#math-help
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
I havent done this in forever but
sub in 2 for x in f and g
subtract f(2)-g(2)
then multiply h(2) by that value
thank you!
Was that correct
yes
pls help
Apply chain rule
dz/dt = dz/dx * dx/dt + dz/dy * dy/dt
(All derivatives expressed at t = 0 for .../dt and (x(t), y(t)) = (x(0), y(0)) for dz/dx or dz/dy)
Substitute the values the question gave you into the expression, and you get :
27 = 45 * 1/5 + 3 * dy/dt
(And dy/dt|t=0 is the same as y'(0))
ahh right, now I get it. I was very confused because symbols for the derivatives was changed and how they were said 😆. Thank you so much!
Np !
Usually, f'(x) is the same as df/dx, with the specificity that f has to be a function of ONE variable : x
df/dx has to be used when f has 2 or more variables
can someone help me with this ? thanks in advance!
i have to write it in general form btw
Idk if you've done it yet but you can use m=change in y/change in x and then the general formula for a line (y - ycoordinate = m(x - xcoordinate)). Your other point would be (4,0) since the line passes the x-axis at 4 at which point y is 0
can sb help me pls
anyone here good with discrete random variables?
@versed orchid Do you know what the answer is, I solved it, if the answer is correct, I will post it.
triangle ABC if sinA:sinB:sinC=6:5:4 how to find cosA:cosB:CosC
peeps
can anyone hepl me
convergent
You put the same shape around common terms and a different one over another
I don't know. Or maybe some people might think that it sounds stupid to do. IDK. It worked for me
bruh I'm not talking bout explanation
wdy even mean by cheesy
@languid zenith
Maybe the wording is weird.
Nevermind..
Anyone know what variance and standard deviation actually mean, i understand how to find them but what actually are they?
Yo, is anyone taking math proof here?
Yo horizontal asymptote is lim x-> infinity right?
someone explain this
2nd step == multiply both sides by a
3rd step ==
lhs -- useing identity
rhs --- take b common
a+b=b
b+b=b
in the last step we chand "a" to "b"
coz a=b (we take this as let)
To simplify the (a-b) on both sides, what they do is divide both sides by (a-b).
What they overlook is that a=b, so they're actually dividing both sides by 0, which you can't
That's why they get to 2=1
lol i know this is kinda simple but...
can someone just tell me how <BOC = 29
pulling all-nighters and brain just isn't functioning so...
I don t think that the second answer is correct but here is my explanation : we got ABDC a parallelogram so opposite angle is eaual therefore <BDC = 32 . And lets take P asthe middle of BD SO in the triangle PDC <C= 180-90-32 <C=58. Now <ACD=90+58=148 .
...
That kind of makes sense.
But why does my teacher think it's 29.
I just don't get it.
Do you guys know why the 3 repeats in 45/54?
is math related to science?
if h(t) = e^(ax), then h'(t) = a e^(ax)
That's a big hint
It is related, but if you want to ask about mechanical stuff, ask it in #science-help
hi guys i'am new here can anyone explain how this works and what should i do so i can study with you guys 🤓
is NML~PQR same as MNL~QPR
Here, it's mostly about sending questions or things you don't understand to get them explained to you. It's not that much about "studying together" 😁
ohh ok thanks
yes, because both are N to P, M to Q and L to R
sometimes it makes me confused
But this one worked
okkk
You're welcome !
What is the notation of translating a point A through V
the result of it is A' and |AV| = |VA'|
If this does not make sense, i hope the second sentence will help
Can someone explain that how do we multiply sqrt(2) in the above equation (in blue) to result in the equation at the bottom (in red)?
⬆️ Does it help ? ☺️
if only a median and two sides of a triangle are proportional to the same of other triangle, can we prove the two triangles similar?
does anyone have good notes or anything on intergration?? ;;
can anyone explain this?
What specifically
I have everything up to Calc 3
Get them in terms of sin and cosine (csc is 1/sin and cot is cos/sin)
You know that 1/sin = 1
Nvm
I can’t work it out right now
But yes, get them into sin and cos
im actually doing o level;;
additional math to be specific
1D or multivariable ?
im not sure what those are as i take IGCSE;;
1D integration = 1 integral S thingy, multivariable: several integral S things
If you don't know it's probably 1D
yea sure can you dm me :'(
aight i'll go watch the organic chem tutor
you can speak tiếng việt k ?
ok i can :))
don't wanna flood chat with diff language
oki i know , sry bro
Hello, can you help me please with Probability theory🙏
Of the surveyed businessmen, 80% prefer to keep money in a bank (event A), 60% invest in securities (event B), 50% simultaneously hold money in a bank and invest in securities. Find the probability that a randomly selected businessman keeps money in a bank or in the form of securities.
P(A union B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A intersection B)
This is a formula based on probability Venn diagrams
Here 50% is P(A intersection B)
And the result we need is P(A union B)
Thanks☺️
also die Steigung ist 1/1
hä
Place radar at (0,0) and the plane trajectory on the line (x,2)
So you know for what x the two are separated by 5 miles
And since x = v * t (you know v), you can calculate for what t radar and plane are separated by 5 miles
Then, take f again, but replace x by that vt expression (you know v) and evaluate its derivative at t = the time you calculated for the plane and the radar to be separated by 5mi
In formulas :
(Only considering the positive value for x since we say the plane has already passed the radar, so it's getting away from it (assuming it moves towards the positive x)
now :
f(x) ---> f(t)
Differentiate according to t, and evaluate at t = 360 sqrt(21) / 47
Since f(t) [m] and differentiating according to t gives it [1/s], you'll get an answer in [m/s], which is what you're looking for (a rate of change of distance)
Quick tip : when dealing with physics maths, always make sure the units make sense. Analyse what units the answer needs to have, based on what you're asked
I can't stress it enough ; it WILL guide you and help you make less mistakes, because when you don't know how to apply a certain operation (multiply by a/b or b/a ?) or when you just don't know what to do to get to the solution, going through steps that make you closer to the correct units will be the best thing to do in most cases
(Disclaimer : I'm exhausted, so I may have miscalculated some values, check twice before writing)
As soon as it is a physics-related problem, I advise you to at least evaluate the units of your answer
A teacher will never ask you to find a velocity expressed in [m] or [m/s²]
Decimals suck
wha-
Hi guys I need some help writing a proof for this , i know the answer is right i just don't know how to go about explaining it with logic 😥, I've been breaking my head for last couple hours. I just started classes couple weeks ago so I'm kind of lost still .
@rustic pine maybe show that your set belongs to [0;1[ (easy) and then show that any value of [0;1[ belongs to your set by finding a contradiction if it exists x such that x doesn't belong to your set
I need to master linear algebra anyroadmap's ?
hello does anyone know how to solve this
Can someone tell me how to i get the slope of a tangent at a specific point in a polynomial function
@winter crow
Take the derivative of the function
Sub in the point into that derivative
determine the coordinates (x,y), with respect to the canonical basis of the plane vectors, of the vector, with the same norm as the vector (2.8) and which is orthogonal to the vector (2.8)
The vectors are orthogonal
So (2,8)•(x,y) = 2x + 8y = 0
And they have the same norm
So x² + y² = 2² + 8² = 68
Two equations, two unknowns, just solve the system to get the solution
Is there any way to know if you've to do construction in a question or not...
I can't figure out which questions require what type of construction
What do you mean by "construction" ?
Like steps to get to the answer ?
yep like draw AB perpendicular to BC
I don't know what you mean. Like, just draw it ? That question seems pretty straight-forward and what you're required to do looks clear
I mean it's not implicit in question
have you never come across a question which doesn't ask to draw anything but we do it anyway
i have encountered this problem
angle xoy, point m inside the angle. construct a,b such that m is the midpoint of ab
if this is what u meant
is it
is u meant this
the question is to construct
what conditions a,b have to meet
aight i dont get u then
If your question is "do we sometimes have to draw intermediate constructions in geometry to get to the solution ?", the answer is "obviously, yes"
If you were always asked one-step-answers questions, you wouldn't grow your thinking skills. All you'd do is brainlessly draw what the question explicitly tells you to draw
Does anyone know about GCSE maths who can help please?
What are you supposed to do?
hi, I am doing gcse maths, i can try to help
what year are you in?
11
same
ok, did u want any particular help, cos i can try haha
yes pls do you know compound growth/decay
yeah i think so
like 22/7×(49)^2×360
how does one do this quickly without error and calculate
would anyone be able to helpl me out with this question? since the z-score table only goes up to 2 decimals (1.06), i was wondering what i should do with the 3. do i do a weighted sum kind of thing or should i pretend like it's 1.065 :")
thank you in advance
You write it down and take the time to calculate it ????
Hi could anyone help me with this problem? Thank you so much!
how do you do the last part you said
BEDMAS or PEMDAS
someone up? help me with this logic
if the cloth is hexagonal, what are the designs drawn on?
table?
the other desing are the segment
You misread the question. The table cover is round, so the designs are also drawn on it
yes the table is round but the CLOTH IS HEXAGONAL
Designs drawn on whole table? or just that portion which isn' covered by cloth
Consider the 6th Power of that equation, then write any term in terms of power of 2
What
write all the terms under the power of 2, the essence is to make all of them with same base (ex 8= 2^3)
I still dont get it
Try it
Can you do this?
I cant because i dont understand
You need to understand, not to copy what someone else can do....
Your equation is only a multiplication right?
No addition
considering there's only one equation for 2 variables we don't have enough information to solve this question
If U is 10 x is 5.
it's math help, not tinder 😛
lol
apply logarithm
Pls someone solve this...i dknt knkw how
-_-
hmmm anyone here that could explain to me how to predict the chance for a T/student distribution? It is given that P(T_8>3,25) but i don’t really have a single clue how to begin
"Round table cover"
And even if it was drawn on the table, it wouldn't change the total area of the designs, so you could still solve the problem and get the proper answer
so there's no mention of table?
Read your question again ^^
No mention of a table, only the table cover
well thanks
it makes its understanding easy
so you're trying to find the probability that T > 3.25, where T is a Student t-distribution with 8 degrees of freedom?
Indeed
well i assume the answer would be between 0,005 and 0,006 if using a t-table as i wrote down during class but i don’t remember exactly how to get there
Do you just count up 1 degree of freedom and count 1 down respectively for lower and upper boundaries? But how do you then exactly decide what values to pick (from a t table) as boundaries?
Because when looking at T_9 i get a boundary of exactly 3,25 (which is my lower boundary?) then i get the 0,005; but i don’t know how my professor came up with the 0,006 part as there is no probability value like that linked to a value of T_7 in my table
(Perhaps he used a more exact version of a t table?)
Anyone know how i could solve (x-2)^(-½) = 0?
did you try graphing the left-hand side?
i don't think you'll want to do this. if you change the degrees of freedom, you're looking at a different probability distribution
so you should only look at the 8 degrees of freedom case
Well it is rather an estimate that i need to predict, i probably should’ve said that earlier haha
(My professor does use some weird tactics, but i’d be more than open to hearing another method)
So feel free to explain haha
i think the first thing to remember is that the t-distribution is symmetric -- so P(X > a) = P(X < -a)
so if I want to find P(X > something), but the table only tells me about P(X < something), that's okay
so P(X > 3.25) = P(X < -3.25). make sense so far?
Yes!
so like you said, some tables are more precise than others; here's one
you'll just want to look at the n=8 row, ignore all the others. because you're working with a t(8) distribution
So you would just need to pick a value that is an overestimate and an underestimate and then read the values at the top? (Of course in the form 1-…)
yeah exactly. so P(X < 2.896) = 0.99, and P(X < 3.355) = 0.995. so P(X < 3.25) must be between those two
Which would mean the value 3,25 would have a probability between 0,005 and 0,010?
As we’re looking for everything greater than 3,25
right, 0.99 < P(X < 3.25) < 0.995
Okidoki! Thank you!
Hahaha i do get what you mean luckily :))
Thank you very much! :))
np
I can´t do it, I´ve been almost 1 hour to complete it and nothing
The result is: " 1/e " according to the book
Help me pls :c
Try a change of variable like: u=1-x, then study it
if you plug in 0 directly in its not possible
since there is an asymptote at x=1
so what you do next is you will
I catch u, in my country that method it´s called "Chain Rule"
I will try it
Hi could anyone please help out with the second part of this question?
Try to express t in terms of s, then inject the relationship into the velocity
I did it!
whats the answer? the guy's teacher keeps saying his answer is wrong
i beleive it is $147
I may be incorrect but that is my attempt
same but his teacher insists that its not
maybe ask the teacher to explain?
ye prob
ohh wait
Okay I think i got it
how
$126
howd you get to that?
that is my process
so i took 12 percent of the full price instead of what you did which was taking the 12 percent tax from the reduced price
thank you!!
you're welcome
Substitution is :
- in eq. 1, isolate x. You get x = ... (... depends on y)
- in eq. 2, replace all instances of x by ..., and solve for y.
- Once you get the solution value for y, go back to x = ... and substitute in the expression of "..." the value lf y you found in eq. 2 to get the solution value of x
do you get what the first equation means?
yepp, that 4 raised to t/3 is 25
yeah exactly
try playing with that equation a little bit: 4^(t/3) = 25. can you change it so that it's more relevant to the log_2 equation?
for example, what's another way to write 4?
yeah
so you've got (2^2)^(t/3) = 25
do the same thing with the right-hand side, and see if you can get to an expression that tells you "log_2(5) = something"
log_4(25) = log_2(5) = t/3
Is the answer to finding the 101th derivative of cos just (cosx)^101= cosx
am not really great with logic ;~;
The question tells us there is a 7 among the three integers
- So Kevin's perspective :
7 + x + y = perfect square (1, 4, 9, 16,...)
Assuming Jim has the z = 7 (but only Michael and Dwight see it, but read it as 1)
- Jim's perspective : x + y + z is a perfect square
-Michael and Dwight's perspective :
1 + x + y is a perfect square
Since the perfect squares HAVE to be 9, 16 or 25 (because the integers range from 1 to 10 and aren't duplicates),
That means 7 + x + y = 16 OR 25 (9 is not possible in this scenario)
and 1 + x + y = 9 OR 16 (25 is not possible in this scenario)
Ohh, cuz I was thinking that it had to be both perfect squares whether z = 7 or z = 1
Yup that's it
Bcuz Kevin did say that it was a perfect square knowing that there was a number 7, but at the same time, the other 3 also guessed their number based on the fact that the sum was a perfect square.
so is it possible that both sets of numbers sum up to be a perfect square?
my groupmates and I tried all possible combinations and they both don't come out as perfect squares
I'll give it a try after my class
Hi, can someone explain what a line with a nonzero slope is?
that means it is not a horizontal line i guess?
Very simple explanation: A line with a nonzero slope is a line that isn't flat, or has a slope of some kind, but it cannot be equal to zero.
Line with a slope of 0: ___
Line with a nonzero slope: /
If the line is on a coordinate plane, then if the line is parallel to the X axis and the Y coordinate doesn't change, then that line's slope is 0.
If the line is on a coordinate plane and the Y value is not the same for the entire line or it intersects with the X axis eventually, then your line has a nonzero slope.
Pretty simple explanation, I hope this helps :)
^
@cyan night @limpid dagger thank u both!! this helps a lot
yes i hope you understand it
yess i do now :D
That's awesome :) I hope you have a good day
thanks, you too :>
For recurring decimals
imagine 0.037
some people put a dot on the second zero and the seven
other people put a dot on the 0, the 3 and the 7.
In both cases, the number is 0.037037037
But I was marked incorrect b/c I was supposed to put a dot on just the second zero and the seven.
I don't understand the difference though.
I wanna tell my teacher that maybe there's a mistake
but i don't wanna embarrass myself in case i'm actually wrong
anyone know if i'm right or not?
Math is kinda pedantic like that. If I saw three dots I'd wonder if it was a mistake and I couldn't say for certain whether that'd be 0.037037... or 0.037373737...
guý
guys
can help me with this problem
When Uncle Minh was the same age as baby Mi, Mrs. Hanh was the same age as Uncle Minh and baby Mi now plus
again. Which of the following statements is true?
A. Now, Mrs. Hanh's age is twice that of Uncle Minh's age
B. Now Mrs. Hanh's age is three times that of Uncle Minh's age
C. Now, Mrs. Hanh's age is one and a half times that of Uncle Minh's age
D. All other answers are wrong
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/898372860911947821/899809278939004968/Screen_Shot_2021-10-18_at_8.00.46_PM.png Can someone help me with proofing
leverage this following logarithmic property : log_(a^n) of (b) = 1/n * log_a of (b)
yoooo im kinda confusedLMAO how do u get the length of x
is that just a arbitrary quadrilateral?
or is it a parallelogram?
Its not rhombus.... wait what is that shit?
just a quadrilateral
Nah cant use trig. Its not right triangle
it doesnt have to be right triangle smh
There are two isosceles triangles in it
I think we need to use properties of isosceles
theres not much
can u give us the problem in words
Try using Pythagoras theorem
it clearly isnt a rhombus smh
rhombus needs all 4 sides to be equa
theres no right angle
We just have to make one
what
Altitude of both triangles
the altitudes arent collinear
F yea
Does that quadrilateral have name. Adjacents are equal and opposites are diiferent
well its much more confusingin words LMAO i just simplified it to that problem
how exactly
no just give words pls
ok
yeee
i knew it
whatever thank u lol
LMAOFSAKJ
Oh the question was wrong. Was it meant to be a parellelogram
nah i meant if you drop another diagonal then u get 4 right triangles maybe that could have helped
but it would have been nice if we had any one angle :)
sorry is anyone here familar with desmos?
you cant assure that the diagonal is perpendicular to the sides
thats a property of a kite
ohhhh i didnt realize that xD sorry
i forgot the kite thing
is it solvable?
idek dude if i get just one angle then its pretty easy
otherwise i dont see i mean there might be a trick idk
could use any help thanks
you know how to find the derivative right?
basically when you differentiate you get an expression in terms of x right?
dy/dx=-1/2sqrt(x)+ something something
yep
then you just have to equate the polynomial to -4
then u will get some value of x after solving
lets say u get x=4 after solving
i havent solved just saying
then to find the point basically you can substitute x=4 into the first expression which is y=sqrt(x)+3x^3/2+2
then u can solve for y and voila
oh ok thanks I'll try to solve it now
Anyone in here know taylor expansion for complex analysis?
I'm struggling with how to do the taylor expansion for this one
z_0 is 2i
radius of convergence should be sqrt(2). I want to use the geometric series 1/(1-w), where w=z-2i*some factor but idk how to write the function in that form.
Hi, is 10 the only result for √[(-10)^2]? Can someone explain why it can't be -10?
Because a square root can't be negative
sqrt(...) >= 0
No matter what "..." is
"But Quentin, then why do we say that the square roots of 25 are 5 and -5 ?"
Because the square roots of 25 are ± sqrt(25). The - sign doesn't come from the sqrt() itself
(Otherwise we wouldn't write ± sqrt, we would just write + sqrt and imply the - is given throught the sqrt)
so we cannot do the exponent calculation of 2*(1/2) as sqrt is value over (1/2), so we also cannot, for example, do the calculation of ((-23)^(2))^3/8 without first taking the square of -23 right?
Exactly, because of PEMDAS rule
Bracket (P for parenthesis) first, only THEN exponent (E)
Np
thanks
hey, can anyone help me out with this?
how is the highlighted term evaluated as '0'.... please explain
Cos(0) = 1, 1-1 =0
dude denominator also will be zero, so it will be in an indeterminate form
I think it's like top one will become zero "faster" than bottom one, idk been a while
What have you learned so far ? l'hopital's rule or just the limit operation
well we have to solve this question with just limit operation
i know it can be solved using l'hospital's rule
ok the hint is applying x->0 (sinx/x) ,
does anyone know how to do question 13 a and b
A) h'(t) = 0
B) h(t) = 0
I haven't checked the math 100% but you seem to have forgotten a +1
Don't think that's the issue though, idk your math seems right to me
OK assuming that the equation you wrote in the top right is correct, this is what I got. Is that the answer?
The answer for the question is y=(x^2 +4x -12)/x^2 -4
Then I think your first equation is wrong
What should it be
Sorry I don't remember asymptotic functions enough to help you there
Ok thanks anyways
I actually just figured it out the y-intercept shouldn’t even be included in the equation
@lean quiver thankyou
you got the first zero right
2/3
have you learned synthetic division?
you can divide the function by x-2/3 and then apply quadratic formula to get the imaginaries
oh thanks! that helped alot
Hey! Can someone help me with this?
A square ABCD is given. Points P and Q are taken on the sides AB and BC such that the BP is equal to the BQ.BH is the height of the triangle BPC. Find the angle DHQ
height of triangle bpc not bpq right
Yes
pretty tricky in that case
yeah, idk where to start from
it could be plainly adding angles
since we have an isoceles right angle
but idrk
dhq is 90o
are u vietnamese?
no
we have the same problem in vietnam
oh haha tough bish is this problem
i can give u a hint
try using similar triangles
so ill give u the ending point: at the end u would wnat to prove that angle qhb = dhc since qhb+qhc = 90
its not too tough
thanks again!!! have a nice day
g(x) =
∫ x
1
√1 + t dt for x > 1.
Determine whether g has an inverse function. Note: if an
inverse function exists, there is no need to find it
find the g'(x) and for any x>1 g'(x)>0 (*)
(*) ==> strictly increasing function ==> one to one function ==> the inverse function exists
Can someone please help at this 3 questions
sorry i don't know such advanced math
please help !! @ember kernel
@here
please solve all 3 parts pleaseee
i) c
ii) d
iii. ??
what have you thought of?
what have you thought of for iii?
i am implying that you should have progress before asking people to solve everything for you unless you dont know how to start you should just ask how to start not for the answers alone
i was stuck at v = 1/70
then i realised i had to find u not v
Heyy, could someone please explain why ( A ∧ ¬ B ) => (A ∨ B ) is 1 even though A ∧ ¬ B is 0 ?
The last term in the second line of 2 should be ln(-3), which is not valid. The integral doesn't converge
Nr 3 I think is just 1/x? Idk if it's supposed to be more complicated than that..
@pearl tusk no time to read the discussion, it is answered yet ?
i got the answer quentin
Hello, can someone explain where 1,3 and 5 came from?
i am i high school so i don't know much math eheh
it's okay 🥲
Hi ! Looks like B got wrongly defined. I'd recommend you ask your teacher about it, to confirm it is indeed a mistake
(got wrongly defined in the first line)
Unfortunately I don't have teacher for this material. so B = { 1, 3, 5 } then, right ?
yes.
Okay thanks both of you
Thanks
Can someone help me understand how both got cancelled in the sum? As in how sin(8pi/9) = sin(pi/9)?
If you think about the unit circle, the sin(8pi/9) (y-axis) = sin(pi/9). Therefore you can cancel these two out when dividing
8pi/9 and pi/9 are both above the x axis, therefore their y-values are the same.
@oblique current
Let me try
limit definition of derivative right
I sloved it but I don't think it is right
Did u try to watch any youtube videos can help u to understand this equation ?
Idk how to search it
Btw, sorry for my English :(
Dosent help all the time
That question looks like. Common one. Maybe there might be
Just typ the name of the equation which Ig is definition of the derivative explantion in your language on youtube. This will help u alot
Wish u luck 
Examples of [x] :
[3.14] = 3
[15] = [15]
[-3.14] = -4
Therefore, when x tends to 0-, that means [x] = -1 (because x is very close to 0 and negative)
Also, since x is negative, |x| = -x
Now you know how to simplify [x] and |x| in your expression, you just need to solve it 😉
Okayyy thanks Quentin!
- When you sub in x = 0, you get an undefined value 0/0 -> Try using l'Hospital's rule
Yeah the ans comes out to be (A) -sin1, thankss
its a 4degrer eq, you suggest using LH rule?
I'll try once tho!
Yup
Thanks man!
Np !
@ember kernel if you still there pls help 😀
I always face problem solving these series type questions, pls help
For very small values of x, 15/x >>>>>>>> 14/x
so you can kinda just ignore everything inside the brackets apart from the 15/x
no wait that's a lie
For small values of x, 15/x is not >>>> 14/x, they keep the ratio 15/14, which is not that great (even when dealing with large numbers)
yeah
I'll give it a try when I'm done with my work
I'm too tired to be answering thins ahahaha
I don’t have a paper in front of me but for 15/x as x approaches 0 from the right side, that limit should approach infinity
Because 15/0.000000000000001 is a large ass number
Therefore it’s unbounded
I could be wrong though I literally just woke up lol
thats approaching from 0+
if you approach from 0- then its - infinity
the limit diverges, yeah no limit
@cyan night they're asking for lim at 0+, wo no mention of 0- needed
Oh
the limit is 120. consider integer part + decimal part and construct inequality equation for using the squeeze theorem
Merge x and (x)^3/5, then put outside the exponent
Can you send a proper solution for it ? I dont know the working of the squeeze theorem..ik what it means tho :)
can anyone help me to construct the formula of this ball
i dont know why the L = 12 but z is 7
Those are just some points at which the data has been gathered
so i think i only use the ellipse equation is enough, right
Yes.. ellipse eq is to be used thats it
Thats what I figured, in a cab rn sorry, will try once I get back home
thank youu
Have you studied/known the squeeze theorem ?
like this example
if comfortable with this example, then the solution
hmmmm
would this help?
i dont understand how no limit tho because the solution that i came up with does not care whether its 0+ or 0-
Wrong channel my dude
Hello, can someone help me with this problem: i have a triangle and have to calculate the b side and i have this: a=25 c=30 and γ=2α help pls
but that's math
@sharp ferry @lean quiver thanks guy, I understand it now! Cheers 🙏🏻
Learnt eng but eh never understood grammar, anyone feels the same?😂
felt the same. But I worked hard over it while I was in school. Now its never a cause of concern for me. I recommend this to you as well. After all, grammar is important.
use sine rule for sides a and c. You get cos(alpha)=3/5. now use cosine rule. there is your answer 😋
Thank you so much! Will try it
x^3 = -1, therefore, x^6 = (x^3)^2 = 1
that means x^12 = x^(2*6) = (2^6)^2 = 1
Quickly enough you realise 2^6n = 1 for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, ...
That means x^2021 = x^(2021%6) = x^5
(since 2021 = 6 * 336 + 5, because x^2016 = x^(336*6) = 1 )
Therefore, you are able to simplify |x^2021 - x^2| = |x^5 - x^2| = |x^2 (x^3 - 1)|= |-2 x^2| = 2*|x^2| = 2x^2 because x^3 = -1
Solved :D
Quicker way : x^3 = -1 ===> x = (-1)^(1/3) = -1
So |x^2021 - x^2| = |(-1)^2021 - (-1)^2| = |-1 - 1| = |-2| = 2
But I prefer the first method because, although it doesn't provide a precise answer (there's still an x^2 in it), it doesn't require you to interpret the value of x. Throughout the whole answer, you just work with what you've been given (x^3 = -1) and nothing more
@oblique current I did this .
What do you think?
Can someone PLEASE confirm this (x = domain & theta = range)
Find all points on the line r of the equation (x, y) = (1 + 2t, 5-t) whose distance to the line s containing the points (4,0) and (1, -4) is equal to 5 .
I'm having difficulties in interpreting, I've already found the s line, how do I develop the rest with the parametric equation and this s line?
What do you mean by x = domain and theta = range? Domain and range are limits that define where a function is continuous. In this case the arcsine function is going to be defined for all x values between -1 and 1 (included) which is the domain. Inversely, arcsin(x) = θ is continuous for all y-values such that -π/2 <= θ <= π/2 which would be the range.
To get x, simply take the cube root of -1, so x = -1. This is because any negative number raised to an odd power is going to be negative, likewise any negative number raised to an even power will be positive. That being said, if you raise -1 to ANY odd power (1, 3, 5, 7, 9…) it will stay at -1. However when raised to ANY even number, it will change to a +1. Therefore since x^2021 is raised to an odd power, you know (-1)^2021 = -1. Moreover since x^2 is raised to an even number, you know (-1)^2 = 1. You are then left with |-1 - 1| = |-2|. Take the absolute value and you’re left with 2 as your answer.
That’s a good problem solving strategy in like linear algebra or multi variable calculus, but mans is in algebra 1 it’ll only confuse him haha
Hey can someone write me a detailed proof as to why 1^infinity is indeterminant and why 1^infinity ≠ 1?
I’m having a hard time piecing together the reasoning for it. Even if you take the limit to infinity of 1^n, it should still = 1. I mean think about it, common sense tells you that if one raised to any positive finite integer even if it’s like 1^999999999999999999, it still equals one. Yet, 1^infinity is indeterminate. I don’t understand it
I wish I could tell ya
Yes you're correct, do you want me to send you a list of all the domains and ranges; Standard Ones..
That would definitely help a lot. Please do!
So |x^2021 - x^2| = |(-1)^2021 - (-1)^2| = |-1 - 1| = |-2| = 2
@ember kernel Thx a lot, I was getting -2 but answer is given -1 , it's wrong I guess . I got to say this is a friendly and helpful community ( I am new to this server )
Can plz someone help us with this
The guy who had asked this Q has solved it
See (exact 1)^infinity is indeed 1 and its not an indeterminant form consider lim x-->inf (1)^x this limit is precisely equal to 1 and IS NOT and indeterminant form, butt (1+)^inf and (1-)^ inf is indeed indeterminant for example consider the limit x-->inf (1+1/x)^x as x approaches infinity 1/x approaches 0 but is not EXACTLY 0 so (1+1/x) is basically slightly bigger than 1 and the limit is indeed not 1. This limit is precisely equal to e!
(EXACT 1)^inf form
(1+)^inf form
(1-)^inf form
So is it right what he answered ?
yeah...its correct
lads can i ask for some help
im not sure what this question is trying to say. im pretty sure x/x=1 is not a false statement
is this a case of the question being worded poorly or am i missing something
0/0 ≠ 1
One in the chat said it is correct
✨
Thankk u🫂
Thanks!!
Does Sin(45 + theta/2) = sin 45????
A wikipedia page has 4,9*10^9 words, 1 page of word dokument has 700 words
how many word page is needed to get same amout of words
how do i do this?
anyone?
no
I didn't get the question completely, but it seems that you just need to divide them
Thank you!
Totally, depends on the value of theta. It's like asking if 3 + x² = 7
^^
@woven orchid Exactly. I like using fake units in this kind of cases (where we don't know how to multiply/divide certain given values), just to be sure my answer makes sense "physically" speaking.
Eg. the question gives you values expressed in [words] and [words/page]
You want a number of pages, so [pages] = [words] / [words/page]
I also use that trick to not get lost when converting time (eg. 370 [s] / 360 [s/min] = ... [min] )
How would you work out 9b?
express y in terms of arcsin(or sin inverse) of 1/x and the differentiate
please help
Nr 2 is just the expression in 1 to the power of 5: x^5 = (p+q)^5
substitute the value of y into z under x
z = 9(4x-9/x+4) -4/(4x-9/x+4)
yep but after that I kinda struggled with simplifying dw I already submitted it. thanks tho 🙂
dw u'll get used to it
I would love to see that day
yesss
yiz
just algebra, try finding what (p+q)^3 is
and try adding p^5 and q^5 , see what you get
can anybody help me ?
i'm doing pythagoras theorem and i need to find the square root of 260
(hypothetically the / is the square root symbol)
i know the answer is 2 / 65 ( 13 x 5 x 2 x 2 )
but i need a number
it is confusing
do you guys know matrix?
I would like to help but i didnt understand what u didnt understood
fair enough
i dont like using calculator unless i know how to work it out
Is this what u needed?
Well if u have 260 in a square root u will didive 260 by the prime numbers, for instance u start diving by 2, then when it dsnt work anymore u divide by 3, then by 5... and so 260 = 2 x 2 x 5 x 13. Since u have two times 2 u can take it out of the square root and so it gives u 2 square root of 5 x 13
Oh im sorry the multiplication symbol makes it weird
thank you
Np, hope it helped : )
guys....
what is ur answer coming?
its your question.
its correct
if it wasnt a fluke
nothing..
A
All other are false
k
guys....
Take an arbitrary number, and remove 3 units from it. Eg., for x = 5, then y = 2 will become y = -1 (moved three units down)
so its....A
How do you go from 5 to 2 ?
-3
Yup
so its A
Ok let's imagine it's A.
At x = 5, I said that we needed to expect y = 2. Does answer A fit the solution ?
Yup
Can someone explain to me how to find the phase shift of a sine and cosine graph?
Can someone please help me understand the blue line segment?
You mean [x] part?
Yeah
I am not sure if I can explain well but I'll try
If you take a no. Between 0 and 1.....like say 0.5...it's integer part is 0
Between 1 and 2 ...say 1.4...1 and 0.4...the integer part is 1
It means that if you take any no. Between 1 and 2 then you get the integer part as 1 so the graph is a straight line between 1 and 2
Similarly other numbers
No
Why not?
What you drew is y=x
And [X] is?
Did you see the abv explanation
...
Ya.....on taking all the numbers between 1 and 2, we definitely have the integral part as 1
Now if you try plotting for every no. Between 1 and 2
It would be 1....a constant
Did you get it?
Ohhh!! Yeah! Fr, thanks a lot. I think the integral part was misunderstood by me
Thank you!
Ok😁
Ms margie is 3 times as old as a grade 9 student is now. In 5 years, she will only be twice as old as you are then how old is ms margie? help me please this is very confusing and because apparently an actual grade 9 students age has nothing to do with the equation please help we're meant to turn it into an equation and show working out
as "you" are?
how old are you?
hint) u - w= (u-w)*(u+w) / (u+w) = u^2-w^2 / (u+w) ; Let u=2x-3 , w= sqrt(...)
Not sure, but what I'd try is apply the limit to each term separately (because lim (a+b) = lim a + lim b), then get the indeterminate form inf - inf
How do we solve this question using derivatives?
Find a function f that, given an input in volume (cm³), returns the height of the water
The easiest way to do that is to find the function g that given a height h, returns a volume V (much easier) and calculate its inverse, to isolate h
could you solve it?
I'm sorry, I'm quite busy right now so I can't
But getting g is easy ; you just need to calculate the volume of a circular cone of height h and of circular base radius b = B * h/H (because the proportions are conserved when h varies ; it stays a right circular cone) with B=4cm and H = 8cm
Just use the formula of the volume of a cone to get V(h) = g(h) using h and b= h/2
Then isolate h to inverse g and get h(V) = h(V(t)) (because the volume varies with time)
Then, using chain rule, calculate :
dh/dt = dh/dV * dV/dt
(dV/dt = -3 according to the question)
Therefore, you just need to calculate dh/dV using your function h(V) and multiply it by -3 to get the answer dh/dt
Oops, ended up solving it
Got it ?
how would i simplify (81x^8)^-3/4
As a starter, 81 is 3^4
yeah,
i dont understand what happens to x^8
Well (x^8)^(-3/4) = x^(-3*8/4) = x^(-6)
hm, alright, thanks
You didn't understand ?
i get it
Okok
can someone help me with this? thank you!
25= u cos(theta) X time. you'll get the time in which water reaches the building. now use this --- s = ut + 1/2g*t^2.
u= 20, g=10, s=displacement= 11
Hello, why would it be s in the second equation? thank you!
yeah, there is a mistake. In the 2nd eq. , its u cos(theta) instead of u. It is the vertical motion of water. s is the vertical displacement of water till the time water hits the building.
hello, i am trying to solve this but i don't really know where to start. I tried computing the first 50 values and they converge to 1.750 but idk how to prove it analytically
Does anyone know where to start or have any advice?
sorry but I didn't quite get where the second equation came from, can I ask what concept was applied to it?
its the eq. of 2 dimensional motion, applied to vertical motion instead of horizontal. when the water hits the 3rd story, its displaced by "s" distance in upward direction
feel free to ask if you didn't get it
I'm still looking into it. Thank you for your time!
<@&717391911132069929>
??
Looks like it got deleted, it was a scam link
oh okkai, thanks for reporting
Heyy could y'all please suggest any good youtube channels to study and understand college level calculus?
pretty nice for intuition
How do you learn to enjoy maths?
Maths is like a language, full of terms, definitions and relations between the concepts. Idk about other people, but what I like about maths is that, when you really get into it and try to deeply understand what you learn, you become "fluent" at it ; solving becomes intuitive and you're able to make links between many maths concepts, and apply them to everyday problems. It's really satisfying
And there are a lot of YT videos to help you discover more about what you don't know yet or to help you understand what you don't
Mastering maths requires the same kind of rigor needed to master a language's grammar and vocabulary, but at the end of the day it's very accessible when you approach it the way it works best for you
Hope this helps ☺️
i understand whats going on till 5:42
but after that i don't understand what formula he is using to get his answer..........edit; nvm i went over it again and got the explaination
As you improve your grip at maths and develop problem solving skills, you will start seeing maths as joyous ,rather than a burden. I was not good at it too. When I was in 5th grade, I had scored 1/25 and 0/25 in maths **proficiency **tests. But at present, I have secured a seat in the best engineering college in my country.
All that I did was that I never stopped focusing and working hard on what I was studying at that moment. Yes, the journey is a long one ,but definitely gives you extraordinary skills
just focus on what you are currently studying. Try to figure out why do we conduct the basic mathematical operations like division and multiplication. In many word problems, all you have to do is division, but still that problem stumps many. WHY?? That is the reason why you need to get every concept at the grassroot level. If you didn't get what I was trying to convey, let me know Coz this is very important
I see, thank you!
I'm not sure if I quite understood, what do you mean by the grassroot part
by grassroot level, I mean you should know why we perform each and every operation. Only then you can tackle their difficult applications. EX- division is repeated subtraction. we see its application in word problem for kids. Questions like - if you have X amount of money, and an object costs Y, then how many objects can you buy. This is just a childish question but can serve as a nice example. One shouldn't just remember that in such Q's we have to divide. Instead, they should see that if you repeatedly take out Y Y Y Y from X, then you get the amount of objects you can buy. Its a bit difficult to explain, but not as difficult to learn. Just be consistent and work on maths everyday. A consistent person can do wonders!
Hello everyone)I need some help, do you know different sites or a source with information about "Probability theory in forensics"?
sqrt(56-r)=r
when solving this how come the solutions aren't both -8 and 7? when you substitute -8 and u get sqrt(64)=-8, isnt -8 squared 64?
sqrt is a positive operator by definition
In other words : when you say, "8 and -8 are the square roots of 64", that means the square roots of 64 are +sqrt(64) = 8 and -sqrt(64) = -8
Notice how, in the latter, we manually added a - sign before the sqrt ; therefore, it doesn't come from sqrt operator itself
@fiery haven
Can someone help me with this?
here's the function and the graph
Logically i would say that x cant be 90, bc cos(90)=0, but the graph says otherwise. Help, im so confused
I guess x is in radians. So if you wanna put 90 in the cos function, then take x=1.57 (pi/2).
Well there is no value at x = pi/2 ≈ 1.57
There's just a vertical asymptote
if you have a matrix equation can u take the determinants of both sides? like if AX=B will |AX|=|B|?
yes, but only if both A, B and X are square matrices
also, they all must have same no. of rows
ah ok thanks!
but its still there??? TT
What you mean by "it's still there" ?
Zoom as much as you want into your graph
You will never ever find any definite value for f(pi/2)
Keep in mind that 1.57 is not equal to pi/2, it's only an approximation
Just like pi ≈ 3.14
even 984.8 is a large value. If you put exactly pi/2, it will tend to infinity
π = 3
e = 3
π = e
3 ≠ 3
A bacteria culture grows with a constant relative growth rate. After 2 hours there are 400 bacteria and after 8 hours the count is 50,000.
(a) Find the initial population.
P(0) =
Correct: Your answer is correct.
bacteria
(b) Find an expression for the population after t hours.
P(t) =
Incorrect: Your answer is incorrect.
(c) Find the number of cells after 3 hours. (Round your answer to the nearest integer.)
P(3) =
Incorrect: Your answer is incorrect.
bacteria
(d) Find the rate of growth after 3 hours. (Round your answer to the nearest integer.)
P'(3) = bacteria/hour
(e) When will the population reach 200,000? (Round your answer to one decimal place.)
t = hours
can someone help me with this, I can't seem to find the right exprfession
because tan is in the third quadrant
So does the 180 come from the 0<X<180 instead of tan
You can use the rule that angles in alternate segments are equal the calculate the secondary value by doing 45°+180°=225°, thats how its obtained
because the range is 0<x<180 the value 225 is invalid @valid vine
Can someone help me with Q4d? I've been stuck at this question for ages- Any help is appreciated!! (Also pls ping me or I wouldn't see your msg)
do let me know if the answer is incorrect or if you need any further explanation
@random flame
I don’t get the 2x+3 = 7.0059 part
thats actually the base angle + 2pi
i think the base was 0.7227, but its not in the accepted range, but if u add a 2pi its one of the angle in the accepted range
its like the next cycle of it
please help me math lords
I'm not too sure,, I get 19 mins? the girl takes the family home every time so 10 + 1 + 5 + 1 + 2 = 19 mins. I'm pretty sure there must be a trick to this question so I'm not so sure.
i also got the same but ans key shows 17min ._.
So 2 and 1 goes first, then 1 stays. 2 comes back, then stays. 10 and 5 goes together. 1 takes the brollie then comes back with 2
wheres the father?
with his dad
hopefully that makes more sense?
ye it does thankyou so much
anyone can help . i stuck at the last part
this problem has roots from a teded riddle btw
the answer is indeed 17
hi does anyone have experience using MATLAB/simulink software ? can do process control too,,
can someone help me i only have on attempt left : (
Hi does anyone here know matlab and could help me with this? Been stuck at it for ages don't know how to go about it so any hints would be helpful. Even writing the steps out in words would be appreciated 🙏
Taylor:
f(x+dx) ≈ f(x) + f'(x) * dx
Here, the values for dx are -0,01 and 0,01
can someone explain something for me?
Yeah
The ways this channel works is, send your question right away. Someone will answer 😄
Hi!
Does any of you guys know how to **prove **the following expression:
|A U B| = |A| + |B| - |A ∩ B|
I understand it but I just don't know how to prove it 🙂
Sure
Give me some time, it's very easy to visualise actually
Yeah it is, and it makes perfect sense when applying it to real sets but I don't know where to start to prove it for any finite set
Paint skills yeaaah
Hope this helps
But I don't recall any rigorous demo for it tho
Like, even mathematicians seemed to agree it was intuitive
Alrightyyy, I had this in mind too but I didn't know I could simply put words on the process instead of doing as you said, a rigorous demo. Quite new to the world of maths demonstrations haha
Thanks my dude I asked two questions in this discord and the two of them were answered by you ❤️
Np !
I don't recall ever seeing such a thing. What's this about ?
whats your answer for this 2(x-5)=7(x+1)
-3.4 or 3.4
Oh ok, I had never saw this kind of notation for multiplication
ye same someone asked me this but ive never seen it
i think its - 3,4
but it says the answer is 3.4 for some reason
thats also what i got
Impossible
probably a mistake in solutions
u sure that is what this means?
i even used photomath but it says -17/5 HUH
Are you sure the strange notation is for multiplication and = only, with no mention of a - popping up somewhere ?
no thats different
dont mind the picture..
ok
2(x-5)=7(x+1)
probably a mistake in ur solutions
so its not -3.4?
ok
kinda curious about this notation tho
me too......
someone asked this question on me but i wasnt sure how to do it
I think in your shoes I just would've replied I didn't know either
That's what I usually do
yah ive never seen that before
might ask my teacher out of curiosity tho
aight tell me what they say
If i dnt forget to ask i will tell u : )
If you want a straight demo, look for the "inclusion-exclusion" principle, witch is a general form of this expression for any countable union of finate set.
I had to know it from a combinatorics point of vue as part of my studies, it's quite an heavy proof :v
Yeah I saw that earlier before I asked a question about it. The general demonstration is one of the question at the end of the exercise I was doing, the beginning was only proving it for n=2 finite sets of elements 😉
But yeah as you said, quite heavy haha, noticed there was multiple pages for the demo and saw a tear dropping 😂
I see ☺️
Good luck ahah :D
Hey, i need help with this please ☺️ : One point P is on the graph for the function y = x2 ; 0 < x < 2 The P point is one of the corners in a rectangle, where one of the sides is on the x axis and one on x = 2. Decide the biggest possible area, that the rectangle can have.
You could draw a graphic, then notice that the area of the rectangle can be express in terms of x ( Area = LenghHeight = x^2(2-x) )
Once you got this expression, as you're looking to maximize it, you'd want to do a studying of its variation between 0 and 2.
To do so, you could calculate it's derivatives ( -x^3+2x^2 ) to then being able to tell where it's maximum lize, thus answering the question.
I hope it helps D:
I think it will be 3.75 for 1/2 a cup soy sauce
Oh ok thanks just checking i was hvaing a dilemna
U do like this
2=15
0,5=x
Then 15 • 0,5 /2 = 3,75
quick and kinda dumb question, is -2 the same as -2/1....
Whats ▪︎ ?
X ( in sweden we use • too for multiplication )
yup its 3.75
could somebody help me with circle theroerems and circles at some point aha? im quite hopeless at maths
im just gonna throw this out here for anyone who if looking for a solver that explains the steps for free\
are there any youtube lectures that solve calc problems from Thomas Calculus?
Solution manual is available for Thomas Calculus, iirc
ah i didn't know that, thank u
any suggestions on how to be good at maths? Im studying at high school so maths is a very difficult and intense subject. I think that mere practicing is not enough since the subject has become extremely complicated and it takes nearly an hour for me to fully grasp a single lesson. Therefore, my grades have been dropping quite badly so im kind of tired and bored with maths right now 😔
