#math-help
1 messages Ā· Page 4 of 1
silly mistake?
i dont think u need the quadratic formula for that one right
ik but im dumb TvT
wait i do tho, to solve for x
anyways, i finally solved 1 thanks to u TvT <3
now number 4... TvT
ill show u my working in a min
oh that would be useful,thx
let me ask u, if instead of C(x) = 0.01x^3-10x+150
ok for 4 im assuming i start of with R-C
huhhh
how would that change things
there is no negative in the problem tho?
is it cause its a cost
so u lose money hence the negative sign?
the shape of cubic would change
righttt
so the min t.p would be in the negative side, in many cases
so it would be the graph on the right in ur notes page?
ok
right ok
because u would have the max t.p no the min t.p (assumming the function still has 2 turning points)
so u need to think because u use calculus
otherwise ur just guess essentially
okkkk
so i did whwat we did in question 1 for both equations?
assumming theres two turning points, we want the min t.p
im not sure if ur teacher will deduct a mark if u dont test the solutions for max or min t.p
u have to make sure
ok
lemme calculate rlly quick
gimme a sec
wait but r'(x) equals 35
what do i do with that?
if u want to test if a solution to the first derivative is a local max or min., you can simply substitute the solution into the original function and see which is the higher and the lower one
in terms of y or C(x) in this case
or
the cool way to do it is to find the second derivative
and then sub a solution where x is a turning point into the second derivative
and if the result is positive
i think i means its concave down
therefore max t.p
and if its negative
the t.p is min
because the nearby values make a concave up arc
can u check if im correct by looking at ur drawings yesterday please?
hmmmm, i dont think i quite get what ur saying, sorry TvT
so when u solve the first derivative in this case u get two answers right?
yes
even if u are very good with understanding cubic functions, it can be very hard to tell which solutions give the max t.p and which solution gives the negative t.p
i was just not understanding the part where u talked about the third derivative ;-;
thats why it may be neccessary (even in an exam) to test which t.p ur solution give
did i say third?
second haha
third derivative is all 0
ok
u should test the solutions of the first derivative to see it give a min or a max t.p
best way to do that is using the second derivative
imo
ah i see
please verify these results by looking at the sketches u made yesterday
in this case u want to test to know if ur t.p is the local minimum (minimum t.p). if it isnt, then logically this solution is not the answer to the questions how much goods x should be made at the lowest cost C(x)
let me know if u need help with question 4
tysm i got it
part b looks like a simultaneous equation i think
c is asking u to articulate u know what the heck happened
i.e why was ur method is part b correct dependent upon how part a's method was correct
tbh i dont know the answer to part a
part b is ok
if cost cant be negative then c(x) is a discontinuous function
that makes little sense to me
maybe theres a typo and the constant should be 4000?
idk
please tell me the answer to part a
lol its a poor question
c(x) is negative at x = 272
c(x) is cost
cost cant be negative
by definition
there r many typos in this textbook š
itās a rlly shit textbook
š
thx for helping tho lol
u were very helpful
if u can understand why the writer made an inaccuracy then ur fine
thanksss <3333
yeh, thx :)))
if this was a test then u would have found x = 272... by testing the second derivative
and found it is the min t.p
then, u sub x=272 into c(x)
and u see that its negative
and then u note that
idk
smth is wrong
u should write, since cost c(x) cant be negative, c(x) is a discontinuous function and undefined at x = 272
part b is fine
profit = revenue - cost
so u do r(x) - c(x)
and solve for x
i think
the answer is still 563
i think the textbook is just bonkers tbh
like really bad if im not mistaken
Would the education variable be an ordinal or scale?
there are no set values (just number of years)
I don't understand where did 1/4 came from
cos60 =1/2
1/4*
u sure?
Did they multiple whole equation? if say why is cos80 outside
I meant where did 1/4 came from
my bad
1/2= 2/4 = 2 * 1/4
i think he wants to reach this form
so he made 1/2 = 2/4
i didn't solve the whole question so i don't know well
Interesting question
You just use the formula over and over again to get to the solution
2cos90cos10* instead of 2cos100cos90
@left knoll yo tysm but my dumb brain still can't understand I have to cram whole trigonometry and other 4 chapters because i procastinated
totally understand your pain
What should I do
I don't want to fail :(
do your best and whatever will happen isn't a problem
it's not the end of world if u fail. just learn from mistakes and don't procrastinate anymore
going to the exam with 30% studying better than you going with 0% because you were afraid of failing or because you thought you would not be able to pass
like i said just do ur best in this moment
I will try(hopefully)
bruh I need 28/70 means 40% i have past papers even if i did all sums i know perfectly it still only adds up to like 15 :(
@left knoll Thank you <333
Do not count like that
God only knows š
yup am gonna definitely fail will try nevertheless
np bro
I had some times that I thought it was impossible to succeed but it was a miracle and I succeed so don't give up
yeah better than not trying
bruh just use photomath
its free
and explains the steps
hi everyone, I'm trying to use geogebra commands but it doesn't work. do u have any idea?
i don't think i rememberš
is the math help chat also for accounting???
can someone explain?
just use these formulas
oh it was identify i thought they simplified or something
They simplified it but they used this, not the usual fraction simplification(you get what I mean)
yup got it
Yes
Can someone help question b?
what is the proportion method
Hi everyone, is there anyone who's studying calculus 1 and 2? I'm searching for a study buddy so we can exchange exercise...
Do I just multiply, the 7/8 and 1/2 of the inches is confusing me
Can anyone help me with thisĀæ
it's ( 7 + (1/12)*(11 + 1/2) ) x ( 28 + (1/12)*(3 + 7/8) ) square feet
My attempt. With trig questions like these with bearings its a great habit to immediately look for information based on the 3 pairs of parallel lines pointing north. Whenever two parallel lines are intersected by another straight line thats is where u have insight and you should spot them easier with practise.
Can somebody tell me if two rectangular hyperbolas intersect if there have the same sign but different scale factor? i.e does y= 3/x and 1/x intersect? If so, how might i find the intersection points?
If two functions f(x) and g(x) intersect, that means they have the same value at the point of intersection, which means there is a solution to the equation f(x) = g(x). So try to solve 3/x = 1/x
limx->0 is the answer?
so theres no intersection point?
does that make sense logically too?
as y f(x) and g(x) increase at the same height they are ever closer yet never intersecting?
Yeah the only solution is 0 but they diverge at that point so they don't intersect
ok thanks for ur explanation and your answer š
np
can someone help me 
it's in german but i think you will still understand it
i have to find the volume of the right cylinder
Volume = piĆr²h
I don't understand the full thing
The blue cylinder has a volume of 144cm^3. Give the volume of the purple cylinder with the same height and a quarter of the radius of the base.
Is that even english idk I trust google translator
Vol is Directly proportional to square of radius
So if radius becomes 1/4th then volume becomes 1/16th
So I guess 9
What's the answer?
9 was correct thank you 
Np
Nvm I got it :))
Ah. Solved it anyway
Still helpful Iāll go through ur notes thank you!
algebra? looks similar to what iām doing today
Can someone help me ? With this
Do u know pythagorean theorem?
Can someone please show me the working to get tanx . -tan(pi/2-x) = -1 ? I have no idea
I just know its true and verified on graphing software
I can get it like this but i want to know if there is a purely algebraic way to simplify tanx . -tan(90-x) into -1.
TIPS for SAT?
Do you know tan(90-x) = cot(x)
no. not yet.
i dont know why tan(90-x) is cot x but i see tan x times -cot x is sinx/cosx times -cosx/sinx =-1 now, thanks to you
i think i know why tan (90-x) is cotx actually
its the complimentary angle
so tan of 90-x is x/y on the unit circle
Yes accorindg to what you draw above
Anyone familiar with lie algebra and its application in yang mills SU(N) guage theory?
Yes , thats correct
ok, thanks for telling me about the cotx identity! that should tie it all together for me.
Np
does a empty set consider a proper subset of a set š
These questions were a pain for me 
Yes empty set is subset of every set
hi, do you guys have any tips on how to learn math fast? like im ass at math im like at a 4th grade level and by june i gotta know pretty much all thats there to learn between 1st and 8th grade (both geometry & algebra) cus i have a very important exam thats basically gonna determinate the highschool that ill go to for the next 4 years and i need at least a 90% on that exam
let me know if you need additional info on the situation that im in
Hi everyone, I have to prove that this function is continuous but I cannot use limit or polar coordinates. I have to prove that the distance between f(X) and f(x0) is 0 when the limit of the distance X - X0 approaches the zero
In this case this is the distance: (x^2 + y^2)^(1/2)
So you have to prove that: 0 < |(xy)/(x^2 + y^2)(1/2)| < (x^2 + y^2)^(1/2). and then lim (x^2 + y^2)^(1/2) = 0 as x --> 0, so |(xy)/(x^2 + y^2)(1/2)| is zero, therefore f(x,y) is continuous
Kinda forgot š
In mathematics, the Pythagorean theorem or Pythagoras' theorem is a fundamental relation in Euclidean geometry between the three sides of a right triangle. It states that the area of the square whose side is the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the areas of the squares on the other two sides. This theorem can...
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicingāand saving your progressānow: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-eighth-grade-math/cc-8th-geometry/cc-8th-pythagorean-theorem/v/the-pythagorean-theorem
Introduction to the Pythagorean Theorem
Practice this lesson yourself on KhanAcademy.org right now:
https://www.khanacademy.org/...
and don't forget the sum of the angles of a triangle = 180
My advice would be to have a day-to-day system where you are able to spend your free time anyway you see fit and are free from addictions and distractions. A plan like this will require a lot of work, thinking and self-awareness, but if you are able to study 3 or more hours every day until June with proper math guidance and real patience there is no goal that is too far fetched for you. Get a good textbook and use khan academy or similarly talented teachers online to learn each topic and investigate every single concept you encounter. First you will need to do a lot of thinking to yourself and figure out what is important to you. If you realise that working hard towards your dream(s) will provide more meaning and fulfilment and improvement to your life than you can possibly comprehend at first then the next step is to progressively abandon the habits that stop you from acting freely toward any such goals. As you understand more and more over time exactly how much more meaningful and rewarding your dreams are as well as why it is necessary to not become mediocre then hopefully things will start falling into place and you start to form solid habits that align toward your health and improvement. You will pick up tools too keep you accountable and routines that you can keep a record of each day. All in all I am just trying my best to give you my honest opinion of how i think someone achieve their goal no matter how immense they may be. Its a personal journey of progress and its very complex and not easy to achieve, but as you learn more as you go you will improve as you go as you will be able to adopt an increasingly comprehensive plan for your self that includes a day-to-day regime of how you can achieve your giant goals by achieving each and every tiny goal that you set after conscious measurement and consideration.
Oh and no. We donāt have any tips to ālearn maths fastā if you know what i mean. Thats not what you actually want for yourself. I hope what i said above made sense and i wish the best of luck for you 
Hey all, could someone help me understand what the formula this question is asking for? I'm not understanding how the input and output relates to the initial rates given? I think there's algebraic formula in here somewhere?
I can't understand ur question but the code should be something like this
Ah I see, so what I was initially thinking was to do an algebraic formula because this is for my Intro To Programming class and we're using Python thru-out this class. We just learned variables/operations in Python and I'd assumed it would be some kind of math formula that we have to show within the IDE. Thanks for your help! I'll keep looking over what you wrote and try to replicate it so I can further understand it
Not a problem . If u found an algebraic formula to solve the problem please tell me.
@left knoll Will do!
are you sure this is continuous?
im like pretty sure this is not continuous at (0,0)
hi can someone pls help me with the first 2 questions i completely forgot how to do it š
if cos^-1 (0) is equal to 90 degrees because at 90 degrees cosine equals 0, why isn't it also equal to 270, since at 270 it is also equal to 0
when you say cos ^ -1 you are implicitly implying it's the invertible function of cos. but that is simply not true for all R (real numbers)
first, cos^ -1 is defined on [-1,1]
when we say cos^-1 we mean the invertible function
an invertible function is first and foremost a function, and for all numbers in it's domain (which is the interval [-1,1]) it should be well defined (it should define a single value for every x). in the case you're describing cos^-1 is not a function because cos^-1 assigns two different values to 0. therefore, in order for it to be function we should restrict it's range to intervals of the length pi. and in the case of cos^-1 [0,pi] is used (it's just defined like that, if you wish to use other ranges it's not "cos^-1" "anymore"). that's because when we ask what is cos^-1(1/2) we are really asking.. what's the smallest angle x for which cosx=1/2.
i didnt give a super formal explanation, but i hope it helps
can someone please show me how to do this conversion (step by step using the whole table thing)
Convert 45 kg cm / hr^2 to Newtons
Learn for free about math, art, computer programming, economics, physics, chemistry, biology, medicine, finance, history, and more. Khan Academy is a nonprofit with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere.
Those should get you up to speed in no time :)
I'm not sure but I should prove it with the distance. Idk if you know that definition
oh actually it's my bad i didn't see the sqrt there
math exchange is usually a good source
Thank you
it will be a great help if you anyone could solve this
Is it algebra?
I've never seen something like this in C.
= is the assignment operator
If you mean C as in the coding language⦠wouldnāt this be a compilation error?
But this is the math help channel so maybe thatās not what that means idk? Regardless Iām curious about what this is lol
So like if someone knows what this is can you tell us š
no its evaluation problem in C language
exactly, it does not make any sense to me
yes in coding only, its supposed to be related to operators precedence and associativity
oh ok. I'm kinda sure 100% there is nothing like this in programming
maybe the second equal sign should be a double equal sign instead? Then it would make sense
That would make sense
yeah the double equal sign is what's used in c
i think this problem's meant to show how c doesn't have a strict "boolean" type
booleans are represented by integers basically
so even though subtracting a number by true/false makes zero sense to us it technically works in c (iirc, true is equivalent to any positive nonzero number)
just tested (sorry for ping)
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char *argv[]){
printf("%d\n", (4 + 5) - (4 == 5));
return 0;
}
9 is printed on screen
oh hm
right if (5 == 5) is put in, it comes back with 8
so true -> 1, false -> 0
when it comes to equality checks
what's it going chat i (believe i) failed my calc quiz on integration by parts and trig identities substitution
Hey guys, need help here with java in eclipse ide. First time learning, I'm not sure if im doing this right. Some help would be really appreciated thank you!
There are a few problems there
From what i understand from the question, time 2 should be later than time 1, your code suggests the opposite
Also the "min1>min2+45" doesnt account for time in between hours, such as 14:30 and 15:20 (50 minutes = True) which in your code would not pass
I'm only focusing on the logic because idk the coding language so well
ouch noo i hope it's not too bad
hope i still get some partial, it was a very short quiz
one nice thing at least is that we get a couple of our quiz scores dropped through the semester, so provided i can understand that topic going forward, itāll be alright
just had a bit of a shaky start this semester since there was a lot i didnāt fully grasp during the latter part of calc 1, so thatās been taking some time to catch up on, like u sub, i sorta understand it but it hasnāt clicked in the way that iād hoped, and iām still a little lost without the formulas
just a little worried that i canāt keep to pace since we also have graded homework this semester, albeit on completion
the grade drops are a nice buffer so iām remaining optimistic, as long as i keep filling in the gaps
itāll be alright iām sure, pardon my ramble
Oh I canāt stress enough how much I hate the technical part of calculus lol
None of it is easy I feel you š„²
But at the end of the day thatās what I really need to do since Iām not a math major
I just finished my calc 2 course and it doesnāt get any easier but you learn to push through it š„²
Thank god my course isnāt too technical
Itāll be alright though just keep at it
Iāve gotten some pretty bad grades (like really bad) in math in the last semester on my midterms
They arenāt always a good indicator of how things will go moving forward
I learned from my mistakes and improved and got higher grades than I expected⦠thereās always hope
You got this!
thank you @left knoll!! it means a lot
guys what is the right way to find the Highest Common Factor (HCF / GCD) of two integers?
there's so many ways and it's confusing me now
generally i think you'd want to use the Euclidean algorithm since it's an efficient way to do it
the euclidean algorithm
at least as long as the two integers we're talking about arent two consecutive terms of the Fibonacci sequence
do you still need help?
EBOB means HCF
you just divide the integers sequentially 2,3,4,..,etc.
wow this is realyl insane, thanks
ser
yes pls š
for the first qs, u need to split the middle term (it's a method for factorizing)
u need to split it in such a way that when u add/subtract the numbers it's the middle number, and when u multiply it you get the product of the first and the third term
like-->
6p^2 - 9pq+4pq - 6q^2
(-9pq+4pq= -5pq, i.e the middle term) and
-9*4=-36 (product of the first and third term
Now, after splittiing the term, u have to find common
6p^2 - 9pq+4pq -6q^2
3p(2p-3q) + 2q(2p-3q)
=> (3p+2q)(2p-3q)
and in the second one, we have to use an identity, we can write the above question as
(a)^2 - (12)^2
as we can see, the identity x^2 - y^2 = (x+y)(x-y)
here x corresponds to "a" and y corresponds to "12"
==> (a+12)(a-12)
there you go
ohhh ic ty!
hello, if anyone here has good experience in mathematical logic, I have one question that I asked in my Uni's discord but no one responded there at all lol. If I have a formula or a set of clauses, let's say { p(x), p(f(x)) } with p a predicate, and I apply a substitution onto it like [x/y], would the x inside the function call also be exchanged or will it be unchanged? I'd argue it would change as well
dumn question but is it possible to go for 40 to 80-100 in math with 3 months in exams
from*
When applying a substitution such as [x/y] to a formula or set of clauses, the variable x will be replaced by the variable y throughout the entire formula or set of clauses. This includes inside function calls. So in the case you provided, the x inside the function call of f(x) would also be replaced by y, resulting in the clause p(f(y))
Thank you! staying on the topic of substitution to clean a FOL formula. I've followed the various exercises and solutions by my prof and his assistants. Let's say in a exercise involving converting a given FOL formula into it's prenex and/or skolar form, and the formula F looks like this:
Vy: (p(x,y) ^ Ex: q(x))
They would first notice that x is both bound and unbound, and according to both wikipedia and the slides, the x in the subformula Ex: q(x) must be renamed to a var that's not yet existing like lets say z, so the formula F becomes F' := Vy: (p(x,y) ^ Ez: q(z)), but I have also seen them substitute the free instance of an x in videos or the solution to the mock exam as well instead, so:
Vy: (p(z,y) ^ Ex: q(x))
Which version is valid? are both valid? because for me both seem valid, because we're trying to resolve this naming conflict by changing either one of these to something else and both achieve that that the cut between both free and bound variables is empty.
in said mock exam solution this was given:
and this is the cleaned version
Both versions are valid ways to resolve the naming conflict between the free and bound occurrences of the variable x. In the first version, you rename the free occurrence of x to a new variable z, which ensures that all free variables are distinct from all bound variables. In the second version, you rename the bound occurrence of x to a new variable z, which also ensures that all free variables are distinct from all bound variables.
it is important to be careful when renaming variables to avoid introducing new errors or ambiguities into the formula, and to always check that the renaming preserves the meaning of the formula.
any time
Hi, I have a problem with contour lines. If I have f(x,y)=(x^1/2 + y^1/2)^2 and if I search for the contour line for z=1=f(x,y) I find: y = (1-x^1/2)^2 but using geogebra I obtain the same curve from x=0 to x=1 but then it's different and I don't understand why
in yellow the contour line. in red the function of the contour line that I found. In x from 0 to 1 it's the same
The equation you have provided, f(x,y)=(x^1/2 + y^1/2)^2, represents a surface in three-dimensional space, with x, y, and z as the coordinates. To find the contour line for a specific value of z, you need to solve for x and y when the value of z is fixed.
In this case, the contour line for z=1 is given by y = (1-x^1/2)^2. This line represents the set of points (x,y) on the surface for which the value of z is equal to 1.
The difference between the curve you obtained from the equation and the one from Geogebra may be due to the range of x values being used. The equation y = (1-x^1/2)^2 only holds for values of x between 0 and 1. If Geogebra is plotting the curve for a range of x values outside of this interval, the shape of the curve may be different.
It is also possible that there is an error in either the equation or the way it was implemented in Geogebra. It may be helpful to double-check both the equation and the input in Geogebra to make sure they are correct.
does anyone know how to rotate text on geogebra?
Thank you for the answer.
But, the contour line is raised to the second so x can assume any value, so the range is not from 0 to 1.
Not any value but xā„0
Hi everyone! could someone be so kind to help me with this? I have been stuck on this qn for 2 hours now.........
Here you go
this is for b)
You can get c) from there
Hi
I know that the area of the parallelogram is 100 cm² and the AC diagonal intersects the BE height in the point O.
BO/OE=5/3
I need to know the area of BEDC.
I think that the solving has something to do with AOE and COB triangles but I'm lost.
Please help.
Isn't it the difference of two squares?
did u solve yet?
What??
greatOR
just square it and find the two roots
the answer will turn out to be some kind of interval
when u look at the solution you may not understand it anyway. please check PM shortly for some youtube videos that you should watch
Why doesn't null factor law apply to solving inequalities of a quadratic?
only using vertex form and taking absolute values works but not (x+a)(x+b)>0 x>-a or x>-b
I understand why its a wrong result
but I don't know the reasoning behind why the algebra doesn't work correctly that way when it does with equations
because ones a rule for equations and another is a rule for inequalities?
can someone pls help
not sure tbh
Sure enough ChatGPT is handy, but wouldn't it be even more handy to learn to find the answer by yourself so you get a better understanding of it ?
Maybe I'm oldschool, who knows 
i dont really get it either, but thanks for going out of your way to take the time to ask the AI
i was doing revision so ill see if i can ask for an explanation at school
lol, idc to understand the answer cuz it's not my question
not old school i totally agree with u
yea, revise the syllable/subtopics taught and study the ones you dont know and keep practicing questions from each subtopic until youre familiar ig, i actually have no right to say this bc my math tests are usually in the 70% š
Does anyone knows where they get that log 25?
there are 25 patients
hello, i am struggling with 8a. any help appreciated!!
This seems like kind of a silly problem, but if try to find the factors of of a trinomial it doesn't seem to yield the exact answer. The answer was either (x + a)(x + b) or (x + b)(x + a), are both correct or is there only one singular answer?
When I take the factors of the third term it could either be (a Ć b) or (b Ć a) if it is a positive term
In example is x^2 + 10x + 16 factored (x + 2)(x + 8) or is it (x + 8) (x + 2)?
Lemme grab a pen and paper pal
Yeah it just seems so simple and yet I'm not grasping it
Sorry for the time, I checked, and it is (x+8)(x+2)
What is the exact process to that answer though?
Just so I don't make the same mistake on future equations
both answer is correct. doesn't matter the order in this problem
Okay thats what I was thinking, either way it achieves the same answer
yeah
Could it also be (x+2) (x+8) since it is commutative?
Using the difference of squares:
x² + 10x + 16 can be written as (x + a)² + b, where a = 8 and b = 16 - 64 = -48
Factor the expression (x + 8)² - 48, using the difference of squares formula (a - b)(a + b)
The result is (x + 8)(x + 8 - 6) = (x + 8)(x + 2).
I don't know if that makes sense to you though, I nearly fell asleep on my phone here so I'll go now
Are both answers correct or does it have to be just one?
If you want it to be precisely according to the formula, (x+8)(x+2), but otherwise (x+2)(x+8) also works
Neither can be wrong as long as you got it right
did you already complete this?
you can find one solution by observation if you set both sides equal to zero
one of the solution(s) is 2/3?
how can i find another if theres another?
thanks btw wouldnt have guessed that
how to solve
i see thank u
not yet!
did you got α and θ in terms of arctan?
you got the answer?
no, iām still struggling with applying all of this
i got the answes but they are in terms of arctan or tan-¹
if youāve got it written down somewhere iād love to look over it
yes 2 min please
I'm in middle of something
ofc itās not pressing at all please take your time
if you do not understand something, please let me know
thank you so much this is so helpful š„¹š„¹
glad I was able to help
CS students: how proof-based are your math courses? And when did you have to take them? (Say linear algebra and calculus 1+2 and or vector analysis, maybe discrete math if you take that? and so on)
Just curious about how it is elsewhere bc I took my proof-based math courses in the first semester + second semester and heard that some donāt take them till a bit later but idk how true that is
Anyone got some good algebra books? Some pretty basic ones, i wanna get better at the fundamentals
Hall and Knight is very good
even though it's not very basic
i graphed it and there is another solution at 5 point something iirc. However I have no idea how you can solve it analytically, it's not a conventional equation and even online equation solvers won't give you a step by step answer (at least the ones that are free)
Iāll give it a go
got till here but I have no idea how to go further
yeah you can also write this way which resembles a quadratic but instead of degree two it is degree 1.29... :p
ah that's another way to write it
thanks, learnt something new
doesn't this diverge?
yes it should
it was a calc question
i ended up with this
oh so you should check whether it's divergent or convergent and if it's convergent you want to sum it?
it's probably convergent because the numbers are getting smaller and smaller
i wouldn't say that's enough of a reason for it to converge
like as you already might know 1/n also follows that pattern but the infinite sum is not convergent
you'd have to prove it
intuitively i'd say that it "looks" like 1/n
as in the sequence here
yes
it kinda does, but it's like 1/4n
yea but a 4 doesnt matter in infinity
you can use the comparison test probably
and play around with it
please elaborate
how far are you into calculus might i ask
i am in high achool
ooh
last year of high school to be precise
umm do you know anything about convergence tests of infinite sums?
honestly I don't know much
i stumbled from this question from a social media post
and I thought I'll be able to solve it using telescoping method
as taught to us in sequence and series
okok there are plenty of sources online i'll link a wiki page if you want to check it out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergence_tests
In mathematics, convergence tests are methods of testing for the convergence, conditional convergence, absolute convergence, interval of convergence or divergence of an infinite series
ā
n
=
1
ā
...
i have no idea :(
thank you for helping, appreciate it
is this a power series i cant see it too well
wait I'll send a better picture
I think itās a power series aka a Taylor series
Idk if thereās an easier way but typically what youād want to do is youād want to find the function whose Taylor series is that and then that limit would be easier cuz youād have a more concrete function⦠usually youād try to find that function through playing around with the power series and seeing which already known Taylor series it looks like
Then again you can still try to play around with the expression and find an easier way to do it Iām not sure
of course assuming Iām assuming so many things here about the convergence radius
But yea
Does anyone else have any input on it?
I am sorry but I am not able to understand anything of this :'). Thanks a lot for your time tho
Ouch Iām sorry š
Where did you get this from
Like the problem
Youāll learn all of this in calculus 2 š
black pen red pen ig
he has a solution video too, but that one is very different from the question I posted
like the question he posted on ug
ig*
Ooh
and then solved on yt was different
How did he solve it
Oh okok
he double differentiated the expression inside
and was left with x^ 4n+2 / 4n + 2 which he said becomes tanh-1
Yea then he probably used Taylor series as well
Can you provide me a source to read about these power series
of course
Wikipedia has everything and you can also use khan academy
i'd honestly recommend studying cacl 1 and all before you jump to this (calc 2)
then again calc 1 and 2 is different depending on where you're getting your education haha
but here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_series
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-bc/bc-series-new/bc-10-13/v/power-series-radius-interval-convergence
In mathematics, a power series (in one variable) is an infinite series of the form
where an represents the coefficient of the nth term and c is a constant. Power series are useful in mathematical analysis, where they arise as Taylor series of infinitely differentiable functions. In fact, Borel's theorem implies that every power series is the Ta...
also pretty cool that you do all of this already and are exploring things
wish i had done more exploring back in the day lol
:)
Are things like expansion of log(1+x), a^x also Taylor series
(haven't seen the links, i am in forest and chrome is disabled :/)

hmm i dont know lol cant really follow
nope, the only answer i have is 2/3 but cant find the other
what is your grade, if you don't mind me asking
im in highschool last year (its called form five in botswana)
ah same
thanks for the help you offered, ill see what i can do
:)
(ignore the red marks)
is it wrong to square both sides and then prove that the squared LHS is equal to squared RHS?
1 ā -1 but if you square them, you'll get same result
so it isn't the best way
Hmm
do you know about square root being always in |mod|
No..
oh
square root of X² is |X|
not just X
I think I am complicating it
ignore it
Does the || mean +-?
the || means that no matter what is inside, the result will be always ā„ 0
so you proved that X² = Y²
but that does not prove X = Y
because after taking roots, it will give |X| = |Y|
which means X = ± Y
Ok Ty
log(0) -> -ā, so log(0)/log(0) = -ā/-ā = ā/ā
Oh yehhhh
Thanks a lot! :)
How do I add area I got the area of two rectangle 270 and 288 and got 558. Is this right. I just added both
That's correct
thx
np
Does anyone know this, I can't find a solution to this expression. I need to find x1 and x2 but I can't figure out where the error is
there is only x in the expression
x1 and x2?
so I need to extract x1 and x2 from all that via the quadratic equation
but no matter how I tried to get it, it was impossible to get it
oh you mean the roots
something like that
with us, it is an equivalent equation, so through it I finally get a quadratic equation and only then do I get x1 and x2
but I think that this task is impossible to solve if it doesn't exist, so I wanted to check with you people
okay, if you manage to solve it somehow, although I tried to do it on the easy and on the thesis, but nothing, and I only know that somehow the solution should be 1 and 2
is the left hand side multiplied?
because I assume it is
the left side is subtracted and the right side is multiplied
1 and 2 are not the solution then
I don't know, that's what it says in the solution book, and now I don't know if they made a mistake about the task or about the solution. but I think this task is impossible to solve
Did you get something?
2^(x^2)^(-3) is 0.01 if we assume its x is 1, no ?
(sorry, not trying to intrude just to understand as well)
isn't it like 2^ x² - 3
which gives the answer 1/4 when x = 1
well, like me, I only know that x1 should be 1, and x2 should be 2. but that's before I get the quadratic equation
no need to be sorry, I am sorry if that came out as rude
it's ok you don't have to apologize trust me i'm confused about the task too
that means the LHS is not substracted
instead it multiplied
LHS = (-1)^-2 . (2)^-2. (5)^-2
which is 0.01
same as RHS when we put x = 1
yes it's definitely multiplied
@nimble wedge @whole wren
may i ask where the (-1)^x²-3 comes from ?
i'm assuming it's the (-) sign
that's what I wanted to ask
(-5) = (-1).(5)
(a.b)^m = a^m.b^m
this is correct for x = 1
but for x = 2, it is not
because the power of (-1) will be odd i.e 1
which will make the left hand side negative of the right hand side
I think there is only one solution i.e 1
x = 2 doesn't satisfies
solution mistake maybe
now I understand how you did it and I see what now. thank you very much for the result and the solution šš
If I understood you correctly, generally speaking when you have a variable you as an exponent and youād want to isolate it youād use log because itās the inverse function of the exponential function a^x, (a is a given number)
And from what I can see they are trying to find what T_(1/2) so thatās why they did that
@last saffron
Otherwise tell me if I misunderstood you
You're absolutely right, thank you very much!
can anyone explain why eulers number is used to model functions
because it is exponential
why is it used over other constants in exponential functions?
it's literally just found almost everywhere. and perfectly describes different phenomena in different fields (finance and so on). which is why it's used over other constants
Hello, someone wanna some math books links for free?
i need to provide an explanation in a portion of my paper, would you be willing to read a paragraph and let me know if it makes sense?
hi, can anyone recommend me exercises? most of the time i understand how to solve a question but still ended up being wrong because i wasnt careful on very very basic and easy operation. i tried being more careful but things still got out of my sight. thanks in advance
Iām not that well-versed in this I just know that fact
exercises on?
I mean like algebra, geometry, calculas
Q. Find the number of co prime divisors of the number 2^5 à 3ⓠà 5ⷠà 7²
do you know about fundamental principle of multiplication?
Nope
Should I look into it?
it's a very basic principle
when you have to do two simultaneous operation, you multiply both of them
like there are two tasks A and B
Ohhh wait I know it
A can be done in 3 ways and B in 4 ways
if you are going to do A and B simultaneously, it'll be 3.4 = 12 ways
simple as that
so you can break the problem into two parts
So that equation I have can be done in 8 ways
But I need to find the number of ways for females
I'll solve b part for you
So we need 1 female players in the team of two players. Now we have two choices, either take the female player from the team A, or take the female player from team B.
If we take female player from one team, it's a necessity that we take a male player from other team.
The required probability will be :- 3/4 x 1/2 + 1/4 x 1/2
Is the answer 1/2 for part b @undone ledge
Is this from permutations and combinations?
I learnt something like this last year but can't recall
Yep it is
Iām going to work it out going over what you just said itās making more sense now thank you :))
720?
I need help
Please solve this inequality
The answer is c
But I don't get how
Ohh
Wait
I get it
š
How do I find mean using scores ?
I am not able to understand why the right hand limits doesn't exist at x = 1
This is the solution
but I can't understand what does "oscillating" mean here
its b not c
c is correct!
when X ā 1+ lim 1/1-x= + infinit , and when xā +infinit lim cos does not exist
can you explain it to me please
multiply the equation by -1
that'll change the sign of inequality
-4 ⤠3x - 2 ⤠-1
add two to each side and then divide the whole equation by 3
which'll give -2/3 ⤠x ⤠1/3 @pliant agate
can you explain please, I do not understand
Anyone knows what chapters do i study before complex numbers (11th grade India)
it doesn't have a lot of pre-requisite
before the algebra part, study trigonometry
it does when you see questions
and before the geometry part, study circles and straight lines
yeessss needed thet
well, if you'd do jee advanced question, they'll require more than one concept
yea
ik
thenks
kinda hard to explain in english since i know math in french
will it work with google translate?
basically all i did is calcultale the lim of 1/1-x =+ ā ( and then u use the lim GoF rule) then lim cosx when xā+ā does not exist , you can see it in this graph
There is no limit. The real limit of a function f(x), if it exists, as x->oo is reached no matter how x increases to oo. For instance, no matter how x is increasing, the function f(x)=1/x tends to zero. This is not the case with f(x)=cos(x). Let x increases to oo in one way: x_N=2piN and integer N increases to oo. For any x_N in this sequence co...
here is a better explanation than the graph lol
Hope it helpsā¤ļø
write down all the formulas somewhere and then memorise it and solve a lot of question after that
you'll get used to it
oh
you know the DI table method?
you can use that in place of integration by parts
and it's easy to learn
they are both very similar
when you solve question, do you need to show the full procedure?
nah that's not the case I assure you
maths and physics don't really require frequent revision
ah for written you'll have to go with the parts one, no choice for you
also I think you are having difficulty in those sinx, cosx problems
where you gotta do the steps again and again
nah I am not taking stats
trig problems in by parts are hard
maybe you should do like 5 question on that concept daily for a week atleast
oohhh thanks maan
anyone have a video or can explain how people came up with the addition and subtraction identities in trig
i understnad thing more when i see where they came from
and i couldnt find any yt videos
search up Ptolemy's theorem for the sine addition formula explanation
I derive forms of the double and half angle formulae for the sine and cosine using Euler's formula for complex exponentials. I state how these methods can be generalized to derive any trigonometric identity far more easily than using purely real methods.
if you studied complex numbers, you'll remember them easily
can anyone help me with solving my math homework
i keep having trouble finding the point A
can you translate what's written in arabic
kk
we need to find the equation of AB and the equation of AC
we are givin that both AC and AB touch the circle
they are tangent
idk much english
tangent means a line which touches at only one point
and we are givin that B = (-2 , 1) C = (10,-5) and M = (3,-4)
the equation of a tangent is
xx1 + yy1 + g ( x + x1 ) + f ( y + y1 ) + c
where x1 and y1 are the points where the line ( tangent ) intersects the circle, in this case B ( -2, 1 ) and C ( 10 , - 5 )
g is the negative of x coordinate of centre of circle
f is negative of y coordinate of circle
c is the constant in the circle's equation, which you'll get when you will write the equation of circle
@solemn estuary
kk
Sometime math seems like Arabic lol, jk
De l'hopital
Lim X --> inf {(1/X)/1 } = 0
n is tending to?
n tending to N
i think + infinit
So you solved it ?
Also correct me if I'm wrong but these are vectors right ?
Yes i did, i just had to prove that the determinant of that matrice is equal to (a-b)³, there no vectors.
Sine takes value between -1 and +1 when we solve in the second case the argument of sine inverse it comes out to be somewhere above 2 which isn't possible hense an error
While in the ist case it comes under 1 that's why no error
You have the same calculator
i have no specific math problem i need help on, but i'm just curious on how to go about studying math. since i'm in precalc i know to memorize limits, derivatives and equations but i feel like i'm missing something/i still end up forgetting stuff when i get test papers handed to me
Can someone help me do my math homework?
I am super behind and Iām trying to get tutored to get caught up but itās difficult
I feel you
which number?
here's #1 and #4 to get you started
Anyone down to help with some trig?
send question
Ah I got it figured out, thanks though mate!
You asking me
hey guys does anyone have a counterexample for 2
we're given a function sequence f_n which is bounded for all n in N and x in I, I=[1,inf) and it's (the function sequence) uniformly convergent to a function f
and 2 says if the the improper integral of f_n on 1 to inf is convergent for all n in N then the improper integral of f on 1 to inf is convergent and is equal to that limit
all of the examples im able to come up with wind up being convergent to 0 and that's why im struggling
thanks in advancee
if I remember correctly fn should also be approximated by a staircase function for 2 to work
i'll look into it thanks a lot!
if anybody has strategies that they used for calc + general ideas for practicing math that would be helpful (i forget everything for my tests)
ty!
Also I put the side length as the angle on accident soo oops
if triangle YZX correlates with XZW then shouldn't XY correlate with XW? If so then option B should be right too.
(key says option A is correct)
no YZX is not similar to XZW
wait it is
mb
yeah, B should be correct too
ikrrr but key says only A is correct
im losing my mind here
this book is rarely wrong so i think we might be missing something
are multiple answers correct?
if its single correct mcq then A is more appropriate
why so
because first we got YZ/XZ = 1/k, then we got XY/XW = YZ/XZ so maybe thatswhy
i'm trying to solve it
i divided the problem in 2 parts, solved the second one (i think it's right)
i will try the first part now
I'm not taking into account the constants, bc we can just group them at the end
i have no idea how to do this, sorry
Solve definite and indefinite integrals (antiderivatives) using this free online calculator. Step-by-step solution and graphs included!
Idk why but I smell long division
really? O.o
no problem mate, thanks for help
damn, didnt knew something like this existed
yeah , kinda long division and then breaking the denominator into x(1 + xlnx)
haha no worries
use sin cos tan cot
example 1
sin60* = y/10
=> y = 5 multiple square root of 3 (i can't type it, doesn't see any square root symbol)
similar to another, it's easy
Could someone walk me through how I substitute the 5/root(2) for terms of theta. The answer is pi/4 and I can integrate it but I don't know how to get my X in terms of theta.
Thank you
@obtuse mural
Whatās the difference between PVIFA and PMT
anyone got discounted cash flow analytics questions and answers? i cant seems to do any practice T_T
I've done the "A" part right but can't understand how to do the "B" part as my answer doesn't match it
This is from Edexcel Core Math C2 A level math and the topic is "Radian measures and its applications"
These are the answers
i think for part b we differentiate
i'll try to do it
hold on
is it okay if we turn the sin into a (1-cos) here or is it invalid?
part i, we differentiate 50r-r^2 into 50-2r
equation will become 0=50-2r, which gives r as 25
to show A as a maximum just differentiate the equation of the area given, which will give you -2 (when the answer is negative the point is a maximum)
wait the ms is confusing
but for the second part it's substituting the value of r into the perimeter ewuation
giving you the angle as 2 radians
nvm i understood it wrong
for the last part substitute the value of r into the area equation given
How to do 5.11
Hey , you need solution of this ?
Does $1,0759.50 mean 1,0759 x 50 = $53,795 ? And this is the amount of money u get after 10 years ?
Hi, I would like some help on this question please. As I arrived at the end of my answer I ended up with sin inverse 3/5 which doesn't give a definite value so I am confused whether I did get the correct answer or not
Yeah ><
Thanks me later : )
I actually added an extra step to get more values
@forest iris Guys, If you need any help regarding any solution or something else related to maths , you can dm me for your problems
Thanks :DDD
really smart solution!!
Hey Shot cool, I believe your method for finding p(x) was incorrect. Here is what I believe is the correct way of finding out the pr(X)
what topic are you learning?
like what kind of math
i would think like this:
(a)
you know the price for 10m --> 7500
you know the price for 20m --> 9300
the difference in depth is 10m, so for an extra 10m you pay 9300-7500 = 1800
so if you need to know how much it is for 100m i would do the price for 10m = 7500 + 9(1800) since its givin that its a constant price for every subsequent extra depth of 10m
Can some one help me with this
if not for the m!=0 condition it couldve been equivalence (as condition for symmetric wouldve been met) but since it exists this will be symmetric and transitive only
I think it would be equivalence as you mentioned 2 already ... We have m!=0 but n can be able to 0 (n=0) .. hence we can say a-a = 0 where m!=0 ... Correct me if am wrong
n is mentioned a positive integer and I think 0 isn't included in it, otherwise it will be equivalence only
Isn't positive integers are same as whole numbers
Okay thanks š
Then what could be the solution since answers can't be multiples š
You have to mention FR=EP (perpendicular from centre bisects the chord)
And then prove them congruent cuz RHS
i see
** rth term from beginning is (nār+2)th term from end.** but how ?? (I read this line in BINOMIAL THEOREM)
gotta be (c) then i think because its not reflexive as a - a = 0 and neither n nor m are 0
i think it means
it is closer to the origin
by half of the other one?
sorry for the sloppy line
i ws using a trackpad
@vague dagger
but im not 100% sure that is what it means
also if you do end up using my answer
there should be another perpendicular line at positive 2.5
that is perpendicular to the line
since i only gave 1 solution
do you know how to do volume of revolution
im a bit rusty with the integrals
but i can explain what the problem wants
so given this graph of all the lines
they want you to rotate where the area from quadrant 1 (upper right) around the line x=-3
since it is a vertical rotation around the y axis it will be an integral with dy
Thank you, I think I'm supposed to use the disk method, I was just a bit confused on how the process would change with having 3 functions instead of 2, and with me only having to find the volume in the first quadrant
if you are finding the volume of whatever is in the first quadrant
you will be using the range
with respects to whatever is in the first quadrant
actually
i dont want to misinform you because it has been years since i have done calculus
so
i would just watch this
Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicingāand saving your progressānow: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/ap-calculus-ab/ab-applications-of-integration-new/ab-8-10/v/disc-method-rotating-around-vertical-line
Volume of solid created by rotating around vertical line that is not the y-axis using the disc method. Created by Sal...
Ok gotcha thank you, I appreciate the help
yeah sorry I couldnt be of more help
No worries! Still appreciate it nonetheless, I'll check out the video
does anybody know how to simplify this question
I think the only thing you can do is to get rid of the brackets but that wouldn't be simplifying it
can someone explain how to get that ax²+bx+c type of function with the function on the left?
thx
ofc
is the function on the right any type of hint or smth or it has to be totally ignored
the funtion on the right is the solution you get by changing the left side. but idk how
idk what i did LMFAO
i hope its correct
"Prove that if a plane is perpendicular to two secant planes, then it is perpendicular to the intersection of these planes"
pls help
makes sense, thanks
no problem
Been trying to solve this for a little. I don't think squeeze theorem works but I can't get the term stuck in the cos out
pls help š©
Can anyone help me to solve this?
Hi have i done this correctly?
thanks dude!!
Is anybody familiar with Gauss' and Stokes' Theorems in differential geometry?
In the context of Vector Analysis from the book of Apostol, yes, but I don't know in differential geometry
Is this Chat only for math help in High School or are university maths also welcomed?
This is the exercise task
Hii, but can't we directly substitute the limits in this case? Wouldn't the resulting answer be 1?
I got it-- took the conjugate. Forgot it was a thing x) Thanks though
Np :)
But why take the conjugate though?
hey
can someone please explain me in the simplest way why its true?
take 2^(x-2) common
you'll be left with 2^2-1 which is 3
how can i take 2^(x-2) common if its the biggest among the two?
(thanks for the reply)
2^x is bigger lol it can be broken down to 2^(x-2 +2)
the integral of cos x = sinx , then sub in the value of 2pi into the sinx and minus that from the sin of 0
i need help in inequation 2
why cant i find the solutions even i am doing the right steps
wdym?
im pretty confused
like they give us 3 integrals
Guys I found the answer
goodjob
how would i start this problem
I need help
i did integration by parts once but im not sure where to go from there
hey guys this is apparently wrong but im not sure where pls help š
u can simplify 2x^2-2x-24 =0 as x^2-x-12 = 0
and then factor it as (x-4)(x+3) = 0
which is 4,-3
ohhh right tysm
might wanna double check the values, but this is how you do integration by parts
Q7 or Q8?
8 please
So 10 <= a <= 100, so it could be a=28 or a=79
Standard form means only one digit before the dot
So 4 in standard notation would be 4 * 10^0, 455 in standard notation would be 4.55 * 10^2
No problem š
how is a cubic equation solved? the book I'm using didn't give me a solution to this n straight forward gave me the answer "0.25", I end up getting to 16x^3-4x^2+4x-1=0 but idk what to do next and how to get to the "0.25" answer
i searched up abt how to solve a cubic equation but it looked really complicated, can anyone explain it to me in a less complicated way? I'm a science major n this is my first time coming across something like this n we don't really get straight forward questions from this topic, but today i came across this two times in chemistry n since im not a math major the books aren't helping at all š
Well
Here is the solution
16x³-4x²+4x-1=0
U can regroup this with 4x²
4x²(4x-1) + 4x-1
And then u can again regroup this
4x-1 (4x²+1) =0
Then u can find the solution easily.
Hopefully this helps.
OH MY GOD š
i was literally sitting there for an hour n i couldn't think of a solution this was way too good and easy tysm
i feel dumb as hell ngl
if it wasn't possible for the equation to be regrouped n stuff, how is it solved?
You're welcome
We have cube expansion
(a-b)³= a³-3a²b+3ab²-b³
(a+b)³=a³+3a²b+3ab²+b³
If the equations fits these formula we can use these formula.
Sometimes equations can also be solved by factoring.
But I don't have a very good knowledge of math, so maybe there are other ways, I don't know.
oh alright, tysm!
someone have some tips for me?
I am learning second degree equation
Delta, Bhaskara, etc
dont worry from then to university it will get way easier in factorisation
like taylor formula i dont know if you study it in your country but you can look for it
he can also do this (a-b)³=(a-b)(a-b)²
it make it waaaay easier
is the 2x= 2-5y the answer for the thing u wrote at top?
cause the first one seems to have a problem, since the (x-y) are the same they can be removed, but then there won't be any answer
noo,This is a system
i dont know the name this problem in english
hmm
bottom line looks like linear equation for a graph
yeah but what's the one on the top
x-y/5 = x-y/2
ohh so the 2 and 5 r under y? not the whole (x-y) thing?
yeah
ooo
nah again it'll be false
Is my handwriting that bad?
no no it's not about the handwriting

