#science-help
1 messages · Page 6 of 1
The upward force will be Kx and downward will be mg
And to calculate the magnitude of it u need the mass of the person and distance at which she stopped
One message removed from a suspended account.
does someone here have an idea how to answer this?
Yes but they haven’t given u either of m or x
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
If resonance is there then + m is theres so both r almost the same thing
Either way the answer is the same
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
can someone please explain cross-aldol condensation between ethanal and propanal?
U want the mechanism is it?
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
thanks that helped a lot!
thanks for the info!
however if I consider butanol has +I which reduces acidity
and para methoxy phenol has +M or +R effect which reduces acidity too! but +R is stronger that +I so para methoxy phenol's acidity will be much more lowered than that of butanol...in that sense butanol should be more acidic than para methoxy phenol. Can you clarify where this reason goes wrong?
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
okay
One message removed from a suspended account.
<@&942391219206647828>
@merry raven
thanks
- A person on a raft is drifting downstream with the
current. Suddenly he dives off the raft and swims
upstream for a quarter of an hour. He then swims
downstream at the same velocity with respect to the
water and catches back up to the raft at a position
1.0 km downstream from where he started. What
is the speed of the current, in kilometres per hour?
(1.6 or 2km/h)
Can someone help me with this question please, i don't understand how you would pull any numbers from limited amounts of information
I’m assuming there will be three distances that you can calculate
hii anyone here studying astrophysics?
as a minor yeah
can someone give some tips on understanding physics content (specifically the bPho year 12 challenge) except for doing ppq. Because realistically the same question wont come up and tbh so far I havent even found anything weven similar
walking outside
😐
he is being serious lmfao
like you aren't gonna circumvent a complex issue by endlessly searching google
walking outside is analagous to spending time in a muse
yh but i dont think it will help me too much
if i could understand physicsd by walking outside i would be a genius with straight A*s
i studied and walked outside with the mindset of "what did i see in class that i can explain to myself right now"
i aced it
you can to
physics is the study of what happens around us
you wont see any of it if you stay inside and study study study, thats overrated
help
6
THANKS BRO
does this pic mean that retinoblastoma spread to his brain?
does this pic mean that retinoblastoma spread to his brain?
(CT scan)
I guess the medic help is the best channel for this
hNT REAL
I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking two short surveys. One is over fashion and sustainability; the other one is over art and perception. Your participation would help greatly! And all submissions are anonymous.
Why, if the vapourisation (condensation) temperature of water is 100°C, is there still water in the air? Why is it all non-condensed
Wdym ? 100° is the evapourasiation temperature, water is in gas phase at atmospheric pressure
<@&942391219206647828> pls do sth about about this
ma'am u can't keep spamming here like this
<@&942391219206647828>
@white sleet they're at it again
does anyone have good notes for counter current mechanism/concentration of urine?
can anyone explain why neutrinos can only be detected if above the threshold energy
is this special relativity
im not sure, Im just researching neutrinos and I saw that they can only be detected if its above a threshold energy, but I was confused as why that is
interesting
im not sure how to help you with that one, sorry, ive studied very little on alpha and beta decay
idek inverse beta
its alr thanks anyways bro
help
when doing thevinin
do you consider the dependent source
as vth + the voltage across 12 ohm
could someone explain where 4.25 is coming from for the pKa?
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Ohh ok thank you! I thought I was going crazy lol
The energy value is very less in terms of MeV. They react very feebly with nuclei, that too is a very rare occurrence. But they simply cannot interact with energies below the threshold. Could be that they lack charge(so electrons will remain unaffected because of the small mass). So only way they can interact with a nucleus is maybe when they have a minimum energy value (having sufficient mass to interact). I'll not go into spin contribution here. Won't make much difference. But that's what I think it is. Below threshold energy, the mass would be way too low for interaction. Just an opinion, nothing more.
ok thanks so much
i understand it more now cheers
yeah
anyone get this (part b)? My professor words his problems in an odd way
youre doing it right
did u put R and x in parantheses and square it?
thats like the most important part and u got it
instead of plugging in the values, just solve the equation without variables
for part b?
yea im just having issues with rearranging the equation algebraically
oh ok ill help
This is what my professor did
yeah
but my calculation yields a different answer lol
oh wait nvm I was dividing instead of subtracting zzz
Can someone draw a Hess cycle and show where the numbers are on the Hess cycle be
Because ugglinf to know where to put the numbers on the cycle
surprised they dont allow u to use mesh current analysis 😭
wouldve made it easier
you can prol combine the resistors and do source transformation to make things easier
thats what i thought of doing
Can someone help me understand how this is the right answer, idk how they got 2.07, I tried -log(0.16) it wasn't right
thank u so much
this is a reach but if anyone can point me in the right direction on how to do this i would appreciate it
Np!!
pH of a solution = the negative base 10 logarithm of the concentration of hydrogen ions [h+] in the solution
and in the case of 0.160 M HNO2 solution, the concentration of h+ ions is 160 mM right?
by taking the negative base 10 logarithm of h+ gives us: pH = -log[h+] = -log(160 mM), which gives 2.07
there might be a mistake in your method, try again
because it has a flat topography and lacks terrain features that could create springs (such as hills n mountains)
this type of landscape reduces the amount of runoff which prevents the formation of springs
and i think at the equator, the energy is at its lowest point bc the force of gravity is at its minimum
At point Y, the spring is neither extended nor compressed (i.e it is in a neutral position).
PE = 1/2kx^2. As x increases in either direction (extension or compression), potential energy increases. So, this neutral point Y provides the lowest PE out of the 3 options
(i think)
because the potential by gravitational pull and elastic potentional have the least difference at point Y and hence cancel outs eachother
(Look I'm a 10th grader... and that's all I can figure out from the figure so please correct me if i'm wrong
🥲 )
When I wrote “holds true ONLY for strong acids”, I meant that substituting the concentration of the acid directly (without using Ka) only works for strong acids.
OFF TOPIC BUT I LOVE YOUR PFP ONG
Can anyone solve this problem and see if they calculated similar values? I received partial feedback earlier but am still stumped:
A 1000 kg car starting at rest reaches a velocity of 45 m/s in a distance of 25 m up a frictionless incline of 35 degrees. What is the work done by the engine on the car? (d) What is the average force and power exerted by the engine of the car?
Tnx
ngl i haven't done mechanics in ages so you might want a second opinion
also could not think of a way to comfortably do the power
@quartz comet help
Off topic but your car kinda looks like amogus.
yea I figured out the first part using trig
solving for power sux. @snow meadow any idea?
I did (distance * work)/time. I calculated time using kinematics, which this part is that which is under question
hm lemme see
i did i
I always do work with energy theorema
Best thing there is
idk if i got it right
aye I tried using that approach
but i'm a bit shit w these types of questions
yeah that makes sense
physics centripetal forces, if anyone know how to solve would appreciate (how do I even draw the FBD lol)
there could also be an outward force called the centrigal force
depends if you have to neglect or not
Hi, please can anyone answer this within two days? I am having my exam and this is from a specimen paper.
In case you are wondering about the background.
It is a question from class 12th biology of ISC board (India)
And the question is from the chapter biotechnology and the topic is Gel electrophoresis and vectors
Please while replying ping me or send me a dm!
With love from India ❤️
Hope it helps.
DM for any queries
Ooh i flipped the fraction oopsie
Thanks
no problem cutie🩷
someone help this dude already😂 😭
What is it that you're asking?
Do you want to see the electron movements?
More like how the ketone splits to become branched but I sort of get it now
Ty tho
Can anyone pls explain me calorimeter? And when to use its formulas?
You will use Bf3 as a reagent and idk it’s mechanism either but you can use this as a trick to learn
My trick is, where you can see the hope of making H2O make it and it works most of the time
H20 will be made, which is a good leaving group
It’s a guess, sorry if the logic is incorrect in advance
Is this how you did? Pls share your answer too, thanks
Please help me with this one-
Calculate the cell potential, E°cell, when H₂O₂ is oxidized by MnO4. The half-reactions are-
2H++O2 + 2e = H2O2 ; E° = + 0.68 V
MnO4+8H++5e¯ = Mn2+ + 4H2O; E° =1.51 V
I have 2 answers and idk which one is correct, Ecell = 6.4V or -0.4 😭
I forgot electrochemistry, but as per I know, this will be solved by 🔺G= -nfEcell
Ecell won’t be added directly as it is an intensive property
n will be 10 when you try to equate the electrons
F will get cancelled
Same....i am out of practice as well and this question has to come🥲
+/-0.83,+0.38 or +2.19...i think one of those is the correct answer
Can you send your solution?
Because you have to reverse the anode reaction
And E cell will become negative
If reaction is happening it means net E will never be negative so I g the answer is 6.4
This is my solution
U12=MCv(t2-t1), can anyone explain, if this is for constant pressure, volume or for temperature?
It was a multiple choice question... Those 4 were the options given
No problem... Ig i shd start to review tht chapter agn...i hate tht
Good luck and Thanks buddy
Idk...i dont like chemistry 🥲
Good luck dude, it will be fun
Hopefully.
Yeah😆
I feel you dude
Do you think there is any mistake in my sol.?
Feeling is mutual then😞
🤝
Can u solve this using nernst
Yeah
I forgot
And conc
It should be solved by G= -nfEcell
See, my answer was 0.4
So maybe the answer is 0.38
Maybe
Yeah....maybe
Here just minus 3.4 and 3
I added here because I took 3 positive
Hopefully it is correct, if not then pls do send me the solution
Inshaallah... Thnx agn🌸
Can anyone explain difference between electron affinity, ionisation enthalpy in a little detail?
it's constant volume!
you use Cv for constant volume and Cp at constant pressures
constant temperature won't apply as you only ever use the mc(t2-t1) equations when temperature changes
the other equation being ∆Q = mCp(T2 - T1), where ∆Q is change in heat energy and Cp is specific heat capacity at constant pressure
Yeah right, It was used for concluding that for a constant temperature heat Supplied = work done , so i am kind of confused as to why is that relevant
I don't understand that statement at all, it says change in internal energy fo isothermal process then shows a formula where there is change in temperature
anyone can help me identify strcture
from spec
hydrocarbons are the bane of my exsistance
my discord on my laptop is taking 10 years too update
So IR
NMR
Carbon 13
Mass Spec
Mass is already there
and Imma assuming it's 5 carbons and 10 hydrogens
5 x 12 = 60 + 10 = 70
So #1 and #2 satisfies the rule of triplet and quartet
I know that is for sure correct
#3 is my guess on the 5th extra carbon on the C13
#4 is the middle Singlet with 3H
and #5 breaks the rule
It needs to have more than 4
but rn idk how to get there
I just studied this, but can anyone help me with Klechkowski of Chromium (Cr) 😢ASAP
Someone plss
It’s the n+l rule right?
Electrons will enter the sub shell which has low energy ig
Cr is a special case
🫂.
this looks interesting.
can you send a picture of equation 4.9 and I'll have a look at this once I'm back from the gym?
its doesn't show 'change' in temperature it shows that between state 1 and 2 there is no change in temperature due to which there is no change in internal energy in isothermal process
and as per the first law
Energy of system = Heat suppied - work done
0 = Q - W
Q =W
hence all heat will be converted into work
Can anyone explain difference between electron affinity, ionisation enthalpy in a little detail?
oh yeah. it does show ∆U = 0.
soooo like wiz was said
Ah makes sense , thanks
In intel 8051, why setting any port to 0 makes it an output port and making it 1 acts as an input?
WHERE'S THE PHYSICS MAN WHEN I NEED HIM @quartz comet
Loads of other people are a lot better then me hahahaa
But what's up? What can I help you with
Any tips for thermo numericals?
all jokes my guy! I was just faced with an energy problem i have never seen before lol
Lemme help you thrn
A 950 kg car starting at rest reaches a velocity of 50 m/s in 120 m. If the coefficient of friction on the tires and ground is 0.35, what is the work done by the engine and friction on the car? (b) What is the average force of the engine on the car?
I never worked with friction and work simultaneously
There is an EQ for that
Since you are working with external forces
So your total energy is the the sum of difference in kinetic and potential
So T1 + U1 = T2 + U2
But external forces results in the following:
T1 + U1 = T2 +U2 + F_ext
Try working with that shoukd be good I thinj
You can also use kinematic equations
with thermo, I found being strong with fundamentals helped a ton in the long run. there is a lot of stuff that repeats (subtly and not so subtly) through all the levels so having a strong foundation really helps.
so rather than remembering formulas, I usually try to understand where the formula comes from, and I can write it down from there. Really you want to break things down into the lowest level (at your discretion) and be strong with all of these little pieces.
(i hope that is kinda what you were asking)
Does someone know how to solve this problem, we need to make this for a group project but aren't sure how: A 5 mL plasma sample (pH 7.4) from the patient treated with tramadol hydrochloride was extracted with 10 mL ether (true partition coefficient (P) ether:water = 75). The ether was evaporated dry and the extracted drug reconstituted in 2 mL of chloroform. The concentration of tramadol in chloroform is 10.8 μg/mL. Calculate the initial concentration of tramadol in the plasma sample.
hi everyone i have a school project its about building a science project if the project good enough my project will be taken to the international space station DM if u want to help
Hi, do someone knows why this is the solution to the differential equation.
I believe we can write it with complex numbers but idk
also theta(0)= theta'(0)=0
est ce que cest lagrange?
ou pas?
euh je pense pas je sais pas ce que c'est
tu veux fair un photo de question general?
tu dois fair ca?:
En déduire l’équation vibrationnelle normale pour un système conservateur avec des liaisons holonomes indépendantes (décrit par un lagrangien avec n généralisé
coordonnées), pour de petits écarts autour d’un équilibre stable.
Peut-être que cela peut vous aider ?
woww ca me semble beaucoup plus compliqué que mon niveau, mais ça marche peut être
C'est science naturelles première année
how does 1st has more resonance structures than the 2nd?
arent they each others resonance? idk much though
i thought so too but in the ans it says that 1st has more structures than 2nd and therefore 1 is more stable than 2
i think stability is about formal charges
either way all of the elements have formal charge of 0 nah?
thats the thing
its a question of hyperconjugation vs resonance
wait i actually drew this wrong
in resonance the elements do not change their places but i gave hydrogens to other carbons lol
but that way carbon makes 5 bonds which is impossible 
first time hearing about hyperconjugation so idts i can help w this one
oh npp!!
haha
i didnt notice these texts earlier, im sorry
np 🤣
<@&942391219206647828>
This guy is in every channel
10J laddie
Hey everyone, I have a physics question, it's about the spring. Could anyone explain it to me, I don't get why it's correct: if 2 boys were pulling each end of a spring with the same force exerted on the spring from the boys, why would the elongation of the spring be the same if the spring was attached to a wall and a boy was pulling the spring towards him with the same force (as the other boys)?
this is about hooke's law i'm pretty sure
'the elongation or compression of a spring is directly identically proportional to the force applied to it'
the forces exerted are equal and same in both situations where he's pulling it from the wall and where he's pulling it with his friend
so even when the two boys are pulling, the friend cancels out as he exerts the same force
the net force is the same
I will be honest, I still don't really get it, the friend force cancels out the other guys force?
I think yeah since they both exert the same amount of force it's basically like it doesn't matter if the friend on the other side was pulling or not
idk my wording is a bit weird but
but if they cancel out, then there wouldnt be an elongation?
they don't exactly cancel out I guess moreso they're equal
one friend ends up becoming the wall. i feel like u could understand it in reverse. if u and a friend tried to walk into each other u arent going to go anywhere. same if u walked into a wall. that could either be a helpful explanation or completely useless. i have no clue what the theory is so im just assuming that how it would work (im no a smart man)
this is how I understood if i'm not mistaken
when forces are exerted from both sides, the spring elongates or compresses around its equilibrium position -> the equlibrium position is the midpoint in the two boys case
@thorny gyro does that make sense or
It makes a lot of sense, but isn't the elongation supposed to be 18m and 18m for the first example and the second? isn't the second scenario not supposed to be 36 m? or am I the one understanding it wrong?
no no ur right cause in the two boys case the total elongation of the spring is 36m
but, we measure the elongation from the middle in the second case since there are two (equal) forces pulling from both sides
when we measure from the middle, it's still considered 18m to the boi
oh ok nice, still weird that we measure it from the middle but the other stuff makes sense
thank you so much for explaining it to me
ofc glad i could be of some help
you don't always measure from the middle, only when the two opposing forces are equal
the general rule is you measure from the equilibrium point which you can find with hooke's law (F = kx)
but when the forces opposing are equal just take the midpoint as the reference
ofc ofc ur most welcome
does someone knows WHERE i can found the meaning of each “term” in this equation? this is all i have but im not sure what “n” stands for, or that inverted triangle
well, for those 2 terms, the upside down triangle stands for divergence. It really is just a fancy way of representing a differential. The differential operator (divergence) is applied to a 3 dimensional vector function to produce a function that describes a rate of change. It represents the 'outgoingness' of the particle under consideration.
kinda looks like this:
well when considering velocity anyway
uhhh for n, I thibk it's just the number or so of the particle you're considering
but that could be totally wrong
is there any more context you can give? is this equation being applied in a heat transfer sense, or a fluids sense, or so on?
ahhhh it's geology.
so n will be the concentration of the substance per gram of carrier
i was seeing atmosphere, im not sure about the context of it but it says is about “chemical transport”
thank u so much 🙏🏼
I guess you gotta assume maximum spectral lines here, i.e., ground state to n=infinite.
Ow wait, wavelength is given. You can find the excited state
λ = Rz² (1/n² - 1)
night mode notability enjoyer
well, it's likely because you're assuming all of the energy from the bullet is converted to gravitational potential in the block
in reality, that probably won't be the case
i think you would want to consider some rotational equations to help you find where the energy has gone
i don't remember any of them i'll go look now though
ok honeslty you're probably right and i have no idea what I'm talking about
what if you considered momentum?
good looks
I'm super curious about the solution though, how'd you do it?
I’ll write it out and send it
It might not be as high level physics because I’m doing AS physics at,
ATM
gl w exams
Yeah it’s difficult to see
Thanks man, I’m so ass at physics so it’s a struggle
nahhhhhh you're already reading questions well, that's about half the battle
maybe a quarter
Not sure but maybe as the branching increase, boiling point of alkaline chain decreases.
could anyone here who has studied organic chemistry (uni level) give me some tips for studying this subject?
A Type II error involves:
(A) concluding a difference between groups exists after the experimental manipulation when, in fact, a difference does not exist
(B) concluding a difference between groups does not exist after the experimental manipulation when, in fact, a difference does exist
(C) concluding a score is two standard deviations above the mean when, in fact, it is two standard deviations below the mean
(D) concluding a score is two standard deviations below the mean when, in fact, it is two standard deviations above the mean
(E) rejecting the null hypothesis when, in fact, it should have been accepted
----how is it B?
C and D and E are ruled out but not sure about A and B
Can someone tell me how the addition of 2 moles of HBr to CH2CHCOOCH2CHCH2 takes place?
Not at all sure about the solution but as a newbie to organic chemistry I wanted to try it... try to provide the error and the solution if I'm wrong
hello guys
do u know a good chanel in youtube for last year student in highschool (physics)
Br will attach to the secondary carbon becasue it has a more stable carbocation aka markonikov rule, futhermore, the left carbocation is resonance stabilized
it can be better understood as
Thankss Bro, appreciate it...😇
I can try but I can't understand the second one too
Okay iam in 12th too and I am female if u want, I can add u and we can try and solve this together
To find the standard potential of the corresponding galvanic cell (ii), you can use the relationship between Gibbs free energy change (ΔG°) and standard cell potential (E°):
[ΔG° = -nFE°]
Where:
- (ΔG°) is the standard Gibbs free energy change (given as -62.5 kJ/mol).
- (n) is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the balanced equation.
- (F) is Faraday's constant (96485 C/mol).
- (E°) is the standard cell potential we want to find.
To find (n), examine the balanced equation. The number of moles of electrons transferred is determined by the stoichiometric coefficients of the species involved in the redox reaction.
Given the balanced equation:
[2 Ag^+ + CrO_4^{2-} + 2 e^- → Ag_2CrO_4(s)]
The number of moles of electrons transferred ((n)) is 2.
Now, rearrange the equation to solve for (E°):
[E° = -\frac{ΔG°}{nF}]
Substitute the given values into the equation and solve for (E°).
For part (ii), the standard potential of the Ag2CrO4/Ag,CrO4^2- couple can be calculated using the Nernst equation:
[E = E° - \frac{RT}{nF} \ln Q]
Where:
- (E) is the cell potential under non-standard conditions.
- (E°) is the standard cell potential (which you calculated in part (i)).
- (R) is the gas constant (8.314 J/(mol·K)).
- (T) is the temperature in Kelvin.
- (n) is the number of moles of electrons transferred.
- (F) is Faraday's constant.
- (Q) is the reaction quotient.
You would need to calculate (Q) using the concentrations of the relevant species in the cell.
I have added you
can someone explain why we have to write a in terms of F to solve this?
Well, F is what the question is asking for. The acceleration is also one of the 'knowns' (in the sense that it is known a is equal in both the block and object).
Since you know this, it becomes easier to approach the question with F and a in mind
If you are asking about the last line, it's because you know a is the same for both the block and object. Due to this, you can find F faster by substituting into the equation
I think you cant balance it because you don't have the full equation - where does the H and Na go?
does anyone have knowledge about classification of waters using their dominant ions (geochemistry), piper diagram? i have a doubt 😔
I have a question about entropy , if for example we have gas as react and gas as product (same amount ) the variation is positive or negative
for me its negative cuz the system becoming more stable but idk
positive change in entropy as the first reactant molecules turn into product.
as they are in same phase
ye but why
can u explain to me the cause
stable as in more stable compound?
entropy doesn't depend on how stable the compound is
since same number of gas molecule is being formed
two possible cases arises
either the number of micro state remains same (so s=0)
or there is increase in micro state (if complex molecule broken into simpler ones,) which causes increase in entropy
think entropy in terms of number of possible arrangement of molecules or atoms
order and disorder more disorder = less stable thats what I meant it wasnt clear sorry
So for this one : CO (g) + 1/2 O2 (g)=> CO2(g)
as the molecule is bigger its positive ?
And this one : Cl2(g) + H2 (l) = Hcl(aq) + HclO (aq ) its + cuz there is more particles ? or is it because we changing state
yes entropy decreases here
so negative reason being even though there are same number of molecules
the co2 is has less freedom to move because of rigid structure of molecules as compared to reactants
hence lesser number of possible arrangement
due to it being in liquid form there is decreases the possible number state (as in liquid there is less room to move around)
@split thunder back me up
It was my first tought then I ask to chat gpt and it said the opposite
The shit is pure evil
Ty mate
never fully rely on chatgpt
that sht gets gaslight very easily
"theory will only take you so far"
yea @outer jetty gotta make some chlorine gas
sniff*
good shit
jokes aside I'm dogshit w chem oops
bro is really gonna be wiz "was"
man entropy same everywhere haiyaaaaa
shame on newton
very haiyaaa moment
dude smoked too much crack
so true, im currently studying chemistry and it say SO many things wrong 😭
Anyone able to answer a quick question?:
Say the concentration of an enzyme is 0.005 mg/ml and the reaction rate is 0.0054, what is the unit for the reaction rate measured in seconds? Is it mg/ml/s?
moles/l/s
depends on the order of rxn
or wait you said measured in sec?
shouldnt be the unit be in sec^-1
Why would it be?
You sure it's moles/l/s and not mmoles/ml/s? Just so if I do edit it, I don't get it wrong
yee
reaction rate is also depletion rate
moles/liter is standard unit to get concentration
source: trust me bro
oh no my bad i literally thought you were asking about the rate constant mb bro
yeah its mol lit^-1 sec^-1
i mean ml;
ml
it should be obvious tho
So just molar?
Wdym?
This was a question and this was the solution
Now my doubt:
Suppose we take 1000gm water and 500gm ethylene glycol.
Let it's freezing point be -100 degrees.
Now if we are cooling it to only -50 degrees then some mass of ice will form and rest part will be water .
The ice formed will be due to the fact that that mass obtained it's freezing point.
Now my point is when we are cooling it to -50 degrees, if we assume it to be the freezing point depression,and apply the formulas ,then the molality we are getting is the molality of that mass of ice freezed.
So shouldn't x be th mass of ice formed?
Please ping me when replying...dms are preferred kinda
dude love the handwriting
it should be obvious if the given info is in ml you should convert it to standard units or let it be like that according to the options
Afaik Normal reaction from A should be zero when wheel turns and gets up
It was obviously not obvious since I asked.
xD
Mate you have some issues if that was not obvious ☠️
What are you even saying, your subjective opinion holds no significance. Perhaps stay silent?
Why are you so mad?
Why are you assuming I am mad? I simply dislike your comment because you literally said one has issues if you don't understand enzyme kinetics, however considering your profile picture and your childish language, I am not surprised.
You should be considering studying kinetics maybe that will help you more than my profile picture
Uff, what a comeback! Perhaps you should learn basic grammar and punctuation.
Anyways, you are not worth anyone's time, bye. 😊
ok this is one cooked question
so I've tried thinking about it in terms of units, then by the step by step process of water freezing
got about that far but no Idea what role specific heat capacity plays
not sure, but the terms can definitely work further to get a nice expression
Can someone help me draw the Lewis dot diagram for these
CO2, CHCl3, K2O
A step-by-step explanation of how to draw the CO2 Lewis Dot Structure (Carbon dioxide).
For the CO2 structure use the periodic table to find the total number of valence electrons for the CO2 molecule. Once we know how many valence electrons there are in CO2 we can distribute them around the central atom with the goal of filling the outer shells...
A video tutorial for how to draw Lewis Structures in five steps. The video covers the basic Lewis structures you'll see in an introductory chemistry class.
Steps to Write Lewis Structures
- Find the total valence electrons for the molecule.
- Put the least electronegative atom in the center. Note: Hydrogen (H) always goes outside.
- Pu...
Hope it helps
I cant remember anything from highschool tbh , but i remember this was as any chemistry lesson , so as i remember any highschool subject is there on yt
Ok thank you
To create the Lewis dot diagram for potassium oxide (K2O), we first need to determine the number of valence electrons for each element:
- Potassium (K) is in Group 1 of the periodic table, so it has 1 valence electron.
- Oxygen (O) is in Group 16, so it has 6 valence electrons.
-
Start by placing the least electronegative element (potassium) in the center. Oxygen will surround it.
K O K
-
Distribute the valence electrons around each atom, pairing them up if necessary. Remember, each bond contributes two electrons.
K O K
: : :
:
: : : -
Complete the octet for each atom by forming bonds between potassium and oxygen atoms. Each potassium atom donates one electron to form a bond, and each oxygen atom shares two electrons to form a bond.
K O K
: : :
: : :
: : :
: : :
K ─ O ─ K -
Count the total number of valence electrons used in the diagram. Each bond contributes two electrons, and each lone pair contributes two electrons.
K O K
: : :
: : :
: : :
: : :
K ─ O ─ K
The Lewis dot diagram for potassium oxide (K2O) shows two potassium atoms bonded to one oxygen atom through ionic bonds. Each potassium atom donates one electron to the oxygen atom, resulting in a stable arrangement for both atoms.
@supple monolith
A step-by-step explanation of how to draw the K2O Lewis Dot Structure.
For K2O we have an ionic compound and we need to take that into account when we draw the Lewis Structure. We’ll first draw the metal and put it in brackets with its charge on the outside (video: finding ionic charge: https://youtu.be/M22YQ1hHhEY).
Next, we'll draw the Lewis...
Yw
Ig u have to
He explained it in the video tho , but idk if it was necessary or he was just showing as the steps
oops
?
Yw!
hi can anybody tell me why cant n-ethyl-n-methylethamine be written as n,n-diethylmethamine?
One message removed from a suspended account.
Damn
isnt the longest carbon chain the parent one?
oh💀
How to prove Fermat’s principle( least time) in optics using laws of reflection and laws of refraction?
I can do the opposite but this one is giving me some trouble
i have it writtin out
lemma show you
excuse me for my handwritting
work with triangles
v = x/t
differentiate
also, you know that its a principle that has been around for a pretty long time so think in classical ways
triangles, circles etc
aint no way there is some crazy advanced mathematics etc
i also think i have a small sign convention mistake, but the essence is there
6th question can anybody pls help
I keep doing mistakes in calculation what should I do
drawing is a bit sketchy! d is the height of the triangle
answer is b? so it's not that the date is unique, it's that since the lists are created weekly, you will only have one list of a certain type created on a specific day.
the two of these combined are unique.
think of it like your friends. you may have 2 friends born on the same day, but you will only have one friend from the Jones' household born on that day. Hence, you can use uhhhh date and family name as the primary key for your friends.
Thanks @split thunder
I have a scientific question about the 'final fate' of the universe. According to what I read about boltzmann's understanding of entropy, the second law is statistical. However, this idea was controversial because it implied there was a very small probability for entropy to decrease, rather than the previous understanding that entropy could only increase. It seems boltzmann was proven correct experimentally, when challenged on it by Planck and others. Given infinite time, is it not certain that all entropy has to reverse if there is any non-zero probability for it to occur? When people talk about the final fate of the universe, given an infinite amount of time I don't know why we would stop considering things after some finite amount of time. That would be less than the first planck second of an eternal universe.
What makes me doubt this is not understanding by what mechanism energy that has been lost in the form of light radiation could ever return, or energy lost through various other types of radiation that propagate through space? Perhaps the universe's final state is matter radiating itself out of existence over infinite time?
question
in the experiments, under what conditions was entropy able to decrease
The experiment didn't show entropy reversed. Just that boltzmann's statistical calculation of entropy, that gave a probability of entropy reversing as real but extremely unlikely, produced a more accurate result confirmed by experiment than the methods at the time which didn't allow for the possibility of entropy doing anything but increasing.
This is from memory, but I'll double check my source.
ahh that makes sense thank you so much
oo makes sense, i mean the possibility of the universe's entropy (over an infinite amount of time) going down is definitely a cool thing to consider.
it is stastical, as you've mentioned. In a system, there is definitely the possibility for the reduction of entropy at certain points over time. For the universe, i don't think we would see this at a considerable scale.
if heat death ends up not being the fate of our universe, there could be some currently unheard of ways by which energy starts becoming available again (like in your last paragraph). Answer from me is, I have 0 idea. But, the heat death theory is my favoured one for now.
I have the quotes here from the book Ernst Zermelo : An Approach to his Life and Work by Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus
I'm guessing the improved radiation formula was tested experimentally, but it didn't say anything about an experiment technically
It would definitely take an inestimable amount of time and be supremely unlikely, occurring well after the heat 'death' of the universe. But given infinite time, even the most unlikely things have to happen.
I'm just not sure if it's very unlikely or if it truly has no chance to occur because of some scientific information I'm not aware of.
BOTANY: Hello does anyone know the parts here and what is happening in these pictures?
I've got the first part but second part is troubling me... please try to provide a brief solution for a beginner 🥲
I'd guess not, cus ΣFy = 0, so it's more likely that 2G + T3 = T1y + T2y
One message removed from a suspended account.
One message removed from a suspended account.
Please answer q3
Just want to clear out the answer : since c =distance / time. And we know that time is reduced to half but speed of light i.e "c" is constant so to make it constant the distance is needed to be increased hence the universe is doubled over night. Is this the answer ?
Not really... Actually I was studying by PW where the teacher gave this one out of many PYQ's
He said this one is of Jee Adv.
That's HC Verma..?!!
I too have it, and I remember reading and thinking about that question
Ig we can conclude it by calculating the gravitational force btw Moon and Earth... since the size is doubled (assuming the densities to be same) the gravitational force would be quadrupled , as,
g = (GMm)/R^2
g' = (G2M*2m)/R^2
But there's an issue that if the size is doubled either the empty vacuum btw earth and moon should also get doubled or the distance btw their closest points would come even closer
One message removed from a suspended account.
what epq topic would you recommend me do as a person who does maths, chemistry and physics and i want to pursue engineering (preferably mechanical engineering). Initially I wanted to link my epq to some advanced mechanics mathmatics (since i dont do further maths) but im finding a topic for that quite tricky.
since i think i have to pose my dissertation as a question
I mean there's so much you could do
i have a prompt anyways so its fine lol
oh
what was ur idea if u had one tho>?
lmaooo I was gonna ask your hobbies
Could always do sth hobby related so it's even more fun for you
ah fairss
or any interests, blah blah blah. One of my mates who was an F1 enjoyer did sth relating to tires for his BEng final year. Another liked robots so he made a lil scanny bot. Lot of potential in stuff like that so it may be worth thinking about
ah ok thanks bro
making something is quite interesting
ye you don't even have to make anything, can just do an investigation. In my case I made a software model for a renewable energy thing. Could be an analysis of golf swings even
damn thats impressive
My elder brother also says tha same😇 ... I'll definitely practice maximum possible jee mains pyqs
One message removed from a suspended account.
hello everyone, do you have a material about peroxosimal and glycerol exidation and as well as endogenous and exogenous pathway? like a video material or even just a document form?? thankyou
Hiii! can anyone pls help me with these questions?? Thank youu T^T
hope this helps!! ignore the writing 😅 @proven quartz
replying to this.
THANK YOUUU!!! I HAVE A TEST TMRW N YOU SAVED ME A MENTAL BREAKDOWNNN : " D n I hope your pillows are cold both side, thanks againnn
Yeahh... luckily for me, I would get all the module, notes and other stuff of FIIT-JEE of my brother in a month asa he would be done with adv. .
One message removed from a suspended account.
Any method to solve the circuit
electrical (count all currents and
durable)
guys plz help me i cant do it can someone solve this
i dont get it what do u need to find?
count all electric current and electric voltage
ok
To find current
Use mesh law
Guys my sir made us write this I didn't understand where this delta cam from since d/dx (ln x) is 1/x
This is from error analysis
Its for small changes since ln(1) = 0
So after 1st ln(x) they took it again as ln(1) ? Cuz I cannot understand working
Usually we consider error in f(x) to be derivative of f(x) multiplied by ∆x
I think it comes from Taylor series I don't remember exactly
Also this is only when ∆x<<x which is the case for most situations as we assume it beforehand
that means we assume x as a very small integer such as 1 and write del x
For a rigid body, let say a cube sliding on an inclined plane. When we make the free body diagram of the cube, we know that the normal reaction force vector changes its point of application according to the situation , we also know that friction = coefficient of friction × normal force .
So Can we determine a point where we can call/assume it the point of application of friction?
Uhh del x is the absolute error!!
And ∆x/x is relative error
Did your teacher not tell the basic definitions and stuff before going into errors in log etc.
he did tell us abt log but didnt told us abt the "errors in log"
Merge R1 and R2 into one, then do ohms law for everything I guess
U can also search for Kirchoff's law it could help
U can also convert all of the remaining resistances into one sole resistance
It would be easier to solve
It has to do with absolute and relative variation but idk if your teacher already told you about that if he did not just keep this in mind , you will need it for incertitude calculus with * and / (using the proprety of log) and for + and - you'll use differentials
Ah man that sucks see if you can find Khan academy video or smth on it it might help you clear your basics
Just a quick bio question:By the end of Kreb cycle, how many ATP, NADH, FADH2 and CO2 are made?
Start with 1 glucose
glycolysis : net 2 ATP 2 NADH, PDH: 2 acetyl CoA 2 NADH TCA: 6NADH 2 FADH2 2 GTP (i forget co2)
The results of Mains April Exam just came yesterday, He scored ig 95%ile
ty ty
if all capacitors are identical each of capacitance C find the equivalent conductance between A and B
any insights?
search up star delta capacitor conversion
Given answer is 2m/s.
Does anyone has a full pdf of the solutions of classical mechanics by goldstein 3rd edition? cant seem to find full editions on google
hey ! can anyone help me to understand chemistry first chapter of class 11th, can anyone find me a good yt video
im new just new to the science world
nah, the laws of chemical combinations
like the gay lussacs law and the avogardo's law and all
I know the laws but can't understand how to do the numerical's
numerical's of multiple proportion
yoo @night coral help me out ?
damn thanks
and also for the time graph of physics of motion in a straigt line ?
thnks arigatoo
I guess it should be 40 cm length and 20 cm height. As for the minimum velocity we have to make the ball reach the edge of the last step and hence fall on the floor. The line of trajectory should be going tangent to the edge of the last step.
hey, does anyone know youtube channels i can use to study electric circuits?
organic chem tutor
i like his videos but i would rather another channel if you have one
Hey can I dm u about smth
hello guyz
hello
it asks abt no of atoms so shouldnt it be 6.74576x10^24 ??
ask me for any explanation ..
yes, this is exactly what I got!
Yeah that solution is wrong
wassup
Hey, I'm not sure whether this is the right place for programming questions but: I need to implement the secant method to approximate the root of a function. One of the given functions is f(x)=tanh(x) with initial values x1=-1 and x2=3. This leads to the output NaN because of the asymptotes of tanh. I asked the tutor for help and he told me that if I make the method return an error message for f(x1)*f(x2)>0, all cases with asymptotes should be solved. As you may guess, that didn't work. I asked chat gtp, which implemented an if statement leading to the root becoming infinity. I am at my wits end and could use some help. Here is my code:
double secant(double x1, double x2, double (*func)(double), int &schritt, const double tol )
{
double xn; // Variable für die lineare Approximation
schritt = 0; // Schrittzähler für Konvergenzgeschwindigkeit
//triviale Lösung
if ( func(x1) == 0 ||func(x2)==0)
{
std::cout<<"0";
}
//checken ob f(x1)*f(x1)>0 => return 0
if (func(x1)*func(x2)>0)
{
std::cout<<"Bedingung nicht erfüllt\n";
}
do
{
// Berechne neuen Wert für die lineare Approximation
xn = x2 - func(x2) * (x2 - x1) / (func(x2) - func(x1));
x1 = x2; // für die nächste Iteration: x2 -> x1
x2 = xn; // xn -> x2
schritt++; // Inkrementiere
} while (std::fabs(x2 - x1) > tol); // Iteration wiederhohlen bis gewünschte Genauigkeit erreicht wird
return xn; // Ergebnis
}
Here is the code from chat gpt:
double secant(double x1, double x2, double (*func)(double), int &schritt, const double tol)
{
double xn; // Variable for the linear approximation
schritt = 0; // Step counter for convergence speed
do
{
// Calculate the new value for the linear approximation
xn = x2 - func(x2) * (x2 - x1) / (func(x2) - func(x1));
// Check for NaN or extremely large values
if (std::isnan(xn) || std::fabs(xn) > 1e10)
{
// Adjust interval away from asymptotes
double mit = 0.5 * (x1 + x2);
if (func(mit) * func(x1) < 0)
x2 = mit;
else
x1 = mit;
}
else
{
x1 = x2; // Update for the next iteration: x2 -> x1
x2 = xn; // Update for the next iteration: xn -> x2
}
schritt++; // Increment step counter
} while (std::fabs(x2 - x1) > tol); // Repeat iteration until desired accuracy is achieved
return xn; // Result
}
chemistry,
is there a specific naming convention that helps us figure out the compound of hydrogen peroxide?
e.g: ''per'' adds one more oxygen than the ''ate'' form for some anions
Hey, everybody.
So there's this project I need to finish for tomorrow. My biology teacher said to do everything from 0, hence I've been sitting the past few hours on my laptop. My topic is "How to live in accordance to our biorythms". I wanted to find information on if people back then lived more according to their biological rhythms and what hinders us today on living a healthy life, but I couldn't find anything. Is there anybody who could help me?
Food
Social media
Time changing periods
You can write a whole lot only on that
similar question
does anyone have any good resources on how to determine what can be used as an internal standard when a stable isotope of your specific compound is not available for whatever reason?
Thanks a lot
in these two questions we need to find the net flux but the apporach of both the questions are different and the final result isn't matching if done the other way
When to know to substitute the value of x in variable E.F and when to go by integration?
Someone recommend me a way to complete backlogs 😭😭
HELP
I keep getting 1.8x10^4
no matter what when i try to calculate the gravitational potential energy i always get it to be x10^9 instead of x10^8
is my calculator just awful or is this the same for anyone else?
Hello does anyone know why my uncertainties are super wrong
What class is this
Analytical chemistry
But i got the solution
Ty anyway
I need an urgent physics help
This is the question I was given.
Those on right are capacitor plates. And the one which is rolling is cylinder.(Tell me what u can't understand and I will tell u about it)
This was how I solved it.
I used basic Newton's laws of motion
This was my sir's answer.
He considered the whole system and wrote equations so that no. Of equations decreases.
We are asked to find the acceleration, and surprisingly my ans and sir's ans are diff as u can see.
Can you tell me where is the mistake and who is doing the mistake...I am clueless
Concepts used: capacitors, Newton's laws of motion, rotation of bodies
I will be really grateful if you could solve this before 25th may...I am in urgent need of it...
I can help u
but this topic need long conversation
from the first look I don't see here where do you use dielectric coefficient of the brick
also your expression for moment of inertia is incorrect (no it's my mistake)
Yes yes.. I haven't noted down the expression of F so dielectric constant will be used in the expression of F..
The thing is, since m and m' are not undergoing rotation here, why do we have to include their moment of inertia in the equation? That's actually my main concern..
if you reduce the length of ropes to near the zero, we can effectively say that they are rotating around the cilinder's axis
Thank you.. but is there any specific name of this concept? I mean, the fact that we have to reduce the rope's length to check effective rotation?
I don't know if this concept has any name, but you can make yourself sure that rope's length doesn't affect rotation equations, because it will not also affect strict 3 Newton laws if you will try to write them for every point of cilinder
I see.. thank you so much..
Can you help us with the fbd and explain it to us, in that way it will be easy for both of us
It's a bit wide topic without specific problem you want to solve, I definitely can explain that but it will transform into lecture instead of post
No no I meant, just the fbd of the system. We know the concepts, we are just new to the concept that we need to include m and m' in the equation for moment of inertia.
If you could solve the equation using basic Newton's laws of motion like I did , it will be very helpful
I can explain you that in a call, I'm too lazy to write it all here
Alright let me see if @raw blade is up for it. Actually it was his problem.
Thank you for the initiatives!
I guess the mistake is that you equalized accelerations of both bricks, while brick m will have twice as much acceleration as brick m' has
because they are connected via movable block
yeah it seems like it's the main mistake in the solution
you wouldn't meet that problem if you solved that in your teachers way via total moment of inertia
I thought of using constraint relation with the help of power developed by internal force is zero (T.v=0) and then relate the accelerations but got stuck after a while
if you consider work of different forces and equalize it to zero you'll automatically obtain moment of forces equation, so you don't need to think about work here
accelerations relation can only be obtained with kinematic relations, as I already said. You just look at geometry of cilinder and get that a=2a' if the bottom of the cilinder is axis of rotation
Can you do it somewhere and send a picture of it here?
yeah wait a second
you can see it from similarity of trianlges
thankk youu so muchhh yes i got it!!!
That was so so so basic that I ignored it!
My mind is soo complex! 😭
it happens with all of us
Hello! Is there anyone who has gromacs installed and could help me w md
wdym by nuclear density
rate of nuclear mass over nuclear volume? Or atomic volume?
can anyone suggest me a very easy to understand stoichiometry equations yt video
I'm little new to chemistry
organic chem tutor
Yes
any chemistry ppl here?
yes me but im in 12th grade-
Why can't I post any ss here
I don't know palestinian or whatever language it is
Palestinian💀
Palestinian 💀💀💀💀
ignorance 🧘♂️
ok boss
i dmd u
i dmd u
Chemistry question
Does anyone have mechanism for reaction of 1,5-dicarbonyl and ammonia to form pyridine?
In these images, how are the two cells in series?
Current is going to the voltmeter also, wouldn't it make it a parallel connection?
Ideal voltmeter has infinite resistance hence no current passes thru it, it's just used to measure the potential
Got it, Thank you so much guys !
Does anyone have any general tips/good recs for understanding how to write redox and acid/base titrations? the part where you have to add hydroxide and water is throwing me off so badly.
Best advice I got is to forget about OH and to use H+.
If we have reaction in basic conditions, try to balance it in acid, then neutralise with OH-. To give an example:
KMnO4 + SO2 + KOH = K2MnO4 + K2SO4 + H2O
Ox: SO2 = SO4(2-)
Now use acid rules to balance:
SO2 + 2 H2O = SO4(2-) + 4 H+ + 2e-
Now add 4 OH- so it can neutralise H+ ions!
SO2 + 2 H2O + 4 OH- = SO4(2-) + 4 H2O + 2e-
Now you just cancel water.
SO2 + 4 OH- = SO4(2-) + 2 H2O + 2e-
Hopefully I helped!
You did! I really appreciate it 🙏
It says a is correct option but I think b should be
As if we use restriction enzyme and cut out the ampicillin resistant gene and in its place I put my desired gene then that colony of vectors won't be resistant to ampicillin and we will be able to identify transformant vectors having recombinant genes.
Can anyone clarify where I am wrong?
No ori is intact...I am assuming I am just replacing the amp site and replace it with my gene of interest so that I know that I have transformant with recombinant
I don't get how in option a I'm supposed to identify if I did transfer gene of interest 😂
Like if I don't transfer it and let it grow in amp medium it will grow smoothly.
If I use (a) and replace the small site with my gene of interest then too it will grow smoothly in amp medium as I am not disturbing the amp resistant site.
However if I use (b) and ligate my gene of interest in place of amp resistant site then my recombinant would have my gene of interest and ori(as amp resistant site is replaced by my gene of interest). Then these won't grow in amp medium and I would know that these colony has been successful!
Also I dare say that this was a single choice correct question so if option b is correct then c will be correct too 😂
Use anki, for anatomy
Learn positions, like anterior, posterior, distal, proximal, etc. Trust me in helped me figure out locations which helps with what's wrong
Can anyone explain the second part, Like how will the magnetic field point upward in the vertical plane?
The best way to understand the direction of the magnetic field is to use the right hand thumb rule... thumb in the direction of current... imagine the X-axis as the same as the wire and Y- axis an an imaginary line perpendicular to the wire... now the way your other fingers curl is how the magnetic field will behave... so when you are in the vertical plane(+ve Y axis), your fingers will be pointing upwards...
I hope the explanation helps!
Suppose you hover some arbitarily small distance outside of a black hole's event horizon, without falling inside. Would you be melted into plasma by blue shifted light from the rest of the universe due to the black hole's time dilation?
Yes
The blue shifted radiation creates ionizing energy which if scientifically calculated is enough to melt your whole body into plasma
The ionizing energy and the intense thermal energy will melt you in a fraction of second
And this is all assuming that you're already not experiencing tidal forces and radiation pressure...if they came into play..you would be gone before even god knows
The radiation would have intense energy due to the gravitational blue shift*
@somber bison hope this helps
It helps a lot! It confirms my intuition of what would happen to an observer approaching a black holes event horizon. Forget whether the black hole is big or small, the accretion disk, or what its like inside of a blackhole, they would be turned into plasma by the blue shifted cmb before ever getting inside.
Now I'm wondering would the blue shifted light be blasting in-falling matter to within nearly the maximum temperature allowed in the universe the planck second before it passed into the blackhole? And would this blasting change some properties of matter, that would get rid of some information paradoxes?
You never know it what if the velocity near it is too high that you are getting sucked in before the blue shift radiation reaches you and in the mean time your accelerating too keeping in mind that the radiation pressure as well as the gravitational shift is acting on you it is more likely you get spaghettified before actually turning into plasma
Or another case might be you turning into plasma while getting spaghettified..since your question was particular yes you would turn into plasma when maintaining a distance
Here distance supports only staying at one point not orbiting coz the centripetal force will be enough for you to not turn into plasma rather stay what you are if the right velocity is achieved
I'm not as familiar with spaghettification but I think spaghettified plasma would certainly be a possibility. 😅
short in short, when you are in it, you wont even notice
and there are some theories whereas you surpase a black hole, you come into a white hole
if you shift long enough to a certain "side" of the black hole resulting in other universes
something like this
which is pretty cool because mathematically it shows that there is an infinite amount of these "boxes"
Well I'm not actually certain if I could answer that question for you
We would require a deeper understanding of quantum gravity and space-time and how information is preserved in this universe
The particular scenario you mentioned can happen according to the theory of everything proposed by Stephen Hawking
As we know...everything has a possibility...here or in an alternate universe well it is a compelling idea that the matter would reach nearly the maximum temperature allowed but we need a deeper understanding
Sorry for the inconvenience
screams infinite parallel universe????
You never know
I'm a bit confused why the centripetal force would prevent you getting turned into plasma while rotating. Wouldn't rotating at a faster speed just make time dilation more intense (although according to what I've read its approaching infinity at the event horizon already?).
nah
Ya the Penrose diagrams are very interesting. You are reaching the end of time in the previous universe you were in before entering the blackhole (and potentially new universe?). Experiencing an 'infinite time' of cmb radiation all at once seems like it would really fry matter.
because the time dialation near the EH is so big that the centripital force does not have a big effect anymore
Oh I'm sorry I got a bit perplexed over there I actually meant of escape velocity not the centripetal force...centripetal force is just a mechanical term even if your orbiting at a certain velocity your more likely to turn into plasma..if not by the blue shift but also due to other relativistic effects
Then we come to conclusion
We turn into plasma
No matter what
When visiting a Blackhole
identifies as a quark gluon
What if we surpass a blackhole and imagine we enter another universe through a white hole...and what if we got into another black hole
Would that send us to over universe...or another universe??
That is an extremely interesting question actually
i thought the math checks out, but the physics doesnt
Yeaa I'm very much confused about what happens...but turns out we turn into plasma
💀
well
its a bit contradicting isnt it
a black is so massive it absorbes everything, even light
so we go in it right?
but a white hole should be its counterpart, meaning you cant get in it
so how could we possibly go from one to another when we cant get into the white hole?
we could also possible imagine that if you pass trough the black hole the other end is a white hole? because the gravity is so strong it just "pushes" you down if you see what i mean
and we havent discussed einstein rosen bridges
mental
Brain.exe gave up
Yes but you cant possibilly travel from those
the link between black hole and white hole breaks
becaus the time being infinite to travel btw them
this shi haunts me
does somebody know why they sum over 2 different indexes?(the place of the question mark)
its about oscillations
and finding the eigenvalues of an oscillation
this is the rest of the derivation^^
is there anyone doing masters in physics right now?
Can anyone explain how to solve this? I know it's definitely beginner-level astronomy but I'm unsure how mass comes to play when calculating this with Keplers third law. It's probably a lot more simple than my overthinking brain is allowing me to see :')
What’s au?
In this context it's astronomical units
1AU is nearly 150M km
It's approx
T² is proportional to R³
Oh that’s very huge
yes
hi i’m doing my bachelors right now and i needed some guidance regarding where to do my masters from. could you tell me where you’re doing your masters from
YO!
what you should do first is look what topic you like the most
Some universities are very specialized in some topics, which gives you an advantage for an eventual PhD.
Ill give an example, my university is excellent in quantum, astronomy, theoretical, condensed matter and nuclear physics.
So if for example I want to do quantum, its an option of staying at my uni. If they dont have the topic you want to specialize in, you should look for a uni that does in fact specialize. Look up the univerities with: Best university for masters in theoretical physics. I support going to the best unvirsitiy possible for you masters because it has a wayyy bigger impact then a bachelors. Most bachelors are very alike, whereas the masters is very very different. Even if it sounds irrealistic to go for example to MIT, it doesnt. Iv heared from people that if your grades are good, and you did research in your bachelors, did well on the GRE then you have a fair shot at getting in. Caltech, oxford, cambridge, all very good schools!
I wish you the best of luck!
I dont know where you are from, but Europe also has VERY VERY good universities, and probably more affordable
i’m from india and the education system makes it very hard for a general category student to get into good universities here because half of the seats are reserved based on caste system. So i want to get out of here for my masters and need a road map to help me with it, i’m working on my grades right now but really need guidance with the extra things that are needed to build my CV. i have my year break rn (got done with first year exams last week) and i’m looking for the best universities i can aim for, yes MIT and all the ivy league are the top ones but i honestly don’t feel like i can do it.
which university are you doing your masters from right now?
Not in masters yet
But talk with people whom are and do phd
So i give you their advice
can someone explain me how it choose "Region 4" without knowing Ka or pKa? i dont get the ""rules"" for this thing tbh
theres no friction between the prism and base right
when the mass starts to accelrate downward a itll push the prism backwards i did this in 11th i just remember the concept
calculate the accelration using alpha and newtons third laws equations
ma = mgsinalpha probably
in respect to this calculate the accelration of the prism
it's wrong
ma equals total force and total force consists not only of mg but also reaction force
that's why the bar will fall downwards at bigger angle than alpha
you mean normal right
Normal is kind of reaction force.
Also friction is a reaction force
ohhh
yes
these forces literally are reaction of the surface to body being placed on it
yepp
I did that but I got the wrong answer
does anyone have any resources on how to determine LOD and LOQ? especially in HPLC?
this stuff is giving me a headache
I was thinking about doing AP chem. Is this a bad idea? I like math and science and want a challenge.
an electron moves along +x direction and mag field along -z direction what will be thwe trajectory of an el;ectron entering from origin
idk I haven't taken it but when my teacher taught us for fun I seemed to get it easily
alright
what did you score?
no
but my teacher briefly went over it
I was looking at the AP distribution score and 75% of people passed chem which was one of the highest passing rates of all APs
I was thinking of taking that senior year
I'm going into 11th
2 years before college although i am doing dual enrollment
good question
I should probably look
I have no clue lol
I just want to pole vault in college
haha yea I will think about it. I have about a month
before I finalize my schedule
Ok thank you so much!
What school do u go to?
College?
that's cool
So you do models and stuff
That's awesome
Sounds like it
what are you interested in building?
or designing I should say
oooo
That sounds so interesting
I just know I don't really want to be a lawyer haha
kinda
well for school at least
one dimensional motion
I figured i could directly get the displacement since it was an equation of position
but the answer is very incorrect then
its supposedly B
i guess you need to find the derivative of x in respect to t - to find the velocity function. And then find the integral v(t)dt from 0 to 5
x' = 3t^2-18t+15
oh it is the same function then after the intagration
correct answer is A
No it's 39 I kinda figured it out
It's accelerating then retarding
Matches the answer key too
Oh my apologies that's my account
The one that posted question
Hello there! I would like to ask these two questions:
- Biology or Chemistry is a better career overall? Which one has better job opportunities and better salaries (specifically in Europe)?
- If I want to get into the pharmacy industry (without being a pharmacist) which one (biology or chemistry) is better for that?
why would any integration or differenciation be required if the equation is given in terms of distance and time and we need to find the distance
i think if the question asked the velocity then we would have to differenciate the equation
the answers A tho
You need to find derivative of x with respect to t.
This is velocity.
Find where velocity=0 and this will give t where v =0.
Where the velocity is 0,particle must have taken a turn.
Then add the distances individually by drawing path of motion.
Or use v.dt from the time period of start to where it turned and then from where it turned to where it reached
Both these integration have to be separate and under modulus since distance is positive
Anybody know how to easily write in Latex in Anki and Obsidian?
I downloaded a gitbuh code which is an Obsidian plug-in for converting text to Latex.
How do I enable this in Obsidian or attach this code to Obsidian.
I haven't used GitHub before.
Kindly help.
We have to find the distance not the displacement so you’ll have to check if and when the velocity changes it direction
it's 39 you are right
Are there any study rooms specifically for JEE?
Nope
Ask in study buddies
Make some
And all of u can join one room
Can anybody explain me why does acid contain hydroxyl (OH-) ions ?????
From what I understand
Acid don’t contain oh- ions but when you dissolve them in water they break into H+ and the conjugate base
Now there is some H+ ions in the solution but water dissociates to form H+ and OH- ions with its equilibrium constant equal to 10^(-14) which is the product of concentration of H+ and OH- ions
Now there are already some H+ ions in the solution due to the acid let’s say it’s concentration is 10^(-3) for example then the product of concentration of OH- and concentration of H+ is equal to 10^(-14) hence there will be 10^(-11) molar OH-
In short the OH- comes from dissociation of water into H+ and OH-
It seems there might be some confusion here. Acids typically do not contain hydroxyl (OH-) ions; instead, they release hydrogen ions (H+) when dissolved in water.
Here's a simple breakdown:
Acids: When acids dissolve in water, they release hydrogen ions (H+). For example, hydrochloric acid (HCl) dissociates in water to produce H+ and chloride ions (Cl-).
HCl
→
H
+
+
Cl
−
HCl→H
+
+Cl
−
Bases: On the other hand, bases release hydroxyl (OH-) ions when dissolved in water. For example, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) dissociates in water to produce sodium ions (Na+) and hydroxyl ions (OH-).
NaOH
→
Na
+
+
OH
−
NaOH→Na
+
+OH
−
So, to summarize:
Acids release H+ ions in water.
Bases release OH- ions in water.
Can someone explain to me how much mol O² is necessary to burn 24g of C?
basically:
C + O² -> CO²
with C = 24g
ik that I need to do
g
g/mol
but I don't know what value of g/mol I should take, C, O² or both.
C would make sense bc the other given value (g) is also given in C, but then again, the amount in mol of O² is asked...
(this is about the most simple example I could find. I did calculations like that before, but now that I'm revising everything, I've become unsure about it)
You have 24 g of C, molecular weight of C is 12 hence no of moles of C is 24/12 = 2
The balanced chemical equation has equal no of moles of C and O2
Hence 2 mole of C would require 2 mole of O2
Molecular weight of O2 is 32
Hence 2 moles of O2 would weigh 2*32=64
Thank you very much. It's all clear now.
can any economist in here explain what is a country's GDP ?
You add the sum total of all goods and the value of services produced in your country and get GDP
tin hcl and nano2 is part of
diazonium
even cl3
cl2*
wait
yup
I would replace the diazonium
You're still having problems?
Na na, this was from the same day.
You sorted it out
Am i missing something or is there no correct answer?
There is no correct answer
Hunds rule violated in the last one
Otherwise it would've been correct
B breaks Hund's rule
Only I can think of is that D is correct and that the order of the "boxes" doesn't matter. Can't remember enough to say if that's accurate or not
yea D violates the Aufbau principal but was somehow the correct answer for this practice quiz
nonetheless i think no answer is truly correct
Yeah none is correct
is a single electron which is not in motion paramagnetic or diamagnetic or none?
maybe cuz they are degenerate orbitals thats y D
someone who studies genetics, can u explain what it topoisomerase
it's from textbook i use, but i don't understand it
help pleaseeeee
hi guys is someone here studying chemical engineering or is a chemical enginner please
None because the Heisenberg principle
u can’t have an electron that’s not moving
like remember that u can’t know the location and momentum at the same time
oops I meant to ping @remote dragon
.
you should not really look at that
what they want you to do is look at the magnetic propertie of an electron i.e. the spin of such an electron + magnetic moment
you should look at the properties of para and diamagnetism
where paramagnetism is kinda known for having unpaired electrons whom will eventually allign with an external magnetic field
if you look at those chemical principles, not very good at it tbh :D, there is one where an unpaired electron has an unpaired spin and therefore an unpaired magnetic moment --> alligning with an external magnetic field --> paramagnetic
XD its ok
dayum is paramagnetic and magnetic property shown by a single electron cuz i thought it was shown by a molecule/atom
like i know diamagnetic can be shown by the electron spin
if you consider it as a magnetic dipole
thank youuuu
the question I saw said that we put electrons and protons (not atoms) on a surface then we apply magnetic field. which of them act diamagnetic and which act paramagnetic. idk maybe i don't understand the question correctly. I can't even translate the question or else I'd send it.
thx for the reply my guy
can someone help me derive transformer efficiency if we provide grid and solar supply and load is connected
η= p(load)/p(load)+p(loss) X 100%
efficiency if you include power loss during the working of transformer
thanks
👍
what the difference b/w magnetic and dipole moment
can anyone tell me if prostaglandin is a hormone or not?
how to calculate explosion momentum
No, they can be produced in almost every tissue and not by an especific gland
Hi is anyone here familiar with physics 2? Im having trouble with the course and am looking for help, thank you!
i think it depends a bit from uni to uni
but i can for sure help!
Bro thank god I don't have to take pchem