#math-help
1 messages · Page 36 of 1
yes
can u give me more problems if you can blue?
as i introduced to u before, a function simply requires an input and an output. for every input, there's 1 and only 1 output. the problem helps us determine what's the input and what's the output, in order for our function to be in correct order. the problem often states" y is a function of x", means that the value of y depends upon the value of x, so: y can be written in terms of x (e.g. y = 3x ). If f(x) = 3x, and y is a function of x.
so this problem wants you to indicate 2 abilities, 1 is you know how to apply geometry theorems and 2 is you know how to write a function
u can ask ur prof for more problems i personally dk any lol
for 1 input there could only exist 1 result, but an output can be the result of many inputs, for example, y = f(x) = x^2, both x = 2 and x = -2 would result in y = 4. but if u input x = 2 u cannot have both y = 4 and y = -4 for example. on the graph, the "undefined function" is represented as a vertical line on the graph. this verticle line indicates that for 1 input there are many outputs, or 1 value of x, many values of y exist. as aforementioned, this is invalid
Blue is a maths enthusiast
ITS AMAZING
understooood
You're amazing too zay 😩
okayy
i actually dk really well the term "y is a function of x", biii corrected me so i learnt from it
i, academically suck pls
blue is awesome, im glad you're into math
yay thank you
gotchuuuu
Doing good in academics doesn't necessarily define "amazing" 😩 for example you're an amazing singer !!!!!
omg both of u are awesome
ahh but singing wont do anything for my future ahem
tis just a hobby
Yes Blueberry I'm here
winnie da pooh
Tch tch noo just give your best in everything you do ᕦ(ò_óˇ)ᕤ
lmaooo you know im right !! Thank you, you too, whatever happens happens
the vertex could be the absolute min or max of the parabola
depending on if its faced up or down
you can find the vertex
if the quadratic has a solution
the x coordinate of the vertex is the average of the x intercepts' x coordinates
for example quadratic x^2-3x+2
= (x-1) (x-2)
wait
yeah
so its intercepts are 1 and 2
so the vertex's x coordinate is 1+2/2 = 1.5
to find the vertex's y coordinate u simply input its x coordinate to get the ouput
y = (1.5-1)(1.5-2) = -0.25
you must kidnap me and teach me all the math u know
His like 13 years old he has a very limited amount of knowledge of mathematics so don't worry
what
Ok I see it
thats... rude
dw i forgive
oh no
winnie
I'm sorry Blueberry I sincerely apologise I won't make fun or mock you
good
Thats true or else we will get in trouble by the police
HI KNIGHT
That's contradictory to him
what
See ya Blueberry 👋 Thank you for the quick parabola lesson I will hold on to that for sure
okok
WHAT
What
wdym
WDYM
Oof okay dumb question
hmm
ok
so
do u know how to calc the area of a square based on diagonals?
she isnt correct actually
it should be a = x^2/2
Double the sides ?
its actually the product of 2 diagonals divided by 2
How so
cuz its diagonal^2 divided by 2, not just diagonal ^2
the 2 diagonals in a square is equal
hence it is x*x = x^2
Ahh okay
the correct answer should be
What ab the d then
d/2*sqrt.2
Ooooo
she forgot to divide x^2 by 2
Okay
so x^2/2 is the area of the square
and we already have x = d/sqrt.2
so it is just (d/sqrt.2/2)^2
= (d/2sqrt.2)^2
ya np any questions just ask here
I'mma write all this down too
u see the vertical line here
it isnt a function if it has a vertical line
or two points with same x coordinate
Yes it's a function because x isn't repeating
HA?
It is a function tho :0
it isnt a valid function
so we could say it isnt a function since no function exists in order to satisfy that
Hold up, you're talking about the first one right?
so what im saying here is u see the stripped vertical line that passes through some points? those points have the same x coordinate
the not a function ones
I see it now
so using this graph
for example, we input x = 7
we get y = 5
but we also get y = -5
the ones i circled
whenever 2 points have the same x-coordinate, they create a verticle line, and with that, the function is invalid
Yess
ya
I understand all this I'm just sleepy at this point sorry 😭😭😭
maybe u can sleep and continue tomorrow
Ahh I car
Can't
Lmao
I have school tmr and it's only 4 pm
But I understand what you're saying dw
You're good at teaching
ahh another question, i hate this lmao,
Express the edge length of a cube as a function of the cube's diagonal length d.
Then express the surface area and volume of the cube as a function of the diagonal length.
Literally never took this stuff 😩
does anybody know how can i solve this?
actually, the expression is this
i can't even find a calculator that can solve this, even using differential equations aa
are you sure this can be solved?
C. i guess
2 triangles CAB and DAC are similar since ACB^ = CDA^ and they share CAB^.
-> AB/AC = AC/AD = 8 / 3 -> AB = 64 / 3 -> DB = 55/3. Correct me if i'm wrong
hmm this was given by my teacher, she could have made a mistake, i can't see how this can be solved either
I think it might be, even an online calculator like Wolfram Alpha cannot give a good answer to this, maybe she accidentally put 2x instead of 2 f.ex.
i always use this one to solve integrals
Solve definite and indefinite integrals (antiderivatives) using this free online calculator. Step-by-step solution and graphs included!
i found this but... i don't understand this at all lol, and it's supposed to be an exact differential equation, which it isn't, so i'll assume she typed something wrong. thanks anyways!
Help :(
Sorrry I went studying physics zay
Do similarly, you should know the relationships between the diagonal and the edge length, or the diagonal and the cube length
:D BLUEEEE
Oof physics
I don't know the relationships
ahh ok
Let the edge length be x, the problem requires us to express x as a function of d
So x=f(d) = Seth
Because this is a cube, it's helpful to remember that the value of the diagonal of one face is the same length for the other five faces. Additionally, the length of one edge will be the same length of all the cube's other edges.
thats what i got
Search relationship between diagonal and edge of cube
There’s actually a way using Pythagorean twice to find it but I’m kinda lazy
A diagonal of a cube is a segment joining two points that are not the endpoints of an edge. ... The final edge is perpendicular in particular to the longest diagonal of the previous cube, and these two segments form the two sides of a right triangle having the longest diagonal of the new cube as its hypotenuse.
okay so we have a hyp
which means imma repeat what we did last time right?
Have I figured out relationship yet
It should be expressed in variables
Draw it out and follow their directions
nah it's not showing up the edge of the cube
Draw it out zay draw the cube and diagonal out
Sqrt of 3* x?
Yes correct
Now u have it then make it a function with d as input and x as output
For question 2 do similarly it instead of the edge, it’s the entire volume, if u know how to calculate the volume of a cube then u are able to find the relationship between the edge and the cube and hence the diagonal and the cube as u previously found how the edge and the diagonal relates
ahhh okay
Hey could anyone please help with this
Put all of the information in a system of equations, then you will have three variables and three equations.
how i can do it??
is it wrong if i rearrange 3x+4 as 4/3 and insert that? i didnt get zero. so what should i do
Don’t take 4/3
You have to take -4/3
Because 3x+4 = 0
So x = -4/3
Take this x value and substitute it into f(x). You should get zero. And then when you do conclude the
“Therefore (3x+4) is a factor of f(x)
Hope that helps
Agreed
To get the other factor, there is a shortcut :
you know that f(x) = 6x² + 5x - 4 = (3x+4)(ax+b) = 3a x² + (3b + 4a) x + 4b
Therefore, that means that 3a = 6 (the coefficient of x²) and 4b = -4 (the coefficient of the independent term)
That gives you a = 2, b = -1 ➡️ the other factor is (ax+b) = (2x-1)
ty to both yall
Are you doing A2 maths @azure lion ?
Is anyone here familiar with markov chains/stochastic processes?
Do you know anything about a,b?
A sqrt 2 + b sqrt 3 = 0
ok
whats ur approach
i think ill do it this way
a sqrr 2 + b sqrt 3 = 0
=> a sqrt 2 = -b sqrt 3
=> -a sqrt 6/3 = b
=> a sqrt 2 + -a sqrt 6/3 = 0
=> -a sqrt 6 + 3 a sqrt 2)/3 = 0
=> - a sqrt 6 + 3a sqrt 2 = 0
=> a sqrt 6 = 3a sqrt 2
and 3 sqrt 2 is not equal to sqrt 6 => a = 0 => b = 0
To get the solution a = b = 0, we HAVE to assume a and b are integers
uhh yeah i figuered that out
You said it didn't have a domain tho
i mean why would the problem give us domain
yes it is
ok
@ember kernel sorry for the ping but in a non-linear slope (velocity/time graph) that represents motion, does the secant line of any particular point represent its instantaneous change in velocity?
i cant do calculus yet so may this work
Every parameter MUST have a domain. Most of the time we just assume it is the real set, but that's not always the case
but this time they said that prove a = b = 0 why would they give us the domain
of a and b
Because you have :
If a and b are real, this equation has infinite possibilities of solution: (0; 0), (sqrt{3}; -sqrt{2}), ...
Since the question tells us that the only solution is (0; 0), that means a and b are assumed to be whole numbers
can u help me out a bit
or is it the tangent line
IDK I DONT GET IT
Instantaneous => tangent
THANK YOU SIR
np
its calculus right
aw man
is there any other way to find instantaneous change
ig i can only work with linear slopes when solving instantaneous velocity
How are you asked to find the instantaneous acceleration (= difference of velocity) ?
Graphically or using derivatives (if you know what this is) ?
At your level, you must either use Calculus for a precise answer (for any x of the function and using the derivative of the function itself), or solve graphically to get only an approximation of the actual acceleration (for only one value of x and using the graph of the function)
Middle school
but i dont have calculus at my level yet
Then just use the graph
ok
Draw the tangent at the x-value you want, measure its slope, and that's the instantaneous acceleration (= difference of velocity)
np!
@cyan night bii was right yesterday, also we went way too deep into the questions (not bii) because it so easy😭😭
How
I was just explaining the concepts
And how is she right
Ye ye we actually didn't need to know much about the concepts
She made me feel so silly hahaa
Wait I'll voice recording cause it's too long
I will eat first
Ok
The thing about math is that it’s important to thoroughly get what’s behind the equations, the functions. Not only it makes you more versatile, you would be able to find mathematics interesting.
Yes yes , we're going deeper don't worry
Ahh I might not have time to explain
Sorry :(
I'll try
@cyan night
Oops
I just saw ur sleep message
Oops
Sorry
Idk I must've been high last night 😩
Not literally
I wasn't saying you're wrong blue!
ok
How is this wrong? I did (20-0)*28 +(40-20)(53) + (60-40) * 64 + (80-60) * 50 + (100-80)(44)
its a miles per hour not miles per second
ya gotta convert the mi/hr to mi/s
and also u should keep in mind the actuality, whether if its asctually ppossible to get 4780 miles in 100 seconds lol
Hey so I was able to get the first two solutions but can someone explain how to get the second two please?
anyone here familiar with latex?
What's the question ?
sorry, i solved it already!
Hi can someone help me solve Q3ai? Ping if you do and thanks in advance! :D
hello, if x maps to themselves that means f(x)=x so you have to solve the equation x=5x/(3-2x)
you can replace the x's with y's and make x the subject. So, you would have x = 5y/3-2y. then you'd multiply both sides (by 3-2y) to get x(3-2y) = 5y. Expand the brackets --> 3x-2xy = 5y. Add 2xy to both sides --> 3x = 5y + 2xy. Factor out y --> 3x = y(5+2x). Divide by 2x+5 (it looks better in the solution but 5+2x is the same) to get --> 3x/ 2x+5 = y. Then just replace y with f^-1. That's my way of doing it.
hey i solved it, I'll send you the work in dm
Thank you!!
Ooo aight thanks :D
it's really easy it just requires a lot of work
the idea is literally just using the theorem of integrating rational functions, u swapping and integration by parts
the last 2 you have to use it at least 13 times, its ridiculous
this integral is fucking dreadful
very boring
Hi can someone help me with this question? I have to solve it, and I’m not sure where I went wrong. Ping if you’re interested to help, and thanks in advance!!
tytytytytytyty
you can write e^(2x) as e^(x²), use t= e^x and you have a quadratic function, t²+4t-4=0, solve it and you will get the value of t, swap back to e^x and do ln to get the x value
Thanks so much!!
Exactly
@ember kernel the slope of tangent line in a non linear graph indicates whether the object's velocity increases or decreases right (acceleration)?
like compared to the previous line of tangent
when dealing with instantaneous
v
can someone explain how there is squared and cubed when inserting x=0
Just expand the brackets of f(x)
Can someone help i dont really understand what this question is asking me
the answer to the question is 0.68, 0.6823 but I dont understand the process to get it
Any maths nerds who can help me out pls
Pls
@pastel helm
@formal heart
Can someone help out with q4
@here
I think it would depend on the distance he needs to travel. If it usually took an hour, he would take double the time to arrive, which is two hours. Do you have the distance?
Yes i figured it out. I was lacking on it haha
Thnx though
I need help
with what
nevermind
lmao
They're probably using n = 3 to mean 3 different subintervals
So that'd be [10,20], [20,30], [30,40]
wait no that's exactly what you've done
how do you find the domain of this function using algebra?
you cant take the sqrt of a negative number
so x^2 -2x+5>= 0
so the minimum value of x would be when x^2-2x+5 = 0
and solve using quadratic formula or whatever method you prerfer
I see
Would you happen to know how this would apply to a trig function?
the denominator can't be 0, so we need to choose x such that 1 ≠ sin(x)
mm yes ok I see that
You also have to take into account that sin(x) is periodic, and will be equal to 1 many times as well
Just remember that the denominator of a fraction can’t b e 0 and u can’t take negative roots
So would I use logarithms here?
Trig function or quadratic
trig
I dunno hehe
:(
I see, I'm reviewing a lot of old material and it's hardly comming back
@ancient prawn u can use mathway
Free math problem solver answers your trigonometry homework questions with step-by-step explanations.
finds everything fro u
im trying to figure out how to calculate the domain of this trig function
I understand so far that sinx ≠ 1
so that you don't divide by 0
Maybe you can use general solution of sinx=siny?
Then x is not equal to nPi +(-1)^n Pi/2
sin(x) = 1 when x = pi/2
but sin(x) is 2pi periodic
so sin(pi/2 + 2pi) = 1 as well
same with + 4pi, +6pi ..., as well as -2pi, -4pi ...
this second line is 50% right in what x can't be equal to
I thought it'd be covered if n is an integer.Then what is the domain?
pi/2 + 2pi*n, where n is an integer
I should've been more clear sorry, yours is still correct but it could be simplified more
Ah right.this one is more clear too.I was just overdoing it
ty
How do I prove that 2^n + 2^n+2 is divisible by 5?
Double check that the math checks out
thank u
I dont understand this part of geometry can I get help on understanding.
idk
ah thank you
My book says the answer is e^x/(e^x+1) + C. Idk how they got to that answer, any help?
nope sorry
Yours is correct.maybe your book gave wrong answer
If anyone’s taking honors calc please help me with this nightmare of a question 😭
bro goodluck 🤣 im sorry i cant even read that correctly
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/854413728938590268/884920278713528360/Screen_Shot_2021-09-07_at_5.56.43_PM.png my teacher never told us this part can someone explain
This is using the program MATLAB. I have done no work this semester and have a project due in 3 days. so just trying to learn the basics now. Anyone know why I'm getting this error?
no 😔
can some one please help me integrate this. (need some knowledge and application of trig identities)
What exactly are you trying to do?
this is the first task, context is we are doing stuff to do with cryptopgraphy. I wasn't sure what to do about the uint8 stuff
Bisecting is cutting something until two equal parts, so UY=YV, then you can solve for x and find UV from UV=UY+YV
Are you writing a function?
yea cus i need to be able to copy and paste this function to use in future tasks
Let me dm you
for anyone that does financial math, how do you derive the maximum of a constant rebalanced strategy in a two asset model? In terms of the number of periods n?
can someone help me with this question. My answer doesnt seem to be any of the options. (disregard option 1 being chosen)
i got (-5/x+5) +1
can anyone help me with this?
i have gotten the answer it is option a tyty
Is it Option B 0.10; 0.09 rounded off to 0.10
Hello, this isn't really school related but I need expertise of someone studying curves and such in math or cs
I'm looking for an algorithm/formula, similar to bezier curves, that would allow me to interpolate not only the 3D position, but also direction
From what I found so far I want to get a manifold, where for any point on the curve, I'll be able to get that point's basis vectors (2 are technically enough, the 3rd can be derived as it's tangent to the first 2, and it's direction is not important in my case)
Standard bezier only gives me a single basis vector (from the derivative)
I've tried to find or derive something of my own, with no greater success, if you have any clue that may help me lmk 🙂
hello! can someone show me how to do this problem?
can someone help me with this? please :(
i could be dumb but isnt the rate of drainage 100 gallons/minute
sorry mate this question confused the everloving hell out of me
only if speed is constant, if is full weight over the bottom is higher son it pushes with more force the water and rate of drainage is higher
just do the derivate of the volume ecuation and then evalute it on the times indicated 5 and 20
derivative of 3000 *( 1- t/30)^2, do first the square parentesis (a+b)^2 and then do the derivative d/dt
you need to increment the mean by 2, you have 5 days, if you just put 52, the mean will stil same, if you want it to be 1 point higher you need to increment by one, for each day !! if you want it to go from 52 to 54, same as incrementing the mean by 2, you need to add 2 for each day, so 5 days*2, thats 10, now the actual mean is 52, at the 5th day first you need to keep it same so you need 52 and the add 10 to that to increment it from 52 to 62,
Total of customers (cst) after the 4th day = 52 cst/day * 4 days = 208 cst
A goal average of 54 cst over 5 days requires a total of 54cst/day * 5 days = 270 cst
The difference of total cst between the end of the 5th day and the 4th day is 270 - 208 = 62. Therefore, there must be 62 customers on the 5th day to get an average of 54cst/day
ooo thank you!!
guys can someone explain this solution to me
its basically finding the area of a triangle using determinant
but i cant understand the second step
like how did it become 0 0 2
can someone tell me how did we do the binomial approximation over here
If you add one row to another row in a matrix, the determinant of that matrix wont change. Here the first row was added to the last
ohhhh
got it thanks!
hai anyone know how to do these two questions 💔
for "5",
find the distance bet'n P and R or P and Q..
and as it is a rhombus, the distance from P to Q and R to S OR P to R and Q to S would be equal, use the distance formula for S
hey, can someone explain me how do i solve the 40th question, ik the formula of angle bw two lines, but I am not able to solve it correctly after many attempts
Did you get the point of intersection (0,0) and (1,1)? Then you just get the tangents and angle done
3pi/4
nvm, realized that wasn't the question deleted a post explaining something else
find the area of a kite shaped piece of land having unequal adjacent sides of length 120 m and 160 m and the bisector diagonal 200 m
every side of kite is adjacent :/
to each other
ik upto that then dont know 🥲
im sending wait..
actually you dont, just wait bro..
in triangleABD
(AB)² + (AD)² = (BD)²
ie. 120² + 160² = 200²
=> TriangleABD is right angled at A
=> Similarly, Triangle BCD is right angled at C
find area of ABD or BCD using formula
1/2 * base * height
multiply the area by two
converse of pythagoras theorem
we have to find it bro, that is the whole point 😑
but how is it a right angled ?
do you know pythagoras theorem?
upto my grade
its just a basic one bro
how 😭
ur in which grade?
10th
which country??
Nepal
ohk
how is that right angle ?
CONVERSE OF PYHTAGORAS THEOREM!
explain 😑
wait im sending a pic from my book..
jesus christ no wait i understand since base and perpendicular add upto the hypotenuse it is a right angle
i ignored that i was just looking at the figure
right or wrong @left knoll
?
its correct
that is what is written here..
its not needed..
area of kite is 1/2 d1 x d2 ?
its not necesary to use that
you have 2 rt angled triangles
yes!
yay so easy who is this idiot that doesnt know how to solve this
understood na?
yes
<@&717391911132069929>
woah you guys quick thx
change pas
probs hacked
change pas
Hey is someone familiar with statistic tests like anova and ttest?
i can help you if you want 
I made a complete file explain how to do t-test and anova because I took statistics last year
i currently have a d in calculus how do i study in general for math
create a cheat sheet -- basically a single sheet of all the formulas that you've learnt
one thing that i noticed with math is that when solving people dont write down their given information & end up going back and forth between the question and their solving & get distracted
if you'e doing calc I i can tutor you in it -- i did pretty well when i was in year 11
ok thanks if im ever stuck on a topic ill make sure to reach out
feel free to dm me or tag me -- i probably wont see it otherwise
okok appreciate the help
@ember kernel Can anyone please give me an idea of what to do?
I'll be honest with you ; I'm not in a state where I can answer you right now. I'll give it a try when I wake up. Thanks for the ping and the trust tho
@ember kernel No problem, when ever you get a chance to answer just ping back at me please so i know to check, Thank you!
this is where im getting stuck
@small canyon Brother take two cases. Use (0,0) in one case and take out the angle and then (1, 1) In another case.
@small canyon Or just simply make the graph of the two over each other and you will see for yourself
aight got it now, thanks alot 🙂
So how do you solve
u know how to calc area of trapezium?
yup
Thank you
total of 2 bases * height * 1/2
total of bases = xm + (x+10)m
= (2x+10)m
(2x+10)m * 2xm*1/2 =50
2 and 1/2 cancel out
(2x+10)m * xm = 50
i think
the m stands for meters and isnt another variable
but thank you so far im following
ahaha okay
(2x+10 * 2x)/2 = 50 ye?
so (2x+10)*2x = 100
distribute
4x^2 + 20x = 100
4x^2 + 20x - 100 = 0
4 (x^2 + 5x - 25) = 0
x^2 + 5x - 25 = 0
heres how ill do it wait
brb
okay np thank you
u can use the quadratic formula or this way
so x^2 + 5x - 25 = x^2+5x+25/4 - 125/4 = 0
sorry 5/2^2 = 25/4
so
(x+5/2)^2 = 125/4
x+5/2 = sqrt.125/2
sqrt. 125 is sqrt.5*5
-5/2 from each side
hm wait
ill send u a picture wait
okay thanks
try using quadratic formula
for this
okay sure
hm?
its because x = 5(sqrt. 5 - 1)/2
ye
and cause the height is 2x
we times by two and get rid of it
thank you so much
it was just trying to re-arrange the equation to the normal ax^2+bx+c
yea thats what i was having trouble with
i find it hard having a /2 with a variable and my brain just freezes so i have no clue what to do
the /2 cancels with the 2x
always try to simplify
Hello guys
okay so here
in a function
theres an input and an output
for example y = 3x
input x, get a y
and for everyone x u input, u can only get 1 y
1 result of y
u cannot get 2 results of y because it makes no sense
here u see that there is the input -6
but it outputs 2 results, which is impossible
therefore it isnt a function
sin^2+cos^2 = 1
sin^2 pi/4 + cos^2 pi/4 = (sin^2+cos^2)* pi/4
very easy
This is false
yes
Ok
Sin^2(x) + Cos^2 (x) = 1 , x can be an angle.
yeahhh
but you cannot write it as (Sin^2+Cos^2)*x
tru
If thats the case , the result would be ! * pi/4 = pi/4
ye that isnt right
so, that's not how it's done.
as long as both angles in sine and cosine function is the same , answer remains 1
but i thought it only works in right triangles
and its the law of cosines for nonr ight
😅 I suggest you go through the concept once again. It's better if you clear it up and go forward or it might end up causing some problems later
i need help
sin^2+cos^2 = 1 works for every triangle?
it's about angles and not triangles
Ok
It's gonna sound even more confusing if I type it out here. please try to watch a couple of videos online . I'm sure there will be many videos available in your native language
Ok
for every angle x, Sin^2(x) + Cos^2 (x) = 1
you can prove it through the right triangl
triangle
yes
using Pythagoras theorem
it works for all angle it's not about triangle
ok
but how old are you?
alright
feel free to ask anything needed
just dm through discord
do u take ib
Guys so who do i follow lol
what do you mean?
Is this still false ?
it's true
but with an ngle lol
true with an angle
(u cant square 2 functions and add them)
has the trig question been solved? if not i can help
It's TOTALLY false
Nope
The real identity is cos²(x) + sin²(x) = 1
It's important to have an angle associated with trigonometric functions, because otherwise you could end up with non-sense such as cos²(pi) + sin²(pi/2) = 1, which is utterly wrong
yeah I didn't notice that
Find all the points belonging to the line that contains the points (0.2) and (-1.0) and whose distance to the point (1.2) is equal to the square root of 5.
I determined the reduced equation of the line => y=2x+2 . How can I find the distance to the point (1,2) = sqrt5 ? help
Use the equation of a circle of radius sqrt(5) and of center (1,2)
If I'm correct, it's just (x-1)²+(y-2)²=(sqrt(5))²
Then, you have a system of two equations :
y = 2x + 2
(x-1)²+(y-2)²=5
Due to the square, it's likely that you get 2 solutions
thank you friend !!
Ok so you know that vector addition works such that ab + bc = ac
Therefore, you can simplify P1P2 + P2P3 + ... + P{k-1}Pk into P1Pk
Therefore, you have vector P1Pk = -Pk, which is Pk - P1 = -Pk, which finally gives you 2 Pk - P1 = 0 and Pk = (P1)/2
pls help me
what's the question? graph the function or just solve
bc if it's just solving then the solution set is -3<x<-2/3
Sorry for replying late , I dont understand how you get "-Pk"
you have too see when [3x + 2 > 0 and x + 3 < 0] or [3x + 2 > 0 and x + 3 < 0]
try to think about what median and mean mean. Try to think about what would happen to the mean and median of the data set if you added to it just one more company, that happened to have a growth of 100,000%
|| The answer is that most companies have negative growth, but there are a few rockets that absolutely explode in value, which hardly affects the median, but even just one such company can pull up the mean significantly ||
Hi can someone help me with Q5a? For some reason I got y=-2x-1 as my ans. The textbook ans is y=-2x :/
2x+y-5=0
Thanks I already solved it :)
How do we do this question?
Equation manipulation. Anything that happens to the x-variable will shift the graph over by b units. Shifts to the right if -b and left for positive. A coefficient next to the function means the magnitude the graph grows or shrinks by. The y outpust grows if a>1 and shrinks if y<1. Anything that happens outside the function is how much the graph shifts vertically. Up c units if c is positive and down if c is negative. All you have to do is compare this graph with the parent function which in this case is just tan(x). I hope this helps and this might not be exactly right since I havent dealt with this stuff since algebra 2. Correct me if I'm wrong on anything
I just use ab = b - a with a and b vectors of length n
Pk is just an undefined vector, the value of which we're trying to find
Therefore, OPk = Pk - O = Pk (because O is just the vector [0,0,...0] )
And PkO = O - Pk = -Pk (the opposite of the coordinates of point Pk)
is outer radius + inner radius = total radius?
I have no context, but I'd say outer radius = total radius when if you're talking about hollow cylinders
Hello ! I would like to know how to be sure of the coherence of this :
(1) : ln(Y) = f(x) + e
(2) : Y = f(x) exp(e)
I am reading a paper on econometrics but I find it strange, because if (2) is true, then :
ln(Y) = ln( f(x) exp(e) )
<=> ln(Y) = ln(f(x)) + e (2.1)
The only way to resolve this would then be to confront (2.1) and (1) :
ln(f(x)) + e = f(x) + e
<=> ln(f(x)) = f(x)
Which is... impossible ?
Y = exp(f(x) + e)
You take the exp of both sides of the equation, so the entire right side will be in the exponent (sorry if my English is unclear, not sure how to translate this)
Oh ok I will try this thank you !
someone can help me with this task😅
seee first look at the last term and the first term
and all the terms are perfect squares right
so you discard n^3 and now look at the last term and think of the last term and the number on the top of the sigma sign
i think this would be enough hintt now u should be able to figure it out :<
hiii um i feel kinda embarrassed to ask but do u know what the answer is for this? im not good with math :((
Functions are input- and output-based
I'm sure one of the first things you've learnt about functions is that you CAN'T have two different outputs for a single input
That's exactly what (b) does ; assigning a single input (4) to several outputs (0,1,2 and 3)
That means it isn't a function
(a) and (c), however, follow that "single output per input" rule. Therefore, they are indeed functions
@left knoll Does it help ?
YES thank u so much
You're welcome !
So stumped idk where to start after setting up A=1/2 bh (in this triangle A=1/2s^2)
imagine its a sqaure, s·s = A --> s·x·s·x = A*(1-0.64), x is the (1-percentatge), you can translate it to your triangle easly modifying this
there are 2 x becuase you decrease both sides
Sorry, what is “x” again?
if is 30% x is 1-0.3
in a square case of 10 value side A=100. if you decrease it 64% A=36, so sqrt(36) is 6, 6 is the value of the side, now they have been decresed 40%, 10*(1-0.4)=6
But book says x = .80 meaning there is a 20% decrease in “s”, what don’t understand is the process of how they got that… 😦
sorry, i wrong understand, it says that the new area is 64% of the original, not the original decreased by 64%
A=s·s, if you want Area to be less then A·0.64 = 0.64·s·s, but you need to decrease both sides equally
So the new triangle is smaller than the original triangle, 36% smaller
yes
imagine its a sqaure, s·s = A --> s·x·s·x = A*(1-0.36), x is the (1-percentatge), you can translate it to your triangle easly modifying this
t
Thanks so much!
thanks a lot i solved it
is geometric series just a way to summationally express an exponential function
No, they have an exponent in common but are different in many ways
i find similarity since the problems i encountered seem real familiar
An exponential function is continuous and works with real numbers, while a series is discrete as it only works with integers as indexes
wa
The index is i
r = 1.05, but is not the index
hmm yeah
You don't believe me
The index is "i", and is just a temporary variable that is assigned integer values one after the other
so you're saying we cant have fractional exponents right
1.05 is 1 + the rate of the growth
in geometric series
ye
Well you could, but not using the index only
Example :
im not really used to sigma notations
The index itself is an integer, so if you want a fractional exponent, you need to make it a fraction yourself
😕
Basically, it's just a simplified notation of :
why could it only be an integer
could the index be a non integer but still remain ratio
No
Imagine the sequence :
with u0 = 0 and u1 = 1
ok
You'd get :
ooof
Ok, do you agree with that ? (n is the index here btw)
😕
i guess im going to try fractional indexes in the calculator and try to identify if there is common ratio
thanks btw
Just remember : exponents in exponential sequences/series CAN be fractional, but indexes CAN'T
And the rate 1.05 is totally different from the index
wait arent exponents and indexes same thing
No
oh
?
index means power right
Exponent = power
Index is just the name of the temporary variable
ok thanks
Have a good look at this
"i" is the index here. In the first term, we give the value i = 0, then in the second term we make it i = 1, then i = 2 in the third term, ..., until i = n in the last term
is it n or n-1
n, you can see that in the last term
That's what a generic series is : a sum of terms which only differ by the value of the index
okkk i get it now thanks
np
How would you calculate the side of the square if you know that the radius of the circle is 2?
Is that the only info the question gives?
"A square is inscribed in a semicircle with a radius of 2 cm. Calculate the area of the square in centimetres"
it will be (side of square )^2 =2/root 5, i am not that sure but ...
And also, the answer should be 3.2cm^2 (probably rounded), I just have no idea how to get there
Can someone please explain to me how
Equals
It literally just looks like the 1/2 disappears
I feel so stupid lol
ill send it in a sec
Alright.
I know that if you expand it, it's gives you the same thing. My question is,
If you start with the first one, how do you get it to the second one?
I tried factoring but I couldn't get it.
I hope you can read my handwriting
basically you expand it and make a single fraction out of it
then you can rewrite the numerator using (a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab +b^2
Rewrite the denominator from 16x^6 into (4x^3)^2
Okay one sec
What is that factoring method called again? I completely forgot it.
The one where you get 16x^12 + 8x^6 + 1 into (4x^6+1)^2
No idea how it's called, probably something like factoring it into a square or something like that
Alright, thank you!
It would have made the integral literally impossible without doing that
I can't do integrals, I don't even know what they are xdddd
Well you'll be in good shape then haha it's been forever since I've done algebra
Been in algebra*
Linear Algebra?
No I mean is that the class
ouh yes its linear algebra
Solve this using the (a+b)²=a²+b²+2ab
Oh, I've never seen that before. Thank you for this.
Oh okay, np :)
Yea.. it was a lot easier than I thought
621.19m/s
I mistook your S's for 5's and almost had a heart attack
Hi can someone help me with Q6a? The ans is (0,-7) but I’ve been getting (0,8) instead
This is my working btw
i guess you've gotta use point A for the perpendicular, not the midpoint, as it says "the perpendicular ..... at the point A", your working for gradient is fine, just that the point you substituted to form the equation is incorrect
I guess you're using midpoint cuz you learnt about the perpendicular bisector? But in this case the perpendicular line isn't a perpendicular bisector, so the midpoint is not a point of the line, instead it passes through point A
Ah alright I got it thank you so so much!!
Eyo me again QwQ
I need help with Q3a, been asking everywhere but I can’t understand the explanations-
Behold my confusion scribbles, also just ignore the sketch it’s completely wrong
It's right angle at Q so you would get something like this, R could be any point on the line x = 7 as we dont know k yet, but since Q is a right angle, you can try to find equation PQ and equation QR and equate them, they would be perpendicular, so you got the gradient of QR there, just gotta solve for k
just to confirm is k = -9?
So I got y=2x+2 and y=-1/2x-5 1/2
Erm
How do I sub in the values?
R is (7, k)
And k is y
ok so for equation QR you have to form an equation using point R so you get the k in your equation, and from my diagram you can see Q is an intersection point right?
I think there are other ways to do but i'll try to explain my method
yea yea try it, and by equate, sorry i didn't make it clear, I mean equation both y equations, and substitute the x-coordinate of R in
oh
Idk what I’m doing-
ok let's understand what's happening here first, so
the trick here is to try to find something common between these lines, we gotta need line PQ to find QR as we have all the info for PQ right?
first we form line PQ
and then we form line QR by using the coordinates of R
and are you able to obtain the gradient?
Yeah
ok then i'll skip the part of finding gradients
so now we have two equations, PQ: y = 2x + 2, and QR: y = -1/2 + 7/2 + k
i used gradient -1/2 and R(7, k) to form eqn QR
and now what's common between two lines? can you see it?
Erm
do they intersect somewhere
2x+2=-1/2x +7/2 +k ?
Erm maybe?
yes and do you know what it means when we write this?
it means that they have a same y value
Yeah
yes so at which point do they have the same y value? it is Q right?
as that's the intersection point
Ah yeah
in other words, both lines contain the point Q
yea yea
so we take the x coordinate of Q
and sub into here
no problemmm
OH MY GOSH I WAS STUCK HERE FOR HOURS-
and u got it now yayyyy