#math-help
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
One of them but idk which one
@trail swift
sorry my answer is wrong 1^infinity is indeterminant form
ans should be e^-30
Thnk youu so much
we need to use the fact that we're working on a LINEAR differential equation, which means that if you look at its homogeneous equation, then if y1 and y2 are solution then Ay1+By2 is also a solution (with A and B constant numbers). Hence here the right solution is the last one
Hmm I understand that. But does the exponential e^t being different to y2(t) which is e^-t make a difference?
Oh you're right, didn't see it ! So yes you picked the right one, since it is in the form Ay1 with y1=a solution
hey guys im a lil confused by the markscheme here
why is the least possible value of n 4 and not 2
the function is increasing so for any number <4 f'(x) is below or zero
can someone solve the logarithmic equation 8log₂(0.6(x-3))-7
and post the solution please
its the only question i cant solve idk why
what do i do for #29
bc after combining its sin(r^2) which idk how to integrate ngl 😭
if it was (sin(r))^2 itd be nice bc identity
james stewart book is alwas good
thanks bro :)
does anyone here know about Shortest Job Next (SJN) or Shortest Job First (SJR) for Preemptive method?
it's a lecture for Operating Systems, i'm confused on how it flows to the gantt chart
If anyone knows, I would gladly appreciate it 😭
is it =7 ?
answer says 8.06
no i meant the = sign of the equation. There is no = in your equation
8log₂(0.6(x-3))=7
log₂(0.6(x-3))=7/8
0.6(x-3)=2^(7/8)
x-3=[2^(7/8)]/0.6
x=3+[2^(7/8)]/0.6 ~ 6.06
I don't know if it is the right equation, but what you need to know is :
log₂(X)=b if and only if X=2^b
and it is still true if you replace 2 by every real positive number a>0
Super simple, but my answer is not the same as the textbooks answer - 6pi cm^2. is the textbook wrong? I keep getting half pi cm^2
area of a circle : pi×r²
40' =60' ×(2/3) which means the area is 2/3 of a full circle
Thus, area= pi×(3)² × (2/ 3) = 6.28
Oh i was working with the hour hand 😪
Does the equation between de brackets reminds you of something?
nvm i got it now
No thanks I now was able didn't know what answer to get to
👍
Can somebody help with Normality Testing in statistics?
you can "notice" that each term is actually equal to 1/3[1/(3i-1) - 1/(3i+2)] =1/3[1/(3i-1) - 1/(3(i+1)-1)]. Thus you can factorize by 1/3 and then in the sum everything cancels out except the first and last term : S=1/3 sum with sum=1/(3-1) - 1/(3(n+1)-1) = 1/2 - 1/(3n+2) = (3n+2-2)/6n+4 =3n/(6n+4)
the "we notice that" part is called partial fractions
also if you want me to write it on paper so it's clearer i can
yes please!
there you go
if you want an other problem that uses the exact same techniques, you can try to prove this equality
Have a good day !
Ohh i just thought maybe they wanted you to do it by induction since they give you the result, tell me if that's what you're actually studying
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
=tex 5x-8>2
Wtf
Pleas help I’ve been stuck on this calc 2 question for an hour now
I just don’t understand how u can do this without the height of the cylinder
Question : “ A water storage tank has the shape of a cylinder with diameter 22ft. It is mounted so that the circular cross sections are vertical. If the depth of the water is 13ft, what percentage of the total capacity is being used (round to tenths place)
existence of this limit, please
how can i level up my mathematic solving skills?
If a 6 inch cube is filled to 3 inches then it is half full
in the question you posted you dont need the length of the cylinder at all
"It is mounted so that the circular cross sections are vertical" so the cylinder is not upright - che circles are at the ends - its like a tunnel
it has a diameter of 22 feet
if the water is filled up to 11 feet, the tank would be exactly half full
in the cube example, the relationship between the depth and the percentage is linear
but the cylinder acts differently
to get the first foot of water depth takes way way less water than getting the 11th foot because the tube is way thicker in the middle
you now need to figure out how much (percentage) of the total area of a circle with d=22ft is below 13ft
and divide that by the area of a semicircle
we only need to calculate for a semicircle because the water in the tank is perfectly symmetrical
you cant fill the left and right sides to different percentages
i don't think the limit exist.
Let's say x=1, then y->1- and then y->1+ makes the limit equal to +infinity and -infinity
but i might be wrong i haven't studied that yet
A chopper 1200m above Yemen boundary towards Red Sea, observes two ships,
one is Cargo ship and the other one is Naval ship at angles of depression of 30° and
60° respectively.Based on the above given information, answer the following questions (assuming
line joining the ships leads to the point below the chopper):
i. Find how far is Naval ship from Yemen boundary.
ii. An anti-aircraft gun fixed on naval ship is aiming to hit the chopper. Find how far the
target is, from the gun.
iii. Find the distance between the ships.
hey guys, did i get it correct? i think the last trace is a little weird
can someone please tell the answer?
In the first part, value for x and y should be +- underroot 2 and +- underroot 3 as by your values it would give 2 on LHS and 1 <as given> on RHS
i) 2078.46m
ii) 2400m
iii) 1455.64m
Thankss
guys if anyone is able to solve this
ill admit they r a math god
jus for ref this is a siingapore elementary grade question 💀💀
Ur solution
bro whats ur final answer i cant see
53/3
or 17.6 (approx)
Z=4 two whistles
dm for explanation tho i aint givin here
it's 30
no
wtf
fine i'll try once more
bet
ok
oh sorry i dont get what you mean
umm.. actually i too thought the same but it isn't it
there something more
Actually i too don't actually know much about that thing but I have just checked the first part and it seems that by subsituting ur values it's giving 2 on LHS and 1 on RHS
MAAN i even substituted my values
how am i wrong ?/ prove it if i am
the thing is that on the third line there are 2 times 2 whistles, whereas on the 4th line it is only 1 whistle
Actually this question was given by @ebon thorn so I don't really wanna ruin his riddle... U can refer him for solution
This is easy af, lemme check first 💀
Here's the answer: 30 🫡
YEAH idk what is fuss abt
elucidate yourself
Hello
Is there a quick way to solve this equation?
162.75÷ x =93
162.75/x=93 iff 162.75=93x iff x=162.75/93
(multiply by x on both side and then divide by 93 on both side)
@drowsy birch haha bro if it was that ez i wudnt give it and the answer is 16 dm for explanation lmao
Not really a shorter way but it will always work with this method :
- Use the euclidian division (x/y =(ay+r)/y = a+r/y with r<y
- write r and y as products of prime numbers so you can simplify the expression
my first doubt -= Why Circle Is CONSIDERED OF 360 degree ?????
why not it is a simple number thats why
FRЕЕ GIFТ DISСОRD NIТRO - discord.com/freenitro
GET FREE FORZA HORIZON 5 - discord.com/freenitro
<@&942391219206647828>
Because a year is of 365 days but yet 360 because it is closed to 365 and is divisible by 24 numbers
It made the calculations and division of circle much easier
hmm oh i think ure talking abt a diff chapter ? i may be wrong but im doing sketching
One message removed from a suspended account.
What’s the solution ?
Thank you
just letting u know, that's waste of page space, try splitting it into 2 halves
FRЕЕ GIFТ DISСОRD NIТRO - discord.com/freenitro
FRЕЕ GIFТ DISСОRD NIТRO - discord.com/freenitro
🫡
wrong lmao dm for exmplanation
16
Post it here
Let p = pink shoe, h = human, and w = whistle.
3p = 30 --> p = 10
10 + 2(h+w) = 20 ---> (h+w) = 5 (notice the whistle on the dudes jacket)
5 + 2w + 2w = 13 ----> w = 2
10 + 3*2 = 16 (Notice the final guy has no whistle on his jacket, so h = 5-w = 3)
lmao it all about visual observation ykwim
… 🤷♂️
ohhh the whistle on the jacket ok haha
real
Where do I find these questions
the voices will whisper them
y?
know how to solve it
its a geometric progression with the ration
e^(1/n^2)
if u use the usm formula for that
its useless
What
why ?
.
I’m asking where do you find questions like this
@lethal slate
where u from
they are in my language
they are to apply to college
'u get a test with question simillar
Saudi Arabia
ok i got it but i use the taylor expansion of exp and 1/(1+x)
idk what any of that means
well i can write it if you want but if you don't know what taylor expansions are it won't make sense (basically it's a way of writing some functions as a polynimial + something that is to a certain extent negligible)
@candid rivet write pls
i kinda understood
u aplied the sum formula
then
idk
ill look l8ter thx anyway
question tho
if the ratio
is under 1
then the sum formula switches to what you wrote
like 1- the thing instead of the thing -1
?
if you're talking about the geometric sum (sum of a^k for k=0 to n-1) then the formula is (1-a^n)/(1-a) = (a^n-1)/(a-1) no matter the value of the ratio (sorry if i did not understand what you said)
bruh u annoying af
how tf u know all of them
albert einstein im malding what grade u in or wtf
sorry i'm too late but i have the solution for your last post
😭
actually the method is the same
this one is right question
use partial fractions and then try to make the maximum of terms cancel out each other
well tell me if you want me to do it or if the method is enough
its the same
bro from now give the values 0 , -1 , 1 , 2
to figure out a b c d
than write it so it simplifies in the sum
haha thx ! I don't know what "grades" are (like to what level it matches) (I'm french) but I finished high school 2 years ago
wow u finished hs 2 years ago and ur still below 17yo T-T
that makes sense
what u below 17
ikr
wait no i'm 19 😂
aha ok
😭 ohhhhhh
better
why would i be below 17 ? haha
ur profile
oh because of the green ?
where is it to change ?
ohhhhhhhhh
if i didnt mess smth up
in roles
hmmmmm
ok now
@candid rivet
question
on this exercise if im wrong i think
if you split it out like this
and make it a sum of this
the first () will cancel out
but the second one wont unless i got c d wrong
and one should be positive
ye
c = +1/2
fuck
😭
this
from this
so now
the first sum in the paranthesis will be 1/1-1/2+1/2-1/3 ....
so it cancels out
the same in the second one
so it will remain 1/1 -1/10
if you said ti goes to then
same on the second one
same logic i mean
@torn trellis
well i get this
yeah same as me
@candid rivet can u help with a exercise
whats b
so that the function is surjective
thankyou so much guys for ur help!
thats weird i dont see anything to change my age in roles
sorry two seconds i'll give a look right after
no worries
lol thats fine XD
yaaaa thats right
yeah
wait why u picked green color
yes harder if c=-1/2 haha
u should pick blue right?
oh shit i'm so bad 😂😂
One message removed from a suspended account.
🤣 happens when ur only good at maths
how tf do u find the range
i tried the first derivative
and it isnt close to any answers
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
equal the first derivative or the f(x)
One message removed from a suspended account.
you're welcome don't hesitate if you need help 🙂
thankyouuu!!
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
@rugged crown do u have the solution of that question in one slide ???
nvm thats fine
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
what grade u in ?
😭 it was taught in 11th grade right?
like why is it surjective if '
it has solutions
that's what i'm trying to figure out 😂
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
surjective
if for every y there is a x
so if it has solutions
that means there exists a x
for every y ?
yeah you're right
so you're looking for the y such as the equation f=y has solutions alright my bad
still
either im messing up the numbers
cause im working in paint
or im f ing smth up
wait i redo 1 more time
if not i request help
@candid rivet btw f me ur too msart
actually im jealous
ok i'll give it a try
@vagrant gale u 2
no i swear i'm really not smart
@candid rivet how much maths u studied?
both of you f u
how many hrs?
ur
actually i'm kind of failling my tests right now 😂😭
One message removed from a suspended account.
what books u followed? @candid rivet in hs
One message removed from a suspended account.
i get D=-3y²+15y+1
oh might be wrong then ouch
:>
@rugged crown what grade r u in?
ohh
i was in a good high school so didn't really need to learn more out of schools
oh yeah 18y i have the same
ohhhhhhhh
guess it is the same for everyone 😭
but actually there are some decent videos on youtube
or some good websites
but i think what worked for me was to spend a lot of time practicing calculation, and then learning new stuff with because once you know how to calculate good I swear a lot of things become easier
wooooooooooohhh i swear i will study as much as i can to be good at maths
thnxxx
and then try to understand and learn the methods and why it works, more than learning things by heart (even if you need to know some formulas haha)
good luck then ! (:
ohh
I found this online... actually i've done it but the method was pretty informal so i was looking for some better way to solve this problem
You didn’t write steps.
guys how do I factorise 4xsquared - 4x + 17 using the complete the square method?
We need to identify a complete square in this expression. (a^2 - 2ab + b^2)
Let’s start with a^2 it’s 4x^2 (because they have the same degree: 2)
So a is sqrt(4x^2) = 2x
Let’s look at the next term: -2ab, we know a, so b is equal to 1.
We know a and b, so let’s identify the complete square:
4x^2 - 4x + 17 = [(2x)^2 - 2 * (2x) *(1) + 1] + 16 = (2x - 1)^2 + 16
thank you
if you really want to be formal you have to check if x is such that the function is well-defined (square root of only positive numbers)
@candid rivet
can you calculate the limit of nIn
in this exercse please
i cant seem to do it
I have this
I do an integration by part and the last integral converges to 0
tell me if I'm wrong
but i know a lot of times when you have a sequence of integrals one of the trick is to do and integration by part, trying to create a relation between I_n and I_(n+1) for instance
and also find inequalities to calculate limits often
umm
usually when we do these ones
we do something related to I n+1 +I n
and we see that its a decreasing fucntion
or however you call it so we say
then that I n+1 + In < 2In
and we find out what In+1 + In equals
then amp
liek this would be the tehnique
but u cant do that since u have that annoy thing under the fraction forgot the name
yes this one is right
so u are in 0 x infinity
and u cant to shhh abt it
i don't understand what •|• n/2 means
lol
miss click
just multiply by n/2
then u apply a limit both sides
so that the yare equal to the same thing
so if its greater and less than smth its that smth
- Express a with b and c
- Write 2 expressions that only involves b and c
- Combinate these two expressions such that either b or c disappear
damn that's smart
thank you very much man that helped a lot
was stuck on this annoying question
u can do cramer
and
write it as a matrix
less calculations
yes but with cramer you still have to calculate 3 determinants of 3x3 matrixes. Wouldn't use cramer even if it works
@candid rivet
yo
i did the exercise
same answer as you
gj
this is the fancy way lets say
The doubt is I don't think going from dy/dx to dx/dy is valid cause dy/dx is not a fraction.....so the above soln is correct or not?
Below*
okkk really nice to calculate I_(n+2) + 4I_(n+1) + 6I_n
nice trick ! (:
from what I've seen on internet yes that works
https://youtu.be/62EcIqPMW4s?si=E_VFkzMrWo-WaM6U
A very interesting calculus 1 derivative notation problem: is dy/dx the same as 1/(dx/dy)?
👉 Subscribe: http://bit.ly/bprpfast
👉 Support https://www.patreon.com/blackpenredpen
🛍 I use these markers https://amzn.to/3skwj1E
🛍 Shop math t-shirt & hoodies: http://bit.ly/bprpmerch
math, but FAST!
Oh okayy
Got it
Thnxx
u really have to explain ur solve
i cant get it no matter what fr fr
where did -1 go
?
why not -10/11
it is -1 times 0
the last big integrals equals 0 when n-> +infinity since I_n -> 0
and integration by parts is actually just :
[fg]' = f'g + fg'
f'g = [fg]' - fg'
and then integrate the last line (knowing that integral of [fg]' is just fg)
can someone help me with statistics? It's about discrete distributions (probability)
I probably can but my english is not quite good enough to understand the conditions
I'd start by completing the square
In elementary algebra, completing the square is a technique for converting a quadratic polynomial of the form
to the form
for some values of h and k.
In other words, completing the square places a perfect square trinomial inside of a quadratic expression.
Completing the square is used in
solving quadratic equations,
deriving the quadratic for...
Maybe, just ask and if I can I will help you
During a long holiday weekend, an average of 2 fatal traffic accidents per hour is recorded (assume that these traffic accidents occur independently of each other).
a) Calculate the probability that an hour can pass without fatal traffic accidents.
b) Calculate the probability that 15 minutes can pass without fatal traffic accidents.
We need to use Poisson, the answers i got are
a) 13,53% chance that an hour can pass without a fatal traffic accident.
b) 60,65% chance that 15 minutes can pass withotu a fatal traffic accident.
Bruuhhh no latex
b) is harder: 2 accidents per hour = 1 per 30 minutes = 0.5 per 15 minutes, so µ=0.5, x=0, then we get e^(-0.5) = 0.6065
Hope that helps 🙂
how would u find X?
I know all the angles
32, 90 and 58
but I only have one of the variables for pythagorus which is the hypotenuse. Can someone pls help me out? thx!
You can use the sine rule
Law of sines
The math bot is useless
Could you explain the sine rule? we haven't done trig in a while
In your case, you know gamma = 90° and c = 15cm and can use that to calculate the length of a and b since you know the angles alpha and beta
Basically sin(x) divided by the side opposite it has the same value as any other angle (like sin(y) or smth) over their own opposite sides
Kinda hard to put into words, this might explain it better
And the equation above my messages
we havent gotten to that part in class yet so that prob explains why idk, thanks a bunch!
I got another question thats got me confused a little:
I'm guessing c is 11 because thats where P is ?
The question is: Why is P at (0, 11)?
You know P is at (0, c), but how do you conclude that c must be 11?
I conclude its 11 because of the diagram
but is that the only way? is there no way via calculation?
So you've read the value/measured the distance?
I think its 11 as this is what I see, but I may be wrong, I frequently am so I'd like to see what u think
Ah, but you can't be sure, it could be 11.1 or 10.9 or anything in between
Your right, how would you get 11 then?
There is! We know that the Point is on our parabola! Can you find a way to use that in the equation for the parabola we've got?
would you factorize the equation?
So far (if you've done question a) you have y = (x - 3)² + 2
Now you know that
- the point P is on your parabola so if you put in its x and y values the equation must match (like 1=1 or 2=2)
- you know P's x-coordinate is 0
How does that help you?
Ok do you want me to tell you?
I was going to say u subsitute the x coordinate 0 in the brackets
so it becomes (0 - 3)² + 2
Well done!
and for a minute I thought I was asking a silly question 😅
so now that its 0 how will that give me 11? would I factorize the double brackets?
Uhh what do you mean?
You put the x=0 in the equation which gives you (0-3)²+2 = (-3)²+2 = 9+2 = 11, that's the y-coordinate
How come a = -3? Is it because the coordinates given correspond to a turning point = no change?
and B is 2 because thats what is substitued for b ?
b can be read from the point (idk how it's called in english, the deepest point of the parabola)
b is its y-coordinate, a is its x-coordinate negated
ah mk
Ah apex is the word i was looking for i think
you see this? is this the same as -25 over 4?
yes it is
👍
and also the same as 25 / (-4)
see for this one? I got 3 without the bracket
is that because I multiplied first?
Yeah
I'm supposed to add r first?
Yup
👍
But if you decide to multiply by 3 first you should multiply everything, so that would mean that the equation turns into the following:
3P = mn - 3r
But it's better to move r first
I multiplied first and ended up with 3p + r over n
and that is wrong right? cuz its different from the 3 outside of the bracket
Yeah 3p + r over n is wrong
Try to like isolate the variable you want to make subject
👍
would I use the quadratic formula for this?
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
So my answers were correct right? Only difference between yours and my answers were that i expressed mine in percentages? Or is that forbidden to do?
Ah I thought they were solutions
I can't guarantee the correctness of my answers 😆
Your needed solution is before the solution of Quadratic equation but this topic is also gonna be there in exams so I solved it...
And since there it is not mentioned to solve the quadratic you don't need to apply quadratic formula
oh okay haha
If A is the value, we see that A^3+3A-14=0 which only has one real root
no probleme
oh nice
i thought about it at the beggining but I thought there were gonna be some weird x^(2/3) which is totally false
ye
Can anyone tell me an example for a ring with an irreducible element which is not prime?
R=Z[sqrt(−5)] - element 2
could somone please explain this to me?
Which one
both please
Part (a) is using baseheightdepth= volume and you sub in the given values. Part (b) is solving the quadratic that you get from part (a)
can someone please help me out with c? it says the answer is supposed to be 23.2ft but I ended up with 24.3ft
This is an inhomogeneous differential equation you have to solve. The solution is f(x) = exp(-3x) + 1. To get the final answer you just have to plug in the asked value for f(x).
@bold atlas
Please send your calculations
The mistake in your calculation is that when you put the pole back into position, the angle is not 65 degrees.
I want to start off by thanking you for taking your time to help me out, could u explain to me what to do instead of using 65 degrees?
I used 65 degrees as I thought I cannot calculate anything even with the sine rule if I have more than 1 unknown variable
Look at my solution above. When the pole is skew, I calculate with the sine rule the distance between point F and G. Because when you flip the pole to the right position, the distance between F and G remains the same. Finally I just use pythagoras to calulate the length of the wire. The problem of your calculation is when you would just imagine to rotate the skew pole so that it is normal again, you would also make the angle which was 65 degrees bigger.
Hope that makes it clear
Thats what i mean with the rotation to the normal position
Look how on the right the angle gets bigger
that's the reason why you can't use the 65 degrees anymore
so ur left with 90 degrees
and 22 feet
interestin, ill take a more detailed look at this tmr as I'm really tired and just finishing up with some English work now, Thank you very much Maciel!
does anyone know how to test h(t) for causality in an LTI system?
Yes, you have to calculate the impulse response and check if it is zero for t < 0.
for h(t)=e^2t u(-1-t) it would be non causal ?
I never done this type of math be4
Yes
Math question here
If y is 3 and x is negative 4 how do I graph that in a graphing call
in your coordinate system go 3 up and 4 left
Thanks
can someone explain where the tau+1/2 came from?
whoever evaluated this integral left some steps in between the solution. I'm not sure but i think you can solve this integral by "integration by parts". But you could also just check if it is right by taking the derivative of the solution.
I am having trouble with hyperbolic functions
Is there a geometric interpretation of hyperbolic like regular sin/cos ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbola there are a lot of graphic examples
In mathematics, a hyperbola ( ; pl. hyperbolas or hyperbolae ; adj. hyperbolic ) is a type of smooth curve lying in a plane, defined by its geometric properties or by equations for which it is the solution set. A hyperbola has two pieces, called connected components or branches, that are mirror images of each other and resemble two infinite b...
Would I use the sine rule for this?
side 1/sin(angle 1) = side 2/sin(angle 2)
Replace then by the values including the variable e
Then rearrange to find e itself
You see for this what did u get for the angle on the top and on the bottom right?
whats the limit x tends to negative infinity for? i dont get it, i do solve the diffferential equation but dont understand the limit part of it
@frail dust scammer
the actual link on that hyperlink is https://u.to/wgBmIA
@trail swift ban
pls
🙏 🗣️ 🔥 🐟
thank you, they are banned
anyone know how to find the derivative of this? (using high school level calculus)
apply the chain rule multiple times, also product rule once
y = a(b(c(x))) * a(b(c(x))), where a(x) = cos(x), b(x) = sqrt(x), c(x) = (2x+1)^2 - 1
you need permission for this
!warn @vestal charm
tagging everyone?
!warn @vestal charm
Hello
Can anyone share IB grade 7 Algebra questions? Like practice for summative. It will be helpful.
That's just a boundary condition to determine the unknown constansts
how would one do this?
I also don't understand this
x length of pyramid is 2x(5-2) = 6, y length is 2x(2-0) = 4. Therefore B is at (8,4,0). For b) just determine the length of A to the middle by using pythagoras. After that you can again calculate the length AV with pythagoras
I'm not sure but if the lines go through the center of the circle, y should also be 120 deg.
Y=120° due to the fact that opposite angles are equal
I got the wrong answer for this how would u do it?
does this always apply?
could you elaborate please? I'm sorry but so far I don't get it
I think so
which part in particular you don't understand?
to be frank, most of it
Yeah... in any case if two lines intersect each other, then both pairs of opposite angles will be equal
The correct answer is [e^(-2x)/(-2)] + 3x² tho..
idfk know bro
One message removed from a suspended account.
thats the same thing as saying -1/2e^2x
could someone explain how to do this pls? thank you.
I think this is the solution
That is the solution, could you walk me through the pythagorus part? why is it subtract? is it because you already have the hypotenuse?
The hypotenuse of the triangle is the radius of the circle
Here CB=QC=PC= radius of circle
so thats why you did subtract right?
Yes 😀
I kinda get it, this is what I see so far
so u got 12cm which is A and A is the two triangles
15 is the hypotenuse of both triangles
so to get AC you just do pythagorus
Yes AC=12 cm
To get AC you subtract CB=15cm from AB=27cm
Then you apply pythagoras to get AQ
so is this what ur doin?
Yes
and you got AQ after doing pythagoras
then you added AQ and AP to get PQ, am I understandin this correctly so far?
Yesss
thank you a million, very helpful 😄
You are welcome, glad to help you.
What step don't you understand ? I think the calculation of the integral is right
Tell me if I made a mistake i'm bad at probabilities.
The only things I used are :
P(Ā)=1-P(A) where Ā is the contrary of A
P(M∩N)=P(M)+P(N)-P(M∪N)
P(M∪N)=P(M)+P(N)-P(M∩N)
A∪Ā is a certain event (its probability is equal to 1)
And formulas like :
(A∩B)∪C = (A∪C)∩(B∪C)
(A∪B)∩C = (A∩C)∪(B∩C)
Ā∪Ē = contrary of (A∩E)
Ā∩Ē = contrary of (A∪E)
😲 OMGGGGGG
ITS RIGHT
THANKYOU SO MUCH
haha you're welcome ! (:
Does anyone know how these formulas or are derived?
T-T
<@&942391219206647828> Idk if this is alright to do ?
Does anyone know a video that explains how to solve this?
Or can someone explain to me how to solve this?
I can't solve the integral...
i need help
Tell me if there's something you don't understand
YOOOOOO I DIDNT KNOW THAT FIRST FORMULA!!! thanks man
can anyone help me with this
A separable partial differential equation is one that can be broken into a set of separate equations of lower dimensionality (fewer independent variables) by a method of separation of variables. This generally relies upon the problem having some special form or symmetry. In this way, the partial differential equation (PDE) can be solved by sol...
i did not look at your problem but maybe this will help you
Adobe Full Espanol GRATiS 2024
https://telegra.ph/Adobe-GRATIS-2024-FULL-ESPANOL-02-25
Tutorial video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vNlpHfAttU
@everyone
Hola, quiero compartir con ustedes un sitio donde puede probar los programas de adobe, así como varios y otros programas de forma gratuita. Esta es una excelente manera de familiarizarse con los programas que necesita.
Descargar Sony Vegas 2023 Full Español
thanks for your help,but i have a whole book to read about that,the things is i dont understand how its work,anyway i solved it myself,hehe
Get free gift 50$ - steamcommunity.com/gift/50
which calculator would you recommend between the texas instrument 83 and 84? is there really a difference?
get the 84, for one, its the standard for most math classes
it also has a lot of processing power for when you start graphing more complicated functions, and has mathprint so fractions can be written in actual fraction form instead of 1/2 or 0.5
also a bigger screen iirc
plus if theres any firmware issues, theres a port
anyone know what formula I would use for this?
42
You can use the sine rule
a/sin(A) = b/sin(B) = c/sin(C)
Thus, sin(120)/62 = sin(BCG)/20
BCG = arcsin(20sin(120)/62)
GBC = 180 - 120 - BCG = 60 - arcsin(20sin(120)/62)
why this server flooding with bots 😭
can anyone tell if this looks right? (for Calc)
what is the notation name for the following?
XE(1;15)
and
2<x<-2 ; XER
cosine or sine rule ma guy
lemme help
you forgot a cosine at the end
let me clarify:
3.cos^2(x), when defirentiating using the chainrule, we get:
3 in the front, since this is a constant, we are left with cos^2(x)
2 to the front power rule
we are left with cos(x)
so:
3 . 2. Cos(x) but the chain rule tells us we still need a derivative of the function f(x) itself, which in this case is cos(x)
taking the derivative, we get: (-sin(x))
resulting in:
-6cos(x)sin(x)
first one:
X is an element of the open interval ragning from 1 to 15, where X can not be equal to x and 15
Second one:
we need to find a number x, which values layes between -2 and 2, where as X is an element of all real number, and can not be equal to -2 and 2
yea i mean thats like 8th grade math, our teacher asked us to name the notation being used or we have to go run laps on the field
@trail swift Please look out for these bots
How would I solve #7? I know I have to find the momentum’s in the x and y direction, and then relate them somehow and then solve for final velocity, but how do I relate the two problems together?
In every type of collision you can use momentum conservation.
As you have already written that those balls have momentum 3mv î + 4 mv ĵ so using vector addition the resultant vector will be 5mv (in the shown direction)
So the momentum of two ball system is 5mv and total mass of the system is 3m, then the speed = (5mv)÷(3m) = (5/3)v.
i'm getting recommended to study math, mostly becouse of my interest in epistemologi, more specifically rationalism, in use, i suppse. And therefore wonder if you guys know any good math lore youtube videos or channels? To, hopefully peak into, if a degree is a more practical vision is a solid choice?
Two small silly balls of super sticky silly putty
This server has the most useless mods 💀
😭
@minor iris please do something 😭😭
I'm struggling real badly with this, could someone explain it to me?
Hey, can somebody help me solve this?
X=-2?
My maths is weak so sorry if I am wrong
Is it correct?
ye
It was, thanks 🙂
Welcome 😊
*find the number of the roots
if you add and substract cos³(3x) to the expression, you'll see that the function is actually equal to -2cos³(3x) (by using the fact that cos²+sin²=1)
which is equal to zero
iff cos(3x)=0
iff 3x=pi/2 +kpi
iff x=pi/6 +kpi/3=(1+2k)pi/6
where k is an integer
In conclusion you have only 2 roots (k=0 and k=1) in [0 ; pi/2]
@foggy torrent
I hope it will help...
@undone ledge
Can anyone help me 😭
anyone taking pre-calc have any resources for the probabilities unit?
check proffesor leonard, has a full free course on yt for precalc calc123, the best resource i have found for maths tbh
can someone explain to me why i cant just integrate the 3/2x+2 and get 3ln(2x+2)?
instead getting 3/2ln(2x+2)
and whats the rule that im missing
hello guys , can somebody please help me with this everytime i do i get the answer 12 but in the answer list its 9
i can but its in Azeribaijani
qardas im from azerbaijan
hello everyone i am seeking help in understanding this example. [linear algebra]
Can someone explain why this makes sense?
How did it go from the first line to the second one
can someone pls help me out with this?
answers are supposed to be
a) r-5
b) 10.6cm
I don't get it so if someone could please try a calculation and explain it to me, that would be much appreciated.
Yo could someone help me with this excel equation, i can't figure out how I should transform the function like y=2,323x+3E+07 to y=2,323x+and than a numer (y). Help would really be appreciated.
Multiply both sides by (T/2pi)²
I Hope it helps
Anyone free to help me with this?
what's the answer
how come im getting 200 💀
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Stuck on this question, gotten to
3a^4/3 - 24a^2/3 = -8
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
do you still need it ?
inverse trigonometric functions have many outputs for one input
so , how are they even 'functions' ? bcs functions have only one output for an input
F is not 90 degree? the straight angle is 180 and there is 83 outside so F should be equal F = 180-83 , F = 97
I’m currently studying for calc 1/2 and i often find that i have issues connecting concepts or in general “thinking” in a mathematical way i’m mostly solving problems without knowing why or what i’m solving… Therefore when I find myself in a situation where the problem is not in a pattern i’m familiar with i struggle immensely to solve it and often use tools like wolfram to see the steps to the solution and be like “i think i get it” but the next time i see a similar problem i have a super slim chance of actually solving it… Same applies to theory if it’s something that can just be memorized it’s easy but deducing stuff from it and proof feel impossible to even start. This is also a big issue for my exams because I often just don’t have time to solve everything and i fail.
I’m planning on studying the subjects again from the ground up because I feel i’ve messed up my learning so much that even my notes are worthless and i feel like looking at them is a waste of time. I have my professors lectures, notes which are almost par to par with the textbook he recommends and two big workbooks. I know my question is subjective but what would you say are the fundamentals i should have and where to get them(textbooks etc.)? how should i approach the learning? mindset? notes? flash cards? i don’t have a lot of money but online courses or teachers? roadmaps? Everything is welcome and appriciated!!!!
In case it helps here are my textbooks (in italian sadly because that’s where i study but i have good academic english so it’s no issue to consume material in that language)
ISBN 883395684 vol 1&2
I dont have much of an advice but I think relearning is not the key here in this case, but may I ask u what text book or resource do you use for solving problems on calc 1
ISBN 883395684 vol 1&2
lets say you have to solve integrals
what would i do?
sit down, just pen and paper, or ipad idk what you use.
just that with the exercises. no solution, like 0
work on every problem for a total of lets say 2/3h
if you get stuck, doesnt matter, try something else, somethign totally different (im talking about techniques here)
the most important thing, what i learned from a friend who went to the IMO, is to NEVER EVER GIVE UP
math is something unique, why? it has only 1 solution, but the fun things is that you can get there in different ways
your mind is capable of so many great things
just give it time to develop
best of luck
elp
help
watching a video on some vectors stuff. The question says that the wind is blowing NW yet the teacher draws the arrow going SE. I have no idea why ?
should I assume that everything works in opposites ? then why is the plane going north (sorry, im not the sharpest tool in the shed (yet)
could it be the from ????
my fear of getting roasted has given me a clue but i cant be sure
it come from northwesst
Possible, me and my brother got 21.16 as a, I can share working s wiht you if you want but it might be tricky to decipher
Nvm spotted your mistake, lower boundary of the integral is 8 not 0
When graphing the equation or setting it equal to 0 to solve for the x intercept it gives 8
Lmk what you get if you can be asked to try again!!
And lmk if I made a mistake too
One message removed from a suspended account.

If you try and solve pls lmk what u get, we only started our integration topic last week but yeah
thjat question is worth 9 marks 😭
Hey guys, do you have any course/videos recomendation for dynamic optimazation? like variational calculus. Example: F(x',x,t)=4xx'-5x'^2+3x^2(t)
Blackpenredpen/profesor leonard style videos if possible, but anything is good 🙂 thx
F(x',x,t)=4xx'-5x'^2+3x^2(t)
is this multivariable calculus?
is it like a combination of multivariable and differential equations
yeap i think it is
you have to differantiate acording to fx,fx' and fx't, then equalize fx and fx't and solve via a diferential calculus method
i know the theory, but i want more examples and stuff to practice
One message removed from a suspended account.
Anybody plzz solve Q4 for meeee
it's so rough Lmaoaoa tell me ill properly solve and send you
Yep thnx
Is 2/3 correct?
Let me know if you can’t decipher my scrawling
6x - x² + 2023
6(√24 + 6√15) -(√24 + 6√15)²+ 2023
= (6 x 28.13) - (791.49) + 2023
= 168.78 - 791.49 + 2023
= 1400.29
i think this is the answer
Thankss
is it true
The thing is that I don’t have an answer key for that, that’s why I’ve been asking people
exactly
Thanks for your help, guys. Appreciate it
ur so smart ur so cool
Dudeeee.... You made it look so easy
Actually!!
I did it your way using a calculator.... I got something like 2017.0231
Maybe you went wrong solving the under-root part
- 1?
yess
tysmm
253?
ohh
thank you for letting me know 🫂
can someone pls explain this? I dont understand how the answeris 151
calculate surface of total circle
calculate circle segment
subtract
what would the result be of Fx't= 21(x(t^3)(x')) - 6x'
in case of PD's, here its with respect to x, so the rest you treat as a constant
so, even t is a constant
Solution...
I don't really know if there's any fractional value for sin50... so i've used 0.76
In ∆ BCE, it is given that:
EC = BC
therefore,
angle CBE = angle CEB (angle opposite to equal sides are equal).
now find angle BCE.
on like AE we use the property of linear pair
angle ACB + angle BCE = 180
=> angle BCE = 110°
apply angle sum property of a triangle in ∆ BCE
angle BCE + angle CBE + angle CEB = 180
110+ 2( angle CEB) = 180
2( angle CEB) = 70
angle CEB = 35°.
Now angle E = angle CEB + angle CED,
angle E = 35+ 50
= 85°.
lmk if you want me to explain any step
thaaank uu smm!!!
i can try
Send the problem, worth a try.
I appreciate ur help to begin with, many thanks, im guessing angle e = 50 + 35 because angle e is the entire right bottom corner? like this?
yes
👍
I guys i really need some help, the question says: find the equation of the hyperbola having r: x+3y=1 and s: x-6y=3 as asymptotes.
thanks a lot! ❤️
In the third question why is the option(A) wrong
yes you're correct
ln|a^x| = xln|a| + c
a in this case turns into a function of x here i believe:)
Aren't we supposed to use logarithmic functions or exponential to solve this? Well derivative w.r.t x of xln|a|= ln|a| so that cannot be the right answer
Remember a is any constant
well, although derivatives are the opposite of integrals, in some cases we arent able to get the absolute values when changing from derivative to an integral in the case of indefinite integrals
Hmm can you solve one example , integrate 1/(8^x) w.rt x
its the same answer, xln|8| + c
So you mean to say the constant C is representation of what's missing
yup
thats it:)
lets say, we find the derivative of xln|a|
w.r.x
its x/a + ln|a|
theres some complex calculations from this point forward, but the value will be similar to 1/a^x
and for the missing part, we add the c
But i don't understand why you are treating ln|a | as a function of x because it's not, it's simply a real number , it could be 4 ,
Derivative of xln|4| is simply ln|4| not x/4 + ln|x|
once to ingtegrate this again, i mean
ln|4| is treated as a logarithm function
not a constant
i get where you're coming from, but derivatives here will follow the uv method
where x is a algebric and ln|4| or ln|a| is a logarithmic function
I'm still doubtful that we are supposed to use the product rule for xln|4|,
As far as i know derivative indicates change w.r.t something but ln|4| is constant hence the change is 0 w.r.t anything
Can you elaborate or prove that the derivative of ln|4| w.r.t to x is not zero?
the derivative of ln|4| wrt x is indeed 0, but the derivative of xln|4| isnt
since x here is in multiplication with ln|4|
it turns xln|4| into a function of x
similar to 3x, 4x etc
But the derivative of 3x is simply 3 w.rt x
look, the derivative of ln|x| is 1/x
this, is a function of x
this is a formula, as you may know
To use product rule u and v both u and v needs to be functions of x if derivative w.r.t x i.e u(x) and v(x) isn't that right?
okay, your making it extremely complex, more then it is
ln|4| is a constant, and xln|4| is a function of x
and since, the 4 here, is in a logarithm function, you cant just treat it as a you would a 3, 4,
math majors, help?
What are you guys talking about
i think my brain is not enough to figure out a proper answer without getting confused
scroll up a bit
im willing to apologize if im wrong, but please double cross my words
the ingetral of 1/a^x
Forgot to add the constant of integration sorry.
thanks:)
2+2?
Too difficult for me. sorry chief
f*** thx anyway, i think im gonna have D-
How can I solve this question
3k-11=4p, p natural number
3k-11=4
3k=15
k=5
im guessing b = 4 because of this?
no i don' think so i think if we multiply 4 with these values we get the normal cos diagram
for example in this diagram we see 90 degrees is equal to 5 which if 1 if we divide it to a
normally 90 degress should be equal to 0 but we multiply it with 4 so we get 360 degress
and it equals to 1
you can try it on other numbers
sorry if i couldn't explain well i am not used to explain math in english 
that's the idea basically
the graph you have on there has a period of pi/4, or 90 deg
whereas normal cos has a period of 2 pi, or 360 degrees
whenever you have an equation of the form y = acosbx, it gets taller by a factor of a, and the period is shorter by a factor of b
so multiply 1 by a, there's your magnitude.
divide 360 by b, and it's your period.
Can someone help me in a question of trigonometry?
An electrical cable must be taken from a pole A to a pole B over a channel whose width is 10m as shown in the figure. The distance between posts A and B is very long, an auxiliary pole C will be used. Knowing that the cost of cabling over the river is $ 100.00/meter and over land is $50.00/meter, mark the expression that allows you to determine the total cost of this cabling depending on the angle indicated in the figure.
Here's the image containing the possible answers and the electrical cables:
Didn't found that answer. Somethow its automatically setted to mark the first option.
Also, this is the automatic translation of the question/exercise. If the errors impair the understanding of the text, I'll change it to help the one who is solving it.
tell me if you need more detailed explanations (:
also if you just want to quickly guess the right solution, by only calculating the length AC you'll see there is a 1/sin(x) factor, which only appears in the third solution
Found my error. I just used the value of (sinx/10*cosx) as HC instead of inverting it while doing my solution. Thanks A LOT mate.
You're right. Again, THANK YOU A LOT.
the same logic works for bigger matrixes (like picking the right lign of the 1st matrix, and the right column of the 2nd matrix)
for matrixes of size n you then get the formula
And to quickly remember the formula, notice how the i and j are placed :
i always at the most left/beginning
j always at the most right/at the end
and practice ! Do some matrixes multiplication so it feels natural (:
In this laplace transform can anyone explain how we got s^(n+1)? Why is it not s^n?
Okii i solved it. Thank you so much!
What was the solution?
So if u go furthur down the solution. We have to solve for laplace transform of t^0 at some point. Which gives us 1/s. That's where the extra s came from
I was so confused frfr
@signal nimbus oop i forgot to @ my apologies
All good!
I see now, thank you!
Another poblem of laplace transform
how do we do this?
In SPSS: The proportion of measurements with a high NO2 concentration (>16 μg/m3) in previous years was equal to 60%. Is the proportion of measurements with a 'high' NO2 concentration after the traffic campaign significantly different from the proportion of measurements with a high NO2 concentration in previous years? Check at a 1% significance level.
How do i do this in SPSS?
can someone explain why option D one of the answers? I understand that B and C are isosceles triangles but not D
if x=7
y=5
perimeter=12+z
2<z<12
14<z+12<24
but where did the two come from?
the formula is called triangle inequality. I think she was going to throw this away
oh yes
Hey guys ,does anyone know how can i prove that this equation is true for every x>0 ?
you could write e^-x as 1/e^x
with the x multiplying in the front, now you have the fraction x / e^x
e^x is always greater than x for every x>0, since e^x is an exponential function, e being equal to approximately 2.71, so e power x will always be greater than x
thus, the fraction of x/e^x is a proper fraction, which means its value is less than 1
This is true only if x>0 right? Because I’m trying to think of a case where it wouldn’t work and all I can think about is when x<0 and if x=0 the equation will just equal one
how would u do this?
x + 5 = r
r^2 = x^2 + 9^2
?
Does anyone know how to solve this problem?
A plleasant day everyone! I just want to know if some of you guys have any ideas how to solve a taylor series?
I was thinking of doing series solution today but went with vector calculus. I have my exam the day after tomorrow. Also we only have power series in the current so I'm not doing Taylor series😕
Hello