - 0.5)
= 1/4 (cos 2pi/5 * cos 4pi/5 - (cos 2pi/5 + cos 4pi/5)/2 + 0.25)
= 1/4 ( [ cos 6pi/5 + cos 2pi/5] / 2 - [cos 2pi/5 + cos 4pi/5] /2) + 1/4 * 0.25
= 1/8 ( cos (2pi - 4pi/5) + cos 2pi/5 - cos 2pi/5 - cos 4pi/5) + 1/16
= 1/8 ( cos(4pi/5) - cos (4pi/5)) + 1/16
= 0 + 1/16
= 1/16
I used cos 120= cos 240 = 0.5,
and cos a * cos b = [ cos (b+a) + cos (b-a)] / 2 to go from line 2 to line 3
and cos (2pi-c) = cos ( c) to go from line 4 to line 5
No I just wanted to state to everyone that pinging me won't help anyone get an answer more quickly.
You don't need to apologise publicly for sending messages to me.
You don't even need to apologise for sending messages to me.
Please stop repeatedly apologising for so little
I have a function like this: f(x) = f(x+1) + 2.How to find the true relation f between two sets?
do u know if f is continuous?
seems to me like f(x) = g(x) - 2x where g is a 1-periodic function
Honestly, I don't know anything about functions like this.For instance, how did you reach this result about this function?
well , f(x+1) = f(x) - 2
so everytime X goes up by 1, Y goes up by exactly -2 (aka goes down by 2)
so u draw something random on the interval [0,1) for example, then u replicate that drawing on [1,2) + translating it downwards by 2
etc
anyway I saw the answer by imagining a graph
u didn't study periodic functions?
and what sets do u mean exactly? R->R or N->N?
cause would be much easier if it's N->N (if x are integers)
gonna need more information about the question if you want to get help
From looking at that, the sistem is possible but undetermined
x2 and x4 are the variables that we can't determine
the group of possible solutions are in function of the missing varialbes, and assuming that x2 = r and x4 = s,
you just need to solve the equation system
fuck let me do this in paper it's easyer to explain then over text
1 sec i'll post the steps
Not yet..
Lets say N => N, to understand easily
but what does the question say tho
if it's N=>N then f(n+1) = f(n) - 2, AKA for every integer n f(n+1) - f(n) = -2
that's an arithmetic sequence of common difference -2
Sorry for grammar erros in advance, my main lang is not english
so f(n) = f(0) + n * (-2)
so f(n) = f(0) -2n
and you can arbitrarily choose any f(0) you want
actually this works even if it's N=>R *
but the problem is R=>R
Hmm, you mean functions like this treat like they're actually sequences?
i mean functions that go from N to R
are literally sequences
f(n) = Un basically lol
so i assume ur question initially implied R->R ?
Yes
do u know what a periodic function is?
and is it said that f is continuous or no?
Not really
It's not given
it's weird that you get this exercice.. without knowing what a periodic function. Unless they gave you some information about f other than "f(x) = f(x+1) + 2"?
this was the answer btw
and the proof is :
we know that f(x) = f(x+1) + 2
so f(x) + 2x = f(x+1) + 2 + 2x
so f(x) + 2x = f(x+1) + 2(x+1)
so by naming g(x) = f(x)+2x, we have :
g(x) = g(x+1) for every x in R
so g is a periodic function, 1 being a period of g
so in general f(x) = g(x) - 2x where g is... (same as line above)
Ugh don't question it. Our education system is not that good so unfortunetly we can encounter problems like this at the beginning of functions, which is veery nonsense...
this is a difficult problem for that stage
lol
like I'd expect this problem in
university
definitely not just after discovering what a function is
I'd better to study periodic functions after making a lot of process in functions (i just started to study functions in real meaning after all..). Maybe i can understand better after studying them.
periodic functions are just functions that repeat themselves regularly, but yes that's for later
Really 😄?
u should ignore this problem for now I guess
in my opinion yes
Yes, of course
for me it was easy cause I did exercices like this before, but for high-school me I would've found it hard and it would've taken me a lot of time
I see
Thanks a lot friend 👍
try to draw (or analyze the monotony of) f(x) = sqrt ( 10x/(x+1) ) for x in [0;10]
deduce from that the different intervals of X:
-where 0<=f(x)<1 : that's where [f(x)] = 0
-where 1<=f(x)<2 : that's where [f(x)] = 1
-where 2<=f(x)<3 : that's where [f(x)] = 2
-where 3<=f(x)<4 : that's where [f(x)] = 3
once you find out all the values of [f(x)] for x in [0;10], you can just compute the integral
PLZZ GIVE COMPLETE ANSWER
He gave you 70% of the answer tho
any tips to solve logarithm questions ( linaer and exponential)
For 3b, how do you know when to use integral by substitution
How do you know if something is a minimum or a maximum point? Eg, the point (3,1) is a minimum, but the point (-4,47) is a maximum. How can you tell?
And this is for a parabola and not a cubic, so there's only one answer
the bigger number is the max, and smaller number is the min
but how could you tell that from looking at say, the point (3,1)?
Like, how do you know it's a positive or negative parabola from looking at the point?
Or would you look at the original equation?
or the x value, or y value?
if the original equation is negative, then negative parabola. the point (3,1) tells us that when x is at 3, y is at 1, when we;re trying to find min or max, we're looking at the y-value
does that make sense?
yes, thank you
Help me please ;-;
I guess that when the primitive isn't obvious, and ur dealing with a fraction, u can substitute the denominator by U
but that stuff I read made no sense
u can't tell how the parabola is just from one point
u need for example to look at the equation : is f(x) = ax^2 + bx + c :
- the sign of "a" determines whether the parabola has a minimum, or whether it has a maximum
- x=-b/(2a) is the X where Y is maximal or minimal [that can be proven if u studied derivation]
-to get the value of that maximal/minimal Y, u compute y = f(-b/(2a)) =...
in a parabola ur not supposed to have a maximum AND a minimum, u typically only have one of those, unless X is restrained in a bounded interval
hey i was wondering what type of calculator will i need for the SAT exam? like a simple + - x / one will do or do i need anymore functions?
(i dont have any knowledge of calculators since in my country we dont need it for any exam)
well, in some of my problems, it's the numerator that's being substituted by u
oh I was confused
any calculator works
but if u were to get a graphing calculator get the ti nspire
its way better than ti 84
ah all right thank you!
hi! I'm trying to find the limit as n-> infinite here. They say the answer is 3/2 but I just don't understand (I thought it was infinite). Could someone help me ?
this is a very famous question you can find a lot of video solutions on youtube
i remember i saw the exact same question once
at this time stamp the solution starts
The two expressions are the same, I just distributed the sqrt(x+1) to get to it
If you look closely, the second expression, with x tending to inf, results as "inf - inf", which is an undefined form
You can look up on the internet how to solve a inf-inf form, but uf I recall correctly you need to multiply these two terms a-b by their conjugate a+b
thankyou soo much! you saved mee
-tu multiplies en haut et en bas par le "conjugué" du numérateur (aka [ (n+3)^(1/2) + n^(1/2)]) pour utiliser l'identité remarquable (a-b)(a+b) = a^2 - b^2
- le (n+1)^(-1/2) en bas devient (n+1)^(1/2) en hautq
-après toutes ces transformations, tu factorises partout par n^1/2 (numérateur et dénominateur), tu les simplifies, et tu fais tendre n vers +inf
faster if u studied equivalence in sequences
2^7-1-7
to form a new color, you just need a subset of the set color {red, blue,..} : there are 2^7 of those
except that the 1 empty subset (aka no color) and the 7 subsets containing just one color aren't viable, so u subtract 1 and 7
so that's 2^7-1-7
maybe "combination" is better vocabulary than "subset" depending on how this stuff was taught to u
merci de m'avoir répondue!
Bonjour, je suis un jeune étudiant et je ne comprends pas vraiment les fonctions, (les images des nombres)
Heyo I need help with Q15c, so if anyone wants to help pls ping me, and thanks in advance!!
you use the combination formula n(c)r = n1/r!(n-r)!
so with the no restrictions there are 10 cd's and the number of selection is 5 so it becomes:
10
C
5
using the formula it will be:
10c5 = 10!/4! (10-4)!
for B however we take the number of jazz cd's (3) and subtract it by the total amount (10) so it becomes (7)
and we do the same
7
C
3
im not really good at explaining nor am i sure about this certain equation but the basic idea is to get the amount of combinations
hope this helps in anyway!
Learn how to recognize when to use the combination formula. Permutations and combinations are similar yet different. When using a combination the order is not important.
the video uses a different equation but both explain the same idea
Translation:
b) find the characterization of the subspaces that generate the vectors u1, u2, u3 and u4.
(fog)(x)=3x-4
g(x)=x-4
what is f(x)?
can you help me with this question
i found an answer but i'm not sure
f(x) = 3x + 8
Therefore f(g(x)) = 3g(x) + 8 = 3(x-4)+8 = 3x-12+8 = 3x - 4
What does this exactly mean?
correct me if im wrong but this is physics isnt it?
It's from physics but I thought vector space is a concept in math ..
i think so
yes
it may be linear transformation but im not too sure
So that any number of R^n can be transformed to R^n?
i dont really understand it myself but ill link something that may help
https://textbooks.math.gatech.edu/ila/linear-transformations.html
(the example in the picture is included in the last page)
mb wrong example
thanks!
no problem, if im incorrect about anything please do correct me!
I dont think the second case is correct
you just surely take that one favoritr jazz CD, so u just need to choose the 4 others among the 9 remaining
so that would be (9 choose 4)
for 15c,
-either u take exactly 4 classical CDS :
then u just need to pick the 5th CD among the 6 other choices
so that's (6 choose 5) = 5
-either u take exactly 3 classical CDS:
in that case u first need to pick which classical CDS you take : (4 choose 3) = 4
then you pick which 2 other CDS you take among the 6 other choices : (6 choose 2)
so the final answer is : 5 + 4 * (6 choose 2)
which is 65
Oh my bad, thanks for correcting me
it means that F takes a vector in n dimensions as argument, and returns a vector in n dimensions
an example for n = 3 is, let's say, the transformation F(u) = 2u where u is a 3d vector
so F would be the function that "doubles" the size of the vector lol, AKA stretches it
but you can imagine allll sorts of functions F
to sum up : F is a function from the set R^n to the set R^n
R^n is the set of n-dimensional vectors (so for example, R^3 is the set of 3D vectors, AKA "irl space" kinda i guess lol)
@quaint magnet is wrong. This notation just means that we define F to be a function that takes a vector of length n as an input, and returns a vector of length n as the output.
This is pure mathematics btw
So if i plug n numbers into F, i can/will get n numbers out?
write that (blabla)^X as exp(x * ln(blabla))
and write (nx+1)/(nx-1) as 1 + 2 /(nx-1)
Again, thank you for correcting me. I did not know much into the subject but wanted to help in someway.
Shouldnt have dug my head into something i dont purely know and im sorry for that but overall glad that they got the help they needed
Np man. That's nice to offer help anyway. But yeah maths can be tough to those who haven't been introduced to some specific concepts
seems to me like that subspace is the 2-dimensional subspace generated just by (u1, u2), so in other words by (-1,0,1) and (0,-1,-1)
aka a subspace where z=y-x
But idk what you mean by characterization
You won't get n real numbers out, but you will get one vector of length n
kind-of...
u could have for example, for n=4
F(0,2,3,2) = (666,69,666,69)
or if V is a velocity vector, and V0 is a constant velocity vector, and n=3,you could have F defined as :
F(V) = V+V0
u can view the vector as n different numbers, and vice versa, it depends on how that "F" is used
So these return arrays or matrixes in someway?
what u shared here is too general for me to be able to explain what kind of F
Nope, just an array :)
oh
Oh thats p neat
A matrix would be R with m*n as """exponent"""
So its an N array of R I suppose?
ah they say array for vector?
Do you know what divergence is?
R^n just describes a space of arrays
yeah
that's what i'm trying to understand
but divergence is a R^n -> R function if i recall
Ohh ok i get it, thank you
I don't think so
It takes a vector and returns a number no?
It is
Curl is R3 -> R3
Diverg. is R3 -> R
Gradient is R -> R3
oh no, you are right. But for an F: R^n --> R^n
Rotationnel
okok
and Laplacien R->R
i didnt study physics for 1.5 year im starting to forget this stuff
So this function takes R^N amounts of arrays and returns R^N amounts of array?
But why would we need to return the same array?
it doesn't return the same array
the screenshots u sent were wrong
Think Laplacian is R3 -> R, might be wrong
that was just one example of an F
(the F that doesn't change anything to the vector, AKA the identity function)
ah I think there are both
scalar Laplacien and vector one
im glad I don't study that anymore
No, it takes one n-item-long array, and returns one n-item-long array
Just think of it as any function you've ever dealt with before, except it doesn't use x as the input, but (x,y,z, ...)
so can you say that the R on the left is the domain?
The R^n on the left is indeed the domain :)
And the one on the right is the codomain
the codomain*
But the original pitcure you sent didn't specify any expression for F, so you just need to treat as any arbitrary function that could exist and deal with arrays coming from the vector space R^n
range is Im(f) I guess
alright, thanks a lot!
in physics R^n more often represents "space vectors" than "arrays" (even tho ik those are basically the same things), so maybe not talk abt the array thing too much
Thanks for correcting
i mean physics isn't very mathematically precise ukno
R^n is indeed a vector space. But it contains vectors/arrays
That's how I meant to explain it at least
nvm im just a bit confused abt the English terms cuz i studied it in French
im confused on this topic on geometry
Slope = (difference in y)/(difference in x)
Example : the slope of the line that goes through P = (-4,17) and Q = (1, -3) is :
(Py - Qy)/(Px - Qx) = (17 - (-3)) / (-4 - 1) = 20 / (-5) = -4
Two lines are parallel if they have the same slope
when we are to find the standard deviation of a number set, but aren't told whether it is for the population or sample, do we always assume they ask for population standard deviation unless told otherwise?
u didn't study Dot products did you?
and orthogonal vector spaces
cause if u did u can prove it in 1 line
if not u need to:
-mention its a subset of R4
-show that [0 0 0 0] is in that set
- set lambda in R, [a b c d] in that set and [a' b' c' d'] in that set. Prove that the vector (lambda * [à b c d] + [a' b' c' d']) is also in the set (AKA that its coordinates verify the set's equation)
or actually u can just say that it's the Null space of the linear map f : [a b c d] ->a+b-c-d = D * [a b c d] where D is the 4x4 diagonal matrix whose 4 diagonal coefficients are 1, 1, -1 and - 1
that makes it a vector space
Prove these three things for the set -
is f-1(x) continuous on r?
if f(x) is continuous yes
e^x is continuous on R
Since you don't know what f(x) is, you can't be 100% sur that f-1(x) is continuous tho
Since mathematicians always take into account the "worst case scenario", that means we treat f-1(x) as "not continuous on R" as long as we don't prove the opposite (which we can't since f(x) could be any possible function that exists)
@small canyon
thanks alot :))
np man !
i did but honestly its such a clusterfuck to understand atm, i was aware of the 3 rules but didnt know how to implement them, thanks a lot
don't worry it takes time to get used to it
why do they use vectors to represent points on the argand plane but not the cartesian plane
why are there vectors even
well vectors cover more ground I guess?
like if u want to translate a point A on the argand plane by a translation vector u = 2+3i
you can deduce a point B from that translation (so that the vector AB = u)
would it make sense for you to use a point to represent 2+3i?
vectors can represent all points (cause every vector OM represents the point M, where O is the origin of the coordinate system) and more (things like the translation vector u that I talked about)
while points can't represent all vectors that well (it wouldn't make that much sense to represent the previous 2+3i with a point in the plane)
so interpreting complex numbers as vectors does have a point
(and even beyond that, linear algebra is all about vector spaces... You will see that for example, a function continuous on [0;1] is a vector. A polynomial is a vector. A sequence is a vector. The notion of vectors is very general)
while we rarely talk about points in linear algebra
for example you plot a point 3+i on the complex plane, and you represent its modulus as a vector.. why dont you use a line segment?
its just the distance from that point to the origin why do they use vectors
it's not distance :o
otherwise 3+i would be the same as -3-i
that's not at all 2 things we wanna mix up
and we don't actually represent its modulus as a vector
we represent its modulus as the norm (length) of the vector, but we also represent the direction and orientation of the vector
:o
isnt the distance calculated via pythagorean?
i meant the sqrt (a^2+b^2)
this is what im asking
why does it have direction
(represented by the arrow tip?)
Historicallly, complex numbers come from the R2 plane, to which has been added a specific, commutative R2->R2 multiplication (R2 has no "general" multiplication operation, and dot product is not considered multiplication since it's R2->R).
The specific multiplication operation is :
(a,b) * (cd) = (ac - bd, ad + bc)
Then shorter notation conventions were applied :
(1,0) would be denoted as 1
(0,1) would be denoted as i
That leads to eg. (2,5) = 2 (1,0) + 5 (0,1) being denoted as 2 + 5i
You can also check that i² = i * i = -1 and that a * b = (a,0) * (b,0) = (ab, 0) = ab
Since the complex plane comes from the R2 plane (with a multiplication operation and notation conventions as their only difference), it could make some sense to use vectors to represent them. However, complex numbers represent ... well ... numbers, and I therefore advise you represent them as points
But that doesn't matter that much. In linear algebra, physics, etc., we also represent points in R^n with vectors anyway, and don't make a whole deal about it
A complex' modulus, however, cannot be represented by a vector, as it is a real number (it belongs to R)
But if you want to represent it graphically anyway, the only conventional ways to do so I can think about are :
- Write it at the middle of a segment that links the origin (0) to the desired complex number (z), with an arrow tip on both tips of the segment
- Or just the same as before but without the arrow tips ; either because you're lazy or because you need to represent several modulus in your sketch, which would be overloaded if you drew all the arrow tips as well
i think it was a misuse of words by me, the "complex' modulus" was what i referred to the graphical representation
but why are there arrow tips anyway?
Because that's how we represent distance
why is it not like that on the cartesian plane
Well we also represent distance this way in R2
Never with a vector
Always with a segment with optional arrow tips on both sides
If you draw a square, how would you represent its side length ?
You'll most likely just write c next to one of the sides, or draw a double-arrow parallel to the side and then mark a c next to it
But I'm almost sure you've never ever seen a one-tip arrow represent it (besides in lower grades, where maths is not rigorous)
@cyan night
because i learnt in khan academy sal keeps saying its a vector
like this one
so whats it called if not a vector?
What is "it" : modulus or complex number ?
Yeah the arrow is a vector
yeah thats what i was wondering about, why is it a vector
But what really matters is what it represents
its length is the modulus of the number
Then it's wrong
🤔
You can't represent a modulus (in C) or a distance (in Rn) by a vector
I think you misunderstood
The vector actually represents the complex number
Continuity... of what ?
i thought the arrow tip of the vector indicates that the vector keeps going
No
The arrow tips is meant to say two things :
- "Here, it's the head (end) of the vector, not its tail"
- "The vector stops exactly at the tip of the arrow tip"
We usually make use of dashed points to represent that something keeps going
ohh okk thank you
why wouldn't it? why reduce the rich information of a complex number a+ib (the information a and the information b) to the poor information of its modulus (only 1 information remains : sqrt(a^2+b^2))?
then I'd ask you why not represent every complex number with just its Real axis and ignoring the imaginary axis?
we want our representation of the complex number to tell us as much as possible about the complex number
a vector does it greatly, just by looki g at the vector u can tell what complex number it represents
no we represent distance + direction with vectors
We can say magnitude ?
ohh no at all xD
yea magnitude
im not on point in terms of the English translation of what I learnt
also he was saying distance so I was saying that too, that's a fine way to view magnitude
Distance is always in positive I guess
magnitude is always positive
to?
so the arrow is used to represent the direction (the argument of the complex number)?
ehmm it tells u whether its "towards the left" or "towards the right" for example
but why are there no vectors in the cartesian plane?
so the angle of a horizontal arrow pointing right is 0° (compared to the x axis)
while the angle of a horizontal arrow pointing left is 180°
if we didn't see where the arrow was pointing we can't tell what's the argument
Sorry not add
there are
idk what u mean
maybe u didn't study it yet but there are
oh hm
for example if u draw 2 random points À and B, the vector AB is drawn by drawing the segment AB and adding an arrow head on the B side
Always there are in Cartesian plane
represent the complex number (as a vector)
+1
and represent -1
then remove the arrow heads
can u tell them apart? +1 and -1?
don't they look exactly the same if u take away the arrow heads?
In this video, we learn about representing complex numbers as vectors, and use these to solve some challenging geometrical problems
@cyan night
okk ill watch it after school
It explains all the questions you are asking
wait dont they have different ending points?
Np
u can define vectors without even defining starting and ending points tbh
for example 3i can represent any vector (arrow) going up +3 towards the y axis
u can draw the arrow anywhere and it'll still represent 3i, itll still be the same vector
wdym by "draw the arrow anywhere"?
ofc if u wanna represent 3i with a point A, then u can just put your A at coordinates (0,3), u don't NECESSARILY need an arrow for that it's fine
u don't even need to draw a segment if ur goal is to represent a complex number with a POINT
choose anywhere to start ur arrow, doesn't have to be in the origin of the plane
it's like if I have 1$ in my pocket, or if u have 1$ in ur pocket, we're still gonna call it a 1$ coin regardless of where it is
same with vectors, we can represent the arrow "3i" wherever u put it in the plane
but 3 is normally interpreted as the modulus (the distance from 0,0) so shouldnt it be from the origin
however we often prefer to start the arrow from the origin so that the arrow representation of the complex number and the point representation of the same complex number sort-of agree
Indeed. What I meant was "you can't represent distance (and only distance) with a one-sided arrow"
modulus doesn't mean distance from (0,0)
modulus of a vector that starts at (0,0) sure that's the distance from (0,0), but in general modulus is just the ""size"" of the arrow
oh
modulus of a complex number z
= the distance of a POINT REPRESENTATION of z, from (0,0)
= the magnitude (size) of a VECTOR REPRESENTATION OF Z, wherever u draw ur arrow
it can be interpreted as both??
yeah
u can interpret a complex number as a point in the plane, or as a vector in the plane
for example in some problems u'll see them saying stuff like : "let A(1+2i) and B(3+4i) be 2 points in the complex plane, and let u(-1-i) be a vector in the plane"
or shit like that
u(-1-i) be a vector on the plane means it has modulus 1?
I think u'll understand more with exercises
no it's modulus is : sqrt[ (-1)^2 + (-1)^2] = sqrt[2]
it's weird to study vectors representing complex numbers when u didn't know about vectors in the usual Cartesian plane
how do you draw u on the complex plane
what u can do for u (-1-i) is :
-u choose any random starting point of ur arrow
-by moving 1 to the left (cause the x coordinate of u is -1) and 1 to the bottom (cause the y coordinate of u is also -1), you deduce the ending point of ur arrow
-so now that u know where the starting and ending point, u just draw the arrow
often u'll see ppl choosing the starting point of the vector u to be O, the origin of the plane, but that's not necessary
I think maybe try to understand whzt vectors are in the normal cartesian plane first
before studying them in complex numbers
if the starting point is O then doesnt that mean the u is the number -1-i itself
if the starting point is O, then u is the vector OA where A is the point representation of the number -1-i
ah ok ty
(line I) + 2 * (line II) gives you 7r = 15 so r = 15/7
and you use for example line III to deduce what s is (now that you know what r is)
Tyvm
does anyone have a google classroom for math or anything
Minimize 𝑧 = 12𝑥 + 18𝑦, subject to 4𝑥 + 𝑦 ≥ 4, 𝑥 + 3𝑦 ≥ 6, 𝑥 + 𝑦 ≥ 3, 𝑥 ≥ 0, 𝑦 ≥ 0.
Can someone help please?
plot the graph for this and find the feasible region with the constraints given, y>3 wil be parallel to x axis at y 3. then find the corner points of the region and put it in the objective z. @fossil token
does anyone know how the first epxression gives, after integration, the second expression?
integral of w'(t)dt from 0 to t
is w(t) - w(0)
and integral of alpha*dt from 0 to t
is alpha * t
Can somebody help me with this question?
Area = ½ * base * height (half a rectangle)
next fill in what you know
400 = ½ * x * 2x
400 = x²
||20=x||
nvm i got it thank for trying to help
If i am trying to find the local extrema of a funcion using the 2nd and 3rd derivative test, if the stationary point is odd when I add it to the 3rd derivative, then the function does not have a local extrema in that point
Right?
I hope my sentence makes sense
Trying to find the extrema of: f(x)=x^(4)-6x^(2)+8x-3
is tan-1x domain (-infinity, infinity) or [-in,in.]
Successful attack though lol
can anyone please help me with this? ive tried to set up a factored form equation for it but i sense im not getting the degree of the function or the orders for the zeros right.
Hello can someone help me with my homework in math or teach me through call would gladly appreciate it
it's about performance task sequences
Nobody an idea? 😦
For a), create a table:
iteration # | 1 | 2 | 3 | ... | n
------------+---+---+---+-----+----
# add. dots | 1 | 3 | 5 | ... | ?
For b), create a formula for all needed dots (you can use the same table as in a) to get there)
I honestly still don't get it but thanks for the reply-
Okay so for the 2nd iteration you get 3 additional dots. For the 3rd you get 5 additional ones. right?
Yeah..
Do you have an idea how to put that in a formula?
I don't.
ok 1 sec
Does this help?
Sorry for my bad handwriting I hope you can read it
You're going to struggle- I still don't get it..
Haha okay so you have 3 for the right side, 3 for above and 1 extra for the corner.
So that's 2x3 dots for the two sides plus the additional one in the corner. In math language 2x3+1 dots. right?
What part do you not understand?
This is embarassing everything-
Do you understand the question?
Or, if you don't understand the question, do you understand the situation presented here?
I don't.
@small canyon open braces
look at the roots and what number it is at the root. eg at -1 its is x^3 etc